quality metrics

40
Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010 Performance Improvement Solutions Conquering the Challenge!™ 1 Presented to ASQ St. Petersburg-Tampa-Section 1508 08 February 2010 by T. M. Kubiak, President Performance Improvement Solutions Developing Meaningful Metrics: Driving Action for Results!

Upload: haroon-abbu

Post on 20-Aug-2015

8.930 views

Category:

Education


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 1

Presented to

ASQ St. Petersburg-Tampa-Section 1508

08 February 2010

by

T. M. Kubiak, President

Performance Improvement Solutions

Developing Meaningful Metrics:

Driving Action for Results!

Page 2: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 2

If you don’t have confidence in

the diagnosis, you won’t have

confidence in the prescription.

— Steven Covey

Page 3: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 3

Page 4: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 4

Can any of you help me with

metrics? My boss wants a

whole new set by the end of

the week and I don’t even

know where to start! HELP!

Page 5: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 5

The Driving Force

Definitions

Why Measure?

Barriers to Measurement

Pitfalls to Avoid

What Measures Measure

The “E’s” of Measurement

Different Views of Measures

Overview

Characteristics of Measures

Development Considerations

Principles of Measurement

Where Should You Measure?

Goals, Targets, & Benchmarks

Evolution of a Measure

Examples of Measures

Some Final Words...

Page 6: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 6

Measure (Metric)

Refers to numerical information that quantify

input, output, and performance of processes,

products, and services

Indicator

Measurement that relates to performance, but

is not a direct or exclusive measure of such

performance

Measure that is a predicator of some more

significant performance

A Few Definitions, Of Course!

Measure, Metrics, and Indicators! Oh my!

Page 7: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 7

If you cannot measure it, you cannot control it.

If you cannot control it, you cannot manage it.

If you cannot manage it, you cannot improve it.

What gets measured and rewarded is what gets

done. Corollary: If the measurements don’t

change, neither do the results.

Measurements allow us to track where we have

been, where we are, and where we are going

Shows how effectively we use our resources

Why Measure?

Measurement: The Roadmap to Progress

Page 8: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 8

Focuses attention on factors contributing to achieving the organization’s mission

Assists in setting goals and monitoring trends and progress

Provides input for analyzing root cause and sources of errors

Identifies opportunities for on-going improvement

Provides a means of knowing whether we’re winning or losing

More Reasons for Measuring

Measurement: The Roadmap to Progress

Page 9: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™

Integrated System of Metrics

Driving Customer Satisfaction and Business Success!

Corporate

Objectives

Business

Requirements

Corporate

Strategy

Operational

Processes

Customer

Requirements

Business

Strategy

Support

Processes

Supplier

ProcessesAre these processes capable of

meeting business requirements?

Lean Six Sigma drives

improvement at the individual

process level.

The Driving Force

Page 10: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 10

Thinking some jobs can’t be measured

Thinking there isn’t enough time to measure

The process of accomplishing a task is not

understood

Fear that the measurement will become a club

Barriers to Measurement

Page 11: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 11

Using the measure as a carrot or a stick

Reason: the goal becomes to manipulate the number

Pitfalls to Avoid!

Page 12: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 12

Measuring everything that is possibly helpful

Reason: dilutes the effort

Pitfalls to Avoid!

Page 13: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 13

Measuring parameters where the organization excels

Reason: reduces the effort to a publicity campaign

Pitfalls to Avoid!

Page 14: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 14

Requiring precision in the data beyond the

requirements of the decision

Reason: exasperates all involved

Pitfalls to Avoid!

Page 15: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 15

Quality (acceptable, good, in-spec, etc.)

Quantity (Number of...)

Time (Cycle time, rates)

Cost

What Measures Measure

Page 16: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 16

Extent (volume-based or deployment)

How much?

Efficiency (productivity-based, usually

expressed as a rate)

How fast?

Effectiveness (customer-based or

objective-based)

How well?

The “E’s” of Measurement!

If It Were Only That Easy!

Page 17: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 17

W IPM W IPM W IPM W EOPM

W IPM W IPM W IPM W EOPM

Organizational level

Operational measures (invisible to the customer)

Predictive measures (in line of sight of the customer)

Process Level

In-process measures (evaluate the method that

creates results)

End-of-process measures (measure the results of a

method)

Different Views of Measures

Page 18: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 18

Actionable (So What?)

Easily measurable

Economical to collect

Focused on processes

Objective

Relevant

Specific

Timely

Traceable

Understandable

Characteristics of Measures

If It Ain’t Actionable...

Page 19: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 19

How often will the measure be computed and

posted?

What about data stratification/aggregation?

Where will the data come from?

Is the data source reliable?

Can/should the data be normalized?

How will the measure be presented?

Who will see them?

Development Considerations

Critical Questions Require Thoughtful Answers

Page 20: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 20

Answers: Who, How, What, Where, When

Defines: formulas and terms

Defines: interpretation (e.g., up is good)

Example:

Operational Definition

Establishes a common language and understanding

What is a “month?”

Page 21: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™

Cash for Clunkers Example Issue: 78 cars bumped from the list

Threshold: 18 mpg

Reason: More precise data (4 decimals) caused the revisions (Note: 0.0001 miles is ½ drop of fuel based on 18 mpg)

Measurement Methods:

Older: Dynamometer, fuel consumption measured, measured to 4 decimals, numbers rounded

Newer: Tailpipe emissions, measured to 4 decimals

Fix: Old data updated to be “effectively equivalent”

Quote: “Repeatability and accuracy is something we spend a lot of time on.” EPA scientist

21

Hey, Joe! Gotta light?

Source: WSJ 09-08-05

Page 22: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 22

Cancer Deaths Example

Normalized

Stratified by age

•Gaps in age

stratification

•Aggregated across

gender

•Aggregated across

cancer type

Does this chart support

the conclusion?

Source: WSJ 09-02-09

Page 23: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™

Pareto Chart Example

23

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Def 1 Def 2 Def 3 Def 4 Other

You can’t fix stupid!

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Def 1

Def 3

Def 5

Def 7

Def 9

Def 11

Page 24: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™

Air Travel Example

What is your understanding of an “on-time arrival?”

How does plus or minus 15 minutes of the scheduled arrival time sound?

Is this a good metric or a bad metric?

How many customers are aware of it?

Related metrics (by carrier):

Percentage of flights arriving on-time

Percentage of canceled flights

Mishandled bag reports per 1,000 passengers

Complaint reports per 1,000,000 passengers

Bumped passengers per 10,000

24

Do key players understand the metrics?

Source: WSJ 1--01-07

Page 25: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 25

ExtentEfficiency

Effectiveness

Measurements must be specific

Measure the outputs of highest value to

the customerMeasures can be applied to all performance

dimensions - external as well as internal

Understand the game before you decide

how you’ll keep score

Measure the process as well as the results

There is no single perfect measure

Principles of Measurement

Page 26: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 26

Early in the process to promote prevention

At the point where a cause-and-effect

relationship can be established

Functional boundaries

Points of convergence

Points of divergence

At critical processes

Where Should You Measure?

Page 27: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 27

Goals, Targets, & Benchmarks

Page 28: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 28

If you can’t win the race, make

sure the guy ahead of you

breaks the record.

— Steve Prefontaine (1951-

1975), American runner

Page 29: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 29

Extent

Efficiency

Effectiveness

Number of computer reports

delivered

Number of acceptable computer

reports delivered on time

Number of computer reports

delivered on time

Percent of acceptable computer

reports delivered on time

Evolution of a Measure

Page 30: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 30

The value of this measure is unclear. It is not

customer-focused nor does it measure the

ability of an organization to deal with incoming

trouble calls since no processing of trouble

calls is evident in the metric. Essentially, this

metric measures nothing more than the

volume of incoming trouble calls. The fact that

it is expressed in the form of a rate is

misleading and may fool one into thinking it is

a measure of efficiency. Type of Measure: Extent

Measure: Trouble calls received/week

Examples of Measures

Page 31: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 31

This metric focuses on measuring nothing

more than the volume of jobs scheduled. Other

than that, it provides little insight into the

underlying process of “scheduling jobs.” The

metric is not actionable.

Type of Measure: Extent

Measure: Job Scheduled

Examples of Measures

Page 32: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 32

Measures the planning/forecasting process.

Type of Measure: Effectiveness

Measure: Actual versus planned sales

Examples of Measures

Page 33: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 33

This metric is highly misleading and often

used for organization to organization

comparisons. It falsely assumes that all

employees generate sales and does not

consider the product being sold or the

associated supporting infrastructure required

to produce and sell the product.

Type of Measure: Efficiency

Measure: Sales/employee

Examples of Measures

Page 34: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 34

This metric measures the deployment of

training hours to the workforce.

Type of Measure: Extent

Measure: Number of training hours/employee

Examples of Measures

Page 35: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 35

This metric measures the impact of training the

sales workforce so long as a clear cause-and-

effect relationship can be established between

training and revenue.

Type of Measure: Effectiveness

Measure: Revenue/sales training hour

Examples of Measures

Page 36: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 36

This metric measure the design process from

the point of view of the drawings. However,

note that this metric does not normalize or

adjust for the complexity of a given drawing.

Type of Measure: Effectiveness

Measure: Engineering change orders/drawing

Examples of Measures

Page 37: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 37

Measure, Control, Manage, Improve

Extent, Efficiency, Effectiveness

Performance measurement is

irrelevant without a frame of

reference

Measure twice! But cut once!

Some Final Words...

Page 38: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 38

People without information are

unable to change; those with

information are compelled to

change.

Page 39: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 39

Page 40: Quality Metrics

Copyright T. M. Kubiak 1996-2010

Performance Improvement Solutions

Conquering the Challenge!™ 40