radio frequency plasma heating · 2011-03-20 · •electron cyclotron waves electrons electrons,...
TRANSCRIPT
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
1
Radio Frequency Plasma
Heating
Credits/thanks:
Riccardo Maggiora & Daniele Milanesio
Giuseppe Vecchi
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
2
Ohmic Heating
The plasma current is driven by a toroidal electric field induced by transformer action, due to a flux change produced by current passed through the primary coil
Initial heating in all tokamaks comes from the ohmic heating caused by the toroidal current (also necessary for plasma equilibrium)
: ohmic heating density
Limitations:• on current density to avoid instabilities and disruptions• by plasma resistivity
Additional heating needed
2jP η=Ω
23−
∝Tη
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
3
Method Principle Heated species
Neutral Beam Injection
Injecting a beam of neutral atoms at high energy across magnetic field
linesElectrons, ions
Electromagnetic Waves
Exciting of plasma waves that are damped in plasma
• Alfven waves
• ion cyclotron waves
• lower hybrid waves
• electron cyclotron waves
Electrons
Electrons, ions
Electrons
Electrons
α-Particles Collisions Electrons, ions
Auxiliary Heating and Current Drive (H&CD) Methods
At ignition, only α-particles sustain the fusion reaction
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
4
How does this work?• Excitation of a plasma wave at the plasma edge• Wave transports energy into the plasma• At a resonance the wave is transformed into kinetic
energy of resonant particles• Collisions distribute the energy
Electromagnetic Wave H&CD
Courtesy of D. Hartmann
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating
(ICRH&CD)
Direct ion heating, possible current drive, high efficiency,
low cost
Internal solid antennas, minority heating, low plasma
coupling
Lower Hybrid Current Drive
(LHCD)
Localized current drive useful in current profile control,
waveguide antenna
Low power capability, low plasma coupling
The Ion Cyclotron, Lower Hybrid and Alfven Wave Heating MethodsR. Koch - Transactions of Fusion Science and Technology 53 (2008)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
iddensrcJJD
tH
Bt
E
++∂∂
=×∇
∂∂
=×∇−
)(ED Accounts for bound charges (dielectric)
)(EJ Accounts for free charges (conduction)
In a (fully ionized) plasma: free charges dominate ED 0ε=
Maxwell Equations
)(EJ Couples kinetic effects (Coulomb+Lorentz) to EM fields
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
typical parameters of an ICRF system:• frequency: f ≈ 10-100 MHz• Power: 2 MW/antenna strap• Voltage: 10-50 kV at the antenna• Antenna current: IA ≈ 1 kA• Central conductor: width ≈ 0.2m, length ≈ 1m,distance to the plasma 5cm, to the wall 20cm• Typical RF electric field: 20kV/m• Typical RF magnetic induction: 10-3T
BRF ≈ 10-3 T « B0 ≈ 3 T.
RF electric field ≈ 20 kV/m << Vti×B0≈1.5MV/m
)( BvEqF ×+=
RFEE =
RFBBB += 0
Likewise one can show that also RF perturbation on // motion of particles is << thermal velocity(We can use the unperturbed trajectories)
Linearity
(Koch 2008)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Non-collisional (1)Typical machine size: JET-type machine R0 = 3m, 2πR0 ≈ 20m; ap=1.5m, 2πap = 10m
ion an electron collision frequencies: νe≈10kHz, νi≈100Hz. electron mean free path: 3km or 150 toroidal revolutions.ion mean free path: 5km or 250 toroidal revolutions. (Koch 2008)
J can be approximated as contribution from (average) charge motion of all species (electrons, one or more ion species)
Motion can be considered “single particle” (collective effects neglected at first order)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Non-collisional
(Koch 2008, 2006)
Wave energy absorption is not by collision drag
In bulk of a hot plasma,e.g. Te≈Ti≈5keV, n=5×10^19m-3 collision frequency ν ≈ 20kHzRF frequency f above 30 MHz, v/f<<1
B-lines are guidingνe≈10kHz, νi≈100Hzelectron cyclotron gyration: 10psion cyclotron gyration: 40ns During one gyration: electron travels 0.4mm in the toroidal direction and the ion 2cm. Electron: 1µs for one toroidal turn= 50,000 cyclotron gyrations, ion: 40µs= 1,000 cyclotron gyrations
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Unperturbed: thermal motion (equilibrium)Perturbed: RF fields (much smaller fields or effetcs)
Particle motion linearizaton
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
src0
0
JJEiH
HiE
++−=×∇
−=×∇−
ωε
ωµ
Time-harmonic Maxwell equations
For (small perturbation) linearized RF field
)]exp();(Re[),( tirEtrE ωω −=
Important notes: 1) the RF field here is strictly sinusoidal (time-harmonic), it is so produced by the RF generators(in radio communications, it is nearly sinusoidal)2) Since the problem is linear, the frequency is the same everywhere and “no matter what”
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Cold Plasma Approximation
EEJ ⋅= )()( ωσ
=
||00
0
0
)(
σσσσσ
ωσ syx
xys
For a static magnetic field (B0) along z axis
src0 JJEiH ++−=×∇ ωε
srcJEiH +⋅−=×∇ εωσω
εεi−
+=1
0
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
12
−
=
P
SiD
iDS
00
0
0
0εε
( )∑ +−≡
s cs
psR
ωωω
ω 2
1( )∑ −
−≡s cs
psL
ωωω
ω 2
1 ∑−≡s
psP
2
2
1ω
ω
( )LRS +≡2
1 ( )LRD −≡2
1
The dielectric tensor results as:
Stix parameters are defined as:
Cold Plasma Approximation
The cold-plasma approximation provides a good description of wave propagation even in quite hot plasmas, except for the reason where absorption takes place
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Plane wave solution
Look for a solution of the kind
])[exp()(Re[),( rktiEtrE ⋅−−= ωω
To be determined in such a way that the solution satisfies (source-free) Maxwell eqs.
)exp()( rkirf ⋅= )()( rfkirf =∇
EiH
HiE
⋅−=×∇
−=×∇−
εω
ωµ0
EHk
HEk
⋅−=×
=×
εω
ωµ0
nkk 0=normalize
xe
yeze
k
ϑzeBB ˆ
0=
static magnetic field
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
14
0
sin0sincos
0
sincoscos
222
2
222
,=
⋅
−
−
−−
=⋅
z
y
x
k
E
E
E
nPn
nSiD
niDnS
EM
ϑϑϑ
ϑϑϑ
ω
0)()()(0),(det 24 =+−⇒= θθθω CnBnAkM
where: ( )
=
++=
+=
PRLC
PSRLB
PSA
ϑϑϑϑ
22
22
cos1sin
cossin
0)( =⋅+×× EEnn ε : wave in homogeneous plasma
Wave Equation and Dispersion Relation
xe
yeze
k
ϑ
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Note: setting k and ϴ means choosing the wavevector nkk 0=
Consider first vacuum (or air) 0)( =+×× EEnn 12 ==⋅⇒ nnn
Plane waves
Observe:There is ONE solutions for n^2There are two solutions for n and k, corresponding to counter-propagating wavesIf you fix frequency and angle, then n is “chosen” by the physicsand this gives the wavelength (spatial period of wave oscillations) n=1 means k=k0
Recall: frequency is a constant everywhere (enforced by generator, linear problem)
1±=n
)exp()( 0nxikxf =||
2
0 nk
πλ =
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Example: Consider simple medium with (slowly) varying material properties
0)()( =+×× ExpEnn
)(2 xpnnn ==⋅⇒
Plane waves
|)(|
2)(
0 xnkx
πλ =
))(exp()( 0 xxnikxf =
)()( 0 xpx εε =
0 2 4 6 8 101
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
x
n(x
)
0 2 4 6 8 10-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
x
f(x)
f(x)=cos(2π n(x) x)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
17
0)()()(0),(det 24 =+−⇒= θθθω CnBnAkM
where: ( )
=
++=
+=
PRLC
PSRLB
PSA
ϑϑϑϑ
22
22
cos1sin
cossin
0)( =⋅+×× EEnn ε : wave in homogeneous plasma
Wave Equation and Dispersion Relation
xe
yeze
k
ϑ
Observe:There are TWO solutions for n^2 (only one in vacuo)If you fix frequency and angle, then n is “chosen” by the physics
Recall: frequency is a constant everywhere (enforced by generator, linear problem)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
18
0=ϑ
2
πϑ =
: parallel propagation
: perpendicular propagation
Langmuir wave
Ionic whistler
Electronic whistler
Slow (O) wave
Fast (X) wave
( )BE //
( )BE ⊥
xe
yeze
k
ϑ zeBB ˆ0= : static magnetic field
Dispersion Relation Solutions
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
Note: setting k and ϴ means choosing the wavevector nkk 0=Who chooses k and ϴ?
Consider first vacuum (or air) 0)( =+×× EEnn 12 ==⋅ nnn- The RF generator “chooses” (enforces) the frequency- The “physics” chooses k (i.e. n), i.e. the wavelength- The antenna chooses angle ϴ (if very directive..)
Actually, we never launch a single plane wave, we launch a fieldwith some plane-wave “spectrum” e.g. we consider its Fourier transform
e.g. 1D case
θcos
)exp()()( 0
=
−= ∫u
dxuuxikuAxa
Plane waves and plane wave spectrum
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
nkk 0=Who chooses k and ϴ?
Any source distribution corresponds (can be represented as) a “collection” of plane waves with different wavenumber (PW spectrum)
Each component (each individual PW) will travel its own way At a first approx, we consider only the peak of the plane wave spectrum (like the “dominant” tone in a sound or color in light)
In fact, all ICRH antenna have a pretty broad spectrum…
Plasma propagation acts as a “filter”, some plane waves pass through better than others, some get absorbed well etc.We’d like to put all our power in those that get well absorbed…
Plane waves and plane wave spectrum
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
21
Wave PropagationDispersion relation for plane waves: ( )ωkk =
“Index of refraction”:
(wavenumber normalized to vacuum value)
ωckn =
Phase velocity:k
vphω= Group velocity:
At which
energy and information travel
kvg ∂∂= ω
Cutoff:
02 <nNote: when frequency or angle is such that αin =
)exp()( xrf α−= Evanescent wave
02 =n ∞→phv
“Resonance”: 0, →∞→ phvn Wave slows down enormously, filed can now interact with thermal velocity (intuitive), absorption mechanisms favored
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
22
Wave Propagation
( )ωkk =
Cutoff: Resonance: ∞→→ phvn ,0 0, →∞→ phvn
2n
Space
propagation
evanescence
2n
propagation
propagation
Space
Dispersion at fixed frequency and non-homogeneous plasma (density and/or B field vary in space)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
23
Ion Cyclotron Resonance
Frequency range: 40÷80 MHz
pecepici ωωωωω ,, <<≈
Generators: tetrode tubes
Principle: absorption of the wave by ions (cyclotron resonances) or by electrons (ELD - TTMP)
Tore Supra ICRH antenna
s
scs
m
Bq 0=ω
Courtesy of CEA-Cadarache: http://www-cad.cea.fr
0
2
εω
s
ssps
m
qn=
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
24
Improved resonance condition in IC range
0//// =+− vkn cihωω
≥
=
2
1
h
h
n
n : first harmonic heating
: second (or higher) harmonic heating
Adding effect of parallel motion due to RF field (v||)It is a Doppler effect
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
25
Single Ion H&CD
First harmonic heating
Slow wave:• sensitive to the fundamental resonance • not excitable in toroidal geometry (evanescent)
Fast wave:• excitable in toroidal geometry• not sensitive to the fundamental resonance
NOT WORKING!!!
⇒+= ////vkn cihωω
≥
=
2
1
h
h
n
n : first harmonic heating
: second (or higher) harmonic heating
Second harmonic heating
FW is sensitive to the harmonics of the cyclotron frequency, but damping
strength strongly decreases with harmonic number
High density and high temperature needed
NOT EFFICIENT!!!
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
26
Minority H&CD (Multiple Ions)
cicicih vkvkn ωωωωωω ≈⇒+=⇒=−− //////// 0
Propagation and polarization are determined by the majority ions
Good cyclotronic absorption on the minority ions (< 10%)
Possible mode conversion to Ion Bernstein Waves (IBW)
Ion Bernstein Waves:• Perpendicularly propagating warm plasma waves with solutions near each harmonic of the cyclotron frequency of each species• Higher percentage of minority species (~ 15-20%)• Landau damping on electrons
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
27
Main Collisionless Wave Damping Mechanisms
Landau damping
Transit time magnetic pumping (TTMP)
Force on magnetic moment: BF ∇−= µ
similar to Landau damping with substitution:EB
q
→∇
→µ
kv ω≅Strong interaction if
Slower particles are accelerated and faster
particles are decelerated
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
28
ICRF Power Scheme
ICRF power
FW + cycl. res.• Abs. fund. cycl.• Abs. harm. cycl.
Fast Wave• Abs. Landau• TTMP
Ion Bernstein Wave• Abs. Landau
Ions Fast ions Fast electrons
Ionic heating Electronic heating
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
29
Lower Hybrid H&CD
Frequency range: 1÷8 GHz
ceLHci ωωω <<<<
Generators: Klystrons
Principle: Landau absorption of the wave by fast electrons
Tore Supra LH antenna
2
2
2
2
1ce
pe
pi
LH
ωω
ωω
+≈
with
Courtesy of CEA-Cadarache: http://www-cad.cea.fr
Courtesy of PSFC (MIT): http://www.psfc.mit.edu/
Alcator C-Mod LH antenna
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
30
Lower Hybrid H&CD
Original use: ionic heating by conversion of LH wave to a compressional wave
the best, experimentally proven, current drive method
“Modern” use: electronic heating by Landau
damping on fast electrons In ITER: controlling current profile (in addition to EC)
Propagation on a narrow cone of resonance almost parallel to magnetic field when
Group velocity: kv g ⊥ Polarization:
kE //
//nn >⊥
Accessibility criterion :
ceci
accnn
ωωω 2
2
//,
2
//
1
1
−=>>
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
31
ICRF Overall Scheme
~Tuning and matching systems
Launcher
Generator
DC breaker
T&M solutions (two elements):• Resonant loop: the two feeding arms are set to the proper length to achieve the desired phasing
• Hybrid: the two feeding arms are connected to the two output ports of an hybrid device
• Conjugate T: the two feeding arms of equal length are connected in order to minimize the imaginary part of the active input impedance of the elements
ITER IC antenna T&M scheme
Feed through
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
32
Issues with Plasma Facing Antennas
Courtesy of CEA-Cadarache: http://www-cad.cea.fr
Plasma facing antennas are used in experiments towards controlled nuclear fusion with
magnetically confined plasmas to transfer power to the plasma and to control plasma current
ICRF antennas
These antennas are very complex geometries in a very complex environment and they can not be tested before
being put in operation
A numerical predictive tool is necessary to determine the system performances in a reasonable computing time and
to properly optimize the antenna
Courtesy of JET: http://www.fusion.org.ukLH antennas
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
33
• 2 adjacent cavities
• 2 center-fed straps
• 4 loading capacitors to resonate the straps (resonant double loops)
• Main parameters:– Major radius: 2.355 m– Minor radius: 0.725 m – Toroidal magnetic field: 3.13 T – Generator frequency: 48 MHz– Scenario: D(H) with 10% H
minority
Example : the Tore Supra ICRH Antenna
Courtesy of CEA-Cadarache: http://www-cad.cea.fr
Some features:
Analysis of Tore Supra ICRF Antenna with TOPICAD.Milanesio, V.Lancellotti, L. Colas, R.Maggiora, G.Vecchi, V.KyrytsyaPlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 49 (2007)
Loading capacitors
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
34
Example : the JET ITER-Like Antenna
Courtesy of JET Task Force H
Some features:• Single cavity
• 8 straps with coax cable excitation, grouped in 4 resonant double loops
• Main parameters:– Major radius: 2.96 m– Minor radius: 1.25 m– Toroidal magnetic field: 1.9 T – Generator frequency: 42 MHz– Scenario: D(H) with 3% H minority
• Measured density/temperature profiles
Jet ITER-like Antenna Analysis using TOPICA codeD. Milanesio, R. Maggiora, F. Durodié, P. Jacquet, M. Vrancken and JET-EFDA contributors51st APS-DPP meeting, Atlanta (2009)
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
35
Example : the ITER IC Antenna
Some features:• 24 straps grouped in poloidal triplets
• Complex antenna structure and matching scheme (never experienced before)
• Main parameters:– Major radius: 6.2 m– Minor radius: 2.1 m– Toroidal magnetic field: 5.3 T – Generator frequency: 40÷55 GHz– Main scenario: 50%D-50%T
• Expected density/temperature profiles
Proposed reference launcher
Side views
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
36
Large Plasma-Antenna Distance Dependence
Several plasma profiles have been loaded to predict
the antenna performances in a
wide range of input conditions
By increasing the distance between
the antenna mouth and the plasma,
results converge to the vacuum case
TOTAL power to plasma (MW)
Max. voltage in coax: 45kV
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
37
Why rectified potentials are so important?RF-induced drifts accelerate ions that can hit the tokamak first wall, causing:• hot spots• sputtering (impurities)• fuel dilution• disruptionThe heat flux attributed to accelerated ions is directly proportional to the DC sheath (rectified) potential.
Solutions?By accurately knowing the DC potential map resulting from the rectification process due to RF fields in front of the antennas, one can try to mitigate this effect modifying the antenna geometry itself.
Plasma-Surface Interactions
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
38
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
z (m)
y (
m)
Re(E//) (V/m for 1V @ feeder), x=5mm
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5 Upper box corner zone
Lower box corner zone
Electric Field Map and Rectified Potential
Electric field maps can be evaluated at every radial position in front of the
antenna mouth
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
x (m)y
(m
)
|VRF
| (V for 20MW coupled)
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Rectified potentials are influenced by plasma scenarios, by input
phasing and by the geometry of the front part of the launcher
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
39
A significant increase in the antenna performances has been reached by optimizing some geometrical details
TOTAL power to plasma (MW)Max. voltage in coax: 45kV
TOPICA as an Optimization Tool
The optimization process has been focused on the shape of the horizontal
septa and their position, on the dimension of the feeder and its transition with the coaxial cable and on the wideness of the straps
Reference antenna
Optimized antenna
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
40
Proposed Design II: the ITER LH Launcher
Some features:• 2352 waveguides, grouped in 4 blocks of
12 rows
• Based on the PAM concept, i.e. on the alternation between active and passive waveguides
• Main parameters:– Major radius: 6.2 m– Minor radius: 2.1 m– Toroidal magnetic field: 5.3 T – Generator frequency: 5 GHz– Main scenario: 50%D-50%T
• Expected density/temperature profiles
Proposed reference launcher
Detailed view of a single module
Courtesy of ITER-LH working group
Plasma FacingPFAAntenna Group
POLITECNICO
DI TORINO
Cla
ss m
ate
rial-
dis
trib
ution f
orb
idden
T.H. Stix, The Theory of Plasma Waves, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962 T.H. Stix, Waves in plasmas, American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992
R. Koch, “The Ion Cyclotron, Lower Hybrid and Alfven Wave Heating Methods”, Transactions of Fusion Science and Technology 53 (2008)
All-time classics
Tutorial, with nice application to RFH
Tutorial, tries to explain wave penetration in a Tokamak-like geometry
R. Koch, “The Coupling of Electromagnetic Power to Plasmas”, Transactions of Fusion Science and Technology 49 (2006)
To fill in the gaps/to probe further