radiological response: myth vs. reality
DESCRIPTION
Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality. James Barnes Certified Health Physicist Chairperson, Homeland Security Committee, Health Physics Society Bobbie Walton Governor’s Office of Emergency Services State of California. Health Physics Society Homeland Security Committee. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Radiological Response:Myth vs. Reality
James BarnesCertified Health Physicist
Chairperson, Homeland Security Committee, Health Physics Society
Bobbie WaltonGovernor’s Office of Emergency Services
State of California
![Page 2: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Health Physics SocietyHomeland Security Committee
http://hps.org/hsc/
![Page 3: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Radiation and the First Responder
![Page 4: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Visualizing Radiation
For best viewing, turn brightness and contrast on the monitor to
maximum values
http://faraday.physics.uiowa.edu/modern/7D30.60b.htm
![Page 5: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Average Exposures From Background Radiation
Average Exposure: 0.360 rem/year
![Page 6: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Syndrome Acute Dose (RAD) CharacteristicsSubclinical syndrome
~50 - 200 Subclinical signs (blood changes, nausea, vomiting, weakness, “flu-like symptoms”). May require treatment, but not necessarily hospitilization.
Hematopoietic syndrome
200 – 400 Anemia, hemorrhage, infection, electrolytic imbalance
Gastrointestinal syndrome
600 – 1,000 Lethargy, diarrhea, dehydration, degeneration of bowel epithelium, death in 10-14 days
Agitation, apathy, disorientation, disturbed equilibrium, vomiting, convulsions, prostration, coma, death in 1-2 days.Without medical intervention, exposure to doses between 600 and 2,000 rads may result in death within 3 to 10 days.
Central Nervous syndrome
> 1,000
Radiation Risk – High Dose
![Page 7: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Radiation Risk – Low Dose
2,000 Cancer Fatalities10,000 people
2,004 Cancer Fatalities10,000 people
1 REM
(4 additional fatalities / 10,000 people) / 1 REM0.0004 / rem
In our society, about 20% of the population will die of cancer. In 10,000 people, this means that 2,000 will die from cancer.
If 10,000 people were to be given 1 REM of radiation, statistics suggest that 2,004 will die of cancer.
This suggests that the risk of excess cancer deaths is increased by a factor of about 0.0004 per rem.
![Page 8: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Myth 1
Radiation is so deadly that an attack using radioactive materials
will kill thousands of people.
![Page 9: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
The Goiania Experience
(Sept, 1987)
Rozental, J. J. Radiological Accident in Goiana - An Overview.
![Page 10: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
The Goiania Experience• A mothballed tele-therapy irradiator was present in an
abandoned hospital building.
• Two men decided to “mine” the metal in the irradiator.
• The unit (containing 1400 curies of Cs-137) was dismantled. The source capsule was ruptured and the cesium was released.
• The “glowing crystals” (due the the extremely high radioactivity of the material) was taken home and shared with family and friends.
• There was widespread contamination of the neighborhood.
![Page 11: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Initial ResponseInitial Response112,000 people (10 % of Goiania’s population) were surveyed at an Olympic Stadium.
– 250 were identified as contaminated
– 50 contaminated people were isolated in a camping area inside the Olympic Stadium for more detailed screening
– 20 people were hospitalized or transferred to special housing with medicaland nursing assistance
– 8 patients transferredto the Navy Hospital inRio de Janeiro
– Residential contamination surveywas initiated
![Page 12: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Early ConsequencesEarly Consequences• Widespread contamination of
downtown Goiania
• 85 residences found to have significant contamination (41 of these were evacuated and a few were completely or partially demolished)
• People cross-contaminated houses 100 miles away
• Hot Spots at 3 scrap metal yards and one house
![Page 13: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Radiation Injuries and UptakesRadiation Injuries and Uptakes• 4 fatalities (2 men, 1 woman and 1 child)
• 28 patients had radiation induced skin injuries(they held/played with the source for extended periods)
• 50 people had internaldeposition (ingestion)
![Page 14: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
The Goiania Experience (cont.)• Significant psychological consequences amongst the
population such as fear and depression.
• Discrimination against the victims and key products of local economy
• Psychomatic illnesses related to the accident stress.
• In first 60,000 monitored individuals;
• 5,000 presented symptoms consistent with Acute Radiation Syndrome (i.e, rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, etc.).
• Of these 5,000 persons, NONE were contaminated.
Salter (citing Peterson in Nuclear News; 1988). Helping to Prevent Terror Following A Radiological Incident. HPS Annual Meeting; 2001.
![Page 15: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
ConclusionsConclusions• Long and expensive
clean-up effort.
• Profound psychologicalpsychological effects such as fear and depression on large populations
• Isolation and boycott of goods by neighbors
![Page 16: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
The Reality:The primary effect of this dispersed radioactivity
was psychological and sociological, not radiological.
The true radiation effects were limited to those in the immediate vicinity of the source remnants:
• They were exposed the longest• They were closest to the source material• They had little protection from the source
![Page 17: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
The “Radiation” Terrorist
![Page 18: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
(i) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure; and
(ii) appears to be intended --
(A) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(B) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(C) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping, or hostage-taking.
The term "terrorism" means an activity that --
Executive Order on Terrorist Financing, 24-September-2001
![Page 19: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
The Nuclear Weapon
![Page 20: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
![Page 21: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
What was your reaction to that last slide?
![Page 22: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Myth 2
Nobody can survive the aftermath of a nuclear weapon. There is so much radiation that it will scorch
the earth.
![Page 23: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Blast and Fire create high levels of destruction
![Page 24: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
![Page 25: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
The process (nuclear fission), creates radioactive materials and distributes them over a wide area (“fallout”).
![Page 26: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
![Page 27: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
![Page 28: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
The RealityTerrorists do not have thermonuclear weapons. They may have small yield nuclear (fission) weapons.
The levels of an atomic weapon’s dispersion are NOT as severe as a hydrogen bomb’s, and CAN be survived.
While such an attack would be devastating, it does not create an inescapable environment in the surrounding areas (i.e., survive the blast, and you have a good chance of escaping).
With proper planning and preparation, people can escape from fallout affected areas without incurring serious exposures.
![Page 29: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Radiological Dispersal Device
![Page 30: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Myth 3
Thousands will die if a “dirty bomb” is exploded in a major city.
![Page 31: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Radioactive Material
High Explosive
The Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD)
![Page 32: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Detectable Ground Detectable Ground Contamination Can be Found Contamination Can be Found
Miles DownwindMiles Downwind
≥ 0.2 uCi/m2Can be detected
with thin window G-M meter
≥ 2 uCi/m2Can be detected with dose rate
meter
![Page 33: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Despite Widespread Despite Widespread Contamination, There Are Contamination, There Are
Relatively Small ExposuresRelatively Small Exposures
≥1 REMEPA Shelter Area
Less than 0.1 miles
downwind
0.01 – 0.1 REMout to 2 miles
[Dose similar to a chest x ray or
~30% of natural background]
![Page 34: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Release: 1.3 KCi CS-137 RDDwith 5 lbs HE 4-Day Dose (Internal + External)Evacuation/Relocation PAG
Color
Level
(Rem)
Area
(km2) Description
1 0.026 Consider evacuation. Shelter in place if no evacuation.
0.1 .42
0.01 3.84
Los Angeles Example: EPA PAG Los Angeles Example: EPA PAG Would Recommend Would Recommend
Shelter/Evacuation of a Few Shelter/Evacuation of a Few Residential BlocksResidential Blocks
Release location: Burbank Police Department 34 10' 60"N, 118 18' 31"W
100% Aerosolized release fraction
Normal summertime west-northwest winds, 10-12 mph.
Map size: 6 x 6 km
HYPOTHETICALHYPOTHETICAL
![Page 35: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
The Reality
The Dirty Bomb is a weapon of mass disruption, not mass destruction.
It is effective to the degree that it would:– Deny area access– Induce psychological stress in a
population– Create economic disruption
![Page 36: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
What Will You Need to Know?
![Page 37: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Know the Basics About Radiation
• Lack of trained personnel is the primary reason for loss of control of radiation / radioactive environments
• Responders FEAR radiation about as much as the public
• Training should be tailored to the mission / scope of the responder (Firefighter vs. EMT vs. Haz Mat’l Team)
![Page 38: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Where do you get this information?
http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/is301.asp
![Page 39: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Where do you get this information?
Many local HPS Chapters
will provide training
(general or specific) as a public service (especially to small (poor)
organizations).
http://hps.org/aboutthesociety/organization/chapters.html
![Page 40: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Where do you get this information?
http://hps.org/hsc/documents/
![Page 41: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Know Your Response Mission Precisely
Examples:
• Fire fighters: Set Perimeter; Recover Victims
• Police: Secure Perimeter / Scene Investigation
• FBI: Scene Management
• Red Cross (and others): Mass Shelter and Feeding
• EMTs / Medical: Victim Triage and Medical Services Management
Each Mission Requires a Different Radiation Protection Approach
![Page 42: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Where do you get this information?
http://www.usfa.fema.gov/applications/nfacsd
![Page 43: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Where do you get this information?
http://terrorism.spjc.edu/ceu/blurb.asp?examid=11
![Page 44: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Where do you get this information?
http://hps.org/publicinformation/asktheexperts.cfm
![Page 45: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Obtain and Maintain Instruments• “Simple” works
• Match the Instrument to the Mission
• Dose Rate instrument for scene entry
• Contamination instruments for perimeters
• No one instrument does it all
• Cover a range of levels / doses
• Dose Rates: 0.010 – 50,000 millirem
• Contamination: 100 – 100,000 dpm
• Keep them working and calibrated
![Page 46: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Can I get instruments with no budget?
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/equipment_hder.htm
![Page 47: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Know Your Radiation Exposure Limits for a Terrorist Scene
• What is a “safe” dose level for a member of the public?
• What dose level should a responder not exceed?
• What dose level would make a rescue too dangerous to attempt?
• When would the dose levels apply?
These levels should be formally described. If you’re trying to figure this out AT THE SCENE, it’s TOO
LATE!
![Page 48: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
“Emergency” Limits• No dose: Anecdotally reported to be the limit in several
U.S. cities• 100 mrem: Limit listed for first responders in several
emergency response guidance documents (some in draft stage)
• 5,000 mrem: OSHA limit, (first responders to be engaged in occupational exposure in an emergency scenario)
• 10,000 mrem: EPA guidance for property protection• 25,000 mrem: EPA guidance for lifesaving activities• 50,000 mrem: NCRP Report 138• 75,000 mrem: “Old” military limit for lifesaving activities• No upper limit: Draft ICRP Guidance for lifesaving activities
![Page 49: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Know Where to Get Expert Help• Local Radiation Regulatory
Organizations (City, County, State)• Federal Organizations with Radiation
Expertise (NRC, DOE, EPA)• Local Professional Societies (Health
Physics Society Chapters, Medical Physicists, Radiation Oncologists, etc.)
Do it NOW! Don’t wait until the event happens!
![Page 50: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50Official Use Only5
Federal Radiological Monitoring Assessment Center
Operational & logistic management cell focused on radiological consequence management
Nuclear/Radiological Advisory Team
DOE subject matter experts directlysupporting FBI or Dept of State
SearchResponse
TeamSpecialized search for lost or stolen nuclear devices,
weapons or material
Joint Technical Operations Team
Advance technicalcapabilities to neutralizeor move nuclear WMD
devices
Accident Response GroupScientific technical expertise & equipment to
a U.S. nuclear weapon accident/incident
Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/
Training SiteExpert medical assistance forradiation exposure accidents
RadiologicalAssistanceProgramRadiological
measurements & advice to public sector
AerialMeasurements
SystemAirborne radiologicalsensing & surveying
capabilities
NationalAtmospheric Release
Advisory CenterComputer modeling of transport, diffusion &
disposition of radioactive & hazardous material
RAP
ARG
JTOT
Triage
NRATNARAC
AMS SRT
FRMAC
REAC/TS
DOE/NNSA Emergency Response
Assets
Consequence Management
CrisisResponse
TriageGamma Spectroscopy
Home Team
![Page 51: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
RAP Team Configuration• Each region has a minimum of 3 teams • RAP teams consist of trained employees from DOE and
DOE contractors/facilities• Each team consists of 9 members; one Team Leader,
one Public Information Officer, one Team Captain, one Senior Scientist, and five Health Physics Survey/Support personnel
• Additional personnel are available, such as industrial hygienists, transportation specialists, logistics support, etc.
![Page 52: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Standard Response Equipment
• Alpha Detection• Beta Detection
• Gamma Detection• Neutron Detection
•Gamma spectroscopy systems (NaI and HPGe)
•Air samplers (high and low volume)
![Page 53: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
RAP RegionalContact Numbers
Region 1, Brookhaven Area Office (631) 344-2200
Region 2, Oak Ridge Operations Office (865) 576-1005
Region 3, Savannah River Operations Office (803) 725-3333
Region 4, NNSA Service Ctr. Albuquerque (505) 845-4667
Region 5, Chicago Operations Office (630) 252-4800
Region 6, Idaho Operations Office (208) 526-1515
Region 7, Livermore Site Office (925) 422-8951
Region 8, Richland Operations Office (509) 373-3800
DOE HQ (202) 586-8100
![Page 54: Radiological Response: Myth vs. Reality](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062321/568135d2550346895d9d385e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Any Questions?