reactive liner charges true or...

15
Reactive Liner Charges True or False!! MENAPS 16-12 AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg, Mohammed Iqbal(PDO) NOV 13TH, 2016 MUSCAT, OMAN

Upload: others

Post on 17-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

MENAPS 16-12

AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg, Mohammed Iqbal(PDO)

NOV 13TH, 2016

MUSCAT, OMAN

Page 2: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

AGENDA/INTRODUCTION

Field overview Well Completion Wells Correlation Perforation Strategy Well’s Performance & analysis Summary Conclusion

MENAPS 16-12

1

Page 3: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Field Overview- Discovered 1995- The field is located in the west of the Ghaba Salt Basin- Deep gas reservoirs (Haima)- 31 wells were drilled so far.

MENAPS 16-12

2

A B DC

Page 4: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Well Completion

3

MENAPS 16-12

Tubing size Perforation System

Designation

Shot Density Phasing

inch SPF Degree4 1/2" 2.7/8" DP HSD 6 60

Page 5: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Well Correlation

MENAPS 16-12

4

POR_AVG = 10% POR_AVG = 7.9% POR_AVG = 8%POR_AVG = 9.7%POR_AVG = 7.8%

Well-C Well-D Well-A Well-B

MD TVDss MOB

m m mD/cP

5013.7 4838.9 6.29

5019 4844.2 11.8

5021.6 4846.8 17.78

MD TVDss MOB

m m mD/cP

4996.9 4820.2 11.75

5004.9 4828.2 2.25

MD TVDss MOB

m m mD/cP

5025.85 4850 286.02

5031.95 4865 98.07

MD TVDss MOB

m m mD/cP

5005.5 4858.5 1.4

5010 4833 0.3

5020 4843 13.2

Page 6: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Perforation Strategy

MENAPS 16-12

5

WellPerforations Shot Density Phasing

UB or OB Charges TypeLength/ m SPF Degree

Well-A 5 6 X2 60 14% (SUB) Deep penetration charges

Well-A 5 6 60 DUB Deep penetration charges

Well-B 4 6 X2 60 17% (OB) Deep penetration charges

Well-B 3 6 60 Balanced Deep penetration charges

Well-B 4 6 X2 60 Balanced Deep penetration charges

Well-B 3 6 60 Balanced Deep penetration charges

Well-C 9.5 6 60 7% (SUB) Reactive liner Charges(RLC)

Well-D 9.5 6 60 7% (SUB) Reactive liner Charges(RLC)

Page 7: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Well-A

MENAPS 16-12

6

Perforation strategy

Perforation Results

Perforations Shot Density PhasingUB or OB Charges type

Length/ m SPF Degree

5 6 (X2) 60 14% (SUB) Deep penetration charges

5 6 60 DUB Deep penetration charges

13

2

Per

fora

tio

n

stra

tegy

1 2 3

1 23

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

TH

P,

ba

r

Gas Rate Mm3/d

Deep penetration charges, SUB Deep Perforation charges, Balanced

Deep penetration charges, DUB

0.0000

0.0005

0.0010

0.0015

0.0020

0.0025

0.0030

0.0035

0.0040

0.0045

Well-A

PI

Deep penetration charges, SUB

Deep penetration charges, Balanced

Deep penetration charges, DUB

Page 8: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

TH

P,

ba

r

Gas Rate Mm3/d

Deep penetration charges, OB & B Deep penetration charges, Balance

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Well-B

MENAPS 16-12

7

Perforation strategy

Perforation Results

Perforations Shot Density PhasingUB or OB Charges type

Length/ m SPF Degree

3 6 60 Balanced Deep penetration charges

4 6 X2 60 Balanced Deep penetration charges

3 6 60 Balanced Deep penetration charges

4 6 X2 60 17% (OB) Deep penetration charges

Per

fora

tio

n

stra

tegy

1

2 1

2

1

2 1

2

1

2

0.0000

0.0005

0.0010

0.0015

0.0020

0.0025

0.0030

Well-B

PI

Deep penetration charges, OB&BDeep penetration charges, Balanced

Page 9: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Well-C

MENAPS 16-12

8

Perforation strategy

Perforation Results

Perforations Shot Density PhasingUB or OB Charges type

Length/ m SPF Degree

9 6 60 7% (SUB) Reactive liner Charges

Per

fora

tio

n

stra

tegy

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

TH

P,

ba

r

Gas Rate Mm3/d

Reactive liner charges

0.0000

0.0020

0.0040

0.0060

0.0080

0.0100

0.0120

Well-C

PI

Reactive liner charges

Page 10: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Well-D

MENAPS 16-12

9

Perforation strategy

Perforation Results

Perforations Shot Density PhasingUB or OB Gun Type

Length/ m SPF Degree

9 6 60 7% (UB) Reactive liner Charges

Per

fora

tio

n

stra

tegy

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

TH

P,

ba

r

Gas Rate Mm3/d

0.0000

0.0020

0.0040

0.0060

0.0080

0.0100

0.0120

0.0140

0.0160

0.0180

Well-D

PI

Reactive liner charges

Page 11: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Result summary

MENAPS 16-12

10

0.000

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.010

0.012

0.014

0.016

0.018

Well-A Well-B Well-C Well-D

PI

Deep penetration charges, SUB

Deep penetration charges, OB&B

Deep penetration charges, Balanced

Deep penetration charges, DUB

Reactive liner charges

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

TH

P,

ba

r

Gas Rate Mm3/d

Well-A, Deep penetration charges (SUB) Well-A, Deep penetration charges (Balanced)

Well-A, Deep penetration charges (DUB) Well-B, Deep penetration charges (OB & B)

Well-B, Deep penetration charges (Balanced) Well-C, RLC

Well-D, RLC

Page 12: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

Conclusions

MENAPS 16-12

11

RCL method shows positive result to the field.

Good method to be applied in tight gas formation.

Success in gas production has been increased obviously in the

target formation.

Reduce the well intervention in order to optimize well production.

Saving in intervention cost.

Page 13: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

QUESTIONS? THANK YOU!

MENAPS 16-12

MUSCAT, OMAN

Page 14: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

MENAPS 16-12

13

The reservoir shows vertical and lateral heterogeneity seen in different wells and reflected by porosity and permeability.

Amin is a formation deposited in continental conditions and consists of different facies : arid fluvial to sebkha and eoliandeposits. The best quality reservoir coincides with the eolian sandstones seen at the upper part of the reservoir in the core area and decreasing towards the north and the north west of the field. The poor reservoir quality correspond to the sebkha deposits associated with alluvial/fluvial sheet deposits.

-5250

-5250

-5250

-5250

-525

0

-5250

-5250

-5250

-5250

-5000

-5000

-5000

-50

00

-5000

-5000

-5000

-5000

-5000

-500

0

-5000

-5000

-500

0-5

000

-5000

-5000

-5000

-5000

-5000

-4500

-4500

-45

00

-4750

-5000

-5000

-5000

-5000

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-52

50

-5250

-5250

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750-4

750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-4750

-47

50

-4750-4750 -4

750

-4750

495000 500000 505000 510000 515000

495000 500000 505000 510000 515000

23

92

00

02

40

00

00

24

08

00

02

41

60

00

24

24

00

0

23

92

00

02

40

00

00

24

08

00

02

41

60

00

24

24

00

0

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000m

1:164030

The best quality reservoir coincides with the eolian sandstones

Field Overview

Page 15: Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MENAPS_2016...AUTHORS: Wafa Shizawi, Ibrahim Hanaey, Salha Mahrouqi , Yahya Shereiqi, Ashraf Farg,

Reactive Liner Charges True or False!!

MENAPS 16-12

14

Comparison of perforating tunnels in stressed Sandstone produced using a conventional deep-penetrating shaped charge (top) and A reactive shaped charge (bottom)

Conventional Deep penetration charges vs. RLC