ready by 21: the big picture
DESCRIPTION
Dr. Kathy Burkhardt, Superintendent Erlanger-Elsmere Independent School District Polly Lusk Page, Executive Director Northern Kentucky Education Council Connie Pohlgeers, Director School Improvement and Community Education Campbell County School District. Ready by 21: The Big Picture. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Dr. Kathy Burkhardt, SuperintendentErlanger-Elsmere Independent School District
Polly Lusk Page, Executive DirectorNorthern Kentucky Education Council
Connie Pohlgeers, Director School Improvement and Community Education
Campbell County School District
Ready by 21: The Big Picture
The Readiness Target
The Insulated Pipeline
The Building Blocks
Ready Youth
Ready Communities
Ready Leaders
CEO Leadership BoardCommunity Advocacy and Funding
The Northern Kentucky Education Council promotes communication among public and private school systems, post-secondary institutions, the business community, and government agencies about educational issues. The Council serves as a catalyst for
collaboration, change, and progress toward regional educational goals.
Board of DirectorsPolicy Development, Oversight and Guidance
Equal Representation of Education, Business and Community
Executive DirectorOrganizational Leadership, Direction and Daily Operation
Regional Education Goals
Reducing Barriers to Student Learning
NKY will ensure successful transition for every child and student along the
continuum from birth through career.
Team Co-ChairsLeshia LymanShelli Wilson
College and Career Ready
Academic rigor and relevance of the
curricula in NKY P-20 schools will meet
student educational career goals and
employment needs in the community.
Education Accessibility and Lifelong Learning
NKY has system and outreach programs
to make educational opportunities
available, accessible and affordable to every community
member, no matter what age.
Team Co-ChairsAngie Taylor
Dave Schroeder
Business Involvement and Service Learning
NKY is recognized for culture of
contribution, through service
learning in schools and full engagement
of business community in
schools.
Team Co-ChairsMelanie FreyRay Hebert
Advocacy
All education institutions in NKY have the financial
resources and program alignment
necessary to support the needs of the
region.
Team Co-ChairsCurtis Hall
Judy Gibbons
Educator Excellence
Educators in NKY meet or exceed
national standards for educator excellence.
Team Co-ChairsKaren Cheser
Christy Petroze
Team Co-ChairsKathy Burkhardt
Susan Cook
Early Childhood
Post Secondary
Work & CareerK – 12 System
Education Pipeline
Action Teams
Northern Kentucky Educational Outcomes
• All children are prepared for kindergarten
• All 3rd thru 8th grade students are proficient in reading and math
• All students graduate from high school• All students are ready for college and
career• All adults are ready for career
• All schools promote a culture of contribution
• All students are hopeful, engaged and thriving
Enhanced Gallup Student Poll
• Northern Kentucky selected as national pilot site by the Ready by 21 National Partnership
• The Northern Kentucky Education Council serves as the lead agency for coordination and administration of the two-year pilot– In partnership with United Way of Greater
Cincinnati and Vision 2015
Enhanced Gallup Student Poll (contd)
• The Enhanced Poll allows communities to: – Administer the poll outside of school– Track individual progress over time– Opportunity to integrate with existing individual student data
• Tracks individual progress around a composite hope, engagement and wellbeing score called “Ready for the Future”.– Students who are Ready for the Future are hopeful for the
future, engaged at school and thriving in life
Enhanced Gallup Student Poll
Hope | ideas and energy we have for the future | Double Hope
Engagement | involvement in/enthusiasm for school | Build Engaged Schools
Wellbeing | how we think about and experience our lives | Boost Wellbeing
Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.
Northern Kentucky 2012 GSPi Participation and Methodology
The Gallup Student Poll was live from Tuesday, February 21, 2012 through Friday, April 23, 2012.
81 schools, representing 14 school districts participated.– One school from the Cincinnati Public Schools and the Brighton Center Step Up
Program were included– In 2011, 49 schools, representing 13 school districts participated
A total of 25,430 total students participated in the GSPi.– 24,586 students participated in Northern Kentucky alone– 3,771 elementary school students, 10,461 middle school students and 11,198 high
school students participated.– In 2011, a total of 21,239 students participated in the GSPi.– In 2011, 20,552 students in Northern Kentucky alone participated.
11
Enhanced Gallup Student Poll
The Gallup Student Poll is a 20-item measure of hope, engagement, and wellbeing. Gallup researchers targeted these three variables because theymet the following criteria:
– They can be reliably measured.– They have a meaningful impact on educational outcomes.– They are malleable and can be enhanced through deliberate action.– They are not associated with FARL status or family household income.– They are not measured directly by another large-scale survey or
testing program.
Enhanced Gallup Student PollYear 2
• Included the 20 core items, a 9 item, Parent & Non-Parent Involvement Index
• Administered in 80 schools representing 13 Northern Kentucky public school districts, one Cincinnati public high school and the Brighton Center
• A total of over 25,000 completed the Poll in grades 5 through 12
Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.
19,937
1,077
881717 253 223 66 54532
White
Black
More Than One Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish Origin
Asian or Pacific Islander
American Indian/Alaska American
Arab American
Asian Indian
Another Race/Ethnicity
14
Race/Ethnicity for Northern Kentucky GSPi
Note: Population based upon student responses to the race/ethnicity demographic item. Students may choose not to answer.
Total n for 2012 Northern Kentucky GSPi = 24,586
Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.
Living Arrangement for Northern Kentucky Schools
15
14,088
3,537
3,150
890862
830 386 104 92 68 5341
Both Parents
Birth Mother Only
One Birth/Adoptive & One Stepparent
Birth Father Only
Another Arrangement
Relatives
Both Adoptive Parents
Adoptive Mother Only
Friends
Foster Parents
Group Home
Adoptive Father Only
Note: Population based upon student responses to the living arrangement demographic. Students may choose don’t know/does not apply.
Participating Student Population by Living Arrangement
Total n for Northern Kentucky Schools Overall = 24,586
Northern Kentucky Hope, Engagement and Wellbeing by County
County Hopeful 2011 Hopeful 2012 Engaged 2011
Engaged 2012 Thriving 2011 Thriving 2012
Boone 56 57 57 57 71 70
Campbell 54 55 55 53 69 69
Gallatin 51 49 50 51 66 64
Grant 56 50 62 53 65 66
Kenton 55 56 53 57 68 69
Pendleton 52 55 53 51 67 69
Note: Due to rounding, percentages may add up to 100% +1%
Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.
Parent and Non-Parent Involvement Index
My parents talk with me about what I’m doing in school. My parents ask if I’ve gotten my homework done. My parents give me the help and support I need to succeed in school. My parents would know if I did not come home when I was supposed to be
home. When I am not at home, one of my parents knows where I am and who I am
with. Other than my parents or step-parents, an adult has made an important
positive difference in my life. There are people in my neighborhood who notice when I am doing a good job
and let me know. There are people in my neighborhood who encourage me to do my best. There are people in my neighborhood who are proud of me when I do
something well.
18
Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved.Copyright © 2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 19
Northern Kentucky Schools — Spring 2012 Parent and Non-Parent Involvement Item Means & Percentage 5s by School Level
Northern Kentucky Schools Overall Means
ElementaryMeans
MiddleMeans
High SchoolMeans
Northern Kentucky Schools Overall
Percentage 5s
Elementary Percent 5s
MiddlePercent 5s
High School
Percent 5s
N = 24,586 N = 3,771 N =10,461 N = 11,198 N = 24,586 N = 3,771 N =10,461 N = 11,198
Talk about school 4.11 4.30 4.20 3.96 49 59 54 43
Homework done 4.22 4.75 4.45 3.81 62 86 71 45
Help and support 4.35 4.64 4.46 4.15 62 77 67 52
Supposed to be home 4.57 4.74 4.66 4.41 77 86 81 69
Knows where and who 4.46 4.64 4.56 4.30 69 79 74 61
Adult made positive difference 4.44 4.49 4.48 4.39 68 72 70 65
People notice a good job 3.22 3.55 3.35 2.97 30 38 33 24
People encourage to do best 3.28 3.63 3.42 3.03 32 43 36 26
People are proud of me 3.37 3.74 3.50 3.10 35 46 39 28
Regional Supports• Shared analysis tools for using data• Professional Learning Communities for School /District
Leaders and Counselors• Northern Kentucky Education Council: Action Teams • Northern Kentucky Youth Advisory Board: Children, Inc.• Postsecondary Education involvement• Operationalize school and community supports• Create “Northern Kentucky Promising Practices” guide• Administer Year 2 Program Landscape Survey
It is the mission of the Erlanger-Elsmere Schools to embrace and attend to the individual needs of our
students, regardless of the obstacles.
Sample Analysis of Hope2011 Grand Mean
2012Grand Mean
% Hopeful2011
% Stuck2011
% Discouraged 2011
% Hopeful2012
% Stuck2012
% Discouraged 2012
School 1 4.43 4.29 54 20 26 28 53 19
School 2 4.44 4.31 58 26 16 39 36 25
School 3 4.36 4.44 31 50 19 42 45 13
School 4 4.36 4.51 32 46 22 62 33 5
School 5 4.29 4.35 42 34 24 48 36 16
School 6 4.30 4.32 42 34 24 44 39 17
District 4.31 4.34 44 35 21 48 36 16
Sample Analysis Hope Individual Items
School
School
School
School
School
School
Distric
t0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Graduate 2011Graduate 2012Adult cares 2011Adult Cares 2012Good Grades 2011Good Grades 2012
Assessing Individual Student Needs
• Individual student goal setting• Needs assessment at the school and district level• Mentoring- (College and Career Readiness)• Individual Learning Plans (ILP) grades 6-12• Student Voice: NKY Student Advisory Board• Intentional Counseling• Increasing service learning opportunities• Triangulating cognitive and noncognitive data for
Response to Intervention(RTI)
Triangulating the DataPersistence
to Graduation
Tool
Gallup Poll Data
AcademicData
Tell Survey Data
Intentional Alignment, Developing & Location of Programs at all Schools
• Truancy Diversion• One-to-One• Lunch Buddies• Big Brothers/Big Sisters• Mentoring• Children’s, Inc. Service Learning• YMCA After School Programs• Clubs
Middle School After School Program
Tutoring Computer Classes Health and Fitness
Activities Service Learning Project Homework Assistance Games Art Programs Snack and Dinner
Community PartnersBoys and Girls ClubBrighton Center YLDCity of ErlangerCity of ElsmerePolice Department of ErlangerPolice Department of Elsmere
In today’s world, educators are charged with much more than increasing academic rigor and providing high quality instruction. Barriers to learning now play a much larger role in the lives of our students. Educators cannot always remove the barriers to learning that exist beyond the school walls.
We must assist our students in becoming resilient and we must provide them with the support and strength needed to climb over those obstacles.
Our children are worth every ounce of our efforts. The greater the obstacle, the more glory in overcoming it!
Gallup Poll DataFollow General Process Model for Data-Based Decision Making
Describe the
Problem
Identify Where and HowTo Intervene
Generate Vision Data
Commit to Yearly
Benchmarks
Select Interventions
Evaluate Interventions
Monitor ProblemData
The CCS Process
• Receive the data- district level• Request data in EXCEL to
manipulate student “Ready for the Future” Scores
• Pull School Score Card• Analysis
Analysis
• Share school scorecard with administrators and counselors
• Reviewed the meaning of hope, engagement and well-being
• Prepared to “mine the data” (See Gallup Student Poll Manual to link which questions go with hope, engagement and well being)
• Certified Analysis Tool
Analysis Tools
• Certified Staff
Ready for the Future Scores
• Requested Excel file so that RFF scores could be manipulated
• 5th to 6th
• 8th to 9th
• Compare data for Spring 11 to Spring 12• Merge with beginning of the year PtGT report• Merge with MAP data by SSID #
Classified Inclusion
Classified Inclusion
Huddle Cards
• Shared with administrators• Shared with counselors• Data-Based Decision Making Teams will continue to
“mine the data” to identify how and where to intervene with both school-wide and individual interventions
• “Huddle Cards” provided by Gallup will provide a starting point
• Interventions for 6-12 will be loaded into the ILP Intervention Plan Module
Evaluation of Interventions
• Persistence to Graduate (PtGT Reports)- each trimester
• Attendance• Discipline• MAP Data• K-PREP/EPAS/Quality Core Data• Student Survey• Spring 2013 GSP Results (Yearly Benchmark)
Gallup Poll DataFollow General Process Model for Data-Based Decision Making
Describe the
Problem
Identify Where and HowTo Intervene
Generate Vision Data
Commit to Yearly
Benchmarks
Select Interventions
Evaluate Interventions
Monitor ProblemData
“Data-based decision making, using existing evidence to identify possible interventions and
evaluating interventions and programs creates success.”
Evidence-Based School Counseling: Making a Difference With Data Drive Practices, (2007)
The GSP Data helps us to do just that!