recycling in the sl district an overview of an internship project dina freedman geog 6950 12.13.11

10
Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Upload: noreen-nelson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Recycling in the SL DistrictAn overview of an Internship Project

Dina FreedmanGEOG 695012.13.11

Page 2: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Pop Quiz

• How much trash do we each generate a day?

• 4 lbs

• How much garbage in the curbside trash bins in SL county do you think is recyclable? (%)

•Audits found up to 60%– From greenfiber.com and ksl.com

Page 3: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

The Problem

• School recycling was at 50%• No formal program• Calculations had previously not been made to

show the improvements from recycling– Cost reduction/Savings– Environmental Improvements (CO2)– Trash Reduction (quantity)

Page 4: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Previous Work

• SLD is considered Energy Star Leader by the EPA (Press Release, 2011)

• 50% of the schools were recycling mixed materials• Successful implementation of paper recycling at 40+ tons a

month

Page 5: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Deficiencies/Problems

• Custodial pushback of “too much work”• Administration roadblocks/confusion• Lack of student green teams/participation

Page 6: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Problem Questions

• How do we decrease the amount of trash removal and increase the amount of recyclable material?

• Why isn’t every school involved?• What are the obstacles?– Perceived workload– All schools haven’t been reached yet– Time to work with schools/parents/admin

Page 7: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Methods

• Use existing data on price and volume– Cost savings & projections

• Survey administered to collect opinions and ideas– Custodial, administrative, kitchen staff

• Network with schools to communicate benefits of recycling

• Donor meetings/proposals

Page 8: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Deliverables/Methods • A “Best Practices Guide”• Increased school participation• Administered surveys

63%8%

25%

4%

Bag use at cafeteria recycling schools

Fewer Bags Used

Not Using Fewer Bags

Same Amount

Don’t Know

Figure 1: A sample of the survey data from The Custodial Survey. Question in regards to trash bag usage.

Page 9: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Model

• The district wished to have a prediction model– Cost– Volume– Changes– CO2– Weight

Weekly Total 2009 Weekly Total 2011$1,500.00

$2,000.00

$2,500.00

$3,000.00

Weekly Cost Trend

Time (Years)

Figure 3: Cost savings for all 35 schools since implemented savings based on a 39 week school year.

Page 10: Recycling in the SL District An overview of an Internship Project Dina Freedman GEOG 6950 12.13.11

Significance

• Recycling in schools now has more of a procedure with in the SLD

• SLD can accurately predict savings in cost, volume and CO2• Schools can use mathematical and scientific lessons • Increased student awareness/stewardship