reforming the income tax: a citizen’s proposal

36
Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal Richard A Demers Minneapolis, MN April 1, 2014

Upload: lazaro

Post on 22-Feb-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal. Richard A Demers Minneapolis, MN April 1, 2014. Contents. Why is income tax reform needed? What are the goals of this Citizen’s Proposal? What income should be taxed? Transferring income among individuals Taxing asset transactions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

Reforming the Income Tax:A Citizen’s Proposal

Richard A DemersMinneapolis, MN

April 1, 2014

Page 2: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

2

Why is income tax reform needed? What are the goals of this Citizen’s

Proposal? What income should be taxed? Transferring income among individuals Taxing asset transactions Taxing income by formula Income taxes and the national budget? Household examples

Contents

Page 3: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

3

Neither fair nor just Too many ways to avoid and evade taxes Too complicated, intrusive and expensive It harms the national economy

◦ Too much interference ◦ Drag on the national economy

It fails to adequately fund the government◦ Annual deficits◦ Ever increasing federal debt

Why does the income tax system need to be reformed?

Page 4: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

4

Raise enough money for government operations in a way that is fair, just, simple and efficient

Eliminate tax biases in favor of some people and businesses at the expense of everyone else

Automatically link taxation with spending

Take control of the details of income taxation out of the hands of politicians who don’t really know what they are doing anyway

What are the goals of this Citizen’s Proposal?

Page 5: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

5

It is not the goal of this proposal to Reduce taxes Redistribute wealth Reduce the size of government Reduce government spending

What are NOT goals of this Citizen’s Proposal?

Page 6: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

6

Yes, if we incorporate good ideas from many sources

Libertarian Taxation should intrude as little as possible in our lives and economy. People should have some say in how their taxes are spent.

Conservative Income shouldn’t be taxed more than once - dividends, gifts, estates. Rely as much as possible on the national economy, not government, to meet

society’s needs.

Liberal We are a community and not just individuals. We should help people who help themselves to get ahead. Taxes should be progressive and affect everyone to the same extent.

Is real reform possible?

Page 7: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

7

Every person, every business and every non-profit – no exceptions As individuals - infants to corporations Eliminate Single vs. Married distinctions Eliminate personal vs. business vs. non-profit

distinctions

If businesses want to be treated as individuals for other purposes, they should be taxed as individuals.

Who should be Taxed?

Page 8: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

8

Tax all Income – no exceptions Individuals,

Wages, tips, bonuses, awards, realized options, interest, dividends, pensions, Social Security payments, welfare payments, insurance and annuity payouts, jury awards, alimony, lottery and gambling winnings, etc.

Capital gains taxed as income only if not reinvested Gifts and estates not considered income

Businesses, Net, pre-tax business income

Non-profits Same as service businesses

What income should be taxed?

Page 9: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

9

No deductions, credits, allowances, exclusions or rebates to anyone or any organization

for any purpose

"We are all in the tax game together, and what is a privilege to one group of people

ends up being a penalty to everyone else through higher tax rates.“ Taxing Ourselves: A Citizen's Guide to the Debate Over Taxes

 by Joel Slemrod and Jon Bakija, 2008, p. 89.

Eliminate all loopholes

Page 10: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

10

Social Security and Medicare are currently financed through wage taxes

Social Security wage taxes not progressive◦ Only on wages below a cutoff◦ Greatly increases the tax burden of low income people

Social Security is not an annuity◦ The so called SS Trust Fund is a bookkeeping gimmick

Social Security and Medicare benefits should be financed by the entire nation through income taxes

Eliminate all wage taxes

Page 11: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

11

Any amount of pre-tax income can be transferred to any other individual or organization where it is taxed as part of the receiver’s income.

Family transfers among members Windfall transfers to IRAs Corporate transfers to stockholders as dividends Transfers to non-profits as contributions Limitations on transfers

All income transfers become part of online public record

Income Transfers

Page 12: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

12

The income of a household can be transferred among its members so each is taxed at the lower rate of a progressive tax.

Family Transfers

Tax Rate

Income

Household

Member

Page 13: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

13

One-time income from inheritances, insurance payouts, lottery winnings, bonuses, high income years, etc

Income can be transferred to flexible IRA type accounts

Taxed as income on withdrawal

Windfall Transfers

Page 14: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

14

After-expense, pre-tax income can be transferred◦ To stockholders as dividends◦ To subsidiaries to enhance their capitalization◦ To non-profits

Eliminates double taxation of profits and dividends

Eliminates unfairness of different tax rates for wage vs. investment income

Strong incentive for businesses to pay better dividends and to support non-profits

Corporate Transfers

Page 15: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

15

Non-profits viewed as service businesses No distinctions made among non-profits

◦ charitable, religious, political, cultural, etc Net income taxed after operational

◦ Property costs, salaries, supplies, etc Non-profits can be viewed as transfer

agents when income received is transferred directly to beneficiaries

Transfers to Non-profits

Page 16: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

16

Objective: Help citizens become rich in assets and part of the so called “ownership society”◦ Assets: anything that generates a monetary return◦ Examples: real estate, stocks, bonds, mutual funds,

savings accounts, farms, real estate, businesses, etc

Assets can be freely converted from one form to another with no tax consequences

Assets can be freely transferred from one individual to another with no tax consequences

Asset Transfers

Page 17: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

17

When sold and any part of the proceeds are taken as income◦ This makes this proposal a consumption tax.

Losses are the investors responsibility, not the government’s

When are Assets taxed?

Page 18: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

18

Gift taxes eliminated Estate taxes eliminated The special treatment of Capital Gains and

Losses is eliminated

All asset transfers part of online public record

Consequences of Asset Transfers

Page 19: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

19

No quid pro quo transfers No reciprocal transfers from whom the

donor can extract an advantage◦ Money◦ Assets◦ Influence

Violations to be prosecuted as tax fraud

Limitations on Transfers

Page 20: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

20

Why taxes?◦ To pay for essential governmental services ◦ Which services are essential is not part of this proposal◦ Should not be to encourage or discourage any activity

How high should taxes be?◦ As high as necessary to pay for budgeted spending◦ Tax-cutting without cutting spending is foolish◦ New spending without new revenues is foolish

Should individuals have a say in how their taxes are spent by the government?◦ Yes, to the extent that they are willing to transfer income and assets

to organizations that can otherwise provide required services

Taxation

Page 21: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

21

Why not a flat tax?◦ Inherently regressive ◦ Does not affect everyone to the same extent

Why should taxes be progressive?◦ High income individuals receive

disproportionately more value from living in a modern society

◦ As an incentive for individuals to transfer income to non-profits Example: privatize NASA and get to MARS sooner

Tax Rates

Page 22: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

22

Simple way to determine taxes at all income levels

◦ Calculated per individual, not household

◦ The same formula used for individuals and businesses

◦ From incomes of $0 to $1 Trillion-12 orders of magnitude

If your income is $x, your income tax is f(x) = $y.

Taxation by formula

Page 23: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

23

tax = k × (basic rate × income) – offset

Basic rate depends on income◦ 0% at $0 and 100% at $1 Trillion◦ All taxes are on individuals◦ No special rates for single vs. family vs. business vs. non-profits

offset depends on earned wages◦ Similar to existing Earned Income Tax Credit

k depends on◦ National spending budget◦ Population in each income range.◦ Calculated repeatedly until the generated tax revenue equals budgeted spending.

Actual tax rate = tax / income

Taxation by Formula

Page 24: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

24

Basic rate = (1.059463log(income) - 1)

Basic Rate

1E+00 1E+04 1E+08 1E+120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Basic tax rate Individual Income

Basic rate= xlog(income) - 1 1 = x12 - 12 = x12

x = the 12th root of 2 x = 1.059463

Page 25: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

25

Depends on earned wages◦ Similar to current Earned Income Tax Credit◦ Calculated per individual, not per family◦ Encourages all citizens to work for their living◦ No offset for those able to pay taxes

Offset

Offset

Plateau = $2,000

Phase-in limit = $3,000

Phase-out limit = $100,000

Plateau limit = $4,000

Wages

Other income limit = $4,000

Page 26: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

26

Ideal tax = 1 × (basic rate × income) – offset

Ideal rate = ideal tax / income

Ideal Rates

• Ignores spending budget • Ignores population distribution

1E+00 1E+04 1E+08 1E+12-100%-80%-60%-40%-20%

0%20%40%60%80%

100%Ideal tax rate as % of individual income

Basic tax rate Ideal Tax Rate Total individual income

Ideal Tax Rate

Page 27: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

27

2011 Household Income

Most tax revenue from households with a modest incomeRevenue from high income households also required

1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09 1E+101E+00

1E+07

1E+14

Households and Household Income

Households Total household income Income

DollarsHouseholds

Page 28: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

28

Goal: Determine if proposal is reasonable

Revenue target is sum of◦ 2011 individual income tax ◦ 2011 employee FICA and Medicare wage taxes

Limited to personal income◦ Population distribution from IRS tables

Business, gift, estate and non-profit income not part of model because income distribution not available

Allocates household income equally to all members

2011 Spreadsheet Model

Page 29: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

29

Individual Tax Revenue Individual, estate and trust income tax $1,175,989,528,000

Employee FICA + Medicare wage taxes $481,552,411,000

Total individual tax revenue

$1,657,541,939,000

Estate and Gift Tax Revenue Gift tax $6,572,384,000 Estate tax $2,506,991,000

Total Estate and Gift Tax revenue

$9,079,375,000

Organizational Tax Revenue Corporate income tax $242,435,939,000

Employer FICA + Medicare wage taxes $481,552,411,000

Tax-exempt unrelated business income tax $412,183,000 Total organization tax revenue

$242,848,122,000

Revenue Target of 2011 Spreadsheet Model $1,657,541,939,000

2011 Tax Revenue

Page 30: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

30

tax = k × (basic rate × income) – offsetwhere k = 0.692

Proposed 2011 Taxes

• Assumes equal allocation of household income• Includes FICA and Medicare financing• Model does not include business income

$1,000 $10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,000,000,000-60%-50%-40%-30%-20%-10%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%Individual Tax Rate

Basic Tax Rate Proposed individual tax rate Individdual Income+ FICA + Medicare

Individual Tax Rate

Page 31: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

31

2011 Income vs. Tax Revenue

$10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000$100,000,000

$1,000,000,000

$10,000,000,000

$100,000,000,000

Proposed tax revenue 2011 combined tax revenueNegative values cannot be shown on a log chart.

Page 32: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

32

Dad earns $x per year Mom earns $y per year Their two children have no income The family transfers 10% to charities, their

church, their political party and cultural non-profits

For tax purposes, they allocate the rest equally (25%) to each person

Household Example

Page 33: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

33

Household income $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $50,000 $100,000 $250,000 $1,000,000% of income transferred out 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Taxable household income $9,000 $18,000 $27,000 $45,000 $90,000 $225,000 $900,000

% of taxable household income per person 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%

Each person's taxable income $2,250 $4,500 $6,750 $11,250 $22,500 $56,250 $225,000log(each person's taxable income) 3.352182518 3.653212514 3.829303773 4.051152522 4.352182518 4.750122527 5.352182518

Basic tax rate 21.3646369% 23.4933971% 24.7559095% 26.3648770% 28.5813424% 31.5711276% 36.2271747%

Basic tax rate * income $481 $1,057 $1,671 $2,966 $6,431 $17,759 $81,511 Phase in offset $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Plateau offset $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Phase out offset $0.00 $1,989.58 $1,942.71 $1,848.96 $1,614.58 $911.46 $0.00 offset $1,500.00 $1,989.58 $1,942.71 $1,848.96 $1,614.58 $911.46 $0.00

Each person's tax -$1,083.72 -$1,074.06 -$495.62 $719.61 $3,954.42 $14,467.44 $70,587.79Each person's tax rate -48.17% -23.87% -7.34% 6.40% 17.58% 25.72% 31.37%

Household tax -$4,335 -$4,296 -$1,982 $2,878 $15,818 $57,870 $282,351Household tax rate -48.17% -23.87% -7.34% 6.40% 17.58% 25.72% 31.37%

Household take-home income $13,335 $22,296 $28,982 $42,122 $74,182 $167,130 $617,649

$10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,000,000,000-60.00%

-40.00%

-20.00%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

Household tax rate

Household tax rate

Page 34: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

34

Tax all income Eliminate all loopholes Allow income and assets to be transferred

without tax consequences All taxes are on individual persons and

businesses Tax all income using a single progressive

formula that spans 12 orders of magnitude Make all income, transfer and tax

information available online and transparent

Proposal Summary

Page 35: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

35

A much more complete model is needed!

This is a work in progress, a stake in the ground.

Please throw rocks at it.

Proposal Status

Page 36: Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal

36

taxreformproposal.org

Tax proposal home page with links to: Tax proposal essay Early comments Spreadsheet model This slide show About the author

Links