region 02, cagayan valley schools division office of nueva...

Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Region 02, Cagayan Valley SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF NUEVA VIZCAYA

DIVISION MEMORANDUM No. /26' , s. 2018 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATiON'"!

To

From

Date

RELEASED OSDS (ASDS, B.A.L.L T .A.) X' 'IE'- 1'/1-11 CID (Chief, EPS, PSDS, DIC) TIME: 3-ID SGOD (Chief, EPS, EFU, SMME, PAR, SMAN, .nB!;;-: :-:::::1.: ::; ;; :;;~;; Secondary School Heads l§£.HOOI..S DIVISION OF Jl.!J .. E~ All Others Concerned

FLORDEL~ECOBE, PhD, CESO VI Officer-In-Charge ) , If Office of the Schools Division Superintendent cJf--*" July 9, 2018

Subject: SEARCH FOR THE 2018 OUTSTANDING TEACHING AND NONTEACHING EMPLOYEES OF SDO NUEVA VIZCAYA

1. In line with Proclamation No. 242 signed by his Excellency President Benigno S. Aquino III on August 24,2011 declaring September 5 to October of every year as National Teacher's Month and to the designation of United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) making every 5th of October as the Celebration of World Teachers Day, this Division celebrates this National event through a division-wide search entitled," 2018 Search for Outstanding Teaching and Non-Teaching Employees".

2. Its main feature is to recognize the exemplary performances and excellent accomplishments of the teaching and non-teaching employees of the Division in consonance with the Vision and Mission of the Department of Education (DepED) in untimely improving its mandates on Access, Retention, Completion, and Achievement (ARCA).

3. The activity aims to:

a. recognize and reward outstanding achievements in the delivery of basic education b. encourage innovative and sustainable practices in education c. promote quality performance and commitment to public service

4. All eligible teaching and Non-Teaching Employees from the different schools and from the Division may pruticipate as long as they meet the qualification standards required per category (See Enclosure).

5. The school level screening shall commence on July 13, 2018 through the School Level Selection Committee headed by the School Head and Winners shall compete to the District Level. The fmal assessment of candidates by the Division Level Selection Committee will start on August 27, 2018.

6. Attached are pettinent documents concerning the search.

7. Immediate and wide dissemination of this Memorandum is desired.

Email: [email protected] Telefax: (078)392-0454 Trunk lines: (078)392-0381, (078)392-0351, 09171589946

Website: www.deped-nv.com.ph Mailing Address: Quezon Street, Brgy. Don Domingo Maddela

Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, 3700 Phils.

Attachment 1: Guidelines and Procedures

General Requirements

a. Teaching and Non-teaching employees in the Schools Division of Nueva Vizcaya for at least five ( 5) consecutive years.

b. Performance rating of Very Satisfactory (VS) for the last three (3) successive school years.

c. Have permanent appointment. d. No pending administrative/civil/criminal case.

*For IP Teachers, additional requirements are the following: Must be a 100% or 50% IP of any tribe (i.e., Ibaloy, Bugkaot, Isinay, etc.)

with certification from the National Commission of Indigenous People (NCIP) provincial office

Search Procedures

1. Elementary Level

1.1. The competition will start in the school level where potential candidates should emanate to compete in the district level, of which the winner per district shall move on to compete in the division level.

1.2. Contenders from the private schools shall join in the district where they belong.

1.3. The winners per district shall accomplish the nomination form duly signed by the chairman of the selection committee. The nomination forms of the winners in the district level shall be submitted to the division office for pre assessment.

2. Secondary Level

2.1 The competition will start in the school level. Accomplished nomination forms of school level winners shall be submitted to the division selection committee for pre assessment.

2.2 Contenders from the private schools will submit directly their duly accomplished nomination forms to the division screening committee.

3. The division selection committee shall select the top ten contenders per category. The top ten shall submit their portfolio/s for final assessment.

4. The top three winners per category shall undergo the fmal assessment where they undertake the interview process, actual demonstration teaching, and actual classroom visitation for validation.

5. THERE SHALL BE ONLY ONE WINNER PER AWARD CATEGORY.

2018 PRIME-HR (Rand R)

6. Candidates from the Division Office shall submit their portfolio/s to their immediate superior for initial assessment. The winning candidates from their respective offices shall be nominated by the persons authorized to nominate to the Division level screening.

7. For the Division Level the members of the Committee shall evaluate the docmnents submitted based on the set criteria (See Enclosures).

Official Nominations

The winning candidate from the school wide selection for elementary shall join the District competition upon nomination by his/her Immediate Superior (preferably Principal). The winners per district shall submit nomination forms to compete to the Division Level where endorsement of tentative winners will be forwarded to the Overall Selection Committee to identify the top ten per category. The top ten will submit portfolios for assessment. The top three will undergo assessment for determination of the final winners of the search.

Candidates from the Division Office shall submit their portfolio/s to their immediate superior from whom one of the three nominations shall originate. The other two nominations shall come from one (1) peer/Co-employee, and one (1) community official where the nominee resides.

Search Categories

• Teaching

1. Outstanding KE Teacher 2. Outstanding SPED Teacher 3. Outstanding MULTI GRADE Teacher 4. Outstanding SPECIAL EDUCATION Teacher 5. Outstanding ALS Teacher 6. Outstanding ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Teacher (one per grade level) 7. Outstanding ELEMENTARY Master Teacher (MTI, MT -II) 8. Outstanding SECONDARY SCHOOL Teacher (one per learning area) 9. Outstanding SECONDARY Master Teacher (MT -I, MT-II)

• Non- Teaching

1. Outstanding Health Personnel 2. Outstanding Administrative Officer 3. Outstanding Administrative Aide 4. Outstanding Administrative Assistant 5. Outstanding Accotmtant 6. Outstanding Librarian 7. Outstanding Guidance Counselor 8. Outstanding Department Head (Not handling a school) 9. Outstanding Teacher In Charge (Elementary) 10. Outstanding Elementary School Principal

2018 PRIME-HR (R and R)

11. Outstanding Secondary School Principal 12. Outstanding Senior Education Program Specialist 13. Outstanding Education Program Specialist I 14. Outstanding District-In-Charge 15. Outstanding Public Schools District Supervisor 16. Outstanding Education Program Supervisor 17. Best Performing Elementary School 18. Best Performing Secondary School

Pertinent Documents Needed

The following documents shall be accomplished by top ten winning candidates per category and to be submitted to the respective selection and screening committees. 1. Latest PDS-CSC Form 212 2. Nomination Form duly accomplished by the authorized person to nominate per level. 3. Overall assessment rating from the school level for secondary and district Level Selection Committee for elementary. 4. Properly labeled and certified photocopies only (8.5"Xl3" bond papers) with ear tabs, ring bound, and evidence-based portfolio/s containing accomplishments that commensurate with the intended award being vied for. The cover/title page is color coded as follows:

Elementary: Green Secondary: Red SDO: Yellow

5. 10-minute actual teaching activity video presentation in CD form (For Teacl1ing Category)

Awards at Stake

• The awarding of winners in the school/district level shall be done during the awards ceremony in their respective schools/districts.

• The declared winners shall be receiving a Certificate of Merit and cash incentive (to be determined later) from the Division during the awards ceremony on October 5, 2018.


Attachment 2: Important Dates to Remember

Date Activity In-chare;e Documents to submit July 10-11, Launching of the activity SDO 2018 July 12-13, Information SDO 2018 dissemination to the

PSDS/DIC and SH by the DO

July 23-31, School level screening School Level Accomplishment 2018 and selection Selection Committee Portfolio/s by the

candidates August 13- • District level screening District Level Accomplishment 23,2018 and selection Selection Committee Portfolio/s by the

• Annotmcement of candidates winners per district Overall rating from the

• Submission of District/Municipal Level

Nomination forms Selection Committee; Accomplished Nomination forms of the school/district winners

August 24, • Selection of top ten Division Level Accomplishment 2018 per category Selection Committee Portfolio/s by the

candidates; Short list of winners per category

August27- • Selection of top three Division Level Assessment rating; 31,2018 per category Selection Committee Winners per category

September • Personal Division Level Accomplishment 10-14, 2018 Interview /Background Selection Committee Portfolio/s by the

Investigation and candidates; validation of Short list of winners per documents of the top category three per category

October 5, Awarding of winners SDO List of awardees 2018 Culminating Program Program

Acknowledgment Receipts


Screening and Selection Committee

Teaclting

Overall Selection Committee Chairman: Co -Chair: Members:

Eduardo A Escorpiso, Ph.D, CESE (ASDS) Romulo S. Ancheta, Ph.D - SGOD Chief Mrs. Evelyn V. Ramos- CID Chief Mrs. Maritess E. Vidad- Administrative Officer V

Consultant: Flordeliza C. Gecobe, Ph.D, CESO VI (OIC- SDS) Division Level Selection Committee Elementary Chairman: Members:

Secondary Chairman: Members:

KEand SPED Chairman: Members:

MULTIGRADE Chairman: Members: IP Chairman: Members:

ALS

Nimfa Norie A Aquino, Ph.D Macrino Raymundo, Ed.D. NVESSHA President

Maricel S. Franco, Ph.D; RogerS. Sebastian, Ph.D. NV ASSP President

Phoebe V. Acojido, Ph.D Bermelita E. Guillermo, Ph.D SPED Center School Head

Dindo John H. Moreno Orlando D. Vicente, Ph.D; Evelyn A Castafteto, Ph.D

Mrs. Rayda Joy Calansi Mrs. Olivia Brazil Dr. Onofre Molina

Chairman: Macrino A Raymundo, Ph.D Members: Mr. Edgar B. Capuno;

Mrs. Yunima Batog District Level Selection Committee Chairman: PSDS/DIC Members: (1) SSH

(1) Elementary Central School Principal (1) Elementary Non-Central School Principal (1) Head Teacher

School Level Selection Committee Chairman: School Principal Members: Head Teacher (for big schools)

(3) Master Teachers/Teacher ill

2018 PRIME-HR (RAND R)

Screening and Selection Committee

Non Teaching

Overall Selection Committee Chairman: Co- Chair: Members:

Eduardo A. Escorpiso, Ph.D, CESE (OIC-ASDS) Romulo S. Ancheta, Ph.D - SGOD Chief Mrs. Evelyn V. Ramos - CID Chief Mrs. Maritess E. Vidad- Administrative Officer V

Consultant: Flordeliza C. Gecobe, Ph.D, CESO VI (OIC- SDS) Division Level Selection Committee Chairman: Ofelia A. Flores, Administrative Officer IV Members: Legal Officer Atty. Julius Caesar Domingo, CPA,

Rudy Agustin, Health and Nutrition Unit Marianne C. Eugenio, Ph.D, SEPS-HRD Criselda B. Ildefonso, EPS-HRD

District Level Selection Committee Chairman: PSDS/DIC Members: (1) SSH

(1) Elementary Central School Principal (1) Elementary Non-Central School Principal ( 1) Head Teacher

School Level Selection Committee Chairman: School Principal Members: Head Teacher (for big schools)

(2) Administrative Officers

2018 PRIME-HR (RAND R)

OUTSTANDING KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION TEACHER GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

Average Equivalent to 3.76-5 A. Demonstrated Outstanding competence in teaching1 as Average Equivalent to 3.6-evidenced by the high Very Satisfactory 3.75 performance evaluation & Average Equivalent to 1.26-rank obtained as a teacher Satisfactory 2.5 for the last three years Average Equivalent to 0-1.25 (5points); Below Basic

a. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (Grammar/vocabulary/rate of speaking/voice tone

1 and in~)ection/clarity of speech b. VISUAL IMAGE (attire/general 1 appearance/grooming/physic al mannerisms) c. KNOWLEDGE AND

a.1 10-minute video ORGNIZATION (topic presentation of teaching mastery/quality of

1 information/appropriate Instructional scope/ depth/ objectives/impo Competence skills (5 points) rtance/organization/l~ric/foc

us/handliria auestions and Teaching d. INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS Effectiveness (proper use of notes/learners' (60 points) active participation/teaching

1 to entire class/control of students/use of instructional aids/qualitv of materials) e. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (appropriate seating arrangement/physical/visual barriers/ acoustical( sounds) 1 conditions/writing surfaces/ physical comfort/control of distractions) Internationally 10 recognized/utilized

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recognized/ utilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recognized/utilized (10 points) Division-wide 4

recognized/utilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/ uti I ized Internationally 5

C. Research outputs/ recognized/ utilized Publications in the last 5 Nationwide 4 years (5 points) recognized/ utilized

2018 PRIME-HR(R AND R))

3 Region-wide Division-wide 2 recognized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/ utilized 9 and above 10

D. Original creative outputs 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4 to 3 4 points) 1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5

G. Educational attainment Ph.D Units 4 and professional M.A/MAEd. 3 advancement (5 points) M.A/MAEd. Units 2

BS 1 Organizer 5

A. Participation in training Co-organizer 4 programs (5 points) Resource Speaker 3

Facilitator 2 Participant 1 International level 5

B. Leadership in National level 4

Professional professional organizations Division level 3

and related to teaching District level 2

Community (5 points) School level 1

Involvement Organizer 5 (20) C. Participation in Co-organizer 4

community and civic Resource Speaker 3 movements (5 points) Facilitator 2

Participant 1 International level 5 !

D. Professional/community National level 4 service awards (5 points) Division level 3

District level 2

School level 1 Unquestioned honestly and 5 integrity

A. Model of Morality and 4 Integrity in Public and High Work Ethics Private (5 points) Trustworthy in the discharge of 3

duty or of oblj_g_ation


Personal With high level of stress 2 Qualities and tolerance

Character 1 (10 points) Virtuous Conduct

B. Good Human Relations Immediate supervisor's 2 in School and Community character evaluation (5 points) Peer's (co-teacher) character 2

evaluation Community official's character 1 evaluation Records of children on ECCD and SReYA Pre &Posttest 5 which

Unique Criteria (10) shows improvement Coordinated the organization of classes/implementation of Kindergarten program in the 5 School/ district/ division/ regional level (5 points)

TOTAL 100


SPECIAL EDUCATION GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

Average Equivalent to 10

A. Demonstrated Outstanding

competence in teaching, as Average Equivalent to 8

evidenced by the high Very Satisfactory

performance evaluation & Average Equivalent to 6

rank obtained as a teacher Satisfactory for the last three years Average Equivalent to 4

(10 points); Below Basic Internationally 10 recognized/utilized

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recognized/utilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recoonized/utilized (10 points) Division-wide 4

recognized/utilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/uti I ized Internationally 5

Instructional recognized/ utilized Competence Nationwide 4 and Teaching C. Research outputs/ recog_nized/utilized Effectiveness Publications in the last 5 3 (60 points) years (5 points) Region-wide

Division-wide 2 recognized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/ utilized 9 and above 10


1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4to 3 4 points) 1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5

G. Educational attainment Ph.D Units 4 and professional M.NMAEd. 3 advancement (5 points) M.A/MAEd. Ul}its 2


BS 1 A. Participation in training Organizer 5 programs (5 points) Co-organizer 4

Resource Speaker 3 Facilitator 2 Participant 1

B. Leadership in International level 5 professional organizations National level 4

Professional related to teaching Division level 3

and (5 points) District level 2 Community School level 1

Involvement Organizer 5 {20) C. Participation in Co-organizer 4


Participant 1 International level 5


District level 2 School level 1

A. Model of Morality and Unquestioned honestly and 5 Integrity in Public and integrity Private (5 points) 4

High Work Ethics Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 duty or of obligation


Character 1 {10 points) Virtuous Conduct

Immediate supervisor's 2 B. Good Human Relations character evaluation in School and Community Peer's (co-teacher) character 2 (5 points) evaluation

Community official's character 1 evaluation Organized/trained academic/socio-cultural activities - i.e. choral group, 5 dance troupe, theatre arts club, visual arts club, etc. (5

Unique Criteria {10) points) Coordinated the organization of classes/implementation of Kindergarten program in the 5 School/ district/ division/regional level (5 points)

TOTAL 100

2018 PRIME-HR(R AND R)}

I MULTIGRADE I

Specific GENERAL CRITERIA Criteria Points

Average Equivalent to 10 Outstanding

A. Demonstrated competence Average Equivalent to

in teaching, as evidenced by Very 8 the high performance Satisfactory evaluation & rank obtained as a Average teacher for the last three years Equivalent to 6 (10 points) Satisfactory

Average Equivalent to 4 Below Basic Internationally 10 recognized/ utilize d Nationwide 8 recognized/utilize

B. Instructional materials d Region-wide 6

produced and used for the recognized/utilize

improvement of teaching in the d Division-wide 4

last 3 years (10 points) recognized/utilize d School/District- 2

I wide recognized/ utilize

I

!

d Internationally 5 recognized/utilize d

Instructional Nationwide 4 recognized/utilize

Competence d

and C. Research Region-wide 3 recognized/ utilize

Teaching outputs/Publications in the last d

Effectiveness 3 years (5 points) Division-wide 2 recognized/utilize

(60 points) d School/District- 1 wide

2018 PRIME HR (R and R)

recognized/utilize d 9 and above 10

D. Original creative outputs in 7 to 8 8 5 to 6 6 the last 3 years (10 points) 4to 3 4 1 to 2 2 9 and above 10

E. Original, innovative teaching 7 to 8 8 approaches/ strategies/ practices 5 to 6 6

in the last 3 years (10 points) 4 to 3 4 1 to 2 2 9 and above 10 7 to 8 8

F. Co-curricular involvement in 5 to 6 6 the last 3 years (10 points) 4 to 3 4 1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5

G. Educational attainment and Ph.D Units 4 professional advancement (5 M.NMAEd. 3

points) M.NMAEd. Units 2 BS 1 Organizer 5

A. Participation in Co-organizer 4 Resource 3

training programs (5 Speaker points) Facilitator 2 Participant 1 International 5

B. Leadership in level professional National level 4

organizations related to Division level 3 Professional teaching (5 points) District level 2

and School level 1 Community Organizer 5

Involvement Co-organizer 4

(20) C. Participation in Resource 3 community and civic Speaker

movements (5 points) Facilitator 2 Participant 1

International 5 D. level

Professional/community National level 4 -~·-

2018 PRIME HR (R and R)

service awards (5 Division level 3 points) District level 2

School level 1 Personal \A.Model of Morality and Integrity in Public Qualities and Private (5 points) 5

and Character B. Good Human Relations in School and Community (5

(10 oints) !points) 5 NAT average 5

result for the last 3 years

40% below-1

Unique Criteria (10) pt.

41-50-2 pts. 51-60 - 3 _QtS. 61-74-4 pts.

75 and above - 5 _Qts.

TOTAL 100

2018 PRIME HR (Rand R)

BS 1 Organizer 5


Facilitator 2 Participant 1


Professional related to teaching Division level 3 and (5 points) District level 2

Community School level 1 Involvement Organizer 5

(20) C. Participation in Co-organizer 4 community and civic Resource Speaker 3 movements (5 points) Facilitator 2



District level 2 School level 1 Unquestioned honestly and 5 integrity

A. Model of Morality and Hioh Work Ethics 4 Integrity in Public and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Private (5 points) duty or of oblioation


Character Virtuous Conduct 1 {10 points) Immediate supervisor's 2

B. Good Human Relations character evaluation in School and Community Peer's (co-teacher) character 2 (5 points) evaluation

Community official's character 1 evaluation

NAT average result for the last 3 years 40% below - 1 pt. 41-50 -2 pts. 5 51-60 -3 pts. 61-74 -4 pts. 75 and above - 5 ots. Networking Linkages (for the last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing

Unique Criteria {10) of funds and other donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 5 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 pts 11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1,000 to 10,000 = 1 ot.

TOTAL 100 2018 PRIME-HR(R AND R}}

ELEMENTARY MT I, II @ SECONDA MT I, II GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

Average Equivalent to 10 A. Demonstrated Outstanding competence in teaching, as Average Equivalent to 8 evidenced by the high Very Satisfactory performance evaluation & Average Equivalent to 6 rank obtained as a teacher Satisfactory for the last three years Average Equivalent to 4 (10 points); Below Basic

Internationally 10 recoqnized/utilized

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recognized/utilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recognized/utilized (10 points) Division-wide 4

recoqnized/ utilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/utilized

Instructional Internationally 5 Competence recognized/utilized and Teaching Nationwide 4 Effectiveness C. Research outputs/ recognized/utilized {60 points) Publications in the last 5 3

years (5 points) Region-wide Division-wide 2 recognized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/ utilized 9 and above 10


1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 points) 4to 3 4

1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7to 8 8 in the last 5 years 5 to 6 6 (10 points) 4to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5





B. Leadership in International level 5 professional organizations National level 4 related to teaching (5 Division level 3

Professional points) District level 2

School level 1 and Community Organizer 5

Involvement C. Participation in Co-oroanizer 4 {20) community and civic Resource Speaker 3

movements (5 points) Facilitator 2 Participant 1 International level 5 National level 4

D. Professional/community Division level 3 service awards (5 points) District level 2


A. Model of Morality and High Work Ethics 4 Integrity in Public and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Private (5 points) duty or of oblioation

With high level of stress 2 Personal tolerance

Qualities and Virtuous Conduct 1 Character Immediate supervisor's 2

{10 points) B. Good Human Relations character evaluation in School and Community Peer's (co-teacher) character 2 (5 points) evaluation

Community official's character 1 evaluation Records/Data on Performance 2 in Supervisory Duties and resoonsibilities Management of trainings 2 conceptualized and implemented Coaching/mentoring activities 1 evidences (present relative MOVs)

Unique Criteria {10) Networking Linkages (for the 5 last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing of funds and other donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 pts 11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1,000 to 10,000 = 1 pt

TOTAL 100 2018 PRIME-HR(R AND R))

ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

A. Demonstrated Average Equivalent to 10 competence in Outstanding teaching, as 8 evidenced by the Average Equivalent to

high performance Ve!Y_ Satisfacto_ry

evaluation &rank Average Equivalent to 6

obtained as a Satisfactory teacher for the last 4 three years (10 Average Equivalent to points}; Below Basic

Internationally ·recognized/utilized

10


recognized/utilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/utilized

C. Research outputs/ Internationally 5 Instructional Publications in the last 5 recognized/ utilized Competence years (5 points) Nationwide 4 and Teaching recognized/utilized Effectiveness 3 (60 points) Region-wide

Division-wide 2 recq_gnized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/ utilized

D. Original creative outputs 9 and above 10 in the last 5 years (10 7 to 8 8 points) 5 to 6 6

4to 3 4 1 to 2 2

E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4 to 3 4 points) 1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5



BS 1 Oroanizer 5




Professional related to teaching (5 Division level 3 and points) District level 2



Participant 1 International level 5 National level 4


School level 1 Unquestioned honestly and 5 integrity Hiqh Work Ethics 4

A. Model of Morality and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Integrity in Public and duty or of obliaation

Personal Private (5 points) With high level of stress 2 Qualities and tolerance

Character Virtuous Conduct 1 (10 points) Immediate supervisor's 2


Community official's character 1 evaluation Conducted action-research on community-based proqramsjproiect Number of passing learners in the A@ E Networking Linkages (for the 5 last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing of funds and other

Unique Criteria (10) donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 pts 11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1,000 to 10,000 = 1 pt

TOTAL 100


INDIGENOUS PEOPLES PER ICC GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

A. Demonstrated Average Equivalent to 10 competence in Outstanding teaching, as 8 evidenced by the Average Equivalent to

Very Satisfactory high performance 6 evaluation &rank Average Equivalent to

obtained as a Satisfactory teacher for the last 4 three years (10 Average Equivalent to pointsj; Below Basic

Internationally recognized/utilized

10

Nationwide 8 B. Instructional materials recognized/ utilized produced and used for Region-wide 6 the improvement of recognized/utilized teaching in the last 5 years Division-wide 4

recoqnized/ utilized (10 points) School/District-wide 2 recognized/utilized

Instructional Internationally 5 Competence recognized/utilized and Teaching Nationwide 4 Effectiveness recognized/utilized (60 points) C. Research outputs/ 3

Publications in the last 5 Region-wide years (5 points) Division-wide 2

recoqnized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/utilized 9 and above 10


1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4to 3 4 points)

1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5



BS 1 Organizer 5




Professional points) District level 2 and School level 1

Community Organizer 5 Involvement C. Participation in Co-organizer 4

(20} community and civic Resource Speaker 3 movements (5 points) Facilitator 2




A. Model of Morality and Hiqh Work Ethics 4 Integrity in Public and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Private (5 points) duty or of obliaation


Character Virtuous Conduct 1 (10 points} Immediate supervisor's 2


Community official's character 1 evaluation Experience as IP Teacher- 5 teaching in an IP community for 3 consecutive years and still presently teaching in an IP community. 3 years - 1 pt. 4 years - 3 pts Syrs. and above - Sots Networking Linkages (for the 5

Unique Criteria (10} last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing of funds and other donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 ots

2018 PRIME-HR(R AND R})

111,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts lLOOO to 101_000 = 1 _Q_t

TOTAL 100


3 Region-wide Division-wide 2 recoonized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recoqnized/ utilized 9 and above 10

D. Original creative outputs 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4to 3 4


1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5

G. Educational attainment Ph.D Units 4 and professional M.NMAEd. 3 advancement (5 points) M.NMAEd. Units 2

BS 1 Organizer 5


Facilitator 2 Participant 1 International level 5

) B. Leadership in National level 4 Professional professional organizations Division level 3

and related to teaching District level 2 Community (5 points)

School level 1 Involvement Organizer 5

{20) C. Participation in Co-organizer 4 community and civic Resource Speaker 3 movements (5 points) Facilitator 2




A. Model of Morality and 4 Integrity in Public and High Work Ethics Private (5 points) Trustworthy in the discharge of 3

duty or of oblioation




B. Good Human Relations Immediate supervisor's 2 in School and Community character evaluation (5 points) Peer's (co-teacher) character 2

evaluation Community official's character 1 evaluation Records of children on ECCD and SReYA Pre &Posttest 5 which

Unique Criteria (10) shows improvement Coordinated the organization of classes/implementation of Kindergarten program in the 5 School/ district/ division/ regional level (5 points)

TOTAL 100

2018 PRIME-HR{R AND R))

SPECIAL EDUCATION GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points



8 competence in teaching, as Average Equivalent to




(10 points); Below Basic Internationally reco_g_nizedl utilized

10

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recognizedlutilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recognized/ utilized (10 points) Division-wide 4

recognizeQL utilized School/District-wide 2 recqg_nizeciL_ utilized Internationally 5

Instructional recognized/utilized Competence Nationwide 4 and Teaching C. Research outputs/ reco_gnizedl utilized Effectiveness Publications in the last 5 3 (60 points) years (5 points) Region-wide

Division-wide 2 recognized/ utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/ utilized 9 and above 10



1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5







and (5 points) District level 2 Community School level 1

Involvement Organizer 5 (20) C. Participation in Co-organizer 4




District level 2 School level 1

A. Model of Morality and Unquestioned honestly and 5 Integrity in Public and integrity Private (5 points) 4

Hiqh Work Ethics Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 dutv or of oblioation




Community official's character 1 evaluation Organized/trained academic/socio-cultural activities- i.e. choral group, 5 dance troupe, theatre arts club, visual arts club, etc. (5

Unique Criteria (10) points) Coordinated the organization of classes/implementation of Kindergarten program in the 5 School/ district/ division/regional level (5 ooints)

TOTAL 100


MULTIGRADE GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points



competence in teaching, Average Equivalent to 8

as evidenced by the high Very Satisfactory Average Equivalent to 6

performance evaluation & rank obtained as a teacher Satisfactory

for the last three years Average Equivalent to 4

(10 points); Below Basic Internationally recognized/uti! ized

10

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recognized/ utilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recoqnized/utilized (10 points) Division-wide 4

recoqnized/ utilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/ utilized Internationally 5

Instructional recognized/utilized Competence Nationwide 4 and Teaching C. Research outputs/ recoqnized/utilized Effectiveness Publications in the last 5 3 (60 points) years (5 points) Region-wide

Division-wide 2 recognized/ utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/utilized 9 and above 10

D. Original creative outputs 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years 5 to 6 6 (10 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4 to 3 4 points)

1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years 5 to 6 6 (10 points) 4to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5

G. Educational attainment Ph.D Units 4 and professional M.NMAEd. 3 advancement (5 points) M.NMAEd. Units 2

BS 1


Organizer 5 A. Participation in training Co-organizer 4 programs (5 points) Resource SQ_eaker 3



Professional related to teaching Division level 3 and (5 points) District level 2






4 High Work Ethics

A. Model of Morality and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Integrity in Public and duty or of obligation




Community official's character 1 evaluation NAT average result for the last 3 years 40% below -1 pt. 41-50 -2 pts. 5 51-60 -3 pts.

Unique Criteria (10) 61-74 -4 pts. 75 and above - 5 pts. Experience as MG Teacher 3 years - 1 pts 5 4 years -3 pts 5yrs. and above - 5 pts.

TOTAL 100


ELEMENTARY T I, II, Ill @ SECONDARY TI, II, Ill GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points



competence in teaching, as Average Equivalent to 8




(10 points); Below Basic Internationally recognized/utilized

10


recoanized/ utilized School/District-wide 2 recoanized/utilized

Instructional Internationally 5 Competence recognized/utilized and Teaching Nationwide 4 Effectiveness C. Research outputs/ recognized/ utilized (60 points) Publications in the last 5 3

years (5 points) Region-wide Division-wide 2 recognized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/ utilized 9 and above 10

D. Original creative outputs 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years {10 5 to 6 6 points)

4 to 3 4 1 to 2 2

E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years 4 to 3 4 (10 points) 1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years 5 to 6 6 (10 points) 4to 3 4

?

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5



BS 1 Organizer 5





and (5 points) District level 2






A. Model of Morality and High Work Ethics 4 Integrity in Public and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Private (5 points) duty or of obligation




Community official's character 1 evaluation

NAT average result for the last 3 years 40% below - 1 pt. 41-50 -2 pts. 5 51-60 -3 pts. 61-74 -4 pts. 75 and above - 5 pts. Networking Linkages (for the last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing

Unique Criteria (10) of funds and other donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 5 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 pts 11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1,000 to 10,000 = 1 pt.


ELEMENTARY MT I, II @ SECONDA MT I, II GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

Average Equivalent to 10 A. Demonstrated Outstanding competence in teaching, as Average Equivalent to 8 evidenced by the high Very Satisfactory performance evaluation & Average Equivalent to 6 rank obtained as a teacher Satisfactory for the last three years Average Equivalent to 4 (10 points); Below Basic

Internationally 10 recoqnized/ utilized

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recoqnized/utilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recognized/utilized (10 points) Division-wide 4

recognized/utilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/utilized

Instructional Internationally 5 Competence recognized/utilized and Teaching Nationwide 4 Effectiveness C. Research outputs/ recognized/utilized (60 points) Publications in the last 5 3

years (5 points) · Region-wide Division-wide 2 recognized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/utilized 9 and above 10

D. Original creative outputs 7to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years 5 to 6 6 (10 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5





B. Leadership in International level 5 professional organizations National level 4 related to teaching (5 Division level 3 points) District level 2 Professional

School level 1 and Community Organizer 5

Involvement C. Participation in Co-organizer 4 (20) community and civic Resource Speaker 3

movements (5 points) Facilitator 2 Participant 1 International level 5 National level 4



A. Model of Morality and High Work Ethics 4 Integrity in Public and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Private (5 points) duty or of obl!g_ation

With high level of stress 2 Personal tolerance

Qualities and Virtuous Conduct 1 Character Immediate supervisor's 2 (10 points) B. Good Human Relations character evaluation

in School and Community Peer's (co-teacher) character 2 (5 points) evaluation

Community official's character 1 evaluation Records/Data on Performance 2 in Supervisory Duties and responsibilities Management of trainings 2 conceptualized and implemented Coaching/mentoring activities 1 evidences (present relative MOVs}

Unique Criteria (10) Networking Linkages (for the 5 last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing of funds and other donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 pts 11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1,000 to 10,000 = 1 pt


ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

A. Demonstrated Average Equivalent to 10

competence in Outstanding teaching, as 8 evidenced by the Average Equivalent to

high performance Ve_ry Satisfactory


obtained as a Satisfactory teacher for the last 4 three years (10 Average Equivalent to points); Below Basic

Internationally 10 recoqnized/ utilized

B. Instructional materials Nationwide 8 produced and used for recognized/ utilized the improvement of Region-wide 6 teaching in the last 5 years recognized/ utilized

(10 points) Division-wide 4 recognizedlutilized School/District-wide 2 recognized/utilized

C. Research outputs/ Internationally 5 Instructional Publications in the last 5 recognized/utilized Competence years (5 points) Nationwide 4 and Teaching recognized/utilized Effectiveness 3 (60 points) Region-wide

Division-wide 2 recognized/utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/_utilized

D. Original creative outputs 9 and above 10 in the last 5 years (10 7 to 8 8 points) 5 to 6 6

4to 3 4 1 to 2 2

E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4 to 3 4 points) 1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4 to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5



BS 1 Organizer 5




Professional related to teaching (5 Division level 3

and points) District level 2 Community School level 1

Involvement Or-ganizer 5 (20) C. Participation in Co-or-ganizer 4


Participant 1 International level 5 National level 4


School level 1 Unquestioned honestly and 5 integrity High Work Ethics 4

A. Model of Morality and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Integrity in Public and duty or of obll9_ation




Community official's character 1 evaluation Conducted action-research on community-based prQgrams[Qroject Number of passing learners in theA@E Networking Linkages (for the 5 last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing of funds and other

Unique Criteria (10) donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21,000 to 30,000 = 3 pts 11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1 000 to 10 000 = 1 pt

TOTAL 100


INDIGENOUS PEOPLES PER ICC GENERAL CRITERIA Specific Criteria Points

A. Demonstrated Average Equivalent to 10

competence in Outstanding teaching, as 8 evidenced by the Average Equivalent to

high performance Very Satisfactory


obtained as a Satisfactory teacher for the last 4 three years (10 Average Equivalent to points); Below Basic

Internationally recognized/utilized

10

Nationwide 8 B. Instructional materials recognized/ utilized produced and used for Region-wide 6 the improvement of recoonized/ utilized

teaching in the last 5 years Division-wide 4 recognized/ utilized (10 points) School/District-wide 2 recognized/utilized

Instructional Internationally 5 Competence recognized/utilized and Teaching Nationwide 4 Effectiveness recognized/utilized {60 points) C. Research outputs/ 3

Publications in the last 5 Region-wide years (5 points) Division-wide 2

recognized/ utilized School/District-wide 1 recognized/utilized 9 and above 10


1 to 2 2 E. Original, innovative 9 and above 10 teaching approaches/ 7 to 8 8 strategies/practices in the 5 to 6 6 last 5 years (10 4to 3 4 points) 1 to 2 2 F. Co-curricular 9 and above 10 involvement 7 to 8 8 in the last 5 years (10 5 to 6 6 points) 4to 3 4

1 to 2 2 Ph.D 5



BS 1 Organizer 5




Professional points) District level 2 and School level 1

Community Organizer 5 Involvement C. Participation in Co-oroanizer 4

{20) community and civic Resource Speaker 3 movements (5 points) Facilitator 2




A. Model of Morality and Hiah Work Ethics 4 Integrity in Public and Trustworthy in the discharge of 3 Private (5 points) duty or of obligation


Character Virtuous Conduct 1 {10 points) Immediate supervisor's 2


Community official's character 1 evaluation Experience as IP Teacher- 5 teaching in an IP community for 3 consecutive years and still presently teaching in an IP community. 3 years - 1 pt. 4 years - 3 pts Syrs. and above - Spts Networking Linkages (for the 5

Unique Criteria {10) last three years): Served as instrument for sourcing of funds and other donations in kind for classroom and/or school facilities Amount cash or kind: 50, 000 and above= 5 pts 31,000 to 49,000 = 4 pts 21 000 to 30,000 = 3 pts


,11,000 to 20,000 = 2 pts 1,000 to 10,000 = 1 pt

TOTAL 100


CJQpu6fic of tlie Pliiftppines DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

<.Rfgion 02 SHOOLS DIVISION OF NUEVA VIZCA YA

(]Jayom6ong

2818 SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING TEACHING AND NOH TEACHING EMPLOYEES OF SDO NUEVA VIZCAYA

NOMINATION FORM

Instructions:

1. Please fill out all information completely and print legibly. 2. Please read and follow instructions carefully./

Category joining in: -----------

Full Name Surname Given Name

Home Address

Attach here your latest 2"x2" ID colored photo.

Middle Name

Residence No. St. Barangay Municipality Province Zip Code

Date of Birth:-------- Place of Birth ____ _ Age:__ Gender: ____ _

Email Address:---------- Mobile No.: ________ Religion: ____ _

Name of spouse (if any) --------------No. of Children: ___ _

Current School Affiliation:-------------Address:-----------

District where the school is located: __________ Total Years Teaching:------

Current Position: ____ G.rade Level being handled: ______ Subject Specialization: __ _

Number of hours teaching load per week: ____ _ Other Assignments: ----------

Years of Teaching Experience:--------- Month and year started teaching:-----

Bachelor's Degree:----------- Highest Educational Attainment:-------

Numerical Rating Descriptive Equivalent

2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 AVERAGE

Have you been charged in any of the following offense? Administrative Civil Criminal

YES NO

Status: Case dismissed ___ Pending

Have you been convicted of any of the following offense? Administrative Civil Criminal

Y~ NO

Status: Case dismissed ___ Pending

This is to certify that------------------' ____________ __, (Name of nominee) (Position)

of __________________ -' has a total of hours/week teaching load.

(School and district) (teaching load)

She/He is also currently serving as-----------------(Administrative position, if applicable)

I also certify that __________________ is the official nominee of this

(Name of nominee)

School/district for the------------------- competition. {Complete category and level)

(Printed name and signature of nominator)

(Position/Designation)

(Date Signed)

For Non-teaching, please attach KRA with duties and responsibilities.