REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL KOOTENAY BOX 590, 202 Lakeside Drive, NELSON, BC V1L 5R4 ph: 250-352-8165 fax: 250-352-9300 email: plandept@rdck.bc.ca

REFERRAL FORM FLOODPLAIN EXEMPTION APPLICATION RDCK Planning File: F1702E Date: January 11th, 2018

You are requested to comment on the attached FLOODPLAIN EXEMPTION for potential effect on your agency’s interests. We would appreciate your response WITHIN 30 DAYS (PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 11TH, 2018). If no response is received within that time, it will be assumed that your agency’s interests are unaffected. LEGAL DESCRIPTION & GENERAL LOCATION: 1428 Highway 3A, Queens Bay LOT 1 DISTRICT LOT 12075 PLAN 4230 (PID 014-909-189) PRESENT USE AND PURPOSE OF PERMIT REQUESTED: The subject property is a vacant treed lot located in Queen’s Bay, with waterfront access to Kootenay Lake. The applicant is applying for a floodplain exemption to reduce the floodplain setback for Kootenay Lake from 15.0m to 7.5m, in order to expand the buildable area of the lot and accommodate a two-bedroom single-family dwelling. Due to the size of the property as well as the location of the proposed septic system, the applicant states that hardship would be incurred with the current 15.0m floodplain setback requirement. The applicant has also applied for a Watercourse Development Permit, which is being reviewed concurrently. AREA OF PROPERTY AFFECTED 0.02 ha

ALR STATUS n/a

ZONING n/a

OCP Country Residential (RC)

APPLICANT: Jeff Ovens OTHER INFORMATION: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PLEASE NOTE: If your Advisory Planning Commission plans to hold a meeting to discuss this Development Variance Permit application, please note that the applicants must be provided with an opportunity to attend such meeting, in accordance with Section 461, subsection (8) of the Local Government Act, which reads as follows:

“If the commission is considering an amendment to a plan or bylaw, or the issue of a permit, the applicant for the amendment or permit is entitled to attend meetings of the commission and be heard.” Please fill out the Response Summary on the back of this form. If your agency’s interests are ‘Unaffected’ no further information is necessary. In all other cases, we would appreciate receiving additional information to substantiate your position and, if necessary, outline any conditions related to your position. Please note any legislation or official government policy which would affect our consideration of this permit.

DARCY ROSZELL, PLANNER

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL KOOTENAY INTERIOR HEALTH

Cranbrook (A,B,C) Nelson (E,F,G,H,I(Thrums), K) Trail (Castlegar Area I, J)

TRANSPORTATION West Kootenay District Office, Nelson Kootenay-Boundary Sub-Office, Grand Forks

FORESTS Kootenay Lake (Nelson) Arrow (Castlegar) ENVIRONMENT FRONT COUNTER BC (Cranbrook)

FIRE CHIEF – ANDREW BELLERBY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. APC AREA E DIRECTORS FOR:

A B C D E F G H I J K

RDCK BUILDING SERVICES RDCK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OTHER

INSERT COMMENTS ON REVERSE . . .

The personal information on this form is being collected pursuant to Regional District of Central Kootenay Planning Procedures and Fees Bylaw No. 2457, 2015 for the purpose of determining whether the application will affect the interests of other agencies or adjacent property owners. The collection, use and disclosure of personal information are subject to the provisions of FIPPA. If you have any questions about the collection of your personal information, contact the Privacy Officer at 250.352.8167, bbird@rdck.bc.ca, or RDCK Privacy Officer, Box 590, 202 Lakeside Drive, Nelson, BC V1L 5R4.

RESPONSE SUMMARY

FILE: F1702E APPLICANT: JEFF OVENS

Name: Date:

Agency : Title:

RETURN TO: DARCY ROSZELL, PLANNER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL KOOTENAY BOX 590, 202 LAKESIDE DRIVE NELSON, BC V1L 5R4 Ph. 250-352-8175 Email: plandept@rdck.bc.ca

Property Information Report

Land-use Information

Land-use InformationGeneral Services Information

Folio Number: 707.22199.010

The Regional District of Central Kootenay

04-Jan-2018Box 590, 202 Lakeside Drive, Nelson British Columbia V1L 5R4Phone: 250-352-6665 Toll Free 1-800-268-7325 Web:

www.rdck.bc.ca E-Mail: Info@rdck.bc.ca

This information is provided as a public resource for general information purposes only. The information shown is compiled from various sources and the Regional District of Central Kootenay makes no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. This report is not a legal document and is published for information and convenience only. The RDCK is not responsible for any errors or omissions. Report generated: 04-Jan-2018

EA: E

LOT 1 PLAN NEP4230 DISTRICT LOT 12075 KOOTENAY LAND DISTRICTLegal Description:

Parcel area: 0.05 ACRES

HIGHWAY 31Site Address:

014-909-189PID:

Zoning Designation: UNZONED

Fire Department: BALFOUR

PERDLJE

November 22, 2017

Jeff Ovens446 28th Avenue NWCalgary, Alberta GEQTECHNICAL SERVICES

T2M 2K6

Attn. Mr. Jeff Ovens

RE: SITE SPECIFIC SETBACK VARIANCE, KOOTENA Y LAKELOT 1, PLANNEP4230, DISTRICT LOT 12075, KOOTENAY DISTRICT

INTRODUCTION

At the request of Mr. Doug Stewart of Coldwell Banker Rosling Real Estate, on behalf of Mr. Jeff Ovens,

Perdue Geotechnical Services Ltd. (PCS) conducted a geotechnical assessment of the above-referenced

property. The purpose of the assessment was to provide supporting information for a site specific

variance from the 15 m setback along the shoreline of Kootenay Lake, in order to meet the requirements

of the Regional District of Central Kootenay (RDCK), as per Section 11.3 of the Floodplain ManagementBylaw No. 2080, 2009.

It is understood that a geotechnical assessment has been requested by the RDCK prior to issuing a

building permit for the proposed development. Any site specific variance from Bylaw No. 2080, under

Section 910 of the Local Government Act, and any conditions in this report shall be included in a

restrictive covenant under Section 219 of the Land T/t/eActand Section 56 of the Community Charter and

filed against the title of the subject property.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

PGS has received and reviewed the following documents:

• "PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES - LEGISLA TED FLOOD ASSESSMENTS in aCHANGING CLIMATE in BC", Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientist of BritishColumbia, June 2012.

• " TERMS OF REFERENCE, Requirements for Professional Engineers / Geoscientists

undertaking GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS / FLOOD HAZARD ASSESSMENT REPORTS',Regional District of Central Kootenay, November 2009.

• "FLOOD HAZARD AREA LAND USE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES', Ministry of Environment(Province of British Columbia), May 2004.

Kootenay Lake Building Setback and Flood Construction Level

Since the introduction of the RDCK Floodplain Management Bylaw No. 2080, 2009, the building setbackhas increased from 7.5 m to 15 m from the natural boundary of Kootenay Lake. The bylaw defines the

natural boundary as the visible high watermark along the lakeshore, where the presence and action of

water are evident in all ordinary years with respect to vegetation and the nature of the soils along the

shoreline by such action.

55 - 622 Front Street Nelson, BC V1 L 487phone250.354.0208 mobile250.354.3524 email c.perdue@shaw.ca

In addition to the building setback, the Ministry of Environment (in 1975) adopted a conceptual 200-yearflood level of 536.5 m above sea level (including freeboard), which is defined as the Flood Construction

Level (FCL) along Kootenay Lake.

Aerial Photographs and Ortho-imagery

Historical aerial photographs were reviewed as part of this assessment, including the 1968 series BC7111

Nos. 073 and 074. The photos provided monochrome stereo coverage of the property and surrounding

area. More recent ortho-imagery provided by Google Earth (May, 2016) was used to compare the

geomorphic changes that have occurred within the Queens Bay area of Kootenay Lake over a 48 year

period.

SITE ASSESSMENT

An on-site assessment was completed by Mr. Chris Perdue, P.Geo., Eng.L, of PCS on November 16,

2017. The assessment consisted of a foot traverse through the subject property as well as a brief

inspection of the immediate surrounding area. Significant terrain features shown on the attached site plan

map were mapped in the field using a Trimble GPS unit. Data collected was differentially corrected toimprove positional accuracy.

OBSERVATIONS

Lot 1 (the property) is situated within Queens Bay, on the western shoreline of Kootenay Lake,approximately 2 km north of Balfour, BC (refer to Figure 1). The property is an approximate rectangular-

shaped lot measuring 12 m wide (north-south) and 16 m long (east-west), and bound by the Highway 31right-of-way and the former natural boundary of Kootenay Lake (Plan NEP4230) along its western and

eastern boundaries, respectively (refer to Figure 2). Access to the property is provided by a gravel

driveway within the highway right-of-way. At the time of the assessment, the property was well-vegetated

with coniferous trees and absent of any development.

The property is characterized by uniform and gentle terrain with slopes not exceeding 15%. Surficiat soils

observed along existing cut bank exposures, tree churns and shallow test pits consist of glaciofluvial

deposits of sand and gravel atop compact, glaciolacustrine deposits of fine sand and silt. The shoreline

(east of Lot 1) slopes towards Kootenay Lake at 15% to 20% and consists of washed pebbles andcobbles.

Several adjacent properties, to the north and south of Lots 1 and 2, have extended their respective

eastern, shoreline boundaries through accretions, as illustrated on the appended survey plans. The

accretions were registered in 2005 (Plan NEP78423) and 2008 (Plan NEP86787) by IntermountainEngineering and Surveying Ltd. and Ward Engineering and Land Surveying Ltd., respectively.

A review of historical air photos (1968) and most recent ortho-imagery available (Google Earth, 2016)identified no discernible erosion or adverse alteration of the shoreline within Queens Bay and adjacent to

Lot 1 over the past 48 years.

Proposed Development

It is understood that Mr. Ovens intends to construct a single-family, recreational residence on the property

that is situated a minimum 7.5 m from the present natural boundary of Kootenay Lake.

Perdue Geotechnica! Services Ltd.File No. 17001-007 Page 2

Photo 1 - Linear extrapolation of the present natural boundary across Lots 1 and 2 (red dashed line,also shown on Figure 2). Note white corner post (Lot A) center-left of photo. Blue dashedline denotes extension of approximate lot boundary between Lots 1 and 2. Uniform,erosion-resistant shoreline (washed pebbles) along Queens Bay. View looking northward.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results of the assessment, the coarse gravels and pebbles observed along the shoreline of

Lot 1, and the immediately adjacent properties, are considered to be resistant to low to moderate flow

velocities, wind-generated wave action and inundation during anomalous high water levels.

In the absence of a registered accretion for Lot 1 , extrapolating the present natural boundary of Kootenay

Lake between Plans NEP78423 and NEP86787 (approximately 23 m shoreline distance) is considered anappropriate point of reference to determine the setback for the proposed development (refer to Photo 1and Figure 2).

According to hydrometric data provided by Environment Canada and FortisBC, peak levels measured on

Kootenay Lake at Queens Bay (Station 08NH064, between 1931 and 1972), averaged 534.98 m. Sincethe Duncan Dam (BC Hydro) and the Libby Dam (U.S. Army Corp of Engineers) were constructed in 1967and 1972 (respectively) to control flooding under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, peak lake levelshave averaged 532.96 m (1973 to 2015), a reduction of 2.02 m.

Perdue Geotechnica! Services Ltd.File No. 17001-007 PageS

Lake level data for Kootenay Lake also indicates that high water levels typically do not exceed a twomonth period, which are not expected to subject the shoreline and the proposed development within Lot 1

to sufficient wave action capable of causing significant erosion. Typically, storm winds across Kootenay

Lake are from the north or the south. The study area property is shielded from the prevailing wind-driven

waves within Queens Bay.

Since the introduction of the RDCK Floodplain Management Bylaw No. 2080 (2009), the building setbackhas increased from 7.5 m to 15 m from the natural boundary of Kootenay Lake. However, installation of a

septic field within the upper (western) area of the property and the 15 m setback creates insufficient roomfor the proposed development.

CONCLUSION

The foregoing assessment has been conducted in accordance with the legislated guidelines prepared by

the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientist of BC (APEGBC, 2012).

The present application to reduce the floodplain setback along the natural boundary of Kootenay Lakeshould be accepted on the basis that the 15 m setback line does not provide sufficient room for

development within the property.

Provided the top of the residential foundation wall, the underside of any floor system, or entrances (i.e.

windows and doorways, etc.) to an inhabited area of the building meet the established FCL of 536.5 m

above sea level, as defined in the RDCK Floodplain Management Bylaw No. 2080 (2009), the land maybe used safely for the intended purpose.

Perdue Geotechnical Services Ltd.File No. 17001-007 Page 4

CLOSURE

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Jeff Ovens and his authorized representatives.

Both the Regional District of Central Kootenay and the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, West

Kootenay District may also rely on this report for the sole purpose of the current building permit

application by Mr. Ovens. Any use of this report by a third party, or any reliance on or decisions to be

made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. Perdue Geotechnical Services Ltd. accepts

no responsibility for damages incurred by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based

on this report. No other warranty is made, either expressed or implied.

The methods used herein are in accordance with generally accepted geological and geotechnical

principles and practice. Site conditions are based on surface observations, shallow test pits and exposed

soils. Deep, sub-surface exploration techniques were not used unless otherwise noted. Recipients of this

report should be aware that sub-surface variability is inherent, as a function of natural geomorphic

processes,

The topographic features shown on the attached figures are illustrations only and have not been surveyed

to determine their precise locations, unless otherwise noted.

Thank you for requesting Perdue Geotechnical Services Ltd. to assist with the proposed development. If

there are any questions or concerns regarding the foregoing information, please contact the undersigned.

Regards,PERDUE GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES LTD.

"L

.'-•^.

Christopher G. Perdue, P.Geo., Eng.L.

Engineering Geologist

^ ^ (.••' •" i

Attachments: Flood Hazard and Risk Assurance Statement (APEGBC, 2012)

Figure 1 - Location Map (1:250,000 scale)

Figure 2 - Site Plan (1:500 scale)

2005 Accretion Plan NEP78423, Ward Engineering and Land Surveying Ltd.

2008 Accretion Plan NEP86787, Intermountain Engineering and Surveying Ltd.

Perdue Geotechnical Services Ltd.File No. 17001-007 Page 5

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK ASSURANCE STATEMENTNote: This Statement is to be read and completed in conjunction with the "APEGBC Guidelines for Legislated Flood Assessment in a ChangingClimate. March 2012 ("APEGBC Guidelines") and is to be provided for flood assessments for the purpose of the Land Title Act, Community Charter orthe Local Government Act. Italicized words are defined in the APEGBC Guidelines.

To: Regional District of Central Kootenav Date: November 22, 2017Box 590202 Lakeside DriveNelson, BC.V1L5R4

With reference to (check one):

Land Title Act (Section 86) - Subdivision Approval

Local Government Act (Sections 919.1 and 920) - Development Permit

D Community Charter (Section 56) - Building Permit

Local Government Act (Section 910) - Flood Plain Bylaw Variance

Local Government Act (Section 910) - Flood Plain Bylaw Exemption

For the Property:

Lot 1. Plan NEP4230. District Lot 12075. Kootenav DistrictLegal description and civic address of the Property

The undersigned hereby gives assurance that he/she is a Qualified Professional and is a ProfessionalEngineer -or Professional Geoscientist.

I have signed, sealed and dated, and thereby certified, the attached flood assessment report on theProperty in accordance with the APEGBC Guidelines. That report must be read in conjunction with thisStatement. In preparing that report I have:

Check to the left of applicable items

1. Collected and reviewed appropriate background information

IE1 2. Reviewed the proposed residential development on the Property

[>3 3. Conducted field work on and, if required, beyond the Property

4. Reported on the results of the field work on and, if required, beyond the Property

5. Considered any changed conditions on and, if required, beyond the Property

6. For a flood hazard analysis or flood risk analysis I have:

6.1 reviewed and characterized, if appropriate, any //ooatethat may affect the Property

6.2 estimated the flood hazard or flood risk on the property

D 6.3 included (if appropriate) the effects of climate change and land use change

6.4 identified existing and anticipated future elements at risk on and, if required, beyond theProperty

6.5 estimated the potential consequences to those elements at risk

7. Where the Approving Authority has adopted a specific level of flood hazard 'or flood risk toleranceor return period that is different from the standard 200-year return period design criteria I have

7.1 compared the level of flood hazard 'or flood risk tolerance adopted by the ApprovingAuthoritywWn the findings of my investigation

7.2 made a finding on the flood hazard or flood risk tolerance on the Property based on thecomparison

7.3 made recommendations to reduce flood hazard or flood risk on the Property

1 Flood Hazard Area Land Use Management Guidelines published by the BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations and the2009 publication Subdivision Preliminary Layout Review- Natural Hazard Risk published by the Ministry of Transportation and Public Infrastructure. Itshould be noted that the 200 - year return period is a standard used typically for rivers and purely fluvial processes. For small creeks subject to debrisfloods and debris flows return periods are commonly applied that exceed 200 years. For life-threatening events including debris flows, the Ministry ofTransportation and Public Infrastructure stipulates in their 2009 publication Subdivision Preliminary Layout Review - Natural Hazard Risk that a 10,000year return period needs to be considered.

Adapted from APEGBC Guidelines for Legislated Flood Assessments in a Changing Climate, March 2012

8. Where the Approving Authority 'has not adopted a level of flood risk or flood hazardtolerance I have:

8.1 described the method of flood hazard analysis or flood risk analysis used

D 8.2 referred to an appropriate and identified provincial or national guideline for level of floodhazard of flood risk

8.3 compared this guideline with the findings of my investigation

D 8.4 made a finding on the level of flood hazard 'of flood risk tolerance on the Property based onthe comparison

8.5 made recommendations to reduce flood risks

9. Reported on the requirements for future inspections of the Property and recommended whoshould conduct those inspections.

Based on my comparison betweenCheck one

[>3 the findings from the investigation and the adopted level of flood hazard or flood risk tolerance(item 7.2 above)

D the appropriate and identified provincial or national guideline for level of flood hazard 'or floodrisk tolerance (item 8.4 above)

I hereby give my assurance that, based on the conditions contained in the attached flood assessmentreport,

Check one

for subdivision approval, as required by the Land Title Act (Section 86), "that the land may beused safety for the use intended".

Check one

D with one or more recommended registered covenants.

D without any registered covenant.

D fora development permit, as required by the Local Government Act (Sections 919.1 and 920),my report will "assist the local government in determining what conditions or requirementsunder [Section 920] subsection (7.1) it will impose in the permit".

for a building permit, as required by the Community Charter (Section 56), "the land may beused safely for the use intended".

Check one

D with one or more recommended registered covenants.

D without any registered covenant.

for flood plain bylaw variance, as required by the Flood Hazard Area Land Use ManagementGuidelines associated with the Local Government Act (Section 910), "the development mayoccur safely".

D for flood plain bylaw exemption, as required by the Local Government Act (Section 910), "theland may be used safely for the use intended".

Christopher Perdue, P.Geo., Ena. L November 22,^017Name Date

/^-^- _ , •i>.^-r"Signaturec,^^ /') f

201^03 Baker Street '"]Nelson. BC V1L4H5Address

250-505-4380 (Affix Professional seal here)Telephone

If the Qualified Professionals a member of a firm, complete the following.I am a member of the firm: Perdue Geotechnical Services Ltd. and I sign this letter on behalf of the firm.

Adapted from APEGBC Guidelines for Legislated Flood Assessments In a Changing Climate, March 2012

y0-

SiLsSSZro-> co:<°0

°^a^2~^

P1570

A

NEP86787

JEFF OVENSFLOODPLAIN SETBACK

VARIANCE

LOT 1, PLAN NEP4230,DISTRICT LOT 12075

KOOTENAY DISTRICT

LEGEND

PUBLIC ROADSTRAILSSEASONAL STREAMSEEPPARCEL BOUNDARIESRIDGESLOPE BREAKDRAWCULVERTSLOPE DIRECTIONLARGE ROCK

^_ y\^7 ST^7r

/*<< ^\ /\ y\ /\ ^^

:»TO))^TO)

THIS SITE PLAN DRAWING IS FORILLUSTRATION AND DISCUSSION ONLY.

LOT BOUNDARIES MAY NOT BE CONSISTENTWITH SURVEY PLANS AND SHOULD NOT BERELIED UPON FOR LEGAL PURPOSES.

25

Scale 1:500

SITE PLANFILE: 17001-007.DGNDRAWN: Tripwire

PROJECT: 17001-007DATE: NOV. 2017FIGURE:

NEP19533

PERDUEC3EOTECHNICAL SERVICES

Status:,Filed Plan #: NEP78423 App fl: N/A CM #: RCVD: 2005-OB-29 RQST; 2017-11-20 09.30.13

REFERENCE PLAN OF LOTS 2, 3, AND 4DISTRICT LOT 12075, KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 4230AND OF ACCRETED LAND.

(Pursuant to section 94(1 )(c) of the Land Title Act)

B.C.G.S. 82F.066

SCALE 1: 250

PLAN No. NEP 75^.3

DI»tonco» arc In mctrea

Bearings ore ostronomlp dflrived from Plan 4230

l£SE(iC• DENIES SnHDARG IRON POST FOUND0 DENOTES STANDARD IRON POST SET

REGISTERED OVfNEBSLot 2 Plon 4230

1-^.0: ^O^ffA)oaeph? Kdnfgan

Miohacl Roymond Kanigan

l.lLLwu>^Wilfraa to both Slgnaluna

ra'rta<,'A;r<>t/fia.^ lA^e.iSf-.

Addrtss

J<klieaA_;o(-^» fiu\.

Occupollon

RFRISTEfiFR OWNERS:Lot 2 Plan <2,!0

/i4*Mt^ (^wyS]!onc8r Wayne C^y

0/Uu. ft^<^Dtboroh Lyn pflrny

^^^0-Wilnaaa V both SlgnoiuraT

hA^us-Tefof&^c?Prinl«d-Ham«"Tn"ra

,{S2_

^^^^^-^(?e ^fs:5

vn^ct ^7<uji»~&£JS.

REKIKTFRFB OWNERS:Lot 3 Plan 4230

Sa

Wi'lnSaB^ftioth ^gnaturea

iA^°?S€^^WWM»

5>L.\IO»sipk

Sa^

REGISTERED OWNERS:1st t Plcn 4230

Horlan Nelson Jorgensen

Wlnoss to Signature

FrIntotTNome In Full

Occupotion

WARD ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING LTD.SBlll »1. ?» B.Ht SWt T't (2MJ. .>M-16(0 FlE 3082Kttioft^ Bnttth "Wumb-o Fox:'(256) JM-1670 QWWW 3QB2HUTT

DeposHnd \(\ the Land Title Office at Komtoops, 0.C.

this A.9 day of 3"U.A< . 2005

^).6^tA _ "'Registrar

^'•s^-Ccriificote under the laml Wo t.ct,Sidion 94(1 )(c)

The unrgglstered land included withinthis plan 'a deemed to be lawfullyaccralad land adjoining Crown lond.

V.,G..

~^8-s~?/-^'fteoo-^'S

/If

./ .<?'^

REGISTERED OWNERS;lol 4 Plon 4230

t tfs *uJ-<Jj%,lorgofct Isabel Hutt

Wlthesa to signoluro^

l/»nrfn (. t/i/^c. a noPrintBd Name In Fuir

•/d^ /Mt-S.Sf-.Address

A/C./5M 6C

REGISTERED OWNERS:Lot 4 Plan 42.10

Va^>inda Joyce Von Fallen

&„-.

^UCCUI/fcs/.

Wilncni" 1^ SlghnlAe

Thia plan lies ullhln th« Central Kootanay Re9ionol Dlslrict.

i, Peter Word, a British Cotumbla Lond Surveyor, of thsCity of Nelson, In Britiah Columbia, cortKy thol I waspresent ot and peraonally aupertnltndod th* survey rapMBcnled

in, and that the survey and plan ore correct.mn/ey was cornpletadl on Ihs 5th day of Octobor, 2004.

The plan was completed and chockcd. and the chockllat fHedundnr |f2S757, on th« 18th day ol Moreh, 2005.

present ot and peraonally aupertnltndod th* survey rapMBcn.SCJeMfl by this plan, and thai Uw survey and plan are wrecl.

rinUd Name !h Full :• The"nBM'-'aurVBy-wa8'cOfflpl«t»cl on Iha'5th day of Oclobtr,

?l 716 t/do.Address

fi±51_CL^Ji&_|/(A.<.;Knt-.--«n _/T/Z^fsupolinn —^— Tttcr Ward ' T: Enj., B.C.L.S.

,f .'

;,L ;1!|!'i

Page 1 of 1

Status: Filed Plan ft NEP86787 ADD #: N/A Ctrl #: RCVD: 2008-06-10 RQST: 2017-11-20 09.27.51

REFERENCE PLAN OFLOT 3, PLAN 2339, DISTRICT LOT 12075 EXCEPTPLAN R213, KOOTENAY DISTRICT AND ACCRETED LAND.

N

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 100(1)(a) OF THE LAND TITLE ACTBC3S B2F.066

SCALE 1:500AU. DISTANCES ARE N HETfES AND DECIMALS TtEREOFUMRB OTHERWISE KCCATBX

BEARINGS ARE ASTTiONOMC DERIVED FROnPLAN NEPJSS33.

0 DENOTES STWCARD tUN POST SET.• DENOTES STANDARD RON POST FOUND.B DENOTES STANDARD CAPPS POST FOUND.® DENOTES NON-STANDARD POST QBmw RON BPS.

Wt DEN013 UTTNESS.

^-

PLAN NEPifo.m.

DEPOSTED IN THE LAND TITLEOFFICE AT KAMLOOPS, B.C. THSDAY OF __>ianC_, ZOOg'

o^ww,RESIST?

LOT 8

PLAN 1570

s^\-s^' SORDON MrrCHEU- SUITH - OIWER

'U/SQahE. ELEAXbR SMM - OWNER

^ <c^WINESS AS TO BOTH SICNATURES

\-\<.— •Ai^.v 'Ewvs

Q<

0CfuQ

u-1

ec=3V)

FULL PRINTS) NAME OF WITNESSISTV QCS»TM. &^^•sV?a&L%.C- \i'\'fc»V>r

ADDRESS - WITNESS

T).^atv»t-OCCUPATION - WITNESS

ga'26'25"

&t.Z48

D. L.

PREPARED BY

GORDON STEINB.C.L.S. and P ENG.,

SOS FRONT ST,NELSON, B.C. V)L 4CZ

PHONE OR FAX 250-352-7312E-MAIL ADDRESS -ilssltd«nistMui.csm

TNS PLAN LES WFTHN THE CENTRAL KOOTENAY RESIONAL CISTRICT.

LOT 1

PLAN 2339

D. L.LOT 1

PLAN 2528

REGISTRAR <y?-

i 30-1-11^

CERTIFICATE; UNDER UNO TI"[l£ ACTSECTION 94 (1) (c)THE UNREGISTCRED LAND INCLUDS)WITHIN THIS PLAN IS DEEMED TOBE LAWFULLY ACCRETCD LANDADJOINltlG CROWN LWD.

G»»'t nia No CSCVSZ.t

!. GORDON STON. c British Columbia Lend Sun/ayor,of NELSON, In British Cdumbto, certify that I wo!present at and personaliy superlntonded the surveyrepresented by this plan.' and that the survey andplan an correctTho field survdy wos complotod on the 27th dqyof AUGUST. 2007. The plan wa» complatad nnd-checked, end. ftc^cddbt, fflcd under ^7S\S2. on tha10th day of MARCH, 2008.

SJ.^SIGNATURE OF B.C.L.S.

Page 1 of 1