1\lIA~JAG!::R.LABOR RELATIONS

Area

July 23, 2012

Omar Gonzalez Western Regional Coordinator, APWU 1350 Old Bayshore HWY. Suite 360 Burlingame, CA 94010

To: ~.Pacific Area Local(s) [ ] Western Area Local(s) Withholding Info

ng issue(s) review, take action and reduce issues to writing

omments: Prepare & Review 12.S.C.S & 12.S.C.6 Omar Gonzalez. Coordinator

This is to advise you of the intent of the Bay Valley District to utilize the provisions of Article 12.5.C.5 of the National Agreement to involuntarily reassign eighteen (18) Tractor-Trailer Operators from the craft and/or installation at the San Francisco NDC bid cluster (Event 39898). The basis is an approved Area wide mode conversion.

The impacted employees will be notified of their involuntary reassignments by separate letter. Based upon the availability of residual/withheld assignments, it may be necessary to utilize the provisions of Article 7.2.B of the National Agreement to detail some of the impacted employees in order to provide them with a work opportunity until sufficient residual/withheld assignments can be identified for their placement.

By copy of this notice, we will withhold up to eighteen (18) residual assignments in the clerk, carrier, mail handler, vehicle maintenance or custodial crafts in sites within a 50 mile radius of the impacted bid cluster for placement of the impacted vehicle operators.

Since all Postal vehicle operations in California are being contracted, the provisions of Article 12.5.C.5.b(1)(a) to adjust the excess to the maximum extent possible by making voluntary reassignments to vacant motor vehicle craft positions in installations within 100 miles have been met. The impacted vehicle operators retain the right to seek a reassignment outside of California if they elect to do so.

Attached you will find copies of the automated impact statement, the operational data that supports the excessing, the list of sites at which withholding has been authorized and the names of the junior impacted vehicle operators.

Please include this impact on the agenda for our next meeting. jf you have any questions you may contact me at (858) 674-3193 or Linda Shumate, Area Complement Coordinator at (858) 674-3183.

cc: Area Manager Operations Support Area Manager, Human Resources

Area Manager, Finance Area Manager, In-Plant Support District Manager, Bay Valley District

2

Area Complement Coordinator with attachments Manager, Human Resources - Bay Valley District with attachments District Complement Coordinator, Bay Valley District with attachments Chris Jackson, NALC with attachements Richard Siu, NPMHU with attachments HRA (2) with attachments

WorkHour Impact Report

Impacted Bid Cluster

Installation Address

Area Name

Impact Type

Date of Impact

Period (Dates) of Review Performed

Report Prepared By

Report Prepared Date

Reviewed By

Phone

SAN FRANCISCO BMC EVENT 39898

PVS Conversion

PACIFIC

Reduction Other Than by Attrition

11/17/2012

07/23/2011 thru 07/20/2012

Yolanda Garcia-Martinez

07/23/2012

James Clausen

(510) 874-8222

WorkHour Impact Report Craft = MOTOR VEHICLE

A B C D E F G Current Planned Weekly Hrs Monthly Annual Annual FTE Current Average Weekly Savings Savings Work Hours Savings FTE Yearly

Weekly Hrs Hrs Savings Hr Rate

Total 972 324 -648 -2592 -33696 -17 2028

OverTime Impact

Current OT Current Planned OT Additional Percent Planned OT Planned OT Average OT Rate per Week Planned OT Planned OT Hours per Rate

Weekly Hrs from changes per Week per Week Week

Total 27 2.8% -27 0 0 0%

WorkHour Impact Report Casuals

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals that will be Terminated

f. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals Remaining After Impact

g. Provide Narrative Justifying need for Remaining MOTOR VEHICLE Casuals

There are no casuals in the motor vehicle craft.

Part Time Flexible (PTFs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Will there be any MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MOTOR VEHICLE PTFs

f. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

There are no PTFs in the motor vehicle craft.

Transitional Employees (TEs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs on Rolls

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE TE Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE TE Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs that will be Terminated

f. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE TEs After

Postal Support Employees (PSE)

o o o o o o

o o o o

NO

o

o o o o o o

b. Current Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PSE Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Total Non-OverTime MOTOR VEHICLE PSE Hours per Month

d. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PSE that will have Reduced Hours

e. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PSE that will be Terminated

f. Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PSE Remaining After

g. Provide Narrative Justifying need for Remaining MOTOR VEHICLE PSE

There are no PSE's in the motor vehicle craft.

o o o o o

WorkHour Impact Report

Part Time Regular (PTRs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTR Positions after Impact

c. Estimated Number of MOTOR VEHICLE PTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MOTOR VEHICLE PTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

MOTOR VEHICLE PTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

There are no PTRs in the motor vehicle craft.

Full Time Regular (FTRs)

a. Current Number of MOTOR VEHICLE FTRs on Rolls

b. Planned Number of MOTOR VEHICLE FTR Positions After Impact

c. Estimated Number of MOTOR VEHICLE FTR Attrition

d. Will there be any MOTOR VEHICLE FTRs Excessed from Craft or Installation

If Yes how Many MOTOR VEHICLE FTRs

e. Provide Narrative Explaining need for Excessing

A change in the CA emission law resulted in a need to convert PVS to HCR and to excess 18 FT no's from the craft and/or installation

o o o

NO

o

25

7

o YES

18

WorkHour Impact Report-MOTOR VEHICLE

Preliminary Summary

a. Total Planned Non-OT Reduction per Month for Regulars and PTRs

b. Planned Reduction in Total OT Hours per Month

c. Planned Reduction in Casual Non-OT Hours per Month

d. Planned Reduction in PTF Non-OT Hours per Month

e. Planned Reduction in TE Non-OT Hours per Month

f. Planned Reduction in PSE Non-OT Hours per Month

g. Total Planned Non-OT Hours per Month

h. Total FTE Savings

-2592

-108

o o o o

1296

-17

US POSTAL SERVICE

Area-wide Mode Conversion Proposal Pacific Area

NATIONAL AGREEMENT ARTICLE 32

SUBCONTRACTING

February 28, 2012

2

ARTICLE 32 PROPOSAL & COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

ar';::':::I •• YIIII'1S:> Mode Conversion

BACKGROUND

Network Vehicle Operations enable and ensure

....,,,,."V.r'I:> to Contract

the fleet with particulate matter (PM) kits Lease compliant vehicles

new veh!cies to contract route ';'UUVII""

conducted an most economically

to assess the

Alternative Analyzed - Retrofit Fleet (Not Recommended)

Installation of PM Mars on an the best use of the In\)'t::,.::!trr,,::>nt

is not recommended, the best return on investment since the

solution and not r"".", ... ,,,,,, the lowest

IS{'31!':HICIII of filters

Alternative - Purchase (Not Recommended)

Alternative Analyzed - Outsoufce (Recommended)

Justification:

The Postal is mandated to procure transportation that meets all requirements by the most economical means. In regards to highway transportation, service may be via Highway Contract Route (HCR) or Postal (PVS). After comprehensive evaluation and due consideration of ali critical factors (as cited in Subcontracting A.rticle 32.2A of the national agreement USPS and APWU). results indicate that the will from subcontracting PVS at all Pacific Area and network facilities HI Supporting

factor are as follows:

Public Interest

public not change under operation nor will availability at change under HCR operations. Service points and their arrival I

times in current exactly in HCR Under

more

used to calculate schedule and is the same

Cost costs bet\!'/een PVS and HeR C'e"nr'o

from that total

an

and will

to

Availability of Equipment

an advantage since these suppliers would be more responsive in to perform required to

with state and local law to provide appropriate equipment including that equipment that should provide increased availability of equipment. In Postal Service should reduce their need for future capitol investment and

work hours cost

Equipment Requirement

LER SINGLE

11-TON

#OF PVS VEHICLES {CURRENTLY IN

32 102 109

121

446

# HeR VEHICLES REQUIRED

1 1

21

45

i-Jr,,,<:.<:.nf:1t\/ 446 vehicles are due

The W .... ,..,I'I",£'

to 1

follows

TOTAL PVS Operators

nlr,\I(:>,""'" are located Pacific Area processing & r1'C~~"'"

employees will adhere to 12 of contract

513 137

797

distance guidelines ali

and other applicable

1j§9§ COST EVALUATION - CAblFORNIA POSTAL. VeHICLE SERVICE YS HIGHWAY CONTRACT SERVICE

V2612()t2

u.s. Postal Service COST EVAlUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

6.864.00

---- $43,07800

60x

Van Tractor (SA) Tractor

6

Box 22 Trailer COS!

N-EaSl East PaCific Sot:th Central

60x 25

Tex! Claim COSl Per Mile

Box 27

PVS Field OperatlOns Management Costs

CostS)

VAN

SAT TAT

INT

SAT TAT

N-East East West South

Central

Nat' I

PVS

$ $

'5 $ $ S

$1.260 $1,290

8.38 '1.80 '3.45

71600

2.25

U.S. Postal S<?l'1icG COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHiCLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

$1300 51

V~'1 51380 $1,260 51

2i

IntermeO;ale INT 838 7 ~fCafgO 7-TON 11.80

Carg{) ,-fON 1345 Tractor (SA) SAT 1378 Trador TAT 13

80)(22

Trailer Cos! N-East N-East East East Pacific Wesl 1.716.00 South South Central Central

Box 25

Clam; Cost Per Nar! 20

Bo;<27

i6.A<lj""I.G<l (!in'! 113)( 1

U.S. Postal Service

COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

$ 446.769.57 Cost

$ 573,78729

!

$ 5.148.00 I !

I 23 T 0Vll Vehicle Cost

(}ines 20 ~ ?' 22)

-+ $1,025,704.86

-+

-+ $69,200.60

-+ I t $ 3.022,344.05

FORM COMPLETED: #tltlfUttlHIl

Box 1

Box 20 Intermediate 7-T Van

Van Tractor (SA) Tractor (T Ai

Box 21

Intermediate -T

80x22

TraIler Cost N-East East Pacific South Central

Box 25

Van

Tort Claim Cost PerMde

80)(27

~Jf"O TIO

INT V,l\N VAN SAT TAT

INT 7-TON

1 i-TON SAT Tft,T

N-East East West South

Central

$ $

$ $ $

$ $ $ $ $

$1.300 $1400 $1.38C $1.260 $1.290

8.38 11.80 13.45 13.78 13.98

14,

IS

16 AdJYSt~ for

t5 it:

18 mmrum Pay ';Ol\l (RequimsEmry

19

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION - POSTAL VEHICLE SER'V'iCE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

_..::....:. __ --1 5

$945}47.08

25, Too

$14,L27970 Nat'! .,

$0.00

2.885,25693

Box Motor $

$

Bo)(20 Intermediate INT $1.300 7-T VAN $1400

VAN $1.380 SAT $1.260 TAT $1.290

Box 21

Intermediate INT 7 Van 7 TON 11-T Cargo Van 11-TON

Tractor SAl Tractor TAT

Bo:.:22 Trailer Cost

N-East N-East East East Pacific I/Vest 1,71

SOlJth South Cenlra! Central

Bo)(25

Tort Cl<um Cost Per Mile Nat'!

80:.:27 2

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

V~~CO$l

:> 2,nS,20771 ~C<)$t

S 4,783,82527 '

! :$ 18Ul96 00 I

I

I 23, '1 001. V~ Cost

(tines 20 ~, !, 22:,

............ S7,741,92!l98

TIC ----to-Mlies (1"",,, 3)

$742,130,g.; ............ $430,419.60 ~15

............ $ 24,217,249,71

Box

Tractor no 3

Box 20 Intermediate INT $1.300 7-T VAl"ll $1.400

VAN $1.380 SAT $1.260 TAT $1.290

Box 21

Intermediate INT l! 8.38 7 -T Van 7-TON

Ji 11.80

11-T Van 11-TON 13.45 Tractor (SA) SAT 13.78 Tractor TAT 13.98

Box 22 Trailer Cost

N-East N-East $ East East $ Paci:ftc \Nest $ 1.716.00 South South $ Central Centra! $

80x 25

Tort ClaIm Cost Per Mite Nat'l

80x27 2

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

3207,869,53

_,..:$:.,;1:..;:;,..:1.::5;,;;.00"::"--1 S 320,892,00 I 100.00%

$5.990,440.15

$381.655.6U

17.150.47074

Box Motor Vehicle

Treliler TIO

Box Intermediate $1.300

VAN $1400 VAN $1.380 SAT $1260 TAT $1.290

Box 21

Intermediate INT $ 7 -T Cargo Van 7-TON $ 11-T Van ii-TON $

SAT $ Tractor (TA) TAT $

6

Box 22 Trailer Cost

N-East N-East $ East East $ Pacific West $ South South $ Centra! Central $

Box 25

Tort Cta;m Cost Per Mile

80x27

Y';

lR"'lIJires Entry Ewe,

U.S. Postal Service

COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

$446.178.40

15,685,638,81

$3.837,134,24

Motor $ TIO

80')(20

intermediate INT $1.300 7-T VAN $1.400 11-T VAN $1.380

SAT $1.260 Tractor (T A) TAT $1.290

Box 21

Intermediate INT 7 -T Van 7-TON 11-T Van 11-TON Tractor (SA) SAT Tractor TAT

80:.:22

Trailer Cost N-East N-East $ East East $

Pacific West $ 1.716.00 South South $ Central Central $

80;.::25

Tort Claim Cost Per Mile Nat'l

80.:<27

U.S. Postal Service

COST EVALUATION· POSTAL VEHlCLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERVICE

~C'»t

S 425.833,46

16~ ftffjUS."OO Confu1q£>f'.ces 15x 1w}

$733,847~99 24. Fee" (Allach Slaternent)

S1.362,17!nO --fII-

S75,60!Ul6 $43,231,40

-

T

Box Motor Vehicle P"tVO $ Tractor Trailer Operator TIO $

80)(20 !ntermediate INT $1.300 7-T Van VAN $1.400

Van VAN $1.380 Tractor (SA) SAT $1.260 Tractor TAT $1.290

80)(21

intermediate INT $ 8.38 7 -T Cargo Van 7-TON $ 11.80 11-1 Cargo Van 11-TON $ 13.45 Tractor (SA) SAT $ 13.78 Tractor (T A) TAT $ 13.98

80:<22

T railer Cost

N·East N·East $ East East $ Pacific West $ South South $ Central Central $

(0)(25

Tort Claim Cost Per Mile Nat"

80:<27

PVS Field Operations

HCR

PS

U.S. Postal Service COST EVALUA nON • POSTAL VEHICLE SERVICE VS. CONTRACT SERViCE

$10,877.86139

S605,31844

24(tOO

13. Tetal Ver.icle Cost

Git1e,s 20: + 2'! '*'

-+

-+ Miles (LiM

-+

-+

$7,105.182.26

$545.096.80

S 19.133,458.90

Box Motor Vehicle MVO Tractor Trailer Operator TIO

3

Box2Q Intermediate INT n300 7-T VAN $1400

VAN $1.380 SAT $1260 TAT $1.290

8ox21

[ -,-

Intermediate INT

1 8.38

7 -T Van 7-TON 11.80 11~T Van 11-TON 13.45 Tractor (SA) SAT 13.78 Tractor (T A) TAT 13.98

6

Box 22 T raller Cost

N-East N-East $ East East $ Pacific West $ 1,716.00 South South $ Centra! Central S

80:>::25

Tort Claim Cost Per Mile Nat!l

Box 27