religion nurtures some forms of prosocial behavior , education does not
DESCRIPTION
Religion Nurtures Some Forms of Prosocial Behavior , Education Does Not. René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam 11th ISTR Conference, July 24, 2014. Thanks. To the McArthur Foundation for funding the MIDUS data collection. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Religion Nurtures Some Forms of Prosocial Behavior,
Education Does NotRené Bekkers
Center for Philanthropic StudiesVU University Amsterdam
11th ISTR Conference, July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 2
Thanks• To the McArthur Foundation for
funding the MIDUS data collection.• Colleagues who gave feedback:
Dorret Boomsma, Dinand Webbink, Sara Konrath, Paul van Lange, Daniëlle Posthuma.
• To be submitted as a chapter for a CESifo volume published at MIT Press.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 3July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 4
Three questions• How alike are twins in the United
States with respect to prosocial behavior?
• Are differences among twins in giving and volunteering related to differences in education and religion?
• If so, what explains these relationships?
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 5
Number of publications per year about philanthropy by academic discipline (1899-2009; Bekkers & Dursun, 2013)
1899-1970
1970-1975
1976-1980
1981-1985
1986-1989
1991-1994
1995-1999
2000-2005
0
50
100
150
200
250other
natural sciences
education and health
public admin-istration
marketing & communication
philanthropic studies
economics
sociology
psychology
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 6July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 7
Prosocial behavior
Formal: philanthro
pyMone
y Time
Informal: helping
Social suppo
rtCare
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 8
Ubiquitous correlates of philanthropy
1. Religion: – Affiliation (yes>no)– Denomination (Protestant>Catholic)– Participation (church attendance)
2. Education:– Level achieved
The variance between fields of study is small
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 9
Where do the correlations originate?
The more general research questions:1. Why are religion and education
correlated with prosocial behavior?2. To what extent are these
relationships the result of environmental influences?
3. Are these relationships causal?
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 10
Three ‘theories’ on philanthropy
Philanthropy varies between social groups
1. because the resources of group members vary;
2. because the social values of groups vary;
3. because members of different groups have different self-identities.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 11July 24, 2014
The ideal experiment would randomize education
VWO = higher secondary education (≤ gymnasium)VMBO = lower vocational education
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 12
Monozygotic twins
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 13
The unique environmental influence of education
July 24, 2014
Note that shared environmental influences are also excluded by design in this analysis
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 14
What behavioral geneticists do: the ACE model
A Additive genetic effects
Typically 40-60%
C Common (shared) environmental effects
Typically less than 10% (often zero)
E Unique (non-shared) environmental effects (including error)
Typically 30-50%
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 15
ACE mediated effects modelA Religiousness
C Prosocial behavior
E
July 24, 2014
Koenig et al., 2007; n= 165 MZ and 100 DZ twin pairs
A C ETotal effect on prosocial behavior
10.2 27.6 62.3
Mediated by religiousness 7.5 (73.5
%)
13.6(49.3
%)
2.9(4.7%
)
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 16
Biometric model fitting• Fit statistics of various biometric
models are compared to identify the best-fitting model.
• Models depend on assumptions such as the Equal Environments Assumption.
• The EEA is often disputed theoretically.
• Empirical tests show it is often violated.
• The resulting bias, however, seems to be minor (see Felson, Soc.Sc.Res., 2014).
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 17
What molecular geneticists do
• Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS): identify ‘candidate genes’ that could explain variance in some outcome variable.
• Typically, individual genes like OXTR and DRD4 explain tiny fractions of variance (<1%).
• Typically, all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) combined explain less variance (16% of education) than the is estimated in biometric models (35%) - missing heritability problem.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 18
Where is the social science?• In the variance explained by shared
and unique environmental factors.• Let us rule out genetic effects by
looking at monozygotic twins only. • This choice also avoids problems
with the EEA.• Note that MZ twins also share 100%
of shared environmental effects.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 19
The problem• “…families whose unobservable
characteristics cause them to have a high likelihood of volunteering are also more likely to educate their children, so the relationship between schooling and volunteering is just a correlation caused by an excluded common cause.” (Gibson, 2001: 229)
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 20
This is not my idea• In 2001, New Zealand economist John Gibson
published a study of volunteering among 85 identical twin pairs.
• Though education in the pooled sample is associated with more volunteering, pairwise comparisons reveal the opposite.
• The twin with more years of education was found to volunteer fewer hours.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 21
The implication• Genetic effects cause a positive association
between education and volunteering.• Unique environmental effects of education
on volunteering are negative in this sample.• One interpretation of the negative effect is
that it is the result of the opportunity cost of volunteering, potentially amplified by a decision making process within the household.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 22
Related literature• The twin fixed effects model has
been used in economics to estimate the influence of schooling on income since the 1970s (Behrman & Taubman, 1976; Ashenfelter & Kreuger, 1994; Ashenfelter & Rouse, 1998; Isacsson, 1999; Miller, Mulvey & Martin, 1995; Bonjour et al., 2003).
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 23
Environment mediation model
Religiousness
E Prosocial behavior
Education
July 24, 2014
Note that this is a unique environment mediation model
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 24
The MIDUS data• Two wave longitudinal panel survey on
Midlife in the United States (1995 and 2005) sponsored by the McArthur Foundation.
• The RDD sample selection procedure included twin screening questions.
• Only English-speaking respondents aged 25-74 living in the US who were physically and mentally able to complete the interview were allowed to participate.
July 24, 2014
25
Assessing zygosity
July 24, 2014 11th ISTR Conference, Münster
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 26
Are twins different at all?
Education Religious affiliation
MZ 55% 50%DZ 64% 53%
July 24, 2014
Proportions of respondents from the same twin pair not reporting exactly the same level of education and
religious affiliation
Yes – here’s the discordance table:
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 27
ACE model resultsA C E D
Education 29.8 38.6 31.5Strength of religiosity
22.8 32.7 39.3
Frequency of church attendance
46.7 53.3
Amount donated ($)
33.7 66.3
Hours volunteered
84.2 15.8
Financial assistance to friends / family
82.3 17.7
Hours helping friends / family
73.5 26.6
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 28
The higher educated give more
July 24, 2014
These differences are massive: amounts donated in the top category are nine times the amount donated in the lowest
category
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 29
The higher educated volunteer more
July 24, 2014
Again, large differences
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 30
Informal prosocial behaviors
July 24, 2014
Perhaps Americans with less education know more people in need of support?
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 31
The religious give more
July 24, 2014
Religious giving is included in this figure. Excluding donations to religion, the differences
are much smaller.
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 32
The religious volunteer more
July 24, 2014
This figure includes volunteering for religious organizations.
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 33
Informal prosocial behaviors
July 24, 2014
Perhaps Americans who attend church less often know more people in need of financial assistance and support?
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 34
Two basic regression models
1. Between effects model: ignores the twin pair structure, replicates bivariate analyses. Includes genetic + environmental effects.
2. Within MZ twin fixed effects model: does the higher educated / more religious twin of an MZ pair give and volunteer more than the less educated / religious co-twin? Includes environmental effects only.July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 35
Education and giving
Between siblings, DZ twins, and MZ
twins
FE DZ twins FE MZ twins0
50100150200250300350400
****** p <.001
***
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 36
Two further models• Reduced form within MZ twin
model: excludes religious denomination dummies, retaining education, church attendance and strength of religiosity.
• Mediated reduced form within MZ twin model: adds social responsibility, prosocial self-identity, household income, and assets.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 37
Education and giving among MZs
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within
020406080
100120140160180
Total amount donatedexcluding religion
***
***
*** p <.001
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 38
Education estimates on total giving
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within
0
50
100
150
200
250
+1SE
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 39
Education and volunteering
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within
-10-8-6-4-202468
10
hours volunteeredexcluding religious
July 24, 2014
***
***
*** p <.001
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 40
Church attendance and giving
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within
0
5
10
15
20
25
Amountexcluding religion
*** p <.001
July 24, 2014
***
****** ***
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 41
Church attendance and volunteering
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.60.8
1
hours volunteeredexcluding religious
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 42
Strength of religiosity and giving
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Amountexcluding religion
July 24, 2014
*
*
*
* p <.05
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 43
Religiosity and volunteering
Between Within Reduced within
Mediated reduced within
05
10152025303540
hours volunteeredexcluding religious
July 24, 2014
**
**
******
******
***
*** p <.001; ** p < .01
44July 24, 2014 11th ISTR Conference, Münster
45July 24, 2014 11th ISTR Conference, Münster
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 46
Conclusions• The association between the level of
education and giving and volunteering is due to genetic or shared environmental effects.
• The association between religiosity and charitable giving is due to unique environmental effects, but it is limited to church contributions.
• Religiosity nurtures volunteering, also beyond religious organizations.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 47
Mediation• Education hardly mediates unique
environmental influences on giving (-0.5%) or volunteering (1.8%).
• Religion mediates unique environmental influences on giving (15.6%) but not on volunteering (2.0%).
• Education effects are partly mediated (25%) by income and assets.
• Religiosity effects are mediated by prosocial self-identity (55%), but not by prosocial values.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 48
Or vice versa• Perhaps volunteering nurtures
religiosity.• Or perhaps an omitted (shared?)
environmental effect nurtures volunteering and religiosity.
• We cannot infer causality from the twin fixed effects model.
• But we can look at changes in religiosity and volunteering between the two waves.July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 49
…and?• Respondents who quit volunteering
between the first and the second wave are less frequently attending church and report lower strength of religiosity in the second wave than in the first wave.
• Respondents who started volunteering are more frequently attending church in the second wave.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 50
The measurement error problem
• Could differential measurement error explain the pattern of results?
• That is unlikely. The test-retest correlation of education is higher (.87) than that of the frequency of church attendance (.72). It is similar to strength of religiosity (.84).
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 51
The variance problem• Could a differential lack of variance
explain the pattern of results?• That is unlikely. MZ twins are more
likely to be discordant with respect to education (55%) than with respect to religion (50%).
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 52
Future directions• Include hourly wages as a proxy for
the opportunity cost of volunteering.• Replicate this finding using data
from other samples of twins, in the US and beyond.
• Examine other dependent variables using this method: trust, subjective well being, prosocial values...
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 53
Income effects of schooling
Between Siblings FE
DZ FE MZ FE-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Education (12 cat)College+
***
***
*** p <.001
***
***
***
***
July 24, 2014
René BekkersCenter for Philanthropic Studies
VU University [email protected]
Blog: http://renebekkers.wordpress.com
Twitter: @renebekkers
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 55
References• Bekkers, R. & Dursun, E. (2013). “A Brief History of Research on
Philanthropy.” http://www.understandingphilanthropy.com• Felson, J. (2014). “What can we learn from twin studies? A
comprehensive evaluation of the equal environments assumption.” Social Science Research, 43: 184-199.
• Gibson, J. (2001). “Unobservable Family Effects and the Apparent External Benefits of Education.” Economics of Education Review, 20: 225-233.
• Koenig, L.B., McGue, M., Krueger, R.F., Bouchard, T.J. (2007). “Religiousness, Antisocial Behavior, and Altruism: Genetic and Environmental Mediation.” Journal of Personality, 75: 265-290.
• Reuter, M., Felten, A., Penz, S., Mainzer, A., Markett, S. & Montag, C. (2013). “The influence of dopaminergic gene variants on decision making in the ultimatum game.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7: 1-8.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 56
More references• Ashenfelter, O., & Krueger, A. (1994). “Estimates of the economic return
to schooling from a new sample of twins.” American Economic Review, 84, 1157–1173.
• Ashenfelter, O., & Rouse, C. (1998). “Income, schooling and ability: Evidence from a new sample of identical twins.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 153–284.
• Behrman, J. & Taubman, P. (1976). “Intergenerational Transmission of Income and Wealth.” American Economic Review, 66: 436-440.
• Behrman, J. & Rosenzweig, M.R. (1999). “Ability biases in schooling returns and twins: a test and new estimates.” Economics of Education Review, 18: 159-167.
• Bonjour, D., Cherkas, L., Haskel, J., Hawkes, D., & Spector, T. (2003). “Returns to Education: Evidence from UK Twins.” American Economic Review, 93: 1799-1812.
• Isacsson, G. (1999). “Estimates of the Return to Schooling in Sweden from a Large Sample of Twins.” Labour Economics, 6: 471-489.
• Miller, P., Mulvey, C. & Martin, N. (1995). “What Do Twins Studies Reveal About the Economic Returns to Education? A Comparison of Australian and U.S. Findings." American Economic Review, 85: 586-599.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 57
MeasuresDonations. Donations to organizations were measured with the following question: “On average, about how many dollars per month do you or your family living with you contribute to each of the following people or organizations? If you contribute food, clothing, or other goods, include their dollar value. (If none, enter "0".)” After this introduction, donations to three categories of organizations were measured: (1) to religious groups; (2) to political organizations or causes; (3) to any other organizations, causes, or charities (including donations made through monthly payroll deductions)? Amounts donated per month were multiplied by 12 to obtain the total amount donated per year. The sum of these contributions is the variable for the total amount donated to organizations. A separate variable was created excluding donations to religion to see if the relationship between religion and philanthropy would also hold for ‘secular giving’. The test-retest correlation of the total amount donated measured in dollars is .25; for the logtransformed amounts the test-retest correlation is .44. For donations to organizations other than religion the test-retest correlation of the dollar amounts is .29; for the log-transformed amounts it is .39.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 58
Volunteering. The questions on volunteering in M1 and M2 asked about four types of formal volunteer work: ‘hospital, nursing home, or other health care-oriented work’, ‘school or other youth-related volunteer work’, ‘volunteer work for political organizations or causes’, and ‘volunteer work for any other organization, cause or charity’. While these questions did not explicitly identify religious organizations, respondents could report volunteering for religious organizations in the question about any ‘other’ organizations. A separate variable was created excluding potentially religious volunteering by computing the sum of hours volunteered in the first three types. The test-retest correlation of the total number of volunteer hours is .38; for the log-transformed hours the test-retest correlation is .46. For the hours volunteered in organizations other than religious organizations the test-retest correlation is .28; for the log-transformed variable it is .36.
July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 59July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 60July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 61July 24, 2014
11th ISTR Conference, Münster 62July 24, 2014
63July 24, 2014 11th ISTR Conference, Münster
64July 24, 2014 11th ISTR Conference, Münster