remcor - united states environmental protection agency · 2020-03-11 · report assessment of...

REMCORREMCOR.Inc. • 701 Alpha Drive • P.O. Box 38310 • Pittsburgh, PA 15238 • 412-963-1106

October 26, 1987

Project No. 87323.7

Mr. William D. SteutevilleCompliance OfficerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IIICERCLA Removal Enforcement Section (3HW14)841 Chestnut Building, 6th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19107

TransmittalProject Report

Suspected Waste Disposal Area AssessmentHunterstown Road Site

Dear Mr. Steuteville:

Enclosed are two copies of the above-captioned report for your informationand use. We recognize that the copies of the surveyor's map (Appendix C)did not reproduce well. We are currently getting new copies made. If youhave trouble reading your copies, please contact us and we will replacethem. Please feel free to contact us if you have any additional questionson this submittal.

Very truly yours,

Leo M. BrauschVice President

LMB:sdmEnclosures

cc: P. Pi Jack, Wesfcinghouse (w/two copies)

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEM',

REPORT

ASSESSMENT OF SUSPECTED WASTEDISPOSAL AREAS

HUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITEGETTYSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PRO'BLt *'""*' ,— -,-,.*-*...4R300057: PROBLEMS" W '

REPORT

ASSESSMENT OF SUSPECTED WASTEDISPOASL AREAS

HUNTERSTOWN ROAD SITEGETTYSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA

PREPARED FOR

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATIONPITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA

OCTOBER 1987

PROJECT NO. 87323.7

REMCOR, INC.PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTEREMCOR

1ffo-'j) !. - : oRfWAi

TABLE OF CONTENTS $•*<!)

PAGELIST OF TABLES/LIST OF FIGURES iv1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 ' SITE HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION 1-11.1.1 Site History 1-11.1.2 Site Description 1-2

1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 1-3

2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 2-12.1 DEFINITION OF AREAS AND EXCAVATION PIT LOCATIONS 2-12.2 TEST PIT EXCAVATION 2-2

2.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURES 2-32.4 HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES 2-42.5 SITE RESTORATION AND SURVEY 2-5

2.6 RECORD KEEPING 2-63.0 NORTH AREA 3-1

3.1 OBSERVATIONS MADE AT THE TEST PITS 3-1

3.1.1 Perimeter Test Pits . 3-13.1.1.1 Test Pit 1 3-1 ;

1

3.1.1.2 Test Pit 2 3-2 • j

-3.1.1.3 Test Pit 3 3-23.1.1.4 Test Pit 4 3-33.1.1.5 Test Pit 5 3-33.1.1.6 Test Pi-t 6 3-43.1.1.7 Test Pit 7 3-4

1;:: 3.1.1.8 Test Pit 8 3-5%3V1.2 Interior Test Pits 3-5-'•i--~- • •- 3.1.2.1 Test Pit 9 "" 3-5

3.1.2.2 Test Pit 10 3-63.2 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES 3-7i • . - '

3.2.1 Hazardous Categorization of Drum Samples 3-73.2.2 EP Toxicity Metals 3-8 j3.2.3 Indicator VOCs 3-8 ,

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTEJUUUOOOS9

TABLE OF CONTENTS(Continued)

- ' PAGE3.2.4 Asbestos 3-9

• 3.2.5 Priority Pollutants 3-93.2.5.1 Volatile Organic Compounds 3-93.2.5.2 Semi-Volatile Compounds 3-93.2.5.3 Total Metals 3-103.2.5.4 Pesticides and PCBs Analyses 3-103.2.5.5 Phenols and Cyanide ' 3-10

3-3 WASTE QUANTITY - _ 3-104.0 SOUTH AREA ' j '! 4-1

4.1 OBSERVATIONS MADE AT THE TEST PITS : 4-14.1.1 Perimeter Test Pits ' 4-1

4.1.1.1 Test Pit 11 ' 4-14.1.1.2 Test Pit 12 [ 4-24.1.1.3 Test Pit 13 . .. . 4~2

4.1.2 Interior Test Pits :' 4-34.1.2.1 Test Pit 14 " \ 4-34.1.2.2 Test Pit 15 ' ; 4-4

4.2 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES 4-44.2.1 Hazard Categorization of Drum Samples 4-44.2.2 EP Toxicity Metals 4-54.2.3 Indicator VOCs - ; 4-54.2.4 Asbestos T 4-64.2.5 Priority Pollutants : : 4-6

4.2.5.1 Volatile Organic Compounds 4-6- - - '• - ' • - :' - r

4.2.5.2 Semi-Volatile Compounds " 4-64.2.5.3 Total Metals4.2.5.4 Pesticides and PCBs Analyses 4-74.2.5.5 Phenols and Cyanide

4.3 WASTE QUANTITY

4-7

4-84-8

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBL&&3odo§o //- AV.-I/

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS(Continued)

PAGE5.0 SUMMARY . 5-1

5.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 5-15.2 CONTAMINATION CONDITIONS 5-2

TABLESFIGURESAPPENDIX A - CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS RECORDSAPPENDIX B - PERIMETER ASBESTOS AIR MONITORING DATA

APPENDIX C - SITE SURVEY MAPAPPENDIX D - SITE WORK'FORMSAPPENDIX E - TEST PIT LOGS, NORTH AREAAPPENDIX F - TEST PIT LOGS, SOUTH AREAAPPENDIX G - LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASREMCOR

iv

LIST OF TABLES ; .;

TABLE NO. ' TITLE1 Summary of Test Pit Data, North Area2 ' Summary of Test Pit Data, South Area3 Hazard Characterization Analysis Data4 EP Toxicity Leachate Analysis Data5 Selected Volatile Organic Compound Data6 Volatile Organic Compound Analysis

Summary7 Total Metal Analysis Summary8 Semi-Volatile Compound Analysis Summary

£9 Phenols and Cyanide" Analysis Summary10 Summary of Assessment Data

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. TITLE1 Hunterstown Road Site Plan

! •: !f2- North Area Plan3 ' South Area Plan4 Subsurface Cross Section, North Area5 Subsurface Cross Section, South Area

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PflOfl 300062

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Under contract to Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse),Remcor, Inc. (Remcor) has conducted an assessment of two suspected wastedisposal 'areas at the Hunterstown Road site near Gettysburg, Pennsylva-nia (Figure 1). This project involved the determination of the extentof these areas, procurement of samples, characterization of the contentsof encountered drums, and preparation of detailed site maps and test pitdiagrams.

This report provides an account of the field investigation conductedfrom August 19 through 26, 1987 and includes a summary of laboratoryanalytical data for samples taken at the site. Activities were con-ducted in accordance with the procedures specified in Remcor's revisedwork plan of June 30, 1987 and subsequent revisions made by Westinghouseand U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials. Two variancesfrom the approved work plan follow:

• At the designated "North Area," eight, ratherthan six, perimeter test pits were excavated

• At the designated "South Area," three, rather• than six, perimeter test pits were excavated.

These revisions were made with the approval of the Westinghouse siterepresentative and the Remcor project manager.

1.1 SITE HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION

1.1.1 Site HistoryReportedly, Mr. Frederick M. Shealer transported and disposed of variouswaste material generated by several facilities in the Gettysburg region.Two abandoned clay pits located at the Hunterstown Road site near Get-tysburg, Pennsylvania were used for disposal (Figure 1). For purposesof this study, these suspected disposal areas have been designated the"North Area" and the "South Area", as shown in Figure 1. Various bulk

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE

1-2

and drummed waste materials were reportedly buried within the two pits,including paint sludges, spent solvents, and scrap wallboard. Accordingto Mr. Shealer, drums were at times intentionally pierced before beingpushed into the pit.

1.1.2 Site DescriptionThe North Area is rectangular in plan lying within an area of approxi-mately 90 by 440 feet (Figure 1). It is located on the west side ofHunterstown Road, behind the Shealer Septic Tank Service business. Theeasternmost portion of the North Area is situated within a grass-coveredfield that slopes to the west. The remaining portion of the North Areaextends to a boundary to the north and west defined by a drainage swale.This drainage swale lies within a heavily vegetated section of the prop-erty and appears to be a local receptor of surface water runoff. Aneastward extension of the vegetated area lies at the northern perimeter

j' .I

of the burial area. A small pond defines the southern perimeter of theburial area. According to Mr. Frederick M. Shealer, this pond was pres-

!• ' .; ient while disposal activities were being conducted in the area; it is

: I ,junlikely that material was disposed beneath the surface boundaries ofthe pond.

The South Area, approximately 50 by 180 feet in plan, lies to the eastof several houses situated along Hunterstown Road (Figure 1).' Access tothe South Area is gained via a gravel road extending from HunterstownRoad. The South Area is situated to the north of the access road in avegetated field that slopes to the east. The pit is bordered by adrainage swale within an associated wooded area to the east, a westwardextension of the wooded area to the north, several mounds of dirt andtrash to the west, and the access road to the south.

The surfaces of both suspected disposal areas are characterized by hum-mocky topography that is unlike the surrounding areas, which are wellgraded and flat. This disturbed surface character'becomes more pro-nounced adjacent to the drainage swale associated with each area, where

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBtP"** *''"'** U Q 4REMCOR

portions of buried drums are exposed at the surface. Portions of drumsare also visible within the flanks of the swales. Unburied drums, someobserved to be intact and unopened, are staged within the drainage swaleadjacent to the North Area. These drums are rusted with no discerniblemarkings.

1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVESThe objectives of this assessment were to develop needed data relativeto the following:

• Actual plan areas and depths of waste disposal

• Estimates of the quantity of waste disposed ineach area

• Evaluation of drumicontents and condition

• Estimates of the degree and extent of associatedsoil contamination

• The occurrence of perched water within the dis-posal area.

The developed information should allow an evaluation of existing condi-tions associated with the sites.

Ai\

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE Pi

^" • f**: " ' ~***~fir ———— , -'__ -

: 2-1

2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES

This chapter describes the methodology used in the field assessment ofthe two suspected waste disposal areas at the Hunterstown Road site.

2.1 DEFINITION OF AREAS AND EXCAVATION PIT LOCATIONSTo develop additional information concerning the areas, a brief inter-view and site inspection with Mr. Shealer was conducted by the RemcorSite Supervisor. The focus of the interview was to determine the physi-cal boundaries of both areas, possible contents of drums, and methods ofdisposal used. Specific inquiries were made relative to the configura-tions of the burial pits. ' '

Subsequent to the interview, the limits of the areas where visual fillactivity was apparent were staked for identification during the surfacesurvey of the burial areas. The surfaces of the South Area and a por-tion of the North Area were grubbed and cleared of debris.

To further define the locations of drum burial, a high-sensitivity metaldetector was used to survey the two suspected waste disposal areas. Aseries of traverses across the sites were made during the survey, andthe boundaries of positive metal detections were staked. Results of thesurvey confirmed the perimeters of the suspected disposal areas. Theseareas conformed to areas of hummocky topography, which provided visualsurface evidence of fill activity,. No other nearby locations outsidethe defined^perimeters of the two disposal areas we're found to havepositive metal detector readings. \

A portion of the North Area located in the northeast corner of the areaand characterized by hummocky topography had no positive metal detectorreadings. This zone was, however, included as part' of the investigationarea based on its surface appearance.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS^ (mUitmmAdim/ •

. r ;!\:i - - ' • . - •- . i

2-2

At the South Area, results of the metal detector survey were inconclu-sive at several locations due to the amount of metallic materials at theground surface. Boundaries of the investigation area at these locationswere extrapolated from adjacent defined boundaries.

Subsequent to the metal detector survey, all locations for perimeter andinterior test pits were selected and staked. Prior to initiating exca-vation activities, limits of site work zones (including an exclusionzone, buffer zone, and support zone) were established and demarked withhigh-visibility barricade tape.

2.2 TEST PIT EXCAVATIONTest pits at the site were excavated using a Case 580 rubber-tired back-hoe. Eight perimeter test pits were excavated at the North Area andthree at the South Area, as shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.These test pits were extended from at least five feet beyond and perpen-dicular to the suspected perimeter of waste burial. Each of the perim-eter test pits were two to three feet wide, at least three feet deep,and extended until waste material (i.e., wallboard or drums) was

•

encountered. ;

Two interior test pits were also excavated in each suspected disposalarea. These pits, located as shown in Figures 2 and 3, were approxi-mately 10 by 10 feet in plan and extended at least two feet below thetop surface of the drum burial zone and/or waste horizon at each loca-tion. The .interior test pits at the North Area were not advanced beyonda depth.two feet below the encountered waste due to the accumulation of -,inflowing oily liquid in the pits. At the South Area, both interior ,tes't pits were advanced to bedrock.

While excavating each of the test pits, encountered wastes were segre-gated from clean overburden soil and staged on six-mil polyethylene ,:sheeting. Subsequent to completion, each of the perimeter test pits was ]backfilled with the staged waste material prior to the placement of >

" • • " - : ' j; I

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS*1* *» U U 0 •-/

2-3 i'"-f<yi

clean soil. Each interior test pit was lined with six-mil polyethyleneand then subsequently backfilled, first with exhumed" waste material anddrum remains and then the overburden soil..

As each pit was excavated, the Remcor on-site geologist recorded thefollowing: ;. i

• Physical dimensions of the test pits

• Overburden thickness

• Visually identifiable contents of the pitsi

• Organic vapor analyzer (OVA) readings at each pitwith visible contamination other than wallboardor trash :i

• Location (plan and elevation) in pit where wastematerials were encountered

• Elevation and flow characteristics of any perchedground water

• Discernible drum markings

• Character of contained material in drums, includ-ing color, consistency, and phase (i.e., solid,liquid, sludge)

! i T

• Visual presence of wallboard. '

2.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURESAt the North Area, four samples of waste material were collected fromdrums uncovered in the two interior test pits. Six samples were col-

~ '"' ' '• • - • ' .irlected 'at the South Area representing the contents of drums uncovered inthe two interior test pits. Samples removed from drums were containedin appropriate glass bottles in preparation for shipment to the labora-tory for the following hazard categorization tests:

.'.' :

• OVA screen (headspace) ; v• Bielstein halogen test• Open-cup ignitibility and flashpoint *• pH" :• Water solubility - - , A _• Hexane solubility. :

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS.FOR HAZARDOUS

2-4 y-

In addition to the samples collected from drums, three soil samples werecollected in each interior test pit as follows:

• Soil mixed with waste• Soil from 0 to 1 foot below the waste• Soil from 1 to 2 feet below the waste.

Soil samples representing each of the above categories were contained inappropriate vials or bottles for the following laboratory analyses:

Extraction procedure (EP) toxicity metals (copperwas also included)

• -Hazardous substance list (HSL) priority pollutants

• Indicator volatile organic compounds (VOCs):- 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA)- Trichloroethylene (TCE)

• Asbestos.

Each sample container was numbered and logged prior to shipment to thelaboratory. Copies of completed chain-of-custody and request for analy-sis forms are included as Appendix A. Specific sample numbers, loca-tions, and descriptions along with container types and requested testingprograms are shown on these forms.

Following the collection of samples from each drum or soil interval,•contact surfaces of sampling tool's were decontaminated to minimize thepossibility of sample cross-contamination. Gloves Worn by the samplingpersonnel were discarded after each sampling event.

2.4 HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES'Health and safety procedures specified in Remcor's revised work plan ofJune 30, 1987 were followed during all phases of the investigation.Procedures employed, supplemental to those outlined in the plan,^arediscussed in the following paragraphs.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTl

2-5

Level C protection was worn by personnel within the designated exclusionzone while perimeter test pits were being excavated at the North Area.Level B was worn while the interior test pits were being excavated inthe same area. No specific personnel protection was used while TestPits TP-7 and TP-8 were being excavated in the northern portion of thedesignated area. Level D was used at these pits due to negligible OVAreadings obtained at the previously excavated interior test pits at thesame burial area. Once visual contamination (wallboard) was identifiedat these pits, removed material was immediately placed back into the pitand covered with previously removed soil that was visually clean. Thesepits were only excavated for the definition of the perimeter of buriedwaste in the northern portion Of the North Area. At the South Area,•Level B protection was used by personnel within the designated exclusionzone throughout all excavation activities.

During the field assessment, air quality was monitored with a portableOVA at each test pit where visual contamination other than possible as-bestos material was encountered. Prior to use, the OVA instrument wascalibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Other ambient air quality monitoring included the installation of twoperimeter stations (one located upwind and one downwind at each sus-pected waste disposal area where excavations were occurring) to monitorfor airborne asbestos on a daily basis during the excavation operations.•Sampling and analysis were performed in accordance with the U.S. Depart-ment of Health and Human Services, National Institute of OccupationalSafety and Health (NIOSH) recommendations. Results of ambient air qual-ity monitoring for asbestos, included as Appendix B, indicated noreleases. '. ":

2.5 SITE RESTORATION AND SURVEY '

Subsequent to activities at each suspected waste disposal area, eachtest pit location was staked, and the surrounding surface was graded tothe general contours found prior to excavation. The surfaces of both

-

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PRO:4&300070 REMCOR

2-6

disposal areas were then stabilized with straw mulch and seeded withgrass. A registered professional surveyor was then summoned to conducta field survey at each area, locating all test pits and various naturalfeatures. A survey plat showing pertinent information and land owner-ship boundaries is included as Appendix C.

Restoration activities at the North Area included repackaging two drumsthat had been exhumed during the excavation of TP-9. Several other emp-ty unburied drums were collected and staged inside the lagoon area fenceat the Hunterstown Road site.

2.6 RECORD KEEPINGAppendix D includes forms which were completed at the site for the fol-.lowing items:

• Foreman's Daily Reports• Training Session Documentation Records• Health and Safety Equipment Logs• Visitors Logs.

These forms constitute the field record of all on-site activities.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMSM30007I

yZ tu*-*'"4-:- . . ^ ^ rl -__ . t=- ,£ . = ——

; 3-13.0 NORTH AREA

This chapter provides a detailed account of the results of the NorthArea assessment. • •-

3.1 OBSERVATIONS MADE AT THE TEST PITSSubsequent to the field investigation of the North Area, logs for eachtest pit were developed from notes data taken in the field. Copies ofthese logs are included as Appendix E. Locations of all test pits exca-vated at the north burial area are shown in Figure 2. Descriptions ofeaph test pit and observations made during excavation are highlighted inTable 1 and discussed in the following sections.

3.1.1 Perimeter Test Pits • : _ _ ;; ': -Perimeter test pits excavated at the North Area were slot-type (i.e.,exaggerated rectangle) in nature. As part of the descriptions includedin the following section; the ends of these pits in 'plan are referred toas "exterior" (away from the center of the suspected disposal area) and"interior" (toward the center of the suspected disposal area). As shownin Figure 2, each perimeter test pit is labeled as having an "E" extentand an ."I" -extent. The "E" is positioned at the exterior portion of thepit, and the "I" is positioned at the interior portion of the pit.

3.1.1.1 Test Pit 1Test Pit 1 was excavated to a total depth of three feet at its exteriorportion and one foot at its interior extent. In plan, Test Pit 1 wasapproximately 3 feet wide and 15 feet long. Approximately 13 feet ofthe interior portion of this test pit was excavated within the perimeterof the disposal area.

Dry white to gray broken sheets of wallboard (each sheet approximately0.5 inch thick) were encountered at a depth of less than one foot overthe interior 13 to 14 feet of the pit, underlying a heterogeneous mix-ture of silty light gray top soil and red-brown clay. The wallboard was

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE I S1P072 REMCOR

3-2

tightly packed in some portions of the pit and thinly spread and mixedwith soils over the remaining area.

The exterior five feet of Test Pit 1 was excavated to a total depth ofthree feet. In this portion of the pit, shards of two empty, rusteddrums were found along with wallboard. Indigenous, stratified soil thatappeared undisturbed was encountered adjacent to waste and fill materialat the exterior limit of the pit. Native soil consisted of light graysilty top soil that gradually became darker gray at depth.

i

No ground water was encountered in Test Pit 1, and all contents of thepit appeared to be dry. An OVA reading was not taken at Test Pit 1.

3.1.1.2 Test Pit 2Test Pit 2 was excavated to a total depth of 3.5 feet within a plan areaof 3 by 32 feet. Undisturbed indigenous soil, consisting of layeredgray silt was encountered in the exterior 28 feet of the pit. Brokenwallboard sheets and a drum shard were encountered at the interior limitof the pit at a depth of 1.5 feet below the surface, underlying a unitof red-brown clay and silty topsoil.

No free ground water was encountered at Test Pit 2, and all contents ofthe pit appeared to be dry. An OVA reading was not recorded at thistest pit.

3.1.1.3 Test'Pit 3Test Pit 3 was excavated to a total depth of four feet. In plan, thedimensions of the pit were 3 by 12 feet.

The exterior half of the pit consisted of native soil, including layeredlight gray silty topsoil that became darker and more clayey at depth.The interior portion of the pit consisted of fill material, includingvarious items such as wood planks, bottles, and aluminum cans mixed withsilty clay soil, beneath a heterogeneous interval of red-brown clay and

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WAST - - - - - - -JU3M0073 'REMCOR

3-3gray silty topsoil approximately one foot thick. Mixed within the soilwas a blue-gray solid waste material. At the interior perimeter of thepit, one rusted drum was encountered at a depth of approximately twofeet. The drum was empty and had no discernible markings.

No ground water was encountered at Test Pit 3, and all contents of thepit were dry. OVA readings at the pit and on some of the exhumed wastematerial yielded no response above background levels.

3.1.1.4 Test Pit 4Test Pit 4 was excavated to a total depth of four feet. The dimensionsof the pit were 3 by 15 feet in plan. :

•: •-'•

Over the entire length of the pit a layer of fill, consisting of clayand light gray silt containing broken stone and concrete slabs, wasfound to a depth just below one foot. The easternmost exterior half ofthe pit contained undisturbed, indigenous soils consisting of gray siltand clay. Beneath the surface layer of fill in the. interior portion ofTest Pit 4, fill material consisting of silty clay mixed with wasteitems, such as wood planks, tree fragments, bottles, and aluminum cans,were found.1 Excavation of Test Pit 4 was concluded when a rusted, semi-crushed drum was encountered at the western edge of the pit at a depthof approximately two feet.

Perched water from within void space created by the drum was releasedinto the pit. A sheen of oil was observed on the surface of the water.OVA readings taken at Test Pit 4 were not above background levels.

f • - ; • ; - • • » : . - -3.1.1.5 Test Pit 5 : • - " - "a ':Test Pit 5 was excavated to a total depth of four feet at its exteriorlimit and three feet at its interior extent. Dimensions of the test pitwere 3 by 20 feet in plan. '- .' i

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROfiifc30007ii

3-4

A layer of fill containing light gray silty soil and broken concreteblocks and stone was found over the entire pit area to a total depth ofone to two feet. Undisturbed indigenous soil was encountered beneathone foot of surficial fill material in the exterior five feet of thepit. The native soil was silty and light gray in color just below thefill, turning clayey and dark gray at depth. Within the remainder ofthe pit, underlying the surficial fill, existed a mixture of red-brownclay and light gray silt containing broken stone and concrete. Belowthis layer of fill in the central portion of the pit was a wet, gray-black sludge.

•

OVA readings at the pit and on the sludge-like material were not abovebackground levels. No free water was encountered in Test Pit 5.

3.1.1.6 Test Pit 6Test Pit 6 was excavated to a total depth of three feet. The dimensionsof the pit were 3 by 10 feet in plan.

Material encountered within the pit was fill comprised of light graysilty topsoil containing debris (e.g., automobile tires, broken stoneand concrete blocks, aluminum cans, and bottles). The exterior limit ofthe fill was not delineated due to the presence of thick vegetation atthe exterior extent of the pit and the proximity of a pond.

No free ground water was encountered in Test Pit 6. OVA readings takenat the pit^were not above background levels.

3.1.1.7 Test Pit 7Test Pit 7 was excavated to delineate the northeast perimeter of theNorth Area. In plan, the dimensions of the pit were 3 by 15 feet. Thepit extended to a total depth of three feet at its interior boundary and\five feet at its exterior limit.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBL£13000754 22

3-5

Native soil encountered in the exterior five feet of Test Pit 7 wassilty and light gray at the surface, becoming clayey and dark gray atdepth. The interior 10 feet of the pit was excavated to a total depthof one foot. Material exhumed from the interior portion of the pit in-cluded light gray topsoil containing fragments of wallboard.

No ground water was encountered in Test Pit 7. OVA readings taken atthe pit were not above background levels. ;

3.1.1.8 Test Pit 8 ' '[Test Pit 8 was excavated in the northeast portion of the North Area todelineate the perimeter of buried waste. In plan, the pit was 3 by 15

. '.i •;feet. The exterior half of the pit was excavated to a total depth offour feet; the interior half was excavated to a total depth of one foot.

Material encountered in the exterior half of the pit included indigenousundisturbed soil, which was silty and light gray at'the surface andclayey and dark gray at depth. Material excavated in the interior half

*of the pit consisted of light gray silty topsoil containing fragments of iwallboard. ' - '* 1

No free water was encountered ! in Test Pit 8. OVA readings taken at thepit were within background levels. E ' " "

3.1.2 Interior Test Pits ! • "_'.

3.1.2.1 ;Test Pit 9 " ;'; tInterior Test Pit 9 was excavated to a total depth of five feet. Dimen- '~',sions of the pit were 10 by 10 feet in plan. The uppermost 1.5 feet of ]the pit contained fill material consisting of dry mixed brown-red clay .""and light gray silt and broken stone and concrete fragments. -

;' •; -:i . - -iFrom a depth of 1.5 to 3.0 feet, encountered materials included twoseptic tanks and a breached drum with no discernible markings; broken

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBL 1300076

3-6

sheets of wallboard were abundant. Water and sludge contained withinthe interval associated with the open drum and septic tanks, were re-leased into the pit. Soil underlying the drum and septic tanks, con-sisting of red-brown clay mixed with wallboard, was saturated withsludge and oil. Excavation of Test Pit 9 was stopped at five feet dueto the excess amount of free-liquid product in the pit. OVA readingstaken at Test Pit 9 were within background levels.

3.1.2.2 Test Pit 10i

Interior Test Pit 10 was excavated to a total depth of 5 feet within aplan area of 10 by 10 feet. Densely packed waste material was encoun-tered at a depth of 1.5 feet, below a heterogeneous mixture of'fill con-sisting of light gray silty clay and red-brown clay. Included in thewaste material were five drums, three of which were shards; the othertwo drums were perforated but basically intact. Only one portion of onedrum (a lid) had discernible markings. Those markings read "ChryslerChemical Division, Trenton, Michigan." Other information painted on thelid are recorded on the log prepared for Test Pit 10 (Appendix E).Other drums and portions thereof encountered in Test Pit 10 were rustedwith no discernible markings.

Wallboard was found in sheets in some areas of the pit and mixed withsoil throughout other areas. Other identified objects within the pitincluded various automobile parts.

Soil within..and below the drums and other waste items was mixed withsludge.' Oil and water were released from the drums and voids within the

•.•_.-,0=««,dC ,"•_-_ . . . . . . ' J

associated"fill material. Flow of oil and water from the walls of thepits filled the pit with approximately two feet of free product, pre-cluding further excavation. OVA readings taken at Test Pit 10 peaked at8.0 parts per million by volume (ppmv) in ambient air above the surface

: s.of the liquid product in the pit. Other OVA readings taken in thebreathing zone adjacent to the pit were within background levels.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE I

i- , - M - 3-7

3.2 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES "Samples discussed in the following section are labeled according to thefollowing: . : :;

• The first set of letters designates the type ofsample as follows:DW = drummed waste : ~'SS = grab soil sample ; !PP = composite soil for priority pollutant

analysis ., .; .;

• The center digit(s) designate the test pit fromwhich the given sample was taken -

• The final digit is a sequential number for asample of that type. This digit'may be followedby a letter which corresponds to the depth fromwhich the sample was taken. Depths are asfollows: : !A - Soil sample taken from within disposal

horizon :

B - Soil sample taken from one-foot below thedisposal horizon

: * , ~

C - Soil sample taken from two feet below the :disposal horizon. ; •

; \3

This sample nomenclature was developed for this report to clarify sample *locations and types. It represents a revision of the sample numberingscheme used in the field. The correlation of the sample nomenclaturesused is given in Appendix A. Appendix G provides laboratory analysisreports. i

;-••-" -_- . 1

..^ . .,. . \ :, . ' —I3.2.1 Hazardous Categorization of Drum Samples *Results of hazard categorization analyses performed on four sludge sam- ;pies removed from buried drums at the North Area are shown in Table 3. ' ',OVA readings on two samples, DW-9-1 and DW-10-4, were recorded at 70 and200 ppmv, respectively, while others were generally near background lev-els (3 to 4 ppmv). Negative results were obtained on all four sampleswhen analyzed for Bielstein's halogen test. None of the samples were

REMCOR"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS" ' ' ~ (mm mm fm / <

j

3-8

ignitible and all of their open-cup flashpoints were recorded to beabove 140 degrees Fahrenheit. The pH of Sample DW-10-4 was recorded at5.5; pH values for all other samples were 5.0. Two samples, DW-10-3 andDW-10-4, were considered moderately soluble in water and nonsoluble inhexane. 'Sample DW-9-1 was completely soluble in water and nonsoluble inhexane. Sample DW-9-2 was only slightly soluble in hexane and nonsolu-ble in water.

These categorization data suggest that the drummed materials are par-tially decomposed organic and inorganic sludges containing a high per-centage of solid and water. All of these materials are compatible for.bulking purposes.

3.2.2 EP Toxicity MetalsResults of EP toxicity metals analyses performed on six soil samplesremoved from various depths within two interior test pits at the NorthArea are shown in Table 4. None of these soils exhibited the charac-teristic of an EP toxic hazardous waste, and none of the leachates con-tained metal concentrations above three percent of the EP toxicitythreshold levels.

Detectable concentrations of lead and silver were found in all of thesamples. Leachable amounts of barium were detected in five of the sam-.ples, and leachate chromium was detected in the three samples removedfrom Test Pit 10. Detectable concentrations of leachable mercury werediagnosed" in; two samples, one taken at each test pit.

^'. f=SS?.':, - 7 - . --

• - -i.cs -v'.r-s—--*! 5?' ~ - • , .

3.2.3 Indicator VOCsResults of the analyses for TCA and TCE in six soil samples taken fromvarious depths within two interior test pits at the North Area are shownin Table 5. All of the samples were found to contain quantities of TCA,

- • \with concentrations ranging from approximately 74 to 39,000 microgramsper kilogram (ug/kg) or parts per billion (ppb). Three of the six sam-ples contained less than 1,000 yg/kg. Four soil samples contained de-tectable quantities of TCE, with concentrations ranging to 6,800 yg/kg. •

sR^nnnTQ /MIZM W"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBO>Mi"%J ««"/<?

^ v v r- T5 i"-7 ^ fiF . ff - T7 ."- • r •--• — -! -.«-_ i Tj ••. -T, • i J, * S.-= rttw,r -,-ir-~-. _

3-9

The pattern of contamination generally shows higher VOC concentrationsin Test Pit 9 with elevated TCA concentration in both soils mixed withand below the waste. All TCA and TCE concentrations in soils taken fromTest Pit 10 were at or below 1,000 yg/kg or 1.0 milligram per kilogram(mg/kg).

3.2.4 AsbestosAnalyses for asbestos were performed on composite soil samples removedfrom each of the two interior test pits at the North Area. The resultsof these analyses revealed that none of the samples contained asbestos.The analyses confirmed that the samples contained fragments of fiber-glass and cellulose. "

3.2.5 Priority Pollutants•! f

3.2.5.1 Volatile Organic Compounds ;'Results of the laboratory analyses for priority VOCs performed on com-posite soil samples taken from each of two interior test pits at theNorth Area are shown in Table 6. Overall, six compounds (e.g., acetone,1,1-dichloroethane [DCA], ethylbenzene, toluene, TCA, and total xylenes)were found above their detectable limits.

The soil sample from Test Pit 9 was found to contain concentrations of•these compounds (excluding 1,1-DCA) above 1,000 yg/kg; total xyleneswere detected in the highest level, exhibiting 96,000 yg/kg. The soilsample fronr-Test Pit 10 showed generally lower levels of VOCs. Acetonewas not detected, but 1,300 yg/kg 1,1-DCA was found. Total xylenes ex-hibited the highest concentration of all priority VOCs in Test Pit 10with a level of 21,000 yg/kg. The priority VOC data generally corrobo-rate the results of the indicator VOC testing.

i ; • • . - • < - ; j - • .: : - - - - - " . , ! N -

3.2.5.2 Semi-Volatile CompoundsAnalyses for semi-volatile compounds were performed on composite soilsamples taken from each of the two interior test pits at the North Area.

! • • : - - - • i - . .

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROM300080 i

3-10

The results of these analyses revealed that none of the semi-volatilecompounds analyzed were diagnosed above their detectable limits ineither sample.

3.2.5.3 Total MetalsResults of the total metals analyses conducted on composite soil samplestaken from each of two interior test pits at the North Area are shown inTable 7. Detectable quantities of all but three parameter metals ana-lyzed were diagnosed in the samples. Thallium, selenium, and mercurywere not found above detectable limits in either sample.

Detected metals concentrations were generally within the range of "nor-•mal" soils unaffected by significant anthropogenic sources. These re-sults corroborate the EP toxicity testing data.

3.2.5.4 Pesticide and PCB AnalysesAnalyses for pesticides and PCBs were performed on composite soil sam-ples taken from each of two interior test pits at the North Area. Theresults of these analyses revealed that none of the parameters analyzed*were diagnosed above their detectable limits in either sample.

3.2.5.5 Phenols and CyanideAnalyses for phenols and cyanide were performed on composite samplesremoved from each of the two interior test pits at the North Area. Theresults of these analyses revealed that neither of these components arepresent above their limit of detection in either sample.

- *-v. jjjsjft— . • i •

3.3 WASTE''QUANTITYThe limits of the defined North Area occupy a plan area of approximately37,500 square feet (ft ) or 0.9 acre. Clean overburden soil, at anaverage thickness of about one foot, overlies the encountered waste ma-

\

terials. The thickness of the waste disposal horizon has not been fullydetermined, but estimated to be approximately six feet at its deepestpoint. The total volume of fill material, including waste and visually

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE I 'REMCOR

3-11

affected indigenous soils, is estimated to be on the order of 5,000 to6,000 cubic yards (yd3). Figure 4 provides subsurface cross sectionsfor the North Area.

Six nonempty drums were encountered in the criterion test pits, whichrepresented a plan area of 200 "ft . Extrapolating this frequency ofoccurrence to the entire North Area suggests that approximately 1,100drums could be expected. Several hundred cubic yards of wallboard andother debris could also be expected, based on the observations made intest pitting. .: :

V

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS MP082

4-1

4.0 SOUTH AREA

This chapter provides a detailed account of the results of the SouthArea assessment".

4.1 OBSERVATIONS MADE AT THE TEST PITSSubsequent to the field investigation of the South Area, logs for eachtest pit were developed from notes taken in the field. Copies of theselogs are included as Appendix F. Locations of all test pits excavatedat the south burial area are shown in Figure 3. Descriptions of eachtest pit and observations made during excavation are highlighted inTable 2 and discussed in the following sections.

4.1.1 Perimeter Test PitsPerimeter test pits excavated at the South Area were slot-type- (i.e.,exaggerated rectangles) in nature. The descriptions included in thefollowing sections follow the same nomenclature used for the North Areatest pits.

4.1.1.1 Test Pit 11Test Fit 11, was excavated to a total depth of at least four feet. Aportion of the pit, located in the central area in plan, was excavatedto a total of 4.4 feet where competent bedrock, consisting of dry shaleand claystone,- was encountered. The dimensions of the pit were measured,to be 3 by 100 feet in plan.

A surface;layer of fill, 2.5 feet thick, was excavated from the entirelength of the pit. In the exterior 65 feet of the pit, surface fillconsisted of a heterogeneous soil mixture including light gray siltytopsoil and brown clay. In the interior 35 feet of the pit, the surfi-cial layer consisted of light gray topsoil containing various items suchas automobile tires, bottles, cans, and portions of trees. At thenortheast perimeter of the pit, the surface fill contained broken sheetsof white-to-gray wallboard. One rusted drum lid with no markings wasalso identified.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PRO

"„.-,:1^ .. . . ,

""'- '~"'~-~ •" • •' " " - . yj;(fted)

4-2

Below the surface fill, at a depth from 2.5 to 5.0 feet across the en-tire length of the pit,'existed indigenous, undisturbed dark gray clayeysilt. Clay content within this layer, which existed on top of bedrock,increased at depth.

No free water was encountered at Test Pit 11, and all OVA readings takenwere within background levels. ' *:

4.1.1.2 Test Pit 12 i. ;The dimensions of Test Pit 12 were three by seven feet in plan. The ex-terior half of the pit was excavated to a total depth of three feet.The interior half of the pit was excavated to a total depth of two feet.

Fill consisting of light gray silty topsoil was excavated from the pitto a depth of two feet. This fill material contained broken sheets ofwallboard in the interior half of the pit. No wallboard was observed inthe fill material within the exterior half of the pit. Indigenous medi-um gray silty soil, observed to be stratified and undisturbed, was pres-ent below the fill in the exterior portion of the pit at a depth of twoto three feet.

No free water was encountered, and an OVA reading was not taken a TestPit 12. :

4.1.1.3 Test Pit 13 !Test Pit 13was excavated to a total depth of three feet within an areabeing 3 by 24 feet in plan. ' :;..

Removed from the pit was fill!material consisting of light gray siitytopsoil mixed with varying colors of clay and including items such asbroken stone, concrete slabs, wood planks, portions of trees, and glass

: . V

bottles. One drum was encountered at the interior extent of the pit be-low one foot of cover. The drum contained a white gummy elastic sub-stance, was partially rusted, and had no visible markings.


4-3

OVA readings taken at the pit and above the contents of the drum werenot above background levels. No ground water was encountered in TestPit 13.

V,

4.1.2 Interior Test Pits

4.1.2.1 Test Pit 14Interior Test Pit 14 was excavated to the top of competent bedrock, con-sisting of dry claystone, at a depth of nine feet. In plan, the dimen-sions of Test Pit 14 were 10 by 10 feet.

• '

Indigenous, undisturbed dark gray clay was encountered from a depth offive to nine feet. The uppermost interval of the native material wasstained with oil. Above the native soil, at a depth from three to fivefeet, existed a layer composed almost entirely of wallboard that wassaturated with oil and sludge. Present from one to three feet was aninterval of brown silty clay fill containing tightly packed drums, someof which were crushed, all of which were perforated. A total of ninerusted drums were encountered, some of which were partially intact andcontaining sludge. No discernible markings were observed on the drums.One hot water tank was also identified in the debris. Above the drumsand associated fill interval, was a surface layer being one foot thickand consisting of light gray silty topsoil containing items such asaluminum cans and glass bottles.

Material within several of the drums consisted of soft black fibers and-,-£!&£&.

metal fijlngsj other material included gray-black sludge. Some of theblack fibrous material was observed to give off smoke, and was warm tothe touch. An OVA reading taken over the smoking material was recordedat 40 ppmv. OVA readings taken above the black sludge were 10 ppmv.Free water was released from voids existing within the interval contain-

V

ing drums. No other ground water zones were observed above bedrock atTest Pit 14. -

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS9 'REMCOR

--*::,fc3f-:"r - ~" - ^

4-4

4.1.2.2 Test Pit 15 : -'Test Pit 15 was excavated to the top of competent bedrock, consisting ofdry claystone, at a depth of nine feet. The dimensions of the pit were10 by 10 feet in plan. ••

The lowermost three feet of the pit contained indigenous, undisturbedclay. The uppermost one foot of this interval was visually affectedwith gray-black oil and sludge. ;

Fill material encountered from ground surface to a depth of approxi-mately six feet contained 14 drums that were faintly rusted and partial-ly crushed, had no markings apparent, and held material such as driedsolid paint sludge, oily liquid, and gray-black sludge. Soil packedwithin the drums was brown silty clay that was visually stained with oilfrom a depth of approximately four to six feet. Wallboard fragmentswere also found mixed within the soil beneath and between the drums.

Perched ground water was found within the interval containing drums andvarious other debris. Water was observed to seep from the debris withinthe walls of the pit for a short period of time (approximately 10 min-utes). OVA-readings taken at Test Pit 15 peaked at 2.0 ppmv.

4.2 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSESSamples discussed in the following section are labeled according to thesame system as used for the North .Area. Appendix A includes the key forcorrelating.-this nomenclature to field sample numbers. Appendix Gprovides the*laboratory analysis reports.

4.2.1 Hazard Categorization of Drum SamplesResults of hazard categorization analyses performed on five solid(sludge) samples and one liquid sample (DW-15-10) removed from burieddrums at the South Area are shown in Table 3.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE Pi 'REMCOR

The solid materials were found to exhibit low VOC levels, with headspaceOVA readings of 3 to 12 ppmv. Two sampled materials (DW-14-5 and

I

DW-14-6) tested positive for halogens with a screening sensitivity ofabout five percent. None of the solid materials are ignitible; SampleDW-15-8 burned moderately but did not sustain combustion. The solidswere generally of no to moderate solubility (in either water or hexane).From these data, the drummed solids appear to consist of partially de-composed organic and inorganic sludges containing a high percentage ofsolids and water. Some of these materials contain halogenatedcompounds .

The liquid material (DW-15-10) tested positive for volatile (headspaceOVA reading of 150 ppmv) and halogens. The material is organic, as evi-denced by solubility in hexane but not water. From these data and thephysical description, this liquid appears to be a halogenated organicliquid possibly mixed with oil or similar products.

4.2.2 EP Toxicity MetalsResults of EP toxicity metals analyses performed on six soil samplesremoved from various depths within two interior test pits at .the SouthArea are shown in Table 4. • Leachable quantities of barium, cadmium,copper, lead, and silver were detected in all of the samples. One sam-ple, SS-15-4B was diagnosed to contain a detectable amount of leachablemercury. Sample SS-15-4C was diagnosed to contain a leachable amount ofchromium.

.None of • th§.s soils exhibit the characteristic of an EP toxic hazardouswaste. None:" of the leachates showed metal concentrations in excess ofabout four percent of the EP toxicity threshold limits.

4.2.3 Indicator VOCsResults of the analyses for TCA and TCE in six soil samples taken fromvarious depths within two interior test pits at the South Area are shownin Table 5. All of the samples were found to contain quantities of TCA,

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE I- ' • I.

• • '•" ' •-. T*3f'«i>.*4 i*

'REMCOR

4-6

with concentrations ranging from 150 to 38,000 yg/kg. Two of the sixsamples (soils mixed with the waste) showed TCA concentrations less than1,000 yg/kg.

Two of the six soil samples showed detectable TCE; in one sample, how-ever, matrix interferences resulted in a 1,000 yg/kg minimum detectionlimit. Detected levels were below 1,000 yg/kg.

4.2.4 Asbestos ;Analyses for asbestos were performed on composite soil samples removedfrom each of the two interior test pits at the South 'Area. The resultsof these analyses revealed that none of the samples contained asbestos.The analyses confirmed that the samples contained fragments of figer-glass and cellulose. . :;

4i

4.2.5 Priority Pollutants -..-...:

4.2.5.1 Volatile Organic CompoundsResults of the analyses for VOCs performed on composite samples takenfrom each of two interior test pits at the South Area are shown in Table6. Overall., four compounds • were diagnosed above their detectable limitsin the samples: ^ .:t

• 2-butanone (methyl ethyl ketone [MEK])• Ethylbenzene f• TCA • -• Total xylenes. "

Total xylenes were diagnosed in the largest quantity in both samples,being 250 yg/kg in the soil sample from Test Pit 14 and 11,000 yg/kg inthe soil sample from Test Pit 15. Concentrations of 2,600 yg/kg TCA and1,900 yg/kg ethylbenzene were diagnosed in the sample from Test Pit 15.

_^ ^4.2.5.2 Semi-Volatile CompoundsAnalyses for semi-volatile compounds were performed on composite soilsamples taken from each of the two interior test pits at the South Area

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTl41400088 'REMCOR

(Table 8). -The soil sample from Test Pit 15 was found to contain de-tectable quantities of seven priority (target) semi-volatile compounds.A concentration of 39,000 yg/kg p-chloro-m-cresol was detected. Thiscompound is used as a preservative in glues and paints. The other pri-ority semi-volatiles are various phenolics (total concentration of about3,400 yg/kg) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.

4.2.5.3 Total MetalsResults of the total metals analyses performed on composite soil samplestaken from each of two interior test pits at the South Area are shown inTable 7. Detectable quantities of all but four parameter metals ana-lyzed for were diagnosed in the samples. Thallium, silver, selenium,•and mercury were not detected in either soil sample, and beryllium wasnot found above the detectable limit in the soil sample from Test Pit15.

The metals levels detected in soils at Test Pit 14 were generally withinnormal background ranges. Soils at Test Pit 15, however, showed ele-

• vated levels of the following:

• Antimony• Cadmium

' ' •, Chromium• Copper• Lead "• Zinc.

' - • • ' ' . .

Results of the EP toxicity testing of these soils suggest that themetals aj]|3feesent~in generally low-solubility forms.

4.2.5.4 Pel&icides and PCB AnalysesAnalysis for pesticides and PCBs were performed on composite soil sam-ples taken from each of two interior test pits at the South Area. Theresults of these analyses revealed that none of the parameters analyzedfor were diagnosed above their detectable limits in either sample.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE P/»iAR30QQ89PROBLEMS" ****»*•*

4-8

4.2.5.5 Phenols and Cyanide ;Analyses for phenols and cyanide were performed on composite samplestaken from each of the two interior test pits at the South Area(Table 9). The results of the analyses for these components revealedconcentrations of 7 yg/kg phenol in Sample TP-1-5 and 30 yg/kg in SamplePP-15-4 Cyanide was not found above the detectable limit in eithersample.

4.3 WASTE QUANTITY ";The limits of the defined South Area occupy a plan area of approximately

• i

10,000 ft^ or 0.2 acre. Clean overburden soil, at an average thicknessof about one foot, overlies the encountered waste'materials. The thick-ness of the waste disposal horizon averages approximately 4.5 feet; thetotal fill volume, including waste and visually affected indigenoussoil, is estimated to be on the order of 1,500 to 2,000 yd3. Figure 5

•• *provides a subsurface cross section of the South Area.

In the two interior test pits (representing 200 ft**), 23 nonempty drumswere encountered. Extrapolating this frequency of occurrence to the en-tire South Area suggests that approximately 1,100 to 1,200 drums may beburied within this area. Much of the remaining fill consists of wall-board and other debris. '-"-

•3-- 4•3

4t>


5.0 SUMMARY

Data summarizing the results of the suspected waste disposal areaassessment are included in Table 10 and discussed in the followingsections:

5.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICSThe horizontal limits of disposed material, in both the North and South

-Areas at the Hunterstown Road site have been defined in this assessment.The North Area is approximately 100 by 440 feet, and the South Area isapproximately 50 feet on one side to 70 feet on the other side by 180feet long in plan. Drums, wallboard, and various other debris were ,buried at both areas beneath a hummocky surface layer of fill rangingfrom less than 0.5 to 2.0 feet. Overburden material thickness was ob-served to diminish in a direction towards the drainage swale in eacharea. Buried drums are partially exposed within the flanks of theswales and adjacent areas.

In both areas, soil associated with buried drums was observed to bediscolored by sludge and oil. Discolored soil was found to extend aboutone to two feet below buried debris in the South Area. The lowermostextent of contaminated soil in the North Area could not be evaluated dueto the excess amount of liquid in the test pits.

The lowermost extent of disposed material in the North Area could not bedetermined due to the volume of liquid product released into the interi-or test pits during their excavation. Buried material was observed toextend to a depth at least five feet below the surface within the twointerior test pits.

In the South Area, buried debris was found to a depth of five to sixvfeet in two interior test pits. A layer of native clay, approximatelythree to four feet thick lying on bedrock, was found to underlie theburied debris. The uppermost one foot of the clay interval was stainedwith liquids that were associated with the waste interval.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PBOBl4 .00091

5-2

Six drums were encountered in the two interior pits excavated in theNorth Area. The density of drums in the North Area is believed to in-crease in areas adjacent to the drainage swale where closely packeddrums are partially exposed beneath a thin and incomplete layer ofoverburden.

At the South Area, a total of 23 drums were encountered in the two inte-rior test pits. The density of buried drums in the South Area, like theNorth Area, was observed to increase in the area lying adjacent to thedrainage swale where closely packed drums were not fully covered beneatha thin layer of overburden.

Most drums encountered within the test pits were both rusted andcrushed. Some of the drums were removed in shards. Drums that remainedintact were perforated and contained a minor amount of material. Con-tained materials included the following:

• Dried sludges (solid) of various colors• Gray-black sludge ;• Granular sludge with metal filings• Oily liquid.

Discernible-markings were apparent only on one drum portion. Otherdrums were either totally rusted or had no visible markings apparent.

Soil containing wallboard fragments was found to exist at the groundsurface at various localities within both areas. Pockets of water werefound at both disposal areas within voids present within buried debris.

•» _ . - _ - . " , , , . ' . - ;

No other free-water zones were encountered during the assessment.• • : •'•

5.2 CONTAMINATION CONDITIONSBased on the laboratory analytical results, waste materials and associ-ated soils in the two disposal areas contain VOCs; soils from the SouthArea were diagnosed to also contain elevated levels of target semi-volatile organic compound and metals. Specific VOCs identified includeTCA (0.068 to 39 mg/kg) and total xylenes (0.250 to 96 rag/kg).

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROlA&300092 'REMCOR

5-3

A semi-volatile compound, p-chloro-m-cresol (39 mg/kg), and elevatedtotal metal concentrations (particularly cadmium, chromium, lead, andzinc) were found in soil samples from the South Area. These soils, how-ever, do not exhibit the characteristics of an EP toxic hazardous waste.

Metals, asbestos, semi-volatile priority organics, pesticide, and PCBanalyses indicated no significant levels of concentration in the NorthArea soils. Asbestos, pesticide, and PCB analyses indicated no signifi-cant levels of concentration in the South Area soils.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE Pft&ttMtf'O 0093

TABLES

-?J.. -I


o x ZZ

;5 2=11»- . 3 -i co

0) Cjj D

I I£ C)*-t «J

CQ

1

O

"(2

c<9

u o -o a*"• . Ctu o =T 3 6"

™H . S WO 13

H mD. < ' ' ' -"?

— H 2s a* ^I H P s m s § - i* £| £ ^ a. ~ o w * 3 e s>i * 3- «~ Q" 3 S O| « 5 S -' «g aa -H_ ffl

T3 0) c a) AS ~icv 3 •" g aC O ^ M * * » Z b D O " O £

. 3- .— Q ^ -HC JJ

« . ' . 8 fe "* o£ 1= "~* C

«1 S S5H W m Q « - ^Q UJ O eg • OS t?

*~ i " O S -«" "7 ' 5 ' S

f y j W OI Q) N

~- _ jj -a • £a — -H c c JJo o 2 a . — i o > r t

"J z 8 a O *i " 60 H0 j — C O )t. -a -H >o i_ -a Di> a a ~*jj — > CM , E _E .o i. i>c_j I ft 1^ ^K O 3

Q) (8 C T3Q. S On s.co n a) a.

" 15 Q J C Q ) Q ; I i . C E « - 5 CC —(

o c t. rt a ocs ~« a)0) o o - ^- -

o. c i> i. JB •*> ot - r a a . ( i ) E - i W i - <3 ^ 0) > « a) >

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PiM3A009S

in —. _ <u .=r

01 O -^ C O• • * ! — ( •O CM

2 3 =r cdo . 3S Tl - .U W5 c - M O )

° « £ - " 5M • - .2 s 5«* ^ ; :t JM =

S S ,5 - :-i • !i Jgg g « - - 3 5 - « B S 7 I£§ • S ¥ ?63 a ™ .3 3 53

1 P| "S £H § R ^ ^ >rH m oQ in in ><H n ooo < - > • _ * -

OSfe.- 8 =r o

S - ^ . O O 1 3 • - U - O . GCO °° ; -H C • -Ua- o Q. -fi c cd

(U (UjJ = • .M £-w Q o cd .a

.« . . : CO = 4J 4J -v.|2 ^ - . J J 4 0 ^ J - ~ » > 4J Q) i-l^ - ^ c o a j . c o a j . E . - b o a ;S . V ^ C P O J O - ^ - ' Q . ^ - n - c >g i CH CH, CM i ex a ; f c . n - M a )s3 jj ni <D -a fH

Q) O iH CdE .a aJ a) 4J•H iH 4J S» O

• n t. ^-4 o 3to , Q) CB J3 O "O0) Q. 3 C Oc - juj* - n w n w a,

WO (1) CD C <Uc e c - M o J - j j a J c d J J o ;c d o j s c t - c d c d o c d - uE-i •!-( c-i <1> Q> O U O WCd 05 'C U t O Q 3 W O > < 1 J = . . r 3 = Oo . f i . Q e D . c c s : c u s ^ n i j a :c x c j J i - j J O = = c d = < £ . -t - c d c x - - ^

3 r - i e d a ) E » » - C M r o ^ rCU CU O O T CU O - * ** *~* —' X-H*~

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBL fl 3 0 U U J D'REMCOR

TABLE 3HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION ANALYSIS DATA

NORTH AREA DRUM. SAMPLES

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONPARAMETER TEST PIT 9 TEST PIT 10

DW-9-1 DW-9-2 DW-10-3 DW-10-4

Phase Solid Solid Solid SolidOVA Reading (adjusted 70 ppmv 4 ppmv 3 ppmv 220 ppmv

for background) ,Bielstein's Halogen Test Negative Negative Negative NegativeOpen-Cup Flashpoint >140°F >140°F >140°F >140°FOpen-Cup Ignitibility Does not Does not Does not Does not

ignite ignite ignite ignitepH (paper determination) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5Reactivity (water):• Solubility Complete None Moderate Moderate• Temperature of No change No change No change No changeReactivity

Reactivity (hexane):• Solubility ' None Slight None None• Temperature of No change No change No change No changeReactivity

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEi38300097•PROBLEMS' W "* *

REMCOR

TABLE 3(Continued)

SOUTH AREA DRUM SAMPLES

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONPARAMTER TEST PIT 14

DW-14-5 DW-14-6 DW-14-7: '•'•! .

Phase Solid Solid SolidOVA Reading (adjusted 12 ppmv 4 ppmv 4 ppmvfor background)

Bielstein's Halogen Test Positive Positive NegativeOpen-Cup Flashpoint . >140°F >i400F >140°FOpen-Cup Ignitibility Does not Does hot Does not

ignite ignite ignitepH (paper determination) 5.0 5.0 5.0Reactivity (water): : ]• Solubility None Moderate Moderate• Temperature of No change No change No changeReactivity :

Reactivity .(hexane): • ::• Solubility Moderate None None• Temperature of No change No change No changeReactivity

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PffM&00098

TABLE 3(Continued)

SOUTH AREA DRUM SAMPLES

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

PARAMETER ' TEST PIT 15DW-15-8 DW-15-9 DW-15-10

Phase Solid Solid LiquidOVA Reading (adjusted. 3 ppmv 5 ppmv 150 ppmvfor background)

Bielstein's Halogen Negative Negative PositiveTest

Open-Cup Flashpoint >140°F >140°F >140°FOpen-Cup Ignitibility Burns moderately; Does not Burns moderately;

does not sustain ignite sustains sootyflame

pH (paper 5.0 5.0 5.0determination)

Reactivity (water):• Solubility None Slight None• Temperature of No change No change No changeReactivity

Reactivity (hexane):• Solubility ' None None Complete• Temperature of No change No change No changeReactivity :,~

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PR £00099\MS

8

in vo in

7 o d 5 o d o-CO

oCQ CM inE- 'Y o r ^ S ^ i n g o

£ o q q °. o - 8 °.= o = = o

£2 OT53 3

! §:S o S * l § 87 d d ? d d o o oCO ^ v v •CO

g5 O 00 O O

1 a s £ 125- ^ ~ s § "•* „ ri I 8 S s S ° °. d-:°S§ S S o , 8' ?"

7 S c o s g o g grk ° "~ « • . O •

CM

S o Q. o o

aCO V N V . \ \ > N . \ V > > .g-t bO bO bO 60 bO bO bO boi-t S S E E E E E E

W ! - S SE-f o e s >> 3- 3 -r-l S- "-<

O O J S C O C O

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PRC4•j

.-

C C t O t i T J i - f t -<: s - c d c d j r o j c o c o " - ! QJCU «S CO

'REMCOR*

-__-- -I

3- in 3 inI O O C \ J C O L n C \ j g O C \ Jin o r o p o o o g o oi o o o o o o . _ ! o o

Vin*~ CQ^^f o c r > c \ j | £ J = r c ~ o o o j£ in ocoo°. o o o o o^^ V— . . • _^ • • O • •

r, I O O O H o O ^00^

E-

«C in ,„ 2i in£ o ^ S <=> o S1 g o o'

i d d d o , o o d ° oCO .v X s/

I e^ ^ g gco n y 5 o o - o o °. • ow i" • *-; « » o • « Q. o •

-CO —

. 0v & 1v no.

!§.. | g „ „ m II j SI " tA 8* °* °' ° °' °' °* 8* °' ° E 11 E E55 co v <D o ti t- o -H

)-l Cd E E O QJT - ' E -H -t-l (1) N

CM '-; ; ' -. fl3 -i-t "cd (U V V »H•~* M f^in Q . w > j ^ 4 J * a c d

• i - o o o o o o Q. o d 1 |J 5 » a I S- ' : •'• - co S , " ' . B f S o S - S S 2

C O . i - H C O J - > Q > C D E O-:. - - i —i —i co JD ja 1-1"-••.'" -H cd 3D,---•••• E "• 2 J-5 JJ O Eco o co i—i cd

• v » - v > ^ . ^ . ~ - v ^ » ^ « ^ v - ^ CU "—I »^ 6-4 4-i .Qb O b O b Q b O b O b O b O b O b O 4->Q,jC OE E E E E E E E . E g§.^S|S|

T3 Cd '. . E fH r-l 1-1 r-( O T3

. .,-1 ._< .H -r-l -i-l Er : O O O O TJ •-<ce = co w w co E

[d E E °* -H sP! CJ E 3 >, 3 ^ Jl II II it 5=y >H B 3 -H t. S U - r - I t i b O C d v S ^N.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PR4B306IQI

s-co t— OT

I I § K : S I I1--" N

a ?1 ° BS s ^ ss» "

o

- - 3 ' °- 5 ' §ja o;

™ ° fe 5^82 8. QI CO ^ W% ™ t "E «. : a a s

CO Ot, a) -r-iw ° fc £3-i. SO 3 ES o o £ ° "° >H

P _L X? "> bb to> S O o ~ U > ^ ?: ™ V O E C d c d - H ESS ' I ^ W V .-i O > > OQ CO .-« i-l -i-l £M t. T3 "-IM 5 co _ .M jj co co o> 4-5H CO ... „ eg jj jj N oU S, E E E >» Q)fa] • •- 0) bQ -H 'H iH 4JJ ,—. ^. : . Q. -H ' r-l cd Ci>3 c. $$ c - » - c o S g ^ ^ S " !co ^"r1 co c^c^ E T i s - n n ES s s s » : 2 - - § s s is a ^ a ;a::1- b o o c 3"-<

S> 3 - O J J " H 3 3 E• - • - - SM 4J O O 05 -i-<

••-~ : ,i CJ 0> CD r-l rH rH E. -•; -M rH JJ CO (!) Q.

;; ; ::i S co J2 l E 3—,„ co <y ~ cd cd oC C C O C 0 3 4 J J J C O - - (cd cd co co o CD co.C " £ • - ' - -U i-t E O CO W J3a j c o j j c o cd Q. -^ 4-,. «M co

O S C O E O S C O E C J S £ J - > M[d O C O I j j O C O - t - I C d - W C U O C d C OE-i t , r M E-i LrH T3 W -H C 3 O J->t 3 O > » t d O > > E 3 O 4 J - - I C dZ r-H^: S - H J 2 "Hr-H TJO2 - J24J e c £ J - > •Hi- H ' - l r - I E ' HOS CJ CO CC CJ CO = O -H -H «H -H 73< C - i - i O " • = £ - H O b O C O O O O ECU S*!L, CU t , i 4 Ja! C ^ C O C O S ' H

£0 E-0 V.J3 X4,I i-| I <-H bO OS II H It *^ -

«-jC '-JS 3.£- =^ t V~o - ~P = c j « a : o a o = =~ t, ~ d • «- CM cf> =r

............. ,..,,....../?"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PR

;:•: - ! ;t 'it-'REMCOR

TABLE 6

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDANALYSIS SUMMARY

NORTH AREA SOIL SAMPLES

; SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION^3^PARAMETER^1) UNITS^2^ TEST PIT 9 TEST PIT 10

PP-9-1 PP-10-2i

Acetone ! yg/kg 22,000 <500(4)1,1-Dichloroethane (DCA) yg/kg <3,200 1,300Ethylbenzene yg/kg ' 13,000 '3,400Toluene yg/kg 12,000 9001,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) yg/kg 5,200 420Total Xylenes yg/kg 96,000 21,000

SOUTH AREA SOIL SAMPLES

' ' SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONPARAMETER ' UNITS TEST PIT 14" TEST PIT 15

-.—.',- ••••' -- , ' - PP-14-3 PP-15-4

2-Butanone "" yg/kg 130 <910Ethylbenzene ' yg/kg <50 1,9001,1,1-Tr|| roethane (TCA]) yg/kg 72 2,600

^ t V r - r -

Total X'ylefirr yg/kg 250 11,000. - -

^1^Samples analyzed for all target volatile organic compounds. Parame-ters listed include only those detected in one or more samples."yg/kg" indicates micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion (ppb).

^'Composite soil samples.(4)n<it indicates below minimum detection limit..

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE P I 03'REMCOR

-; ~r -rr.-~" '- '--'• —

TABLE 7

TOTAL METAL ANALYSIS SUMMARY

NORTH AREA SOIL SAMPLES

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION^

PARAMETER UNITS(2) TEST PIT 9 ~ ;TEST PIT 10PP-9-1 ' PP-10-2

Antimony mg/kg 26 34Arsenic mg/kg 13 16Beryllium mg/kg : 1.8 3.8Cadmium mg/kg 3.1 : 4.2Chromium mg/kg 32 40Copper mg/kg 20 '19Lead mg/kg . ' 33 : 36Mercury mg/kg <0.2/<0.2(3'4) ' <0.5Nickel mg/kg 37 • 18Selenium mg/kg <0.9 ' <0.9,Silver mg/kg 1.5 3.6Thallium mg/kg <0.9 : <0.9Zinc mg/kg 103 86

See footnotes at end of table.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS'REMCOR

^ ^_

TABLE 7(Continued)

i


SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION^ 1 PARAMETER UNITS(2) TEST PIT 14 TEST PIT 15

: PP-14-3 PP-15-4

Antimony mg/kg 26 100/1 1Arsenic mg/kg 16 23/20Beryllium mg/kg 2.0 <0.9/<0.9Cadmium mg/kg ' 3.5 11/8.2Chromium mg/kg 37 410/590Copper mg/kg 19 240/170Lead mg/kg 21 5,400/6,700Mercury mg/kg <0.2/<0.2(3» <0.2Nickel mg/kg 53 36/28Selenium mg/kg <0.9 <0.9/<0.9Silver .; mg/kg <1.8 <1.8/<1.8Thallium mg/kg <0.9 <0.9/<0.9Zinc ', mg/kg 110 17,000/22,000

"'Composite soil samples." indicates milligrams per kilogram or parts perx

.-.'"' million (ppm).(' --•"-'-• ,-.-.,„.-„.--...-,-. - .,... ...^ .--- - - ..,, - .. ..

ii^tt indicates- less than minimum- detection limit.tt indicates sample was analyzed in duplicate for the

indicated metal.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROi

TABLE 8

SEMI-VOLATILE COMPOUND ANALYSIS SUMMARY


SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION^)PARAMETER^1) UNITS^ TEST PIT 14 TEST PIT 15

PP- 14-3 PP-15-4

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate yg/kg <330 690Di-n-butyl phthalate yg/kg <330 6702-Methylpnenol yg/kg <330 3604-Methylphenol yg/kg <330 400Naphthalene yg/kg <330 970p-Chloro-n-cresol yg/kg <330 39,000Phenol yg/kg <330 1,700

''Samples analyzed for all target semi-volatile organic compounds .Parameters listed include only those detected in one or more samples.'"yg/kg" indicates micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion (ppb).

^'Composite soil samples.indicates below the minimum detection limit.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLflB'300106PROBLEMS* ' w uREMCOR

iHSI s '

.

TABLE 9• • ! - .

PHENOLS AND CYANIDE ANALYSIS SUMMARY


PARAMETER UNITS^ TEST PIT 14 TEST PIT 15SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION(1

JST PIT 14 TEST PITpp-14-3 PP-15-4

Cyanide mg/kg <2 <2Phenol mg/kg 7/7(4) 30

-' ''Composite soil samples.( 2 };.v_ '"mg/kg" indicates milligrams per kilogram or parts

per million (ppm}_.(3)«<i« indicates below minimum detection, limit.

" indicates sample was analyzed in duplicate forthe indicated parameter.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS ' ** *

jS g a .-i*';--'

TABLE 10

SUHHARY OF ASSESSHENT DATA

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS ;

PARAHETER

Plan area of defined disposal area

Noiinal plan dimensions

Overburden thickness (range)

Overburden thickness (estimated average)

Estinated overburden volute

LoHenost extent (depth) of waste

Loweriost extent (depth) of affected soil

Maxisuc thickness of waste horizon

Estitated average thickness of waste

Estimated total fill volute

Drui disposal density (in plan)

Estimated: drii* (noneipty) inventory

Perched water > :

UNITS

sq ft

ft x ft

ft

ft

cu yd

ft

ft:

ft

ft

cu yd

druas per100 sq ft

drues

— ™"

AREA IDENTIFICATIONNORTH SOUTH TOTALAREA ' AREA

37,500

90 x 440

0.5 to 2.0

1.0

1,400

> 5.0

> 5.0

5.0.1

4.0 ;5,600

3.0

1,130

In waste;oily

10,000

50 x 180

0.5 to 2.0

1.0

400

6.0

8.0

5.0"

! *-5

1,700

11.5

1,150

None

47,500

--

0.5 to 2.0

1.0

1,800

5.0

7,300

—

2,280

"

..1*?

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROiAR300I08PROBLEMS" ^ VREMCOR

TABLE 10

(CONTINUED)

CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS

PARAMETER

•

Drutaed waste characteristics

EP toxicity aetals in soils

Indicator VOCs in soils ••

_Asbestos in soils

Priority VOCs

-

t '

Priority (total) eetals

_

Priority seni-volatile cospoundsr.-z":—:- ':..-.: . : -" . "T i " " '.

- -..tfi-sl^ -- ^ -PCBs and pesticides (prioirty list)

NORTH AREA

Mixed organic andinorganic sludges.

p

All below EP toxicwaste thresholds.

Elevated TCA and TCEin TP-9, both inand below waste.

None detected.

Six chlorinated andnonchlorinatedcoipounds detected;higher levels atTP-9.

Metals found atnoreal backgroundlevels.

None detected.

None detected.

SOUTH AREA

Mixed organic andinorganic sludges;halogenated organicliquid.

All below EP toxicwaste thresholds.

Elevated TCA in bothTP-14 and TP-15,prissarily in soilbelow waste.

None detected.

Four chlorinated andnonchlorinatedcompounds detected;higher levels atTP-15.

Cadiiun, chroeius,lead, and zinc levelselevated at TP-15.

p-chloro-e-cresol foundat TP-15 (39 iig/kg);soie phenol ics alsodetected at TP-15.

None detected.

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS

FIGURES


_________ ':• 4

MO 110 /-----'REMCOR

o133J 'NOUVA313 3AliV13U

£ S2<«-. lit £EB- _ .?° CO

LU

5

mm2gIV)V)inocco

V- .*y in

CJ ;— ftUUUJr^-^5

zS* o

o: uj o w o S rr-£« 52<« «°:

- cvi

ow-«

I I I I 1q q o q qO c J * < e i ' d i

133d 'NOI1VA313 3AI1V13H

133d 'NOI1VA313 3AI1V13U

1

APPENDIX A

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS RECORDS

fl o^nn i i /."REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WAS! f ;

A-1

APPENDIX A

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS RECORDS

To clarify the sample locations and types for purposes of reporting,revisions were made in sample nomenclature. The following is a key tothe numbering systems used in this report ("new numbers") versus thoseused in field sampling and laboratory reports ("old numbers").

Type New Numbers , Old Numbers

Dr-ummed Materials DW-9-1_ TP1-1A NorthDW-9-2f TP1-1B NorthDW-iO-3 TP2-1A NorthDW-10-4 TP2-1B NorthDW-14-5 TP1-1A SouthDW-14-6 TP1-1B SouthDW-14-7 TP1-1C SouthDW-15-8 TP2-1A South ^DW-15-9 TP2-1B South '\DW-15-10 TP2-1C .South 1

• ' • I -a

Soils (grab - EP toxicity metals) SS-9-1A TP1-2A NorthSS-9-1B TP1-2B NorthSS-9-1C TP1-2C NorthSS-10-2A TP2-2A North

"*T.i__. . " .. j. . . SS-10-2B TP2-2B North •^2: ; . ; . SS-10-J2C TP2-2C North 1

' SS-14-3A TP1-2A South "-SS-14-3B TP1-2B South \SS-14-3C TP1-2C SouthSS-J15-4A TP2-2A SouthSS-15-4B TP2-2B SouthSS-15-4C TP2-2C South

"if?300H7

{y*.:r'---?fij

A-2' -5

Type New Numbers Old Numbers

Soils (grab - selected VOCs) SS-9-1A TP1-3A North: " SS-9-1B TP1-3B Northi SS-9-1C TP1-3C North: SS-10-2A TP2-3A North

SS-10-2B TP2-3B North1 SS-10-2C TP2-3C North

SS-14-3A TP1-3A SouthSS-14-3B TP1-3B SouthSS-14-3C TP1-3C South

-_ - i --- SS-15-4A TP2-3A SouthSS-15-4B TP2-3B South

| SS-15-4C TP2-3C South

Soils (grab - asbestos) Not Revised

Composite Soils (priority pollutants) PP-9-1 TP1-5 Northpp.10-2 TP2-5 Northpp-14-3 TP1-5 South

' • . ' PP-15-4 TP2-5 South

3R300II8

. __-.__ IE V-- ,— -;-.-£ - *

coun

c c <o o >O O ^< O yc o £

o

isz -}o =

O £: ^ «O *~ cUJ LU mDC Q E>• m ccQ < <O -• °

u.r™»0Z

e

!

CO m"° '> "° >•? XJ r- CD._ O .2 TJD g> 3 «CT .> O- .>C 0 C Q)'= O = OCD CD CU CUCC CC CC CCCO

ll 11 " ' 1 1HO» 5s o "5.SwO < < _____________________ _ 3 c"r-iT > Z UJ -^. . -_ X i T-i. tv . T. i n^ CT> >-: 5

dsa

•-.HO ^ H ^CQ'5*:^^'^^^^^ w «i— "^ m ! K \ . N , ! \ r v i f \ i ^ r \ ^ v r \ s h i J x c OTg uj j|>>^?^^^t. -|os wz^^^:^^^$:$:^:$: »• aE § I___b-h_h^_h_fc:_b_h_t=:_h. w S. v> SR300I19

ovD

r-o< *

o. § *O< Ooc o

K

ccoo

H

j

15

CO CCLu LU>- m ccQ < <O - J O</>

O

I i

E RS

NAME/NUMB

M MEMBE

A EA

T T

O LULU3cca. <co

t ' cro

Q E . c , i /I" • ., = 0 = 0

_ oto Z8-0

a8scu tocr Qoo _

O **

(D.E <Bto O.• - - -» _ -^ .rf ^. ^l ^

_ CDO

c.2

.". a-.._oto

tD CUQ.Q

S SIICO 3CO Z

V

fc

11

VA

\ni

Nl

fc

'.!2 -D .52 -o3 CD 3 CDQ- > O" >CO) C CDCD CD CD CDOC CC CC DCC*3 •*•'

1CO

c x t^o ±>,CQ

If S3 S -o ! m•fe S a: , .<2 TJ .£2 TJ£ CO § = S> = $i ' r-1 rr > tr >cr

_ - C CDco ^ < s: o so-o ,« CD CDo - OT 5 cc cc or ccco D. 55 T-: c\j

AR300I20

NO

d d "-Z Z \T"o "o 'J

o o yO O v>**••». ***s. »"*•

KH

O — o *~ ci A.». ft C, / N ^ C - ^ - X - C S O CD

§ 5 ™o ? IUJ LU LUoc Q E>- CD OC§ 5 S(0

ou.O

1 ' vi2 « 3o ^ o

X

/C/A/7£V ^

< &

ccLUCD-s.Z LTJ /J=5 ' <- ^ > \r\ v^ Vj v) ^ \^ v^ will 5 o| S

O LULU pr1 E t _i • ( • ' '. \ v ' '> "co _3 2 < S 3 r v * . / M r M f < i ( v i N / \ ! « s » r a r A *s, ~ z «cc <D_ CO

D: DC cc cceo - r

_ oco Z

C\J>0NO

o

c co oO O

OO

H

CO

oz

p I^ <

i" Lu LUS ° 5>• CD CCQ < <O

9LUO

0 "- oV.

X'JJ

SGj

ft4

S S CE COO0O LU Q:g3g l aIII 1 I11 H

O LULU -I-3 0-o scc <Q. CO

g£<D CCCC DC T3O CC mO CO

.1.™ g;

(S

I..' -Q.'5:OT

0> ffiO.C1E?CO CW «co

ple

ber

Sam m

K

si

V!

t

TE

VoA

V!

CO"2sCOI ?1 t

H J- <DI . I . , I M «o

2•t

VnQ.-O 7 v r i r r ~ vco ja'o '«CD COQ. OCO 0.

CD•5 >,

CD

jc -Q _c CDCO -o <2 TJ3 0) 'D CDCT .> CT .>C CD C 03= 0 = 00) 0) CD Q)CC CC CC CC

CO -

CZ CO

flR300!22

LOT!cn•cHLO

;-~ii~-L: -j--- ^ !*- ;-??® :: 5 1 ' -^ -• -'- ~--~ • '— - V^ 1? - '^ -'- -~ -?y JJ

v x ^ \T7 '

d dZ Z

1 1c "cO OO OS 52cc o

COCOjzcc0u.1-coUJDaUJcc

hJ

^"

^

^

KK

TH

j•vl

vK•x.

K°x

yQ^V(

^l~*•

î

t '

f

*.

CL!c

^ — sV.Wt

^c-r

^"S

•V

S

-. s

v^

•^

^

•J1

- *•s•

^

P-

VJ

X

-1

I' ',_;

•s"•v~\ft'^ \5-i o,• .

^^ 1

' -SC Vjs

CJQ h

»•,-s.p0LU

Q h- S °a g o s £CL • H H D i_ i_X -7 Z h- O O OCO ^ O CC LU < <co °- 0 0 cc t- j_UJ b > 9r, h- Z Z-1 < CC £ CC 0 0F^ ^ O ^ O 0 OS H |_ CO CL i_ i_< co < < LU r; r;co LU cc _i DC y yLU Q O O LU T^ CD CD z H; O O< < < LU < CC DCQ _1 _1 CO O Q. Q.

>1'•L

i

• x

'i'S

v»k..S-

^•>>'

§J><53

JjiJ,

§Sci-iOSHr-ttjC

8

•-•

P\•

jy\i \rovj

3\c'S\}

v^û"

ôHj0W i

^rs1"X

Cit -M

tV)

'

QX\'

-O\

v^^.X

'N;

. >[

QQ

\A-"Kx"

^

.VT:- ."• -

CCC z

CC LU DCLU O LU

LU CD < Q

f- o o o o 1UJ LU LU t. -t; -9 -3 -3 ^ O: O O O -^ cccc cc cc =; DQ- D- D_ C0 Q_

V)1oD

WC

"co'o&w

COO!20.

flested Tes

^COEC

S

10)(0

1

e Volume

a.EmW

ai >

•Q.reW

6ZCOQ.

iw

' C* b• V)•< €

x

|f

V g0 *^

^

\

^N

^tj" >

^.

ir\

•^t"w >i

N

M

i

^

1

£

1-' __

(5JJ*cL>$ ^ra £

S?* v »«§^

^

#

s.

J^L

.;

KVi

<\

SA

1

h

X

^

Vl"-JfvKVi i^x

JX

./-

JV-

Dt-V!

NCl

^'k

1

f;

^

Q UJ

"J JU "^

?

VI

"\o

\

-

•

-^

0

O£)l/

c

r

CQ

^f:

s~\

^

J

S

——S

^

rv>

'

xJ

i

\

\*o(.

^ s)

££V) v- x"5 x"^0^-0

1

IN

«o

— ~-^

Vt•0

^^-S

f^

,

•?ci

ft

r

jT-oO

VJC

«i.

^V

'

Sff

V,

1t>4

Ci

t

't

Q

I

£

s

**

^ —

sJ

:^

i

0tV)

t

i

VI

V!

CQVI

-~ i •••

sJ

^(in

*

'

%J3T3§O

-\CO \CO \

ToE -jr Eto H

v

" >——— _ - - --365

j" Hi ''(*!*

?1(O

1£IO

"ina>¥Ss3enen8•Dca

"5

f *.2 J

1 £*c 13)"c £

T3CO•5CDD.en3. enL.OTOCCOtfi.2 '® e§*" j

"J

1s(0

1• *•wD)_co• ax

3 "c G)€ 2 SS w Jl\S «\ li?CO

sample(s)

S:0>"co3_c

en i5 i

Ms i^ Sc1 1.£ 20 ^1s1»0

t E §• .yu f

t I * 1

QUJCCDOUJCCUJ21-QZ

O

' Zcc

0SOu_H-Z xUJODCC

=5o ^1 i

! !i It E

liCO

1 , 8ill 1 S2- I N Qm J uj8 §2 2I I

UJ

'U!

1

S1fl *

r<75*

-

i|.Q

fl

^

,1j*2?^

A/f \^

i

-v

CD"•g- . —uOC $CD

"EL1i?COg

1

i €03 O

2 iR300I23

D

1*2 ,

•d bZ Z"o "5k. i_c c0 OO 0

cc g

1

COCOJ^

1

CDZLU

s & |1a. < O £ a.9: H IT => h- l-

S 1 1 § i s <1 i s i £ § §p- z o cc o o o5 i- \L CQ a. . .< co < < LU n r;CO LU Q; -1 CC UJ UJLU Q O Q LU -} ->j- CD CQ Z H O O< < < LU < OC CCQ _l _1 CO Q CL CLf

UlD0UJcc

tJ

r-KNAiiv^rlA

:HNOLOGY

tPORATION

LnJ

t

\

X ;

^

« _

(

\

"• e-

\'cc

\

V'""•

Vu--s

V

2)~N

Ti- ——

-•

"

*

•. -

——— -*

^UH •

x *

>" "

^.— -

\

c —w- -

.--—.

ccCC LULU OLU ca <

•552

*

•<*~f•r1***

>> .

dccLUQCC

< D < 0 -Z Z 5 LU1- h- 1- - s?O O O o TLU LU LU p i-3 -3 -3 OO O O -{ ccCC CC CC =f Da. a. a. ca CL

t0S2Tn

15'oCDaw

CO

1ott3)C

1

1enCD&S

eservative

£

CDE3O

CDa.ECOCO

CDO.fCD0.

COCO

|

Sample No.

V/-v

fviCQV,

•sV

JO

*0

x

V)

isj-s1

s*p2••

rv^K.

<$

-

J<o£i(r\

'JUvk

|

ia

;

^

^

x!<0RjvA

*

'

h

T

i

S~

ViJ

c^

V•

t

i

\

\

^

1

— -^

V^

^^.1.^s

.-

^/

1

a.

1

"

->

.-V*t:"^"

c

-;

'X

j

•

b

*ft J'

S «nsCO•cS 'S•3 «E "Sen —3 cca j= o .5c « ^ JJ

J 5 § W

i5"a.CD

.§••o1oa.a.COCD

"ea

2C9"e/T

•Q.

±:2S1

cflS 5

1 - 1 8I I- I3 n "-E z ..™

flME REQUIRED:

TURNAROUND 1

O

,RD IDENTIFICATI

f

'•5iOJCTC'5.Q.'•ga>c'•g§.2

Q€5

3 ^.2 * Ctn ^ **

I sig> a•i -91 00

"5.fz(A

'o11CO'•5

.: (Please indicaU

Return to

Cllen

•\\ \CQ j| uJ

8 § %o z <Q. co

ft???/**Cl.&lgfc

' '(!}j

,si. */x

IX,

1"-y~Q^/\ j

j)

s

euPQ

<c(3Sr

^

^

r\iP*

• }

'

. >»"i!« s

ac

NLY

to accompany

sar

opy

FOR LAB USE O

WHITE - Original.

YELLOW

- Fi

eld c

6 6z z2 S^ .»-•- cD 0.) Oc c. \c o

COCO

^zOCou.fr—COUJDoUJCC

Jxlz• •»/•»cue2£rf**OPSC

tw

s"^'O1*1c^

1

e-

iv

j;•x.

v-

cc

VI

iÎx-X

XSJ

*J

~<L •

^V.*v•t

.V

i•N

^

V

:* -

'i1

^"50

^ »v^54<*

i" ~"^s!^

4*>t

Q

Wt:

•X

x^ \ O, X. **N

•C " *

f- -.4£ -^yi ^'4. csl^ il-ti ^

"ozLL

Q i- S 1LU o „ jy xQ. < O Pr CL9: 1- ~ ^ 1- 1-CO g O £ LU < <CO g 0 g CC H HLLI b > m *- ? 5_j < £ LU CC O O

i ~ ° m CL ° °< CO & < LU IT l^W LU eg -1 ^ UJ ULLU Q O Q LU -3 -3r- CO CD Z H O O< < < LU < DC DCQ _l _J CO Q CL Q.

-K,t ."SJ

_Jo"v~>

iO

^^

3£-,^<-A"\

fc-

i

o.» \v*y

J

VjSJ

<\y\

1

'-s••s

-

Jj J

r

Vv

fU,^

X4

iv

y.\

^r\-

"L"nr*VIx.

^

"

3:*vJîS.

Pi

r%

l

....f-

:,%

i

! 9! . oc z1 DC LU OCI LU O LU' • > * rn -^ ^^

MCU LU LLJ «J, l_lIg 1 1 1 g •Cre-'v.3»0*1

i 2* Z «2 LU}_. }•_ » - C/5| O O O o $I LU LU LU tl XI -» -5 -> "" O0 O O -j DCOC DC DC =! DCL a. a. CD CL

Â £ vi^ >• N_ J.

cao

'ISc.HrtCO

eCOO)2a.Olc

Requested Tes

CD

1CDa.

CD

3

$CDaCOCO

CDa.i-CDa.ECO

dZCDa.1CO

( s

~^Vl*?>ix;

QÂMx VI

0^

0-

X

1

-

^^_5

>><-

jV

Q

$>

A j

•v "i• .J^

-11 ?J-s,•<i^V'J

^1

"4jXt~

|Vx-O

?»£-

lif) •«•^ Q* i— VjV

xKcn^CQ-XA

N^

;

\

J

^

<?

s

s'

0

i>sor

'

xl"J"1 •-f -VyV-

K

^

Vj

.•^

J_!)

•oV•s•

•If I/x.r

iif

VVy *£*

Sr CiX

's V

3

^

i

'.

^

si

. O

$

X.

co1^f.r"

s x

^s

^

—

0

^

^

si

toA.i-

vj

IT]V>

X

^

Cp

XJ|

/

xl

V !

"

t:»

— » ^

<:CO1rx.fXr

"a§

X-A.

*

s

-~-~

si~

••*:x?

- —

cctrir-iijX.> -

s1 U"

\j X.Q fy^ 0x s.

"u xSx^

iS uxt

^%*

-

s.

s

~~-~.

-•t:<

--, _

rjcr1

-"Ia..\

«

'

f-'A

tVj

0f\e

— -

*"3*i!

rsi•'X'.-~

-

-

~>

SJ

o&

— ,s

COJ*~

• (•Oi•X^

-

/••

£)

s,

oV"

_/*

CX5-sJ)

I

'£4.

1oInCDg2enn

en3O•ocrj

I

en

£^rtf (* ?f ? r

"o •* •'• *J

% ±03 ye

* £o> \!-CD 2 *c) c nic — —« 2 I1 §3 0ea o 3en TJE C D*d2 CD

o "a<L 7Z3" Z3 OCO ix_

CD

' 1(0CO.2

^1••S•acaen1.a-enc

S c o§ I a1 I °

O) - C IDco £ O -s ea1 | i a i\ ,•5CD'oCLCD

CDO

a\CO \

n \w3

NC3

1 -•2.CD

1

8

i8'•5c'«» - «

w x

1 ea 1

J 31 ri 2M IP>

? 11 30

5E

ca ™« P •s

1 1 t i ien P J= S "•*«•* *

QUJCCDOUJCCUJ

H- QZ

0cc

cc1-J

;

"

Otcou.

:1Cfl'€

i S^ 01 B> - 3 61 ~ ! l

QCC

«tgo

S 1 ft

s I8 1QUJ

i %o z <

IR300I25

1

V f \

"" .IX1

*

£;5-T

l*"XJ-SC\"a,c

Sd

1

S~*\f j

£.'

, JC-/Â1 1

* CD•oJuce 2?CD

a.

Sc

1

>j * >•z ~^0 |LU .ij H

CQ O '< • 5-J UJQcr t H2 !£

--

i

1

«o oZ Z

1 1c co oO O

OZLU

Q }- ft OLU f 1 LU -p0 - ^ 0 E CL2: K H- 3 u. ::5 § g fc S S ffl I > S - ^ 3 DC £ CC O O°- § O °E 000h- |_ 03 CL . i_co < < LU n nW LU § -I CC O OLU Q o Q LU T Tco co z t- O O_ < < LU < CC CCQ _J _l CO Q CL CL

168 ' '• mS§5 « . i$Q« DC LU CC53O LU O LU»" LU CO < Q

2 5 Z cc< D < OZ Z 2 ui

___ (_ H- h- WS Ll3 S g 2~3 -J -3 O0 0 0 - 1 ccOC DC DC d 13Q. CL Q. 03 CL

2a02"ca_c2*oCDa03

E2O)2Q,O)cto2T3SMCD3cra>cc

§

!ss>CL

Sample Volume

$.fj»Q.

CO

Sample No.

o.ftf~-VlUi50v;"

'•Uo-^

1NJ

. 3:Q8

jX

Q•A"OSi

t:i

'•3

$;

HV

tt--»t.?t?«vV

^

's<

£

t

VQ

^^

J

^Si

" Cxt

s*5

*

inJ

,-*

*v.

^

^— "

/'s/

X^•5;-

— — — .

InV

<••»,-\

- ;-

^*•

^

^^ s^

v>xlT".V

^

•x:>$

s

V.I

.-IC;

t— •

•

•

•

"3Ccc£C

5£0vC^Carcy

•~ CDO)ca j:C 1co :S aoCD

SCLCD£S•aSSv»\! -"S51 -« etc 5E z

QUJccoUJccUJ

INAROUND

TIM

u.1-

|c'ca'CDOc5«.03enCOD0T3COS£

'oenS 0« *o> •-•— >- •= 1

1) C. c. ^2 I§00

i1Q.«- is- 1

(0COmi ca aE -cea »3 eO —•a -SCO W

1;e

indicate

if sa

mple(s)

are

if

m

- 1*™zO5ou.Z xUJQ

iSIBLE HAZARC

nhazard .

UJ O

2 z

®&m.| ;''"ca)COsso_

t

I

T3COaUl'•5•o§?0.a!n»ra_c15uaja.h.£OJav«\-C \ iIN

ample following a

nalysis.

Lab t

DUpofil by Lib -A.

r\

H'ocg•(Jioa.m'•SS SS J'•5 Of |o 3t ce

PLE DISPOSAL:

<CO

JS4

\ ••U

£ru-x."X

/—>1(X,,VoT6•i1P2•5a

<

-J

JP:/ «1QC

•s-

1 LAB USE ONL'

u.Ou.

•\)

9

enCDa.

>,cCOao8CO >,

2&Isti2?iUJOis

AR30QI26

s

^

i icoO O CQ

flCoo>ao

ou.o

IVHO

/ ,'.\J7Fs!ST&

X

CCLU032"Z. Ulu3 21 I•Z. LU

O ujhi ,_j~> £:O 5Q- CO

CO |||o.2 oQ •cc

o do " tcl

f %<D CD0.0E ?CO fZCO «

I

Condition on Receip

(Name and Date)

S CDO..QE ECO 3CO Z

c

j

c>H IS . .v,

> \! . ,. 5 * VHk

'

ID ^ "V 'VJ'"X! \n i M , M r\ 13 si N-j *z ^ -N x. vi \^ \.» '.^ . y . • •? y jg

•

iX

QIT

I

03 03

.22 "o .52 -a3 CB 3 WCT .5 CT .>c co ca>SS O 2= OCD 0) CD 0)CC DC CC CC

CO

cOO

C «.~ _CDC8 J3'o 'in8.W CL W- _r- _ . 5JAR300I27

N.'5

O

§ §O O

o

a03<

ffl CO^ ccCD UJ"S. COi %uJ 2

I <Z LUI- HO LU

DC <Q. CO

Q. E

_ o82o -o8-0•B^

8?CD COCC Qc -nO cO CD

CB

CJ

CD= COCO 0.

O

'-xj '" '"'* N

Q. a

•\

xi

§

Vn

CDT3CD

CO

mW "O 0) -o'5 cr .2C O ) C O ):= O •.= O :(D CD CD CD •'• "OC OC DC CC

l

C

COs

T3CO

Q:>iCOa.oO

6Z\J

/v

r

u

V

>.035 j- — co

1 t «i !v£ 1 * liJi 1 c i ™ i ? If'w ^ i i - s c o 3 § § 1 *= 2 g ? "S ? I ' ' |T 1co S < = o =o 7> t7 i ' S 7 C D O ) 0 ) 0 ) i u n *g g g. OC CC CC DC ^35- £ CO ^ cvi H. |

ftR300128 ^

oco"xT

CDO

o oZ ZE 21 Io o

CHAIN-

838

SHU

•<;.' iKl"D CO -»-

o 0°

IKJ

O

i IO F £S i Ia I 1K Q E>- 03 CCQ «£ **•i : °9 S(

U;SJ

X

DCi28 z 2

£ £jLU -J-j CLO S

. 6

Q.

8?= 3§?

e.E <D

O

S CD

If

>r,v

11

i, X?X.

Z v*f >J 1 , ~ ^ >* 1 1 -^ , 1| , \f ^

o

ample

nd De

scription

CO co\

J

X

sc 0xYl

X

CO CD^ * * "O xLC3> ^ <D . *CO -o CO -Q'3 Q) '5 CDO- .> CT .>

= ' 8 I I<r cc cc cc

vxs*

CO

1CO CO

O Q. >»3 & ft j? CO 2 COin52 cw 5* a » 56c _2

jaS S g C? C? C?Q. o yCO CL CO i- CM

AR300I29

x-***

CD*=xT«={•CDO

d dz zS S ê c ^0 0 Tt0 0 S< o "Qcc o ^c:

°<kH d-€ 1Q F CD

CC < <O z I

I S " Stt Q E>• 03 OCQ <; %O - J OwD K*O *4

$9 x§z î ^s vj

\uf^'<*:f\<s<

!*J

. $ \% *$ j-I J -<;

§50 s sm iill 11gpo z 2rO LULU ^~i CLO 5OC <Q. CO

_ dO 3en O•- OQ CD

CC

a8sCD COE Q£ "0o cc "g <D^ CO

§£0

1—a>.S CD2 §:§ô

CD

t &i?w

CD

It,h- CD

Mf5Q

co•--v-1.

(Q <O•5.0E "o™ 5co "cg

-«8_i

« 5IICO 3W Z

rc, "J

v<

} \*-~~~nf'*-

""3Hta• zc

*1*bQ

v)O^

?x.v.

^><i^

^<X•Mt"b

^

1<1

?

*

X

VX. 0M

?-ft I•f.

*»

^

X.

\

v\**sx<31<4Si

,Vt-^

V

^-1^«;;-l*tXV^v

XJ

•?!NS4.

-:>-Jl-

1

sT-

-TX

jVj

vl'i!X

'«$nJ•4

tx*1\,

v>\^

X

<*£..™*S»f

•fest

L**%BlW

n

4

x-

V'-.

5

5

v^

vl

1x

s»sl t~-*

1.B«" "-** * -'

^

" ,

44

•-x.

lf)I

3'x%

\w

igg»

~ -

">««*^

•~x»

s*

••™»x»

V1-i^

— >

^x/\J7"*>-*>.

itgs*

^

Vi*>t. i•"V

)I

•

>CD . cc?•O V T3 x.Jj £ 5 mW -O W T3'3 CD 'D CDo- .> cr .>C CD CO)= 0 = 0CD CD CD CDDC CC CC OCCO TT

v*$

•vMIN\HJV

1 1p s-•o Va ?« st0> ^ <

8$*«-i rx -x

^\coa. \'I-' ^J \ 'n v*

«j ~. \ VTJ ® \ « §(^

A~M!"Y>

s

Vcb

^ /r'7 'hc

xrS; >

k«s a z >. ,AA§ i - (U->

7 %

£TI f

1 1 « I :; of 1 ccTis. = •= <A -o w -o=• f 1 1 > 'i- >_ ^ H C CD C <BCO JD < 1= O = O'5 -S Z ® ® CD <DCD « m CC OC DC CCa o is .co a. aj^j^—— .-~.

!I

H- •« 1^ iC"tr>* O-•-—

d os

XN. "

Z Z X

1 1 csl'c "c >va a &'^ saOC O

COCOJ^zccou.H111DOUJcc

_,

S.X?

j.10xj

C"i*jX^Kh

V

__ T~^

"•Q*/

"'«;

-c.Xs)

s

M"

•x"!

-Xx

/ ~•AVJ

•C;<x

xlnJ

rv>*>X,

lxx

^_-Cs

/o*— s

X

d

^"v

1 <j\

M•^

i

^*

:orjr«.X x

XT' N.X

'•• \v> •• , ,

X x!

\ i » '"""

- "'

dzLU

S o n | §g. .< 0 | D.

i z z j- q o oOT n ° S Hi < <(-0^00 cc H- i-[3 H x. Q- i- z zIj < g LU cc O OPi ? 0 O O O.5 i- J- co 0. i_ i_< co < < LU n r;CO LU Q; -J CC y yLU Q o Q LU -5 -)b CD co z i- o o< < < LU < DC OCQ _3 _l CO Q CL CL

V.

Q

f

0"*i~

*<

"3

;V.i J->. i

fel "t?«J<

*,N

V

X)X

s<JQ

K\

f\'^''x."r,^

^

•

XJ^^(1c_.

\

i<Y>

Q«S'••x.

fcMQTT\

,'r,

cfs^SJ

A\,-xl<

c)t: oc •f-

2O« DC LU CC

%%§,*%% %WJ*{/v 3; 5 Z DCJ_QO, ^ .a itSHCr*LjJKiL;

| < 3 W

* t_ i_ i_ CO| 0 0 0 o ^

-3 -5 -> *~ O0 0 0 -j ccCC DC DC — D

I Q. CL CL CD Q.

COco-Q

InC

"ca'oCDa.w

2OloCL0)cJJ1-I"eoCD3CTCDcr

CD

1CDenCDtil

CD

3

§COaCOin

CDa

CDa.COin

6CDa.ca

1>J

/ \

K\s ,

4

"

1i*

N)"

S

!'J15""<;Si

'Cs

x.

XXv

V3

J. X

•J1?

Jli$t c.t»*4 "1 ,\

^

V

**

V

X

%f*t-S

u V J

b -A

5*

^ *

<\|

^X „

^ C••

?^:<Q

^

^

*•<*

X1§'

/

•

^

x)t-

-••

f"5

!ls>

s.

J

•.

*

^

J

'

—v

^

w*"*•*«f

',

\n

1''vMj

t

^S

.

J

!i•4 -i

>SK K^* \r

£

yv

x

at*

\.0*•~-~_

S»J

\

~ ~

\

x.

'

/I

>

MM*

«"*^

90*

>

*

^

'

01t

s

"

t:Vj

-.^xO* N*

y £.•xj• -••

' s.

s-

^

^

V-y•«*,

x}

^

^^

" — '

?s,'"-

y <

I?VJ «y

,-v

^?

> "

££*w 'C

x-^

N

* y~/"—

X.

~

>

X

"* "

;C

.';*•

i

*~\

/y

— <mm

^

™* -*.,

1•x

r

•.tLt/»V I

xj

,- x

vj" ^

er*

"-• 7

>

'X>

1CJren

|C

c

C/]

•CDO)co .ec uco :

oCD'2CLCD

%

T3CD

1

!\s «« i

-» i£»

CO

icu

O"a?CDocCO

1COg"2ca£oCO

l!ooo ~CD §.

I 1a -aen e

• 1 •••!•g a.§ 1CO

1 I2 c ag a a.e -B i-en i 28 C C D

*~ Ol

"2 $ £\CO ™ § \

1 pCO ^™ -1 J342. "> "CD « >.•Q. '5 •"P CZ 1

s I |'CD o °to =y 5? o.£ a.f> a g

— S Z •1 1

c? 1 §- z z .10 ?

QUJcrOinOCUJ

H

AROU

ND

ocI-

| j 12 M 3

S £ I

1N co^ o5 I |$ s 2S5 § |2z <

c/>

|1

^

•j)^

Date/Time

tk>,;

a

•

«

•o"3flC enf

1"£

itflCQ O ,<f t «

cc b-o r jU. g j

AR30013I

*")"»AV™d aZ Z"o "o*-• •«-c co o0 0<rf" f *\^ XDC O

COCO

^z*HcoUlDOUlDC

<

_ .

•J

iNATIONA

NOLOGY

ORATION

raE

•

QUJCLa.X.COCOLUa2COLUf-

Q1

,

u2<Z

r c

i! a.

C

|1-coLUQCO_J

V

ccuCD213Z1-CJUJ-1

i Q: cc. a

OHOOOC0

DCOCD_l

-

-~

l-~

\

^<

CCLUc<z<"5.1-cLL—C• cca

0H-

ccoCLLUCCCD

CzaCO

x^~_J

•*

N.

Ol'C

£L

0t-i ~-: s

-"•v*"V

J.

i

xj<

'

0M

ioc}_<c_

i£-

->»'"

QLUDCDOUJccccoa.LUDCLU

Q

c:**•)

§v - . *-; .- *' —

OZccLUQCCOLUV.<Iocc•

a

0zLUZOCL

t- t-0 01- 1-z z0 0o ot- 1-o o(11 LU-5 -0o oCC OCa. CL

.. tj

z- ,

F"

•"•

Cflc.011•5'o• CDa

ECO

1a.0).£enCD

TJCD"e/5CD3crCDcr

CD

CDenCDCL

1

1CDa.

I

CDa.£CDa

dCDa.ECOCO

'

j/j,-.i

p

fl

^

X-O

0

pi

jst

1?r

fc

i

"

x

'

^

-

^t

h

y>fxg.4fx.s)M

— "•

VVXT*

s

X

tetrad

J*<ir

i1

s)

S

JVow\'

*ux.

xXJ

ini

ar

x

>**S?6r*»

W*

%l

xi

QK

\_

\r\t

PI

^

JSS»

\\_*&*^

tSK

J-iix>

xi,

-s

/~v

toiQ_V-

i

-x -

«•*•

•

^

*

S*

V.

.M

1

.**

'r

j

^

\Jjfjr;Jss»"»e

«*

^

^

!t

p

\vJr

>.CO•of»c •

AR300I32

aE

mpan

>j « >.

2 ll% tir03 O '

-i uj o2' U

-^ •* ' , J

w

^r-,.d d'- j7 "Z. Xx~ __ v\

c c x .o o rfo o •< 0i o

-xIS.

~ ;

X,

.***

C"

^

1

" *

Xv

,:-s• V-,

'<}"'-X

.\

\l ;

»-

f.,1^l

5

^

h

Q0-JVlx"

" -

, rte^

^

0_ - ,*"*x,.

^. *>.pC

V.*

4

•••S;V> . '<.•x w

'. *"i

^ ' "x_^ -J

• -^

'$.$"~">

d•z.ai

Q h- S °a! < 0 • £ £a. p l- D H i_^ Z j? fc O Q 0s i 8 o s t tLU b >- P-; h- Z Z

/ n ^ ^ b c t y C C O OJ 2 p - z g c c o o oCO 2 H H m 0_ , .> < CO !< < ai £ £i f A 1 1 1 M i rf ^-* *•-'_] C/J UJ Q; — 1 CC uj uj< lil Q Q Q L U - 3 - 3Z b ca co z I— OO<£ < < < UJ < C C D C^ Q -J _J CO Q Q - C Lcc0u.h-coUlDO '•tUl s.CC xT

\ 9V ,

••Ci

1•X' I].'J*.;x

<:»«-J "''X*-tJ 'X

•Tfl^ »•'">\\Y\

l( J%^^

vl

'"')->

*" rf

>

v\

'V*x

-' 1'A,',("^ ,.

•-Jo•fi,

*XIy'Ur <

0~*s'

'T1

X

I >i_4

p,"s

/

k1

'M] *^

,-vt:

i/-rQj/jU.r—

/-,"*i >,_

v^5C5OtrfOtH ^

Ô« cc S ccqWg 2 2 Z ccSô z Z 5 ujm**m H f- 1- «^"H UJ UJ UJ ° X

J-3H o o o H ccI CC DC CC =i DjJKj a. CL Q. CD a.

cnC

tj3

"enc

'oCD ra.<fs

ECO1CLO)_c"enCD1-•aCOenCDcrCDa:

1raCDenCDai

3O>CDCL

COCO

0)exHCDd

COCO

1CD

1eaco

^J

'N

t .i-x

N^

,-Nj

^

'~>

-V

~

***sL

xi

'Ci

«x>

•j•0

-iCI

i

O<^s?

5 <,"\ JllÂ

^

x-

x—

-»

x-^

V

'">•*.

l\

•'•2i

*— .

!>>j *"sX

|1t.

^

X VJ

^- — >

'

"SBfc.W ft

X

(

-«—— «.

/"•

^ ^

^ _;

"j

•C••x.

p<

"" t

-Jt

1s

N.

X

3,uu

<

_?i V •«.•

x

^23**

b»»«

_

V.

o

<

s

J

;i

filX t^*

•«,

"Qn

xA-

s ^

use*

1,ag*

*fe

i

"

,

<•£

•X

^

— s

&*»m^

•' —

X,

^

—

-J

^

0~"

*c

••5

, ••j •*'

-x.

,.X,

.-

X1/3J5*»

g C

N.!

•t:

<

-•!

r j-

io ;-"i ^

vj

^ ^

—— ?*

__•"

"*-

~

>

X

/

'-

.-•

-A

"

»

^

<-xTi

•~x

'~>j

fj

••t

j\

;~

_/*

Js

,— •^

i:

•*\~*« \

rh

;;•

^.cc

t to r

ush

si

_a:

"3 .CDai

15

I2"en3encn3O•aCOCOc."3en

3 •;— c•i1 >c. •§1 £of

pected

to <

CO

1COcn.2

I1

Please Sp

*

«i

S "eS J3"ICO _

1 1 ^ 31 g ea

ioCLS

approved

by t

/•

CD \n \Ing^ "n

ICDCOcn"3?

ndicate if samp

CD -en s.CO (

Q- t

| 0 E— • Z "

QUJCCDOLUCCLU5h-QZDOCE<£E3h-

O

Iu.i ÛJQQOC

I TiLU SoJ 3^ §o zQ.

Clisn

CL

Cfl•n>»CCO0.

WHITE -

YELLOW

--ft- f}-- AR300I33

CX"

f /""«—' J•o oZ Z? Hc co oO O< OCC O

o1-x z zco £ o

-J <

o Ob ->-OCO

2 F h- CD< co < <CO LU J -Juj Q o Qb co CD zQ 5 5 co Q ex E m „, pn—r • « s i

m

ozai

Q 0LU -p

Sîoc p pi_ z zDC 0 OO 0 O0- |_ L_ •m o o& LU UJLU -5 -0H- O O< CC DCQ CL CL

£_•

"••>

1:

o2 :-:DCUlQDC ..,OLUw

ODC£

cnCOo5In_c75'oCDCLCO

E21a.O)SInCDHT3

Requeste

CD

Preservativ

I1oo.eeflCO

ai 1CDaECOCO

6CDaeaCO

V"'.

C'

1r*"i

Uj

1

xj»J^

^n\• X-J

•^0v,

?i

V

j—

•X

/>

X

s

t

.<-

"?"1

Af*

v^•

<S.û-i3'Vts

Ii '

X.$ss l/•N**

,ijr

ii

._- --

xj**»

^•OiV*/

'"**.

v?5.

t

\.

^ ^3jr

g.pt-f «*&

W*

«

~l

xj

*

O*f\

^

v><J:

_

,-'

0*

L«**•>•^-.

?!)..._^ 6

/

^sJ"H•»*k^^x.

•— -— .

(

fc

•—X,

MM*

**!»

•"""I..M,

™u«SaS«**

^

*"

V.*1

-xu.

-os'

)*%

o

_-V

V"4r-

\J/

.

SeMgoE

I0

"inSc2

iften30•oca£•5en0) t_S ">

*«.

.c i2O) ^

"0? •*- 2D) C a

JZ ^

§ 8£ 2S ?o |*. c« 3CD ~

3 OCO ^

en.2

CD 3 ~CO Si O —S 3 1 W

O ^CD CD'? «°- 17

""I . 1>» £

(B•O »£ =.•O CDa. • g •cL\ .yCO X 13CD \ .5->Q •• QJ. 4

1 S «f — i

— z zoQ 5LU CJ£ u.§ iÛJ uj •CC ' Qut , —1 E• 1— <Q ^

o - •g? i 12 co c£C CO O3 O Z

OCcc LULU O

LU 03 <

115Z Z S

O O O oUJ LU LU i_

O O O Hoc oc ic d . - - 3 ^ »~ =— !- i- f~ ;— 5 p z $CL a. o_ co a, _ ______ • _____ H- o, <n

SS

Ipany

c

NLY 'ac y

o al ld

B USE

-Origin

Field

I ll% pu. 5 >

APPENDIX B

PERIMETER ASBESTOS AIR MONITORING DATA

: .-! < AR300I35"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS" "

>-^f rr -*:

001

Professional Service Industries, Inc.. . _. . . Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division 412/922-4000

Laboratory No. 889959 PJEHDif PHT Order No. PMT-1356Client No. P.O. #1368 HlSlr y/Lni U Bate: 9/10/87

Client: • Remcor Inc.Post Office Box 38310Pittsburgh, PA 15238

i

Attention: James Balint Method: NIOSH 7400 MethodProject: Hunterstown Road

*Sampled By: Clientl

Sample PTL VolumeDescription Serial # (Liters) Fibers/cc LLD

WH-001 8712185 336.5 0.001 0.015

WH-002 8712186 352 J.0.001 0.014

WH-003 8712187 458 0.008 0.011

WH-004 8712188 482 L0.001 0.010

Analytical Blank; 9/1/87 N/A 0 1.5 Fibers N/A100 Fields

Reviewed And Approved By:

Josep/h. Klichni^cki' Glenn A. Goss,M.S., ManagerIndustrial Hygi;enist Asbestos Division

*ANALYTICAL RESttLTS REPORTED ON SAMPLES NOT COLLECTED BYPSI-PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY ARE BASED ON SAMPLING DATA PROVIDEDBY THE CLIENT.

LLD IS THE LOWER LEVEL OF DETECTABIHTY, DEFINED BY NIOSH AS10 FIBERS/100 FIELDS.

vDistribution: 1-Client Verbals 9/1/87dla . . • • •••-

AJI-rws cONfOfHruu. I'mui'tmi i of CUCNT*.mjnuRATioNor BTATXMKMTB.coNCLLJwaNBoocxrfucr* &R300I36• mmmtftvmo ffNOnB Ouw fffrrrwn

APPENDIX CSITE SURVEY MAP

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS

UNSCANNED ITEM(S)

ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MAY BE ASSOCIATEDWITH THIS DOCUMENT:

PHOTOGRAPHSDRAWINGS

OVERSIZED MAPSROLLED MAPS

PLEASE CONTACT THE CERCLA RECORDS CENTER TO VIEW THEITEM(S)

APPENDIX D

SITE WORK FORMS

: /J.-WJM.-W/"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE P$P§|.5jrs3 Oi39

FOREMAN DAILY REPORT ; Page _^ of

Date: #-/? -/??Start Time: £'OO »

Signature: _______________ Finish Tine: __£Superintendent Signature: ^>, s-k Jrn/i Weather: ^,

Description of Daily Activities and Events:SsfA'4 7*

Accidents:

Important Telephone Calls:

Materials Received:

Visitors on Site: Jr--/£-

SITE DAILY TIKE SHEET

EMPLOYEE CLASSTOTALur^Mrc1 fUw. .O

TASKS

CL sa sii=-l

7srjrsS

>3.S

FOREMAN DAILY REPORT Page af -'.'

Project No.: , Date: B~Project N'ame: Hi*s)//=rsfc ^ &*J /ffr Start Time:

' Foreman Signature: ________________ Finish Time:Superintendent Signature: / Z' m t Weather: -5 . . -,

Description of Daily Activities and Events

THUS

si,~<t~> < .~mj*r~J et-

Accidents:


Katerials Received:

isitors on Site:' . -Jeff s>*~j/+r ~7Z~ /f* /*,-*<.- -J,'*x /

SITE DAILY TIME SHEET

EMPLOYEE CLASSTOTALHO'Jr.5

T AS PCS

s Sl&l

9.<T

.

FOREMAN DAILY REPORT Page

Project No.: ° Date:Project Name: Hi fc** * 0** <, %g Start Time: £°<?rtForeman Signature: __________________ Finish Time: __£Superintendent Signature: ^ /&„»-,.— Weather: $„„„ .

Description of Daily Activities and Events

Accidents:


Materials Received:

Visitors on Site:' /


EMPLOYEE CLASSTOTALKOUF.S

TASKS

fft

II /Y

G.

813

o -

til l*2

FOREMAN DAILY REPORT Page of

Project No.: ___Project Name: //**/?%';% /?v~/ 4,'7¥ Start Time:Foreman Signature: _________________ Finish Time:Superintendent Signature: — Weather: _

Description of Daily Activities and Events: ..X - 7 //>- / < *M liJ£sTf——5'etfJeJ\ x? i**r,S <S-rs ) sn fc/ &„ 7 —— S"/..*_ ~,,/.

/, j- xi 77- f_____

A> y/-X/-ya // < //x /-

Accidents:

Important Telephone Calls

Materials Received:

Visitors on Site:


EMPLOYEE: CLASSTOTALHOUr.S

TASKS

-Jf-ffi C*~<»ef I /Wxr I g I g Igu<^ /$r/s</r I . r

B -

A43-WMU3

FOREMAN DAILY REPORT ' Page of

Project No.: _____Project Name: Hu*1*,'f-%,j» f~-S *»W Start Time: g -oe>

1 Foreman Signature: _______________ Finish Time: ff-reSuperintendent Signature: "x : SiL,,* ^ Weather: ^ .

Description of Daily Activities and Events:siTs /

Accidents:

Important Telephone Calls

Materials Received:

Visitors on Site:


EMPLOYEE CLASSTOTALHOUF.S

TASKS

/flk,

i &-?gzJ?. r I

SR3'QOI

'""." " Project Name: /•

1'

t

By: ~c.'//.<S /S:'/~$ _____ Project No.: ~ a.Q —— —— / — ——————————————— ——— -• ———— •

Date: r •>-<-- Cs? ______________ Sheet _________ /_____ of /

Time: Start f ." Finish

TRAINING SESSION DOCUMENTATION RECORD

Instructor:1 '

J Material Covered: ___/• <" •- -•- >•___AJZC^ • ••' - ,^ -rr /_r _ff;.y

1ATTENDEES

"j , NAME (print) SIGNATURE

'.s *•,,.S//f <&*-&f;

Routing: Site File (copy)Project Files

flR300U5

•]

— j

J

Project Name:

By: ___'./,">•''_'/ ,/y&? .4'~f_____. Project No.: c /*'~\r-->____Date: c /^ -" C f~' '' _________ Sheet ______^_______ of /

Time: Start :<,// Finish f

~| ' TRAINING SESSION DOCUMENTATION RECORD*

Instructor:i Material Covered: ____X-/- 7- • 'r-r_<"._••"

1 ——I' * . i

j ATTENDEES

I

1 ! NAME (print) - SIGNATURE

,c r

lfw &t

t-| Routing: Site File (copy)J .• Project Files

AR300U6

.j'!

Project Name:

By: -\X>x-- -X /• *~_________ Project No.: eP / ZDate: ,/*°- <g£ - p 7 " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sheet _________/ of

Time: Start .?, -/V Finish


Instructor:i Material Covered: ____ :- xx '—.-;{' X'->- X^-*-

..., ... '. x-T- .X' x>-< <"—— *—z —— ' rr; ~j _ ____ / -l x",- ' '".

r .J '

j ATTENDEES

"1 NAME (print) SIGNATUREJ • ' .. /

.. s, X

Routing: Site File (copy)Project Files

! • ' • . . . . ' AR3GQU7

HS-3

Project Name:

By: S-?</ .&><!__________ Project No.:

Date: _______8'ZY- 8f________ Sheet _____/______ Of _/_Time: Start &.'0O Finish V£>~>_'z5


Instructor: ________________________________________———————————7 »————— —Material Covered: -/££<-7--9y <~/C«_r.--2%*<? . <O?» mA Ct- o7 s&ft

~ g>-fl»x\s Ojf&r7**'e 7t,*s \ f J

i. ATTENDEES

NAME (print) SIGNATURE

Routing: -_)ice File (copy)Project Files

AR300U8

tSLL/BCRING DRILLING AND WATER. SAMPLING EQUIPMENTField Equipment Used for Week Ending:P""n T A'**" V-9f"V& • i1 * r.cr A_ \y \ ., - • i«r <•-x * w_/c^ •_. 4xc--*/ s u x! i^ y Y\\ ^ - ' i\

*

ITEM--_ -r-m(V ui

• 2h .<L.«rrq

^-\(i V'.'vn •

C p "TruC-V^fc

^ r..'). 4 r

"Trailer

/\Yxrvrtva \iaOc-.r (WW* DV/A

J ric-t '-k-„;-...- . '..

•5= I r.f.,- .K n <YM rv \«>Vtf<-, ....... . . -1

p-ir«54 iV^ m-V .

... ... • ......

Mt_i

—— LJ-

M

L(

HVWD M

SL/N MON

Project Ko.: l^y^.

uJE

1

I.

1j

•^ l I1 1

M i 11 !! I! 1 *I 1

1! 1I .j

=.---l- , |i " i !

' ! (.,-

-c-- p-.;-., - -\~ : L. : I

> i |"- l ^ -: ---'--' " "" i I

! ' I- " ' - i f

_ , i?ge S si::v: -. ^ [ jI I1 i '

Wl:-sSi.-. •;.«.. -.-I'.— • • --. -.--•

WED

.S'

THUu'.5

F?J

it

SAT

1l"2/. <? ^

B.S R.5

1 I1

\3,S M.5"

R,5

15" 5-

\3.5

!?.S

.S"

P.S"

9.S"tf,5

1

1

1IIii jjj{••-ti

i

TOTALWEEK

33

. 3

<* *r

o?

?"5 v

5? 3 v

33 w

53 ^i i1 23 v•i ililiiiiiifiii

I ' I II I I !

• • f, - — - — • " '- _ ^

~^~ ' - . ' . • ' r •.''*.* . - r - **'" i"*,'«* • '•--'" * • • "*"..,. - • • " '"."v • ' „•"*" "-j- -,"*.r. ••"•- .- . . - . . - - - - • - ' • "

-.;•'/ -.- - ' •••— . *i'iir< ..\" * ' "^* .-"*r" '"' . """ * ' . • '

WELL/BORING DRILLING AND W-.TER SAMPLING EQUIPMENTField Equipment Used for Week Ending: <?-Project Ncde: 0,Cs- ry VNW*n<*>

*—>

ITEM

^T_\C -Vr.v>S -I PVvr.-w

smH

M » - " f-

Y~- u- \!no

C D\-fJT ~\u•TrvxaeiT:

f/yArxV beA-e.c.'Vr.r •* .:??/,(-m/i .

. • •

SLJN WON

Project No

TUE WED

U iIG.S"

H

qj:

L\

5-M

I!i!j!t!i!

|

;'

1! i

1 i 11 ! 11 . i 11 i 1f 1 11 1 I

l \\

\ \{\

J

10.5"

.:<?-]?S3

THU P?J

ID. 6"

I

lo.s"

„ 1SAT

*P,* IT*i T1 w ..0.1

UZEK

l\

11

?\I \

1^ll

tf?l"

——— •

;J

v.'/yys

Jflf?300i50

sz- r : _V~'jLj!r- ''• ' •-*•* " «i*i ' -.--., -" ' "*" —— _ -- - . _~_ ~ ' -V --

JOBSITE SAFETY CHECKLIST

Project Project No. Person Making Inspection

tzrerJobsite Location - Date of Inspection

A. Adequate at time of inspection. C. Item not applicable.B. Needs immediate attention. N/A No items in section applicable.

Check one of the following: Check one of the following:A B C A B C

A. Poiteri k Record! N/A O E. Electrical N/A •1. OSHA poster displayed? • D Q 29. Distribution boxes covered or marked? ODD2. Foremen holding weekly safety meetings 30. GFI's in use or positive grounding been

— recording? _f D D tested? ODD3. Emergency medical numbers posted? • D D 31. Temporary lighting protected? ODD4. Explosives inventory current? D D •5. Copy of OSHA regulations on jobsite? • D D6. Have utility contacts been made/ F. Tools N/A O

recorded? • D D 32. Damaged or broken tools tagged out of7. Are safety talk subjects available? • D D service?8. Blank accident report .forms available? BOD 33. Proper storage space provided?9. Using Employment Applications before 34. Operative guards on all power tools?

hiring? • D D 35. Persons using powder actuated tools• 10. Are Safety posters being displayed? • D D certified?

36. Are guards provided on grinders? D37. Airhose couplers secured or safety valve

Housekeeping & Sanitation N/A D 3S ToSLina orooerlv used? * n nE E 39 ™3%l£ffl8i!£lZ. being used? I S E

fOf. D * '14. Materials of all types properly stockpiled? • D D ground/ Q D •15. Is an area provided for waste and trash

and is it removed regularly? * D D G structures N/A D16. Adequate lighting in passageways, stair- '41. Floor openings covered or guardrailed? D D «„ a.ys,a"d. ?rka;eas7, . , „ 2°° 42. Standard guardrailing on scaffolds, bridge17. Toilet facilities adequate and dean? • -D D decks, floors of buildings, work platforms18. Sanitary supply of drinking water? Una and walkways? Q n •19. Disposable drinking cups and refuse 43. work areas clear of debris, snow, ice, and

container? ft D D qrease? • n D20. Means provided for sanitizing personal 44. Adequate fire protection? • D D

protective equipment? ^ • D d 45> stairways provided with handrails? O D •ilfe * i * -*" 45- Hollow pan-treads filled with solid material? D D •

. .* .,i.%:sFi-.-. • 47. Ladders properly constructed? D D •C. Fire Protection W S 4a- Side rails of ladders extend 36" above

21. Are "No SmokingfjEFjammable1* signs landing? anaposted at all storagllind fueling locations? • D D ' 49. Scaffolds properly anchored, braced and

22. Clear access pro<mn<H4 all fire fighting plumb? . D D »equipment/are inspections i recorded? • D D 50. Protection provided over vertical rebars

23. Lacation of all fire! fighting equipment when working above? D D •1 prominently marked? • D D 51. Safety belts in use when guardrails are. 24. Are flammable liquids stored in approved absent? D D •

containers? HDD 52. Employees clear of swinging crane loads? D D •25. Fire extinguishers adequate size? • D D 53. Tag lines used on suspended crane loads? D D •26. ' targe fuel tanks properly diked and • 54. Gas cylinders separated, secured upright

separated? D D • and capped if not in use? • t D D55. Safety lines in use on suspendedscaffolds? O D •56. Heating devices properly ventilated? • D "D

/ 57. Gates functioning on all levels when_Flrit Aid N/A D / material or personnef hoists used? D D •27. First Aid Kits wjsJf 'stocked? • D D 58. Safe procedures being used to wreck28. Trained first-aider on jobsite? . •DO forms? D D •

AR300I5I

A. Adequate at time of inspection. C. Item not applicableB. Needs immediate attention. N/A No items in section applicable.

Check one of the following: Check one of the (ollowiA B C " A

H. Traffic Control N/A •• 103. Excavated material stockpiled far enough59. Advance signing at approaches to work from the edge of the trench? • D D

areas? D D O 104. Laser warning signs in place? D Q •60. Correct message on signs? D D D 105. Adequate ventilation in pipe? DOB61. Traffic control set-up on highways meet 106. Traffic control adequate? n D p

ODOT regulations? D D D 107. Sides of excavation for building shored or62. Flag persons properly dressed and protected? D D J_

equipped? ODD 108. Oxygen level tested in tunnel, shafts or63. Flag persons performing properly? D D D confined space? D D •

'•' 109. Public protected from exposure to openI. Welding & Cutting N/A • excavation? • D D

64. Using right type eye protection? D D Q65. Gages, valves, torches and'lines in good M. Miscellaneous N/A D

condition and free of oil and grease? ODD no. Sufficient quantities of approved personal66. Cylinders not in use capped? ODD protective equipment on thejobsitse? HDD67. Cylinders in use or storage secured up- 111. Proceduresestablishedtohandleloxicand

right? D D O carcogenic materials? • D D68. Anti-flashback valves at torch? D D D 112. Sewers, vaults, tanks and bins tested for69. Stored oxygen separated from acetylene adequate oxygen levels be/ore employees

by 20 ft.? ODD are permitted to enter? D D *70. Fire extinguisher near welding or cutting 113. Everyone wearing hard hat? * D D

operations? D D D 114. Fall protection being used on steel71. Adequate ventilation provided? D Q D erection? D D •72. Grounding for arc welding machine? Q D D 115. Walls properly braced (concrete and block73. All parts of arc welding outfits properly construction)? D D •

insulated? ODD 116. Toxic fumes, vapors and dusts present, isventilation adequate? • D DJ. Heavy Equipment N/A D

74. Operators wearing hard hats?75. Hearing protection being used?76. Dust Control?77. Haul road adequate and maintained?78. Equipment speeds excessive for safety?79. Horns and back-up alarms functioning?80. Clearing cabs on machines when clearing?81. Engines shut-down when refueling or

lubricating?82. Seat belts on machines with HOPS?83. Steps and hand holds adequate and safe

condition?84. Adequate lighting of haul roads at night?85. Parked or unattended equipment have

blade lowered to the ground?86. • No hitchhikers riding on equipment?87. '

D D117. Guards in place and used on wood working

machines? D D •g 118. Explosives being used, transported and

g • stored in compliance with regulations? D Dg g 119. Blaster following all safety precautions? D Dg g 120. Tunneling operations/lighting and ventila-g g tion adequate? Q D •

121. Belts, pulleys, shafts, gears and chainsg g guarded on all machinery and equipment? Unag g 122. Masonry saws grounded and personal

protective equipment being used? O D •r-i r-. 123. Exit signs over doors in offices and storageg 0, buildings? D D •

D Dg g "This checklist does not include all hazards on every job, but is

88 Dumo man orominentlv located? D • intended to remind you of most common hazards.89. Overhead guard on fork lift truck? D O • Unsafe acts and/or practices observed:90. Vehicles with restricted rear visibility

equipped with operating back-up alarms? •DOK. Cranes N/A P

91. Power line distance from machines? D D O —————————————,——————————————————————92. Annual inspection? ODD93. Cables in safe condition? D D D ————————————————————————————————————94. Rear swing protection and pinch point

guarding? D D D ——————————————————————————————————95. Exposed gears, shafts and belts guarded? D D O96. Fire extinguisher, boom angle indicator, ___________________________________________

load capacity chart and hand signal posterin crane? D D O ———————————————————————————————————

97.. .Signs and/or flags on cranes in transit? D D D ., .98. Operator making daily inspections and ——————————————————————————————————

tests? ODDL. Trenching & Excavations N/A D I the undersigned superintendent have reviewed the indicated

99. Trench side shored, layed back or boxed? • D D hazards and will take the necessary action to immediately100. Utilities contacted-'and located before correct them.

digging? , ' ~~ ' • O O , I " , «f I101. Ladder in the trench? D D • >!., hi (\ 'U.JU_.102. Stop logs placed where necessary afong ———ril***W.—U." rTgwl*a-' —————.——

top of the trench? ' D D • • Signature of Project Supervisor"*

!: " "P! SR300I52

JOBSITE SAFETY CHECKLIST

1 / ••' / - <~- •X X£y.T

Prelect ' Project No. Person Making Inspection

'

Jobsite Location * • Date of Inspection

A. Adequate at time of inspection. C. Item not applicable.B. Needs immediate attention. N/A No items in section applicable.

1

1

*

Check one of the following: Check one of the followimABC A B

A. Poiters & Records N/A D E. Electrical N/A D1. OSHA poster displayed? EDO 29. Distribution boxes covered or marked? D D i2. Foremen holding weekly safety meetings 30. GFI's in use or positive grounding been

— recording? ODD tested? n g I3. Emergency medical numbers posted? B D D 31.' Temporary lighting protected? D D I4. Explosives inventory current? D D E95. Copy of OSHA regulations on jobsite? & D D6. Have utility contacts been made/ F. Tools N/A D

recorded? £3 D D 32. Damaged or broken tools tagged out of7. Are safety talk subjects available? QD D D service? ja D C8. Blank accident report forms available? HDD .33. Proper storage space provided? B D I9. Using Employment Applications before 34. Operative guards on all power tools? S D [

hiring? • B D D 35. Persons using powder actuated tools10. Are Safety posters being displayed? BOD certified? * D D £

36. Are guards provided on grinders? D D i37. Airhose couplers secured or safety valve .

d. Houtekeeping & Sanitation N/A D 3S TOOIS beina orooerlv used? en n r

% gS 3_3 ."S!2S I I I 1 ' * E13. Nails removed from lumber? DDE nrnunrf? n n R14. Materials of all types properly stockpiled? m D D* . 9rouno- D u E

• '• 15. Is an area provided for waste and trash'-•'-' and is it removed regularly? B D D G structures N/A D

16. Adequate lighting in passageways, stair- ' '41. Floor openings covered or ouardraiied? DDE• ways and work areas? £55 42. Standard guardrailing on scaffolds, bridoe

.,.. 17. Toilet facilities adequate and dean? • D D decks, floors of buildings, work platforms18. Sanitary supply of drinking water? 13 DO and walkways? DDE

.-•••. 19. Disposable drinking cups and refuse _.3> work areas clear of debris, snow. ice. and•;. container? G3 D O grease? ' . H D

20. Means provided for sanitizing personal 44. Adequate fire protection? B Dprotective equipment? • E D D 45. stairways provided with handrails? D D

46. Hollow pan-treads filled with solid material? D D.*•£. i - . 47. Ladders properly constructed? D D

C. Fire .Protection N/A D 48. Side rails of ladders extend 36" above21. Are."No Smgking" or "Flammable" signs landing? D D

posted at alljsfprage and fueling locations? IS D D 49. Scaffolds properly anchored, braced and22. Clear acce$|j>rovided to all fire fighting Dlumb? D D

equipmentSSIJOSpections recorded? HDD 50. Protection provided over vertical rebars23. Location of.sH fire fighting equipment ' when working above? D D' , prominently marked? - ffi D D 51. Safety belts in use when guardrails are24. Are flammable liquids stored in approved absent? B D

containers? §3 D D 52. Employees clear of swinging crane loads? O D25. Fire extinguishers adequate size? EDO 53. Tag lines used on suspended crane loads? D D25. Large fuel tanks properly diked and 54. Gas cylinders separated, secured upright

separated? D D 0 and capped if not in use? D D55. Safety lines in use onsuspendedscaffolds? D D56. Heating devices properly ventilated? Q D57. Gates functioning on all levels when

T. First Aid N/A;, O material or personnel hoists used? D D27. First Aid Kits well stocked? BD n D 58. Safe procedures being used to wreck28. Trained.first-aider on jobsite? SI D D forms? O D

AR3QQI53

A. Adequate at time of inspection. C. Item not applicableB. Needs immediate attention. N/A No items in section applicable.

J

j

*j

Check one of the following: Check one of the following

A B C A B C

H Traffic Control N/A ffl 103. Excavated material stockpiled far enough«;Q Advance sioning at approaches to work from the edge of the trench? B D C

areas? D D D 104. Laser warning signs in place? DDE• 60 Correct message on signs? P D D 105. Adequate ventilation in pipe? DDE'* 61 Traffic control set-up on highways meet 106. Traffic control adequate? D D C' ODOT regulations? D D P 107. Sides of excavation for building shored or

fi? Flaa persons properly dressed and protected?,' "' eauipped? D D D 108. Oxygen level tested in tunnel, shafts or! G3 Flaa persons performing properly? D D D confined space?» 109. Public protected from exposure to open

I. Welding 4 Cutting N/A El excavation?64 Using right type eye protection? ODD

V 65. Gages, valves, torches and lines in good M. Miscellaneous N/A Dcondition and free of oil and grease? D D D 110. Sufficient quantities of approved personal

66 Cylinders not in use capped? ODD protective equipment on the jobsitse?67! Cylinders in use or storage secured up- 111. Proceduresectablishedtohandletoxicand

rioht? D D D carcogenic materials?68. Anti-flashback valves at torch? D D D 112. Sewers, vaults, tanks and bins tested lor69. Stored oxygen separated from acetylene adequate oxygen levels before employees

by 20 ft.? " D D D are permitted to enter? D D70. Fire extinguisher near welding or cutting 113. Everyone wearing hard hat? £3 D

operations? D D D 114. Fall protection being used on steel71. Adequate ventilation provided? D D D erection?72. Grounding for arc welding machine? D D D 115. Walls properly braced (concrete and block73. Ail parts of arc welding outfits properly construction)?

insulated? D D D 116. Toxic fumes, vapors and dusts present, isventilation adequate? B D C

Heavy Equipment N/A D 117 Guards in place and used on woodworking74. Operators wearing hard hats? ffl D D machines? S n C75. Hearing protection being used? 3 D D 118> Explosives being used, transported and-f' SUM! £1,5 In-mi-iP -nd maintained? El n n stored in compliance with regulations? DDE/7. Haul road adequate» «.nd maintained? B D D 119> B|2_Jer Jo||owing a|, safety precautions? DDE7_: §SnsmancI ffi alarr^rfunctioning? ODD 12°- Tunneling operations/lighting and ventila-80 Clearino cabs on machines when clearino? ODD &> „„..—,.. .. ' i _ j t _, , . i — i t — 1 1 $ .ai enaines shut-down when refueling "or 121- Belts- PulleVs. shafts, gears and chains *

lubricatina? 13 D D guarded on all machinery and equipment? ffl D C82. Seat belt's on machines with ROPS? 13 d D 122. on saws unde personal 'S3.

84. Adequate lighting of haul roads at night? D D E^-85. Parked or unattended equipment have

blade lowered to the ground? 12 D P85. No hitchhikers riding on equipment? ID D DS7. Full fire extinguisher pear refueling tank? §3 D D88. Dump man prominently located? DDE89. Overhead guard on fork lift truck? D D D Unsafe acts and/or practices observed:90. Vehicles with restricted rear visibility

equipped with operating back-up alarms? D D D* ' ra*=s _______________________________________________

K. Cranes N/A- ifvf'ff ; ' - -91. Power line distance. from machines? D D D —————————————————————

• 92. Annual inspection?;.-~ ODD93. Cables in safe condition? D D D ———————————————.———————94. Rear swing protection and pinch point

Guarding? • ODD ——————————————————————95. txposed gears, shafts and belts guarded? D D D96. Fire extinguisher, boom angle indicator, ——————————————————————

load capacity chart and hand"signal posterin crane? , • _. _P D D ——,—————————————————.——

97. Signs and/or flags on cranes in transit? P D D98. Operator making daily inspections and ————————————————————

tests? . P • P • D .Trenching & Excavations N/A P I. the undersigned superintendent have reviewed the indicated599. Trench side shored, layed back or boxed? HDD hazards and will take the necessary action to immediately4

100. Utilities contacted and located before correct them.digging? E3 D P

101. Ladder in the trench? P D Q102. Stop logs placed where necessary along^«^4_> f /Wt_> Via WC W ¥»•!&! W llWWW«J*»t»IT btt^llW ——————— —— - - - - - ^ _

top of the trench? . P P E3 •• Signature of Project Supervisor

CO(-1

• — fCJ ~ 0)

-4 K CJOJ l-l *O0) •XJ C.o —< s

to>i CXJ -0) uj

e>(0O nC. •M ;

0t-<

XJU 32 O—t "«xH C

(J

A

•A

IQ\

£$

e.t!Ci _ d

.§bo

O

tof XJ &

Q

*- 0.

c

o _ _ _CK

cs

^•/s»

UJ

c_01

tf

Of

•o«

00

iO

-I<r

Ck!t30.11)

\A

v\u)

ftrt3QfOI55

SioHH-lco

00

u-Q

_

^

-s-~~4) *->

0) 3 CJ

-4 U 0U M JOa> • ••XJ (2.o * *£J- 3 -—c. cv>-u

. bO >«X C «

u, c)

10 1- .n >-

CJ XJ

o mC.-I** >3e- u_o

so.5XJ

.' Ctsu-c.

.-•---- w. - ..-;.: e_

1'

XJ03S OH Gi— i

oXJRC

^

_

- *-r

ji• *

C

"*£1JV

Uj

<cx-

u£I£y)O

<r-o^3\MOQ!

o>.

> .

c1~c

1Ji— v-

*rt

3c<y

(\/

'< ~

rO

j"v~-»

*"

i.yfeat

DO- ^s ^

">-.

-BO/j£))|

f0t-ho

I

7

,v_Bi• '_'

g"4^o*--*

0* V

w ,

/>swO

1

s

CX>

>'i--- «—

"Z

>

dj

•* < jS

N^

XD>

3

t

1%5.j^3<o^

o

* •C

r-—.QDiin

oo

i

-:_„-: -

" „ 4

iSES"'-,.. ..- •**•-"'':-•-f' "*™ *?T

AF

-T -KW-,

X

30

~- ~3S '-

Oi

•as**ti,

56

•TJiP

OOF-'i':

ii'M

¥

^ -S

*

2

j

APPENDIX E

TEST PIT LOGS, NORTH AREA

SR3QG157"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS"

REMCOR

REMCORTEST PIT CLASSIFICATION

PROJECT NAMEFIELD ENG./GEO.COORDINATES

tyuntz'/cvid 0- fa*_. . tos-rn ppn.iFrr WIIMRFP a7.?,?3•n SA*n-»ue. APPROV n FV/

HFPTW TO GWI

PAGP npTEST PIT WO "7T5 /DATE B/S?/

11co

UJ

l_Qtra.joto

5"DESCRIPTION

«>c!OOQ REMARKS

NOTES: '„ OR.

PRH IFPT NIAMF* A

FIELD ENG./GEO.iCOORDINATES

"oft -*/'<*- pRn.lFP.T WtlMRFR &73Z3f>Jr.' a/J£- APPRO* FI FW

HFPTH TO KWI

PAGF OF

TEST PITDATE ...

WO -r-<P -^_// /_9 7

/.O —

^.o — —

3-0

REMCORay;'''- '.'.jK-.-~ ~~SS3gfK~- -flSJ*3389Sjwi-\*r'':-. •-'" "V-V. '•' ' .-*i.'-: *;'.->;.."• -•••-"*'!*s ;V;* iifiSiS

_£. r _ <?

1F PROJECT NAME 1FIELD ENG./GEO.

TEST/UA/TE&TW**.ZoAb - fJoft 77/

£Sl£lLosJ£-

PIT CLASSIFICATIONDPRO.IFCT NIIMRFR ^ 25APPRny FI FVDFPTH TO fiWI

l«%PAGP OFTEST PIT NO Tf>~ SDATE Ss/ r/f?''?

to

LESOIL PRO DESCRIPTION OCD

to 2 REMARKS

TO/3

etJTs 3orrT.££tT>

>t'•Y*

C-oiJrr*-ffje.ie.A

NOTES- £, TT/ «c r ;*-. ^ ^ i.*-' 3'00|go

TEST PIT CLASSIFICATION

PROJECT NAMEFIELD ENG./GICOORDINATES

•t+,vrv'*fn,*.5- xU/»/5-,Oo,<77*pRn)f-rT NIIMRFR e*73Z3"n £/+f/i-j>*J£. APPROy Fl FV :

HFPTH TD RWI.1

PAGE , OFTFST PIT WO -TP -H~DATE 8//9/B7

i.<*c-~«»;s_r*

REMCOR ~\


Ppn.iFrT NAMP &**-*S<>*™ PRn.iFrrr fuiiMRFR &73Z.3FIFI n FNfi /RFO £fe' °»J£- APPROy Fl FV/nOORniNATF55 DFPTH TD RWI

..--.-•.-Jj

PAGF OFTFST PIT WO TT13 3DATE i3/7$/i&'7

UJ V

UJ_l

oto

i: /"

DESCRIPTION ODD REMARKS

3,0

6.0'.

* +

VVWZJST f=W /V^AJTS r«««As ^^c. 'A'c/e rc /=•/£/»_;/V AJ 73 . ««E/SJx

NOTES- '

//# frz££ «£/£<»_/>O ,d A /I-TT?*/?. ijiJ&S

BR300I62


PROJECT NAME J f - J flTPROJECT NUMBERFIELD FMftVftFn aftftt,ofj&, APPROX. ELEV.

DATE B//9/07COORDINATES_________ DEPTH TO GWL —— ———

PAGE__OF ,TEST PIT NO.~rf>-

UJ

x " 5

oto SO

IL PRO DESCRIPTION om

C02 REMARKS

NOTES-

F/t-#•

I

CT7.fJt: Si

T&r c&tt.AT

TEST*

REMCOR pf-rTEST PIT CLASSIFICATION

//u*nf:*i7*»>fJPPn IFTT ISJAMF A"k*/}-A/o. />'PR."i.lFr.T NIIMBFR &7?2-~!FIFI n FIMR /KFC\ BAs/tetiz APPRny FI FWr.r>nRniNATF5? DEPTH TO RWI

rPAGF OPTFST PIT NO T/7- >''..DATE 8/2.o_l&>~7

DEPTH

( )

to

PROFILE

SO

// '77" A' ' r/C\

DESCRIPTION OCD. REMARKS

7J1?

70 2>/f/C/C/f Y ft lift £

72

NOTES-

/Oo G/Louf^k tu/f r_?/Q i-o/li1f) ovA

*2rs. r-


PROJECT NAMEFIELD ENG./GEO.COORDINATES

#U*J.rKST*«x3r /?»/»* -.A/,.-</>pRn.,F(Tr MUMRFR S732.2

~r\ &.Asi-.ot$c AppRny FI FWDFPTH TO fiWI

;

PAGE OFTEST PIT WO ~T -DATE ©/20/ar


Don irrr WAUF £&A&-A/o#.rHFIFI n FWR /RFn BAstt.o&e-rnnpniNATFS

ppn.iFrr WIIMRPR Z.APPRny FI FWDEPTH TH fiwi

PAGF OFTEST PIT NO TV -?DATE G/sq'/a-?

11to SOIL PROFILE

DESCRIPTION

*'

Oco REMARKS

« 7/°/-//?r/°.-/Sfrf>l-2A

TPf- V/1

T/3/ ^

TPI-g'

5,0'

*i-

NOTES- „ ,- /(_> X/' ' " X

DRO \fC~T NAMF

FIELD ENG./GEO..X.COORDINATES


v*_-A/»«ry ppnjFr.T MIIWRFR &722S?jS/to*J£. APPRny Fl FV

DEPTH T" RWI

.

PAfiF OFTEST PIT NO TP'/ODATE S/Zo/SV

'•

UJ

11V)

PROFILE

SO

DESCRIPTION OCDto' 2 REMARKS

J.o'

TPZ-5"

TP2.-33

- _ 7T2- f

<t_"rf

- ._./7 •_. j« f • •-*•-" '»^ & r i t ~ r tx- - •• • «v*«-> « j* *^* f f f-** ft \». -^

2.o f

5Z;/0-ZS'- 78 ? 0/z 7$?—

S&-2.2.0

e.£ 7zr<;sJ"

/J

flR300167

APPENDIX FTEST PIT LOGS, SOUTH AREA

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBL48300168

r-±s=»to-•" -~-~g-, .-I"" fff f Cjir. ---: " ' - " " • • . ' ~ - '• ^ - •

/Vr- //

TEST PIT CLASSIFICATIONrr;e-"7»*>A/

PROJECT NAME - *A £££Z2L PROJECT NUMBERFIELD FNB'/RFf. B4suo*>£ APPROX. ELEV. —————————COORDINATES__________ DEPTH TO GWL

PAGE__OFTEST PIT WO

a

UJ V_lt-li< <to

PROFILE

SO

DESCRIPTION omto'2 REMARKS

£K,TT-

L/toHT 6,6 A72"° &e>/t.

of

+ l\r?^.j,**.Qf*\/.o A£ a.t.'f-'a f iC.L . /A/C«

2.0' 2/6/VT c /f/J-f 3/1-7 r*

TO ft

/SHger*. of

NOTES'-%lJo

?-5AR'56oi69

-d *-- - —————————-— ————————————-—————— - --'--.— . .. ' - - , - - . - - _ _ _ - _^_-

REMCOR<ip>?<vr?A

TEST PIT CLASSIFICATION ;,•,:.*)^• -/4" PROJECT NAME Xr

FIELD ENG./GEO. *COORDINATES

U. --?*«rvPRn.lFr.T MtlMRFR "? 5/i«>Aj£ APPRny Fl F^

DFPTH Tf> fiWI

r/2 3? PA6F OFTEST PIT NO -Tf>-/2-~DATE &/2.S~/&7

oto

DESCRIPTION toZ REMARKS

J,o'

NOTES;/Jo

ftR300!70

P'T /3 _ - -*-

TEST PIT CLASSIFICATION ,".."' !

QOf\ IFPT MAIulF KjoAi>,SouTH

FIELD ENG./GEO._ f£ii£±L _rnnpniisiATFS

.)PRO.IFCT NIIMRFR 7523APppny FI FWnFPTH TO ftWI :

PAGE OFTEST PIT NO -7P/3DAT E a/Z .T/B 7

1 . ' 1 -t

to SOIL PROFILE

°'DESCRIPTION OtD

to 2 REMARKS

.-»'

5.C7'

NOTES-

flR300!7l

-2——W*W~ :..- «•!-™=«fl>iK?


NAMEFIELD ENG./GICOORDINATES

tfwrfffSTavA- £oA-.fo*TH pRn.)FrT MUMRPR 373Z.Z

•c\B*f/<-<»3£ APPRny FI FV/DEPTH TD RWI

PAGE OFTEST PIT WO 7~P-/y-DATE Bf2.yr/S7

UJX

||to

UJ

.occa.oto

DESCRIPTION OCDto 2 REMARKS

• /.o'-TPi-iA

7P/-2J5TPt-36rPt-5

TPI-ZC

{,.0'

S.o'

~ F

-5/7-r*/Z,o'I rtt-L '?<*£T£b £o*£: 0™eK**•"»** j • - -

Of TH£f//3/e» us.

IfjftS

OVA Z£Al>itJ<x o/= _PPM.

rpt 4* U £/>£•# MOST / r-tf/Ztssiii.

1,o' -I

?.o

/o.o'

wnrcc // utM£fJ£'OfJ<> of ~7H/SINU I C. d • ' . . .,

TEST

PRD IFCT NAME °*t> -So THFIELD ENG./GEO. COORDINATES

]A£tt.o*>£.

PIT CLASSIFICATION

PROJECT NIIMRFR 7j?2$APPROX FI.FVHFPTH TO RWI

- .',-•. •PAGETESTDATE

OFPIT NO -rPy_T_

iio UJ V

to

PROFILE

SO

/VC/DESCRIPTION om REMARKS

\-s.o'

(,.<>'

•70'— -

S.o'

0,0 '

£*?<>£££>

/=/LCTP2-3A

"rPZ"5* • ' -"•.«_,?/,&

f>£.f!.CH~£.l>

<2c/J77f/-///J>T?2r/)Stric/z,

(___<?, o '

:.

PAth/r -Sew £•<$,£

• Otl. Y -.tQ M//J

NOTES- V _2-7 /&/C /W-S/ t. i •& fSt?/£//~*77OA} j£<f Q/-t-& /A c?/--* (1 IS£7~&h Y

!;• .:t ..' ' • J

-

= 2.0 PP/-S ftR300l73

APPENDIX GLABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS

"REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS? A rk rt I -J I

G-1

APPENDIX G' : &:•/<••*_•••LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORTS

-'• . 7 i< ...

To clarify the sample locations and types for purposes of reporting,revisions were made in sample nomenclature. The following is a key tothe numbering systems used in this report ("new numbers") versus thoseused in field sampling and laboratory reports ("old numbers").

Type New Numbers Old Numbers

Drummed Materials DW-9-1 TP1-1A North! DW-9-2 TP1-1B North

DW-10-3 TP2-1A NorthDW-10-4 TP2-1B NorthDW-14-5 TP1-1A SouthDW-14-6 TP1-1B SouthDW-14-7 TP1-1C SouthDW-15-8 TP2-1A SouthDW-15-9 TP2-1B SouthDW- 15-10 TP2-1C South

Soils '(grab - EP toxicity metals) SS-9-U TP1-2A North; SS-9-1B TP1-2B North

' SS-9-1C TP1-2C NorthSS-10-2A TP2-2A NorthSS-10-2B TP2-2B North

; - - - - SS-10-2C TP2-2C North* ,: SS-14-3A TP1-2A South

''--- • SS-14-3B TP1-2B South; SS-14-3C ' TP1-2C South',: SS-15-4A TP2-2A South:; SS-15-4B TP2-2B South: SS-15-4C TP2-2C South

UR300I75

-"--VSifc.' ^ -f sa-a- zjp;-,-*.&*, -r —•__.____£;-•* ji -— --f—

G-2

Type New Numbers Old Numbers :' "'

Soils (grab - selected VOCs) SS-9-1A TP1-3A North! SS-9-1B TP1-3B North

SS-9-1C TP1-3C NorthSS-10-2A TP2-3A NorthSS-10-2B TP2-3B NorthSS-10-2C TP2-3C NorthSS-14-3A TP1-3A SouthSS-14-3B TP1-3B SouthSS-14-3C TP1-3C SouthSS-15-4A TP2-3A SouthSS-15-4B TP2-3B SouthSS-15-4C TP2-3C South

Soils (grab - asbestos) Not Revised

Composite Soils (priority pollutants) PP-9-1 TP1-5 NorthPP_10-2 TP2-5 NorthPP-14-3 TP1-5 South

' . PP-15-4 " TP2-5 South

INTERNATIONALTECHNOLOGYCORPORATION

September 25, 1987

Mr. Tim Basilone ; ,iR.emedial Corporation701 Alpha Drive .i , .P.O. Box 38310Pittsburgh, PA 15238 "

Laboratory AnalysisProject: No. 662016

Dear Mr. Basilone:•

IT Analytical Services (ITAS) completed the analysis of the samples receivedin our laboratory on August 20 and 26, 1987. Results of the analyses arepresented in the enclosed tables and were determined in accordance withrecommended analytical procedures listed in the Method Reference.

Please note, there have been some changes in the preliminary results whichwere telecopied to you September 21 and 25, 1987.

The asbestos analysis will be completed some time next week. Should you haveany questions or need additional information, please contact us at thePittsburgh Laboratory. . :

Very truly yours, :

S. H. CochenourOrganics Manager

Approved By:William S. Davis, DirectorLaboratory Services

SHC;WSD:wsEnclosures

Regional Office5103 Old William Penn Highway. Export, Pennsylvania 15632 • 412-731-8806

SR300177

3 V;-tfe --r-i-*'- '..;-. ,,Sv

o o

<5

C

H

3 °0 =£ o g «•£ 2 £ S - I « 4! oa - •§•* g i g

0 & 5 a «AW a g OM g

?_;!! a!- | «• i -fvj u; X^x w «ri O —. »2 c - o e g gH

S ^ ^- gc

U 0 o c i ; o « gS S 8& « ' & 'S gs - 5- . s

•-.itit.j.gx T3 4J ^ y ;» ;- "tffl* B tO C ^-" -H J..-fc-sterSi..._ . 3 QJ o ij _j T- -™ss5rw o H >, ^ y O 1

(•j AJ u iJ cO ** ft? *-" *' - * • ". . bfl C> C *rH Ctt *• CJ ^^ O r

' O t>0 O —I -H lJ CCO O ( *Q £ C1J u_ fO i_tja^i c o u u o x o

g J3 J2 JJ 0) tS 0)

> C B - H O , D , S : ( l » (U "^

AR300I78

0)hn

§.

0)

§: * 25--ss ° § sI 0 5 - g - l-ow « O „S5 g w §

- COD J-i

t5

-e* 2 3 o o s 3 o -s, I sjca 7? °- to sr to c ,X --i "5 0*57 w i n 60'ia)_o'n - - ( u C °s s " •§" • " g gH

2 s: ii s> . &-3 I i £ «S o § I § I?s : i; g| « § -s g -sS S ^ » C g gH g » e

—10) W

w ekJ M WP5ij L H O ^ - . a ^ h O O ) S g 5 « >H5 " : S f t i l 0 o c ^ ° 2§ g «^ H - 3 a « 5 « > c ^ «> -g o -g, r X - b o - H O W i ^ > a u e u- g ^ o ^ o 0

0, .. B § g

c

o .«>

_ 0B g g

•O -) /-v > >C CO C -H -r-l3d) O AJ iJO H >, ^ y yu u u xj CO >* cob o e c ^ - i to •« a> •—• «jJ^ 8) -H »-( C'-s O S a ) Biy to o -H -^ i-i c( C O 0 4 . Q SO) U-i to iwX > r - i C B U i J O X Oeg jr u aj co cuu ns w — i ij 3 a>x a>o toe a; N-' t>, u ^ >, w

C - f a » - ( >, .H j-> >i — t AJ- H - 3 E S U 4 J ^ - l t 8 A J - H «-o w •-« eu o. c i ^ ~ i ( - i ^ - i - ^ u

pi

AR300I79

:f M ^ S ^ & ^ x :- - K :*--:.5

" ' INTERNATIONAL TLCHNOLOGY CORPORATION

TABLE 2"

SOIL ANALYSIS SUMMARYOF SELECTED VOLATILE ORGANICS

. FOR REMCOR/87323PROJECT NO. 662016

PARAMETER

SAMPLEIDENTIFICATION 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHYLENE

Concentration '•«/!-«•( 1)

TP1-3A HR-N 6,300 50

TP1-3B HR-N 970 <50

TP1-3C HR-N 39,000 6,800TP2-3A HR-N 130 <50

TP2-3B HR-N 1,000 51

TP2-3C HR-N . 79/68(2> 73/88TP1-3A HR-S 250 <50

TP1-3B HR-S 38,000 900TP1-3C HR-S 3,700 <50TP2-3A HR-S 150 <50

TP2-3B HR-S 2,300 <1000TP2-3C HR-S 6,400 500

'pg/kg - micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion,( 2")^ ''The sample was analyzed iri duplicate.

AR300I80

"— f*-

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY JORPORATION

TABLE 3

SURROGATE SPIKE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARYOF SELECTED VOLATILE COMPOUNDS

FOR REMCOR/87323PROJECT NO. 662016

D '' 2-DICHLOROETHANE-d,

Percent Recovery.! •:!

TP1-3A HR-N 71% .. . _ 93%

TP1-3C HR-N 104% 67%

TP2-3B HR-N ' 70% : 104%TP1-3B HR-S ! 112% 110%

TP1-3C HR-S 78% : 105%

TP2-3C HR-S 72% 106%

IDENTIFICATION 1 • 2-»ICHLOROETHANE-d4• Percent Recovery• • • •'•• • (

TP1-3B HR-N 102%

TP2-3A HR-N 106TP2-3C HR-N 104%/l"03%(2)

TP1-3A HR-S "96%TP2-3A HR-S 106%TP2-3B HR-S 110%

results reported for the samples are a combination of twoseparate analyses. "

,- «t,J,_ , : -,,

The sample was analyzed in duplicate. "_

AR30018I

- jr"J S_a-'_jJSj* | V;6°!i-'-:-':-'w*a-':'T"-•'-.*"-.£••''•<- •' -:••• -'--'-.-.• "__'" . • '• ',:r " ".'jig,

f - -- INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

TABLE 4 '" ".MATRIX SPIKE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY

. "•" OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDSFOR REMCOR/87323PROJECT NO. 662016

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONPARAMETER TP2-3C HR-N

Percent Recovery

Benzene 100%

Chlorobenzene 94%1,1-Dichloroethene 83%

Toluene 131%Trichloroethene 81%

flR300!82

w

ss o g g

I ^ v \/CMCUH

I <•->2 C_ CM

U -H bOM C_ 3.tw HM CJH OZ inU UQ a «

W M I U

u a : c o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oO'

O W £_U H

S_4

^2 Z vOS <! ro -i£: H CM O 2£ 3 CO CM I

CM OO

o < >o o o o o o o o o o o< - " - - - l -

3 S H 2 P-2 "3 M W H H

S 1 Di CPSO U• M at *-}^3 g O g

S W ^ ^ ::

H w 7 ? 7 c i > T V ? L ? r r 7 r r ° P T 1 i r i ' f T c i 4 T l ? To » v f ? 7 T T < 7 1 7 c i 4 T T ? ' T v ? ? < : i 4 7 ? t ? ? TIO

OT — — H _H ,— < ,— I O

d -. . 2

- > ' ' JJ -, Cw J= C C rH CO,; < uo AJ d o j J t o c s > - , o .

:: *_ i—) Q) iM Ui Q) .C I« C OCrf *H .^ £ ^ O € J - J ^ 4 - ) Mu a> u.< o a) o i-H rH o m co ai cuH ^ H - i c o e e a j > , j r e o o o o c uu w-i rj u cu o e j2 a o u ij t-i u c

Crf C *H O Ui —3 ^J QJ ^ AJ Q O I O ,!^ __ _S ^^ _^ C

p - c o i - o e t c u - i e e o o o o o « O M - ( - H i ^ j a. f u u u e t a o u i u - H r H r - i O t - i M O - < C M - ^ C M _ ;

AR300I83

Crf r-, Os c j o o o , o o o o o o o S o o o o o o u. ^ 4 < — l i — I — 4 — H V O v O v O v O v O v O j n V O v O — H i — l i — l O Oto o \ C T \ c ~ . c y > o T \ - * < r < f - 3 - < r - 3 - _ -a- -a- o\ o-> <r\ ^ n-<l v v v v v v v v v v v - r v v v v v — ,

CM ^ -H )PM 0)H W

3

COuto cuI ^ ja

l ^ ^ i g g g g o o o o o o c . o o g g g o §^ V ^ O O v O v V v ^ O ^ v ^ v O c O C ^ ^O -H bO C/3M d, a. <fe H • U- i d C /H o*Z. -r4 0)w AJ . ya z to . 45HH I U j>

prf -J o u •W E e o o c o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a)«;J o J O O O O o m m m o m u i c M i n i r i o o o o c o mP u i r > y i n m t r i i n i n c M c M c M c r > c M c M - » c M c M i n u i i n - -aS I C V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V - H t O C< CM O CM U I-HCO Cu O y

H co toUl JJxj yCO COX 3£

/-N I, - W•o s o o o o . o o o o 2 o o o o o o o o ' 2 "lJ5ma) ^ o o o o o o o o g o o o o o o o o g ^"^3 ._ < r - 3 - - 3 - « 3 - - a - C M C M C M ~ . C M C M C M C M C M - a - - a - < r t J Uue i v D \ o v o \ D » o c o n r n r . 1 p o f < - > ^ c o m o v o o . - T 'ir:j- V N / S / V V / u -

o> jr u• JS O 0)

• oi _2 eo—I Ul AJ AJ—x CO Ul

u: v f ( c ? V 7 i l ? T T l ? v f T l ? v f T T T v ? d .5 §.to c o c n r ^ o O c M s r c o o o o c M i n o - H c o m —« t«- e2 t - » O O O O O i " H « 3 ' P r i i - l c O v D O i n O O ' - I O O - 3 ' 303 Ul

CO IA l—I ."H .—I i—I rH O — 4 — H OCO_5 O to a. uiCJ • -H in E to

A O O1 . AJ O rH.

e -o _<:iH CU

*t3 CC CUo> o exo . AJ -He e t3 tocfl CU C 6.C to iH COAJ CU Ul

C Ed J U i j i > % r H r - i o o a j o . - .cu 13 o c u _; j s ^ u i U r H U i <u co yU bO -HDC SJ3 -HE M U3 O

00

W • O - H r H C U C C A J O O O O 6 - . O C U - 3 C O•H ~4 Ul __ CU UQJ - H ~ H r H i - H j r 3 A J i H c yw E O O I A J O Q O j r _ = A j ^ « u i e2 C U O i - H C M C U U i I I O O C U t M A J O C U^ C U i _ r c u | H O C M C O i H i H O O O )

^ < C C U > > C U C M ^ S ( U - < — < H H O O C f l y f < toC_ CO r-l r-l ^ ^ . . . . . .

CU X 5-v >% .E 3 A J A j . u 2 ! > » . ' - < - J , - H t f l c o - H - H . r + . H e e A jl a ) ( U Q j l A j - c u o u i U ! - « u i u i . r t i H : oCM g '2 2 «* CO >-i H H AJ A J — i - * H H > > H

CU AJ -~-«J= Cfl 00HO 3.> /—xH CM

SR300I8U

K OOO O O O O 2 O O O O O O O O O O O O Oc n c o c o Q c ^ r n f o r o ^ t ^ c o r o P 1 o o \ r - | c o r o r o r o r o r o

in ro ro CO. z c o r o c O c o ~ : r - ) r o r o r o r - ) v D r O r o r o r o r o r o r oI \s \/ \s v v v v r j v v v s / v v v v v v v vCM •C-

2 erf CM —s 'O EC >-^ OOO O O ' O O S O O O O O O O O O O O O OH ' bo co co co Q co co c o c o ; ~ c o c o c o c o c o c o c o r o c o c o c o c o r oE—t in .*•* fO co co 2 co co CO co . ro ro ro co co co ro co ro PO co co CO^ t ^ . N/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ N/ vy " >v/ ^ ^ v/ / N/ " S \ \/ \/ *V* VO -H bOM PM 3- =fcu, H . • • - • !M d ,;H O2 • iH 7U 3 A J ' . . . . . :Q 2 COM I U

Q U E S d O O O O O O O § O O O O O O O O O O O O O

o s ' ^ c C ' O C ' v \ / v \ / r j \ / s / v s / v v v v v v v v vQj ^ CM O2 CO CLl CJ ;O H , • ' . - ; -o I ••H ,: j§ 2 -H vO I --.Ca co -H erf co _-.JCMO se o o o v - ' 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CXj OO vO I N/ N/ \/ \ N/ \/ \/ v v/ N/ \/ \/ \/ ^ \X \/ X N/ \/ N/ \/

"**. I—I

H o o H : - r

- .^ DJ erf •-> <~* ' -. o o -H :j—j !___] [l< rt * :tZjj eu erf e y v c o r « . m c n o o c M e M O C 3 N ^ o - H < r e T \ r - . c o r > . c o r > . c o r o O N^M U | I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IO T H & c s v o c M t ^ i n C M o s - t f i n o o - H — i . 3 - c M ^ i n o o r ^ c x j r > > c M - H

<! 2 co C3> -H oo in co o \ c s c o o « n o s ^ r c o o o i n \o-» t n m r ^ o^ S I t 1 I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I IO - 2 c o o o o c M \ o o t n i - H » n r ^ o - ^ i - H e p r ^ r - i i n \ o - H i n » n o o>• . o o o c M c r \ m i n O c r . \ o o o - H - H f o ^ H O e o o c y > c T \ O - Hl-l CO CM — < C M - H O J i - H - H - H v O — H - H -H OCMs <3 ' ; CTN t>.S O -: rOCO fu, i . r ;r •;; . - -o

Ul Ui

eCU (U CU Ul 0)' " js AJCO X AJ

= Ul 0) rH AJ CU1 AJ CU • <-N CO CU 0)

0) C U ^ i H X A J ,-1C C U C U S A J > , A J r - i r O > ,cue e « — \ o > O i . e > * r - < cu ccu . e cu cu >-, -v o c. c co d cu

cu d >, AJ o :>vo co ui e js Ae r f c u c o c u u c u c o r - < A j A ju d u t d o o , u i o r u r u ._*™i (U C) jTt CD t3 ^ ^ *O O ^ O O

Pw " 5 . ' H . c S - 3 v ^ v _ > a ) ^ x ^ » - X r H l I I I g V O O O O C UC 8 C O U l ^ O O W O O O & - . C M C M C M C M O r H r H i - H r H r H C O

- _ » _ ,e e - ^ - e e e c t o t a c n t o e a - j o u c j u uI IJS ^-.

Hjk-

O O d f U O C U " O C U C U C U T H i H M ^ I 3 1 I I I J S<: < < ea cq ca ro ca K CQ K ea ca ea cs <r pa <r CM

AR300I85

e,-3 -H.1

COi •33 O Q~ O O O O O O o S g o O O O O

co f»V - c n f O ' c o v D c o c o c o ; _ _ r _ 7 r c o r ^ c o c o r oi n C O C O C O C O f O v D C O C O r O - " ^ _ - C O \ O C O C O C OI x / v ^ v v v v x / v v r l r l v V N / VCMPu

V

2 e_ CM _. __ . _O EC N-' O. O O O O O O O O X S O O O O O O O O O Ot-H b o c o c o c o o o v o c o o c o ^ ^ f o r o p o c o r - i o c o c o c o c o c oH i n ^ ! c o r i c o c o c o v o c o c o c o ~ ~ c o c o r o c o c o z f o c o c o c o c o< ! I < V V V V V V . V V S / ^ ^ J V V / N / V V V V V N / VM PLI 3.ta HM dH O2 iHb_ AJQ 2 COM I U

Prfu q K_3 <UO j i n y2 I C< CM' OCO OH O

H

2e r f ' . _ . . _ .E S O O O O O O O 0 0 2 S O O O O O O O O O O O• f o r o c o c n c n v f i c o c n c n ^ ' - s c n c o c o c o c o C J c o c o c o c o c o c oin c o o c o c n c o \ o c o c o c o _ _ : : : : c o c o c o f o c o 2 c o c o c o c o c o c o__

V V V V N / V V N / V ^ J ^ V V V V N /PMH

e r f f o a \ i - H - H r ~ — i t M C M c n — i m c o c N c M c ^ o r - O r ^ - ^ c o - a - i — iEd I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I(ja O • 3 • O C O v O • a • f O \ O ^ « . C M O O ' - ^ - a • • ^ • O • * ^ J ^ - 3 • C O ' - I O O ^ ~ C ^ ^S f - v o m r » - * r o N C Q \ o v D i n e N - H r ^ > - H C M c o i - a - t i ^ ! - » v 0 « 3 - r - »3 I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CM I I I I I I2 - c o c M i n i - t v O i - H O « a - i n - a - - H - H < - i - « i _ > r > > c M ~ v O v o o o i - » r » r > .m c O r O N s r o c r i c M e o O c o i n f o o o c M O — < - H O c o - H o o r ^ . v oCO • —H in •— I —I i— I UO i-H i-H \O " H CM —H

o

•-'-."-: •- ' Q)-* "jj- . •' ' i . d-»••-.• cu

. - - V Me cu -3•H rH aj cu e «C U C U - 3 O A J A J i H C U A Je e * H T H » H W c u t e o c y c o N d dc u c u N O c u o c u i - H A J r - i e e r H c o c u c u c uN N C d A J d U O C O C O C U C U C O U i d i - I O i C U- d e < u c u f ( ) c u y e T H j C 3 3 x - 3 c u - o o ee r f e c u c u c u ^ a X T H ^ i c u c o A j - H - H A j ^ , N < O T - H C O

t _ C O J S j Q ^ 3 O C . C f l P - O J = J = J O O j 2 j : d A J y JH ^ ^ d O O O U O _ 3 i H | O i A J C h A J A J C U i - t a ) C U 3 > . A Ju i ' u i o u i A j > , o o ^ : o o > * e _ a j s o o )

O O - H O _ ^ X U i U i C X i _ H _ i _ i r H e c U O O O Or H - H J 3 i - I P - A J A J A J > , A J A J > , a ) J = U Ul U Ul

AR300I86

#&&G_?3g_£&g&3.£ u™'Mn*HI* ' '"-' ' "•~- ——-

3a e

co

CMCu,H

.o o o z o c? or o o s

o l c C i o o o o o o g g g o o g o o o g o o o o g o> - i b O c o c o c o c O C O C O ^ S v n ' ^ ' ^ v i D Q c o r o c o > £ c o c o c o c o ~ r os v ^ o o o o o o - 5 o " ^ 3 v O o g o o o s g sU -H HOM Cu 3.6u H>H e =H O : :2 --I ;W AJ - - =a 2 coM I Ul

w r t e o o o o o o g g g o o g o o o g o o o o g oJ d ) c O C O c O r O C O f O > i _ _ ^ > _ 5 c O C O ; _ _ : ; O c O C O C O ^ i f O C O f O C O J S C Op u i n o c o c o c o c o c o c o ~ ~ : 2 c o c o ~ 2 c o c o t ^ ^ Z f ^ ^ r ^ r ^ ^ r ^E I C V V N / V ' N / V ^ J ^ J ^ J V N X ^ v \ / v r j s / v v v ^ v«C CM OM CX, CJH • • • • . !

n : o o o o o o g g g o o g o o o g o o o o g o

i s / v v v / N / v r ' J r ^ r ' j N / v / r ' j \/v/ v r"j v v v \/ r/ v

W 'ecu -"':'' 11 " cu e cu <ue .-.-. i,-.- . - e to e , e I-H TH0) '------ . ^ TH iH CU O Oui T-jn i .:,,/-. C co a, co > d cu cuO, "7 CU ' ^H O >-*» ^H r-H CU J2 J_'-* TH >% u >>-' o o f> a a.13 to .s a. e '-x to e o o o.O _ 3 t H i H O O O A J I O O O O U i U i Ml A J O O d e d i H r H o e j = e u i j = o o oc o ^ ± e e i H i H M o o o E i

•-1 , . • ; J*-' • • . -.11prf i n - H \ o t ^ i n f O - a ' C M O c o i n t - » c T \ t « . v o r - - . i n o o c M O i - H ^ - c M iu i l l l l l l l l l t l l l l t i l l l l t i ,t o o > a \ r ^ c o - a - o < r o \ i - < > n i n c M i n < r o o \ o - H i n o c M i n \ oS c o m i n - < r - < r c M i ^ . o o c y > i ~ » o i ^ - o c o m e o o c y \ o c o t ~ > o ;3 l I i l i I l i l l I i I i t I t t l l I I l :2 c o o o - H t n \ o - H c o c r . o o o c o o c M - H \ o c - . t ^ - i n c o c - . o i n c oc \ r » p \ e T \ o c \ e o o v o c T \ c o o v O c M c o i n c o c o o c M c M c \ c o iC O • — I — H - H . — I V D • - ( • — < — H

2 C M C U C O ^ a S d i H i H i H O C U O ' O ' O ' a c O S U i O O O O< - d d e . a , o e e e N J = : . e o o O T H l o u - H _ H « He r f - H O T - < r - i - - i i H c f l c o t f l d C i < a , t o t o t o > 1 O i H ^ : u u i t jC O • < v - ' U ^ t ^ X W O O O O O O O O O d U i J S A J H H HPM o o j e _ = ^ : ^ : u i v < u i ^ u i u i u i t H U i o o o e i H ' O i I If l ) B , d A J A J A j A J A J A J A J O A J A J A J A J A J , e r H C O C O O e ^ r i n v DO D . o o o j r - H M - H u i ' H ^ M ^ H ^ o . j S A j e e o . - .~ - 3 O S S 2 0 , 2 2 2 A J 2 2 2 2 2 M C J C « C U U | C M < - < Tj ° e t o i i i t o i i l ^ i i i i i o i o ^ 3 j : > , » - «P U T H M ( N C M - a - 2 C M r O s r 2 C N t < - 2 2 2 > — ' C U P ^ P u C U P U — i e M C M

A.R300I87

•oeto13 UiO toco B3 iH

- Uito ' a,Ul0). 03£> AJ6 TH

§ uo<-N UHCO<: Mcj e• THdo eo <o•H O> toUi •O. {«! >>CO O *Q

T3co e oAJ M i— Iy cucd to Eu AJ coAJ o toto coJO Ul O•< AJ X

W AJ

S^ § 45_. t i _ __>""' r ^E CO rH ~3o 0 TH o

Hc§JS MO EE ^3 Oo ocu js ui AJf CJ O OAJ a, -3cuO JS CO AJUl AJ AJ Oco u ed cad -H ex to •E to co3 W • Ul IS OiH T3 O COOB -3 Oo s B e js

O CO 3 AJro Q. ui o e•HE 00 Cu OA O O E UiAJ O iH O CO

TH O CUe -j -«J•HO CU d

AJ U J_ THTJ CO O AJ

lB •O.-'-VS'co CO 3W-C'-i-i.B • JS - OCQ. THp ... CO AJ CU

u aT-' .bo to to ocujs .~ o OB oAJ" W AJ Oto y to TH toui bSi .. T-( o co

JZ TH ~3 Ul "dB bO H B CO O3 O TH "C AJB iH bO BO

«0 A! HO OO AJ ^. O AJJS CO bO O O OHO 3. 2 to Q

—> CM CO S3"

..J<«•--=*

AR3QQI88 '***

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

TABLE 7

SURROGATE SPIKE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARYOF VOLATILE AND SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS

FOR REMCOR/87323PROJECT NO. 662016 '_ ''k

Volatile Priority Pollutants


PARAMETER TP1-5 HR-N TP2-5 HR-N "' TP1-5 HR-S TP2-5 HR-S

Percent Recovery4-Bromofluorobenzene 98% 102%/116%(1> 113% 94%

l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 114% 96Z/110Z [ 84% 106%

Toluene-d8 100% 115Z/119Z ' 96% 98%

Base-Neutral Extractables

i SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

PARAMETER TP1-5 HR-N TP2-5 HR-N ' TP1-5 HR-S TP2-5 HR-SPercent Recovery

2-Fluorobiphenyl 39% 36% 66% 35%Nitrobenzene-d5 50% 49% 80% 47%p-Terphenyl 64%' 43% 120% 60%

Acid Extractables'.', '<• • t


PARAMETER TP1-5 HR-N TP2-5 HR-N , ' TP1-5 HR-S TP2-5 HR-SPercent Recovery

2-Fluorophenol,-;, 33% 37% 56% 32%Phenol-d5 40% 4l% 68% 40%2,4,6-Tribromophenol 70% 38% " _ 78% 47%

^ 'The results reported for this sample is a combination of two separate analyses.' "

IAR300I89

m vo m

id » - • _ ; • . o « »7 o o ° o o o . oo

2

5:1 O c o g o i n g o i n'oa O O ^ O - n g o OC M • * < • ? • • . • «7 0 0 ° 0 0 o - 0 0CM v V ^c-H

£__! m ______ ^ in___.. o o ^ o - i S o oi

>-l tl CMOrf > P-< ?5 H

- -^ 2 S p , - H m § £t d l P g o O c O O O v D

• •

O— . • • • O O

f^SG ^ o v>_^J

*, Q 3 5H fa {____; i

H ' ^ ^ O V V ^ C D O P—H V V

. ." CUCU Hta

b O b O b O b O b O b O b O b OE E E E E S E E

erfw s st* O E 3 >> 3M - - T H S 3 - H u T ^ t ,2 B 3 T H E 3 B O

t * i t O U - O U c O U r H r H

&R30QI9Q

coSi n g•— o o c M c o i n c M Xo o c o o o o o g^ O O O ' - O O O _ _ !CM V °CUH

COI£; m . _-. sr m**• o o > c M ; J - 3 - r > . o o c M_ o c o o — o o o o oS . . . .J • • o • •7 o o o ° o o o . ooCM0,H

CO ,

k « m o «i *~ ^ v_ <-* —_ " f" v* ..f s _. f {*) ( * f— f *— r f r•HlS « . . - _ . . . . « •H V o o o R o o . _ t o o<J ' V ^^ R V

" sMH ;

R m co inco o in .OP•vi I o m c M O ^ a - c o O o m•i Crf * ^D ^3 * O O O * O

£ i v o o v o o o v o•c r i c M i n - s r c M i n < r c o c M i n i n J!o o o w l o o o o o o o o o "3 - H O « » . . « O O « t ,w e P U » o o o o o o « o S

J -H HO V .0 "ea AJ v o v/ 2< a vH o

coHM"-_

erfC M u B EN H O E 3 >. 3

U T H B 3 i H U l U l T H UO 2 B 3 T H E O 3 d Ob O < O - H E O C U - 3 O O >i f e r f t O U l - O U l C U C O U l r H r H

Cu3T-

J H . $ 0 0 V 0 0 P 0 , ° JH Cu H CH Ul

O T3°* COco «> :

K "^ m o "^ n ui

C M • • • o * ' ° * " U i O

i. v V v v ,__, c~£l o o

u too oCu TH

CU

h O b O b O b O b O b O b O b O b O t o t oE E E E E E E E E U

iH «•H OE TH

•On B••>. Obo x:E H

!flR300!9l

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

• TABLE 9TOTAL METAL ANALYSIS SUMMARY


• SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

PARAMETER • UNITS TP1-5 HR-S TP2-5 HR-S TP1-5 HR-N TP2-5 HR-N

Antimony mg/kg 26 100/110 26 34

Arsenic mg/kg 16 23/20 13 16Beryllium mg/kg 2.0 <0.9/<0.9 1.8 3.8Cadmium mg/kg 3.5 11/8.2 3.1 4.2

Chromium mg/kg 37 410/590 32 40Copper- mg/kg 19 240/170 20 19Lead .mg/kg 21 . 5,400/6,700 33 36Mercury mg/kg <0.2/<0.2 <0.2 <0.2/<0.2 <0.5Nickel mg/kg 53 36/28 37 IS

Selenium mg/kg <0.9 <0.9/<0.9 <0.9 <0.9Silver mg/kg <1.8 <1.8/<1.8 1.5 3.6 ,Thallium mg/kg <0.9 <0.9/<0.9 <0.9 <0.9Zinc mg/kg 110 17,000/22,000 103 86

*• •'mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram or parts per million.

samples were prepared and analyzed in duplicate for the indicatedparameters. .

AR300192

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION"

TABLE 10

PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARYOF E.P. TOXICITY METALS


SAMPLE ANALYTICAL SPIKE(1) SAMPLE MATRIX SPIKE(2>PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION PERCENT RECOVERY IDENTIFICATION PERCENT RECOVERY

Arsenic TP1-2BHR-N 80% TP1-2A HR-N '" 91ZTP2-2C HR-S 96% TP1-2A HR-S 99%

Barium TP1-2B HR-S 97% " Tp'l-2A HR-N 106%TP1-2B HR-N 101% TP1-2A HR-S 119%

Cadmium TP1-2B HR-S 96% TP1-2A HR-N 94%TP1-2B HR-N 96% TP1-2A HR-S 100%

Chromium TP1-2B HR-N 108% TP1-2A HR-N ' 106%TP2-2B HR-S 106% TP1-2A HR-S 103%

Copper TP1-2B HR-S " 101% TP*1-2A HR-S 84%Lead TP1-2B HR-S 92% TP1-2A HR-N 99%

TP1-2B HR-N 102% TP1-2A HR-S 90%

samples were spiked after digestion but prior to analysis,' "'samples were spiked prior to digestion and analysis.

Mercury — — ; TP1-2A HR-N: i TP1-2A HR-S 100%. . i _

Selenium TP1-2B HR-N 104% " TP1-2A HR-S 95% jTP2-2A HR-S ;' 100% TP1-2A HR-N 100%

Silver TP1-2B HR-N 98% T? 1-2A HR-N 80%TP1-2B HR-S 96% TP1-2A HR-S 78% -*

AR30Q193

ri -feS 's -";- ;?" -:r- "- -C:" " ": : : INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATE

TABLE 11

PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARYOF TOTAL METALSFOR REMCOR/87323PROJECT NO. 662016

PAKAMETFK SAMPLE ANALYTICAL SPIKE(1> SAMPLE MATRIX SPIKE (2>IDENTIFICATION PERCENT RECOVERY IDENTIFICATION PERCENT RECOVERY

.Antimony TP2-5 HR-N 89% TP2-5 HR-S

' TP2-5 HR-S 92% :

Ars'enic . TP1-5 HR-N 92% . TP2-5 HR-S 155%/50%/41%/235%^TP1-5 HR-S 92%

Beryllium TP2-5 HR-N 97% TP2-5 HR-S 115%TP2-5 HR-S 110%

Cadmium TP2-5 HR-N , 97% TP2-5 HR-S 91% -TP2-5 HR-S 108% J

Chromium TP2-5 HR-N . 94% TP2-5 HR-STP2-5 HR-S 105%

Copper . TP2-5 HR-N 100% TP2-5 HR-S 311%<5)TP2-5 HR-S 102%

Lead TP2-5 HR-N 97% TP2-5 HR-S 2710%TP2-5 HR-S 117% .

Mercury — — TP2-5 HR-S 98%' , TP2-5 HP-N 96%

Nickel , TP2-5 HR-N 92% TP2-5 HR-S 107%TP2-5 HR-S 103%

Selenium TP2-5 HR-S 56%/52%(3) TP2-5 HR-S 44%/55%(3)Silver TP2-5 HR-N 91% " " TP2-5 HR-S 104%

TP2-5 HR-S 94%Thallium TP 1-5 HR-S 100% TP2-5 HR-S 81%Zinc s * " 5 HR-N 9 6 % N TP2-5 HR-S 5780%(5:>

____ . /.i;:..-- T : ; - • • ' • ' . . ' . 4samples were spiked after digestion but prior to analysis. ;samples were spiked prior to digestion and analysis. ';

The spike was prepared and analyzed in duplicate for the indicated samples to confirm jmatrix interference. x _. _. J

> •'The indicated matrix spike was prepared and analyzed in quadruplicate to confirm matrix Jinterference. 1

isample concentration is more than ten times the spike concentration. '

TABLE 12

:! -' - • - ^ «iINTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION T

SOIL ANALYSIS SUMMARY' OF PRIORITY POLLUTANT PESTICIDES

FOR REMCOR/87323 'PROJECT NO. 662016

11 ! SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

PARAMETER CAS NUMBER^1) TP1-5 HR-N TP2-5 HR-N TP1-5 HR-S TP2-5 HR-S

Concentration yg/kg' 'a-BHC ' 319-84-6 <24 <200 <8.0 <400

Y-BHC (Lindane) 58-89-9 <24 <2QO <8.0 <400p-BHC 319-85-7 <24 <200 <8.0 <400Heptachlor ' .76-44-8 <24 <200 <8.0 <4006-BHC 319-86-8 <24 <200 <8.0 <400Aldrin 309-00-2 <24 <200 <8.0 <400

Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 <24 <200 <8.0 <400Endosulfan I 959-98-8 <24 <200 <8.0 <400Dieldrin 60-57-1 <48 X400 <16 <8004,4'-DDE 72-55-9 <48 X400 <16 <800Endrin 72-20-8 <48 <46o <16 <800Endosulfan II 33213-65-9 <48 <400 <16 <*4,4'-DDD 72-54-8 <48 <400 <16 <£4,4'-DDT 50-29-3 <48 <400 <16 <£

Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 <48 '<400 <16 <?Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 <48 <400 <16 <fEndrin ketone • 53494-70-5 <48 <400 <16 <?Methoxychlor 72-43-5 <240 <2000 <80 <4Chlordane 57-74-9 <240 <2QOO ' <80 <4Toxaphene ' 8001-35-2 <480 <4000 <160 <8Aroclor 1016 12674-11-2 <240 <2dOO <80 <4i itAroclor 1221 . ..-_ , 11104-28-2 <240 ,.<20°0 <80 <4Aroclor 1232 / Vt, 11141-16-5 <240 <2000 <80 <4Aroclor 1242 53469-21-9 <240 <2000 <80 . <4Aroclor 1248 12672-29-6 <240 <2000 <80 <4Aroclor 1254 11097-69-1 <480 <4000 <160 <8Aroclor 1260 11096-82-5 <480 <4000 <160 <8

numbers presented in this column are the Chemical Abstracts System (CAS) numbersused for cataloging the indicated compounds in the Chemical Abstracts Index.

^ ^ micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion.

SR300I95

j:?*?-''^ ' sft-s a ?

PROJECT NO. PROJECT NO. 662016- •' . OSfPffM

(Bed)METHOD, TITLE REFERENCE

Extraction Procedure Method 1310, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid(EP) Toxicity Test Waste. USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.Method and StructuralIntegrity Test

Acid Digestion of Method 3010, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidAqueous Samples and Waste, USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.Extracts for TotalMetals for Analysisby FLAA or ICP-Spectroscopy

Acid Digestion of Method 3020, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidAqueous Samples and Waste, USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.Extracts for TotalMetals for Analysisby Furnace AtomicAbsorptionSpectroscopy

Acid Digestion of Method 3050, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidSediments, Sludges Waste. USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.and Soils

Arsenic (Furnace Method 7060, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidMethod) Waste, USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.

Mercury, Method 7470, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidManual Cold Vapor'_ Waste. USEPA. SW-846 3rd. Ed., 1986.

Mercury in Solid or Method 7471, Test Methods for EvaluatingSemi-Solid Waste' V. 1;.. Solid Waste. USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.(Manual Cold VaporTechnique)

:_ Method 7740, test Methods for Evaluating Solid7 Waste. USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.

Gas CSlpppgraphy/: Method 8240, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidMass Spectrometry Waste, USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986.for Volatile Organics

Gas Chromatography/ Method 8270, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidMass Spectrometry Waste, USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed», 1986. ~ ~ ^ ~for Semi-Volatile"' ~

'" •_-•-"" '•-- •"' '•""•'•*_-***f~'£&'fi'~$,''"'-• 'i c& l

Organochlorinev:~ "~..?~~ Method 808Q, Test Methods for Evaluating SolidPesticides and PCBs J Waste. USEPA SW-846 3rd Ed., 1986*

* ' " i " ' " * w " ' ^ ' ' ' • " ' ' ' ' " ' ' ' ' '~''~ ' ~ "T = %;- ; ., ;:?::

'-T-E T - "~-~. -~s -•'• &'_ *__ytji ~ J y •-*•:... •v"r"_!T* e

_ - :;:.V. ~"T---; ...- -

Professional Service Industries, Inc._.__.__, - , — -• r«_ < r * « - * Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division 412/922-4000

001

Laboratory No. 890107 Order No. PAS-174Client No. Letter Date' 9/29/87

BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

Report For: IT Corporation :' ' .5103 Old Wm Penn HighwayExport, PA 15632 J

Attention: S. CochenourProject: Remcor 662016Sample ID#AdditionalIdentificationInformationSample color?Does the sample contain •any asbestos fibers?Asbestos Present(Type &Percent Shown)1. Chrysotile2. - Amosite3. Crocidolite4. Other, sj>ecify

Total Percent AsbestosPresent in SampleOther FibrousMaterials' Present(Type & Percent Shown)1. Fibrous glass2 . Cellulose3. Other, specify

Nonf ibrous MaterialsPresent - (Description& Percent Shown)

8713617HR-N TP1-4A

Brown

No

NoneDetected

0%Type 15-10%Type 23-5%

NotAnalyzed

8713618HR-N TP1-4B

Brown

No

NoneDetected

0%Type 13-5ZType 25-7Z

Not iAnalyzed

8713619HR-N-TP1-4C

Brown

No

NoneDetected

0%Type 11-3ZType -25-10%

NotAnalyzed

i --

RR3QQI97MJ>U~I_ AMI •UaMTTtD Am THE CONPOCNTML PHLU'mi I Of CLJCNTB.PUauC4.TDN Of BTAtiMCNTm, COTtCUJliONB D* CXT*ACT_ • ~CM—VCO KNOXO OJ-WWTTWM AP^—OV«_

B

gj Professional Service Industries, Inc.— „... . ._.. .. - _... Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15220Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division 412/922-4000

Laboratory No. 890107 u Utou ^uuu Order No. PAS-174Client No. Letter Date 9/29/87


Report For: IT Corporation5103 Old Wm Penn HighwayExport, PA 15632

Attention: S. CochenourProject: Remcor 662016Sample ID#AdditionalIdentificationInformationSample color?Does the sample containany asbestos fibers?Asbestos Present(Type &Percent Shown)1. Chrysotile2. Amosite3. Crocidolite4. Other, specify

Total Percent AsbestosPresent in SampleOther FibrousMaterials -Present(Type & Percent: Shown)1. Fibrous glass2. Cellulose3. Other , specify

Nonfibrous MaterialsPresent (Description .& Percent Shown)

8713620HR-N TP2-4A

Brown/WhiteTan

No

NoneDetected

NoneDetectedType 1

. 35-40ZType 220-25Z

NotAnalyzed

8713621HR-N TP2-4B

Brown/Gray/White

No

NoneDetected

NoneDetectedType 130-35ZType 225-30Z

NotAnalyzed

8713622HR-N-TP2-4C

Brown/White

No

NoneDetected

NoneDetectedType 15-10%Type 260-65Z

NotAnalyzed

001

Professional Service Industries, Inc._. . . Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania 15220Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division 412/922-4000

Laboratory No. 890107 , Order No. PAS-174Client No. Letter Date 9/29/87


Report For: IT Corporation :, \5103 Old Wm Penn HighwayExport, PA 15632

Attention: S. CochenourProject: Remcor 662016Sample ID#AdditionalIdentificationInformationSample color?Does the sample containany asbestos fibers?Asbestos Present(Type Percent Shown)1. Chrysotile2. Amosite3. Crocidolite4. Other, specify

Total Percent AsbestosPresent in SampleOther FibrousMaterials- Present(Type & Percent Shown)1. Fibrous glass2. Cellulose3. Other, specify

Nonfibrous MaterialsPresent (Description .& Percent Shown)

8713623HR-S TP1-4A

Brown/Gray

No

NoneDetected

0?Type 2

. 3-5%

NotAnalyzed

8713624HR-S TP1-4B

Tan/ Gray /White

No

NoneDetected

0%Type 15-10% "iType 220-25%

Not ,.'Analyzed

8713625HR-S-TP1-4C

Gray

No

NoneDetected

0%Type 21-3%

NotAnalyzed

-i4

**»a«rr_ AMC mjuurrnn AC -rue CONCOINTUU. pwupmnf of euEwrm.«j»!jCATiON Of «TATEMENT«.CONCLU*ON-"O« txr

-

I

Professional Service Industries, Inc. eso popiar Slree,_... . ,.->.«• r «. M. r^« • • Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania 15220Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division 412/922-4000

Laboratory No. 890107 u Ul=u ^- » - Order NOij PAS_174Client No. Letter. Date 9/29/87


Report For: IT Corporation5103 Old Wm Penn HighwayExport, PA 15632

Attention: S. CochenourPro'ject: Remcor 662016Sample ID#AdditionalIdentificationInformationSample color?Does the sample containany asbestos fibers?Asbestos Present(Type &Percent Shown)1. Chrysotile2. Amosite3. Crocidolite4. Other, specify

Total Percent AsbestosPresent in SampleOther FibrousMaterials Present(Type & Percent Shown)1. Fibrous glass2 . Cellulose3. Other, specify

Nonf ibrous MaterialsPresent (Description& Percent Shown)

8713626HR-S TP2-4A

Brown/ Tan

No

NoneDetected

NoneDetectedType 25-10%

NotAnalyzed

8713627HR-S TP2-4B

Tan

No

NoneDetected

NoneDetectedType 115-20%Type 25-10%

NotAnalyzed

8713628HR-S-TP2-4C

Brown

No

NoneDetected

NoneDetectedType 13-5%Type 215-20%

NotAnalyzed

^_ _ _Analytical Analysi £5 Method: EPA recommended FLM with dispersion staining.Note: Tfijl J2PA does not consider a sample to contain asbestos if the

percent asbestos is less than 1%. However, PSI-PITTSBURGH TESTINGLABORATORY considers the presence of asbestos in any amount in dustto be significant.

Analyzed /Byi Reviewed & Approved

JoetfKucJmicki/Sheryl Kraft Gl'enn A. Goss, M.S., ManagerIndustrial Hygienist/ Asbestos DivisionElectron Microscopist

Distribution 1-Client Verbals 9/28/87CS . • " ' ' .' ' . ' ".'

U HKPOff T* f-!* "*. f: • ' .."'?' " ~~*' 1 t ?V?CTg*-rri*.! «»aOng Tr O* CLffMTK T J»LCATT f O* »TrTTr TfiTg O iT uaOl CM IKTnifll _ffl OMiiPI 'til Ij-rfl -Wirl in mmi i i 1 " - ""

remcor - united states environmental protection agency · 2020-03-11 · report assessment of...

Documents