renal update for internists: controversies and conundrums paul segal do assistant professor of...
TRANSCRIPT
Renal Update for Internists: Controversies
and ConundrumsPaul Segal DO
Assistant Professor of MedicineJohns Hopkins
ACP Meeting 2015
Objectives
• After viewing this presentation, the clinician will understand The staging system of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
• The strengths and weaknesses of GFR equations• The clinical associations with various CKD stages• CKD progression• When to refer and when to dialyze
• The role of metabolic acidosis in CKD progression• The controversy surrounding sodium restriction• The Interaction of Physical Activity and CKD• Blood Pressure Targets in CKD
Prevalence of CKD
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Stage 5
~ 7.6 million
~ 350- 400,000
~350, 000
NHANES III : prevalence of CKD ↑ 15.9% (1988-2004)
~ 5.3 million
~ 5.9 million
One in 10 American Adults• Prevalence is projected
to increase to 14.4% in 2020
Coresh, Am J Kidney Disease 2003;41:1-12.
Prevalence of CKD• Grams et al (AJKD 2013): lifetime risk of reaching a GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 from birth = 59%
(Stage 3A) [33.6% (Stage 3B), and 11.5% (Stage 4)]• Lifetime risk of: developing diabetes (33-39%), ischemic heart disease (32-49%), and invasive cancer (38-45%)
• Most patients with CKD have co-morbid illnesses• 50% have 3 or more chronic diseases• 20% have 5 or more chronic diseases• The mean number of chronic conditions per individual increased from 1.88 (65-69-year age group) to 2.71 (80-84-
year age group)
CKD Patients Are More Likely to Die Than Progress to ESRD
Percentage Who Remained Event-Free vs. Death vs.Developed ESRD During 5-Year Follow-Up
10%20% 24%
46%
75%63%
64%
28%
15% 16% 10% 7%
20%
1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
% o
f P
atie
nts
DisenrolledEvent-freeRRTDied
Totals Stage 2-43.1% RRT
24.9 % Die
Keith D, et al, Arch Int Med 2004;164:659-663 2002;13:620A.
N = 27,998
eGFR 90 eGFR 60-89 eGFR 30-59 eGFR 15-29 (-) Proteinuria (+) Proteinuria
Why Do We Use a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Equation?
• Creatinine is an imprecise value and affected by many influences:
• High protein meal• Medications:
• Cimetidine, trimethoprim, fibrates• Hemolysis• Hyperglycemia• Edematous states• Hydration• Age, race and gender
SCr = 1.2 mg/dL
Adapted fromShemesh, KI, 1985
Increase in SCr from 1.0- - > 2.0 mg/dL, ~ 50% ↓ CrCl
GFR Estimating EquationsMDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease)
• Developed in a cohort of 1628 people with CKD (mean GFR ~ 38 mL/min/1.73m²)
• Predominantly White Participants• Mean age 50.6 ± 12.7 yrs
• Limited data in DM and Transplant Pts• Tends to UNDERESTIMATE GFR in the
Healthy population (higher level of GFR)
CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease- Epidemiology Collaboration)
• Developed in a cohort of 8254 people• Whites and Blacks• Both + and – CKD, Diabetics and
Solid Organ Transplants• High and Low risk groups
• Wide range in GFR (2 -198 mL/min/1.73m2) and age (18-97 yrs)
• More accurate in people with higher levels of GFR (reduces misclassification)
What is a Disease?A pathological condition characterized by an identifiable group of signs or symptoms or
A condition that impairs normal functioning or
Illness or sickness often characterized by typical patient problems (symptoms) and physical findings (signs).
Does a Change in eGFR with Aging Constitute Disease?• Baltimore Longitudinal Study of the Aging
(Lindeman et al, JAGS 1985;33:278-285)• “Normal” group: Average loss of 0.75
mL/min/year• ~35% of individuals experience no decline
with age• Higher BP and Heart Disease greater rate of
decline of renal function
• NHANES III• 38% of pts > 70 yrs without DM or HTN had a
MDRD eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
• 0.7% between age 20-39 yrs had eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
• Octabaix Study (European Journal of IM 2012;23(6):534)
• 321 individuals, community-dwelling 85 yr olds
• > 50% had an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
Hoerger TJ et al, AJKD 2014.
When NOT to Diagnose CKD (NICE Guidelines 2014)
• Do not diagnose CKD in people with:• An eGFR creatinine of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Stage 3A) and• An eGFRcystatinC of > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and• No other marker of kidney disease
Creatinine Cystatin CSmall molecule, 113 Da Non-glycosolated protein, 13kD
Breakdown product of creatine/muscle metabolism
Cysteine protease inhibitor, made by all nucleated cells
Filtered, secreted (↑ as GFR ↓) and excreted (extra-renal elimination)
Filtered, reabsorbed and catabolized (proximal tubule)
Colorimetric and enzymatic assays, widely standardized
Immunoassays, becoming standardized
Multiple alterations (muscle mass, drugs, interferents)
Alterations: obesity, thyroid disease, steroids and HIV
“Tried and true”, GFR estimation “New kid”, GFR estimation and prognostic marker: CVD, all-cause mortality, DM, unsuccessful aging
Comparison of GFR Equations
MDRD
CKD-EPI
CKD-EPI Cys
CKD-EPI mix
Delanaye P et al. BMC Nephrology 2013;14:57.
“ Moving from strictly creatinine-based GFR equations (MDRD and CKD-EPI) to cystatin-C based or combined equations will decrease the prevalence of CKD, Stage 3 by ~ 50%”
What do we know about CKD Progression?• Stage 3B is more likely to progress to Stage 4 and 5 than Stage
3A• Predictors: degree of albuminuria microscopic hematuria Stage 3 subgroup
• ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 = clinically significant breakpoint• GFR trajectory may be an important predictor of progression
2 x ↑ risk for disease progression
> 3 mL/min/1.73 m2/year requires CLOSER follow-up and identification of potentially reversible factors
Ann O’Hare
When to Refer?• KDIGO 2012 Guidelines
• Abrupt or sustained fall in eGFR (↓ GFR of ≥ 25%, change in GFR category or sustained ↓ in GFR of ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 within 12 months)
• eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 ± Diabetes• Urinary RBC casts or RBC > 20/hpf (microscopic hematuria without an
anatomic cause)• Refractory HTN (≥ 3 drugs)• Significant albuminuria:
• ACR ≥ 300mg/gm or AER ≥ 300mg/24 hrs• PCR ≥ 500mg/gm or PER ≥ 500mg/24 hrs
• NICE 2014 Guidelines• Take into account the individual’s wishes and co-morbidities• Rare or genetic renal disease
When Should Dialysis Be Initiated?• In the US, dialysis is typically
initiated at an eGFR > 10 mL/min/1.73 m2
• No survival benefit• Reasons to start early
• Fluid overload/Heart Failure• Hyperkalemia• Uremic Symptoms (weight loss,
weakness, appetite issues)• Non-adherence
eGFR 10-14 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR 5-7 mL/min/1.73 m2
Susantitaphong P et al, AJKD 2012;59(6):829-840
Metabolic Acidosis in CKD• Occurs 2nd to western diet (sulfur containing amino
acids)
• Maintained until GFR < 40-50 mL/min
• Dangers:• Protein energy wasting (muscle weakness)• Impairment in myocardial function and glucose
homeostasis• Uremic osteodystrophy (bone loss 2nd to ↑ bone
resorption)• Chronic inflammation• In observational studies, metabolic acidosis - - > faster
progression of CKD• Direct toxicity• Tubulointerstitial damage• Activation of the RAAS• ~ 1.47 ± 0.19 mL/min/year reduction in eGFR decline
Treatment of Metabolic AcidosisSome Helpful Tips• Baking soda is cheap (1/2
teaspoon = 26.8 mEq of bicarbonate)
• If PO4 binder is used, choose: calcium acetate or sevelamer carbonate
• Surprisingly, LESS sodium retention with NaHCO3-
versus NaCL• Target bicarbonate 22-24
mEq/L
Chen and Abramowitz. AJKD 2014;63():311-317
Sodium Restriction: Benefits and Controversies• Benefits
• Reduction in SBP (~ 10 mmHg)• Helpful in resistant HTN
• Reduction in proteinuria (≥ 300 mg/day)• Especially if > 1 gram/day• Control of sodium excess improves the response to
RAAS blockade in CKD -- > ↓ proteinuria• Reduction in progression of CKD• Decrease in mortality (all-cause, ~ 28%)
• Risks• ↑ in plasma renin, aldosterone, adrenaline and
cholesterol• ↑ risk of progression to ESRD• ↑ NT-proBNP• May be augmented by very low sodium diets (< 1.5
grams/day)
• Safe suggestion: 2300 mg/day ≈ 1 teaspoonful salt/day
McMahon EJ et al. JASN 2013;24:2096-2103.
Minimum Amount of PA for Reduced Mortality and Extended Life Expectancy
Largest health gains occur within the 1st 15-29 min/day in inactive people
Minimum Amount of PA and Benefits• 15 minutes/day or 90 minutes/week (6
days/week) of moderate-intensity exercise)
• Reduction in all-cause mortality by 14%
• Reduction in cancer mortality by 10%• Reduction in mortality from CVD by
20%• 3 year longer life expectancy
Wen CP et al. Lancet 2011;378:1244-1253.
• Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans• 150 minutes/ week or more of moderate-
intensity aerobic PA or 75 minutes/ week of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA or a combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity aerobic activity
• Episodes of at least 10 minutes, spread throughout the week
• For additional and more extensive health benefits, adults should increase their aerobic activity to 300 minutes/week of moderate-intensity or 150 minutes/ week of vigorous-intensity activity
• Adults should do muscle-strengthening activities at moderate or high intensity involving ALL muscle groups on 2 or more days a week
• Excess sitting harms lean and obese alike
CDC Guidelines December 2011
Association of Walking with Survival and RRT in CKD Stages 3-5
• Observational cohort, June 2003 to May 2013, Taiwan
• Competing risks analysis
• 6363 pts with CKD, stages 3-5
• Higher frequency of exercise and Longer duration was associated with: lower mortality and lower RRT risk
• Not related to: higher renal function, comorbidity or younger age
Chen IR et al. CJASN 2014
Overall Mortality
RRT
BP Targets: What is the Evidence?• JNC 8 focused on individuals and populations
• Expert-opinion based, not evidence-based• 5 out of 17 dissenting authors published comments
in the AIM January 2014.• ACC/AHA anticipates new guideline in 2015
• Clinical Pearls• If SBP > 160 mmHg, consider combo therapy (CCB
plus RAAS blocker)• Faster BP control and lower CV event rate
• Consider dosing a short to moderate-acting BP med at night in pts with CKD
• Enalapril, Nifedipine XL or Losartan• There is no advantage to DUAL RAAS blockade (ACE
plus ARB), and potential risks• ↑ risk of GFR decline and hyperkalemia• BP ↓ of 2.4 mmHg with dual versus 1.2 mmHg alone• Reduction in albuminuria ~ 440 mg/day
• If you suspect white coat HTN, but continued CV events, consider ambulatory BP monitoring
A = strong, E = expert
Recent HTN Trials
Bakris GL. Lancet 2010;375:1173-1181
11,056 pts, randomized + double blindedSecondary Endpt:-Progression of CKD, doubling SCr , need for RRT or ESRD
Obesity Paradox
Impact of Achieved BP on Mortality and ESRD • Retrospective cohort study, Kaiser
Permanente Southern California• 398,419 treated hypertensive subjects
• 30% (+) diabetes mellitus• 43% (+) BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (obesity paradox with
lower HR)• Mortality in 25,182 (6.3%) and ESRD in 4,957
(1.2%)• DM population had a lower nadir at 131 and 69
mmHg• Age ≥ 70 had a higher nadir at 140 and 70
mmHg
• U-shaped curve with incremental risk increases in BOTH directions
60-79 mmHg
130-139 mmHg
Sim JJ et al. JACC 2014;64(6):588-597
Importance of the Team Approach
• ~ 7.6 million people with Stage III CKD (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2)
~ 6891 Full-time Nephrologists ( January 2006, AAMC) but ~30% ≥ 55 years or older
~ 1100 pts with Stage III CKD per Nephrologist ( i.e. ~ 7 new patients/day/Nephrologist)
IMPOSSIBLE!
Take Home Points• Though GFR equations continue to evolve, they are helpful in predicting CKD complications and
provide prognostication.• CKD-EPI is the preferred equation due to less bias.• Newer markers such as cystatin C may provide advantages over creatinine-based assays.
• eGFR ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 is an important decision point.• Every individual likely has a unique GFR trajectory.• The addition of proteinuria (≥ 1 gram/day) or albuminuria (≥ 300 mg/gm creatinine) worsens every stage
of GFR.
• Metabolic acidosis (serum bicarbonate < 22 mEq/L) should be treated and may slow progression in CKD.
• The degree of salt restriction remains controversial, though moderate restriction (~ 2300 mg/day) may assist with proteinuria reduction and augment RAAS blockade.
• Inactivity has important associations (↑ CV morbidity/mortality, ↑ risk of malignancy as well as increases the risk of progression to RRT and death). Inactivity is more deadly than obesity.
• BP goals continue to be moving targets and hopefully further studies will elucidate the optimal values.