report on checking/5% sample checking...the sample check survey was conducted in 16 schools in...

1 | P a g e

Report on

Submitted to: STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR

Lakshadweep Sarva Shiksha Abhyan (LSSA) U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP

KAVARATTI

Submitted by: U. NOORUL HASSAN

LECTURER (TE) IN HINDI District Institute of Education and Training (DIET)

U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP KAVARATTI-682555

2 | P a g e

I express my deepest sense of Gratitude and heart full thanks to all

members of Institutions and Personnel who have assisted and

contributed in the smooth conduct survey.

I extremely gratitude to State Project Director SSA Lakshadweep for

assigning this work to me and for his cooperation and support in the

Project. My place on record my most sincere thanks to Mr

K.Muhammed, Principal District Institute of Education and Training

(DIET) Lakshadweep. I would like to thanks to State Project Officer, SSA

Lakshadweep as well as SSA staff for providing all the support during the

project. I hearted thanks to Mr Abdul Gafoor A.K PGT Economics GSSS,

Kavaratti Lakshadweep, for providing the technical support during the

Project. I express my sincere thanks to Shri Badeeudden Thangal,

Lecturer(TE) in Zoology(DIET) for giving Guidance during the Project, I

also express my thanks to all other faculty members and staff in my

Office.

I also acknowledge the cooperation of all the co coordinators of BRC

and CRC for unstained efforts during the project work. I also thanks to

invaluable co operation extended by the Principal/Headmaster/ Senior

Teachers in charge of Headmaster and all other Teachers of the schools

for their support and help during the survey.

Noorul Hassan U Lecturer (TE) in Hindi

District Institute of Education and Training (DIET) Lakshadweep

3 | P a g e

List of Tables 4 List of figures 5 Abbreviations 6

CHAPTER 1 - Executive Summary 7-8

CHAPTER 2 - Introduction 9

CHAPTER 3 - Methodology 10-11

CHAPTER 4 - Detailed Analysis 12-35

CHAPTER 5 – Investigator’s Feedback 36-37

CHAPTER 6 – Conclusion and Recommendation 38-39

Annexure - 1: List of Schools in Lakshadweep

Annexure - 2: List of Schools selected for sample survey

Annexure - 3: Questionnaire used for the survey

4 | P a g e

Table 3.1 Selected School for Sample checking

Table 3.2 Category wise Schools for sample checking

Table 4.1 Comparison of U-DISE data with present data regarding school particulars

Table 4.2 Location

Table 4.3 Type of School

Table 4.4 School Management

Table 4.5 Establishment Year

Table 4.6 Status of school building

Table 4.7 Type of school Building

Table 4.8 Condition of Class Rooms

Table 4.9 Enrolment Data

Table 4.10 Electricity

Table 4.11 Boys Toilet

Table 4.12 Separate Toilet for girls

Table 4.13 Play Ground

Table 4.14 Availability of Drinking Water

Table 4.15 Land available for additional Class room

Table 4.16 Separate Room for Headmaster/Principal available

Table 4.17 Boundary Wall

Table 4.18 Library

Table 4.19 News Paper Magazine

Table 4.20 No. Computers

Table 4.21 Medical Check-up

Table 4.22 Category wise comparative analysis of data regarding “Enrolment of Students”

Table 4.23 Category wise analysis of data regarding No. of Teachers

Table 5.1 Investigator’s Feedback Table 5.2 Observation of Investigator

5 | P a g e

Figure 3.1 Selected School for Sample checking

Figure 4.1 Comparison of U-DISE data with present data regarding school particulars

Figure 4.2 Location

Figure 4.3 Type of School

Figure 4.4 School Management

Figure 4.5 Establishment Year

Figure 4.6 Status of school building

Figure 4.7 Type of school Building

Figure 4.8 Condition of Class Rooms

Figure 4.9 Enrolment Data

Figure 4.10 Electricity

Figure 4.11 Boys Toilet

Figure 4.12 Separate Toilet for girls

Figure 4.13 Play Ground

Figure 4.14 Availability of Drinking Water

Figure 4.15 Land available for additional Class room

Figure 4.16 Separate Room for Headmaster/Principal available

Figure 4.17 Boundary Wall

Figure 4.18 Library

Figure 4.19 News Paper Magazine

Figure 4.20 No. Computers

Figure 4.21 Medical Check-up

Figure 4.22 Category wise comparative analysis of data regarding “Enrolment of Students”

Figure 4.23 Category wise analysis of data regarding No. of Teachers

Figure 5.1 Investigator’s Feedback Figure 5.2 Observation of Investigator

6 | P a g e

DPEP : District Primary Education Programme

MHRD : Ministry of Human Resource Development

NIEPA : National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration.

NUPA : National University of Educational Planning and Administration

UNICEF: United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund

DCF : Data Capture Formats

DISE : District Information System of Education

PES : Post Enumeration Survey

LSSA : Lakshadweep Sarva Shiksha Abhyan

LSSASMA: Lakshadweep Sarva Shiksha Abhyan State Mission Authority

BRC : Block Resource Centre

CRC : Cluster Resource Centre

SSA : Sarva Shiksha Abhyan

HM : Headmaster

RTE : The Right to Education

CWSN : Children with Special Need

SMC : School Management Committee

7 | P a g e

CHAPTER 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Free and compulsory education to all children up to the age of fourteen years is

our constitutional commitment. The Government of India has initiated a number of

programmes to achieve the goal of Universalization of Elementary Education (UEE).

Among the several programmes launched, Sarva Shiksha Abhyan (SSA) is the most

recent one in this regard. The Sarva Shiksha Abhyan (SSA) is a historic stride

towards achieving the long cherished goal of Universalization of Elementary

Education (UEE) through a time bound integrated approach, in partnership with

states. SSA, which promises to change the face of elementary education sector of

the country, aims to provide useful and quality elementary education to all children

in the 6-14 age groups by 2010. Unlike previous programmes of this nature,

SSA is quite distinct in terms of implementation through mission as well as

partnership mode. “U-DISE” (Unified District Information System for education)

is a system for scientific collection of data related to schools. Under the process,

the districts are selected as nodal point of data collection, computerization, analysis

and use of data. The state level MIS wing coordinates the activities of the districts.

The flow of data plays an important role in information system. U-DISE is a

tool to support the decentralized planning and management of SSA. The basic

data collected primary schools, Upper primary schools, UPS classes of Secondary/

Senior secondary schools. The data are computerized and analysed at Island level.

8 | P a g e

Key Objectives of the study:

Following are the main objectives of this study.

1. To cross check the U-DISE data with the data collected by the Investigator, and

to find out the deviation as well as the precision levels.

2. To make field level observation on:

a) Cooperation of principal/ head teacher in providing data / BRC / CRC.

b) Status of records of schools

c) Availability of infrastructure in the school.

d) Availability of U-DISE data at all levels.

e) Enrolment of Students

f) Staff details

Findings of the study

U-DISE formats in adequate numbers were given in all the schools having primary

and elementary classes. This has helped in data compilation from all schools.

The availability of filled U-DISE formats in the schools has improved because

of the instruction given to the schools by SSA Office.

A positive mind-set of Principal/ Head teacher is required for accurate and

timely U-DISE data collection. 100% of sample Head Teachers/ Principals have

shown very good initial response to the Investigator.

As per the aspects of observation of investigators, 81.25% of Principals/ Head

teachers are able to provide the information pertaining to enrolment and pass

percentage, attendance register, report card etc.

9 | P a g e

CHAPTER 2

Introduction

The Government of India realize the non-negotiable requirement of a

sound information base for planning and monitoring of Educational projects

during the inception stage of DPEP in late 1994 Accordingly NUEPA

developed the core Data Capture Formats (DCF) and software for

implementation of the system at district level and the software named as

District Information System of Education DISE was released during the

middle of 1995.It is a system for scientific collection of data related to

schools. DISE data is collected from each school for 1st to 12th class in the

whole of the state on regular basis every year.

To ensure its consistency and accuracy it has been decided to have a

sample checking of DISE Data on 5% basis to avoid devotion and provide

corrective measures to help in improving the quality of Data being collected.

That is way it has been made mandatory for all state to get DISE Data sample

checked by an agency immediately after DISE Data collection. This survey is

termed as Post Enumeration survey (PES).

In pursuance with the move of NUEPA the Sarva Shiksha Abhyan, Union

Territory of Lakshadweep also distributed the DCF to all schools and collected

the DISE data. State Project Director, Lakshadweep Sarva Shiksha Abhyan

State Mission Authority (LSSASMA) has Direct the Investigator, and

appointed for Post Enumeration Survey, to conduct the survey for 5%

random checking of DISE 2012-2013 data after visiting minimum Three Island

in Lakshadweep.

The investigator visited Three Island personally and collected data

through the DCF for the Post Enumeration survey (PES).The Data collected

through both the DCF, viz, DCF for DISE and DCF for 5% PES were tabulated

and computerized. The Analysis was made in scientific way by calculating the

Discrepancies by using the descriptive statics such as percentage.

10 | P a g e

CHAPTER 3

Methodology

The sample check survey was conducted in 16 Schools in Lakshadweep. The

Investigator has randomly selected Three Island namely Amini, Agatti and Kavaratti. All

Schools are run by Department of Education UT of Lakshadweep. Island wise break up of

selected schools were shown in the following Table.

Table 3.1 Selected School for Sample checking

SL .No Island No. Schools %

1 Kavaratti 5 31.25

2 Amini 6 37.5

3 Agatti 5 31.25

Total 16 100

Figure 3.1 Selected School for Sample checking

31%

38%

31%

Kavaratti Amini Agatti

11 | P a g e

Table 3.2 Category wise Schools for sample checking

Island

No of Schools by Category

Total

Pri

mar

y O

nly

Pri

mar

y w

ith

Up

per

Pri

mar

y

Pri

mar

y w

ith

Up

per

Pri

mar

y,

Seco

nd

ary

&

Hig

her

Sec

on

dar

y

Up

per

Pri

mar

y

on

ly

Up

per

Pri

mar

y

wit

h S

eco

nd

ary

&

Hig

her

Sec

on

dar

y

Kavaratti 3 - 1 - 1 5

Amini 4 - - 1 1 6

Agathi 3 - - 1 1 5

Category wise Total

10 Nil 1 2 3 16

Grand Total 16

State project Director provided Data Collection Format (DCF) for Collection of

requisite Data from the selected Schools to compare with U-DISE Data already filled in the

school for the Year 2012 – 2013.

To cross check the U-DISE

To Identify the Gap/Weaknesses and suggest appropriate measures for

strengthening the System.

12 | P a g e

CHAPTER 4

Detailed Analysis

The Data available in U –DISE Data Capture Format (DCF) is 100 % matching with the data

available in survey.

Table 4.1 Comparison of U-DISE data with present data regarding school particulars

Variable on which

information collected

Sample size

Available in U –DISE data but not match with

survey data

Available in U –DISE data and match with

survey data

No. of School

% No. of School

%

Type of School 16 0 0 16 100

Lowest Class 16 0 0 16 100

Highest Class 16 0 0 16 100

School Management

16 0 0 16 100

School Location 16 0 0 16 100

Year of Establishment

16 1 6.25 15 93.75

Figure 4.1 Comparison of U-DISE data with present data regarding school particulars

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Type ofSchool

Lowest Class Highest Class SchoolManagement

SchoolLocation

Year ofEstablishment

Available In U-DISE data and match with survey data

Available in U-DISE data but not match with survey

13 | P a g e

Information regarding the location of schools is same in both U-DISE and PES.100%

of data available in U-DISE data.

Table 4.2 Location

Island Total No. of

Schools

Not filled/Not available in U-DISE

Data

Available in U –DISE data but not match with survey data

Available in U –DISE data and

match with survey data

No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0 0 0 0 100

Amini 6 0 0 0 0 0 100

Agatti 5 0 0 0 0 0 100

Grand Total

16 0 0 0 0 0 100

Figure 4.2 Location

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

KAVARATTI AMINI AGATHI GRAND TOTAL

Not filled/Not available in U-DISE Data

Available in U-DISE data but not match with survey

Available In U-DISE data and match with survey data

14 | P a g e

Information regarding the Type of schools is same in both U-DISE and PES.100% of

data available in U-DISE data.

Table 4.3 Type of School

Island Total No. of

Schools

Not filled/Not available in U-

DISE Data


Available in U –DISE data and match with survey data

No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0 0 0 0 100

Amini 6 0 0 0 0 0 100

Agatti 5 0 0 0 0 0 100

Grand Total

16 0 0 0 0 0 100

Figure 4.3 Type of School

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Kavaratti Amini Agathi GrandTotal

Available in U-DISE data but does not match with survey data

Available in U-DISE data and match with survey data

15 | P a g e

Out of Total 16 Schools Data regarding Management in survey all schools data are

matching with the Data available in U – DISE. The surveyed schools are run by Dept. of

Education and there is no private schools in this locality at present.

Table 4.4 School Management

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0 0 0 0 100

Amini 6 0 0 0 0 0 100

Agatti 5 0 0 0 0 0 100

Grand Total

16 0 0 0 0 0 100

Figure 4.4 School Management

0

20

40

60

80

100

Kavaratti Amini Agathi Grand Total

Not filled/Not available in U-DISE data

Available in U-DISE data but not match with survey data


16 | P a g e

The following table presents the details of establishment year of schools in both U-

DISE and survey data. 93.75 percent data in survey is matching with data available in U-DISE

and 6.25 % shows mismatches.

Table 4.5 Establishment Year

Island Total No. of

Schools


Data

Available in U –DISE data but not




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agathi 5 0 0.00 1 20.00 4 80.00

Grand Total 16 0 0.00 1 6.25 15 93.75

Figure 4.5 Establishment Year

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00


ESTABLISHMENT YEAR




17 | P a g e

The status of building of all schools surveyed was matching with the U-DISE data

available.

Table 4.6 Status of school building

Island Total No. of

Schools


Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agathi 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 100.00

Figure 4.6 Status of school building

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00





18 | P a g e

Out of 16 schools, 15 schools data (93.75%) available in U-DISE are matching with the

survey data and one school data (6.25%) is mismatching with Survey data.

Table 4.7 Type of school Building

Island Total No. of

Schools


Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 1 16.67 5 83.33

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 1 6.25 15 93.75.00

Figure 4.7 Type of school Building

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00


TYPE OF SCHOOL BUILDING




19 | P a g e

In case of condition of classrooms, all school details are not matching with the U-DISE

data.

Table 4.8 Condition of Class Rooms

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data





No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 3 60.00 2 40.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 4 66.67 2 33.33

Agatti 5 0 0.00 4 80.00 1 20.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 11 68.75 5 31.25

Figure 4.8 Condition of Class Rooms

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00


CONDITION OF CLASS ROOMS




20 | P a g e

The following table shows the comparison of enrolment data of students in U-DISE

data with survey data. The enrolment data of all the schools surveyed are mismatches with

data available in U-DISE.

Table 4.9 Enrolment Data

Island Total No. of

Schools


Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 2 40.00 3 60.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 4 66.67 2 33.33

Agatti 5 0 0.00 3 60.00 2 40.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 9 56.25 7 43.75

Figure 4.9 Enrolment Data

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00


ENROLLMENT DATA




21 | P a g e

In case of electricity, hundred percent of schools are matches with the data available

in the U-DISE.

Table 4.10 Electricity

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data





No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 100.00

Figure 4.10 Electricity

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00





22 | P a g e

In case of boys’ toilet, the data of only one school data matches with data available

in the U-DISE and other two schools data are mismatches.

Table 4.11 Boys Toilet

Island Total No. of

Schools


Data





No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 2 40.00 3 60.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agathi 5 0 0.00 3 60.00 2 40.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 5 31.25 11 68.75

Figure 4.11 Boys Toilet

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00


BOYS TOILET




23 | P a g e

The following table presents the details of separate toilet for girls in both U-DISE and

survey data. 81.25 percent data in survey is matching with data available in U-DISE and 18.75

percent shows mismatches.

Table 4.12 Separate Toilet for girls

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data



No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 1 20.00 4 80.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 2 40.00 3 60.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 3 18.75 13 81.25

Figure 4.12 Separate Toilet for girls

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


SEPARATE TOILET FOR GIRLS




24 | P a g e

In the case of playground the data available in U-DISE exactly match with the survey

data except 3 schools data are mismatches with survey data.

Table 4.13 Play Ground

Island Total No. of

Schools


Data





No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 3 50.00 3 50.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 3 18.75 13 81.25

Figure 4.13 Play Ground

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00


PLAY GROUND




25 | P a g e

All the schools data regarding the availability of drinking water surveyed matches

with U-DISE data.

Table 4.14 Availability of Drinking Water

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 100.00

Figure 4.14 Availability of Drinking Water

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


AVAILABLITY OF DRINKING WATER




26 | P a g e

The below table show the comparison of U-DISE and survey data of land availability

of additional classrooms. Data regarding the land availability for additional classrooms is

mismatching in two island and in one island school data matches with U-DISE data.

Table 4.15 Land available for additional Class room

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 1 20.00 4 80.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 2 40.00 3 60.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 3 18.75 13 81.25

Figure 4.15 Land available for additional Class room

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


LAND AVAILABLE FOR ADDITIONAL CLASS ROOM




27 | P a g e

Out of 16 schools, all the schools data in U-DISE regarding the availability of separate

room for Head Teacher/ Principal matches with survey data except one school data

mismatches with U-DISE data.

Table 4.16 Separate Room for Headmaster/Principal available

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 1 20.00 4 80.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 1 6.25 15 93.75

Figure 4.16 Separate Room for Headmaster/Principal available

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00





28 | P a g e

In case of boundary wall, Overall data available in U-DISE regarding boundary wall

matches with survey data.

Table 4.17 Boundary Wall

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 0 0.00 15 100.00

Figure 4.17 Boundary Wall

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


BOUNDARY WALL




29 | P a g e

Hundred percent data in U-DISE regarding the library in schools matches with the

survey data.

Table 4.18 Library

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data





No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 100.00

Figure 4.18 Library

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00





30 | P a g e

Out of 16 schools, all the schools data in U-DISE regarding the availability of News

Paper Magazine matches with survey data except one school data mismatches with U-DISE

data.

Table 4.19 News Paper Magazine

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 1 16.67 5 83.33

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 1 6.25 15 93.75

Figure 4.19 News Paper Magazine

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00


NEWS PAPER MAGAZINE




31 | P a g e

All data available in U-DISE are mismatches with survey data.

Table 4.20 No. Computers

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data




No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 2 40.00 3 60.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 1 16.67 5 83.33

Agatti 5 0 0.00 2 40.00 3 60.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 5 31.25 11 68.75

Figure 4.20 No. Computers

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00





32 | P a g e

Hundred percent of data regarding the medical check-ups of students in schools in

U-DISE is matching with survey data.

Table 4.21 Medical Check-up

Island Total No. of

Schools


DISE Data





No. of School

% No. of School

% No. of School

%

Kavaratti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Amini 6 0 0.00 0 0.00 6 100.00

Agatti 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 100.00

Grand Total

16 0 0.00 0 0.00 16 100.00

Figure 4.21 Medical Check-up

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00





33 | P a g e

Table 4.22 Category wise comparative analysis of data regarding “Enrolment of Students”

SL. N

o.

Island Enrolment DISE PES Discrepancy % of

Discrepancy % of

Precision

1 Kavaratti

Overall 2113 2115 2 0.09 99.91

Boys 1069 1083 14 1.29 98.71

Girls 1044 1032 12 1.15 98.85

SC 0 0 0 0.00 100.00

ST 2089 2100 11 0.52 99.48

OBC 15 15 0 0.00 100.00

Minority 2102 2106 4 0.19 99.81

Repeaters 0 0 0 0.00 100.00

CWSN 18 18 0 0.00 100.00

2 Amini

Overall 1803 1803 0 0.00 100.00

Boys 898 898 0 0.00 100.00

Girls 905 905 0 0.00 100.00

SC 0 0 0 0.00 100.00

ST 1803 1803 0 0.00 100.00

OBC 0 0 0 0.00 100.00

Minority 1803 1803 0 0.00 100.00

Repeaters 15 15 0 0.00 100.00

CWSN 243 202 41 16.87 83.13

3 Agatti

Overall 1712 1710 2 0.12 99.88

Boys 818 816 2 0.24 99.76

Girls 894 894 0 0.00 100.00

SC 1 2 1 50.00 50.00

ST 1700 1701 1 0.06 99.94

OBC 8 7 1 12.50 87.50

Minority 1695 1703 8 0.47 99.53

Repeaters 0 0 0 0.00 100.00

CWSN 55 52 3 5.45 94.55

TOTAL

Overall 5628 5628 0 0.00 100.00

Boys 2785 2797 12 0.43 99.57

Girls 2843 2831 12 0.42 99.58

SC 1 2 1 50.00 50.00

ST 5592 5604 12 0.21 99.79

OBC 23 22 1 4.35 95.65

Minority 5600 5612 12 0.21 99.79

Repeaters 15 15 0 0.00 100.00

CWSN 316 272 44 13.92 86.08

34 | P a g e

Figure 4.22 Category wise comparative analysis of data regarding “Enrolment of Students”

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

Category wise comparative analysis of Students Enrolment

% of Discrepancy % of Precision

35 | P a g e

Table 4.23 Category wise analysis of data regarding No. of Teachers

SL.No Island No of Teacher

PES DISE Discrepancy % of Discrepancy % of Precision

1

Amini

10 10 0 0.00 100.00

2 27 24 3 11.11 88.89

3 11 10 1 9.09 90.91

4 3 3 0 0.00 100.00

5 13 13 0 0.00 100.00

6 22 23 1 4.55 95.45

7

Kavaratti

27 25 2 7.41 92.59

8 40 27 13 32.50 67.50

9 62 62 0 0.00 100.00

10 10 15 5 50.00 50.00

11 12 12 0 0.00 100.00

12

Agatti

37 39 2 5.41 94.59

13 25 25 0 0.00 100.00

14 16 16 0 0.00 100.00

15 16 16 0 0.00 100.00

16 15 15 0 0.00 100.00

Total 346 335 11 3.18 96.82

Figure 4.23 Category wise analysis of data regarding No. of Teachers

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

Amini Kavaratti Agathi Total

Island wise analysis of Teachers

% of Discrepancy % of Precision

36 | P a g e

CHAPTER 5

Investigator’s Feedback

In addition to DCF forms for getting information on data elements related to

school, teacher and children enrolment and retention indicators enumerators also

give feedback in my observations. This also gave an understanding about how much

do the head teachers or other teachers understand about the use of U-DISE data. This

is reflected by up keep of records. Time and efforts spend to access the data at the

time of need indicates the attitude of Principals/HM. The table below gives responses

in percentages given to various questions by the field enumerators. During my visit

to all the 16 selected schools for data collection and majority of Principal’s initial

reaction towards the investigation and response to provide information was very

good. Availability of records in 81 .25% of schools was also very good.

Table 5.1 Investigator’s Feedback

Attribute

Category of Responses from the School

% of Very Good No.

of Schools

% of Good No. of

Schools

Average No. of

Schools

% of Poor No.

of Schools

% of Very poor No.

of Schools

Initial Reaction of Principal / Headmaster

100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Availability of Records 81.25 0.00 0.00 18.75 0.00

Figure 5.1 Investigator’s Feedback

0

20

40

60

80

100

% of VeryGood No. of

Schools

% o GoodNo. of

Schools

Average No.of Schools

% of PoorNo. of

Schools

% of Verypoor No. of

Schools

Invistigator's Feedback

Initial Reaction of Principal/ Headmaster Availability of Records

37 | P a g e

Table 5.2 Observation of Investigator

SL No Aspects

Schools for which Observations of Investigator were positive

out of 16 schools

No. of Schools %

1 UP to Date maintenance of school records 11 68.75

2 Availability of Data regarding Enrolment and Pass percentage

14 87.5

3 Availability of Data regarding Enrolment in a single Register

13 81.25

4 Properly fill up of attendance Register 13 81.25

5 Proper Maintenance of attendance Register 13 81.25

6 Punctuality of teachers in coming to school 16 100.00

7 Availability of school Report card 11 68.75

8 Availability of Display board 11 68.75

9 Mid -Day Meals in the school 16 100.00

Figure 5.2 Observation of Investigator

0102030405060708090

100

OBSERVATION OF INVESTIGATOR

38 | P a g e

CHAPTER 6

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

I have been visited the schools in three Islands namely Kavaratti, Amini and Agatti for 5% sample survey, it has a learning experience for me. I have visited the schools with open mind and did share all the concerns, problems and obviously required data of the school. Frankly I went beyond my schedule documentation to observe the ground reality. This trip provide a broad picture about the whole system, implementation of different schemes, teacher’s training and its impact on daily

school schedule and other aspects concerning with the school administration. This visit also provided me an opportunity to watch the whole proceeding and

documentation of the school. The U-DISE format for collecting the data is well structured for fulfilling all the features of good schedule. It consists of simple and straight forward points using very Simple language. The objectives of the survey/enquiry, the questions/items are put and arranged in logical order. However, there are some methodological confusion still exists with teachers. Therefore, training on U-DISE Data Collection Format should be long enough to discuss all the issues. It is found that there is no significant deviation except in few cases, between UDISE& Sample Survey Data relating to almost all the indicators of education for the 3 sample Island.

The overall deviation of U-DISE data from sample data taking into consideration

of all the items and sub items for all the above 3 islands are very much acceptable, except in few exceptional cases where the deviation is possible. This indicates that the collection & maintenance of data in U-DISE. There is no manipulation of data anywhere for any of the indicators as there is no significant difference in data between the surveys. The major objective of the study was to assess the degree of deviation and get the precision level of U-DISE data vies‐a‐vies Post Enumeration Survey (PES) data, so as to suggest appropriate remedial measure for strengthening the U-DISE system in Lakshadweep. As such the number of total schools were covered under sample checking are 16 schools of 3 Island namely Kavaratti, Agatti and Amini in Lakshadweep. While observing whole process of data collection under U-DISE, particularly on the basis of scrutiny of U-DISE formats of sample schools.

39 | P a g e

1. The Principals/Head-teachers of the school must be given orientations on the

purpose of U-DISE data collection. 2. The proper training should be given for conceptual clarity. 3. In most of the schools I observed that Head Teachers/Principals were not

aware about the purpose and importance of the information for which that was provided. So it is strongly recommended that they should be informed about the need, importance and utility of the U-DISE data which would definitely motivate them to respond precisely and reliably.

4. During the survey noticed that SMC members are acting a good roll for school management. Schools conditions and status had improved after the formation of SMC. But in few cases members of SMC are not aware there duties.

5. Financial aspect like School Grant & TLM grant should be covered in 5% sample checking format. It was observed that in all schools are utilized the School Grant & TLM grant received from SSA.

6. U-DISE format filled by the teacher in schools further should be properly checked by concerned CRC/BRC so that inconsistency of data can be reduced. Concerned authority should be properly checked by higher authority also and care should be taken future.

7. It was found that overall enrolment of school does not too much, but some variation was found in enrolment of boys and girls.

8. It was suggested that the schools record was not up-to date in some schools. 9. Social Aspects of this survey: -. I get a chance to talk with some of the parents

and the members of school management committee (SMC) in almost all the schools. I found that there were a long gape with parents and Teachers.

10. Parents are expecting from the Teachers that at least try to teach their children to Read and Write well.

11. Some of the schools are not filled the details of contract / Guest teachers properly.

40 | P a g e

ANNEXURE – 1

Details of Primary Schools / Upper Primary / Secondary and Senior

Secondary Schools in Lakshadweep for the year 2013-14.

SL.

No

Island Name of School Category

1 Amini

GJBS (N) Primary School Only

GJBS(s) Primary School Only

GJBS© Primary School Only

GJBS(NW) Primary School Only

SBS Upper Primary School Only

GSSS Secondary with Senior Secondary

2 Androth

GJBS (Moola) Primary School Only

GJBS(C) Primary School Only

GJBS(CH) Primary School with Upper Primary

GJBS(M) Primary School Only

GJBS(Unda) Primary School Only

GSBS(K) Primary School with Upper Primary

SBS(P) Primary School with Upper Primary

GGHS Primary School with Upper Primary, Secondary & Senior

Secondary

GHS Upper Primary with Secondary

MGSSS Senior Secondary

3 Agatti

GJBS (S) Primary School Only

GJBS(N) Primary School Only


GSBS Upper Primary School Only

GSSS Secondary & Senior Secondary

4 Bitra GSBS Primary School with Upper Primary

5 Chethlat GJBS Primary School Only

GSSS Upper Primary with Secondary & Senior Secondary

6 Kadmath




GSBS Primary School with Upper Primary School

GHS Upper Primary with Secondary School

JNS Senior Secondary School Only

7 Kalpeni

GJBS

GSBS

GSSS

Primary School Only

Primary School with Upper Primary

Senior Secondary School Only

8 Kavaratti

GJBS (N) Primary with Upper Primary

GJBS(E) Primary with Upper Primary

GSBS Primary with Upper Primary

GGSSS Primary School with Upper Primary, Secondary & Senior

Secondary

GSSS Upper Primary, Secondary & Senior Secondary

9 Kilthan

GJBS Primary School Only


GSBS Primary with Upper Primary School


10 Minicoy

GJBS Primary School Only


GSBS Primary with Upper Primary School


41 | P a g e

ANNEXURE – 2

List of Schools Selected for DISE 5% Post Enumeration Survey 2012-13

SL.

No

Island Name of School Category

1 Amini




GJBS(NW) Primary School Only

SBS Upper Primary School Only

GSSS Secondary with Senior Secondary

2 Kavaratti

GJBS (N) Primary with Upper Primary

GJBS(E) Primary with Upper Primary

GSBS Primary with Upper Primary

GGSSS Primary School with Upper Primary, Secondary & Senior

Secondary


3 Agatti

GJBS (S) Primary School Only



GSBS Upper Primary School Only

GSSS Secondary & Senior Secondary

report on checking/5% sample checking...the sample check survey was conducted in 16 schools in...

Documents