results of cacg survey leonie horrocks. positive aspects of cacgs platform for information sharing...
TRANSCRIPT
Results of CACG surveyLeonie Horrocks
Positive Aspects of CACGs
•Platform for information sharing
•Open discussion
•Great / effective chairperson
•Raising community awareness / community consultation
•Strong support from airport
•All relevant parties present
Major issues over last 12 months
• Noise
• Master plan consultation
• Future expansion: infrastructure, flight paths & development
• Major Development Projects
• Circuit training & impact on community
• Traffic congestion & public transport around airport
Biggest challenges
• Noise associated matters
• Too much time spent discussing noise
• Developing meaningful agenda items
• Conflicting views of members
• Attracting or keeping community representation
• Vocal minority groups & full representation of community
• Increased aviation activity
• Lack of independence of the CACG chair
Issues that dominate discussion
• Noise
• Aviation matters: circuit training, flight paths and aircraft movements
• On-airport operations
• Airport developments
• Planning / rezoning / green wedge
• Congestion and road traffic
• Curfew
• Terms of Reference and structure of CACG
• No dominating issue / equal coverage
Outcomes of CACGs
• Information exchange
• Installation of noise monitoring devices
• Fly friendly procedures
• Better / improved understanding of airport issues
• Improvements in communication and community consultation
• Nil / very little / hard to measure
Effective and open discussion?
68%
8%
23%
Yes
Has potential
No
Breakdown - Effective and open discussion?
Yes 76%
Has potential6%
No18%
Airport
Yes 75%
No25%
CACG Chairs
Yes 68%
Has potential11%
No20%
CACG Members
Equal opportunity for all CACG members to put forward their views?
81%
3%
16%
Yes
To some extent
No
Breakdown - Equal opportunity for all CACG members to put forward their views?
Yes82%
No18%
Airport
Yes89%
No11%
CACG Chairs
Yes80%
To some ex-tent5%
No16%
CACG Members
Strategic dialogue between the airport and community?
58%22%
21%
Yes Not yet, but has potential
No
Breakdown - Strategic dialogue between the airport and community?
Yes33%
Not yet, but has po-tential27%
No40%
Airport
Yes73%
Not yet, but has potential
18%
No9%
CACG Chairs
Yes61%
Not yet, but has potential
23%
No16%
CACG Members
Improvements to CACGs?
28%
35%
6%
5%
27%
Membership
Community participation
Meeting frequency
Meeting time
Other
Breakdown - Improvements to CACGs?
54%
31%
15%Airport
Membership
Community participation
Meeting frequency
35%
53%
6%6%
CACG Chairs
Membership
Community participation
Meeting frequency
Meeting time
Other
27%
41%
7%
10%
15%CACG Members
MembershipCommunity participationMeeting frequencyMeeting timeOther
Preferred frequency of meetings?1%
11%
26%
53%
8%
Once a year
Twice a year
Three times a year
Four times a year
Other
Breakdown - Preferred frequency of meetings?
7%
20%
20%
47%
7% Airport
Once a yearTwice a yearThree times a yearFour times a yearOther
9%
27%
64%
CACG Chairs
Twice a year
Three times a year
Four times a year
7%
29%
55%
10%CACG Members
Twice a year
Three times a year
Four times a year
Other - More than Four
Dissemination of information to the community
14%
27%
45%
14%
CACG website
Airport website
Personal email
Other
Patterns in CACG meeting reportsHelen Gannon• Number of meetings held since 2011
• Attendance breakdown
• Breakdown of issues
• Breakdown of issues – Capital Cities vs smaller airports
Number of Meetings held for all Airports since 2011
16%
53%
32%
1 to 5 meetings
6 to 9 meetings
10 or more meetings
Attendance across all Airports
21%
9%
31%
8%
5%
5%
11%
10%
0.2% 0.4%Airport
AsA
Community
Local Council
State Gov
Fed Gov
The Dept
Industry / Stakeholder
CASA
Other
Breakdown of Issues
20%
11%
12%
20%
16%
21% Noise
Land use planning
Community
Construction & Infrastructure
Aviation
Other
Breakdown of IssuesCapital cities vs smaller airports
20%
12%
12%
22%
14%
19%
21%
9%
12%
18%
17%
24%
Noise Land use planningCommunity Construction & InfrastructureAviation Other