return torque micro-bearing refit scott kruse jared smith jacob reese john anderson cherrod williams

21
Return Torque Micro- Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams

Upload: samuel-alexander

Post on 14-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit

Scott Kruse

Jared Smith

Jacob Reese

John Anderson

Cherrod Williams

Overview• Project Introduction

• Design Requirements

• Concept Generation/Selection

• Design Progression

• Material/Magnetic Selection

• Large-Scale Prototype Construction

– FDM (Rapid Prototyping)

– Magnetic Construction

– Assembly

• Results

• Future Work

Project Introduction

• Design Statement: •Design of a micro return torque bearing for actuation purposes through the use of permanent magnets

• Design Specifics:•When an external torque is applied to the bearing, the bearing reacts by producing an opposing torque.•Once the external torque is removed, the bearing returns to its initial position.•Traditionally accomplished with springs.

Design RequirementsDegrees of Travel 15

Max Torque .001 in-lb @ 15 degrees displacement

Torque Requirement Monotonic (no max/min between end

points)

Max Diameter .1 in

Max Thickness .06 in

Proposed Concepts

Shaft/pin

Rotational Magnetic Pair

Axial Magnetic PairAxial Magnetic Pair

Grounded Outer Bearing Surface

Inner Bearing(attached to pin)

Initial Chosen Concept

• Variant of Concept 3• Allows multiple

moment arms• Repeatable/expandable

geometry• Travel limiter inherent

in design• Simple, balanced and

symmetric

Design Progression

• More robust design

• Added magnetic material to produce necessary torque

• Uses only repulsive forces to generate return torque

– Better model of a spring

Chosen Material: Polysilicon• Stronger than steel• Low coefficient of friction• Extremely flexible• Directly compatible with modern IC fabrication• Used extensively in micro-machining

Magnetic Selection

*Sintered NeFeB 48 was chosen for our application.

Torque Results

Torque vs. Angular Displacement

0

0.0002

0.0004

0.0006

0.0008

0.001

0.0012

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Angular Displacement (degrees)

To

rqu

e (i

n-l

b)

Field Visualization

Geometry Results (inches)

Results SummaryDegrees of Travel 15

Max Torque .001 in-lb @ 15 degrees displacement

Monotonic Torque? Yes

Diameter .08 in

Thickness .06 in

Construction of Large-Scale Prototype

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

Rapid Prototyping Process

– Adds layers of material instead of subtracting

– Can construct complicated geometries

– Fast turn around from CAD files to working prototypes

– Utilizes ABS plastic

Prototyping Process

Magnet Construction

• Purchased small Neodymium magnets• Set magnets in blocks of resin of the necessary

geometry

Assembly

•Cut Plexiglas to required diameter •Epoxied magnetic blocks in the appropriate locations•Completed the assembly by adding the parts created through FDM

Prototype Results

Future Work

• Research attachment details for the micro-scale

• Run cost/benefit analysis for the replacement of springs with permanent magnets

• Apply design on the micro-scale

Acknowledgements

• Dr. Masson• Dr. Gielisse• Dr. Luongo• Gary the Prototype

Guy• Ron Wild and Dr.

Greenwood