revealing the fflo phase by the in- plane critical field
TRANSCRIPT
1
A. Buzdin University of Bordeaux I and Institut Universitaire de France
Revealing the FFLO phase by the in-plane critical field anisotropy in layered
superconductors
in collaboration with M. Croitoru
ECRYS-2014, August 11-23, 2014 Cargèse , France
1. Singlet superconductivity destruction by the magnetic field: - The main mechanisms - Origin of FFLO state. 2. Experimental evidences of FFLO state. 3. Quasi-2D superconductors: in-plane anisotropy of the critical field due to FFLO modulation. 4. Quasi-1D superconductors
Outline
• Orbital effect (Lorentz force)
B
-p FL
p
FL
• Paramagnetic effect (singlet pair)
Sz=+1/2 Sz=-1/2
μBH~Δ~Tc ( ) cTsSI ≈⋅
Electromagnetic mechanism
(breakdown of Cooper pairs by magnetic field
induced by magnetic moment)
Exchange interaction
1. Singlet superconductivity destruction by the magnetic field.
Pc
orbc
HH
2
22≡α 1~ <<∆
Fεα
Superconductivity is destroyed by magnetic field
Orbital effect (Vortices)
Zeeman effect of spin (Pauli paramagnetism)
12
χN H 2 =12
N(0)∆2
χN =12
(gµ B )2 N (0) B
Pc g
Hµ
∆=
22
20
2 2πξΦ
=orbcH
Maki parameter
Usually the influence of Pauli paramagnetic effect is negligibly small
B
-p FL
p
FL
μBH~Δ~Tc
Superconducting order parameter behavior under paramagnetic effect
Standard Ginzburg-Landau functional:
...2222 +Ψ∇+Ψ∇−Ψ= ηγaF
The minimum energy corresponds to Ψ=const
The coefficients of GL functional are functions of the Zeeman field h= μBH !
Modified Ginzburg-Landau functional ! :
422
241
Ψ+Ψ∇+Ψ=b
maF
The non-uniform state Ψ~exp(iqr) will correspond to minimum energy and higher transition temperature
q
F
q0
242 )( qqqaF Ψ+−= ηγ
Ψ~exp(iqr) - Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state (1964). Only in pure superconductors and in the rather narrow region.
FFLO inventors
Fulde and Ferrell
Larkin and Ovchinnikov
P. Fulde, R. A. Ferrell, Phys.Rev. 135, A550 (1964) A. I. Larkin, Yu. N. Ovchinnikov, JETP 47, 1138 (1964)
E
k kF +δkF
kF -δkF
The total momentum of the Cooper pair is -(kF -δkF)+ (kF -δkF)=2 δkF
ky kx
E
Conventional pairing
FFLO pairing
( k ,-k )
( k ,-k+q )
pairing between Zeeman split parts of the Fermi surface Cooper pairs have a single non-vanishing center of mass momentum
k
-k
-k k
ky kx
E
q
q~gµBH/vF
-k+q q
-k+q
k
k
Pairing of electrons with opposite spins and momenta unfavourable :
But :
• the upper critical field is increased
• Sensivity to the disorder and to the orbital effect:
(clean limit)
At T = 0, Zeeman energy compensation is exact in 1d, partial in 2d and 3d.
if
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cTT /0.56
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
cTT /
∆/HBµ1d SC 2d SC 3d SC
0.56
•Anisotropies of the Fermi surface and the gap function can stabilize the FFLO state. Stability of FFLO state crucially depends on the dimensionality of the system.
11
Requirements for the formation of the FFLO sate
• Strongly type-II superconductors with very large Ginzburg-Landau parameter
• Large Maki parameter, such that the upper critical field can easily approach the Pauli paramagnetic limit:
pairing • Very clean, , since the FFLO state is sensitive to the presence of impurities.
1D SC 2D SC 3D SC
FFLO phase in the case of paramagnetic and orbital effect (3D BCS limit) – upper critical field
Lowest m=0 Landau level solution, Gruenberg and Gunter, 1966
Pc
orbc
HH
2
22≡α FFLO exists for Maki parameter α>1.8.
For Maki parameter α>9 the highest Landau level solutions are realized – Buzdin and Brison, 1996.
Note : The system with elliptic Fermi surface can be tranformed by scaling transformation to ihe isotropic one. Sure the direction of the magnetic field will be changed.
FFLO and orbital effect
FFLO phase in 2D superconductors in the tilted magnetic field - upper critical field
Highest Landau level solutions are realized – Bulaevskii, 1974; Buzdin and Brison, 1996; Houzet and Buzdin, 2000.
θ B
3. Experimental evidences of FFLO state.
•Unusual form of Hc2(T) dependence •Change of the form of the NMR spectrum •Anomalies in altrasound absorbtion •Unusual behaviour of magnetization •Change of anisotropy ….
15
Layered organic superconductor
Layered structure suppression of orbital effects in H parallel to the planes.
BEDT-TTF layer
Cu[N(CN)2]Br layer
∼ 15 Å
C S H or D
C S H or D
BEDT-TTF (donor molecule)
17
Possible FFLO state in Heavy Fermion superconductors
This 2nd order phase transition is characterized by a structural transition of the flux line lattice (FLL).
Ultrasound and NMR results are consistent with the FFLO state which predicts a segmentation of the flux line lattice
Y. Matsuda and H. Shimahara, J. Phys. Sos. Japan 76, 051005 (2007)
Pauli paramagnetically limited superconducting state
Field induced superconductivity (FISC) in an organic compound
S. Uji et al., Nature 410 908 (2001)
L. Balicas et al., PRL 87 067002 (2001)
FISC
Metal
Insulator AF
λ-(BETS)2FeCl4
c-axis (in-plane) resistivity
Other example:
Temperature [K]
Crit
ical
fiel
d H
c2 [T
esla
]
Jaccarino-Peter effect
Eu-Sn Molybdenum chalcogenide
H. Meul et al, 1984
Zeeman energy Exchange energy between conduction electrons in the BETS layers and magnetic ions Fe3+ (S=5/2)
For some reason J > 0 : the paramagnetic effect is suppressed at
S
S (Eu0.75Sn0.25Mo6S7.2Se0.8)
20
Anomalous in-plane anisotropy of the onset of SC in (TMTSF)2ClO4
S.Yonezawa, S.Kusaba, Y.Maeno, P.Auban-Senzier, C.Pasquier, K.Bechgaard, and D. Jerome, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117002 (2008)
21
Model system –quasi 2 metal
We assume that the corrugation of the Fermi surface is small
22
Eilenberger equation for layered SC
Here:
Taking into account that the system is near the second-order phase transition, the linearized Eilenberger equation describing layered superconducting systems acquires the form
The order parameter is defined self-consistently as (s-wave)
23
Choice of the solution The solution of the Eilenberger equation can be chosen without loss of generality as a Bloch function
At the same time, the order parameter can be expanded as
This expansion takes into account the possibility for the formation of the pairing state with finite center-of-mass momentum:
• The direction of the FFLO modulation vector is fixed by the symmetry of the Fermi surface.
• |q| is taken that maximizes Hc2 calculated in the Pauli paramagnetic limit.
M. Croitoru, M. Houzet, and A. I. Buzdin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 207005 (2012).
25
Solution
Here:
Making use of the self-consistency relation we finally obtain
General case:
Resonance:
Out of resonance:
26
Orbital correction (out of resonance) Normalized orbital correction of the superconducting onset temperature as a function of in-plane magnetic field H for several angles between magnetic field and the FFLO modulation vector q.
Absolute value of the wave vector q of the FFLO phase (dashed lines) and of the wave vectors Q (solid lines) versus the reduced temperature calculated for several values of Fermi velocity .
28
Orbital correction (resonance)
Resonance condition:
29
Resonance condition • Vector potential of the parallel magnetic field results in a modulation of the interlayer coupling;
Resonance condition:
Conducting layer
• The period of this modulation may interfere with the in-plane FFLO modulation leading to the anomalies in the critical field behavior;
Conducting layer
30
Intrinsic vortex pinning in LOFF phase for parallel field orientation
Δn= Δ0cos(qr+αn)exp(iφn(r))
t – transfer integral
Josephson coupling between layers is modulated
Fn,n+1=[-I0cos(αn_- αn+1)+I2cos(qr) cos(αn_+ αn+1)] cos(φn- φn+1)
φn- φn+1=2πxHs/Φ0 + πn s-interlayer distance, x-coordinate along q
31
Intrinsic Josephson vortex pinning in the FFLO phase for parallel field orientation
S. Uji et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 97, 157001 (2006) L. Bulaevskii et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 90, 067003 (2006)
Normalized superconducting transition temperature, as a function of the angle between the directions of the applied magnetic field and the vector q for several values of .
32
In-plane anisotropy of the onset of superconductivity
Resonance case Non-resonance case
Croitoru, Buzdin, PRB, 2012
34
Anomalous in-plane anisotropy of the onset of SC in (TMTSF)2ClO4
S.Yonezawa, S.Kusaba, Y.Maeno, P.Auban-Senzier, C.Pasquier, K.Bechgaard, and D. Jerome, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117002 (2008)
Normalized correction of the superconducting onset temperature as a function of in-plane magnetic field H for several angles between magnetic field and the FFLO modulation vector q.
35
Orbital correction (d-wave)
Orbital correction FFLO modulation vector
Normalized superconducting transition temperature, as a function of the angle between the directions of the applied magnetic field and the vector q for several values of .
36
In-plane anisotropy of the onset of superconductivity (d-wave)
37
Phase diagram with FFLO • Normalized correction of the superconducting onset temperature as a function of (i) the reduced temperature, (ii) of the magnetic field direction; • Polar plots of .
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
α = 0°
α = 20°
α = 70°
α = 45°
∆TcP
/TcP
T2 c0
/t2 c0
T/Tc0
mx/my = 1, 10 η = 5.5
0 45 90 135 180-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
η = 5.5
T/Tc = 0.05
T/Tc = 0.1
T/Tc = 0.2
T/Tc = 0.4
T/Tc = 0.6T/Tc = 0.8
my/mx = 1
∆TcP
/TcP
T2 c0
/t2 c0
angle (°)
0.6
0.8
1.00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160180200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
0.6
0.8
1.0
Croitoru, Houzet, Buzdin, PRL, 2012
Quasi 1D superconductors
Croitoru, Buzdin, PRB, 2014
41
Conclusions
• There are strong experimental evidences of the existence of the the FFLO state in organic layered superconductors.
• The interplay between FFLO modulation and orbital effect in
layered superconductor in tilted field results in the very special oscillatory-like angular dependence of the critical field.
• The careful studies of the in-plane critical field anisotropy
could provide the information about the direction and the absolute value of the FFLO wave-vector.
42
System of coupled equations
Substituting one gets system of coupled equations
where
Assumptions: We keep term up to:
FFLO phase in 2D superconductors in the tilted magnetic field - upper critical field
Highest Landau level solutions are realized – Bulaevskii, 1974; Buzdin and Brison, 1996; Houzet and Buzdin, 2000.
θ B
4. Vortices in FFLO state.
45
Order parameter distribution for the asymmetric and square lattices with Landau level n=1.
The dark zones correspond to the maximum of the order parameter and the white zones to its minimum.
Exotic vortex lattice structures in tilted magnetic field
Near the tricritical point, the characteristic length is
Microscopic derivation of the Ginzburg-Landau functional :
Instability toward FFLO state
Instability toward 1st order transition
Validity:
• large scale for spatial variation of ∆ : vicinity of T *
small orbital effect, introduced with
• we neglect diamagnetic screening currents (high-κ limit)
Generalized Ginzburg-Landau functional
Next orders are important :
• 2nd order phase transition at
→ higher Landau levels
• Near the transition: minimization of the free energy with solutions in the form
gauge
ζ Parametrizes all vortex lattice structures at a given Landau level N
is the unit cell
All of them are decribed in the subset :
__ 1st order transition __
2nd order transition __ 2nd order transition in the
paramagnetic limit
Temperature -2 -1 0
Mag
netic
fiel
d
0
1
2
3
Tricritical point
n=1
n=0
n=2
Analysis of phase diagram :
• cascade of 2nd and 1st order transitions between S and N phases
• 1st order transitions within the S phase
• exotic vortex lattice structures
At Landau levels n > 0, we find structures with several points of vanishment of the order parameter in the unit cell and with different winding numbers w = ± 1, ± 2 …