revised draft ma science & technology/ engineering standards overview december, 2013

32
Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Upload: austen-horton

Post on 17-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Revised Draft MAScience & Technology/ Engineering Standards

OverviewDecember, 2013

Page 2: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Why revise?

Full set of standards last developed in 2001

STE contributes to college & career readiness

Student preparation for STEM-focused jobs and postsecondary opportunities

Supports State STEM Plan; Governor’s STEM Advisory Council

Articulation with newly revised AP exams

Supports implementation of Model Curriculum Units and Educator Evaluation initiatives

Reinforces mathematics and literacy standards

Page 3: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Shifts in the draft STE standards

Preparation for post-secondary success

Coherent progressions of learning (practices and concepts)

Integration of practices with concepts

PreK-8 integrated, grade-by-grade standards

3

Page 4: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Scientific & Technological LiteracyThe overarching goal of our framework for K-12 science education is to ensure that by

the end of 12th grade, all students have some appreciation of the beauty and wonder of science; possess sufficient

knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussions on related

issues; are careful consumers of scientific and technological information related to their everyday lives; [and] are able to

continue to learn about science outside school.

(Framework for K-12 Science Education, NRC, 2012, p.1, emphasis added)

Page 5: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Essential Competencies: LearningStudents who are college and career ready in Science and Technology/Engineering will demonstrate the academic knowledge, skills, and practices necessary to enter into and succeed in entry-level, credit-bearing science, engineering or technical courses; certificate or workplace training programs requiring an equivalent level of science; or a comparable entry-level science or technical course at the institution.

That lead to “economically viable career paths” (MA ESE & DHE, 2/26/13; www.doe.mass.edu/boe/docs/2013-02/item1.html)

Developed with support of the Department of Higher Education That also allow for, but may not be a complete preparation for,

postsecondary STEM degrees and majors We will be checking on this over the next year…

College & Career Readiness

Page 6: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

6

Essential Competencies: LearningStudents who are college and career ready in Science and Technology/Engineering will … be academically prepared to:

• Analyze scientific phenomena and solve technical problems in real-world contexts using relevant science and engineering practices and disciplinary core ideas.

• Use appropriate scientific and technical reasoning to support, critique, and communicate scientific and technical claims and decisions.

• Appropriately apply relevant mathematics in scientific and technical contexts.

College & Career Readiness

Page 7: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Science & engineering practices

1. Asking questions and defining problems2. Developing and using models3. Planning and carrying out investigations4. Analyzing and interpreting data5. Using mathematics and computational

thinking6. Constructing explanations and designing

solutions7. Engaging in argument from evidence8. Obtaining, evaluating, and

communicating information

7

Page 8: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

8

Page 9: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

9

CCR Evidence Practices are essential

ACT (2011) College Board (2001); AP redesign Conley (2005) Employer surveys

Not an agreed-upon set of HS science content Depth over breadth, independent of subject

(Tai et al, 2005, 2006) Importance of mathematics (Sadler & Tai,

2007) All agree practices devoid of content is

not appropriate!

Page 10: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Coherent progressions of learning Vertical alignment through

progressions of practices and concepts

Draws on learning progression research A Framework for K-12 Science Education (NRC, 2012) Learning Progressions in Science: Current Challenges and

Future Directions (Alonzo & Gotwals, 2012) Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based

Approach to Reform (CPRE, 2009) 10

Page 11: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

11

Coherent progressions PreK-HS

Page 12: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Turn and talk (1) Choose an aspect of the progressions for

core ideas and practices

Do you feel they represent coherent progressions of learning?

Do the high school level practices reflect the types of skills students need for post-secondary success?

Page 13: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Integration of practices & content Importance of opportunities to engage in

practices in authentic contexts Increased mastery of sophisticated subject

matter Increased interest in STEM

America’s Lab Report (NRC, 2005) Opportunity to Learn Audit: High School Science

(Rennie Center, 2008)

13

Page 14: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Findings from America’s Lab Report

Typical Lab Practice Content Mastery

No better or worse than other modes of instruction

Scientific Reasoning Aids development of

some aspects Interest in Science

Some evidence of increased interest

Integrated Dimensions

Content Mastery Increased mastery of

subject matter compared to other modes of instruction

Scientific Reasoning Aids development of

more sophisticated aspects

Interest in Science Strong evidence of

increased interest

Page 15: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Findings from Opportunity to Learn Audit (MA Science)

MA schools with higher performance in science: Had more science funding, materials, and real-

world experiences for students (ES-HS) Provided more science course options (HS) Offered enrichment opportunities, peer

tutoring, or science-related partnerships with universities (HS)

Had more teachers who specialized in science (ES-HS)

Provided science teachers more preparation time (HS)

Spent more time on elementary science (ES) Had school leadership who supported science

(ES) Had greater parent involvement & advocacy for

science (ES)

Page 16: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Integration of practices & content

5-PS3 Energy

5-PS3-1. Use a model to describe that the food animals digest: a. contains energy that was once energy from the sun, and b. provides energy and materials for body repair and growth, motion and body warmth, and reproduction. [Clarification Statement: Examples of models could include diagrams and flow charts.] [Assessment Boundary: Details of photosynthesis or respiration are not expected.]

Articulates expected

performance/demonstration

Does not limit curriculum and instruction to the included practice

Page 17: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

MA strand maps

Arrows highlight conceptual connections (needed for learning);

not curricular connections

Page 18: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Turn and talk (2) Review the standards of one elementary

grade

In what ways do the disciplines support and rely on each other?

In what ways to the standards connect to math and literacy?

Consider conceptual and curricular connections

Page 19: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

19

PreK-8 grade-by-grade standards Grade-specific standards support:

Collaboration and sharing across districts on curriculum, district determined measures, etc

Consistency when students move schools/districts

All 4 disciplines in each grade encourage integrated instruction

Pre-K developed by EEC

Page 20: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

20

High school model

Maintain current model of course choices, flexibility for different pathways

Ensure all options lead to student development of science & engineering practices by end of 3 years of lab science (MassCore)

Continuing to work on the HS model with DHE and others

Page 21: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Implications for teaching

Shifts in revised standards Shift in curriculum & instruction

Organized around core explanatory ideas

The goal of teaching needs to shift from facts to explaining phenomena

Central role for science and engineering practices

Inquiry- and design-based teaching is not a separate activity; all STE learning should involve engaging in practices to build and use knowledge

Coherence: ideas and practices build across time and between disciplines

Teaching involves building a coherent storyline across time

Source: Brian Reiser, Northwestern University, 2013

Page 22: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Turn and talk (3) Consider the implications of the draft

revised standards for curriculum and instruction

What aspects of the draft revised standards do you value?

How might your district/organization use the standards?

Page 23: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

A multi-stage (multi-year) process

Pu

blic D

raft

State Revision ProcessMA STE Review Panel & NGSS Advisory Group

www.doe.mass.edu/STEM/review.html

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015-16

www.nextgenscience.org

www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_Framework_Homepage.html

Adoption

Page 24: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

To do before adoption

STEM pathways; implications for HS course sequences and/or upper-level courses

Edits based on input (should be refinements; this version is close)

Develop Framework materials

Post model curriculum units

Page 25: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Next steps for MA standards

Public draft through 2014-15 Use for planning; PD, curriculum Try out standards in curriculum & instruction Use to inform educator goals, district

determined measures Move to official public comment and

adoption process 2015-16 Add additional Framework materials

Multi-year implementation/transition period (including MCAS) after adoptionwww.doe.mass.edu/boe/docs/2013-10/

item2.html

Page 26: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Based on NGSS

MA participated as a Lead State in NGSS development (26 states total)

www.nextgenscience.org Significant and ongoing input from state

Core ideas, practices, and coding system in MA draft are consistent with NGSS

Specific wording & HS model differ

Page 27: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

What does MA value in NGSS?

Progressions of DCIs and practices Integration of concepts and practices in

standards Move to grade-by-grade standards Inclusion of engineering Explicit links to math and ELA standards Conceptual focus Benefits of commonality across states

Page 28: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Why adapt NGSS for MA?NGSS MA Adaptation

4 dimensions 2 dimensions

Broadly written; inconsistent interpretation

Balances broad concepts with specificity to inform more consistent interpretation

MS grade span MS grade-by-grade

Engineering design as occasional application of science

Technology/Engineering as a discipline

No CCR definition; all HS courses expected

Define CCR; maintain HS options

Page 29: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

NGSS construction

Standard and foundation boxes indicate what is to be learned

Page 30: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

MA adaption of NGSS (proposed)

Standards should be able to stand on their own without need for significant interpretation

Page 31: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Much is consistent with NGSS

Coding system of standards Allows teachers and districts to find and use

NGSS-aligned resources created elsewhere Disciplinary Core Ideas Science and Engineering Practices K-5 standards kept in the grades NGSS

assigned them to

Page 32: Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Overview December, 2013

Thank you!Questions or Comments

[email protected]

Jake Foster781-338-3510

[email protected]

Joyce Bowen781-338-3540

[email protected]

32