ro pretreatment media and chemical free - nemtilmeld · ispe nordic september 2016 ro pretreatment...
TRANSCRIPT
Biopuremax profile
2
Biopuremax has over 20 years of experience in thedesign, supply, installation, validation and operationof high quality Biopharmaceutical water systems.
Biopuremax specialty is water systems - PurifiedWater (PW) and Water-for-Injection (WFI) systems,with cutting edge water production technologies.
Developed the revolutionary Biopuremax process ofmedia and chemical free RO pretreatment.
Main Critical Problems for Pharma Water
3
Stop scaleprecipitation in RO
Free chlorine removalbefore RO and CEDI
Prevent microbialgrowth
Ø Scale Precipitation & Chlorination
Traditional Systems - Common Problems
ProblemProcess
Salt and water wasteSofteners
Contamination build up
High maintenanceAntiscalent
Removal issues
Rapid bacteria build upGAC/ACF
Water waste
Reliability issuesSodium Bi Sulfite
4
Our Solution - Chemical and Media Free System
5
Electrolytic Scale Reduction (ESRTM)
Green Technology
Hot Water Sanitization
Continues Bioburden Reduction
Hydro Optical Dechlorination (HODTM)of free chlorine by UV irradiation
Ø ESRTM Process
Electrolytic Scale Reduction (ESRTM)
7
Ø Electrical current splits water in to OH- and H+
Ø Anode will have low pH
Ø Cathode will have very high pH
Ø One of the key factors for precipitation is high pH
Ø Cathode high pH will cause scale to form
Ø Fluffy scale will form on the cathode and drop to the bottom of reactor
Ø ESRTM Advantages
Electrolytic Scale Reduction (ESRTM)
9
Ø ESRTM will precipitate magnesium, calcium, silicates, ferrites, and other cations not
removed by softeners
Ø Softener replaces magnesium & calcium with sodium
BUT total load on RO will be unchanged
Ø ESRTM will reduce RO Load
Ø Reductions in RO: concentrate, maintenance, fouling, scaling, cleaning
Ø Process
Hydro Optic De-Chlorination (HODTM)
12
Ø Decompose the free chlorine into O2 and Chloride
Ø Chloride and Sodium ion are stopped by the RO membrane
Ø Bacteria destruction
Ø CBRTM - Meaning
Biopuremax Continuous Bioburden Reduction (CBRTM)
16
Ø Inherent destruction of bacteria - via continuous operation
Ø No need of maintenance, cleaning or sanitization
Ø CBRTM - Process
Biopuremax Continuous Bioburden Reduction (CBRTM)
17
Ø City water tank - bioburden reduction by dilution
Ø ESRTM - bioburden reduction by inherent chlorine generation
Ø HODTM - bioburden reduction by UV irradiation
Micro contamination level through typical system
18
Cont
amin
atio
nle
vel
Position in system
Softener ACF
City water tank
Micro contamination level through BPM
19
Cont
amin
atio
nle
vel
Position in system
ESRTM
HODTM
City water tank
Microbial Reduction in BPM
20
Micro Total CountCFU/100ml
E. COLICFU/100ml
PseudomonasCFU/100ml
Position in system Average Range Average Range Average Range
City water inlet 15,800 78-0 ,000 47 227-1 24 82-0
Exit City storage tank 127 1,000-0 0 0 0.167 1-0
After ESRTM 50 300-0 0 0 0.167 1-0
After HODTM 5 100-0 0 0 0.167 1-0
After RO 5 100-0 0 0 0 0
Storage anddistribution
0 0 0 0 0 0
Microbial Reduction in BPM
21
ColiformsCFU/100ml
FungusCFU/100ml
Position in system Average Range Average Range
City water inlet 201 910-28 13.16 48-0
Exit City water storage tank 1.375 11-0 0 0
After ESRTM 0.25 4-0 0 0
After HODTM 0 0 0.167 1-0
After RO 0 0 0 0
Storage and distribution 0 0 0 0
PQ product, sampled over a 12 month period
22
Total Micro
CFU/100ml
Average
E.COLI
CFU/100ml
Average
Pseudomonas
CFU/100ml
Average
Coliforms
CFU/100ml
Average
Fungus
CFU/100ml
AverageProduct Water 0 0 0 0 0
WFI Criteria <10cfu/100ml <1cfu/100ml <1cfu/100ml <1cfu/100ml <1cfu/100m
l
PQ product, sampled over a 12 month period
23
Endotoxin (EU/mL)
Average
TOC (ppb)
Average
Heavy Metals (ppm)
Average
Nitrate <0.1 mg/l
Average
Product Water <0.005 <50 <0.1 <0.1
WFI Criteria <0.25 <500 <0.1 <0.2
Biopuremax Continues Membrane Performance
24
No deterioration of the membrane after over a year of operation
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
1 20 29 38 47 56 65 74Operating Time (weeks)
Normalized Permeate Flow
Per
mea
teFl
ow
(m3/
hr)
Biopuremax Continues Membrane Performance
25
No deterioration of the membrane after over one year of operation.
0,000,100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,901,001,101,201,301,401,50
1 20 29 38 47 56 65 74
Pressure(bar)
Operating Time (weeks)
Differential Pressure
Biopuremax Continues Membrane Performance
26
No deterioration of the membrane after one year of operation.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Feed
Co
nd
uct
ivit
y(µ
S/
cm)
Per
mea
teC
on
du
ctiv
ity
(µS
/cm
)
Operating Time (weeks)
ConductivityPermeate Conductivity Feed Conductivity
Biopuremax Hi Recovery %
27
Single stage RO recovery over 80% with no chemicals !
70%72%74%76%78%80%82%84%86%88%
Operating Time (weeks)
RO Recovery %
Very low maintenance
28
RO-CEDINo additionalmaintenanceneeded
SanitizationAutomatic hotwater sanitizationafter maintenance
ESRTM
No maintenance,automatic cleaning
HODTM
Replace UV lamps& gaskets, washevery 6 months
FiltersReplace post EESRTM filters 1-2 months
Green Technology - Cost Reductions
29
Reliability andclean operation-
savings inmaintenance
No Salt,No Chemicals -
No purchase andsolutionmakeup
Water savingscompared tosofteners and
GAC/ACF
Nohigh chloride
effluent
Lowenergy
consumption
Fulfill Corporate Directives
§ Total Cost of Ownership§ Reliability – Continuous Bioburden Reduction§ Environmental Footprint
- Carbon Footprint – low energy consumption and NO chemical dosing- Water footprint – NO loss of water
§ Operability – ease of operations§ Maintainability – less down time
30
European Standards
31
Ø EU cGMP
Ø European Pharmacopoeia, EP8.1 version
Ø Annex 11
Ø EU-GMP-Guideline Part 1, Annexes 1, 15 & 17
Ø CE Mark
US Standards
32
Ø FDA cGMPØ PW United States PharmacopeiaØ ASME BPE-2014Ø CFR 21 part 11Ø ISPE Pharmaceutical Engineering Guide, Volume 4: Water and
Steam SystemsØ ISPE Pharmaceutical Engineering Guide, Volume 5:
Commissioning & Qualification
Added Values of ESR-HOD Combination
33
Simplicityof
operation
Low lifecycle costs
Lowmaintenance
Lowbacteria
Highreliability
ESR-HOD