road infrastructure to support oil development

48
Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development Gene Griffin Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University

Upload: ugpti

Post on 22-Jun-2015

469 views

Category:

Business


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Road Infrastructure to Support Oil DevelopmentGene Griffin

Upper Great Plains Transportation InstituteNorth Dakota State University

Page 2: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

2

Points Covered

• Impact of oil development on roads• Additional factors• Long term implications• Political considerations• Potential solutions• Expected long-term investments

Page 3: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Road Impacts

Page 4: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Year well cost oil price IP stages

2010 725+ 15-28+

2009 $5,651,771 $60 654 10-20

2008 $5,413,471 $81 576 6-10

2007 $4,386,927 $54 326 2-6

2006 $4,089,715 $52 195 1-2

Will take 10,000 – 20,000 to fully develop the Bakken – Three Forks

4

Page 5: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

5

Road Impacts• An sample Bakken

horizontal well requires 2,024 truck trips during the drilling phase

Rig Related MovementsItem Number of Trucks Inbound/OutboundSand 80 InboundWater (Fresh) 400 InboundWater (Waste) 200 OutboundFrac Tanks 100 Inbound/OutboundRig Equipment 50 Inbound/OutboundDrilling Mud 50 InboundChemical 4 InboundCement 15 InboundPipe 10 InboundScoria/Gravel 80 InboundFuel trucks 7 InboundFrac/cement pumper trucks 15 InboundWorkover rigs 1 InboundTotal - One Direction 1012 Total Trucks 2024

Page 6: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

6

Impacts are LocalizedProduction by County (Barrels)

Billings

Bottineau

BowmanBurke

Divide

Dunn

Golden Vall

ey

Hettinge

r

McHen

ry

McKen

zie

McLean

Mercer

Mountrail

Renvil

leSlo

peSta

rkW

ard

Willi

ams

0

5000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

30000000

35000000

19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009

Page 7: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

7

Road Impacts

• The number of outbound trucks during the production phase depends on initial production rate and pipeline access

• In North Dakota, 96% of well locations are located more than ¼ mile from the state system, thus requiring the use of local road systems designed for low traffic volumes

Page 8: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

8

Existing Road Conditions

• Resurface vs. Reconstruction– Roadway Width – practice of thin-lift overlays

maintains surface condition but reduces roadway width

– Existing condition – Is resurfacing feasible?

Page 9: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

9

Improvement Responses to Impacts

• Gravel Roads– Increase blading frequency (low impact)– Increase gravel application frequency (medium impact)– Upgrade to a paved surface type (high impact)

• Paved Roads– Increased ESALs decrease pavement life– Structural Overlays– Reconstruction

• Insufficient roadway width • Existing condition poor

Page 10: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Additional FactorsAgriculture

Page 11: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

11

Changing Agriculture

• Farm Size Increasing• Acres Increased by 2,000,000 Since 1997• More Tons/Acre• More Inputs (fertilizer, chemicals)• Larger Equipment• Larger Trucks (Semis)• Reduced Grain Elevator Numbers (Shuttles)

– From 1029 in 1950 to 402 today– Capacity increased from 60 million bu to 288 million b– From 10 miles to market in 1950 to 30 miles today

Page 12: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

North Dakota Decade Average Annual Crop Production (NASS)

Page 13: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

13

North Dakota Wheat versus Corn Bushels (NASS)

Page 14: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

14

Decade Average Annual Corn Production and Acres in North (NASS)

Page 15: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

15

Irrigated Acres

Page 16: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

16

Decade Annual Average Sugarbeet Production (NASS)

Page 17: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

17

Sugarbeet Production Tons and Planted Acres (NASS)

1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Decade Average Production Tons

Decade Average Acres Planted

Prod

uctio

n To

nsTh

ousa

nds

Plan

ted

Acr

es

Thou

sand

s

Page 18: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

17.1 Billion Pounds

Source: National Agricultural Statistics Service

18

Page 19: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

62.3 Billion Pounds

3.6 Times More Weight

19

Page 20: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

20

3,000,000.0

4,000,000.0

5,000,000.0

6,000,000.0

7,000,000.0

8,000,000.0

9,000,000.0

0.0

500,000,000,000.0

1,000,000,000,000.0

1,500,000,000,000.0

2,000,000,000,000.0

2,500,000,000,000.0

3,000,000,000,000.0

3,500,000,000,000.0

Public Road Mileage - VMT - Lane Miles1920 – 2008 (FHWA)

Year

Pu

blic

Ro

ad M

ileag

e

Veh

icle

Mil

es o

f Tra

vel (

VM

T)

Public Road Mileage

Vehicle Miles of Travel

Lane Miles

Page 21: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Long Term Implications

Page 22: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

22

Several Factors

• Future of the carbon based economy• Global growth of the middle class

– China, India, Brazil, and others• Drilling technology• Other sources of oil

Page 23: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

23

Current Activity

• On 11/2 there were 154 rigs operating in North Dakota

– (Source: ND Oil & Gas)

Page 24: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

24

Page 25: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

25

Page 26: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

26

Duration of Impacts

• ND Oil & Gas– Western North Dakota

• 1,450 to 2,940 wells/year• 10 to 20 years in duration

– 21,250 new wells– If estimate and technology hold, this represents 43 million

truck trips for the drilling alone

Page 27: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Ray - Tioga Area

Page 28: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

28

Ray-Tioga Area

• 430 to 540 wells per year

• 3.5 million – 4.5 million gallons fracturing water per day May through December

• 11 to 14 years

Page 29: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Williston Area

Page 30: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

30

Williston Area

• 70 to 90 wells per year

• 0.9 million – 1.1 million gallons fracturing water per year May through December

• 8 to 20 years

Page 31: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Alexander Area

Page 32: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

32

Alexander Area

• 120 to 150 wells per year

• 1.4 million – 1.8 million gallons fracturing water per day May through December

• 12 to 15 years

Page 33: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Watford City - Keene Area

Page 34: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

34

Watford City - Keene Area

• 250 to 310 wells per year

• 2.0 million – 2.6 million gallons fracturing water per day May through December

• 5 to 7 years

Page 35: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Killdeer Area

Page 36: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

36

Killdeer Area

• 235 to 290 wells per year

• 1.0 million – 1.2 million gallons fracturing water per day May through December

• 6 to 8 years

Page 37: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Parshall Area

Page 38: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

38

Parshall Area

• 375 to 470 wells per year

• 1.5 million – 2.0 million gallons fracturing water per day May through December

• 7 to 8 years

Page 39: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Political ConsiderationsSmall p

Page 40: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

40

Federal Aid and Interstate Highway System

• Highway Trust Fund• Donor/Donee system

– Historically, North Dakota received about $2 for every $1 contributed to the Federal Highway Trust Fund

– Federal Aid makes up about 57% of NDDOT budget

• Long standing battle in Congress over this system

Page 41: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

41

New Jersey California Connecticut Airzona New York Kentucky Kansas Montana North Dakota

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

Lane Miles/CapitaFederal-Aid-Highway Lane Miles

Page 42: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

42

North Dakota Politics, small p

• Not dissimilar from Federal debate• East versus West• Agriculture versus Oil• Water issues• Flood issues

– Devils Lake– Red River

Page 43: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

43

National Issue

• The culture of free– Santa Claus– Easter Bunny– Tooth Fairy

• Honest discussion– What we want from government– What we’re willing to pay for

Page 44: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

Potential Solutions

Page 45: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

45

State Driven

• Not a Federal issue• Can’t be solved at the local level• State Legislature and Executive Branch has to resolve it

– Extraction taxes go to the state– Problem is larger than Western ND

• Western part most severe

– Solution needs to be part of a system plan– Legislature’s have the responsibility to look after the entire

state and solve equity issues– Will need to viewed within the context of other major issues

such as water supply and flood control

Page 46: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

ExpectedLong Term Investments

Page 47: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

47

Summary

• Impact of oil development on roads• Additional factors• Long term implications• Political considerations• Potential solutions• Expected long-term investments

– Beneficial to the local communities, ND and U.S.– Logically one would presume that ND will deal with

this effectively and efficiently

Page 48: Road Infrastructure to Support Oil Development

48

UGPTI Oil Impact Study• Agencies involved: ND Department of Commerce, ND Association of

Oil & Gas Producing Counties• Objectives

– Estimate the incremental needs for county and local roads due to oil development activity in ND

– Develop GIS/Cube based traffic flow model– Model inbound and outbound rig related movements and outbound oil and

saltwater– Assign movements to specific routes – Estimate the incremental maintenance and improvement needs

• Final Report Release: December 3, 2010• Contact:

– Alan Dybing: [email protected] 701.231.5988– www.ugpti.org