role of multi-stakeholder-partnerships for achieving a
TRANSCRIPT
Close research gap on the impact of MSP on policy lobbying and identify key actors for the initiation of change processes
Role of Multi-Stakeholder-Partnerships for Achieving a Higher Degree of Sustainability in Cross-Border Agri-food Supply Chains
To what extent can MSP in Germany influence policies and legislation on sustainability in global agri-food supply chains?
Ever since the Club of Rome’s first report on The Limits to Growth in the early 1970s, sustainability has become an increasingly important factor in global supply chains. Many multi-lateral actors have since formulated frameworks seeking to improve sustainability levels in all areas of social life, including along (global agri-food) supply and value chains. However, a lack of “level playing field” in international markets makes it difficult for sustainably ambitious companies and policy makers alike, to implement according to international guidelines.
1 Background
2 Research Question & Research Objective
3 Methodology
Develop questionnaire for network analysis
Conduct interviews with MSP members
Conduct interviews with actors
mentioned in first collection round
(snowball method)
Conduct network analysis
Current Stage of Research
39% Civil Society
32 % Industry
7% Certifier
3 % Politics 4 % Retail
4 % Research
n = 3332 % response rate
4
Julia Reimers, PhD candidate Institute for Agricultural Policy and Markets (420)
Poster-ID: 369
Preliminary Results
5 Preliminary Conclusions
Member in a MSP
Not a member in MSPLegend
Non-prestigous actor within the network
Prestigous actor within the network
► Through multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSP) in consumer countries, government representatives, private companies from the agri-food industry as well as civil society actors and research institutions aim to jointly and nationally address sustainability issues within certain global supply chains.
► One of the goals of MSP is to jointly influence (political) frame conditions for an improved sustainability framework in Germany. But is this voluntary option really suited to do so?
time1976 1998 2010 2011
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
2000 2015
2014/95 CSR Reporting Directive
2014 2016
German Action Plan on
CSR Directive
Implementation Act in Germany
2017 2021
First Sustainability
Strategy Germany
2002
Adoption of Supply Chain Law
in Germany
Extract of Sustainability Frameworks Over Time
Preliminary network map based on first round of questions
Die Taube derHoffnung e.V.
HamburgerStiftung für
Wirtschaftsethik
SchokoladenmuseumKöln
Vollers HamburgGmbH
Civil SocietyAnonym I
INKOTA
SüdwindInstitut
Ludwig Weinrich
RübezahlSchokoladen;
Hans RiegeleinZG Anonym I
Exposure− undDialogprogramme
e.V.
Eisbär Eis
Alfred RitterKakao
SCHOKINAG
GIGA Institute
Schöki GmbH
EinzelhandelAnonym I
RainforestAlliance
BMZ
Global NatureFund
IOI OlioChemical
FairtradeDeutschland
H.C.C.O GmbH
IHK FrankfurtBohnkaf−Kolonial
GISCO
VOICE Netzwerk
Germanwatch
Brot für dieWelt
Miserior
FERN
EuropeanCoalition
for CorporateJusticeBusiness and
Human RightsPlatform
Mighty Earth
ICTI Initiative
GEPA
Oro Verde
EngagementGlobal
GIZ
GISCOSekretariat
Lindt Sprüngli
Verbraucher*innen
European CocoaAssociation
European CoffeeFederationInternational
CocoaInitiative
DeutscherKaffeeverband
World CocoaFoundation
SchokolatierHalba
Develey
StiftungAllianz für
Entwicklung undKlima
BMU
ZNU
ZivilgesellschaftLokal
Forum FairerHandel
BMEL
LIDL
REWE
ALDI Süd
BDSIBVLH
Medien
Mondelez
OLAM
Nestlé
Kaufland
BMW
Original Beans
Barry Callebaut
CSR Club OWL
FairtradeLabelling
OrganizationsInternational
EdekategutCargill
FONAP
RSPO
Roundtable onSustainableBiomaterial
ISCC
WWFGreenpeace
Borneo Orang
Wild Asia
Welthungerhilfe
Oregon StateUniversity
EarthUniversityCosta Rica
CATIE InstituteCR
Produzent*innen/Kooperativen
vor Ort
TechnischeExperten
Ruggi Runde
Bühler AG
Living IncomeCommunity of
PracticeISEAL Alliance
SustainableFood Lab
Consultingwirtschaft(Studien)
Guan ChongBerhard
Unternehmen ausder Industrie,Konfisserie
(vor Endkunde)
IFAD
DIE
Common Fund forCommodities
Wienco GhanaLtd
KfW
Uni Göttingen
UniversitätKiel
SWP
CeValSaarbrücken
SWISCO
LEH D undSchweiz
FIBL Schweiz
Instituts fürAngewandte
Informatik/ UniLeipzig
Gourmet Gardens
Pronatec
Max Felchlin AG
ChocolateStella Bernrain
MSC
Solidaridad
SustainableTrade
Initiative(IDH)
HDE
Banana Link
EUROBAN
ABNBSekretariat
Fyffes
Gewerkschaftenvor Ort
World BananaForum
Chiquita
Dole
Ferrero
Mars
Regierung(sinstitutinen)vor Ort
Weltladen
Oxfam
Aid by TradeFoundation
ALDI Nord
Tchibo
Beckers' Bester
AngeliquesFines LUSHLB Nuss ?
Continental
BMAS
Uni Hohenheim
AöL
CAOBISCO
NAPBeratungskreis
AA
Die Stiftung 2°
KlimabündnisBaWü
ZNU Goes Zero
Global G. A. P.
Nicofruta
GROFOR
VENRO
Fair TradeTowns
BMWi
Kanzleramt
BDA
BDI
BVE
EuropäischeKommission
BMJV
CDUMittelstandsunion
InitiativeLieferkettengesetz
AA
Bundestag
FONAPSekretariat
United Nations
INA
Brandt Zwieback
Chr. Storz
ContinentalBakeries
Ein Dach fürAfrika
Fördervereinder Maria
MontessoriGesamtschule,
Düsseldorf
FrankoniaSchokoladenwerkeFuchs &
HoffmannGewerkschaft
Nahrung−Genuss−Gaststätten
Griesson−deBeukelaer
Gustav Berning
GutSpringenheide
H.D.Cotterell
HachezChocoversum
Hanns G. Werner
HanseatischesChocoladen
Kontor
HARIBO
Henry Lambertz
InfozentrumSchokolade
JacobsFoundation
J.G.Niederegger
LübeckerMarzipan−Fabrik
LudwigSchokolade
Myclimate
PiastenStiftung derDeutschen
Kakao− undSchokoladenwirtschaft Stollwerck
UlmerSchokoladen
United−Agro−Alliance GmbH
VerdenerKeks− und
WaffelfabrikHans Freitag
GmbH & Co.KG
Verein der amRohkakaohandel
beteiligtenFirmen e. V.
WETZEL
ZDS Solingen
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
22.1
0.13
15.0
1.14
12.0
2.14
12.0
3.14
02.0
4.14
11.0
4.14
23.0
5.14
26.0
6.14
09.0
9.14
08.1
0.14
05.1
1.14
25.1
1.14
05.1
2.14
16.0
1.15
06.0
2.15
05.0
3.15
27.0
3.15
20.0
5.15
17.0
6.15
17.0
7.15
23.0
9.15
14.1
0.15
11.1
1.15
27.1
1.15
13.0
1.16
17.0
2.16
06.0
3.16
27.0
4.16
01.0
6.16
22.0
6.16
08.0
7.16
22.0
9.16
20.1
0.16
23.1
1.16
14.1
2.16
25.0
1.17
08.0
3.17
29.0
3.17
17.0
5.17
21.0
6.17
05.0
9.17
17.0
1.18
02.0
2.18
02.0
3.18
23.0
3.18
27.0
4.18
07.0
6.18
28.0
6.18
12.0
9.18
10.1
0.18
07.1
1.18
23.1
1.18
14.1
2.18
01.0
2.19
22.0
2.19
22.0
3.19
11.0
4.19
16.0
5.19
27.0
6.19
26.0
9.19
24.1
0.19
14.1
1.19
13.1
2.19
17.0
1.20
14.0
2.20
13.0
3.20
13.0
5.20
17.0
6.20
03.0
7.20
17.0
9.20
07.1
0.20
04.1
1.20
SpeechesQuestionsMotions
Thematically relevant debates, motions and question in the Bundestag (electoral term 18 and 19)
Identification of 2 MSP
► With whom are you in regular exchange on the topic of sustainability in (agri-food) supply chains?
► Who are the 7 most important actors, able to influence the level of economic, ecological and social sustainability in cross- border (agri-food) supply chains in Germany?
► On which occasion do you exchange on the topic?
► Responsability for the topic is spread across at least 7 German Ministries
► Ministries, the German Chancellery, industry associations and retail are perceived as the most influencial actors, influencing both positively and negatively
► Only around 50 % of the most influencial actors are also members of those MSP being subject to analysis
► According to preliminary results of the network analysis, German Parliament is - at least in the current electoral term - not perceived as being influential at all
► Nevertheless, the Parliament is debating on the topic constantly. Since 2013, the topic was adressed in more than 40 motions, 250 speaches and raised in 46 questions
► Since 2014► 8 Members► Public funds
► Since 2012► 77 Members► Private and funds
Discussion of 1 motion from SPD/ CSU/ CDU (18/2739) & 1 from Alliance90/ TheGreens (18/2746)
Discussion of 2 motions from Alliance90/ TheGreens (18/1003, 18/10255)
Discussion of 3 motions from The Left (19/22487, 19/9269, 19/22491) and 1 from the Alliance90/ The Greens (19/9269)
Tropentag 2021Towards shifting paradigms in agriculture for a healthy and sustainable futureTropical and subtropical agriculture, natural resource management and rural development
4 % Wholesale
7 % Implementer