route 28 south of i-66 corridor safety and operations study technical committee meeting #2

27
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25, 2014 1

Upload: donnica-taurus

Post on 04-Jan-2016

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25, 2014. Agenda. Introductions Please sign in Study Overview Phase 1 – Short term improvements Phase 2 – Long term improvements Data Collection Activities Initial Observations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations

Study

Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25, 2014

1

Page 2: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Agenda

• Introductions • Please sign in

• Study Overview• Phase 1 – Short term improvements• Phase 2 – Long term improvements

• Data Collection Activities• Initial Observations• Agency Meeting Summaries• Schedule & Next Steps• Steering Committee Meeting Guidance

2

Page 3: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Overall Corridor Activities

Study– Phase 1 – Short term

• Current study effort• Discussed in detail in this presentation

– Phase 2 – Long term• Currently on hold• Subject to HB2 prioritization process

3

Page 4: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Study Area

Route 28 – Centreville Rd– From South of I-66– To Liberia Ave

Mathis Ave– From Manassas Dr– To Liberia Ave

Agencies Included:– Fairfax County– Prince William County– City of Manassas Park– City of Manassas– Virginia Department of

Transportation4

Page 5: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Phase 1 Study Overview

Scope of Work• Data collection• Evaluate existing conditions• Develop candidate solutions (under $2M)• Develop traffic model• Screen candidate solutions• Model & evaluate recommended solutions• Make recommendations• Public involvement

Overall Schedule• Completed Spring 2015

5

Page 6: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Data Collection Effort

Data collection includes:– Turning movement counts at 33 locations

•AM and PM peak periods–24 hour tube counts

•8 locations–Two-Way Left Turn Section

•81 driveways–Intersection Queuing

•10 locations–Travel Time Runs

•Northbound and Southbound•AM peak and PM peak periods 6

Page 7: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Data Collection

Turning Movement Count Locations– 33 locations– Rt 28 (Centreville Rd)– Mathis Ave

7

Page 8: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Data Collection

24-Hour Count Locations– 8 locations

8

Page 9: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Data Collection Effort

Field data collection is complete–Time frame for collection

•Prior to end of school year

Data summaries being completed–All collection summaries to be completed by July 3, 2014–Data will be summarized in Tech Memo

• With raw data on CD• Due to VDOT mid July

–Data available to agencies and future studies9

Page 10: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Observed Peak Periods

AM Peak– 7:30 am to 8:30 am– Heavier congestion when compared to PM– Truck 7%– Directional Flow – NB

PM Peak– 4:45 pm to 5:45 pm– Truck 3%– Directional Flow – SB

10

Page 11: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Initial Observations

Three distinct roadways– Northern Section

• More expressway like, higher speed• Wide median• Pedestrian facilities

– Middle section• More commercial• Less access control

– Southern portion• More urban• Divided thoroughfare

11

Page 12: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Initial Observations

Approximate Travel Times – Between south of I-66 to Liberia Ave

• AM Peak– Northbound = 60 minutes– Southbound = 10 minutes

• PM Peak– Northbound = 15 minutes– Southbound = 20 minutes

12

Page 13: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Initial Observations

Queuing Summary

– Northbound queues extend from New Braddock Road to Manassas Drive during AM peak period

– Southbound queues extend from Compton Road to Upperridge Drive

– Area of study focus

13

Page 14: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Initial Observations

Two-way left lane volumes - driveway peaks– Very low volumes, out of 81 driveways

- 24 driveways had zero volume- 32 driveways had volume of less than 5 vph- 19 driveways had volume between 5-10 vph- 6 driveways had volume more than 10 vph (maximum

observed was 24 vph)

Pedestrians– People walk in street– Pedestrian fatalities 14

Page 15: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Agency Meetings

Meetings and highlights– Prince Williams County (June 16)

• ROW constrained• Pedestrian safety

– City of Manassas Park (June 17)• PM peak - bypass for Route 28 - Old Centreville Road• Consider “limited one-way couplet”

– Fairfax County (June 19)• Neighborhood cut-through traffic (northbound to eastbound)• Future plan for express bus service

– City of Manassas (June 24)• Signal coordination• Corridor capacity helps all traffic

15

Page 16: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Scheduled Activities

Six month look-ahead– Submit data collection memo, mid-July– Develop website– Steering Committee Meeting– Existing condition evaluation– September Technical Committee Meeting– Begin development of traffic model– Begin development of candidate solutions

16

Page 17: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Schedule of Activities

– October Steering Committee– November Citizens Information Meeting– December – Combined Technical/Steering

Committee Meeting

17

Page 18: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Next Steps

Web Page– Set up project informational page– Will develop content for Tech Committee

Review– Load page onto VDOT web site– Available end of July

18

Page 19: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Steering Committee Guidance

Steering Committee Meeting

– July 21, 2014

Develop agenda items

– Project overview– Study area– Two phases – short and long

term actions– Scope of Work– Data collection

• Analysis• Alternatives development and

screening– Traffic Model– Recommendations– Public involvement– Schedule – Steering Committee actions– Next steps

19

Page 20: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Next Steps

Existing Condition Analysis – end of August– Level of Service– Hot spots– Bottlenecks– Crash Analysis

Improvement screening process defined

Begin development of traffic model20

Page 21: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Next Technical Committee

Next meeting in about 2 months– Likely September 10 (Wednesday)– Agenda

• Working Meeting• Existing condition analysis summary• Discuss list of solutions for consideration

– Buildable/Affordable– Acceptable to local agencies

21

Page 22: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Next Steps

Begin development of traffic model– Obtain VDOT/COG base model– Obtain Prince William County model– Obtain VISSIM model from City of Manassas

Park– Create existing conditions plus 5 year land

use look-ahead– Use model to evaluate proposed solutions

22

Page 23: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Next Steps

Develop initial candidate improvements– List of candidate solutions– Screening Criteria

• Level-of-service • Cost• R.O.W impacts• Utility impacts• Maintenance & Protection of Traffic (MOT)• Construction duration• Delay• Safety • Local acceptability

23

Page 24: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Steering Committee

October Meeting– Review candidate solutions

• Construction impacts

– Provide input• Constructible• Concerns

– Approve candidate alternatives for additional evaluation

24

Page 25: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Public Involvement

Citizen Information Meeting (CIM)– November timeframe– Recommendations for initial meeting

• Open format• Stations for observed problems• Recorder, brochure, comment sheet

– Discuss existing conditions– Initial observations and issues– Obtain comments

• Other problems• Input on candidate solutions

25

Page 26: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Combined Committee Meeting

Technical & Steering Committee Meeting– December timeframe – Review CIM feedback– Discuss candidate alternatives– Generate alternative selection guidance

26

Page 27: Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2

Additional Input

• Questions / Comments?

27