RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN HOLISTIK UNTUK ‘TUTORIAL TASK’

SKALA WAJARAN DESKRIPTORAMAT

CEMERLANG

9-10

Excellent task/ commitment Submission of all the tasks Very relevant to principles of materials selection

and adaptation Very clear presentation of notes / mind-map Very attractive and creative presentation

CEMERLANG

8

Very good task/ commitment Submission of all the tasks Relevant to principles of materials selection and

adaptation Clear presentation of notes / mind-map Attractive and creative presentation

KEPUJIAN

7

Good task/ commitment Submission of all the tasks Fairly relevant to principles of materials selection

and adaptation Fairly clear presentation of notes/ mind-map Fairly attractive and creative presentation

LULUS

6

Satisfactory task/ commitment Submission of all the tasks Relevant to principles of materials selection and

adaptation Clear presentation of notes/ mind-map Attractive and creative presentation

GAGAL

<5

Poor task/ commitment Failure to submit all the tasks Hardly relevant to principles of materials selection

and adaptation Hardly any evidence of note-making/ mind-map Not attractive and not creative presentaion

RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN HOLISTIK UNTUK ‘SUMMARY OF 3 ARTICLES FROM VARIOUS SOURCES ON PRINCIPLES OF MATERIALS SELECTION AND ADAPTATION’ AND/ OR

‘MIND-MAP’.

SKALA WAJARAN DESKRIPTORAMAT

CEMERLANG

27 – 30

Excellent choice of references and selection of articles

Very relevant to principles of materials selection and adaptation

Very clear presentation of notes / mind-map Very attractive and creative presentation/mind-

mapCEMERLANG

23 – 26

Very good choice of references and selection of articles

Relevant to principles of materials selection and adaptation

Clear presentation of notes / mind-map

Attractive and creative presentation/ mind-mapKEPUJIAN

19 – 22

Good choice of references and selection of articles

Fairly relevant to principles of materials selection and adaptation

Fairly clear presentation of notes/ mind-map Fairly attractive and creative presentation/ mind-

mapLULUS

15 – 18

Satisfactory choice of references and selection of articles

Relevant to principles of materials selection and adaptation

Clear presentation of notes/ mind-map Attractive and creative presentation/ mind-map

GAGAL

<15

Poor choice of references and selection of articles

Hardly relevant to principles of materials selection and adaptation

Hardly any evidence of note-making/ mind-map Not attractive and not creative presentaion/

mind-mapRUBRIK PEMARKAHAN HOLISTIK UNTUK ‘LESSON PLANNING AND PRODUCTION OF

TEACHING AND LEARNING MATERIALS’.

SKALA WAJARAN DESKRIPTORAMAT

CEMERLANG

27 – 30

A very thought -out lesson. Very clear and very well-sequenced steps

showing very clear lesson progression. Activities are very relevant and engaging Very creative in designing activities. Resources are varied, interesting,challenging and

relevant. Excellent effort in sourcing and producing

materials.CEMERLANG

23 – 26

A well thought -out lesson. Clear and well-sequenced steps showing very

clear lesson progression. Activities are relevant and engaging Creative in designing activities. Resources are varied, interesting, and relevant. Very good effort in sourcing and producing

materials.KEPUJIAN

19 – 22

A well thought -out lesson. Fairly clear and fairly well-sequenced steps

showing very clear lesson progression. Activities are relevant and quite engaging Fairly creative in designing activities. Resources are fairly varied, interesting, and

relevant. Good effort in sourcing and producing materials.

LULUS

15 – 18

A well thought -out lesson. Reasonably clear and sequenced steps showing

very clear lesson progression. Activities are very relevant and fairly engaging Satisfactory in designing activities. Some variety in resources.. Some effort in sourcing and producing materials.

GAGAL

<15

Lesson is patch and poorly planned Steps are vague and do not show lesson

progression Activities are partly relevant and mundane A plain, not engaging lesson Limited use of resources, some not relevant Hardly any effort in sourcing and producing

materials.RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN HOLISTIK UNTUK ‘CHECK-LIST’

SKALA WAJARAN DESKRIPTORAMAT

CEMERLANG

18 – 20

Excellent descriptors to evaluate the materials prepared.

Very relevant and effective to evaluate the materials.

CEMERLANG

15 – 17

Very goo descriptors to evaluate the materials prepared.

Relevant and effective to evaluate the materials.KEPUJIAN

13 – 14

Good descriptors to evaluate the materials prepared.

Relevant and fairly effective to evaluate the materials.

LULUS

10 – 12

Fairly good descriptors to evaluate the materials prepared.

Some relevance and fairly effective to evaluate the materials

GAGAL

<10

Poor descriptors to evaluate the materials prepared.

Not effective to evaluate the materials.

RUBRIK PEMARKAHAN HOLISTIK UNTUK ‘REFLECTION’

SKALA WAJARAN DESKRIPTORAMAT

CEMERLANG

9-10

Reflection is very focused and critical. Very good link of practice to theory Very comprehensive range of literature to support

discussion Excellent ability to rationalise and analyse ideas Thoughts are very well-expressed and coherent Hardly any grammatical errors.

CEMERLANG

8

Reflection is focused and critical. Good link of practice to theory Comprehensive range of literature to support

discussion Good ability to rationalise and analyse ideas Thoughts are very well-expressed and coherent Few minor grammatical errors.

KEPUJIAN

7

Reflection is fairly focused and critical. Clear link of practice to theory Use of some literature to support discussion Fair ability to rationalise and analyse ideas Thoughts are fairly well-expressed and coherent Some grammatical errors.

LULUS

6

Reflection is focused but descriptive Satisfactory link of practice to theory Use of limited literature to support discussion Some ability to rationalise and analyse ideas Thoughts are expressed fairly coherently Many grammatical errors but they do not impede

comprehension.GAGAL

<5

Reflection is merely recount of events Poor link of practice to theory Almost no use of literature to support discussion Limited ability to rationalise and analyse ideas Thoughts are incoherent most of the time Gross grammatical errors.