s a w p a · letter of support for fran spivy ... recomputation of the ambient ... • every potw...

S A W P A

COMMISSION MEETING

TUESDAY, MARCH 15, 2011 – 9:30 A.M.

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (Terry Catlin, Chair)

2. PUBLIC COMMENTS

Members of the public may address the Commission on any item that is within the jurisdiction of the Commission; however, no action may be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by Subdivision (b) Section 54954.2 of the Government Code.

3. FEATURED PRESENTATION – TASK FORCES Presenter: Mark Norton • Basin Monitoring Program Task Force Status (CM#8445)...................................................................5 • Regional Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Status (CM#8446)…………………………....7 Recommendation: Receive and file.

4. NEW BUSINESS

A. FYE 2012 AND 2013 BUDGET GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CM#8438)…………………...….9

Presenter: Karen Williams Recommendation: Review and discuss the goals and objectives that will be used in preparing the FYE 2012 and 2013 Budget, and receive and file them.

B. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR AUDIT SERVICES (CM#8439)………………………….…11

Presenter: Karen Williams Recommendation: Authorize the issuance of an RFP for audit services commencing the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.

C. FUNDING TRANSFER FOR OWOW (CM#8444)…………………………………………….…25

Presenter: Karen Williams Recommendation: Authorize a transfer of $28,900 from the GIS Initiative Fund No. 391 to Watershed

Management Plan (OWOW) Fund No. 373 to help fund OWOW activities.

D. STATE LEGISLATIVE REPORT (CM#8450)……………………………………………………27 Presenter: Celeste Cantú • Key Legislation • Letter of Support – Fran Spivy Weber for Water Board Chair

Recommendation: Receive and file the report, adopt Resolution No. 2011-06, and direct staff to prepare a letter of support for Fran Spivy Weber for Water Board Chair.

SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California 92503 • (951) 354-4220

1

5. OLD BUSINESS

A. STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS - DRAFT GOALS AND SWOT ANALYSIS Presenter: Celeste Cantú Recommendation: Review comments regarding the draft goals and SWOT Analysis.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by the Committee by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the time the Committee votes, unless any Committee members, staff, or the public requests specific items be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.

A. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE MEETING HELD 3-1-11..........................................41

Recommendation: Approve as mailed.

B. TREASURER’S REPORT – FEBRUARY, 2011……………………………………………….….…43 Recommendation: Receive and file.

C. WRCRWA BUDGET AMENDMENT (CM#8449)…………………………………………………..49

Recommendation: Approve a budget amendment to the FY 2010/11 WRCRWA Budget in the amount of $500,000, for the next phase of planning and engineering needed to expand the WRCRWA treatment plant.

D. SARI REACH IV-B MAINTENANCE ACCESS STRUCTURES – NOTICE OF COMPLETION

(CM#8442)…………………………………………………………………………………………….51 Recommendation: Accept the Caliagua, Inc. work as complete and direct staff to file a Notice of

Completion with the Riverside County Clerk.

7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS Recommendation: Receive and file the following oral/written reports/updates.

A. OWOW UPDATE

Presenter: Jeff Beehler • COGs’ Steering Committee City Seat Appointments Update • Conference Update • Proposition IE Projects List

B. CASH TRANSACTIONS REPORT – JANUARY, 2011…………………………………………....53 Presenter: Karen Williams

C. INTER-FUND BORROWING – JANUARY, 2011 (CM#8440)…………………………………….59

Presenter: Karen Williams

D. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING – JANUARY, 2011 (CM#8441)………………………………………………………………………………………........61 Presenter: Karen Williams

E. FYE 2011 SECOND QUARTER BUDGET VS. ACTUAL VARIANCE REPORT (CM#8443)…..82

Presenter: Karen Williams

F. FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE 2ND QUARTER ENDING 12-31-10 …………………………....92 • SARI Enterprise • SAWPA Presenter: Karen Williams

2

G. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT ..................................................................................................112

H. CHAIR’S COMMENTS/REPORT

I. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS

8. CLOSED SESSION

A. PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (b) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Litigation – One Potential Case

9. ADJOURNMENT

Any person with a disability who requires accommodation in order to participate in this meeting should telephone Commission Secretary Patti Bonawitz at (951) 354-4230, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting in order to make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation.

PLEASE NOTE Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Authority’s office located at 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, during normal business hours. Also, such documents are available on the Authority’s Website at www.sawpa.org, subject to staff’s ability to post documents before the meeting.

Declaration of Posting I, Patti Bonawitz, Clerk of the Board of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority certify that a copy of this agenda has been posted in the Agency’s office at 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, California by 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, March 9, 2011.

_______________________________________ Patti Bonawitz

3

http://www.sawpa.org/�

2011 - Upcoming Meetings/Events (NOTE: All Commission workshops/meetings begin at 9:30 a.m., unless otherwise noted)

March 3-24-11 3 pm PA 21 Committee Meeting May 5-3-11 Commission Workshop 5-17-11 Commission Meeting July 7-5-11 Commission Workshop 7-19-11 Commission Meeting September 9-6-11 Commission Workshop 9-20-11 Commission Meeting November 11-1-11 Commission Workshop 11-15-11 Commission Meeting

April 4-5-11 Commission Workshop 4-19-11 Commission Meeting 4-27-11 OWOW Conference - Riverside Convention Center

June 6-7-11 Commission Workshop 6-21-11 Commission Meeting

August Dark

October 10-4-11 Commission Workshop 10-18-11 Commission Meeting

December Dark

4

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8445 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Basin Monitoring Program Task Force Status PREPARED BY: Mark Norton P.E., Water Resources and Planning Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file this status report about the Basin Monitoring Program Task Force. DISCUSSION On January 22, 2004, the RWQCB approved the Basin Plan Amendment for TIN and TDS. The Basin Plan Amendment defined specific agencies throughout the watershed responsible for several monitoring and analyses programs for TIN and TDS. Some of the programs are conducted on an annual basis and some on a triennial basis. SAWPA serves as the administrator to conduct these monitoring and analyses programs. A task force was formed in May 2004 to administer the required monitoring programs proposed for formation. A task force agreement, along with an agreement to form the Project Agreement 20 Committee among three of the SAWPA member agencies, IEUA, OCWD, and EMWD, was developed and approved by the Commission in June 2004. Pursuant to the 2004 Basin Plan Amendment, the task force agencies are required to conduct the following investigations: 1. Recomputation of the Ambient Water Quality – every three years 2. Preparation of a Water Quality Report for the Santa Ana River – annual

The Task Force includes the following agencies:

• Eastern Municipal Water District • Chino Basin Watermaster • Inland Empire Utilities Agency • Yucaipa Valley Water District • Orange County Water District • City of Beaumont • City of Riverside • City of Corona • Lee Lake Water District • City of Redlands • Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District • City of Rialto • Irvine Ranch Water District • Jurupa Community Services District • Colton/San Bernardino Regional Tertiary

Treatment and Wastewater Reclamation • Western Riverside Co Regional Wastewater Authority

Authority

The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and SAWPA also are signatories to the agreement.

5

CM#8445 March 15, 2011 Page 2 In addition to the annual report and the triennial ambient water quality update, the Task Force also has completed Wasteload Allocations for the Santa Ana River, which assists the agencies in assuring that their permit requirements are kept current and reflecting compliance with the groundwater objectives. Another major activity that the Task Force completed was the Declaration of Conformance. Within this Declaration, the Task Force and Regional Board declared that they are in conformance with the new State Board Water Recycling Policy requirements for the completion of a TDS/Nutrient Management Plan for the Santa Ana Region, by efforts conducted by the Nitrogen TDS Task Force that resulted in a RWQCB Basin Plan Amendment for Nitrogen and TDS in 2004. Further, the Declaration indicated conformance with the Emerging Constituents monitoring requirements in the State Board Water Recycling Policy through the Phase II Emerging Constituents Investigation Program submitted to the Regional Board in December 2009 by the Emerging Constituents Program Task Force. Finally, the major tenets defined in the Nitrogen and TDS Task Force’s Reclamation Guidance Document were included for regulatory acceptance, an action that SAWPA and the Task Force strongly encouraged the Santa Ana Regional Board to take on since the completion of the Nitrogen TDS Task Force in 2004.

The benefits of this Task Force overall are as follows:

• Created a watershed-wide monitoring program to assure water quality protection of groundwater basins for Nitrogen and TDS.

• Avoided development costs of a $2-3 million dollar groundwater/surface water modeling effort and all possible model update costs.

• Avoided lawsuits over challenges to legitimacy and science used in the development of past groundwater objectives.

• Decreased costs of conformance by sharing costs among 16 agencies, which reduces annual costs for all task force agencies in meeting basin plan requirements.

• Unified regional voice working with the Regional Board. RESOURCE IMPACTS None. MN:pb

CM#8445 PA 20 Basin Monitoring Program TF Status 3-15-11

6

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8446 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Regional Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Status PREPARED BY: Mark Norton P.E., Water Resources and Planning Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file this status report about the development of a proposed regional surface water quality monitoring program. DISCUSSION In October 2010, SAWPA was approached by the Regional Board to determine if we could assist in holding meetings with interested surface water quality monitoring agencies to discuss the development of a voluntary regional surface water quality monitoring program. The Regional Board proposed a regional approach as an alternative to surface water quality monitoring currently required under individual NPDES discharge permits for wastewater treatment plants, stormwater permits, and others. The intent of the program would be to reduce sampling duplication, reduce costs, reduce the number of sampling sites, and assist with a better determination of river reach compliance with surface water objectives. Some of the benefits and costs savings of such a program are described as follows: • The Regional Monitoring Program would not specifically be tied to TMDLs or permits, and

therefore would retain the ability to receive grant money. Also, it would qualify for other Federal and State programs like USGS, Parks and Rec’s work, EPA and DWR work.

• Every POTW in the Region already has a permit requirement to sample upstream and downstream. Reducing this obligation to major tributaries and representative locations could save a lot of money just by sampling fewer locations.

• At least half of the cost in the Monitoring Programs is in the sampling and the shipping ice to keep the vials cold. Combining more samples into a single shipping container can greatly reduce costs.

• Every one of the separate Monitoring Programs has its own project management, staff, and own reporting requirements all causing too much over-head.

• Any sampling program these days must go through a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). The advantage of doing regional monitoring is one QAPP could be done that gets revisited once a year, and can be cited by everyone.

• Reducing the cost of reacting to surprises – the issue of everyone’s monitoring affecting everyone else, particularly if you don’t know about the monitoring until the results are published and they take the form of a 303(d) listing.

• Participation in the Regional Monitoring Program would mean compliance with the receiving water monitoring requirements in NPDES permits, certifications and waivers, and would be done instead of individually monitoring the receiving waters.

7

CM#8446 March 15, 2011 Page 2 The proposed regional surface water quality program could start off for just the middle and upper Santa Ana River Watershed for the following reasons: • Large concentration of organizations monitoring these two watersheds for similar reasons. • Current EPA’s decision to list the Santa Ana River and tributaries for metals. • Fortunate to have an agency like SAWPA who could provide the forum, and the expertise to

facilitate this task. • Large stakeholder interest in these watersheds. • Can be the model for the other upcoming regional monitoring programs in the Santa Ana Region.

(Lower Santa Ana River, Big Bear Watershed, Newport Coast Watershed, and the San Jacinto Watershed).

To explore the interest in this cost savings program, SAWPA sponsored a meeting on January 18, 2011. Presentation speakers included Pavlova Vitale, Regional Board; Ken Schiff, Southern California Coastal Research Project (SCCRP); and Nancy Gardiner, Brown and Caldwell and the lead TMDL sampling firm. Staff also presented and shared a beta version of an interactive GIS tool showing surface water quality data and trends to support the proposed program. The meeting asked the participants if there was enough interest to further pursue such a program. The participants agreed that a regional effort that could save money was worthwhile. On February 17, 2011, SAWPA held another meeting with the group to further define the parameters and discuss potential work tasks. Ken Schiff of SCCRP facilitated the meeting. It was estimated that the cost to develop the program would range from $25,000 - $50,000 for the Monitoring Program Workplan, $25,000 for the QAPP, and $40,000 for the full year of agreement development and administration. These costs would be funded by the participants if interested. Some skepticism and concern still exists by some participants whether the ultimate program will result in a cost savings. The Regional Board staff acknowledges that if the regional program doesn’t provide for a reduction in sampling costs for the participants, they will not require it. The participants asked that for the first year of development, rather than creating a new task force, that funding be used from some of the existing task forces directly impacted such as the Stormwater Quality Standards Task Force, the Middle SAR TMDL Task Force, and the Basin Monitoring Program Task Force, to fund the next fiscal year of development. This approach was deemed acceptable at this stage. The next meeting for this proposed program is scheduled for March 17, 2011 at SAWPA. RESOURCE IMPACTS None. MN:pb

CM#8446 Regional Surface Water Monitoring Program Status 3-15-11

8

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8438 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: FYE 2012 and 2013 Budget Goals and Objectives

PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission review and discuss the goals and objectives that will be used in preparing the FYE 2012 and 2013 Budget, and receive and file the budget goals and objectives. DISCUSSION Staff has been working on the budget in a parallel process with the Strategic Plan. Budget goals and objectives have been developed keeping the strategic planning process in mind, and will be presented for review and discussion at the meeting. As in the past, the FYE 2012 and 2013 will be a two-year budget and will be prepared in accordance with the Government Finance Officers Association’s (GFOA) recommended guidelines and practices. Our FYE 2008 and 2009 Budget and FYE 2010 and 2011 Budget both received the GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award. Staff will submit the FYE 2012 and 2013 Budget for this award program after final adoption. RESOURCE IMPACTS None. KW:pb

CM#8438 Budget Goals & Objectives 3-15-11

9

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8439 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Request for Proposal (RFP) for Audit Services PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission authorize the issuance of an RFP for audit services commencing the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011. DISCUSSION A contract for audit services typically covers a period of three years. In keeping with good business practices, the contract should be reviewed for cost and services being evaluated by the agency following contract expiration. The current audit relationship with Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc. has been in force without interruption since the Agency’s audit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. While the relationship has met the Agency’s legal independent audit requirement, it is in our best interest to issue an RFP in order to evaluate current costs being assessed, and overall audit services being rendered at this time. RESOURCE IMPACTS There are no impacts to the current year budget. Anticipated costs for audit services will be included in the FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13 Budgets. KW:pb

Attachments: 1. RFP 2. List of Auditing Firms CM#8439 RFP for Audit Services 3-15-11

11

SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

AUDIT SERVICES

March 15, 2011

PROPOSALS DUE: Friday, April 15, 2011, at 4:00 PM

Hand delivered to:

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Attn: Finance Department

11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503

By USPS:

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Attn: Finance Department

11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503

13

April 2011 - Request for Proposals Audit Services

2

PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS Responses to the Request for Proposal (RFP) are to be submitted to:

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority – Finance Department 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503

Phone (951) 354-4220 Fax (951) 352-3422 No later than 4:00 p.m. on Friday, April 15, 2011. Two (2) copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a sealed envelope and marked “April 2011 – Request for Proposals – Audit Services.” An electronic copy of this proposal also should be provided on or before the deadline, preferably in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format to [email protected]. Proposals received after the specified time will not be accepted. Questions regarding this request may be addressed to Karen Williams ([email protected]). INTRODUCTION The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) was formed in 1972 to plan and build facilities to protect water quality in the Santa Ana River Watershed. The organization is a joint powers authority comprised of the following five major water districts that share the Santa Ana River Watershed: Eastern Municipal Water District, Inland Empire Utilities Agency (formerly Chino Basin Municipal Water District), Orange County Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, and Western Municipal Water District. The governance structure of SAWPA is made up of an elected Board of Director, an alternate Board of Director (also elected), and a respective General Manger from each of the five water districts forming what is known as the Board of Commissioners. The Santa Ana River is the largest stream system in southern California. The river begins high in the San Bernardino Mountains and flows over 100 miles southwesterly where it discharges to the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. The Santa Ana River Watershed, which receives an average annual rainfall of about 13 inches, covers over 2,650 square miles of widely varying urban, rural and forested terrain. The watershed covers the more populated urban areas of San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange Counties, and a small portion of Los Angeles County and provides a home to over 4.8 million people. SAWPA’s current audit relationship is with Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc., and has been in force without interruption since its audit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008. While the relationship has met SAWPA’s legal independent audit requirement, it is in SAWPA’s best interest to issue an RFP in order to evaluate current costs being

14


3

assessed and the overall audit services being rendered at this time. Proposals for partial services or a varied scope of work will not be considered. The intent of this RFP is to identify a professionally responsible certified public accounting firm that can offer the highest quality of service at the lowest overall cost to SAWPA. The establishment of a three (3) year contract commencing with the fiscal year end audit for June 30, 2011 is desired. SAWPA requires fixed pricing for the three years of the contact limited by the prevailing Consumer Price Index. Notwithstanding the intended three-year duration of the proposed contract, as provided below, the contract may be terminated by SAWPA upon 30 days written notice. SAWPA will make every effort to administer the proposal process in accordance with the terms and dates outlined in this RFP; however, SAWPA reserves the right to modify the activities, timeline, or any other aspect of the process at any time and as deemed necessary by SAWPA staff. By requesting proposals, SAWPA is in no way obligated to award a contract or pay the expenses of proposing audit firms in connection with the preparation or submission of a proposal. The awarding of a contract shall be contingent on the availability of funds and the requisite staff and Commission approvals. The decision to award any contract to a particular company will be based on many factors to include, but not limited to: office location, products available, service levels, overall cost, quality of references, and financial strength. No single factor will determine the final award decision. RFP AND PROPOSAL SCHEDULE SAWPA intends to follow the schedule described below during the procurement process for Audit services, but reserves the right to alter the schedule at any time for any reason. ACTIVITY DATE Release of RFP March 15, 2011 Questions Due from Firms April 11, 2011 Proposal Due Date April 15, 2011 Commencement of Contract June 30, 2011 Audit PROPOSAL PROCEDURES Submission of Proposal – Proposal must be received by the Finance Department no later than 4 p.m. on Friday, April 15, 2011. Late proposals will not be considered. Proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope, marked “April 2011 - Request for Proposals - Audit Services”, and delivered to: Finance Department, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503. Telephoned or faxed proposals will not be accepted.

15


4

Right to Reject Proposals - SAWPA reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any non-material irregularities or informalities in any proposal, and to accept or reject any item or combination of items. Execution of Agreement - If an audit firm is not able to execute the standard services agreement and task order for year one (example attached) within thirty (30) days after being notified of selection, SAWPA reserves the right to select the next most qualified proposing audit firm or call for new proposals, whichever SAWPA deems most appropriate. The audit firm shall be required to work under a written contract with SAWPA in accordance with standard terms of the services agreement and task order approved by legal counsel for SAWPA. Notwithstanding anything in this RFP to the contrary, SAWPA reserves the right to negotiate the terms and conditions of the contract with the selected provider. Incorporation of RFP/Proposal - This RFP and the audit firm’s response, including all promises, warranties, commitments, and representations made in the successful proposal will become binding contractual obligations and will be incorporated by reference in any agreement between SAWPA and the audit firm. Authorized Signatories - Audit firm personnel signing the cover letter of the proposal or any other related forms submitted must be authorized signers with the requisite authority to represent their firm and to enter into binding contracts with clients. Validity of Proposals - Proposed services and related pricing and warranties contained in the proposal must be valid for a period of 120 days after the submission of the proposal. Reporting - Independence is essential to the effectiveness of the agency’s annual audit, and is strongly emphasized by the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), the U. S. General Accounting Office (GAO), and the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). To ensure independence and objectivity are maintained, the Audit Firm selected shall receive direction from and report directly to the SAWPA Board of Commissioners/Audit Committee. Termination Clause – SAWPA, at its sole discretion, may terminate the contract by giving a 30 day written notice to the audit firm selected. In the event of such termination, SAWPA’s liability, if any, will be limited to only the work actually performed, if any, up to the termination date. SCOPE OF WORK SAWPA is requesting proposals from qualified firms of certified public accountants to audit its financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, and the two (2) subsequent fiscal years. Additionally, the Agency has the option to extend two (2)

16


5

additional years (in single year increments). As a recipient of federal grants, a single audit may be required for SAWPA.

1. The audit shall be in compliance with Section 26909 of the Governmental Code and the related State Controller Guidelines.

2. SAWPA desires the independent auditor to express an opinion on the fair presentation of its general purpose financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

• The audit shall be a full-scope financial and compliance review of all funds

and account groups of SAWPA. The auditor shall issue an opinion letter on SAWPA’s financial statements, in compliance with applicable legal provisions, the auditor's report on the study and evaluation of internal control system and the auditor's report on compliance.

3. SAWPA will provide the auditor with trial balance, general ledger and schedules

for all of the funds. The auditor will be responsible for preparing the financial statements, footnotes and supplementary information of the individual funds.

4. The auditor must provide SAWPA with draft copies of the financial statements,

including journal entries and explanations to support the changes to the trial balance. Any results prepared by the auditor which alter SAWPA’s books must be reviewed by SAWPA’s personnel.

5. Final copies of the financial statements, including the opinion letter, footnotes, and supplemental data for individual funds, must be available for review by the Board of Commissioners during a regular Commission meeting. Regular Board of Commissioners meetings are scheduled on the first and third Tuesday of every month.

6. The auditor shall submit a written management letter to the Board of Commissioners that communicates any observations for improvements in SAWPA’s financial operations, and any deficiencies in internal controls that need to be addressed by SAWPA.

7. The partners in charge shall be available to attend up to two SAWPA

management and/or public meetings at which the audit report may be discussed.

8. The auditor shall assist SAWPA personnel in applying generally accepted accounting principles and provide support necessary to maintain sound financial management procedures. The auditor shall provide financial advice and counsel on significant matters occurring throughout the year that would affect the annual reports and sound accounting practices.

17


6

9. SAWPA finance personnel will assist the auditor in preparing all required schedules for the annual audit, assist in locating information, and answer questions as they arise. SAWPA will provide work space for auditor personnel.

10. Test compliance with the Single Audit Act as amended in 1996, and applicable laws and regulations, including additional requirements applicable to federal stimulus funds under the American Recovery Reinvestment Act (ARRA); Auditor will prepare and publish an audit report, if required, and prepare the forms for submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.

11. The auditor shall perform, as part of the annual audit, the preparation and transmittal of the Special Districts Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller’s Office as required under California Government Code section 53891.

12. The auditor must provide (1) unbound copy and one (1) electronic copy (PDF) of the complete financial statements to the Agency for incorporation into the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).

OPTIONAL SERVICE – AUDIT OF LESJWA Refer to number 11 of guidelines for proposal on page ten of the RFP. REPORTS TO BE ISSUED Following completion of the audit and preparation of the fiscal year’s comprehensive financial statements and special purpose audits, the auditor shall issue:

1. Reports on the fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with auditing standards and generally accepted in the United States of America as listed below:

Basic Financial Statements for the Agency State Controllers Report for the Agency Single Audit Report on Schedule of Federal Awards (as listed

below) Program - Specific Audit Report on the Technology

Innovation Program (FYE March 31 – audit report due in September)

2. A report based on the auditor’s understanding of the internal control structure

and assessment of control risk. In this report, the auditor will also communicate any reportable conditions found during the audit and indicate whether they are also material weaknesses.

3. A Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 114 letter communicated to the

Commission reporting any control deficiencies that are considered significant deficiencies and/or material weaknesses as defined by the Standards.

18


7

4. Auditors shall be required to make an immediate written report to the Agency of

all irregularities and illegal acts or indications of illegal acts of which they become aware to the following:

• Terry Catlin, Chairman, Board of Commissioners • Philip Anthony, Vice Chairman, Board of Commissioners • Celeste Cantú, General Manager • Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer

5. The Auditor must present to the Agency’s Board of Commissioners, the results of

the Audit and address all findings and all adjustments.

6. Final Audit Report: The Auditor must deliver the final audit report by December so that the Agency may continue to apply for the Government Finance Officer’s Association Award for Excellence in Financial Reporting.

7. Single Audit Report: The Auditor must deliver 10 original, signed, final audit reports to the Agency’s Chief Financial Officer in September. (NIST Grant FYE March 31)

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Copies – The Agency will require four physical copies of the proposal mailed to the address listed on the cover page of this request and an electronic copy, preferable in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format emailed to [email protected]. Each proposal shall be received and stamped by SAWPA no later than 4:00 P.M. April 15, 2011. The successful audit firm will be notified in writing within 30 days of acceptance by the Agency. Format – To achieve a uniform response and consideration please include the following information in the proposal. The purpose of the proposal is to demonstrate the qualifications, competence, and capacity of the firms seeking to undertake an independent audit of SAWPA in conformity with the requirements of this request for proposal. The proposal should demonstrate the qualifications of the firm and of the particular staff to be assigned to this engagement. It should also specify an audit approach that will meet the request for proposals requirements. Proposals shall be organized, tabbed and numbered in the following order:

1. Executive Summary 2. Statement of Independence 3. License to Practice in California 4. Firm Qualifications and Experience 5. Partner, Supervisory and Staff Qualifications and Experience

19


8

6. References - Similar Engagements With Other Government Entities 7. Specific Audit Approach 8. Cost Proposal 9. External Quality Control Review Report 10. Professional Insurance 11. Optional Service – Audit of LESJWA

1. Executive Summary

The Executive Summary should be addressed to:

Board of Commissioners Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503

The summary should state the prime firm and include the firm’s name submitting the proposal, their mailing address, telephone number, and contact name. The letter shall address the firm’s understanding of the project based on this RFP and any other information the firm has gathered. Include a statement discussing the firm’s interest and qualifications for this type of work. Certify that the person signing the proposal is entitled to represent the firm, empowered to submit the bid, and authorized to sign a contract with SAWPA.

2. Statement of Independence The firm should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of SAWPA as defined by generally accepted auditing standards and/or U.S. General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards. The firm also should provide an affirmative statement that it is independent of all of the component units of SAWPA as defined by those same standards.

3. License to Practice in California An affirmative statement should be included that the firm and all assigned key professional staff are properly registered / licensed to practice in California.

4. Firm Qualifications and Experience The proposer should state the size of the firm, the size of the firm's governmental audit staff, the location of the office from which the work on this engagement is to be performed, the number and nature of the professional staff to be employed in this engagement on a full-time basis, and the number and nature of the staff to be so employed on a part-time basis. The firm also shall provide information on the results of any federal or state desk reviews or field reviews of its audits during the past three (3) years. In addition, the firm shall provide information on the circumstances and status of any disciplinary action taken or pending against the firm during the past three (3) years with state regulatory bodies or professional organizations.

20


9

5. Partner, Supervisory, and Staff Qualifications and Experience

Identify the principal supervisory and management staff, including engagement partner, managers, other supervisors, and specialists who would be assigned to the engagement. Indicate whether each person is an active licensed certified public accountant in California. Provide information on the government auditing experience of each person, including information on relevant continuing professional education for the past three (3) years and membership in professional organizations relevant to the performance of this audit. Indicate how the quality of staff over the term of the agreement will be assured.

This section may include graphs, charts, photos, resumes, references, etc in support of the firm’s qualifications.

6. Similar Engagements with other Government Entities Please provide a list of not less than five client references for which services similar to those outlined in the RFP are currently being provided. For each reference listed provide the name of the organization, dates for which the services(s) are being provided, type of services(s) being provided and the name, address, telephone and email address of the responsible person within the reference’s organization. SAWPA reserves the right to contact any or all of the listed references regarding the audit services performed by the Proposer.

7. Specific Audit Approach

The audit approach should indicate the firm’s ability to meet each specification as outlined in this document. The work plan should address the items of work as described in this RFP. The plan should be simple, easy to read and follow, and address and satisfy the objectives and specifications as listed in the Scope of Work in this RFP.

8. Cost Proposal The proposal should contain all pricing information relative to performing the audit engagement as described in this request for proposal. The total all-inclusive maximum price to be proposed is to contain all direct and indirect costs including all out-of-pocket expenses for each of the three years. This information is required to be shown for each year to be audited and in total. SAWPA will not be responsible for expenses incurred in preparing and submitting the proposal. No cost increases shall be passed onto SAWPA after the proposal has been submitted.

• The proposal shall include a separate fee (not related to the financial year-end audit) that the bidding firm would charge to conduct an annual audit of the Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority and preparation and transmittal of the Special Districts Financial Transactions Report to the State Controller’s Office as required under California Government

21


10

Code section 53891, beginning with fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 (see number 11 on page ten).

9. External Quality Control Review Report

The firm also is required to submit a copy of the report on its most recent External Quality Control Review Report, with a statement whether that quality control review included a review of specific government engagements.

10. Insurance

The proposal shall include a copy of the firm’s most current certificate of insurance and endorsements for professional liability and worker’s compensation insurance.

11. Optional Service – Audit of the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority

The bidding firm also shall include as a stand-alone component (option) for the cost to do an annual audit of the Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority (LESJWA). This additional option will be considered separately. All audit requirements and deliverables previously defined for the SAWPA audit would apply to the LESJWA audit as well in relation to the LESJWA Board. The Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority was formed in 2000 pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California relating to the joint exercise of powers common to public agencies. The Authority was formed for the purpose of implementing projects and programs to improve the water quality and habitat of Lake Elsinore and its back basin consistent with the Lake Elsinore Management Plan, and to rehabilitate and improve the San Jacinto and Lake Elsinore Watersheds and the water quality of Lake Elsinore in order to preserve agricultural land, protect wildlife habitat, and protect and enhance recreational resources, all for the benefit of the general public. Major activities include administering the LE/CL TMDL Task Force, developing BMPs, and continued improvement of lake quality. The Authority’s five member agencies are the City of Lake Elsinore, City of Canyon Lake, County of Riverside, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA).

SAWPA serves as the administrator for this JPA and manages the finance and accounting functions on behalf of the Authority.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SAWPA reserves the right to conduct interviews with all, any or none of the firms submitting proposals, and to reject any or all proposals and to accept the proposal most favorable to the Agency’s interest. The audit firm submitting bid proposals should be aware that SAWPA has no obligation whatsoever to engage the firm for future work to implement any of the recommended changes in procedures and policies revealed during the course of the audit. In addition,

22


11

there is no obligation on the part of SAWPA to engage the firm for any management services or studies.

23

Shawn Washington Accountancy Corporation 3801 University Ave Riverside, CA 92501 Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc 4201 Brockton Ave Ste 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Levias Kanouse & Assoc 6370 Brockton Ave Riverside, CA 92501 Charles Z. Fedak & Co. 6081 Orange Ave Cypress, CA 90630 Diehl, Evans & Company, LLP 5 Corporate Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606-5165 Mr. Steve Northcote, Managing Audit Partner Leaf & Cole, LLP 1843 Hotel Circle South, Ste 300 San Diego, CA 92108-3397 Moreland & Associates Accountancy Corporation 1201 Dove St., Ste 680 Newport Beach, CA 92260 Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP 290 North “D” Street, Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92401 RSM McGladrey Inc. 3880 Lemon Street Suite 100 Riverside CA 92501-3667 Marcia Fritz & Company 5530 Birdcage Street, Suite 105 Citrus Heights, CA 95610-7698

Gary Caporicci Caporicci & Larson. 9 Corporate Park, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92606 Mr. Kevin T. Pulliam Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP 8270 Aspen Street Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 James Marta & Company 701 Howe Avenue, Suite E3 Sacramento CA 95825 Armando Balbin Certified Public Accountant 10630 Downey Avenue, Suite 210 Downy CA 90241 John Modlin Crowe Horwath LLP 15233 Ventura Blvd, Suite 900 Sherman Oaks CA 91403 Eadie & Payne LLP, CPAs 300 E State Street, Suite 350 Redlands CA 92373

24

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8444 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Funding Transfer for OWOW PREPARED BY: Mark Norton P.E., Water Resources and Planning Manager Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission authorize a transfer of $28,900 from the GIS Initiative Fund No. 391 to Watershed Management Plan (OWOW) Fund No. 373 to help fund OWOW activities. DISCUSSION In September 2007, SAWPA entered into an agreement with the Southeastern California GIS Council (Council) to serve as administrator of an initiative to provide high-quality imagery for GIS analysis to stakeholders throughout the region, including local governments, regional agencies, and special districts. Purchasing imagery as a group provided better quality imagery at a lower cost for stakeholders in the region. Staff established a segregated fund (No. 391) to track costs associated with this effort. All costs, including staff costs, were paid by the GIS Council stakeholders. This effort came to a close in February 2009, and all outstanding costs were paid. Because of the economic climate, further imagery purchases have been put on hold. As of January 31, 2011, the fund balance in this account is $28,900. These funds have been earned by and belong to SAWPA. Because there is no planned activity in this fund, staff would like to transfer the funds to the Watershed Management Plan (OWOW Fund No. 393) for use in that effort. RESOURCE IMPACTS With this transfer, sufficient funds will now be available to continue work on the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (OWOW). MN:KW:pb

CM #8444 GIS Initiative Fund Transfer 3-15-11

25

SAWPA Legislative Tracking List

Priority Legislation

CA AB 19 AUTHOR: Fong (D) TITLE: Building Standards: Water Meters: Multiunit Structures INTRODUCED: 12/06/2010 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Requires a water purveyor that provides water service to a multiunit residential structure or mixed-use residential and commercial structure to require the installation of a water meter or a submeter. Requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to develop and submit to the commission building standards that require the installation of water meters or submeters in individual dwelling units within a newly constructed multiunit residential structure.

CA AB 54 AUTHOR: Solorio (D) TITLE: Drinking Water INTRODUCED: 12/06/2010 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Local Government Committee SUMMARY:

Allows the Department of Public Health to issue a letter of no prejudice to a public water system that is a lead applicant for a project that may be funded by the Safe Drinking Water Revolving Fund; makes expenditures related to the project reimbursable in specified circumstances. Authorizes a local agency formation commission to review and approve or disapprove the consolidation of territory within a mutual water company into the jurisdiction of a city as a special district that operates a water system.

CA AB 83 AUTHOR: Jeffries (R) TITLE: Environment: CEQA Exemption: Recycled Water Pipeline INTRODUCED: 01/05/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Natural Resources Committee SUMMARY:

Amends existing law regarding California Environmental Quality Act environmental impact reports. Exempts a project for the installation of a new pipeline for the distribution of recycled water within an improved public street, highway, or right-of-way.

CA AB 134 AUTHOR: Dickinson (D) TITLE: Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District INTRODUCED: 01/12/2011 LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Authorizes the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District to file an application for a permit to appropriate a specified amount of water that is based on the volume of treated wastewater that the district discharges into the Sacramento River and recovers for reuse. Requires the State Water Resources Control Board to grant a permit to appropriate that treated wastewater upon terms and conditions determined by the board.

CA AB 157 AUTHOR: Jeffries (R) TITLE: Safe, Clean and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act INTRODUCED: 01/19/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Reduces the total amount of bonds authorized to be issued pursuant to the Safe, Clean and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012. Makes conforming reductions to amounts specified to be allocated from these bond funds for certain purposes.

27

CA AB 262 AUTHOR: Harkey (R) TITLE: California Regional Water Quality Control Boards INTRODUCED: 02/07/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee SUMMARY:

Revises the description of the boundaries of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board.

CA AB 275 AUTHOR: Solorio (D) TITLE: Rainwater Capture Act of 2011 INTRODUCED: 02/07/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending COMMITTEE: Assembly Business, Professions and Consumer Protection Committee HEARING: 03/22/2011 9:00 am, Room 447 SUMMARY:

Enacts the Rainwater Capture Act of 2011, which authorizes landowners to install, maintain, and operate rain barrel systems and rainwater capture systems for specified purposes, provided that the systems comply with specified requirements. Authorizes a landscape contractor to enter into a prime contract for the construction of a rainwater capture system if the system is used for landscape irrigation.

CA AB 359 AUTHOR: Huffman (D) TITLE: Groundwater Management Plans INTRODUCED: 02/14/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Requires a local groundwater management agency to provide a copy of a resolution of intention to the Department of Water Resources. Requires the local agency to provide a copy of the proposed groundwater management plan to an interested person. Specifies that groundwater projects shall include projects that are part of an integrated regional water management program.

CA AB 467 AUTHOR: Eng (D) TITLE: Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply INTRODUCED: 02/15/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Amends existing law that requires the State Department of Public Healthy, in collaboration with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the State Water Resources Control Board, to develop and adopt regulations governing the repayment of costs that are subsequently recovered from parties responsible for the contamination of groundwater. Requires the State of Department of Public Healthy to develop guidelines governing this repayment.

CA AB 550 AUTHOR: Huber (D) TITLE: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Peripheral Canal INTRODUCED: 02/16/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY: Prohibits the construction of a peripheral canal that conveys water from a diversion point in the Sacramento River to a location south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, unless expressly authorized by the Legislature. Requires the Legislative Analyst's Office to complete an economic feasibility analysis prior to the enactment of a statute authorizing the construction of a peripheral canal. Prohibits the construction and operation of a peripheral canal from diminishing water quality.

28

CA AB 576 AUTHOR: Dickinson (D) TITLE: Delta Stewardship Council: Planning and Administration INTRODUCED: 02/16/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Requires the Delta Stewardship Council to adopt a fee on water supply contractors of the State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project to fund a portion of the planning and administrative costs of the council.

CA AB 662 AUTHOR: Hueso (D) TITLE: Stormwater INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes several, technical, nonsubstantive changes to require the State Water Resources Control Board to develop minimum monitoring requirements for each municipality that is required to obtain a stormwater permit, and a minimum standard monitoring requirements for industries that are required to obtain a stormwater permit.

CA AB 685 AUTHOR: Eng (D) TITLE: State Water Policy INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Declares that it is the established policy of the state that every human being has the right to clean, affordable, and accessible water for human consumption, cooking, and sanitary purposes, that is adequate for the health and well-being of the individual and family. Requires all relevant state agencies to employ all reasonable means to implement this state policy.

CA AB 741 AUTHOR: Huffman (D) TITLE: Onsite Wastewater Disposal Conversion INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Natural Resources Committee SUMMARY:

Amends an existing law authorizing an owner of property included within an assessment district for construction of a main trunkline or collector sewer lines to request the governing board to construct plumbing to connect his or her property to the adjoining public sewer system. Authorize specified entities, to use this provision for the purpose of converting properties from onsite septic systems and connecting them to the sewer system.

CA AB 955 AUTHOR: Huber (D) TITLE: Onsite Sewage Treatment Systems INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Requires the Water Resources Control Board to classify onsite sewage treatment systems into regulatory tiers based on the demonstrated risk each system poses to the public health and environment. Specifies that the exemption criteria to be contained in the regulations may also be established by the state board in addition to the regional boards.

CA SB 34 AUTHOR: Simitian (D) TITLE: Water Infrastructure Projects: Fees INTRODUCED: 12/06/2010 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee

29

SUMMARY:

Declares the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to develop a fee-based system to pay for costs associated with updating and modernizing water infrastructure projects. Expresses legislative intent with respect to the imposition of the fees and use of the fee revenues.

CA SB 200 AUTHOR: Wolk (D) TITLE: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta Conveyance Facility INTRODUCED: 02/08/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee SUMMARY:

Prohibits the construction of a new Delta conveyance facility unless specified conditions are met. Prohibits the transportation of water for the federal Central Valley Project through state project facilities, with specified exceptions. Requires the Department of Water Resources to enter into contracts with specified Delta agencies for purposes of recognizing the right of users to make use of the waters of the Delta and establishes criteria for minimum water quality in the Delta.

CA SB 215 AUTHOR: Huff (R) TITLE: Invasive Aquatic Species: Mussels INTRODUCED: 02/09/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee SUMMARY:

Deletes that repeal of existing law that generally prohibits a person from possessing, importing, shipping, or transporting in the state, or from placing, planting, or causing to be placed or planted in any water within the state, dreissenid mussels, and authorizes the Director of Fish and Game or his or her designee to engage in various enforcement activities. Provides that a person who violates or resists, delays, obstructs, or interferes with the implementation of these provision is subject to a penalty.

CA SB 571 AUTHOR: Wolk (D) TITLE: Water Commission: Financing and Developing Resources INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee SUMMARY:

Requires the Water Commission to develop a master plan for financing and developing water resources in the state, including specified assessments and recommendations. Requires the commission to annually review and audit the award of state funds for water resources projects and programs and to develop a prioritized list of projects and programs related to water supply, water quality, water conservation, water use efficiency, and ecosystem and watershed restoration.

CA SB 607 AUTHOR: Walters (R) TITLE: Water Resources Board: Brackish Groundwater Sources INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

Requires the Water Resources Control Board on a specified date after consultation and collaboration with the Department of Water Resources, to submit a report to the Legislature on impediments to the development of potable water from local brackish groundwater sources.

CA SB 834 AUTHOR: Wolk (D) TITLE: Integrated Regional Water Management Plans: Contents INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: SENATE SUMMARY:

Requires an integrated regional water management plan to demonstrate the manner in which the plan complies with a specified state policy concerning reducing reliance on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta for water supply and improving regional self-reliance for water.

30

CA SB 900 AUTHOR: Steinberg (D) TITLE: Water Quality: Waste Discharge Requirements: Fees INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: SENATE SUMMARY:

Amends the Porter-Cologne Water Quality control Act. Requires a waste discharger to file a report of waste discharge with regional water quality control board and to pay an annual fee established by the State Water Resources Control Board. Requires the state board to report to the Governor and the Legislature on the expenditure of those annual fees on or before December 1 of each year.

Additional Legislation

CA AB 23 AUTHOR: Smyth (R) TITLE: Local Agency Meetings: Prohibition INTRODUCED: 12/06/2010 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Local Government Committee SUMMARY:

Amends the Ralph M. Brown Act which requires each legislative body of a local agency to provide the time and place for holding regular meetings. Prohibits the members of a legislative body, during a meeting of that legislative body, from convening simultaneous or serial order meetings of any other legislative body for which the members of the convened legislative body constitute at least a quorum.

CA AB 148 AUTHOR: Smyth (R) TITLE: Local Government: Ethics Training: Disclosure INTRODUCED: 01/14/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Local Government Committee SUMMARY:

Defines the term ethics laws, for purposes of training for officers and employees of a local government, to include compensation setting guidelines as established by specified organizations. Requires the local agency to post the ethics training record on the local agency's Internet Web site, if any, and to submit a copy of the record to the Controller. Requires a local agency that has adopted a written attendance compensation policy to post the policy on the local agency's Web site.

CA AB 162 AUTHOR: Smyth (R) TITLE: Local Government: Financial Reports INTRODUCED: 01/19/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Local Government Committee SUMMARY:

Requires that, if an audit of a local agency reveals certain financial irregularities, the findings be sent separately to the Controller immediately after the audit has been concluded. Requires the Controller to prepare and transmit a report on those findings, and the Controller's recommendations, to the Assembly Committee on Local Government and the Senate Committee on Local Government.

CA AB 246 AUTHOR: Wieckowski (D) TITLE: Water Quality: Enforcement INTRODUCED: 02/03/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending COMMITTEE: Assembly Judiciary Committee HEARING: 03/22/2011 9:00 am, Room 4202 SUMMARY:

Authorizes a regional water quality control board to delegate to its executive officer the authority to apply for judicial enforcement to the Attorney General, a district attorney, a city attorney of a city with a population that exceeds 750,000, or a city attorney for a city and county. Authorizes a district attorney, a city attorney of a city with a population that exceeds 750,000, or a city attorney for a city and county, to bring civil actions under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act.

31

CA AB 380 AUTHOR: Chesbro (D) TITLE: Resources: Watersheds INTRODUCED: 02/14/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Natural Resources Committee SUMMARY:

Require the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, when implementing a pilot project to protect and restore the riparian zone in watersheds with listed anadromous salmonids, to provide the industry, agencies, and the public with the opportunity to participate in the development of the pilot project in a transparent manner and to ensure that the pilot project have certain goals.

CA AB 531 AUTHOR: Olsen (R) TITLE: Groundwater INTRODUCED: 02/15/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to existing law relating to groundwater management which encourages local agencies to work cooperatively to manage groundwater resources.

CA AB 627 AUTHOR: Berryhill B (R) TITLE: State Water Resources Development System: Annual Report INTRODUCED: 02/16/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to existing law which requires the Department of Water Resources to prepare, and submit to the fiscal committees of the Legislature, an annual report relating to the budget for the State Water Resources Development System, and prescribes the information to be included in the annual report.

CA AB 640 AUTHOR: Logue (R) TITLE: Water Discharges: Mandatory Minimum Civil Penalties INTRODUCED: 02/16/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee SUMMARY:

Authorizes the state board or a regional board, in lieu of assessing all or a portion of the mandatory minimum penalties against a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) that serves a small community, to elect to requires that POTW spend an equivalent amount toward the completion of a compliance project.

CA AB 745 AUTHOR: Valadao (R) TITLE: California Water Plan INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, substantive changes to existing law requiring the Department of Water Resources to update every 5 years the plan for the orderly and coordinated control, protection, conservation, development and use of water resources of the state, which is known as the California Water Plan.

CA AB 763 AUTHOR: Berryhill B (R) TITLE: Department of Water Resources INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee SUMMARY:

Delete an obsolete reference from, and make technical, nonsubstantive changes to provisions establishing the Department of Water Resources and providing for the appointment of the director.

32

CA AB 779 AUTHOR: Fletcher (R) TITLE: Water Transfers: Public Notice INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Requires a public water agency to provide public notice to its customers prior to approving a transfer of water to the agency.

CA AB 849 AUTHOR: Gatto (D) TITLE: Water: Use Efficiency INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

States the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to encourage the installation and implementation of residential and commercial water use efficiency measures, including, but not limited to, graywater and storm retention systems, to reduce or eliminate regulatory barriers for water use and efficiency, and if feasible to provide incentives to increase investment in and use of graywater systems.

CA AB 903 AUTHOR: Berryhill B (R) TITLE: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to legislative findings and declarations that state, among other things, that the water problems of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta are unique within the state and that a general law cannot be made applicable to the Delta.

CA AB 938 AUTHOR: Perez V (D) TITLE: Public Water Systems INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Amends existing law that establishes the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and requires total funding of a single project, to be determined by an assessment of affordability. Adds environmental documentation to the costs of a single project that the department is required to determine by an assessment of affordability. Requires that written public notice given by a public water system be in various languages.

CA AB 963 AUTHOR: Valadao (R) TITLE: Environmental Quality Act: Contaminated Groundwater INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Exempts from the Environmental Quality Act a project undertaken to allow for the substitution of a source of surface water for a source of groundwater deemed to be contaminated if the source of contaminated groundwater is serving an economically disadvantaged community of less than 3,00 residents.

CA AB 964 AUTHOR: Huffman (D) TITLE: Environmental Protection: Contamination INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Requires the State Department of Public Health to adopt and implement a 10-year plan for sewer upgrades, including, but not limited to, onsite septic and sewer lateral upgrades. Relates to contractual assessments to finance onsite sewer and septic improvements. Permits onsite septic and sewer improvements to be installed to convert residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, or other real property from an onsite septic system to community sewer collection service.

33

CA AB 977 AUTHOR: Harkey (R) TITLE: Water INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Amends an existing law that requires there to be incorporated in the planning and construction of certain structures to provide for the conservation, storage, regulation, transportation, or use of water, specified features, including additional storage capacity that the Department of Water Resources determines necessary for the preservation of fish and wildlife. Makes technical nonsubstantive changes.

CA AB 983 AUTHOR: Perea (D) TITLE: Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical changes to existing law that establishes the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund for the provision of grants and revolving fund loans to provide for the design and construction of projects for public water systems that will enable water suppliers to meet safe drinking water standards.

CA AB 1002 AUTHOR: Butler (D) TITLE: California Water Plan: Stormwater Recovery INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Relates to the California Water Plan. Requires the Department of Water Resources to include in the plan a discussion of strategies relating to stormwater recovery.

CA AB 1048 AUTHOR: Harkey (R) TITLE: Water Quality: Recycled Water and Wastewater: Fluoride INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Requires the State Water Resources Control Board to adopt a statewide policy establishing standards for levels of fluoride in recycled water and wastewater.

CA AB 1058 AUTHOR: Smyth (R) TITLE: Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to legislative findings and declarations in the Clean Water Bond Law of 1970 relative to water quality.

CA AB 1109 AUTHOR: Chesbro (D) TITLE: Drinking Water: Point-of-Use Devices INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to the California Safe Drinking Water Act, which provides for the operation of public water systems.

34

CA AB 1152 AUTHOR: Chesbro (D) TITLE: Groundwater INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Amends existing law that requires the Department of Water Resources to identify the extent of monitoring groundwater elevations. Requires the department to contact all well owners within the unmonitored part of the groundwater basin or subbasin. Makes the county and other specified entities that are contacted by the department ineligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state.

CA AB 1187 AUTHOR: Fong (D) TITLE: Water Plan: Safe Drinking Water INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Requires the Department of Water Resources to include a specified safe drinking water plan prepared by the State Department of Public Health in updates of the State Water Plan. Requires the department to contract with the Department of Public Health for that purpose.

CA AB 1194 AUTHOR: Block (D) TITLE: Drinking Water INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Amends the Calderon-Sher Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996. Includes cooking, preparing food and washing food in the definition of human consumption. Exempts certain public water systems that sell water through a submetered distribution system if the water supply is obtained from a public water system and the user is not charged a rate that is higher than the rate of the public water system, and water quality requirements noncommunity water systems from the act. Relates to violation citations and penalties.

CA AB 1200 AUTHOR: Ma (D) TITLE: Department of Water Resources: Recreation Development INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to existing law that requires the Department of Water Resources to plan recreation development associated with state-constructed water projects and to acquire land necessary to implement and execute plans for that development pursuant to legislative authorization.

CA AB 1221 AUTHOR: Alejo (D) TITLE: Water Quality Control Fund: Pollution Cleanup Account INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Authorizes the state Water REsources Control Board to pay moneys from the WAter Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account to tribes and entities operating private, not-for-profit water systems that have authority to clean up or abate the effects of waste.

CA AB 1228 AUTHOR: Halderman (R) TITLE: Public Agencies: Joint Power Agencies: Meetings INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY

35

SUMMARY: Authorizes a joint powers agency to include in its joint powers agreement provisions authorizing an employee of a member local agency to disclose information obtained in a closed session of the agency that has direct financial or liability implications for that member agency to that agency's legal counsel or to other persons present in a closed session.

CA AB 1283 AUTHOR: Berryhill B (R) TITLE: Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: ASSEMBLY SUMMARY:

Declares the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation relating to the Safe, Clean, and Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2012.

CA SB 46 AUTHOR: Correa (D) TITLE: Local Government: Compensation Disclosure INTRODUCED: 12/09/2010 DISPOSITION: Pending COMMITTEE: Senate Governance and Finance Committee HEARING: 03/16/2011 9:30 am, Room 112 SUMMARY:

Requires local government filers to annually file a compensation disclosure form. Requires the Secretary of State to develop the form. Requires a county, city, city and county, school district, special district, or joint powers agency that maintains an internet web site to post the information contained on the filed form on that web site. Authorizes a district attorney or any interested person to commence an action by mandamus to enforce these provisions.

CA SB 52 AUTHOR: Steinberg (D) TITLE: Water Quality: Sacramento Regional Sanitation District INTRODUCED: 12/15/2010 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Environmental Quality Committee SUMMARY:

Appropriates funds to the Department of Water Resources from the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 to provide financial assistance to the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District to offset rate increases associated with the costs of capital improvements to the district's regional sewage treatment plant.

CA SB 224 AUTHOR: Pavley (D) TITLE: Public Contracts: Department of Water Resources INTRODUCED: 02/09/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee SUMMARY:

Amends existing law regarding public contract approvals. Exempts specified contracts entered into by the Department of Water Resources. Excludes contracts for the sale, delivery, or use of water or power from the State Water Resources Development System.

CA SB 235 AUTHOR: Negrete McLeod (D) TITLE: Water and Flood Districts: Reorganization INTRODUCED: 02/09/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending COMMITTEE: Senate Governance and Finance Committee HEARING: 03/16/2011 9:30 am, Room 112 SUMMARY:

Authorizes the governing board of a special district to reorganize the district to reduce the total membership of the governing board by a resolution adopted by a majority vote of the board, including procedures for the reapportionment of division boundaries within the district.

36

CA SB 237 AUTHOR: Wolk (D) TITLE: Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: Agriculture INTRODUCED: 02/09/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Environmental Quality Committee SUMMARY:

Provides that an unspecified percentage of funds generated from the state sale of emission allowances for market-based compliance mechanisms adopted pursuant to the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and funds from federal global warming programs shall be made available to fund activities that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, or adapt to global warming, in the state's agricultural sector. Creates a related committee to assist in the implementation of these requirements.

CA SB 263 AUTHOR: Pavley (D) TITLE: Wells: Reports: Public Availability INTRODUCED: 02/10/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee SUMMARY:

Makes a report relating to a well constructed, altered, abandoned, or destroyed available to the public. Makes available to the public reports relating to a well constructed, altered, abandoned, or destroyed unless the Department of Water Resources receives notification by the well owner that the well owner desires to keep the report confidential.

CA SB 267 AUTHOR: Rubio (D) TITLE: Waste Discharges: Report INTRODUCED: 02/14/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

Relates to a provision requiring a person who proposes to discharge pollutants or dredged or fill material or to operate a publicly owned treatment works or other treatment works treating domestic sewage to file a certain report. Requires that report to be filed at least a certain number of days before the discharge or operation of the treatment work.

CA SB 409 AUTHOR: LaMalfa (R) TITLE: Flood Control: Department of Water Resources INTRODUCED: 02/16/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to existing law that authorizes the Department of Water Resources to make examinations of lands subject to inundation and overflow by flood waters.

CA SB 434 AUTHOR: Anderson (R) TITLE: Water: Delivery and Storage INTRODUCED: 02/16/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

States the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to enhance delivery of public water resources and storage.

CA SB 494 AUTHOR: Fuller (R) TITLE: California Regional Water Quality Control Boards INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

Declares the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would transfer responsibility for the investigation and remediation of perchloroethylene contamination to the regional boards.

37

CA SB 496 AUTHOR: Fuller (R) TITLE: State Water Resources Development System INTRODUCED: 02/17/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

Makes technical, nonsubstantive changes to a provision that authorizes the issuance of bond funds in a specified amount for the purposes of the State Water Resources Development System.

CA SB 665 AUTHOR: LaMalfa (R) TITLE: Water: Public Trust Doctrine: Groundwater INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

States the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would clarify that the public trust doctrine does not extend to groundwater.

CA SB 710 AUTHOR: LaMalfa (R) TITLE: State Water Project INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: Senate Rules Committee SUMMARY:

States the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would address cost to local governments caused by State Water Project operators.

CA SB 877 AUTHOR: Anderson (R) TITLE: Public Water Systems: Point-of-use Treatment INTRODUCED: 02/18/2011 DISPOSITION: Pending LOCATION: SENATE SUMMARY:

Amends existing law authorizing the Department of Public Health to develop limited emergency regulations governing the permitted use of point-of-entry and point-of-use treatment by public water systems in lieu of centralized treatment and requires that these emergency regulations remain in effect until a specified date. Limits these regulations to the public water systems with less than 2,500 services connections. Permits the emergency regulations to remain in effect until the earlier of a specified date.

38

RESOLUTION NO. 2011-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY ENDORSING FRANCES SPIVY-WEBER FOR CHAIR OF THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

WHEREAS, Frances Spivy-Weber has provided invaluable service on the State Water Resources Control Board, bringing to bear on key issues her strong background and understanding of water supply, water rights, water quality, environmental and energy issues; WHEREAS, she has demonstrated an ability to work productively with a wide range of interests and stakeholders, including urban and rural communities, agricultural interests, environmental groups, environmental justice advocates, public and private sector entities, academic leaders, and the philanthropic community; WHEREAS, she has proven her ability to develop and garner support for policies that achieve multiple benefits by engaging numerous partners together, particularly for the improvement of the San Francisco Bay Delta and the increase statewide of water recycling and water use efficiency; WHEREAS, she has demonstrated her understanding of the value to a regulatory agency of stakeholder collaboration, as well as the value to stakeholders of the presence of a regulatory agency prepared to act if stakeholders do not produce solutions; WHEREAS, she has extensive knowledge of how CalEPA, the Resources Agency, and the Water Boards work, and is willing to work to improve their teamwork with other State and regional agencies;

WHEREAS, she has spent her career working on a wide range of environmental issues, particularly water issues, in both governmental and nongovernmental capacities; and

WHEREAS, she has long working relationships with key leaders in the new administration and with

her colleagues on the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards and their staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority endorses Frances Spivy-Weber to be the Chair of the State Water Resources Control Board and encourages her appointment to that position.

ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2011.

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority By: _______________________________ Commission Chair

39

SAWPA Commission __ Workshop Minutes MARCH 1, 2011 COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT

REPRESENTING

Terry Catlin, Chair Inland Empire Utilities Agency Phil Anthony Orange County Water District Don Galleano Western Municipal Water District Ron Sullivan Eastern Municipal Water District George Aguilar San Bernardino Valley MWD OTHERS PRESENT Tom Evans Western Municipal Water District Mark Bulot San Bernardino Valley MWD Michael Markus Orange County Water District Celeste Cantú General Manager Rich Haller Ex. Mgr. Engineering and Operations Larry McKenney Executive Counsel Mark Norton Manager of Water Resources and Planning Jeff Beehler Program Manager David Ruhl Program Manager Karen Williams Chief Financial Officer Dean Unger Information Services and Technology Manager Patti Bonawitz Clerk of the Board

The Commission Workshop of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority was called to order at 9:37 a.m. by Chair Terry Catlin at the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Office, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503. Chair Catlin led the flag salute. Chair Catlin called for public comments; however, there were no comments received. WORKSHOP DISCUSSION AGENDA STATUS OF STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS AND DISCUSSION OF DRAFT GOALS AND SWOT ANALYSIS Celeste Cantú presented the Public Policy Institute of California’s (PPIC) book entitled, Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation, as well as a copy of the Executive Summary to each Commissioner. Salvador Lopez incorporated the book’s principles into the strategic planning workshop, noting that the challenges mentioned in the book closely align with OWOW’s “Four Horsemen.” The book also alludes to five major crises that await and five promising directions in water policy. Discussion ensued regarding the purpose of this book (to influence policy at the State level), its principles, PPIC’s desire to implement a nine regions concept throughout the State (similar to the SAWPA model in the Santa Ana River Watershed), and the concepts of leadership vs. management. Commissioner Aguilar commented that it is much better for SAWPA to serve in the leadership role. Celeste Cantú invited each of the Commissioners to attend the PPIC’s Southern California book rollout event on March 28 at Cucamonga Valley Water District’s Frontier Project. Salvador Lopez reviewed the vision and mission statements, the six draft goals, and the objectives tied to each of those goals. Our vision defines what we stand for; our mission defines our purpose and role. The six goals align with some of the Pillars – water supply, water quality, salt balance, habitat protection, public outreach/ education, water resources/land use planning, and climate change. Suggestions regarding the draft goals were noted as follows: • The brine line should be a goal by itself as it is the most important thing SAWPA does. It is a real and big

project that SAWPA is responsible for. • The goal “Achieve optimal use of local water supplies and reduce reliance on imported water…” doesn’t

make sense. SAWPA needs to do real projects…we need dust! • Don’t use the word “promote.”

41

The Commission used these draft goals to frame a discussion of how SAWPA can best provide value to the member agencies and the watershed without over-reaching its strengths or resources. The Commissioners emphasized SAWPA’s desired roles with capital projects, the Inland Empire Brine Line, improving water supply reliability in the watershed, and working constructively with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The following comments were noted regarding the goals and objectives: • SAWPA is not to be set up as a “super” agency, but rather as a forum to achieve multiple benefit goals. • Water supply – we should promote inter-ties and other connections to make us drought proof. • SAWPA needs to be a leadership agency – lead the discussions, not manage them. • We need to stick to the original reason why SAWPA was created – not for dictatorship, but rather for

leadership. • SAWPA should not be a regional authority. • SAWPA should lead people to do the right thing – what projects do we need collectively to make us a lot

stronger as a whole? • Regarding the “water quality tree”, it should list the invasive plant specifically, i.e., Arundo donax removal

as we’ve been doing that for years. • Make the strategic “trees” more actionable to what SAWPA really is doing. • Change the language, “manager of waterways to protect all beneficial uses…” Due to time constraints, the Commission requested that Salvador Lopez send them his PowerPoint presentation to review and comment. Chair Catlin stated that it would have been more beneficial if the Commission could have had something in advance, so they could have come to the meeting better prepared. Those comments were echoed by both Commissioners Anthony and Aguilar. CONSENT CALENDAR

Upon motion by Commissioner Anthony, seconded by Commissioner Aguilar, the motion unanimously carried:

11-03-01 MOVED, approval of the Consent Calendar.

A. The Commission approved the Minutes from the meeting held 2-15-11.

CLOSED SESSION The Commission went into Closed Session at 10:41 a.m., pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation (Significant Exposure to Litigation – One Potential Case). The Commission reconvened into Open Session at 11:00 a.m. Larry McKenney reported that the Commission took no reportable action.

There being no further business for review, Chair Catlin adjourned the meeting at 11:03 a.m. APPROVED: _______________________________________ March 15, 2011 Terry Catlin, Chair 2011-3-1 Com Min

42

Security Purchase Maturity Call Date Yield To Investment Market Value Unrealized Coupon InterestType CUSIP Dealer Date Date (if appl) Par Value Maturity Cost Current Month Gain / (Loss) Rate Earned

FHLB 3133XS4S4 WMS 03-18-09 09-16-11 No Call $500,000 3.625% 519,670.00 509,305.00 (10,365.00) 3.625% 1,390.41$ FHLB 3133XWNZ8 WMS 01-27-10 01-27-14 02-27-12 $500,000 2.300% 500,000.00 508,290.00 8,290.00 2.300% 882.19$ FHLB 31333702E7 WMS 07-01-10 04-02-12 01-11-11 $500,000 0.750% 500,000.00 501,705.00 1,705.00 0.750% 287.67$ FHLMC 3134G1D92 WMS 12-21-10 12-21-12 03-21-11 $1,000,000 0.800% 1,000,000.00 998,190.00 (1,810.00) 0.750% 613.70$ FHLMC 3134G1LD4 WMS 01-26-11 12-27-12 No Call $500,000 0.722% 503,600.00 503,655.00 55.00 1.100% 276.76$ FNMA 3136FMTQ7 WMS 05-27-10 02-27-14 05-27-11 $500,000 2.050% 500,000.00 501,525.00 1,525.00 2.050% 786.30$ FNMA 3136FMP99 WMS 06-30-10 06-28-13 06-28-11 $500,000 1.350% 500,000.00 500,835.00 835.00 1.350% 517.81$

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityINVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - MARKED TO MARKET - UNREALIZED GAINS & LOSSES

February 28, 2011SAWPA primarily maintains a "Buy and Hold" investment philosophy, with all investments held by the Citizens Business Bank via a third-party safekeeping contract.

$ , , , $FNMA 31398A3S9 WMS 09-30-10 09-30-15 03-30-11 $500,000 2.000% 500,000.00 492,620.00 (7,380.00) 2.000% 767.12$ FNMA 3136FPLT2 WMS 09-30-10 12-30-13 09-30-11 $500,000 1.150% 500,000.00 495,040.00 (4,960.00) 1.150% 441.10$ USTN 912828NP1 WMS 01-26-11 07-31-15 No Call $500,000 1.786% 499,218.75 497,580.00 (1,638.75) 1.750% 685.10$

Total Actively Invested Funds $5,500,000 5,522,488.75$ 5,508,745.00$ (13,743.75)$ 1.598% 6,648.16$

Total Local Agency Investment Fund $44,669,106.34 0.449% 15,385.75

Total CalTRUST Investment Fund $2,058,540.07 1.560% 2,463.48

Total Invested Cash $5,500,000 52,250,135.16$ 0.614% 24,497.39$

Key to Security Type: Key to Dealers:FHLB = Federal Home Loan Bank FCS = FinaCorp SecuritiesFHLMC = Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation MBS = Multi-Bank SecuritiesFNMA = Federal National Mortgage Association MK = Morgan KeeganCORP = Corporate Note RCB = RBC Dain Rauscher

SA = Securities AmericaBSS = Brookstreet SecuritiesWMS = Wedbush Morgan Securities

44

Feb-2011

Investments

i i

Investments$52,250,135

Securities$5,522,489

11%11%

CalTRUST

LAIF$44,669,106

85% CalTRUST$2,058,540

4%

85%

45

Feb-2011

2.0%

Interest Rate Analysis

0.0%

1.0%

Securities LAIF CalTRUST Avg Rate of Return

1.598%

0.449%

1.560%

0.614%

46

Feb-2011

I t tInterest$24,497

LAIF$15,38663%

Securities$6,64827%27%

CalTRUST$2 463$2,46310%

47

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8449 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA) Budget Amendment PREPARED BY: Rich Haller, Executive Manager - Engineering and Operations RECOMMENDATION The Executive Committee of WRCRWA recommends that the Commission approve a budget amendment to the FY 2010/11 WRCRWA Budget in the amount of $500,000 for the next phase of planning and engineering needed to expand the WRCRWA treatment plant. DISCUSSION The 8.0 mgd WRCRWA treatment plant is rapidly approaching capacity. The average daily flow was 6.0 in November, and was 6.6 mgd in December 2010. At the February 23, 2011 Executive Committee meeting, JCSD proposed to fund $400,000 of the $500,000 needed for the next phase of planning and engineering. The cities of Norco and Corona proposed to share the remaining $100,000. A budget amendment was proposed by the Executive Committee in the amount of $500,000 to be considered by the WRCRWA Board of Directors at its meeting of March 31, 2011. However, each member agency must approve the proposed amendment before it can become effective. RESOURCE IMPACTS The Executive Committee proposes funding based generally on new capacity needed by proposed wastewater contributors as follows: HGSD $ 0 WMWD $ 0 SAWPA $ 0 JCSD $ 400,000 Norco $ 50,000 Corona $ 50,000 RH:pb

CM#8449 WRCRWA Budget Amendment 3-15-11

49

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8442 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: SARI Reach IV-B Maintenance Access Structures – Notice of Completion PREPARED BY: Carlos Quintero, Project Manager RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission accept the Caliagua, Inc. work as complete and direct staff to file a Notice of Completion with the Riverside County Clerk. DISCUSSION The SAWPA Commission authorized a contract with Caliagua, Inc. on November 16, 2010 to construct seven maintenance access structures along the SARI Reach IV-B to allow pipeline assessment and provide access to remove scale build-up. The work started on December 1, 2010 and was completed on January 31, 2011. All documentation and punch list items have been completed and submitted. A Notice of Completion needs to be filed with the Riverside County Clerk’s Office. The following is a summary of the project expenditures: Original Contract Amount: $199,300 Change Order: $ 39,000 TOTAL AMOUNT: $238,300 An additional maintenance access structure was required due to unexpected conditions found in the field. RESOURCE IMPACTS There are sufficient funds in the FY2010-11 Budget to cover any expenses associated with filing the Notice of Completion. CQ:pb Attachment: Notice of Completion

CM#8442 Notice of Completion Caliagua 3-15-11

51

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO NAME Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority STREET 11615 Sterling Avenue ADDRESS CITY Riverside STATE CA ZIP 92503 No fee per gov’t code 27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion. (See reverse side for complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described. 2. The full name of the owner is ____Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority____________________________. 3. The full address of the owner is ___11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503______________________________________________. 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is: In fee. ________________________________________________Fee__________________________________________________________________ (If other than Fee, strike “In fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase,” or “Lessee”) 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES __None__________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6. The full names and full addresses of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned, if the property was transferred subsequent to the

commencement of the work or improvements herein referred to: NAMES ADDRESSES ___None__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on __January 31, 2011____________________. The work done was:

__________Reach IV-B Maintenance Access Structures_____________________________________________________________________ 8. The names of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was ____ Caliagua ____________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________November 16, 2010_______________________________ (If no contractor for work of improvement as a whole, insert “None”) (Date of Contract) 9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the Cities of _____ Corona and Riverside__________________________, County of ___Riverside___________, State of ___CA__, and is described as follows: __Construction of six maintenance access structures fittings and appurtenances. ______________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. 10. The street address of said property is ____None (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none”.) Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Dated ____________________________ _________________________________________________________ (Signature of Owner or corporate officer of Owner named in paragraph 2, or his agent)

___________________________________________________________________________________.

WOLCOTTS FORMS, INC.

*67775-ABBBEc

FORM 1114 Rev. 10-05

Space above this line for Recorder’s use

VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: I am the _______Project Manager__________________, the Declarant of the foregoing Notice of Completion; (President of, Manager of, Partner of, Owner of, etc.) I have read said Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true to my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on ___March 16_________________, 20_11_ at __Riverside___________________________________, ____CA____. ________________________________________________________________ (Personal signature of the individual who is swearing that the contents of the Notice of Completion are true)

52

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCash Transaction ReportMonth of January 2011

Below is a summary of cash transactions completed during the month in the Authority's checking account with Citizens Business Bank. Attached are summaries by major revenue and expense classifications.

Cash Receipts and Deposits to Account 1,879,101.81$

Net Investment Transfers 500,000.00

Cash Disbursements (2,059,731.59)

Net Change for Month 319,370.22$

Balance at Beginning of Month 162,468.58

Balance at End of Month per General Ledger 481,838.80$

Collected Balance per Citizens Business Bank 800,336.37$

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE RECONCILIATION

Accounts Payable Balance @ 12/31/10 1,457,834.04$

Invoices Received for January 2011 1,767,684.18

Invoices Paid by check/wire during Janaury 2011 (see attached register) (1,613,025.96)

Accounts Payable Balance @ 01/31/11 1,612,492.26$ .

53

CASH RECEIPTS

SARI Operating Revenues 1,176,596.50$ Member and Other Agency Contributions 180,000.00 LESJWA Admin Reimbursement 21,395.74 Prop 50 Grant 498,448.32 Other 2,661.25

Total Receipts and Deposits 1,879,101.81$

INVESTMENT TRANSFERS

Transfer of Funds: -$ From (to) LAIF 500,000.00 From (to) Grant Retention (CBB) - From (to) CalTRUST (CBB) - From (to) Wealth Management (CBB) -

Total Investment Transfers 500,000.00$

CASH DISBURSEMENTS

By Check:Payroll -$ Operations 1,431,989.74

Total Checks Drawn 1,431,989.74$

By Cash Transfer:Payroll 115,847.97$ Payroll Taxes 49,112.49 Wire Transfer - OCWD Prop 50 180,968.05 Wire Transfer - YVWD Prop 50 281,745.17 Bank Fee 68.17

Total Cash Transfers 627,741.85$

Total Cash Disbursements 2,059,731.59$

54

Category Check # Check Date Type Vendor Check Amount

Audit Services 41945 1/21/2011 CHK Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc 22,400.00$ Audit Services Total 22,400.00$

Benefits 41894 1/7/2011 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 86.15$ Benefits 41902 1/7/2011 CHK Assurant Employee Benefits Insurance 2,637.81$ Benefits 41913 1/13/2011 CHK ACWA Health Benefits Authority 27,104.16$ Benefits 41915 1/13/2011 CHK AFLAC 313.59$ Benefits 41917 1/13/2011 CHK ICMA Retirement - Trust 457 5,134.91$ Benefits 41920 1/13/2011 CHK Public Employees' Retirement System 15,409.05$ Benefits 41921 1/13/2011 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 86.15$ Benefits 41959 1/27/2011 CHK ICMA Retirement - Trust 457 5,234.91$ Benefits 41961 1/27/2011 CHK Public Employees' Retirement System 15,416.17$ Benefits 41962 1/27/2011 CHK Cal PERS Long Term Care Program 86.15$ Benefits 41963 1/27/2011 CHK State Compensation Ins Fund 1,455.23$

Benefits Total 72,964.28$

Computer 41928 1/13/2011 CHK Solver Inc. 2,048.00$ Computer 41937 1/21/2011 CHK ESRI Inc. 912.00$ Computer 41965 1/27/2011 CHK CDW-G Computer Center 309.24$

Computer Total 3,269.24$

Construction 41971 1/27/2011 CHK Riverside County Regional Park 9,841.80$ Construction 41972 1/27/2011 CHK Caliagua Inc 99,630.00$

Construction Total 109,471.80$

Consulting 41887 1/3/2011 CHK Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 8,718.00$ Consulting 41895 1/7/2011 CHK Risk Sciences 4,793.72$ Consulting 41897 1/7/2011 CHK Tom Dodson & Associates 1,294.00$ Consulting 41909 1/7/2011 CHK Accent Computer Solutions 353.00$ Consulting 41910 1/7/2011 CHK Salvador Lopez-Cordova 7,500.00$ Consulting 41911 1/7/2011 CHK David Taussig & Associates Inc 27,500.00$ Consulting 41927 1/13/2011 CHK The Dolphin Group 7,000.00$ Consulting 41932 1/13/2011 CHK RBF Consulting 42,710.21$ Consulting 41933 1/13/2011 CHK Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 6,003.71$ Consulting 41935 1/13/2011 CHK CV Strategies 2,500.00$ Consulting 41939 1/21/2011 CHK Risk Sciences 10,549.34$ Consulting 41943 1/21/2011 CHK Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 13,422.25$ Consulting 41947 1/21/2011 CHK Van Haun Consulting 550.00$ Consulting 41948 1/21/2011 CHK Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 19,303.90$ Consulting 41952 1/21/2011 CHK Environmental Engineering & Contracting Inc 2,099.00$ Consulting 41975 1/27/2011 CHK David Taussig & Associates Inc 10,000.00$ Consulting 41976 1/27/2011 CHK Fieldman Rolapp & Associates 1,765.67$

Consulting Total 166,062.80$

Contract Services 41964 1/27/2011 CHK Western Municipal Water District 136,815.80$ Contract Services Total 136,815.80$

Contributions 41907 1/7/2011 CHK Southern California Water Committee Inc 850.00$ Contributions 41954 1/21/2011 CHK Inland Empire Economic Partnership 1,000.00$

Contributions Total 1,850.00$

Debt Services 41886 1/3/2011 CHK State Water Resources Control Board 526,243.03$ Debt Services 41941 1/21/2011 CHK Western Riverside County Regional 316,729.86$

Debt Services Total 842,972.89$

Director 41955 1/27/2011 CHK Inland Empire Utilities Agency 341.76$ Director 41956 1/27/2011 CHK Denis R Bilodeau 407.04$ Director 41957 1/27/2011 CHK Philip Anthony 422.34$ Director 41958 1/27/2011 CHK Eastern Municipal Water District 184.14$ Director 41968 1/27/2011 CHK Thomas P Evans 174.25$ Director 41970 1/27/2011 CHK Mark Bulot 197.91$ Director 41973 1/27/2011 CHK George Aaron Aguilar 380.52$

Director Total 2,107.96$

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityCheck DetailJanuary 2011

Page 1 of 3

55



Dues 41944 1/21/2011 CHK California Society of Municipal Finance Officers 110.00$ Dues Total 110.00$

Employee Reimbursement 41934 1/13/2011 CHK Alice Duecker 81.70$ Employee Reimbursement Total 81.70$

Equipment Rented 41918 1/13/2011 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 868.92$ Equipment Rented 41974 1/27/2011 CHK NEC Financial Services LLC 776.33$

Equipment Rented Total 1,645.25$

Equipment Repair/Maint 41953 1/21/2011 CHK Standard Tel Networks LLC 210.00$ Equipment Repair/Maint Total 210.00$

Facility Repair/Maint 41900 1/7/2011 CHK Yeier Janitorial Service 1,120.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41904 1/7/2011 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 250.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41908 1/7/2011 CHK Elevator Support Services Inc 182.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41923 1/13/2011 CHK Burrtec Waste Industries Inc 68.78$ Facility Repair/Maint 41925 1/13/2011 CHK G&G Environmental Compliance 3,070.50$ Facility Repair/Maint 41926 1/13/2011 CHK Western Exterminator Co. 81.50$ Facility Repair/Maint 41929 1/13/2011 CHK Barr Engineering 200.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41930 1/13/2011 CHK Innerline Engineering 5,776.30$ Facility Repair/Maint 41950 1/21/2011 CHK Underground Solutions, Inc. 1,200.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41951 1/21/2011 CHK T W Hawkins 600.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41966 1/27/2011 CHK E. S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. 120.00$ Facility Repair/Maint 41969 1/27/2011 CHK City Electric, Inc. 92.00$

Facility Repair/Maint Total 12,761.08$

Fees 41898 1/7/2011 CHK State Water Resources Control Board 1,452.00$ Fees 41912 1/11/2011 CHK Riverside County Superior Court 1,162.19$

Fees Total 2,614.19$

Legal 41888 1/7/2011 CHK Aklufi and Wysocki 371.25$ Legal 41931 1/13/2011 CHK Brownstein,Hyatt,Farber,Schreck 12,203.00$

Legal Total 12,574.25$

Office Expense 41891 1/7/2011 CHK Konica Minolta Business Solutions 687.32$ Office Expense 41893 1/7/2011 CHK Costco Wholesale 1,429.13$ Office Expense 41899 1/7/2011 CHK Staples Business Advantage 404.31$ Office Expense 41914 1/13/2011 CHK Aramark Corporation Refreshment Services 129.71$ Office Expense 41940 1/21/2011 CHK Staples Business Advantage 165.47$ Office Expense 41949 1/21/2011 CHK Printing Connection, Inc. 195.75$

Office Expense Total 3,011.69$

Offsite Storage 41906 1/7/2011 CHK Archive Management Services 190.53$ Offsite Storage Total 190.53$

Payroll/Taxes WDL000002185 1/14/2011 WDL Direct Deposit 1/14/2011 57,169.92$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000002186 1/14/2011 WDL PR Tax - Federal 19,172.57$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000002187 1/14/2011 WDL PR Tax - State 4,822.74$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000002195 1/28/2011 WDL Direct Deposit 1/28/2011 58,678.05$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000002196 1/28/2011 WDL PR Tax - Federal 20,083.13$ Payroll/Taxes WDL000002197 1/28/2011 WDL PR Tax - State 5,034.05$

Payroll/Taxes Total 164,960.46$

Prop 50 41967 1/27/2011 CHK Santa Ana Watershed Association 32,218.91$ Prop 50 P018516 1/27/2011 WDL Orange County Water District 180,968.05$ Prop 50 P018517 1/27/2011 WDL Yucaipa Valley Water District 281,745.17$

Prop 50 Total 494,932.13$

Safety 41901 1/7/2011 CHK Underground Service Alert 183.00$ Safety 41905 1/7/2011 CHK Golden State Fire Protection 360.00$

Safety Total 543.00$

Shipping/Postage 41890 1/7/2011 CHK Overnite Shipping 61.87$ Shipping/Postage 41892 1/7/2011 CHK Pitney Bowes Global Financial 355.62$ Shipping/Postage 41916 1/13/2011 CHK Overnite Shipping 8.90$

Page 2 of 3

56



Shipping/Postage 41924 1/13/2011 CHK United Parcel Service 13.11$ Shipping/Postage Total 439.50$

Uniforms 41903 1/7/2011 CHK Imagetech 509.48$ Uniforms Total 509.48$

Utilities 41884 1/3/2011 CHK Verizon Wireless 1,619.40$ Utilities 41885 1/3/2011 CHK AT&T/SBC 637.13$ Utilities 41889 1/7/2011 CHK Riverside, City of 2,206.51$ Utilities 41896 1/7/2011 CHK Southern California Edison 26.07$ Utilities 41919 1/13/2011 CHK AT&T/SBC 545.23$ Utilities 41922 1/13/2011 CHK Southern California Edison 240.82$ Utilities 41936 1/13/2011 CHK AT&T/SBC 91.63$ Utilities 41938 1/21/2011 CHK AT&T/SBC 29.97$ Utilities 41942 1/21/2011 CHK AT&T/SBC Long Distance 11.47$ Utilities 41946 1/21/2011 CHK X O Communication 1,157.15$ Utilities 41960 1/27/2011 CHK AT&T/SBC 600.01$

Utilities Total 7,165.39$

Accounts Payable 2,059,663.42$

Checks 1,431,989.74$ Wire Transfers 462,713.22$

1,894,702.96$

Other: 68.17$

AFLAC -$ Payroll 164,960.46$

164,960.46$

Total Disbursements January 2011 2,059,731.59$

Page 3 of 3

57

RemainingCheck # Check Date Task # Task Description Vendor Name Total Contract Check Amount Contract Amount Notes/Comments

41909 1/7/2011 ACS100-02 IS Network/Security Support Accent Computer Solutions 25,000.00$ 154.00$ 20,265.60$ 41909 1/7/2011 ACS100-02 IS Network/Security Support Accent Computer Solutions 25,000.00$ 199.00$ 20,265.60$

41887 1/3/2011 CDM373-02 OWOW Project Ranking Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 67,240.00$ 8,718.00$ 5,762.83$ 41933 1/13/2011 CDM384-05 MSAR TMDL Support Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 79,450.00$ 6,003.71$ 35,361.24$ 41948 1/21/2011 CDM240-09 Solids Control Study Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 49,900.00$ 4,147.81$ 15,211.95$ 41948 1/21/2011 CDM384-04 MSAR TMDL Comprehensive Bacteria Reduction Plan Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 229,500.00$ 15,156.09$ -$

41935 1/13/2011 CVS100-01 SAWPA Strategic Planning CV Strategies 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ -$

41911 1/7/2011 DTA373-01 OWOW Plan and Prop 84 - CM #8382 David Taussig & Associates Inc 130,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 92,500.00$ 41911 1/7/2011 DTA373-01 OWOW Plan and Prop 84 - CM #8382 David Taussig & Associates Inc 130,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 92,500.00$ 41911 1/7/2011 DTA373-01 OWOW Plan and Prop 84 - CM #8382 David Taussig & Associates Inc 130,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 92,500.00$ 41975 1/27/2011 DTA373-01 OWOW Plan and Prop 84 - CM #8382 David Taussig & Associates Inc 130,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 92,500.00$

41952 1/21/2011 EEC240-02 SARI Line Red Team Implementation Plan Environmental Engineering & Contracting Inc 24,110.00$ 2,099.00$ 4,664.45$

41976 1/27/2011 FRA100-01 SARI Financial Advisory Services Fieldman Rolapp & Associates 65,000.00$ 1,765.67$ 60,276.83$

41932 1/13/2011 RBF502-01 Brine Line Sediment Trap Design Services RBF Consulting 119,939.00$ 7,880.05$ 6,979.90$ 41932 1/13/2011 RBF323-07 Repairs to Unlined RCP IV-A and IV-B RBF Consulting 49,471.00$ 17,769.74$ 3,977.76$ 41932 1/13/2011 RBF323-05 SARI Repairs to Unlined RCP Reach IV-A & IV-B Design Svcs RBF Consulting 565,230.00$ 16,826.01$ 6,534.39$ 41932 1/13/2011 REF323-06 SARI Repairs to Unlined RCP Reach IV-A & IV-B Site Clearing RBF Consulting 45,104.00$ 234.41$ 3.44$

41895 1/7/2011 RISK392-02 Emerging Constituents Workgroup Phase 3 Risk Sciences 43,050.00$ 4,793.72$ 10,660.57$ 41939 1/21/2011 RISK384-04 MSAR TMDL Compliance Expert Risk Sciences 45,120.00$ 10,549.34$ 19,128.89$

41910 1/7/2011 LOPZ100-01 SAWPA Strategic Planning Salvador Lopez-Cordova 45,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 30,000.00$

41927 1/13/2011 TDGI10000-13 State Legislative Consulting The Dolphin Group 110,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 51,500.00$

41897 1/7/2011 DODS323-01 SARI Line Biological Determination Tom Dodson & Associates 10,000.00$ 210.00$ 936.60$ 41897 1/7/2011 DODS323-02 Repairs to Unlined RCP IV-A and IV-B Tom Dodson & Associates 25,000.00$ 1,084.00$ 16,735.50$

41947 1/21/2011 VANH37006-04 Santa Ana Sucker Fish Conservation Van Haun Consulting 16,000.00$ 200.00$ 2,295.10$ 41947 1/21/2011 VANH37006-04 Santa Ana Sucker Fish Conservation Van Haun Consulting 16,000.00$ 350.00$ 2,295.10$

41943 1/21/2011 WILD374-05 Recomputation of Ambient Water Quality & Interpretive Tools Wildermuth Environmental, Inc 348,449.00$ 13,422.25$ 173,731.00$

166,062.80$

January 2011

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityConsulting

58

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8440 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Inter-Fund Borrowing – January, 2011 PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file the informational report on short-term, cash-flow inter-fund borrowing. DISCUSSION On December 13, 2005, the Commission approved Resolution No. 452, Inter-Fund and Inter-Project Loan Policy. Staff was directed to bring back an accounting of the loans each month for review when the total exceeded $250,000 in aggregate. The following projects, with negative cash flow, are listed below with the amounts borrowed from SAWPA General Fund Reserves in January 2011. The total amount borrowed is over the aggregate $250,000 amount recommended in Resolution No. 452, Inter-Fund and Inter-Project Loan Policy. The Commission has requested that this item be brought back each month as an informational item when the loan amount is under the $250,000 aggregate amount.

Fund Fund Name 12/31/10 Balance

Loan Receipts

New Charges

01/31/11 Balance

393 Trails Marketing Support

$5,482.92 ($0.00) $1.68 $5,484.60

477 LESJWA Administration

21,488.48 (21,395.74) 16,267.12 16.359.86

500 Proposition 13 projects

0.00 (0.00) 1,649.25 1,649.25

Total Funds Borrowed

$26,971.40 ($21,395.74) $17,918.05 $23,493.71

General Fund Reserves Balance $1,479,409.27 Less Amount Borrowed (23,493.71) Balance of General Fund Reserves $1,455,915.56 The following table lists each fund that has a negative cash flow, the source of funding for the fund, how often the fund is billed, and the project rate of payment for the fund.

59

CM#8440 March 15, 2011 Page 2

NEGATIVE CASH-FLOW FUNDS

Fund No. Source of Funding Billing Frequency Projected Payment Time 393 – Trails Marketing Support

Riverside County Parks & Open-Space District

Monthly 1 to 2 months

477 – LESJWA Admin Reimbursement from LESJWA

Monthly 2 to 4 weeks

500 – Proposition 13 Projects

SWRCB Quarterly Up to 6 months

The following graph shows projected inter-fund loan balances, total unrestricted General Fund Reserves available for loans, and projected cash net of loans through July 2011. The projected loan balance is expected to remain within the $250,000 aggregate limit through July 2011, and can be covered by General Fund Reserves without a major impact on cash flow.

RESOURCE IMPACTS The funds borrowed from the General Fund Reserves will be paid back with interest when the grant funding is received. Budgeted expenditures from the General Fund and proposed borrowings are not expected to have an impact on the General Fund Reserves balance. KW:pb

CM 8440 InterfundBorrow 3-15-11

60

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8441 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: Performance Indicators and Financial Reporting – January, 2011 PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file staff’s report. DISCUSSION The attached reports have been developed to keep the Commission informed as to SAWPA’s business and budget performance. These reports are categorized into the following groups: financial reporting, cash and investments, and performance indicators. They are explained in detail below. As new reports are developed, they will be added for the Commission’s review. Financial Reporting

Balance Sheet by Fund Type Lists total assets, liabilities, and equity by fund type for a given period.

Revenue & Expense by Fund Type Lists total revenue and expenses by fund type for a given period.

Receivables Management Shows total outstanding accounts receivable by age.

Open Task Order Schedule Shows SAWPA’s total outstanding obligation for open task orders.

SARI Debt Service Funding Analysis Shows total annual income by source used to make debt service payments through debt maturity at FYE 2022.

Debt Service Payment Schedule Shows total debt service interest and principal payments through debt maturity at FYE 2022.

Cash and Investments

Total Cash and Investments (chart) Shows the changes in cash and investments for the fiscal year.

Reserve Balance & Source of Funds Shows total cash and investments for all SAWPA funds and the types of investments held for each fund.

Cash & Investments (pie chart) Shows total cash and investments for all SAWPA funds and the percentage of each investment type.

Reserve Account Analysis Shows changes to each reserve account for the year and projected ending balance for each.

Twelve Month Security Schedule (chart) Shows the maturity dates for securities held and percentage of securities in each category.

Treasurer’s Report Shows book and market value for both Treasury strips and securities held by the Agency.

61

CM#8441 March 15, 2011 Page 2 Performance Indicators

Average Daily Flow by Month

Shows total flow in the SARI System by month compared to total treatment capacity owned. This is an indicator of the available capacity in the line. As we add yearly flows, it will show trends in flow throughout the year.

Summary of Labor Multipliers Summarizes the information generated from the following two reports and compares the actual benefit and G&A Allocation rates to the total budgeted rates.

General Fund Costs Lists total Fund No. 100 costs to date and the amount of those costs recovered through the G&A Allocation and member contributions.

Benefit Summary Lists total employee benefit costs actual to budget and projects them through the end of the year. This report compares how the actual benefit rate compares to the budgeted rate.

Labor Hours Budget vs. Actual Shows total budgeted hours for each project and compares them to the actual hours charged to each.

RESOURCE IMPACTS Staff expects minimal impacts to SAWPA or its member agencies related to this effort. KW:pb

Attachments: 1. Balance Sheet by Fund Type 9. Reserve Account Analysis 2. Revenue & Expense by Fund Type 10. SARI Debt Service Funding Analysis 3. Average Daily Flow by Month 11. SARI Debt Service Payment Schedule 4. Burden & Overhead Rate – Actual 12. Treasurer’s Report 5. General Fund Costs - Distributed 13. Twelve-Month Maturity Schedule - Securities 6. Benefits Summary 14. Accounts Receivable Aging Report 7. Labor Hours Budget vs. Actual 15. Open Task Order Schedule 8. Cash & Investments Graph CM 8441 Perform Indicators 3-15-11

62

Task Order No. Vendor No. Vendor Name Task Description Begin Date End Date Original Contract Change Orders Total Contract Billed To Date Contract Balance SAWPA ManagerProject Contracts

AAWA320-01-03 1238 Albert A Webb Associates SARI Prado Dam Engineering Down Stream 2/14/2006 12/31/2010 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 6,019.45$ 18,980.55$ Jeff Beehler

AAWA320-01-04 1238 Albert A Webb Associates SARI Line Vegetation Mapping 3/31/2008 12/31/2009 5,200.00$ -$ 5,200.00$ 4,349.32$ 850.68$ Jeff Beehler

AAWA320-01-05 1238 Albert A Webb Associates SARI Protection in Orange County 6/5/2009 6/30/2011 15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$ 2,890.05$ 12,109.95$ Rich Haller

B&C394-02 1332 Brown and Caldwell BBL TMDL Monitoring 6/30/2010 6/30/2011 260,000.00$ -$ 260,000.00$ 54,309.77$ 205,690.23$ Rick Whetsel

Construction 1795 Caliagua Inc Reach IV-B MAS Project 11/29/2010 1/13/2011 199,300.00$ 39,000.00$ 238,300.00$ 179,370.00$ 58,930.00$ Carlos Quintero

CALV240-01 1872 Calvada Surveying Inc SARI On-call Land Surveying Services 10/22/2010 6/30/2011 30,560.00$ 30,560.00$ 8,083.00$ 22,477.00$ Carlos Quintero

CDM240-08 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Salinity Management Program 8/6/2009 6/30/2010 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ 249,919.79$ 80.21$ Rich Haller

CDM240-09 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Solids Control Study 2/23/2010 6/30/2011 49,900.00$ -$ 49,900.00$ 34,688.05$ 15,211.95$ Rich Haller

CDM240-10 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Study to evaluate impact of EnerTech discharge 2/3/2010 6/30/2010 15,000.00$ -$ 15,000.00$ 14,986.07$ 13.93$ Rich Haller

CDM240-11 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Phase 2 of EnerTech Water Quality Study 4/5/2010 6/30/2010 14,500.00$ -$ 14,500.00$ 14,500.00$ -$ Rich Haller

CDM240-12 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Prado Dam Repair 6/24/2010 6/30/2011 27,830.00$ -$ 27,830.00$ 27,658.88$ 171.12$ David Ruhl

CDM240-13 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc EnerTech Modifications Support 7/12/2010 6/30/2011 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ -$ Rich Haller

CDM373-01 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Integrated Water Resources Management Plan 8/24/2007 12/30/2009 49,880.00$ -$ 49,880.00$ 25,748.29$ 24,131.71$ Jeff Beehler

CDM373-02 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc OWOW Project Ranking 4/30/2010 12/31/2010 49,740.00$ 17,500.00$ 67,240.00$ 61,477.17$ 5,762.83$ Jeff Beehler

CDM384-05 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc MSAR TMDL Support 6/28/2010 6/30/2011 79,450.00$ -$ 79,450.00$ 44,088.76$ 35,361.24$ Rick Whetsel

CDM386-05 1575 Camp Dresser & McKee Inc Stormwater Quality Standards Study 9/28/2009 6/30/2011 256,200.00$ -$ 256,200.00$ 252,722.11$ 3,477.89$ Jeff Beehler

CARO323-02 1508 Carollo Engineers SARI Reach IV-A & IV-B Repairs - Value Engineering Workshop 11/13/2009 6/30/2011 14,687.00$ -$ 14,687.00$ 11,383.25$ 3,303.75$ David Ruhl

WO#2011-04 1486 David Jenkins and Associates Inc SARI Water Quality Sampling Program 6/28/2010 6/30/2011 2,500.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ -$ 2,500.00$ Rich Haller

DTA373-01 1875 David Taussig & Associates OWOW Plan & Prop 84 - CM #8382 11/10/2010 3/31/2011 130,000.00$ -$ 130,000.00$ 37,500.00$ 92,500.00$ Jeff Beehler

EEC240-02 1786 Environmental Engineering & Co SARI Line Red Team Implementation Plan 3/5/2010 2/28/2011 12,110.00$ 12,000.00$ 24,110.00$ 19,445.55$ 4,664.45$ Jeff Beehler

WO#2011-06 1404 E S Babcock & Sons Inc SARI Water Quality Sampling 7/7/2010 6/30/2011 10,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 12,665.00$ 12,335.00$ David Ruhl

FRA100-01 1878 Fieldman Rolapp & Associates Inc SARI Financial Advisory Services 11/1/2010 6/30/2011 65,000.00$ -$ 65,000.00$ 4,723.17$ 60,276.83$ Karen Williams

G&G240-07 1222 G & G Environmental Compliance Inc SARI System O & M 6/29/2009 6/30/2010 50,150.00$ -$ 50,150.00$ 48,344.25$ 1,805.75$ Rich Haller

G&G240-08 1222 G & G Environmental Compliance Inc SARI System - Establish DOC Local Limit 3/29/2010 12/30/2010 23,000.00$ -$ 23,000.00$ 19,128.50$ 3,871.50$ Rich Haller

G&G240-09 1222 G & G Environmental Compliance Inc SARI System O & M Permitting & Pretreatment Program 6/11/2010 6/30/2011 50,385.00$ -$ 50,385.00$ 25,380.50$ 25,004.50$ Rich Haller

G&G240-10 1222 G & G Environmental Compliance Inc SARI System Permitting & Pretreatment Procedures Manual 5/26/2010 12/31/2010 8,120.00$ -$ 8,120.00$ 8,037.50$ 82.50$ Rich Haller

HAZ240-01 1349 Haz Mat Trans Inc On-Call SARI Line Cleaning Services 6/7/2010 6/30/2012 25,600.00$ -$ 25,600.00$ 17,278.03$ 8,321.97$ Carlos Quintero

HAZ240-02 1349 Haz Mat Trans Inc Brine Line On-Call Line Draining and Emergency 11/4/2010 6/30/2012 84,147.00$ -$ 84,147.00$ 4,343.96$ 79,803.04$ Carlos Quintero

HOFF240-01 1654 Hoffman Southwest Corporation On-Call SARI Line Cleaning Services 6/4/2010 6/30/2012 172,984.00$ -$ 172,984.00$ 6,498.00$ 166,486.00$ Carlos Quintero

HOFF240-02 1654 Hoffman Southwest Corporation SARI On-Call Inspection Services 7/28/2010 6/30/2011 43,550.00$ -$ 43,550.00$ 10,736.63$ 32,813.37$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2011-08 1032 Inland Empire Utilities Agency SARI O & M 7/6/2010 6/30/2011 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ Rich Haller

INN240-01 1450 Innerline Engineering On-Call SARI Line Cleaning Services 6/23/2010 6/30/2012 113,750.00$ -$ 113,750.00$ 37,593.95$ 76,156.05$ Carlos Quintero

KANA240-01 1871 Kana Pipeline Inc On-Call SARI Potholing Services 10/6/2010 6/30/2012 20,460.00$ 20,460.00$ 500.00$ 19,960.00$ Carlos Quintero

K&SI320-03-01 1119 Krieger & Stewart, Inc. Alcoa Dike Project - Protection of Existing SARI Facility 7/29/2009 12/30/2010 29,000.00$ 602.73$ 29,602.73$ 26,477.65$ 3,125.08$ Rich Haller

LOPZ100-01 1858 Salvador Lopez-Cordova SAWPA Strategic Planning 11/16/2010 3/31/2011 45,000.00$ -$ 45,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 30,000.00$ Jeff Beehler

LOPZ373-01 1858 Salvador Lopez-Cordova OWOW Plan & Prop 84 App Tech Support 6/7/2010 2/28/2011 75,000.00$ -$ 75,000.00$ 71,250.00$ 3,750.00$ Jeff Beehler

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

As of January 2011Open Task Orders Schedule

66

Task Order No. Vendor No. Vendor Name Task Description Begin Date End Date Original Contract Change Orders Total Contract Billed To Date Contract Balance SAWPA ManagerProject Contracts

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority

As of January 2011Open Task Orders Schedule

Construction Agreement 1873 Natures Image Inc Site Clearing - Repairs to Unlined RCP 9/28/2010 4/30/2011 336,024.00$ (60,514.33)$ 275,509.67$ 248,934.67$ 26,575.00$ David Ruhl

OCDH387-01 1422 Orange County Parks Habitat Restoration 5/16/2006 3/30/2008 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ Jeff Beehler

RBF323-05 1539 RBF Consulting SARI Repairs to Unlined RCP, Reach IV-A & B Design Svcs 6/29/2009 6/30/2011 565,230.00$ -$ 565,230.00$ 558,695.61$ 6,534.39$ David Ruhl

RBF323-06 1539 RBF Consulting SARI Repairs Unlined RCP Reach IV-A & B Site Clearing Design 5/23/2010 12/31/2011 45,104.00$ -$ 45,104.00$ 45,100.56$ 3.44$ David Ruhl

RBF323-07 1539 RBF Consulting Repairs to Unlined RCP- IV-A and IV-B 9/16/2010 12/31/2011 49,471.00$ -$ 49,471.00$ 45,493.24$ 3,977.76$ David Ruhl

RBF502-01 1539 RBF Consulting Brine Line Sediment Trap Design Services 8/11/2010 6/30/2011 119,939.00$ -$ 119,939.00$ 112,959.10$ 6,979.90$ Carlos Quintero

RISK374-02 1174 Risk Sciences Support BPA for WLA 6/16/2009 6/30/2011 77,800.00$ -$ 77,800.00$ 76,372.67$ 1,427.33$ Mark Norton

RISK384-04 1174 Risk Sciences MSAR TMDL Compliance Expert 8/23/2010 6/30/2011 45,120.00$ -$ 45,120.00$ 25,991.11$ 19,128.89$ Rick Whetsel

RISK386-06 1174 Risk Sciences Stormwater Quality Standards Study - Phase 3B 3/15/2010 6/30/2011 146,400.00$ -$ 146,400.00$ 94,061.68$ 52,338.32$ Jeff Beehler

RISK386-07 1174 Risk Sciences Stormwater Quality Standards Study - Economic Analysis 3/15/2010 6/30/2011 40,000.00$ -$ 40,000.00$ 6,947.50$ 33,052.50$ Jeff Beehler

RISK392-02 1174 Risk Sciences Emerging Constituents Workgroup - Phase 3 2/22/2010 6/30/2011 13,050.00$ 30,000.00$ 43,050.00$ 32,389.43$ 10,660.57$ Mark Norton

RISK394-01 1174 Risk Sciences Big Bear TMDL Compliance Expert 7/22/2010 6/30/2011 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ 12,018.96$ 17,981.04$ Rick Whetsel

RIVCO387-02 1643 Riverside County Regional Park Habitat Restoration 7/1/2009 6/30/2011 200,000.00$ -$ 200,000.00$ 126,047.48$ 73,952.52$ Jeff Beehler

SMEA381-08 1387 San Marino Environmental Assoc Santa Ana Sucker Fish Conservation Program 11/16/2009 9/30/2010 50,000.00$ -$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ -$ Jeff Beehler

SMEA387-01 1387 San Marino Environmental Assoc Santa Ana Sucker Habitat in Areas Cleared of Arundo 12/16/2010 3/30/2011 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ -$ 30,000.00$ Jeff Beehler

SAWA323-01 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Habitat Mitigation in Prado Basin 1/29/2010 12/30/2011 245,000.00$ -$ 245,000.00$ -$ 245,000.00$ Carlos Quintero

SAWA387-02 1420 Santa Ana Watershed Association Habitat Restoration 1/22/2008 9/30/2009 250,000.00$ -$ 250,000.00$ 235,247.34$ 14,752.66$ Jeff Beehler

TK240-01 1863 T & K Engineering SARI Sewer System Management Plan 8/11/2010 6/30/2011 9,960.00$ -$ 9,960.00$ 9,960.00$ -$ Carlos Quintero

DODS323-01 1189 Tom Dodson & Associates SARI Line - Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior 11/10/2009 6/30/2011 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ 9,063.40$ 936.60$ Carlos Quintero

DODS323-02 1189 Tom Dodson & Associates Repairs to Unlined RCP IV-A and IV-B 9/8/2010 12/31/2011 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 8,264.50$ 16,735.50$ David Ruhl

USI240-01 1618 Underground Solutions Inc SARI On-Call Potholing Services 6/7/2010 6/30/2012 70,800.00$ -$ 70,800.00$ 6,900.00$ 63,900.00$ Carlos Quintero

VANG37006-04 1532 Van Haun Consulting Santa Ana Sucker Fish Conservation 2/12/2008 6/30/2011 6,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 13,704.90$ 2,295.10$ Jeff Beehler

WO#2011-12 1217 Western Municipal Water District SARI Line Operations & Maintenance 6/30/2010 6/30/2011 499,000.00$ -$ 499,000.00$ 136,444.46$ 362,555.54$ Rich Haller

WO#2011-17 1217 Western Municipal Water District SARI Line Cleaning 7/12/2010 6/30/2011 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ -$ 10,000.00$ Carlos Quintero

WO#2011-23 1217 Western Municipal Water District NIST Grant Field Support 9/20/2010 6/30/2011 3,000.00$ -$ 3,000.00$ -$ 3,000.00$ Carlos Quintero

WILD374-05 1281 Wildermuth Environmental Inc Recomputation of Ambient Water Quality & Interpretive Tools 6/21/2010 6/30/2011 348,449.00$ -$ 348,449.00$ 174,718.00$ 173,731.00$ Mark Norton

Annual Support Contracts

ACS100-02 1842 Accent Computer Solutions IS Network/Security Support 8/26/2010 6/30/2011 25,000.00$ -$ 25,000.00$ 4,734.40$ 20,265.60$ Dean Unger-$

COOK100-10 1604 Cook/Arthur Inc Liberty 8/12/2010 6/30/2011 12,000.00$ -$ 12,000.00$ 11,963.90$ 36.10$ Dean Unger

TDGI10000-13 1326 The Dolphin Group Legislative Services for FY 10/11 6/30/2010 6/30/2011 110,000.00$ -$ 110,000.00$ 58,500.00$ 51,500.00$ Celeste Cantu

INSOL100-02 1648 Integrated Systems Solutions Great Plains Software & Technical Support 10/14/2010 6/30/2011 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ 43.50$ 4,956.50$ Dean Unger

WO#2011-09 1385 J Richard Eichman CPA FPPC Filing and Audit 6/29/2010 6/30/2011 1,000.00$ -$ 1,000.00$ 402.88$ 597.12$ Karen Williams

TEAM100-05 1413 Teaman Ramirez & Smith Inc Audit Services 8/12/2010 6/30/2011 27,900.00$ -$ 27,900.00$ 27,900.00$ -$ Karen Williams

TEAM100-06 1413 Teaman Ramirez & Smith Inc Program Specific Audit 10/1/2010 12/13/2011 3,000.00$ -$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ -$ Karen Williams

2,322,882.46$

67

COMMISSION MEMORANDUM NO. 8443 DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: SAWPA Commission SUBJECT: FYE 2011 Second Quarter Budget vs. Actual Variance Report PREPARED BY: Karen Williams, Chief Financial Officer RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive and file the informational report on FYE 2011 Second Quarter Budget vs. Actual Variance Report. DISCUSSION Staff has developed a Budget vs. Actual Variance Report and will be presenting this report on a quarterly basis. Attached is the FYE 2011 Budget vs. Actual Variance Report through December 31, 2010. The Agency’s net revenue was -$454,784, which was $1,360,771 or 75% more favorable than budgeted. Several significant items comprise the majority of this favorable variance. Operating Revenue was $462,463 more than budgeted. This favorable variance is due to an increase in BOD and TSS concentrations in SARI discharge from what was budgeted. Operating Expense was $10,514,048 less than budgeted. This favorable variance is due to the repairs of Reaches 4-A and 4-B not starting until Spring 2011. Currently, design documents for the project are 90% complete. Bids were invited in November and we hope to award the construction contract in early 2011. Non-Operating Revenue/Expense was -$9,615,740 less than budgeted. This unfavorable variance mainly is due to not needing reserves to fund the CIP for the reasons stated above. Because the use of reserves for the CIP is less than budgeted, reserve balances are higher than what was budgeted. Favorable Revenue Variances Listed below are explanations of favorable variances of $150,000 or more for individual revenue categories: Discharge Fees – The 8% variance of $462,463 is due to higher concentrations of BOD and TSS than what was projected in the budget. Other Income – The 100% variance of $343,959 is due to the unbudgeted sale of BOD treatment capacity rights from EnerTech. These funds were contributed to the OCSD Future Capacity Reserve account. Unfavorable Revenue Variances Listed below are explanations of unfavorable variances of $150,000 or more for individual revenue categories: Interest and Investments – The 16% variance of $209,214 is due to lower than budgeted interest earnings. In the past year, interest rates have declined to below 1% and have remained below that amount. Staff has invested in agency securities to increase returns, but those returns have decreased as well.

82

CM#8443 March 15, 2011 Page 2 Use of Reserves – The 94% variance of $9,349,025 is due to not having started the repair work for Reaches 4-A and 4-B until spring 2011. Because the use of reserves for the CIP is less than budgeted, reserve balances are higher than what was budgeted. Favorable Expense Variances Listed below are explanations of favorable variances of $150,000 or more for individual expense categories: Labor – The 14% variance of $163,194 is due to not having hired two full-time positions that are included in the budget. Consulting & Professional Services – The 39% variance of $727,094 is due to the GIS Initiative project not moving forward as expected due to lack of development within the last few years, and the SARI Reaches 4-A and 4-B repairs not starting until Spring 2011. Repair & Maintenance – The 71% variance of $250,295 is due to the majority of the line cleaning program will not take place until February and March 2011. While SAWPA does a portion of the scheduled line cleaning on a quarterly basis, staff has achieved significant cost savings by implementing changes in traffic control planning, debris hauling and disposal, and water truck costs. We also were able to obtain lower hourly rates for line cleaning. These significant cost savings along with the concentration on cleaning siphons in the system have reduced costs for the fiscal year. Construction – The 95% variance of $9,156,706 is due to not having started the repair work for Reaches 4-A and 4-B until spring 2011. Unfavorable Expense Variances Listed below are explanations of favorable variances of $150,000 or more for individual expense categories: Contributions to Reserves – The 16% variance of $338,957 is due to having received funds from the sale of BOD treatment capacity rights from EnerTech that were unbudgeted and were contributed to the OCSD Future Capacity Reserve account. RESOURCE IMPACTS None.

KW:pb

Attachment: Variance Report

CM#8443 Variance Rept 2nd Qtr 3-15-11

83

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityFYE 2011 Budget vs. Actual

for the Period Ending December 31, 2010

Consolidated

FavorableFYE 2011 6-Month YTD (Unfavorable)

Budget Budget Actual Variance

Operating Revenue

Discharge Fees 11,005,730$ 5,502,865$ 5,965,328$ 462,463$ 8.40%

Total Operating Revenue 11,005,730$ 5,502,865$ 5,965,328$ 462,463$ 8.40%

Operating Expenses

Labor 2,313,431 1,156,716 993,522 163,194 14.11%Benefits 977,833 488,917 377,978 110,939 22.69%Education & Training 28,750 14,375 4,011 10,364 72.10%Consulting & Professional Services 3,704,875 1,852,438 1,125,344 727,094 39.25%Operating Costs 5,115,800 2,557,900 2,541,231 16,669 0.65%Repair & Maintenance 704,050 352,025 101,730 250,295 71.10%Phone & Utilities 69,224 34,612 30,764 3,848 11.12%Equipment & Computers 212,040 106,020 82,329 23,691 22.35%Meeting & Travel 58,050 29,025 18,024 11,001 37.90%Other Administrative Costs 200,596 100,298 103,665 (3,367) -3.36%Other Expenses 284,654 142,327 98,712 43,615 30.64%Construction 19,280,000 9,640,000 483,294 9,156,706 94.99%G&A Allocation - - - - 0.00%

Total Operating Expenses 32,949,303 16,474,652 5,960,604 10,514,048 63.82%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (21,943,573) (10,971,787) 4,724 10,976,511 100.04%

Non-Operating Revenue (Expense)

Interest & Investments 3,243,866 1,325,589 1,116,375 (209,214) -15.78%Other Income - - 343,959 343,959 100.00%Debt Service (4,535,441) (3,961,997) (3,961,997) 0 0.00%T-Strip Maturities 2,019,000 1,404,000 1,404,000 - 0.00%Member Agency Contributions 1,619,045 1,572,407 1,572,407 - 0.00%Other Agency Contributions 2,434,511 705,252 705,252 - 0.00%Mitigation Credit Sales 645,000 - - - 0.00%Grant Proceeds 427,845 45,449 26,471 (18,978) -41.76%Other Financing Proceeds 362,690 181,345 137,819 (43,526) -24.00%Contributions to Reserves (4,042,946) (2,076,873) (2,415,830) (338,957) -16.32%Use of Reserves 19,922,121 9,961,061 612,036 (9,349,025) -93.86%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 22,095,691 9,156,232 (459,508) (9,615,740) -105.02%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) 152,118$ (1,815,555)$ (454,784)$ 1,360,771$ 74.95%

84

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityFY 2011 Budget vs. Actual


General Fund



Operating Revenue

Total Operating Revenue -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.00%

Operating Expenses

Labor 1,178,111 589,056 570,883 18,173 3.09%Benefits 497,961 248,981 199,201 49,780 19.99%Education & Training 23,750 11,875 3,691 8,184 68.92%Consulting & Professional Services 295,100 147,550 118,123 29,427 19.94%Operating Costs 2,500 1,250 327 923 73.84%Repair & Maintenance 90,550 45,275 22,979 22,296 49.25%Phone & Utilities 64,524 32,262 29,283 2,979 9.23%Equipment & Computers 202,590 101,295 70,332 30,963 30.57%Meeting & Travel 42,500 21,250 14,605 6,645 31.27%Other Administrative Costs 142,246 71,123 72,689 (1,566) -2.20%Other Expenses 53,500 26,750 20,731 6,019 22.50%G&A Allocation (1,854,668) (927,334) (690,593) (236,741) 25.53%

Total Operating Expenses 738,664 369,332 432,251 (62,919) -17.04%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (738,664) (369,332) (432,251) (62,919) -17.04%


Interest & Investments - - 7,793 7,793 100.00%Member Agency Contributions 889,724 889,724 889,725 1 0.00%Other Income - - 2,632 2,632 100.00%Building Reserve - - - - 100.00%Retiree Medical Reserve (151,060) (130,930) (130,930) 0 0.00%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 738,664 758,794 769,220 10,426 1.37%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) -$ 389,462$ 336,969$ (52,493)$

85



Enterprise Fund - SARI



Operating Revenue

Discharge Fees 11,005,730$ 5,502,865$ 5,965,328$ 462,462$ 8.40%

Total Operating Revenue 11,005,730$ 5,502,865$ 5,965,328$ 462,462$ 8.40%

Operating Expenses

Labor 438,157 219,079 202,868 16,211 7.40%Benefits 185,200 92,600 85,813 6,787 7.33%Education & Training 5,000 2,500 320 2,180 87.20%Consulting & Professional Services 515,000 257,500 176,277 81,223 31.54%Operating Costs 5,112,800 2,556,400 2,532,315 24,085 0.94%Repair & Maintenance 613,500 306,750 78,751 227,999 74.33%Phone & Utilities 4,700 2,350 1,481 869 36.98%Equipment & Computers 8,000 4,000 9,568 (5,568) -139.20%Meeting & Travel 6,000 3,000 500 2,500 83.33%Other Administrative Costs 10,650 5,325 9,562 (4,237) -79.57%Other Expenses 231,154 115,577 77,981 37,596 32.53%G&A Allocation 715,780 357,890 331,487 26,403 7.38%

Total Operating Expenses 7,845,941 3,922,971 3,506,923 416,048 10.61%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 3,159,789 1,579,895 2,458,405 878,510 -55.61%


Interest & Investments 3,192,644 1,299,978 1,098,953 (201,024) -15.46%Grant Proceeds 55,894 27,947 8,969 (18,978) -67.91%Other Income - - 341,327 341,327 100.00%Debt Service (4,535,441) (3,961,997) (3,961,997) (0) 0.00%T-Strip Maturities 2,019,000 1,404,000 1,404,000 - 0.00%Contributions to Reserves (3,891,886) (1,945,943) (2,284,900) (338,957) -17.42%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (3,159,789) (3,176,016) (3,393,648) (217,633) 6.85%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) -$ (1,596,121)$ (935,243)$ 660,877$

86



Planning Funds



Operating Revenue


Operating Expenses

Labor 139,332 69,666 74,333 (4,667) -6.70%Benefits 58,891 29,446 31,443 (1,998) -6.78%Consulting & Professional Services 100,800 50,400 118,691 (68,291) -135.50%Equipment & Computers - - 1,633 (1,633) 100.00%Meeting & Travel 3,700 1,850 1,901 (51) -2.76%Other Administrative Costs 21,000 10,500 4,272 6,228 59.31%G&A Allocation 227,612 113,806 121,460 (7,654) -6.73%

Total Operating Expenses 551,335 275,668 353,733 (78,066) -28.32%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (551,335) (275,668) (353,733) (78,066) -28.32%


Interest & Investments 4,883 2,442 1,319 (1,123) -45.98%Member Agency Contributions 527,281 527,281 527,280 - 0.00%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 532,164 529,723 528,599 (1,123) -0.21%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) (19,171)$ 254,055$ 174,866$ (79,188)$

87



Collaborative Project Funds



Operating Revenue


Operating Expenses

Labor 166,618 83,309 52,162 31,147 37.39%Benefits 70,423 35,212 22,065 13,147 37.34%Consulting & Professional Services 2,129,975 1,064,988 565,083 499,905 46.94%Operating Costs 500 250 - 250 100.00%Equipment & Computers 1,450 725 796 (71) -9.79%Meeting & Travel 5,350 2,675 580 2,095 78.32%Other Administrative Costs 100 50 1,322 (1,272) -2544.00%Construction 500,000 250,000 40,646 209,354 83.74%G&A Allocation 272,186 136,093 85,233 50,860 37.37%

Total Operating Expenses 3,146,602 1,573,301 767,887 805,414 51.19%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (3,146,602) (1,573,301) (767,887) 805,414 51.19%


Interest & Investments 46,339 23,170 8,310 (14,859) -64.13%Member Agency Contributions 192,040 145,402 145,402 - 0.00%Other Agency Contributions 2,434,511 705,252 705,252 - 0.00%Mitigation Credit Sales 645,000 - - - 0.00%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 3,317,890 873,824 858,964 (14,859) -1.70%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) 171,288$ (699,478)$ 91,077$ 790,555$

88



Grants / Contract Funds



Operating Revenue


Operating Expenses

Labor 240,010 120,005 53,392 66,613 55.51%Benefits 101,447 50,724 22,585 28,139 55.47%Consulting & Professional Services - - 70 (70) 0.00%Meeting & Travel 500 250 426 (176) -70.40%Other Administrative Costs 10,600 5,300 10,085 (4,785) -90.28%Construction - - 113,973 (113,973) 0.00%G&A Allocation 392,084 196,042 87,243 108,799 55.50%

Total Operating Expenses 744,641 372,321 287,774 84,547 22.71%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (744,641) (372,321) (287,774) 84,547 22.71%


Member Agency Contributions 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 0.00%Grant Proceeds 371,951 17,502 17,502 - 0.00%Financing Proceeds 362,690 181,345 137,819 (43,526) -24.00%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 744,641 208,847 165,321 (43,526) -20.84%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) -$ (163,474)$ (122,453)$ 41,021$

89

Santa Ana Watershed Project AuthorityFYE 2011 Budget vs. Actual


Capital Project Funds



Operating Revenue


Operating Expenses

Labor 151,203 75,602 39,884 35,718 47.24%Benefits 63,911 31,956 16,871 15,085 47.20%Consulting & Professional Services 664,000 332,000 147,100 184,900 55.69%Operating Costs - - 8,589 (8,589) 0.00%Meeting & Travel - - 12 (12) 0.00%Other Administrative Costs 16,000 8,000 5,735 2,265 28.31%Construction 18,780,000 9,390,000 328,675 9,061,325 96.50%G&A Allocation 247,007 123,504 65,170 58,334 47.23%

Total Operating Expenses 19,922,121 9,961,061 612,036 9,349,025 93.86%

Net Operating Revenue / (Deficit) (19,922,121) (9,961,061) (612,036) 9,349,025 93.86%


Use of Reserves 19,922,121 9,961,061 612,036 (9,349,025) -93.86%

Net Non-Operating Revenue / (Deficit) 19,922,121 9,961,061 612,036 (9,349,025) -93.86%

Net Revenue / (Deficit) -$ -$ -$ -$

90

S t A W t h dSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority

Financial Report for the SARI Enterprise/CIP for the 2nd Quarter Ending December 31, 2010

Agenda

• Cash & Investments• Cash & Investments• Reserve Account Balances• Transfer, Uses & Contributions from/to

Reserves• Enterprise Performance• Enterprise Revenuesp• Enterprise Expenses• Capital Improvement Program

92

Cash & Investments

$60,766,110

Reserve Account Balances

Reserve Account BalanceS lf I $3 455 984Self Insurance $3,455,984SARI Debt Retirement 16,633,488Pipeline Replacement 26,631,882OCSD Rehabilitation 1,751,137Capacity Management 11,074,037OCSD Future Capacity 451,763Flow Imbalance Reserve 54,422Operating Reserve 713,397

Total Reserves $60,766,110

93

Reserve Account Balances

Reserve Balance @ 03/31/10

Balance @ 06/30/10

Balance @ 09/30/10

Balance @ 12/31/10

Self Insurance $3 331 284 $3 390 131 $3 422 128 $3 455 984Self Insurance $3,331,284 $3,390,131 $3,422,128 $3,455,984

SARI Debt Retirement 17,199,188 18,937,158 18,090,958 16,633,488

Pipeline Replacement 23,385,579 23,890,138 26,239,200 26,631,882

OCSD Rehabilitation 0 0 1,750,000 1,751,137

Capacity Mgmt 10,990,649 11,021,702 11,045,347 11,074,037

OCSD Future Capacity 112 828 113 151 113 386 451 763OCSD Future Capacity 112,828 113,151 113,386 451,763

Flow Imbalance Reserve 20,788 35,233 43,115 54,422

Operating Reserve 1,071,565 1,074,628 659,597 713,397

Operating Cash 3,334,785 4,756,322 0 0

Total $59,446,666 $63,218,463 $61,363,731 $60,766,110

Cash & Investments

94

• Pipeline Replacement Reserve– Contribution of $1,873,443– Transfer of $1,532,606 from Operating Cash

$

Transfers, Use and Contributions To/From Reserves

– Use of $739,144 (CIP)• OCSD Rehabilitation Reserve (new)

– Transfer of $1,750,000 from Operating Cash• OCSD Future Capacity

– Contribution of $338,083 (EnerTech purchase of BOD capacity)

• Self Insurance Reserve– Contribution of $50,000

Fl I b l R• Flow Imbalance Reserve– Contribution of $19,033

• Capacity Management Reserve– Contribution of $774 (EnerTech BOD/TSS Lease Fee)

• Operating Reserve– Transfer of $950,000 from Operating Cash

Total Operating Revenues

Source Total Budget DifferenceBOD/TSS Fees $2,322,581 $1,585,500 ($737,081)Volumetric Fees 2,013,933 2,049,300 35,367Fixed Charges 1,200,565 1,200,565 0Sampling Surcharge 0 25,000 25,000Truck Discharge 428,249 633,000 204,751Permit Fees 0 9,500 9,500Total Operating Revenues $5,965,328 $5,502,865 ($462,463)

95

Operating Revenues vs. Budget

Total Operating Expenses

Source Total Budget DifferenceTreatment Costs $1,912,967 $1,585,500 ($327,467)Volumetric Costs 363,678 455,400 91,722Operating Costs 255,670 515,500 259,830General & Administration 719,580 793,571 73,991Facility Repair & Maintenance 78 781 306 750 227 969Facility Repair & Maintenance 78,781 306,750 227,969Consulting & Professional Services 176,277 257,500 81,223Total Operating Expenses $3,506,953 $3,914,221 $652,697

96

Operating Expenses vs. Budget

Enterprise Performance

Flow, BOD, TSS Actual vs. OCSD Billing

SAWPA Billed

OCSD Billing Difference

Total Flow (MG) 2,281.074 2,271.710 9.364

Total BOD (1,000 lbs) 1,339.362 1,638.204 (298.842)

Total TSS (1,000 lbs) 4,122.728 4,144.666 (21.938)

BOD cost per 1,000 lbs $312.00 $245.56 $66.44

TSS cost per 1,000 lbs $462.00 $364.49 $97.51

97


OCSD Flow, BOD & TSS Charges vs. Revenue Billed

Revenue Billed

OCSD Charges Difference

Flow (pass through) $365,177 $363,678 $1,499

BOD 417,881 402,277 15,604

TSS 1 904 700 1 510 689 394 011TSS 1,904,700 1,510,689 394,011

TD Allowance 129,334 0 129,334

Total $2,817,092 $2,276,644 $540,448


OCSD Flow, BOD & TSS Charges vs. Revenue Collected

98

Average Daily Flow by Month

Capital Project Fund

Funding = Reserves

99

Capital Project Fund

Capital Project Fund (320)

SARI Protection / Relocation

• D/S Prado in OC – emergency protection work, pipeline relocation

• At Prado - pipeline relocation

/Projects

• Above Prado - pipeline relocation and manhole lid adjustments – when required

• D/S Prado in Riv County – bank armoring

100

S t A W t h dSanta Ana Watershed Project Authority

Financial Report for the 2nd Quarter Ending December 31, 2010

Agenda

• Cash & Investments• Fund Overview• General Fund• Grant/Contract Funds/• Planning Funds• Collaborative Project Funds

102

Cash & Investments

$5,060,056

Checking Accounts$162,969

3%Grant Retention

$44,760 1%

Savings - EPA$435,990

9%

, ,

LAIF$4,416,337

87%

Cash & Investments

Total by Fund

General Fund $1,936,262

Planning Fund $300,278

Collaborative Project Funds $2,303,755

Total by Fund

Grant/Contract Fund $519,761

Total $5,060,056

103

Cash & Investments

General Funds

Fund Checking (Cash)

LAIF Account Total

General Fund $162,969 $1,353,557 $1,516,526

Building Reserve $0 $419,736 $419,736

T t l $162 969 $1 773 293 $1 936 262

General Funds

Total $162,969 $1,773,293 $1,936,262

Cash & Investments

Planning Funds

Fund LAIF Account Total

General Basin Planning $156,953 $156,953

SC Waste Reclamation $8,630 $8,630

Watershed Plan $52,344 $52,344

WDR Alternative $82,351 $82,351

Total $300,278 $300,278

104

Cash & Investments

Fund LAIF Account Total


Basin Monitoring $164,427 $164,427Storm WQ Standards ($16,545) ($16,545)SA Fish Conservation $135,842 $135,842Chino TMDL Facilitation $278,884 $278,884GIS Initiative $28,945 $28,945Emerging Constituents $15,007 $15,007g g $ , $ ,Big Bear TMDL $186,326 $186,326Mitigation Banking $1,510,869 $1,510,869Total $2,303,755 $2,303,755

Cash & Investments

FundLAIF

AccountSavings

EPAGrant

Retention Total

Legal Defense Fund $0 $435,990 $0 $435,990

Prop 13 – Grant Retention $0 $0 $44 760 $44 760

Grant/Contract Funds

Prop 13 Grant Retention $0 $0 $44,760 $44,760Prop 50 – Admin $39,011 $0 $0 $39,011

Total $39,011 $435,990 $44,760 $519,761

105

Cash & Investments

Grant Retention Balances

Agency Project Retention

City of Norco Recycled Water Piping $44,760

Total Retention $44,760

Cash & Investments

LAIF Interest Rates

0 558 0 56 0.528 0.531 0.513 0 5 0 4540 30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

0.558 0.56 0.513 0.50.48

0.454 0.462

00.10.20.3

Apr'10 May'10 Jun'10 Jul'10 Aug'10 Sep'10 Oct'10 Nov'10 Dec'10

106

Cash & Investments

Interest Rate Comparison

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

Interest Rate Comparison

Securities

LAIF

A R t f R t

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

Ave Rate of Return

CalTRUST

2yr Treasury

Analysis by Fund Type

Revenues and Expenses

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

Thou

sand

s

General Fund Grant/Contracts Planning CollaborativeFunding/Revenue $900,150 $165,321 $528,599 $858,964 Costs/Expenses $563,181 $287,774 $353,733 $767,887

$-

$100

$200

$300

107

General Fund

Budget vs Actual

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

Thou

sand

s

Revenue ExpenseActual $900,150 $563,181 Budget $889,724 $500,262

$-

$100

$200


Budget vs Actual

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

Thou

sand

s


$-

$50

$100

108


Costs vs Funding

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

Hun

dred

s

Prop 13 Adm Prop 50 Adm LESJWA AdmFunding $- $17,502 $147,819 Costs $123,727 $16,219 $147,828

$-

$200

$400

Planning Funds

Budget vs Actual

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

Thou

sand

s


$-

$100

109

Planning Funds

$3 000

Costs vs Funding

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

Hun

dred

s

Planning General

SC Waste Rec

Alternative WDR

Watershed Mgmt

Funding $256,578 $19,314 $304 $252,403 Costs $107,458 $7,349 $1,892 $237,034

$-

$500


Budget vs Actual

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

Thou

sand

s

Revenue ExpenseActual $858,964 $767,887 Budget $873,824 $1,573,301

$-

$200

$400

110


$450

Costs vs Funding

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

Thou

sand

s

Basin Monitoring

Fish Conservatio

n

Chino TMDL Storm WQ Arundo GIS

InitiativeEmerging

Consti BB TMDL Trail Marketing

Funding $381,352 $10,708 $347,537 $50,091 $5,567 $106 $55,039 $891 $7,673 Costs $222,948 $72,613 $214,771 $92,068 $51,518 $353 $48,822 $57,124 $7,670

$-

$50

$100

Questions ?

111

GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT

March, 2011

Summary of highlights of major activities and/or projects addressed in February Issues ready for action by the Commission are agendized separately

OWOW 2011Conference: We are on our way planning the”Working Together for a Sustainable Future” conference. OWOW Steering Committee re appointments: Coordinating and supporting the process of the COGs and Board of Supervisors in selecting their representatives. Strategic Planning: We continue to refine work to bring to the Commission for review. This has been a learning process for all those involved and I appreciate all the time spent by others to help develop a vision for SAWPA and define what SAWPA should be. Proposition 84: About 50% of the bonds needed to fund both Proposition 84 Planning and Implementation grant programs have been acquired. The focus now is on getting the planning grants approved and the agreements processed to provide justification to the Dept of Finance that more bonds need to be sold. Brine Line SRF loan: We are nearing the finish line in receiving approval for the State Water Board to approve our loan that will allow us to perform needed repairs and add life to the line. PPIC Program: SAWPA has assisted the PPIC in identifying participants in their book roll out. This is scheduled for March 28 at the Frontier Project in Rancho Cucamonga. California Indicators Symposium, USC: SAWPA presented on the OWOW process and SAWPA in general. Legislative: All bills are filed at this date, but many are still spot bills. We will be tracking those related to our interest in this watershed. Budget: This is budget season and we will be coming before the Commission are several occasions as we proceed. EJ Conference June 28: SAWPA is assisting the Cal State University Water Resources Institute in presenting an environmental justice conference at the Frontier Project. The conference will bring down funders to present funding opportunities in this area.

Proposition 1E: SAWPA is assisting the process in getting the work out to others and helping them to make sure their projects are on the OWOW project list as required by Proposition 1E.

112

s a w p a · letter of support for fran spivy ... recomputation of the ambient ... • every potw...

Documents