sa statement mnappeal62cv09-1163

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS

In Re EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs RESPONDANT'S 697 SURREY

pg.53 91CHRYSLER,TRAILER,WATER

INTESTATE CPL.JIM ANDERSON

VA WIDOW SHARON ANDERSON

STATEMENT OF CASE

TRIAL COURT CASE NO.62cv09-1163 Medicare #670295

APPELLATE COURT CASE NO. A.09____

1. Court or agency of case origination and name of presiding judge. Ramsey Co. District Court, Judge John Vandenorth and Kevin McCoy, Supervisor Mark Oswald.

2. Jurisdictional statement 42USC1983 Civil and Criminal Action Deprivation of Rights re: Supplement. Rule 24.04 Attorney General to Defend Constitutionality,Elections.

3. State type of litigation and designate and statutes at Issue: Appellant Relator petitions to redress RICO MS609.43 by Theft,Trespass,Treason MS 609.531 Forfeiture Laws , triggering Constitutionality of MS429.061,City Ordinance's encompassed to Taxes,usurious interest, re FIRREA,FFIEC About the FFIEC

4. Brief description of claims,defenses,issues litigated and result below.

Sharon Scarrella aka Peterson aka Anderson has for 30 years Consumer Advocate, Candidate for various officers, Not to win, but to Whistleblower the Ponzi, Schemes and Misconduct of Public Officials., This action of 3 thousand property owners, illegally taxed by Bogus Ordinances, Fees,Assessments,ROW,selectively by "takings" of Sharon's Propertys by Taking Homestead Credits to inflate Taxes, then by Heinous takings of Water 2006, stalking by police causing Fractured Ankle over 22 thousand Medical then in a Patterened Enterprise, of Reprisals "taking" Sharons 91 Chrysler with disabled plates, trailer, personal property 2007, without Warrants,Tickets or Probable Cause. On a Senior, Disabled Woman who paid the Taxes under protest.

At all times material Sharon has responded when notified> re: July 5th,2007 City Council Agends, Answer/Cross 1/2 Million Dollars, Shaon has been on disability since 1983, when the Queer Judge Alberto Miero put Sharon in Jail, had her beaten re: Sharons Property at 2194 Marshall,

Sharon has talked to Election/Tax Supervisor Mark Oswald numerous times re: Taxes, all documents in pdf format at www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com the

False Statement of Mark Oswald that only $449.93 15May08 taxes for 697 Surrey were paid, when Oswald bounced the debit, and ran it thro a second time even tho Sharon ran another debit of $449.13 to pay the property taxes and challenge the "taking" of MS429.061 in the guise of False Statements, Misconduct of DSI Employees DSI Joel

of 5

Sunday, November 01, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Essling and Cop Tanya Hunter to Steal Cars without the City Attorneys Approval to prosecute, without Tickets,Warrants, incompassing the Manager of Police Impound Lot Aaron Foster, implicated in the Murder of Barb Winn. re: MS609.531 Forfeiture

Laws.

Sharon is the only one out of 3 thousand propertys to Answer/Cross putting the Court in a Felony Case Fixing, re FIRREA AND FFIEC mandates all property taxes

paid to www.usbanks.com are at issue.

THEREAFTER: County Attorney DFL Susan Gaertner Candidate for Governor and in the Lou McKenna, John Finley Grand Jury Proceedings 20 yrs ago has full

knowledge that the 697 Surrey Property Taxes 2008 were paid in Full, with Constitutional Challenges. Sharon gave full and Good Faith Proper Notices to appear

on the record's with forensic evidence at the 20 Aug09 Hearing.

At the 20Aug09 hearing Judge John Vandenorth issued Summary Judgment without reading the records, His Order issued and filed 10Sept09 is based on the

Statute of Fraud, Heinous denial of Trial by Jury, Evidentary Hearings, Constitutional Issues, FIRREA AND FFIEC mandates the 3 thousand propertys are all given "due process" on the Bizzare Taxing System plus usurious interest of the City of St.Paul

and County of Ramsey.

5. List specific issues proposed to be raised on appeal

(a) Whether the trial court correctly exercised its discretion by issuing an Order based on FRAUD. As bank statements and county records prove otherwise.

(b) Whether the trial court correctly granted summary judgment against defendants based on False Statement, False Affidavits of Mark Oswald and Lynn Moser,

(c) Whether the trial court by Heinous Bias,Discrimination wilful neglience to accept the Affidavit of Prejudice against Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, which incompass all Judges who were sued by Affiant Defendant Sharon Scarrella in re: Scarrella for Justice 221NW2d561

(d) Whether the Trial Court by Misfeasance, Malfeasance,Nonfeasance refused to address the Medicare File #670295 Kevin McCoy and the "takings" of HS Credits by Auditor Mark Oswald. Election of St.Paul Mayor and the Ballot re: Residence, Titles to Realestate Eminent Domain Issues.

6. Related Appeals: Re File's

7. Contents of record. Transcript necessary YES (X)

8. Is oral argument requested Pending forensic records on file

JURIST - Paper Chase: Arizona Supreme Court rules electronic data is matter of public record

of 5


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. List the names and addresses of witnesses known to either party that either party may call. Indicate the party who expects to call the witness and whether the party intends to qualify that witness as an expert. (Attach add

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY COUNTY COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

62cv09-1163 Judge John Vandenorth MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog

All doc. Data Memorandumn Public Records

JURIST - Paper Chase: Arizona Supreme Court rules electronic data is matter of public record

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY FAX RULE 5.05 ELECTRONICALLY and US Mails $4.95 postage prepaid Tues 3Nov09 depositing in the Downtown St.Paul PO

FORM 133. 2nd SHORT STATEMENT OF THE CASESRegister of Actions

www.mncourts.gov Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 Aff6 Apr07indit Coleman 20 Lantry Stalking19 Apr07

Case No. 62-CV-09-1163 Related Case: WritProA06-1150 30Jun06 Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul

Party Information LeadAttorneys jean.@[email protected] [email protected]

Topic Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Legal Notice TaxLetter 62cv09-1163(VandeNorth)2008 EastSideReviewnews

2008TaxDelpg53 Events & Orders of the Court Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09

Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008 EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs pg.53Forfeiture Cars etc.42 USC 3631 MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct

§§§§§§

[email protected]

Case Type: Administrative FileDate Filed: 02/12/2009

Location: Ramsey Civil

Judicial Officer:VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.

DISPOSITIONS02/12/2009 Closed administratively

09/10/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.) http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09

All parties have been served with process. The's case's is are at issue

1. Estimated trial time: _____ days _____ hours (estimates less than a day must be stated in hours).

2. Jury is requested by the ☐ plaintiff ☐ defendant. (If this is a change from a court to a jury request, then a $75 fee must be paid when filing this document).

3. Concise statement of the case including facts plaintiff(s) intend to prove and legal basis for claims: Re above

of 5


The pertinent issue is not whether metadata considered alone is a public record. Instead, the question is whether a "public record" maintained in an electronic format includes not only the information normally visible upon printing the document but also any embedded metadata. ... The metadata in an electronic document is part of the underlying document;

it does not stand on its own. When a public officer uses a computer to make a public record, the metadata forms part of the document as much as the words on the page.

Arizonia Order http://www.supreme.state.az.us/opin/pdf2009/CV090036PR.pdf

The State Supreme Court MN has the FormsAPPENDIX OF FORMS "but for" encryption creates Hardship for Any/All Litigants contrary to Electronical Case Filings JURIST - Paper Chase: Supreme Court hears arguments on property seizure, attorney's fees Sharon Scarrella Anderson Attorney Pro Se_InFact and Private Attorney General, VA Widow_Whistleblower has for over42 USC 3631 25 years, forensic evidence of payment of Property Taxes, Chain of Title Documents, Elections Cases etc. In the Instant Action of 3 thousand Delinquent Property Taxes http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/S81FFVMU.pdf 697 Surrey on pg. 53, All 3 thous encompassed in Ramsey Dist. Court File 62cv09-1163. EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs This Short Summary is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that when property is seized " Sharons 91 Chrysler" due process requires that offense. One issue before the Court was whether in the absence of exigent circumstances, the Due Process Clause prohibits the seizure of real property without a prior adversarial hearing. The answer was that a preseizure hearing is required.P]romptly after their vehicles are seized . . . as alleged instrumentalities of crime, plaintiffs must be given an opportunity to test the probable validity of the City’s deprivation of the vehicles pendente lite, including probable cause for the initial warrantlessAll in all, we agree with Krimstock. The private interest involved, particularly in the seizure of an automobile, is great. Our society is, for good or not, highly dependent on the automobile. The hardship posed by the loss of one’s means of transportation, even in a city like Chicago, with a well-developed mass transportation system, is hard to calculate. It can result in missed doctor’s appointments, missed school, and perhaps most significant of all, loss of employment. seizure. Sharon an her Mother Decedant Tenant in Common Bernice A. Peterson had sued in Tax Court and Won 1981 http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonandersonbernicepeterson821292taxfight Sharon4Council

A. www.sharonanderson.org Water Shut Off Apr.Sharons Water Shut off v. City St.Paul MN - Google Search

Shames-Yeakel v. Citizens Financial Bank: Failure to Expeditiously Implement State-of the Art

of 5


Security Measures Can Create Li.. Fn1 The Court agreed with the OTC that the Electronic Funds Transfer Act did not cover the

plaintiffs' claim because a credit, not a deposit account was involved in the illegal funds transfer. However, it rejected the OTC's facile conclusion that a Truth in Lending Act claim

was barred because the line of credit had been linked to the plaintiffs' business checking account. disagreed with the OTC. Rather, because the funds from the line of credit had been used for personal purposes, the Court found that the TILA could go forward. The Court also let the plaintiffs' Fair Credit Reporting Act claim to go forward, because there was sufficient

evidence that the Bank failed to note the disputed nature of the debt in their reports to the credit bureaus and that it had failed to properly investigate their complaints.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle

of 5


sa statement mnappeal62cv09-1163

Business