sa tax del62cv09 1163 18 84

84
Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 12:37:22 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: Sharon4Anderson Page 1 of 4 Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message: Fax Transmittal_ Affidavit of E Service/Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist. Court 62cv09-1163 www.co.ramsey.mn.us mn revenue department - Google Search Property Tax Taxpayer rights advocate Ward EinessCabinet Pursuant to my call today Mon 30Mar09 to [email protected] Court Administrator tel.651- 266-8266 Fax: 651-266-8266 and [email protected] tel.651-266-8255 Fax: 651-266-8263 Sample Brief encompassed 1984+Tax+Court.jpg (image) GrittnerJud89.jpg (image) CrimComplaint v Judges 05_41 FTC v. Debt Assets04_73.pdf CityStP_Conflicts_Ethics Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Aitkin Ans/Cross20Aug01 SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 (FIAFEA&FIRREA)Dahn Files are exensive, We the People must make government accountable. LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN - SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA S harons - Psychic - Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse - Court - Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06 - 2118,Money Launderin No direct un - apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581 - 582(1937) g and FCC Complaints - http://sharons - copywrite.blogspot.com knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA - Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons - copywrite.blogspot.co Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 12:25:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] CC: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected]

Upload: guest83d0a7

Post on 08-Dec-2014

1.731 views

Category:

Real Estate


3 download

DESCRIPTION

City St.Paul, has Assessed Fees, by Theft,Trespass,Treason, Stealing Cars,Trailer,DL, by Incompetant City Attorneys, triggering Tax Delinquency Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv-09-1163, Affiant pai the Property Taxes $900.xx challenging the Arbitrary,Excessive Assessments, "taking" without Compensation 42USC3631

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 12:37:22 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: Sharon4AndersonTo: Sharon4Anderson

Page 1 of 4

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Fax Transmittal_ Affidavit of E Service/Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist. Court 62cv09-1163 www.co.ramsey.mn.us mn revenue department - Google Search Property Tax Taxpayer rights advocate Ward EinessCabinet Pursuant to my call today Mon 30Mar09 to [email protected] Court Administrator tel.651- 266-8266 Fax: 651-266-8266 and [email protected] tel.651-266-8255 Fax: 651-266-8263 Sample Brief encompassed 1984+Tax+Court.jpg (image) GrittnerJud89.jpg (image) CrimComplaint v Judges 05_41 FTC v. Debt Assets04_73.pdf CityStP_Conflicts_Ethics Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Aitkin Ans/Cross20Aug01 SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 (FIAFEA&FIRREA)Dahn Files are exensive, We the People must make government accountable. LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.co

Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163

Date: 3/30/2009 12:25:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Page 2: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Sorry for e-error

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Will transpose to http://taxthemax.blogspot.com My Presentations on SlideShare

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message:

DTD: Mon 30Mar09

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON

697 Surrey 32.29.2.41.0053 2008_$2,499.43 pg 53

www.review-news.com ie: Janice Rettman Res: 2009-012 279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 697 Surrey_09

697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09 TO THE ABOVE NAMED www.co.ramsey.mn.us www.ci.stpaul.mn.us

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY 62cv09-1163 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

To: All Persons with Legal Interest in the Parcels of Real Property Described in the Folowing Delinquent

Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E.Olson 651-266-2002 , published 18Mar09, sent to Affiant by US Mails Fri.20thMar09, received Sat. 21Mar09, Auditor Mark Oswald, acting in

concort with Larry Dease Court Administrator without a FEE, Proper Service, S&C. Heinous denial

Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163

Date: 3/30/2009 11:30:03 A.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To: lynae [email protected]

CC: Sharon4Anderson

Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163

Date: 3/30/2009 10:58:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To: Sharon4Anderson

CC: [email protected], BillDahn4

Subj: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163

Date: 3/30/2009 10:55:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To: lynae [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Page 2 of 4

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 3: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

of due process as Realestate taxes 2008 paid.

State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey ,Auditor

Mark Oswald,PS Michael Campion,Agents,Assigns,Official Capacity, Individually,severally, John Doe,Mary Roe Plaintiffs

279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes vs. 697 Surrey, Intestate Decedant CplJimAnderson,VA Widow

Sharon Anderson, heirs,assigns, all others as their interest appear

Defendants Memorandumn of law,Dismissal 554 - FREE SPEECH; PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 3rd Party Pltf,vs. US&State of MN et al File No.62cv09-1163

INTRODUCTION COUNT 1 Title 18 At all times material, when notified Sharon has answered, techinaly the city of st.paul has created False Statements, False Assessments, False Ratification of Asessments, then signed off by the Mayor Chris Coleman WaterA06-1150f/_26 in a RICO Patterened DL/803-2007-02-27T0343 Enterprise against Seniors, Protected Class to Steal Cars, Suspend Drivers License, Shut off Water www.sharonanderson.org without Long Form Complaints, specifically DSI Employee Joel Essling, Sharon Anderson v. Joel Essling MN - Google Search unabated by Public Offici als.

COUNT II 42 USC 3631

COUNT IIIMS 609.51SimulatingLegProcess To simulate legal process without decending to particulars , said file/complaint of delinquent taxes contains NO accusations or charging language, distinct from the published 18Mar09 Maple Wood Review www.review-news.com .

COUNT IV MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct Affiant challenges Authority/Jurisdiction as no long formal complaints, Car fully insured until Dec.08, DL never returned http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com Property taxes were paid

Please take legal notice: that E Commerce Brief is under construction, Affidavits of Prejudice against Kathleen Gearin and Gregg Johnson for Criminal Cause My Presentations on SlideShare

Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 1 hour ago Pursuant to Law Brief due 20 days from 18Mar09 = exclusive of weekends 7Apr to 17th Apr09 and or place in File 62cv09-1163 this E-Commerce Notification. to challenge the "taking" of Homestead Credit, The Bizzare Assessments with 12% interest is Bizzare, Reppugnant to

Page 3 of 4

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 4: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

the 1st,4th,5th Amendments of the US and Art. 3 MN Constitution. Submitted in Good Faith /s/ [email protected] ECF_P165913_sa1299 Attorney Pro Se_InFact,Private Attorney General,Candidate 2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862

Sharon Scarrella Anderson's Page - We The People USA http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com political ?(Sharon4Anderson?) Alliance for a Better Minnesota | Sharon Anderson's Blog Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson | Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

Page 4 of 4

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 5: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 6: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 7: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 8: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: SharonScarrellaAndersonsObjections to RealEstate Tax CasesMN 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 3:48:32 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: Sharon4AndersonTo:

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], EEskola, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 1 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 9: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 2 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 10: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], BillDahn4, Sharon4Anderson, [email protected], [email protected]

Page 3 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Click here: Objections to RealEstate Tax Cases MN - Google Search Mon.30Mar09

NIOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY E-COMMERCE/FAX RE: CLASSIFICATION 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053 published 18Mar09 www.review-news.com

Tues for 1Apr09 Related Court File Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 Further to reopen the Grand Jury Proceedings

against Lou McKenna former Auditor. 697 Surrey 08 Assess/TaxValueStmt.asp?pin=32292

To [email protected] Auditor/Taxes/Elections,his Agents,Assigns,Employees,et al. Ramsey County PRR If you have questions regarding your Notice of Valuation and Classification for Taxes Payable in 2010, you may call the Assessor’s Office at 651-266-2000, prior to March 27, 2009, to discuss your concerns with an appraiser over the phone. Please be aware that you will: Pursuant to Affiants call today to [email protected], re: Supervisor [email protected] to Challenge the "taking" of Homestead credit at 697 Surrey Ave. St. Paul, MN.55106, Continuous Homestead from 1992 up to and including the present, apparantly "taken" 2008 for taxes payable 2009, again 2009 payable 2010., without change in ownership and or Sale. Affiant is not objecting to the Valuation, as the single little cottage is insured for over $100,000.00. Questioned What is Row Maintance 01000032 $112.68 Water Drain 01000080 $67.84

Page 11: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Delq Util 01008416 $78.92 Recycle 01009996 $27.04, was told they were city issues. Sha Answer/Cross 5Apr07 THEREFORE: http://taxthemax.blogspot.com working a a pdf legal brief to challenge the City of St.Paul, Fraudulent Theft,Trespass,Treason to have Joel Essling of DSI 42USC1988 - Google Search and Tanya Hunter cop packing a gun steal my car,traileCode-Corruption 19Apr07 Lantry r,personal property SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Michael Campion v. Mpls,Rybak Sa Beale Answ 07 278 - REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX; OBJECTION, DEFENSE, 2008 Minnesota Statutes

278.14 REFUNDS OF MISTAKENLY BILLED TAXES. Subdivision 1.Applicability.

697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09 A county must pay a refund of a mistakenly billed tax as provided in this section. As used in this section, "mistakenly billed tax" means an amount of property tax that was billed, to the extent the amount billed exceeds the accurate tax amount due to a misclassification of the owner's property under section 273.13 or a mathematical error in the calculation of the tax on the owner's property, together with any penalty or interest paid on that amount. This section applies only to taxes payable in the current year and the two prior years. As used in this section, "mathematical error" is limited to an error in:

(1) converting the market value of a property to tax capacity or to a referendum market value;

(2) application of the tax rate as computed by the auditor under sections 275.08, subdivisions 1b, 1c, and 1d; 276A.06, subdivisions 4 and 5; and 473F.07, subdivisions 4 and 5, to the property's tax capacity or referendum market value; or

(3) calculation of or eligibility for a credit.

The remedy provided under this section does not apply to a misclassification under section 273.13 that is due to the failure of the property owner to apply for the correct classification as required by law.

Subd. 2.Procedure.

A refund of mistakenly billed tax must be paid upon verification of a claim made in a written application by the owner of the property or upon discovery of the mistakenly billed tax by the county. Refunds of overpayments will be made as provided in section 278.12.

Subd. 3.Appeals.

If the county rejects a claim by a property owner under subdivision 2, it must notify the property owner of that decision within 90 days of receipt of the claim. The property owner may appeal that decision to the Tax Court within 60 days after receipt of a notice from the county of the decision. Relief granted by the Tax Court is limited to current year taxes, and taxes in the two prior years

AFFIANT'S DEMAND'S OF TAKING FOR THE PAST 21 YEARS

MANDATES 21 MILLION RE: RICO ACTS.

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX5 Not his car, but still his tickets? It's man versus state database - TwinCities.com Sharon's Quitam

Page 4 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 12: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.co

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

Page 5 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 13: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: RE: SharonAnderson,BillDahn Constitutional Challenge Agenda 1Apr091thro15_33,37,50 Date: 4/1/2009 1:16:52 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: [email protected]: [email protected]

Page 1 of 1Message

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This is an automatic acknowledgement that your e-mail was received. It will be reviewed in the order it was received.

Page 14: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: SharonScarrellaAndersonsObjections to RealEstate Tax CasesMN 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 3:48:32 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: Sharon4AndersonTo:

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], EEskola, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 1 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 15: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 2 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 16: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], BillDahn4, Sharon4Anderson, [email protected], [email protected]

Page 3 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Click here: Objections to RealEstate Tax Cases MN - Google Search Mon.30Mar09

NIOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY E-COMMERCE/FAX RE: CLASSIFICATION 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053 published 18Mar09 www.review-news.com

Tues for 1Apr09 Related Court File Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 Further to reopen the Grand Jury Proceedings

against Lou McKenna former Auditor. 697 Surrey 08 Assess/TaxValueStmt.asp?pin=32292

To [email protected] Auditor/Taxes/Elections,his Agents,Assigns,Employees,et al. Ramsey County PRR If you have questions regarding your Notice of Valuation and Classification for Taxes Payable in 2010, you may call the Assessor’s Office at 651-266-2000, prior to March 27, 2009, to discuss your concerns with an appraiser over the phone. Please be aware that you will: Pursuant to Affiants call today to [email protected], re: Supervisor [email protected] to Challenge the "taking" of Homestead credit at 697 Surrey Ave. St. Paul, MN.55106, Continuous Homestead from 1992 up to and including the present, apparantly "taken" 2008 for taxes payable 2009, again 2009 payable 2010., without change in ownership and or Sale. Affiant is not objecting to the Valuation, as the single little cottage is insured for over $100,000.00. Questioned What is Row Maintance 01000032 $112.68 Water Drain 01000080 $67.84

Page 17: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Delq Util 01008416 $78.92 Recycle 01009996 $27.04, was told they were city issues. Sha Answer/Cross 5Apr07 THEREFORE: http://taxthemax.blogspot.com working a a pdf legal brief to challenge the City of St.Paul, Fraudulent Theft,Trespass,Treason to have Joel Essling of DSI 42USC1988 - Google Search and Tanya Hunter cop packing a gun steal my car,traileCode-Corruption 19Apr07 Lantry r,personal property SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Michael Campion v. Mpls,Rybak Sa Beale Answ 07 278 - REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX; OBJECTION, DEFENSE, 2008 Minnesota Statutes

278.14 REFUNDS OF MISTAKENLY BILLED TAXES. Subdivision 1.Applicability.

697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09 A county must pay a refund of a mistakenly billed tax as provided in this section. As used in this section, "mistakenly billed tax" means an amount of property tax that was billed, to the extent the amount billed exceeds the accurate tax amount due to a misclassification of the owner's property under section 273.13 or a mathematical error in the calculation of the tax on the owner's property, together with any penalty or interest paid on that amount. This section applies only to taxes payable in the current year and the two prior years. As used in this section, "mathematical error" is limited to an error in:

(1) converting the market value of a property to tax capacity or to a referendum market value;

(2) application of the tax rate as computed by the auditor under sections 275.08, subdivisions 1b, 1c, and 1d; 276A.06, subdivisions 4 and 5; and 473F.07, subdivisions 4 and 5, to the property's tax capacity or referendum market value; or

(3) calculation of or eligibility for a credit.

The remedy provided under this section does not apply to a misclassification under section 273.13 that is due to the failure of the property owner to apply for the correct classification as required by law.

Subd. 2.Procedure.

A refund of mistakenly billed tax must be paid upon verification of a claim made in a written application by the owner of the property or upon discovery of the mistakenly billed tax by the county. Refunds of overpayments will be made as provided in section 278.12.

Subd. 3.Appeals.

If the county rejects a claim by a property owner under subdivision 2, it must notify the property owner of that decision within 90 days of receipt of the claim. The property owner may appeal that decision to the Tax Court within 60 days after receipt of a notice from the county of the decision. Relief granted by the Tax Court is limited to current year taxes, and taxes in the two prior years

AFFIANT'S DEMAND'S OF TAKING FOR THE PAST 21 YEARS

MANDATES 21 MILLION RE: RICO ACTS.

Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX5 Not his car, but still his tickets? It's man versus state database - TwinCities.com Sharon's Quitam

Page 4 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 18: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.co

A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

Page 5 of 5

Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 19: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

File No. 62-cv09-1163 Case Type: Other Civil and Criminal

JURY TRIAL-FORPERSON GRAND JURY DEMAND

To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E. Olson 651-2202,

published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review www.review-news.com

******************************************************************************

STATE OF MINNSOTA, DEFENDANTS JOINT ANSWER/CROSS

AUDITOR MARK OSWALD 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43

State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Mark Oswald,RamseyCo.Auditor/Tax/Elections,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling in their Official Capacity‘s, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66 Million Dollars. Plaintiffs

V.

697 Surrey Ave St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 96 Blogs www.sharonanderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and 3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson.

***************************************************************

TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLAINTIFF’S AND THEIR ATTORNEYS

Page 20: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 2 of 2

Beale v. McClure

LORI SWANSON,STATE CAPITOL,SUSAN GAERTNER,JOHN CHOI,AT THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICES .

Defendants, as and for their Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, state:

1. Deny each and every matter,allegation and thing contained in Plaintiffs Vague,Arbitrary, False Assessments, by Theft,Trespass,Treason, except as hereinafter specifically admitted,qualified or otherwise answered.

2. Defendants admitted to having Homestead Classification since 1992, (17 yrs), Ex. http://sharon4privateattornygeneral.blogspot.com pg 8 Paid the full property taxes of $949.86, for 2008. Challenge thAT Title 18 USC 1001 False charges. By Mark Oswald to “take” HS Credit,

INTENT

It is the intent of this fiduciary to challenge the Assessment,Ratifications, findings, and conclusions made by the DSI Inspector Joel Essling, City Council President Kathy Lantry acting in concort with Marcia Moermond in proper venue and forum Art. II US Constitution an First Amendment right to petition for redress of reievances: and it is my intent to preserve all Constitutional rights, either by amendment,supplement or future litigation and or Removal’s to protect property interest rights under Constitutional and Statutory Law:

Court File 62cv09-1163 apparently is an Administrative without Filing Fees, to Simulate Legal Process, causing irreparable intentional infliction of emotional stress, anti-trust by government official, Sharons intent to preserve minimal or full-blown due process rights to an Administrative Hearing with FOIA Disclosure of Warrants, Tickets, signed off by City Attorneys, to Steal Cars,Trailers,, in US Supreme Court decisions it has been determined that it is clearly unlawful to seize or levy funds absent a prior fully disclosed proof of lawful claim or judicial due process through judicial courts with proper jurisdiction. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp. 337 US 682 (1949) Kelo Decision Stands

3. As to the Allegations “taken” in the form of Summary Judgment, published Falsely in the Maplewood Review, www.review-news.com 18Mar09 pg.53 Sharon Anderson 697 Surrey Ave. 32.29.22.41.0053 Lyman Dayton Add. Lot 5 Blk 46 2008 $2,499.43 without proper citation of any statute,ordinance,rule,or regulation which Defendants alleged to have violated contrary to Crim Rules , as to the required specificity of an apparent crimial accusation of “not paying taxes” US v. Cruikshank,92 US 542 at 558 (1876)

COUNT I CONSPIRACY Title 18 s. 241,242

Page 21: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 3 of 3

Beale v. McClure

Between April 2006 up to and including the present The Stalking of Sharon by shutting off Water www.sharonanderson.org, Stalking causing Fracutured Ankle, Sharon ran for State Ag from her Wheel Chair, Plaintiffs, Lantry,Moore,Coleman,Kessler,Essling, did unlawfully combine,conspire,confederate and agree to Steal Sharons Car, Trailer, Realestate http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com and obstruct justice in connection with the Homicide of Cpl James R. Anderson www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com starting 1996, when Sharon paid the property taxes on her Cabin in Itasca Co. legally in the Corporation of Anderson+Advocates, by altering and orchestrating the crime scene, disposing of,altering and planting evidence, commitments to Brainard for 1 year by the SCAP Panel Gearin and Smith, lying to law enforcement authorities and others about the true circumstances surrounding Sharons RealEstate, Disabilitys,Disparagment of Title and Death of Tenants in Common and Sharons 2nd Husband.

4. Defendants are without sufficient information in order to judge the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in the Tax Statement’s 2008,2009 and the 2010

The Valuation is not challenged, but the Classification,Assessments,Fees,Row Maintainance,Delq Utilitys, Usurious interest is.and hold the Plaintiffs to the strictest proof thereof. http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com

5. Defendants deny the False Assessments,False Fees, Ratification thereof obtained by Fraud and Murder to Steal Sharon’s Realestate, Car’s,Trailers, Personal Property, reducing her to utter Poverty, Standing in Food Lines, for over 2 years, Heinous Hardship of taking Commerce Rights to drive to get grocerys, medical care and the Aitkin,Itaska Cabins. “taken under color of corrupt Judges”

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

6. As its First Affirmative Defense, Defendants state Plaintiffs complaints of Non Payment of Property Taxes fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

7. As its Second Affirmative Defense, Defendants state insufficiency of service of process.

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY PUBLICATION

AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMIA PAUPERIOUS Faxed>Mon.30Mar09 to [email protected] 651-266-8263

ON SHARONS BLOGS, PDF FILES: BY E-COMMERCE: E-MAIL

Page 22: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 4 of 4

Beale v. McClure

STATE OF MINNESOTA ET AL V. 697 SURREY ET AL

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FILE: 62-cv09-1163

Please take legal notice, pending Full Disclosure, Tickets,Warrants,

Constitionality, Demand for Grand Jury Indictments against the Plaintiffs

QUESTIONS PRESENTED :

Whether a state violates the dormant Commerce Clause by providing an exemption of Homestead Credits, Old House Credits, Disabled, Senior Credits, re: MN Const. Art.X to the citizenry, yet Denial to a Political Candidate for State Attorney General, Judge,State Rep64a ?

/s/ Sharon Anderson Private Attorney General, Attorney Pro Se_InFact will Move the Jurisdiction/Authority of the Court for Dismissal, Recover of Car,Trailer,Personal Propertys, Attorney Fees $240.00 pr hour,

WHEREFORE< Defendants pray that Plaintiff take nothing by their pretended cause of action and that the sam be dismissed and that Defendants recover their costs,disbursements,herein attorney pro se fees, quiet title actions,on all Sharon Scarrella Anderson dba Church of Justice Reform, Rose of Sharon Ministrys, Anderson+Advocates, “taken” without Just Compensation, under color of Authority, by the Corrupt Judiciary.

Dated: Wed. 1Apr09 /s/ Sharon Anderson ECF

MEMORANDUM OF LAW ENCOMPASSED HEREIN

Page 23: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 5 of 5

Beale v. McClure

In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda

thurs,July5,2007

Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12th,2007 public hearing Aug.15th,07 (GS3041156)

Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A

Notice to remove from Agenda refer

To City or County Attorneys

Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars

State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey, City of St. Paul

Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707A-J0708A:Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053

VA Widow Candidate Ward (2) Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella

http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com ,Attorney Pro Se: Private Attorney General

Decedant http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,

http://sharon4council.blogspot.com all others similarily situated

Quitam Whistleblower-Fidicuary Watchdog Victim Relator

vs.

St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman,DSI and Bob Kessler,Joel Essling and 168 employees, union Supervisory, John Choi, all agents,city attorneys,assigns, in their personal and official capacities, executive branch Kathy Lantry as President of the City Council,enbanc Thune,Bostrom,Harris,Benanav,Montgomery,helgen,her agents,assigns specifically shari moore, Marcia moermond,enbanc in the legislative

Page 24: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 6 of 6

Beale v. McClure

branch in their personal,official capacities, sued individually, severally, John Doe

and Mary Roe. Matt Smith www.ci.stpaul.mn.us

) Relatees

Sharon’s discovery of Treason by city officials in all realestate matters:

Forcing repeal of State and Federal Laws. Cooking the Fidicuary Books by

Mail Fraud , Extortion, Complicity, Theft of Personal Property,defrauding the State

of Minnesota and the United States of America, http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com

http://sharon4council.blogspot.com by mail fraud, confusion,stacking,blatant

trespass on private property in a “Patterned Enterprise” for Greed, to conspire to

commit Murder by WATER SHUTOFF www.sharonanderson.org.

FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF

A SUIT FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER AUTHORITY OF ARTICLE

I, SECTIONS 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 & 10 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF

MINNESOTA

JUDICIAL NOTICE re: MS2.724 of City and

County Attorneys, Lawyer Mayors Treasonable Bad

Behavior.

BACKGROUND;

1. Officers of the court who may come in contact with the matters of city

attorneys simulating legal process without warrants, tickets, due process , are

noticed under authority of the supremacy and equal protection clauses of the United

States Constitution and the common law authorities of Haines v Kerner, 404 U.S.

519-421, Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25, and Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898

(8th Cir. 2000). In re Haines: pro se litigants are held to less stringent pleading

Page 25: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 7 of 7

Beale v. McClure

standards than bar licensed attorneys. Regardless of the deficiencies in their

pleadings, pro se litigants are entitled to the opportunity to submit evidence in

support of their claims. In re Platsky: court errs if court

And St. Paul City Council to assess fees willfully, knowingly, to Steal Car’s,

Trailers, constituting a Restraint of Trade, Heinous, Repugnant without a probable

cause complaint which contains an accusation or charging language, distinct from

the statement of probable cause constituting of a statemebnt of essential facts

constituting a public offense or public offenses charged or sought to be charged.

Contrary to Rules 2.01 and 2.03 of Minn. Rules of Criminal Procedure., Taxaction

without Representationd, kickbacks, bribery scheme involving the Department of

Safety and Inspections involving non-profits:, Defendants Steve Magner residence

Stillwater Minnesota, Defendants Dick Lippert, living in Inver Grove, technically

under RICO Indictments Steinhauser, et al v. Randy Kelly et al File No 04-2632,

Harrilal et al v. Magner et al File 05-461, Gallagher et al v. Magner et al File No 05-

1348 (JNE/SRN), City has dismissed the Sharon Andersons

Answer/CrossComplaints without instruction of how pleadings are deficient and

how to repair pleadings. In re Anastasoff: litigants’ constitutional rights are violated

when courts

City attorneys representing City Council and the Mayor depart from

precedent where parties are similarly situated.

2. A court-city council (quasi-judicial) may dismiss a assessments for failure

to state a claim "only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be

introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the

relief demanded." N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395, 122 N.W.2d

26, 29 (1963), In re Milk Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, 588 N.W.2d 772,

1999.MN.42154, A claim prevails against illegal “takings” 5th Amend, Illegal Search

Page 26: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 8 of 8

Beale v. McClure

and Seizure 4th Amend,it is possible on any evidence which might be produced,

consistent with the pleader's theory, to grant the relief demanded. The purpose of a

motion to dismiss and or the alleged tax assessments thro the back door of the

executive branch of the Mayork, then to be approved by the Legislative Branch

“AFTER THE FACT” is not only TREASON but Domestic Terrorism Sharon is to

test the law’s support for a claim, not the sufficiency of the underlying facts, Patel v.

OMH Medical Center, Inc., Okla. 987 P.2d 1185 (1999). The burden to show legal

insufficiency of petition is on party moving for dismissal, and motion to dismiss for

failure to state a claim must separately state each omission or defect in petition; if it

does not, motion shall be denied without hearing, Indiana Nat. Bank v. State Dept. of

Human Services, Okla., 880 P.2d 371 (1994). And demurrers have been abolished –

see Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 7(c).

3. Minnesota Rule 8001.9 incorporates the Federal Internal Revenue Code

into the Minnesota Rules by reference. The State of Minnesota has entered into

agreement with the Federal government to establish their qualified state income tax

particularized in 5 USC 5517 and 31 CFR Part 215. Administration of qualified

state income taxes is governed by regulations published in 26 CFR Part 31. The

State of Minnesota has abdicated both administrative and judicial remedies to the

Federal Government under 26 CFR §301.6361-2. Therefore, the Federal Debt

Collection Procedure, 28 USC §3001, is the exclusive remedy for tax related debt. It

provides substantive rights secured by the fourth, fifth, Sixth, and Seventh

amendments to the United States Constitution, restricting administrative and

judicial powers and the government bears the burden of proof for whatever claim is

made.

4. The MDR consistently quotes Minnesota statutes as authority for their

behavior. However, courts have consistently stated that statutes have no force or

effect without implementing regulations. In accordance with Minnesota Rule 8001.9,

Page 27: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 9 of 9

Beale v. McClure

Minnesota’s regulations are the Federal regulations for the state income tax. There

are no other Minnesota rules implementing most of Minnesota Statutes, chapters

270, 271, 290 and 290A. Therefore, the MDR is required to submit to the Federal

regulations that provide substantive rights under the Constitution of the United

States and due process of law.

4(a) In order for there to be (1) liability for any given tax imposed by the

Internal Revenue Code,and in this instance Assessments for What by the St. Paul

City Council or (2) a requirement to collect any given tax imposed by the Internal

Revenue Code, an implementing regulation must apply to the fact circumstance of

the person liable. The requirement for implementing regulations is restated in the

general rule that controls 26 U.S.C. § 6011(a): “When required by regulations

prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title,

or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according

to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary. Every person required to

make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such

forms or regulations.”

4(b) California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz, 39 L.Ed. 2d 812 at 820: “Because it has a bearing on some of the issues raised by the parties, we think it important to note that the Act’s civil and criminal penalties attach only upon violation of regulations promulgated by the Secretary; if the Secretary were to do nothing, the Act itself would impose no penalties on anyone.” In U.S. v. Murphy, 809 F.2d 1427 at 1430 (9th Cir. 1987), following California Bankers Association rationale, the court said “The reporting act is not self-executing; it can impose no reporting duties until implementing regulations have been promulgated.” In U.S. v. Reinis, 794 F.2d 506 at 508 (9th Cir. 1986) the court said, “An individual cannot be prosecuted for violating this Act unless he violates an implementing regulation … The result is that neither the statute nor the regulations are complete without the other, and only together do they have any force. In effect, therefore, the construction of one necessarily involves the construction of the other.” U.S. v. Mersky, 361 U.S. 431, 4 L.Ed. 2d 423, 80 S.Ct. 459 (1960), agreed with in Leyeth v. Hoey, supra, U.S. v. $200,00 in U.S. Currency, 590 F.Supp. 866; U.S. v. Palzer, 745 F.2d 1350 (1984); U.S. v. Cook, 745 F.2d 1311 (1984); U.S. v. Gertner, 65 F.3d 963 (1st Cir. 1995); Diamond Ring Ranch v. Morton,

Page 28: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 10 of 10

Beale v. McClure

531 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1976); U.S. v. Omega Chemical Corp., 156 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 1998); U.S. v. Corona, 849 F.2d 562, 565 (11th Cir. 1988); U.S. v. Esposito, 754 F.2d 521, 523-24 (1985); U.S. v. Goldfarb, 643 F.2d. 422, 429-30 (1981). “For Federal tax purposes, the Federal Regulations govern. Lyeth v. Hoey, 1938, 305 U.S. 188, 59 S.Ct. 155, 83 L.Ed. 119,” quoted in Dodd v. U.S., 223 F.Supp. 785 (1963).

5. The Supreme Court of Minnesota has determined that the Minnesota

Legislature has not provided adequately for trial by jury in the statutes and that

trial by jury is always available to review statutory law and administrative

decisions.

5(a) Abraham v. County of Hennepin, 2002,639 N.W.2d 342. (“one form of action” procedure is anathema to due process in the course of the common law), however, “Provision in Minnesota Constitution regarding trial by jury is intended to continue, unimpaired and inviolate, the right to trial by jury as it existed in the Territory of Minnesota when constitution was adopted in 1857.” The prohibition against depriving people of property without proper adjudication is secured by Article I § 2 of the Minnesota Constitution: “No member of this state shall be disfranchised or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers…”

CAUSES OF ACTION

6. On Apr. 24th,2007 The City of St. Paul trespassed on Property at 697

Surrey without Probable cause, warrant, tickets, caused irreparable harm injury,

intentional infliction of Emotional Stress on Candidate Sharon Anderson,

Defendants Joel Essling and policewoman Tanya Hunter to Steal Sharons Car, fully

licensed and to date 2ndJuly07 fully insured: Towing company Rapid Towing as on

numerous blogs, web sites, Again 16May07 during the Police Memorial at mears

Park Essling or Harold Robinson with pistol packing cop Tanya hunter again

trespassed on Sharons and intestate decedants property at 697 Surrey ,stealing

Page 29: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 11 of 11

Beale v. McClure

Sharons Trailer.

The cop corruption involves Aaron Foster, Murder of Barb Winn, as the city

employs an indicted Murder Aaron Foster to steal Cars, at the St. Paul police

Inpound Lot.

Again thro the US Mails June 5th, stating Fence and Paint with another

inspection by Badge 322 joel Essling on 5July07 Again Because all these complaints

fail to set forth an accusation in separate counts for separate offenses charged or

sought to be charged, contrary to Rule 17.02 of Mn Rules Crim. In a patterned

enterprise are falsely claimed that Sharon Anderson is a criminal without the

required specificity of a criminal accusation, re: US v. Cruikshank,92 US 542 at 558

(1876)

As to the prohibition of duplicity in a criminal accusation (ie: charging

m9ore than one offense in one accusation without separate counts for each offense

charged US 73F2d795 (10Cir.1934)

The right to a specific accusation including separate counts for distinct

offenses charged has been incorporated by the 14th Amend. To the US Constitution

re: Cole v. Arkansas 33 US 196 at 201 (1948) and Faretta v. California 442 US 806

at 818 (1975)

The City of St. Paul apparently has 25 million for Housing Programs,DSI has

conducted a program against the elderly, disabled, vunerable persons, mandating

the federal government audit the 1065 vacant buildings manulipated by defendants

Magner and Moermond.

Sharon Anderson has established in the past 30 years the continuing pattern

of taking realestate for pecuniary gain without quiet titles, marketable propertys

without investigation, evidence, or a competent witness with first-hand knowledge.

Page 30: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 12 of 12

Beale v. McClure

The claims are demonstrably false, since Sharon Anderson has submitted affidavits

that she has been harmed injured along with 1065 vacant Minnesota Rule 8001.9

which puts the burden of proof on the government to prove their claims. MS

289A.37, Subd. 3, which puts the burden of proof on the victim, is unconstitutional

on its face, since it directly contradicts Article I, Sections 2, 4, 6, 7, and 10 of the

Minnesota Constitution. The constitution places the burden of proof on the

government to establish their claim that Sharon Anderson has with intent violated

any Criminal, or Ordinance Violations for the past 30 years.Furthermore 26 USC

7403 requires the The city of St. Paul as a government entity, to prove their claim in

Court. Common law process also places the burden of proof on the advocate,

particularly when the plaintiff is government.

6(a) Wright v. Commissioner of Revenue, MN Tax Court, Docket No. 2620 June 4, 1980, "A person who leaves his home to go into another state for temporary purposes only is not considered to have lost his residence. But if a person removes to another state with intention of remaining therefore an indefinite time as a place of permanent residence, he shall be considered to have lost his residence in this state."

Sharon Anderson has never abandoned her legal domicile at 1058

Summit, 2194 Marshall,325 N. Wilder, 448 Desnoyer, 697 Surrey 1/3rd of 309

Pelham Blvd,St. Paul Minnesota or her Buck Lake Cabin Itasca Co. 42741-

321st pl (GunLake ) Aitkin or Gull Lake in Brainard.

http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com

6(b) The character of acts that suppose to bypass judicial process is articulated in United States v. Lovett (1946), 328 U.S. 303; 66 S. Ct. 1073; 90 L. Ed. 1252: We hold that § 304 falls precisely within the category of congressional actions which the Constitution barred by providing that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." In Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. 277, 323, this Court said, "A bill of attainder is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without a judicial trial. If the punishment be less than death, the act is termed a bill of pains and penalties. Within the meaning of the Constitution, bills of attainder include bills of pains and penalties." … On the same day the Cummings case was decided, the Court, in Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333 also held invalid on the same grounds an Act of Congress which required attorneys practicing before this Court to take a similar oath. Neither of these cases has ever been overruled. They stand for the

proposition that legislative acts, no matter what their form, that apply either to named

Page 31: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 13 of 13

Beale v. McClure

individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict

punishment on them without a judicial trial are bills of attainder prohibited by the

Constitution. Adherence to this principle requires invalidation of § 304. We do adhere to it.

Those who wrote our Constitution well knew the danger inherent in special legislative acts which take away the life, liberty, or property of particular named persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct, which deserves punishment. They intended to safeguard the people of this country from punishment without trial by duly constituted courts. See Duncan v. Kahanamoku,

327 U.S. 304. And even the courts to which this important function was entrusted were commanded to stay their hands until and unless certain tested safeguards were observed. An accused in court must be tried by an impartial jury, has a right to be represented by counsel, he must be clearly informed of the charge against him, the law which he is charged with violating must have been passed before he committed the act charged, he must be confronted by the witnesses against him, he must not be compelled to incriminate himself, he cannot twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense, and even after conviction no cruel and unusual punishment can be inflicted upon him. See Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 235-238. When our Constitution and Bill of Rights were written, our ancestors had ample reason to know that legislative trials and punishments were too dangerous to liberty to exist in the nation of free men they envisioned. And so they proscribed bills of attainder. Section 304 is one. Much as we regret to declare that an Act of Congress violates the Constitution, we have no alternative here.

6(c) See 26 CFR 601.106 (f)(1), Wayman v. Southard, 23 U.S. 1, 6 L.Ed. 253, 10 Wheat 1 and Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina Ports Authority, 535 U.S. ___, 122 S. Ct. 1864. In Miranda v. United States, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602,

16 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1966), former Chief Justice Earle Warren penned the following: “As courts have been presented with the need to enforce constitutional rights, they have found means of doing so. That was our responsibility when Escobedo was before us and it is our responsibility today. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”

7(a) In Brafman v. United States of America, 348 F.2d 863 (5th Circuit, 1967), the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff because an assessment officer did not sign a certificate of assessment. “For a tax to be collected upon any deficiency, an assessment must be made against the taxpayer within three years after his return is filed… If the estate is not assessed within the statutory period there can be no transferee liability. United States v. Updike, 1930, 281 U.S. 489, 50 S. Ct. 367, 74 L.

Ed. 984. We therefore adhere to our pronouncement in United States v. Fisher, 5 Cir.

Page 32: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 14 of 14

Beale v. McClure

1965, 353 F.2d 396, 398-399, that: In the absence of any better test, we give effect to the generally recognized rule that Regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to statutory authority, and when necessary to make a statute effective, although not a statute, may have the force of law. Fawcus Machine Co. v.

United States, 282 U.S. 375, 51 S. Ct. 144, 75 L. Ed. 397; Commissioner of Internal

Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co., 333 U.S. 496, 501, 68 S. Ct. 695, 92 L. Ed. 831.

The Treasury Regulations are binding on the Government as well as on the taxpayer: "Tax officials and taxpayers alike are under the law, not above it." Pacific

National Bank of Seattle v. Commissioner, 9 Cir. 1937, 91 F.2d 103, 105. Even the instructions on the reverse side of the assessment certificate, Form 23C, specify that the original form "is to be transmitted to the District Director for signature, after which it will be returned to the Accounting Branch for permanent filing. * * *" Case after case has quoted Treasury Regulation § 301.6203-1 and cited it approvingly, and the treatises on taxation take its literal application for granted. Finally, where state taxation is involved, compliance with a statutory provision requiring an assessment list to be signed by the assessors is usually considered essential to the validity of further proceedings. 84 C.J.S. Taxation § 473 (1954).”

7(b) The requirement for IRS, and therefore the MDR, to provide assessment certificates was defined by the court in Huff v. United States of America, 10 F.3d 1440 (9th Cir.,1993):” the IRS failed to respond to the Huffs' request for a copy of an assessment under § 6203. See 26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1… the record contains no evidence indicating that the Huffs received copies of their assessments pursuant to their request under § 6203, we conclude there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the IRS has complied with the requirements of § 6203. See Farr, 990

F.2d at 454; Geiselman, 961 F.2d at 5-6; Brewer, 764 F. Supp. at 315-16. Accordingly, we reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment as to count II.

7(c) Date of assessment is date when summary record is signed by assessment officer in district director's office or in service center. Welch Ins. Agency v Brast

(1932, CA4 W Va) 55 F2d 60, 10 AFTR 1041, cert den 285 US 555, 76 L Ed 944, 52 S

Ct 457; Davidovitz v United States (1932) 75 Ct Cl 211, 58 F2d 1063, 11 AFTR 347.

7(d) Assessment is complete as soon as record is signed by assessment officer. Filippini v United States (1961, ND Cal) 200 F Supp 286, 62-1 USTC P 9144, 9 AFTR

2d 313, affd (CA9 Cal) 318 F2d 841, 63-2 USTC P 9548, 11 AFTR 2d 1720, cert den 375 US 922, 11 L Ed 2d 165, 84 S Ct 267.

7(e) Assessment of estate tax deficiency was not timely filed and was invalid where it had not been signed by the proper official, and the authenticity of the document and admissibility at trial had no effect on the validity where the requisite signature was missing. Brafman v United States (1967, CA5 Fla) 384 F2d 863, 67-2

Page 33: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 15 of 15

Beale v. McClure

USTC P 12494, 20 AFTR 2d 6008.

7(f) Radinsky v. United States of America, 622 F.Supp. 412 (USDC, Colorado, 1985). 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1) confers jurisdiction upon this court and waives the sovereign immunity of the United States regarding claims for sums wrongfully collected under the internal revenue laws. In a suit under this section, a plaintiff "may challenge the constitutionality, legality or fairness of any tax statute or amount assessed or collected." White v. C.I.R., 537 F.Supp 679 (D.Colo. 1982). In the two briefs filed in this action, the IRS has not explained where it finds statutory authority to employ its tax collection procedures to collect from the plaintiffs a sum of money that has never been assessed as a tax. Since the IRS had no authority to adjust the plaintiffs' account or employ deficiency procedures in these circumstances, it is self-evident that the collection of the sum in this manner was wrongful.

under 26 CFR 301.6361-2 (d)(3) the MDR does not have subject matter

jurisdiction to determine an increase in income tax: “all administrative

determinations shall be made by the Federal Government without review by the

State.” Therefore the ST. Paul City Council judgments are void for both violation

of Constitutional rights and lack of subject matter jurisdiction under MRCP 60.02

(d) and can therefore be vacated at any time and cannot be time barred. Including

over 1065 vacant building in the city of St. Paul et al.

8(a) Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MSC, 612 N.W.2d 862, C1-98-2200, 2000. “The traditional rule is that there is no time limit for challenging a final judgment that is void for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 12 James W. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice §á60.44 (3d ed. 1997). The principle underlying this rule is that a judgment's validity is of utmost importance. Minnesota courts have adhered to this traditional rule. In Lange v. Johnson and its progeny, we held that judgments are void if a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that there is no time limit for bringing a motion to vacate such a judgment. 295 Minn. 320, 323-24, 204 N.W.2d 205, 208 (1973); see also Peterson v. Eishen, 512 N.W.2d 338, 341 (Minn. 1994)”.

Page 34: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 16 of 16

Beale v. McClure

8(b) Mesenbourg v. Jerome, 1995.MN.20775, 538 N.W.2d 489, Although the language of the statute and the rule indicate that motions to vacate void judgments must be made within a reasonable time, the supreme court has held that there is no time limit for commencing proceedings to set aside a judgment void for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties. Id. A void judgment is legally ineffective; it may be vacated by the court which rendered it at any time, and a void judgment cannot become valid through the passage of time. Id

8(c) Peterson v. Eishen, 1994.MN.21542, 512 N.W.2d 338, A judgment rendered without due service of process upon the defendant is void and may be vacated at any time. Although the language of the rule and the statute indicate that motions to vacate void judgments must be made within a reasonable time, we have previously held that there is no time limit for commencing proceedings to set aside a judgment void for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties. Lange v. Johnson, 295 Minn. 320, 204 N.W.2d 205 (1973) (applying Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02); Beede v. Nides Finance Corp., 209 Minn. 354, 296 N.W. 413 (1941). A void judgment is legally ineffective; it may be vacated by the court which rendered it at any time. United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc., 909 F.2d 657, 661 (1st Cir. 1990); Misco Leasing, Inc. v. Vaughn, 450 F.2d 257 (10th Cir. 1971) (holding defendant's failure to move to vacate default judgment within reasonable time after its entry did not preclude motion to vacate the judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction). A void judgment cannot gain validity by the passage of time. In re Center Wholesale Inc., 759 F.2d 1440 (9th Cir. 1985); Austin v. Smith, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 97, 312 F.2d 337, 343 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

given notice by regular mail is a rebuttable assumption, and is therefore not

on the record. violation of Minnesota Rule 8001.03. St. Paul Executive Branch

complicity with St. Paul Legislative branch mandates FBI or Justice Intervention

for false tax assessments to acquire Property rights of the citizenry denied

constitutional right of notice and the opportunity to be heard. They also violated

Sharon Andersons rights under Minnesota Constitution, Article I, Sections 6 and 7

to be confronted by competent witnesses with first-hand knowledge and evidence

that she owe’s any money. Administrative decisions must be based on testimony and

evidence in the hard-copy case file, per 5 U.S.C. §§ 556 & 557.

However, according to the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Tax Court has no

jurisdiction in matters of fact or law if it is not a) granted by the appealing

Page 35: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 17 of 17

Beale v. McClure

individual, or b) granted by the District Court. Also, a void administrative

judgment cannot be time barred.

10(a) “In analyzing the framework created by the tax statutes in question, it is crucial to note that the taxpayer always has the option to file in district court. See, Minn.St. 278.01; Note, 4 Wm. Mitchell L.Rev. 371, 406.

10(b) Wulff v. Tax Court of Appeals, 288 N.W.2d 221 (Minn. 1979). “This is perhaps the saving feature of this statutory scheme. Because a tax suit may be initiated in district court, and because transfer of that suit to the tax court is discretionary with the district court, the exercise of jurisdiction of the tax court on transfer does not violate Minn. Const. art. 6, § 3, which provides that the district court has original jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases”.

12(a) The Notice of Levy does not apply to income tax. It is a search and

seizure instrument used in criminal violation of internal revenue laws exclusively

related to regulated industries and authorized by 26 U.S.C. §§ 6321, 6331 and

implementing regulations 27 CFR Part 70 under the exclusive jurisdiction of the

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Sharon Anderson has not been accused

of any criminal activity or violating any Internal Revenue Laws. Therefore, the St.

Paul City Officials fraudulently seized Sharon Andersons assets, under the color of

law, by pretending that she violated laws related to unknown at this time..

12(b) The Federal Government must sue to secure a judgment prior to

executing a levy if an alleged tax liability is contested, initiated in compliance with

26 U.S.C. § 7401. Then procedure must comply with requirements of the Federal

Debt Collection Act at 28 U.S.C. § 3201 as the exclusive remedy for collection of tax-

related debt. The Notice of Levy must conform to requirements specified by 28

U.S.C. § 3201(a) that a notice of levy, filed subsequent to judgment, must include an

abstract of the judgment. A notice of levy is evidence of a levy only when it identifies

the underlying judgment. The City of St. Paul has consistently violated Sharon

Page 36: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 18 of 18

Beale v. McClure

Andersons constitutional rights by denying her due process of law.

12(c) Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 82 (1972): The requirement of notice and an opportunity to be heard raises no impenetrable barrier to the taking of a person's possessions. But the fair process of decision-making that it guarantees works, by itself, to protect against arbitrary deprivation of property. For when a person has an opportunity to speak up in his own defense, and when the State must listen to what he has to say, substantively unfair and simply mistaken deprivations of property interests can be prevented. It has long been recognized that "fairness can rarely be obtained by secret, one-sided determination of facts decisive of rights . . .. And no better instrument has been devised for arriving at truth than to give a person in jeopardy of serious loss notice of the case against him and opportunity to meet it." Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123, 170-172 (Frankfurter, J., concurring).

For more than a century the central meaning of procedural due process has been clear: "Parties whose rights are to be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right they must first be notified." Baldwin v. Hale, 1 Wall. 223, 233. See Windsor v. McVeigh, 93 U.S. 274; Hovey v. Elliott, 167 U.S. 409; Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385. It is equally fundamental that the right to notice and an opportunity to be heard "must be granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner." Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552.

Sharon Anderson has never been served with The Order for Writ of Entry

and seizure was an in rem, admiralty action; there is nothing comparable in

common law procedure. Minnesota Statute 270.70 and 26 U.S.C. § 7302, relate only

to property used in violation of internal revenue laws, so it is necessarily predicated

on the presumption that the seized property was being used in violation of or was

the fruit of criminal activity. The implementing regulation is 26 CFR Part 403,

which applies only to drug-related commercial crimes listed in the regulation.

Article III § 2 of the U.S. Constitution secures exclusive admiralty and maritime

jurisdiction to the United States and that the Minnesota Constitution authorizes law

and equity only. Therefore, the April 24th, 2007 and May 16th,2007 property

seizure’s and Minnesota Statute § 270.70 are patently unconstitutional. Sharon

Anderson has not been accused of violating an State, County, City or Federal

Internal Revenue laws. Therefore the seizure of Sharon Andersons property without

Page 37: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 19 of 19

Beale v. McClure

probable cause of criminal activity is pure criminal behavior characteristic of a

totalitarian government.

17(b) Per The Sarah, (1823) 21 U.S. 391, it is simply necessary to declare that the seizure was on land to abort an admiralty seizure. Cans of Egg Product v. U.S., 226 U.S. 172, 1912.SCT.40400, 57 L. Ed. 174, 33 S. Ct., “Although this statute prescribes that the proceedings shall conform "as near as may be to the proceedings in admiralty," the proceeding being a seizure on land is, in its nature, a common-law proceeding”. Hendry v. Moore, (1943) 318 U.S. 133, 63 S. Ct. 499, 87 L. Ed. 663: “, since a judgment in rem to enforce a lien is not a remedy which the common law is competent to give, a ruling which has since been consistently followed.” Morris'

Cotton v. U.S., 8 Wall. 507, “Property on land was seized under the acts of 1861 and 1862, passed for suppression of the rebellion, according to which the claimants were entitled to a trial by jury.”

17(c) State of New Jersey v. One 1990 Honda Accord, (New Jersey Supreme Court, 1998) 154 N.J. 373, 712 A.2d 1148, The Appellate Division reversed, holding that McDermott was entitled to a jury trial in a forfeiture action and that the statutory proceeding for summary Disposition was unconstitutional. 302 N.J. Super. at 227. In reaching that result, the court relied on an historical analysis of the right to trial by jury in England and the American colonies. Id. at 230-34.

In New Jersey, forfeiture never existed at common law and remains a disfavored remedy. State v. Seven Thousand Dollars, 136 N.J. 223, 238 (1994); State v. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am, 98 N.J. 474, 480-81 (1985); Farley v. $168,400.97, 55 N.J. 31, 36-37 (1969); State v. One Ford Van, 154 N.J. Super. 326, 331 (App. Div. 1977), certif. den., 77 N.J. 474 (1978). Its existence depends on the enactment of a statute. The State argues that because forfeiture is a creature of statute, McDermott has no common-law right to a jury trial.

Although forfeiture depends on a statute for its existence, it remains subject to common-law principles. When analyzing the right to trial by jury, the term "common law" refers to those principles of English law that evolved in the common-law courts such as the Court of the Exchequer, as opposed to those applied in the Admiralty, Chancery, or Ecclesiastical Courts. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet Coupe, 231 P.2d 832, 836 (Cal. 1951); In re Forfeiture of 1978 Chevrolet Van, 493 So.2d 433, 435 (Fla. 1986); Commonwealth v. One 1984 Z-28 Camaro Coupe, 610 A.2d 36, 39 (Pa. 1992);

Page 38: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 20 of 20

Beale v. McClure

The City of St. Paul has violated Sharon Andersons constitutional

rights by advertising /publishing on the www.ci.stpaul.mn.us false information,

again with the publication of the Agenda’s, mail fraud sent by Joel Essling

numerous times without obtaining ownership rights to the property in violation of

28 CFR §403.26(b). The City of St. Paul is prohibited from selling/ excessive

consumption/taxs on all Sharons Propertys and all citizens 1,065 vacant property’s

until they obtain ownership rights in a court of competent jurisdiction. 200 years of

jurisprudence has firmly established that administrative claims cannot take

ownership to property until obtaining a judgment in a court of competent

jurisdiction. Even drug dealers are guaranteed a trial after their property is seized

before it can be sold. The City of St. Paul is committed extortion under the color of

law, by causing Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella to pay about $9xx.00 before July 18,

2007, to prevent the interest and illegal tax fees

18(a) United States v. A Parcel of Land, Buildings, Appurtenances and

Improvements, known as 92 Buena Vista Avenue, Rumson, New Jersey (1993), 507 U.S. 111; 113 S.Ct. 1126; 122 L.Ed. 2d 469.Writing for four of the justices joining the plurality decision, Justice Stevens traced the relation-back doctrine to an 1806 decision written by former Chief Justice John Marshall: "It has been proved, that in all forfeitures accruing at common law, nothing vests in the government until some legal step shall be taken for the assertion of its right, after which, for many purposes, the doctrine of relation carries back the title to the commission of the offence." United States v. Grundy, 7 U.S. 337, 3 Cranch 337, 350-351, 2 L. Ed. 459 (1806). n20

18(b) United States v. Real Property at 2659 Roundhill Drive, Alamo,

California, 283 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2002) we reversed, holding that the government had no legal interest in the property. We applied United States v. 92 Buena Vista

Ave., 507 U.S. 111 (1993), which held that the relation-back rule of 21 U.S.C. § 881(h) cannot be invoked until a final judgment of forfeiture has been entered; the United States had never obtained a final judgment. Therefore, according to Buena Vista, the government's interest in the Roundhill property could not have related back to 1974 (when the Paytons engaged in drug trafficking

19(a) In re Welfare of B.R.K., 658 N.W.2d 565 (Minn. 04/03/2003): The Fourth Amendment guarantees: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,

Page 39: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 21 of 21

Beale v. McClure

shall not be violated." U.S. Const. amend. IV. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places." Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967). Thus, the Fourth Amendment is a personal right and an individual must invoke its protections. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83, 88 (1998). An individual may invoke the protection of the Fourth Amendment by showing "that he personally has an expectation of privacy in the place searched, and that his expectation is reasonable; i.e., one that has 'a source outside of the Fourth Amendment, either by reference to concepts of real or personal property law or to understandings that are recognized and permitted by society.'" Carter, 525 U.S. at 88 (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 n.12 (1978)). Thus, the determination of whether B.R.K. can invoke the protections of the Fourth Amendment involves a two-step analysis. First, we must determine whether B.R.K. exhibited an actual subjective expectation of privacy in the home and, second, whether that expectation is reasonable. See Katz, 389 U.S. at 361 (Harlan, J., concurring).

19(b) The Minnesota Supreme Court recognized the tort of invasion of privacy in Lake v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 582 N.W.2d 231, 235 (Minn. 1998): “The right to privacy exists in the common law of Minnesota, including causes of action in tort for intrusion upon seclusion, appropriation, and publication of private facts.”

19(c) State v. Larsen, 2002.MN.0001476: The right to be left alone—the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 478 (Brandeis, J., dissenting).

Concerns for this essential element of our personal freedom are reflected in the Fourth Amendment and art. I, § 10 of the Minnesota Constitution protecting the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures." U.S. Const. amend. IV; see Minn. Const. art. I, § 10.

Entry constitutes a search whenever there is an intrusion upon an area where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, State v. Hardy, 577 N.W.2d 212, 215 (Minn. 1998). Warrantless searches where an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment—subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions." Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967); see also Matter of Welfare of D.A.G., 484 N.W.2d 787, 789 (Minn. 1992) (extending the per se concept to the Minnesota Constitution); O'Connor v. Johnson, 287 N.W.2d 400, 405 (Minn. 1979) (discussing the greater protections available under the Minnesota Constitution). But an expectation of privacy does not have the constitutional right to be free from impermissible search as its roots. As the Supreme Court noted in Minnesota v.

Page 40: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 22 of 22

Beale v. McClure

Carter, an expectation of privacy has 'a source outside of the Fourth Amendment, either by reference to concepts of real or personal property law or to understandings that are recognized and permitted by society.'" 525 U.S. 83, 88 (1998) (quoting Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 n.12 (1978)).

The Supreme Court has recognized that an expectation of privacy is reasonable in one's home and curtilage, Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 589-90 (1980), in one's automobile, Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 662-63 (1978), and in a closed telephone booth, Katz, 389 U.S. at 352. We have similarly acknowledged a constitutionally protected expectation of privacy in one's home and curtilage, State v. Perkins, 582 N.W.2d 876, 878 (Minn. 1998), Garza v. State, 632 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Minn. 2001), in one's automobile, State v. Goodrich, 256 N.W.2d 506, 510 (Minn. 1977), and in a public restroom, State v. Bryant, 287 Minn. 205, 211-12, 177 N.W.2d 800, 804 (1970).

NOTICE OF MISPRISION

20. All Judges in the State of Minnesota has shown prejudice to Sharon

Scarrella Anderson In re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221Nw2nd562 denied

employment of Judge without a Law License ie: Therefore Madam Marcia

Moermond who has an eating disorder weights over 350 lbs, her “hearings” are null

and void, mandating Just compensation to over 1065 vancant bldgs. Owners and

constitutional rights by denying her access to court. All Minnesota Judges have

shown contempt against the courts of justice by making light of the violations of law

by the City and County Attorneys representing City and County Employees, as well

as the unconstitutional infringement of the Madam Moermond’s illegal

jurisdiction/authority on the judicial functions of this district court. , Minnesota

Constitution Art III Separation of Powers Doctrine. City of St. Paul has not

provided transcripts of DSI hearing in a timely manner, and falsely claimed that

MGRP, Rule 4 denies the opportunity to have your own court reporter. City and

County Attorneys acting in concort with State Attorney General have denied the

citizenry right to what the Minnesota Supreme Court described as an “opportunity

to elect a judicial determination” in matters relating to the Tax Court, which is

Page 41: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 23 of 23

Beale v. McClure

precisely what the Supreme Court declared was “the saving feature of this statutory

scheme”. Wulff v. Tax Court of Appeals, 288 N.W.2d 221 (Minn. 1979). Finally,

Madam Marcia Moermond must be disqualified for incompetence for not

understanding that demurrer has been abolished by Federal RCP Rule 7(c), and

that unsupported contentions of material fact without affidavits and other testimony

are insufficient for dismissal of claims.

REMEDY SOUGHT

21. Determination by the St. Paul Mayor and City Council, and that

Sharon Anderson does not owe the amount claimed by the DSI Badge 322 Joel

Essling

Approximately $900.00

22. Return to Sharon Scarrella Anderso Car 91 Chev replacement

value $30 thous, Trailer $10 thous, Contents over $10 thousand, plus Damage to

Driveway, Fence, over 20 thous, Punatitive, Compensatory,Tort Damages

$500,000.00 for each and every occurance.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Prepared and Submitted by:

/s/ Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se, Private Attorney General, __________________________________http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

AFFIDAVITS

3. I did not authorize MDR or the City of St. Paul personnel to execute

substitute or levy fees, assessments, banking online and or Minnesota

property or individual income tax returns for me.

evidence in record that alleged delinquent Minnesota property taxes have been

assessed against me, and therefore I have no evidence that I have a

Page 42: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 24 of 24

Beale v. McClure

delinquent property tax liability for qualified Minnesota resident or

nonresident property taxes.

13. I have not signed a consent agreement authorizing the City of St. Paul direct

withdrawal of sums decedant intestate http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com

and I have on deposit in banks located in Minnesota.

14. I am not a government disbursement officer or withholding agent required to

withhold income and employment taxes from wages at the source, deposit

such taxes into trust accounts, report amounts withheld and pay said

amounts to the Treasury of the United States or the Minnesota Department

of Revenue.

16. On April and May 2007 Theft/Trespass Criminal Charges were sent to St.

Paul police John Harrington control no. Cn07089912

[email protected] former city clerk

[email protected] demanding that they cease Trespassing/Theft and

return assets and demanding my constitutional and statutory rights of due

process and trial by jury.

17. On April 24th, again 16May, 2007, the DSI trespassed into 697 Surrey and

land valued at about $137,000.00, Trees, shrubs, flower gardens and ground

cover valued at black top driveway, redwood fencing, retaining walls and

personal property valued at about $50,000.the seizure of my assets, without

claiming that I was a criminal.

18. I am not in receipt of any evidence in record of criminal conduct that would

Page 43: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Page 25 of 25

Beale v. McClure

warrant admiralty or common law seizure. None of the real and personal

property I own was used in conjunction with or was the fruit of drug-related

commercial crimes.

Under penalties of perjury, I attest that to the best of my present knowledge, understanding, and belief all matters of fact set out above are accurate and true, so help me God. /s/ Sharon Anderson Disclaimer

Word Program by Beale is used for Original and Educational Purposes.

Page 44: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: Fwd: ReadyTalk Webinar Oswald v.Anderson et al Ramsey Dist. 62cv09-1163 Date: 4/2/2009 12:33:20 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: Sharon4AndersonTo:

[email protected], Sharon4Anderson, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], BillDahn3, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Stanton4people, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], jan [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] .mn.us, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 1 of 5

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 45: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], EEskola, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 2 of 5

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 46: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ATM@startrib

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Page 3 of 5

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Please help to notify the average Homeowner of the Bizzare

Page 47: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

tax and spend by the St.Paul City Council, Ramsey County Board, Tax Delinquent File Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv09-1163 Thanks http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

New Low Prices on Dell Laptops - Starting at $399 ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Click here: ReadyTalk Web Conferencing, Webinars, and Audio Conferencing - Web Seminar Series Thurs. 2ndApr09 file no. 62cv09-1163

To: 2nd Judicial Court Administrator [email protected] Court Clerk: [email protected] Ramsey Co. Court House, RM 15_17 St.Paul,MN 55102

651-266-8255 Fax: 266-8263 and 651-266-8266 Fax 266-8278

Pursuant to my call today to your office approx. 11:05am wit the Following Requests: 1. To insure that the word and pdf. format e-commerced,e-mailed yesterday 1Apr09, would be filed, with IFP. http://sharon4council.blogspot.com Ex: http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com TaxProf Blog: Tax Cases in the Supreme Court's New Term 2. It also has been brought to my attention the E-Democracy uses Webinar, request that the Court, City Council, County Board must have laptop computers to avoid these Fraudulent Asessments, Fees by

Statute of Fraud and Murder, by theft of Cars,trailers,personal property,trespass on private property by Joel Essling et al, without Long Form Complaint,Tickets,Warrants, or probable cause etc. and Treason to deny/repeal State Law. Citizen Media and Online Engagement Webinar - E-Democracy.Org

3. AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE AGAINST VARIOUS JUDGES, Specifically Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson entire SCAP Panel Impeachments are found at http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com 4. Constitutional Challenge of Canvass Board of which

Larry Dease,Mark Oswald, Shari Moore,Janice Rettman, Toni Carter are members. a. As Sharon Anderson did vote, http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com

THEREFORE: Thank You for answering the phone to talk live, with

Subj: ReadyTalk Webinar Oswald v.Anderson et al Ramsey Dist. 62cv09-1163

Date: 4/2/2009 12:22:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ward.einess@state, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Page 4 of 5

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 48: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

these requests, Please familiarize www.slideshare.com encompassing Webinar. update your court system to get with the times.

Citizen Media and Online Engagement Webinar - E-Democracy.Org /s/Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se, Private AG, Candidate 2010 AG, In Fact To be notified by E-Commerce of any all updates,answers,etc. [email protected] 651-76-5835

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.co

New Low Prices on Dell Laptops - Starting at $399

Page 5 of 5

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 49: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: Fwd: SharonAnderson,BillDahn Constitutional Challenge Agenda 1Apr091thro15_33... Date: 4/1/2009 2:24:48 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: Sharon4AndersonTo: Sharon4AndersonCC: BillDahn4

Page 1 of 6

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

New Low Prices on Dell Laptops - Starting at $399 ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Subj: Fwd: SharonAnderson,BillDahn Constitutional Challenge Agenda 1Apr091thro15_33...

Date: 4/1/2009 1:52:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], BillDahn4, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], jan [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] .mn.us, [email protected], [email protected],

Page 50: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], EEskola, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 2 of 6

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 51: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

Page 3 of 6

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 52: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Apology if in duplicate Fundamental Fairness of due process is the

Right to be Notified the 3 thous. tax delinquent www.review-news.com is not published online

the average person has no idea of the Bizzare City of St. Paul and County of Ramsey Tax and Spend False Statements Title 18s1001

TARP Tales | Once upon a time... Sharon-Anderson

New Low Prices on Dell Laptops - Starting at $399 ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Click here: http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=40 St.Paul City Council Agenda 50 Items Wed. 1Apr09 Related Files Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1663 Sharons Brief under Construction pdf.

AFFIDAVITS OF SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON-CHERGOSKY-SCARRELLA Blogger: Dashboard http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com

BILL DAHN www.billdahn.com www.billdahn.blogspot.com COMES NOW SHARON AND BILL with Standing,Acting as Private AG 42USC1988

13D. Meetings Of Public Bodies 42 USC 1988 - Google Search

Qualified Criminal Investigators 18USC 1510 and Federal QuiTam Witness's 18USC 1512 Title 18 1510,1512,42 USC 1988 - Google Search

with the Commands of the US Justice Dept. Eric Holder to have open government

Eric Holder commands open government - Google Search 'Era of open government' behind information policy reversal - CNN.com

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Subj: SharonAnderson,BillDahn Constitutional Challenge Agenda 1Apr091thro15_33,37,50

Date: 4/1/2009 1:13:08 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Sharon4Anderson

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Page 4 of 6

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 53: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

AFFIANTS OBJECT TO THE ST.PAUL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IN ITS ENTIRETY, AS CONTRARY TO THE CITY CHARTER,St.PaulCharter/Ordinances Specifically 1 thro 15, as the S&C are not published for

cursory review,possible Amicus Intervention re:Writ of Cert Bee Vue_ 393-397 Case

Tax & Property Look Up Information - Quick Info Items 9 and 10 the Jurisdiction/Authority of Marcia Moermond, Lantrys Appointee sec.18.01 to act as a Tax Assessor,Tax Collector, Condemning

REalestate Stealing/Towing Cars without Tickets,Warrants,Probable Cause contrary to 4th Amend Search and

Seizure Kathy Lantry v. ACLU - Google Search Lantry has been apprised Jan2007

1 thro 15 Ordinances 16 tho 29

Public Hearings 30 thro 50

GS3068056-Ordinance Denial of Judicial Review based on Fraud, is Unconstitutional.

Relators demand the Abolishment of the entire DSI Department, as Anti-Trust, DSI Employee Joel Essling without Authority Stealing Sharons Car,TRailer,Personal Property, Raified by the Council on Theft,Trespass,Treason and must not Stand on the Property Taxes at 697 Surrey OBJECTIONS

TO CLASSIFICATION, after 17 years the Homestead has been "taken" illegally, now in Court File 62cv09-1163

Titled State of MN by and thro Mark Oswald Auditor et al v. 697 Surrey,Decedant James R. Anderson,Sharon Anderson et al

GS3068924-Resolution

GS3068924-Attachment A

GS3068924-Attachment B

GS3068924-Attachment C

GS3068924-Attachment D

GS3069018-Resolution

33. Third Reading - 09-312 - An ordinance amending Chapter 18 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code clarifying Judicial Review of Appeals made under this chapter. (GS 3068056)

37. Resolution - 09-359 - Approving a budget amendment to reduce spending and financing in the Department of Safety and Inspections, License and Permit fund 320. (GS 3068924)

38. Resolution - 09-360 - Amending the 2009 budget and authorizing a 2009 Façade Improvement Program with funding awards up to $902,489. (GS 3069018)

Page 5 of 6

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 54: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

GS3069018-Attachment

GS3066741-Approving-Ratifying Assessment

GS3066741-Attachments

THEREFORE: AFFIANTS AGAIN CHALLENGE THE ST.PAUL CITY AGENDA, FURTHER AS INJURED PARTYS, COMPENSATORY,PUNATITIVE,TORT DAMAGES

RE: 5TH AMENDMENT JUST COMPENSATION AMT. UNK AT THIS TIME In simple lay language, to Steal Car,Trailer,Drivers License, Shut off Water,STalking

then to illegally assessments based on Theft,Trespass,Treason, Ratified by the Mayor is Criminal Intent with Malice to do Harm to the Public and Affiants as Political Candidates.

Constitutional Challenge of Ramsey County Canvass Board also

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/[email protected] ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com

Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |

FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw

SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption

3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S.

548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public

domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons-

copywrite.blogspot.co

/S/ Bill Dahn Homestead at 256 Morton St. W.St.Paul,MN ECF:#P1291866

Ojj_Sioux #408B1911 www.billdahn.com www.billdahn.blogspot.com

http://www.mklaw.com/documents/20090226105116227.pdf Homestead Act of 1862

New Low Prices on Dell Laptops - Starting at $399

50. Resolution Ratifying Assessment - 09-368 - In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost, and expenses for summary abatement (property cleanup) on private properties from December 15 to 30, 2008 [J0825A]; providing weekly garbage hauling services from December 17 to 31, 2008 [J0825G]; demolition of vacant buildings in January 2009 [J0901C]; emergency sewer repair at 1298 Earl Street [SWRP0901]; and towing abandoned vehicles from private property during October 2008 [J0901V]. (GS 3066741) (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the following:

Page 6 of 6

Monday, April 06, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 55: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: Sharon4Council-Criminal Charges against Mark Oswald Election/Tax/CanvassBoard Date: 11/3/2008 11:44:51 A.M. Central Standard TimeFrom: Sharon4AndersonTo: [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: BillDahn3, [email protected], [email protected]

Page 1 of 2

Monday, November 03, 2008 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Click here: Sharon4Council 3Nov08 TO MARK OSWALD: 651-266-2000 Fax: 651-266-2199 Tax,Election,Supervisor, Canvass Board

Apparantly you wilfully,neglient, are in a Continuing "Patterned Enterprise" of these County Auditors, starting with Lou McKenna,

indicted by the County Grand Jury, along with at that time Commissioner John Finley

In Re: Complaint Concerning The Honorable John T. Finley, Ramsey County District Judge. C2-97-1370, Supreme Court Order, Dece..

Re Kirby, 350 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 1984) and In Re McDonough, 296 N.W.2d 648 (Minn. 1979).

Up to and including Dorothy McClung, former tax court Judge when Carl Jensen gave a favorable Tax court Ruling, giving Sharon Scarrella her HS Credit back plus 1,000, McClung, Revenue Commissioner your

precedecesor McClung was Revenue Commissioner when 1988, the Lesbian Judge Kathleen SCAP,current Chief

Judge Ramsey County embellezed $110,000.00 "taking" our Homestead at 1058 Summit FORENSIC FILES ARE EXTENSIVE.

MS 609.903 RICO Ruling State Case Law, Federal 42 USC 3631 reducing the Citizenery to Proverty

and White Slavery.Raping the Seniors,Vunerable of their Lands and Propertys.

Pursuant to the Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud criminal charges against you in your official, capacity, individually,severally, John Doe and Mary Roe. 1. The Property at 697 Surrey purchased with nonmarital Funds for $5,000, yes Five Thousand, 2 thous for Furnace from Boehm Heating and $2 thous back taxes based on Vacant Bldg. 1992697 SurreySingleFamily Please note Sharon Anderson was running for St.Paul Mayor against Norm Coleman, Sharon walked to the Store to buy paper, 3rd and Maria Blast occurred with incompetance of city workers. WhistleblowerBlog 2. Yes http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com was Murdered 21Sept00 Affidavits of Surviorship properly filed with Dorothy McClung at that time. Further the evidence that My Husband Committeed Bigmany 1979 after our Marriage must be taken into Consideration SCAP 3. Please list the name of Lyle V. Rambo and 9Apr08 letter By information and belief Lyle Rambo is involved with the Murder of Veterans my husband over 20 + years, who spent 1 year at Brainard State Hospital, and http://richard-bullock.blogspot.com for pecuniary gain of their property rights. mark oswald tax,election,canvass board mn - Google Search THEREFORE: CORRECT YOUR TAX RECORDS ON ALL SHARONS OWNERSHIP IN FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE ON WHAT BASIS ARE YOU "TAKING" HS CREDIT,DISABLED CREDITS, OLD HOME CREDITS, ? WHAT IS THE REVERSAL AMT. ???/ MS 284.27CountyQuietTitle

Page 56: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

2194MarshallDuplex 448Desnoyer Duplex 1058SummitDuplex 32 5 N.Wilder 6unit 309Pelham 697 SurreySingleFamily PLUS the Buck Lake, Gun Lake,Gull Lake Propertys At all time Sharon has been denied Just Consideration for the past 30 years. /s/ [email protected] ECF_P165913_sa1299 Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson | Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard AndersonAdvocates/ddaweborg.msnw ������������� ������� ����� ��������������������������������������������������� ������������������ ���� ������� ��� ������!��"�#$�%�&����''�()#*�()(#"�����Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot 5 Travel Deals!

Page 2 of 2

Monday, November 03, 2008 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 57: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: Fwd: Sharons Valid Drivers License/Election Computer Fraud Date: 10/3/2005 3:33:41 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: ShewolfeagleTo: Shewolfeagle

Page 1 of 3

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

----------------- Forwarded Message:

7Sept05 TO: Vicki Albu Director Driver Services www.dps.state.mn.us www.mndriveinfo.org MN Dept Public Safety 445 MN St #180 St. Paul,MN.55101-5180 cc: Michael Campian cc:Public Notice to the State Officials The undersigned St. Paul Mayoral Candidate Sharon Anderson has numerous Election Contests submitted to Ramsey County Attorney:

Subj: Sharons Valid Drivers License/Election Computer Fraud

Date: 9/7/2005 2:19:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Shewolfeagle

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Shewolfeagle, [email protected], eagledahn1, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], EEskola, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Right-click picture(s) to display picture options

Page 58: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

The deprivation of Campaigning and use of Sharons Car,now www.msnusers.com/EagleEyeReporting web site tampered with, denial of Absentee Ballot, Title 31 Relator of heinous violations of Title 26 501(c)3 Non-Profits specifically Utility company District Heating and Public Housing at Central Towers owned by PresHomes, 22Aug05 Mayoral Debate: Denial to Candidates: but witnessed by Candidate Nick Tschida and Cable by www.spnn.org Federal Intervention on Election/Vote/Computer Fraud 1. It has become apparent the Electronic Filings of a. "taking" Drivers License by the City & County false statements, currently Valid by State.? b. Election Clerks lawyer Dorothy McClung,Joe Manskys verbal denial of Sharon Anderson's Absentee Ballot to be mailed to PO Box 4384 St. Paul MN 55104-0384 c. Mandates/Triggering Computer Fraud/Election Fraud. d. Mandates Quiet Titles for Residency Requirements.

DL Number Enter a MN DL number in this format: A123456789012

M243104164509 Get Record

Driver License Search Results 9/7/2005 1:41:32 PM

DL Number Class Type Class D StatusCommercial

Status

M243104164509 D 1 VALID N / A

Endorsements DL Issued DL Expiration

NONE 01/14/2005 01/27/2009

Messages 9/7/2005 1:41:32 PM

As of July 1, 2003, the reinstatement fee for alcohol-related

Page 2 of 3

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 59: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME:

: VA WIDOW VOTE SHARON ANDERSON: SeniorSilverSneakers Candidate : ST PAUL MAYOR: HOMEGROWN/HOMETOWN:2006 MN ATTORNEY-GENERAL Legal ResearchAnalyst TelFx:651-776-5835 [email protected] [email protected]

Attorney Pro Se,ECF: P165913sa1299 Vote Sharon Anderson Mayor Castle Coalition: Hands Off My Home Campaign Institute for Justice: Property Rights Cases: New London, CT, Kelo TITLE 12 . BANKS AND BANKING - TOC Kelo v US 5thTakingEminentDomain Sharon'sBIO MS 508A Titles Registered The Constitution of the United States: Transcription Electronic Filing Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 USCAVC Docket 03-0639 Cpl Anderson STAR Program 1058 Summit BullMN $3Billion

revocations is $680.00.

The information provided is accurate for this day only. Pending action and record updates may change status nightly. If you need additional information you may contact the Department of Public Safety, Driver and Vehicle Service Division at: General Driver License Information - (651) 297-3298 Driver License Revocations and Suspensions - (651) 296-2025 Or contact us by E-Mail, DVS Help

Page 3 of 3

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 60: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: Legal Notice Taking DL Date: 9/9/2005 9:38:16 P.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: ShewolfeagleTo: Shewolfeagle

Page 1 of 6

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Office of the Board on Judicial Standards

Board on Judicial Standards Fax Transmittal Chair Cindy Brucato:2025 Centre Pointe Blvd.Suite 180Mendota Heights, MN 55120Telephone - (651) 296-3999 Fax (651) 688-1865

TTY - use the State Relay service: call toll-free, 1-800-627-3529

E-mail - [email protected] Judicial Standards Info www.bjs.state.mn.us This Fax e-Criminal Complaint against Judge Larry Cohen and others for PENSION FRAUD/ CASE FIXING/ ABUSE OF POWER Computer Fraud: In good faith the Senility of these Retired Judges must be held accountable. We are filing this complaint against Cohen former Mayor, County Commissioner, Judge, appointed to some Blue Cross Board to coverup the data warehousing of our medical records, commitments to the tune of $3 Billion yearly to create a terrorism act by send to the mainframe of France. Further Affiants sayeth not at this time: Demand Investigations as we are turning Cohen into the IRS, Demand that he be disbarred and demand for a Rule 20 Psyc Exam for his Pattern of Criminal Conduct. Sharon & Bill ----------------- Forwarded Message:

Subj: Legal Notice Constitutionality of "taking" DL without Due ProcessComputer Fraud

Date: 8/9/2005 12:32:15 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From: Shewolfeagle

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: Shewolfeagle

Right-click picture(s) to display picture options

Page 61: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:NEWS RELEASE August 9th, 2005 PLEASE CIRCULATE: FORWARD It can happen to you also RETIRED SENILE JUDGE LAWRENCE COHEN "TAKES" CANDIDATE Sharon Anderson's DRIVERS LICENSE WITHOUT JURISDICTION, FORMAL COMPLAINT, TESTIMONY UNDER OATH FROM COP CYR T. ABRAHAMSON WHO NEVER APPEARS IN COURT AT ANY TIME. and without a written order of findings of facts,conclusions of law etc. QUESTIONS: To the public the worth of a Drivers License to do Commnerce is certainly worth the salary of the Mayor of St. Paul? Demand for Reinstatement of Drivers License as not Guilty, Punitative, Compensatory, Tort Damages, Irreparable Harm,Injury to Reputations over $75 thousand dollars for each occurrance. Murder by Diabetes Amundson ie: Susan Berkovitz's pay out by City of St. Paul. JURY DEMAND OR GRAND JURY INDICTMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** State of Minnesota, City of St. Paul by Attorney Manuel Cervanties, his agent Maria Anna Dewolf & Cyr.T.Abrahamson ,cop Plaintiffs TCIS : T0-05-011101 v Ticket: 905191492 VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson, Candidate St. Paul Mayor,John Doe, Mary Roe and all others similarily situatedDOJ/Antitrust: Contacts Title 31 Relators,Defendant,3rd Party Plaintiffs www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates & www.billdahn.com Sharon Anderson, Bill Dahn Candidates for St. Paul Mayor for the 12Sept05 Primary to be filled for the Nov General Election. v. US,State of Minnesota, All Agencies, Dept. Public Safety, Michael Campion,Court Administrator Larry Dease,Lynae Olson,Gwen & Michael Upton as husband and Wife,Dan Lundstrom, Chief Judge Gregg Johnson and Lesbian Judges Joanne Smith, Kathleen Gearin, SCAP Panel in its entiretyRetired Judges Lawrence Cohen, Betrand Poritisky, Salvador Rosas Aitkin Judges John Solien John Leitner,Itasca Judges Lesbian Lois Lang, Jon Maturi,John Hawkinson,Retired Spellacy, Gay County Commissioner John Dimish, John Joe, Mary Roe, all others as their interests appear.

Page 2 of 6

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 62: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Price Fixing, Bid Rigging and Market Allocation Schemes MEMORANDUMN At all times material, published www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates Sharon & Bill have had numerous examples of Case Fixing by Apparent Senile Retired DFL Judge Lawrence Cohen and others ie: US Dist. 02-0332( Rosenbaum) implicating the Corrupt Judiciary Gregg Johnson triggering the "Murder" of Cpl. Anderson and his 1 year stay at Brainard State Hospital........... Motion Vacate, Restraining Order Jesie Ventura TO COVERTLY Deceitfully case fix the Data Warehousing of the State of Minnesota's Medical Records to France to the tune of $3 Billion Dollars, constituting Terrorism by the Corrupt Courts against the taxpaying citizenery. Bull North America - Customer References MS 609.491failure to appear Said Matter was Removed to either the State Supreme Court MS2.724 or the Attorney General MS8.01 or to convene a Grand Jury MS388 County Attorney. Appearance by Personal Service and Fax 5Aug05 that the Jurisdiction was questioned. Faxed to Micheal Upton who is now culpable for the computerized false entrys or lack of entrys, now by verbal heresay of apparent Senile Judge Cohen to suspend DL without AA site Brief 1058 Su mmit Authority. Uniform Commercial Code

BREECH OF PUBLIC TRUST

BAD JUDGES AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT THEM Title 18 chapter1sec(3) Accessory after the fact Thanks Vicki Eventually My DL must be reinstated because: Trying to get the Trainscript of the Proceedings as the Cop never showed up, I had removed, computer fraud in Ramsey County is Rampant. More Important is Pension Fraud Case Fixing which is a felony: No Order to appeal from or transcript...........

�� ����� ����� ���� ��� � � �� ����

������� ����� ��������� �� � ����� �!� �

Page 3 of 6

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 63: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Can't get the assignment of the Pensioned Judge Larry Cohen Further how can a verbal heresay be fed on the computer to "take" DL without a Jury Trial, Formal Complaint, JUrisdictional Questions etc. Currently my DL is worth the Salary of Mayor approximately $90 thousand yearly. Based upon all Findings,Records, Conclusive Evidence of Not Guilty Plea: Removal to State Appeals Court, served upon State AG, State Supreme Court, County Attorney Susan Gaertner, and City A

�� ����� ����� ���� ��� � � �� ����

�"����# ������� ����� ���� � $%�&� �� �

�� ����� ����� ���� ��� � � �� ����

����#�' ��(��� ��������� �� � $%�&� �� �

Page 4 of 6

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 64: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

ttorney Manuael Cervanties:

DL Number Enter a MN DL number in this format: A123456789012

M243104164509 Get Record

Driver License Search Results 8/9/2005 11:07:33 AM

DL Number Class Type Class D StatusCommercial

Status

M243104164509 D 1 VALID N / A

Page 5 of 6

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 65: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

/s/ Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se,Legal Research Analyst Vote Sharon Anderson Mayor Castle Coalition: Hands Off My Home Campaign

Institute for Justice: Property Rights Cases: New London, CT, Kelo TITLE 12 . BANKS AND BANKING - TOC Kelo v US 5thTakingEminentDomain Sharon'sBIO MS 508A Titles Registered The Constitution of the United States: Transcription Electronic Filing Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 USCAVC

Docket 03-0639 Cpl Anderson STAR Program 1058 Summit BullMN $3Billion

Endorsements DL Issued DL Expiration

NONE 01/14/2005 01/27/2009

Messages 8/9/2005 11:07:34 AM

As of July 1, 2003, the reinstatement fee for alcohol-related revocations is $680.00.

The information provided is accurate for this day only. Pending action and record updates may change status nightly. If you need additional information you may contact the Department of Public Safety, Driver and Vehicle Service Division at: General Driver License Information - (651) 297-3298 Driver License Revocations and Suspensions - (651) 296-2025 Or contact us by E-Mail, DVS Help

Page 6 of 6

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Page 66: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

Subj: RE: Legal Notice Taking DL Verbal Order by Senile Pensioned Judge Larry Cohen Date: 10/6/2005 10:09:58 A.M. Central Daylight TimeFrom: [email protected]: [email protected]

Page 1 of 1Message

Thursday, October 06, 2005 America Online: Shewolfeagle

Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This is an automatic acknowledgement that your e-mail was received. It will be reviewed in the order it was received.

Page 67: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 68: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 69: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 70: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 71: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 72: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 73: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 74: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 75: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 76: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 77: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 78: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 79: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 80: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 81: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 82: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 83: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Page 84: Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84