sample digital brochure

217
MASTER Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches PREPARED BY Design, Engineering and Permitting Services for the RFP# 11-5772 Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass,

Upload: alison-galy

Post on 06-Mar-2016

265 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

This is a sample document

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sample Digital Brochure

MASTER

Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches

PREPARED BY

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services for the

RFP# 11-5772

Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass,

Page 2: Sample Digital Brochure

Table of Contents

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

FIRM: Taylor Engineering, Inc.

PROJECT: Design, Engineering and Permitting Services for the Renourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples Beaches

RFP #: 11-5772 Tab

I. Cover Letter / Management Summary

II. Business Plan

Proposed Team

Approach and Time Line Project #1

Sample Report

III. Experience and Capacity of Firm

Experience

Capacity of Firm

IV. Specialized Expertise of Team Members

Organizational Chart

Resumes

Sub-consultants Letter of Intent

V. References

VI. Acceptance of Conditions

VII. Required Forms

Page 3: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 4: Sample Digital Brochure

Business Plan

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

PROPOSED CONTRACT TEAM We are proud to submit our qualifications to provide design engineering and permitting support to Collier County. The Taylor Engineering team consists of nationally recognized experts with extensive experience in and around Florida’s coastal environment. We are confident you will find our team unmatched in both depth and breadth of technical excellence, client service, and commitment. Notably, Taylor Engineering has worked extensively with each of our nine team members on past work. Tab 3 – Experience and Capacity provides a detailed description of our team members’ qualifications.

Taylor Engineering, Inc. – Taylor Engineering will serve as the coastal engineering and marine structures lead and prime contractor for this contract. We maintain our corporate office in Jacksonville and a Florida branch office in West Palm Beach.

Taylor Engineering’s experience extends to all aspects of engineering design related to beach restoration and coastal structures. We have designed and permitted over 20 federal and non-federal beach nourishment projects, which collectively have or will restore over 45 miles of beach with over 18,000,000 cubic yards of sand. Currently, the company is engaged in the design and permitting of eight additional non-federal beach nourishment projects, which will restore about 40 miles of coastline with over 10 million cubic yards of sand. The firm has prepared both regional- and project-level feasibility studies and plan formulation documents for over 50 miles of beaches. The firm was responsible for the feasibility, design, permitting, and construction administration phases of the award-winning seven-mile Western Walton County and East Destin Beach Restoration Project. Located on the Gulf of Mexico shoreline, the project received one of the 2008 national awards for “Best Restored Beach” from the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association.

Continental Shelf Associates, Inc. (CSA) – With over 40 years of experience conducting multidisciplinary marine environmental programs, CSA has extensive operational experience in coastal and offshore habitat areas in Florida, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Atlantic seaboard. CSA will provide pre-construction biological reef and hardbottom monitoring, hardbottom mapping, and ground truthing.

Sonographics, Inc. (Sonographics) – Sonographics has specialized in sonar, oceanographic, and marine geophysical surveys for over 35 years. Sonographics will perform the required side-scan sonar surveys as well as sub-bottom and magnetometer surveys if necessary. In the last 10 years, Sonographics provides oceanographic services to a wide variety of clients throughout the world. Sonographics has used side-scan sonar, sub-bottom profilers, or magnetometers to collect data on over 200 commercial surveys.

Marlowe & Company, LLC – Since 1984, Marlowe & Company has successfully assisted with the state and federal permitting process on numerous water resource projects. For this project, Marlowe & Company will provide state and federal coordination with permitting and/or construction efforts. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., Marlowe & Company has established strong professional relationships with regulatory agency staff that oversee beach and shoreline protection

Page 5: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

projects. Marlow & Company is currently assisting 27 local governments and associations — six of them in Florida — with beach related needs. Relevant experience includes the construction of numerous beach restoration and nourishment projects, including 12 that received the American Shore & Beach Preservation Association’s (ASBPA) Best Restored Beach awards. Notably, Taylor Engineering’s Western Walton County and East Destin Beach Restoration Project received the ASBPA’s 2008 Best Restored Beach Award.

RWParkinson Consulting, Inc. – As specialists in native beach characterization, borrow area delineation, sediment compatibility, and permit compliance, RWParkinson Consulting will provide geological consulting services for this project. The company bases its success on the professional experience of Randall W. Parkinson, Ph.D., P.G. (President) who has worked in the southeast United States, including Florida and the Gulf Coast, for nearly three decades. Dr. Parkinson provides a broad range of coastal construction services including feasibility and desktop studies; reconnaissance and detailed field surveys; laboratory testing and analyses; interpretation of aerial and remotely sensed images; vibracore and geophysical surveys; and assistance with permit application and compliance monitoring.

American Vibracore Systems, Inc. (AVS) – Since 2002, AVS has specialized in offshore / onshore geotechnical drilling, vibracore collection, and marine support services. AVS will provide SPT borings as part of any marine structure design or vibracore collection and analysis services for any sand search initiatives required for

the contract. AVS’s U.S. Army Corps of Engineers certified lab offers a variety of laboratory testing methods. AVS has performed many projects throughout Florida and the Gulf of Mexico.

Morgan & Eklund, Inc. (M&E) – With over 25 years of experience, M&E will provide bathymetric and land surveying services for this project. Certified by the Florida Department of Environment Protection in Boundary, Topographic, Control and Hydrographic Surveys, M&E currently holds continuing service contracts for topographic and hydrographic surveys with South Florida Water Management District, Florida Inland Navigation District, and Miami-Dade County.

Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. (SEARCH) – Since 1993, SEARCH has provided cultural resource consulting services including underwater archaeology, archaeology, architectural history, history, and public outreach. SEARCH will provide underwater archaeological surveys

and other cultural resource management services that may be required. SEARCH brings Florida expertise; state-of-the-art equipment and facilities; and expert personnel. SEARCH has successfully completed over 1,600 projects according to federal and state guidelines, including more than 75 underwater archaeological investigations. SEARCH assists clients in complying with requirements under Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, 36 CFR 800, 36 CFR 79, and Florida statutes and regulations.

Page 6: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Aerial Cartographics of America, Inc. (ACA) – Since 1973, ACA has provided a full range of photogrammetric services including aerial photography (digital & film), airborne GPS, LiDAR, photographic laboratory services, and scanning services. ACA will provide aerial photography services for this project. Staff members include six Florida Licensed Professional Survey and Mappers (PSM) and one ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist. ACA’s aerial mapping software capabilities include a variety of translations. Based on the client’s request, ACA can deliver work products in AutoCAD, MicroStation, Geopak and ESRI formats.

PLAN OF APPROACH FOR THE RENOURISHMENT OF THE BAREFOOT, VANDERBILT, CLAM PASS, PARK SHORE, AND NAPLES BEACHES Taylor Engineering has developed a comprehensive approach for the design, engineering, and permitting services needed to renourish the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, and Naples beaches. To develop our approach, we considered the County’s Request for Proposal (RFP) document, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Permit number 0222355-001-JC and associated permit modifications, the conceptual engineering report provided by the County, and our knowledge of the project area and permitting process. The detailed work plan specifies steps Taylor Engineering proposes to take to complete the tasks and sub-tasks below in a cost effective and time sensitive manner. The narrative below provides a summary of the key work plan components. Notably, FDEP Permit number 0222355-001-JC requires physical and biological monitoring during the fifth year following project construction; thus, the work plan assumes the County conducted the monitoring surveys during summer 2011. The plan also assumes that project construction will occur between 11/1/2013 and 5/1/2014 as stated in the RFP. D a t a R e v i e w a n d P r e - a p p l i c a t i o n m e e t i n g w i t h F D E P With a conceptual design and recommended plan already prepared and approved by the County, we will coordinate and conduct pre-application meetings with the FDEP and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Meeting objectives will include introducing the proposed project modifications (i.e., increased fill template, additional reaches, groin removal/modification, and Doctors Pass spur jetty construction) to regulatory staff, informing them of the desired project construction timeline, and determining agency-specific items for the permit applications. During these meetings, we will discuss permitting strategies to give the County the shortest permitting timeline and to allow future construction to move forward without permitting delays. Before the scheduled meetings, we will review the results of the 2011 physical and biological monitoring surveys and report to verify that the County’s conceptual design and recommended plan remain valid. We will discuss the results and coordinate with the County as necessary to prepare for the meetings. We will also visit the project site to observe existing conditions. E n g i n e e r i n g D e s i g n S u r v e y s Beach profile design survey — To facilitate a prompt start to design work, we will use the 2011 physical monitoring survey as the basis for the project design modification. Where necessary, particularly in the Barefoot Beach and Clam Pass Park segments and other areas of interest such as hot spots, and structure locations, we will coordinate with Morgan & Eklund to obtain new beach profile data. As discussed below, we propose conducting a new project-wide beach profile survey with intermediate profiles (i.e., 500-foot spacing) to develop construction plans and determine accurate construction quantities; however, we assume the 2011 survey and supplemental data will sufficiently serve permitting purposes. Additionally, we assume the 2011 beach profile data, together with the

Page 7: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

2011 biological monitoring data will provide sufficient hardbottom location data in the original project area for permitting purposes. Structure surveys — Following discussions with the County to determine the priority of existing groins identified for removal/modification, we will coordinate with Morgan & Eklund to survey the structures and to conduct a detailed bathymetry survey of the Doctors Pass south jetty vicinity. The survey data will define baseline conditions for structure modifications, including design of the proposed spur jetty. If necessary, Taylor Engineering will coordinate with AVS to conduct in-water geotechnical investigations of the proposed spur jetty vicinity. The information gathered will allow Taylor Engineering to set design parameters for the required depth and capacity of the spur jetty, and provide an understanding of subgrade conditions and structure stability. Notably, if such data is currently available from historic jetty design surveys or as-built drawings, the above geotechnical surveys may prove unnecessary. Borrow area survey — We will coordinate with Morgan & Eklund to conduct an updated bathymetric survey of Borrow Area T1. We will apply the data to develop plan view and cross section plots of the borrow area and to design a dredging template that conserves as much sand as possible for future nourishment events. We assume Borrow Area T1 will require no additional geotechnical; however, we will compare the new data to past surveys to evaluate any infilling since the 2006 dredging event. Based on the conceptual engineering report, we also assume that designing and permitting the Cape Romano sand source will require no additional survey work. Pipeline corridor mapping — We will use the results of the 2011 hardbottom monitoring survey and other applicable available data to identify the required pipeline routes and booster pump operational areas for inclusion in the permit modification request drawings. If new data collection is necessary to identify the routes and operational areas, particularly for the Barefoot Beach segment, we will coordinate with our subcontractors — CSA, Sonographics, and ACA — to conduct the necessary survey work during the earliest workable conditions, likely during late spring or early summer 2012. Upon completion of the pre-construction hardbottom survey discussed below, we will re-examine the proposed routes and operational areas, and propose modifications if necessary. J o i n t C o a s t a l P e r m i t M o d i f i c a t i o n R e q u e s t We will use the data discussed above to develop a permit modification request to the current FDEP and USACE permits. The modification request will include a revised beach fill template based on the County’s conceptual design; a borrow area conservation plan and dredging template for Borrow Area T1 (and possibly the Cape Romano borrow area); a description of proposed groin modifications; design plans for the proposed spur jetty at Doctors Pass; a request to eliminate the turtle nesting season construction window restriction; and appropriate revisions to the physical and biological monitoring plans. We will prepare a project narrative describing the requested permit modifications; develop permit drawings to include plan and cross section views of the beach fill, borrow areas, and structures; and prepare additional reports or assessments as necessary. Notably, depending on the permitting strategies discussed at the pre-application meetings, we may prepare and submit a separate JCP application to address the spur jetty. Taylor Engineering’s coastal engineers will prepare engineering justifications for varying the width and height of the permitted beach fill template, revising the beach fill placement areas, modifying/removing existing groins, and constructing the spur jetty at Doctors Pass.

Page 8: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Dr. Parkinson will collaborate with our coastal engineers to design dredging templates at Borrow Area T1 and the Cape Romano borrow area to recover beach compatible sand. Dr. Parkinson will help develop permit sketches including delineation of horizontal and vertical (aka maximum depth of cut) boundaries and buffer zones of appropriate offset to ensure target avoidance, such as gravel-sized sediment. The dredge plans will maximize efficiency, and hence minimize project costs, by delineating cells with (a) horizontal boundaries logically feasible to track during dredging and (b) cut depths as suggested by the geological (i.e., vibracore) and geophysical (i.e., seismic) survey data. Additionally, the dredge plans will consider the conservation of borrow resources by allowing for practical dredge templates for future renourishment events. Design of the Barefoot Beach and Clam Pass Park sections, as well as the spur jetty, will require an evaluation of potential hardbottom impacts. We will work with CSA and Sonographics to review the side-scan and hardbottom surveys to identify hardbottom outcrops within or near the construction sites. If necessary, CSA will conduct a UMAM assessment to quantify potential hardbottom impacts. Taylor Engineering’s environmental specialists will prepare environmental assessments and Essential Fish Habitat reports addressing the proposed project modifications. Taylor Engineering will prepare a permit modification request to the Doctors Pass dredging permit to change the disposal site for beach sand placement from R57 to R59. After review of the JCP modification request, the FDEP and USACE will likely respond with requests for additional information (RAIs). RAIs typically comprise a series of questions that require additional clarification or other information regarding the proposed work. Experience indicates that similar projects have generally required responses to a minimum of two RAIs from FDEP. The USACE typically issues one RAI before the public notice and then requires a response to public comments. We will coordinate with FDEP and USACE regulatory staffs, maintain consistency between state and federal permit applications and other environmental documentation, and provide submittals in electronic and hardcopy format, per their requirements. B O E M R E C o o r d i n a t i o n The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE), formally the Mineral Management Service (MMS), manages sand resources in federal waters. Such is the case for the proposed borrow site, Borrow Area T1, which provided sand for the 2006 project. We will coordinate with BOEMRE to determine the work requirements to obtain a borrow area lease. Taylor Engineering will prepare a new environmental assessment for the borrow area, and coordinate with the County and BOEMRE as necessary to accomplish all lease application requirements. P r o j e c t C o o r d i n a t i o n The single most important activity during the permitting process is the establishment and maintenance of a clear line of communications between the applicant and the participating agencies. To that end, Taylor Engineering will actively coordinate with local, state, and federal agencies staff during the application process. These agencies include, among others, Collier County, FDEP, USACE, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and BOEMRE. We will also meet or correspond with Collier County staff members regularly to inform them of the project progress and get their concurrence on the project elements.

Page 9: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Additionally, we will meet with the Captiva Erosion Control District to coordinate construction of regional projects to realize cost savings. E r o s i o n C o n t r o l L i n e E s t a b l i s h m e n t We expect FDEP will require establishment of an erosion control line (ECL) in the proposed project additions within the Barefoot Beach and Clam Pass Park areas. To begin, we will coordinate with the County to schedule a mean high water line survey, as project construction typically should occur within two years after establishing the ECL. We will schedule Morgan & Eklund to conduct the mean high water survey during the appropriate timeframe. Morgan & Eklund will conduct preliminary discussions with the FDEP Bureau of Survey and Mapping to verify the appropriate mean high water (MHW) elevation(s) for use in the survey. We will coordinate with the County to obtain appropriate property ownership information. Upon completion of the mean high water line survey, Morgan & Eklund will submit draft mean high water survey drawings to the Bureau and obtain review comments. After addressing the Bureau’s comments, Morgan & Eklund will provide us a revised drawing set. We will review the drawings and coordinate with the County to prepare a final draft for submittal to the Bureau. We will address any FDEP questions promptly to resolve outstanding issues and to obtain final state approval.

Upon receiving FDEP approval, we will prepare presentations for two public forums — a public workshop and a public hearing — required to establish the surveyed mean high water line as the ECL. FDEP requires three public advertisements appearing once each week for three weeks before the scheduled events. We will coordinate with the County and FDEP to schedule and attend the workshop and hearing. Following the public hearing, we will work with the County and FDEP to incorporate any final changes to the proposed ECL. P r e - c o n s t r u c t i o n S u r v e y s FDEP Permit number 0222355-001-JC requires completion of biological monitoring during the summer months before construction. Monitoring includes side-scan sonar and diver verification of the nearshore hardbottom edge, biological reef and hardbottom characterization and mapping, environmental aerials, and preparation of a biological monitoring report. We will coordinate with CSA, Sonographics, and ACA to conduct the monitoring surveys during summer 2013, the summer before construction. FDEP Permit number 0222355-001-JC also requires completion of physical monitoring before construction. Monitoring includes beach profile surveys of the project and control areas within 90 days of construction commencement. We will coordinate with our subcontractor, Morgan & Eklund, to conduct the survey during the required timeframe or request FDEP to accept the design survey, if appropriate, in lieu of a new survey. C o n t r a c t D o c u m e n t P r e p a r a t i o n a n d B i d A d m i n i s t r a t i o n A s s i s t a n c e Following FDEP and USACE acceptance of the proposed project modifications and structure improvements/modifications, Taylor Engineering will prepare technical specifications and construction drawings consistent with the FDEP and USACE permits. After final approval from Collier County, Taylor Engineering will develop a final specifications package, incorporating all comments received from Collier County and signed and sealed drawings and specifications. We will provide the final construction-ready specifications and plan set in reproducible hardcopy and digital format for use in producing copies for bidding purposes. Additionally, we will provide the drawings in AutoCAD 2007 digital format on CD-ROM for distribution to the selected contractor.

Page 10: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Following completion of the construction plans and technical specifications, we will support Collier County during the solicitation/award phase of the project. These services will include, at a minimum, the following items:

Compile the Contract Documents to incorporate the County’s “front-end” documents. Support the County’s construction contract solicitation process and assist with the issuance of addenda to

answer technical questions from contractors regarding the Contract Documents, if any. Coordinate the distribution of construction Contract Documents to prospective contractors, if required. Coordinate, prepare for, and conduct a pre-bid conference. Assist with evaluation of bids and assist with checking contractor’s references. Furnish a written recommendation to the County upon completion of the proposal evaluation.

Notably, we will coordinate with Morgan & Eklund to conduct an updated beach profile survey that will define baseline conditions for the construction plans. We will apply the data to update the beach fill template and calculate construction quantities C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n a n d O b s e r v a t i o n We will assist Collier County with administration of the construction contract from our West Palm Beach and Jacksonville offices and from the project site. In-office duties typically include reviewing the contractor’s shop drawings and submittals, reviewing progress pay surveys and applications, providing oversight of the progress of work, and assisting with the preparation of change orders, if required. Additionally, we will review the contractor as-built surveys during construction to monitor the placed fill volume to determine project adjustments, if necessary.

We will conduct the preconstruction conference with the contractor selected to construct the project, FDEP field representatives, Collier County staff, and other agency representatives. During construction, Taylor Engineering’s project and/or senior engineers will make weekly visits to the project site to attend coordination meetings and ascertain whether work is proceeding in general conformance with permit conditions and plans and specifications. We will maintain frequent communication with the County to discuss project progress and issues, and coordinate between the County and contractor as necessary. FDEP Permit number 0222355-001-JC requires monitoring of the pipeline route immediately after pipeline placement and immediately after pipeline removal. We will schedule CSA to conduct the pipeline route monitoring at the appropriate times. SEARCH will remain on-call throughout construction to resolve problems or issues that arise in the event that construction activities unearth coastal or historic artifacts.

P r o j e c t C l o s e - o u t a n d C e r t i f i c a t i o n Upon Collier County receiving from the Contractor a request to certify the project substantially complete, we will make a substantial completion inspection of the project to determine if substantially complete. If it is not, we will develop preliminary and final punch list items for the contractor to complete or correct. With concurrence from the County, we will transmit this list to the Contractor for completion. Upon completion of outlined items, we will certify the project substantially complete. We have budgeted for one meeting/inspection.

Page 11: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Before project close-out, we will collect and review the contractor’s final waiver and release of lien from all subcontractors and suppliers, final pay application, pre- and post-construction survey files, final contractor certification, and final contractor affidavit. We will assist the County with coordination of post-construction monitoring surveys and permit-related submittals. Following completion of the project, we will prepare and submit to the FDEP and USACE a statement of completion and a certification in accordance with the FDEP and USACE permit requirements. PROJECT TIMELINE – PROJECT #1 R e n o u r i s h m e n t o f t h e B a r e f o o t , V a n d e r b i l t , C l a m P a s s , P a r k S h o r e , a n d N a p l e s B e a c h e s Gantt chart — The Gantt chart on the next page describes the proposed project activities, interdependencies, start times, end times, and durations of each activity. The chart also describes the critical path, float, and project milestones. EXAMPLE WORK PRODUCT REPORT A copy of the report as an example of work product immediately follows the schedule.

Page 12: Sample Digital Brochure

ID Task Name Start Finish

1 Review Data; FDEP Pre-application Meetings Tue 12/13/11 Fri 1/13/122 Review 2011 Data; conduct site visit; prepare for meetings Tue 12/13/11 Fri 1/6/123 FDEP and USACE pre-application meetings Mon 1/9/12 Fri 1/13/1245 Engineering Design Surveys Mon 1/16/12 Fri 6/29/126 Beach profile survey Mon 1/16/12 Wed 2/29/127 Structures survey Mon 1/16/12 Wed 2/29/128 Borrow area survey Mon 1/16/12 Wed 2/29/129 hardbottom mappng Tue 5/1/12 Fri 6/29/121011 Permit Modification Request Mon 1/16/12 Mon 4/1/1312 Beach fill design Mon 1/16/12 Thu 5/31/1213 Borrow area design Thu 3/1/12 Thu 5/31/1214 Groin modifications Mon 1/16/12 Fri 6/29/1215 Spur jetty design Mon 1/16/12 Fri 6/29/1216 Hardbottom analysis; UMAM assessment Mon 1/16/12 Tue 7/31/1217 Map pipeline routes and operational areas Mon 1/16/12 Tue 7/31/1218 Essential Fish Habitat report Thu 3/1/12 Fri 6/29/1219 Biological assessments Thu 3/1/12 Tue 7/31/1220 Update biological and physical monitoring plans Fri 6/1/12 Tue 7/31/1221 Prepare and submit FDEP and USACE permit modification requests Mon 1/16/12 Tue 7/31/1222 RAI cycle and meetings (2 RAIs) Wed 8/1/12 Mon 12/31/1223 Draft Permit Review and Coordination Tue 1/1/13 Mon 4/1/1324 Doctors Pass dredging permit modification request and RAI cycle Mon 1/16/12 Tue 7/31/122526 BOEMRE Coordination Wed 2/1/12 Fri 3/29/1327 Environmental Assesssment Wed 2/1/12 Mon 4/30/1228 Other tasks and coordination Wed 2/1/12 Fri 3/29/132930 Erosion Control Line Establishment Fri 6/1/12 Fri 11/30/1231 Mean high water survey and drawings Fri 6/1/12 Tue 7/31/1232 Public workshop and hearing Wed 8/1/12 Fri 9/28/1233 FDEP and county coordination Fri 6/1/12 Fri 11/30/123435 Contract Document Preparation and Bid Administration Assistance Tue 4/2/13 Thu 10/31/1336 Construction Plans and Specifications Tue 4/2/13 Thu 5/30/1337 Bidding Support Fri 5/31/13 Thu 10/31/133839 Pre-construction Surveys Wed 5/1/13 Fri 8/30/1340 Hardbottom surveys Wed 5/1/13 Fri 8/30/1341 Beach Profile survey Wed 5/1/13 Fri 8/30/134243 Construction Administration and Observation Fri 11/1/13 Wed 4/30/1444 Construction contract inspection and monitoring Fri 11/1/13 Wed 4/30/1445 Construction contract volume adjustment by segment and reach Fri 11/1/13 Wed 4/30/1446 Attendance at weekly coordination meetings Fri 11/1/13 Wed 4/30/1447 Pipeline corridor monitoring during construction Fri 11/1/13 Wed 4/30/144849 Project Close-out and Certification Thu 5/1/14 Mon 6/30/1450 Inspections Thu 5/1/14 Fri 5/30/1451 Project certification and close-out reports Thu 5/1/14 Mon 6/30/145253 Project Coordination Mon 1/2/12 Mon 6/30/1454 Agency Coordination (FDEP, USACE, NMFS, USFWS, FWCC) Mon 1/2/12 Mon 6/30/1455 County and Contractor coordination Mon 1/2/12 Mon 6/30/1456 Coordination with Captiva Erosion Control District Mon 1/2/12 Mon 6/30/14

Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul2012 2013 2014

Task

Split

Progress

Milestone

Summary

Project Summary

External Tasks

External MileTask

Split

TENATIVE SCHEDULE FORDESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND PERMITTING SERVICES

Renourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, and Naples Beaches

Project Schedule.mpp Page 1 of 1

Page 13: Sample Digital Brochure

Dubois Park Snorkel Area Hydrographic Study,

Palm Beach County, Florida

February 2009

Page 14: Sample Digital Brochure

Dubois Park Snorkel Area Hydrographic Study,

Palm Beach County, Florida

Prepared for:

Palm Beach County, Florida

By:

Taylor Engineering, Inc. 10151 Deerwood Park Blvd, Bldg 300, Suite 300

Jacksonville, Florida 32256 (904) 731-7040

February 2009 C2007-022

Page 15: Sample Digital Brochure

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... ii

LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 MODELING PROCEDURES, STUDY AREA, AND CALIBRATION ...................................... 2

2.1 Procedures ................................................................................................................................ 2

2.2 Study Area and Model Domain .............................................................................................. 3

2.3 Tidal Characteristics and Model Calibration ....................................................................... 8

2.4 Model Parameters and Boundary Conditions .................................................................... 10

2.5 Model Calibration Results .................................................................................................... 10

3.0 HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS .................................................................. 18

3.1 Overview Stopped here ......................................................................................................... 18

3.2 Tidal Stage Comparison ....................................................................................................... 18

3.3 Velocity Distribution Comparison ....................................................................................... 19

3.4 Particle Flow Trace ............................................................................................................... 19

4.0 WATER QUALITY MODELING AND ANALYSIS .................................................................. 34

4.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 34

4.2 Boundary Conditions ............................................................................................................ 34

4.3 Snorkel Area Model Results ................................................................................................. 35

4.4 Pee-Wee Beach Model Results ............................................................................................. 39

4.5 Dubois Creek Model Results ................................................................................................ 42

5.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 45

REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 46

Page 16: Sample Digital Brochure

ii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Model Domain around Jupiter Inlet, Palm Beach County, Florida ............................................ 4

Figure 2.2 Dubois Park Project Site and Proposed Breakwater ................................................................... 5

Figure 2.3 Dubois Park Project Breakwater Plan View ............................................................................... 6

Figure 2.4 Dubois Park Project Breakwater Section View .......................................................................... 7

Figure 2.5 Proposed Dubois Park Mesh and Bathymetry ............................................................................ 8

Figure 2.6 Model Calibration Points ............................................................................................................ 9

Figure 2.7 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results at the Marina Tide Station (S1) ................................. 11

Figure 2.8 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results at Jupiter Inlet, South Jetty ....................................... 12

Figure 2.9 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results, Velocity Station 1 (V1), Marina Entrance ............... 14

Figure 2.10 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results, Velocity Station 2 (V2), Marina Interior ............... 15

Figure 2.11 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results, Velocity Station 3 (V3), Snorkel Area ................... 16

Figure 2.12 Dubois Park Model Calibration Velocity Comparison ........................................................... 17

Figure 3.1 Hydraulic Data Sample Locations ............................................................................................ 18

Figure 3.2 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point S1 ............................... 20

Figure 3.3 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point S2 ............................... 21

Figure 3.4 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point S3 ............................... 22

Figure 3.5 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point L1 ............................... 23

Figure 3.6 Tidal Phase Comparison, Point S1 vs. Point S2, with Breakwaters ......................................... 24

Figure 3.7 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, West 2 Sample Line ...................................... 25

Figure 3.8 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, West 1 Sample Line ...................................... 26

Figure 3.9 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, East 1 Sample Line ....................................... 27

Figure 3.10 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, East 2 Sample Line ..................................... 28

Figure 3.11 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, West 2 Sample Line ....................................... 29

Figure 3.12 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, West 1 Sample Line ....................................... 30

Figure 3.13 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, East 1 Sample Line ........................................ 31

Figure 3.14 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, East 2 Sample Line ........................................ 32

Figure 3.15 Snorkel Area Particle Flow Trace ........................................................................................... 33

Figure 4.1 Snorkel Area and Pee-Wee Beach Areas of Interest ................................................................ 35

Figure 4.2 Initial Snorkel Area Contaminant Concentration and Numbered Sample Points ..................... 36

Figure 4.3 Contaminant Concentrations in the Snorkel Area, Neap Tide, Initial Snorkel Area

Contamination .................................................................................................................................... 37

Figure 4.4 Contaminant Concentrations in the Loxahatchee River, Neap Tide, Initial Snorkel Area

Contamination .................................................................................................................................... 38

Page 17: Sample Digital Brochure

iii

Figure 4.5 Initial Pee-Wee Beach Contaminant Concentration and Numbered Sample Points ................. 39

Figure 4.6 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at Pee-Wee Beach, Neap Tide, Point PW1

............................................................................................................................................................ 40

Figure 4.7 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at Pee-Wee Beach, Neap Tide, Point PW2

............................................................................................................................................................ 41

Figure 4.8 Initial South Dubois Creek Contaminant Concentration and Numbered Sample Points .......... 42

Figure 4.9 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at South End of Dubois Creek, Neap Tide,

Point DC3 ........................................................................................................................................... 43

Figure 4.10 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at South End of Dubois Creek, Neap

Tide, Point DC7 ................................................................................................................................. 44

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 NOAA Tide Data ....................................................................................................................... 10

Page 18: Sample Digital Brochure

1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Palm Beach County proposes to build a protected snorkel area on a portion of the southern

shoreline of the Loxahatchee River just west of Dubois Creek about one-half mile inland from Jupiter

Inlet in Palm Beach County, Florida. Plans call for a detached, segmented breakwater to protect

swimmers in the snorkel area from strong currents in the Loxahatchee River and waves produced by

transiting boat traffic. Gaps in the breakwater would maintain hydraulic communication between the

snorkel area and Dubois Creek and the river to minimize the breakwater’s effect on water quality.

Taylor Engineering conducted a numerical model study to assess the effects of the proposed

breakwater on water quality in the snorkel area and in the adjacent water of the Loxahatchee River and

Dubois Creek. The permitting process for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)

requires verification that the hydraulic conditions characteristic of the proposed breakwater will maintain

adequate water quality within the snorkel area and not degrade the quality of adjacent waters

As a measure of water quality in the snorkel area, Taylor Engineering has assumed the flushing

time requirements for docking facilities specified by the South Florida Water Management District

(SFWMD). SFWMD requirements define “flushing time” as “the time required to reduce the

concentration of a conservative contaminant to 10% of its original concentration” (SFWMD, 2008, p. 19)

and prescribe a maximum desirable “flushing time of less than or equal to four days … for docking

facilities” (SFWMD, 2008, p. 19). In addition, SFWMD requires that contaminants “leaving the site of

the docking facility will be adequately dispersed in the receiving water body so as to not cause violations

of water quality standards based on circulation patterns and flushing characteristics of the receiving water

body” (SFWMD, 2008, p. 19). Taylor Engineering conducted this study to demonstrate that the proposed

snorkel area protected by a detached, segmented breakwater meets or exceeds these guidelines.

Following this brief introduction, Chapter 2 describes the proposed snorkel area and breakwater,

the general modeling procedures, and model calibration. Chapter 3 presents the hydraulic model results

and Chapter 4 presents the water quality modeling results. Chapter 5 summarizes this report.

Page 19: Sample Digital Brochure

2

2.0 MODELING PROCEDURES, STUDY AREA, AND CALIBRATION

2.1 Procedures

Typically, tidal currents resulting from water level changes over the tidal cycle provide the

primary mechanism for water exchange and mixing. Numerical hydrodynamic models provide engineers

a means to evaluate tidal circulation in and around inlets, rivers, and bays. These models simulate flow by

solving the governing equations for the fluid dynamic processes at a given location under specific water

level and flow boundary conditions.

This study employed two U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) two-dimensional finite

element models (RMA2 and RMA4) to determine the effects of the proposed project on water quality.

RMA2 computes water surface elevations and horizontal velocity components in two-dimensional flow

fields based on tidal or riverine flow data. RMA4 applies the hydrodynamic solution from RMA2 to

simulate the advection-diffusion transport process of a hypothetical contaminant introduced into a water

body.

Resource Management Associates, Inc. of Davis, California developed the hydrodynamic model

RMA2 in 1973. Continuing modification and improvement by researchers at the USACE Waterways

Experiment Station (WES) has resulted in a robust, well-established model. RMA2 solves the two-

dimensional transient, depth-averaged, fluid dynamic governing equations in a finite element scheme with

specifications for roughness coefficients to describe bed friction, turbulent exchange coefficients for

turbulence closure, and both flow and free surface boundary conditions. Additional capabilities include

treatments for wetting and drying, Coriolis acceleration, wind stress, dynamic bed friction assignment by

depth, Peclet number definition of turbulent exchange coefficients, and one-dimensional storage and flow

structures.

RMA4, another Resource Management Associates program modified and improved by

researchers at WES, applies the hydrodynamic solutions from RMA2 to simulate depth-averaged

advection-diffusion transport processes. RMA4 can simulate the fate of constituents as conservative or

non-conservative with a first order decay. Successful applications include investigating the physical

processes of migration and mixing of a soluble substance in reservoirs, rivers, bays, estuaries and coastal

zones; defining horizontal salinity distributions; tracing temperature effects from power plants;

calculating residence times of harbors or basins; optimizing the placement of outfalls; identifying

potential critical areas for oil spills or other contaminant spread; evaluating turbidity plume extent; and

monitoring other water quality criterion within game and fish habitats.

Page 20: Sample Digital Brochure

3

Therefore, the RMA2 model, calibrated with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

(NOAA) data and predicted tides, provides the hydrodynamic solution for the RMA4 model. The RMA4

solution estimates the flushing time (i.e., the time over which the tidal exchange reduces the concentration

of the contaminant in the marina basin).

2.2 Study Area and Model Domain

The Dubois Park snorkel area lies on the south bank of the Loxahatchee River about one-half

mile west of Jupiter Inlet and the Atlantic Ocean. Figure 2.1 shows the extent of the model domain and

locates the Dubois Park project site in Palm Beach County, Florida. The project site consists of the

snorkel area and a detached, segmented breakwater lying parallel to the Loxahatchee River. Figure 2.2

locates the project site on the Loxahatchee River near Jupiter Inlet, just west of Dubois Creek and details

the proposed breakwaters. Gaps in the proposed breakwater would preserve hydraulic communication

between the waters in the snorkel area, Dubois Creek, the Loxahatchee River, Jupiter Inlet, and the

Atlantic Ocean. Tidal waters from the Atlantic Ocean enter and exit the snorkel area through the gaps and

maintain water quality. The model includes the Loxahatchee River, and extends north along Jupiter Sound

to Hobe Sound State Park and south along the Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW) to Lake Worth Creek.

The snorkel area covers 44,960 square feet (ft2) and has an average depth of 5.4 ft at mean tide

level (MTL). The plan for the snorkel area does not include any dredging of the river bed. Figure 2.3

shows five gaps in the breakwaters, the line of the longest distance between gaps (540 ft), and the section

line through the breakwater. Figure 2.4 shows the breakwater crest lies at 0.5 ft-NAVD and varied gap

width from 30 – 42 ft at mean high water (MHW). The east end of the snorkel area will remain open to

allow unimpeded flow between snorkel area and the Loxahatchee River and Dubois Creek.

Survey data collected by Lidberg Land Surveyors in 2003 provided bathymetry around the jetties.

Another survey conducted by Lidberg in 2007 provided bathymetry data in the Loxahatchee River and at

the project site. The USACE ICWW survey data from June 2007, USGS quad maps, USGS aerial

photographs, and NOAA nautical charts provided additional bathymetric and topographic data for the

model. Figure 2.5 shows the model mesh and the bathymetry at the project site.

Page 21: Sample Digital Brochure

4

Figure 2.1 Model Domain around Jupiter Inlet, Palm Beach County, Florida

Jupiter Inlet

Lake Worth Creek

Jupiter Sound

Loxahatchee River Dubois Park Project

N

Page 22: Sample Digital Brochure

5

Figure 2.2 Dubois Park Project Site and Proposed Breakwater

Jupiter Inlet

Loxahatchee River

Proposed Detached, Segmented Breakwater

Snorkel Area

Page 23: Sample Digital Brochure

Figure 2.3 Dubois Park Project Breakwater Plan View

N

1 2

34

5

Footprint at bed

Crest at 0.5 ft-NAVD

Section Line

Longest Path Dubois Creek

Loxahatchee River

6

Page 24: Sample Digital Brochure

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600

Feet

Feet

-NA

VD

MLW (-2.3 ft-NAVD)

Crest at 0.5 ft-NAVD1 2 3 4 531 ft

30 ft

19 ft

7.5 ft

34 ft

33 ft

23 ft

5 ft

36 ft

35 ft

25 ft

5 ft

45 ft

42 ft

33 ft

7.5 ft

MHW (0.1 ft-NAVD)

Figure 2.4 Dubois Park Project Breakwater Section View

7

Page 25: Sample Digital Brochure

8

Figure 2.5 Proposed Dubois Park Mesh and Bathymetry

2.3 Tidal Characteristics and Model Calibration

Taylor Engineering collected tidal stage and velocity data at five points in the project area. Figure

2.6 shows these points and the NOAA tidal datum benchmark station at the Jupiter Inlet Jetty (Station

8722495). The Marina Tide Station (S1) and the Jupiter Inlet Jetty Station (S2) provided tidal stage

information. Velocity Stations V1, V2, and V3 provided velocity data collected over the water column

with an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP). Extremely shallow water depths at Velocity Station

V4 prohibited ADCP use. Taylor Engineering collected velocity data at this location with a propeller-

driven velocimeter. Table 2.1 shows the benchmark data, which indicate a 2.5-ft mean tidal range for the

semidiurnal tides (two varying high and low tides per day) occurring in the area.

Loxahatchee River

Proposed Detached, Segmented Breakwater

Snorkel Area

Page 26: Sample Digital Brochure

Figure 2.6 Model Calibration Points

Jupiter Inlet Jetty Station (S2)

Jupiter Inlet

Dubois Creek

Marina Tide Station (S1)

Velocity Station 1 (V1)

Velocity Station 2 (V2)

Velocity Station 4 (V4)

Velocity Station 3 (V3)

9

Page 27: Sample Digital Brochure

10

Table 2.1 NOAA Tide Data

Tide Data Jupiter Inlet

Jetty (ft-NAVD)

Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) 0.25 Mean High Water (MHW) 0.08 Mean Tide Level (MTL) -1.11 Mean Low Water (MLW) -2.31 Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) -2.50 Tide Range (ft) (MHW – MLW) 2.39

2.4 Model Parameters and Boundary Conditions

A Manning’s roughness coefficient (Manning’s n) value of 0.030 provided the bed friction

boundary condition within the model. The Florida Department of Transportation recommends n = 0.022 –

0.028 for earth channels (FDOT, 2004); the USACE recommends n = 0.02 – 0.025 for sand channels

(Donnell et al., 2005); Chow (1959) recommends n = 0.035 for rivers.

A turbulent exchange coefficient value of 50 lb-sec/ft2 controlled the turbulence closure for the

hydrodynamic model. This value falls well within the 20 – 100 lb-sec/ft2 range the model developers

recommend for flow in tidal estuaries (Donnell et al., 2005). Grid Peclet number control automatically

assigned the model diffusion coefficient for the transport model. The actual diffusion coefficient averaged

3 ft2/s (0.3 m2/s) or less for all model simulations.

The model calibration applied time-varying free surface water level boundary conditions from

September 16 – 20, 2008 at Hobe Sound, seaward of Jupiter Inlet, and Lake Worth Creek. NOAA tide

predictions provided water level boundary conditions for the model.

2.5 Model Calibration Results

A model’s calibration demonstrates its capability to reproduce observed hydrodynamic

conditions. Figures 2.7 and 2.8 compare the modeled water levels with the measured water levels at the

Marina Tide Station and NOAA predicted water levels at the Jupiter Inlet Jetty Station.

The correlation coefficient provides a statistical measure of the correspondence of two data sets.

Two coincident data sets have a correlation coefficient of 1.0 (i.e., the data sets match), while correlation

coefficients approaching zero indicate less correspondence between the data sets. The figures indicate the

correlation coefficient (r2) for each time series. The modeled and measured water level data show good

agreement for both stations with correlation coefficients of 0.97 or more.

Page 28: Sample Digital Brochure

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

9/17/200816:48

9/17/200821:36

9/18/20082:24

9/18/20087:12

9/18/200812:00

9/18/200816:48

9/18/200821:36

9/19/20082:24

9/19/20087:12

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)Measured Model

r² = 0.97

Figure 2.7 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results at the Marina Tide Station (S1)

Page 29: Sample Digital Brochure

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

9/17/200816:48

9/17/200821:36

9/18/20082:24

9/18/20087:12

9/18/200812:00

9/18/200816:48

9/18/200821:36

9/19/20082:24

9/19/20087:12

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)NOAA Model

r² = 0.99

Figure 2.8 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results at Jupiter Inlet, South Jetty

12 12

Page 30: Sample Digital Brochure

13

Figures 2.9 – 2.12 show plots of the measured velocities against the RMA2 model depth averaged

velocities. Figure 2.13 compares all model velocities. Velocity measurements, taken with the ADCP

(Figures 2.9 – 2.11), show fairly good agreement with the model results. Figure 2.10 shows the model

reproduced the very low measured velocities inside the marina area (V2). In contrast, Figure 2.12 shows

the model underestimated measured velocities at the Dubois Creek Bridge (V4). Shallow water in this

location made measurements difficult.

The low model diffusion coefficient (0.3 m2/s) indicates that the model relies on advection to

transport contaminants through the system. Therefore, the underestimated water velocities at some

locations indicates a more conservative flushing model (i.e., lower velocities would yield higher flushing

times) for these portions of the study area.

Overall, the comparison of measured and model data indicate that the model satisfactorily reflects

the physical processes in the study area and should provide conservative flushing time estimates.

Page 31: Sample Digital Brochure

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

9/18/08 0:00 9/18/08 3:00 9/18/08 6:00 9/18/08 9:00 9/18/08 12:00 9/18/08 15:00 9/18/08 18:00 9/18/08 21:00 9/19/08 0:00

dept

h av

g. v

eloc

ity (f

t/s)

measured model

Figure 2.9 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results, Velocity Station 1 (V1), Marina Entrance

14

Page 32: Sample Digital Brochure

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.008

0.009

0.010

9/18/08 6:00 9/18/08 9:00 9/18/08 12:00 9/18/08 15:00 9/18/08 18:00

dept

h av

g. v

eloc

ity (f

t/s)

measured model

Figure 2.10 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results, Velocity Station 2 (V2), Marina Interior

15

Page 33: Sample Digital Brochure

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

9/18/08 0:00 9/18/08 3:00 9/18/08 6:00 9/18/08 9:00 9/18/08 12:00 9/18/08 15:00 9/18/08 18:00 9/18/08 21:00 9/19/08 0:00

dept

h av

g. v

eloc

ity (f

t/s)

measured model

Figure 2.11 Dubois Park Model Calibration Results, Velocity Station 3 (V3), Snorkel Area

16 16

Page 34: Sample Digital Brochure

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

9/18/08 0:00 9/18/08 3:00 9/18/08 6:00 9/18/08 9:00 9/18/08 12:00 9/18/08 15:00 9/18/08 18:00 9/18/08 21:00 9/19/08 0:00

dept

h av

g. v

eloc

ity (f

t/s)

V1 (Marina Entrance) V2 (Marina Interior) V3 (Snorkel Area) V4 (Dubois Creek Bridge)

Figure 2.12 Dubois Park Model Calibration Velocity Comparison

17

Page 35: Sample Digital Brochure

18

3.0 HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING AND ANALYSIS

3.1 Overview

As noted in Chapter 2, the project area experiences a semidiurnal tide with a 2.5-ft mean tidal

range. This chapter compares hydrodynamic model results for the project site before and after

construction of the proposed snorkel area breakwater. Taylor Engineering simulated a neap tide for this

study. The comparison examines tidal stages and tidal discharges at various points near the snorkel area.

Figure 3.1 shows the sample point locations for these model results.

Figure 3.1 Hydraulic Data Sample Locations

3.2 Tidal Stage Comparison

Figure 3.1 shows the modeled tidal stage sample points (S1, S2, S3, and L1) in the proposed

snorkel area and the Loxahatchee River. Figures 3.2 – 3.5 compare the tidal stage for the existing

conditions and with the proposed breakwater in place. The figures demonstrate that construction of the

breakwaters have a negligible effect on the tidal stage at these points. Figure 3.6 compares the tidal stage

Jupiter Inlet

Dubois Creek

Loxahatchee River

S1

S2S3

L1

West 2 West 1

East 1East 2

Page 36: Sample Digital Brochure

19

at opposite ends of the snorkel area after construction of the proposed breakwaters. The figure indicates

that no phase difference exists within the proposed snorkel area.

3.3 Velocity Distribution Comparison

Figure 3.1 shows sample lines for velocity distributions across the Loxahatchee River upstream

and downstream of the proposed snorkel area. Figures 3.7 – 3.14 compare the velocity distribution at the

indicated sample lines for the existing condition and with the proposed breakwater in place. Figures 3.7 –

3.10 show the velocity distributions during peak flood flows and Figures 3.11 – 3.14 during peak ebb

flows.

The figures demonstrate that construction of the breakwaters only have an appreciable effect on

the hydraulic conditions in the immediate vicinity of the breakwaters (Figures 3.8, 3.9, 3.12, and 3.13). At

these locations the flow distribution shifts slightly to the north at the south side and middle of the river.

The breakwaters have a negligible effect on the velocities on the north side of the river. The plots indicate

velocity increases of less than 0.5 ft/s and decreases less than 1 ft/s. As one might expect, the largest

velocity decreases occur within 100 ft of the proposed breakwater.

The velocity distributions further upstream and downstream of the breakwaters (Figures 3.7, 3.10,

3.11, and 3.14) show no appreciable change from the existing velocity distributions.

3.4 Particle Flow Trace

Figure 3.15 shows a particle flow trace of the snorkel area. A particle flow trace follows the path

of theoretical particles released into model and carried by the simulated currents. The figure demonstrates

that the breakwaters should not cause local circulation pockets which might trap floating debris in the

snorkel area.

Page 37: Sample Digital Brochure

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

model time (hrs)

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)existing with breakwaters

Figure 3.2 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point S1

20

Page 38: Sample Digital Brochure

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

model time (hrs)

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)existing with breakwaters

Figure 3.3 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point S2

21

Page 39: Sample Digital Brochure

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

model time (hrs)

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)existing with breakwaters

Figure 3.4 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point S3

22

Page 40: Sample Digital Brochure

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

model time (hrs)

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)existing with breakwaters

Figure 3.5 Tidal Stage Comparison (Existing Condition vs. Breakwaters), Point L1

23

Page 41: Sample Digital Brochure

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

model time (hrs)

wat

er s

urfa

ce e

leva

tion

(ft-N

AVD

)Point S1 Point S2

Figure 3.6 Tidal Phase Comparison, Point S1 vs. Point S2, with Breakwaters

24

Page 42: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.7 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, West 2 Sample Line

25

Page 43: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.8 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, West 1 Sample Line

Page 44: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.9 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, East 1 Sample Line

Page 45: Sample Digital Brochure

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.10 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Flood, East 2 Sample Line

Page 46: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.11 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, West 2 Sample Line

Page 47: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.12 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, West 1 Sample Line

Page 48: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.13 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, East 1 Sample Line

Page 49: Sample Digital Brochure

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

cross channel distance (ft)

velo

city

mag

nitu

de (f

t/s)

Existing with BW

North Bank South Bank

Figure 3.14 Cross River Velocity Distribution, Peak Ebb, East 2 Sample Line

Page 50: Sample Digital Brochure

Figure 3.15 Snorkel Area Particle Flow Trace

Snorkel Area

Breakwaters

Particle Flow Trace Lines

33 33

Page 51: Sample Digital Brochure

34

4.0 WATER QUALITY MODELING AND ANALYSIS

4.1 Methodology

The water quality portion of this study examines three areas of interest within the Dubois Park

project area (Figure 4.1): the proposed snorkel area, a swimming area ― commonly known as Pee-Wee

Beach ― on Dubois Creek just south of the Loxahatchee River, and Dubois Creek itself. To examine the

breakwater’s effect on the snorkel area, Taylor Engineering treated the snorkel area as a flushing study

marina basin and determined its flushing time — defined by SFWMD — by tracking the decay of the

concentration of a conservative contaminant from the snorkel area over a 100 hour (hr) period. Taylor

Engineering also examined the contaminant levels in the surrounding waters of the Loxahatchee River

and Dubois Creek.

To examine the breakwater’s effect on contaminant removal from Pee-Wee Beach and Dubois

Creek, Taylor Engineering modeled the decay of the concentration of a conservative contaminant initially

placed in each area under the existing configuration (i.e., without the breakwater) and with the breakwater

in place.

4.2 Boundary Conditions

The calibrated RMA2 hydrodynamic model supplied water depth and current velocity

information to the water quality model (RMA4). For this study, the hydrodynamic model simulated a

neap tide (October 17 – 20, 2007).

Each water quality model simulation begins with a uniform contaminant concentration of 100 ppt

in the area of interest during high tide conditions to maximize the mass of contaminant in the system. A

concentration of 100 ppt allows a direct conversion to a percentage of the initial concentration.

Page 52: Sample Digital Brochure

35

Figure 4.1 Snorkel Area and Pee-Wee Beach Areas of Interest

4.3 Snorkel Area Model Results

Figure 4.2 shows the initial contamination levels and the sample points for the snorkel area

simulations. The neap tide provided the longest flushing time and Figures 4.3 and 4.4 plot the

concentration versus time for a contaminant originating in the snorkel area and mixing with a neap tide.

Figure 4.3 shows the contaminant concentrations at four sampling points in the snorkel area

(Points S1, S2, S3, and S6 as shown in Figure 4.2). The figure demonstrates that contamination levels

drop below 10% of the initial contamination level within 5 hrs.

Examination of sample points to the east of the snorkel area and in the Pee-Wee Beach and

Dubois Creek area (DC1, PW1, PW2, DC3, DC4) showed negligible traces of contamination migrated

from the snorkel area to these locations. Figure 4.4 shows four sample points within the adjacent waters

of Loxahatchee River (Points L1, L3, L5, and L6) just north of the breakwaters. At these locations the

contaminant concentration reached a maximum of 10% and quickly dropped back to negligible levels

within 5 hrs.

Jupiter Inlet Breakwater

Snorkel Area

Pee-Wee Beach

Dubois Creek

Page 53: Sample Digital Brochure

36

S1S2

S3S4

S5S6

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7

DC1

PW1

PW2

PW3

Loxahatchee River

S1S2

S3S4

S5S6

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7

DC1

PW1

PW2

PW3

Loxahatchee River

Figure 4.2 Initial Snorkel Area Contaminant Concentration and Numbered Sample Points

Page 54: Sample Digital Brochure

96 hrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

time (hrs)

pollu

tant

con

cent

ratio

n (%

of i

nitia

l)S1 S2 S3 S6

Figure 4.3 Contaminant Concentrations in the Snorkel Area, Neap Tide, Initial Snorkel Area Contamination

37

5 hrs

Page 55: Sample Digital Brochure

96 hrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

time (hrs)

pollu

tant

con

cent

ratio

n (%

of i

nitia

l)L1 L3 L5 L6

Figure 4.4 Contaminant Concentrations in the Loxahatchee River, Neap Tide, Initial Snorkel Area Contamination

38

Page 56: Sample Digital Brochure

39

4.4 Pee-Wee Beach Model Results

Figure 4.5 shows the initial contamination levels and the sample points for the Pee-Wee Beach

simulation. For this area of interest, Taylor Engineering modeled the dispersion of the contaminant

pictured in Figure 4.5 for the existing configuration with no breakwater and the proposed configuration

with the segmented breakwater in place. Figures 4.6 and 4.7 compare the contamination decay curves for

these two cases at sample points PW1 and PW2.

The figures demonstrate that the presence of the proposed breakwaters has a negligible effect on

the decay of contaminant concentration originating in the Pee-Wee Beach area.

S5

L6 L7

DC1

PW1

PW2

PW3

DC2

S5

L6 L7

DC1

PW1

PW2

PW3

DC2

Figure 4.5 Initial Pee-Wee Beach Contaminant Concentration and Numbered Sample Points

Page 57: Sample Digital Brochure

96 hrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

time (hrs)

pollu

tant

con

cent

ratio

n (p

erce

nt)

Pee Wee Existing Pee Wee with BW

Figure 4.6 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at Pee-Wee Beach, Neap Tide, Point PW1

40

Page 58: Sample Digital Brochure

96 hrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

time (hrs)

pollu

tant

con

cent

ratio

n (p

erce

nt)

Pee Wee Existing Pee Wee with BW

Figure 4.7 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at Pee-Wee Beach, Neap Tide, Point PW2

41

Page 59: Sample Digital Brochure

42

4.5 Dubois Creek Model Results

Figure 4.8 shows the initial contamination levels and the sample points for the Dubois Creek

simulation. For this area of interest, Taylor Engineering modeled the dispersion of the contaminant

pictured in Figure 4.8 for the existing configuration with no breakwater and the proposed configuration

with the segmented breakwater in place. Figures 4.9 and 4.10 compare the contamination decay curves for

these two cases at sample points DC3 and DC7.

The figures demonstrate that the presence of the proposed breakwaters has a negligible effect on

the decay of contaminant concentration originating at the south end of Dubois Creek.

DC1

DC2

DC3

DC4

DC5

DC6

DC7

DC1

DC2

DC3

DC4

DC5

DC6

DC7

Figure 4.8 Initial South Dubois Creek Contaminant Concentration and Numbered Sample Points

Page 60: Sample Digital Brochure

96 hrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

time (hrs)

pollu

tant

con

cent

ratio

n (p

erce

nt)

Dubois Creek Existing Dubois Creek with BW

Figure 4.9 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at South End of Dubois Creek, Neap Tide, Point DC3

43

Page 61: Sample Digital Brochure

96 hrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

time (hrs)

pollu

tant

con

cent

ratio

n (p

erce

nt)

Dubois Creek Existing Dubois Creek with BW

Figure 4.10 Contaminant Concentrations, Initial Contamination at South End of Dubois Creek, Neap Tide, Point DC7

44

Page 62: Sample Digital Brochure

45

5.0 SUMMARY

Palm Beach County proposes to build a protected snorkel area on a portion of the southern

shoreline of the Loxahatchee River just west of Dubois Creek about one-half mile inland from Jupiter

Inlet in Palm Beach County, Florida. Plans call for a detached, segmented breakwater to protect

swimmers in the snorkel area from waves produced by transiting boat traffic and strong currents in the

Loxahatchee River. Gaps in the breakwater would maintain hydraulic communication with the river to

minimize the breakwater’s effect on water quality. Taylor Engineering conducted the present study to

determine the hydrodynamic and flushing characteristics of the snorkel area and the breakwater’s effect

on the flushing characteristics of Dubois Creek.

The study showed that the presence of the breakwaters did not effect the tidal stage. The

breakwaters had a negligible effect on the velocity distribution of waters in the Loxahatchee River

upstream and downstream of the project site. At the project site, the breakwaters caused the velocity to

decrease on the south side of the Loxahatchee river ― immediately adjacent to the breakwaters ― and

increase slightly at the center of the river. The velocities did not change on the north bank of the

Loxahatchee River. Also, the particle flow traces developed from the model results demonstrate that

water flows freely through the breakwater system with no local circulations pockets which might trap

floating debris within the system.

The study shows that the concentration of a hypothetical conservative contaminant in the snorkel

area falls to 10% of its original concentration within 5 hrs. The model also indicates that contaminants

leaving the snorkel area quickly disperse in the Loxahatchee River and have a negligible effect on the

waters in Dubois Creek.

Additionally, the study found that the presence of the breakwater had a negligible effect on the

removal of contaminants originating in either the Pee-Wee Beach swim area near the mouth of Dubois

Creek or at the south end of Dubois Creek.

Page 63: Sample Digital Brochure

46

REFERENCES

Chow, V.T. (1959) Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Donnell, Barbara P., Letter, Joseph V., MacAnaaly, William H., and Thomas, William A. (2005). Users

Guide to RMA2 Version 4.5. U.S. Army, Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways

Experiment Station, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory. Vicksburg, MS.

Donnell, Barbara P., Letter Joseph V. (2003). Users Guide to RMA4 Version 4.5. U.S. Army, Engineer

Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal and Hydraulics

Laboratory. Vicksburg, MS.

FDOT (2005) FDOT Drainage Manual. Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Design,

Drainage Section, Tallahassee, FL.

SFWMD (2008) Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Volume IV. South Florida Water

Management District, West Palm Beach, FL.

Page 64: Sample Digital Brochure

Experience and

Capacity of Firm

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

QUALIFICATIONS Taylor Engineering’s history of specialized experience on coastal, marine, and environmental projects along Florida’s coasts provides a unique set of qualifications for Collier County’s design, engineering, and permitting services for the renourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, and Naples beaches. Our project team possesses a wealth of experience in beach restoration, coastal and erosion control structures, shoreline protection, environmental permitting, environmental restoration, dredging, construction administration and observation, and other support activities as outlined in the County’s Request for Proposals (RFP). The paragraphs below introduce our team’s combined experience relevant to the County’s work.

Taylor Engineering’s experience extends to all aspects of engineering design related to beach restoration and coastal structures. This experience includes modeling sediment transport, waves, and hydrodynamics; designing beach construction and borrow area templates; calculating borrow and placement quantities; conducting sand source investigations; determining nourishment intervals; predicting project performance and borrow site dredging impacts; and preparing construction plans and specifications.

The company’s repeated selection by federal and state agencies underscores the company’s success in meeting client needs in coastal, marine, structural, marina, and water resources engineering. Past and current clients include, among others, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE); the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND); the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD); the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); and Walton, St. Johns, Volusia, St. Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach counties. Our 10- to 25-year relationship with these agencies is a testament to client service delivery.

Taylor Engineering and its team members routinely provide coastal and marine engineering services and assistance including, in part

Beach restoration design, permitting, and construction administration Collection and analysis of project monitoring data Preparation of project monitoring reports to Florida Department of Environmental Protection standards Federal shore protection project technical assistance Technical and community meetings with local, state, and federal agencies Federal, state, and local agency coordination Environmental permit applications and/or modifications and coordination Environmental/ecosystem restoration BOEMRE environmental assessments Biological monitoring plans and updates Fish habitat reports Biological reef and hardbottom assessments, monitoring, mapping, and ground truthing Aerial photography Physical monitoring plans and updates Erosion control line (ECL), 3D design surveys, and borrow area surveys Numerical modeling for engineering design Construction drawings and technical specifications development Bid documents and bidding support

Page 65: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Construction observation services and engineering certification

C o a s t a l E n g i n e e r i n g Since its inception, Taylor Engineering has helped federal, state, and local government agencies identify causes and develop innovative solutions for all types of coastal problems. Ranging from specific to comprehensive, these projects address plan formulation, coastal processes analyses, and shore protection. Project elements include, in part, sediment budgets, littoral drift, coastal structures, wave generation and propagation, wave and inlet hydrodynamics and sediment transport, beach restoration, economics, storm impacts, and post-storm beach assessment and management. C o a s t a l P r o c e s s e s , M o d e l i n g , a n d A n a l y s i s Understanding a region’s coastal processes and their effects on the coastal system is a crucial element of nearly every coastal engineering project. Taylor Engineering has extensive experience in every aspect of coastal processes analyses including shoreline changes, beach volume changes, empirical orthogonal analyses, sediment budgets, littoral transport (by waves, tides, and winds), storm effects, inlet management, sand bypassing, storm damage assessments, wave modeling, tidal hydrodynamics modeling, and beach modeling.

We apply wave models (USACE models RCPWAVE, WISWAVE, and STWAVE; REFDIF; FUNWAVE; MIKE21; and in-house developed models) to investigate borrow site mining impacts on fronting beaches, analyze the effects of hardbottom on nearshore beach behavior, assess the effects of structures on adjacent shorelines and shoal systems, analyze inlet shoaling, estimate sediment transport in the littoral zone, design coastal structures, and provide input to shoreline change and dune erosion models. Example applications include USACE projects in Ft. George Island, Jacksonville Beach, St. Augustine Inlet, Martin County, Ft. Pierce Beach, Amelia Island, Key Biscayne, Panama City Beach, and Gasparilla Island; and local government projects in Marco Island, Ft. Pierce Beach, Walton County, Destin, Okaloosa Island, Eglin AFB, Jupiter Island, and St. Johns County. For projects in coastal Louisiana, Texas, and South Carolina, we applied STWAVE to evaluate nearshore wave conditions and provide radiation stresses to produce wave-induced water level changes in the hydrodynamic model ADCIRC.

Taylor Engineering’s beach modeling applications include storm erosion modeling and shoreline change modeling to assess the storm damage risk to upland development, to help design shore protection projects, and to quantify beach restoration benefits. Modeling capabilities include GENESIS, DNRBS, SBEACH, EDUNE, CCCL, MIKE21, n-line model, and in-house developed models. Selected applications include USACE projects in Amelia Island, St. Augustine Beach, Ponce De Leon Inlet, New Smyrna Beach, Ft. Pierce Beach, Panama City Beach, and Key Biscayne; and local sponsor projects in Walton County, Destin, Okaloosa Island, and Eglin AFB.

We also apply tidal hydrodynamics models (ADCIRC, RMA2, FESWMS, MIKE21) to design inlet jetties, to compute storm surge, to assess inlet impacts on adjacent beaches, to examine flushing and water quality, and to define inlet shoal dredging templates by examining impacts on inlet shoaling, navigation, and adjacent beaches. We also model tidal currents to estimate impacts of thermal plumes on sediment entrainment, to design coastal structures at inlets, and to quantify water quality for beach fill projects. Applications include local and/or USACE projects at Marco Island, East Pass, Nassau Sound, St. Johns River Entrance, St. Augustine Inlet, Ponce De Leon Inlet, Ft. Pierce Inlet, and Charlotte Harbor. In partnership with URS, Taylor Engineering is developing ADCIRC and STWAVE models for the South Carolina coastline to determine storm surge caused by hurricanes.

Page 66: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Beach Res to ra t i on Pro j ec t s Taylor Engineering has been responsible for plan formulation, design, permitting, geotechnical, surveying, construction observation, monitoring, or economic elements of USACE shore restoration projects in Lee County, Venice Beach, Key Biscayne, Lido Key, St. Lucie County, Martin County, St. Johns County, Nassau County, Bay County, and Walton County in Florida. We have also been responsible for similar elements of beach restoration projects for local government and state agencies in north Jupiter Island, Jupiter/Carlin, Ocean Ridge, Hillsborough Inlet, Bakers Haulover Inlet, Summer Haven, New Smyrna Beach, Anastasia State Park, Walton County, east and west Destin, Okaloosa Island, and Eglin Air Force Base. We have designed and permitted over 20 federal and non-federal beach nourishment projects, which collectively have or will restore over 45 miles of beach with over 18,000,000 cubic yards of sand. Currently, the company is engaged in the design and permitting of eight additional non-federal beach nourishment projects, which will restore about 40 miles of coastline with over 10 million cubic yards of sand. The firm has prepared both regional- and project-level feasibility studies and plan formulation documents for over 50 miles of beaches. M a r i n e S t r u c t u r e s Taylor Engineering has experience in the evaluation, design, and permitting of coastal and waterfront structures including jetties, groins, breakwaters, seawalls, marine and land-based pile foundation structures, stone revetments, bulkheads, piers, docks, and hydraulic control structures.

B r e a k w a t e r s , G r o i n s , a n d O t h e r E r o s i o n C o n t r o l S t r u c t u r e s Taylor Engineering has conducted numerous shore protection structure projects requiring design, permitting, bid assistance, and construction-phase services. These projects included a variety of erosion control, shoreline stabilization and stone revetment, projects. Among these, we recently completed construction of a 3,000-foot-long revetment along the shores of the Intracoastal Waterway in Flagler County. Taylor Engineering designed a complete revetment system to mitigate erosion and protect the shoreline at dredged material management area FL-8. The project also included design for shoreline public pedestrian walkways and access bridges. Other revetment designs include projects to protect one of the main runways of the St. Augustine Municipal Airport, 1,200 feet of shoreline along a county park in Ft. Pierce, and the shoreline of Lake Mangonia. Additionally, Taylor Engineering designed a system of stone breakwaters for construction in Jupiter Inlet; these breakwaters protect a recreational snorkeling area associated with Palm Beach County’s Dubois Park restoration project.

Taylor Engineering has a proven track record in the planning, design, rehabilitation, and permitting of bulkhead; groin; seawall; and coastal and marine structure projects. Taylor Engineering designed, prepared plans and specifications, and provided construction phase services for a complete restoration project for the Jupiter Inlet jetty — a combined steel sheet pile and riprap structure — in Palm Beach County. Our previous bulkhead and seawall evaluation, restoration, or design work includes design for an aluminum sheet pile seawall to protect an eroding shoreline along a county park in Stuart, Florida. We evaluated damage, monitored structural movement, made preliminary recommendations, and developed final construction documents for the preservation of a 160-year-old coquina bulkhead wall on the Matanzas River just inside St. Augustine Inlet. We also designed a seawall reconstruction project along Flagler Drive in West Palm Beach. This project applied concrete soldier piles to stabilize and replace the existing shoreline stabilization. Most recently, we designed and then oversaw construction of an emergency seawall to protect the Town of Lantana’s oceanfront park from severe coastal erosion. Our design for the Dubois Park restoration project in Jupiter Inlet also addresses new bulkhead and seawall features as well as riprap wall toe protection.

Page 67: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

P i l e s a n d P i l e - S u pp o r t e d S t r u c t u r e s Taylor Engineering’s successful experience extends to the design and construction oversight for piles and pile-supported structures. In the design of these specialized structures, our engineers apply a range of design tools from classic hand calculations to state-of-the-art software to account for the unique interactions between soil, water, and structural elements. We have designed and built projects with every type of pile material (timber, steel, concrete, and composite); shapes (square, rounds, pipe, helical, and built-up); application (bearing, lateral support, and guide); and installation techniques (driven, jetted, vibrated, pressed-in, and auger-cast). Completed pile supported structure projects include simple mooring piles for marinas, mooring dolphins for ship berths, pile-support docks, floating dock anchor piles, and pile foundations to support a range of structures. Recently, Taylor Engineering completed design, permitting and construction phases for the Miramar Parking Structure in Walton County. The project included 181 prestressed concrete piles supporting a hurricane resistant, 141-space public beach access parking area. The pile design accounted for poor soils conditions marked by pockets of muck soils through the use of Pile Dynamic Analyzer testing. This construction monitoring procedure provides a method of verifying pile bearing capacities. With the test results, engineers correlated required pile driving conditions (blow-counts) to the pile capacity to field-certify each pile’s load rating. B o r r o w A r e a D e s i gn & S a n d C o m p a t i b i l i t y Taylor Engineering and RWParkinson Consulting have extensive experience in conducting sand source investigations and the design and permitting of borrow areas for beach nourishment activities. Taylor Engineering has conducted several sand source investigations for various government entities throughout Florida including Eglin Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, City of Destin, Walton County, and the USACE. Projects typically include development of geophysical and geotechnical data collection and analysis programs to locate beach quality sand reserves for future beach management activities. The programs include reconnaissance and detail phase sub-bottom seismic and bathymetric surveys, cultural resource surveys, and vibracore collection. Engineering evaluations include characterization of native beach sand and potential borrow material, overfill analysis, design of borrow area dredging templates, and borrow area excavation impact analyses.

For over a decade, Dr. Parkinson has participated in beach nourishment projects throughout Florida. RWParkinson Consulting has designed field and laboratory methods to characterize native beach sedimentology and assess fill compliance in real time during project construction. This includes collecting samples at an appropriate time and density to characterize beach granularmetrics, composition, and Munsell color. Dr. Parkinson’s continental margin sedimentation and stratigraphy knowledge has contributed to the completion of numerous successful offshore sand source investigations; including the delineation of beach compatible borrow areas of suitable volume for Santa Rosa County, Volusia County, and Gulf County. Dr. Parkinson bases his investigations on an integrated field program (i.e., bathymetry, side-scan, seismic & magnetometer, vibracore) designed to verify the presence of beach compatible sand sources as required by regulatory agencies. RWParkinson Consulting is also keenly aware of the economic and social consequences that emerge when gravel-size limestone, ‘rock’, shell, or other material is discharged onto the beach during project construction. To minimize the economic and social consequences, RWParkinson routinely applies desktop, field, and laboratory analyses to areas with a high probability of encountering gravel-sized sediment. The firm has worked on several Sand Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plans designed to ensure the dredged material placed on a beach is compliant with specific permit conditions throughout construction. In 2009 RWParkinson Consulting

Page 68: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

collaborated with Martin County and an environmental consulting firm to develop a Sand QA/QC Plan, which incorporated a newly developed field method for quantifying beach fill granularmetrics in real time. This methodology is based upon field data derived from nested sieve analysis instead of the qualitative method of visual inspection. The goal of this new methodology is to reduce error while not interfering with the tempo and therefore costs of construction. The content and intent of the FDEP QAQC Plan has been under review for several years. Revisions have been recommended and a new template is now being evaluated. RWParkinson Consulting will continue to track the evolution of the Sand Plan to ensure the appropriate version is submitted on behalf of Collier County. F e d e r a l , S t a t e , a nd L o c a l P e r m i t t ing and Env i ronmen ta l Se rv i ce s Taylor Engineering takes great care to integrate its projects with the natural environment. We have significant experience with the full range of environmental issues commonly encountered during coastal, marine, and waterfront projects including environmental permitting (USACE, state, and local), submerged land lease issues, habitat and impact assessment, mitigation design and long-term monitoring, and field data collection and analysis. Many of Taylor Engineering’s water resource projects have required environmental investigations and assessments, environmental permitting, and coordination with state and federal environmental and regulatory agencies. We have a clear understanding of permitting issues, and over the years we have developed valuable professional relationships with both state and federal regulatory agencies. We have permitted over 20 beach restoration projects, both federal and non-federal, in Florida which have or will restore over 45 miles of beach with over 18,000,000 cubic yards of sand. Environmental issues for these projects include the protection of water quality, seagrasses, nearshore hardbottom, sea turtles, shorebirds, fish, and coral. We are currently permitting five additional beach restoration projects. Our project team’s experience with wetlands, endangered/threatened species, and mitigation has proven valuable during the permitting process. For example, we successfully created five acres of hardbottom habitat to mitigate for beach nourishment impacts from the Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project. We developed a mitigation plan involving the creation of 17 acres of hardwood wetlands to offset wetland impacts from Dredged Material Management Area SJ-14 in St. Johns County. During our work on the Sebastian Inlet Channel dredging project, to meet the project’s environmental challenges, we developed mitigation plans including seagrass restoration, seagrass protection, and funding for a proposed stormwater treatment facility in the local area. Our work on numerous marina projects provides a strong background on submerged lands issues. Our team is accustomed to reviewing, revising, coordinating, and developing submerged lands leases and easements for marina and recreational marine projects. This expertise has played an integral role in projects including the Fort Pierce Marina Expansion project in St. Lucie County, the Waterfront Commons Floating Dock project in West Palm Beach, and the Dubois Park Redevelopment project in Palm Beach County. Taylor Engineering’s experience with the USACE, the FDEP, the water management districts, and local governments has often proved invaluable in securing permits for marina and waterfront development projects. Taylor Engineering has extensive experience designing, monitoring, and performing cost benefit analyses of coastal ecosystem restorations. We have considered restoration issues as part of practical solutions to public and private development and management needs. Our involvement in this type of work extends over most of the firm’s 25+ year history.

Page 69: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

We have designed artificial reefs, beaches and dunes, foredune and backdune vegetation communities, mangrove and herbaceous estuarine wetlands, and coastal freshwater swamps. We have monitored the success of our plans, using adaptive management techniques to ensure successful, cost-effective completion of our projects. We have provided these services throughout Florida and other states along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. In the Florida panhandle, we have developed beach and dune restoration projects in Okaloosa and Walton Counties. In Mexico Beach (Gulf County), we analyzed and designed an herbaceous wetland project similar to others we have developed around the state. In summary, experience with regulatory agencies and public coordination often plays a key role in the success of our projects. We have coordinated with the FDEP and the USACE on beach restoration, coastal structures, drainage, dredging, and marine structures projects. We are strong proponents of feedback and coordination with our clients and project stakeholders during the development of any project. We often work with government staff to communicate information concerning a project’s progress and to receive community input. Hardbo t tom Mapp ing , Mon i to r ing , and Ground Tru th ing CSA’s comprehensive projects range from the intertidal zone and estuaries to deep ocean surveys. They include biological, geological, chemical, and physical oceanographic data collection; reef and hard bottom surveys; environmental assessments and impact statements; biological impact and compliance monitoring; marine habitat mapping; site clearance surveys; hydrographic and bathymetric surveys; data and literature reviews; various types of permitting; and other environmental services associated with beach restoration, borrow areas, ocean dredged material disposal sites, other dredging studies, and marine mining projects. CSA is a certified corporate member of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences (AAUS). All CSA diving staff meets or exceed AAUS requirements and have extensive diving experience. CSA brings extensive experience in diver video, in situ data collection, and side-scan sonar surveys for characterizing, mapping, and monitoring marine habitats offshore west Florida. Having conducted marine survey work for many projects with nearshore environments throughout Florida, CSA is familiar with that many factors that influence Florida’s environments, including, tidal cycles, vessel traffic, and sensitive marine habitats CSA’s relevant project experience includes over 200 benthic habitat mapping projects, many of which are very similar to Collier County’s Design, Engineering, and Permitting Services for the Renourishment of Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches projects. CSA has also performed dozens of benthic habitat mapping, characterization, and monitoring projects off the southwest coast of Florida in Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Collier, Monroe, Manatee, Hillsborough, and Pinellas Counties in support of beach nourishments, federally-sponsored habitat mapping efforts, and natural gas pipeline installations. Geo techn ica l Inves t i ga t i ons and V ibracor ing AVS provides vibracore, drilling, and marine support services. In addition to field services, AVS conducts a variety of laboratory services at its US Army Corp of Engineers certified lab. In the past few years, AVS has performed offshore geotechnical and geophysical data collection for many projects relevant to the requested design, engineering, and permitting services for the renourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, and Naples beaches. Similar project experience includes collecting vibracores, drilling, core sampling, and lab testing and analysis. AVS has collected hundreds of vibracores in support of sand searches for beach restoration/renourishment projects including the Eglin AFB/Okaloosa Island/Destin Sand Source Investigation.

Page 70: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

B a t h y m e t r i c a n d L a n d S u r v e y i n g For over 26 years, M&E has collected onshore and offshore data for Beach Restoration design and monitoring. For the past fifteen years, a substantial portion of this work has been for Taylor Engineering Inc. throughout Florida. With offices in Deerfield Beach and Vero Beach, M&E has successfully completed the surveying component of numerous projects including, dune restoration projects, inlet sand by-pass studies, offshore positioning for vibracores, bathymetric surveys of offshore borrow areas and sand traps; profiles along FDEP profile range lines, establishment of the coastal mean high water line, location of the Coastal Construction Control Line and monitoring surveys for beach restoration projects. M&E has performed coastal and marine related survey services for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and numerous counties throughout Florida. A e r i a l P ho t o g r a p h y ACA has a long history of providing photogrammetric services, which have been used in planning, project development, final design and GIS implementation for various projects for local, state and federal government agencies. They currently have 6 registered Professional Surveyors & Mappers (PSM) and 1 ASPRS Certified Photogrammetrist who supervise nineteen experienced technicians. ACA has two complete flight crews that manage and operate two-fixed wing aircraft and one helicopter. ACA utilizes state-of-the-art flight management software to establish overlap and sidelap that is necessary for stereo coverage. Airborne GPS and IMU equipment is used during each flight to record lat/long, tip, tilt, pitch and roll of the camera or sensor. Combined with ground based survey units, ACA processes coordinate information that allows the geo-referencing of each photo taken. C u l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s SEARCH has successfully completed over 1,600 projects according to federal and state guidelines, including more than 75 underwater archaeological investigations. They have assisted clients in complying with requirements under Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, 36 CFR 800, 36 CFR 79, and Florida statutes and regulations. SEARCH is the most qualified firm to provide underwater archaeological surveys and other cultural resource management services that may be required. SEARCH brings Florida expertise, a Florida-based principal investigator, and state-of-the-art equipment. SEARCH has an established Florida-wide network of offices, laboratories, and facilities. The underwater archaeological project will utilize our specialists across our network of Florida offices, and the Principal Investigator for the project is a Florida native and resident. Geophys i ca l Da ta Co l l e c t i on and Ana ly s i s Sonographics, Inc. specializes in marine geophysical services, including marine geophysical data analysis and interpretation. They have performed beach renourishment, cultural resource, and coastal engineering surveys along Florida’s coastlines, rivers, and lakes. For nearly 40 years, they have performed seismic profiling, side-scan sonar and magnetometer surveys throughout Florida – From Pensacola to Key West.

Page 71: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Sonographics has also collected and analyzed magnetometer data offshore Florida’s east and west coasts, including the Keys and the Bahamas. They routinely provide magnetic contour charts and target analysis for cultural resource surveys, searches, treasure hunters, utility locations and numerous other projects. They have mapped hard bottom, sea grass, wrecks, debris, cable routes, artificial reefs and many other items offshore Florida. Sonographics owns and operates three complete seismic systems. Sonographics uses the SB-512i system to penetrate deep into the calcareous sand encountered off a majority of Florida’s coastline to locate and quantify borrow sites for beach renourishment. They also use SB-216S and SB-424 sub-bottom profilers for shallow penetration projects such as cultural resource and artificial reef foundation surveys. TEAM MEMBERS’ EXPERIENCE WORKING TOGETHER The Taylor Engineering team consists of nationally recognized experts with extensive experience in and around Florida’s coastal environments. Taylor Engineering has enjoyed a strong working relationship with most of our proposed team members, as outlined below. CSA has served as subcontractor to Taylor Engineering on over 20 projects including, beach management feasibility studies, artificial reef design, shore protection, hardbottom assessments, and beach monitoring. CSA has collected physical data and conducted a variety of surveys in support of Taylor Engineering’s coastal and marine projects. Current projects with Taylor Engineering include an EIS for the St. Lucie County South Beach and Dune Restoration Project and an EIS for Palm Beach County. Sonographics has worked with Taylor Engineering on several projects over the last ten years. Sonographics has conducted multiple geophysical and cultural resource surveys in conjunction with Taylor Engineering. Their project experience with Taylor Engineering includes geophysical and cultural resource surveys for a joint Eglin Air Force Base/Okaloosa County/City of Destin sand source investigation and a Walton County sand source investigation. As a team member with Taylor Engineering and Morgan & Eklund, Sonographics also completed surveys for the St. Lucie Power Plant and Artificial Reef Mitigation project. Teaming together, Marlowe & Company and Taylor Engineering constructed the ASBPA’s award-winning Walton County/City of Destin Beach Restoration project. As Walton County’s former Director of Beach Management, Mr. Pickel coordinated with state and federal agencies for beach management projects. He also conducted local community outreach with residents, businesses, and elected officials. RWParkinson Consulting has collaborated with Taylor Engineering and its team members on a number of coastal construction projects including Gulf County, Palm Beach County, Martin County, and Volusia County. Throughout the past ten years, AVS has worked with Taylor Engineering and several other team members on a variety of projects. AVS has performed vibracoring and laboratory services for Taylor Engineering on projects such as Ft Pierce Inlet, BP Oil Terminal Expansion, Eglin Air Force Base/Okaloosa County/City of Destin Sand Source Investigation, Walton County Sand Source Investigation, Okeechobee Waterway, Panama City Dredging Project and the St John’s Water Management District continuing service contract.

Page 72: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

AVS’s experience with CSA includes marine consulting services for the Port Dolphin Pipeline project in Tampa, Florida. AVS has also worked with M&E and Sonographics on numerous sand search projects throughout Florida. M&E has collaborated with Taylor Engineering on over 100 projects. As a subcontractor, M&E has provided hydrographic, topographic, and bathymetric surveying services for a variety of projects including beach restoration; beach monitoring; beach fill; shoreline engineering; sand source investigations; and coastal and marine structures projects. Over the past ten years, ACA has completed many coastal imagery projects with Taylor Engineering, M&E and CSA. ACA’s project experience with Taylor Engineering, M&E and CSA includes monitoring for various counties; design, construction, and permitting and bid documents for FIND; and shore protection projects. FINANCIAL STRENGTH R. Bruce Taylor Ph.D., P.E. founded Taylor Engineering, Inc. in 1983. Twenty-eight years later, the firm comprises a vibrant employee-owned organization. We have developed into an in-depth, professional services organization with multiple offices capable of addressing the full spectrum of engineering and environmental issues dealing with water and sediments in natural environments. Taylor Engineering holds a D&B rating of 3A2, which indicates a net worth of between $1 million and $10 million and a “good” credit appraisal. As verification of our financial stability, this section concludes with Taylor Engineering’s most recent audit summary, which an outside, professional source prepared. We believe financial responsibility is much more than the information provided above. Financial responsibility refers to a comprehensive, accountable, sustainable, and transparent approach to managing finances and risk while supporting the best interests of employees and clients and giving back to the community. Led by an internal CPA (a Taylor Engineering officer) and reviewed by both an external accounting firm (represented on our Board of Directors as an advisor) and a business valuation firm, our accounting practices adhere to strict principles and standards. Taylor Engineering has practiced sound financial judgment for the past 28 years and consistently realized a modest profit every year. Recently, during these uncertain economic times, we implemented appropriate cost-control measures to remain a financially stable company as we continue to provide quality work products. In fact, critical components to financial responsibility include employee, client, and social responsibilities. We value all of our employees (valuable resources to our clients) and take every effort to protect their jobs. In the best interests of both our employees as well as our clients, we have developed and implemented measures to save jobs (while sacrificing company profit) yet remain financially stable; thus, when called upon, we stand better prepared to serve our clients with our retained staff. As just one example, we cross train employees to broaden staff capabilities and facilitate internal redistribution of professional resources. This measure further advances one of our core values — teamwork. Through these measures, we maintain more staff availability than many other companies (even those with considerably higher revenues) that have cut staff to maximize company profit — a common practice in this economy. Since Taylor Engineering’s incorporation, ownership changes have occurred to establish an Employee Stock

Page 73: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Ownership Plan and to transfer ownership among Taylor Engineering employees. The company has not been involved in any recent mergers or acquisitions nor does it foresee any such activities. Bank References Taylor Engineering banks with Mercantile Bank, located at 9715 Gate Parkway North, Jacksonville, FL 32246. Interested parties can also reach Patrick Kincaid at (904) 265-2504. CAPACITY OF FIRM The table below lists Taylor Engineering’s current coastal engineering projects in the requested format.

Project Description Start Date

End Date

Original Budget

Final Project

Cost * To Date

No. of Change Orders

Taylor Engineering FPL Shoreline Engineering and Permitting Services

2009 Ongoing $608,619 $486,794* 2

Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Bulkhead Project Schematic

2011 Ongoing $544,423 $357,006* None

Palm Beach County Lantana Shoreline Restoration EIS

2009 Ongoing $288,603 $273,726* None

Central Palm Beach County Comprehensive Erosion Control Project

2010 Ongoing $421,786 $366,381* None

Volusia County Artificial Reef Permit Renewal 2010 Ongoing $49,969 $47,613* None

Walton County 30A Corridor Design & Permitting

2007 Ongoing $765,444 $486,163* None

Destin Beach Restoration Design & Permitting 2007 Ongoing $349,458 $348,955* None

Palm Beach County Jupiter/Carlin SPP Design and Permitting

2008 Ongoing $189,932 $160,235* 1

C2010-006 St. Lucie County Ft. Pierce SPP Permitting Assistance

2010 Ongoing $75,620 $29,814* None

Ft. Pierce General Reevaluation Report 2010 Ongoing $471,858 $412,104* None

Summer Haven Beach Maintenance Project 2009 Ongoing $224,879 $222,072* None

Jupiter Carlin SPP Geotechnical Investigation 2011 Ongoing $104,037 $2,328* None

Jupiter Inlet 2012 Sand Trap Dredging 2011 Ongoing $30,135 $7,847* None

Rollover Pass Closure Project 2011 Ongoing $618,543 $467,199* None

Page 74: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Project Description Start Date

End Date

Original Budget

Final Project

Cost

No. of Change Orders

C2011-014 St. Lucie County Ft. Pierce Emergency Beach Fill and C2011-024 SPP Monitoring

2011 Ongoing $157,395 $140,632* None

The table below lists subcontractors’’ current projects in the requested format.

Project Description Start Date

End Date

Original Budget

Final Project

Cost

No. of Change Orders

CSA City of Venice Beach Hardbottom Monitoring and Artificial Reef Pre-construction

2005 Ongoing $1,376,734 $1,322,197 None

Port Dolphin Deepwater Feasibility Study and Habitat Characterization

2006 Ongoing $50,305 $5,266,077 19

Indian River County Hardbottom Habitat Biological Surveys

2007 Ongoing $774,381 $472,918 None

Hillsboro/Deerfield Beach Benthic Hardbottom and Reef Habitat Monitoring Surveys

2010 Ongoing $576,583 $414,226 None

Sonographics St. Lucie Artificial Reef Survey

2011 Ongoing $2,266 $2,266 None

Fort Pierce Artificial Reef Monitoring Survey

2011 Ongoing $4,596 $4,596 None

Town of Palm Beach Sand Search Seismic, Side-scan and Magnetometer Survey

2011 Ongoing $12,988 $12,988 None

St. Lucie County Sand Search Seismic and Side-scan Survey

2011 Ongoing $55,561 $55,561 None

Marlowe & Company City of Flagler Beach

2009 Ongoing $30,000/yr $30,000/yr None

Okaloosa County

2008 Ongoing $52,524/yr $52,524/yr None

City of Sarasota

1996 Ongoing $42,744/yr $42,744/yr None

St. Johns County

2005 Ongoing $43,200/yr $43,200/yr None

City of Venice

1996 Ongoing $39,996/yr $39,996/yr None

Walton County

2002 Ongoing $72,000/yr $72,000/yr None

Page 75: Sample Digital Brochure

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Project Description Start Date

End Date

Original Budget

Final Project

Cost

No. of Change Orders

RWParkinson USACE Martin County Offshore Sand Search Geological Assessment

2009 2010 $29,000 $29,000 None

Port Dolphin Proposed Pipeline Geotechnical and Geophysical Survey

2009 2009 $25,000 $25,000 None

Gulf County Offshore Sand Search, Characterization, and Compatibility

2005 2006 $45,000 $45,000 None

AVS

Town of Palm Beach Sand Search Vibracore Collection

2011 2011 $71,000 $71,000 None

St. Lucie County Offshore Sand Search Vibracore Collection

2011 2011 $177,000 $177,000 None

USACE Miami Harbor Harbor Deepening Vibracore Collection

2011 2011 $79,000 $79,000 None

St. Lucie County Geotechnical Investigation Vibracore Collection

2011 2011 $177,000 $177,000 None

M&E

Lee County Offshore Borrow Area Bathymetric and Seismic

2011 Ongoing $22,000 $22,000 None

St. Lucie County Artificial Reef Investigation

2011 Ongoing $50,000 $50,000 None

SEARCH

Jacksonville Harbor Dredged Material Management Plan Remote Sensing Survey

2011 Ongoing $49,964 Ongoing None

Brazos Island Harbor Channel Improvement Remote Sensing Survey

2011 Ongoing $55,185 Ongoing None

Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Coastal and Submerged Site Inventory and Analysis

2011 Ongoing $200,842 Ongoing None

Motor Vessel Mississippi IV Historic Research, Display, and Museum Design

2011 Ongoing $214,934 Ongoing None

ACA Longboat Key Raster Imagery

2010 Ongoing $12,936 $12,936 None

Anna Maria Island Imagery

2011 Ongoing $10,926 $10,926 None

Lido Key Aerials

2011 Ongoing $5,951 $5,951 None

St. Lucie County South Coastal Imagery

2010 Ongoing $11,715 $11,715 None

Town of Palm Beach Imagery

2010 Ongoing $36,414 $36,414 None

Page 76: Sample Digital Brochure

Specialized Expertise of

Team Members

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AND RESUMES The organizational chart on the next lists all proposed project team members who will be involved in the management of the total package of services, as well as the delivery of specific services. Resumes for key personnel, including sub-consultants, immediately follow the organizational chart.

LETTERS OF INTENT This section concludes with the letters of intent from the proposed sub-consultants.

Page 77: Sample Digital Brochure

TEAM MEMBERS

Kenneth Craig, P.E.

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

Taylor Engineering, Inc.Continental Shelf Associates, Inc.

Sonographics, Inc.Marlowe & Company

RWParkinsonAmerican Vibracore Services

Morgan & Eklund, Inc.Southeastern Archaeological

Research, Inc.Aerial Cartographics of America,

Inc.

Chris HorganFrederick Horgan

Jason Burns, M.A., RPAJeffrey Enright, M.A., RPA

Michael Arbuthnot, M.S., RPAMichael Krivor, M.A., RPA

CULTURAL RESOURCES & GEOPHYSICAL DATA

COLLECTION/ANALYSIS

MARINE STRUCTURES

HARDBOTTOM MONITORING, MAPPING

& AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & PERMITTING

/ AGENCY COORDINATION

Steven Schropp, Ph.D.David Stites, Ph.D.

Chris EllisBrad Pickel

Michael Trudnak, P.E.

PROJECT MANAGER

Rajesh Srinivas, Ph.D., P.E.Mike Krecic, P.E.

Matt Trammell, P.E.Michael Kabiling, Ph.D., P.E.

Bill Miller, Ph.D., P.E.Randy Parkinson, Ph.D., P.G.

Organizational Chart

Jonathan Armbruster, P.E.Hugh Verkerk, P.E.Keith Knight., P.E.Nancy Lehr, P.E.

James Marino, P.E., D.CE

QA/QC

Keith SpringDavid Snyder

Erin HodelDeborah Fawcett

Melanie CahillDustin Myers

Thomas LamoureSteven Kuda, PSM, PHO

Kurt GriffelKimberly Peterson

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING &

SURVEYING SERVICES

COASTAL ENGINEERING / BORROW AREA DESIGN &

SAND COMPATIBILITY

John Morgan, II, P.L.S.David Coggin, P.S.M.

Chris Gammon, P.S.M.Frederick Kaub, P.G.

Brian McCordSean Kemnuir

Page 78: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 79: Sample Digital Brochure

2317 N Andrews Ave, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 Telephone: (954) 566-0620 Fax: (954) 564-6882 fhorgan@ aol.com

Remote Sensing Excellence September 30, 2011

Taylor Engineering, Inc. Attn: Kenneth Craig, P.E. 10151 Deerwood Park Blvd. Bldg. 300, Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL 32256 RE: Sub-contractor Commitment Letter CCNA Solicitation 11-5772 Collier County Design, Engineering and Permitting Services for the Re- nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches Dear Kenneth Craig, SONOGRAPHICS, INC. is pleased to respond to Taylor Engineering, Inc. with this letter of commitment to the above referenced project. We fully recognize the trust and confidence placed in us by Taylor Engineering, Inc. to provide the skills required for collecting and interpreting geophysical data. SONOGRAPHICS, INC. represents that it possesses the equipment, resources, knowledge, ability, professional skills, and qualifications to perform this work as we have in the past, in an expeditious and economical manner consistent with the interests of Taylor Engineering, Inc. If you should require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Laura Gilbert SONOGRAPHICS, INC.

SONOGRAPHICS

Page 80: Sample Digital Brochure

October 3, 2011 Kenneth Craig Vice President of Coastal Engineering Taylor Engineering, Inc. 10151 Deerwood Park Blvd., Bldg 300, Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Dear Mr. Craig:

Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal to serve as a subcontractor to Taylor Engineering, Inc. for Collier County’s CCNA Solicitation 11-5772- Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches. As the foremost experts in Corps of Engineers consulting in Washington, D.C., we bring a long track record of success with federal agency coordination and are ready to supplement your efforts in providing Collier County with exceptional service. As you aware, we have been serving as consultants for beach projects in Florida for over twenty years.

We have reviewed the requirements of the solicitation and have enclosed the requested

materials. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know and we will forward it to you immediately. I can be reached at (202) 775-1796 or [email protected] Sincerely, Howard Marlowe

President

Page 81: Sample Digital Brochure

October 6 Kenneth CAssociateTaylor E10151 DeBldg 300Jacksonv Sir: With thiscompletinSolicitatithe Baref My commcontingen Respectfu

Randall WPresidentRWParki

6, 2011

Craig, P.E. e Vice Presingineering, eerwood Par

0/Suite 300 ville, Florida

s letter I am ng the geoloion 11-5772 foot, Vander

mitment to cnt upon Coll

fully,

W. Parkinsot inson Consu

2018 Melbo(3

rwpark

dent, CoastaInc. rk Blvd.

a 32256

conveying mogical and ge

- Design, Enrbilt, Clam P

complete thislier County a

n, Ph.D., P.G

ulting, Inc.

ourne Ct. Sui321) [email protected]

al and Water

my commitmeotechnical wngineering a

Pass, Park Sh

s work as a sawarding the

G.

te 205 Melbo6 [v] (267) 3com www.rw

rfront Engine

ment to proviwork as descand Permittinhore, Naples

subcontractoe contract to

ourne, Florida92-0976 [f] wparkinson.co

RW

eering

ide Taylor Ecribed in Colng Services fs, and Marco

or to Taylor Eo your firm.

32901

om

WParkinson

Engineering wllier Countyfor the Re-no Island Sou

Engineering

Consulting

with assistany CCNA nourishment uth Beaches.

g Inc. is

g Inc.

nce in

of

Page 82: Sample Digital Brochure

1215 Wallace Drive, Delray Beach, Fl 33444

Ph 561-372-0500 Fax 561-372-0501

www.americanvibracore.com

49181 Hwy 51 N, Tickfaw, La. 70466 Ph 985-981-3980 Fax 985-902-8609

October 4, 2011

Mr. Kenneth R. Craig, P.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc. 10151 Deerwood Park Boulevard Building 300, Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL. 32256

RE: CCNA Solicitation 11-5772 Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches

Dear Mr. Craig,

American Vibracore Services, Inc. is pleased to present this letter to Taylor Engineering, Inc. and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection acknowledging American Vibracores commitment to provide professional geotechnical services for the referenced project. We anticipate that our services on this project would include, vibracoring, soil sampling, laboratory testing and marine services related to the project.

We appreciate your inclusion of American Vibracore on your project and look forward to working with Taylor Engineering, Inc. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Sean W. Kemnuir Vice President of Operations American Vibracore Services, Inc.

Page 83: Sample Digital Brochure

MORGAN & EKLUND, INC.PROFESSIONAL SURVEY CONSULTANTS

October 7,2011

Taylor Engineering, Inc.Attn: Mr. Ken Craig, PE10151 Deerwood Park Blvd.Building 300, Suite 300Jacksonville, Florida 32256

RE: Collier CountyCCNA Solicitation Number 11-5772Request for Proposals for Design, Engineering and permitting Services Re-nourishment ofthe Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples and Marco Island South Beaches

Dear Ken:

Taylor Engineering, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida has asked our firm to provide the required land andhydrographic surveys for the above referenced project.

This letter is to inform you that we are fully committed to performing these surveys for TaylorEngineering, Inc. in a timely, cost-effective manner.

Additionally, our firm has worked successfully with Taylor Engineering, Inc. on numerous projects withsimilar scopes of work.

If you should have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call.

\ -A( s:-organ, II, P.L~

8745 U.S. HIGHWAY I, P.O. BOX 701420, WABASSO, FL 32970-1420. PHONE: (772) 388-5364. FAX: (772) 388-3165· [email protected] S.E. COURT, SUITE 110, DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441 • PHONE: (954) 421-6882· FAX: (954) 421-0451 • [email protected]

Page 84: Sample Digital Brochure

315 NW 138th Terrace Newberry, Florida 32669 Phone 352-333-0049 Fax 352-333-0069 www.searchinc.com

Kenneth Craig, P.E. September 30, 2011 Vice President, Coastal Engineering Taylor Engineering, Inc. 10151 Deerwood Park Blvd. Bldg. 300, Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Re: Letter of Intent: Cultural Resources Support for the Collier County Design,

Engineering and Permitting Services and Beach Re-nourishment Project Dear Mr. Craig, Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc., (SEARCH) is pleased to provide cultural resources support services, including underwater archaeological services, to Taylor Engineering, Inc., for the Collier County Design, Engineering and Permitting Services and Beach Re-nourishment Project, CCNA Solicitation 11-5772. SEARCH is pleased to be included as a member of this team. With kind regards, Anne V. Stokes, Ph.D. President

Page 85: Sample Digital Brochure

Aerial Cartographics of America, Inc. DIGITAL MAPPING - LAMP - LiDAR - GIS - PHOTOGRAPHY - ORTHOS

1722 WEST OAK RIDGE RD., ORLANDO FLORIDA 32809 PHONE: 407-851-7880 FAX: 407-855-8250 www.aca-net.com

September 29, 2011 Mr. Kenneth R. Craig, PE Taylor Engineering, Inc. 10151 Deerwood Park Blvd Bldg. 300, Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Re: Letter of Intent for Collier County's CCNA Solicitation # 11-5772

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services and Beach Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples and Marco Island South Beaches Project.

Dear Mr. Craig, This letter of intent stating Aerial Cartographics of America, Inc's intent to provide the Aerial Photogrammetric services to Taylor Engineering, Inc. for the Design, Engineering and Permitting Services and Beach Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples and Marco Island South Beaches project. We appreciate the opportunity to work with Taylor Engineering, Inc. on this project. If you have any questions feel free to contact us. Sincerely, AERIAL CARTOGRAPHICS OF AMERICA, INC. Steven Kuda, PSM, PHO Senior Vice President

Page 86: Sample Digital Brochure

KENNETH R. CRAIG, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT OF COASTAL ENGINEERING

EDUCATION University of Florida, M.E., 1994, Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering University of Florida, B.S., 1992, Civil Engineering REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 1997 Civil Engineering / AL / 2004 Civil Engineering / LA / 2006 Civil Engineering / PR / 2008 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 14 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 2

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Craig serves as Vice President of Coastal Engineering. As such, he holds overall responsibility for the company’s coastal engineering operations. He possesses a unique, experience-based skill set that spans a broad range of coastal zone issues. Coming from earlier roles as engineer and director of the Coastal Engineering group, he mentors younger staff, coordinates the group’s strategic plan development and implementation, and ensures consistency with the corporate strategic plan. Mr. Craig’s formal academic training focused on coastal process analyses (i.e., shoreline evolution and sediment transport, wave and hydrodynamic modeling) and their impacts on major shore protection projects. He frequently acts as project liaison to local, state, and federal agencies regarding project related issues such as design, permitting, and funding options. In addition to his beach-related experience, Mr. Craig has accumulated extensive inlet-based knowledge through development of inlet management plans and other studies throughout Florida. He has examined sand bypassing mechanisms, developed wave refraction/diffraction models near inlets, and developed recommendations to improve both sand bypassing and navigation at numerous tidal inlets. Mr. Craig also has designed several major coastal structures. PROJECT EXPERIENCE FPL St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Seawall, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — Served

in lead QA/QC role for this project to provide coastal and structural engineering design and environmental permitting for a seawall and breakwater/artificial reef to protect the nuclear power plant's discharge canal and headwall structure. Taylor Engineering staff members are currently preparing design alternatives for the shoreline protection structure and reef.

Lantana Emergency Seawall, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009) — Served in lead QA/QC role for this project to construct an emergency seawall to protect the Town of Lantana’s waterfront park. Taylor Engineering designed the structure with readily available steel sheetpile and helical anchor tiebacks under the existing buildings. Worked closely with Palm Beach County to provide dune restoration as part of the overall shoreline stabilization. The resulting system provides protection against a 50-year design storm, which approximately equates to a Category 3 hurricane.

Bathtub Beach Design and Permitting, Martin County, Florida (2010) — Provided QA/QC of beach placement design and dredging design for the restoration of this pocket beach located immediately north of St. Lucie Inlet in Martin County, Florida.

Ft. Pierce Inlet Sand Bypassing – Preliminary Design, St. Lucie County, Florida (2008 – Ongoing) — Senior advisor and QA/QC lead for preliminary design of a sand trap inside Ft. Pierce Inlet, St. Lucie County, Florida. Project included public workshops, detailed numerical modeling with the MIKE21 system, and report preparation.

Okaloosa Island Beach Restoration Design and Permitting, Ft. Walton Beach, Florida (2009) — Provided QA/QC and client coordination for the first beach nourishment project on Okaloosa Island.

Walton County 30A Corridor Design and Permitting, Florida (2007 – Ongoing) — QA/QC of permit application and coastal engineering design for this beach nourishment project in central and eastern Walton County, Florida.

Page 87: Sample Digital Brochure

Kenneth R. Craig 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Jupiter Inlet District Jetty Renovations, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007) — Project manager and Engineer of Record for the repair of the north and south jetties at Jupiter Inlet. Project involved placement of approximately 11,700 tons of armor stone, removal of the southern wall cap on the north jetty, repair of concrete sheet pile cap, and repair and installation of aluminum handrail. The total project cost approached $3.2 million. Construction began November 1, 2006 and concluded in May 2007. Taylor Engineering provided construction observation, pay application, and troubleshooting services to JID throughout the project.

Ft. Pierce 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 Beach Monitoring Reports, Florida (2009) — Project manager and QA/QC oversight during development of the 2007, 2008, and 2009 monitoring reports that documents existing conditions on the project and adjacent beaches.

Jupiter/Carlin 2 and 3 Year Monitoring Reports (2006) — Project manager and QA/QC during preparation of the permit required post-construction engineering performance analysis of the Jupiter/Carlin Shore Protection Project. The project included analysis of survey data to assess changes to beach volume and shoreline position, nearshore hardbottom change analysis, and report preparation.

Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project 2007, 2005, 1997 Permitting, St. Lucie County, Florida (2007) — Provided QA/QC and lead engineer services during the preparation of FDEP permit application for this federal shore protection project. Lead engineer during permitting process. Responsible for completing a Joint Coastal Permit Application including project design sheets, dredging borrow area analysis, overfill ratios, advanced maintenance requirements, local, state, and federal agency coordination, hardbottom impacts/mitigation plan, erosion control line, water quality variance, defining pipeline corridors, derelict structure removal, and turtle issues. Used the company’s GPS to document and map preconstruction features on the beach. Developed several custom software programs for analysis of beach profile data and planform evolution. Received final permit authorization from the DEP. Modified borrow site on an emergency basis to support the county and the USACE during a work stoppage that resulted from litigation filed against the USACE shortly after construction began.

City of Ft. Pierce Dune Management Assistance, St. Lucie County, Florida (2007) — Developed a dune management plan for the shoreline within the City of Fort Pierce. Plan included recommendations for traffic control, planting, and future sand placement.

Maiden Island Phase I, Antigua, West Indies (2005) — Provided QA/QC for an emergency shoreline stabilization design for an eroding beach on a privately-owned island to the northeast of Antigua. Stabilization concepts included buried geotextile sandbags and rock revetment.

St. Johns County Shore Protection Project Permitting Services, St. Johns County Parks and Recreation Department (2004, 1999) — Project manager for an emergency permit modifications and project design to address severe erosion caused by the 2004 hurricane season. Directed engineering design, coordinated with FDEP, Florida Parks Department, USACE, St. Johns County, State Historic Preservation office. Directed impact analysis of revised borrow site design..

Page 88: Sample Digital Brochure

MICHAEL E. TRUDNAK, P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER

EDUCATION University of Florida, M.S., 1997, Coastal Engineering Pennsylvania State University, B.S., 1995, Geosciences REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 2002 Civil Engineering / TX / 2009 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 14

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Trudnak obtained his Master of Science degree in Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering and joined Taylor Engineering in 1997. He specializes in coastal process analyses and their impacts on major shore protection projects. He has worked on all aspects of beach nourishment projects including feasibility studies, sand source investigations, borrow area impact analyses, project design, permit application preparation, and regulatory agency coordination. In addition to his beach-related experience, Mr. Trudnak has accumulated extensive inlet-based knowledge through development of inlet management plans and other studies throughout Florida. He has examined sand bypassing mechanisms, analyzed wave refraction/diffraction models near inlets, and developed recommendations to improve both sand bypassing and navigation at numerous tidal inlets. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Beach Restoration Design and Permitting Services, Various Locations, Florida

(2001 – 2011) — Directed the completion of JCP applications to obtain FDEP and/or USACE permits or permit modifications for the South Marco Island 2006 Beach Nourishment Project, Walton County/Destin Beach Restoration Project, Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project 2007 Nourishment and 2011 Emergency Beach Fill, Martin County Shore Protection Project 2002, 2005, and 2012 Nourishments, Walton County 30A Corridor Beach Restoration Project, Western Destin Beach Restoration Project, Okaloosa Island Beach Restoration Project, Eglin AFB Beach Restoration Project, and Holiday Isle Emergency Beach Fill. Work includes beach and borrow area design; geotechnical analyses; sand compatibility analyses; environmental impact analyses; local, state, and federal agency coordination; development of project plans and specifications, and conducting public workshops. Completed projects restored approximately 20 miles of beach, and proposed projects will restore approximately 21 miles of beach.

Beach Restoration Bid Administration, Construction Observation Services, and Monitoring (2005 – 2010) — Assisted various government entities with bid administration and construction observation of their beach restoration projects. Projects included the Walton County/Destin Beach Restoration Project, Holiday Isle 2011 Emergency Fill Project, Ft. Pierce 2011 Emergency Beach Fill Project, and Summer Haven 2011 FEMA Dune Project. Work responsibilities included preparation of contract documents, construction plans, and technical specifications; overseeing daily construction observations services, conducting pre-bid and project progress meetings and substantial completion and final inspections; reviewing contractor submittals, pay applications, and project surveys; project certification; collection and analysis of monitoring surveys; and preparation and submittal of post-construction reports.

Beach Management Feasibility Studies, Florida Panhandle (2001 – 2008) — Conducted beach management feasibility studies for various government entities in the Florida Panhandle including the Walton County/Destin Beach Management Feasibility Study (2001 – 2003) and the Okaloosa Island Beach Management Feasibility Study (2006 – 2008). Work included evaluation of present and historic beach conditions, analysis of local littoral processes, characterization of native beach sediments, development of sediment budget, cross-shore erosion modeling, completion of a shorefront development storm damage risk assessment, and development of a list of feasible beach management projects for the project areas. Recommended management actions include beach and dune restoration.

Page 89: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael E. Trudnak 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Sand Source Investigations, Various Locations, Florida (2001 – 2008) –– Conducted several sand source investigations for various government entities throughout Florida including the Eglin Air Force Base/Okaloosa County/Destin Sand Source Investigation (2006 – 2008), Walton County Sand Source Investigation (2005 – 2007), Walton County/Destin Sand source Investigation (2002 – 2003), and Venice Beach Sand Source Investigation (2001 – 2002). Projects included development of geophysical and geotechnical data collection and analysis programs to locate beach quality sand reserves for future beach management activities. Fieldwork included reconnaissance and detail phase sub-bottom seismic and bathymetric surveys, cultural resource surveys (side-scan, magnetometer, and sub-bottom seismic surveys), and vibracore collection. Projects included characterization of native beach sand and potential borrow material, overfill analysis, and design of borrow area dredging templates. Projects collected and analyzed hundreds of cores and identified over 25,000,000 cy of beach compatible sand.

Rollover Pass Closure, Galveston County, Texas (2009 – Ongoing) — As project manager and lead coastal engineer, currently directing the design and permitting phase of a project to close a man-made inlet. Work to date includes an environmental and engineering literature review, site observations, field data collection (bathymetry, water quality, tide elevations, and flow velocities), coastal processes analysis and sediment budget development, numerical modeling to evaluate the potential effects of Rollover Pass closure on inland water hydraulics and salinity, preparation of an Environmental Assessment, development of the engineering plan to close the pass (fill volume and sediment quality requirements, borrow site locations, existing structure demolition and/or removal requirements, and closure methodology), preparation and submittal of a Department of the Army permit, public workshops, and coordination with state and federal agency staff.

Post-Hurricane Assessment and Recovery Efforts, Florida — Assisted various government entities throughout Florida to assess hurricane impacts and design, permit, and construct emergency restoration projects. Designed the Martin County Emergency Dune Restoration Project in 2005 following Hurricanes Francis and Jeanne and assisted the county with design and costs issues associated with FEMA-approved projects. Assisted Walton County and Destin following Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis with post-storm beach assessments and design and permitting of dune restoration projects. Responsibilities included analysis of pre- and post-storm MHW shoreline positions and beach volume calculations; development of project plans and specifications, bid administration assistance; construction observation services; and local, state, and federal agency coordination.

Ft. Pierce Inlet Sand Bypassing Feasibility Study, St. Lucie County, Florida (2002 – 2005) — Evaluated the feasibility of implementing a sand bypassing project to bypass 130,000 cy/yr to the erosional hotspot downdrift of Ft. Pierce Inlet. The analysis examined historic and present beach survey data, collected and analyzed vibracores, and delineated sensitive habitats including seagrass beds to identify potential sand sources containing beach-compatible sand. Evaluation of coastal processes involved longshore transport calculations and modeling shoreline evolution in response to sand tightening the north jetty. Evaluation of sand bypassing alternatives addressed technical feasibility, effectiveness, environmental impacts, and costs.

Page 90: Sample Digital Brochure

JAMES N. MARINO, P.E., D.CE PRESIDENT

EDUCATION University of Florida, M.S., 1986, Coastal Engineering U.S. Military Academy at West Point, B.S., 1978, General Engineering Graduate, U.S. Army Command & General Staff College, 1992 REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 1986 Civil Engineering / VA / 1982 Civil Engineering / LA / 2005 Academy of Coastal, Ocean, Port, & Navigation Engineers, Diplomate of Coastal Engineering, 2010 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 33

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Marino has more than 30 years of experience, including 20 years as an officer in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He has served in an executive management role for a broad range of engineering projects, providing comprehensive staff and project management, development, and oversight for public works, coastal, port and harbor, transportation, and environmental projects. Mr. Marino holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point and a Master of Engineering degree in Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering from the University of Florida. He is certified as a Diplomate in Coastal Engineering from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Academy of Coastal, Ocean, Port, and Navigation Engineers and is a registered professional engineer in Florida, Virginia, and Louisiana. Executive leadership roles include serving as an officer in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), in executive management for the Seminole County, Florida government, and as a senior executive in private practice. Mr. Marino managed a multi-million dollar research and development program while stationed at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal Engineering Research Center. He served as Director of Public Works, U.S. Army, Japan and as Director of Public Works and Deputy County Manager for Seminole County, FL. He also served as Vice President of an 8,000-member multidisciplinary international consulting firm specializing in maritime planning, engineering, and management; Vice President of a 500-member international consulting firm specializing in coastal engineering, transportation design, port & harbor planning and engineering, and urban waterfront design; Chief Operating Officer of a multi-disciplined consulting firm specializing in planning, engineering, management, and environmental compliance in the coastal zone; and Associate Vice President responsible for the strategic planning, development and integration of Federal Services projects within the southeast division of a 3,000-member architectural, engineering, and planning firm. Mr. Marino is a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers de Fleury Medal winner. He currently serves as the Coastal Engineering Practice Chairman and the Policy Chairman for the ASCE Coasts, Oceans, Ports, & Rivers Institute and serves on the Energy, Environment, and Water Policy Committee for ASCE, and the Government Affairs Committee of the American Shores & Beach Preservation Association. PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE

Marco Island South Beach Coastal Engineering Study, Collier County, FL (2010-

2011) –QA/QC officer and peer review as a subconsultant to Coastal Engineering Consultants for the modeling effort and alternatives design analysis of South Marco Island shoreline.

Hidaeaway Beach Coastal Engineering Study, City of Marco Island, FL (2010-2011 –QA/QC officer and peer review as a subconsultant to Coastal Engineering Consultants for the modeling effort and alternatives design analysis of Hideaway Beach shoreline.

Bird Key Shoreline Restoration, City of Sarasota, Florida (2009 – 2011) — QA/QC officer for the Bird Key Shoreline Restoration project involving the design and construction of the articulated concrete mat, seawall, and kayak launch.

Page 91: Sample Digital Brochure

James N. Marino 2 of 2

11/13/2011

City of Treasure Island Sand Sharing Program, Pinellas County, Florida (2009 – 2011) — Served as the project manager for the redistribution of beach quality sand from the center of Treasure Island to the north and south reaches. Total volume is approximately 150,000 cy and stretches over 2 miles.

Navarre Beach Restoration, Santa Rosa County, Florida (2009 – 2010) — Served as the QA/QC officer for the restoration of Navarre Beach in the Panhandle of Florida.

Big Sarasota Pass/New Pass Inlet Management Study Peer Review, Sarasota, Florida (2009 – 2011) — Served as the QA/QC officer for the development of the inlet management study of this complex inlet/barrier island system.

Indian River County Sector 3 Beach Nourishment Project, Indian River County, Florida (2009 – 2011) — Served as project manager for the construction phase services of a 6-mile, 472,000 cubic yard beach nourishment project.

Flagler Beach Restoration Project, Flagler, Florida (2007 – 2008) — Served as Principal-in-Charge for the conduct of a USACE Jacksonville Feasibility Study Sand Search Investigation for 25 miles of Flagler County, Florida shoreline. City of Flagler Beach and Florida DEP are the sponsors for this phase of the Feasibility Study.

Guapo Beach Shoreline Protection, Point Fortin, Trinidad (2007 – 2008) — Project director for major coastal engineering and environmental impact assessment near Atlantic LNG’s terminal site in Point Fortin, Trinidad. The local coastline configuration and coastal processes had been greatly modified following construction of the terminal, dredging and land reclamation. The project includes construction of groins, headlands and an offshore breakwater in tandem with high quality imported beach nourishment.

Southeast Florida Shore Protection Inventory Program (2007 – 2008) — Principal-in-Charge responsible for the development of the first regional sediment management plan to be developed by the Jacksonville District of USACE. The Plan brought together existing information of identified future beach nourishment needs (from Federal, State, local and private sources) and set out a plan for linking these needs with known domestic beach sand sources.

Los Angeles County DPW Santa Monica Bay Beach Restoration Project (2007 – 2008) — Project Director responsible for the restorative design of 10 Santa Monica Bay beaches which were damaged by winter storms from 2004 and 2005. Initial design estimates call for $8m of various restoration efforts throughout the 37-mile stretch of Los Angeles County shoreline.

PUBLICATIONS

"Sediment Trapping at Florida's East Coast Inlets," C&E Studies, Springer-Verlag

"Effects of Florida Tidal Inlets on Adjacent Shorelines," Beach Preservation Technology Conference '88, Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association

"Case of an Updrift Migrating Inlet: Fort George Inlet, Florida, " Proceedings of the 1990 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association

"Inlet Ebb Shoals Related to Coastal Parameters," Coastal Sediments '87, American Society of Civil Engineers

Page 92: Sample Digital Brochure

STEVEN J. SCHROPP, PH.D. VICE PRESIDENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

EDUCATION Texas A&M University, Ph.D., 1985, Oceanography, Biological Oceanography Texas A&M University, M.S., 1979, Biology Texas A&M University, B.S., 1976, Marine Biology REGISTRATION Environmental Assessor / FL / 1996 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 20 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 6

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Dr. Schropp has worked on environmental issues in Florida, the Gulf of Mexico, and elsewhere since 1979. After five years with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Dr. Schropp joined Taylor Engineering in 1991 as a Senior Environmental Scientist. His project experience includes permit application and mitigation plan preparation and regulatory agency coordination for beach nourishment, dredging and other projects; sediment quality sampling and data evaluation; evaluation of dredging as an environmental improvement technique; Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Site Assessments; bathymetric surveys; NEPA preliminary environmental assessment preparation; and environmental characterization of offshore benthic communities. Serving as Vice President since 2000, Dr. Schropp now oversees administrative operations while continuing to provide senior oversight of the company's environmental projects. PROJECT EXPERIENCE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Impact Statement, St. Lucie

County South Beach and Dune Restoration Project Environmental Impact Statement St. Lucie County, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — QA/QC review for Environmental Impact Statement evaluating environmental impacts of the 3.8-mile-long project. Key issues include turtle nesting habitat, hardbottom habitat, and listed shorebird species.

Rollover Pass Closure Feasibility Study, Phases I and II, Galveston, Texas (2009 – Ongoing) — Senior review and oversight for Phase I and II of the Rollover Pass Closure Feasibility Study. Phase I included an environmental and engineering literature review, site observations, meetings with state and federal agency environmental permitting and review staff, and field data collection (bathymetry, water quality, tide elevations, and flow velocities). Phase II included numerical modeling to evaluate the potential effects of Rollover Pass closure on inland water hydraulics and salinity and preparation of an Environmental Assessment and a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit application.

Town of Lantana Emergency Seawall Design, Permitting, and Construction Administration, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009) — Oversaw Taylor Engineering staff efforts to evaluate, design, permit, and construct an emergency seawall at the Town of Lantana's municipal park, which suffered extreme beach and dune erosion during 2008.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Impact Statement, Central Palm Beach County Comprehensive Erosion Control Project, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Quality control review of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed shore protection project (SPP) along nearly one mile of critically eroded South Palm Beach / Lantana shoreline.

Jupiter/Carlin Shore Protection Project Section 934 Study, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Senior review for preparation of a Reevaluation Report, Section 934 Study for the Jupiter/Carlin Shore Protection Project.

Ft. Pierce Beach Permitting Assistance, St. Lucie County, Florida (2009) — Senior review of permitting assistance and limited construction observation activities for 2009 renourishment of 1.3-mile federal shore protection project immediately downdrift of Ft. Pierce Inlet.

Page 93: Sample Digital Brochure

Steven J. Schropp 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project Emergency Permitting Services, St. Lucie County, Florida (2005) — Supervised preparation of emergency permit modification request for beach nourishment following Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne. Coordinated responses to regulatory agency review and consultation with federal review agencies. Prepared evaluation of project's impacts on nearshore hardbottom.

Ft. Pierce Beach Shore Protection Project, 2008 and 2009 Monitoring, St. Lucie County, Florida (2008 – Ongoing) — Senior review and oversight of marine turtle and hardbottom data collection and data analyses to fulfill physical and biological project monitoring requirements.

Ft. Pierce Beach 2003 Renourishment Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2003) — Supervised field investigation of hardbottom distribution and assessment of the previous nourishment's impact on nearshore hardbottom. Assisted with permit application and regulatory agency coordination.

Florida Inland Navigation District M-5 Permitting and Preliminary Design, Martin County, Florida (2010) — Senior oversight for the permitting and preliminary design of the MSA M-5 DMMA offloading and Crossroads channel maintenance dredging with beach placement of dredged material.

Martin County Shore Protection Project, 2009 Hutchinson Island Renourishment Design and Permitting, Florida (2008 – Ongoing) — Senior review and oversight of design and permitting services for the 2009 renourishment of the Shore Protection Project along Hutchinson Island.

Bathtub Beach Nourishment Project, Martin County, Florida (2009) — Senior review of environmental permitting and construction specifications for a dredging and beach fill project involving very sensitive habitats in St. Lucie Inlet (part of an Aquatic Preserve) and Bathtub Beach (worm rock reef).

St. Johns County Shore Protection Project, Post-Construction Monitoring, Florida (2003 – Ongoing) — Senior review of marine turtle monitoring activities and final report.

Martin County Shore Protection Project Emergency Permitting Services, Florida (2005) — Supervised preparation of emergency permit modification request for beach nourishment following Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne. Coordinated responses to regulatory agency review and consultation with federal review agencies.

Beach Design/Build Assistance, Anastasia State Park, Florida (2002) — Obtained federal and state permits for beach nourishment.

Shore Protection Feasibility Study, Lido Key, Florida (2002) — Provided Independent Technical Review for the beach nourishment feasibility study.

Beach Nourishment Feasibility Study, Walton County, Florida (2001) — Coordinated sand source investigation to locate offshore borrow areas for beach nourishment projects. Investigation included subbottom profiling, vibracores, side-scan sonar, and magnetometer surveys.

Destin Beach Nourishment, Okaloosa County, Florida (2001) — Coordinated sand source investigation to locate offshore borrow areas for beach nourishment projects. Investigation included subbottom profiling, vibracores, side-scan sonar, and magnetometer surveys..

Page 94: Sample Digital Brochure

DAVID L. STITES, PH.D. DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

EDUCATION Emory University, Ph.D., 1986, Aquatic Ecology Georgia Institute of Technology, M.S., 1981, Applied Biology / Aquatic Ecology Eckerd College, B.S., 1972, Biology YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 7 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 20

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Dr. Stites expertise includes freshwater, estuarine, and marine environmental matters including wetland restoration, water quality, endangered species, and associated permitting processes in Florida and around the U.S. During his career, Dr. Stites has successfully implemented and managed a wide range of environmentally-focused water resource projects from initial environmental feasibility, evaluations, and diagnostic studies through pilot project and full implementation efforts, including restoration design and implantation, wetland impact evaluation and, mitigation, design and monitoring, state and federal environmental permitting, and document support for federal NEPA coordination activities. He has extensive experience presenting such issues to technical and public audiences, as well as negotiating environmental regulatory issues. Currently, Dr. Stites is responsible for performance and overall quality assurance and quality control of Taylor Engineering’s environmental and permitting services. This includes active responsibility and oversight of state/Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit applications and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Dredge and Fill Permit applications, as well as related documentation associated with specific issues – such as NEPA documentation and project specific technical environmental evaluations. He also provides senior technical support for permit application negotiations, environmental impact and mitigation designs, and related issues. His knowledge and understanding of state and federal environmental regulations combined with his negotiation skills have allowed him to succeed in timely award of state and federal permits for projects with unusual natural resource issues.

EXPERIENCE

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for St. Lucie County Dune and Beach

Restoration Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — Project manager for USACE / BOEMRE (cooperating agency) EIS to assess beach nourishment alternatives for 3.9 miles of beach on south Hutchinson Island in St. Lucie County. EIS considers six beach design alternatives and two borrow sources: an offshore shoal and upland sand. Issues include endangered sea turtles, hardbottom, and offshore essential fish habitat and wave climate impacts of offshore dredging. The project has included public scoping and public comment meetings developed and facilitated by Dr. Stites and others at Taylor Engineering. EIS completion is expected in 2012.

Sand Dollar Island Boardwalk Feasibility Study and Dune Walkover Project Design and Permit (2004 – 2010) — Project manager for development of boardwalk conceptual design, including natural resources impact assessment and evaluation of regulatory and public issues, responses, and desires concerning management of access to a public beach and federally designated critical wildlife breeding habitat (marine turtles and shorebirds). Project resulted in a follow-up project designing and permitting (CCCL and dredge and fill permit applications), dune walkover, and public amenities for Tigertail Park in Collier County.

Tigertail Park Dune Walkover and Facilities Improvements, Collier County, Florida (2005 – Ongoing) — Project Manager for feasibility study to identify and permit the most feasible means of improving access from Tigertail Beach Park to the Gulf of Mexico shoreline. The development of Sand Dollar Island seaward of Tigertail Park beach had cut off the park beach from the Gulf of Mexico. Taylor Engineering identified the most feasible alternatives, permitting requirements,

Page 95: Sample Digital Brochure

David L. Stites 2 of 2

11/13/2011

and developed public stakeholder participation in the feasibility study. Dr. Stites provided senior oversight for subsequent Taylor Engineering tasks that obtained the necessary state and federal environmental permits for the final dune walkover and park facilities modifications.

Jupiter-Carlin Beach/US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 934 Study, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Task manager for environmental assessment component of a study to reauthorize USACE shoreline protection project for a 50-year project life. Environment Assessment summarizes existing conditions and changes to environmental conditions and related federal policies since the original (1994) environmental impact statement and subsequent project authorization.

Bathtub Beach Nourishment Project, Martin County, Florida (2008 – 2010) — Manager for project to protect essential infrastructure of Bathtub Beach County Park and adjacent public roads and utilities from severe beach erosion. Bath. Project includes design, permitting, and construction bid support for dredging and beach fill project that involves very sensitive habitats in St. Lucie inlet (part of an Aquatic Preserve) and Bathtub Beach (worm rock reef). Project activities to date include development of a Joint Coastal Permit Application, responses to multiple agency Requests for Additional Information (RAI), management of a team of independent consultants to Martin County, development of natural resource documentation for state and federal permit applications, and design of monitoring programs. Project was constructed in spring 2010.

Town of Lantana Emergency Seawall Project and Gap Closure Seawall Project, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009 – 2010) — Task Manager for emergency construction and followed by an after-the-fact CCCL permit for a seawall to protect essential infrastructure along a 700-foot municipal park shoreline owned by the Town of Lantana. Received final permit approval in summer 2009. Dr. Stites than led the permitting of a 150 ft extension of the seawall to the northern boundary of the property. Key permit issues included construction beyond “emergency level” construction recommended by FDEP, turtle nesting habitat, and CCCL gap closure permitting rules. Emergency project was constructed in Winter-Spring 2009. Gap Closure Project was permitted in 2010 and constructed in late 2010 – early 2011. The dune in front of the wall, constructed as part of the project has continued to provide active turtle nesting habitat.

Ft. George Roadway Revetment Design and Permitting, Duval County, Florida (2004 – 2008) — Project manager for Joint Coastal Permit development. Project provided a revetment armoring for a critical FDOT coastal highway running along the Atlantic Ocean Beach and marine turtle nesting habitat, and partially within a state park. The permit was approved and construction was completed in 2007. Taylor Engineering recently completed a permit revision to extend the armoring design to repair and upgrade an already armored section of waterfront adjacent to the current project footprint.

Ft. George Roadway Revetment Design and Permitting (2004 – 2006) — Project manager for Joint Coastal Permit development. Project provided armoring for a critical FDOT coastal highway running along the Atlantic Ocean Beach and marine turtle nesting habitat, and partially within a state park. The permit was granted and construction is scheduled.

Florida Inland Navigation District IR-2 UMAM, Indian River County, Florida

(2005 – 2009) — Project Manager for impact quantification and mitigation design for wetland impacts associated with Dredged Material Management Area design. Mitigation design provides six acres of red mangrove wetland with an upland edge of mixed black and red mangroves.

Page 96: Sample Digital Brochure

CHRISTOPHER B. ELLIS SENIOR SCIENTIST

EDUCATION Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, B.S., 1999, Environmental Science, Aquatic Resources YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 12

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Ellis earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science with emphasis on aquatic resources from Virginia Tech in May 1999. As a student, Mr. Ellis developed a strong foundation in disciplines such as chemistry, biology, ecology, groundwater hydrology, freshwater systems, and soil and groundwater pollution. Since joining Taylor Engineering in 1999, Mr. Ellis has provided environmental expertise on a wide variety of projects including wetland delineation and habitat characterization, wetland mitigation design and monitoring, ecosystem restoration, state and federal permitting, threatened and endangered species consultation, NEPA documentation, submerged resource surveys, and Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments. PROJECT EXPERIENCE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement for St. Lucie

County South Beach and Dune Restoration Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — Preparing Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental and social effects of restoring 3.9 miles of Atlantic shoreline in south St. Lucie County. Key project issues include sea turtles, essential fish habitat, benthic resources, hardbottom impacts and mitigation, socioeconomics, and cumulative effects.

Florida School for the Deaf & the Blind, Shoreline Stabilization Project, St. Johns County, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — As permitting task leader, provided state and federal environmental permitting services for the construction of a concrete sheetpile bulkhead to stabilize the adjacent shoreline. Delineated on-site wetlands and designed saltwater marsh mitigation plan to offset unavoidable wetland impacts. Currently assisting with construction administration and observation.

Florida Inland Navigation District, SJ-14 Assessment and Remediation, St. Johns County, Florida (2008 – Ongoing) — Biological lead for the assessment and remediation of a ~50-acre forested wetland site severely impacted by a marine dredged material slurry spill. Specific duties include ecological impact analysis, salinity and water level monitoring, regulatory agency coordination, and restoration planning.

Jupiter Inlet District, Loxahatchee River Central Embayment Channel Dredging, Palm Beach County, Florida (2010 – 2011) — Served as environmental lead and provided state and federal environmental permitting services. Specific duties included application development and coordination, seagrass impact analysis and mitigation planning, and Section 7 Endangered Species Act consultation support.

Texas General Land Office, Rollover Pass Closure Project, Galveston County, Texas (2009 – 2010) — Prepared an Environmental Assessment in accordance with NEPA to document the social and environmental effects of closing Rollover Pass on the Bolivar Peninsula. Key project issues include changes in salinity and its effects on fisheries and vegetation within the Galveston Bay Estuary, protected species and critical habitat, recreational resources, socioeconomics, and air quality.

Jupiter Inlet District, Loxahatchee River Seagrass Surveys, Palm Beach County, Florida (2009) — Performed surveys to quantitatively assess seagrass distributions within the Loxahatchee River Central Embayment main and south channels, Southwest Fork, and entrance to Sims Creek. The surveys followed NOAA’s NMFS survey protocol for Johnson’s seagrass.

Page 97: Sample Digital Brochure

Christopher B. Ellis 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Bird Island Trust, Bird Island Restoration Project, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — As project manager, provided state and federal environmental permitting and design support for the restoration and enhancement of an 8.9-acre spoil island near South Lake Worth Inlet. Project features comprised mangrove restoration, tidal creek dredging, and shoreline protection. Specific duties included permit application development, restoration design support, wetland and seagrass analysis including Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM), endangered species consultation, agency coordination, bid document preparation, and construction phase support.

Palm Beach County, Dubois Park Restoration Project, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — Conducted submerged natural resources survey to assess sensitive resources that the proposed project may affect. Provided state and federal environmental permitting support for the construction of various project components including shoreline stabilization, snorkeling lagoon, and docking facility. Permitting duties included application development, impact analysis, and agency coordination.

St. Joe Company, Pier Park Beachfront Improvements, Bay County, Florida (2005 – 2007) — As task manager, provide state and federal permitting services for the construction of a large pile-supported beachfront structure. Specific duties included application development, dune restoration design, and agency coordination.

Collier County, Tigertail Beach Access and Amenities, Collier County, Florida (2004 – 2007) — Mapped and characterized natural communities within the project area and quantified potential impacts related to construction of a beach access walkover and restroom facility. As permitting task leader, provided state and federal environmental permitting services including environmental impact analysis, mitigation design, application development, and agency coordination. The project required both CCCL and ERP permits from the state and a dredge and fill permit from the Department of the Army.

Volusia County, South Volusia County Beach Restoration, Florida (2004 – 2006) — Prepared an Environmental Assessment in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to evaluate the potential impacts associated with beach restoration along 8.4 miles of Atlantic shoreline in South Volusia County, Florida. Project included an evaluation of dredging and beach/nearshore placement impacts on sensitive natural resources including Essential Fish Habitat, threatened and endangered species, and benthic resources.

St. Lucie County, Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2004 – 2007) — Prepared an Environmental Assessment to investigate the potential impacts associated with the proposed 1.3-mile beach nourishment project just south of Ft. Pierce Inlet. Specific project duties included evaluating impacts to hardbottom communities, Essential Fish Habitat, threatened and endangered species, and cultural resources.

Sebastian Inlet District, Sebastian Inlet Channel Completion, Brevard and Indian River Counties, Florida (2005 – 2007) — As task manager, provided state and federal permitting services to the District in support of the proposed completion of the Sebastian Inlet channel connecting the inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. Specific duties included application preparation and submittal, development of a boating activity survey for the inlet and its flood shoals, natural resource impact analysis, mitigation planning, and agency coordination.

Page 98: Sample Digital Brochure

BRAD PICKEL DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ADVISOR

EDUCATION University of South Alabama, MSc, Marine Science and Coastal Geomorphology Auburn University, BSc, 1997, Marine Biology YEARS EXPERIENCE 10

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Brad Pickel serves as the Senior Public Policy Advisor and Director of Business Development for Marlowe & Company. Mr. Pickel is an expert in the environmental management of coastal areas and worked in both university and government settings prior to entering the private sector in April 2007. Mr. Pickel is also a leader in numerous national and state organizations relating to coastal management. For example, he is on the board of directors of the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association and served on the board of directors of the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association from 2004 to 2007. EXPERIENCE Director of Beach Management for the Walton County Florida Tourist

Development Council (TDC) (2000 – 2008) — Coordinated all aspects of beach protection and restoration.

Walton County/City of Destin Beach Restoration Project (2006 – 2007) As project manager Mr. Pickel served as the county’s point of contact regarding coastal issues with the local community, non-governmental organizations, and local, state, and federal agencies. This provided him opportunities to develop strong partnerships and encourage collaboration among all interested parties. This project received an American Shore and Beach Preservation Association Best Restored Beaches Award in 2007. For his work on behalf of Walton County, Mr. Pickel was awarded the 2006 Person of the Year Award from the Northwest Chapter of the Florida Public Relations Association.

Page 99: Sample Digital Brochure

JONATHAN T. ARMBRUSTER, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT, WATERFRONT ENGINEERING

EDUCATION University of Illinois, M.S., 1998, Environmental Hydrologic & Hydraulic Engineering The Cooper Union, B.E., 1996, Civil Engineering REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / AL / 2004 Civil Engineering / FL / 2002 Civil Engineering / NY / 2002 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 10 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 3

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Armbruster received his Bachelor of Engineering at The Cooper Union in New York City where he developed a strong foundation in civil engineering fundamentals. In 1996, while working toward his master’s degree, Mr. Armbruster served as a Research Assistant at Hydrosystems Laboratory of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. During his tenure at Illinois, his research focused on the fields of environmental hydrology and hydraulic engineering. His thesis research, conducted on behalf of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, resulted in the development of a physical model and rehabilitation design for the Batavia Dam on the Fox River in Illinois. Mr. Armbruster's professional experience includes employment by Development Consultants Group in Atlanta where he honed basic land development engineering skills. Also, Mr. Armbruster served as Vice President at MRD Associates, Inc. in Florida's Panhandle for three years. There, his professional experience encompassed business development and management as well as project management for marina design and permitting, dredging and dredged material management, and marine structures engineering projects. As Vice President of Taylor Engineering's Waterfront Engineering group, Mr. Armbruster oversees efforts across a spectrum of activities from feasibility analysis through final design and construction phase services for a range of projects including marina and waterfront facilities, marine structures, dredging projects, dredged material management facilities, hydraulic control structures, pile foundation structures, erosion control measures, and shore protection installations. PROJECT EXPERIENCE SR 951 Over Big Marco Pass, Collier County, Florida (2009 – 2010) — As part

of a Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) design-build team, provided QA/QC and design review for approximately 800 linear feet of prestressed concrete sheet pile seawall to protect expanded bridge abutments. The project included design and specifications for concrete sheet pile, concrete seawall cap, and tieback system. Work included coordination with multi-disciplinary bridge design and construction team. Seawall design considered abutment and traffic loads, storm surge and scour, riprap placement, hydrodynamic storm loads, and lateral loads from construction sequence.

Dubois Park Redevelopment: Final Design and Environmental Permitting, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – 2010) — Project manager for engineering design and permitting for redevelopment of Dubois Park. The completed project included dredging and construction of approximately 24 visitor boat slips, fixed docks to moor a life-rescue boat and a law enforcement vessel, a floating dock to serve as a water taxi terminal, a recreational snorkeling area protected by an artificial reef/breakwater, and improved and expanded shoreline stabilization combining vinyl bulkheads and riprap revetments.

FPL St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant: Discharge Canal Headwall Stabilization Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Project manager for marine structures engineering design and environmental permitting to protect the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant's discharge canal and headwall from severe coastal erosion. The project includes all phases of work from feasibility through final design of an ocean seawall and an offshore breakwater. Together, the two structures will protect the plant’s vital ocean-side infrastructure.

Page 100: Sample Digital Brochure

Jonathan T. Armbruster 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Guantánamo Bay Naval Base Shoreline Erosion Assessment, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba (2010) — Project manager, evaluated severity of and proposed potential repair solutions for eroding portions of Naval Base shoreline. The erosion threatened to undermine Windmill Beach Road. Efforts included site reconnaissance and evaluation, coastal conditions assessment, and evaluation of erosion control and mitigation strategies.

Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind: Seawall and Shoreline Infrastructure Improvements, St. Augustine, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Project manager directing team to mitigate shoreline erosion, design and construct protective shoreline seawalls, and improve campus shoreline infrastructure including perimeter roadway, stormwater systems, and student waterfront access features. Project includes planning and landscape architecture, marine structures engineering, stormwater design, roadway design, and construction phase services.

San Juan Waterfront Redevelopment, Puerto Rico (2010 – Ongoing) — Serving as project manager for marine and waterfront engineering consulting and design services and a member of a team of land development and design professionals working to redevelop nearly two miles of waterfront in San Juan. The project team plans to revitalize, retrofit, or replace aging and failing deep-water port infrastructure to support new mixed-use development including cruise passenger tourist attractions and commercial, residential, and civic developments. Marine structure services include evaluation of bulkheads, docks, and piers and design and construction phase engineering for new bulkheads, piers, mooring facilities, dredging, and other waterfront facilities.

Charles E. Cessna Landing Boat Ramp Engineering Design And Permitting, Walton County, Florida (2009) — Project manager for engineering design and permitting of concrete boat ramp structure to replace a dilapidated yet popular boat launch facility in South Walton County. Project included survey, geotechnical investigation, ramp structural design, cofferdam design, and environmental permitting.

Miramar Beach Parking Structure, Walton County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — Project manager and Engineer of Record for design and permitting of beachfront parking structure. The structure replaced traditional at-grade asphalt parking historically subject to severe damage by coastal storms. Project included construction of a single-level concrete parking structure supported by 178 prestressed concrete piles, installation of a sheetpile upland retaining bulkhead, and roadside utility relocations to develop storm resistant public access parking.

Waterfront Park Development, City of West Palm Beach, Florida (2007 – 2009) — Provided QA/QC of marine structure engineering design and construction phase activities associated with floating docks in the Lake Worth Lagoon east of downtown West Palm Beach. These floating docks serve as key elements of the city's downtown waterfront redevelopment program.

Flagler Beach Erosion Control Design, Flagler County, Florida (2002) — Reviewed structural alternatives and provided preliminary designs for erosion control structures along 10,000 ft of critically eroding Flagler Beach. Erosion patterns threatened to undermine State Road A1A, and the Florida Department of Transportation contracted Taylor Engineering to assess alternatives and design erosion control measures to protect the roadbed. Erosion control measures considered included rock revetments, seawalls, beach nourishment, and T-head groins

Page 101: Sample Digital Brochure

HUBERT C. VERKERK, P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER

EDUCATION Vaal Triangle College, University of Potchefstroom, South Africa, B.S., 1976, Civil and Structural Engineering REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 1987 Civil Engineering / South Africa / 1998 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 3 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 30

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Verkerk has almost 30 years of experience with project management, engineering design, contract administration, and construction supervision on numerous civil engineering land development projects and industrial and commercial marine projects such as industrial site developments, commercial site developments, residential and commercial sub-divisions, ports, harbors, shipping terminals, and bulk receipt terminals. He is also experienced in the design of highways, rural and city roadways and bridges, stormwater collection systems, water and sewer distribution systems, and all related permitting and environmental activities. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind: Seawall and Shoreline Infrastructure

Improvements, St. Augustine, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Engineer of Record for the design and construction of a protective shoreline seawall, and to improve campus shoreline infrastructure including perimeter roadway, stormwater systems, and student waterfront access features. Project includes planning and landscape architecture, marine structures engineering, stormwater design, roadway design, and construction phase services.

San Juan Waterfront Redevelopment, Puerto Rico (2010 – Ongoing) — Serving as project engineer for marine and waterfront engineering consulting and design services, a member of a team of land development and design professionals working to redevelop nearly two miles of waterfront in San Juan. The project team plans to revitalize, retrofit, or replace aging and failing deep-water port infrastructure to support new mixed-use development including cruise passenger tourist attractions and commercial, residential, and civic developments. Marine structure services include evaluation of bulkheads, docks, and piers and design for new bulkheads, piers, mooring facilities, dredging, and other waterfront facilities.

FPL St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant: Discharge Canal Headwall Stabilization Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Engineer of Record for marine structures engineering design and environmental permitting to protect the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant's discharge canal and headwall from severe coastal erosion. The project includes all phases of work from feasibility through final design of an ocean seawall and an offshore breakwater. Together, the two structures will protect the plant’s vital ocean-side infrastructure. Seawall design included evaluation of numerous anchoring schemes (helical anchors, grouted anchors, deadmen wall, and diaphragm structures) to support a 24-foot high seawall in the post-storm scoured condition.

Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba (2010 – Ongoing) — Provided a field study requested by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) to inspect numerous erosion and sinkhole hot spots threatening the stability of a coastal road. Study includes an in-depth inspection of probable causes and recommendations for repair.

Port of Ft. Pierce Engineering Services, North 2nd Street Improvements, Ft. Pierce, Florida (2004 – Ongoing) — Design Engineer for modifications to the City of Ft. Pierce port improvements to provide upgraded and widened roadways for several roads within the port area, improved and revitalized stormwater structures, and upgraded water and sewer utilities. This project includes a variety

Page 102: Sample Digital Brochure

Hubert C. Verkerk 2 of 2

11/13/2011

of right-of-way acquisitions and three new stormwater management areas, and provides new and expanded utilities for future growth and development. Project challenges include dealing with severe contaminated groundwater pollution, high tidal influences, dilapidated utility infrastructure, seasonal local industry demands, high volume truck traffic, and local residential and commercial activities.

Florida Inland Navigation District Dredged Material Management Area SJ-14 Pipeline Design, St. Johns County, Florida (2007 – Ongoing) — Project Manager and Design Engineer for the proposed installation of approximately 7,000 linear feet of buried 36-inch and 42-inch diameter gravity discharge pipe at SJ-14 Dredged Material Management Area (DMMA). The proposed pipeline design incorporates flow characteristics to drain a 100-acre dredged material containment basin and to provide an overflow return line for a variety of future dredging operations. Project challenges include numerous environmental impact hurdles, hydraulic modeling for a variety of dredging operations, tidal influences, and coordination with existing public parks, a school, and residential areas.

Lantana Park Emergency Seawall Project, Town of Lantana, Florida (2008 – Ongoing) — Provided project design and management, construction administration, and supervision for this $1.5 million dollar construction project, which comprised an emergency steel sheetpile seawall for the Lantana Beach Park, which had undergone severe beach and dune erosion endangering two existing buildings built on the dune profile. Project design, management, and administration services included every aspect of this project, including an emergency environmental permitting application.

PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE

Nassau County Ocean Highway and Port Authority, Georgia-Pacific, Fernandina International Tradeplex, Yulee, Florida (1995) — Project manager and design engineer for this 14 million-dollar, 80-acre Industrial Complex in Yulee, featuring one of the largest enclosed buildings in Northeast Florida at 560,000 square feet. Additional tenants included Shoreline Plastics. Project challenges included numerous environmental obstacles, road and rail access to the Fernandina Port, and utility master planning.

Fernandina Marine Terminal, Fernandina Beach, Florida (1990) — Project engineer responsible for the design and construction of the Marginal Wharf Container Terminal for the Nassau County Ocean Highway and Port Authority.

Smurfit-Stone Paper Mills, Fernandina Beach (2000) — Project engineer for upgrade of the Smurfit-Stone Paper Mills general trucking route and parking area. Services included realignment of 8th Street to Escambia Street to separate truck and vehicle traffic.

River Bend Development, Putnam County, Florida (2007 – 2008) — Provided conceptual design, planning, and permitting services for a 200-slip marina directly across from the town of Palatka. (Prior Firm Experience.)

Page 103: Sample Digital Brochure

KEITH A. KNIGHT, P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER

EDUCATION University of Florida, B.S., 1997, Civil Engineering REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / TX / 2010 Civil Engineering / SC / 2006 Civil Engineering / GA / 2004 Civil Engineering / FL / 2002 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 10 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 4

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Knight has 14 years of experience in the design, construction, and permitting of marine facilities and waterfront structures. His design experience includes marinas, waterfront parks, ship terminals, seawalls, bulkheads, jetties, shoreline protection systems, dredging and dredged material management facilities, pedestrian bridges, retaining walls, mooring fenders, and drainage control structures. His construction/inspection experience includes marinas, dry docks, docking terminals, bridges, bulk material handling systems, dredged material management sites, shoreline protection systems, pipe installation, plus seawall and boat ramp inspections, among others. Mr. Knight’s structural experience includes designs with carbon steel, stainless steel, timber, wood composites, concrete, vinyl, fiberglass (FRP), aluminum, and high-density polyethylene. Analysis and software experience includes STAAD 3-D structural design, finite element modeling, laterally loaded pile analysis, soil anchor design, slope stability analysis, seepage analysis, and determination of wind, wave, seismic, mooring, and berthing loads. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Rollover Pass Restoration, Galveston County, Texas (2010 – Ongoing) — Design

of steel sheet pile wall and soil land bridge to block off tidal flow and fill a 200 ft wide manmade inlet on the Gulf of Mexico, thereby restoring the area to a natural state. Project included steel sheet pile walls, concrete armor unit coastal erosion protection, riprap erosion protection, and beach fill.

Dredged Material Management Area O-7 Steel Box Weir, Martin County, Florida (2011 – Ongoing) — Design of two steel frame weirs 14 ft high with adjustable weir boards and timber access walkway. Work included structural steel design and modeling, design of concrete foundation to resist hydrostatic uplift forces, and design of an elevated timber access walkway.

Dredged Material Management Area O-7 Concrete Bridges, Martin County, Florida (2011 – Ongoing) — Design of two concrete bridges required for construction access and future offloading of dredged material management area 0-7 in Martin County. Each bridge was an approximately 40ft span and consisted of cast-in-place concrete deck supported by prestressed concrete girders with pile supported abutments. Design work included 3-D structural modeling, determination of truck and vehicle loads, prestressed concrete pile design, concrete design and detailing, and preparation of drawings and specifications.

Bahia Urbana Shoreline Improvements, San Juan, Puerto Rico (2010 – Ongoing) — Design of approximately 400 linear feet of steel sheetpile bulkhead, a 300-foot long pedestrian bridge, mooring dolphins, seaplane docking, and other shoreline improvements. Design includes seismic loading on the bulkhead due to liquefaction of poor soils and wave loading on the pedestrian bridge. Project items include a steel sheet pile bulkhead with concrete cap, sacrificial anodes, bollards, fenders, soil anchors, concrete filled pipe piles, prestressed double-tee members, and tropical hardwood decking. Work includes load rating and repair of existing structures, seismic load determination for new structures, corrosion analysis, and coordination with a multi-disciplinary team including architects and civil engineers.

Florida School for The Deaf and The Blind Seawall, St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — Design of approximately 200 linear feet of concrete sheet pile bulkhead with tie-back system. Work includes determination

Page 104: Sample Digital Brochure

Keith A. Knight 2 of 2

11/13/2011

of storm loads, traffic loads, and coordination of design to accommodate nearby roadway and existing utilities.

Florida Power & Light (FPL) Seawall, St. Lucie County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Structural design of steel sheet pile seawall to protect oceanfront facilities at FPL’s nuclear power plant. Project includes seawall design accommodating hurricane induced scour with wall penetration of a 12-foot diameter buried discharge pipe and analysis of different seawall material types.

Dubois Park Improvements, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – 2010) — Design of vinyl sheet pile bulkhead and dockage for Zeke’s marina located within the boundaries of Dubois Park at Jupiter Inlet. Project included design and specifications for various park improvements including a seawall, fixed dockage, floating docks, dredging, and a breakwater.

Judge SS Jolley Bridge Over Marco Pass Addition, Collier County, Florida (Ongoing) — Design of approximately 800 linear feet of prestressed concrete sheet pile seawall to protect expanded bridge abutments. The project includes design and specifications for concrete sheet pile, concrete seawall cap, and tieback system. Work includes coordination with multi-disciplinary bridge design team and inspection and monitoring of existing seawall before and during construction.

Charles E. Cessna Landing Boat Ramp Engineering Design and Permitting, Walton County, Florida (2009) — Structural design and engineering of concrete boat ramp and temporary cofferdam. Work included structural modeling of concrete slab with pile supported end-section, development of marine concrete specifications, design of vinyl sheet pile cutoff wall to prevent foundation undermining, and engineer’s cost estimate.

Miramar Beachfront Parking Facility, Walton County, Florida (2009) — Structural design and engineering for a pile-supported concrete parking deck adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico. The structure replaces traditional at-grade asphalt parking historically subject to severe damage by wind and wave forces encountered during a typical hurricane.

Waterfront Commons City Park Dock Design, Palm Beach County, Florida (2005 – 2009) — Structural design of the fixed concrete piers for the addition of approximately 1200 linear feet of dock at the City of West Palm Beach. Specific work includes design of pre-stressed concrete piles, concrete caps, connection to the existing bulkhead, and review of contractor's structural submittals during construction.

St. Johns River Water Management District, Herndon Swamp Restoration, Brevard County, Florida (2007 – 2010) — Structural design and construction observation for three concrete weirs comprising over 400 linear feet of precast concrete sheet pile and cast-in-place concrete aprons to resist hydrostatic uplift and erosion. Other work included structural design of concrete deadman, tie-rod system, and concrete cap. Construction observation included submittal review and limited on-site inspection.

South Florida Water Management District, S-65E Cellular Sheet Pile Weir, Okeechobee County, Florida (2008) — Part of an interdisciplinary team responsible for the emergency design of a cellular steel sheet pile water control structure to protect an upstream dam. Tasks included design of a 4000 cubic yard 8-foot thick underwater concrete apron with associated concrete mix design for underwater mass concrete.

Page 105: Sample Digital Brochure

NP P

EUCE UC RC YE5

NANCY P.E.

PROJECT

EDUCATIOUniversity of FCoastal and OcEngineering

University of FCivil Engineeri

REGISTRACivil Engineeri

YEARS WITENGINEER5

E. LEHR

ENGINEER

ON Florida, M.S, 20ceanographic

Florida, B.S., 20ing

ATION ing / FL / 2010

TH TAYLORING

R,

R

006,

005,

0

OR

BA MrsrespconsCurrcalcudeve PR M

Oscdbrt2poy

Dafis

H

daa

C

rFdc

EdppMdw

A–

ACKGROUN

. Lehr joined Tonsibilities incstruction plan rently, her respulations and melopment of pla

ROJECT EX

Miramar BeacOngoing) — Astudy, as well construction ddesign includebulkhead, conrestoration, antimes within th2005) and tropparking lot. Wof the surface year storm and

Dubois Park Rassisted with tfeatures to resincludes a rostabilization, a

Harborview MStaff Engineerdevelopment tha 192 capacitya boat lift trans

Charles E. CesStaff Engineerramp for the CFlorida. The development ocutoff wall to p

San Juan HarEngineer, assidocuments for port infrastrucpassenger tourMarine structudesign for newaterfront faci

Avenida Mene– 2008) — A

ND / RESPO

Taylor Enginecluded assistindevelopment.

ponsibilities inmodeling, dredans and specifi

XPERIENCE

ch Parking andAs a Staff Engias the final stru

drawings, and ed several fecrete piles, co

nd timber walkhe past decadepical storms h

Walton County parking pavem

d the attendant

Restoration, Jupthe design, perstore the Duboock revetmentand a rock brea

Marina Design,r, assisted in hat included a

y dry storage fasfer system, an

ssna Boat Ramr, assisted in thCharles E. Cess

project incluof marine conprevent founda

rbor, San Juanisted with the plans to revita

cture to supprist attractions aure services incew bulkheadsilities.

endez Seawall As a Staff Eng

ONSIBILIT

eering in May ng in dredging

Mrs. Lehr retnclude marina pdging calculatioications, and co

E

d Access Strucineer, assisted uctural design,

construction eatures includioncrete beam dkways surroun

e, hurricanes (mhave come ashseeks a more p

ment and parkibeach erosion.

piter, Florida (rmitting, and ois Family prot, a day-dockakwater for a sn

, Charlotte Cothe permitting361-wet slip m

acility, a marinnd a public boa

mp, Santa Rosahe design and psna Landing Ruded structura

ncrete specificaation undermin

n, Puerto Ricodesign, engin

alize, retrofit, oort new mixeand commerciclude evaluatios, piers, moo

Design and Pegineer, assisted

TIES

2004 as a sum calculations, turned to Taylplanning and dons, assistanceonstruction adm

cture, Walton Cin the conceptu, modeling, calobservation a

ing an uplanddesign, pre-strnding the exismost recently Hhore nearby anpermanent soling structure ca.

(2007 – 2010) construction doperty in Jupitk marina comnorkeling pool

ounty, Florida g and design omarina and singna-based pumpat ramp.

a Beach, Floridpermitting of aRecreational Paal modeling ations, and dening.

o (2010 – Onneering calculaor replace agined-use develoal, residential, on of bulkhead

oring facilities

ermitting, St. Ad in preparatio

mmer intern. Mpermit applicaor Engineeringdesign, structue in permit apministration.

County, Floridual layout and lculations, prepand administrad aluminum ressed double sting bathhousHurricane Dennd severely damution to the reapable of endu

— As a Staffdocuments of fter, Florida. T

mponent, a se.

(2007 – 2008of a 553-slip gle-family homp-out and fueli

da (2009 – 201a replacement 2ark in Santa Ro

of the concesign of vinyl

ngoing) — As ations, and co

ng and failing dopment includi

and civic deveds, docks, ands, dredging,

Augustine, Floon of final co

Mrs. Lehr's ations, and g in 2006. ral design,

pplications,

da (2006 – feasibility

paration of ation. The sheet pile tees, dune

se. Several nnis in July maged the

eplacement uring a 50-

f Engineer, four major

The project eawall for

8) — As a waterfront

me facility, ng station,

10) – As a 2-lane boat osa Beach, crete slab,

sheet pile

a Project onstruction deep-water ing cruise elopments. d piers and and other

orida (2005 onstruction

Page 106: Sample Digital Brochure

N2

1

Nancy E. Lehr 2 of 2

1/14/2011

dsspp

C2tcWfd

FBascC

ACmpi

FEEas

Ao

DBtacc

AF AmeAmeFlor

documents ansignificant seawseawall and wprotection meapending.

City Common2009) — As athree 400-ft loconstruction adWest Palm Befacilities, plandock’s use as a

Flagler Drive Beach, Floridaassisted in theseawall in a dcoordination Construction is

Aqua Vista MCounty, Floridmarina enginepermitting for in the City of W

FL-8 ShorelinEngineering InEngineer, assiand associatedspecifications.

South VolusiaAs an Engineeof emergency d

Design & PerBeach, Floridathe previously access to the bconcrete rampconcrete retain

FILIATION

erican Society erican Concretrida Engineerin

nd coordinatiowall (circa 183waterfront proasures, within

s and Waterfroa Staff Engineeong floating dodministration aeach Boat Shownters for wetlaa promenade.

Downtown Wa (2005 – 2007e design and cdowntown urba

with an ans in progress.

Marina Engineda (2004 – 20eering, upland a 42-slip mari

West Palm Bea

ne Stabilizationntern, assisted sted with the d upland bridg

a County Emerering Intern, asdune restoratio

rmitting Servica (2006 – Ongo

existing boat rbeach. The pro, vinyl sheet p

ning wall.

S

of Civil Engine Institute

ng Society

on with agen30) and scour pomenade, utilitthe historic di

ont Park, City er, assisted in ocks of varyinand observationw and as a pa

and and native

Waterfront Seaw7) — As an E

construction adan setting alonnticipated fut

eering & Env006) — As an

civil site worina and a 5.4-aach.

n, Flagler Cou with design ddesign reviewges. Assisted

rgency Beach ssisted in permon along the be

ces, 3rd Streeoing) — The 2ramps in New

roject includedpile, piles and p

neers

ncies. Preservprotection, instty system upgstrict of St. Au

of West Palmthe structural

ng widths up tn. The public wark. Design aspe plants, and s

wall ReplacemEngineering Indministration tng Florida’s Inture waterfron

vironmental PEngineering I

rk, dredge maacre luxury con

unty, Florida (2drawings and

w for the shorewith creating

Permit and Demitting (USACEeaches of New

et Beach Acce2005 hurricaneSmyrna Beach

d design of a spile cap, and a

ation of a htallation of a negrades, and ougustine. Cons

m Beach, Floriddesign and m

to 30 ft wide, will use the dopects include dstability featur

ment, City of Wntern and Staff to replace a dentracoastal Want park dev

Permitting, PaIntern, assisted

aterial managendominium de

2004 – 2007) calculations. Aline stabilizaticonstruction

esign, Florida E and FDEP) aSmyrna Beach

ess Ramp, Newe season damagh that providesslab on grade a cast-in-place

historically ew 1800 ft ther flood

struction is

da (2006 – modeling of

as well as cks for the daily dock res for the

West Palm f Engineer, eteriorated

aterway, in velopment.

alm Beach d with the

ement, and velopment

— As an As a Staff ion project plans and

(2005) — and design h.

w Smyrna ged one of s vehicular reinforced reinforced

Page 107: Sample Digital Brochure

RAJESH SRINIVAS, PH.D., P.E. VICE PRESIDENT

EDUCATION University of Florida, Ph.D., 1993, Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering University of Florida, M.S., 1989, Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India, B.S., 1986, Mechanical Engineering REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 1999 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 18 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 4

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Dr. Srinivas has worked on coastal engineering issues since 1987. Following six years of research at the University of Florida, Dr. Srinivas joined Taylor Engineering as a Senior Engineer in 1994. His project experience includes numerical and analytical modeling of coastal and estuarine processes and planning, design, construction management, and monitoring of shore protection structures. He has authored several technical reports and peer-reviewed papers. In the past, he has served as the Director of Coastal Engineering, as company Chief Engineer, and as Vice President of Technical Operations. His current responsibilities include business development, buiness strategy, and project management. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project, Limited and General Reevaluation Reports,

Florida (2004 – Ongoing) — Providing quality assurance/quality control and interagency coordination services in the preparation of USACE decision documents for the 1.3-mile federal project which evaluates beach fills, coastal structures, and inlet impacts to develop the recommended shore protection plan, change cost shares to reflect Section 111 impacts, and extend the federal participation an additional 50 years while minimizing impacts to nearshore hardbottom resources.

Palm Beach County Coastal Engineering Services (2005 – Ongoing) — Responsible for quality management services on all projects under the master contract. Example ongoing projects include beach restoration permitting and design, Section 934 report preparation, and Beach-fx modeling for the Jupiter/Carlin shore protection project.

Ft. Pierce Beach Renourishment Project, Florida (2002 – Ongoing) — Project manager providing design, permitting, and interagency coordination services for beach restoration of the federal shore protection project. The project includes beach restoration with the placement of over 2,900,000 cubic yards of sand along 1.3 miles of beach in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011.

Martin County Beach Nourishment, Florida (2000 – Ongoing) — Project manager for the design, permitting, and public and interagency coordination, and monitoring aspects of the federal shore protection project constructed in 2001 – 2002, renourished in 2005, and scheduled for renourishment in 2012. The total project length is approximately 4.2 miles. About 1,000,000 cy of sand has been placed thus far and the next renourishment event is scheduled to place about 800,000 cy of sand dredged from offshore shoals.

Sand Source Investigations, Various Locations, Florida (2001 – 2009) –– Provided quality assurance and/or project management services for several sand source investigations for various government entities throughout Florida including the Eglin Air Force Base\Okaloosa County\Destin Sand Source Investigation (2006 – Ongoing), Walton County Sand Source Investigation (2005 – 2007), Walton County\Destin Sand source Investigation (2002 – 2003), and Venice Beach Sand Source Investigation (2001 – 2002). Projects included the acquisition and analysis of geophysical and geotechnical data to define beach restoration borrow areas with over 15,000,000 cy of beach compatible sand.

Page 108: Sample Digital Brochure

Rajesh Srinivas 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Florida Beach Management Feasibility Studies (2000 – 2008) — Provided project management and/or quality management services for regional beach management feasibility studies at Walton County\Destin (2000 – 2003, 32 shoreline miles), south Volusia County (2001 – 2003, 11 miles), and Okaloosa Island (2006 – 2008, three miles). Work included evaluation of present and historic beach conditions, analysis of local littoral processes, characterization of native beach sediments, development of sediment budget, cross-shore erosion modeling, assessment of shorefront storm damage risk, and development of a list of feasible beach management projects for the project areas. Recommended management actions include beach and dune restoration.

Beach Restoration Services, Western Walton County and Eastern Destin, Florida (2003 – 2007) — As principal-in-charge, provided permitting, design, plans and specifications preparation, bid administration, and construction management services to restore 6.5 miles of eroded beach with the placement of 3,000,000 cubic yards of sand dredged from East Pass.

New Smyrna Beach Dune Restoration, Volusia County, Florida (2005 – 2006) — As engineer-of-record, provided quality assurance and control and interagency coordination services and directed the design, permitting, preparation of plans and specifications, bid administration, and construction management for restoring 6 miles of dune with 720,000 cubic yards of sand dredged from an upland dredge material management area.

Caxambas Pass Dredging and Beach Restoration, Marco Island, Florida (2004 – 2006) — Provided quality assurance services in the design, permitting, and bid administration phases of pass dredging and beach nourishment to place 150,000 cubic yards of sand along one mile of beach.

Storm Impact Risk Assessment, Phipps Ocean Park Shore Protection Project, Palm Beach, Florida (2003 – 2004) — Project manager of a study using SBEACH to assess shoreline recessions and shorefront structure impacts from 10-, 20-, 50-, and 100-year return period storms.

Sand Dollar Island Coastal Study, Collier County, Florida (2002 – 2003) — Project manager of a study investigating the migration and potential fate of Sand Dollar Island offshore Marco Island.

Marco Island Beaches and Caxambas Pass Monitoring Study, Collier County, Florida (2002 – 2003) — Project manager of a study to document historical and current beach and inlet changes.

Marco Island Beaches and Caxambas Pass Assessment, Collier County, Florida (2002) — Project manager of a study assessing the existing conditions of Marco Island beaches and Caxambas Pass to determine long-term coastal management needs.

Lido Key Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Feasibility Study, Sarasota County, Florida (2001) — Project manager for a USACE study incorporating plan formulation, engineering, environmental, economics, real estate, and cost-estimating elements to define the recommended shore protection project consistent with National Economic Development principles.

Proposed Seawall Extension for Howard Frankland Causeway, Hillsborough-Pinellas County, Florida (1998) — Used long-term wind data to hindcast waves. Used storm surge and wave data to determine design wave forces on proposed seawall extension.

Page 109: Sample Digital Brochure

MICHAEL R. KRECIC, P.E. DIRECTOR OF COASTAL ENGINEERING

EDUCATION University of Florida, M.S., 1995, Coastal Engineering Marietta College, B.S., 1993, Mathematics/Applied Physics REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / PR / 2008 Civil Engineering / LA / 2008 Civil Engineering / MS / 2006 Civil Engineering / FL / 2001 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 9 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 6

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Krecic has broad experience in coastal engineering, coastal processes, hydraulics, hydrology, circulation and mixing, statistics, and computer modeling. His project experience includes coastal structures (revetments, breakwaters, and seawalls) design and construction for urban waterfronts, marinas, and other projects; storm impact analyses for coastal development; beach nourishment for natural and man-made (pocket) beaches; shoreline management and feasibility studies; wave hindcast studies for open and interior water bodies; and water quality studies for outfall discharges. He has worked on coastal projects in the southeast U.S., the Caribbean, the Great Lakes, Canada, and South America. Mr. Krecic's hydraulic/water quality modeling experience includes use of the following assessment tools: BREAKWAT, MIKE21, SMS, ACES, GENESIS, SBEACH, EDUNE, HEC-RAS, CORMIX, and PLUMES as well as numerous desktop assessment techniques. PROJECT EXPERIENCE FPL St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant: Discharge Canal Headwall Stabilization

Project, St. Lucie County, Florida (2009 – Ongoing) — Senior coastal engineer for engineering design and permitting of a seawall and nearshore breakwaters to protect the plant's discharge canal and headwall from erosion. Seawall design includes cross-shore erosion modeling, local scour estimates, wave loads assessments, and wave overtopping evaluations. Breakwater design includes desktop assessment techniques and fully-coupled, wave, hydrodynamics, and sediment transport modeling with MIKE21.

JID 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011 Sand Trap Dredging, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – 2011) — As senior engineer, supervised preparation of engineering plans and specifications, bid administration, and construction observation for this maintenance dredging project at Jupiter Inlet. Sand trap dredging, usually 60,000 cy or more, improves navigation through the Jupiter Inlet throat and bypasses dredged material to the beach immediately downdrift of the inlet. Served as Engineer of Record.

Punta Lima Beach Creation Phase I Study, Puerto Rico (2008) — As project manager, led effort to design a beach fill project along the northeast portion of Bahia Lima based on architect’s concept. This study focused on assessing coastal processes, conceptually designing a beach fill, performing desktop sand source assessment, developing conceptual cost estimates, and performing a brief environmental evaluation.

Jupiter/Carlin Structures Feasibility, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – Ongoing) — As project manager, leading effort to assess the feasibility of stabilizing a chronically eroding, 1-mile shoreline segment immediately south of Jupiter Inlet, a stabilized inlet. The work consists of several phases including evaluating historic beach performance, evaluating changes in beach behavior, collecting field data, performing numerical modeling (MIKE21), evaluating design alternatives, performing an environmental assessment, and preparing and submitting permit application.

Jupiter/Carlin Shore Protection Project (SPP) Design and Permitting, Palm Beach County, Florida (2008 – Ongoing) — As project manager, provided technical guidance and quality control for designing and permitting a one-mile federally-reimbursed beach project immediately downdrift of Jupiter Inlet.

Page 110: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael R. Krecic 2 of 2

11/13/2011

Panama City Beach Limited Reevaluation Report Engineering Tasks, Bay County, Florida (2010) — As project manager, supervised engineering analyses that evaluated the feasibility of adding about one mile of beach (Carillon Beach/Pinnacle Port) to the federally authorized Panama City Beaches Erosion Control and Storm Damage Reduction Project. Analyses included performing GENESIS and SBEACH modeling for input into the economic model, Beach-fx. The analyses also included calibrating the Beach-fx model to the site-specific coastal processes.

Dubois Park Redevelopment, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — As senior engineer, supervised design of rubblemound revetment, breakwaters (to protect a snorkeling area), and flushing studies for redevelopment of Dubois Park inside Jupiter Inlet. Project includes permitting and final plans and specifications. Served as Engineer of Record for breakwaters.

Bird Island Shoreline Stabilization Analysis, Palm Beach County, Florida (2007) — As project manager, assessed characteristic current patterns and strengths in the area and how these influence sediment movement, assisted in the preliminary design concept for stabilizing the Bird Island shoreline, provided needed insight and documentation of the far field limits of sediment movement into and out of the project area, and provided wave climate conditions for restoration of Bird Island, a privately held relic spoil island inside of South Lake Worth (Boynton) Inlet. Developed design, assisted with permitting, and performed limited construction observation.

Independent Technical Review for Sheldon Marsh Nature Preserve, Huron, Ohio (2007) — As senior engineer, performed a third party, unbiased Independent Technical Review (ITR) for a proposed Section 227 demonstration project at Sheldon Marsh Nature Preserve, Huron, Ohio. The focus of Section 227 projects includes the demonstration of prototype innovative or non-traditional methods of coastal shoreline erosion control. This project proposes to implement a series of segmented, wide-crested, nearshore submerged rubblemound breakwaters to provide wave attenuation and shore protection to a barrier beach and wetland preserve, which serves as a nesting area for migrating waterfowl on Lake Erie.

Chicago Shoreline Protection Project: Review, Construction Oversight, and Design, 43rd Street to 51st Street, Chicago, Illinois (2002 – Ongoing): — As project manager/engineer, performed coastal analysis for proposed shoreline improvements along Morgan Shoal in Lake Michigan. The third party conceptual shore protection consisted of a large sandy beach with a submerged breakwater, a small pebble beach, a large reclaimed land peninsula with a rubblemound revetment shoreline edge, step-stone revetments north and south of the peninsula that tie into the existing revetments, and a wetland/lagoon area. Analyses included quantitative assessment of wave climate, wave run-up and overtopping, rubblemound revetment design, submerged breakwater design, wave forces on vertical walls, scour protection, and sand and pebble beach performance using various numerical models, including STWAVE, CGWAVE, and SBEACH as well as numerous desktop assessment techniques. Estimated net zero wave energy angle to determine sand and pebble beach orientation. Developed typical design cross sections.

Page 111: Sample Digital Brochure

MATTHEW A. TRAMMELL, P.E. PROJECT ENGINEER

EDUCATION University of Florida, M.S., 2004, Coastal and Oceanographic Engineering University of Florida, B.S., 2003, Civil Engineering Okaloosa Walton Community College, A.A., 1999, Engineering Preparation Program REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 2009 Civil Engineering / LA / 2010 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 2 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 6

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Trammell joined Taylor Engineering’s Coastal Group as a Project Engineer in 2010. He is familiar with a broad range of coastal engineering works and has experience in the preparation of feasibility studies, beach management plans, coastal assessments, dredging and coastal structure design, numerical modeling, engineering design, and regulatory permitting. He has managed projects, prepared construction drawings and specifications, and performed construction oversight and monitoring for large and small coastal engineering works. Mr. Trammell has worked on all aspects of beach nourishment projects, including sand source investigations, numerical wave, sediment transport, and storm impact analysis, borrow area impact analyses, project design, contract administration, construction observation, and monitoring. His coastal structure experience includes assessment and analysis for inlet/jetty structures, revetments, and habitat restoration breakwater structures. Mr. Trammell’s extensive data collection experience includes performing fieldwork for water/sediment quality assessments and data collection in support of numerical model calibration/verification and wave/storm surge measurement. His current responsibilities include managing beach and dune restoration projects along the Florida panhandle and assisting with coastal habitat restoration work along the Gulf Coasts of Florida and Louisiana. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Walton County / Destin and Eglin AFB Beach Restoration Project, 2010

Monitoring, Walton and Okaloosa Counties, Florida (2010 – Ongoing) — Coastal/Project Engineer, conducting coastal analyses to fulfill annual monitoring requirements and evaluate the performance of the 7-mile Walton County / Destin Beach Restoration Project and the segmented Eglin AFB Beach Restoration Project. Beach topographic and hydrographic survey data analysis includes preparation of comparative plots of beach profiles, computation of shoreline position changes, quantification of beach volume changes, and identification of areas of accretion and erosion between successive dates of available surveys. Borrow area analysis includes the comparison of surface data to determine erosion/accretion deposition patterns.

Holiday Isle Emergency Beach Fill Project, Okaloosa County, Florida (2010 - Ongoing) — Project Engineer, providing final permitting services and preparing construction drawings and specifications in support of the emergency beach fill project to protect upland properties damaged from the impacts of Hurricane Ida. Additional services include pre- and post-construction administration, construction observation, post-construction certification, and monitoring as required by regulatory permits.

PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE

St. Joseph Peninsula Beach Nourishment Project, Gulf County, Florida (2005 – 2009) — Coastal Engineer, conducted oceanographic climate, shoreline and volumetric changes, and numerical wave and sediment transport modeling analyses in support of the feasibility study. Developed a detailed sediment budget outlining the shoreline erosion, littoral drift, and sediment transport pathways for the entire 9.5-mile peninsula. The study applied model results in the cost-benefit analysis of alternatives, which consisted of various beach fill templates, coastal structures, and combinations of alternatives, and provided recommendations for the 7.5-mile restoration project. The sand source investigations included development of geophysical and geotechnical data collection and analysis

Page 112: Sample Digital Brochure

Matthew A. Trammell 2 of 2

11/13/2011

programs to locate beach quality sand reserves for future beach management activities. Fieldwork included reconnaissance and detail phase sub-bottom seismic and bathymetric surveys, cultural resource surveys (side-scan, magnetometer, and sub-bottom seismic surveys), and vibracore collection. The final geotechnical report included characterization of native beach sand and potential borrow material, overfill analysis, design of borrow area dredging templates, and borrow area wave modeling impact analysis. The construction phase of the project included final design and preparation of construction drawings, specifications, and bid documents. Additional services included construction observation, sediment and protected species monitoring programs, and certification and monitoring after project completion in 2009.

Mexico Beach Management Plan and Inlet Improvements, Bay County, Florida (2005 – 2008) — Project Engineer, evaluated effectiveness of the existing dredging protocol and alternative systems to optimize sand bypassing, reduce maintenance dredging, and mitigate for long-term "down-drift" erosion caused by the inlet. Prepared the Beach Management Plan, which included coastal analysis, dredging frequency estimates, numerical wave and sediment transport modeling (cross-shore, littoral transport, and storm surge), sediment budget, impacts of the inlet structures on sand bypassing and sediment budget, beach management alternatives analysis, and recommendations for a sand bypassing system, restoration alternatives, and inlet/jetty improvements. Construction phase services included final structural design for the jetty structures and interior revetment and preparation of a Design Document, opinions of probable cost, construction drawings, and specifications.

Gator Lake Breakwater Project, Bay County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — Project Engineer, conducted hydrodynamic, wave, and sediment transport modeling to document existing coastal processes and configure proposed breakwater structures along the interior portion of St. Andrews Bay Entrance. Prepared permit applications and supplemental information and responded to agency requests for additional information (RAI) to obtain all regulatory permits. Prepared a Design Document that documented the coastal conditions and structural design of the breakwaters, including rock size, overtopping, runup, settlement, and stability analysis. Prepared construction plans and specifications, bidding documents, and physical and environmental monitoring plans.

Stumphole Revetment Improvements, Gulf County, Florida (2008 – 2009) — Project Engineer, conducted existing conditions assessment and coastal processes and scour analysis of the existing revetment, located along State Road 30E in Gulf County, Florida, the only evacuation route to St. Joseph Peninsula, and structural design and permitting of the proposed structure. The project included preparation of a Design Document, outlining all aspects of the coastal conditions and structural design, permit applications, and supplemental information, which resulted in permit issuance within 6 months. Construction phase services included the final structural design, preparation of construction plans and specifications for the 1,500-foot revetment, construction oversight, and final certification.

Community Maritime Park Mitigation Site, Escambia County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — Project Engineer, conducted numerical wave, hydrodynamic, sediment transport, and pollutant transport modeling to design and permit the proposed mitigation site. The site included continuous and segmented breakwaters to serve as oyster reef habitat, submerged and emergent saltwater marsh, and tidal creeks. Issuance of regulatory permits occurred within 1 year from submittal of permit applications. Construction phase services included structural design, settlement and stability analysis, opinions of probable costs, and construction plans/specs.

Page 113: Sample Digital Brochure

MICHAEL B. KABILING, PH.D., P.E., CFM SENIOR ENGINEER

EDUCATION Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan, Ph.D., 1994, Hydraulic & Coastal Engineering Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, M.E., 1989, Water Resources Engineering University of Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines, B.S., 1986, Civil Engineering REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / GA / 2010 Civil Engineering / FL / 2009 Civil Engineering / Philippines / 1987 Certified Floodplain Manager / US / 2009 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 10 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 10

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Dr. Kabiling has worked on water resources, hydraulic and coastal engineering, and numerical modeling since 1986. His doctoral research focused on the development and application of a finite difference hydrodynamic and morphological numerical model for water waves and currents phenomena in the coastal region. In 1995, he joined the Carl Bro International a/s in Manila in the Philippines as a hydraulic engineer and numerical modeler in hydrodynamics, water quality, and pollution transport. In this position, he carried out and supervised modeling work, prepared technical reports and project presentations, and participated in business development with clients. Since 1998, he completed several numerical modeling, flood studies, and sediment engineering works for Woodfields Engineering Consultants; since 1999 for DKK Consulting Engineers and Philkoei International/Nippon Koei Consultants; and since 2000 for CTI Engineering of Japan. Dr. Kabiling joined Taylor Engineering in 2001 as a senior engineer. His responsibilities include providing project management, participating in business development, and taking a lead role in the preparation of proposals, cost estimates, and engineering studies. His project experience includes the application of one-, two-, and three-dimensional models such as the UNET, HEC-RAS, MIKE11, HEC-HMS, RMA2, RMA4, CGWAVE, and ADCIRC, the MIKE21/MIKE3 model suites, and the ACES, STWAVE, REFDIF1, CGWAVE, and MIKE21 wave models. He has applied these models on more than 20 bridge hydraulics and scour studies in Florida and South Carolina and more than 55 numerical modeling projects in hydrology, hydrodynamics (dam break, surge, tide, flow, and circulation), waves, water quality, contaminant transport, sediment transport, and surge and flood to predict processes in upland, riverine, inlet, estuary, and coastal areas. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Ft. Pierce Inlet Sand Bypassing Feasibility Study, Florida (2003, 2008 –

Ongoing) — The study evaluated the construction of a deposition basin within the inlet to supplement the sand bypassing volume requirements across the inlet. The study also assessed existing conditions, applied three different methodologies to estimate shoaling rates, and developed two conceptual designs for a sediment deposition basin. Numerical modeling and field measurements of bathymetry, tides, currents, sediment concentrations, sediment characteristics, and waves provided the means to validate assumptions applied in the evaluations. In addition to project management responsibilities, designed field measurement program, supervised and performed data evaluation and numerical modeling, supervised estimation of potential shoaling rates at proposed deposition basins, prepared technical report, and recommended future tasks for engineering design and permitting of the deposition basins.

Jupiter/Carlin Shoreline Stabilization Structures Feasibility Study, Palm Beach County, Florida (2008 – 2011) — As modeler, integrated MIKE21 hydrodynamic and wave models to evaluate performance of submerged breakwaters south of Jupiter Inlet. The design of the submerged breakwaters will focus on reduction of erosion along the south beach. Designed field measurement program, supervised and performed data evaluation, and supervised model.

Florida Inland Navigation District, Matanzas Inlet Sedimentation Study, St. Johns County, Florida (2007 – 2009) — Previous studies suggest Matanzas Inlet captures littoral transport, causing inshore waterway shoaling. In addition to project management responsibilities, modeler performed the MIKE21

Page 114: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael B. Kabiling 2 of 2

11/13/2011

hydrodynamic flexible mesh, spectral wave, sediment transport, and morphology modeling. Set up and applied MIKE21 integrated models to evaluate various alternatives to reduce inshore waterway shoaling in the AIWW near Matanzas Inlet. Applied the model to evaluate the impact of a shoreline breach in Summer Haven on hydraulics and sediment transport in the AIWW and Matanzas River.

Bird Island Shoreline Stabilization, Bay County, Florida (2007) — Hydrodynamic (MIKE21 Flexible Mesh Hydrodynamics) and wave (STWAVE) modeler, evaluated hydraulic conditions around Bird Island in Lake Worth during normal tides, a nor’easter event, and a 50-year surge event. The hydrodynamic model provides water surface elevation and flow velocity (currents speed and direction) and the wave model provides wave characteristics (wave height, period, and direction) that guided the engineering of the island’s shoreline stabilization design.

Guana Tolomato Matanzas NERR Shell Bluff Revetment, St. Johns County, Florida (2007) — Hydrodynamic modeler, set up and applied RMA2 model to estimate flow depth and velocity for various shoreline stabilization schemes at Shell Bluff. The shoreline stabilization schemes included construction of a buffer shoal to shelter the shoreline revetment from erosive waves. Given the various buffer shoal alternative size and elevation, the RMA2 hydrodynamic model described the entire interconnected system and provided predictions of flow conditions necessary to estimate peak velocities at the project site during extreme (10-, 20, 50-, and 100-year) surge flood events.

Wave & Current Modeling, AIW, Sebastian Inlet (Pelican Island), Indian River County, Florida (2001 and 2005 – 2006) — Hydrodynamic and wave modeler set up RMA2, STWAVE, and REFDIF models along the Indian River Lagoon including the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge area. Estimated tide-, storm surge- and wind-induced currents, wind waves, boat waves, and sediment transport in the model domain for existing conditions and for conditions with proposed USACE restoration works. Analyzed project area’s average and extreme wind conditions. Estimated nearshore wave conditions and longshore sediment transport due to winds and boat wakes at Pelican Island for existing and post-proposed restoration works conditions. Evaluated efficacy of existing and alternative shoreline protection structures at Pelican Island. Estimated relative sea level rise through year 2200 in the project area. Applied STWAVE and REFDIF models to evaluate for engineering design the performance of shoal placement northwest of Pelican Island. The shoal was designed to protect the northwest shoreline of Pelican Island from erosion by waves.

Caxambas Pass Dredging and Beach Placement, Collier County, Florida (2004) — Analyzed WIS data to prepare wave case input to STWAVE model. Wave modeler set up and applied STWAVE model to evaluate wave transformation from offshore to coastline. Hydrodynamic modeler set up, calibrated, and applied RMA2 model to evaluate flow field around Marco Island and Caxambas Pass. The modeling established the impact of offshore dredging on inlet stability at Caxambas Pass and shoreline protection at nearby beaches.

43rd Street to 45th Street Revetment Rehabilitation, 43rd Street to 51st Street Design Reach, Chicago Shoreline Protection Project, Chicago, Illinois (2002 – 2003) — Wave modeler set up STWAVE to simulate nearshore wave climate seaward of a proposed seawall. Model simulations include several incident wave spectra corresponding to various combinations of wave heights and water level return periods. Applied CGWAVE to determine wave transformation around structures. Wave models’ results provide design guidelines for shoreline protection.

Page 115: Sample Digital Brochure

WILLIAM MILLER, PH.D., P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER

EDUCATION University of Florida, Ph.D., 2003, Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering, Coastal Engineering / Scour University of Florida, M.S., 1997, Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering, Coastal Engineering University of Michigan, B.S., 1982, Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering, Naval Architecture REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 2009 Civil Engineering / GA / 2009 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 7 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 9

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Dr. Miller joined Taylor Engineering in 2004 and has taken a leading role in near shore and inlet hydrodynamics, hurricane surge, wave mechanics and loading, littoral processes, shoreline stability/protection, water quality in streams, estuaries, and marinas, sediment transport, and structure induced sediment scour; as well as engineering design of shore protection and navigation projects. His work includes the application of two-dimensional finite element models such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' RMA2, RMA4, CGWAVE, and ADCIRC, the MIKE21 model suite, and the REFDIF, CGWAVE, and MIKE21 wave models. He has successfully applied these models to many locations throughout Florida (including applications to inlets, bridge hydraulic studies and flushing/circulation studies). Prior to joining Taylor Engineering, Dr. Miller worked as a hydrodynamic modeler at Ocean Engineering Associates, Inc., a Graduate Research Assistant, a Teaching Assistant, and a Post-Doctoral Associate at the University of Florida; and served 21 years (active and reserve) as a Submarine Qualified, Nuclear Trained U.S. Naval Officer. PROJECT EXPERIENCE San Juan Waterfront Pier Design, San Juan, Puerto Rico (2010) — Task manager

and lead engineer for the coastal conditions estimates (surge, waves, winds) for the San Juan, Puerto Rico waterfront. Estimated the coastal conditions and current and wave forces on boat piers, shoreline revetments, and a pedestrian bridge within the harbor.

Florida School for the Deaf and Blind Seawall, St. Johns County, Florida (2010) — Developed coastal conditions estimates (water level, current speed, wave heights, scour, wave loads) for seawall design at the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind in St. Augustine, FL. Supervised application of 2-D hydrodynamic model to develop water levels and currents speeds at the site. Supervised 1-D wave model application to develop wave heights and periods for various wind speeds. Estimated wave loads and scour based on conditions. Presented results to client and neighboring property owners.

Rollover Pass Closure Assessment, Galveston, Texas (2010) — Task manager to evaluate the effect of closing Rollover Pass. Supervised hydrodynamic and water quality model development and simulations to quantitatively determine the post-closure hydraulics and salinity within Rollover and Galveston Bays. Lead analysis of the model results and completed a report of the study.

SR A1A Seawall Erosion and Scour Study, Vilano Beach, St. Johns County, Florida (2009) — As Project manager, directed cross-shore modeling and evaluated local seawall scour for a proposed seawall along 1,600 feet of SR A1A at Vilano Beach. The project included evaluation of the effects of long-term historical shoreline recession on the scour seaward of the seawall.

Florida Inland Navigation District Site MSA M-5 Gabion Rehabilitation, Martin County, Florida (2009) — Project manager for construction supervision of gabion repair and rehabilitation at the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) dredged material management Site MSA M-5 in Martin County. Coordinated and supervised the marine contractor in installation of 430 new gabions and rock fill and repair of existing gabions along the shoreline of site.

Page 116: Sample Digital Brochure

William Miller 2 of 2

11/13/2011

West Palm Beach Waterfront Park Development, Florida (2008) — Conducted floating dock wave load estimates and evaluated contractor design alternatives for the City of West Palm Beach Waterfront Park Development.

Dubois Park Development, Palm Beach County, Florida (2008) — Developed the final shore protection revetment and snorkeling/recreation basin breakwater designs. The effort included all aspects of the designs, including revetment and breakwater armor and toe protection design and supervision of design drawing development. The project also required modeling (RMA2 & RMA4) the final marina and breakwater designs to ensure contaminant flushing and snorkel area velocities fell within limits, including RMA2 model calibration with velocity measurements.

Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, Shell Bluff Revetment, St. Johns County, Florida (2009) — Determined the design storm surge and wave conditions for the Shell Bluff Revetment at Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve. Determined the required rubble mound revetment armor stone sizes and revetment configuration (including toe protection) for the design conditions and developed cost estimates for the revetment. Also evaluated the feasibility of constructing the revetment with articulated concrete block rather than standard armor stone.

Florida Inland Navigation District FL-8 Shoreline Improvement, Flagler County, Florida (2007) — Evaluated the revetment armor design for the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Site FL-8 along the ICWW. Determined the design wave heights, including wave heights from boat wake, and developed typical revetment cross-sections based on the most recent survey information. The design included special consideration for existing seagrass beds at the foot of the revetment.

South Volusia County Beach Restoration, Florida (2006) — Conducted coupled 2D hydrodynamic, wave and sediment transport modeling to determine the effect of removing material from offshore borrow sites on the erosion at the coastline. The projected used the MIKE21 model suite.

Marco Island, Kice Island, and Caxambas Pass Monitoring, Collier County, Florida (2005) — Project manager for the evaluation and analysis (shoreline position and sand volume changes) of 1990 – 2004 beach profile surveys for Marco Island and vicinity.

St. Johns County Shore Protection Project, Florida (2005) — Used REFDIF1 to conduct wave modeling and analysis for beach nourishment borrow area design and impact study.

Ponce DeLeon Inlet Jetty Extensions, Surfing Wave Impacts, New Smyrna Beach, Florida (2005) — Used the REFDIF1 wave model to evaluate the impact on the wave climate of several south jetty extension alternatives for Ponce DeLeon Inlet

Ponce DeLeon Inlet Jetty Extensions, Effects on Federal Navigation Project, New Smyrna Beach, Florida (2005) — Used the ADCIRC hydrodynamic model to evaluate the hydrodynamic effects of several south jetty extension alternatives for Ponce DeLeon Inlet.

Page 117: Sample Digital Brochure

WILLIAM MILLER, PH.D., P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER

EDUCATION University of Florida, Ph.D., 2003, Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering, Coastal Engineering / Scour University of Florida, M.S., 1997, Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering, Coastal Engineering University of Michigan, B.S., 1982, Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering, Naval Architecture REGISTRATION Civil Engineering / FL / 2009 Civil Engineering / GA / 2009 YEARS WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING 7 PRIOR YEARS EXPERIENCE 9

BACKGROUND / RESPONSIBILITIES Dr. Miller joined Taylor Engineering in 2004 and has taken a leading role in near shore and inlet hydrodynamics, hurricane surge, wave mechanics and loading, littoral processes, shoreline stability/protection, water quality in streams, estuaries, and marinas, sediment transport, and structure induced sediment scour; as well as engineering design of shore protection and navigation projects. His work includes the application of two-dimensional finite element models such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' RMA2, RMA4, CGWAVE, and ADCIRC, the MIKE21 model suite, and the REFDIF, CGWAVE, and MIKE21 wave models. He has successfully applied these models to many locations throughout Florida (including applications to inlets, bridge hydraulic studies and flushing/circulation studies). Prior to joining Taylor Engineering, Dr. Miller worked as a hydrodynamic modeler at Ocean Engineering Associates, Inc., a Graduate Research Assistant, a Teaching Assistant, and a Post-Doctoral Associate at the University of Florida; and served 21 years (active and reserve) as a Submarine Qualified, Nuclear Trained U.S. Naval Officer. PROJECT EXPERIENCE San Juan Waterfront Pier Design, San Juan, Puerto Rico (2010) — Task manager

and lead engineer for the coastal conditions estimates (surge, waves, winds) for the San Juan, Puerto Rico waterfront. Estimated the coastal conditions and current and wave forces on boat piers, shoreline revetments, and a pedestrian bridge within the harbor.

Florida School for the Deaf and Blind Seawall, St. Johns County, Florida (2010) — Developed coastal conditions estimates (water level, current speed, wave heights, scour, wave loads) for seawall design at the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind in St. Augustine, FL. Supervised application of 2-D hydrodynamic model to develop water levels and currents speeds at the site. Supervised 1-D wave model application to develop wave heights and periods for various wind speeds. Estimated wave loads and scour based on conditions. Presented results to client and neighboring property owners.

Rollover Pass Closure Assessment, Galveston, Texas (2010) — Task manager to evaluate the effect of closing Rollover Pass. Supervised hydrodynamic and water quality model development and simulations to quantitatively determine the post-closure hydraulics and salinity within Rollover and Galveston Bays. Lead analysis of the model results and completed a report of the study.

SR A1A Seawall Erosion and Scour Study, Vilano Beach, St. Johns County, Florida (2009) — As Project manager, directed cross-shore modeling and evaluated local seawall scour for a proposed seawall along 1,600 feet of SR A1A at Vilano Beach. The project included evaluation of the effects of long-term historical shoreline recession on the scour seaward of the seawall.

Florida Inland Navigation District Site MSA M-5 Gabion Rehabilitation, Martin County, Florida (2009) — Project manager for construction supervision of gabion repair and rehabilitation at the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) dredged material management Site MSA M-5 in Martin County. Coordinated and supervised the marine contractor in installation of 430 new gabions and rock fill and repair of existing gabions along the shoreline of site.

Page 118: Sample Digital Brochure

William Miller 2 of 2

11/13/2011

West Palm Beach Waterfront Park Development, Florida (2008) — Conducted floating dock wave load estimates and evaluated contractor design alternatives for the City of West Palm Beach Waterfront Park Development.

Dubois Park Development, Palm Beach County, Florida (2008) — Developed the final shore protection revetment and snorkeling/recreation basin breakwater designs. The effort included all aspects of the designs, including revetment and breakwater armor and toe protection design and supervision of design drawing development. The project also required modeling (RMA2 & RMA4) the final marina and breakwater designs to ensure contaminant flushing and snorkel area velocities fell within limits, including RMA2 model calibration with velocity measurements.

Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, Shell Bluff Revetment, St. Johns County, Florida (2009) — Determined the design storm surge and wave conditions for the Shell Bluff Revetment at Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve. Determined the required rubble mound revetment armor stone sizes and revetment configuration (including toe protection) for the design conditions and developed cost estimates for the revetment. Also evaluated the feasibility of constructing the revetment with articulated concrete block rather than standard armor stone.

Florida Inland Navigation District FL-8 Shoreline Improvement, Flagler County, Florida (2007) — Evaluated the revetment armor design for the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) Site FL-8 along the ICWW. Determined the design wave heights, including wave heights from boat wake, and developed typical revetment cross-sections based on the most recent survey information. The design included special consideration for existing seagrass beds at the foot of the revetment.

South Volusia County Beach Restoration, Florida (2006) — Conducted coupled 2D hydrodynamic, wave and sediment transport modeling to determine the effect of removing material from offshore borrow sites on the erosion at the coastline. The projected used the MIKE21 model suite.

Marco Island, Kice Island, and Caxambas Pass Monitoring, Collier County, Florida (2005) — Project manager for the evaluation and analysis (shoreline position and sand volume changes) of 1990 – 2004 beach profile surveys for Marco Island and vicinity.

St. Johns County Shore Protection Project, Florida (2005) — Used REFDIF1 to conduct wave modeling and analysis for beach nourishment borrow area design and impact study.

Ponce DeLeon Inlet Jetty Extensions, Surfing Wave Impacts, New Smyrna Beach, Florida (2005) — Used the REFDIF1 wave model to evaluate the impact on the wave climate of several south jetty extension alternatives for Ponce DeLeon Inlet

Ponce DeLeon Inlet Jetty Extensions, Effects on Federal Navigation Project, New Smyrna Beach, Florida (2005) — Used the ADCIRC hydrodynamic model to evaluate the hydrodynamic effects of several south jetty extension alternatives for Ponce DeLeon Inlet.

Page 119: Sample Digital Brochure

Resume Randall W. Parkinson, Ph.D., P.G.

Education 1987 Ph.D., University of Miami Marine Geology and Geophysics 1982 M.S., University of Iowa Geology 1979 B.S., Cornell College Environmental Science

Professional Experience 2009 – Present Courtesy Assistant Research Professor University of Central Florida 2006 - Present President RWParkinson Consulting Inc. Fa2000 - 2006 Senior Geologist and Laboratory Director Coastal Technology Corporation Su2000 Summer Faculty Fellowship NASA Kennedy Space Center 1993 - Sp2000 Associate Professor Florida Institute of Technology 1995 - 1996 Fulbright Scholar American Republics Research Program 1987 - 1993 Assistant Professor Florida Institute of Technology

Professional Society Memberships American Geological Institute, American Geophysical Union, Geological Society of America, Society of Sedimentary Geology

Publications (selected from >100) Mayhew, T., and Parkinson, R.W., 2007. Holocene Evolution of the Barrier Island System, East-Central

Florida: Florida Scientist, v. 70(4), p 383-396

Parkinson, R.W., and Budde, L., 2006. Plans & Specs–Level Offshore Sand Search Investigation, South

Peninsula Volusia County, Florida U.S.A. in Proceedings National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, February 1 – 3, 2006, Sarasota, Florida

Parkinson, R.W., Walther, M.W., and Truitt, C., 2006. Borrow Area Delineation and Native Beach

Compatibility, Volusia County, Florida: Proceedings of the National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, Sarasota, Florida

Parkinson, R., Dombrowski, M., and Walther, M. 2002. Integrating Technical Expertise to Enhance

Project Performance: Santa Rosa County, Florida: Proceedings of the Florida Shore and Beach Association Annual Meeting

Page 120: Sample Digital Brochure

Resume Randall W. Parkinson

October 2011

2

Parkinson, R.W., and White, J.R., 1994. Late Holocene Shoreface Retreat within a Siliciclastic to

Carbonate Transition Zone, East Central Florida: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. B64, p. 408-415

Parkinson, R.W., 1991. Stratigraphic Evidence of Onshore Sand Transport throughout the Holocene

Marine Transgression, Southwest Florida: Marine Geology, v. 96, p. 269-277 Parkinson, R.W., and Nelson, W.G., 1994. An Overview of Workshop B: Innovative Approaches to

Environmental Monitoring of Near Shore Beach Restoration Projects: Proceedings of the 1994 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association, Tallahassee, Florida

Parkinson, R.W., and Ryder, C., 1992. A Comparison of Physical Attributes of a Renourished and

Natural Beach: Implications for Sea Turtle Monitoring: Proceedings of the 1992 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology, Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association, Tallahassee, FL, p. 416-425

Technical Reports (selected from >50) Ernest, R., and Parkinson, R., 2010. Implementing Sediment Quality Assurance Measures for the Bathtub

Beach Restoration Project, Hutchinson Island, Florida: Martin County Coastal Zone Program, Florida

Parkinson, R. 2009. Geological Assessment of Offshore Sand Search Surveys for Hutchinson Island Shore

Protection Project: Martin County Coastal Zone Program, Florida Parkinson, R., and Horgan, R. 2009. Geological and Geophysical Analysis of the Proposed Port Dolphin

Pipeline Corridor, Manatee County, Florida – Final Report: Taylor Engineering Parkinson, R.W. 2008. Cumulative Impact Assessment of Geohazards forecast to accompany the

Spoonbill Bay Development: Spoonbill Bay Holdings, LP, Galveston, Texas Parkinson, R.W., 2006. Report of Investigation - Offshore Sand Search, Native Beach Characterization,

and Compatibility Assessment, Gulf County: MRD Associates Parkinson, R.W. 2005. Results of Offshore Sand Search, Native Beach Characterization, and

Compatibility Assessment, Volusia County: Volusia County Parkinson, R.W., 2004. Phase II Investigation of Offshore Sand Search, Native Beach Characterization,

and Compatibility Assessment, Santa Rosa County: Santa Rosa County Parkinson, R.W. 2003. Report of Investigation – Regional Offshore Sand Search, Native Beach

Characterization, and Compatibility Assessment: Sarasota and Charlotte Counties

Page 121: Sample Digital Brochure

Morgan & Eklund, Inc.

Experience Project Manager for Benderson Park World

Class Rowing Venue, Sarasota County, FL Performed topographic and bathymetric surveys.

Project Manager for Sarasota Shore Protection Project – Venice Segment. Performed a GPS Static Network throughout the project area. Performed a topographic and hydrographic survey of four miles of coastline south of Venice Inlet & onshore and nearshore profiles.

Project Manager for Venice Inlet Project,

Sarasota County, FL – Performed onshore and offshore profiles and hydrographic survey.

Project Manager for LongKey/Upham Beach in

Pinellas County, FL - Performed pre and post dredge surveys of the beach and offshore sediment borrow area. Performed pre and post construction bathymetric surveys of the offshore sediment borrow area.

Project Manager for Withlacoochee River in

Hernando County, FL - Performed a bathymetric survey of the Withlacoochee River from Lake Rousseau southerly to County Road 575 which extended eighty miles.

Project Manager for Post-Hurricane Charley

Monitoring Survey. Performed topographic and bathymetric post-storm monitoring surveys in Charlotte and Lee Counties, FL - Performed onshore and offshore profiles.

Project Manager for Haldeman Creek

Restoration Project in Collier County, FL - Performed control, engineering design, pre-dredge and post dredge surveys. A topographic survey was also performed of the dredged material disposal site. Performed a sidescan sonar survey of the creek bottom to locate and map oyster bars and other submerged resources.

Project Manager for Marco Island Coastal

Monitoring Survey in Collier County, FL - Performed onshore and offshore profile lines along FDEP and historical beach profile lines together with a comprehensive bathymetric survey of Caxambas Pass.

Project Manager for Matheny Creek, Sarasota

County, FL – Performed hydrographic survey for channel dredging feasibility study, pre-dredge survey and construction staking.

Professional Profile

JOHN R. MORGAN, II, P.L.S. Chief Surveyor Higher Education B.A., Environmental Science – University of Virginia (1974) Part-time, Survey Technology – Penn State (1977) Registration Registered Land Surveyor – PA, RLS #26134-E (1976) Professional Land Surveyor – FL, PLS #3520 (1979) Years Experience With this firm: 25 years With other firms: 8 years Qualifications Summary Mr. Morgan has thirty-three years experience in land and hydrographic surveying. His areas of expertise include hydrographic, topographic, boundary and control surveys. More specifically John has directly supervised all of the survey tasks associated with large-scale topographic and hydrographic survey projects for beach nourishment, Everglades Restoration projects and channel and harbor improvement projects. John is also responsible for the day-to-day management of the company, including project scheduling, client contact, quality control and supervision of personnel. Active Memberships Florida Society of Professional Land Surveyors American Congress on Surveying and Mapping Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Society

Page 122: Sample Digital Brochure

Morgan & Eklund, Inc.

Experience Dave has experience as a project surveyor collecting and reducing hydrographic and bathymetric survey data for the following projects on the West Coast of Florida: Withlacoochee River Bridge Design –

Hydrographic survey Haldeman Creek Restoration Project – Pre and

post dredge bathymetric surveys & topographic surveys.

SWFWMD LiDAR Groundtruthing Dekle Beach – Bathymetric survey South Ponte Vedra Shore Stabilization

Feasibility Study – Onshore and offshore profiles

East Naples Bay Dredging Feasibility Study – Onshore and offshore profiles

Sarasota County Bridge Sites – Preconstruction bathymetric survey

Bird Colony – Preconstruction survey Curry Creek – Channel Dredging Feasibility

Study – Hydrographic survey Phillippi Creek – Preconstruction hydrographic

survey Cedar Creek – Channel Dredging Feasibility

Studies Matheny Creek – Channel Dredging Feasibility

Studies Venice Monitoring Survey – Venice Inlet and

Updrift Beaches – On and offshore profiles, hydrographic survey

Sarasota County Shore Protection Project – Hydrographic and topographic surveys

Crane Creek – Bathymetric survey and muck probes

Cedar Cove – Core borings Post-Storm Monitoring Surveys in Lee and

Charlotte County, FL Georgetown North and South Canals –

Hillsborough County, FL – Bathymetric survey Marina Cay Club Site – Sarasota County, FL –

Bathymetric survey South Creek Bayou – Sarasota County, FL –

Core borings

Professional Profile

DAVID W. COGGIN, P.S.M. Project Surveyor / Hydrographer Registration Professional Surveyor & Mapper – FL #6359 (2002) Years Experience With this firm: 25 years With other firms: 6 years Qualifications Summary Mr. Coggin is in charge of our hydrographic survey operations and has twenty-eight years of land and hydrographic surveying experience. His marine related abilities (i.e., boat handling, rigging, weather and ocean knowledge) make him a very competent project surveyor for the Morgan & Eklund, Inc. hydrographic survey team. David has been the project surveyor for land and coastal projects, including boundary and topographic surveys, establishing horizontal and vertical control, mean high water line surveys, and coastal and hydrographic surveys. Additionally, he has extensive experience with field operations for USACE coastal and hydrographic surveys in and around Port Canaveral, Ft. Pierce Inlet, St. Lucie Inlet, Palm Beach Inlet and in the open waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. His experience with coastal and hydrographic surveys covers from New York to Florida and extends into the waters of the Caribbean and Mexico.

Page 123: Sample Digital Brochure

Morgan & Eklund, Inc.

Experience Chris has worked on the following projects on the West Coast of Florida performing GPS processing and computer drafting: Mexico Beach – Bay County, FL – Bathymetric

survey, canal cross-sections and beach profiles Dekle Beach – Taylor County, FL –

Bathymetric survey Matheny Creek – Hydrographic, pre-dredge and

construction staking surveys Cedar Creek – Channel dredging feasibility

studies Phillippi Creek – Pre-construction and

hydrographic surveys Curry Creek – Channel dredging feasibility

study – performed hydrographic survey Bird Colony – Pre construction surveys Sarasota County Bridge sites – pre-construction

bathymetric survey Sarasota County Shore Protection Project –

hydrographic and topographic surveys Crane Creek – Bathymetric survey and muck

probes Turkey Creek – bathymetric, topographic and

pre-dredge surveys East Naples Bay Dredging Feasibility Study South Ponte Vedra Shore Stabilization

Feasibility Study – onshore and offshore profiles

Haldeman Creek Restoration Project – pre and post dredge bathymetric surveys, topographic survey, sand samples, core borings & benthic mapping

Withlacoochee River Bridge Design – Hydrographic survey

Marco Island Coastal Monitoring Survey – Onshore and offshore profiles, bathymetric survey

LongKey/Upham Beach – Pre and post dredge surveys and pre and post construction bathymetric surveys

Post-Hurricane Charley Monitoring Survey – topographic and bathymetric surveys

Lyons Bay Inlet – Channel Dredging Feasibility Study – Hydrographic survey

Palm River Estates Drainage Study – Collier County, FL

Bayport Channel – Hillsborough County, FL – Bathymetric survey

Professional Profile

CHRIS A. GAMMON, P.S.M. GPS / GIS Project Manager Higher Education B.A., Mathematics - Florida Atlantic University (1993) Registration Professional Surveyor & Mapper – FL #6273 (2001) Years Experience With this firm: 10 years With other firms: 14 years Qualifications Summary Mr. Gammon has been responsible for all aspects of planning, implementation and completion of topographic, geodetic and photo control surveys, utilizing both conventional and GPS technologies. Chris’ extensive experience with GPS field operations makes him uniquely well qualified to supervise our GPS survey projects. All of the data collected during Morgan & Eklund, Inc.’s static or RTK/GPS surveys is processed and checked by Chris on a daily basis. He is proficient in the following areas: Data collection and manipulation using TDS (conventional) and Trimble (GPS) software suites; Training in GPS static and kinematic survey procedures and adjustment analysis; GPS technique and software R&D; Database design and management in DBASE, FoxPRO and Microsoft Access; Integrated software design in Visual Basic; Cartographic and GIS design in AutoCAD (releases 12-14, 2000i), AutoCAD Map (release 2), MapInfo Professional (V4.1), MapBasic, ArcView V3.1, ARCCAD V11.4 and Microstation SE.

Page 124: Sample Digital Brochure

1215 Wallace Drive, Delray Beach, Fl 33444

Ph 561-372-0500 Fax 561-372-0501

49181 Hwy 51 N, Tickfaw, La. 70466 Ph 985-981-3980 Fax 985-902-8609

www.americanvibracore.com

Frederick G. Kaub, P.G. President/Principal in Charge – American Vibracore Services

AVS’ geotechnical projects are performed under the general direction of Frederick G. Kaub, P.G. Mr. Kaub is President of AVS and serves in a supervisory role for the company’s numerous projects – a role in which he has taken personal responsibility since the company’s inception in 2001.

Experience President, American Vibracore Services. Mr. Kaub is founder of American Vibracore Services. Since 2001, he has led the company in providing sampling services throughout the United States. Most recently, Mr. Kaub oversaw vibracore sampling for projects in Holly Beach LA, North Boca Raton FL, Siesta Key FL, Anna Maria Island FL, Town of Palm Beach FL, Panama City Beach FL, New Cut LA, Empire LA, Alligator Point FL, South Pelto LA, Sandy Pointe LA, Topsail Beach NC, North Topsail NC, Nantucket Island MA, Dauphin Island AL, Venice FL, Martin County FL, Tampa FL, Barataria LA, Grand Liard LA, Deerfield FL, St Augustine FL, West Belle Pass LA, Okeechobee FL, St Johns River FL, Panama City FL, Fishweir Creek FL, Flagler FL, Okeechobee Waterway FL, Galveston TX, Broward County FL, Marco Island FL, Stuart FL, Destin FL, Ft Pierce FL, Jacksonville FL, Pahokee FL, and Jupiter Island FL. Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Senior Geologist. Responsible for: coordination of geotechnical field operations including performing beach and hydrographic surveys, bathymetric surveys, seismic studies (sub-bottom), side scan sonar studies, magnetometer surveys, environmental monitoring, jet probe investigations, marine geophysics and vibracore investigations, marine hydrology, water quality analysis, coastal inlet studies, environmental impact mitigation, impact assessment and evaluation, sub-bottom profiling, beach restoration and erosion control design. Certifications and Qualifications

• Professional Geologist in Florida (PG#1344), Mississippi and Alabama • Health and Safety Operations at a Hazardous Materials Site (OSHA 19 CFR

1910-120)

Page 125: Sample Digital Brochure

1215 Wallace Drive, Delray Beach, Fl 33444

Ph 561-372-0500 Fax 561-372-0501

49181 Hwy 51 N, Tickfaw, La. 70466 Ph 985-981-3980 Fax 985-902-8609

www.americanvibracore.com

• Environmental and geotechnical engineering graduate courses, Florida Atlantic University

• Bachelor of Science in Geology, Indiana University, White Star Endowment Scholarship

• Professional Member of: o Geotechnical Society of America, o Association of Engineering Geologists o American Institute of Hydrology o National Association of Environmental Professionals o Florida Association of Environmental Professionals o Florida Groundwater Association.

Representative Experience: During Mr. Kaub's tenure his work has involved solving foundation and earth structure problems, conducting subsurface and subaqueous soil investigations, conducting hydrogeological studies and investigations, and other earth science problems through the application of sound theoretical concepts and a practical knowledge of earth materials and hydrogeology in Florida and the Southeastern United States. Projects have ranged from residential developments to multi-million dollar commercial and industrial developments. Mr. Kaub also has extensive experience in coastal and marine geology.

Page 126: Sample Digital Brochure

1215 Wallace Drive, Delray Beach, Fl 33444

Ph 561-372-0500 Fax 561-372-0501

49181 Hwy 51 N, Tickfaw, La. 70466 Ph 985-981-3980 Fax 985-902-8609

www.americanvibracore.com

Brian McCord Vibracore Project Manager

Experience

• Most recently, Mr. McCord oversaw vibracore sampling for projects in Holly Beach LA, North Boca Raton FL, Siesta Key FL, Anna Maria Island FL, Town of Palm Beach FL, Panama City Beach FL, New Cut LA, Empire LA, Alligator Point FL, South Pelto LA, Sandy Pointe LA, Topsail Beach NC, North Topsail NC, Nantucket Island MA, Dauphin Island AL, Venice FL, Martin County FL, Tampa FL, Barataria LA, Grand Liard LA, Deerfield FL, St Augustine FL, West Belle Pass LA, Okeechobee FL, St Johns River FL, Panama City FL, Fishweir Creek FL, Flagler FL, Okeechobee Waterway FL, Galveston TX, Broward County FL, Jupiter Island FL, Marco Island FL, Jacksonville FL, Pahokee FL and Broward County FL

• Brian is an experienced Vibracore tech having 18 years of geotechnical, exploration and mineral research. He also has water well, rural, and community wells experience with depths up to 1200 ft. His experience with monitoring wells, oils and gases exceeds depths of 10,000 feet: wire-line rock coring to depths of 350ft. He is experienced with hollow stem augers up to 10 1/4 inch in diameter; continuous split spoon sampling; and hammer type spoons of every size. He has drilled on several different types of rigs, CME Big-75 Tandem diesel auto-hammer, CME-75 gas w/ cathead rope hammer, Top-drive Hydraulic Rotary Buggy rigs; CME-45 Track-Drilling rig; Diedrich; Garder-Denver 1200 and 1500; Simco; and off shore Vibracore equipment. He is also experienced with Shelby Tube Sampling; THD testing; field logging; NX; NQ; and HQ coring in Limestone, cleachy, Clays, Granite, Coal, Eagle Ford and other Shale, Cemented Sands, Calcareous, Sandstone, Iron-ore, and Chert. He operates all types of heavy equipment, such as: Back-hoe, track-hoe, and dozer; and is experienced with solid flight augers, drill-stem pipe Rock Coring, diamond bits, all sizes of core barrels and inner barrels, [split and solid] Wire-Line Coring Systems, and Mud-Rotary. He also services, maintains, and repairs any rig truck or equipment.

Certifications and Qualifications • Hazmat Certified • ASE certified Technician [master-tech.] 8 yrs. experience. • ESCO licensed

Page 127: Sample Digital Brochure

1215 Wallace Drive, Delray Beach, Fl 33444

Ph 561-372-0500 Fax 561-372-0501

49181 Hwy 51 N, Tickfaw, La. 70466 Ph 985-981-3980 Fax 985-902-8609

www.americanvibracore.com

Sean Kemnuir Vice President of Operations

AVS’ projects are performed under the direction of Sean Kemnuir. Mr. Kemnuir is Vice President of Operations for AVS and serves in a supervisory role for the company’s numerous projects – a role in which he has taken personal responsibility, since his hiring in 2005.

Experience Vice President of Operations, American Vibracore Services. Since 2005, he has led the company in providing sampling services throughout the United States. Most recently, Mr. Kemnuir oversaw projects in, North Boca Raton FL, , Anna Maria Island FL, Town of Palm Beach FL, Panama City Beach FL, Topsail Beach NC, North Topsail NC, Nantucket Island MA, Dauphin Island AL, Venice FL, Martin County FL, Tampa FL, Barataria LA, Grand Liard LA, Deerfield FL, St Augustine FL, West Belle Pass LA, Okeechobee FL, St Johns River FL, Pahokee, FL, Panama City FL, Fishweir Creek FL, Flagler FL, Okeechobee Waterway FL, Galveston TX, Broward County FL, Stuart FL, Marco Island FL, Jacksonville FL, St Lucie FL, Ft Pierce FL, Jupiter Island, FL, Grand Bahama and Bimini Bahamas. Responsible for coordination of all operations including performing beach and hydrographic surveys, bathymetric surveys, seismic studies (sub-bottom), side scan sonar studies, magnetometer surveys, environmental monitoring, jet probe investigations, marine geophysics and vibracore investigations, marine hydrology, water quality analysis, coastal inlet studies, environmental impact mitigation, impact assessment and evaluation, sub-bottom profiling, beach restoration and erosion control. Mr. Kemnuir is also the company’s Safety Director and documents the execution of the company’s Safety Manual and Procedures. Mr. Kemnuir has an excellent track record at this initiative and there have been zero lost manhours under his direction. Certifications and Qualifications

• ASE Master certification

Page 128: Sample Digital Brochure

1215 Wallace Drive, Delray Beach, Fl 33444

Ph 561-372-0500 Fax 561-372-0501

49181 Hwy 51 N, Tickfaw, La. 70466 Ph 985-981-3980 Fax 985-902-8609

www.americanvibracore.com

• Professional Member of: o ASBPA o FSBPA

Page 129: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Master of SBiological OceanograFlorida InsTechnology

Bachelor oin BiologicaSciences, SBrockport,

EXPERIE

August 19

n

Science in

aphy, titute of y, 1981

of Science al S.U.N.Y. at 1976

MsDSscsapsbocscMar

M2nwHoMThrBbbaar

ENCE

980 to Presen

Project Mhabitat southmonitoring dharbor inlet. (2003 to 201

Project Mportion of St.characterizatwas conduct

Mr. Spring is ascience experiDivision at CSAScientist on nustudies, envirocharacterizatiosurveys for outand site clearaprojects, ship csites, ship groubeen the Chiefoff the east coacollection of unsonar data; drechemistry samManager and/oand analysis oresults.

Mr. Spring has2,000 dives in nearshore andwith beach resHe has been aof Mexico, inclMississippi SoTrinidad, Califohas been Princresource restoBahamas, Puebenthic photogbiota, instrumeassessment. Mattachment of re-attached mo

nt: CSA Intern

Manager/Fieldh of the harborata following t This project is1).

Manager for b. Lucie Countytion and monitted as a subco

a marine biologence. He is cA Internationaumerous oceaonmental monion surveys, hater continenta

ance studies. channel and hunding sites, of Scientist on mast of Florida, nderwater videedge, trawl, an

mples; and varior Chief Scien

of samples and

s extensive exthe past 31 ye

d offshore reefstoration and da scientific diveuding the Flowund, the west ornia, Alaska, cipal Investiga

oration projectserto Rico, and graphs and vident deploymenMr. Spring alsstony corals aore than 5,000

national, Inc.

d Scientist on tr inlet in Fort Pthe renourishms being condu

aseline habitay, Florida. Thetoring data priontract to Coas

gist with over 3currently the Dal, Inc. and hasnographic studitoring program

abitat damage l shelf oil and Monitoring pro

harbor dredginoffshore oil andmore than 150and within the

eo and still camnd infaunal graous hydrograp

ntist on these pd data, as well

perience as a ears. He has fs, seagrass bedredging projeer on surveys wer Garden BaFlorida shelf, Hawaii, Guam

ator or a Field s at more thanHawaii. His d

deotape data, nt, sediment sao has more th

and octocorals0 coral colonie

– Senior Scie

the post-constPierce, Floridament of the beucted as a sub

at characterizae purpose of thor to renourishstal Technolog

Se

31 years oceaDirector of the Cs served as a dies, includingms, nearshoreassessment sgas lease areograms have ig projects, ocd gas drilling, 0 oceanographe Caribbean. mera data; suab/core samplphic samples projects, Mr. Sl as the interpr

scientific divedirected or paeds, and soft b

ects on both thand monitorinanks, the soutthe Florida Ke

m, Qatar, and tScientist on d

n 20 major vesdiving experienin situ identificample collectio

han 17 years es in impacted aes.

entist, Reef E

truction monitoa. The purposeach immediate

bcontract to Ta

ation of hard bohe survey washment of the bgy Corporation

enior Scientis

anographic anCoastal and OProject Mana

g multidiscipline hard bottom surveys, photoeas and pipelinincluded beacean dredged mand wastewa

hic surveys in These surveybbottom profilles; sediment and measurem

Spring supervisretation and re

er, performing articipated in bbottom habitae east and we

ng programs thth Texas coaseys, the Bahathe United Araamage asses

ssel groundingnce includes tcation of hard on, and reef d

experience in tareas, having

Ecologist

oring surveys e of the surveely south of thaylor Engineer

ottom habitat s to collect habeach in this an (2008-2010)

KEITH D. SP

st, Reef Ecol

d environmenOcean Scienceger and/or Ch

nary baseline and reef

odocumentatione right-of-waych nourishmenmaterial dispoter outfalls. Hthe Gulf of Me

ys have include and side-scgrain size and

ments. As Prosed the colleceporting of the

more than biological survets in connectio

est coasts of Fhroughout the st, Mobile Bay,mas, Puerto Rab Emirates. sment surveys

g sites in Floridhe collection obottom and re

damage the re-locationpersonally

of hard bottomys is to provid

he Fort Pierce ring, Inc,

off the southebitat

area. This pro).

PRING

logist

tal es hief

on ys, nt osal He has exico, ed the an d oject ction e

eys of on Florida.

Gulf , Rico, He s or da, the of eef

n and

m de

ern

oject

Page 130: Sample Digital Brochure

Project MBeach in Manourishment (2008).

Project Mwithin the Sepermanent trcharacterize

Project Mand in Sectonourishment repetitive quaannual monitManagemen

Project MPalm Beach permanent trcharacterize

Chief ScShip ChanneKey West Haperformed trdetailed quanand re-attach

Project MTruman HarbU.S. Navy inproject, whicMarine Sancsedimentatiocorals from Tat previouslywithin adjace2002 to 2007

PUBLICATI

Hart, A.D., DexperimentaProceedingsFebruary 1-3

Phillips, N.WFlorida shelf

Gettleson, Ddefined hardFlorida shelf

Manager on a rtin County, Fof the beach.

Manager and Fector 3 project ransects and cthe hard botto

Manager and Cr 7 to monitor projects. Est

adrat data to dtoring associat, 2006 to 201

Manager and CCounty to ass

ransects and cthe hard botto

cientist on an ael off Key Wesarbor Dredgingiage of impactntitative asseshed coral colo

Manager for mbor, the turning Key West, Flo

ch was the firstctuary. Supervon concurrent wTruman Harboy impacted reeent reef areas 7).

IONS (Individ

D.B. Snyder, Kl design in mo of the 19th A

3, 2006, Saras

W., D.A. Gettles. Am. Zool. 30

.A., K.D. Sprin bottom and v. In: Oceans '

pre-constructlorida. The pu Conducted w

Field Scientistarea in Indian

collected closeom communiti

Chief Scientisnearshore haablished permdescribe and c

ated with the b0).

Chief Scientissess the habitacollected closeom communiti

assessment sust, Florida causg Project. Conted coral colonssment of damnies (Polaris A

marine resourcg basin, and torida. Prepart dredging provised the weekwith dredging

or seawalls whef sites. Also r

and seagrass

dual)

.D. Spring, anonitoring hard nnual Nationa

sota, Florida.

son, and K.D. 0:65-75.

ng, R.M. Hammvisually detecte83 Conferenc

ion monitoringurpose of the swith Ecologica

t on a project tn River Countye-up video andes (Coastal Te

t on several suard bottom habmanent transeccharacterize theach nourishm

t on a survey at prior to a bee-up video andes (Applied Te

urvey of damased by the dranducted an ininies and stabil

mages, locatedApplied Scienc

ce monitoring ahe Key West Sed and design

oject ever condkly monitoringactivities. Dir

here repairs weresponsible fos beds to deter

nd R.M. Hammbottom habitat

al Conference

Spring. 1990

mer, and R.E.ed live bottome Record.

g survey of hasurvey was to

al Associates,

to collect basey prior to beacd in situ repetiech, 2007-201

urveys off Indbitat following cts and collecthe hard bottomment projects

of the nearshoeach nourishmd in situ repetiechnology and

ages to reef/haaghead of the itial damage alization of othe

d a coral re-attces, Inc., 2007

associated witShip Channel ned the resourducted within t of coral and s

rected the remere on-going,r the pre- and rmine impacts

mer. 2006. Apts associated on Beach Pre

0. Benthic biol

. Putt. 1983. in the Charlo

rd bottom habo collect monitoInc. and Taylo

eline habitat chch nourishmenitive quadrat d10).

ian River Couconstruction oted close-up vm communities(Applied Tech

ore hardbottomment project. Eitive quadrat dd Managemen

ard bottom hadredge Atcha

assessment ofer resources, ctachment site 7).

th the maintenbeing conduc

rce monitoringthe boundariesseagrass heal

moval of severaand re-attache post-construc

s from the proj

pplication of scwith areas of

eservation Tec

logical studies

Comparison otte Harbor Are

KEITH D. SP

bitat off Bathtuoring data prioor Engineering

haracterizationnt. Establisheddata to describ

nty in Sectorsof beach video and in sis. Conducting

hnology and

m in Juno BeaEstablished data to describnt, 2007 to 200

bitat along thefalaya during f the area of incompleted a mfor displaced

nance dredgingcted for the g program for ts of a Nationath and levels oal hundred stoed most of thection monitorinect (U.S. Navy

cientific beach nourish

chnology

s of the southw

of geophysicalea of the south

PRING

b or to g, Inc.

n data d

be and

s 1 & 2

itu g

ach,

be and 08).

e Main the

njury, more corals,

g of

this al of

ony e coral ng y,

hment.

west

lly hwest

Page 131: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Master of SMarine Biology/IchFlorida AtlaUniversity,

Bachelor oin Zoology,of Florida,

n

Science in

hthyology, antic 1984

of Science , University 1978

M2MhacmatwwacvclirLMfDmHF

MttCasaYcHhP

MHC(aa

Mppbrv

Mr. Snyder is a27 years of exMexico shelf ahas managed and coral reef continental slomonitoring studand southwesthe Bahamas u

with hard bottowestern Floridaand artificial recharacterized fvideotapes takcolleagues at tisting and assrecently studieLoxahatchee RManagement Dishes on nears

Department of monitoring proHe has participFlorida, the Flo

Mr. Snyder hasrawling on inshe bigeye sca

Chief Field Sciand off the Atlasediment profias borrow sitesYork, and Nortconflict betweeHe currently mhard bottom alProtection.

Mr. Snyder hasHe summarizeCalifornia, andEFH) assessm

assessments. annotation of m

Mr. Snyder is aphotographs hpublications. Hbenthic photogreattachment avarious types o

an experienceperience in the

and shore fisheand participathabitats. He h

ope to freshwadies. Mr. Snyt Florida, the Fusing quantitaom areas subjea coasts. He

eefs for the towfish assembla

ken by a remotthe Florida Muessment of m

ed the responsRiver, Florida, District. He is shore hard bof Environmentaogram for seagpated in coral orida Keys, an

s worked with shore fish popuad, an importanientist on numantic coast. Mle imaging, ans for beach noth Carolina. Hen deepwater

manages a projong the east c

s prepared theed commerciald the southeasments for seve Mr. Snyder h

marine environ

an accomplishave appeared

His diving expgraphy and vidand transplantof sediment sa

ed marine ecole ecology andes (particularlyed in ichthyofahas sampled fter streams fo

yder has visuaFederated Stattive and qualitect to impact fhas monitorin

wn of Palm Beges on a deeptely operated v

useum of Natuarine fishes of

se of fish asseusing electrofcurrently inve

ottom habitats al Protection. grass-associatreef damage a

nd the Federat

commercial fiulations in Flont baitfish in s

merous photodoMr. Snyder mand grab sampliourishment offsHe also manag

fisheries and oject that invescoast of Florid

e fish and fishe and recreatio

stern United Steral environmeas extensive enmental literat

hed underwated in regional fieerience includ

deotaping, in-sting both hard amples.

Seni

logist and fish d taxonomy of y seagrass anaunal surveysfish from a var

or various envilly censused ftes of Micronetative methodsfrom dredge ag reef fish ass

each and Palmp reef trend in vehicle. He is

ural History to f southwest Fl

emblages to wafishing gear foestigating habiin Palm BeacMr. Snyder is

ted fishes in thassessment ated States of M

ishermen asserida. He also

southern Floridocumentation naged field effing for assessfshore of Alabaged a project toil and gas op

stigates the ecda for the Flori

eries sectionsonal fisheries dtates. He hasental impact stexperience in ture and data.

er photographeeld guides as wdes more than situ identificaticorals and oc

D

ior Scientist,

biologist. Hewestern Atland reef-associa

s of freshwaterriety of habitatironmental assfish assemblagesia, Grand Cas. He surveye

and fill projectssemblages on

m Beach Coun the northern G

s currently worassemble a colorida and the ater flows and

or the South Fltat utilization bh County, Flo

s also managinhe vicinity of Jand restorationMicronesia.

essing the imphas investigat

da. He has pasurveys in the

fforts that inclusments of sandama, Florida, hat investigate

perations in thecological functida Departmen

s of several endata for Floridas prepared Esstatements andthe identificat

er; his underwwell as techni 1,200 dives; hon of coral ree

ctocorals, and

DAVID B. SN

, Marine Biol

e has more thantic and Gulf oated species).r, estuarine, shts ranging fromsessments anges off southeayman Island,ed fishes assos off the easte

nearshore naty Florida. HeGulf of Mexicorking with omprehensiveFlorida Keys.

d levels in the lorida Water by newly settlerida for the Flong an indepenupiter Inlet, Fl

n projects in so

pacts of shrimted the life his

articipated as ae Gulf of Mexiuded trawling, d deposits proNew Jersey, Ned the potentiae Gulf of Mexiions of nearshnt of Environm

nvironmental rea, southern sential Fish Had environmention, collection

water fish cal and populahe is experienef fishes, the collection

YDER

logist

an of

He helf, m the d

east , and ociated rn and

atural e has o from

e He

ed orida ndent orida. outh

p story of a co

oposed New al ico.

hore mental

eports.

abitat tal , and

ar nced in

of

Page 132: Sample Digital Brochure

EXPERIE

CSA Inter

PUBLICA

ENCE

rnational, Inc.

Chief scnearshore hato present).

Chief scareas for a b2005 to pres

Monitoreconjunction wPlanning and

Managestatement fopresent).

Monitorebeach nouris(Coastal Plan

Managereefs as a mhabitat off Paassociated wanalyses indBeach Count

ATIONS (Indiv

Snyder, D.B.Scorpaenida

Byrnes, M.Rof sand minin

Byrnes, M.Rphysical procResearch, 20

Snyder, D.B.(Aetheloperc

Lindeman, Keffects of hab

. – Senior Sci

ientist and proard bottom in s

ientist and probeach nourishment).

ed fish assembwith a beach nd Engineering,

d field data cor Brevard Cou

ed fish assembshment projectnning and Eng

d a fish and eeans of mitigaalm Beach Cowith artificial reicated that fishty Department

vidual)

. and G.H. Burae), new to Ba

., R.M. Hammng offshore Al

., R.M. Hammcesses and bio0(1):25-43.

., J.E. Randallca rogaa). Cyb

K.C. and D.B. Sbitat burial by

ientist

oject managersoutheast Flor

oject managerment project o

blages associanourishment p, 2005 to pres

ollection and thunty Mid Reac

blages near ept on nearshoregineering, 200

pibiotic monitoating the effectounty, Florida. eefs and naturah assemblaget of Environme

rgess. 2006. hamian ichthy

mer, T.D. Thibaabama, U.S.A

mer, T.D. Thibaological comm

, and S.W. Mibium, 25(3):22

Snyder. 1999dredging. Fis

r for an evaluarida (Florida D

r for monitoringoffshore Venice

ated with artifiroject offshoreent).

he preparationh shoreline pr

pibiotic surveye hard bottom

01 to present).

oring program ts of beach no Quantitative dal reefs were c

es on artificial rental Resourc

The Indo-Pacyofauna. Cora

aut, and D.B. SA. Journal of C

aut, and D.B. Smunities offsho

chael. 2001. 27-232.

. Nearshore hshery Bulletin 3

ation of ecologDepartment of

g of hard bottoe, Florida (Co

cial mitigatione Phipps Park

n of draft sectiorotection proje

y transects est habitat off Mi

designed to aourishment prodata on fish acollected durinreefs differed es Manageme

cific red lionfisal Reefs.

Snyder. 2004Coastal Resea

Snyder. 2004ore New Jerse

Aggressive m

hard bottom fis3:508-525.

D

ical function aEnvironmenta

om adjacent toastal Technolo

n reefs and natk in Palm Beac

ons of an envect (Olsen Ass

tablished to asd-Town Palm

assess the effiojects on nearnd invertebratng summer mofrom those on

ent, 2001 to pr

h, Pterois voli

. Physical andarch, 20(1):6-2

. Effects of saey, U.S.A. Jou

mimicry by the

shes of southe

DAVID B. SN

and mitigation al Protection, 2

o fill and borroogy Corporatio

tural hard bottch, Florida (Co

ironmental imociates, 2005

ssess effects oBeach, Florid

icacy of artificrshore hard bote assemblageonths. Prelim

n natural reefs resent).

itans (Pisces:

d biological ef24.

and mining onurnal of Coasta

redmouth gro

east Florida an

YDER

of 2007

ow on,

tom in oastal

pact to

of a a

ial ottom es inary (Palm

ffects

al

ouper

nd

Page 133: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Master of SMarine BioSoutheasteUniversity,

Bachelor oBiology (Chand SpanisUniversity 2001

EXPERIE

March 200

n

Science, ology, Nova ern 2007

of Science, hemistry sh minors), of Missouri,

MsbaabcrppMat

Msqsap

PCSptahS

M9Sc(adc

ENCE

07 to Present

Chief ScFlorida, to asnourishment repetitive quapeer-revieweCorporation,

Ms. Hodel is a science, with abenthic commuat CSA Internaa diverse rangbottom, seagracharacterizatiorestoration proprograms of neplaying a lead Martin, and Broassessments, he Florida Key

Ms. Hodel hassamples and dqualitative anasupervises fielannual monitopresentations a

Prior to consulCoral Reef InsSoutheastern Uprojects centerhreatened Ca

assessment, dhistopathologicStaghorn cora

Ms. Hodel has900 logged divScientific Divecertifications aPADI). She is

administration.data, identificaconducting cor

t: CSA Interna

cientist and/or ssess nearshoprojects. Est

adrat data to ced survey repo

end client Ind

marine biologa strong backgunities. As Prational, Inc. (Ce of marine enass, and estuaon and mappinograms. She hearshore hardrole in seven oward Countiemonitoring suys, Puerto Ric

s been responsdata, with specalyses of benthd staff in data ring reports anat internationa

ting, Ms. Hodestitute while coUniversity whered on Southeribbean Stagh

disease, histopcal assessmenl.

s over 10 yearsves. She holdr and Professi

as well as specs trained in ca. She is also s

ation of hard boral health asse

ational

Lead Field Score hard bottomablish permancharacterize aorts (Applied Tdian River Cou

gist with over 6ground in field roject Scientist

CSA) she has snvironmental sarine habitats. ng, habitat damhas extensive bottom habitaprojects alonges. She also hrveys, and res

co, and Hawaii

sible for field ccial expertise ihic communitie

collection, annd proposals. al scientific con

el worked as aompleting her Mere she contribeast Florida cohorn coral. Thpathology, andnt of sediment

s of extensive s an Americanional Associatcialty certificatrdiopulmonaryskilled in the cottom and reeessments.

cientist for envm habitat priornent transects and monitor haTechnology anunty, 2007 to p

Proje

6 years experistudies of sub

t for the Coastserved as a Cstudies concer Studies have

mage assessmexperience co

ats prior to andg the east coahas notable exstorations of ci especially wi

collection, manin utilization ofes. She regul

nd prepares fie She also exhnferences and

a graduate resM.S. degree inbuted to field aoral reefs, incluhese studies ind restoration. tation and nutr

experience an Academy of tion of Diving Itions in underwy resuscitationcollection of unef biota, underw

vironmental sur to and after c and collect cl

ard bottom comnd Managemepresent).

ect Scientist,

ience in marinb-tropical and tal and Oceanhief Scientist orning coral reee included benment, and mononducting muld following best of Florida axpertise condu

coral reefs in Sth regard to sh

nagement, anf point count tearly coordinat

eld survey repohibits posters ad meetings.

search assistan Marine Bioloand laboratoryuding critical pncluded coral rHer thesis focrient stress in

s a scientific dUnderwater S

Instructor’s (PAwater navigation (CPR), first anderwater videwater restorat

urveys off Indiaconstruction oose-up video

mmunities. Aunt, Coastal Te

ERIN C. H

, Marine Biol

ne environmentropical marin

n Sciences Divor Field Scienef, nearshore hnthic nitoring and tiyear monitor

each nourishmand in Indian Ructing damage

Southeast Florhip grounding

d analysis of echniques for es field work, orts, includingand gives oral

ant for the Natiogy at Nova y-based reseapopulations of reproduction, cused on the Caribbean

diver with overSciences (AAUADI) Rescue Don and Nitrox aid, and oxygeeo and still camtion technique

an River Counof three beach and in-situ uthor of annuaechnology

ODEL

logist

ntal ne vision tist on hard

ring ent,

River, e rida,

sites.

the

g

ional

arch

health

n

r US) Diver

en mera s, and

nty,

al

Page 134: Sample Digital Brochure

PUBLICA

ORAL PR

Support nearshore haSt. Lucie Coudata, data m2008 to pres

Field Scbeach nourisCounty, June

Field ScFlorida. Ongto offset impa

Field Scnatural gas pvideo and stiincluded colldives to delin

ATIONS (Indiv

Hodel, E.C. aCaribbean SAbstracts, Fo

Vargas-ÁngesedimentatioOkinawa, Ja

Vargas-ÁngeD. Renegar. reef corals. A

RESENTATIO

Hodel, E.C., vessel groun11th Internatio

Hodel, E.C. Caribbean SSoutheast Fl

Hodel, E.C., levels in minKona, Hawai

Scientist and ard bottom haunty, Florida. anagement, aent).

ientist for envishment of Bathe 2008).

ientist for a largoing programacts from beac

ientist for a bepipeline and deill photographyection of toweneate seagras

vidual)

and E.C. Petetaghorn coral,ort Lauderdale

el, B., H. Halteon stress on scpan. 13 pp.

el, B., B. Riegl 2005. A highASLO Summe

ONS

B.D. Grahamndings in Browonal Coral Re

2006. Histoptaghorn coral,lorida Coral Re

W. Longmoreiature coral reii.

Field Scientisbit after constResponsible f

and point coun

ironmental surhtub Beach, M

rge-scale seagm to restore an

ch nourishmen

enthic habitat ceepwater porty for character

ed video data, ss habitat (Leif

ers. 2008. His, Acropora cere, FL. 316 pp.

er, and E.C. Hocleractinian co

, R. Dodge, Pher resolution,er Meeting Ab

, and A.S. McCward County, F

ef Symposium

athological as, Acropoara ceeef Initiative, F

e, and L. Sonneef systems. M

st for post-consruction of a befor collection o

nt analyses (Ta

rveys to assesMartin County,

grass mitigatiod monitor 1.33nt projects (Vi

characterizatiooff Tampa Ba

rization of ovehabitat charac

f Hőegh and C

stopathologicarvicornis. 11th

.

odel. 2004. Aorals. 10th Inte

. Blackwelder multi-layeredstracts, Santia

Carthy. 2008Florida: A reviem Abstracts, Fo

ssessment of servicornis. TeFort Lauderda

enschein. 19Marine Ornam

struction monieach nourishmof close-up vidaylor Enginee

ss nearshore hFlorida (Taylo

on program fo3 acres of turtllage of Key B

on survey in cay, Florida. Ther 103 km2 of scterization with

Co., Septembe

al analysis of hInternational

A histopatholoernational Cor

r, T. Snell, D. G approach to a

ago de Compo

. Coral commew of efforts aort Lauderdale

sedimentation echnical Advisoale, Florida.

99. Effects ofentals ’99: Co

itoring surveysment project indeo and in-situring, end clien

hard bottom hor Engineering

r the Village ole grass (Thal

Biscayne, Sept

conjunction withe benthic sursubmerged hahin the survey

er 2007).

hyaline, fibrillaCoral Reef Sy

ogical index asral Reef Symp

Gilliam, L. Fishassessing sedostela, Spain.

munity restoratand future neee, FL. 219 pp

and phosphaory Committee

f organic and iollection, Cultu

ERIN C. H

s to assess Fort Pierce, u repetitive qunt St. Lucie Co

abitat following, end client M

of Key Biscaynllassia testudintember 2008).

th a proposed rvey utilized toabitat. Survey y area, and sci

r lesions in theymposium

s an indicator fposium Abstra

her, E.C. Hodedimentation str 159 pp.

ions following eds. .

ate stress in the Meeting,

inorganic comure, Conserva

ODEL

adrat ounty,

g Martin

ne, num) .

owed tasks

ientific

e

for acts,

el, and ress in

e

mpound ation,

Page 135: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Master of SMarine SciUniversity Alabama, 2

Bachelor oBiology, WUniversity,

EXPERIE

CSA Inter

n

Science in ience, of South 2003

of Arts in Wittenberg

2000

MfSahasama

PSlobmpMA

MWaPsCG

ENCE

rnational, Inc.

Field Scand post-conconducted intransects, mesand-hard bo

Lead Fiecommunity mPlant outfallsdemonstratioestablished t

Project MProject at NoName Shoal 80 bird roostthe likelihoodmeeting and seagrass resstaff and sub

Ms. Fawcett isreshwater bio

Scientist on seassessments; hard bottom, aassessments (supervised fielanalysis of sammultidisciplinarareas of Florid

Prior to environSouth Florida Wogistical and fbimonthly monmaintenance, dpermit renewaMs. Fawcett coAnnual Report

Ms. Fawcett isWater SCUBAand first aid. SProgram by cosuccessful proCommission. Guard Auxiliar

. – Project Sc

ientist for Hillsnstruction nean association weasuring sedimottom intercep

eld Scientist fomonitoring survs offshore Pueon. Responsibtransects, data

Manager/Leado Name Shoal

included: a) tting stakes. Ad of natural sesite assessm

storation plan, b-contractors,

s a marine biollogy. She has

everal coral reland restoratio

and estuarine h(EIAs), monitod staff in data

mples and datry baseline stua, New Jersey

nmental consuWater Managefield support, fnitoring progradata collectionl, and preparinontributed to thts.

s a certified NaA diver and is tShe has been onducting bioloocurement of fuShe is skilled y Boating Skil

cientist II, Ben

sboro/Deerfieldrshore hard bo

with the beachment accumulpt positions an

or Puerto Rico veys near the

erto Rico. Survbilities includea analysis, and

d Field Scientis. Restoration he placement

Approximately 2eagrass colonizent survey, sefield oversighturbidity monit

ogist with oves served as Prlocation progra

on and monitorhabitats. She

oring and imple collection; ana for numerouudies and envy, Puerto Rico

ulting, Ms. Fawement District–field sampling,m. Other resp

n, quality assung and editinghe preparation

ational Associarained in Red active in the P

ogical monitorunding from thin small boat ols and Seama

nthic Ecologi

d Beach Renoottom and ree

h renourishmenation, assessid coral stress

Aqueduct andArecibo and Aveys were cond video and dd report prepa

st for Biscayneactivities condof approximat

272 m2 of seazation. Respoeagrass injury ht of restorationtoring, and rep

Project S

er 11 years exproject Managerams; environmring programshas prepared

ementation pland provided asus environmenironmental mo

o, Qatar, and t

wcett was a S–Everglades D, and project mponsibilities in

urance/quality g grant proposn of Everglade

ation of UnderCross cardiop

Palm Beach Cing and co-auhe Florida Fishoperations an

anship Course

st

ourishment Moef characterizant project. Asing permanenobservations.

d Sewer AuthoAquadilla Regnducted in comigital photogra

aration.

e National Parducted at two tely 350 yd3 o

agrass habitat onsibilities inclmapping, pren activities, onport preparatio

DEBOR

Scientist II, B

perience in maer, Project Sciemental baselins in coral reefsd numerous enans, and field ssistance in thntal field studieonitoring progrhe United Ara

enior ScientifiDivision. She management oncluded Hydro

control (QA/Qals and annua

es National Pa

rwater Instructpulmonary res

County, Floridathoring grant p

h and Wildlife d has complet

e.

onitoring Projeation and monissisted in estabt quadrats, an.

ority (PRASA)ional Waste Wmpliance with aphic data coll

rk (BISC) Seaorphan seagrf loose fill andwas returned luded participaparation and i

n-sight coordinon.

RAH A. FAW

Benthic Ecol

arine and entist, and/or Fne surveys; has, seagrass benvironmental imsurvey reportse collection anes, including brams in the co

ab Emirates.

c Associate wwas responsi

of a mandatedlab and YSI

QC), data analyal reports. ark Comprehe

tors Advancedsuscitation (CPa Artificial Reeproposals for Conservation ted the U.S. C

ect. Pre-, durintoring surveysblishing perma

nd collecting da

) wet season cWater Treatme

301(h) waiverlection of pre-

agrass Restorarass injuries ond b) the installa

to grade to imation in a planmplementatio

nation with BIS

WCETT

logist

Field abitat eds, mpact s; nd both oastal

with the ble for

d

ysis,

nsive

d Open PR) f

Coast

ng, s were anent ata on

coral ent r

ation n No ation

mprove nning on of a SC

Page 136: Sample Digital Brochure

PRESENT

PROFESS

Lead FieResponsibilitbaseline and

Field Scincluded ovesediment bagFeatherbeds

Lead Scof towed videhabitat. Res

Field Scchanges of thHutchinson Iquantitative d

Field Scassociation wShip Channe

Field Scchanges of thHutchinson Iquantitative d

TATIONS

Kilbane-Fawto SeptembePoster prese

Kilbane-FawSeptember 3

SIONAL CER

NAUI AdvanPADI open wAAUS CertifiFirst Aid/CPRNitrox CertifiCertified USC

eld Scientist foties included p

d biannual mon

ientist for the ersight and phog placement, a

s in Biscayne N

cientist for Leif eo data and hasponsible for to

ientist for the The epibenthic sland, Martin diver video tra

ientist/Diver fowith the mainteel (U.S. Depa

ientist for the The epibenthic sland, Martin dive transects

wcett, D. 2004er 30, 2002. Fentation.

wcett, D. 200430, 2002. Ben

RTIFICATION

ced SCUBA Dwater SCUBA ication R/DAN Oxygeed CG Safe Boat

or the Village opreparation of nitoring survey

Biscayne Natiotographic docand installatioNational Park.

Hoegh Re-roabitat characteowed video da

Texas Reef Yand ichthyofaCounty, Florid

ansects.

or monitoring cenance dredgrtment of the N

Texas Reef Yand ichthyofaCounty, Florid, video transe

. Monitoring aFlorida Artificia

. The status onthic Ecology M

NS

Diver Diver

en Administrati

ing and Seam

of Key Biscayna restoration a

ys, data collec

onal Park Seacumentation on of bird stake

ute Survey in erization withinata collection,

ear 4 Monitoriaunal assemblada. Responsib

coral and seaging of TrumanNavy, 2002 to

ear 1 Monitoriaunal assemblada. Responsibcts, and repor

artificial reefs il Reef Summi

of artificial reefMeeting. Mob

ion

manship Skills

ne Seagrass Rand mitigation

ction and analy

agrass Restorof turbidity screes in selected

Tampa Bay. n the survey aQA/QC of dat

ing Survey to ages associatbilities include

grass health an Harbor, the t 2007).

ing Survey to ages associatbilities includert preparation.

in Palm Beacht. Sarasota, F

fs in Palm Beabile, AL. Marc

DEBOR

Restoration ann plan, field imysis, and repo

ration Project. een installatioorphan groun

Survey tasks area and delinta, and seagra

document temted with the ard conducting q

and levels of seturning basin,

document temted with the ard conducting q

h County: OctoFL. April 27 to

ach County: Oh 25 to 28. O

RAH A. FAW

nd Mitigation Pplementation

ort preparation

Responsibilitn and remova

nding sites on

included colleeation of seag

ass assessme

mporal and spartificial reef offsqualitative and

edimentation and the Key W

mporal and spartificial reef offsqualitative and

ober 1, 2000 o 28.

October 1, 200ral presentatio

WCETT

Project. of .

ties al, Middle

ection grass nt.

atial shore d

in West

atial shore d

00 to on.

Page 137: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Bachelor oin Marine SUniversity 2002

EXPERIE

2006 to P

n

of Science Sciences, of Hawaii,

McSmbnNcpmapSt

Mincr

MOGais

ENCE

resent: CSA I

Permit csupport two visits to colleand natural eagencies to dtypes along pand supporti

Project sdocumentatioRegulatory Cwell as all FeNatural Gas

Staff BioAnalyzed reaEnvironmentClassification

Field ScFlorida, to asnourishment repetitive qua

Ms. Cahill is a communities aStaff Biologist,monitoring andbottom, and esnumerous envNational Envirocoordination ofprovided assismultidisciplinarareas of Floridpart in the colleShe has experechniques, an

Ms. Cahill has ncluding projecompiled literarestoration, mo

Ms. Cahill is a Open Water SGas Blending, and is a Nations trained in Re

International

coordinator invU.S. landings

ect minimal baenvironment adetermine theproposed routng documenta

scientist and pon for a U.S. C

Commission (Federal, State, aFacilities in Fe

ologist for a towal-time video fetal Protection’sn Protocol.

ientist and/or ssess nearshoprojects. Est

adrat data to c

marine biologand related per and/or Permi

d sampling in nstuarine habitaironmental peonmental Policf lease block a

stance in numery baseline stua. As a particection and anarience with colnd field identifi

conducted seects within Biscature, performeonitoring, and

certified ProfeCUBA, RescuDivers Alert N

nal Associationed Cross card

volved with theof an internatsic environme

and socioeconoir specific requte and analyzeations for subm

permit coordinaCoast Guard (FERC) Applicaand Municipalederal Waters

wed video sureed to define s (FDEP’s) Un

Support Field ore hard bottomablish permancharacterize a

gist with over 6rmit coordinatt Coordinator natural and arats. As a permrmitting tasks cy Act (NEPAand pipeline crerous environmudies and envcipating scientalysis of sampllecting video acation of bent

everal seagrascayne Nationaed data synthepermitting pro

essional Assocue, and EnrichNetwork (DANn of Underwatiopulmonary r

e preparation oional fiber opti

ental data arouomic data). Cuirements. Coe data to determittal to local,

ator involved w(USCG) deepwation for Certif permits for th

s to Tampa, Flo

rvey of 200 milhabitat types i

niform Mitigatio

Scientist for em habitat priornent transects and monitor ha

Proje

6 years experieion. She has on numerous

rtificial seagrasmit coordinatorincluding perm) compliant dorossing corresmental field stironmental moist on various

ples and data aand still photohic biota.

ss and reef resal Park and Evesis, and prepojects.

ciation of Divined Air Diver a) O2 Provider,ter Instructors resuscitation (C

of environmenic cable systemund the site (i.

Coordination wonduct benthicrmine impactsstate, and Fed

with the prepawater port appficate of Publiche Port Dolphinorida.

les of habitat oin accordanceon Assessmen

environmental r to and after c and collect cl

ard bottom com

ME

ect Scientist,

ence in field sserved as a Pmarine studie

ss beds, oyster, Ms. Cahill hmit applicationocument prepaspondence. Mudies includinonitoring progrprojects, Ms. as well as rep

ography, diver

storation projeverglades Natipared docume

ng Instructors and has certific and Emergen (NAUI) ScienCPR) and first

ntal permitting m. Includes lae., marine and

with the compec surveys to de. Prepare all deral agencies

aration of envirplication and Fc Conveniencen Deepwater P

offshore Tampe with Florida Dnt Methodolog

surveys off Inconstruction oose-up video

mmunities.

ELANIE L. CA

, Marine Biol

studies of bentProject Scientises including beer reefs, hard as supported

n preparation, aration, and

Ms. Cahill has g both rams in coastaCahill has tak

porting the resudelineation

ects in South Fional Park. Shnts for a variet

(PADI) Advancations in DSAncy First Respntific Diver. Sht aid.

documentatioanding locatiod terrestrial ph

etent regulatorelineate habitapermit applicas

ronmental perFederal Energye and NecessiPort Liquefied

pa Bay, FloridaDepartment ofgy Habitat

ndian River Coof three beach and in-situ

AHILL

logist

thic st, enthic

al ken ults.

Florida he has ty of

nced AT ponse he also

on to n site

hysical ry at

ations

rmitting y ity as

a. f

ounty,

Page 138: Sample Digital Brochure

PROFESS

Staff Biospatial extenin the Indian species and

PreparedCommission construction and mitigatio

Staff Biocommunitiesnourished wi

Staff Bioartificial reef taken at the composition bathymetry a

ConductPark, Floridathe reattachmphotographeduring each tracked over analyzing ph

Staff BioMexico, USAin accordanc

Staff BioLauderdale, documentatio

SIONAL CER

PADI AdvancDSAT Gas BDAN O2 ProvEmergency F

ologist for a sent, and density

River Lagoonspatial extent

d artificial reef(FWC) fundinof an artificial

on methods we

ologist conducts within the Phith approximat

ologist for condoffshore Martreef site for quwithin the artif

and benthic an

ted monitoringa. The groundment of 75 cored, and assess6-month monitime to determ

hotographs and

ologist and PerA. Coordinatedce with USACE

ologist for the rFlorida. Mappon and data m

RTIFICATION

ced Open WaBlender vider First Response

eagrass mappi estimations o

n, Florida. Vidfor mapping i

f construction ng on behalf of reef. Construere developed

ting photodocipps Park, Flotely 1.5 million

ducting monitotin County, Floualitative and qficial reef site.

nd ichthyofaun

g surveys for thing resulted in

rals, primarily sed for reattactoring event.

mine the succed measureme

rmit Coordinatd and produceE permitting g

reef restoratioped reattached

management.

NS

ter SCUBA, R

e and NAUI S

ng effort to deof the seagrasseo transects wn a geographi

grants for Florf Martin Countuction design wd to lessen imp

umentation suorida Beach Ren yd3 of sand.

oring surveys aorida. Analyzequantitative da The annual r

nal assemblag

he restorationn 83 m2 of damPorites astreo

chment status,Growth in oneess of the restnts and comp

tor for Gulf Fibed 136 lease buidelines.

n at the EASTd corals found

Rescue, and E

cientific Diver

elineate and des species withwere analyzedic information

rida Fish and ty, Florida to rwas analyzed pacts.

urveys for the enourishment

and preparinged consecutiveata to determireport consistses.

site of the M/Vmage to the reoides. Tagged, gross dimense, two, and/or toration site. aring the resu

ber’s fiber optiblock crossing

TWIND groundd at the injury s

nriched Air Di

r

ME

etermine preshin the City of d and tabulatedsystem (GIS)

Wildlife Consereceive grant m to determine

monitoring of t project area,

g reports for the still images fne benthic covs of temporal c

V DEBBET in eef; restorationd coral coloniesions, and relathree dimensiReport prepar

ults to previous

c cable installg and 111 pipe

ding site locatesite and respo

ver

ELANIE L. CA

sence/absenceFort Pierce Md to determineapplication.

ervation money for the potential impa

benthic which was

he Texas Reef from video tranverage and bochanges to the

Biscayne Natn efforts resultees were relocaative conditionions were thenration requireds surveys.

ation in the Geline crossing

ed offshore Foonsible for spe

AHILL

e, arina e

acts,

f nsects ottom e

tional ed in

ated, n n d

ulf of letters

ort ecies

Page 139: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Bachelor oin Marine BPalm BeacUniversity,

EXPERIE

2006 to P

n

of Science Biology, ch Atlantic

2005.

Aeducsintd

Mmcsat

ENCE

resent: CSA I

Operatioinvertebrate Responsible

OperatioArabian Gulfcaptain, YSI

Operatiobased out of installation, q

Operatiogrounding ofnavigation, a

OperatioUSS PORT Rnavigation, cphotography

Oceanogfishes, and snavigation, ddeployment a

Operatiolocations offsof site marke2011).

As an oceanogexperienced indocumentationunderwater vidcollecting watesalinity, and transtallation andhroughout Flo

demobilization

Mr. Myers partmonitoring, anclients. He is ssoftware and aa certified Profrained in card

International,

ons Supervisoand macroalgfor dive opera

ons Supervisof based out of data collectio

ons Technicianf Ras Laffan, Qqualitative und

ons Technicianffshore Ponce,and qualitative

ons TechnicianROYAL groun

coral reattachmy (2009).

graphic Technsediments in mdeep water sedand retrieval, a

ons Manager ashore Puerto Rers, and quant

graphic technin environmentan, and field aspdeo/still camerer and sedimeansmissivity. d monitoring dorida, Puerto R, and servicing

ticipates in mad water qualityskilled with CSapplications tofessional Assoiopulmonary r

, Inc. – Techn

r and Dive Maae communiti

ations and saf

r and Dive SuRas Laffan, Qn, and underw

n and Dive SuQatar. Responderwater video

n and Dive Ma, Puerto Rico. underwater v

n and Dive Mading offshore

ment, underwa

nician for a stumultiple locatiodiment grab saand water sam

and Dive SupeRico. Responitative and qua

cian for CSA Ial monitoring, pects of waterra tow systemsnt samples; anHe has served

diver, and boatRico, and the Pg of survey eq

any CSA studiey surveys for gSA’s navigatio produce both

ociation of Divresuscitation (C

nician

aster for extenses associated

fety of a 12-pe

pervisor for mQatar. Responwater still photo

pervisor for arnsibilities incluo photography

aster for coral Responsibilit

video photogra

aster during coHonolulu, Haw

ater navigation

udy to monitor ns offshore Puampling, Seabmpling (2006 t

ervisor for ongsibilities includalitative under

International, collection of b

r quality projecs and current nd profiling wad as an instrumt operator for nPersian Gulf. quipment and

es involving bgovernment, on systems and

h graphic and ting InstructorsCPR), first aid

sive diving sud with coral reeerson team of s

multiple artificiansibilities incluography (2008

rtificial reef Insuded EcoReef y, and Hypack

reef restoratioties included caphy (2010).

oral reef restorwaii. Responsn, and qualitat

the effects of uerto Rico. Rbird operation,o 2011).

going coral moded Hypack nrwater still and

D

Inc. (CSA), Mrbathymetric dacts. He has exmeasurementater columns fment operatornumerous maOther duties icompany vess

bathymetry, enoil industry, and computers, tabular final das (PADI) Dive d, and oxygen

rveys to charaefs in Apra Hascientific diver

al reef monitoruded Hypack n8 to 2010).

stallation in thef assembly, unnavigation (20

on efforts for thcoral reattachm

ration efforts fsibilities includive underwate

sewage dischResponsibilities, acoustic Dop

onitoring effortsavigation, undd video photog

DUSTIN J. M

Techn

r. Myers is ata, photo andxpertise in opet instrumentatifor temperaturr, navigator, rine surveys nclude mobilizsels.

nvironmental nd engineeringand computerata products. Master and isadministration

acterize the arbor, Guam. rs (2010).

ring surveys innavigation, boa

e Arabian Gulnderwater 007 to 2008).

he MATHEWSment, underwa

for the ded Hypack er video

harge on corals included Hypppler current p

s in multiple derwater instalgraphy (2006 t

MYERS

nician

d video erating ion; re,

zation,

g firm r He is

s n.

n the at

f

S ater

s, pack profiler

llation to

Page 140: Sample Digital Brochure

2003 to 20

2005 to 20

2005: Palm

PROFESS

Oceanogbeach renounavigation, inunderwater n

Oceanogfor analysis oResponsibilitretrieval of va

Operatioanalysis surv

006: The SCU

Led SCUcourses.

006: Dark Bea

Located for the Town

m Beach Atla

Studied

SIONAL CER

CPR – AmerOxygen FirstBasic Open WAdvanced ONitrox CertifiRescue DivePADI Dive M

graphic Technrishment activnstallation of unavigation, and

graphic Technof sediment froties included Han Veen grab

ons Technicianvey in Doha, Q

UBA Club, Inc

UBA diving tou

ach Ecologic

and marked t of Palm Beac

antic Universi

various estua

RTIFICATION

rican Red Crost Aid Water Diver pen Water Dived

er Master

nician and Divevities for the Cunderwater mod hard bottom

nician for studyom offshore dHypack navigaand vibracore

n for towed vidQatar (2006 to

c. – Dive Guid

urs. Assisted

al Services, I

turtle nests. Tch, funded by

ity – Field Bio

ries. Collecte

NS

ss

ver

e Supervisor dity of Venice,

onitoring equipm edge mappin

y requiring deeisposal of mai

ation, water sae assembly (20

deo, water sam2008).

de

with PADI SC

nc. – Sea Tur

Traced and dugthe State of F

ologist

d field data. M

during hard boFlorida. Resppment, underwng (2007 – 201

ep water grabntenance dred

ampling with th008).

mpling/quality

CUBA diving co

rtle Monitor

g hatched neslorida.

Monitored biol

D

ottom monitoriponsibilities incwater digital vi10)

sampling anddging in Tamphe YSI 6920, a

assessment,

ourses. Cond

sts. Collected

ogical environ

DUSTIN J. M

ng surveys focluded Hypacdeo surveying

d inshore vibrapa Bay, Floridaand deployme

and sediment

ucted refreshe

and recorded

nments.

MYERS

r k

g,

acoring a.

ent and

er

d data

Page 141: Sample Digital Brochure

Education

Master of SGeographyUniversite et de la Gu

Bachelor oin GeograpUniversite et de la Gu

EXPERIE

CSA Inte

n

Science in y, des Antilles

uyane, 2000

of Science phy, des Antilles

uyane, 1998

Aespsd

IPosa

Mpgs

MsdAW

MdUthm

ENCE

rnational, Inc Lead Terestoration aNational Parsediment fill approximateequipment macoustic dataPark Service

Operatiomain directioincluded mapincluded heaequipment macoustic dataand Sawyer,

As an Operatioenvironmental side scan sonaprojects. He issurvey systemdata profilers.

n addition, MrPortuguese, Soperator and nsurveys througand Tobago, C

Mr. Lamoure hprojects condugovernmental spatial and thre

Mr. Lamoure issoftware and pdata productioAutoCAD, GeoWord, Excel, a

Mr. Lamoure hdamage assesUnited States aransplanting h

helped developmonitoring.

c. – Operatiochnician for imctions associak near Miami, into excavatioly 1,000 m2 of

mobilization, eqa collection, ine, Biscayne Na

ons Manager/Gonal bore locatpping and cha

alth, safety, anmobilization, eqa collection, da P.C., 2007).

ons Manager, baseline, env

ar, subbottom s experienced s, water samp

r. Lamoure is fpanish, and F

navigator and fghout Florida, Colombia, Braz

has been a geoucted for the oagencies. Heee-dimensiona

s experiencedprograms for bn. Computer

o Translator, Aand other prop

has been an opssments and hand Caribbeanhard corals as p methods for

ons Managermplementationated with vessFlorida. Rest

ons and 2) tranf injured areasquipment systenstallation and ational Park [N

GIS Specialist tions under the

aracterization od environmen

quipment systeata processing

Oceanographvironmental sa

profiler, photowith underwa

ple collection,

fluent in five larench West Infield operationthe Gulf of Mezil, Mozambiq

ographic inforil and gas indu

e has extensiveal data.

with the use aboth data colleapplications in

ArcGIS, Adobeprietary data co

perational divehabitat restoratn. Mr. Lamoua means of acdistributing re

r, Lead Technn of a Seagrasel grounding itoration actionnsplanting seas. Responsibilems integratioremoval of tu

NPS-BISC], 20

for a habitat ce New River inof seagrass annt (HSE) manaems integratiog and integrati

Operation

hic Technicianampling, enviroo and video doater video/still bottom sampl

anguages, inclndies Creole. ns manager foexico, Bahamaue, and Malay

rmation systemustry, utilities ae experience i

and applicatioection and ananclude Hypacke Photoshop, Aollection and p

er and scientiftion projects a

ure is experienccelerating ha

eattached hard

nician ss Restorationnjuries to sea

ns included 1) agrass and inslities included on, on-board nrbidity screen

008).

characterization Fort Lauderdnd hard bottomagement and don, on-board nion, and prepa

TH

ns Manager,

, Mr. Lamoureonmental monocumentation camera tow sye collection an

uding EnglishHe is an expe

or numerous inas, Puerto Ricysia.

ms (GIS) analyand engineeriin processing

ons of a wide ralyses and grak, Isis Sonar, SAdobe Premieprocessing pro

fic assistant onat vessel grounnced with reattabitat recoveryd corals to fac

Plan for envirgrass habitat placing appro

stalling bird stadiving operati

navigation, navs, and turbidit

on survey assodale, Florida. m communitiesdiving operationavigation, navaration of digit

HOMAS LAMO

Lead Techn

e has participanitoring, bathymand water quaystems, acousnd oceanogra

, French, erienced instrunternational maco, Antigua, Tr

yst for numerong companiesand integratin

range of compaphic and tabuSonarWizMap

ere, PowerPoinograms.

n natural resonding sites in ttaching and y. He also hascilitate environm

ronmental within Biscayn

oximately 140 akes into ions supervisiovigational and y testing (Nati

ociated with wThe surveys s. Responsib

ons supervisiovigational and tal maps (Haze

OURE

nician

ated in metric, ality stic phic

ument arine rinidad

ous s, and ng

puter lar

p, nt,

urce the

s mental

ne yd3 of

on,

ional

water

ilities on,

en

Page 142: Sample Digital Brochure

PROFESS

Operatioplant pipelinecurrent meteof seagrass bdiving operatnavigation, npreparation o

Operatiohabitat southmonitoring dharbor inlet. equipment macoustic dataCounty, 2008

OperatioMonitoring atransects extseaward edgsupervision, navigational maps (ATM,

GIS SpeCounty. Thebeach in Secfrom the neadata process

Operatiowith the Freemobilization,acoustic and

Operatiooffshore Marnavigation, nmap generatequipment (W

Navigatide Janeiro, B

SIONAL CER

Open Water Nitrox CertifiCardiopulmoStandard Fir

ons Manager/Ge corridor offshers along the pbeds and hardtions supervis

navigational anof digital maps

ons Manager/Gh of the harborata following t Responsibilit

mobilization, eqa collection, da8).

ons Manager fctivities includtending perpege of hard bottequipment moand acoustic d2007).

ecialist for the e purpose of thctor 7 along 12arshore edge osing and integr

ons Manager feport, Bahama equipment sy

d navigational d

ons Manager drtin County, Flonavigational antion. Side-scaWeeks Marine

on TechnicianBrazil.

RTIFICATION

SCUBA Divered – PADI

onary Resuscitst Aid – Amer

GIS Specialist hore Yankeeto

proposed pipeld bottom commion, equipmen

nd acoustic das (Progress En

GIS Specialist r inlet in Fort Pthe renourishmies included Hquipment systeata processing

for nearshore ded quantitativndicular to thetom. Responsobilization, equdata collection

biological monhe survey was2 permanent sof rock outcropration and pre

for a bathymetas cruise termystems integradata, and digit

during surveysorida. Responnd acoustic daan sonar operae, Inc., 2000 to

n during offsho

NS

r – Profession

tation (CPR) –ican Red Cros

for an environown, Florida. line corridor, cmunities. Resnt mobilizationata collection, nergy Services

for a post-conPierce, Floridament of the beHSE managemems integratiog and integrati

hard bottom mve diver video e shoreline frosibilities includuipment systen, data proces

nitoring of beas to collect mosurvey transecps to a distanceparation of dig

tric and subboinal expansion

ation, on-boardtal map gener

s conducted innsibilities incluata collection, ations includedo 2002).

ore support an

al Association

– American Ress

nmental baselThe surveys i

collection of wasponsibilities inn, equipment sdata processis, 2007).

nstruction mona. The purposeach immediate

ment and divingon, on-board nion, and prepa

monitoring in Pcollection andm the nearsho

ded HSE manaems integrationssing and integ

ach renourishmnitoring data p

cts perpendicuce of 180 m ofgital maps (AT

ottom profiling n program. Red navigation, cration (CH2MH

n relation to a uded equipmedata processid the use of di

nd diving opera

n of Diving Inst

ed Cross

TH

ine survey forincluded instaater current dancluded HSE msystems integrng and integra

nitoring surveye of the surveely south of thg operations s

navigation, navaration of digit

Palm Beach Cod in-situ data core edge of haagement and dn, on-board nagration, and pr

ment in Sectorprior to renourular to the shoffshore. RespoTM, 2006 to 20

survey conduesponsible forcollection and Hill, 2006).

beach renourient systems intng and integraigital sonar da

ations in the C

tructors (PAD

HOMAS LAMO

r a proposed pllation of threeata, and delinemanagement ration, on-boaration, and

y of hard bottoy is to provide

he Fort Pierce supervision, vigational and tal maps (St. L

ounty, Floridacollection alongard bottom outdiving operatioavigation, reparation of d

r 7 of Indian Rrishment of thereline extendinonsibilities inc007).

cted in conjunr equipment processing of

ishment projectegration, on-bation, and digiata collection

Campos Basin

I)

OURE

power e eation and rd

om e

Lucie

. g eight t to the ons

digital

River e ng

cluded

nction

f

ct board tal

, Rio

Page 143: Sample Digital Brochure

Steven Kuda, PSM, PHO

  Licenses: 

No.5419 State of Florida Professional Surveyor & Mapper  No.24077  State of South Carolina Licensed Photogrammetrist  Professional Organizations: 

American Society of Photogrammetry (ASPRS)  Mgmt. Assoc. for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors (MAPPS)  Florida Surveying and Mapping Society (FSMS)  Hire Date    February 1981  Years of Experience    

36 years  

Steven Kuda, PSM, PHO Senior Vice President / Project Director  Professional Profile: As  Senior  Vice  President  of  Aerial  Cartographics  of  America,  Inc., Mr.  Kuda  is responsible  for  directing  ACA’s  department  managers  with  detailed  project criteria,  technical  specifications,  cost  estimating,  project  planning,  scheduling, quality  control  guidelines  and  serving  as  a  client  liaison. Mr. Kuda’s 36  years of Photogrammetric and surveying experience have been essential to the growth and success of the company.  Project Experience: 

Town of Palm Beach Coastal Imagery, Palm Beach County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Sep 2011 – Present 

ACA  was  selected  as  a  team  member  to  provide  photogrammetric  imaging capabilities. This 10.8 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color digital imagery to monitor  the  shoreline  from R‐78  to R134 plus 500’  feet past monuments. All work  performed  per  OBCS  monitoring  specifications.  ACA  is  providing  these services on schedule and within budget.      Longboat Key Coastal Imagery, Manatee and Sarasota Counties, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Nov 2010 – Dec 2010 

ACA was  selected  as  a  team member on  this beach monitoring  and  restoration project  to provide photogrammetric  imaging capabilities. This 10.25 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color raster imagery to monitor the shoreline from 500 feet past monument R‐42  in Manatee County  to 500  feet past R‐29  in  Sarasota County. All work was completed per OBCS monitoring specifications. ACA provided these services on schedule and within budget.    Collier County Coastal Imagery, Collier County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Jul 2009 – Aug 2009 

ACA was selected as a team member project to provide photogrammetric imaging capabilities. This 14.2 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color raster  imagery to monitor the shoreline from 500 feet past monument R‐16 to 500 feet south of R‐90. All work was completed per OBCS monitoring  specifications. ACA provided these services on schedule and within budget.   St Lucie Coastal Imagery, St Lucie County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. July 2008 – Aug 2008 

ACA was  selected  as  a  team member on  this beach monitoring  and  restoration project  to  provide  photogrammetric  imaging  capabilities.  This  3.2 mile  project consisted of 1”=100’ scale digital  imagery  to monitor  the shoreline 200  feet past monument  R98  to  200  feet  past  R111.  All  work  was  completed  per  OBCS monitoring  specifications.  ACA  provided  these  services  on  schedule  and within budget.    

Page 144: Sample Digital Brochure

Steven Kuda, PSM, PHO

  Project Experience Continued. 

Beach Monitoring Contract BS011 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, 5600 Tallahassee, FL Nov 2002 ‐ 2009 

The  Florida  Department  of  Environmental  Protection,  Office  of  Beaches  and Coastal Systems  (OBCS)  selected ACA  to provide digital  color ortho  imagery  for their  Beach  Monitoring  Program  in  2002.    This  multi‐year  task  assignment contract  is  still  active  today.   Under  this  contract ACA has provided over  1000 miles  of  six  inch  pixel  color  digital  ortho  imagery  to  the  department  for  this program.  The project areas included entire coastlines in the state of Florida.   The  acquired  imagery was  obtained  from  a  1”  =  500’  negative  scale  and was scanned, ortho  rectified  and  clipped  to meet national Map Accuracy  Standards and OBSC Monitoring Plan Technical Specifications 02100 and 02000.   The  ortho  rectification  was  computed  using  KLT  Atlas  software.    The  ortho rectification phase used  the digital elevation data, aero  triangulation and aerial photo  and  camera  calibration  information  to  produce  orthographically  correct image  products  that  meet  the  standards  and  requirements  of  the  technical specifications. The process took into account the effects of: 

Terrain relief  Camera position and attitude  Ground control points  Camera calibration data including lens distortion & principal point offset  Image measurement data  Film deformation  Atmospheric refraction  Map projection effects  Datum considerations  Earth curvature  Reconciliation of redundant measurements 

Steps in the ortho rectification process included:  Incorporation of aero triangulation orientation and ABGPS/IMU 

parameters and image and ground control coordinates into the database.  Verification that all required data was available and met quality 

requirements.  Generation of rectification post plot of elevations from the DEM to 

compare with topographic map to check for gross blunders.  A theoretical analysis of the rectification accuracy.Perform the ortho 

rectification for the project.  Verified results of the rectification through onscreen measurement of 

control and pass point’s data and automatic calculation of RMS values, which will be displayed on screen and preserved in a report file. 

Page 145: Sample Digital Brochure

Kurt Griffel

  Education: Northeast Missouri State University  USAF  Hire Date    February 1992  Years of Experience    

20 years 

Kurt Griffel Vice President / Project Manager  Professional Profile: Mr. Griffel's  twenty  years  of  experience with ACA  has  been  in  production  and management and as  lab operations manager,  is  involved  in the daily activities of ACA that  include project planning, scheduling, flight operations, fee negotiations and coordinating progress meetings with clients.  Project Experience: 

Town of Palm Beach Coastal Imagery, Palm Beach County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Sep 2011 – Present 

ACA  was  selected  as  a  team  member  to  provide  photogrammetric  imaging capabilities. This 10.8 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color digital imagery to monitor  the shoreline  from R‐78  to R134 plus 500’  feet past monuments. All work  performed  per  OBCS  monitoring  specifications.  ACA  is  providing  these services on schedule and within budget.      Longboat Key Coastal Imagery, Manatee and Sarasota Counties, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Nov 2010 – Dec 2010 

ACA was  selected as a  team member on  this beach monitoring and  restoration project to provide photogrammetric  imaging capabilities. This 10.25 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color raster imagery to monitor the shoreline from 500 feet past monument R‐42  in Manatee County  to 500  feet past R‐29  in Sarasota County.  All  work  was  completed  per  OBCS  monitoring  specifications.  ACA provided these services on schedule and within budget.    Collier County Coastal Imagery, Collier County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Jul 2009 – Aug 2009 

ACA was selected as a team member project to provide photogrammetric imaging capabilities. This 14.2 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color raster imagery to monitor the shoreline from 500 feet past monument R‐16 to 500 feet south of R‐90. All work was completed per OBCS monitoring specifications. ACA provided these services on schedule and within budget.   St Lucie Coastal Imagery, St Lucie County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. July 2008 – Aug 2008 

ACA was  selected as a  team member on  this beach monitoring and  restoration project  to  provide  photogrammetric  imaging  capabilities.  This  3.2 mile  project consisted of 1”=100’ scale digital imagery to monitor the shoreline 200 feet past monument  R98  to  200  feet  past  R111.  All  work  was  completed  per  OBCS monitoring  specifications. ACA  provided  these  services  on  schedule  and within budget.    

Page 146: Sample Digital Brochure

Kurt Griffel

  Project Experience Continued. 

Beach Monitoring Contract BS011 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, 5600 Tallahassee, FL Nov 2002 ‐ 2009 

The  Florida  Department  of  Environmental  Protection,  Office  of  Beaches  and Coastal Systems  (OBCS)  selected ACA  to provide digital  color ortho  imagery  for their  Beach  Monitoring  Program  in  2002.    This  multi‐year  task  assignment contract  is  still  active  today.   Under  this  contract ACA has provided over  1000 miles  of  six  inch  pixel  color  digital  ortho  imagery  to  the  department  for  this program.  The project areas included entire coastlines in the state of Florida.   The  acquired  imagery was  obtained  from  a  1”  =  500’  negative  scale  and was scanned, ortho  rectified  and  clipped  to meet national Map Accuracy  Standards and OBSC Monitoring Plan Technical Specifications 02100 and 02000.   The  ortho  rectification  was  computed  using  KLT  Atlas  software.    The  ortho rectification phase used  the digital elevation data, aero  triangulation and aerial photo  and  camera  calibration  information  to  produce  orthographically  correct image  products  that  meet  the  standards  and  requirements  of  the  technical specifications. The process took into account the effects of: 

Terrain relief  Camera position and attitude  Ground control points  Camera calibration data including lens distortion & principal point offset  Image measurement data  Film deformation  Atmospheric refraction  Map projection effects  Datum considerations  Earth curvature  Reconciliation of redundant measurements 

Steps in the ortho rectification process included:  Incorporation of aero triangulation orientation and ABGPS/IMU 

parameters and image and ground control coordinates into the database.  Verification that all required data was available and met quality 

requirements.  Generation of rectification post plot of elevations from the DEM to 

compare with topographic map to check for gross blunders.  A theoretical analysis of the rectification accuracy.Perform the ortho 

rectification for the project.  Verified results of the rectification through onscreen measurement of 

control and pass point’s data and automatic calculation of RMS values, which will be displayed on screen and preserved in a report file. 

Page 147: Sample Digital Brochure

Kimberly Peterson

  Education   

Valencia Community College  Hire Date 

November 1999  Years of Experience    

10 years  

Kimberly Peterson Digital Imagery Supervisor Professional Profile: Ms. Peterson is responsible for all CAD and ortho image production activities for ACA. Other responsibilities include scanning, GIS processing, and system administration. Ms. Peterson has been with ACA ten years.  She has worked with ACA as a CAD / Ortho technician since 1999 until the present. Ms. Peterson has completed course work related to CAD production at Valencia Community College, Florida. Ms. Peterson has over nine years in the photogrammetric field.   Project Experience: 

Town of Palm Beach Coastal Imagery, Palm Beach County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Sep 2011 – Present 

ACA  was  selected  as  a  team  member  to  provide  photogrammetric  imaging capabilities. This 10.8 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color digital imagery to monitor  the shoreline  from R‐78  to R134 plus 500’  feet past monuments. All work performed per OBCS monitoring specifications.     Longboat Key Coastal Imagery, Manatee and Sarasota Counties, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Nov 2010 – Dec 2010 

ACA was  selected as a  team member on  this beach monitoring and  restoration project to provide photogrammetric  imaging capabilities. This 10.25 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color raster imagery to monitor the shoreline from 500 feet past monument R‐42  in Manatee County  to 500  feet past R‐29  in Sarasota County.  All  work  was  completed  per  OBCS  monitoring  specifications.  ACA provided these services on schedule and within budget.    Collier County Coastal Imagery, Collier County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Jul 2009 – Aug 2009 

ACA was selected as a team member project to provide photogrammetric imaging capabilities. This 14.2 mile project consisted of 1”=100’ scale color raster imagery to monitor the shoreline from 500 feet past monument R‐16 to 500 feet south of R‐90. All work was completed per OBCS monitoring specifications.   St Lucie Coastal Imagery, St Lucie County, FL Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. July 2008 – Aug 2008 

ACA was  selected as a  team member on  this beach monitoring and  restoration project  to  provide  photogrammetric  imaging  capabilities.  This  3.2 mile  project consisted of 1”=100’ scale digital imagery to monitor the shoreline 200 feet past monument  R98  to  200  feet  past  R111.  All  work  was  completed  per  OBCS monitoring specifications.  

Page 148: Sample Digital Brochure

Kimberly Peterson

  Project Experience Continued. 

Beach Monitoring Contract BS011 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems, 5600 Tallahassee, FL Nov 2002 ‐ 2009 

The  Florida  Department  of  Environmental  Protection,  Office  of  Beaches  and Coastal Systems  (OBCS)  selected ACA  to provide digital  color ortho  imagery  for their  Beach  Monitoring  Program  in  2002.    This  multi‐year  task  assignment contract  is  still  active  today.   Under  this  contract ACA has provided over  1000 miles  of  six  inch  pixel  color  digital  ortho  imagery  to  the  department  for  this program.  The project areas included entire coastlines in the state of Florida.   The  acquired  imagery was  obtained  from  a  1”  =  500’  negative  scale  and was scanned, ortho  rectified  and  clipped  to meet national Map Accuracy  Standards and OBSC Monitoring Plan Technical Specifications 02100 and 02000.   The  ortho  rectification  was  computed  using  KLT  Atlas  software.    The  ortho rectification phase used  the digital elevation data, aero  triangulation and aerial photo  and  camera  calibration  information  to  produce  orthographically  correct image  products  that  meet  the  standards  and  requirements  of  the  technical specifications. The process took into account the effects of: 

Terrain relief  Camera position and attitude  Ground control points  Camera calibration data including lens distortion & principal point offset  Image measurement data  Film deformation  Atmospheric refraction  Map projection effects  Datum considerations  Earth curvature  Reconciliation of redundant measurements 

Steps in the ortho rectification process included:  Incorporation of aero triangulation orientation and ABGPS/IMU 

parameters and image and ground control coordinates into the database.  Verification that all required data was available and met quality 

requirements.  Generation of rectification post plot of elevations from the DEM to 

compare with topographic map to check for gross blunders.  A theoretical analysis of the rectification accuracy.Perform the ortho 

rectification for the project.  Verified results of the rectification through onscreen measurement of 

control and pass point’s data and automatic calculation of RMS values, which will be displayed on screen and preserved in a report file. 

Page 149: Sample Digital Brochure

Chris Horgan Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311

[email protected] 954.618.8819

EXPERIENCE Sonographics, Inc. 2003-2010 Fort Lauderdale, FL

Performs side-scan sonar, sub-bottom profiler, and magnetometer surveys. Collects sonar data for underwater surveys and searches using Discover, ISIS,

and Hypack. Analyzes and assembles sonar and magnetometer data using Discover, ISIS, and

Delphmap for presentation to clients. Designs and maintains website using DreamweaverMX and PhotoshopCS for

Sonographics.net. AM 850 WRUF 2001-2002 Gainesville, FL

Board Operator for commercial News Talk Sports radio station. On-Air personality for morning call-in swap-shop program TRADIO. Edited weather and other news clips for weekday morning and evening news

broadcasts. Mars Music Records 2000 Fort Lauderdale, FL

Scouted for marketable unsigned recording artists and screened all artist submissions.

Worked with other A&R team members to create and coordinate a national battle-of-the-bands competition with over $100,000 in rewards.

Set up and maintained a national network of Mars Music store employees to solicit material from talented Mars Music customers.

_______________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION University of Florida 1997-2002 Gainesville, FL

Earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Telecommunications Production with a minor in Sociology.

_______________________________________________________________________ COMPUTERS

Proficient with Windows, ISIS, DelphMap, Discover4200, Discover Sub-bottom, MS Word, Excel, Nuendo, Final Cut Pro, and the Internet.

Working knowledge of Macintosh, Hypack, SonarWiz.MAP, DreamweaverMX, and Adobe Photoshop.

Page 150: Sample Digital Brochure

2317 N Andrews Ave, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 Telephone: (954) 566-0620 Fax: (954) 564-6882 fhorgan@ aol.com

Remote Sensing Excellence

Frederick N. Horgan

CAREER PROFILE 2000 to Present: SONOGRAPHICS, INC.

Specializes in marine geophysical services and search and recovery operations Performs sand resource and cultural resource investigation surveys Collects, interprets and processes data using Side-scan Sonar, Sub-bottom Profilers and

Magnetometers. Produces digital sonar mosaics, digital isopachs and magnetic contour maps and images. 1983 to 2000: OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL, INC. PROJECT MANAGER

Served as the Fort Lauderdale location manager for seventeen years Project Geophysicist on over 25 Geophysical Surveys Performed tasks at all levels of search and survey operations from 0 to 20,000fsw Provided isopachs, mosaics and magnetic charts of the data collected Unparalleled sonar interpretation skills Experienced Electronics Technician (design, manufacturing, installing and repair of field equipment)

In 1999, as the U.S. Navy’s subcontracted Project Manager, Rick identified the wreckage of the JFK Jr’s Piper Saratoga from the sonar data collected by the NOAA Vessel RUDE. Using the Hypack navigation program he subsequently guided USCG Cutter WILLOW over the wreckage to obtain high-resolution side-scan data, which he provided to the U.S.S. GRASP for recovery. 1979 to 1983: STEADFAST MARINE, INC. MANAGER SEAFLOOR SYSTEMS 1977 to 1979: SEAWARD, INC. MANAGER SONAR SYSTEMS 1971 to 1977: HYDROSURVEYS, INC. VICE PRESIDENT/ CHIEF ENGINEER 1969 to 1971: EG&G INTERNATIONAL, INC. FIELD SERVICE ENGINEER Computer and Equipment Skills

Thoroughly familiar with (Hypack, WinFrog, Discover X-Star, Discover Sub-Bottom, Klein Sonar Pro, Marine Sonics Sea Scan, Triton Elics Isis Sonar, Delphmap, Delph Seismic, Sonarweb Pro)

Thoroughly familiar with (EdgeTech X-Star and ORE Geopulse Boomer sub-bottom profiler systems.) (Klein 595, 2000, 3000, EdgeTech DF1000, MP-X, and Marine Sonics side-scan sonar systems) (Geometrics 880/881/882 cesium magnetometers and 866 proton magnetometer) Education

Degree(s)/Year/Specialization Wentworth Institute / 1967 / A.B.S. Mechanical Engineering

Other Experience and Qualifications: Northeastern University / Physical Oceanography / 1966 / Diploma US NAVY / Class A Electronics School / 1967 / Diploma US NAVY / Class A Sonar School / 1967 / Diploma US NAVY / Class C Oceanography School / 1968 / Diploma ACSM / Hydrography / 1985 / Diploma SONARDYNE, LTD. Long Base Line Acoustic Navigation / 1989 & 1997 TRITON ELICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Acoustic Image Processing / 1990

SONOGRAPHICS

Page 151: Sample Digital Brochure

Jason M. Burns, M.A., RPA Project Manager

North Gulf Coast, Florida Office Jason Burns, M.A. has over fourteen years experience, has been with Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. (SEARCH) since 2006, and serves as a Project Manager and Principal Investigator within the Maritime Division. Burns is a Navy veteran who graduated from the University of Florida with his B.A. in Anthropology in 1996. After working for SEARCH as a field technician, Burns continued his education at the University of West Florida (UWF), where he earned an M.A. in History/Historical Archaeology, specializing in underwater archaeology, in 2000. His thesis, The Life and Times of a Merchant Sailor: The Archaeology and History of the Norwegian Ship Catharine, was subsequently published in the Plenum Series in Underwater Archaeology in 2003. Upon graduating from UWF, Burns worked as an archaeologist on the CSS Hunley recovery off Charleston, SC before moving to St. Augustine, FL to work for the Lighthouse Archaeological Maritime Program (LAMP). From 2000-2003, Burns served as LAMP’s Director of Conservation and participated in all facets of the underwater archaeology program. During this time, Burns was fortunate to assist on the 2002 CSS Alabama project off Cherbourg, France. Most recently, Burns served as the first underwater archaeologist hired by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Burns was charged with creating a statewide program for underwater archaeology and he ended his tenure in the position of Deputy State Archaeologist - Underwater. Burns’ qualifications exceed those set forth by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716-42). EDUCATION M.A., 2000. History/Historical Archaeology. University of West Florida B.A., 1996. Anthropology. University of Florida RESEARCH SPECIALIZATIONS Submerged Cultural Resource Management Maritime Archaeology Marine Remote Sensing Scientific Diving PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

2006-present Maritime Archaeologist, Project Manager and Principal Investigator, SEARCH 2008-present Project Maritime Archaeologist, The Serapis Project, Ill Ste. Marie, Madagascar 2005-2006 Georgia Deputy State Archaeologist – Underwater, Georgia Department of Natural

Resources 2004-present Underwater Archaeologist, The Search for the Slave Ship Trouvadore, Ships of

Discovery, Inc. 2003-2005 Underwater Archaeologist, Georgia Department of Natural Resources 2002 Underwater Archaeologist, CSS Alabama Project, Institute for International Maritime

Research 2000-2003 Underwater Archaeologist, Lighthouse Archaeological Maritime Program 2000 Underwater Archaeologist, CSS H.L. Hunley Recovery Project, Friends of the Hunley

Inc. 1998-2000 Archaeologist, US Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District 1997-1999 Archaeological Conservation Laboratory Assistant, University of West Florida 1997 Archaeological Field Technician, Prentice Thomas & Associates 1996-1997 Archaeological Field Technician, SEARCH

Page 152: Sample Digital Brochure

Jason M. Burns, M.A. Project Manager

www.searchinc.com 2 [email protected]

PROJECT EXPERIENCE (Select List) Project Manager and Principal Investigator. Historic Assessment and Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment Survey, Weekley Bayou, Eglin Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, Florida. Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment Survey, Eastpoint to St. George Island TAP, Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment Survey. Gulf Intra Coastal Waterway, Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Manatee Counties, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Historic Assessment and Remote Sensing Survey of the Dade County Beach Erosion Control Project Remaining Sand Source, Miami-Dade County, Florida. For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of John’s Pass and Blind Pass, Pinellas County, Florida. Prepared under contract to Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc., Jacksonville Beach, Florida for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Historic Assessment and Remote Sensing Survey of the St. Johns County Beach Erosion Control Project, St. Johns County, Florida. For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Historic Assessment and Remote Sensing Survey of Intracoastal Water Way Near St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida. For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Maritime Archaeologist. Cultural Resources Survey for Fort San Geronimo, San Juan, Puerto Rico. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey for Tampa Port Authority’s East Port Development, Berths 150, 151, 152, East Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. For CH2M HILL and the Tampa Port Authority. Remote Sensing Specialist. Historic Assessment and Submerged Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey of Four Borrow Areas in Martin and St. Lucie Counties Shore Protection Projects, Florida. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Florida. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey, Keaton Beach Channel, Keaton Beach, Florida. Principal Investigator. Archeological Diver Identification and Evaluation of Twenty-Eight Potentially Significant Submerged Targets, St. Johns County Beach Erosion Control Project, St. Johns County, Florida. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida.

Page 153: Sample Digital Brochure

Jeffrey M. Enright, M.A., RPA Maritime Principal Investigator / GIS Specialist

North Gulf Coast, Florida Office Mr. Enright received his Master of Arts degree in Maritime History and Nautical Archaeology in 1999 and he meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. Since receiving his degree, he has participated in projects as a professional maritime archaeologist along the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf of Mexico seaboards; in numerous inland rivers; and the Caribbean. For the past 11 years Mr. Enright has been employed as a Project Manager, Principal Investigator, Project Archaeologist, and Diving Supervisor in the cultural resources management industry. In these roles, he has designed, directed, and/or participated in more than 75 Section 106 underwater and terrestrial investigations, geophysical surveys, and GIS projects for federal, state, and private clients, and produced more than 35 publications. Mr. Enright has more than 10 years of professional experience working with GIS and CADD in support of environmental compliance and permitting projects. He has designed and managed complex GIS geodatabases of submerged cultural resources, underwater biological habitat, and terrestrial biological inventories in support of multiple disciplines, including marine and terrestrial archaeology, marine and terrestrial biology, and archival and cartographic history. Mr. Enright is experienced efficiently and effectively managing large, multi-component datasets; intelligently organizing attribute tables and spatial layers into functional geodatabases; analyzing spatial relationships and solving geographic challenges; and presenting geographic data as accurate and informative graphics for scientific study. EDUCATION

M.A., 1999, Maritime History and Nautical Archaeology, East Carolina University B.A., 1995, Anthropology and History, University of Miami

RESEARCH SPECIALIZATION Submerged Cultural Resources Management Maritime Archaeology Remote-Sensing Survey Scientific Diving Geographic Information Systems PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

2010-present Maritime Principal Investigator / GIS Specialist, Maritime Division, Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc.

2006-2010 Maritime Archaeologist / Hydrographic Surveyor, BIO-WEST, Inc., Coastal Division, Austin & Houston, TX

1999-2006 Scientist II / Nautical Archaeologist, PBS&J, Inc., Austin, TX 1999 Principal Investigator (Independent Contractor), Site 18CV414, Vessel D2, Maryland

Historical Trust, St. Leonard, MD 1998 Graduate Intern Archaeologist, Site 18CV414, Vessel D1, East Carolina

University/Maryland Historical Trust, St. Leonard, MD

Page 154: Sample Digital Brochure

Jeffrey M. Enright Maritime Archaeologist

2

PROJECT EXPERIENCE (Select List)

GIS Specialist/Remote-Sensing Specialist/Maritime Archaeologist. Submerged Cultural Resources Response for the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, Gulf-Wide Response. For HDR, Inc. / BP.

Maritime Archaeologist/GIS Specialist. Cultural Resources Survey for Fort San Geronimo, San Juan Bay, Puerto Rico. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District.

GIS Specialist. Marine Remote Sensing Survey Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument, Hawaii. For Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument (NOAA).

Project Manager/Principal Investigator/GIS Specialist. Phase I Underwater Investigations for the SH37 Red River Bridge Replacement, Texas and Oklahoma. For the Texas Department of Transportation.

Project Manager/Principal Investigator/Diving Supervisor/GIS Specialist. Cultural Resources Investigation for the Copano Bay Causeway Replacement, Texas. For the Texas Department of Transportation.

Project Manager/Principal Investigator/Diving Supervisor/GIS Specialist. Denbury Green Pipeline Project, Galveston Bay, Texas. For Denbury Green Pipeline – Texas, LLC.

Project Manager/Remote-Sensing Specialist/GIS Specialist. Water Bottom Assessment of Public Oyster Seed Ground, Morgan Harbor, Louisiana. For the Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries.

Maritime Archaeologist/Remote-Sensing Specialist/CADD Specialist. Lake Mead Remote-Sensing Survey, Nevada. For the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

Project Archaeologist/Diving Supervisor. Phase II and III Investigation of the American Civil War Vessel USS Westfield, Galveston Bay, Texas. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District.

Project Archaeologist/Lead Diver. National Register of Historic Places Evaluations of Submerged Sites on the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf – Field Season II. For the Minerals Management Service.

Project Archaeologist/Lead Diver. National Register of Historic Places Evaluations of Submerged Sites on the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf – Field Season I. For the Minerals Management Service.

Project Manager/Principal Investigator/CADD Specialist. Sabine/Neches Waterway Remote-Sensing Survey, Texas. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District.

Project Manager/Principal Investigator/CADD Specialist. Big Reef Marsh Beach Nourishment Remote-Sensing Survey and Anomaly Investigation, Galveston Bay, Texas. For the Texas General Land Office.

Project Archaeologist/Diving Supervisor. Barge Lanes Diving Assessment of Five Localities, Galveston Bay, Texas. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District).

Principal Investigator/CADD Specialist. Lake Wylie Remote-Sensing Survey, South Carolina. For the South Carolina Dept of Transportation.

Project Archaeologist/Diving Supervisor/CADD Specialist. Corpus Christi Ship Channel Diving Assessment of Nine Anomalies and National Register Testing of the Dayton and Utina, Texas. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston District.

Page 155: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael Arbuthnot, M.S., RPA Principal Investigator

Northeast Florida Office Michael A. Arbuthnot, M.S., has supervised archaeology in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, California, Japan, the North Atlantic, and the Caribbean since 1997. He has experience assessing and evaluating sites for National Register eligibility, and has overseen numerous terrestrial and underwater projects, including an expedition to R.M.S. Titanic for the Discovery Channel. Mr. Arbuthnot has an extensive range of experiences, having provided services for the military, as well as the energy, transportation, and private sectors. He has surveyed, mapped, excavated, and analyzed, gathered and interpreted remote sensing data, and has produced reports on a diverse variety of archaeological sites. Mr. Arbuthnot’s research has been presented at numerous conferences, including the annual meeting of the Society of American Archaeology and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference. Mr. Arbuthnot hosted a television series about archaeology called Secret Worlds with Michael Arbuthnot, which continues to air on Travel Channel and History Channel. He has a demonstrated understanding of the pertinent laws and procedures necessary for compliance with Federal and state regulatory agencies, and his qualifications exceed those set forth by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716-42). EDUCATION M.S., / 2002 / Anthropology/Underwater Archaeology / Florida State University B.A., / 1996 / Philosophy / University of California at Santa Barbara RESEARCH SPECIALIZATIONS Submerged Prehistoric Archaeology Paleolandscape Reconstruction Media Production PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2010 – present — Principal Investigator, Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. 2008 – present — Advisor/Host for Archaeology Program, Travel Channel. 2002 – 2010 — Principal Investigator, Environmental Sciences, Inc. 2005 — Principal Investigator/Archaeologist, Earthship Productions. 2004 – 2007 — Adjunct Professor of Archaeology, Flagler College. 2002 — Researcher, Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 1999 – 2002 — Research and Teaching Assistant, Florida State University. 1997 — Underwater Archaeologist, Ball State University. PROJECT EXPERIENCE (Select List) Principal Investigator. Dredge Monitoring, St. Augustine Beach Re-nourishment Project, St. Johns County, Florida. For St. Augustine Lighthouse and Museum/Great Lakes Dredging.

Principal Investigator. Underwater Archaeological Investigations at Homosassa Springs State Park, Citrus County, Florida. For the Department of Environmental Protection.

Page 156: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael Arbuthnot, M.S. Principal Investigator

www.searchinc.com 2 michael.arbuthnot@searchinc .com

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey for the Dania Canal Dredging Corridor, Broward County, Florida. For Taylor Engineering/Florida Inland Navigation District.

Maritime Archaeologist. Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey of the Martin County Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Project, Beach Re-nourishment Area, Martin County, Florida. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey for the Proposed Goodby’s Creek Dredging Corridor, Duval County, Florida. For CH2M Hill Engineering.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey for the Proposed Cumberland Harbour South Point Village Marine, Camden County, Georgia. For Land Resource Companies.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey for the Proposed US 17 Washington Bypass Corridor, Beaufort County, North Carolina. For the North Carolina Department of Transportation.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey and Diver Investigation of Currituck Sound, Eastern NC Natural Gas Pipeline Phase VIIB, Currituck and Dare counties, NC. For Eastern North Carolina Natural Gas.

Principal Investigator. ROV Survey of RMS Titanic’s Interior Bow Structure, North Atlantic. For Earthship Productions/Discovery Channel. Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey and Diver Investigation for the Liberty Harbor Marina, Glynn County, Georgia. For W.W. Group Holdings, Inc.

QAQC Internal Reviewer. Prehistoric Site Potential and Historic Shipwrecks on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf, Outer Continental Shelf Study. For the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE), Atlantic OCS Region.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey and Diver Investigation for the Proposed Antigua at St. Augustine Marina, St. Johns County, Florida. For Hudson Capital, Inc.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey and Diver Investigation for the proposed Dolphin Reef Marina, Duval County, Florida. For Hudson Capital, Inc.

Principal Investigator. Remote Sensing Survey and Diver Investigation for the Proposed Fishing Creek Dredging Corridor, Duval County, Florida. For Prosser Hallock, Inc.

Maritime Archaeologist. Maritime Artifact Collection, Intensive Underwater Mapping and Archival Research of the 3-masted Schooner, Geneva Kathleen, Cayman Islands, British West Indies. For Ball State University.

Page 157: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael Arbuthnot, M.S. Principal Investigator

www.searchinc.com 3 michael.arbuthnot@searchinc .com

Maritime Archaeologist. Artifact Collection, Intensive Underwater Mapping in Ballast Cove, Dog Island Shipwreck Survey, Dog Island, Franklin County, Florida. For Florida State University.

Page 158: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael Cameron Krivor, M.A., RPA Maritime Project Manager/Principal Investigator

North Gulf Coast, Florida Office Michael C. Krivor, M.A. serves as a Project Manager and Principal Investigator with the SEARCH Maritime Division. In 1990, Mr. Krivor received his Bachelor of Arts. in Aquatic Archaeology from Humboldt State University in Arcata, California and in 1998 he received his Master of Arts from the Program in Maritime History and Nautical Archaeology at East Carolina University. His academic research focused on shipwreck investigations along the east coast of the United States, Bermuda, and the Dominican Republic, and his thesis centered on the investigation of an 18th century British Transport that foundered off Bermuda during the American Revolution. In 1996, Mr. Krivor began professional work as a maritime archaeologist, and has served on over 130 SCRM projects, authored over 73 reports, and presented 22 professional papers. Proficient in all aspects of underwater archaeology, Mr. Krivor’s specialties include 18th-19th century New World ship construction, Western River steamboat construction, Civil War wreck sites, and small vernacular craft construction. He also has experience in remote sensing survey, data analysis, and archaeological site layout, scaled mapping, and measured sketching and photography. Mr. Krivor is on the Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA) and has been certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Dive Safety Program. Michael Krivor’s qualifications exceed those set forth by the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716-42). EDUCATION M.A. / 1998 / Maritime History and Nautical Archaeology / East Carolina University B.A. / 1990 / Aquatic Archaeology / Humboldt State University RESEARCH SPECIALIZATIONAS Submerged Cultural Resource Management Maritime Archaeology Remote Sensing Survey Scientific Diving PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2006-present Principal Investigator, Maritime Division, Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. 1996-2006 Principal Investigator/Remote Sensing Specialist, Panamerican Consultants, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. 1993-1995 Graduate Assistant. Manuscripts and Archives Division of the Joyner Library, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina. 1993 Conservation Assistant. Corange Laboratory, Bermuda Maritime Museum, Bermuda. 1987-1990 Dive Safety Officer Assistant. Humboldt State University Dive Program, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California. PROJECT EXPERIENCE (Select List)

Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Survey for Fort San Geronimo, San Juan, Puerto Rico. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Submerged Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey of Proposed Offshore Sand Source Area 5, St. Lucie County, Florida. For Coastal Technology Corporation, Vero Beach, Florida.

Page 159: Sample Digital Brochure

Michael Krivor, M.A. Maritime Project Manager/Principal Investigator

www.searchinc.com 2 [email protected]

Principal Investigator. Cultural Remote Sensing Survey of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Manatee, Pinellas, and Hillsborough Counties, Florida. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment Survey from St. George Island to Eastpoint Transmission Line Rebuild Project, Franklin County, Florida. For Progress Energy, St. Petersburg, Florida. Maritime Archaeologist. Archeological Diver Identification and Evaluation of Twenty-Eight Potentially Significant Submerged Targets, St. Johns County Beach Erosion Control Project, St. Johns County, Florida. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Historic Assessment and Remote Sensing Survey of the St. Johns County Beach Erosion Control Project, St. Johns County, Florida. For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of John’s Pass and Blind Pass, Pinellas County, Florida. Prepared under contract to Dial Cordy and Associates, Inc., Jacksonville Beach, Florida for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Historic Assessment and Remote Sensing Survey of the Dade County Beach Erosion Control Project Remaining Sand Source, Miami-Dade County, Florida. For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey, Ballantrae Yacht Club, North Fork of the St. Lucie River, St. Lucie County, Florida. For Ballantrae Enterprises, LLC., Port St. Lucie, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Submerged Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey, JEA 36-inch Potable Water Line, St. Johns River, Duval County, Florida. For The Phoenix Environmental Group, Jacksonville, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist and Archaeological Diver. Phase II Underwater Archaeological Evaluation of Targets M012 and M-14, Naval Station Mayport, Duval County, Florida. For NAVFAC Southeast, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Diver Identification and Evaluation of Three Potentially Significant Submerged Targets Duval Shore Protection Project, Duval County, Florida. For U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Principal Investigator. Historic Assessment and Submerged Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey of Four Borrow Areas for Martin & St. Lucie Counties Shore Protection Projects, Florida. For the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida. Remote Sensing Specialist. Cultural Resources Remote Sensing Survey for Tampa Port Authority’s East Port Development, Berths 150, 151, 152, East Bay, Hillsborough County, Florida. For Tampa Port Authority, Tampa, Florida.

Page 160: Sample Digital Brochure

RFP_CCNA_Template_RevisedJune2009

Attachment 8: Reference Questionnaire

Solicitation: CCNA Solicitation 11-5772 - Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches Reference Questionnaire for: Taylor Engineering, Inc. (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Michael Trudnak (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Richard Bouchard (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire)

Company: St. Lucie County Erosion District (Evaluator’s Company completing reference)

Email: [email protected]

FAX: (772) 462-2362 Telephone: (772) 462-1710

Collier County is implementing a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisifed (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/indivdiual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored “0.” Project Description: Ft. Pierce Emergency Beach Fill

Completion Date: _April 28, 2011_________________

Project Budget: Fees: $157,395.00 Construction: $1,190,950.63

Project Number of Days: _____23_ ______________

Change Orders - Dollars Added : __N/A____________

Change Orders - Days Added: ___N/A____________

Item Citeria Score 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope).

10

2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on-time or early).

10

3 Quality of work.

10

4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project.

10

5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel.

10

6 Close out project process (final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.)

10

7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly.

10

8 Abiltity to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances.

10

9 Ability to follow County policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc.

10

10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction).

10

TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 Please FAX this completed survey to: __904-731-9847_____________________________ By October 6, 2011

Page 161: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 162: Sample Digital Brochure

RFP: RFP C

Solic Refe (N (N Nam Email Colliethe sclientyour againhave Proje Proje Chan

Ite1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Pleas

11-5772 CCNA Template_

citation:

rence Questio

Name of Com

Name of Indiv

e: (Evaluator

l:

er County is iselection of firt for which theknowledge o

n) and 1 repree sufficient kno

ect Descriptio

ect Budget: __

nge Orders - D

em 1 Ability to

2 Ability to

3 Quality

4 Quality

5 Profess

6 Close o

forward

7 Ability to

8 Abiltity t

9 Ability to

0 Overall

se FAX this c

_06012011

onnaire for:

pany Reques

viduals Reque

completing re

mplementing rms to performey have previn a scale of 1esenting that owledge of pa

n: ________

___________

Dollars Added

o manage the

o maintain pro

of work.

of consultativ

ionalism and

ut project prodocumentatio

o verbally com

to manage ris

o follow Coun

comfort level

completed sur

Atta

sting Referenc

esting Referen

eference ques

F

a process tham this project.iously perform1 to 10, with 1you were verast performan

____________

___________

d : _________

e project costs

oject schedul

ve advice prov

ability to man

ocess (final pron, etc.)

mmunicate an

sks and unexp

nty policies, pr

with hiring th

TOTAL SCOrvey to: _____

achment 8: R

ce Informatio

nce Informatio

stionnaire)

FAX:

at collects ref. The Name omed work. Ple0 representin

ry unsatisfied nce in a partic

_________

__________

__________

Citerias (minimize c

e (complete o

vided on the p

nage personn

roduct turnove

nd document

pected projec

rocedures, ru

he company in

ORE OF ALL I___________

Reference Qu

n)

on)

Company: (

ference informof the Compaease completng that you we(and would n

cular area, lea

Completion

Project Num

Change Ord

hange orders

on-time or ea

project.

nel.

er; invoices; m

information c

ct circumstanc

ules, regulatio

n the future (c

ITEMS ___________

uestionnaire

(Evaluator’s C

T

mation on firmany listed in thte the surveyere very satis

never hire theave it blank a

Date: ______

mber of Days:

ders - Days A

s to scope).

rly).

manuals or go

clearly and su

ces.

ons, etc.

customer sati

____________

Company com

Telephone:

ms and their khe Subject ab. Please rate sifed (and woe firm/indivdiund the item o

___________

___________

Added: _____

oing

ccinctly.

sfaction).

____ By ___

mpleting refere

key personnelbove has listeeach criteriauld hire the fial again). If y

or form will be

___________

____________

____________

Score

____________

3

ence)

l to be used ind you as a to the best ofrm/individual you do not

e scored “0.”

____

___

___

____

5

n

f

kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
October 6, 2011
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
904-731-9847
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Taylor Engineering, Inc.
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Jonathan Armbruster
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Kimberly Miranda
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Palm Beach County DERM
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
(561) 233-2414
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
(561) 233-2465
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Dubois Park Redevelopment & Seawall Replacement
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
Design & Permitting
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
12/2010
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
2006 - 2010
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
9
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
9
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
10
KMiranda
Typewritten Text
~$430,000.00
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
CCNA Solicitation 11-5772 - Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South Beaches
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
98
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Page 163: Sample Digital Brochure
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
98
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
kellrodt
Typewritten Text
Page 164: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 165: Sample Digital Brochure

Acceptance of Conditions

Design, Engineering and Permitting Services Re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco

Island South Beaches – RFP#11-5772

Taylor Engineering has reviewed the general terms and conditions of the RFP, the insurance requirements, the Standard County Professional Services Agreement, and all other requirements listed in the RFP. Exceptions to the general terms and conditions of this RFP are marked with tracked changes on the following pages.

Page 166: Sample Digital Brochure

CCNA (R

In acc

RPa

This pdocumaward,

Revision 6/11)

Rcordance w

BOA

Desige-nou

ass, Pa

roposal solment made b

or any othe

REQUwith Florid

ARD O

gn, Enrishmeark Sh

icitation doby the Vendoer legal reme

UESTda Statute

COLOF CO

CCN

ngineeent of

hore, N

Scott

cument is por may be gedies availa

T FOR 287.055,

LLIEROUNTY

NA So11-5

ring athe B

NaplesBeac

Scot239/252-8

239/25

tJohnson@

prepared ingrounds for able to the C

R PRConsulta

R COUY COM

olicita5772 nd Pearefoos, and ches t Johns8995 (Telep

52-6588 (F

@colliergo

n a Microsorejection of

Collier Count

OPOnts’ Comp

NTY MMISS

tion

ermittinot, VanMarco

son phone)

Fax)

ov.net (Em

oft Word forproposal, c

ty Governm

OSALSpetitive Ne

SIONE

ng Sernderbio Islan

ail)

rmat. Any cancellation ent.

S egotiation A

ERS

rvices lt, Cla

nd Sou

alterations of any subs

Act.

am uth

to this sequent

Page 167: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

2

Table of Contents

LEGAL NOTICE .............................................................................................................. 33 EXHIBIT I: SCOPE OF WORK, SPECIFICATIONS AND RESPONSE FORMAT ........ 44 EXHIBIT II: GENERAL RFP INSTRUCTIONS ........................................................... 1111 EXHIBIT III: COLLIER COUNTY PURCHASE ORDER TERMS AND CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 1515 EXHIBIT IV: ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR RFP .......................... 1919 ATTACHMENT 1: VENDOR’S NON-RESPONSE STATEMENT .............................. 2626 ATTACHMENT 2: VENDOR CHECK LIST ................................................................ 2727 ATTACHMENT 3: CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFFIDAVIT ....................................... 2828 ATTACHMENT 4: VENDOR DECLARATION STATEMENT .................................... 2929 ATTACHMENT 5: IMMIGRATION AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION ............................ 3131

ATTACHMENT 6: VENDOR SUBSTITUTE W – 9 .................................................... 3232

ATTACHMENT 7: INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS ....................... 3333 ATTACHMENT 8: REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................ 3535

Page 168: Sample Digital Brochure

PursuaEnginePass, NapleDepar

11-5

Servicand Pe A non-prompDepar If this presen All staCollier Collierdisabi This Pwww.cGover

ant to appreering and Park Shore

es local timrtment, 332

5772 DesigVande

ces to be prermitting S

-mandatoryptly at 10:00rtment, 332

pre-proposnt in order

atements shr County P

r County dolity or marit

Public Noticcolliergov.nrnment Cen

roval by the Permittinge, Naples,

me, on Oct27 Tamiam

gn, Engineerbilt, Clam

rovided shaServices for

y pre-propo0 am., and

27 Tamiam

sal confereto submit a

hall be madurchasing

oes not distal status.

ce was posnet/purchasnter on Sep

e County Mg Services fand Marcoober 13, 2i Trail E, N

eering and m Pass, Pa

all include,r Beach Re

osal confer will be heli Trail E, N

nce is denoa proposal

de upon theDepartmen

scriminate b

sted on the sing and inptember 14

Legal

Manager, Sfor the Re-o Island So2011 at the aples, FL 3

CCNAPermitting

ark Shore,

but not bee-Nourishm

rence will bd in the Coaples, FL 3

oted at “maresponse.

e official prnt E-Procur

based on a

BOACO

BY:Pur

Collier Co the Lobby

4, 2011.

G/Current-So

Notice

ealed Prop-nourishmeouth Beache

Collier Co34112.

A Solicitatg Services, Naples, a

e limited to ment

be held on ollier Count34112

andatory”,

roposal formrement web

age, race, c

ARD OF CLLIER CO

: /S/ Steprchasing &

unty Purchy of Purcha

olicitation Temp

posals to prent of the Bes will be runty Gover

ion s for the Rand Marco

the followin

Septemberty Governm

prospectiv

m which mbsite: www

color, sex, r

COUNTY CUNTY, FLO

phen Y. CaGeneral S

hasing Depsing Buildi

plate\RFP_CCN

rovide 11-5Barefoot, Vareceived unrnment, Pu

Re-nourisho Island So

ng: Design

r 28, 2011,ment, Purch

e proposer

must be obtaw.colliergov

religion, na

OMMISSIOORIDA,

rnell, C.P.Mervices Dir

artment weng "G", Co

NATemplate_0RFP_CCNAT

5772 Desiganderbilt, Cntil 3:00 pmurchasing

ment of thouth Beach

n, Engineer

, commenchasing

rs must be

ained only v.net/bid.

ational origi

ONERS

M. rector

ebsite: ollier County

06012011 Template

3

gn, Clam m,

he Barefoohes

ring

cing

on the

in,

y

ot,

Page 169: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

4

Exhibit I: Scope of Work, Specifications and Response Format

As requested by the Collier County Coastal Zone Management Department (hereinafter, the “Division or Department”), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Department (hereinafter, “County”) has issued this Request for Proposal (hereinafter, “RFP”) with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified firms in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Vendor, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifications or Scope of Work stated herein. Brief Description of Purchase  The County will be re-nourishing beaches in FY 2013/14. The required services will be Design, Engineering and Permitting services for the re-nourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island South beaches. The County reserves the right to award this contract to two (2) different firms. Detailed Scope of Work Project # 1 Renourishment of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples beaches Coastal Planning and Engineering has completed the conceptual design for the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples beaches. A draft of the conceptual design report will be issued by 9/16/2011. Construction of the Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples beaches is expected to begin 11/1/2013 and be completed by 5/1/2014. This project is expected to be coordinated and bid with the Captiva Erosion Control District project that is being developed in conjunction with this project. A construction budget of $25M has been established for this project. However, scope adjustments will be most likely be required as state and federal funding sources are resolved. This RFP will select a consultant that will complete the execution of this project consistent with the conceptual design to include, but not be limited to:

1. Pre-application meeting with FDEP 2. Pre-construction survey to include beach, side scan and environmental aerials 3. Pre-construction biological reef and hardbottom monitoring and report 4. Hardbottom mapping and ground truthing 5. Pipeline corridor mapping

Three new routes (environmental clearing) Operational Areas for Booster Pumps – possibility of three new locations New Hardbottom Clearing for Barefoot Beach

6. Special design Survey for structures, ECL and 3D design Design survey R8 to R85

Page 170: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

5

Survey and process ECL (Barefoot and Clam Pass Park) Survey new structural foundation areas for erosion control structures Survey intermediate lines for 3D design around hardbottom Borrow area survey

7. 3D Design/Plans Update (area around hardbottom) and new reaches Clam Pass Park and Barefoot Beach Address Hot Spots and hardbottom avoidance with intermediate lines Permit sketches

8. Engineer and design structural modifications or additions 9. Specifications 10. Prepare MMS Environmental assessment 11. Prepare and submit permit modifications to 2005 permit and permit sketches

Environmental Sections changes as a result of learning’s since 2005 Geological sections (with QA/QC Plan) learning’s since 2005 Engineering sections justifications for varying width and height requirements Year-round renourishment condition inclusion into the permit Agency visits Others

12. RAI cycle and meetings 13. Update Biological and physical monitoring plans 14. UMAM assessment of hardbottom coverage 15. Essential Fish Habitat report 16. Biological assessment 17. Bid documents and bidding support 18. Permit modification to the Doctors Pass dredging permit to change the disposal site for

beach sand placement to R57 to R59. 19. Coordination with Captiva Erosion Control District. 20. Construction contract inspection and monitoring (1 day per week) 21. Construction contract volume adjustment by segment and reach. 22. Attendance at weekly coordination meetings 23. Pipeline corridor monitoring during construction 24. Post-construction surveys 25. Record drawings and certification report 26. Agency coordination to include but not limited to National Marine Fisheries, FWS and

FWC. 27. County and contractor coordination 28. USACE permit modification and coordination in conjunction with the FDEP permit

modification. A detailed design schedule based on activities outlined above is expected as part of the submittal package.

Page 171: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

6

Collier County has expended considerable resources in the development of a conceptual design that balances needs for more robust and longer lasting renourishments with available resources. The successful consultant(s) will need to document success in the completion of engineering and permitting activities from a third party conceptual design. Examples of successful project implementation along with key project personnel proposed will be critical to the selection of a consultant. Project # 2 Renourishment of the Marco Island South beach. Coastal Engineering Consultants has completed the conceptual design for the Marco Island South Beach project and a preliminary copy will be available on 9/16/2011. Renourishment of the beach is expected to be completed by 8/2012. Rebuilding of the three existing breakwaters along with the two existing groins will follow the renourishment, along with an anticipated additional groin structure. Renourishment of approximately 104,000 CY’s of beach compatible sand to restore approximately 4,400 feet of beach will be designed and permitted by Coastal Engineering Consultants and is not included as part of this scope package. However, close coordination with Coastal Engineering Consultants is mandatory and will be critical to the successful completion of both projects. This scope of work includes the rebuilding of the five existing erosion control structures and the design and permitting of an additional structure located in the same vicinity. Scope adjustments will be most likely be required as state and federal funding sources are resolved. A detailed design schedule based on activities outlined above is expected as part of the submittal package. This RFP will select a consultant that will complete the execution of this project consistent with the conceptual design to include but not limited to:

1. Pre-application meeting with FDEP 2. Pre-construction beach and structure survey including site aerials 3. Special design Survey for structures, ECL and 3D design

Design survey R144 to G2 Survey and process ECL if required Survey new structural foundation areas for erosion control structures if

recommended in the project scope. 4. Engineer and design structural modifications or additions 5. Specifications 6. Prepare and submit permit application and permit sketches

Agency visits, if required Year round construction permitting RAI cycle and meetings

7. Update to biological monitoring and the physical monitoring plan 8. Biological assessment

Page 172: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

7

9. Bid documents and bidding support 10. Construction contract inspection and monitoring (1 day per week) 11. Attendance at weekly coordination meetings 12. Post-construction surveys 13. Record drawings and certification report 14. Agency coordination to include but not limited to National Marine Fisheries, FWS and

FWC. 15. Coordination with City of Marco Island and Marco Island Beach Committee 16. County and contractor coordination 17. USACE permit modification and coordination in conjunction with new FDEP permit.

A detailed design schedule based on activities outlined above is expected as part of the submittal package. Collier County has expended considerable resources in the development of a conceptual design that balances needs for more robust and longer lasting renourishments with available resources. Consultant will need to document success in the completion of engineering and permitting activities from a third party conceptual design. Examples of successful project implementation along with key project personnel proposed will be critical to the selection of this consultant. Term of Contract

The contract term, if an award(s) is/are made is intended to be for the duration of the Construction Project(s).

Prices shall remain firm for the initial term of this contract. Requests for consideration of a price adjustment must be made on the contract anniversary date, in writing, to the Purchasing Director. Price adjustments are dependent upon budget availability and program manager approval. Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this contract, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure.

Projected Solicitation Timetable

The following projected timetable should be used as a working guide for planning purposes only. The County reserves the right to adjust this timetable as required during the course of the RFP process.

Event DateIssue Solicitation Notice 9/13/11 Last Date for Receipt of Written Questions 9/30/11, 12 Noon,

Naples Local Time Non-mandatory pre-solicitation meeting 9/28/11, 10:00AM,

Naples Local Time and Locations

Page 173: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

8

Addendum Issued Resulting from Written Questions or Pre-Proposal Conference

10/1/2011

Solicitation Deadline Date and Time 10/13/2011, 3:00PM, Naples Local Time

Anticipated Evaluation of Submittals 10/13 thru 11/15/2011 Vendor Presentations if Required N/A Anticipated Completion of Contract Negotiations 12/1/2011 Anticipated Board of County Commissioner’s Contract Approval Date

12/13/2011

Response Format

The Vendor understands and agrees to abide by all of the RFP specifications, provisions, terms and conditions of same, and all ordinances and policies of Collier County. The Vendor further agrees that if the contract is awarded the work will be performed in accordance with the provisions, terms and conditions of the contract.

To facilitate the fair evaluation and comparison of proposals, all proposals must conform to the guidelines set forth in this RFP. Any portions of the proposal that do not comply with these guidelines must be so noted and explained in the Acceptance of Conditions section of the proposal. However, any proposal that contains such variances may be considered non-responsive. Proposals should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward concise description of the Vendor’s approach and ability to meet the County’s needs, as stated in the RFP. All proposals should be presented as described in the RFP in PDF or Microsoft Word format with Tabs clearly marked. If applicable, the utilization of recycled paper for proposal submission is strongly encouraged. The items listed below shall be submitted with each proposal and should be submitted in the order shown. Each section should be clearly labeled, with pages numbered and separated by tabs. Failure by a Vendor to include all listed items may result in the rejection of its proposal.

1. Tab I, Cover Letter / Management Summary

Provide a cover letter, signed by an authorized officer of the firm, indicating the underlying philosophy of the firm in providing the services stated herein. Include the name(s), telephone number(s) and email(s) of the authorized contact person(s) concerning proposal. Submission of a signed Proposal is Vendor's certification that the Vendor will accept any awards as a result of this RFP.

2. Tab II, Business Plan (15)

In this tab, include:

Description of the proposed contract team and the role to be played by each member of the proposed team.

Page 174: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

9

Detailed plan of approach (including major tasks and sub-tasks). Detailed time line for completion of the project. Include with the Business Plan or as an attachment, a copy of a report as an

example of work product. This should be for one of the projects listed as a reference.

3. Tab III, Experience and Capacity of Firm (35)

Provide information that documents your firm’s and subcontractors’ qualifications to produce the required deliverables, including abilities, capacity, skill, and financial strength, and number of years of experience in providing the required services. Also describe the various team members’ successful experience in working with one another on previous projects.

4. Tab IV, Specialized Expertise of Team Members (30)

Attach resumes of all proposed project team members who will be involved in the management of the total package of services, as well as the delivery of specific services. The same should be done for any sub-consultants. If sub-consultants are being utilized, letters of intent from stated sub-consultants must be included with proposal submission.

5. Tab V, References – 5 Completed and Returned (20)

In order for the vendor to be awarded any points for this tab, the County requests that the vendor submits five (5) completed reference forms from clients whose projects are of a similar nature to this solicitation as a part of their proposal. The County will only use the methodology calculations for the first five (5) references (only) submitted by the vendor in their proposal. Prior to the Selection Committee reviewing proposals, the following methodology will be applied to each vendor’s information provided in this area: The County shall total each of the vendor’s five reference questionnaires and create

a ranking from highest number of points to lowest number of points. References marked with an N/A (or similar notation will be given the score of zero (0). Vendors who do not turn in reference forms will be counted as zero (0).

The greatest number of points allowed in this criterion will be awarded to the vendor who has the highest score.

The next highest vendor’s number of points will be divided by the highest vendor’s points which will then be multiplied by criteria points to determine the vendor’s points awarded. Each subsequent vendor’s point score will be calculated in the same manner.

Points awarded will be extended to the first decimal point (per Microsoft Excel).

List Current Projects in the Format Identified Below

Project Description Start Date End Date Original

Budget Final Project

Cost Number of

Change Orders

Page 175: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

10

For illustrative purposes only, see chart for an example of how these points would be distributed among the five proposers.

Vendor Name Vendor Total Reference Score Points Awarded

Vendor ABC 445 20 Vendor DEF 435 19.6 Vendor GHI 425 19.1 Vendor JKL 385 17.3 Vendor MNO 385 17.3 Vendor PQR 250 11.2

Note: Sample chart reflects a 20 point reference criterion. The points awarded by vendor will be distributed to the Selection Committee prior to their evaluation of the proposals. The Selection Committee will review the vendor’s proposal to ensure consistency and completion of all tasks in the RFP, and review the Points Awarded per vendor. The Selection Committee may, at their sole discretion, contact references, and/or modify the reference points assigned after a thorough review of the proposal and prior to final ranking by the final Selection Committee.

6. Tab VI, Acceptance of Conditions

Indicate any exceptions to the general terms and conditions of the RFP, and to insurance requirements or any other requirements listed in the RFP. This would also include any exceptions to terms and conditions of the standard County Professional Service Agreement. If no exceptions are indicated in this tabbed section, it will be understood that no exceptions to these documents will be considered after the award, or if applicable, during negotiations. Exceptions taken by a Vendor may result in evaluation point deduction(s) and/or exclusion of proposal for Selection Committee consideration, depending on the extent of the exception(s). Such determination shall be at the sole discretion of the County and Selection Committee.

7. Tab VII, Required Form Submittals

Attachment 2: Vendor Checklist Attachment 3: Conflict of Interest Affidavit Attachment 4: Vendor Declaration Form’ Attachment 5: Immigration Affidavit and company’s E-Verify profile page and

memorandum of understanding Attachment 6: Vendor Substitute 9 Attachment 7: Insurance Requirements Attachment 8: Reference Questionnaire

Page 176: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

11

Exhibit II: General RFP Instructions 1. Questions

Direct questions related to this RFP to the Collier County Purchasing Department E-Procurement website: www.colliergov.net/bid. Vendors must clearly understand that the only official answer or position of the County will be the one stated on the Collier County Purchasing Department E-Procurement website. For general questions, please call the referenced Procurement Strategist noted on the cover page.

2. Pre-Proposal Conference

The purpose of the pre-proposal conference is to allow an open forum for discussion and questioning with County staff regarding the RFP with all prospective Vendors having an equal opportunity to hear and participate. Oral questions will receive oral responses, neither of which will be official, nor become part of the RFP. Only written responses to written questions will be considered official, and will be included as part of the RFP as an addendum. All prospective Vendors are strongly encouraged to attend, as, this will usually be the only pre-proposal conference for this solicitation. If this pre-proposal conference is denoted as “mandatory”, prospective Vendors must be present in order to submit a proposal response.

3. Compliance with the RFP

Proposals must be in strict compliance with this RFP. Failure to comply with all provisions of the RFP may result in disqualification.

4. Ambiguity, Conflict, or Other Errors in the RFP

It is the sole responsibility of the Vendor if the Vendor discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission or other error in the RFP, to immediately notify the Procurement Strategist, noted herein, of such error in writing and request modification or clarification of the document prior to submitting the proposal. The Procurement Strategist will make modifications by issuing a written revision and will give written notice to all parties who have received this RFP from the Purchasing Department.

5. Proposal, Presentation, and Protest Costs

The County will not be liable in any way for any costs incurred by any Vendor in the preparation of its proposal in response to this RFP, nor for the presentation of its proposal and/or participation in any discussions, negotiations, or, if applicable, any protest procedures.

Page 177: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

12

6. Delivery of Proposals

All proposals are to be delivered before 3:00 PM, Naples local time, on or before October 7, 2011 to:

Collier County Government Purchasing Department 3327 Tamiami Trail E Naples FL 34112 Attn: Scott Johnson Procurement Strategist

The County shall not bear the responsibility for proposals delivered to the Purchasing Department past the stated date and/or time indicated, or to an incorrect address by Vendor’s personnel or by the Vendor’s outside carrier. However, the Purchasing/General Services Director, or designee, shall reserve the right to accept proposals received after the posted close time under the following conditions:

The tardy submission of the proposal is due to the following circumstances, which shall include but not be limited to: late delivery by commercial carrier such as Fed Ex, UPS or courier where delivery was scheduled before the deadline.

The acceptance of said proposal does not afford any competing firm an unfair advantage in the selection process.

Vendors must submit One (1) paper copies with one copy clearly labeled “Master,” and seven (7) compact disks (CD’s) with one copy of the proposal on each CD in Word, Excel or PDF. List the Solicitation Number and Title on the outside of the box or envelope.

7. Validity of Proposals

No proposal can be withdrawn after it is filed unless the Vendor makes their request in writing to the County prior to the time set for the closing of Proposals. All proposals shall be valid for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the submission date to accommodate evaluation and selection process.

8. Method of Source Selection

The County is using the Competitive Sealed Proposals methodology of source selection for this procurement, as authorized by Ordinance Number 87-25, and Collier County Resolution Number 2006-268 establishing and adopting the Collier County Purchasing Policy. The County may, as it deems necessary, conduct discussions with qualified Vendors determined to be in contention for being selected for award for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of, and responsiveness to solicitation requirements.

9. Evaluation of Proposals Collier County will evaluate and select these Services in accordance with Florida Statute 287.055, Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act.

The County’s procedure for selecting is as follows:

Page 178: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

13

1. The County Manager shall appoint a Selection Committee to review all proposals

submitted. 2. Request for Proposals issued. 3. Subsequent to the closing of proposals, the Procurement Strategist and Project

Manager shall review the proposals received and verify whether each proposal appears to be minimally responsive to the requirements of the published RFP.

4. Meetings shall be open to the public and the Procurement Strategist shall publicly post prior notice of such meeting in the lobby of the Purchasing Building at least one (1) day in advance of all such meetings.

5. The committee members shall review each Proposal individually and score each proposal based on the evaluation criteria stated herein.

6. Prior to the first meeting of the selection committee, the Procurement Strategist will post a notice announcing the date, time and place of the first committee meeting. Said notice shall be posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building not less than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. The Procurement Strategist shall also post prior notice of all subsequent committee meetings and shall endeavor to post such notices at least one (1) day in advance of all subsequent meetings.

7. Collier County will consider all the material submitted by the Proposer and other information Collier County may obtain to determine whether the Proposer is capable of and has a history of successfully completing projects of this type, including, without limitation, additional information Collier County may request, interviews, or oral presentations.

8. The Selection Committee, as approved by the County Manager, will review, evaluate and rank all responsive proposals received from Proposers responding to this RFP. The committee members shall score each Proposal in accordance with the rating criteria set forth below and may, at their discretion, schedule presentations from any firms submitting a proposal. The Selection Committee will rank qualified firms in order of preference and by consensus using all information presented to the Committee, choose the top ranked firm and will subsequently enter into negotiations with the top ranked firm. Award of the contract is dependent upon the successful and full execution of a mutually agreed contract.

9. Negotiations shall begin with the top-ranked firm(s) in accordance with Florida Statute 287.055.

10. Upon the successful completion of negotiations, contracts will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval.

The County reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time and for any reason, and to issue such clarifications, modifications, addendums, and/or amendments as it may deem appropriate, including, but not limited, to requesting supplemental proposal information. Receipt of a proposal by the County or a submission of a proposal to the County offers no rights upon the Vendor nor obligates the County in any manner. Acceptance of the proposal does not guarantee issuance of any other governmental approvals. Proposals which include provisions requiring the granting of zoning variances shall not be considered.

Page 179: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

14

10. References

The County reserves the right to contact any and all references submitted as a result of this solicitation.

11. Proposal Selection Committee and Evaluation Factors

The County Manager shall appoint a Selection Committee to review all proposals submitted. The factors to be considered in the evaluation of proposal responses are listed below.

Management Summary 0 Pts Business Plan 15 Pts Experience and Capacity of the Firm 35 Pts Specialized Expertise of Team Members 30 Pts Customer and Reference Listing 20 Pts TOTAL 100 Pts

Tie Breaker: In the event of a tie, both in individual scoring and in final ranking, the firm with the lowest paid dollars by Collier County to the vendor (as obtained from the County’s financial system) within the last five (5) years will receive the higher individual ranking. This information will be based on information provided by the Vendor, subject to verification at the County’s option. If there is a multiple firm tie in either individual scoring or final ranking, the firm with the lowest volume of work shall receive the higher ranking, the firm with the next lowest volume of work shall receive the next highest ranking and so on.

12. Acceptance or Rejection of Proposals

The right is reserved by the County to waive any irregularities in any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to re-solicit for proposals, if desired, and upon recommendation and justification by Collier County to accept the proposal which in the judgment of the County is deemed the most advantageous for the public and the County of Collier. Any proposal which is incomplete, conditional, obscure or which contains irregularities of any kind, may be cause for rejection. In the event of default of the successful Vendor, or their refusal to enter into the Collier County contract, the County reserves the right to accept the proposal of any other Vendor or to re-advertise using the same or revised documentation, at its sole discretion.

Page 180: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

15

Exhibit III: Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions 1. Offer

This offer is subject to cancellation by the COUNTY without notice if not accepted by VENDOR within fourteen (14) days of issuance.

2. Acceptance and Confirmation

This Purchase Order (including all documents attached to or referenced therein) constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, unless otherwise specifically noted by the COUNTY on the face of this Purchase Order. Each delivery of goods and/or services received by the COUNTY from VENDOR shall be deemed to be upon the terms and conditions contained in this Purchase Order.

No additional terms may be added and Purchase Order may not be changed except by written instrument executed by the COUNTY. VENDOR is deemed to be on notice that the COUNTY objects to any additional or different terms and conditions contained in any acknowledgment, invoice or other communication from VENDOR, notwithstanding the COUNTY’S acceptance or payment for any delivery of goods and/or services, or any similar act by VENDOR.

3. Inspection

All goods and/or services delivered hereunder shall be received subject to the COUNTY’S inspection and approval and payment therefore shall not constitute acceptance. All payments are subject to adjustment for shortage or rejection. All defective or nonconforming goods will be returned pursuant to VENDOR'S instruction at VENDOR’S expense. To the extent that a purchase order requires a series of performances by VENDOR, the COUNTY prospectively reserves the right to cancel the entire remainder of the Purchase Order if goods and/or services provided early in the term of the Purchase Order are non-conforming or otherwise rejected by the COUNTY.

4. Shipping and Invoices a) All goods are FOB destination and must

be suitably packed and prepared to secure the lowest transportation rates

and to comply with all carrier regulations. Risk of loss of any goods sold hereunder shall transfer to the COUNTY at the time and place of delivery; provided that risk of loss prior to actual receipt of the goods by the COUNTY nonetheless remain with VENDOR.

b) No charges will be paid by the COUNTY for packing, crating or cartage unless otherwise specifically stated in this Purchase Order. Unless otherwise provided in Purchase Order, no invoices shall be issued nor payments made prior to delivery. Unless freight and other charges are itemized, any discount will be taken on the full amount of invoice.

c) All shipments of goods scheduled on the same day via the same route must be consolidated. Each shipping container must be consecutively numbered and marked to show this Purchase Order number. The container and Purchase Order numbers must be indicated on bill of lading. Packing slips must show Purchase Order number and must be included on each package of less than container load (LCL) shipments and/or with each car load of equipment. The COUNTY reserves the right to refuse or return any shipment or equipment at VENDOR’S expense that is not marked with Purchase Order numbers. VENDOR agrees to declare to the carrier the value of any shipment made under this Purchase Order and the full invoice value of such shipment.

d) All invoices must contain the Purchase Order number and any other specific information as identified on the Purchase Order. Discounts of prompt payment will be computed from the date of receipt of goods or from date of receipt of invoices, whichever is later. Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and in compliance with Chapter 218, Fla. Stats., otherwise known as the “Local Government Prompt Payment Act,” and, pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Purchasing Policy.

Page 181: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

16

5. Time Is Of the Essence Time for delivery of goods or performance of services under this Purchase Order is of the essence. Failure of VENDOR to meet delivery schedules or deliver within a reasonable time, as interpreted by the COUNTY in its sole judgment, shall entitle the COUNTY to seek all remedies available to it at law or in equity. VENDOR agrees to reimburse the COUNTY for any expenses incurred in enforcing its rights. VENDOR further agrees that undiscovered delivery of nonconforming goods and/or services is not a waiver of the COUNTY’S right to insist upon further compliance with all specifications.

6. Changes

The COUNTY may at any time and by written notice make changes to drawings and specifications, shipping instructions, quantities and delivery schedules within the general scope of this Purchase Order. Should any such change increase or decrease the cost of, or the time required for performance of the Purchase Order, an equitable adjustment in the price and/or delivery schedule will be negotiated by the COUNTY and VENDOR. Notwithstanding the foregoing, VENDOR has an affirmative obligation to give notice if the changes will decrease costs. Any claims for adjustment by VENDOR must be made within thirty (30) days from the date the change is ordered or within such additional period of time as may be agreed upon by the parties.

7. Warranties

VENDOR expressly warrants that the goods and/or services covered by this Purchase Order will conform to the specifications, drawings, samples or other descriptions furnished or specified by the COUNTY, and will be of satisfactory material and quality production, free from defects and sufficient for the purpose intended. Goods shall be delivered free from any security interest or other lien, encumbrance or claim of any third party. These warranties shall survive inspection, acceptance, passage of title and payment by the COUNTY.

8. Statutory Conformity

Goods and services provided pursuant to this Purchase Order, and their production

and transportation shall conform to all applicable laws, including but not limited to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, the Federal Transportation Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as any law or regulation noted on the face of the Purchase Order.

9. Advertising

No VENDOR providing goods and services to the COUNTY shall advertise the fact that it has contracted with the COUNTY for goods and/or services, or appropriate or make use of the COUNTY’S name or other identifying marks or property without the prior written consent of the COUNTY’S Purchasing Department.

10. Indemnification

VENDOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY from any and all claims, including claims of negligence, costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, arising from, caused by or related to the injury or death of any person (including but not limited to employees and agents of VENDOR in the performance of their duties or otherwise), or damage to property (including property of the COUNTY or other persons), which arise out of or are incident to the goods and/or services to be provided hereunder.

11. Warranty of Non-Infringement

VENDOR represents and warrants that all goods sold or services performed under this Purchase Order are: a) in compliance with applicable laws; b) do not infringe any patent, trademark, copyright or trade secret; and c) do not constitute unfair competition.

VENDOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY from and against any and all claims, including claims of negligence, costs and expense, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, which arise from any claim, suit or proceeding alleging that the COUNTY’S use of the goods and/or services provided under this Purchase Order are inconsistent with VENDOR'S representations and warranties in section 11 (a). If any claim which arises from VENDOR'S breach of section 11 (a) has occurred, or is

Comment [SJS1]: Replace with: “VENDOR shall perform all of its work to the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by reputable members of VENDOR’ profession.

Comment [SJS2]: Replace with: “to the extent arising from VENDOR’s negligent act, error, or omission.”

Page 182: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

17

likely to occur, VENDOR may, at the COUNTY’S option, procure for the COUNTY the right to continue using the goods or services, or replace or modify the goods or services so that they become non-infringing, (without any material degradation in performance, quality, functionality or additional cost to the COUNTY).

12. Insurance Requirements

The VENDOR, at its sole expense, shall provide commercial insurance of such type and with such terms and limits as may be reasonably associated with the Purchase Order. Providing and maintaining adequate insurance coverage is a material obligation of the VENDOR. All insurance policies shall be executed through insurers authorized or eligible to write policies in the State of Florida.

13. Compliance with Laws In fulfilling the terms of this Purchase Order, VENDOR agrees that it will comply with all federal, state, and local laws, rules, codes, and ordinances that are applicable to the conduct of its business. By way of non-exhaustive example, this shall include the American with Disabilities Act and all prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex creed, national origin, handicap, marital status, or veterans’ status. Further, VENDOR acknowledges and without exception or stipulation shall be fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended. Failure by the awarded firm(s) to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of the award agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate said agreement immediately. Any breach of this provision may be regarded by the COUNTY as a material and substantial breach of the contract arising from this Purchase Order.

14. Force Majeure

Neither the COUNTY nor VENDOR shall be responsible for any delay or failure in performance resulting from any cause beyond their control, including, but without limitation to war, strikes, civil disturbances

and acts of nature. When VENDOR has knowledge of any actual or potential force majeure or other conditions which will delay or threatens to delay timely performance of this Purchase Order, VENDOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respects to what steps VENDOR is taking to complete delivery of the goods and/or services to the COUNTY.

15. Assignment VENDOR may not assign this Purchase Order, nor any money due or to become due without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. Any assignment made without such consent shall be deemed void.

16. Taxes Goods and services procured subject to this Purchase Order are exempt from Florida sales and use tax on real property, transient rental property rented, tangible personal purchased or rented, or services purchased (Florida Statutes, Chapter 212), and from federal excise tax.

17. Annual Appropriations The COUNTY’S performance and obligation to pay under this Purchase Order shall be contingent upon an annual appropriation of funds.

18. Termination This Purchase Order may be terminated at any time by the COUNTY upon 30 days prior written notice to the VENDOR. This Purchase Order may be terminated immediately by the COUNTY for breach by VENDOR of the terms and conditions of this Purchase Order, provided that COUNTY has provided VENDOR with notice of such breach and VENDOR has failed to cure within 10 days of receipt of such notice.

19. General

a) This Purchase Order shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. The venue for any action brought to specifically enforce any of the terms and conditions of this Purchase Order shall be the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida

b) Failure of the COUNTY to act immediately in response to a breach of

Page 183: Sample Digital Brochure

G/Current-Solicitation Template\RFP_CCNATemplate_06012011 RFP_CCNATemplate

18

this Purchase Order by VENDOR shall not constitute a waiver of breach. Waiver of the COUNTY by any default by VENDOR hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default by VENDOR.

c) All notices under this Purchase Order shall be sent to the respective addresses on the face page by certified mail, return receipt requested, by overnight courier service, or by personal delivery and will be deemed effective upon receipt. Postage, delivery and other charges shall be paid by the sender. A party may change its address for notice by written notice complying with the requirements of this section.

d) The Vendor agrees to reimbursement of any travel expenses that may be associated with this Purchase Order in

accordance with Florida Statute Chapter 112.061, Per Diem and Travel Expenses for Public Officers, employees and authorized persons.

e) In the event of any conflict between or among the terms of any Contract Documents related to this Purchase Order, the terms of the Contract Documents shall take precedence over the terms of the Purchase Order. To the extent any terms and /or conditions of this Purchase Order duplicate or overlap the Terms and Conditions of the Contract Documents, the provisions of the Terms and/or Conditions that are most favorable to the County and/or provide the greatest protection to the County shall govern.

Page 184: Sample Digital Brochure

Exhibit IV: Additional Terms and Conditions for RFP 1. Insurance and Bonding Requirements

The Vendor shall at its own expense, carry and maintain insurance coverage from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida as set forth in the Insurance and Bonding attachment of this solicitation. The Vendor shall procure and maintain property insurance upon the entire project, if required, to the full insurable value of the scope of work. The County and the Vendor waive against each other and the County’s separate Vendors, Contractors, Design Consultant, Subcontractors agents and employees of each and all of them, all damages covered by property insurance provided herein, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance. The Vendor and County shall, where appropriate, require similar waivers of subrogation from the County’s separate Vendors, Design Consultants and Subcontractors and shall require each of them to include similar waivers in their contracts. Collier County shall be responsible for purchasing and maintaining, its own liability insurance. Certificates issued as a result of the award of this solicitation must identify “For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County.” The General Liability Policy provided by Vendor to meet the requirements of this solicitation shall name Collier County, Florida, as an additional insured as to the operations of Vendor under this solicitation and shall contain a severability of interests provisions. Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows:

Collier County Board of County Commissioners Naples, Florida

The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the minimum requirements set forth in Insurance and Bonding attachment, with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. If Vendor has any self-insured retentions or deductibles under any of the below listed minimum required coverage, Vendor must identify on the Certificate of Insurance the nature and amount of such self- insured retentions or deductibles and provide satisfactory evidence of financial responsibility for such obligations. All self-insured retentions or deductibles will be Vendor’s sole responsibility. Coverage(s) shall be maintained without interruption from the date of commencement of the Work until the date of completion and acceptance of the scope of work by the County or as specified in this solicitation, whichever is longer. The Vendor and/or its insurance carrier shall provide 30 days written notice to the County of policy cancellation or non-renewal on the part of the insurance carrier or the Vendor. The Vendor shall also notify the County, in a like manner, within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt, of any notices of expiration, cancellation, non-renewal or material change in coverage or limits received by Vendor from its insurer and nothing contained herein shall relieve Vendor of this requirement to provide notice. In the event of a reduction in the aggregate limit of any policy to be provided by Vendor hereunder, Vendor shall immediately take steps to have the aggregate limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy.

Page 185: Sample Digital Brochure

Should at any time the Vendor not maintain the insurance coverage(s) required herein, the County may terminate the Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverage(s) and charge the Vendor for such coverage(s) purchased. If Vendor fails to reimburse the County for such costs within thirty (30) days after demand, the County has the right to offset these costs from any amount due Vendor under this Agreement or any other agreement between the County and Vendor. The County shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverage(s) purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the County to purchase such insurance coverage(s) shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of any of its rights under the Contract Documents. If the initial or any subsequently issued Certificate of Insurance expires prior to the completion of the scope of work, the Vendor shall furnish to the County renewal or replacement Certificate(s) of Insurance not later than ten (10) calendar days after the expiration date on the certificate. Failure of the Vendor to provide the County with such renewal certificate(s) shall be considered justification for the County to terminate any and all contracts.

2. Offer Extended to Other Governmental Entities

Collier County encourages and agrees to the successful vendor extending the pricing, terms and conditions of this solicitation or resultant contract to other governmental entities at the discretion of the successful vendor.

3. Additional Items and/or Services

During the contract term, Collier County reserves the right to add related items and/or services upon negotiation of a satisfactory price by the Project Manager and Vendor.

5. Use of Subcontractors

Bidders on any service related project, including construction, must be qualified and directly responsible for 80% or more of the solicitation amount for said work.

5. County’s Right to Inspect

The County or its authorized Agent shall have the right to inspect the Vendor’s facilities/project site during and after each work assignment the Vendor is performing.

6. Additional Terms and Conditions of Contract

Collier County has developed standard contracts/agreements, approved by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The selected Vendor shall be required to sign a standard Collier County contract within twenty one (21) days of Notice of Selection for Award. The County reserves the right to include in any contract document such terms and conditions, as it deems necessary for the proper protection of the rights of Collier County. A sample copy of this contract is available upon request. The County will not be obligated to sign any contracts, maintenance and/or service agreements or other documents provided by the Vendor.

7. Site Inspection

If services to be provided involve or are related to a physical site(s), including, but not limited to: design services for construction, physical monitoring, environmental studies, inspections or other similar activities, prior to submission of proposal, proposers shall visit the site(s) with the County project manager to become familiar with local conditions that may in any manner affect

Comment [SJS3]: Do we meet this requirement? If not, change it to reflect our subcontractors percentage.

Page 186: Sample Digital Brochure

performance of the Work. This site visit shall be documented in writing by the proposer with sign-off by the County project manager; this documentation shall be submitted with the proposal. The proposal will be deemed non-responsive if the site visit documentation is not presented to the County in the proposer’s submitted proposal materials. Upon award of the contract, subsequent site visits shall be at intervals appropriate to the stage of the project, as determined by the County project manager.

No plea of ignorance of conditions or difficulties that may exist or conditions or difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the Work pursuant to this Agreement as a result of failure to make the necessary examinations and investigations shall be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the awarded proposer, nor shall they be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.

9. Payment Method

Payments are made in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Chapter 218, Florida Statutes. Vendor’s invoices must include: Purchase Order Number Description and quantities of the goods or services provided per instructions on the County’s

purchase order or contract.

Invoices shall be sent to:

Board of County Commissioners Clerk’s Finance Department ATTN: Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trail E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112

Collier County, in its sole discretion, will determine the method of payment for goods and/or services as part of this agreement.

Payment methods include: Traditional – payment by check, wire transfer or other cash equivalent. Standard – payment by purchasing card. Collier County’s Purchasing Card Program is supported by

standard bank credit suppliers (i.e. VISA and MasterCard), and as such, is cognizant of the Rules for VISA Merchants and MasterCard Merchant Rules.

Collier County cautions vendors to consider both methods of payment when determining pricing as no additional surcharges or fees will be considered (per Rules for VISA Merchants and MasterCard Merchant Rules). The County will entertain bids clearly stating pricing for standard payment methods. An additional separate discounted price for traditional payments may be provided at the initial bid submittal if it is clearly marked as an “Additional Cash Discount.” Upon execution of the Contract and completion of each month’s work, payment requests shall be submitted to the Project Manager on a monthly basis by the Vendor for services rendered for that prior month. Services beyond sixty (60) days from current monthly invoice will not be considered for payment without prior approval from the Project manager. All invoices must be submitted within the fiscal year the work was performed. (County's fiscal year is October 1 - September 30.) Invoices submitted after the close of the fiscal year will not be accepted (or processed for payment) unless specifically authorized by the Project Manager. Payments will be made for articles and/or services furnished, delivered, and accepted, upon receipt and approval of invoices submitted on the date of services or within six (6) months after completion of

Page 187: Sample Digital Brochure

contract. Any untimely submission of invoices beyond the specified deadline period is subject to non-payment under the legal doctrine of “laches” as untimely submitted. Time shall be deemed of the essence with respect to the timely submission of invoices under this agreement. In instances where the successful contractor may owe debts (including, but not limited to taxes or other fees) to Collier County and the contractor has not satisfied nor made arrangement to satisfy these debts, the County reserves the right to off-set the amount owed to the County by applying the amount owed to the vendor or contractor for services performed of for materials delivered in association with a contract. Invoices shall not reflect sales tax. After review and approval, the invoice will be transmitted to the Finance Division for payment. Payment will be made upon receipt of proper invoice and in compliance with Chapter 218 Florida Statutes, otherwise known as the “Local Government Prompt Payment Act.” Collier County reserves the right to withhold and/or reduce an appropriate amount of any payment for work not performed or for unsatisfactory performance of Contractual requirements.

10. Environmental Health and Safety

All Vendors and Sub vendors performing service for Collier County are required and shall comply with all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), State and County Safety and Occupational Health Standards and any other applicable rules and regulations. Vendors and Sub vendors shall be responsible for the safety of their employees and any unsafe acts or conditions that may cause injury or damage to any persons or property within and around the work site. All firewall penetrations must be protected in order to meet Fire Codes. Collier County Government has authorized OSHA representatives to enter any Collier County facility, property and/or right-of-way for the purpose of inspection of any Vendor’s work operations. This provision is non-negotiable by any department and/or Vendor.

All new electrical installations shall incorporate NFPA 70E Short Circuit Protective Device Coordination and Arc Flash Studies where relevant as determined by the engineer.

All electrical installations shall be labeled with appropriate NFPA 70E arch flash boundary and PPE Protective labels.

11. Licenses

The Vendor is required to possess the correct Business Tax Receipt, professional license, and any other authorizations necessary to carry out and perform the work required by the project pursuant to all applicable Federal, State and Local Law, Statute, Ordinances, and rules and regulations of any kind. Additionally, copies of the required licenses must be submitted with the proposal response indicating that the entity proposing, as well as the team assigned to the County account, is properly licensed to perform the activities or work included in the contract documents. Failure on the part of any Vendor to submit the required documentation may be grounds to deem Vendor non-responsive. A Vendor, with an office within Collier County is also required to have an occupational license. All State Certified contractors who may need to pull Collier County permits or call in inspections must complete a Collier County Contractor License registration form and submit the required fee. After registering the license/registration will need to be renewed thereafter to remain “active” in Collier County If you have questions regarding professional licenses contact the Contractor Licensing, Growth Management Division at (239) 252-2431, 252-2432 or 252-2909. Questions regarding required occupational licenses, please contact the Tax Collector’s Office at (239) 252-2477.

Page 188: Sample Digital Brochure

12. Principals/Collusion

By submission of this Proposal the undersigned, as Vendor, does declare that the only person or persons interested in this Proposal as principal or principals is/are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this Proposal or in the contract to be entered into; that this Proposal is made without connection with any person, company or parties making a Proposal, and that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud.

13. Relation of County

It is the intent of the parties hereto that the Vendor shall be legally considered an independent Vendor, and that neither the Vendor nor their employees shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the County, and that the County shall be at no time legally responsible for any negligence on the part of said Vendor, their employees or agents, resulting in either bodily or personal injury or property damage to any individual, firm, or corporation.

14. Termination

Should the Vendor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County, the County may terminate this Agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance.

15. Lobbying

All firms are hereby placed on NOTICE that the Board of County Commissioners does not wish to be lobbied, either individually or collectively about a project for which a firm has submitted a Proposal.

Firms and their agents are not to contact members of the County Commission for such purposes as meeting or introduction, luncheons, dinners, etc. During the process, from Proposal closing to final Board approval, no firm or their agent shall contact any other employee of Collier County in reference to this Proposal, with the exception of the Purchasing Director or his designee(s). Failure to abide by this provision may serve as grounds for disqualification for award of this contract to the firm.

16. Certificate of Authority to Conduct Business in the State of Florida (Florida Statute 607.1501)

In order to be considered for award, firms submitting a response to this solicitation shall be required to provide a certificate of authority from the Florida Department of State Divisions of Corporations in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statute 607.1501 (www.sunbiz.org/search.html). A copy of the document shall be submitted with the solicitation response and the document number shall be identified. Firms who do not provide the certificate of authority at the time of response shall be required to provide same within five (5) days upon notification of selection for award. If the firm cannot provide the document within the referenced timeframe, the County reserves the right to award to another firm.

17. Single Proposal

Each Vendor must submit, with their proposal, the required forms included in this RFP. Only one proposal from a legal entity as a primary will be considered. A legal entity that submits a proposal as a primary or as part of a partnership or joint venture submitting as primary may not then act as a sub-consultant to any other firm submitting under the same RFP. If a legal entity is not submitting as a primary or as part of a partnership or joint venture as a primary, that legal entity may act as a sub-consultant to any other firm or firms submitting under the same RFP. All submittals in violation of this requirement will be deemed non-responsive and rejected from further consideration.

Page 189: Sample Digital Brochure

In addition, consultants that have participated and/or will participate in the development of scope, background information or oversight functions on this project are precluded from submitting a Proposal as either a prime or sub- consultant.

18. Protest Procedures

Any actual or prospective Vendor to a Request for Proposal, who is aggrieved with respect to the former, shall file a written protest with the Purchasing Director prior to the due date for acceptance of proposals. All such protests must be filed with the Purchasing Director no later than 11:00 a.m. Collier County time on the final published date for the acceptance of the Request for Proposals. The Board of County Commissioners will make award of contract in public session. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the office of the Purchasing Director.

19. Public Entity Crime

A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.

20. Security and Background Checks

If required, Vendor / Contractor / Proposer shall be responsible for the costs of providing background checks by the Collier County Facilities Management Department, and drug testing for all employees that shall provide services to the County under this Agreement. This may include, but not be limited to, checking federal, state and local law enforcement records, including a state and FBI fingerprint check, credit reports, education, residence and employment verifications and other related records. Contractor shall be required to maintain records on each employee and make them available to the County for at least four (4) years.

21. Conflict of Interest

Vendor shall complete the Conflict of Interest Affidavit included as an attachment to this RFP document. Disclosure of any potential or actual conflict of interest is subject to County staff review and does not in and of itself disqualify a firm from consideration. These disclosures are intended to identify and or preclude conflict of interest situations during contract selection and execution.

22. Prohibition of Gifts to County Employees

No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, the current Collier County Ethics Ordinance and County Administrative Procedure 5311.

Page 190: Sample Digital Brochure

Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RFP, and/or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/or firm for cause.

23. Immigration Law Affidavit Certification

Statutes and executive orders require employers to abide by the immigration laws of the United States and to employ only individuals who are eligible to work in the United States. The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA), provides an Internet-based means of verifying employment eligibility of workers in the United States; it is not a substitute for any other employment eligibility verification requirements. The program will be used for Collier County formal Invitations to Bid (ITB) and Request for Proposals (RFP) including professional services and construction services. Exceptions to the program:

Commodity based procurement where no services are provided. Where the requirement for the affidavit is waived by the Board of County Commissioners

Vendors / Bidders are required to enroll in the E-Verify program, and provide acceptable evidence of their enrollment, at the time of the submission of the vendor’s/bidder’s proposal. Acceptable evidence consists of a copy of the properly completed E-Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company. Vendors are also required to provide the Collier County Purchasing Department an executed affidavit certifying they shall comply with the E-Verify Program. The affidavit is attached to the solicitation documents. If the Bidder/Vendor does not comply with providing the acceptable E-Verify evidence and the executed affidavit the bidder’s / vendor’s proposal may be deemed non-responsive. Additionally, vendors shall require all subcontracted vendors to use the E-Verify system for all purchases not covered under the “Exceptions to the program” clause above. For additional information regarding the Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) program visit the following website: http://www.dhs.gov/E-Verify. It shall be the vendor’s responsibility to familiarize themselves with all rules and regulations governing this program.

Vendor acknowledges, and without exception or stipulation, any firm(s) receiving an award shall be fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended and with the provisions contained within this affidavit. Failure by the awarded firm(s) to comply with the laws referenced herein or the provisions of this affidavit shall constitute a breach of the award agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate said agreement immediately.

Page 191: Sample Digital Brochure

Tawreo. WthB

N A C T E R R

The sole intand openly wishing to reason(s) b

or mail to C

We are nothe Re-nou

Beaches fo

Serv

Our

Spe

Proj

Insu

Inco

Oth

Name of Fi

Address:

City, State,

Telephone:

Email:

Representa

Representa

tent of the competitiv

respond toby checkingCollier Coun

t respondirishment o

or the follo

vices requ

r firm could

ecifications

ject is too s

ufficient tim

orrect addr

her reason

rm:

Zip:

:

ative Signa

ative Name

Atta

Collier Cove. Therefoo this solicitg the item(nty Govern

ing to CCNof the Bareowing reas

ested not a

d not meet

/scope of w

small.

me allowed

ress used.

(s):

ature:

e:

achment 1

ounty Purchore, we aretation. If y(s) listed benment, Pur

NA Solicitefoot, Vandson(s):

available th

specificati

work not cl

for prepar

Please co

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

: Vendor’s

hasing Depe interestedour firm is elow and rerchasing D

tation 11-5derbilt, Clam

hrough our

ons/scope

learly unde

ration of re

orrect maili

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

s Non-Res

partment isd in ascertnot responeturn this f

Department

5772 Desim Pass, Pa

r company

of work.

erstood or

sponse.

ing addres

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

sponse St

s to issue saining reasnding to thform via emt, 3327 Tam

gn, Engineark Shore,

y.

applicable

ss:

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

tatement

solicitationssons for pris RFP, plemail or fax,miami Trai

eering and Naples, a

e (too vagu

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

________ D

s that are crospective ease indica, noted on l E, Naples

Permittingnd Marco

e, rigid, etc

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

Date _____

clear, concVendors n

ate the the cover s, FL 3411

g Services Island Sou

c.)

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

_________

cise not

page, 2.

for uth

__

__

__

__

__

__

_

Page 192: Sample Digital Brochure

IMr V

A

N A C T E R R

MPORTANeturn with

Vendor sho

The P

All apof the

Any a

The m

The mDate.

The Pand ti

ALL COUROUTS

Name of Fi

Address:

City, State,

Telephone:

Email:

Representa

Representa

NT: THIS Sh your Pro

ould check

Proposal h

pplicable foe project.

addenda ha

mailing env

mailing en.

Proposal wime. (Othe

RIER-DELSIDE OF T

rm:

Zip:

:

ative Signa

ative Name

SHEET MUoposal.

off each o

as been si

orms have

ave been s

velope has

Collier CoPurchasin3327 TamNaples FLAttn: ScotCCNA So

nouMar

nvelope m

will be maierwise Pro

LIVERED PTHE COUR

ature:

e:

Attac

UST BE S

of the follow

gned.

been sign

signed and

s been add

ounty Goveng Departmmiami Trail L 34112 tt Johnsonolicitation: urishment orco Island

must be se

led or delioposal cann

PROPOSARIER PACK

______

______

______

______

______

______

______

chment 2:

IGNED. Pl

wing items

ed and inc

d included.

ressed to:

ernment ment E

n 11-5772 Dof the BareSouth Bea

ealed and

vered in tinot be con

ALS MUSTKET

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

Vendor C

lease read

as the nec

cluded, alo

Design, Enefoot, Van

aches.

marked w

me to be sidered.)

T HAVE

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

Check List

d carefully

cessary ac

ng with lice

ngineering nderbilt, Cla

with Propos

received n

THE RFP

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

y, sign in t

ction is com

enses to co

and Permam Pass,

sal Numbe

no later tha

P NUMBER

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

the spaces

mpleted:

omplete th

itting ServiPark Shor

r, Proposa

an the spe

R AND T

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

___ Date __

s indicated

he requirem

ices for there, Naples

al Title and

ecified due

ITLE ON

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________

_________

d and

ments

e Re-, and

d Due

date

THE

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

Page 193: Sample Digital Brochure

Bthinad APth F S P T S C S2b__ N _

By the signhe best of nterest or aand bear ondisclosed.

AdditionallyPurchasinghe contrac

Firm:

Signature a

Print Name

Title of Sign

State of

County of

SUBSCRIB20_______by _________________________

Notary Pub

_________

ature belowtheir knowactivity (finn whether

y, the firm (g/General Sct and/or pr

and Date:

e

natory

__

__

BED AND S_____, ___________________________

blic

_________

w, the firmwledge and

ancial, conthe firm (e

(employeeServices Droject dura

_______

_______

_______

_______

_________

_________

SWORN to

_____________________________

__________

Attachme

m (employebelief, all

ntractual, oemployees,

s, officers irector, or tion.

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

o before me

_____________________________

My Comm__________

ent 3: Conf

es, officersrelevant fa

organizatio, officers a

and/or agedesignee,

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

e this ____

________________ fo_______.

ission Exp_________

flict of Inte

s and/or agacts conceronal, or othnd/or agen

ents) agreeif any actu

_________

_________

_________

_________

__________

__________

_________

_________or the Firm

pires __

erest Affid

gents) certrning past,erwise) wh

nts) has a p

es to immeual or poten

_________

_________

_________

_________

__________

__________

_ day of __

_, who is pem, OR who

davit

ifies, and h present, o

hich relatespossible co

ediately nontial conflic

__________

__________

__________

__________

_________

_________

_________

ersonally kproduced

hereby discor currentlys to the proonflict have

tify in writinct of intere

__________

__________

__________

__________

_________

_________

_________

known to mthe followi

closes, thay planned oposed woe been fully

ng the st arises d

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_________

_,

me to be theng identific

at, to

ork; y

uring

_____

_____

_____

_____

_____

_____

e cation

Page 194: Sample Digital Brochure

BOCN RBa D To TerepfoS

IN20 F

A

C

FANFNT

F

S(T

T

OARD OF ollier Counaples, Flor

E: CCNA arefoot, Va

ear Comm

The undersother perso

The Vendoestablishingequiremen

proposal door the Re-

South Bea

N WITNES00__ in the

Firm’s Legal

Address:

City, State, Z

Florida CertiAuthority DoNumber Federal Tax Number Telephone:

FAX:

Signature byTyped and writ

Title:

COUNTY nty Governrida 34112

Solicitationanderbilt, C

missioners:

signed, as Von and this

r agrees, ifg a formal nts to whichocuments l-nourishmches. .

S WHEREe County o

Name:

Zip Code:

ficate of ocument

Identificatio

y: tten)

A

COMMISSnment Com2

n: 11-5772Clam Pass

Vendor deproposal i

f this propocontractuah the propolisted by C

ment of the

EOF, WE hf ________

on

Attachmen

SIONERS mplex

2 Design, E, Park Sho

eclares thatis in every

osal is accal relationsosal pertain

CCNA Solice Barefoot

have hereu_________

nt 4: Vendo

Engineeringore, Naples

t this proporespect fa

epted, to ehip betweens. The V

citation: 11-t, Vanderb

unto subsc, in the Sta

or Declara

g and Perms, and Marc

osal is madair and mad

execute a Cen the firm endor state-5772 Des

bilt, Clam P

cribed our ate of ____

ation State

mitting Serco Island S

de without de in good

Collier Couand Collie

es that thesign, EnginPass, Park

names on_________

ement

rvices for thSouth Beac

connectiofaith, witho

unty documer County, e proposal neering ank Shore, N

this ______.

he Re-nouches.

n or arrangout collusio

ment for thefor the peris based und Permitt

Naples, an

__ day of _

rishment o

gement witon or fraud

e purpose rformance pon the ting Servicd Marco Is

_________

of the

th any d.

of of all

ces sland

_____,

Page 195: Sample Digital Brochure

Additional Contact Information

Send payments to: (required if different from above)

Company name used as payee

Contact name:

Title:

Address:

City, State, ZIP

Telephone:

FAX:

Email:

Office servicing Collier County to place orders (required if different from above)

Contact name:

Title:

Address:

City, State, ZIP

Telephone:

Email:

Page 196: Sample Digital Brochure

Cth TforethcUE Cwo Cthb VaEDV C

P

S

S C T2 _ _N _P _N Tth

CCNA Solicihe Barefo

This Affidaviormal Invitaequired to he submiss

completed UnderstandE-Verify pro

Collier Counworkers, conof the Immig

Collier Counhe INA. Sube grounds f

Vendor attesand subsequE-Verify andDepartment Vendor’s / B

Company Na

Print Name

Signature

State of ___

County of _

The foregoi20___, by

___________ (Print o

___________Notary Public

___________Printed Name

___________Notary Comm

The signee ohis affidavit

itation: 11-5ot, Vande

t is required

ations to Bidenroll in thsion of theE-Verify C

ding for theogram may

nty will not innstituting a vgration and N

nty may conch Violationfor unilatera

sts that theyuent Amendd to provide

of Homelanidder’s prop

ame _

__________

__________

ng instrum

___________r Type Name

___________Signature

___________e of Notary Pu

___________mission Numb

of this Affidato interroga

A

5772 Desrbilt, Clam

d and shoul (ITB’s) and

he E-Verify vendor’s/bompany P

e companyy deem the

ntentionally violation of Nationality A

sider the emn by the recal terminatio

y are fully codment(s)) anproof of en

nd Security posal.

__________

________

________

ment was si

___________e) ___________

___________ublic

___________ber/Expiration

avit guarantatories here

Attachment

sign, Enginm Pass, Pa

d be signedd Request foy program, bidder’s prrofile page

y. Failure toVendor / B

award Couthe employmAct (“INA”).

mployment bipient of the

on of the con

ompliant witnd agrees torollment in Tin partnersh

__________

igned and a

_ who has pro

_______

_______

_______ n

tees, as evideinafter mad

t 5: Immigr

neering anark Shore,

d, notarized or Proposaland provid

roposal. Ae or a copyo include t

Bidder’s pro

nty contractment provis

by any vende Employmentract by Co

th all applicao comply wiThe Employhip with the

__________

acknowled

oduced ____

denced by tde.

ration Affid

nd Permit, Naples, a

by an authos (RFP) subde acceptacceptable

y of the fullyhis Affidavoposal as n

ts to any vesion contain

dor of unautent Provisionollier County

able immigrith the proviyment EligibSocial Sec

__________

ged before

___________ (Type of Id

the sworn a

avit Certific

tting Serviand Marco

orized princbmittals. Fuable evidenevidence cy executed

vit and accenon-respon

endor who kned in 8 U.S

thorized aliens containey.

ration laws (isions of thebility Verificaurity Admin

__________

Title _

Date _

e me this __

___________dentification a

affidavit requ

cation

ices for tho Island So

cipal of the further, Vennce of theirconsists ofd E-Verify Meptable evinsive.

knowingly emS.C. Section

ens a violatied in Section

(specificallye Memorandation Systemistration at t

__________

__________

_________

_____day o

______ as idand Number

uired herein

he Re-nououth Beac

firm and subdors / Biddr enrollmenf a copy of Memoranddence of e

mploys unan 1324 a(e)

ion of Section 274A (e) o

y to the 1986dum of Undm (E-Verify)the time of s

_________

__________

__________

of ________

entification.)

n, the truth a

rishment ches.

bmitted withders are nt, at the tithe proper

dum of nrollment i

uthorized aSection 274

on 274A (e)of the INA s

6 Immigratioderstanding ), operated submission

______

_____

______

_________,

and accurac

of

h

me of rly

in the

lien 4A(e)

) of shall

on Act with by the of the

,

cy of

Page 197: Sample Digital Brochure

In accordainformationsocial secu119.071(5)used for noreturn with

1. Genera

Taxpa(as shoBusine(if diffeAddres

State _

Teleph

Order

Addres

City __

FAX __

Email

2. Compa

Ind

Taun50

3. Taxpay

Federa (Vendo

4. Sign a

Certific

Signatu

 

Title __ 

nce with thn for tax repurity numbe require thao other purpyour quote

al Informat

yer Name __own on incomess Name __erent from taxss ________

___________

hone ______

Information

ss ________

_________ S

__________

__________

any Status

dividual / Sol

ax Exempt (Fnder Internal 01 (c) 3)

yer Identific

al Tax Identif

ors who do n

nd Date Fo

cation: Under

ure _________

____________

Request

he Internal porting purpoers if usedat the counpose than hor proposa

ion (provide

___________me tax return___________xpayer name___________

___________

___________

n

___________

State ______

___________

___________

(check only

le Proprietor

Federal incomRevenue Se

cation Num

ication Numb

ot have a TIN

orm

r penalties of

____________

____________

Attacht for Taxpay

Revenue Soses from id by the inty notify yoherein stateal.

e all informa

___________n) ___________e) ___________

___________

___ FAX __

___________

___ Zip ___

___________

___________

y one)

me tax-exemervice guidelin

mber (for tax

ber (TIN) ___

N, will be req

f perjury, I ce

____________

____________

hment 6: Veyer Identifi

Service regundividuals andividual oru in writing

ed. Please

ation)

___________

___________

_________

_________

___________

________

_________

________

________

Corporation

mpt entity nes IRC

x reporting p

___________

uired to prov

ertify that the

____________

____________

endor Subscation Num

ulations, Coand companr company

g of the reacomplete a

___________

___________

City ______

Zip ___

___________

Remit / Pay Address ___ City ____

FAX ______

Email _____

n

Limited

E(D = Dis

purposes on

___________

vide a social s

information s

____________

_____________

stitute W – mber and C

ollier Countynies who do for tax reson for coll

all informatio

___________

___________

___________

___________

_ Email __

yment Inform

___________

__________

___________

___________

d Liability Com

nter the tax sregarded En

nly)

___________

security num

shown on this

_______  Da

______  Ph

9 Certification

y is requireo business weporting pulecting thison that app

__________

___________

___________

___________

___________

mation

___________ State _____

___________

___________

Partnersh

mpany

classificationtity, C = Cor

___________

ber prior to a

s form is corr

ate _________

hone Number _

n

ed to collecwith the Corposes). Flinformation

plies to your

___________

___________

___________

___________

___________

___________

_____ Zip

___________

___________

ip

on rporation, P =

___________

an award of t

rect to my kn

____________

____________

ct the followounty (includlorida Statu

n, which willr business a

___________

__________

___________

__________

___________

__________

________

___________

___________

= Partnership

___________

he contract.)

nowledge.

____________

____________

wing ding ute l be and

___

___

___

_______

___

___

_______

_

__

p)

_

___ 

__ 

Page 198: Sample Digital Brochure

RFPRFP

.

Ins1.

2. 3.

4.

4.

5.

P: 11-5772 P CCNA Temp

surance / B Worker

Compensa

Employ

CommeLiability (Opatterned ISO form

Indemn

Automo

Othernoted:

plate_0601201

ond Type r’s ation

yer’s Liabilit

ercial GeneOccurrence

after the cu

nification

obile Liabilit

r insuranc

1

Attach

ReSS

ty $__

eral Form)

urrent

Bo $1, To CoColosparinteemof tnegbe Thof C

ty $ _Ow

ce as

ma the

$5,und

$1

hment 7: I

equired Limtatutory Limtatutory Lim

_________s

dily Injury a

,000,000.00

the maximuontractor/Veounty, its offisses and cosralegals’ feeentionally w

mployed or uthis Agreemgate, abridgavailable tois section dCollier Coun

__________wned/Non-ow

Watercraft

United Stataintained wh

Maritime Ce completion

Aircraft Lia,000,000 eader this Agr

Pollution

Profession

,000,000.00 $ 500

nsurance

mits mits of Floridmits and Req

single limit

and Property

0 single limit

um extent pndor/Consuicers and emsts, includines, to the ex

wrongful conutilized by thment. This ige or reduceo an indemnoes not pernty.

_ Each Occuwned/Hired

tes Longshohere applica

Coverage (Jn of the wor

bility coveraach occurrereement.

al Liability

0 Per Occu0,000 each c

and Bond

da Statutes,quirements

per occurre

y Damage

t per occurr

permitted byultant shall imployees frng, but not lxtent causednduct of the he Contractondemnificate any other nified party ortain to any

urrence; Bod; Automobi

oreman's anable to the c

Jones Act) srk.

age shall bence if applic

rrenceClaimclaim and in

ding Requ

, Chapter 44

ence

rence

y Florida lawndemnify arom any andimited to, red by the negContractor/or/Vendor/Ction obligatiorights or reor person dincident aris

odily Injury &le Included

nd Harborwcompletion o $

shall be mai

$

e carried in cable to the

$

$

m n the aggreg

uirements

40 and all F

w, the nd hold hard all liabilitieeasonable agligence, re/Vendor/CoConsultant ion shall notmedies whiescribed in sing from th

& Property D

$ ________

worker's Act of the work.$ ________

intained wh

$ ________

limits of not completion

$ ________

$ ________

gate

Federal Gov

rmless Colliees, damageattorneys’ feecklessnessnsultant or an the perfort be construch otherwisthis paragr

he sole negl

Damage,

___ Per Occ

coverage s

___ Per Occ

ere applica

___ Per Occ

t less than n of the Serv

___ Per Occ

___ Per Occ

vernment

er s,

ees and s, or anyone rmance ued to se may raph. igence

currence

hall be

currence

ble to

currence

vices

currence

currence

33

Commenlanguage16.

nt [SJS4]: The than the inde

his is different emnification ter

(and better) rm on Page

Page 199: Sample Digital Brochure

RFP: 11-5772 RFP CCNA Template_06012011

34

$1,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate $2,000,000 each claim and in the aggregate

Project Professional Liability $__________ Per Occurrence

Valuable Papers Insurance $__________ Per Occurrence

6. Bid bond

Shall be submitted with proposal response in the form of certified funds, cashiers’ check or an irrevocable letter of credit, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, or proposal bond in a sum equal to 5% of the cost proposal. All checks shall be made payable to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on a bank or trust company located in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

7. Performance and Payment Bonds

For projects in excess of $200,000, bonds shall be submitted with the executed contract by Proposers receiving award, and written for 100% of the Contract award amount, the cost borne by the Proposer receiving an award. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as “A-“ or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders’ surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038.

8. Vendor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is

required to meet. The same Vendor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions.

9. Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial

General Liability where required. 10. The Certificate Holder shall be named as Collier County Board of County Commissioners, OR, Board of

County Commissioners in Collier County, OR Collier County Government, OR Collier County. 11. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required.

Vendor’s Insurance Statement

We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of this solicitation. Name of Firm

_______________________________________ Date ____________________________

Vendor Signature

_________________________________________________________________________

Print Name

_________________________________________________________________________

Insurance Agency

_________________________________________________________________________

Agent Name _______________________________________ Telephone Number _________________

Comment [SJS5]: Can our subs, if any, comply with these insurance requirements? If not, request specific exceptions for specific subs.

Page 200: Sample Digital Brochure

RFPRFP

So Ref Na Em Cotheclieyouagahav Pro Pro Cha

It

Ple

P: 11-5772 P CCNA Temp

licitation:

ference Que

(Name of C (Name of In

me: (Evalua

ail:

llier County e selection oent for whichur knowledgain) and 1 reve sufficient

oject Descri

oject Budge

ange Order

tem 1 Abili

2 Abili

3 Qua

4 Qua

5 Prof

6 Clos

forw

7 Abili

8 Abilt

9 Abili

10 Ove

ease FAX th

plate_0601201

estionnaire

Company Re

ndividuals R

ator complet

is implemeof firms to peh they have ge on a scalepresentingt knowledge

ption: ____

t: ________

rs - Dollars A

ty to manag

ty to mainta

lity of work.

lity of consu

fessionalism

se out projecward docume

ty to verbal

tity to mana

ty to follow

rall comfort

his complete

1

for:

equesting R

Requesting

ting referen

enting a procerform this previously e of 1 to 10

g that you we of past pe

__________

__________

Added : ___

ge the proje

ain project s

.

ultative advi

m and ability

ct process (entation, etc

ly communi

age risks and

County poli

level with h

TOTAed survey to

Attachm

Reference In

Reference I

ce question

FAX:

cess that coproject. Thperformed

0, with 10 rewere very un

rformance i

__________

__________

__________

ect costs (m

schedule (co

ice provided

y to manage

(final producc.)

icate and do

d unexpecte

icies, proce

hiring the co

AL SCORE Oo: ________

ment 8: Ref

nformation)

Information

nnaire) C

:

ollects referee Name of twork. Plea

epresenting nsatisfied (an a particula

______ C

______ P

______ C

Citeria inimize cha

omplete on-

d on the pro

e personnel.

ct turnover;

ocument inf

ed project c

edures, rules

ompany in th

OF ALL ITE__________

ference Qu

)

Company: (E

ence informthe Companse completethat you wend would near area, lea

Completion D

roject Numb

Change Ord

ange orders

-time or ear

oject.

.

invoices; m

formation cl

circumstanc

s, regulation

he future (c

EMS __________

estionnaire

Evaluator’s

mation on firny listed in te the surveyere very satever hire the

ave it blank a

Date: _____

ber of Days

ders - Days A

to scope).

rly).

manuals or g

early and s

es.

ns, etc.

ustomer sa

__________

e

Company c

Telephone

ms and thethe Subjecty. Please raisifed (and we firm/indivdand the item

__________

: ________

Added: ___

going

uccinctly.

tisfaction).

_____ By _

completing r

:

ir key persot above has ate each critwould hire tdiual again)m or form w

__________

__________

__________

Sc

__________

reference)

onnel to be ulisted you a

teria to the the firm/indi). If you do ill be scored

_______

_______

_______

core

_______

35

used in as a best of vidual not

d “0.”

Page 201: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 202: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 203: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 204: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 205: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 206: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 207: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 208: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 209: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 210: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 211: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 212: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 213: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 214: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 215: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 216: Sample Digital Brochure
Page 217: Sample Digital Brochure