2

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONWITHPRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEFSLP (CC) No. 16913 OF 2014

IN THE MATTER OF:Ran Singh & Anr. .PetitionerVersusUnion of India & Anr. Respondent

LIST OF DATES & EVENTS

21.03.2003 The Land Acquisition Collector issued notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter the 1894 Act) vide notification No. F11(19)/2001/L&B/L.A./20112 dated 21.03.2003.

19.03.2004 A declaration under Section 6 of the 1894 Act was issued vide Notification No.F10(7)/2004/L&B/LA/28210 dated 19.03.2004.

27.01.2006 The Land Acquisition Collector vide Award No. 3/DCW/2005-06 under Section 11 of the 1894 Act fixed the market value of land at Rs 15,70,000 per acre in Village Mundka, Delhi 41. Award dated 27.01.2006 at Annexure P-1, Pages 4752, SLP PaperbookSummary of award at Page 52, SLP Paperbook

12.12.2012 &14.12.2012The Petitioners herein filed a petition under Section 18 of the 1894 Act for enhancing amount of compensation before the Learned Reference Court. The Learned Additional District Judge relying upon the case of Jamna v Union of India vide LA Appeal No.784/2005 enhanced the compensation from Rs. 15,70,000/- per acre to Rs. 19,36,440/-per acre. Order for Ran Singh dated 12.12.2012 at Annexure P2, Pages 53-61, SLP PaperbookFinding and Conclusion of Order at Page 59, SLP PaperbookRelief at Page 60, SLP Paperbook

Order for Hari Ram dated 14.12.2012 at Annexure P-3, Pages 62-70, SLP PaperbookFinding and Conclusion at Page 68, SLP PaperbookRelief at Page 69, SLP Paperbook

21.05.2014The petitioners filed appeal for enhancement of compensation under Section 54 of the 1894 Act before the Honble High Court of Delhi numbered as LA Appeal No. 270/2014 titled Ran Singh v Union of India and LA Appeal No. 271/2014 titled as Hari Ram v Union of India.

The Honble High Court vide the impugned judgment and final Order was pleased to dismiss the appeals being LA Appeal No. 270/2014 and 271/2014 preferred by the Petitioners herein on the basis of the judgment of Jamna v Union of India dated 08.07.2011 in LA Appeal No. 784/2005 and the Honble High Court was also pleased to dismiss the appeals on the ground that enhancement in the compensation had already been granted by the Learned Additional District Judge.Judgment of Honble High Court at Pages 1-4, SLP PaperbookFinding and Conclusion at Page 4, SLP Paperbook

04.09.2014Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and final Order of the Honble High Court, the Petitioners herein preferred the instant Special Leave Petition. Special Leave Petition at Pages 36-44