EPJ manuscript No.(will be inserted by the editor)

Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

Vakhid A. Gani1,2, Aliakbar Moradi Marjaneh3, Alidad Askari4, Ekaterina Belendryasova1, and Danial Saadatmand5

1 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia2 Theory Department, National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics,

117218 Moscow, Russia3 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad university, Quchan, Iran4 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Hormozgan, P.O.Box 3995, Bandar Abbas, Iran5 Department of Physics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

Received: date / Revised version: date

Abstract We study the scattering of kink and antikink of the double sine-Gordon model. There is a criticalvalue of the initial velocity vcr of the colliding kinks, which separates different regimes of the collision. Atvin > vcr we observe kinks reflection, while at vin < vcr their interaction is complicated with captureand escape windows. We obtain the dependence of vcr on the parameter of the model. This dependencepossesses a series of local maxima, which has not been reported by other authors. At some initial velocitiesbelow the critical value we observe a new phenomenon — the escape of two oscillons in the final state.Besides that, at vin < vcr we found the initial kinks’ velocities at which the oscillons do not escape, andthe final configuration looks like a bound state of two oscillons.

1 Introduction

The (1 + 1)-dimensional field-theoretical models possess-ing the topologically non-trivial solutions — kinks — areof special interest for modern physics. They arise in a vastvariety of models in quantum and classical field theory,high energy physics, cosmology, condensed matter physics,and so on, [1]–[4]. Firstly, the (1 + 1)-dimensional modelscan be investigated analytically and numerically much eas-ier than (2 + 1) or (3 + 1)-dimensional. Because of that,some general properties of topological defects can be stud-ied within the (1 + 1)-dimensional setups. Secondly, manyphysical systems can be effectively described by the one-dimensional structures. For example, a plane domain wall— a wall, which separates regions with different vacuumstates — in the direction orthogonal to it, presents a kink.Surely, the topological defects arise and in more complexmodels with two, three or more fields. For example, in [5]–[11] the kink-like structures were studied in models withtwo interacting real scalar fields, for further informationsee also [12]–[20].

Kink-antikink collisions, as well as interactions of kinkswith impurities (spatial inhomogeneities), are of growinginterest since 1970s [21,22]. Nevertheless, today it is a veryfast developing area of research. For investigating of thekink-antikink interactions various approximate methodsare widely used. Among them, the collective coordinateapproximation [23]–[31]. Withing this method a real fieldsystem “kink+antikink” is approximately described as a

Correspondence to: moradimarjaneh@gmail.com (A.M.M., cor-responding author) and vagani@mephi.ru (V.A.G.).

system with one or several degrees of freedom. For in-stance, the kink-antikink separation can be used as theonly (translational) degree of freedom. The more compli-cated modifications of the method have also been elabo-rated, which include other degrees of freedom (in partic-ular, vibrational), see, e.g., [24,25,26].

Another approximate method for investigating the kinksinteractions is Manton’s method [3, Ch. 5], [32]–[35]. Thismethod is based on using of the kinks asymptotics, it en-ables to estimate the force between the kink and the an-tikink at large separations.

On the other hand, recently the numerical simulationhas become a powerful tool for studying the dynamics ofthe one-dimensional field systems. Using various numer-ical methods, many important results were obtained. Inparticular, the resonance phenomena — escape windowsand quasi-resonances — have been found and investigatedin the kinks’ scattering [23], [36]–[48]. Many important re-sults have been obtained for the models with polynomialpotentials of fourth, sixth, eighth, and higher degree self-interaction [23], [37]–[42], [44,45], [49]–[56]. One shouldnote interesting results on the long-range interaction be-tween kink and antikink [40,44,45], [57]–[60]. The modelswith non-polynomial potentials are also widely discussedin the literature, for example, the modified sine-Gordon[61], the multi-frequency sine-Gordon [62], the double sine-Gordon [36], [63]–[66], and a number of models, which canbe obtained by using the deformation procedure [46,47,54,67,68].

The impressive progress is achieved in the investiga-tion of domain walls, bubbles, vortices, strings, [69]–[77],

arX

iv:1

711.

0191

8v2

[he

p-th

] 2

9 A

pr 2

018

2 Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

as well as the embedded topological defects, e.g., a Q-lump on a domain wall, a skyrmion on a domain wall,etc. [78]–[88]. Besides that, we have to mention variousconfigurations of the type of Q-balls [89]–[96]. Topologi-cally non-trivial field configurations could also lead to avariety of phenomena in the early Universe [97,98].

In this paper we study the kink-antikink collisions withinthe double sine-Gordon model [36], [64]–[66]. There is acritical value of the initial velocity of the colliding kinks,vcr, which separates different regimes of the collision. Atvin > vcr the kinks pass through each other and escape toinfinities, while at vin < vcr the kinks’ capture and a com-plex picture of the so-called escape windows are observed,see, e.g., [21,22,64]. We performed a detailed study of thekink-antikink scattering at various values of the model pa-rameter R. We have found a series of local maxima of thedependence of vcr on R, which has not been reported upto now. Besides that, at some initial velocities of the col-liding kinks we observed final configuration of the type oftwo oscillons, which form a bound state or could escapeto spatial infinities with some final velocities.

Our paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we givesome general information about the (1 + 1)-dimensionalmodels with one real scalar field. Section 3 introduces thedouble sine-Gordon model, describes its potential, kinks,and their main properties. In section 4 we study the scat-tering of the kink and antikink. In this section we presentour main results related to the kink-antikink collisions.Finally, we summarize and formulate prospects for futureworks in section 5.

2 Topological defects in (1 + 1) dimensions

Consider a field-theoretical model in (1 + 1)-dimensionalspace-time with a real scalar field φ(x, t). The dynamicsof the field φ is described by the Lagrangian density

L =1

2

(∂φ

∂t

)2

− 1

2

(∂φ

∂x

)2

− V (φ), (1)

where the potential V (φ) defines self-interaction of thefield φ. We assume that the potential is a non-negativefunction of φ, which has a set of minima

V ={φ

(vac)1 , φ

(vac)2 , φ

(vac)3 , . . .

}, (2)

which is a vacuum manifold of the model, and V (φ) = 0for all φ ∈ V. The energy functional corresponding to theLagrangian (1) is

E[φ] =

∞∫−∞

[1

2

(∂φ

∂t

)2

+1

2

(∂φ

∂x

)2

+ V (φ)

]dx. (3)

The Lagrangian (1) yields the equation of motion for thefield φ(x, t):

∂2φ

∂t2− ∂2φ

∂x2+dV

dφ= 0. (4)

In the static case φ = φ(x),∂φ

∂t= 0, and we obtain

d2φ

dx2=dV

dφ. (5)

This equation can be reduced to the first order ordinarydifferential equation

dφ

dx= ±

√2V (φ). (6)

In order for the energy of the static configuration to befinite, it is necessary that

φ(−∞) = limx→−∞

φ(x) = φ(vac)i (7)

andφ(+∞) = lim

x→+∞φ(x) = φ

(vac)j , (8)

where φ(vac)i , φ

(vac)j ∈ V. If these two equalities hold, the

second and the third terms in square brackets in (3) falloff at x → ±∞ (the first term turns to zero for all staticconfigurations), and the integral in (3) can be convergent.

If the vacuum manifold V consists of more than onepoint, i.e the potential V (φ) possesses two or more de-generate minima, the set of all static configurations withfinite energy can be split into disjoint equivalence classes(or topological sectors) according to the asymptotic be-haviour of the configuration at x → ±∞. Configurations

with φ(vac)i 6= φ

(vac)j in eqs. (7) and (8) are called topologi-

cal, while those with φ(vac)i = φ

(vac)j — non-topological. A

configuration belonging to one equivalence class (topolog-ical sector) can not be transformed into a configurationfrom another class (topological sector) through a contin-uous deformation, that is via a sequence of configurationswith finite energies.

To describe the topological properties of the configura-tions, one can introduce a conserved topological current,e.g.,

jµtop =1

2εµν∂νφ, (9)

here εµν stands for the Levi-Civita symbol, the indices µand ν take values 0 and 1 for a (1 + 1)-dimensional con-

figuration, and ∂0φ ≡∂φ

∂t, ∂1φ ≡

∂φ

∂x. The corresponding

topological charge does not depend on the behaviour ofthe field at finite x,

Qtop =

∞∫−∞

j0topdx =

1

2[φ(+∞)− φ(−∞)] . (10)

The value of Qtop is determined only by the asymptotics(7), (8) of the field. The topological charge (10) is con-served during the evolution of the configuration. Never-theless, configurations from different topological sectorsmay have the same topological charge. At the same time,configurations with different topological charges necessar-ily belong to different topological sectors.

Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks 3

Further, for the non-negative potential V (φ) we canintroduce the superpotential — a smooth (continuouslydifferentiable) function W (φ) of the field φ:

V (φ) =1

2

(dW

dφ

)2

. (11)

Using this representation of the potential, the energy of astatic configuration can be written as

E = EBPS +1

2

∫ ∞−∞

(dφ

dx± dW

dφ

)2

dx, (12)

whereEBPS =

∣∣W [φ(+∞)]−W [φ(−∞)]∣∣. (13)

Here the subscript “BPS” stands for Bogomolny, Prasad,and Sommerfield [99,100,101]. From eq. (12) one can seethat, firstly, the energy of any static configuration is boundedfrom below by EBPS,

E ≥ EBPS, (14)

and, secondly, the static configuration, which satisfies theequation

dφ

dx= ±dW

dφ, (15)

saturates the inequality (14), i.e has the minimal energy(13) among all the configurations within a given topolog-ical sector. The solutions of eq. (15) are called BPS (orBPS saturated) configurations. Note that eq. (15) coin-cides with eq. (6).

A kink is a BPS saturated topological solution φk(x)of eq. (6), which connects two neighboring vacua of the

model, i.e. for the kink solution the values φ(vac)i and φ

(vac)j

in (7), (8) are adjacent minima of the potential V (φ). Be-low we use the terms “kink” and “antikink” for solutionswith φ

(vac)j > φ

(vac)i and φ

(vac)j < φ

(vac)i , respectively. Nev-

ertheless, in some cases we use “kink” for both solutions,just to be brief.

3 The double sine-Gordon model

Consider the double sine-Gordon (DSG) model. The po-tential of the DSG model can be written in several differ-ent forms. Below in this section we briefly recall two ofthem, and after that we give a detailed introduction tothe properties of the DSG model employed by us.

3.1 The η-parameterized potential

Recall that, e.g., in papers [36,64] the following parame-terization has been used:

Vη(φ) =4

1 + 4|η|

(η (1− cosφ) + 1 + cos

φ

2

), (16)

where η is a real parameter, −∞ < η < +∞. It is easy tosee that

Vη(φ) =

cosφ− 1 for η → −∞,1− cosφ for η → +∞,

4

(1 + cos

φ

2

)for η = 0,

(17)

i.e. the potential V (φ) reduces to a sine-Gordon form forthe field φ at η → ±∞, and for the field φ/2 at η = 0.

The shape of the potential (16) crucially depends onthe parameter η. Following [64], we can split all values of

η into four regions: η < −1

4, −1

4< η < 0, 0 < η <

1

4, and

η >1

4.

1. At η < −1

4the potential (16) has two distinct

types of minima, φ(vac)n = 4πn + arccos

1

4ηand φ

(vac)m =

4πm− arccos1

4η, n,m = 0,±1,±2, . . . , degenerate in en-

ergy, V (φ(vac)n ) = V (φ

(vac)m ) = 0, which are separated by

inequivalent barriers.

2. At −1

4< η < 0 the potential (16) has a single type

of minima at φ(vac)n = (2n+ 1)2π with V (φ

(vac)n ) = 0.

3. At 0 < η <1

4the potential (16) is structurally sim-

ilar to the previous region, with the same set of minima.

4. At η >1

4the minima of the potential (16) are φn =

4nπ with V (φn) =8

1 + 4|η|, and φ

(vac)m = (2m+1)2π with

V (φ(vac)m ) = 0, n,m = 0,±1,±2, . . . .

This our paper deals with the DSG model with thepositive values of η. In this case, as we show below, it isconvenient to introduce another positive parameter.

3.2 The R-parameterized potential

For positive values of η, it is convenient to introduce an-other positive parameter, R, such that

η =1

4sinh2R. (18)

In terms of the parameter R the potential (16) of the DSGmodel reads:

VR(φ) = tanh2R(1−cosφ)+4

cosh2R

(1 + cos

φ

2

). (19)

Depending on the parameter R the shape of the potential(19) looks different, see fig. 1. At R = 0 we have a sine-Gordon potential for the field φ/2, while at R→ +∞ thepotential (19) reduces to a sine-Gordon form for the field

4 Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

R=0

R1=Arcsinh1

R=2

R=4

-4π -2π 2π 4πϕ

2

4

8

VR

Figure 1. The potential (19) as a function of φ for various R.

φ:

VR(φ) =

4

(1 + cos

φ

2

)for R = 0,

4−(

1− cosφ

2

)2

for R = arcsinh 1,

1− cosφ for R→ +∞.(20)

3.3 The double sine-Gordon kinks

In terms of the parameter R the static kink (+) and an-tikink (−) solutions can be written in a simple form,

φk(k)(x) = 4πn± 4 arctansinhx

coshR. (21)

The DSG kink (antikink) can also be expressed as a su-perposition of two sine-Gordon solitons,

φk(k)(x) = 4πn± [φSGK(x+R)− φSGK(R− x)] , (22)

or

φk(x) = 2π(2n−1)+[φSGK(x+R) + φSGK(x−R)] (23)

and

φk(x) = 2π(2n+ 1)− [φSGK(x+R) + φSGK(x−R)] ,(24)

where φSGK(x) = 4 arctan exp(x) is the sine-Gordon soli-ton. According to eqs. (22)–(24), the DSG kink can beviewed as the superposition of two sine-Gordon solitons,which are separated by the distance 2R and centered atx = ±R, see fig. 2. The energy of the static DSG kink(antikink) is a function of the parameter R,

E(R) = 16

(1 +

2R

sinh 2R

), (25)

this dependence is shown in fig. 3. Below we study the col-lisions of the DSG kinks. In such processes the kink’s inter-nal modes may be very important. Therefore, now we in-vestigate the spectrum of small localized excitations of the

DSG kink (antikink) using a standard method. Namely, weadd a small perturbation δφ(x, t) to the static DSG kinkφk(x):

φ(x, t) = φk(x) + δφ(x, t), |δφ| � |φk|. (26)

Substituting this φ(x, t) into the equation of motion (4),and linearizing in δφ, we obtain the partial differentialequation for δφ(x, t):

∂2δφ

∂t2− ∂2δφ

∂x2+d2V

dφ2

∣∣∣∣φk(x)

· δφ = 0. (27)

Looking for δφ in the form

δφ(x, t) =∑n

ηn(x) cos ωnt, (28)

we obtain the Schrodinger-like eigenvalue problem

Hηn(x) = ω2nηn(x) (29)

with the operator H (the Hamiltonian)

H = − d2

dx2+ U(x). (30)

Here the quantum-mechanical potential is

U(x) =d2V

dφ2

∣∣∣∣φk(x)

. (31)

It can be easily shown that the discrete spectrum in thepotential (31) always possesses a zero mode ω0 = 0. Differ-entiating eq. (5) with respect to x, and taking into accountthat φk(x) is a solution of eq. (5), we see that

− d2

dx2

dφk

dx+d2V

dφ2

∣∣∣∣φk(x)

· dφk

dx= 0, (32)

or, in other words,

H · dφk

dx= 0 · dφk

dx. (33)

Sodφk

dxis really an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian (30)

associated with the zero frequency.The potential U(x) for the double sine-Gordon kink

(antikink) can be obtained by substituting eqs. (19) and(21) in (31),

U(x) =8 tanh2R

(1 + sech2R sinh2 x)2

+2(3− 4 cosh2R)

cosh2R

1

1 + sech2R sinh2 x+ 1. (34)

The shape of the potential crucially depends on the pa-rameter R, see fig. 4(a). For R = 0 equation (34) gives the

Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks 5

R=0

R1=Arcsinh1

R=2

R=4

-8 -4 4 8x

-2π

2π

ϕK

(a) Kinks

R=0

R1=Arcsinh1

R=2

R=4

-8 -4 4 8x

-2π

2π

ϕK-

(b) Antikinks

Figure 2. Kinks and antikinks (21) for n = 0 and various R’s.

1 2 3 4 5R

16

24

32

E

Figure 3. The energy of the static DSG kink (antikink) as afunction of the parameter R.

Poschl-Teller potential,

U0(x) = 1− 2

cosh2 x, (35)

which corresponds to the case of the sine-Gordon model.On the other hand, for R� 1 from eq. (34) we obtain

U∞(x) ≈

1− 2

cosh2(x−R)for ||x| −R| . 1,

1 for ||x| −R| � 1.(36)

The discrete spectrum in the potential well (34) forarbitrary value of R can be obtained numerically by usinga modification of the shooting method, see, e.g., [38,44,45]. First of all, for all R there is the zero mode ω0 = 0.Apart from that, we have found the vibrational mode ω1

with the frequency that depends on R, see fig. 4(b).At R→ 0 the frequency ω1 goes to the boundary of the

continuum, which corresponds to the sine-Gordon case.With increasing R the frequency ω1 decreases to zero. Atlarge R’s the levels ω0 and ω1 are the result of splitting ofthe zero mode of each of the two potential wells (36).

4 Collisions of the double sine-Gordon kinks

We studied the collision of the DSG kink and antikink.In order to do this, we used the initial configuration inthe form of the DSG kink and the DSG antikink, centeredat x = −ξ and x = ξ, respectively, and moving towardseach other with the initial velocities vin. We solved thepartial differential equation (4) with the R-parameterizedpotential (19) numerically, extracting the values of φ(x, 0)

and∂φ(x, 0)

∂tfrom the following initial configuration:

φ(x, t) = φk

(x+ ξ − vint√

1− v2in

)+ φk

(x− ξ + vint√

1− v2in

)− 2π

= 4 arctan

[1

coshRsinh

(x+ ξ − vint√

1− v2in

)]

− 4 arctan

[1

coshRsinh

(x− ξ + vint√

1− v2in

)]− 2π. (37)

We discretized space and time using a grid with thespatial step h, and the time step τ . We used the followingdiscrete expressions for the second derivatives of the field:

∂2φ

∂t2=

11φn,j+1 − 20φn,j + 6φn,j−1 + 4φn,j−2 − φn,j−3

12τ2,

(38)∂2φ

∂x2=−φn−2,j + 16φn−1,j − 30φn,j + 16φn+1,j − φn+2,j

12h2,

(39)where φn,j = φ(nh, jτ), n = 0,±1,±2, . . . , andj = −3,−2,−1, 0, 1, 2, . . . .

We performed the numerical simulations for the stepsh = 0.025 and τ = 0.005, respectively, and for two dif-ferent ξ: 10 and 20. We have also checked the stabilityof the results with respect to decrease of the steps. Fixedboundary conditions were used.

In the kink-antikink collisions there is a critical valueof the initial velocity, vcr, which separates two different

6 Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

R=0.0

R=0.7

R=1.0

R=2.0

-5 5x

-1

1

U(x)

(a) The quantum-mechanical potential

1 2 3 4 5 6 7R

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

ω1

(b) R-dependence of the vibrational mode of the kink

Figure 4. (a) The quantum-mechanical potential (34), and (b) R-dependence of the vibrational mode’s frequency.

Table 1. Positions of the local maxima of the dependencevcr(R), which is shown in fig. 6.

n R(max)n vcr(R

(max)n )

1 1.0 0.24092 2.1 0.17433 3.0 0.02964 3.5 0.01355 3.8 0.00816 4.0 0.00617 4.2 0.0047

regimes of the collisions. At the initial velocities abovethe critical value, vin > vcr, the DSG kinks pass througheach other and escape to infinities after one collision, seefig. 5(a). At vin < vcr one observes the kinks’ capture andformation of their long-living bound state — a bion, seefig. 5(b). At the same time, in the range vin < vcr theso-called “escape windows” have been found. An escapewindow is a narrow interval of the initial velocities, atwhich the kink and the antikink escape after two, three,or more collisions, see figs. 5(c), 5(d).

4.1 The R-dependence of the critical velocity

First of all, we found the dependence of the critical veloc-ity vcr on the parameter R. Our results are shown in fig. 6.One can see a series of peaks on the curve vcr(R), see alsotable 1. Note that at this point we have some discrepancywith the results of [64]. The authors of [64] report only onemaximum of the dependence vcr(R) at R ≈ 1. Probablyit can be a consequence of small amount of experimentalpoints in [64].

From fig. 6 one can see that the critical velocity turnsto zero at R = 0, which corresponds to the integrable sine-Gordon model, see eq. (20). Besides that, vcr decreases tozero with increasing R at large R. Remind here, that thelimit R → +∞ also corresponds to the case of the inte-

grable sine-Gordon model, as one can see from eq. (20).Therefore it is quite natural that the critical velocity hasa maximum at some R and tends to zero at R → 0 andR→ +∞. The presence of a series of local maxima on thecurve is an interesting fact that is observed for the firsttime. Apparently we can assume that one of the maxima is

the main (probably, R(max)1 ), while the other ones appear

due to some change of the kink-antikink interaction in thecollision process with increasing R. At large values of Rthe DSG kink splits into two sine-Gordon solitons. There-fore, we can assume that in the DSG kink-antikink colli-sion the four sine-Gordon solitons interact pairwise. Thistransition from the simple collision of the DSG kinks tomore complicated pairwise interaction of the sine-Gordonsolitons can lead, in particular, to the non-monotonicity

of the dependence vcr(R) at R > R(max)1 .

4.2 Two oscillons in the final state

In the kink-antikink collisions below the critical velocitywe observed a phenomenon, which, to the best of ourknowledge, has not been reported for the double sine-Gordon model before. At some initial velocities of the col-liding kinks we observed final configuration in the form oftwo escaping oscillons. At the same time, at some initialvelocities we found formation of the configuration, whichwe can classify as a bound state of two oscillons. In fig. 7we show some typical scenarios of that kind.

For example, at the initial velocity vin = 0.1847 weobserve formation of a bound state of the kink and theantikink (a bion), which then evolves into two oscillons.These two oscillons are moving from each other, then stop,and start moving back to the collision point. This repeatsseveral times, and after that the oscillons escape to infini-ties with the final velocity vf ≈ 0.10, see fig. 7(a).

Formation of the bound state of oscillons and the es-cape of oscillons are extremely sensitive to changes of theinitial velocity of the colliding kinks. For example, at theinitial velocity vin = 0.18467 the oscillons escape to in-finities after fewer number of collisions, see fig. 7(b). The

Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks 7

(a) Kinks escape after one collision, vin = 0.2500 (b) Bion formation, vin = 0.2100

(c) Two-bounce window, vin = 0.2340 (d) Three-bounce window, vin = 0.2380

Figure 5. The space-time picture of the kink-antikink collisions at various initial velocities for R = 1. (The initial half-separationis ξ = 10 in these simulations.)

final velocity of the escaping oscillons also differs substan-tially: at vin = 0.1847 we obtain vf ≈ 0.10 (fig. 7(a)),while at vin = 0.18467 we have vf ≈ 0.03 (fig. 7(b)), andat vin = 0.18470001 we obtain vf ≈ 0.15 (fig. 7(c)). At theinitial velocity of the colliding kinks vin = 0.18470003,fig. 7(d), the final velocity of the escaping oscillons isvf ≈ 0.19.

In the kink-antikink collision at the initial velocityvin = 0.18472, fig. 7(e), we observe formation of two os-cillons, which are moving apart from each other, then ap-proach and collide. After that we have final configurationin the form of the oscillating configuration of the type ofbion at the origin. Apparently this final configuration canbe viewed as a bound state of two oscillons, which oscillatearound each other with small amplitude.

At the initial velocity vin = 0.18473, fig. 7(f), we ob-serve even more complicated picture. The kinks collide,form a bion, which, in turn, decays into two oscillons.

These oscillons escape at some distance and then collideagain. After that, for some time we observe the boundstate of oscillons — small amplitude oscillations of oscil-lons around each other. Finally, the oscillons escape atsome valuable distance, collide for the last time, and es-cape to infinities with the final velocities vf ≈ 0.07.

The obtained results show that in the DSG kink-antikinkscattering we found new phenomenon — formation of thepair of oscillons, which can form a bound state or escape tospatial infinities. Note that similar behaviour has been ob-served recently in the collisions of kinks of another modelwith non-polynomial potential [46,47].

5 Conclusion

We have studied the scattering of kinks of the double sine-Gordon model. Several different parameterizations of this

8 Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

0 . 0 0 . 5 1 . 0 1 . 5 2 . 0 2 . 5 3 . 0 3 . 5 4 . 0 4 . 50 . 0 0

0 . 0 4

0 . 0 8

0 . 1 2

0 . 1 6

0 . 2 0

0 . 2 4v c r

R

Figure 6. The critical velocity vcr as a function of the param-eter R. (The initial half-separation is ξ = 20 in these calcula-tions.)

model are known in the literature. We used the so-calledR-parameterization, in which the potential of the modeldepends on the positive parameter R, see eq. (19).

The scattering of the DSG kink and antikink looks asfollows. There is a critical value of the initial velocity vcr

such that at vin > vcr the kinks pass through each otherand then escape to infinities. At vin < vcr one observesformation of a bound state of the kinks — a bion. Besidesthat, at some narrow intervals of the initial velocity (whichare called “escape windows”) from the range vin < vcr thekinks escape to infinities after two or more collisions.

We have obtained the dependence of the critical veloc-ity vcr on the parameter R. The curve vcr(R) has severalwell-seen local maxima, see fig. 6 and table 1. Note somediscrepancy between our results and the results of [64].The authors of [64] reported only one maximum of thecurve vcr(R). This could be a consequence of small num-ber of experimental points between R = 1.8 and R = 2.4presented in [64].

Apart from the previously known bions and escapewindows, in the range vin < vcr in our numerical exper-iments we observed a new phenomenon, which could beclassified as formation of a bound state of two oscillons,and their escape in some cases. So at some initial veloc-ities of the colliding kinks, in the final state we observedtwo oscillons escaping from the collision point. The timebetween the first kinks impact and the beginning of theoscillons escaping can be rather big. The field evolutionduring this time is quite complicated. First, we observeformation of a bion. After a short time, this bion evolvesinto a configuration, which can be identified as a boundstate of two oscillons oscillating around each other. Theamplitude of these oscillations can vary substantially. Af-ter that the oscillons either remain bound or escape tospatial infinities, depending on the initial velocity of the

colliding kinks. It is interesting that formation of a boundstate of two oscillons, as well as escape of oscillons, hasbeen found recently in the collisions of kinks of the sinh-deformed ϕ4 model [46,47]. We think that this new phe-nomenon can be a part of new interesting physics withina wide class of non-linear models.

We can assume that the escape of oscillons is a kind ofresonance phenomena, i.e. it is a consequence of the res-onant energy exchange between oscillon’s kinetic energyand its internal vibrational degree(s) of freedom. A de-tailed study of such exchange could be a subject of futurework.

In conclusion, we would like to mention several issuesthat we think could become a subject of future study.

– First, it would be interesting to explain the behaviourof the dependence vcr(R) with a series of local max-ima. This non-monotonicity could be a consequenceof the kink’s shape changing with increasing of theparameter R. So at large R’s the interaction of theDSG kinks could be reduced to pairwise interaction ofthe subkinks, which are the sine-Gordon solitons sep-arated by the distance 2R. Note that the authors of[26] observed the non-monotonic dependence of vcr onthe model parameter in the parametrically modifiedϕ6 model. In order to explain the phenomenon, theyapplied the collective coordinate approach. We believethat similar analysis could be applied to the doublesine-Gordon kink-antikink system.

– Second, the oscillons escape in the final state, as well asformation of a bound state of two oscillons, are new in-teresting phenomena, which have to be explained qual-itatively and probably quantitatively.

– Third, it would be very interesting to study multikinkcollisions within the DSG model in the spirit of [42].Due to complex internal structure of the DSG kinks,the multikink collisions could result in a rich varietyof new phenomena.

Answers to these questions would substantially improveour understanding of the DSG kinks dynamics.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the MEPhI Academic Ex-cellence Project (contract No. 02.a03.21.0005, 27.08.2013).

References

1. R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction toSolitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdan (1982).

2. A. Vilenkin and E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and OtherTopological Defects, Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge U.K. (2000).

3. N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2004).

4. T. Vachaspati, Kinks and Domain Walls: An Introductionto Classical and Quantum Solitons, Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambrifge U.K. (2006).

Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks 9

(a) vin = 0.1847, vf ≈ 0.10 (b) vin = 0.18467, vf ≈ 0.03

(c) vin = 0.18470001, vf ≈ 0.15 (d) vin = 0.18470003, vf ≈ 0.19

(e) vin = 0.18472, vf = 0.00 (f) vin = 0.18473, vf ≈ 0.07

Figure 7. Kink-antikink collisions at various initial velocities (R = 1, ξ = 10) and escape of oscillons.

10 Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

5. D. Bazeia, L. Losano and J.R.L. Santos, Kinklike struc-tures in scalar field theories: From one-field to two-fieldmodels, Phys. Lett. A 377 (2013) 1615 [arXiv:1304.6904].

6. A. Alonso-Izquierdo, D. Bazeia, L. Losano and J. Ma-teos Guilarte, New Models for Two Real Scalar Fields andTheir Kink-Like Solutions, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013(2013) 183295 [arXiv:1308.2724].

7. H. Katsura, Composite-kink solutions of coupled nonlin-ear wave equations, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085019[arXiv:1312.4263].

8. R.A.C. Correa, A. de Souza Dutra and M. Gleiser,Information-entropic measure of energy-degenerate kinksin two-field models, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 388[arXiv:1409.0029].

9. D. Saadatmand, A. Moradi Marjaneh and M. Heidari, Dy-namics of coupled field solitons: A collective coordinate ap-proach, Pramana - J Phys 83 (2014) 505.

10. A. Alonso-Izquierdo, Kink dynamics in a system of twocoupled scalar fields in two space-time dimensions, PhysicaD 365 (2018) 12 [arXiv:1711.08784].

11. A. Alonso-Izquierdo, Reflection, transmutation, annihi-lation and resonance in two-component kink collisions,Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 045016 [arXiv:1711.10034].

12. V.A. Lensky, V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Domainwalls carrying a U(1) charge, Sov. Phys. JETP 93 (2001)677 [hep-th/0104266].

13. V.A. Lensky, V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Domainwalls carrying a U(1) charge, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 120(2001) 778 [hep-th/0104266].

14. V.A. Gani, N.B. Konyukhova, S.V. Kurochkin andV.A. Lensky, Study of stability of a charged topologicalsoliton in the system of two interacting scalar fields, Com-put. Math. Math. Phys. 44 (2004) 1968 [arXiv: 0710.2975].

15. V.A. Gani, N.B. Konyukhova, S.V. Kurochkin andV.A. Lensky, Study of stability of a charged topological soli-ton in the system of two interacting scalar fields, Zh. Vy-chisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 44 (2004) 2069 [arXiv: 0710.2975].

16. D. Bazeia, A.S. Lobao Jr., L. Losano and R. Menezes,First-order formalism for twinlike models with severalreal scalar fields, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2755[arXiv:1312.1198].

17. V.A. Gani, M.A. Lizunova and R.V. Radomskiy Scalartriplet on a domain wall: an exact solution, JHEP 04(2016) 043 [arXiv:1601.07954].

18. V.A. Gani, M.A. Lizunova and R.V. Radomskiy, Scalartriplet on a domain wall, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 675 (2016)012020 [arXiv:1602.04446].

19. S. Akula, C. Balazs and G.A. White, Semi-analytic tech-niques for calculating bubble wall profiles, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 681 [arXiv:1608.00008].

20. J. Ashcroft et al., Head butting sheep: kink collisions inthe presence of false vacua, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49(2016) 365203 [arXiv:1604.08413].

21. T.I. Belova and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Solitons and their in-teractions in classical field theory, Phys. Usp. 40 (1997)359.

22. T.I. Belova and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Solitons and their in-teractions in classical field theory, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 167(1997) 377.

23. V.A. Gani, A.E. Kudryavtsev and M.A. Lizunova, Kink in-teractions in the (1+1)-dimensional ϕ6 model, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 125009 [arXiv:1402.5903].

24. H. Weigel, Kink-Antikink Scattering in ϕ4 and φ6

Models, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 482 (2014) 012045[arXiv:1309.6607].

25. I. Takyi and H. Weigel, Collective coordinates in one-dimensional soliton models revisited, Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) 085008 [arXiv:1609.06833].

26. A. Demirkaya et al., Kink Dynamics in a Parametric φ6

System: A Model With Controllably Many Internal Modes,JHEP 12 (2017) 071 [arXiv:1706.01193].

27. H.E. Baron, G. Luchini and W.J. Zakrzewski, Collectivecoordinate approximation to the scattering of solitons inthe (1+1) dimensional NLS model, J. Phys. A: Math. andTheor. 47 (2014) 265201 [arXiv:1308.4072].

28. K. Javidan, Collective coordinate variable for soliton-potential system in sine-Gordon model, J. Math. Phys. 51(2010) 112902 [arXiv:0910.3058].

29. I. Christov and C.I. Christov, Physical dynamics of quasi-particles in nonlinear wave equations, Phys. Lett. A 372(2008) 841 [nlin/0612005].

30. V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Collisions of domainwalls in a supersymmetric model, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64(2001) 2043 [hep-th/9904209, hep-th/9912211].

31. V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Collisions of domainwalls in a supersymmetric model, Yad. Fiz. 64 (2001) 2130[hep-th/9904209, hep-th/9912211].

32. J.K. Perring and T.H.R. Skyrme, A model unified fieldequation, Nucl. Phys 31 (1962) 550.

33. R. Rajaraman, Intersoliton forces in weak-coupling quan-tum field theories, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2866.

34. N.S. Manton, An effective Lagrangian for solitons,Nucl. Phys. B 150 (1979) 397.

35. P.G. Kevrekidis, A. Khare and A. Saxena, Solitary waveinteractions in dispersive equations using Manton’s ap-proach, Phys. Rev. E 70 (2004) 057603 [nlin/0410045].

36. V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Kink-antikink interac-tions in the double sine-Gordon equation and the problemof resonance frequencies, Phys. Rev. E 60 (1999) 3305[cond-mat/9809015].

37. P. Dorey, K. Mersh, T. Romanczukiewicz and Y. Shnir,Kink-Antikink Collisions in the φ6 Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 091602 [arXiv:1101.5951].

38. V.A. Gani, V. Lensky and M.A. Lizunova, Kink excita-tion spectra in the (1+1)-dimensional ϕ8 model, JHEP 08(2015) 147 [arXiv:1506.02313].

39. V.A. Gani, V. Lensky, M.A. Lizunova and E.V. Mro-zovskaya, Excitation spectra of solitary waves in scalarfield models with polynomial self-interaction, J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 675 (2016) 012019 [arXiv:1602.02636].

40. R.V. Radomskiy, E.V. Mrozovskaya, V.A. Ganiand I.C. Christov, Topological defects with power-law tails, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 798 (2017) 012087[arXiv:1611.05634].

41. A. Moradi Marjaneh, D. Saadatmand, Kun Zhou,S.V. Dmitriev and M.E. Zomorrodian, High energy den-sity in the collision of N kinks in the φ4 model, Com-mun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 49 (2017) 30[arXiv:1605.09767].

42. A. Moradi Marjaneh, V.A. Gani, D. Saadatmand,S.V. Dmitriev and K. Javidan, Multi-kink collisions in theφ6 model, JHEP 07 (2017) 028 [arXiv:1704.08353].

43. A. Moradi Marjaneh, A. Askari, D. Saadatmand andS.V. Dmitriev, Extreme values of elastic strain and energyin sine-Gordon multi-kink collisions, Eur. Phys. J B 91(2018) 22 [arXiv:1710.10159].

Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks 11

44. E. Belendryasova and V.A. Gani, Scattering of the ϕ8 kinkswith power-law asymptotics, arXiv:1708.00403.

45. E. Belendryasova and V.A. Gani, Resonance phenomenain the ϕ8 kinks scattering, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 934 (2017)012059 [arXiv:1712.02846].

46. D. Bazeia, E. Belendryasova and V.A. Gani, Scattering ofkinks of the sinh-deformed ϕ4 model, Eur. Phys. J. C 78(2018) 340 [arXiv:1710.04993].

47. D. Bazeia, E. Belendryasova and V.A. Gani, Scattering ofkinks in a non-polynomial model, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 934(2017) 012032 [arXiv:1711.07788].

48. D. Saadatmand, S.V. Dmitriev and P.G. Kevrekidis, Highenergy density in multisoliton collisions, Phys. Rev. D 92(2015) 056005 [arXiv:1506.01389].

49. M.A. Lohe, Soliton structures in P (ϕ)2, Phys. Rev. D 20(1979) 3120.

50. A. Khare, I.C. Christov and A. Saxena, Successive phasetransitions and kink solutions in φ8, φ10, and φ12 field the-ories, Phys. Rev. E 90 (2014) 023208 [arXiv:1402.6766].

51. H. Weigel, Emerging Translational Variance: Vacuum Po-larization Energy of the ϕ6 kink, Adv. High Energy Phys.2017 (2017) 1486912 [arXiv:1706.02657].

52. H. Weigel, Vacuum polarization energy for general back-grounds in one space dimension, Phys. Lett. B 766 (2017)65 [arXiv:1612.08641].

53. P. Dorey et al., Boundary scattering in the φ4 model, JHEP05 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1508.02329].

54. D. Bazeia, M.A. Gonzalez Leon, L. Losano and J. Ma-teos Guilarte, Deformed defects for scalar fields with poly-nomial interactions, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 105008[hep-th/0605127].

55. S. He, Y. Jiang and J. Liu, Toda chain from the kink-antikink lattice, arXiv:1605.06867.

56. S. Snelson, Asymptotic stability for odd perturbations ofthe the stationary kink in the variable-speed ϕ4 model,arXiv:1603.07344.

57. L.E. Guerrero, E.Lopez-Atencio and J.A. Gonzalez, Long-range self-affine correlations in a random soliton gas,Phys. Rev. E 55 (1997) 7691.

58. B.A. Mello, J.A. Gonzalez, L.E. Guerrero and E. Lopez-Atencio, Topological defects with long-range interactions,Phys. Lett. A 244 (1998) 277.

59. L.E. Guerrero and J.A. Gonzalez, Long-range interactingsolitons: pattern formation and nonextensive thermostatis-tics, Physica A 257 (1998) 390 [patt-sol/9905010].

60. A.R. Gomes, R. Menezes and J.C.R.E. Oliveira, Highlyinteractive kink solutions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025008[arXiv:1208.4747].

61. M. Peyrard and D.K. Campbell, Kink-antikink interac-tions in a modified sine-Gordon model, Physica D 9 (1983)33.

62. G. Delfino and G. Mussardo, Non-integrable aspects of themulti-frequency sine-Gordon model, Nucl. Phys. B 516(1998) 675 [hep-th/9709028].

63. D.K. Campbell and M. Peyrard, Solitary wave collisionsrevisited, Physica D 18 (1986) 47.

64. D.K. Campbell, M. Peyrard and P. Sodano, Kink-antikinkinteractions in the double sine-Gordon equation, PhysicaD 19 (1986) 165.

65. Yu.S. Kivshar and B.A. Malomed, Radiative and inelas-tic effects in dynamics of double sine-Gordon solitons,Phys. Lett. A 122 (1987) 245.

66. B.A. Malomed, Dynamics and kinetics of solitons in thedriven damped double Sine-Gordon equation, Phys. Lett.A 136 (1989) 395.

67. D. Bazeia, L. Losano and J.M.C. Malbouisson, Deformeddefects, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 101701 [hep-th/0209027].

68. C.A. Almeida, D. Bazeia, L. Losano and J.M.C. Malbouis-son, New results for deformed defects, Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 067702 [hep-th/0405238].

69. L. Campanelli, P. Cea, G.L. Fogli and L. Tedesco,Charged domain walls, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13 (2004)65 [astro-ph/0307211].

70. V.A. Gani, V.G. Ksenzov and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Exampleof a self-consistent solution for a fermion on domain wall,Phys. Atom. Nucl. 73 (2010) 1889 [arXiv:1001.3305].

71. V.A. Gani, V.G. Ksenzov and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Exampleof a self-consistent solution for a fermion on domain wall,Yad. Fiz. 73 (2010) 1940 [arXiv:1001.3305].

72. V.A. Gani, V.G. Ksenzov and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Sta-ble branches of a solution for a fermion on domain wall,Phys. Atom. Nucl. 74 (2011) 771 [arXiv:1009.4370].

73. V.A. Gani, V.G. Ksenzov and A.E. Kudryavtsev, Sta-ble branches of a solution for a fermion on domain wall,Yad. Fiz. 74 (2011) 797 [arXiv:1009.4370].

74. V.A. Gani et al, On decay of bubble of disorientedchiral condensate, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 62 (1999) 895[hep-ph/9712526].

75. V.A. Gani et al, On decay of bubble of disoriented chiralcondensate, Yad. Fiz. 62 (1999) 956 [hep-ph/9712526].

76. T.I. Belova, V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudyavtsev, Decay of alarge-amplitude bubble of a disoriented chiral condensate,Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64 (2001) 140 [hep-ph/0003308].

77. T.I. Belova, V.A. Gani and A.E. Kudyavtsev, Decay of alarge-amplitude bubble of a disoriented chiral condensate,Yad. Fiz. 64 (2001) 143 [hep-ph/0003308].

78. M. Nitta, Josephson vortices and the Atiyah-Mantonconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 125004[arXiv:1207.6958].

79. M. Nitta, Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1and 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 025013[arXiv:1210.2233].

80. M. Nitta, Matryoshka Skyrmions, Nucl. Phys. B 872(2013) 62 [arXiv:1211.4916].

81. M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta, Sine-Gordon kinks on adomain wall ring, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 085003[arXiv:1302.0989].

82. P. Jennings and P. Sutcliffe, The dynamics of do-main wall Skyrmions, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 465401[arXiv:1305.2869].

83. S.B. Gudnason and M. Nitta, Domain wall Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085022 [arXiv:1403.1245].

84. N. Blyankinshtein, Q-lumps on a domain wall with aspin-orbit interaction, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 065030[arXiv:1510.07935].

85. A.Yu. Loginov, Q kink of the nonlinear O(3) σ model in-volving an explicitly broken symmetry, Phys. Atom. Nucl.74 (2011) 740.

86. A.Yu. Loginov, Q kink of the nonlinear O(3) σ model in-volving an explicitly broken symmetry, Yad. Fiz. 74 (2011)766.

87. D. Bazeia, A. Mohammadi, Fermionic bound states in dis-tinct kinklike backgrounds, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 203[arXiv:1702.00891].

12 Vakhid A. Gani et al.: Scattering of the double sine-Gordon kinks

88. D. Bazeia, A. Mohammadi and D.C. Moreira, Fermionbound states in geometrically deformed backgrounds,arXiv:1706.04406.

89. M. Mai and P. Schweitzer, Energy momentum tensor, andthe D-term of Q-balls, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 076001[arXiv:1206.2632].

90. M. Mai and P. Schweitzer, Radial excitations of Q-balls, and their D-term, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 096002[arXiv:1206.2930].

91. M. Cantara, M. Mai and P. Schweitzer, The energy-momentum tensor and D-term of Q-clouds, Nucl. Phys.A 953 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1510.08015].

92. I.E. Gulamov, E.Ya. Nugaev and M.N. Smolyakov, An-alytic Q-ball solutions and their stability in a piece-wise parabolic potential, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 085043[arXiv:1303.1173].

93. D. Bazeia, M.A. Marques and R. Menezes, Exact solutions,energy and charge of stable Q-balls, Eur. Phys. J. C 76(2016) 241 [arXiv:1512.04279].

94. D. Bazeia et al, Compact Q-balls, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016)146 [arXiv:1604.08871].

95. D. Bazeia, L. Losano, M.A. Marques and R. Menezes, SplitQ-balls, Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 359 [arXiv:1612.04442].

96. V. Dzhunushaliev, A. Makhmudov andK.G. Zloshchastiev, Singularity-free model of electri-cally charged fermionic particles and gauged Q-balls,Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 096012 [arXiv:1611.02105].

97. V.A. Gani, A.A. Kirillov and S.G. Rubin, Classical tran-sitions with the topological number changing in the earlyUniverse, JCAP 04 (2018) 042 [arXiv:1704.03688].

98. V.A. Gani, A.A. Kirillov and S.G. Rubin, Transitionsbetween topologically non-trivial configurations, J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 934 (2017) 012046 [arXiv:1711.07700].

99. E.B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24 (1976) 449.

100. E.B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions,Yad. Fiz. 24 (1976) 861.

101. M.K. Prasad and C.M. Sommerfield, Exact Classical So-lution for the ’t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon,Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 760.