scholars’ blogs or scholarly blogs? perceptions and implications for promotion, reward and...

64
CAROLYN.HANK@MCGILL.CA Assistant Professor School of Information Studies SCHOOL OF INFO & LIBRARY SCIENCE 25 APRIL 2012 CHAPEL HILL SCHOLARS’ BLOGS OR SCHOLARLY BLOGS? PERCEPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PROMOTION, REWARD AND PRESERVATION

Upload: carolyn-hank

Post on 25-Dec-2014

1.008 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Guest talk given at the School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, April 25, 2012.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

[email protected]

Assistant Professor ▪ School of Information Studies

SCHOOL OF INFO & LIBRARY SCIENCE ▪ 25 APRIL 2012 ▪ CHAPEL HILL

SCHOLARS’ BLOGS

OR

SCHOLARLY BLOGS?

PERCEPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR

PROMOTION, REWARD AND PRESERVATION

Page 2: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

BLOGS & PRESERVATION

2006 General Bloggers - Choemprayong & Sheble (UNC)

- BlogForever (EU)

Scholar Bloggers - History, Economics, Law, Biology, Chemistry & Physics

Bibliobloggers

2009

2012

Page 3: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

blogs

THE SCHOLARLY

RECORD &

THE SYSTEM

OF SCHOLARLY

COMMUNICATION?

Page 4: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

FOCUS

GROUPS INTERVIEWS

FUNCTIONS …

LEGITIMIZATION

DISSEMINATION

-ACCESS

-PRESERVATION

-CURATION

ROOSENDAAL

(2001)

BORGMAN

(2007)

REGISTRATION

CERTIFICATION

AWARENESS

ARCHIVING FUNCTIONS

Page 5: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

FOCUS

GROUPS INTERVIEWS

CONTINUED

LEGITIMAZATION

DISSEMINATION

-ACCESS

-PRESERVATION

-CURATION

ROOSENDAAL

(2001)

BORGMAN

(2007)

REGISTRATION

CERTIFICATION

AWARENESS

ARCHIVING FUNCTIONS

VAN DE SOMPEL ET AL. (2004)

REWARD

INSTITUTIONALIZED

ELEMENTARY

HAGSTROM (1965)

EXTRINSIC

INTRINSIC

MURRAY & MOORE (2006)

Page 6: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Questionnaires

Interviews

Blog Analysis BLOGGER

BLOG

03 | xx research questions units & data sources

Page 7: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Completed sample:

153 respondents

RR 1: QI: 63% | QII: 46% | QI/II: 52%

Outcome rates derived from Internet surveys of specifically named persons

from the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR, 2009)

questionnaires (N=294)

Page 8: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

24 semi-structured

phone interviews

72 (47%) of QI & QII respondents expressed interest

interviews

Page 9: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Coded 93 blogs

57 to 63 Indicators

(on/off blog)

Authorship Attributes

Blog Elements & Features

Rights & Disclaimers

Authority & Audience

Blog Publishing Activity

Post Features

Archiving

blog analysis (SR: 49.5%; (N=188)

Page 10: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

results

Page 11: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

AGE

years

(range 25 to 70 years old)

mean real age

bloggers

Page 12: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

(range 0 to 39 years)

mean professional age

years

AGE

bloggers

Page 13: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

ESTABLISHED PUBLICATION AND SERVICE

HISTORY

bloggers

Page 14: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

IDENTITY

Real name | Both | Pseudonym

84 13 8 % % %

legitimization

Page 15: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

(57% between 5 to 8 years old)

mean blog age

years

BLOG AGE

legitimization & dissemination

Page 16: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

BLOGGING OVER TIME

About the same 35%

Somewhat more 14%

Somewhat less 25%

A lot less 17%

A lot more 8%

legitimization & dissemination

Page 17: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

make all of their posts

publicly available

POSTING

dissemination & access

Page 18: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

POSTING

update their blog 1+

times per week

legitimization & dissemination

% published a new post

within the previous week

BLOG

Page 19: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

PRIMARY AUDIENCE

0% 100%

General public

Colleagues and

professional peers

Everyone else students, family, friends, others

8%

32%

61%

legitimization & dissemination

Page 20: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Public 100%

Subject to

critical

review 68%

Allows use and

exchange 94%

Scholarly

record

80%

66% agree with

all three criteria

Association of Research

Libraries (1986).

Braxton, J.M., Luckey, W.,

& Helland, P. (2002).

SCHOLARSHIP

communication?

Page 21: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

… to present

INVITATIONS

impact & reward

Page 22: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

… to collaborate

INVITATIONS

impact & reward

Page 23: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

… to serve

INVITATIONS

impact & reward

Page 24: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

INVITATIONS

… to publish

impact & reward

Page 25: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

SCHOLARY LIFE

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY

RESEARCH CREATIVITY

RESEARCH QUALITY

WRITING QUALITY

WRITING EFFICIENCY

SHARING PRE-PUBS

TEACHING QUALITY

WORK ENJOYMENT

GREATER VISIBILITY

PROMOTION

IMPROVED

NEITHER

IMPAIRED

impact & reward

Page 26: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

ENGAGEMENT

employ a post

commenting feature

dissemination?

Page 27: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

respond to comments

ENGAGEMENT

dissemination

Page 28: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

COMMENTS

of most recent posts

had zero comments

dissemination?

Page 29: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

So looked at

earlier posts

BLOG

COMMENTS

Page 30: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

COMMENTS

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

0 1 2-3 4-5 6-10 11-19 ≥ 20

COMMENTS

PO

STS

dissemination?

Page 31: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

RIGHTS & USE

Creative

Commons (n=13)

Copyright

Statement (n=34)

%

no rights or use statements

at blog or post level

across functions

Page 32: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

DISCLAIMERS

have an explicit or implicit

disclaimer-style statement

Own

opinion

Not

responsible

Advice

across functions

Page 33: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

COMMENT POLICY

have an explicit or implicit

comment policy or guidelines

Moderation

Tone &

language

Copyright &

licenses

across functions

Page 34: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

EDITING

edit posts after publication

Spelling/

Grammar

Rephrasing

Incorrect Info

Published before

ready

curation

Page 35: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

… only 2 blogs included

a policy or statement

Page 36: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

DELETING

delete posts after publication

Duplicate

Post

“Post Regret”

Too sensitive or

revealing

curation

Page 37: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

Agree preservation for public access & use

into the indefinite future (strongly or somewhat)

PRESERVATION

preservation

Page 38: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

PRESERVATION

0% 100%

Personal access/use

Indefinite future

Public access/use

Indefinite future

Personal access/use

Short-term future

Public access/use

Short-term future

16%

19%

76%

80%

preservation

Page 39: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

Purposefully save entire blog via an

archiving service or independently

SAVING

preservation

Page 40: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

%

SAVING

Purposefully save some

blog components

Export tools

Personal

back-ups

Document/text files

Via syndication

services

preservation

Page 41: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

if? What

Page 42: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation
Page 43: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Page 44: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Devastated,

both emotionally and

professionally.

Pretty

bad.

Very

sad.

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Page 45: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Mad as hell.

I’d do something

drastic [in response].

Pretty

peeved. Angry

& upset.

Page 46: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

I don’t have to

do it anymore. I get half an hour of my

life back.

Page 47: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Not welcomed

but not tragic …

I’d get over it.

Probably

have a drink & forget about it.

Pour another cup

of coffee & get back to work. Drop out …

until something else

comes along.

Page 48: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

It would take an

extreme catastrophe.

How would

that happen?

Page 49: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Blogs Teaching

materials

Books

Journal

articles

Blogs

Personnel

Communications

Books

Journal

articles

Filter

Blogs

Class

Blogs

Traditional

Publications

Blogs

Law review

articles

Blogs

Books

Journal

articles

Blogs

Email

Self-

Publications

Peer-

Reviewed

Publications

Journal

articles

Filter

Blogs

Works-in-

progress

Blogs

Published

Papers

Blogs

Peer-

Reviewed

Publications

Informal

Publications

Blogs

Lab

Notebooks

Published

Papers

Dissertations

& Theses

Monographs

Select

Blog Posts

Books

Blogs

Books

Journal

articles

Journal

articles

Book

Reviews

Blogs

Journal

articles

Teaching

materials

Scientific &

Scholarly

Research

Pedagogical

Research & Tools

Blogs

LOWER HIGHER

PRESERVATION PRIORITY

Page 50: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

BLOG DELETION

%

have deleted a blog

curation

Page 51: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

RESPONSIBILITY CAPABILITY

Blogger

Co-Author(s)

Provider/Host/Network

Search Engine

Public Trust

preservation preservation

Page 52: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

RESPONSIBILITY CAPABILITY

Blogger

Co-Author(s)

Provider/Host/Network

Search Engine

Public Trust

Nat'l Library

Nat'l Archive

Inst'l Library

Inst'l Archive

Inst'l IT Dept

preservation preservation

Page 53: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Better things to do

Personal responsibility

Personal communications

Bad experience

BLOGGER PERCEPTIONS

Page 54: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

scholarship? check

Page 55: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

first line of

defense

Page 56: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

first line of

defense

Page 57: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

final line of

defense

Page 58: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

part 2 … or, what’s next

Page 59: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Not actively

published to

in previous

3 months (n=156)

left no message behind

on where they went or

if they would be back

BLOG

%

AVAILABLE BUT INACTIVE

(N=188)

Page 60: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

THE BLOG

BREAK-UP POST

BLOG

DEAR JOHN …

Page 61: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

BIBLIOBLOGGERS

WHAT’S NEXT

2012 OCLC/ALISE LISRGP

The Biblioblogosphere: A Comparison of Communication and

Preservation Perceptions and Practices between Blogging LIS

Scholar-Practitioners and LIS Scholar-Researchers

With Cassidy Sugimoto, CO-PI (IUB)

Page 62: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Questionnaires

Interviews

Blog Analysis

CV analysis

BLOGGER

BLOG

03 | xx research questions units & data sources

Page 63: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

Association of Research Libraries. (1986). The changing system of scholarly

communication. Washington, DC: Author.

Borgman, C.L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure and the

Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Braxton, J.M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of

scholarship through Boyer’s four domains: ASHE-ERIC higher education report. San

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). The scientific community. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2006). The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach.

Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Roosendaal, H.E., Guerts, P.A. Th.M., & van der Vet, P.E. (2001). Developments in

scientific communication: Considerations on the value chain. Information Services &

Use, 21(1), 13-32.

Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004).

Rethinking scholarly communication: Building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib

Magazine, 10(9). doi: 10.1045/september2004-vandesompel

SOURCES

Page 64: Scholars’ Blogs or Scholarly Blogs? Perceptions and Implications for Promotion, Reward and Preservation

THANK YOU …

CAROLYN HANK Email: [email protected]

Phone: (001)514.398.4684

SlideShare: http://www.slideshare.net/carolynhank

Slideshow:

QUESTIONS?

THANKS TO …

OCLC/ALISE LISRGP

ALISE RESEARCHGRANT