science and compliant commenting
DESCRIPTION
The presentation might explain, why some people, especially people in industry, are afraid of contributing to web 2.0 communities.See also discussion at http://ff.im/3cGW3TRANSCRIPT
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Science 2.0We need compliant commenting
Mining Drug Spacehttp://miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Jörg Kurt Wegner, PhD2009-05-26
Fact ! - We need scientific collaborationHow? - Communicate
Since we can not all share the same room, time zone, or flip-chart, can Web 2.0 support communication.
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
But wait ... in science ...technology alone is not a solution
There are communication barriers caused by• scientists from different disciplines using
different terminologies• different personalities and communication
layers, e.g. emotional versus technical• Fear! Yes, fear, of – being non-compliant– unknown reactions of peers
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Let us look at the real road-stoppers for communicationDifferent terminologies
Not easy, but standards and semantics will evolve.So, disarmed.
Different personalitiesExample, often men and women think differently, but still, the man-/woman-kind is evolving anyway.So, disarmed, especially with moderation in-place.
FearThis is tricky, it is all about you and the only thing we can say is that we need YOU and your input!Let us discuss this topic for a few slides.
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Now
The actual situationA sender-receiver dilemma
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
SenderYOU
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
„We need YOUr input“
The actual situationA sender-receiver dilemma
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
„I am afraid of answering“• I do not know if I am non-compliant• The web 2.0 might laugh at me• I just hide here, then I am save
Good news: You are safeBad news: The world will evolve without knowing YOU. Beside, are you not alone?
SenderYOU
Forget it, a non-responder
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The actual situationA sender-receiver dilemma
Nobody invited them, butsome people are sending nonsenseor are non-constructive
SPAM and being a dickThe bad guys
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
SenderYOU
Comment
Douane
Moderation, and disableanonymous posts.
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The future
The futureA compliant collaboration
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
SenderYOU
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
„We need YOUr input“
The futureA compliant collaboration
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
SenderYOU
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Comment
Douane
ObserverProvidestokens and slots
Comment
Douane
„I am happy to help!“
„Build trust and serve!“
The futureA compliant collaboration
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
SenderYOU
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
„Good input. Let us stay in touch.“*
* By the way, nobody is laughing at you ! The community sees how valuable YOUr input is.
Get support from people knowing the compliance regulations in all details !
ReceiverThe Web 2.0 community. People, like you
SenderYOU
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Comment
Douane
ObserverProvidestokens and slots
Your business process or legal department can check if you are compliant.There is no need being afraid of the MANY compliance regulations. They can help YOU !This should be easy and part of the process, not be a challenge !
A third party makes sure,that only approved comment tokenswill be transfered to the web 2.0.They also make sure that the web 2.0 willreserve a (hidden till public) slot for your comment.
ReferencesScience 2.0• Yes, collaboration - Science journalism: Supplanting the old media?
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090318/full/458274a.html • Web 2.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0
Compliance and fear• Even if online, what is missing for a good collaboration?
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.com/2006/09/even-if-online-what-is-missing-for.html • „People are afraid of what they do not know and failure.“
http://books.google.be/books?id=s52lUTjYPHoC• Process Innovation versus Governance, Risk and Compliance
http://www.slideshare.net/mzurmuehlen/process-innovation-vs-governance-risk-and-compliance-presentation-664426
In German (sorry)• There are world-wide more than 10000 compliance regulations
http://www.computerzeitung.de/articles/compliance_nicht-einhalten_von_regularien_ist_kein_kavaliersdelikt:/2009016/31905201_ha_CZ.html?thes=&&page=1
• Compliance must be organizedhttp://www.computerzeitung.de/aktuell/compliance_muss_verwaltet_werden:/compliance_muss_verwaltet_werden.html?thes=
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com