selection, design and construction of a multilevel groundwater monitoring system usgs / epa region 2...

37
Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City January 14, 2014 John N. Dougherty, PG Lisa Campbell, PG

Upload: april-nash

Post on 27-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring SystemUSGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop

EPA Region 2, New York CityJanuary 14, 2014

John N. Dougherty, PGLisa Campbell, PG

Page 2: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

2

What is a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System?

Source: Schlumberger

Monitoring Well Cluster Multilevel Well

Page 3: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

3

Selection

Page 4: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Why Use a Multilevel System?

• Three major systems are on the market– Model 401 Waterloo Multilevel System (Solinst)– Westbay (Schlumberger)– Water FLUTe™ (Flexible Liner Underground Technologies, Ltd. Co)– All are good quality and widely used

• Three other systems not covered in this presentation– Solinst CMT– BESST Barcad and ZIST– Waterloo Continuous Multichannel Tube (CMT) system

4

Page 5: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Why Use a Multilevel System?

• The decision to use a multilevel system is driven by the site conceptual model that includes elements, such as:– Project objectives

• Need to characterize complex site conditions– Hydrogeology

• Depth to water• Aquifer Thickness

– Stratigraphy– Vertical and Lateral extent of groundwater contamination

5

Page 6: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Selection Considerations

• Sustainability• Equipment downhole• Surface support equipment• Water level monitoring• Groundwater sampling• Post installation problems• Operations and maintenance• Decommissioning

• Driller support (subcontractor)

• Layout area• Construction procedure• Installation issues• Surface completion• Development

6

Page 7: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Waterloo System

7Source: Solinst

Installation in an open borehole

Installation in a well

Monitoring fracture zones

Page 8: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Westbay System

8

Packer- reliable seal for a range of borehole sizes

Measurement port- for fluid sampling and in-situ measurement

Pumping port: for hydraulic conductivity testing and purging

Casing: variable lengths

Source: Schlumberger

Page 9: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Key FLUTe™ Components

9

“Sample tube”

“Pump tube”

Secondcheck

valve

First check valve

Sealing liner

Spacerdefiningmonitoring interval

Water FLUTe Port and Pump System

Formationhead in pump

Port to pumptube

Port behindspacer thruliner

(Single port system shown for clarity)

“Bottom of the U”

Pump quick connect

Tether support oftubing bundle

Source: FLUT Ltd.

Page 10: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Advantages of a Multilevel System

• Depth discreet water quality and water level elevation data• Reduced footprint/increased sustainability

– Install one well with many ports versus multiple borings and wells• Reduced drilling costs/increased sustainability

– One borehole– Reduced investigation derived waste (IDW)– Deal with difficult drilling conditions one time

• Reduced sampling costs relative to the same number of conventional wells

10

Page 11: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Disadvantages and Assumptionsof a Multilevel System

• Disadvantages– Requires specialized support equipment and training

• Waterloo and FLUTe™: gas drive pump/bladder pump• Westbay: wire line tool

– Limited use as observation wells during aquifer testing• Assumptions

– All systems assume that ambient groundwater flow maintains representative groundwater at the sampling port

• Stakeholders must agree

11

Page 12: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

12

Design

Page 13: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Design Considerations

• A good multilevel system design is based on:– Good site conceptual model– Clear objectives– Vertical and lateral hydrostratigraphic data– Groundwater quality data

• Overburden: – Lithologic and groundwater sampling during borehole drilling using

direct push, sonic drilling, or hollow stem auger• Bedrock:

– Rock core, air rotary, casing advance– Borehole geophysical logging– Packer testing or fluid sampler

13

Page 14: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Design Considerations (cont’d)

• Optimum borehole or well diameter• Installation in open borehole or well in bedrock• Installation in unconsolidated formation

– Direct burial– Completion inside well

• Number of ports• Maximum depth of installation• Packer system

14

Page 15: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Design Using Packer Testing and Borehole Geophysics

15

Page 16: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

16

Construction: Waterloo System

Page 17: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Waterloo System Advantages

• Gas drive sampling (double valve or bladder pump)• Practical to obtain large sample volumes (important at Superfund

sites)• Can run a “low-flow” type method and collect water quality

parameters• Minimizes IDW• Proven technology

17

Page 18: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Waterloo System Disadvantages

• Relatively complicated installation process• Requires significant work area

– Equipment must be laid out on ground• Transducers and pumps are downhole

– Cannot be recovered in the unlikely event they fail (unless removable packers are used)

• Tubing vulnerable to kinks during installation– Kinks only discovered during final testing before packer inflation

18

Page 19: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Waterloo System Layout

19

Page 20: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Waterloo Components Going Downhole

20

Page 21: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Pump, Transducer and Port Installation

21

Bladder Pump

Transducer

Sampling Port

Page 22: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Waterloo Sampling

22

Page 23: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

23

Construction: Westbay System

Page 24: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Westbay System Advantages

• Relatively simple installation• Requires relatively small work space• Transducer and sampler are on a wire line • Joints are pressure tested during installation• Packers are inflated with water to a specific pressure• Minimizes IDW• Long term maintenance requirements are low• Proven technology

24

Page 25: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Westbay System Disadvantages

• Maximum volume per trip is 1 liter• Can not run a “low-flow” type sample collection method• Interval cannot be purged before sampling• Not always possible to obtain reliable water quality data

especially dissolved oxygen (DO)• Technology is static

25

Page 26: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Westbay Equipment Layout

26

Page 27: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Westbay Pumping (gray) and Measurement Port

27

Page 28: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Packer Installation and Pressure Testing

28

Page 29: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Westbay Sampling Equipment

29

Page 30: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

30

Construction: FLUTe™ System

Page 31: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

FLUTe™ System Advantages

31

• Liner seals entire borehole wall• Relatively simple installation process• Relatively small work area• Gas drive sampling• Practical to obtain large sample volumes• Can run a “low-flow” type method and collect water quality

parameters• Minimizes IDW• Innovative company• Proven technology

Page 32: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

FLUTe™ System Disadvantages

• Pumps are downhole – Transducers can be installed downhole or at the surface

• Fabric liner can tear on sharp bedrock borehole wall• Water must be purged from gas lines to obtain current water level

readings• The water level inside the liner must be checked and maintained

above the static head in the formation

32

Page 33: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Water FLUTe™ and Blank Liner

33

Page 34: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

FLUTe™ Installation

34

F u lly lin e d h o le L in e r p e e le d fro m h o le

N e a rly r e m o v e d

Te th e r

L in e r

E x c e ssh e a d inlin e r

R e e l

In v e r te dlin e r

In s ta lla tio n se q u e n c e

R e m o v a l s e q u e n c e

Page 35: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Water FLUTe™ Sampling Procedure

35

“Sample tube”

“Pump tube”

First check valve(closed)

Pumping Procedure

“Bottom of the U”

Gas/waterinterface atend of samplestroke

Gasbottle

Samplecontainer

Bufferagainstaeration

3 wayvalve

Page 36: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

Site Characterization Using Multilevel Well Data

37

Page 37: Selection, Design and Construction of a Multilevel Groundwater Monitoring System USGS / EPA Region 2 Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2, New York City

38

Questions and Answers