senate properties - does digitalization disrupt the fm and pm scene

103
DOES DIGITALIZATION DISRUPT THE FM&PM SCENE? Case Senate Properties Kasper Fabritius Aalto University 5.10.2017

Upload: senaatti-kiinteistoet

Post on 23-Jan-2018

59 views

Category:

Real Estate


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

DOES DIGITALIZATION DISRUPTTHE FM&PM SCENE?Case Senate Properties

Kasper Fabritius

Aalto University 5.10.2017

Page 2: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

CONTENT

A CHANGING WORLDWHAT ABOUT THE FUTURE?WHAT ABOUT THE PUBLIC SECTOR?

WHAT ABOUT FINLAND?SENATE PROPERTIESPROPERTY MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVEOUR OFFERING

SERVICE OFFERING EXAMPLESSALES & MARKETINGCASE STUDIES

Page 3: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

A CHANGING WORLD

Page 4: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 5: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Source: Stefan Hyttfors 2015

Page 6: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 7: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WHAT ABOUT THE FUTURE?

Page 8: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 9: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

TOP 10 EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

Source: Niklas Bergman 2017

Page 10: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

10

Page 11: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 12: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

12

Page 13: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 14: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 15: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

15

Page 16: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Etunimi Sukunimi | # xxxxxx

Page 17: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 18: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 19: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 20: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WHAT ABOUT THE PUBLICSECTOR?

Page 21: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 22: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 23: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WHATS LEFT?

SOCIALINTERACTION

CREATIVITY

EMPATHY

Page 24: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

A NEW LIFESTYLE EMERGING?

Living the lifeThe active & responsive human

Return to simpler lifeWork life balance

Seeking for sence of communityMeaningfulness

Health consciousness / wellnessEcological living, Quality of life

Page 25: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Working practices and culturehave changed

Working practices and culturehave changed

The centralgovernment willbecome more

dynamic

Structural changeswill continue

Security will grow inimportance

The objectives ofsustainable

development will beemphasised

Digitaalisation willprogress

Sparseness is the newnorm

The need forcooperation will grow

Page 26: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

ORGANISATIONSDEVELOP

Steep hierarchies -> flat organizational models

Knowledge workand organizational

models arechanging.

Centralized organizational structure -> Distributed organizational structure

Direct processes -> Dynamic processes

Individual routine work -> Multidimensional networking

CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE WORK

Page 27: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

5.10.2017Etunimi Sukunimi | # xxxxxx 276

Page 28: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WHAT DOES THE GOVERNMENTSAY ABOUT ITS REAL ESTATEPOTRTFOLIO?

Page 29: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

STRATEGIES AND POLICIES BY THE FINNISH GOVERNMENT

29

State Premisesstrategy 2014

(Demand)

State realestate strategy2010 (Supply)

Principles of ownershipPrinciples of use of premises

Page 30: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

GOVERNMENT PREMISES STRATEGY GUIDES WORKPLACEPLANNING

Efficiency goals:renovated buildings: new buildings:

15 m2/FTE18 m2/FTE

Savings on premises costs

Flexible leases and premises

Suitable for multi-location and remote work

Health, safety and comfort

Senate as a work environment and premises expert

Social andenvironmentalresponsibility

The goal is to ensure that premisessupport productivity and are cost-efficient. Special premises areexpected to have a higher utilisationrate, while offices are expected toimprove space efficiency.

AVERAGEGOVERNMENT OFFICESPACE EFFICIENCY

24 m2/FTE

Page 31: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

SENATE PROPERTIES

Page 32: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

32

OUR VISION

“The Finnish government is apioneer in new ways of working

and work environments.”

Page 33: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WE ARE THE WORK ENVIRONMENTPARTNER OF THE FINNISH GOVERNMENT• We are a pioneer of new ways of working and

work environments.

• Our centralised solutions help our customersimprove operations and save on facility costs.

• The diverse skills of Senate Properties'professionals help the government look after itsvaried property assets and manage their efficientuse.

Space for success.

Page 35: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

35

Page 36: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

36

STRATEGIC GOALS

€100 m

annual savings inpremises costs forthe governmentIN 8 YEARS

ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCEIS IMPROVED BY NEW WAYS OF WORKING AND BY ANEW WORK ENVIRONMENT MINDSETTHROUGHOUT THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Social responsibilityleads the way

Page 37: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

POTENTIAL OF DEVELOPING KNOWLEDGE WORK PERFORMANCE

37

Personnel costsOccupancy costsFurnitureICT and equipment

In addition to savings inoccupancy costs,

considerable added valuecan be achieved by

improving theperformance and

productivity of knowledgework.

Source: VTT Rakennus-ja yhdyskuntatekniikka, Toimistorakennuksen kustannusmalli

Page 38: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

38

SENATE PROPERTIES IN BRIEF

Buildings

9,700State-owned facilities

6,200,000Employees

318Locations

11Rentals from the privatemarket, approx.

1,000,000

Page 39: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Assets

4.4 billion euros

Turnover

622MEUR

Investments

268 MEUR

Overall result

199 MEUR

SENATE PROPERTIES IN NUMBERS

Invested capital profits,rental activities

2.9 %

Invested capital profits,all activities

5.4 %

Equity ratio

62 %

Page 40: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

STATE PROPERTY ASSETS

9,300BUILDINGS

6.2 Mm2

TOTALAREA

500LISTED BUILDINGS

RENTED FROMPRIVATELESSORS

approx. 1 Mm2

SHARE (m2)

MILITARY PREMISES…………….............. 47 %OFFICES………......................................... 20 %HERITAGE PROPERTIES………………....... 7 %

PRISONS…............................................... 6 %POLICE FACILITIES.................................. 4 %COURTHOUSES....................................... 3 %BORDER GUARD AND CUSTOMS FACILITIES… 3 %MUSEUMS............................................... 1 %

OTHER...................................................... 9 %VALUE OF

PROPERTIES

€ 4.4BILLION

Page 41: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY COSTS 2015

Share of facility costsin governmentspending onoperations, recruitingand pensions

9 %

GOVERNMENTFACILITY COSTS

€950M/YEAR

PM`S OFFICE............................... 1%

FOREIGN AFFAIRS….................... 3 %

JUSTICE……………………………….…... 12 %

INTERIOR…………………………........ 12 %

DEFENCE………….…………………….... 33 %

FINANCE………………………………....... 8 %

EDUCATION & CULTURE................. 7 %

AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY……………. 4 %

TRANSPORT & COMMUNICATIONS.... 5 %

EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMY…... 10 %

SOCIAL AFFAIRS & HEALTH…....... 3%

ENVIRONMENT……………………....... 1 %

SHARE BY BRANCH

Page 42: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

SENATE PROPERTIES OFFERS THEBEST PROPERTY INVESTMENTOPPORTUNITIES IN FINLAND

• The state is selling its non-strategicproperties and other, unused propertiesaccording to its property strategy.

• We develop the state property assets allocatedfor sale so that they can be marketed and soldat market value.

• We sell the properties mainly based on offers,offering public notifications on properties forsale.

The sale of unused state propertiesbrings annual profits of

€ 100 M

Page 43: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

43

Sales portfolio

0,5+Mrd €

Objects for sale

500+OBJECTS

Sales target 2016

135 M€

Sales target 2016

100 OBJECTS

REAL ESTATE SALES TARGETS

Senate Properties leasesfrom the market

~ 50 M€ / YEAR

Public Sector leases from themarket

~ 130 M€ / YEAR

Page 44: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

44

www.statepropertiesforsale.fi

Page 45: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

45

USERS

71%Very orquite

satisfied

+ location of facilities+ service attitude+ security services+ cleaning and maintenance

services and outdoor areacare

DECISION MAKERS

65%Very orquite

satisfied

+ location of facilities+ professional skills and expertise+ availability of contact persons+ security services

Page 46: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Senate Properties

Ministry of Finance

Government

Parliament

Customersgovernment organisationsGeneral policies, legislation

Owner LeaseBudgettalks

INTERNAL LEASE FRAMEWORK

Serv

ice

prov

ider

s

Serv

ices

Serv

ice

cont

ract

s

Page 47: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

47

NEW GOVERNMENT RENTAL SYSTEM

2016

PROPERTY VALUE IS RETAINED, WITH NO RENOVATION DEBT

COST-BASED, FLEXIBLEAND CONSISTENT

RENTS REDUCED BY 15 %

12-MONTH NOTICE PERIOD IN NEW AGREEMENTS

SENATE PROPERTIES ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FORALL GOVERNMENT PREMISES AND PREMISES DATAMANAGEMENT

RENTS BASED ON USE OF SPACE ENSURES EFFICIENT USE OF PREMISES

Page 48: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

NEW GOVERNMENT RENTAL SYSTEM 2016• A new cost-based rental system - a step away from the market paradigm• For in-house customers in state-owned buildings• Short notice time of contracts: 12 months.• Cost-based = required return on equity will equal to the average debt cost of the state• Return of equity 3%->1,5%. Required return on investments will decrease from 7% to 6,8%• In practise this lowered the rents 15%• Cost based on portfolio level not on customer/building or project level• “Fiscal” determination of rent – no commercial-type negotiation anymore• The decision to accept a project/new contract is still based on DCF-analysis i.e. is the

investment “profitable” over the life-cycle. The Board of Senate makes the decision.• No variation of risk-premia across projects/buildings• Exit-value payment for pre-planned termination of contract is based on remaining book-

value of special purpose investments• A general purpose modern office space that can be rented out again easily can be vacated

without penalty

48

Page 49: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WE BASE OUR ACTIVITIES ONSOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Well functioningwork

environments

Responsibleemployees Safe premises

Healthyfacilities

Energy-efficientbuildings

Page 50: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Strategy, Development andInformation Management

Financial Management

Human Resources andDevelopment

Internal Auditing

Marketing andCommunications

Operating Unit

Construction Management

Region South FinlandRegion West FinlandRegion East FinlandRegion North Finland

ORGANISATION Board of Directors

CEO

Defence andSecurity

Ministries andSpecial

PremisesOffices

Real Estate Developmentand Sales

Workplace andMaintenanceServicesWorking Environments

Page 51: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

3.9.1811Intendent's office

1865Finland Board of PublicBuilding

1936National Board ofPublic Building

1995State Real Property Agency

THE HISTORY OF SENATE PROPERTIES

1999From agency togovernment enterprise

1.3.2001Senate Properties

Page 52: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

GOVERNMENT AND REAL ESTATE 1990->2016

52

1990 2015

State agency

Conglomeratewithin internal

marketsCost cutting

State as a single entity,horizontal cooperation

No silosshared competences

digitalization

Efficiency, productivityCorporate mimicking

Privatization

”Superministries”

2010 – Finnish Government’sdecision on cutting xx costs

New publicmanagement

Stateagency

Governmentowned

enterprise

IncorporationE.g. Destia

Cost pressure, influencingdemand

End user focus

Senate’smission to cut

15%

Sustainability gapHard structural

changes

Digitize processes to improvequality and efficiency

Government’sfocus

Milestones

Trend

SenateProperties’

focus

Productivityprogramme

2008 – Financialcrisis

1995 –Finlandmember of EU

Centralized decision makingStrict financial maangement

”Savings”

Decision maker focus

90s recessionEvent

Page 53: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Forerunner, partner

HOW GOVERNMENT REAL ESTATE THINKING HAS EVOLVED…

53

1990 2015

No pricingmechanism

Demandmechanism7% av. yield +

risk premium –curbs spending

State agency - owner-lessor conflict

Balance sheet

Service provider,”market player”

Solution provider

Income statemet

Customer orientedaccountability

2000 - Key AccountManager –

organizationalstructure

2010 - Real estatestrategy – selling outproperties in state’s use

Total cost ofoccupation

New ways ofworking 1.0

2003- Cabinet FinanceCommittee – steering

mechanism

Demand basedofferings

– master plans

2015 – Government’sworking premisises

strategy 2Rental system2

New ways of working 2.0

2005 – Government’sworking premises

strategy 1

New ways ofworking 2.0

Customerorientation

2000 2010

SenateProperties

Government

Perspective

Event

1995- Government’srental system 1

Order taker

Coordination,general benefit ofthe government

Page 54: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

CENTRALIZATION OF THE STATEPORTFOLIO INTO ONE UNIT

54

National Board of Public Buildings

Education

Defence

PrisonsCulture

Border Guard

Universities

1995/1999 20102001 2003

Road and Rail administraion properties

Border Guard

Separationbetweenownershipandoperations

Economies of scope and scale

Page 55: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Market

Customer focus

- 1995

2000

2011->

Solution providerExpert services

Page 56: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

PROPERTY MANAGEMENTPERSPECTIVE

Page 57: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

57

SUB-SUPPLIERS SUPPLIERS

BUYING FIRMCUSTOMER

Gadde & Håkansson 2001

OTHER BUYER

SUPPLY NETWORK PERSPECTIVEPARTNERSHIP NETWORK

MANUFACTURING PARADIGM

Page 58: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

58

CONTRACTMANAGERS

SERVICEPROVIDERS

CUSTOMERSOPERATIONALMANAGEMENT

CONT

RACT

MAN

AGEM

ENT

STRATEGYAN

D

STANDARD

S

Modified from Larson 1998

SERVICE NETWORK PERSPECTIVEPARTNERSHIP NETWORK

SERVICE NETWORK TRIAGE

Page 59: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

59

MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

OpenqualityCompe-

tition

4-year framework4-year framework

Price and Quality competition of clusters of buildings

&

selecting a set of ”preferred partners” reduce the risk of public conflicts

OpenqualityCompe-

tition

Page 60: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

• Incentive contracts• Carrot and stick (bonus and sanctions)

• Parameters: Energy, User-satisfaction and Quality

• Improves how we measure things

• Makes co-operation more intense

• Hopefully improves end-result

&

Page 61: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

61

MAINTANANCE COSTS 2006-2014 – TOTAL COSTS WITHOUT REPAIRS

61

0,00

0,50

1,00

1,50

2,00

2,50

3,00

3,50

4,00

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

€ / m2 / kk Senaatti-kiinteistöt KTI - benchmark

> 0,5 €/m2/kk

Page 62: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

62

VELCRO NETWORKS AND NODAL FIRMS

Evolving and Changing Roles ofBusiness Units, Network,VELCRO OrganizationAmbiguous and Changing Controlover Resources and Missions,Value Creation is based on Linkagesand speed of Reconfiguration

NODAL FIRM

Source: C.K. Prahalad, Harvey C. Fruehauf Professor of CorporateStrategy The University of Michigan Business School

Page 63: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

TRADITIONAL PARTNERING I.E. LONG TIME ”MARRIAGES” ARECOMPLICATED FOR PUBLIC ORGANISATIONS

63

From traditional value-chains

Suunnittelu Valmistus jakauppa Urakointi Omistaminen Kiinteistöpalv.Maankäyttö

Agile and flexible networks

”Velcronetworks”

Page 64: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

64

Palkk

i

Prop

erty

Mgmt

Optimaze.net(Rapal Oy)

Construction ICTinfra-

structure

ConctructionMgmt

Consultants

PhRakl

Tenantsservices

Developmentand Sales

The degree of difficulty involved in partnership replacementEasy Difficult

The

stra

tegi

csi

gnifi

canc

eof

the

part

ners

hip

Small

Large PERMANENT PARTNER STRATEGIC PARTNER

SPECIAL PARTNERSERVICE PROVIDER

EnergyProcurement

Servicesdelivered by

tenants

TOWARDS STRATEGIC PARTNERING?

Page 65: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

65

MAINTENANCE BIG DATA SOURCES

© Esa Halmetoja

Page 66: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

66

Human and building interaction

BIM in FM

BAS integration

Data gathering

Mining and analyzing

Process analyzing

Property Management Digitalization

2017

2021

© Esa Halmetoja

Page 68: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

OUR OFFERING

Page 69: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

We produce working environments thatsupport new ways of working

We help organizations torenew their ways of working

WE HELP OUR CUSTOMERS TO WORK SMARTER!

69

SMARTWORK

Page 70: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

SERVICE OFFERING EXAMPLES

Page 71: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

71

Workplace Strategies

Page 72: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Nationwideworkplaceconcepts

Page 73: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

WHAT ARE GOVERNMENT WORKPLACE CONCEPTS INTHE FINNISH CONTEXT?• The Finnish government has a long history of

localised decision-making processes with astrong emphasis on guiding the governmentalagencies through information (e.g. strategies).

• Recently, ministries and central agencies havestrengthened their control through corporatereal estate management models. One tool hasbeen to create governmental workplaceconcepts for branches of administration.

• This development has been done in closecooperation with Senate Properties. SenateProperties is a government-owned enterprisethat acts as the government’s expert on thework environment and work premises.

73Anne Sundqvist 29.1.2016

Page 74: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Työpistetilat Työpistetilat

Työpistetilat

Työpistetilat

Julkiset yhteis-käyttötilat

Kokous /Yhteiskehittely-

keskus

Julkiset tilatCafe/ravintola

Tukiti lat

Tukiti lat

Tukiti lat

Sisäiset yhteis-käyttötilat

TyökahvilaYhteiskäyttöiset työpisteet

Vetäytymisti loja Hiljaisia ti lojaTulostus, WC

Työpistetila tja tukitilat

Julkiset tilatJulkiset tilat Julkiset yhteiskäyttötila tJulkiset yhteiskäyttötila t

Sisä

iset

yhte

iskäy

ttötil

at(ty

ö-ke

rroks

issa)

Sisäiset yhteis-käyttötilat katu-tasossa/kellarissaSisäiset yhteis-käyttötilat katu-tasossa/kellarissa 1. krs.

2-N. krs.

Kulunvalvonta-alue

Asiakaspalvelu

Aula

Ravintola

Muut ti lat

Lounge ja kokouskesku s

Hupi-ti la

Sisäisin työtiloihin

Julkiset tilat Julkiset yhteiskäyttötilat

Ulo

s

Yhteis- ja yksilötyöhön sopivanimeämätön malli

Yhteistyöintensiivisempi järjestely,nimeämätön

Yhteistyöpainotteisempi nimettytyöpistejärjestelyYksityinen nimetty työpistejärjestely

TY ÖPR OFIILIT Hlömäärä Bu ukka usaste (eli mone lleko t yöpiste )1: ANK KURI ( to imisto lla, työ pistee llä) 22 5,0 10 0 %

2: Y HDISTELIJ Ä ( to imisto lla, paljo n liikkeellä ) 22 5,0 80 %3: KER ÄILIJ Ä( vähän toimistol la , paljo n liikkeellä) 22 5,0 60 %

4: NAV IGOIJA (hyvin vähän toimisto lla) 22 5,0 40 %

6,5 teh ollinen palvelu aika (t unt ia/päivä)K ÄY NTIASIAKKAAT / VKO Itsepa lvelussa Palvelu tiskillä Palveluh uon eissa

Lyhyt palv elut ilann e (1 5 mi n) 900 4 50 450 Htila tarvearvi o => 6 ,9 3,5 3, 5

P itkä palvel uti lann e (45 min ) 450 2 25 900tila tarvearvi o => 1 0,4 5,2 2 0,8

6,5 teh ollinen kokou sa ika (t unt ia/p äivä)SIDOSR YHMÄK OKOUK SET / VK O 2 0-30 hlö n euv. 8-1 2 hlö n euv. 4 -6 h lö neu v.

6 0 mi n kok oukset 90 1 80 270 Htila tarvearvi o => 2 ,8 5,5 8, 3

12 0 min kok oukset 90 1 80 270tila tarvearvi o => 5 ,5 11, 1 1 6,6

Hen kilötyövu osia ( htv ) 900Työn tek ijöitä yhteen sä: 900 ,

Työp isteitä yh teen sä: 630Työp isteit ä laskenn allise st i: 70 % :lle t yön tekijö ist ä

ALUSTAVA TULEVA TILAOHJELMA, EsimerkkiohjelmaPin ta- ala yh tee nsä (m2) : 1 2637 8 2 06 Pinta-a la sisä ise t toimisto aluee tTilat eho kkuus (m2 / ht v): 14,0 9,1 Tilate hokkuu s (m2 /h tv):

Tilate hokku us (m2 /t yön tekijä) : 14,0 9,1 Tilate hokkuu s (m2 /t yönt ekijä) :Tilat eho kkuus ( m2 / työ piste ): 20,1 1 3,0 Tilate hokkuu s (m2 /t yöpist e):

J ulkiset t ilat ( katu tasossa) m2 yht . lkm m2 áAula, vast aanot to & post itust ila, asiakas-wc:t 17 6,0 1 17 6,0R avint ola / Cafe (t yökahvila- tyyp pinen , jot a voi käyt tää muin a aikoin a työsken telyyn ) 31 5,0 1 58 2, 0Asia kasp alvelut ilat : Itsep alvelup ist eet itsepalve lualue ella 7 2,0 1 8 4, 0Asia kasp alvelut ilat : Palvelu tiskit ( 1+2 h lö, sis. odo tu salu een ja taust atilat ) 13 5,0 9 1 5,0Asia kasp alvelut ilat : Palvelu huo neet (2+ 2 hlö a siaka st apaamisiin t ai palvelu un vid eoyht eyde llä) 37 5,0 2 5 1 5,0Muu t t ilat: e sim. showroo m ja t alon kirjast o 17 6,0 1 17 6,0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0Pr imäärikäyt ävien osuus (arvio) 41 6,3 25 %

T OTAL m2 1 6 65 13 % pinta-a lastaJ ulkiset yh teiskäyt töt ilat (ensisijaisesti kat ut asossa) HUOM pää llekkäisyys/synergiat julkisten tilo jen kan ssa m2 yht . lkm m2 áLou nget ilat 3 5,0 1 3 5,0Iso n euvo tte luti la (20- 30 h lö), jo ista osa ravint olan kabinet te ina 40 0,0 8 5 0,0Ke skiko koine n neu vot telu tila ( 8-12 hlö) , joista o sa ravin tola n kabin ett eina 51 0,0 1 7 3 0,0Pie ni ne uvot telu tila ( 6 hlö ), joist a osa ra vi nto lan kab inet tein a 37 5,0 2 5 1 5,0Hup i-tila (n. 1 0 hen gen monit ilaympär ist ö) 20 6,0 1 20 6,0Mahd ollisuus n . 100 h lö tila isu uksiin muita tiloja muu nt amalla / yhd ist ämälläHyvinvo inti- ja liikun tat ilat ( 1 kpl, ke skit ett y) 12 6,0 1 26 1, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0Pr imäärikäyt ävien osuus (arvio) 55 0,7 25 %

T OTAL m2 2 2 03 17 % pinta-a lastaSisäiset yh tei skäyt tö tilat (kat uta so ssa jo smahd ollista t ai esim. k ellarissa) m2 yht . lkm m2 áSo siaa litilat (suihku t, p ukukaap it ym. to imii myös väestö su ojan a) 23 6,3 157,5 1, 5Asia kirja- ja mu ut va rasto tilat 18 6,0 1 18 6,0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0Pr imäärikäyt ävien osuus (arvio) 14 0,8 25 %

T OTAL m2 563 4 % pinta-a lastaSisäiset yh tei skäyt tö tilat työ kerroksissa ( "kerroskeida s") m2 yht . lkm m2 áTyö kahvila 55 0,0 5 11 0,0Ke skiko koine n neu vot telu tila ( 8-12 hlö) 31 5,0 1 1 3 0,0Pie ni ne uvot telu huo ne/projekt ihuo ne/ide oint itilat (4- 8 hlö ) 31 5,0 1 3 2 5,0V etäyt ymi st ilat / hilja isen työ n tila t 12 6,0 2 1 6, 0Yh teiskäyt töi set työ pistee t (lu ot avissa h iljaisen t yön alu eeksi, vierailijapist eiksi t ai pu helin työt ilaksi) 8 4,0 2 1 4, 0Muu t t ilat: mm. skan naus- /t ulost us se kä post itust iloja, WC- tilo ja 14 7,0 4 3 5,0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0Pr imäärikäyt ävien osuus (arvio) 51 2,3 25 %

T OTAL m2 2 0 49 16 % pinta-a lastaTyö pistet ilat m2 yht . lkm m2 áTyö piste 1 : Henkilöko ht ainen 140x80 cmt yöpö ytä + 2 ,4 hm sä ilytystilaa oma lla työp isteellä ja 2,4 h mkeskit etysti 1 350,0 225,0 6, 0Työ piste 2 : Nimeä mät ön 1 40x80 cm työ pöyt ä + oma loke ro ja 2,4 h m(h yllymet riä ) säilytystil aa keskitet ysti 90 0,0 180,0 5, 0Työ piste 3 : Nimeä mät ön 1 40x80 cm työ pöyt ä + oma loke ro ja 0,8 h m(h yllymet riä ) säilytystil aa keskitet ysti 60 7,5 135,0 4, 5Työ piste 4 : Nimeä mät ön 1 40x80 cm työ pöyt ä + oma loke ro ke skit et yst i 36 0,0 90, 0 4, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0Pr imäärikäyt ävien osuus (arvio) 1 072,5 25 %

T OTAL m2 4 2 90 34 % pinta-a lastaLähi tukit ilat ( työ pisteid en läh ellä) m2 yht . lkm m2 áPie ni ne uvot telu huo ne/projekt ihuo ne/ide oint itilat (4- 6 hlö ) 19 5,0 1 3 1 5,0V etäyt ymi st ilat 31 5,0 6 3 5, 0Skan naus/-tulost ustila, t oim ist ot arvike varast o 13 0,0 1 3 1 0,0V aate - ja t avarasäilyt ys 39 0,0 1 3 3 0,0Lähi säilyt ys ja varast ot iloja 13 0,0 1 3 1 0,0WC- tilat 24 0,0 1 6 1 5,0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0muu t ila, mikä? 0 ,0 0 0, 0Pr imäärikäyt ävien osuus (arvio) 46 6,7 25 %

T OTAL m2 1 8 67 15 % pinta-a lasta

1 867250

4 290

800

2 049

300

563

200

2 203

300

1 665

400

AR VIOTILATARP EESTA,kaikki lat: 12637 m2,toimis to lat : 8206 m 2

N YK YIN EN TILANKÄYTTÖ,kaikki lat: 2250 m2,

t oimist o lat: 1550 m2

J ulkis et lat ( kat utasos s a)

J ulkis et yhteis käy ö lat( ensis ijais eskatu tasos sa)

Sis äiset yhteiskäy ö lat( kat utaso ss at aikellaris sa)

Sis äiset yhteiskäy ö lat( "kerr oskeidas ")

Työpis te lat

Lähituki lat (t yöpist eidenlähellä)

14.-15.06.2016

STATE GENERIC WORKPLACE CONCEPT

Page 75: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

ChangeManagement

Consulting

Page 76: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

A SHIFT FROM MEASURING EFFICIENCY TO MEASURINGPERFORMANCE

76

Work performance

Individual workhabits

Contextual factors- work

environment

Efficiency

Wellbeing

Physical, virtual and socialwork environment

A Proactive, flexible andmobile ways of working +

efficient use of ICT

Work efficiency andeffectiveness (outcomes,

skills, quality)

Motivation, satisfaction,drive, ambiance, stress,

work-life balance

Source: SmartWOW-työkalu tietotyön suorituskyvynkehittämiseen, NOVI Research Center, Tampere Universityof Technology, 2014

Page 77: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

A KNOWLEDGE WORKER – NOT IN THE ASSEMBLY LINEBUT IN THE MIDDLE OF COMPLEX NETWORKS

77

Page 78: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

FACTORS AND ASSETS OF KNOWLEDGE WORKPERFORMANCE AND PRODUCTIVITY

78

Page 79: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

PRACTICAL MEASUREMENT APPROACH OF KNOWLEDGEWORK PERFORMANCE• Indexes describing the maturity level of ways of working

• Ways and skills of utilizing ICTs• Ways to utilize physical work environment refelcting the work modes• Individual working methods• Group level working methods• Work wellbeing impcats• Subjective productivity

• Organization specific human resource inputs• Organization specific outputs and results

• Measurement before and after workenvironment change

• Development of national data base ofknowledge work performance

79

Page 80: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

ProcessAnalytics

Page 81: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Luonnos, sisäiseen käyttöön2017

Effectiveness & needsWhat should we focus on?What does research say?

Benefit assessmentWhy should we develop?

Vankilanvastaus:Ti lanteen

stabilointi jaluot tamuksen

luom inen

Vankilanvastaus:

Muutoksenvälineiden ja

mahdoll isuuksien

tarjoam inen,sopivan

kokoisinaaskeleina

Haluaisin muuttaaelämääni, mutta

voimavarani siihenovat vielä heikot.

Voin niin huonosti,että j oudun

keskittymään päivästäpäivään selviämiseen

Vankilanvastaus:Rohkea

tavoi t teidenasettam isen

tuki jatsemppaus

niiden eteentyöskentelyyn

Pärjään kyllä,en kaipaaapuanne! Vankilan

vastaus:Asenteisiin ja

ajat teluunvaikut tam inen

akt iivistentoim intojen

ohella

Alan olla valmismuutokseen, mutta

itsevarmuuteni on herkkä jakeinovalikoimani

kaipaa täydennystä.

Need-based segmentsWhat are the needs?

Matching services to convicts’ needs

Päihteet jariippuvuudet

Arvot, ajat telu jatoiminta

Arkielämän taidot Koulutus jatyöelämän taidot

Terveys jahyvinvointi

Lapset,vanhemmuus ja

ihmissuhteet

Yhteiskuntaankiinnittyminen jarikokset tomuus

VKM, vi i si kesk usteluam uutoksest a *

2 ensim mäisenvanki laantu lovi i konto im intaohjelma

Moti vo in ti keskuste lu t,m otivointi ryhmät /anti ri ippuvuus-ryhmä

L ii kkuva t / ul kopuo li setpalve lu t (A-k linikkasäätiö,AA, NA)

Vang in sijoi ttaminenr angaistusa ikanapäihdehoi tolai tokseen(k atkaisuhoi to )

Retkahduspaket ti (esim .Ojast a al likkoon)

VINN-oh jelm a

Kes kustelu ryhmä- ta ityöpaja työsken tely itse tunnonja m inäkuvan vahvistamiseen

Vankien kouluttaminenvo im avaro jentunnistam isk urssin vetä ji ksi

Omaeht oisen muutoksenoh jelma ( OMA) *

Suut tum uksen hal l in taohjelma(SUHA) *

Res tora tiivise t menetelmät

Muutoksen vuoro *

Luova t toiminnat

Psykologin vast aanotto

Pastorin vast aanotto *

Oman usk onnon har jo itt aminen*

Ar kie lämän taido t osastontoiminnassa (* )

Vapaam uotoisethenkilök unnan jär jestäm ättoiminnot osastoi lla *

Sosiaalisten tai tojenope ttelu ja sovitt elu taidot

Dig it ai tojen opetus

Pihatyöt / Gr een ca re

Ruokahuo lt otoim in taavangei l le

Ku ltt uu risten ta ito jenope ttelu

Osasto jen puhd ista ja t *

Ar jen taloustai tojen opetus

Sosiaalisten asioiden ho ito(sosiaal ihuo lt o) *

Yleissivist ävät op inno t *

Am mat il l iset opinnot *

Tek stii l ihuo lto( työtoim in ta) *

Per sona l tr ainer (k oulu tus/t yö toim in ta)

Kahvi la / ca tering -ala( työtoim in ta)

Kantti ini (työto im in ta)

Pien leipom opalvelu t( työtoim in ta)

Polkupyör ien kor jaaminen( työtoim in ta)

Kier rätysto im innot( työtoim in ta)

Ter veyspalvelut VTH *

Psykiatr inen hoi to &jatkohoi to *

Mielent erveys /ter ap iapa lvelut *

U lko ilu valvottuna *

Oh ja tut l i ikunt aryhmät *

Kun tosa li *

Ter veell inen ruokaval io

Ter veyskasvatus

Keho & miei i -ku rssi(esim . rentoutus, jooga,m indfu lness)

Vanhem muutta t ukevar yhm äto im in ta javanhem pi-lapsi r yhm ät

Lastenho itoperheosastoi l la/perhekam puksel la *

Kod inom ainen ,” norm aal imp i ”tapaamiskeskustava ll i siin tapaamisi in ( *)

Yhteydenpi to omaisi inosaksi osaston ar kea japäiväjä rjestystä

Lapset puheeksi –oh jelm a*

Lähe isten le ir i

Skypen käyttöyh teydenp it oon (*)

Asunno ttom uudenenna ltaehk äisy *

Palveluoh jaus-/ neuvon tasivii l in palveluista *

Verta istuki rikoksistai r taut um isest am otivo it uneil le

Väl i työpaik at vapautuvil le*

Nuor iso työ(päiht eettöm yys jar ikoksettomuus) *

Verta istuki pä ih teistäer oon pyr kivi l le vanki lanjälkeen

Turvallinen ja kuntout tava toimintaympäristö & vuorovaikutus

Preliminary map of servicesWhat services do we offer?

FUTUREThe key to a life without crime and being involved

Kaikki Tutkintavanki Sakko vanki Vankeus vanki0-1kk

Van keus vanki1-6kk

Vankeus vanki6kk-1v

Vankeus vanki1- 4v

Vankeusvanki>4v

Vankeus vangi tyhteensä

Vapautuneit a 2 016 231 64 7 2 17 40 13 21 4 95

RANSU tehty 143 1 4 9 17 39 13 20 4 93

RANSU tehty % 62 % 2 % 68 % 100 % 98 % 100 % 95 % 100 % 98 %

As uminen ja arkis elviytyminen 15 1 5 2 6 1 14Tulot ja talo udel linen tilanne 4 1 1 1 1 4Koulutus 8 3 2 1 2 8

Työl lis yys 15 2 3 3 6 1 15Sosi aalis et si doks et ja elämänta pa 32 1 1 1 6 5 13 5 30Päihteet ja muut r iippuvuudet 55 3 8 18 6 16 4 52As ent eet, ajat telu ja käyt täytymi nen 36 3 10 5 13 5 36Yhteis kunt aan si joittumi sen valmis telu 102 4 1 13 29 6 12 1 61Ter veyteen liitt yvä tavoit e 4 1 2 1 3

Täys in t yökykyi nen 111 35 2 3 5 22 8 15 3 52O s ittai n t yökykyinen 38 2 1 4 6 10 1 4 1 22

Tä ys in työkyvytö n 21 1 1 2 4 2 2 0 0 8Ei kirj attu 61 26 2 3 2 6 2 2 0 12

RAN

SUte

hty

RANS

UTA

VOITT

EET

TYÖK

YKY

Processes and factors of productionHow does the prison function now?

What will change?What do the new services and functions require?

What is possible?

Maa na ntai

T iis tai

Ke skiv iik ko

T ors tai

P e rja ntai

La ua n tai

Su n nu n tai

Maa na ntai

T iis tai

Ke skiv iik ko

T ors tai

P e rja ntai

La ua n tai

Su n nu n tai Va lvo tut ta pa am is et

Ju mal a n-pa l vel us

Ju mal a n-pa l vel us

v alv otu t tap aam ise t

sa un a

u lko i lu

lääk

kee

t

Ulko i lu

päi

välli

ne

Aam

iain

e

Tar

kast

us,

Osas to s uljett u/Vangit töis säO s asto s uljettu/ Vangit t öis s ä

1 9:00

Nai

sten

osas

to3

.2

Aa

mia

ine

n,lä

äkke

et

lou

nas,

lää

kkee

t

Tarka

stus,

Osas

tosu

ljetaa

n

1 3:0 0 1 4:00 1 5:00 16 :00 17 :0 0 18:0 07 :0 0 8:0 0 9:00 10 :00 11 :00 12 :0 0

Aam

iain

en

sa un a

päi

väll

inen

+lää

kkee

t

Tark

astu

s,o

sast

osu

ljeta

an

iväl

line

n

Tar

kast

us,

1 4:00 1 5:00 16 :00 17 :0 0 18:0 0 1 9:007 :0 0 8:0 0 9:00 10 :00 11 :00

Tarka

stus,

Osas

tosu

ljeta

an

lää

kkee

t

Ulko i lu

Aam

iain

en,l

ääk

keet

o sas to auk i,sel l i en si i vo us

u lko i lu

12 :0 0 1 3:0 0

Nai

sten

osas

to3.

1

lou

nas

,lä

äkke

et

7 2 S ak kov an kia vap au tuu

92 e hd on alai se en v ap au teen

3 k ok o ran ga istu kse n su ori tettu aa n

9 5 Va nk eu svan kia va pa utu u(9 V alvo tu n k oe vap au de n ka utta )

64 T utkin tava nk ia v ap au tuu

6 S akk ov an kia sii rtyy a vo la ito kse en

7 2 Va nk eu svan kia si i rtyy av olai tok see n

9 V an ke usv ank ia sii rtyy su l je ttuu n lai tok see n

37Va

nkeu

svan

kia

1 Tu tkinta va nki si irty y sul jettu un lai to kse en

14

Sak

kov

anki

a

29Tu

tkin

tav

anki

a

1Tut ki

ntavan

k i

2Tut k in

t avankia

8V ankeusv

anki a

1Sakkovanki

2Tutki nta

vanki a

Yhteensä 411 nai svankia ollut kirjoi llaHämeenlinn an vankilas sa

Yhteensä 231vapau tuu

Hämeenlinnannaisvanki lasta

78 va nkiaAvo laito kseen

10 vankiasulj ettuu nlaitoksee n

80 Jäävankilaan

K uo llutLuovutett u

muuh unmaahan

M uu

Pilot: prison for women in HämeenlinnaWhat kind of spaces support our activities?

PROCESSES AND RESOURCES

Page 82: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Luonnos, sisäiseen käyttöön2017

Page 83: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

OUR OFFERING ENABLING SMART WORK

Workplace andreal estate strategies

The physicalworkplaces andfacility services

Security servicesand consulting

Digitalizationcoaching

Development ofsmart working and

performancemeasurement

Change managementand training

SMARTWORK

Page 84: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

PHASES OF THE WORK ENVIRONMENT SOLUTION

• Proposing a suitable facility• Signing a rental agreement• Initiating possible actions related to

needed changes• Work environment development and

planning• Deployment and collaborative audit

of new work environment

DEPLOYMENTWe deploy a solution that

fits your needs

• Goals, preconditions andorganisation-specific needs

• Work-environment vision• Knowledge work performance

metrics• Description of a work environment

and service package that supportyour operations

PLANNINGWe assess what

your organisation needs

• Supported deployment of new workenvironment and new working methods

• Change management• Knowledge work performance metrics• Work environment management

coaching

NEW WORKENVIRONMENT

We support your transitionto new ways of working

Page 85: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

85

Page 86: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

SUSTAINABILITY

86

If an organizationimproves its space

efficiency by a third, itscarbon footprint gets

almost equally smaller.

© Copyright Codema 2009

Sources:Viiden toimiston ilmastovaikutusanalyysi. Toimitilojen ympäristöjohtaminen. Seppo Junnila ja MikkoNousiainen, TKK rakentamistalouden raportteja 225, 2004.Työympäristökehittämisen ympäristövaikutukset, Päivi Hietanen (KIINKO KIPA-kurssi/projektityö15.05.2009), laskelma Juha Muttilainen/Senaatti-kiinteistöt (23.4.2009)

Page 87: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

AN ACTIVITY-BASED ENVIRONMENT LETS YOUCHOOSE SPACES BASED ON YOUR NEEDS

Collaboration Concentration Confidential discussions andmaterials

Informal meetings

Meetings Calls and onlinemeetings

Customer service Breaks and randomencounters

Page 88: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

88

Page 89: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

8989

Page 90: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

A STRONG SALES & MARKETINGAPPROACH

Page 91: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Senaatti-areena events have been organized since 2015Theme: Key topics: New ways of working and work environment solutions, internalmotivation, knowledge work performance etc.Target group: Central government administration and experts, on average 200participants.

SENAATTI-AREENA

Page 92: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Senaatin Tori was organized for the first time in autumn 2015Theme: Finnish state’s property development and salesTarget group: Real estate desicion-makers, 200 participants

SENAATIN TORI

Page 94: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene
Page 95: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

REMOTE AND FLEXI WORKSpaces for working…

Page 96: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

CASE-STUDIES

Page 97: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Services provided bySenate Properties• Creation of facility strategy• Development of work

environment• Facility acquisition• Facility services

FINNISH CUSTOMS“Centralised facilities improve collaborationand offer savings from premises expenses.”

“It was great to be able to bring together the operations and peoplethat needed to be connected – more efficiently, in a smarter and morecost-efficient way. Our new work environment allows us to work innew ways. It promotes encounters and makes meetings easy toorganise.”

HANNU LAPPICEO, CUSTOMS

Starting point• Operations in 12 different offices• 21,400 m2, 850 people,

rents €4.0 m/year

Goals• Focus operations at one location and

support organisational reform• Save on rental costs

Solution• A 750-person work

environment in the Pasilaoffice hub that promotesnew ways of working

• Rental savings: €0.7 m/year• State profit for selling old

facilities: €26m

Page 98: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Services provided bySenate Properties• Facility mapping• Development of work

environment• Facility services, such as

reception and security andcleaning services

HANNU LUNTIALADIRECTOR GENERAL,POPULATION REGISTER CENTER

“The change from a large room to a multi-facility environment wasquite a challenge. The most important thing was to have the wholestaff involved in the planning and preparation. We are excited aboutour new work environment because our common facilities promote anew kind of communality as well as spontaneous encounters.”

Starting point• Rental agreement in Kalasatama, Helsinki

was about to end, some staff transferredto Kokkola

• Facilities totalling 6,750 m2, with rents of€1.5 m/year

Goal• A work environment that fits the needs of

changed space requirements, new ways ofworking and a younger generation of stateofficials

Solution• Multi-facility environment in

government premises at theSörnäinen campus in Helsinki

• Total facilities area: 3,150 m2

• Rental savings: 0.7 m per year

POPULATION REGISTER CENTRE” From resisting change to a positivesurprise."

Page 99: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Services provided by SenateProperties• Nationwide facility concept• Adaptation of concepts• Facility search, acquisition and

subletting• Supervision of change work and

project management• Office-specific change coaching• User services (in some locations)

TE SERVICES OF UUSIMAA

MARJA KYYTSÖNENSPECIALIST

Starting point• Nationwide organisational reform• Facility efficiency: approx. 35 m2/FTE• Number of offices: 18

Goals• Build a new service model and improve

customer service and customer experience• Save on premises costs• Improve well-being and comfort at work

Solution• Facility efficiency average

22 m2/FTE (improvement of37%)

• Number of offices: 10• Premises rents decreased by

€0.5 m/year after the renewal

“Our new premises provide amplesupport for our new service model.”

Page 100: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Services provided by SenateProperties• Development of work

environment• Change management support• Facility acquisition and

subletting

MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT

HARRI HAKASTESENIOR ARCHITECT

Starting point• Locations rented from three different

landlords• Maze-like spaces in poor condition

Goals• Improve well-being and comfort at work• Improve cooperation between units• Minimise effect on the environment with an

efficient facility solution, e.g. reduce heatingand electricity usage by 60% and travel by13%

• Enable new office property metrics

Solution• Comfortable multi-facility

environment• Rental savings: approx.

€220,000/year (2013–2015)• Facility efficiency improved by

40%(previously 10,340 m2, now6,252 m2)

• Substantial energy savings

“Our greatest benefits have been improvedfacility efficiency and increased cooperationbetween ministries.”

Page 101: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

Services provided by SenateProperties• Facility strategy• Work environment and

interior design• Furniture as a service

VALTORI“Work motivation here has improved agreat deal. Our team has adapted to thenew practices really well. I feel like our staffwere eagerly waiting to see what wouldcome out of this change.” JORMA AIRAKSINEN

ICT MANAGER, VALTORI

Starting point• Employees scattered around the metro

area in 35 different locations

Goals• Compact the organisation’s network in

such a way that there would be a singleoffice in each location

• Improve efficiency• Save on premises costs

Solution• Three floors on

Lintulahdenkatu, Sörnäinen• 3,160 m2 in use• No reserved work desks• Overbooking principle: 320

Valtori employees, 260workstations

Page 102: Senate Properties - Does digitalization disrupt the FM and PM scene

YES!

102

CONCLUSIONS…