session 1 1 - tim carter - nshc 2014 keynote red
DESCRIPTION
The Norwegian Sea Health Conference 2014, Bergen, 27-28th August 2014TRANSCRIPT
Why is maritime health an
international issue? Should
medical examinations remain a
national responsibility?
Tim Carter
Norwegian Centre for Maritime Medicine
Bergen
Maritime health – prevention
and care 1. Fitness to work at sea
2. Prevention of risks from disease and injury – at sea, in port, on leave
3. Management of medical incidents at sea
4. Health care ashore – foreign ports, home country
5. Special health care needs of former seafarers.
All have both national and an international components. Their importance depends on trading patterns and structure of the maritime sector.
NCMM
A paradox! The shipping industry has been around the globe for several
hundred years. Its health problems have long been international ones.
Ships are extensions of national territory in terms of legal jurisdiction. This model fitted when ships were owned, mainly crewed and registered in a single country. Historically maritime health has been regulated and practiced within national boundaries.
National approaches have long been flawed. Infections have been carried across boundaries by ships, ill and injured seamen have been treated in foreign ports, training in the seafarer’s home country and the medical equipment for handling emergencies on board may be incompatible, unfit crewmembers can endanger the safety of other nations’ ships. Fitness standards are not consistently applied.
NCMM
Callao, Peru 1870
Boom town – Guano trade
Fish eating birds nesting on
desert islands.
Dried faeces mined.
Exported to Europe
and North America as a
fertiliser. NCMM
Voyage pattern
Coal – Cardiff, UK to
Aden or Columbo via
Cape of Good Hope.
Ballast - across Pacific
to Callao.
Guano – Callao to Europe
via Cape Horn
Small crews
Long sea passages
No fresh food in Aden
Long port stay in Callao
Away from home port > 1year NCMM
Survey of the condition of British Seamen
– replies from British Consuls worldwide
Dr Thomas Roe
Ex Royal Navy
of British Hospital, Callao
Case series of 606 seamen seen at
hospital 1865-9 reported by consul
251 scurvy – fresh food and juice absent
84 venereal – brothels of Callao
45 accidents – ship and port
40 fevers – malaria from tropics, typhus
from Callao
30 dysentery – most fr. tropical ports
26 rheumatism – living conditions at sea
23 phthisis (TB) – living conditions at sea
10 abscesses
97 other
Infections total 206 – 40% of total
NCMM
Lessons from Callao Trades change – guano peaked in late 19C
Health problems in seafarers may relate to job, to living at sea, to risks in ports.
The preventable (scurvy) may be unprevented.
Treatment provided in port, but it needs an ex naval doctor to know that statistics matter.
Who treated non-British seamen in Callao?
Risks and remedies transcended national boundaries even when fleets and crews were national
NCMM
Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim
1926 Norway had fast growing merchant fleet
Political concern for seafarers as they were main Norwegian casualties in First World War
Seeking international facilities to care of seafarers, rather than national ones.
Had a model for this in port clinics open to all seafarers- visited during conference.
Conference hosted by Norwegian Red Cross.
Recent ILO seafarers conferences, Brussels agreement- VD treatment
NCMM
A changing world 1 [UK Seafarer
Mortality 1925-
2005]
Infection and
respiratory
down by 1955.
- Immunisation
- Precautions
- Antibiotics Circulatory up and slow fall
- Lifestyle and age,
worse prognosis at sea.
- radiomedical not enough
Sources of risk?
Place of illness? NCMM
A changing world 2 Air takes over passenger transport
Containerisation
Flagging out – politics and performance of different flag
states
Crewing from low cost countries vs. home state supply
UN Agencies ILO/IMO/WHO increasing leverage on
international maritime health
BUT flag state and port state authorities are regulators.
NCMM
International Maritime Health Ship operators and insurers have economic reasons to maximise
performance and minimise ill-health within a contract period. The may not be concerned about discrimination or welfare in doing so.
Trade unions want fair deals for their members, but not all shipping is unionised and unions are strongest in traditional maritime nations not crewing countries. FoCs may not acknowledge role of unions.
Authorities want political peace, some want economic benefits, a few want better health – avoid big incidents, avoid harm to citizens. Often more concern for own nationals than others.
Health professionals have concepts of good practice and use of evidence, these differ by country. They can arouse suspicion in others, but are needed when health problems arise.
NCMM
Medical certificate SWOT Easy transaction seafarer/doctor/employer
Fit for work – meaning of ‘fit’: capable, reliable. All duties or
limited? Limits of prediction. How confidential?
Optional UK 1867 – little used, but employers introduced
their own systems. Seafarers hated them!
State systems 1990s – poor QA, inconsistent. Employers
mistrusted certificates, they and P&I Clubs introduced their
own systems. Equity? Corruption?
NCMM
Medical fitness now Employer/P&I medicals continue in crewing countries – often
incompatible with employment law in Europe/ N America.
ILO MLC – provisions consolidated in MLC 2006
IMO STCW Manila amendments. Principles for fitness assessment in more detail. QA requirements
ILO/IMO Guidelines. Detailed recommendations on procedures and on fitness criteria.
Aim is internationally consistent medical certificate based on fair and valid assessment.
NCMM
Colour vision – case study in
barriers to consistency. 1860s – red and green navigation lights introduced
1880s – multiple international reports of incidents from failure to identify colours correctly
1880s – early tests for officers introduced.
1900s – invalidity of test methods recognised
1910 onwards – better tests adopted: lanterns to simulate navigation lights, Ishihara plates.
Incidents from colour vision defects no longer seen.
But c 5% of males excluded from deck officer training
NCMM
Choice of tests Big variations internationally
Cheap option where failures can be discarded – Ishihara.
Cheap option where failures to be minimised but risk may be increased – colour sorting
Higher cost option when greater validity needed – lantern or Ishihara +lantern if failed
Alternatives: opthalmologist opinion, anomaloscopy
NCMM
Where are we now? Each country has its own seafarers tested in the
national way. Any change threatens them and adds
new costs.
Employers may discriminate to save costs.
New screen based tests now available, but not yet fully
validated
NO UP TO DATE ASSESSMENT OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR COLOUR VISION IN
LOOKOUTS
NCMM
Where may we go? IMO adopted CIE 143:2001 criteria. Protests from countries who don’t want or
need to change national practices.
Delay in implementing colour vision parts of STCW
Expert workshop in Kobe Jan 2014 to try and resolve. New tests have potential. First the acceptable level of deficiency needs to be found.
Passed back to CIE – international vision and lighting standards body. Action awaited!
Industry will need to fund studies on vision requirements to secure progress.
But the maritime sector is not organised to fund research.
Problems of national vested interests will remain
NCMM
Summary Maritime health always has been international.
With national fleets most parts could be based on national jurisdictions.
Now fleets do not respect national boundaries. Greater need for international consistency.
Principles are there for all aspects of health management.
People and interest groups are the barriers to realising the benefits of common international approaches.
Commerce is ahead of governments in global approaches, but is less concerned for interests of seafarers and more concerned with competitive advantage
NCMM
All my prejudices can be found in my new book,
out in November 2014!
NCMM