session 28 ic2011 barnes
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Ground Contact Performance of Creosote Amended with Chlorothalonil:
Can we Reduce Retentions?
H. M. Barnes, M. G. Sanders, G. B. Lindsey, and T. L. Amburgey
Forest Products Laboratory
Session 28: It’s not Just Rot: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Wood Product Durability
Background Creosote supply
Reduction of impact (92-192 kg/m3)
BMPs
Chlorothalonil highly effective Ag crops, paints, mold & sapstain
Broad spectrum, low mammalian toxicity
Combined with insecticides,
antioxidants
Removed from AWPA BoS,
2004, lack of use
Objectives
This study asks:
To what extent can creosote retentions be reduced by the
addition of chlorothalonil?
Materials & Methods
Wood All sap southern pine
19 x 19 x 1120 mm (r x t x l)
Cut into matched halves
Preservatives P2 Creosote
Chlorothalonil Both met AWPA 2003 specs
Sample Treatment
Treated full cell at room temperature
91 kPa vacuum for 30 min
Introduction of preservative under vacuum
Pressure increased to 1034 kPa in 5 minutes
Held for 60 min
Vent to atmospheric, drain, remove samples, wipe & weigh
102 mm retain cut from end
Sample Exposure & Evaluation
Matched samples placed in Dorman (AWPA Hazard Zone 4) & Saucier (AWPA Hazard Zone 5) test plots at depth of 230 mm
Rows 0.75 m apart
Saucier = loamy sand
Dorman = silty clay loam
Evaluated annually for decay and termite attack
Decay Rating Termites
Sound; suspicion of decay permitted
10 Sound; 1-2 small nibbles permitted
Trace decay to 3% of cross section
9 Slight feeding to 3% of cross section
Decay from 3-10% of cross section
8 Attack from 3-10% of cross section
Decay from 10-30% of cross section
7 Attack from 10-30% of cross section
Decay from 30-50% of cross section
6 Attack from 30-50% of cross section
Decay from 50-75% of cross section
4 Attack from 50-75% of cross section
Failure (>75% of cross section) 0 Failure (>75% of cross section)
AWPA (2003) visual grading scale for rating decay and termite attack
Data EvaluationApproach 1:Dose response curves
CTL after 6 years of exposure
•Approach 2: Depreciation curves
Curves were fitted
Time to score of 70 (t70) was calculated for comparison purposes
• Fitted curves constructed to give a dose-response curve over time
Organism Response
Decay was more severe than termite attack in both test plots
Decay was generally greater at the Dorman site than Saucier
Termite attack was generally greater at the Saucier site compared to Dorman
Test Plot Response
Impact of CTL addition
What does the study show?
At P2 retentions lower than the AWPA minimum (<92 kg/m3), the addition of CTL improves the performance even for the lowest CTL addition rates
For P2 retentions >92 kg/m3, significant improvement is seen only for the highest CTL addition rate
So, can we reduce creosote loadings and get equivalent or better performance by adding
CTL?
YES,
. . . . . but,
Will we?
Future research papers will report on
Different species including: Red oak (Quercus rubra)
Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Thank you----Any questions?????