shah ppt
DESCRIPTION
this ppt describes about the irrigation economy in india and other future requirementsTRANSCRIPT
India’s Irrigation Economy:In the throes of a transition..
Tushaar ShahInternational Water Management Institute
www.iwmi.org
Highlights• History of Indian irrigation: Three Phases and a Turning Point.
• Since 1975, Indian agriculture has emerged as the world’s largest user of groundwater to grow food and fibre.
• The groundwater boom is fired by population pressure on land and demands of intensive diversification of farming.
• India and Pakistan together lost over 5 million ha of canal irrigated areas; tubewells are canibalizing flow irrigation.
• Investing in flow irrigation under BAU is throwing good money after bad.
• India’s irrigation challenge is one of managing its sub-continental aquifer systems, a vast reservoir we have left unmanaged.
Evolution of Indian Irrigation:Era of adaptive irrigation-upto 1830
• Community was the unit of irrigation management
Rainfall and Soil moisture
Flow irrigation from tanks, canals, rivers
Lift irrigation from wells and surface sources
% of water consumptively used in agriculture
% Contribution to aggregateFarm output and incomes
Evolution of Indian Irrigation:Era of canal construction-1830-1970
• State emerged as the architect, builder, manager of irrigation
Soil moisture management
Flow irrigation from tanks, canals, rivers
Lift irrigation from wells & surface sources
% water consumptively used in agriculture
% Contribution to aggregateFarm output and incomes
Evolution of Indian Irrigation:Era of atomistic pump irrigation-1970-todate
Individual farmer as the irrigation manager
Soil moisture management
Flow irrigation
Pump irrigation from wells, tubewells, canals
% of water consumptively used in agriculture
% ContributionTo Farm output & incomes
India is the world’s largest userof groundwater in agriculture in the world.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
cubi
c km
/yea
r
US W.Europe SpainMexico China IndiaPakistan Bangladesh Sri LankaVietnam Ghana South AfricaTunisia
India has over 20 million irrigation wells. We add 0.8 million/year.
Every fourth cultivator owns an irrigation well; non-owners depend on groundwater markets.
Kharif Rabi
pump flow pump flow
cereals 64.3 36.1 77.8 22.2
pulses 68.6 31.4 66.3 33.7
oilseeds 78.8 21.2 72.7 27.3
mixed crops 90.9 9.1 67.7 32.3
sugarcane 81.9 18.1 86 14
other crops 65.5 34.5 82.8 17.2
vegetables 67.4 32.6 74.9 26.1
fruit and nuts 81.9 18.1 83.9 16.1
plantation 72.7 27.3 72.9 27.1
fibre crops70.4 70.4 29.6 86.5 13.5
fodder 79.7 20.3 86.9 13.1
other crops 84.7 15.3 59.2 41.8
all 69 31 76.5 23.5
National Sample Survey, 2003, 59th round:Proportion of area under different irrigated crops Served by pump and flow irrigation
Groundwater share in irrigatedAreas 70% and rising
Govt. numbersSuggest 60%
Irrigated areasDepend on GW,
But…
Pace of Growth of tubewells: IWMI Survey of 2002
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
upto
196
5
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001%
of pre
sent w
ells b
uilt
during the
year
Region Total Western IGB
Eastern IGB Central & Southern India
Pump irrigation expansion is driven by population pressure on farm lands..
60% of tubewells in useWere made during the1990’s; numbers are Still accelerating..
Throughout the world, intensive groundwater irrigation is a response to water scarcity.
Not in South Asia.
Here, it is a response to scarcity of farm lands.
The rise of a ‘water-scavenging’ irrigation economy..
Chhatis Garh and Jharkhand 4.6
Goa 4.7Uttarachal hill districts
0.7
Assam 4.5Himachal 2.8J& K 2.4
Kerala 4.7
40.4
31.2
46.6
34.9
28.9
26.4
18.7 12.7
Six North-eastern states excl. Assam 2.1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Groups of districts
Ru
ral P
op
/10
0 h
a o
f N
et
So
wn
Are
a
Lift irrigated area as% of net sown area
Minor Irrigation Census 2001:Districts with high rural population density
experience intensive well irrigation
Figure Changing structure of Indian agricultural production
65 66 62 5746
21 2121
2128
11 10 1316 19
4 3 4 6 7
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1961-62 1971-72 1981-82 1991-92 2000-01
% o
f valu
e o
f ag
ricu
ltu
ral
ou
tpu
t
Field crops, sugar, fibres High value crops Milk Other livestock
Canal and tank irrigated areas condemned to low-value crops unresponsive to precision irrigation.
Much diversification isOccurring outside Command areas (IFPRI).
Much diversification Requires small dozes ofYear-round, on-demandIrrigation.
Value added farming Will expand withWaste-water irrigation andGroundwater.
Our irrigation planning is preoccupied with food grains; Indian farmer is diversifying in a hurry.
Area irrigated by public canals are stagnant despite growing investment in public irrigation.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Ind
ian
Rs,
bill
ion
, 199
6/7
pri
ces
Net Irrigated area by public irrigation systems
Public investment in 1996-67 rupees in Major and Medium irrigation
Pump irrigation is cannibalizing flow irrigation.
Irrigation systems are unable toSupport groundwater irrigation
This process has gatheredMomentum since 1995
Throughout South Asia, surface irrigation is givingWay to pump irrigation. India, Pakistan and B’deshLost 5.5 m ha of surface irrigation during 1994-2001
0
10
20
30
40
M ha
Changing mode of irrigation water delivery in South Asia
India(states covered by MIcensus of 1994 and 2001;Pakistan (Punjab and Sind);Bangladesh
22.7 17.2 28.4 35.8
1993/4 2000/1 1993/4 2000/1
Public flow irrigation Private pump irrigation
Mismatch between ground and surface irrigation in India: 578 districts covered by Minor Irrigation Cesus 2001 (GoI 2005)
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0
% of Net Sown Area under groundwater irrigation
% o
f N
et S
ow
n A
rea
un
der
su
rfac
e ir
rig
atio
n Line of hydrologic equilibrium
For sustainable irrigation, conjunctive managementof ground and surface water is essential.
Effective conjunctive managementMeans more well irrigation in commandAreas.
In Indian districts, the situation is the opposite.
Only 12% of India’s wells are In command areas; and thisProportion is dropping every year
Implications: 1Wake up to new realities.
• Recognize and respond to the new reality. Government’s role as irrigation provider is no longer the most critical.
• Investing in surface irrigation is throwing good money after bad..
• Irrigation reforms around PIM are doomed to failure because flow irrigation itself is ebbing..
• Irrigation Department’s mission statement needs to be rewritten.
Implications: 2Groundwater recharge is
the game we must master.
Surface water dams deliver 150 km3/year; aquifer system delivers 220 km3/year which is far more
productive.
Managing the sub-continental system of aquifers ought to be India’s top priority; but this is nobody’s concern.
India gets 4000 km3 of precipitation; we use220 km3 of groundwater. Nature itself puts 4-10% of rainfall
into aquifers. If we focus recharge effort at the right places, sustaining groundwater irrigation is possible.
The challenge is to increase recharge in arid areas (north-west)
and hardrock aquifers (peninsular India).
Implications :3Reinvent surface irrigation management.
We need new institutional models to arrest erosion of public irrigation commands.
What Indian farmer demands is on-farm water he can scavenge at will for high frequency precision-irrigation;
wells will always score on canals and tanks.
Rajasthan’s program of lined farm ponds on Indira Gandhi Nahar Yojana: canal water fill up the pond every 21 days;
farmer run sprinklers with it.
Gujarat government’s new scheme to create local irrigation entrepreneurs who will lay drip-irrigation infrastructure and
operate an irrigation service from public canals.
Maharashtra’s experiments in Northern Krishna basin.
Implications: 4high crop/drop
• Accelerate agricultural diversification
• Embrace and propagate water saving farming systems: aerobic rice, System of Rice
Intensification,Zero-tillage, alternate wet-and-dry irrigation.
Reform micro-irrigation subsidies that shrink drip-and-sprinkler equipment market instead of
expanding it.
Implications: 5Practical strategy for groundwater management
• Evolve a practical, implementable tool-kit for groundwater management.
• Groundwater laws are unenforceable; pricing is impractial; GW Authority’s writ does not run in the country-side.
• Indirect instruments:
• Punjab’s experiment with electricity supply and rice procurement schedules to shift rice transplanting.
• Gujarat’s Jyotirgram Yojana of rationing quality power to farmers for irrigation;