shannon & wilson geotechnical feasibility report ... · shannon & wilson geotechnical...

87
Appendix A Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal, February 8, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

Appendix A Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical

Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore

Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal, February 8, 2017

Page 2: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 3: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 4: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 5: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 6: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 7: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 8: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 9: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 10: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 11: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 12: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 13: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 14: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 15: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 16: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 17: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 18: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 19: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 20: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 21: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 22: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 23: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 24: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 25: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.

21-1-22307-001-R1-Rev-T1 Final 21-1-22307-200

Required Factor of Safety Per

EM 1110-2-2503

Calculated Factor of Safety

Low Tide 1.5 2.5Extreme Low Tide 1.3 2.452475 year Earthquake 1.3 1.9Low Tide 1.5 2.0Extreme Low Tide 1.3 2.02475 year Earthquake 1.3 1.6Low Tide 1.5 1.65Extreme Low Tide 1.25 1.652475 year Earthquake 1.1 1.2Low Tide 3.0 3.7Extreme Low Tide 2.0 3.62475 year Earthquake 1.0 3.0Low Tide 1.5 1.6Extreme Low Tide 1.25 1.62475 year Earthquake 1.1 1.1Low Tide 1.5 3Extreme Low Tide 1.25 2.92475 year Earthquake 1.1 1.9Low Tide 1.5 2.3Extreme Low Tide 1.25 2.22475 year Earthquake 1.1 1.5

Low Tide 100% 90%Extreme Low Tide 75% 89%2475 year Earthquake Resultant in Base 77%Low Tide 75% 90%Extreme Low Tide 50% 89%2475 year Earthquake Resultant in Base 77%

Rotation (Hansen's Method)

TABLE 1RESULTS OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COFFERDAM STABILITY ANALYSES

Loading Condition

Sliding, base friction angle equal to 38 degrees

Sliding, base friction angle equal to 32 degrees

Overturning Analysis, Required Percent of Base in Compression - Rock

Bearing Capacity

Vertical Shear (Terzaghi's Method)

Vertical Shear (Schroeder-Maitland's Method)

Horizontal Shear

Overturning Analysis, Required Percent of Base in Compression - Soil

Page 26: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.

Table 2, Slope Stability Analysis_updated_bwc 21-1-22307-200

Stability Analysis PerformedCalculated Yield Acceleration, ky

(%g)

Assumed Foundation

Material

Assumed Effective Friction Angle, φ,

of Foundation Material (degrees)

Assumed Effective Cohesion of Foundation

Material (psf)

Calculated Factor Of Safety (FS)

Static Properties - Till 42 0 2.2Liquified Properties - Till 42 0 1.6ky for Liquefied Properties 0.21 Till 42 0 1.0

Static Properties w/Surcharge - Till 42 0 2.0Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge - Till 42 0 1.6ky for Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge 0.21 Till 42 0 1.0

Static Properties - Till 38 0 2.0Liquified Properties - Till 38 0 1.5ky for Liquefied Properties 0.15 Till 38 0 1.0

Static Properties w/Surcharge - Till 38 0 1.9Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge - Till 38 0 1.4ky for Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge 0.14 Till 38 0 1.0

Static Properties - Silt 35 0 1.9Liquified Properties - Silt 35 0 1.6ky for Liquefied Properties 0.11 Silt 35 0 1.0

Static Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 35 0 1.8Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 35 0 1.5ky for Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge 0.10 Silt 35 0 1.0

Static Properties - Silt 34 0 1.9Liquified Properties - Silt 34 0 1.3ky for Liquefied Properties 0.12 Silt 34 0 1.0

Static Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 34 0 1.8Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 34 0 1.2ky for Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge 0.10 Silt 34 0 1.0

Static Properties - Silt 33 0 1.8Liquified Properties - Silt 33 0 1.5ky for Liquefied Properties 0.09 Silt 33 0 1.0

Static Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 33 0 1.7Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 33 0 1.4ky for Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge 0.09 Silt 33 0 1.0

Static Properties - Silt 32 0 1.8Liquified Properties - Silt 32 0 1.5ky for Liquefied Properties 0.09 Silt 32 0 1.0

Static Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 32 0 1.7Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge - Silt 32 0 1.4ky for Liquefied Properties w/Surcharge 0.08 Silt 32 0 1.0

TABLE 2RESULTS OF GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSES

Page 27: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 28: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

Center to Center 32.62 m

R

a

d

i

u

s

=

7

.

1

6

m

Center to Center 32.62 m

AA

'

R

a

d

i

u

s

=

1

0

.

5

m

30°

10

5

0

-5

-10

-15

1

1

3.0 m

Bottom of Cell El. -13.0 m

Top of Cell El. +5.6 m

MWL 0.0 m G.D.

LLWL Large Tide -3.0 m G.D.

Cell to be founded on glacially

consolidated soils and

backfilled with select gravel.

Cell Diameter 21.0 m

Excavate and

backfill with

select gravel.

All existing and loose soil shall

be excavated from within the

cell to the top of very dense,

glacially consolidated soils.

Elevation in M

eters (G

eodetic D

atum

)

Main cells consist of 132 sheet piles.

Arc cells consist of 76 sheet piles.

C

L

FIG

. 2

21-1-22307-201

PRELIMINARY CELLULAR

COFFERDAM SCHEME

FIG. 2

Trans Mountain Expansion Project

Westridge Marine Terminal

January 2017

Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.

Filename: J:\211\22307\201\21-1-22307-201 Fig 1 - Cofferdam Scheme.dwg Layout: Layout Date: 02-08-2017 Login: mjm

1:500

010 20

Scale in Meters

Scale 1:500

PLAN

SECTION A-A'

30° Y Pile

(Typical)

Page 29: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 30: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

FIG. 4SCALE 1:300

NOTES

1.

SUBSURFACE PROFILE B-B'

0 5m 10m

?

?

13

11

26

12

44

79

100/4

150/3

150/3

100/3

75/1

50/3

100/6

50/3

60/6

61

50/3

GM-SM

GP

SM-ML

CL-ML

SM

CL-ML

CL-ML

07-18-14

(Proj. 23m NE)

BH14-09

BORING LOG LEGEND CONE PENETRATION TEST

11-26-15Q (bar)0 200

(Proj. 8m NE)

SCPT15-108H Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Designation

Ground Surface or Mudline

Date of Completion

Designation of Boring

Projection (Distance/Direction)

Ground Surface or Mudline

Approximate Geologic Contact

Bottom of Boring

Date of Completion

?

?

?

?

USCS Symbol

Unit SymbolGeological

Sample and Penetration

Corrected TipResistance in Bars

Tip Resistance

Group NameUSCS

Blows per 305mm

Resistance in Blows per 25mm

Projection (Distance/Direction)

2.

3.

4.

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.ONSHORE EXPLORATIONS (LOCATED ABOVE GEODETIC ELEVATION -5m) WERE ESTIMATED VISUALLY FROM A CONTOUR MAP PROVIDED IN THE WSP SURFACE ELEVATIONS FOR OFFSHORE EXPLORATIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM WSP AND GOLDER GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS. SURFACE ELEVATIONS FOR

GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY REPORT PREPARED BY WSP DATED 16 DECEMBER 2016.ESTIMATED GROUND SURFACE ABOVE ELEVATION 0 METERS WAS APPROXIMATED FROM A HARD COPY OF A SITE CONTOUR MAP INCLUDED IN THE

MOFFATT & NICHOL ON 11 JANUARY 2017.ESTIMATED GROUND SURFACE (MUDLINE) BELOW ELEVATION 0 METERS IS BASED ON A FILE WT00-GA0100901 BOUND XREFS.DWG PROVIDED BY

VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE CONTACT LINES SHOWN LIKELY EXIST.GOLDER ASSOCIATES (23 DECEMBER 2016) AND WSP (9 MARCH 2016 AND 15 DECEMBER 2016). SOIL SAMPLES WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR OUR REVIEW.THE SUBSURFACE PROFILE WAS DEVELOPED FROM OUR REVIEW OF THE EXPLORATION LOGS PROVIDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS PREPARED BY

2/7/2

017

6:3

8:5

9 P

M

Filena

me:

J:\211\2

2307\2

00\2

1-1-2

2307-2

00-fig

ures.d

gn

21-1-22307-300

Model:

Fig

ure 0

4

Westridge Marine Terminal

Trans Mountain Expansion Project

February 2017

0

10

-10

-20

0+000

-30

-40

-50

0+020

0+040 0+060 0+080 0+100

0

10

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

B B'

CELLULAR COFFERDAM

?

?

MEAN WATER LEVEL (MWL) 0.0m GD

?

?

SEE NOTE 3 SEE NOTE 2

GROUND SURFACEEXISTING

WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GLACIAL TILL)VERY DENSE, SILTY SAND TO SANDY SILT

?

?

?

?

?

??

?

?

??

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

? ?

?

?

PIPE RACK

OTHER POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONSWOODY DEBRIS, METAL FRAGMENTS, AND SILT, GRAVEL, AND COBBLES, WITH BOULDERS,FILL: VERY LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE SAND,

AND OCCASIONAL SILT INTERBEDS, COBBLESGRAVEL TO SANDY GRAVEL, WITH SHELL FRAGMENTS DENSE, SAND TO SILTY OR CLAYEY SAND WITH BASAL MARINE DEPOSITS: LOOSE TO VERY

OF SILT AND CLAYOCCASIONAL BOULDERS AND LENSES SILT WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES AND TILL: VERY DENSE SILTY SAND TO SANDY

OTHER POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONSWOODY DEBRIS, METAL FRAGMENTS, AND SILT, GRAVEL, AND COBBLES, WITH BOULDERS,FILL: VERY LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE SAND,

?

?

?

(15m EAST)GROUND SURFACEEXISTING

?

??

?

?

?

?

?

?

? ?

??

?

SANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL SAND AND GRAVELDENSE TO VERY DENSE SILT AND CLAYEY,GLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE SILT:

SILT INTERBEDS, COBBLESSHELL FRAGMENTS AND OCCASIONAL WITH GRAVEL TO SANDY GRAVEL, WITH DENSE, SAND TO SILTY OR CLAYEY SAND BASAL MARINE DEPOSITS: LOOSE TO VERY

GRAVEL, AND COBBLESCLAY, WITH SHELL FRAGMENTS,OR SOFT TO VERY SOFT SILTYLOOSE SANDY TO SILTY SANDDEPOSITS: VERY LOOSE TOCOARSE-GRAINED MARINE

INSTALLATIONFOR COFFERDAMEXCAVATION LINE

AND RESIDUAL SOILROCK FRAGMENTS, ROCK: WEAK ROCK,

?

?

?

??

?

??

??

BASED ON ADDITIONAL STUDIESELEVATION TO BE DETERMINEDGLACIAL SOILS BOTTOMSHEET PILES TO EXTEND TO

SANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL SAND AND GRAVELDENSE TO VERY DENSE SILT AND CLAYEY,GLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE SILT:

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

24

55

85

96

>100

85

SM

SC

GM-SM

SM-ML

CL-ML

SM-ML

01-15-16

BH15-09(Proj. 2.3m SW)

2

7

GW

ML

GM-SM

SM

SM

ML

SM

GM-SM

ML

ML

02-18-15

S-11(Proj. 1.6m NE)

24

52/216mm

GW

ML

GW

ML

ML

ML

02-18-15

S-12(Proj. 6m NE)

11

5

50/127mm

GW

SM-ML

SW

SP-SM

GM-SM

SM

10-28-16

S-20(Proj. 2.4m NE)

11-25-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-104D(Proj. 1.7m NE)

11-26-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-108H(Proj. 2.4m NE)

02-17-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-S10(Proj. 2m NE)

02-19-15

Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-S12(Proj. 7m NE)

ML

SM

ML

ML

ML

SM-ML

SW

11-21-15

SH-104(Proj. 1.4m NE)

SM

ML

SM

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

SM

SP-SM

SP-SM

11-23-15

SH-108(Proj. 2.3m NE)

SM

SM-ML

SM-ML

SM

SM-ML

ML

SM

SP-SM

SC

11-23-15

SH15-09/SH108(Proj. 1.3m NE)

(SEE FIGURE 2 FOR DETAILS)

GE

OD

EC

TIC E

LE

VA

TIO

N I

N M

ET

ER

S (

m)

GE

OD

EC

TIC E

LE

VA

TIO

N I

N M

ET

ER

S (

m)

Page 31: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

FIG. 5SCALE 1:300

NOTES

1.

SUBSURFACE PROFILE C-C'

0 5m 10m

2.

3.

4.

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.ONSHORE EXPLORATIONS (LOCATED ABOVE GEODETIC ELEVATION -5m) WERE ESTIMATED VISUALLY FROM A CONTOUR MAP PROVIDED IN THE WSP SURFACE ELEVATIONS FOR OFFSHORE EXPLORATIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM WSP AND GOLDER GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS. SURFACE ELEVATIONS FOR

BY MOFFATT & NICHOL ON 11 JANUARY 2017.ESTIMATED GROUND SURFACE (MUDLINE) BELOW ELEVATION 0 METERS IS BASED ON A FILE WT00-GA0100901 BOUND XREFS.DWG PROVIDED

SEE FIGURE 4 FOR BORING LOG AND CONE PENETRATION TEST LEGENDS.

WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR OUR REVIEW. VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE CONTACT LINES SHOWN LIKELY EXIST.REPORTS PREPARED BY GOLDER ASSOCIATES (23 DECEMBER 2016) AND WSP (9 MARCH 2016 AND 15 DECEMBER 2016). SOIL SAMPLESTHE SUBSURFACE PROFILE WAS DEVELOPED FROM OUR REVIEW OF THE EXPLORATION LOGS PROVIDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL

2/7/2

017

6:3

8:2

6 P

M

Filena

me:

J:\211\2

2307\2

00\2

1-1-2

2307-2

00-fig

ures.d

gn

21-1-22307-300

Model:

Fig

ure 0

8

Westridge Marine Terminal

Trans Mountain Expansion Project

February 2017

OTHER POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONSWOODY DEBRIS, METAL FRAGMENTS, AND SILT, GRAVEL, AND COBBLES, WITH BOULDERS,FILL: VERY LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE SAND,

AND GRAVELSANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL SAND DENSE TO VERY DENSE SILT AND CLAYEY,GLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE SILT:

0

10

-10

-20

0+000

-30

-40

0+020 0+040 0+060 0+080 0+100

0

10

-10

-20

-30

-40

C C'

EXISTING GROUND SURFACE

CELLULAR COFFERDAM

INSTALLATIONFOR COFFERDAMEXCAVATION LINE

ON ADDITIONAL STUDIESTO BE DETERMINED BASEDBOTTOM ELEVATIONTO GLACIAL SOILS SHEET PILES TO EXTEND

???

?

0.0m GDMEAN WATER LEVEL (MWL)

SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 3

?

?

?

?

?

?

20 20

? ?

??

?

??

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

SILT INTERBEDS, COBBLESFRAGMENTS AND OCCASIONAL TO SANDY GRAVEL, WITH SHELLOR CLAYEY SAND WITH GRAVEL TO VERY DENSE, SAND TO SILTY BASAL MARINE DEPOSITS: LOOSE

OF SILT AND CLAYOCCASIONAL BOULDERS AND LENSES SILT WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES AND TILL: VERY DENSE SILTY SAND TO SANDY

AND GRAVELSANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL SAND DENSE TO VERY DENSE SILT AND CLAYEY,GLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE SILT:

OCCASIONAL SAND AND GRAVELAND CLAYEY, SANDY SILT WITH SILT: DENSE TO VERY DENSE SILTGLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE

?

??

??

?

12/89mm

47

GW

ML

ML

SM

ML

SM

SW

ML

ML

ML

02-23-15

S-01(Proj. 0.6m NE)

11-26-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-101A(Proj. 2.2m SW)

11-26-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-105E(Proj. 1.2m SW)

02-23-15

Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-S01(Proj. 1.1m NE)

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

CL

GM-SM

CL

11-21-15

SH-101

OL

ML

GM-SM

ML

ML

GM-SM

ML

ML

ML

11-20-15

SH-105(Proj. 0.4m NE)

(SEE FIGURE 2 FOR DETAILS)

GE

OD

EC

TIC E

LE

VA

TIO

N I

N M

ET

ER

S (

m)

GE

OD

EC

TIC E

LE

VA

TIO

N I

N M

ET

ER

S (

m)

Page 32: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

FIG. 6

NOTES

SUBSURFACE PROFILE D-D'

0

0 5m 10m

VERTICAL SCALE 1:300

HORIZONTAL SCALE 1:1200

20m 40m

1.

2.

3.

4.

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.ONSHORE EXPLORATIONS (LOCATED ABOVE GEODETIC ELEVATION -5m) WERE ESTIMATED VISUALLY FROM A CONTOUR MAP PROVIDED IN THE WSP SURFACE ELEVATIONS FOR OFFSHORE EXPLORATIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM WSP AND GOLDER GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS. SURFACE ELEVATIONS FOR

ESTIMATED GROUND SURFACE (MUDLINE) IS BASED ON A FILE WT00-GA0100901 BOUND XREFS.DWG PROVIDED BY MOFFATT & NICHOL ON 11 JANUARY 2017.

SEE FIGURE 4 FOR BORING LOG AND CONE PENETRATION TEST LEGENDS

OUR REVIEW. VARIATIONS BETWEEN THE CONTACT LINES SHOWN LIKELY EXIST.BY GOLDER ASSOCIATES (23 DECEMBER 2016) AND WSP (9 MARCH 2016 AND 15 DECEMBER 2016). SOIL SAMPLES WERE NOT AVAILABLE FORTHE SUBSURFACE PROFILE WAS DEVELOPED FROM OUR REVIEW OF THE EXPLORATION LOGS PROVIDED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS PREPARED

2/7/2

017

6:4

7:0

8 P

M

Filena

me:

J:\211\2

2307\2

00\2

1-1-2

2307-2

00-fig

ures.d

gn

21-1-22307-300

Model:

Fig

ure 0

9

Westridge Marine Terminal

Trans Mountain Expansion Project

February 2017

0

10

-10

-20

0+000

-30

-40

0+080 0+160 0+240 0+320 0+400

0

10

-10

-20

-30

-40

D D'

CELLULAR COFFERDAM

MEAN WATER LEVEL (MWL) 0.0m GD

INSTALLATIONFOR COFFERDAMEXCAVATION LINE

(AT FACE OF COFFERDAM)EXISTING GROUND SURFACE

ON ADDITIONAL STUDIESTO BE DETERMINED BASEDBOTTOM ELEVATION (VARIES)TO GLACIAL SOILS SHEET PILES TO EXTEND

BOTTOM OF COFFERDAM

20 20

11-25-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-104D(Proj. 1.7m SE)

ML

SM

ML

ML

ML

SM-ML

SW

11-21-15

SH-104(Proj. 1.3m SE)

13

11

26

12

44

79

100/102mm

150/76mm

150/76mm

100/76mm

75/25mm

50/76mm

100/152mm

50/76mm

60/152mm

61

50/76mm

GM-SM

GP

SM-ML

CL-ML

SM

CL-ML

CL-ML

07-18-14

BH14-09(Proj. 2.4m SE)

11-25-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-103C(Proj. 1.8m NW)

SM

ML

GM-SM

ML

ML

GW

ML

GM-SM

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

11-21-15

SH-103(Proj. 2.4m NW)

11-26-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-102B(Proj. 0.4m NW)

OL

ML

SM

SM

ML

ML

ML

ML

SM

ML

CL

11-20-15

SH-102(Proj. 0.4m SE)

2

4

4

7

22

54

63

ML

SM

SM

CL-ML

07-25-14

BH14-08(Proj. 4.6m SE)

07-25-14Q (bar)0 200

SCPT14-08(Proj. 4.1m SE)

11-26-15Q (bar)0 200

SCPT15-101A(Proj. 3.8m SE)

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

ML

CL

GM-SM

CL

11-21-15

SH-101

AND RESIDUAL SOILROCK FRAGMENTS, ROCK: WEAK ROCK,

SANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL SAND AND GRAVELDENSE TO VERY DENSE SILT AND CLAYEY,GLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE SILT:

OF SILT AND CLAYOCCASIONAL BOULDERS AND LENSES SILT WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES AND TILL: VERY DENSE SILTY SAND TO SANDY

SAND AND GRAVELSILT WITH OCCASIONAL SILT AND CLAYEY, SANDYDENSE TO VERY DENSEGLACIOMARINE SILT: GLACIOLACUSTRINE/

OTHER POTENTIAL OBSTRUCTIONSWOODY DEBRIS, METAL FRAGMENTS, AND SILT, GRAVEL, AND COBBLES, WITH BOULDERS,FILL: VERY LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE SAND,

AND OCCASIONAL SILT INTERBEDS, COBBLESGRAVEL TO SANDY GRAVEL, WITH SHELL FRAGMENTS DENSE, SAND TO SILTY OR CLAYEY SAND WITH BASAL MARINE DEPOSITS: LOOSE TO VERY

SANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL SAND AND GRAVELDENSE TO VERY DENSE SILT AND CLAYEY,GLACIOLACUSTRINE/GLACIOMARINE SILT:

OF SILT AND CLAYOCCASIONAL BOULDERS AND LENSES SILT WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES AND TILL: VERY DENSE SILTY SAND TO SANDY

OF SILT AND CLAYBOULDERS AND LENSES AND COBBLES AND OCCASIONALTO SANDY SILT WITH GRAVELTILL: VERY DENSE SILTY SAND

???

?

?

? ?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

???

? ?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

??

???

?

?

?

(SEE FIGURE 2 FOR DETAILS)

GE

OD

EC

TIC E

LE

VA

TIO

N I

N M

ET

ER

S (

m)

GE

OD

EC

TIC E

LE

VA

TIO

N I

N M

ET

ER

S (

m)

Page 33: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

21-1-22307-200

APPENDIX A

RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING

Page 34: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 35: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 36: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 37: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 38: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 39: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 40: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 41: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 42: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 43: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 44: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

21-1-22307-200

APPENDIX B

RESULTS OF LIQUEFACTION STUDIES

Page 45: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

FIG. B-1SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S01LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 46: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

FIG. B-2SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S02LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 47: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

2

4

6

8

10

FIG. B-3SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S03LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 48: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

FIG. B-4SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S04LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 49: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

2

4

6

8

10

FIG. B-5SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S05LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 50: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

FIG. B-6SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S06LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 51: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

FIG. B-7SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-S12LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

mdg

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 52: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-8SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-101ALIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 53: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-9SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-102BLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 54: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-10SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-103CLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 55: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-11SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-104DLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 56: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-12SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-104DBLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 57: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-13SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-105ELIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 58: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-14SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-106FLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 59: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-15SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-106FBLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 60: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-16SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-107GLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 61: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0 50 100 150 200Tip Resistance, qc (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Dep

th (m

)0 1 2 3 4 5

Side Friction, fs (bar)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20Pore Pressure, U (m)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

MeasuredStatic Uo

0 1 2 3 4 5Soil Behavior Index, Ic

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 50 100 150 200Normalized Tip Resistance, qc1N, cs

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7Cyclic Resistance Ratio

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

CRRPGA = 0.20 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.25 g, Mw = 7.1PGA = 0.33 g, Mw = 7.0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Liquefactoin Factor of Safety, FS liq

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FIG. B-17SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

SCPT15-108HLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

201

- Im

prov

ed G

roun

d B

ulkh

ead

Des

ign\

Liqu

efac

tion

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t1+g

0ef5

f0b,

by:

MD

G

Notes:1. Liquefaction analyses based on CPT method by Idriss and Boulanger (2014).2. The PGAs assume Site Class D per the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code S6-14.

Page 62: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

21-1-22307-200

APPENDIX C

RESULTS OF GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSES

Page 63: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

Figure c_1 1/19/2017

FIG. C

-1

FIG. C-1

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSISGLACIAL TILL

STATIC PROPERTIESJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

Page 64: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

Figure c_2 1/19/2017

FIG. C

-2

FIG. C-2

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSISGLACIAL TILL

LIQUEFIED PROPERTIES-DYNAMICJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

Page 65: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

Figure c_3 1/19/2017

FIG. C

-3

FIG. C-3

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSISGLACIAL SILT

STATIC PROPERTIESJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

Page 66: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

Figure c_4 1/19/2017

FIG. C

-4

FIG. C-4

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

GLOBAL STABILITY ANALYSISGLACIAL SILT

LIQUEFIED PROPERTIES-DYNAMICJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

Page 67: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN762 FRE, 000 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN769 G06, 000 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN957 HOW, 060 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN1008 W15, 180 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN1011 WON, 095 component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2010NBCC, 475YR, CRUSTALJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-5

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-5SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 68: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St2101_0730, 180 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7032_1416, 125 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7008_5121, 270 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM016, EW component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: HRS020, EW component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS2010NBCC, 475YR, INSLAB

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-6

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-6SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 69: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgolaflorida, EW component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgocentro, L component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: MYGH02, EW2 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT006, EW component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT007, EW component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2010NBCC, 475YR, INTERFACEJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-7

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-7SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 70: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN752 CAP, 000 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN801 SJTE, 315 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN960 LOS, 270 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN1008 W15, 180 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN1011 WON, 185 component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2010NBCC, 975YR, CRUSTALJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-8

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-8SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 71: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St2101_0730, 180 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7032_1416, 125 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7008_5121, 270 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM007, NS component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM016, NS component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS2010NBCC, 975YR, INSLAB

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-9

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-9SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 72: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: LACH, E(90) component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgocentro, L component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT006, EW component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: TCGH09, NS2 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMTH02, NS2 component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2010NBCC, 975YR, INTERFACEJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-10

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-10SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 73: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN752 CAP, 000 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN801 SJTE, 315 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN960 LOS, 270 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN963 ORR, 090 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN1008 W15, 180 component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2010NBCC, 2475YR, CRUSTALJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-11

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-11SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 74: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St2101_0730, 180 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7032_1416, 125 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM007, NS component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM016, EW component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: HRS020, EW component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS2010NBCC, 2475YR, INSLAB

January 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-12

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-12SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 75: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: LACH, E(90) component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgocentro, L component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT006, EW component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMTH01, NS2 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMTH02, NS2 component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2010NBCC, 2475YR, INTERFACEJanuary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-13

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-13SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\WS

P T

ime

His

torie

s\W

SP

(by

See

man

n) fo

r For

esho

re (2

010

and

2015

)ve

r:0.7

.8.p

ost0

.dev

0+g2

c2e9

49, b

y:m

dg

Page 76: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN762 FRE, 000 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN787 SLC, 360 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN970 FAI, 095 component. ( Motion 03)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2015NBCC, 475YR, CRUSTALFebruary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-14

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-14SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 77: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7008_5121, 270 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM008, EW component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM016, EW component. ( Motion 03)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS2015NBCC, 475YR, INSLAB

February 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-15

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-15SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 78: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgolaflorida, EW component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgocentro, L component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: MYGH02, EW2 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: TCGH09, NS2 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT007, EW component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2015NBCC, 475YR, INTERFACEFebruary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-16

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-16SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 79: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN762 FRE, 000 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN787 SLC, 360 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN970 FAI, 095 component. ( Motion 03)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2015NBCC, 975YR, CRUSTALFebruary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-17

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-17SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 80: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7008_5121, 270 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM008, EW component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM016, EW component. ( Motion 03)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS2015NBCC, 975YR, INSLAB

February 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-18

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-18SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 81: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgolaflorida, EW component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgocentro, L component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: MYGH02, EW2 component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: TCGH09, NS2 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT007, EW component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2015NBCC, 975YR, INTERFACEFebruary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-19

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-19SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 82: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN762 FRE, 000 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 1989 Loma Prieta, CA (Mw6.9). Record: PEER RSN787 SLC, 360 component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 1994 Northridge, CA (Mw6.7). Record: PEER RSN970 FAI, 095 component. ( Motion 03)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2015NBCC, 2475YR, CRUSTALFebruary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-20

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-20SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 83: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2001 Nisqually, WA (Mw6.8). Record: USGS NSMP St7008_5121, 270 component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM008, EW component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2001 Geiyo, Japan (Mw6.8). Record: EHM016, EW component. ( Motion 03)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS2015NBCC, 2475YR, INSLAB

February 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-21

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-21SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 84: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

0.01 0.1 1Yield Acceleration (g)

1

10

100

Dis

plac

emen

t (cm

)

Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgolaflorida, EW component. ( Motion 01)Earthquake: 2010 Maule, Chile (Mw8.8). Record: stgocentro, L component. ( Motion 02)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT006, EW component. ( Motion 03)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: TCGH09, NS2 component. ( Motion 04)Earthquake: 2011 Tohoku, Japan (Mw9.0). Record: YMT007, EW component. ( Motion 05)

SLIDING BLOCKDISPLACEMENT ANALYSIS

2015NBCC, 2475YR, INTERFACEFebruary 2017 21-1-22307-201

FIG. C

-22

Trans Mountain Expansion ProjectWestridge Marine Terminal

FIG. C-22SHANNON & WILSON, INC.Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants

I:\W

IP\2

1-1\

2230

7 Tr

ansM

ount

ain\

Sei

smic

\Gol

der 1

2-30

-201

6 tim

e hi

stor

ies

ver:0

.7.8

.pos

t0.d

ev0+

g2c2

e949

, by:

MD

G

Page 85: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,

21-1-22307-200

APPENDIX D

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Page 86: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,
Page 87: Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report ... · Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Feasibility Report Preliminary Recommendations Foreshore Bulkhead Westridge Marine Terminal,