shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

23
www.pancreaticcanceraction.org Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking? Pancreatic Cancer Action advertising campaign Limited resources maximum impact! Ali Stunt, CEO and Founder Natasha North, Marketing and Communications Manager

Upload: charitycomms

Post on 05-Jul-2015

744 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Ali Stunt, CEO, and Natasha North, marketing and communications manager, Pancreatic Cancer Action

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Shock tactics - a reputation

minefield or a risk worth

taking?

Pancreatic Cancer Action advertising campaign

Limited resources – maximum impact!

Ali Stunt, CEO and FounderNatasha North, Marketing and Communications Manager

Page 2: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

About Pancreatic Cancer Action

Set up in 2010 by a rare survivor

Key aim is to get more people diagnosed in time for surgery – only cure!

Focused on raising awareness of disease and symptoms

Small charity with 2.5 full-time equivalent staff

Page 3: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Big problem

No method of early detection

Chronically underfunded

◦ Receives just 1% of cancer research funding

Chronic lack of awareness

◦ 70% of UK population do not know where their pancreas is or what it does

◦ 50% patients never heard of disease before their own diagnosis

Page 4: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The Strategy

Stand out and provoke thought

Generate interest so people read on

Get the most out of limited budget and resources

Page 5: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

I wish I had… campaign

Page 6: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Why the campaign was necessary

There has been a huge improvement in survival rates of many cancers in 40 years

Page 7: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Objectives of the campaign

Tackle low awareness◦ Of the disease in general

◦ Of diagnosis, survival rates and lack of research funding

◦ Of symptoms

Drive earlier diagnosis◦ Get more people to ask their doctor

◦ Encourage doctors to be less ‘shy’ about referrals

Page 8: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The advert featuring real

patients…

Page 9: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

We did our research…

Neuroscience

Measured how 115 people responded to the adverts.

Outcome: risk of offence was low once people had read

the advert.

Online survey (2000 respondents)

Outcome: only 6% were angry and over 50% were

made more aware and wanted to do more.

In-depth interviews with people affected by different

cancers

Outcome: once the message was understood, they

were supportive of the advert.

Page 10: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Low cost – maximum impact

The adverts appeared only 9 times over 4 days in regional newspapers in London and Manchester.

Total spend for the initial hard-hitting campaign was £15,000

Followed up with symptoms campaign on London Underground featuring same three patients….

Page 11: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The symptoms advert…

Page 12: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

What happened

Social media went bonkers

Inundated with media calls in one day

Spokesperson in high demand

Page 13: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

How we managed it

Adaptability

Respond to media enquiries quickly

Released regular statements online and on social media

Prioritise complainants

Page 14: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Extensive media coverageThe campaign reached well over 20 million people just in the UK and more globally (backed up

by research).

Over 150 pieces of press coverage relating to the advertising in the UK alone:

TV including Newsnight, Daybreak and Sky News

Online and printed national including The Times, Daily Mail and BBC News

Extensive radio coverage including most BBC stations, 5 Live and LBC

At least 100 regional pieces of coverage. Also:

International coverage including US Doctors TV, CBS Canada, BBC World Service and

Melbourne 10

Social media – Twitter mentions of pancreatic cancer up 69% on previous month of

campaign and over 100% increase in followers on Facebook.

Over £1m of highest quality earned media

Page 15: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The good…

Page 16: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The bad…

Page 17: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The ugly…

Page 18: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

What the comms team could

have done differently

More resource

Complaints procedure

Used a monitoring tool

Received more third party input

Page 19: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Impact of the campaign

Months after the campaign it is still being discussed.

43% of people who recognised campaign more aware of the symptoms.

Traffic on explanatory page of website up 963%.

Donations up 60% on same period last year.

Modelled increase in pancreatic cancer diagnosis 14% up.

Modelled number of lives saved = 36.

Page 20: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Impact of the campaign

Surge in petition signatures

Drug approved by Cancer Drugs Fund

Meeting with Jeremy Hunt and Lord Saatchi

Offered speaking opportunities

Pancreatic cancer has higher profile

Page 21: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

The challenges for a small team

• Lack of resource

• Managing damage limitation -

building bridges while fighting fires

• Supporting stakeholders

• Emotional impact

Page 22: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Was the campaign worth it?As Philip Schofield said to the late Kerry Harvey on This Morning:

Page 23: Shock tactics - a reputation minefield or a risk worth taking?

www.pancreaticcanceraction.org

Summary

Means to an end

Set out to shock in order to get attention and then use that attention to deliver an

important message.

Do your homework

Use research to assess the risk.

Be brave

Don’t be put off by the impossible – be prepared to take a calculated risk.

Ride the momentum

use it to drive change