sierra leone · in october 2013 the un revised its communications strategy for the transitional...

SIERRA LEONE(January 2015 - December 2018)

THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENTASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK(UNDAF)

THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK (UNDAF) Sierra Leone 2015 - 20182

Government, UN Country Team and UN System Staff College participants at the UNDAF Strategic Planning Workshop.

Photo ©Silke von Brockhausen

This UNDAF is particularly significant for the people of Sierra Leone because it follows the departure of UN Peacekeepers (UNAMSIL) and UN Peacebuilders (UNIOSIL and UNIPSIL) from the country. The decision to close UNIPSIL on 31st March 2014 marked the end of a

decade of Security Council engagement with Sierra Leone.

The UN family acknowledges and endorses the central theme of the Agenda for Prosperity that seeks a sustainable future for Sierra

Leone with the longer term goal of being a middle income country by 2035. It is widely recognized that the Government, the international community and private business all have essential roles to play to make that goal a reality, for which the UN family is committed to make a valuable contribution.

In the preparation of the UNDAF, as well as throughout its subsequent implementation, the Human Rights Based Approach, which emanates from the UN’s Charter, is the

Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

foundation upon which all UN activities will sit. The principles of environmental sustainability and gender equality permeate throughout the UNDAF. The UN family will work in the most efficient manner possible to obtain the results outlined in the UNDAF. The UN Country Team, including non-resident agencies, shall work together to ensure transparency and mutually supporting programmes.

The UN Country Team shall work inside the coordination structures that have been established by the Government in order to manage the contributions of the international community to the Agenda for Prosperity. In line with the Agenda for Prosperity the UN Family maintains a policy of zero tolerance with respect to corruption.

All UN activities will seek to build national capacity and, on the basis that the global policy of due diligence has been fully applied, promote national systems and national ownership in its partnerships in Sierra Leone.

This UNDAF defines the UN’s contribution, under the leadership of the UN’s Resident Coordinator to Sierra Leone, to the Government’s current Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, the Agenda for Prosperity.

The UNDAF will be rolled out in-line with the aspirations contained in the New Deal as well as the Sierra Leone Mutual Accountability Framework that follows the spirit of the New Deal.


Dr. Kaifala Marah, Minister of Finance and Economic Development and the Executive Representative of the Secretary General for Sierra Leone, Mr Jens Anders Toyberg-Frandzen, sign the UNDAF.


The UNDAF, under the leadership of the Resident Coordinator, is directly supported by the agencies listed below and has been developed and endorsed by the Government of Sierra Leone through the good offices of the Minister of Finance and Economic Development.

Signature Page

5SIGNATURE PAGE


United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon visited Sierra Leone on 4-6 March 2014 to mark the closing of the United Nations Integrated Peacebuilding Office in Sierra Leone (UNIPSIL) after fifteen years of successive UN peace and political operations and highlight the transition to a United Nations presence focused on development.


7INTRODUCTION

Introduction

In line with global UN procedures there were four sequential stages that led to the completion of the UNDAF, which were as follows:

Road Map April (May 2013) Country Analysis (June – July 2013) Strategic Prioritization (August – November 2013) Finalization (December 2013 – February 2014)

The UNDAF Road Map was jointly written by the UNCT and the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development. The Road Map was also endorsed by the Development Partners Group and the UN’s Regional Directors’ Team.The Country Analysis concluded that there were multiple root and underlying causes that accounted for under-achievement in many developmental targets.

‘Root Causes’ in UNDAF terms were defined as attitudes and behaviour traits at different levels (families, communities and government) that require to be addressed over a long period of time. According to the Country Analysis the root causes in Sierra Leone were: a tendency for short term focus; unequal distribution of national wealth, notably revenue generated from resource exploitation that does not adequately flow back to local communities; frequently weak accountability and oversight; insufficient child protection, and inequalities in gender that were rooted in the social norms and harmful traditional practices.

‘Underlying Causes’ in UNDAF terms were defined as obstacles to development due to the consequences of policies, laws, coordination and the availability, or rather lack, of resources. These could be tackled in the relative short term. The underlying causes identified in the

Country Analysis included; lack of capacity and insufficient access to information and services provided by the health sector; food insecurity and malnutrition; high levels of youth unemployment, and unsustainable management of natural resources. Whilst good progress has been made in these areas in recent years collectively they remained “underlying causes” for under achievement. It was considered to be important that the current focus and momentum in these areas should be increased.

When the ‘Root Causes’ and the ‘Underlying Causes’ were combined and converted into programmatic sectors, where the UN had expertise, then Food Security, Land Reform, Sustainable Environmental Management, Education, Health, particularly sexual and reproductive health, child protection, Employment, Youth Employment, Nutrition, Public Sector Reform, Governance, Gender and Women’s Empowerment emerged as the UN’s contribution to the Agenda for Prosperity. These UN priority areas were subsequently mapped onto the architecture of the Government’s Agenda for Prosperity to form the backbone of the UNDAF. To enable effective monitoring and evaluation, outcome statements were added and aligned directly with the pillars of the Agenda for Prosperity to form the results table that is shown below.

Representatives from civil society were consulted twice during the design process, at the Country Analysis stage and again at the Strategic Prioritization Stage. Over thirty civil society organisations assisted the UN to draft the UNDAF. All UN agencies commit to engage with civil society organizations as an important element of the design and / or implementation of projects.

The UNDAF was finalized after further consultations with the Government and the UN’s Regional Director’s Team.


Photo ©Ann Johansson

UNDAF Results

The UN family has worked well with the Bretton Woods Institutes and the traditional resident donors in Sierra Leone to form a harmonized

approach in support the current Agenda for Prosperity (2013-2018), as well as the previous Agenda for Change (2009-2012). Externally the Security Council and the Peacebuilding Commission have

helped guide international interventions. Internally the 2009 Sierra Leone Aid Policy, that is supported by regular Development Partners Committee (DEPAC) meetings, has keep the positive momentum. Looking forward, the Mutual Accountability Framework (MAF) dashboard that was agreed at the DEPAC in October 2013, which emerged from the New Deal (Busan in 2011), will guide the Government and the international community in the years ahead. Through the UNDAF the UN re-commits itself to promoting success against the Busan Peace and Statebuilding Goals and the MAF ‘building blocks’ that includes the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights.

In October 2013 the UN revised its communications strategy for the Transitional joint Vision (2013-2014). This strategy provided a solid foundation for the UN leading into the UNDAF, so ensuring that changing UN ‘footprint’ in 2014 was well understood by Sierra Leoneans. The strategy reiterated that the decision of Security Council to draw down UNIPSIL was based on hard won progress in key political, security and democratic arenas leading to the conclusion that a standard UN configuration would be appropriate to

the situation of Sierra Leone. The UNDAF communications strategy will continue to build on such upbeat messages, that Sierra Leone is on a good path to recovery, that the changes are ongoing and positive, that the country is becoming more robust and that the UN’s configuration is in-step with the developments of the country.

Preventing ‘slippage’, however, remains at the core of the UN’s work in Sierra Leone. During the Transitional Joint Vision (2013-2014) the geographic area of Kono emerged as a priority for the UNCT. The area-based programme that was developed for Kono during the Transitional Joint Vision will be continued during the UNDAF cycle. Kono was identified as a politically sensitive area for which ‘Peace Consolidation’ efforts was considered to be essential. With the exception of Kono, there are no geographic areas of particular critical needs; in a geographically small country of just six million people all the districts are equally important for UN interventions. Consequently the UN will work equally across the whole country, with the exception of Kono that will be an area of particularly intense UN activity.

The table below sets out the UNDAF outcomes inside the broader Agenda for Prosperity Pillars. It is important to note that each PRSP pillar is significantly bigger than the UNDAF contributions shown in the table. Also, that the UN does not plan to contribute to Pillar 4, that being “International Competitiveness”, as others are better positioned to partner with the Government in that area.

9UNDAF RESULTS

The success of Sierra Leone in maintaining peace since the end of the war was due to many factors. An important factor was sustained multi-lateral interest and highly coordinated international interventions.

The UNDAF is fundamentally developmental and that represents a very real shift away from Sierra Leone’s previous ‘post-conflict’ status.


PR

SP P

illa

r 1.

Eco

nom

ic D

iver

sifi

cati

on

to P

rom

ote

Incl

usi

ve G

row

thO

utc

om

e co

nven

er:

UN

DP

Co

ntri

bu

ting

ag

enci

es:

FAO

, WFP

, UN

IDO

, UN

WO

MEN

, UN

CD

F, IL

O

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

Ho

use

hold

s’ p

rod

uct

ive

cap

aci

ties

and

acc

ess

to m

ark

ets

for

ag

ricu

ltu

re, m

anu

fact

uri

ng, f

ishe

ries

and

tou

rism

ha

ve in

crea

sed

.

1. %

cha

nge

in p

rodu

ctio

n an

d yi

eld

of k

ey c

omm

oditi

es (c

rops

&

lives

tock

).B

ase

line:

Sm

allh

olde

r yie

ld a

vera

ge fo

r ric

e is

1.24

MT/

HA

, for

ca

ssav

a is

15.8

8MT/

HA

, gro

undn

uts

is 0.

82M

T/H

A, a

nd M

aize

is

2.2M

T/H

ATa

rget

: Sm

allh

olde

r yie

ld a

vera

ge fo

r ric

e is

1.61

MT/

HA

, for

cas

sava

is

20.6

4MT/

HA

, gro

undn

uts

is 1.

01M

T/H

A, M

aize

is 2

.64M

T/H

A

2. %

cha

nge

in h

ouse

hold

s th

at h

ave

acce

ss to

inpu

ts, e

xten

sion

serv

ices

, pro

cess

ing

serv

ices

, sto

rage

faci

litie

s an

d m

arke

t out

let.

Ba

selin

e:1.

9% o

f sm

allh

olde

r use

of f

ertil

izer

s fo

r ric

e,

8.5%

of

smal

lhol

der u

se m

achi

nery

for p

roce

ssin

g ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duce

, 1

exte

nsio

n w

orke

r per

blo

ck (n

umbe

r of w

ards

)Ta

rget

: 10%

of s

mal

lhol

der p

rodu

cers

of r

ice

use

of fe

rtiliz

er, 3

0% o

f sm

allh

olde

rs u

se m

achi

nery

for p

roce

ssin

g ag

ricul

tura

l pro

duce

, and

1

exte

nsio

n w

orke

r per

war

d

3. C

ontri

butio

n of

prim

ary

(agr

icul

ture

incl

udin

g liv

esto

ck, f

ores

try a

nd

fishi

ng),

seco

ndar

y (m

inin

g, m

anuf

actu

ring,

min

ing

and

quar

ryin

g) a

nd

terti

ary

(ser

vice

s) s

ecto

rs to

the

grow

th o

f GD

P (s

ourc

es o

f gro

wth

).B

ase

line:

In 2

012

the

sour

ces

of th

e 15

.2%

GD

P gr

owth

wer

e as

fo

llow

s- pr

imar

y se

ctor

(2.8

%),

seco

ndar

y se

ctor

(9.3

%) a

nd te

rtiar

y se

ctor

(2.1

%)

Targ

et: O

vera

ll G

DP

is pr

ojec

ted

to g

row

at 5

.2%

. Th

e ta

rget

sec

tora

l co

ntrib

utio

n to

GD

P gr

owth

prim

ary

sect

or (1

.6%

), se

cond

ary

sect

or

(1.8

%) a

nd te

rtiar

y se

ctor

(1.8

%)

Ann

ual a

gric

ultu

ral

surv

eyN

GO

pro

ject

sur

vey

Ann

ual c

rop

asse

ss-

men

tM

AFF

S’ a

nnua

l Rep

ort

SLRA

WFP

dat

a ba

seG

AFS

P six

-mon

th

repo

rtSt

atist

ics

Sier

ra L

eone

G

DP

data

Ass

um

pti

on

: Th

ere

is fa

irly

stabl

e m

acro

eco-

nom

ic e

nviro

nmen

tPo

litic

al s

tabi

lity

Stab

le a

nd

pred

icta

ble

polic

ies

in th

ese

sect

ors

Ris

k:

Unc

erta

inty

of

dono

r fun

ding

Abr

upt c

hang

es in

go

vern

men

t pol

icy

MD

As

Mun

icip

al

Dist

rict C

ounc

ilsN

GO

sA

fDB

FAO

$8,0

00,0

00W

FP$1

0,00

0,00

0 U

NID

O$1

,000

,000

UN

WO

MEN

$148

,750

UN

CD

F$1

,000

,000 ILO

$200

,000

$ 2

0,3

48

,75

0

1

1 A

ssum

ed 3

0% in

crea

se fo

r Cas

sava

11UNDAF RESULTS

B.

Low

inco

me

and

fo

od

inse

cure

ho

use

hold

s ha

ve im

pro

ved

acc

ess

to s

ust

ain

ab

le in

com

e g

ener

ati

ng

op

po

rtu

niti

es (

on-

farm

and

off

-fa

rm)

1. N

umbe

r of l

ocal

cou

ncils

pla

ns a

nd b

udge

ts w

ithlo

cal e

cono

mic

de

velo

pmen

t (LE

D) c

ompo

nent

.Ba

selin

e: 4

LCs

Targ

et: 1

0 LC

s 2.

% c

hang

e in

hou

seho

lds

belo

w th

e po

verty

line

Ba

selin

e: (2

011)

: Abs

olut

e po

verty

-52.

3%, f

ood

pove

rty-4

7.7%

Extre

me

poor

wom

en: 8

4%Ta

rget

: Abs

olut

e po

verty

-34%

, foo

d po

verty

-30%

Extre

me

poor

wom

en: 5

4.6%

2. A

func

tioni

ng L

ocal

Net

wor

k of

the

UN

Glo

bal C

ompa

ctB

ase

line:

No

Loca

l Net

wor

k of

the

UN

Glo

bal C

ompa

ct e

stabl

ished

in

Sie

rra

Leon

e.

Targ

et: L

ocal

net

wor

k ex

ists

and

is a

ctiv

e

3. A

revi

sed

Fisc

al D

ecen

traliz

atio

n Fr

amew

ork

with

Loc

al E

cono

mic

D

evel

opm

ent (

LED

) dim

ensio

ns in

pla

ceB

ase

line:

LED

not

incl

uded

Targ

et: L

ED in

lcud

ed

Inte

grat

ed h

ouse

hold

su

rvey

sLo

cal b

usin

ess

surv

ey

mar

ket a

sses

smen

tW

FP s

urve

y (C

FSVA

)LC

s M

DTF

and

Ann

ual

Dev

elop

men

t and

Bu

dget

Gra

nts

allo

catio

n fo

rmul

a (b

y M

oFED

-LG

FD)

Repo

rts o

f int

ergo

vern

-m

enta

l tra

nsfe

rs

(MoF

ED-LG

ED)

M&

E Re

port

from

M

LGRD

Ann

ual A

ctiv

ity re

port

of L

oCA

SLRe

view

ed C

LoG

PAS

polic

yLC

s M

DTF

and

Ann

ual

Dev

elop

men

t and

Bu

dget

LCs

Budg

et h

earin

g Re

ports

LCS

annu

al fi

nanc

ial

and

activ

ity R

epor

tsW

orld

Ban

k Po

verty

Pr

ofile

sU

N G

loba

l Com

pact

M

embe

rs D

atab

ase

Fisc

al D

ecen

traliz

atio

n Re

port

Ass

um

pti

on

:Th

ere

is fa

irly

stabl

e m

acro

eco-

nom

ic e

nviro

nmen

tPo

litic

al s

tabi

lity

Stab

le a

nd

pred

icta

ble

polic

ies

in th

ese

sect

ors

Dec

entra

lisat

ion

refo

rm a

gend

a co

ntin

ues

to b

e su

ppor

ted

Ade

quat

e an

d tim

ely

disb

urse

-m

ent o

f fun

ds to

lo

cal g

over

nmen

t.R

isk

: F

inan

cial

mism

an-

agem

ent.

Mac

roec

onom

ic

insta

bilit

yLG

FD o

f MoF

ED

does

not

com

plet

e th

e po

licy

refo

rm

on lo

cal c

ounc

il re

venu

e D

elay

in re

view

ing

the

CLo

GPA

S Po

licy

LCs

do n

ot re

ceiv

e de

dica

ted

gran

ts fo

r LED

LCs

do n

ot u

se

own

reve

nues

to

prom

ote

LED

MD

As

Wor

ld B

ank

Loca

l Cou

ncils

NG

Os

UN

DP

$15,

000,

000

FAO

$6,0

00,0

00W

FP$3

,000

,000

UN

IDO

$756

,000

UN

WO

MEN

$250

,000

UN

CD

F$1

,500

,000 ILO

$300

,000

$ 2

6,8

06

,00

0

Photo © Matt Smith


PR

SP P

illa

r 2

.

M

an

ag

ing

Na

tura

l Res

ou

rces

O

utc

om

e co

nven

er:

FA

OC

ont

rib

uti

ng a

gen

cies

: IO

M, U

ND

P, U

NID

O, O

HC

HR

, IA

EA, U

NO

PS

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

By

201

8, t

arg

eted

Go

vern

men

t ins

titu

tio

ns, t

he p

riva

te s

ecto

r, a

nd lo

cal c

om

mu

niti

es m

ana

ge

natu

ral

reso

urc

es in

a m

ore

eq

uit

ab

le a

nd

su

sta

ina

ble

wa

y

1. E

xten

t to

whi

ch th

e Im

prov

ed le

gal f

ram

ewor

ks a

re b

eing

impl

e-m

ente

d by

rele

vant

sec

tors

. B

ase

line:

Fore

stry

fram

ewor

k is

unde

r dev

elop

men

t

Land

Pol

icy

unde

r ref

orm

sin

ce 2

009

draf

t to

be s

ubm

itted

to

C

abin

et b

y en

d 20

13

Dra

ft En

ergy

Stra

tegy

201

2

DRM

Pol

icy

draf

ted

in 2

006,

Ref

orm

ed d

raft

to b

e su

bmitt

ed

to

Cab

inet

1st

quar

ter 2

014.

N

o po

licy

for w

ater

reso

urce

man

agem

ent

N

o po

licy

for s

olid

was

te m

anag

emen

t

Fish

erie

s A

ct n

ot y

et ta

bled

to p

arlia

men

tTa

rget

: (ea

ch a

genc

y to

wor

k w

ith re

leva

nt M

DA

s to

sup

port

the

enac

tmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

draf

t pol

icie

s in

dica

ted

abov

e)

2. P

erce

ntag

e ar

ea p

er d

istric

t whe

re s

usta

inab

le n

atur

al re

sour

ce

man

agem

ent i

s be

ing

prac

ticed

. B

ase

line:

FA

O/U

ND

P to

esta

blish

bas

elin

e da

ta (%

of l

and

unde

r fo

rest

cove

r, m

inin

g, fi

sher

ies,

key

wat

er p

oint

s)

Targ

et: T

arge

ts to

be

esta

blish

ed in

1st

Qua

rter 2

014.

– F

AO

/UN

DP

to fo

llow

up

with

EPA

and

For

estry

div

ision

3. P

erce

ntag

e of

hou

seho

lds

with

acc

ess

to a

fford

able

sus

tain

able

re

new

able

ene

rgy

sour

ces.

B

ase

line:

See

Nat

iona

l Ene

rgy

Prof

ile o

f Sie

rra

Leon

e 20

12;

Targ

et:

Tang

ible

impr

ovem

ent i

n N

atio

nal E

nerg

y Pr

ofile

Publ

ished

doc

umen

ts an

d re

ports

Visu

al v

erifi

catio

n of

co

mm

itted

inpu

ts an

d re

sour

ces

Inte

rvie

ws

with

sta

keho

lder

com

mun

ityRe

ports

from

Env

iron-

men

tal P

rote

ctio

n A

genc

y (E

PA)

Ass

um

pti

on

: A

lega

l fra

mew

ork

exist

s, a

nd c

an b

e im

prov

ed a

nd

appr

oved

.

Ris

k:

Insu

ffici

ent o

r lim

ited

polit

ical

will

an

d in

com

plia

nce

with

Cor

pora

te

Soci

al R

espo

nsib

il-ity

(CSR

) by

priv

ate

sect

or.

Non

app

licat

ion

of

rele

vant

leg

isla-

tion

Offi

ce o

f the

Pr

esid

ent,

Min

istry

of

Justi

ce, M

inist

ry

of E

nerg

y, W

ater

, La

nds

and

Cou

ntry

Pl

anni

ng, M

inist

ry o

f A

gric

ultu

re a

nd

Food

Sec

urity

, M

inist

ry o

f Agr

icul

-tu

re, F

ores

try a

nd

Food

Sec

urity

, M

inist

ry o

f Fish

erie

s an

d M

arin

e Re

sour

ces,

Min

istry

of

Wor

ks a

nd

Hou

sing,

Min

istry

of

Min

es a

nd M

iner

al

Reso

urce

s, E

nviro

n-m

ent P

rote

ctio

n A

genc

y, M

inist

ry o

f Lo

cal G

over

nmen

t an

d Ru

ral D

evel

op-

men

t (lo

cal c

ounc

ils)

Priv

ate

Sect

orC

ivil

Soci

ety

Uni

vers

ities

FAO

$4,0

00,0

00IO

M$1

00,0

00U

ND

P$1

0,40

0,00

0U

NID

O$1

,000

,000

OH

CH

R$2

50,0

00IA

EA$1

32,0

00U

NO

PS$1

,500

,000

$ 1

7,3

82

,00

0

15UNDAF RESULTS

B.

By

201

8, c

om

mu

niti

es w

ith

in ta

rget

ed d

istr

icts

dem

ons

tra

te in

crea

sed

res

ilien

ce to

na

tura

l

a

nd m

an-

ma

de

dis

ast

ers.

1. N

umbe

r of d

istric

ts im

plem

entin

g di

saste

r pre

vent

ion

prep

ared

-ne

ss a

nd re

spon

se p

lans

, in

line

with

the

Hyo

go F

ram

ewor

k of

A

ctio

n.B

ase

line:

No

distr

ict d

isaste

r man

agem

ent p

lan

in p

lace

Targ

et: 1

4 di

stric

t disa

ster m

anag

emen

t pla

ns v

alid

ated

and

op

erat

iona

lized

2. P

erce

ntag

e ch

ange

in th

e po

pula

tion

affe

cted

by

natu

ral a

nd

man

-mad

e di

saste

r or c

ross

boa

rder

mov

emen

ts.B

ase

line:

disa

ggre

gate

- fl

oods

, fire

, lan

dslid

es, c

hole

ra, r

efug

ee

and

IDP

Publ

ished

doc

umen

ts an

d re

ports

Visu

al v

erifi

catio

n of

co

mm

itted

inpu

ts an

d re

sour

ces

Inte

rvie

ws

with

sta

keho

lder

com

mun

ityW

ater

qua

lity

mon

itor-

ing

surv

eys

Issu

ed g

uide

lines

on

pollu

tion

cont

rol

Regu

lar w

eath

er

broa

dcas

ting

and

repo

rts

Ass

um

pti

on

:Ba

sic lo

gisti

c an

d in

stitu

tiona

l in

frastr

uctu

re

exist

s.

Com

mun

ities

hav

e ex

istin

g ca

paci

ties

for e

arly

war

ning

sy

stem

s an

d di

saste

r pre

pare

d-ne

ss.

Ris

k:

Occ

urre

nce

of

disa

sters

of

extre

mel

y hi

gh

mag

nitu

de

Min

istry

of

Ener

gy, W

ater

, La

nds

and

Cou

ntry

Pl

anni

ng,

Min

istry

of

Agr

icul

ture

and

Fo

od S

ecur

ity,

Min

istry

of

Agr

icul

ture

, Fo

restr

y an

d Fo

od S

ecur

ity,

Min

istry

of

Fish

erie

s an

d M

arin

e Re

sour

ces,

M

inist

ry o

f W

orks

and

H

ousin

g,

Min

istry

of

Tran

spor

t and

A

viat

ion,

O

ffice

of

Nat

iona

l Se

curit

y/D

isaste

r Man

agem

ent

Dep

artm

ent,

Envi

ronm

ent

Prot

ectio

n A

genc

yPr

ivat

e Se

ctor

Civ

il So

ciet

yU

nive

rsiti

es

FAO

$3,5

00,0

00IO

M$2

,000

,000

UN

DP

$6,3

40,0

00U

NO

PS$1

,500

,000

$ 1

3,3

40

,00

0


PR

SP P

illa

r 3

:

A

ccel

era

ting

Hu

ma

n D

evel

op

men

tO

utc

om

e co

nven

er:

U

NFP

AC

on

trib

uti

ng a

gen

cies

: U

NIC

EF, I

OM

, WFP

, WH

O, U

NA

IDS,

UN

ESC

O, I

AEA

, UN

HC

R, U

NO

PS

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

By

201

8 t

he c

ap

aci

ty o

f th

e ed

uca

tio

n sy

stem

to p

rovi

de

free

, co

mp

uls

ory

and

qu

alit

y p

rim

ary

ed

uca

tio

n is

enh

anc

ed t

hro

ug

h ta

rget

ed U

N p

rog

ram

mes

.

1. N

et in

take

rate

in p

rimar

y ed

ucat

ion,

% (d

isagg

rega

ted

by g

ende

r).

Ba

selin

e: B

oys

42%

, Girl

s 48

% (M

ICS,

201

0)Ta

rget

: 100

%

2. N

et a

ttend

ance

rate

in p

rimar

y ed

ucat

ion

(disa

ggre

gate

d by

ge

nder

’s g

eogr

aphi

cal d

istric

t).B

ase

line:

Boy

s 73

%, G

irls

76%

(MIC

S 20

10Ta

rget

:100

%

3. %

of g

rade

thre

e ch

ildre

n w

ith a

ppro

pria

te li

tera

cy a

nd n

umer

acy

skill

sB

ase

line:

dat

a no

t ava

ilabl

e at

this

Targ

et: d

ata

not a

vaila

ble

at th

is tim

e

1. P

ass

rate

in W

ASC

E Ex

ams.

Ba

selin

e:1%

Ta

rget

: 25%

2. T

rans

ition

rate

from

prim

ary

to ju

nior

sec

onda

ry.

Ba

selin

e: 7

7%Ta

rget

: 87%

(Disa

ggre

gatio

n of

boy

s an

d gi

rls n

eede

d –

wor

k in

pro

gres

s)

3. L

itera

cy ra

te o

f 15-

24 y

ear o

ldB

ase

line:

Fem

ale

48%

(MIC

S 20

10)

Targ

et: F

emal

e 75

%

EMIS

Lear

ning

ass

ess-

men

t rep

orts

MIC

S/D

HS

WA

SCE

Resu

lt Re

port

EMIS

MIC

S/D

HS

Ann

ual s

choo

l ce

nsus

Ass

ump

tion:

Fam

ilies

hav

e ad

equa

te

reso

urce

s to

mee

t hid

den

costs

Polic

y on

com

pulso

ry

educ

atio

n is

enfo

rced

.R

isk

: A

ttitu

des

of p

aren

ts to

war

ds

educ

atio

n.Fa

mili

es d

o no

t hav

e th

e re

sour

ces

to m

eet t

he

hidd

en c

osts

Ass

ump

tion:

Su

ffici

ent r

esou

rces

av

aila

ble

for i

nfra

struc

ture

ca

paci

ty b

uild

ing.

Ris

k:

Non

will

ingn

ess

to a

ttend

se

cond

ary

scho

ol.

Beca

use

Dist

ance

bet

wee

n ho

useh

olds

and

sch

ools

and

fam

ilies

do

not h

ave

the

reso

urce

s to

pay

tuiti

on fe

es

Gov

ernm

ent

NG

OLo

cal G

over

n-m

ent

Com

mun

ities

Gov

ernm

ent

NG

O

Loca

l Gov

ern-

men

tC

omm

uniti

es

Priv

ate

Sect

or

UN

ICEF

$50,

500,

000

WFP

$9,0

00,0

00U

NH

CR

$500

,000

UN

OPS

$500

,000

UN

ESC

O$1

,000

,000

$ 6

1,5

00

,00

0

UN

ICEF

$6,0

00,0

00IO

M$1

,000

,000

$ 7

,00

0,0

00

B.

By

201

8, b

oys

and

gir

ls h

ave

incr

ease

d a

cces

s to

qu

alit

y s

eco

nda

ry e

du

cati

on

(ju

nio

r a

nd s

enio

r se

cond

ary

).

17UNDAF RESULTS

C.

Vu

lner

ab

le p

op

ula

tio

ns (

wo

men

, ad

ole

scen

t gir

ls, c

hild

ren

und

er 5

, PLH

IV)

incr

ease

uti

liza

tio

n

of

qu

alit

y r

epro

du

ctiv

e he

alt

h se

rvic

es.

1. %

of b

irths

atte

nded

by

a sk

illed

birt

h at

tend

ant.

Ba

selin

e: 6

2% (M

ICS

2010

)Ta

rget

: 75%

*(w

ill b

e up

date

d ba

sed

on D

HS

2013

repo

rt)

2. A

dole

scen

t fer

tility

rate

(wom

en a

ge 1

5 –

19)

Ba

selin

e: 1

22/1

000

(MIC

S 20

10)

Targ

et: 1

00/1

000

Disa

ggre

gate

d by

age

, wea

lth q

uint

ile, l

ocat

ion

– ru

ral/

urba

n

3. %

of p

eopl

e re

ceiv

ing

HIV

ser

vice

s in

hea

lth fa

cilit

ies

(disa

ggre

gate

d,

HC

T, P

MTC

T, A

RT, M

/F c

hild

ren)

.B

ase

line:

PM

TCT:

93%

(201

2) A

RT: 3

9% (2

012)

; Pae

diat

ric A

RT 2

8%

(201

2) H

CT:

7%

(200

8 D

HS)

* (w

ill b

e up

date

d fro

m 2

013

DH

S)Ta

rget

: PM

TCT:

100

%, A

RT: 6

0%, H

CT:

50%

4. C

over

age

of th

ree

dose

s of

DTP

3 by

1st

birth

day

Ba

selin

e: 8

4%Ta

rget

: 90%

5. P

ropo

rtion

of c

hild

ren

unde

r fiv

e s

leep

ing

unde

r LLI

Ns

Ba

selin

e: 4

5% (

MIS

201

3)Ta

rget

: 80%

6. C

ontra

cept

ive

prev

alen

ce ra

teB

ase

line:

16%

Targ

et: 3

0%

7. C

ance

r Con

trol:

Initi

atio

n of

the

esta

blish

men

t of r

adio

ther

apy

and

upgr

adin

g of

the

nucl

ear m

edic

ine

faci

lity

in th

e co

untry

Ba

selin

e: N

ot a

vaila

ble

at ti

me

of w

ritin

gTa

rget

: Not

ava

ilabl

e at

tim

e of

writ

ing

MO

HS

/ D

HS

NA

CP

repo

rtM

ICS

WH

O/U

NIC

EF jo

int

imm

uniz

atio

n es

timat

es

Ass

ump

tion:

Con

tinua

tion

of

free

heal

th c

are

initi

ativ

e Su

ffici

ent a

nd

susta

inab

le

fund

ing.

Con

tinue

d im

plem

enta

tion

of

Teen

age

Preg

nanc

y St

rate

gyH

IV, C

ouns

ellin

g &

Te

st: T

est F

or A

ll is

impl

emen

ted

Ris

k:

Myt

hs/s

tigm

a an

d m

iscon

cept

ions

ab

out h

ealth

se

rvic

es.

Gov

ernm

ent

(MD

As)

–

enab

ling

and

supp

ortiv

e en

viro

nmen

t in

clud

ing

finan

cial

su

ppor

t.N

GO

/CSO

/Med

ia –

ser

vice

de

liver

y im

plem

enta

tion

UN

FPA

$16,

200,

000

UN

ICEF

$80,

085,

000

IOM

$250

,000

UN

AID

S$1

,495

,000

WH

O13

,000

,000

IAEA

$355

,000

UN

HC

R$5

00,0

00U

NO

PS$2

,000

,000

$ 1

13,8

85

,00

0


D.

By

201

8, c

hild

ren

und

er f

ive,

ad

ole

scen

t gir

ls, w

om

en o

f rep

rod

uctiv

e a

ge,

vul

nera

ble

gro

ups

and

ho

useh

old

s a

re

bet

ter

pro

tect

ed fr

om

hun

ger

and

sho

w im

pro

ved

nut

ritio

nal s

tatu

s a

s a

res

ult o

f str

ong

er U

N s

upp

ort

to th

e G

over

nmen

t.

1. P

ropo

rtion

of w

omen

15-

49 y

ears

with

ana

emia

.B

ase

line:

60%

(200

8 D

HS)

* To

be

Upd

ated

bas

ed o

n D

HS

2013

da

ta

Targ

et: 4

0%

2. P

ropo

rtion

of c

hild

ren

unde

r 2 y

ears

. tha

t are

s

tunt

edB

ase

line:

25.

7% (2

010

SMA

RT)

Targ

et: 1

7.7%

3. P

ropo

rtion

of c

hild

ren

unde

r 5ye

ars

that

are

Und

erw

eigh

t B

ase

line:

18.7

% (2

010

SMA

RT)

Targ

et: 1

3.1%

4. P

ropo

rtion

of i

nfan

ts 0-

5 m

onth

s th

at a

re e

xclu

sivel

y br

eastf

edB

ase

line:

32%

(201

0 M

ICS)

Targ

et: 6

0%

1. P

ropo

rtion

of p

opul

atio

n us

ing

an im

prov

ed w

ater

sou

rce

(disa

ggre

gate

d by

sex

, urb

an,/

rura

l and

wea

lth q

uint

iles)

. Bas

elin

e:

57%

(JM

P 20

13)

Targ

et: 8

0%

2. P

ropo

rtion

of p

opul

atio

n us

ing

basic

san

itatio

n (d

isagg

rega

ted

by

sex,

urb

an,/

rura

l and

wea

lth q

uint

iles)

Ba

selin

e: 1

3% (J

MP

2013

) Ta

rget

: 60%

Disa

ggre

gate

by

MIC

S/JM

P

3. P

ropo

rtion

of p

opul

atio

n th

at is

pra

ctic

ing

open

def

ecat

ion

(disa

ggre

gate

d by

sex

, urb

an/r

ural

and

wea

lth q

uint

iles)

B

ase

line:

T: 2

7% (J

MP

2013

) (U

:9%

/ R

:39%

)Ta

rget

: 10%

disa

ggre

gate

d by

MIC

S /

JMP

KPA

sur

vey

HM

IS &

Sur

veys

DH

SM

ICs

SMA

RT

KAP

surv

eyH

MIS

JMP

(WH

O/U

NIC

EF)

Ass

ump

tion:

Su

ffici

ent a

war

enes

s an

d w

illin

gnes

s to

use

nu

tritio

nal s

ervi

ce a

nd

adop

t app

ropr

iate

pr

actic

es.

Ade

quat

e fu

ndin

g av

aila

ble

for t

he im

ple-

men

tatio

n of

prio

rity

inte

rven

tions

in th

e fo

od

and

nutri

tion

secu

rity

impl

emen

tatio

n pl

anSu

stain

ed p

oliti

cal w

ill to

im

prov

e nu

tritio

nR

isk

: C

orru

ptio

n/Th

eft i

n th

e pr

ovisi

on o

f nut

ritio

nal

serv

ices

Ass

ump

tion:

G

over

nmen

t dom

estic

re

sour

ces

allo

catio

n fu

rther

incr

ease

G

over

nmen

t ado

pts

qual

ity s

tand

ards

for

cons

truct

ion,

ope

ratio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce o

f w

ater

and

san

itatio

n fa

cilit

ies

Susta

ined

ado

ptio

n an

d pr

actic

e of

app

ropr

iate

sa

nita

tion

and

hygi

ene

prac

tices

Gov

ernm

ent

NG

Os

Civ

il So

ciet

y

Gov

ernm

ent

prov

ide

enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent

–ens

urin

g su

ppor

tive

polic

ies

are

in

plac

eN

GO

/CSO

s-se

rvic

e de

liver

y im

plem

enta

tion

UN

ICEF

$20,

000,

000

WFP

$7,0

00,0

00W

HO

$500

,000

UN

HC

R$3

50,0

00

$ 2

7,8

50

,00

0

UN

ICEF

$30,

000,

000

WH

O$1

50,0

00IA

EA$3

94,0

00U

NH

CR

$150

,000

UN

OPS

$1,5

00,0

00

$ 3

2,1

94

,00

0

E.

By

201

8, c

om

mu

niti

es h

ave

imp

rove

d a

nd e

qu

ita

ble

use

of

safe

dri

nkin

g w

ate

r,

san

ita

tio

n a

nd h

ygie

ne p

ract

ices

.

Photo ©Ann Johansson


PR

SP P

illa

r 5

:

La

bo

ur

& E

mp

loy

men

tO

utc

om

e co

nven

er:

IL

OC

ont

rib

uti

ng a

gen

cies

: U

ND

P, IO

M, F

AO

, UN

IDO

, UN

ESC

O

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

Pri

vate

sec

tor

ena

ble

d to

lea

d o

n a

ccel

era

ted

gen

era

tio

n o

f su

sta

ina

ble

incl

usi

ve

a

nd d

ecen

t em

plo

ym

ent.

1. N

o. o

f you

th c

ondu

cive

pol

icie

s an

d in

stitu

tiona

l fra

mew

orks

in p

lace

(y

outh

, wom

en e

mpo

wer

men

t, M

.S.M

.E.,

etc.

).B

ase

line:

You

th p

olic

y dr

afte

d; N

atio

nal Y

outh

Em

ploy

men

t Act

ion

Plan

(to

be a

ppro

ved)

; Loc

al C

onte

nt P

olic

y in

pla

ceTa

rget

: 5 n

ew p

olic

ies,

stra

tegy

and

fram

ewor

k

2. %

cha

nge

in s

usta

inab

le a

nd d

ecen

t job

s cr

eate

d (d

isagg

rega

ted

by

age,

etc

.).B

ase

line:

To

be e

stabl

ished

in 2

014

thro

ugh

Labo

ur F

orce

Sur

vey

Targ

et: T

o be

esta

blish

ed in

ear

ly 2

015

(afte

r Lab

our F

orce

Sur

vey)

Vario

us M

DA’

s (r

epor

ts an

d pu

blic

atio

ns e

tc.)

and

parli

amen

t.St

atist

ics

SL

(inte

grat

ed h

ouse

-ho

ld s

urve

y) (I

HS)

an

d M

inist

ry o

f La

bour

.

Ass

um

pti

on:

Gov

ernm

ent w

ill

cont

inue

to c

reat

e co

nduc

ive

envi

ronm

ent

for p

rivat

e se

ctor

gr

owth

.O

rgan

ized

priv

ate

sect

or (O

PS) c

omm

it-te

d to

fulfi

lling

cor

po-

rate

soc

ial r

espo

nsib

il-ity

(CRS

) and

the

loca

l co

nten

t pol

icy.

Ris

k:

Del

ay/f

ailu

re in

op

erat

iona

lizin

g ne

cess

ary

polic

ies/

fram

ewor

ks.

MO

LSS,

M

OYA

, N

AYC

OM

(c

oord

inat

ing

IPs)

C

SOs/

NG

Os,

Pr

ivat

e Se

ctor

UN

DP

$ 14

,000

,000

IOM

$2,0

00,0

00FA

O$3

,000

,000

UN

IDO

$1,0

00,0

00 ILO$1

,000

,000

UN

ESC

O$1

,000

,000

$ 2

2,0

00

,00

0

B.

Sta

te in

stit

uti

on

s/M

DA

s ca

pa

cita

ted

to u

se e

mp

loy

men

t int

ensi

ve

ap

pro

ach

es in

an

incl

usi

ve m

ann

er f

or

pu

blic

wo

rks.

1. N

umbe

r of M

DA

s w

ho h

ave

adop

ted

a po

licy

on a

ffirm

ativ

e us

e of

pu

blic

wor

ks b

udge

ts fo

r em

ploy

men

t gen

erat

ion.

Ba

selin

e d

ata

bei

ng s

ou

gh

t: to

be

incl

ud

ed in

M&

E p

lan

2. P

ropo

rtion

of p

ublic

wor

ks u

sing

empl

oym

ent i

nten

sive

appr

oach

.B

ase

line

da

ta b

eing

so

ug

ht:

to b

e in

clu

ded

in M

&E

pla

n

3. N

o. o

f fun

ctio

nal

TEC

VOC

insti

tutio

nsB

ase

line

da

ta b

eing

so

ug

ht:

to b

e in

clu

ded

in M

&E

pla

n

4. N

o. o

f tra

inee

s su

cces

sful

ly c

ompl

etin

g tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

eB

ase

line

da

ta b

eing

so

ug

ht:

to b

e in

clu

ded

in M

&E

pla

n

Vario

us M

DA

s (R

epor

ts an

d pu

blic

atio

ns)

Min

istry

of W

orks

and

La

bour

Min

istry

(R

epor

ts).

Ass

um

pti

on

: Th

ere

is po

litic

al

and

insti

tutio

nal

will

to im

plem

ent

new

app

roac

hes.

Will

ingn

ess

of

yout

hs to

acq

uire

an

d ap

ply

empl

oyab

le s

kills

Gov

ernm

ent

will

ing

to re

cog-

nize

cer

tific

ates

aw

arde

d by

in

form

al le

arni

ng

insti

tutio

nsR

isk

:Re

sista

nce

to

chan

ge o

f te

chno

logy

and

th

e ad

optio

n of

ne

w a

ppro

ache

s.Lo

w p

erce

ptio

n of

vo

catio

nal a

nd

info

rmal

edu

catio

n

MD

A’s

(Pol

icy

form

ulat

ion

and

impl

emen

tatio

n)

Priv

ate

sect

or

(Par

tner

ship

and

im

plem

enta

tion)

Min

istry

of

Labo

ur (t

o ke

ep

data

on

empl

oym

ent)

Uni

vers

ity,

NAY

CO

M a

nd

MO

YA

(par

tner

ship

and

im

plem

enta

tion)

FAO

$1,0

00,0

00U

NID

O$1

95,0

00 ILO$1

,000

,000

$ 2

,19

5,0

00

21UNDAF RESULTS

Photo © Matt Smith


PR

SP P

illa

r 6

:

St

ren

gth

en S

oci

al P

rote

ctio

n Sy

stem

sO

utc

om

e co

nven

er:

W

FPC

ont

rib

uti

ng a

gen

cies

: U

NFP

A, U

NIC

EF,

IOM

, UN

AID

S, U

NW

OM

EN, I

LO, U

NO

PS

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

By

201

8, v

uln

era

ble

po

pu

lati

ons

incl

ud

ing

ad

ole

scen

t gir

ls h

ave

incr

ease

d a

cces

s

to

live

liho

od

s, e

du

cati

on

an

d im

pro

ved

nu

trit

iona

l sta

tus.

1. P

erce

ntag

e of

food

sec

ure

hous

e ho

ld

(Foo

d C

onsu

mpt

ion

Scor

e, F

CS

>35

: foo

d se

cure

)B

ase

line:

FC

S >3

5, 5

5%Ta

rget

: FC

S>35

, 70%

2. P

erce

ntag

e of

ado

lesc

ent g

irls

(15-

19) w

ho h

ave

been

pre

gnan

tB

ase

line:

34%

Targ

et: 2

8%

3. P

erce

ntag

e of

chi

ldre

n 5-

14 y

ears

invo

lved

in c

hild

labo

urB

ase

line:

49.

8%Ta

rget

: 40%

4. S

uppl

emen

tary

feed

ing

perfo

rman

ce ra

tes

amon

g ta

rget

ed c

hild

ren

unde

r 5

Ba

selin

e:re

cove

ry ra

te =

95.

2de

faul

t rat

e =

2.8

deat

h ra

te =

<3%

no

n-re

spon

se ra

te =

0.8

Targ

et:

reco

very

rate

= >

75%

de

faul

t rat

e =

<15%

de

ath

rate

= <

3%

non-

resp

onse

rate

= <

5%

MA

FFS-

Ann

ual

agric

ultu

ral s

urve

yA

nnua

l cro

p as

sess

men

tW

FP re

port

DH

SM

ICS

IPEC

/ILO

Ass

um

pti

on

: C

oord

inat

ion

of s

ocia

l pr

otec

tion

prog

ram

s N

o sh

ocks

disr

upt

hous

ehol

d fo

od

secu

rity

Ris

k:

Food

pric

e hi

ke,

MD

As,

N

GO

sC

ivil

Soci

ety,

WFP

$14,

000,

000

UN

FPA

$7,0

00,0

00U

NIC

EF$1

0,78

0,00

0IO

M$2

,000

,000

UN

AID

S$2

00,0

00U

NW

OM

EN$2

24,3

75 ILO$2

00,0

00U

NO

PS$5

00,0

00

$ 3

4,9

04

,37

5

B.

By

201

8, 2

0%

of

extr

emel

y p

oo

r ho

use

hold

s ha

ve a

cces

s to

so

cia

l sa

fety

net

s.

1. P

ropo

rtion

of e

xtre

mel

y po

or a

nd v

ulne

rabl

e ho

useh

olds

rece

ivin

g ca

sh tr

ansf

ers

and

food

ass

istan

ceB

ase

line:

0%

Targ

et: 7

%

2. P

ropo

rtion

of c

ash

for w

ork

prog

ram

me

bene

ficia

ries

who

are

w

omen

Ba

selin

e: 3

1%Ta

rget

: 50%

3. S

choo

l atte

ndan

ce a

mon

g ch

ildre

n in

ben

efic

iary

hou

seho

lds

of

cash

tran

sfer

s an

d sc

hool

feed

ing

prog

ram

me

bene

ficia

ries

Ba

selin

e: T

BD 2

014

Targ

et: T

BD 2

014

Sier

ra L

eone

In

tegr

ated

Hou

seho

ld

Surv

ey.

Rout

ine

Safe

ty N

ets

data

Cas

h Tr

ansf

er s

urve

y (N

AC

SA)

Ass

um

pti

on

:Fu

ndin

g by

G

over

nmen

t and

de

velo

pmen

t pa

rtner

s to

im

plem

ent s

afet

y ne

ts w

ill b

e av

aila

ble.

Cap

acity

to

impl

emen

t the

sa

fety

net

pr

ogra

mm

es w

ill

be b

uilt.

Coo

rdin

atio

n w

ill

be s

treng

then

edR

isk

: M

isapp

ropr

iatio

n of

fund

Poor

targ

etin

gLa

ck o

f cap

acity

of

finan

cial

insti

tu-

tions

MD

As,

Wor

ld B

ank,

Lo

cal C

ounc

ils

NG

Os

Civ

il So

ciet

y

WFP

$28,

000,

000

UN

ICEF

$4,0

00,0

00U

NA

IDS

$200

,000

UN

WO

MEN

$223

,125 ILO

$200

,000

UN

OPS

$500

,000

$ 3

3,1

23

,12

5

25UNDAF RESULTS


PR

SP P

illa

r 7:

G

ove

rna

nce

and

Pu

blic

Sec

tor

Ref

orm

O

utc

om

e co

nven

er:

U

ND

PC

ont

rib

uti

ng

ag

enci

es:

UN

FPA

, UN

ICEF

, UN

WO

MEN

, IO

M, W

HO

, UN

OD

C, I

LO, U

NO

PS,

UN

ESC

O

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

UN

su

pp

ort

to p

ub

lic s

ecto

r re

form

s p

rom

ote

s q

ua

lity,

tra

nsp

are

nt,

an

d in

crea

sin

gly

acc

ou

nta

ble

ser

vice

s.

1. N

umbe

r of m

echa

nism

s in

pla

ce to

faci

litat

e pa

rtici

pato

ry p

lann

ing,

m

onito

ring

and

deci

sion

mak

ing.

Ba

selin

e: T

he 1

0 fu

ndam

enta

l prin

cipl

es o

f offi

cial

sta

tistic

of U

N a

re m

issin

g in

the

Stat

istic

Act

200

2; N

o un

ified

and

coo

rdin

ated

sys

tem

s fo

r del

iver

ing

statis

tical

pro

duct

s an

d se

rvic

es.

Targ

et:

I. S

tatis

tics

Act

200

2 re

view

ed w

ith th

e 10

UN

prin

cipl

es in

corp

orat

ed.

II. A

nat

iona

l stra

tegy

for d

evel

opm

ent o

f sta

tistic

s fo

rmul

ated

. III

. A c

redi

ble

mac

ro-e

cono

mic

and

soc

ial d

emog

raph

ic d

ata

for m

onito

ring

soci

o-ec

onom

ic tr

ends

pro

duce

d.

2. P

ropo

rtion

of M

DA

s im

plem

entin

g th

e pe

rform

ance

man

agem

ent s

yste

m

(dat

a di

sagg

rega

ted

by d

istric

t, in

stitu

tion

and

gend

er).

Ba

selin

e: A

mer

it-ba

sed

recr

uitm

ent a

nd In

divi

dual

App

raisa

l sys

tem

s (IP

AS)

ha

ve b

een

intro

duce

d.Ta

rget

: Per

form

ance

man

agem

ent s

yste

ms

casc

aded

to a

ll M

DA

s. Q

ualit

y of

pe

rform

ance

incr

ease

d to

a s

atisf

acto

ry le

vel t

hrou

gh th

e us

e of

the

new

ly

deve

lope

d In

divi

dual

Per

form

ance

App

raisa

l Sys

tem

s (IP

AS)

tool

s ac

ross

all

MD

As.

3. P

rogr

ess

tow

ards

the

appl

icat

ion

of n

atio

nal p

rocu

rem

ent r

egul

atio

ns (b

y 20

18).

Ba

selin

e: P

rocu

rem

ent A

ct 2

004

exist

s w

ith N

PPA

esta

blish

ed b

ut th

e A

ct n

ot

fully

har

mon

ized

with

oth

er p

rocu

rem

ent m

anua

ls, b

iddi

ng d

ocum

ent,

etc.

Pr

ocur

emen

t Offi

cers

trai

ned

and

assig

ned

to a

ll M

DA

s in

cou

ntry

. Per

siste

nt

inte

rfere

nce

and

resis

tanc

e to

follo

win

g sta

ndar

d pr

ocur

emen

t pro

cedu

res.

4. P

erce

ntag

e of

chi

ldre

n un

der f

ive

who

hav

e a

birth

cer

tific

ate

(disa

ggre

gate

d by

dist

rict a

nd g

ende

r)B

ase

line:

78%

Targ

et: 9

0%

SSL

repo

rtsRe

vise

d St

atist

ics

Act

Dev

elop

men

t Par

tner

s’

repo

rtsEM

ISPe

rform

ance

ap

prai

sal/

mon

itorin

g re

ports

of M

DA

sSi

gned

per

form

ance

co

ntra

cts

Revi

sed

and

harm

o-ni

sed

proc

urem

ent

lega

l and

regu

lato

ry

fram

ewor

ks.

MD

As

and

Loca

l C

ounc

ils P

rocu

rem

ent

Plan

sM

ICS

Ass

um

pti

on:

G

over

nmen

t of

Sier

ra L

eone

is

com

mitt

ed to

im

plem

entin

g fo

rmul

ated

refo

rm

polic

ies;

incl

udin

g th

e fu

nctio

nal

revi

ews,

righ

t siz

ing

and

a de

cent

pay

pol

icy.

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Si

erra

Leo

ne is

co

mm

itted

to

crea

ting

the

enab

ling

envi

ron-

men

t for

effe

ctiv

e se

rvic

e de

liver

y –

staff

deve

lopm

ent,

on-th

e-jo

b tra

inin

g,

and

prov

ision

of

equi

pmen

t.

SSL

– D

ata

colle

ctio

n an

d an

alys

isH

RMO

, PSR

U,

PSC

, Cab

inet

Se

cret

aria

t –

Coo

rdin

atio

n an

d po

licy

form

ulat

ion

Dev

elop

men

t Pa

rtner

s Re

sour

ce

mob

iliza

tion,

te

chni

cal

assis

tanc

eG

oSL

– C

oord

ina-

tion

Dev

elop

men

t Pa

rtner

s –

Tech

nica

l as

sista

nce

and

fund

ing

UN

DP

$4,0

00,0

00U

NW

OM

EN$2

00,0

00W

HO

$2,6

34,5

00 ILO$2

00,0

00U

NO

PS$2

,000

,000

UN

ESC

O$5

00,0

00

$ 9

,53

4,5

00

B.

Just

ice

and

sec

uri

ty s

ecto

r d

eliv

ery

sy

stem

s im

pro

ved

in c

om

plia

nce

wit

h in

tern

ati

ona

l hu

ma

n ri

ght

s p

rinc

iple

s.

1. P

erce

nt (%

) of c

ases

repo

rted

and

disp

osed

of b

y ty

pe (c

ivil

and

crim

inal

) at t

he T

radi

tiona

l Cou

rts, M

agist

rate

Cou

rts a

nd H

igh

Cou

rts in

the

prov

ince

s (in

clud

ing

mob

ile c

ourts

) (di

sagg

rega

ted

by d

istric

t and

gen

der)

. B

ase

line:

TBC

Ta

rget

: At l

east

50%

incr

ease

in c

ases

rece

ived

and

disp

osed

of i

n Tr

aditi

onal

, Mag

istra

te a

nd H

igh

Cou

rts (i

nclu

ding

mob

ile c

ourts

) by

type

(c

ivil

and

crim

inal

).

2. P

erce

nt (%

) of c

ourt

user

s sa

tisfie

d w

ith th

e ou

tcom

e of

cas

es (C

ivil

and

Crim

inal

) (di

sagg

rega

ted

by d

istric

t, co

urt t

ype

and

gend

er).

Ba

selin

e: 5

3.2%

(ASJ

P pe

rcep

tion

surv

ey 2

013)

Targ

et: 6

5%.

3. T

he %

of r

espo

nden

ts w

ho b

elie

ve th

at th

e pr

oble

m o

f cor

rupt

ion

is se

rious

in th

e fu

nctio

ning

of t

he M

agist

rate

Cou

rts (b

y di

stric

t, co

urt t

ype

and

gend

er).

Ba

selin

e: 3

3.7%

(ASJ

P pe

rcep

tion

surv

ey 2

013)

Targ

et: 2

5% (

Follo

w-u

p su

rvey

s w

ill b

e co

nduc

ted

by A

SJP

and

poss

ibly

U

ND

P).

4 N

umbe

r of c

ases

inve

stiga

ted

by th

e Tr

ansn

atio

nal O

rgan

ized

Crim

e U

nit

– T

OC

U a

nd p

erso

ns p

rose

cute

d fo

r dru

g tra

ffick

ing

and

orga

nize

d cr

imes

(b

y dr

ug ty

pe a

nd g

ende

r).

Ba

selin

e: 4

1 C

ases

inve

stiga

ted

by T

rans

natio

nal O

rgan

ized

Crim

e U

nit –

TO

CU

and

12

pers

ons

pros

ecut

ed (1

Sem

este

r 201

3).

Targ

et:

Incr

ease

of 5

0% fo

r cas

es in

vesti

gate

d an

d in

crea

se o

f 50%

pe

rson

s pr

osec

uted

5. P

ropo

rtion

of j

uven

ile o

ffenc

es d

iver

ted

from

form

al ju

stice

sys

tem

(by

distr

ict,

age

and

gend

er).:

Ba

selin

e: 3

5%

Targ

et: 7

0% b

y 20

17.

6. P

erce

nt (%

) of p

opul

ace

expr

essin

g sa

tisfa

ctio

n w

ith q

ualit

y of

sec

urity

pr

ovisi

onB

ase

line:

30.

1% (t

o be

disa

ggre

gate

d)

Targ

et: 4

5%

AC

C R

epor

tsD

evel

opm

ent

partn

ers

Repo

rtC

ourt

Repo

rts a

nd

Stat

istic

sJu

stice

par

tner

s’

(UN

DP

and

ASJ

P)

cour

t mon

itorin

g an

d co

urt u

ser

perc

eptio

n su

rvey

re

ports

.C

ourt

mon

itorin

g Re

ports

ASJ

P pe

rcep

tion

surv

ey 2

013

UN

DP

and

ASJ

P fo

llow

-up

perc

ep-

tion

surv

ey 2

015

Polic

e sta

tistic

s an

d re

ports

Cou

rts s

tatis

tics

and

repo

rtsC

hild

justi

ce

strat

egy,

Po

lice/

FSU

, ju

dici

ary

Citi

zen

perc

eptio

n su

rvey

of s

ecur

ity

and

justi

ce

Ass

um

pti

on

: In

stitu

tiona

l mec

ha-

nism

s an

d le

gal

fram

ewor

ks fu

nctio

n-in

g ef

fect

ivel

y an

d en

ablin

g ac

cess

to

justi

ce fo

r all.

Ris

k:

Low

leve

l pol

itica

l w

ill.

Polit

ical

inte

rfere

nce.

Wid

espr

ead

pove

rty.

Lack

of k

now

ledg

e of

the

justi

ce s

yste

mA

ssu

mp

tio

n:

Con

tinua

tion

of

Insti

tutio

nal e

ngag

e-m

ent o

n th

e fig

ht

agai

nst o

rgan

ized

cr

ime

Judi

cial

mec

hani

sms

and

lega

l fra

me-

wor

ks fu

nctio

ning

ac

cord

ingl

y w

ith th

e ru

le o

f law

Ris

k:

Lack

of f

undi

ng fo

r TO

CU

Inte

rnal

insta

bilit

yIn

tegr

ity p

robl

ems

Lack

of p

oliti

cal w

ill

to fi

ght o

rgan

ized

cr

imes

Judi

ciar

y –

Cas

e m

anag

emen

tM

OJ –

Pro

secu

-tio

n an

d po

licy

form

ulat

ion

MIA

– In

vesti

ga-

tion,

pol

icy,

pr

osec

utio

n,

corr

ectio

n,

secu

rity

Offi

ce o

f the

Pr

esid

ent –

In

telli

genc

e,

boar

der m

anag

e-m

ent

Adv

ocac

y, p

ublic

in

form

atio

nM

SWG

CA

–

Polic

y, p

rote

ctio

n.M

OJ –

Pro

secu

-tio

n an

d po

licy

form

ulat

ion

Cap

acity

bui

ldin

g ac

tiviti

esTe

chni

cal s

uppo

rt:

INTE

RPO

L

UN

DP

$17,

200,

000

UN

ICEF

$5,0

00,0

00U

NW

OM

EN$3

00,0

00IO

M$1

,000

,000

UN

OD

C$2

,000

,000

UN

OPS

$1,8

65,0

00

$ 2

7,3

65

,00

0

27UNDAF RESULTS

C.

Ca

pa

city

of

dem

ocr

ati

c in

stit

uti

ons

str

eng

then

ed to

ena

ble

go

od

go

vern

anc

e

1. T

he n

umbe

r of M

edia

law

s re

vise

d (o

r ext

ent o

f re

visio

n) in

line

with

inte

rnat

iona

l bes

t pra

ctic

e on

pr

ess

freed

om.

Ba

selin

e: N

o un

ified

med

ia la

ws

Targ

et: A

cod

ified

med

ia la

w e

ndor

sed;

. 4. N

umbe

r of s

elec

ted

CSO

par

tner

s w

ho a

re

qual

ified

to a

pply

and

mon

itor n

orm

ativ

e sta

ndar

ds in

th

eir r

elev

ant a

reas

of w

ork

(by

type

of C

SO a

nd

gend

er)..

.B

ase

line:

0 (a

s th

e U

N a

s of

now

doe

s no

t hav

e a

proj

ect o

n ca

paci

ty d

evel

opm

ent o

n no

rmat

ive

stand

ards

).Ta

rget

: 25%

of U

N C

SO p

artn

ers

by 2

019.

8. N

umbe

r of l

egisl

ativ

e an

d ov

ersig

ht a

ctiv

ities

by

Parli

amen

t on

natio

nal d

evel

opm

ent

prog

ram

mes

/tar

gets

B

ase

line:

TBD

.Ta

rget

s: T

BD

9. P

oliti

cal p

artie

s Re

gistr

atio

n C

omm

issio

n str

engt

h-en

ed.

Base

line

data

bei

ng s

ough

t: fir

st ste

p in

M&

E pl

an

10. V

oter

turn

out i

n el

ecto

ral p

roce

sses

incl

udin

g dr

aft

natio

nal c

onsti

tutio

n re

fere

ndum

B

ase

line:

87.

3%Ta

rget

:90%

11. N

umbe

r of p

ublic

insti

tutio

ns a

nd e

lect

oral

bod

ies

usin

g th

e in

tegr

ated

nat

iona

l civ

il re

giste

rB

ase

line:

0Ta

rget

: 3

A c

odifi

ed S

ierr

a Le

one

m

edia

law

(Boo

k/po

cket

gu

ide)

IMC

Med

ia W

atch

IMC

, SLA

J, W

IMSA

L an

nual

re

ports

.Se

nsiti

zatio

n se

min

ar re

ports

Feed

back

from

sta

keho

lder

s on

pre

ss fr

eedo

m re

late

d pr

actic

esC

apac

ity b

uild

ing

prog

ress

re

ports

IMC

mon

itorin

g an

d ev

alua

tion

repo

rts.

Ann

ual N

atio

nal M

edia

D

evel

opm

ent F

orum

repo

rts.

Repo

rts o

n tra

inin

g an

d te

chni

cal a

ssist

ance

pr

ogra

ms

cond

ucte

d.Re

ports

sho

w p

erso

nnel

tra

inin

g se

ssio

ns, w

orks

hops

se

min

ars

and

coac

hing

and

m

ento

ring

sess

ions

hav

e be

en re

aliz

ed.

Cap

acity

ass

essm

ents

that

de

mon

strat

e ch

ange

s in

kn

owle

dge

and

skill

s of

civ

il so

ciet

y pa

rtner

s.

Pre

and

post

asse

ssm

ent

linke

d to

the

train

ing/

orie

ntat

ion

even

t.A

sses

smen

ts sh

ow im

prov

ed

serv

ice

to M

Ps;

Legi

slativ

e D

epar

tmen

t m

aint

ains

legi

slativ

e re

cord

s lik

e in

oth

er P

arlia

men

ts.

Ass

um

pti

on:

Gov

ernm

ent w

ill s

uppo

rt ef

forts

on

impr

ovin

g m

edia

law

s to

stre

ngth

en

dem

ocra

cy.

Ther

e w

ill b

e an

incr

ease

in

med

ia re

spon

sibili

ty to

re

spec

t the

law

.G

over

nmen

t will

be

com

mitt

ed to

sup

porti

ng

med

ia c

apac

ity b

uild

ing

exer

cise

s.A

cces

s to

Info

rmat

ion

Act

w

ill b

e po

pula

rized

and

un

ders

tood

by

the

Publ

ic

and

Med

ia H

ouse

sTh

ere

will

be

cons

isten

cy

in m

edia

regu

latio

n.M

edia

Org

aniz

atio

ns w

ill

be e

ffect

ive

and

effic

ient

.Pa

rliam

enta

ry s

treng

then

-in

g w

ill c

ontin

ue to

be

perc

eive

d as

an

esse

ntia

l co

mpo

nent

of t

he

gove

rnan

ce re

form

pr

oces

s.D

onor

sup

port

will

be

avai

labl

e th

roug

hout

the

perio

d.D

onor

sup

port

for

Parli

amen

t will

incr

ease

.Pa

rliam

ent b

elie

ves

that

vi

ews

of c

itize

ns &

CSO

s sh

ould

be

enga

ged

mor

e co

mpr

ehen

sivel

y in

the

Parli

amen

tary

pro

cess

es

(legi

slativ

e an

d ov

ersig

ht);

IMC

will

ser

ve a

s th

e le

d ag

ency

wor

king

in c

lose

co

llabo

ratio

n w

ith

UN

DP/

DPs

and

sel

ecte

d na

tiona

l med

ia o

rgan

iza-

tions

in p

lann

ing

and

rolli

ng o

ut o

f the

pro

gram

s.

Spec

ific

r ole

s ar

e as

fo

llow

s:IM

C: M

edia

mon

itorin

gIR

N/C

TN:

Com

mun

ity/i

ndep

ende

nt

radi

o ne

twor

kM

ass

Com

mun

icat

ion/

FBC

–

Jour

nalis

m e

duca

tion

and

train

ing

med

ia

rese

arch

SLA

J: Pr

ofes

siona

l ass

ocia

-tio

n W

IMSA

L: P

rote

ctin

g in

tere

st of

wom

en jo

urna

l-ist

sG

oE: P

eer r

evie

w m

echa

-ni

sm fo

r new

spap

er e

dito

rsRe

porte

r Uni

on: D

efen

ding

rig

hts

of re

ports

Ass

ocia

tion

of Jo

urna

lists

on E

xtra

ctiv

es, J

ourn

alist

s fo

r Hum

an R

ight

s:

Sect

or/t

hem

e sp

ecifi

c re

porti

ng.

New

spap

er V

endo

rs

Ass

ocia

tion:

New

spap

er

distr

ibut

ion

and

mar

ketin

g

UN

DP

$34,

800,

000

UN

WO

MEN

$150

,000

UN

OPS

$1,5

00,0

00

$ 3

6,4

50

,00

0


Mos

t leg

islat

ive

reco

rds

avai

labl

e on

the

Parli

amen

-ta

ry w

ebsit

e.Pa

rliam

enta

ry re

sour

ce

Cen

tre s

et u

p as

a s

uppo

rt m

echa

nism

for P

arlia

men

t.PA

CO

don

or m

eetin

gs;

Ann

ual d

ata

on d

onor

as

sista

nce

to P

arlia

men

t pr

ovid

ed to

par

tner

s.Pa

rliam

ent u

ses

soci

al

med

ia fo

r fee

dbac

k;Pa

rliam

enta

ry C

omm

ittee

s m

aint

ain

data

of s

peci

al-

ized

CSO

s/ N

GO

s an

d ac

adem

ics

for r

eady

re

fere

nce

and

for d

epos

ing

befo

re th

e co

mm

ittee

on

spec

ific

issue

s.In

crea

sed

tabl

ing

of

Com

mitt

ee re

ports

in

Parli

amen

t;M

onito

ring

of re

com

men

da-

tions

mad

e in

repo

rts.

Inte

rnat

iona

l and

Nat

iona

l El

ecto

ral R

epor

tsN

atio

nal R

egist

ratio

n Se

cret

aria

t Rep

orts

Elec

tions

Com

miss

ion

Ann

ual v

oter

turn

out r

epor

t

Parli

amen

t Com

mitt

ees

are

inte

reste

d in

mon

itor-

ing

the

prog

ress

of t

arge

ts as

spe

cifie

d in

var

ious

po

licy

docu

men

ts.R

isk

: M

edia

can

be

perc

eive

d as

too

pow

erfu

l.Po

litic

al p

artie

s m

ay

indu

lge

in p

etty

pol

itics

an

d je

opar

dize

the

insti

tutio

naliz

atio

n of

de

moc

ratic

bes

t pra

ctic

es

in P

arlia

men

t.Po

litic

al in

terfe

renc

e in

the

Parli

amen

tary

adm

inist

ra-

tion;

Eth

nic

divi

de m

ay

over

shad

ow m

erit

in th

e Pa

rliam

enta

ry s

ervi

ce.

Glo

bal r

eces

sion

mak

e im

pact

ava

ilabi

lity

of

reso

urce

s.Ve

sted

inte

rests

may

get

pe

rpet

uate

d th

roug

h th

e C

SOs.

Aut

hent

ic d

ata

may

not

be

read

ily a

vaila

ble;

Parli

amen

tary

rese

arch

m

ay n

ot b

e ve

ry th

orou

gh.

PAC

O w

ill b

e th

e fo

cal

offic

e in

Par

liam

ent f

or

UN

DP

and

Don

or p

artn

ers

to c

olla

bora

te w

ith

Parli

amen

t.A

CBF

fund

s w

ill b

e av

aila

ble

larg

ely

for

infra

struc

ture

ass

istan

ce,

thou

gh a

por

tion

will

be

avai

labl

e fo

r the

wom

en

cauc

us, I

CT

and

Libra

ry.

Wor

ld B

ank

will

und

erta

ke

its p

ropo

sed

supp

ort t

o th

e fin

anci

al c

omm

ittee

s of

Pa

rliam

ent u

nder

its

finan

cial

sec

tor p

roje

ct.

UN

FPA

will

con

tinue

its

supp

ort t

o Pa

rliam

ent i

n sp

ecia

lized

are

as.

29UNDAF RESULTS


PR

SP P

illa

r 8

:

Gen

der

Eq

ua

lity

and

Wo

men

’s E

mp

ow

erm

ent

Ou

tco

me

conv

ener

: U

NIC

EFC

ont

rib

uti

ng a

gen

cies

: W

FP, U

NA

IDS,

UN

DP,

IOM

, FA

O, U

NW

OM

EN, U

NFP

A, O

HC

HR

, UN

IDO

, IL

O, U

NH

CR

,

UN

OP

S, U

NES

CO

OU

TCO

ME

IND

ICA

TOR

MEA

NS

OF

VER

IFIC

ATI

ON

RISK

S A

ND

A

SSU

MPT

ION

SRO

LE O

F PA

RTN

ERS

IND

ICA

TIV

E RE

SOU

RCES

A.

Wo

men

and

Chi

ldre

n a

re S

afe

r a

nd M

ore

Em

po

wer

ed to

Pre

vent

Gen

der

Ba

sed

Vio

lenc

e

a

nd

Ha

rmfu

l Tra

dit

ion

al P

ract

ices

1. P

erce

ntag

e of

ado

lesc

ent g

irls

(15

– 19

yea

rs) w

ho h

ave

begu

n ch

ildbe

arin

g:B

ase

line:

32.2

%Ta

rget

: 25%

2. P

erce

ntag

e of

chi

ld m

arria

ge u

nder

18

year

s:

Ba

selin

e: 5

0.3%

Ta

rget

: 40

%

3. P

ropo

rtion

of w

omen

sub

ject

ed to

phy

sical

or s

exua

l abu

se in

the

last

12 m

onth

sB

ase

line:

TBD

Targ

et: T

BD

4. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en 1

5-49

yea

rs w

ho h

ad a

ny fo

rm o

f FG

M/C

: B

ase

line:

88.

3%Ta

rget

: 75%

MIC

SA

ssu

mp

tio

n:

Age

nda

for P

rosp

erity

an

d Te

enag

e Pr

egna

ncy

Stra

tegy

is

impl

emen

ted.

En

ablin

g le

gal a

nd

polic

y en

viro

nmen

t in

plac

e.

Ris

k:

Har

mfu

l cul

tura

l and

tra

ditio

nal

belie

fs/p

ract

ises

Pove

rtyIll

itera

cy

All

rele

vant

MD

As

CSO

’s

Don

ors

Judi

ciar

yTr

aditi

onal

and

Re

ligio

us L

eade

rs

UN

ICEF

$10,

000,

000

WFP

$7,0

00,0

00U

NA

IDS

$100

,000

UN

DP

$2,2

80,0

00U

NW

OM

EN$2

48,7

50U

NFP

A$6

,840

,000

OH

CH

R$2

50,0

00U

NH

CR

$500

,000

UN

OPS

$500

,000

$ 2

7,71

8,7

50

B.

Wo

men

ha

ve g

rea

ter

acc

ess

to p

olit

ica

l op

po

rtu

niti

es a

nd in

crea

sed

pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n in

dec

isio

n m

ak

ing

and

dev

elo

pm

ent p

roce

ss in

Sie

rra

Leo

ne.

1. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en in

Nat

iona

l Par

liam

ent a

nd lo

cal c

ounc

ilsB

ase

line:

Nat

iona

l Par

liam

ent 1

4%,

Loca

l Cou

ncils

19%

Ta

rget

: 30%

2. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en in

lead

ersh

ip p

ositi

ons

in m

ajor

pol

itica

l pa

rties

.B

ase

line:

TBC

Targ

et: 3

0%

3. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en in

mid

dle

and

seni

or g

rade

pos

ition

s in

Si

erra

Leo

ne C

ivil

Serv

ice

Ba

selin

e: 1

9.1%

Targ

et: 3

0%

1. P

erce

ntag

e of

lite

rate

fem

ales

age

d 15

-24

year

old

s.B

ase

line:

48.

3%Ta

rget

: 55%

2. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en in

wag

e em

ploy

men

t in

the

non-

agric

ultu

ral

sect

or.

Ba

selin

e: 2

3.2%

Targ

et: 3

0%

3. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en in

the

info

rmal

sec

tor,

espe

cial

ly tr

ader

s.B

ase

line

da

ta b

eing

so

ug

ht: f

irst

ste

p in

M&

E p

lan

4. P

erce

ntag

e of

wom

en in

voc

atio

nal c

entre

sB

ase

line

da

ta b

eing

so

ug

ht: f

irst

ste

p in

M&

E p

lan

Nat

iona

l Ele

ctio

n C

omm

issio

n A

nnua

l Re

port

Polit

ical

Par

ty R

epor

tsH

uman

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Offi

ce

(GoS

L)

MIC

SLa

bour

For

ce S

urve

y

Ass

um

pti

on

: Th

ere

is po

litic

al

will

to im

plem

ent

gend

er la

ws

and

polic

ies

and

esta

blish

app

ropr

i-at

e le

gal a

nd

polic

y fra

mew

orks

. R

isk

: U

nava

ilabi

lity/

un

will

ingn

ess

of

elig

ible

fem

ale

cand

idat

es to

run

for e

lect

ion

Ass

um

pti

on

:G

over

nmen

t will

co

ntin

ue to

cre

ate

cond

uciv

e en

viro

nmen

t of

fem

ale

empl

oy-

men

t in

both

the

priv

ate

and

publ

ic

sect

ors.

Ris

k:

Del

ay/f

ailu

re in

op

erat

iona

lizin

g ne

cess

ary

polic

ies/

fram

ewor

ks.

Nat

iona

l El

ectio

n C

omm

ittee

Nat

iona

l Pa

rliam

ent

All

rele

vant

M

DA

s C

SO’s

D

onor

s Ju

dici

ary

Trad

ition

al a

nd

Relig

ious

Le

ader

s

All

rele

vant

M

DA

s C

SO’s

D

onor

s Ju

dici

ary

Trad

ition

al a

nd

Relig

ious

Le

ader

sU

nive

rsiti

esC

olle

ges

Scho

ols

UN

ICEF

$5,0

00,0

00U

NA

IDS

$100

,000

IOM

$430

,000

FAO

$500

,000

UN

WO

MEN

$250

,000

UN

OPS

$500

,000

UN

ESC

O$4

00,0

00

$ 7

,18

0,0

00

UN

ICEF

$5,0

00,0

00W

FP

$1

,000

,000

UN

AID

S $1

00,0

00FA

O

$2,5

35,0

00U

NW

OM

EN

$200

,000

UN

FPA

$5

20,0

00U

NID

O

$439

,000

ILO

$250

,000

UN

HC

R $1

,000

,000

UN

OPS

$1,0

00,0

00

$ 1

2,0

44

,00

0

C.

Wo

men

ha

ve g

rea

ter

acc

ess

to s

oci

oec

ono

mic

op

po

rtu

niti

es in

Sie

rra

Leo

ne

31UNDAF RESULTS


The President of Sierra Leone His Excellency Ernest Bai Koroma, the Secretary General of the United Nations Mr. Ban Ki-Moon and the Executive Representative of the United Nations in Sierra Leone Mr. Jens Anders Toyberg-Frandzen met with Sierra Leonean Police Officers that have been deployed with the United Nations on various Missions outside of Sierra Leone, alongside UN Police Officers currently serving in Sierra Leone. Sierra Leone has moved from being a Country that received peacekeepers to a Country that now contributes Peacekeepers.


UN Initiatives that are outside the UNDAF Results Matrix

The following agencies are working on projects that cover regional issues but do not specifically target Sierra Leone and therefore did not participate in the country specific UNDAF process:

The United Nations Office in West Africa (UNOWA). UNOWA is working together with ECOWAS and the Mano River Union Secretariat to support the operationalization of their recently adopted security strategy. The strategy aims at addressing cross-border threats to peace and stability in the MRU and is based on a comprehensive approach that takes into account the nexus between security and development. UNOWA is also working with ECOWAS, EU and UNDP on the implementation of a regional White Paper on Increasing Access to Modern Energy Services for rural and peri-urban populations. The implementation stage is expected to start in 2014.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The Governments of Chad, the Gambia, Mali, Sierra Leone and Togo are working

collaboratively in leading a regional project addressing the links between climate change and protected areas. The project (“Evolution of Protected Areas systems with regard to climate change in the West Africa Region”) will build capacity for understanding and managing Protected Areas (PAs) for the threat of Climate Change (CC) by: combining and distilling existing information from disparate sources; undertaking new research to contribute to the body of knowledge; borrowing from other fields and innovating to develop new management approaches; and ensuring that discussion, training and learning are taking place to support a strong cadre of PA managers in the region. Three other countries- Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, are be involved in trans-boundary aspects. The $3.5 million regional GEF project started in 2010 and will end in 2015 and is implemented by UNEP DEPI (GEF) and executed by UNEP WCMC. Other partners include IUCN Protected Areas Programme for West and Central Africa (PAPACO), UK meteorological office Hadley Centre, BirdLife, Durham University, IUCN Global Species Programme (GSP) and Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) University of Kent.

33UN INITIATIVES THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE UNDAF RESULTS MATRIX

It is estimated that the total resources required for implementing the UNDAF over the four years will be approximately US$ 533 million. The table below summarizes the funds required to meet the outcomes listed in each pillar.

Estimated Resource Requirements

Proposed UNDAF contribution to Agenda for Prosperity Pillar

Pillar 1. Economic Diversification to Promote Inclusive Growth 47,154,750

Pillar 2. Managing Natural Resources 30,722,000

Pillar 3: Accelerating Human Development 242,429,000

Pillar 5: Labour & Employment 24,195,000

Pillar 6: Strengthen Social Protection Systems 68,027,500

Pillar 7: Governance and Public Sector Reform 73,349,500

Pillar 8: Gender equality and Women’s empowerment 46,942,750

TOTAL 532,820,500

Indicative Resources Required(Jan’ 2015 - Dec’ 2018)US $

Note: The figures, while only indicative, are as accurate as possible at the time of the UNDAF drafting. In all cases the funds are to be secured and should not be considered as a commitment for accounting purposes.

The table below shows the financial targets against which each agency will raise funds during the UNDAF.

UNDAF Agency Targets Jan 2015 - Dec 2018

UNICEF 226,365,000UNDP 104,020,000WFP 79,000,000UNFPA 30,560,000FAO 28,535,000WHO 16,284,500UNOPS 15,365,000IOM 8,780,000UNIDO 4,390,000

ILO 3,350,000UNHCR 3,000,000UNESCO 2,900,000UNCDF 2,500,000UNAIDS 2,195,000UNWOMEN 2,195,000UNODC 2,000,000IAEA 881,000OHCHR 500,000

TOTAL: 532,820,500


The MPTFO/CCF will accept u n - e a r m a r k e d c o n t r i b u t i o n s for which the in-country Joint Steering C o m m i t t e e , chaired by the Minister of State, will set priorities, by pillar, and allocate money based on a mutually agreed set of criteria.

It follows that pillars responding to the root causes as noted in the Country Analysis would be prioritized by the Government. The UN family in Sierra Leone has operated such a fund since 2009 which has in the past successfully channeled one-off contributions by countries as well as allocations from the MDG window / Delivering as One Fund. It is expected that the new Delivering Results Together Fund will also be able to contribute to the CCF.

In addition UN agencies will also allocate core funds to their programmes contained inside the UNDAF.

Regardless of the channel through which the funds arrives the formulation of each programmme contained within the UNDAF remains with the implementing agency. Each agency will follow the rules and regulations by which it is governed through its Head Quarters. Under the leadership of the Resident Coordinator the UN Country Team will work together to mobilize resources. The agencies, programmes and funds that work inside the UNDAF structure will (a) strive to keep the Government’s Development Assistance Database (DAD) that tracks Overseas Development Aid up to date, and (b) keep the Resident Coordinator’s Office informed of newly secured funding. The UN Country Team will ensure that the various funding channels are transparently operated so that the Resident Coordinator is in a position to lobby for additional funds as and when necessary.

35ESTIMATED RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

The UNDAF will be supported by a Common Country Fund (CCF) that will be administrated through the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO). The CCF will offer donors, in particular non-resident donors, a simple channel through which their contributions can be made and registered within the UNDAF structure.

Contributions to the UNDAF can be made bi-laterally or through the CCF, however in line with increasing national ownership over the prioritization of funds the preferred channel would be through the CCF.

Photo ©Aminata Kobie

Implementation

The central management and coordination hub for each of the UNDAF pillars will be the Government-led Pillar Coordination Working Groups, that in turn feed information to the Agenda for Prosperity Results table and the DEPAC. This is possible because the UNDAF aligns directly with seven of the eight Pillars.2

The Agenda for Prosperity is significantly broader than the sum of the UN’s outcomes shown in the UNDAF results table. The UNADF is the UN’s contribution to the Agenda for Prosperity; a contribution that should be brought to bear on the needs of the country alongside other parallel contributions from other parts of the international community, the private sector, civil society and the Government. The UN will assist the Government to organize those Pillar Working Groups for which it is a member, whilst always encouraging the Government to adopt its central role in the aforementioned Groups.

At the end of 2011 the UN and the Government of Sierra Leone developed Direct Programme Support (DiPs) that extended HACT into a wider understanding of harmonization, simplification, risk mitigation and national capacity building. DiPs has been in operation since 2012 and will be continually improved through the UNDAF. Within the UNDAF DiPS represents a common system to implement national execution through the use of common tools and procedures. The UN cannot provide direct support to the national budget, but through direct programme support the UN has a complementary role to that of donors who provide budget support.

2 The UNDAF does not contribute to Pillar Four, International Competitiveness


As country systems and processes strengthen there will be the expectation of increasing levels of national execution, for which the Harmonised Approach to Cash Transfers (HACT) will become more central to the way the UN operates.

Female trainee participating in the roofing of the Kambia Growth Centre Facility Photo ©Anthony Morsay

37IMPLEMENTATION | MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Monitoring and Evaluation

The UNDAF’s monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be linked to existing national M&E systems.

In particular each agency commits to completing the Gender Score Card on an annual basis.

The UN System will continue to provide support for further strengthening the national M&E systems as may be required.

Management of M&E: The UNDAF will be monitored using indicators, baselines and, where relevant, annualized targets. At the outcome level, indicators will be aligned as far as possible with national Agenda for Prosperity indicators, thus relying on the same means of verification used in the national report on MDG and progress reports for the Agenda for Prosperity. The UN’s Deputies’ Group will be responsible for tracking overall UNDAF performance, based on the UNDAF

M&E matrix and plan, and for promoting a harmonized approach to M&E activities. The UNCT DIPS taskforce will strengthen the role of the Deputies’ Group on M&E by ensuring regular joint assurance

and oversight activities. The Deputies’ Group will review UNDAF programmes and strengthen technical support to, (i) baseline data collection, (ii) effective monitoring mechanisms for the UNDAF (iii) joint UN data collection, analysis and (iv), reporting.

UNDAF Annual Reviews: UNDAF annual reviews will form an integral part of the Joint Strategy Meetings to assess the progress towards achieving the annualized targets and expected results,

including contributions towards the outcomes of the Agenda for Prosperity. Findings and recommendations of the UNDAF reviews will inform the Resident Coordinator’s Annual Report.

Outcome and output monitoring: At the output level, monitoring will be carried out by responsible UN agencies and their implementing partners, based on field visits, sectoral review meetings, desk reviews and reports. At the outcome level, monitoring will be conducted by UNDAF working groups and joint programme teams (as appropriate). At sectoral and programme levels, periodic monitoring and data from routine information management systems will be used to assess the management and efficiency of the interventions.

Evaluation: The timing of the UNDAF reviews will be harmonised with those of the Agenda for Prosperity to ensure that the two processes inform each other. The UNDAF Annual reviews will be conducted by UN agencies. They will examine to what extent the UNDAF results have been achieved and how they are contributing to priorities in the Agenda for Prosperity. A final evaluation will be conducted during the first half of 2018 to inform the formulation of the next UNDAF.

Capacity Building for M&E: The UN system will continue to strengthen national monitoring and evaluation capacities by providing technical assistance in data collection, analysis and reporting for the implementation of the UNDAF together with other partners. The UN will strengthen the capacity of government partners to measure development effectiveness and the attainment of Agenda for Prosperity and to collect, analyze, use and disseminate data and information.

The Pillar Conveners will play an important role with respect to coordinating the agencies in each UNDAF Pillar.

Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar


Surveys/

StudiesMultiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS 5)

Census Post Enumeration Survey (PES)

Secondary Analysis of 2013 DHS

Release of the agriculture sector review report

Release of report on community percep-tion on national early warning system.

Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability

Assessment (CFSVA)

Census Post Enumeration Survey (PES)

Secondary Analysis of 2013 DHS

SARA( Service Availability Readi-ness Assessment)

BEmONC (Basic Emergency Obstet-ric and Neonatal Care) assessments

2015 (Year1) 2016 (Year 2) 2017 (Year 3) 2018 (Year 4)

SARA ( Service Availability Readi-ness Assessment




3rd Demographic & Health Survey



39 MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Monitoring

Systems

Evaluations

Joint Monitoring Visits

Joint Programme Monitoring System for UN Joint Team on AIDS

HIV/AID M&E System Assessment

Quarterly data collection, analysis and dissemination-UNDP

Quarter progress reports from Programmes –UNDP/UNFPA

Joint assurance and oversight visits (spot checks)- UNDP/UNICEF/UNFPA

Evaluation of a project to reduce teenage pregnancy – BRAC

AIDS report for MDG and HLM

Terminal evaluation of the Country Programme Docu-ment (2013-14)-UNDP




Quarterly data collection, analysis and dissemination -UNDP

Quarter progress reports from Programmes –UNDP/UNFPA

Joint Assurance and oversight Visits (spot checks)-UNDP/UNICEF/UNFPA

Mid-Term Evalua-tion of Country Programme-UNFPA/UNICEF

Programme outcome evaluation (per outcome) –UNDP

Mid-Term Evalua-tion of Country Programme document-UNDP



HIV/AIDS M&E System Assessment

Quarterly data collection, analysis and dissemination –UNDP

Quarter progress reports from Programmes-UNDP/UNFPA


Programme outcome evaluation (per outcome)-UNDP



Quarterly data collection, analysis and dissemination –UNDP

Quarter progress reports from Programmes-UNDP/UNFPA


End of Programme Evaluation –UNICEF/UNDP/UNFPA

Impact assessment of Country Programme 2008-12


Reviews

M&E

Capacity

Building

Use of

Information

Partner

Activities

UNDAF Annual Review

Quarterly/Annual review meetings

M&E Curriculum for NAS partners

Training and capacity building of IPs (UNCT/Joint DiPs Team)

Operationalize the Country STAT for Sierra Leone (FAO)

Programme achieve-ment and lessons learned workshop

Release and dissemination of 2014 Census Results

BSS (General Population and Key populations) by NAS

ANC Study by NACP

National AIDS Spending Assess-ment by NAS


UNDAF Annual Review



Programme achievement and lessons learned workshop


UNDAF Annual Review




BSS (General Population and Key populations) by NAS

ANC Study by NACP


UNDAF End of Cycle Evaluation





41 MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Challenges experienced during the 2013-2014 programme cycle that will roll over into the UNDAF

During the review of the Transitional Joint Vision at the start of 2014 the following challenges were noted when implementing projects that will almost certainly persist during the UNDAF cycle. During the planning for the UNDAF it will be important for all projects to build in activities that take these challenges into account, and where necessary mitigate against the associated risks that they may present.

The challenges that will carry over to the UNDAF cycle are shown below:

Delays in the movement of money through internal financial systems. This challenge applied to both Government and UN systems.

The mapping of facilities across the districts proved difficult. In many cases establishments were not labeled correctly and / or were identified with the wrong map coordinates. This affected distribution and planning activities. In broad terms reliable data was often not readily available in many sectors.

Human resource planning, and particularly staff appraisals, was not uniform across Government systems. Too often counter-parts were not of the required level to form effective partnerships given the technical skills needed to implement projects.

Recruitment of new national staff, be it for short term consultancies or regular posts, frequently proved unsuccessful as the required qualifications were often hard to find.

UNDAF Project selection: At the start of 2014 the Transitional Joint Vision was on track, in that the funding from the donors was strong and over 90% of the elements set out in the results framework registered outputs / results at the 50% point of the programme cycle. Whilst those elements that were not able to show progress in 2013 may still be able to produce results in the second half of the cycle during 2014, it is important that the UNCT does not commit to projects that cannot be started / completed within the time permitted in the programme cycle. In most of the elements that were struggling to show results there were other non-UN and / or Government partners that had a comparative advantage over the UN; during the UNDAF it will be important to ensure the careful selection of projects with respect to the landscape in Sierra Leone as opposed to adherence only to agency mandates.


Acronyms

Acronym Meaning

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization

IAEA International Atomic Energy Association

ILO International Labour Organization

IOM International Organization for Migration

OHCHR Office of the Higher Commissioner for Human Rights

UNAIDS The United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS

UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund

UNDP United Nations Development Programme

UNEP United Nations Environmental Programme

UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

UNFPA United Nations Populations Fund

UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

UNICEF United Nations Children´s Fund

UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization

UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services

UNWOMEN United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women

WFP World Food Programme

WHO World Health Organization

The UN Family

43ACRONYMS

The Main Document

Acronym Meaning

ACBF African Capacity Building Foundation

ACC Anti-Corruption Commission

AfDB African Development Bank

ART Antiretroviral Therapy

ASJP Access to Security and Justice Programme

CFSVA Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis

CLoGPAS Comprehensive Local Government Performance Assessment System

CSO Civil Society Organization

DHS District Health Survey

EMIS Education Management Information System

GAFSP Global Agriculture and Food Security Program

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GoSL Government of Sierra Leone

HCT HIV Counselling and Testing

HMIS Health Management Information System

HRMO Human Resource Management Office

IMC Independent Media Commission

IP Implementing Partners

IPEC International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour

JMP Joint Measurement Programme

KPA Key Performance Assessment

LC Local Council

LED Local Economic Development

LGED Local Governance and Economic Development

LGFD Local Government Finance Department

LoCASL Local Council Association of Sierra Leone

MAFFS Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Security

MDA Ministries, Departments and Governmental Agencies

Acronym Meaning

MIA Ministry of Internal Affairs

MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey

MLGRD Ministry of Local Government and Rural. Development

MoFED Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Economic Development

MOHS Ministry of Health and Sanitation

MOJ Ministry of Justice

MOLSS Ministry of Labor and Social Security

MOYA Ministry of Youth Affairs

MSWGCA Ministry of Social Welfare, Gender and Children´s Affairs

NACP National AIDS Control Programme

NACSA National Commission for Social Action

NAYCOM The National Youth Commission

NGO Non-Governmental Organization

PACO Parliamentary Assistant Coordination Office

PMTCT Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission

PSC Public Service Commission

PSRU Public Sector Reform Unit

SLAJ Sierra Leone Association of Journalists

SLRA Sierra Leone Roads Authority

SMART Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timely

SSL Statistics Sierra Leone

TOCU Transnational Organized Crime Unit

WASCE West Africa Senior Certificate Examination

WIMSAL Women in the Media Sierra Leone


45 ACRONYMS

SIERRA LEONE(January 2015 - December 2018)

THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENTASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK

(UNDAF)

sierra leone · in october 2013 the un revised its communications strategy for the transitional...

Documents