sio6002 - s8
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Knowledge management
GRH
Systèmes
eLearning - eTraining
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Rendement des champs de maïs
http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1593
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Quelques principes de gestion
Autonomy An organization is a collection of autonomous professionals.
Compensation tied to performance Own performance and group performance
Connectivity Work depends critically on the inputs of several collaborators
Ubiquity The frontier between home and office, here and there,
vanishes
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Systèmes de KM
PersonnelConnaissances propres + organisationnelles
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Systèmes de KM
PersonnelConnaissances propres + organisationnelles
ConnaissancesEnregistrementsDocumentsExpertise expliciteExpertise taciteEnvironnement
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Systèmes de KM
PersonnelSavoir propre + organisationnel
ConnaissancesEnregistrementsDocumentsExpertise expliciteExpertise taciteEnvironnement
Nouvel employéFormation à l’accèsIntégration des nouvelles connaissances
Employé séniorCapture de l’expertise
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
E-Learning vs e-Training
E-Learning Apprenant en contrôle Contenu fluide Collaboration Objectif: innover
E-Training Instructeur en contrôle Contenu pré-déterminé Automation Objectif : mise à jour
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Lectures
Hicks, R, R Dattero and S Galup, (2006), "The five-tier knowledge management hierarchy", Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1):19-31
Haas, MR and MT Hansen, (2007), "Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations", Strategic Management Journal, 28(11):1133
Spender, JC, (2008), "Organizational learning and knowledge management: whence and whither?", Management Learning, 39(2):159
Wong, K, (2005), "Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises", Industrial Management \& Data Systems, 105(3):261-79
Levy, Moria (2009) WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1): 120-134
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Hicks, Dattero & Galup (2006)
Five-tier KM hierarchy
Knowledge management promotes an integrated approach to identifying, capturing, retrieving, sharing, and
evaluating an enterprise’s information assets. These information assets may
include databases, documents, policies and procedures, as well as the un-captured tacit
expertise and experience stored in individual workers’ heads (Gartner Group,
1999).
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Hicks, Dattero & Galup (2006)
Five-tier KM hierarchy
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Hicks, Dattero & Galup (2006)
Five-tier KM hierarchy
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Haas, MR and MT Hansen, (2007)
Different knowledge, different benefits
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Haas, MR and MT Hansen, (2007)
Different knowledge, different benefits
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Spender, JC, (2008)Organizational learning and knowledge management: whence and whither?"
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Spender, JC, (2008)Organizational learning and knowledge management: whence and whither?"
Proposition 1 might be that as long as our theorizing stands on perfect rationality alone, the different aspects of knowledge management will end up as mere subsets of existing disciplines, such as IT or formal decision-making or OT or microeconomics, and there can be no distinct field which is knowledge management’s alone.
Proposition 2 is that knowledge management is really about managing knowledge-absences rather than knowledge-assets.
Proposition 3 is that if knowledge management is to be about dealing with uncertainty, in Simon’s terms, we necessarily call forth a Model of Man that differs crucially from the model of Rational Man central to most of the management literature and business school discourse. To address the notion of tacit knowledge and skilled practice we cannot rely on a human actor comprising senses and reason alone. Dealing with uncertainty requires us to consider the actor’s imagination too.
Proposition 4 is that managing the impact of one’s imagination is about understanding and shaping the constraints on it as it impacts and engages the world.
Proposition 5 is that knowledge management is a nascent theory of managing others’ responses to knowledge absences, and at some distance from knowledge management’s avowed focus on managing knowledge assets.
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Wong (2005)
CSF for KM in SME
Appui de la haute direction Culture TI Stratégie et objectif Mesures Infrastructure organisationnelle Processus et activités Motivation Ressource Formation GRH
Stephane GauvinuLaval - 2010
Levy, Moria (2009)
WEB 2.0 implications on KM
Deux applications:
Wiki Blogs
Trois concepts: RSS (ex – google Reader) Tagging (ex – delicious) Réseaux Sociaux (ex – Facebook / LinkedIn)
Outils usuels connaissent peu de succès La discipline est en évolution