siscoserv: implications for brazilian private equity fund managers september 20, 2012 peter a. furci

6
SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

Upload: ella-bryan

Post on 16-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers

September 20, 2012

Peter A. Furci

Page 2: SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

23485339 2

Offshore Fund Structures

• Funds for international investors are typically structured as limited partnerships (Delaware, Cayman Islands or Canada) with investors as limited partners and sponsor as general partner

– Sponsor generally entitled to 20% of profits as carried interest once investors receive capital back plus hurdle return

– Governance of fund generally within sponsor control, with limited items referred to investor advisory committee

– Fund will typically have both a general partner and an investment manager

• Brazil-focused international funds utilize this structure, but also typically utilize a “FIP” structure to make investments in Brazilian portfolio companies

Page 3: SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

23485339 3

Brazil: FIP Basics• Closed-end investment funds organized to invest primarily in

shares of sociedades anonimas (target companies)

• IOF of 0% on investments in and outflows from FIPs– Rate fluctuated in 2009-11 between 0% and 6%

• FIP is not taxed on dividends or gains on sale of shares

• Distributions by the FIP to an offshore quotaholder are exempt from tax if

– Quotaholder (individually or with related parties) owns less than 40% of the FIP quotas/economic interests

– FIP does not own debt exceeding 5% of net equity (except convertible debentures, warrants and government bonds)

– Quotaholder not domiciled in a tax haven jurisdiction

• FIP must be managed by an onshore investment manager licensed with the CVM

Page 4: SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

23485339 4

FIP/Offshore Fund StructureGP of GP

(LLC)

General Partner(LP)

Fund A(Cayman LP)

Fund B(Cayman LP)

Fund C(Cayman LP)

Delaware LLC A Delaware LLC CDelaware LLC B

FIP 1 FIP 2 FIP 3

Private Brazilian Portfolio Company

Private Brazilian Portfolio Company

Private Brazilian Portfolio Company

Non-FIP Investments

(Public and non-Brazilian Portfolio

Companies)

Offshore Manager

Brazilian Manager

Management contract with FIPs

Management contract with Offshore Funds

Sub-advisory contract with Offshore Manager

Page 5: SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

23485339 5

Scope of Services

• Services covered by SISCOSERV include “financial services” such as “portfolio management and administrative services”

– Includes “investment banking” services such as merger and acquisition, asset valuation, risk capital and corporate finance services

– Also includes “other auxiliary services related to financial services not specifically classified”

• Advisory services provided by Brazilian based investment managers to funds organized outside Brazil would likely be covered under one of the above categories

• Reporting requirements for financial services begin February 1, 2013

Page 6: SISCOSERV: Implications for Brazilian Private Equity Fund Managers September 20, 2012 Peter A. Furci

23485339 6

Reporting Requirements

• Information required to be provided by the Brazilian service provider includes the name and country of organization of the person or entity receiving the services and details regarding the service transaction

• Identity of service recipient will depend on fund structure– If there is no offshore manager, Brazilian manager will provide

services to offshore funds and potentially the Delaware LLCs– If there is an offshore manager, Brazilian manager will provide

services to FIPs and potentially to offshore manager via a sub-advisory agreement

– If Brazilian manager only provides services to the FIPs, reporting would not appear to be required

– Although the guidance is not detailed, identity of fund investors should not be required to be disclosed as there is no direct provision of services between Brazilian manager and the investors