skimspiration 2015: two ways of making decisions – when utility and regret come together

27
Jeroen Hardon, SKIM Aaron Hill, Sawtooth Software | SKIMspiration 2015 Two ways of making decisions When utility and regret come together

Upload: skim

Post on 25-Jul-2015

41 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Jeroen Hardon, SKIM

Aaron Hill, Sawtooth Software | SKIMspiration 2015

Two ways of making decisionsWhen utility and regret come together

A short introduction to

Random Regret

Modeling

But first, what are we doing now, and why are we looking into

something new?

The market standard

Random Utility Model

(RUM)

RUM

Sum of utility

$ 1.75

350 ml

+3

$ 1.95

475 ml

+4

RUM

Sum of utility

$ 1.75

350 ml

+3

$ 1.95

475 ml

+4

$ 2.25

590 ml

+2

Do not change!

RUM

Sum of utility

$ 1.75

350 ml

+3

$ 1.95

475 ml

+4

$ 2.25

590 ml

+2

RUM assumes rationality

RUM (random utility model)

• Traditional economics

• Rational agents

• Independence of

irrelevant alternatives

Why change?

Random Regret Model

(RRM)

Behavioral economics

RRM

Sum of regret

parameters

$ 1.75

350 ml

- 4

$ 1.95

475 ml

- 2

RRM

Sum of regret

parameters

$ 1.75

350 ml

- 3

$ 1.95

475 ml

- 1

$ 2.25

590 ml

- 3

DO change!

A

Regret modelling: How to code?

Product A has 16 GB less compared to product B,

Product A has 48 GB less compared to product C,

So product A has 16 + 48 = 64 regret on GB

B C

64GB regret

A

Regret modelling: How to code?

Product B has 16 GB more compared to product A,

Product B has 32 GB less compared to product C,

So product B has 0 + 32 = 32 regret on GB

B C

64GB regret 32

A

Regret modelling: How to code?

Product C has 46 GB more compared to product A,

Product C has 32 GB more compared to product B,

So product C has 0 + 0 = 0 regret on GB

B C

64GB regret 32 0

A

Regret modelling: How to code?

For price we follow the same logic, however here we should use the

reverse, as paying less is better!

B C

64

0

GB regret

€ regret

32

50

0

150

In contrast to RUM, RRM acknowledges that context is relevant and that we are not always rational

RUM

• Traditional economics

• Rational agents

• Independence of

irrelevant alternatives

RRM

• Behavioral economics

• Bounded reality

• There is no such

thing as irrelevant

alternatives

• Context Matters

RRM

Except it is not that

easy!

RRM has its own limitations.

You can only simulate the same

amount of products as you

tested in the choice task.1

Only nominal attributes can be

coded with RRM, the others

give the same result3

Using a none option is not

possible.2

RRM is not suited if only price is

the nominal attribute4

RRM limitations

The Duct Tape Solution

RUM RRM

RUMRRM: A hybrid solution

Now we have the best of

both worlds.

Not all animals are mean

But that does not mean all

animals are cute either

We are able to incorporate

behavioral economics in our models,

in order to improve predictions1

We are continuously keeping an

eye out for new methodologies3

We are also looking in ways to

incorporate emotions in our

models2

But what does this mean for you?