- skinner landfill site west chester, ohio o · - skinner landfill site i butler county west...

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

CDC05

o<D

C0)

230254

CONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

0

- SKINNER LANDFILL SITEI BUTLER COUNTY

WEST CHESTER, OHIO

Preparedfor:

>» Skinner Landfill Work Groupro c/o Ben Baker~ 2020 Dow Center0 Midland, MI 48764

o® Prepared by:

c Earth Tech, Inc.ro 200 Vine StreetO, Wilder, KY 41076

fl)

F/AMLFebruary 2001

Project Number 38335

CONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

SKINNER LANDFILL SITEBUTLER COUNTYWEST CHESTER, OHIO

Prepared/or:

Skinner Landfill Work Groupc/o Ben Baker2020 Dow CenterMidland, MI 48764

Prepared by:

Earth Tech, Inc.200 Vine StreetWilder, KY 41076

FINALFebruary 200!

Project Number 38335

Skinner LandfillConstruction Quality Control Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 DEFINITIONS 1

3.0 QUALITY CONTROL ORGANIZATION 1

3.1 Description 13.1.1 Construction Quality Control Manager 23.1.2 Construction Quality Control Technicians 3

3.2 Authorization 3

4.0 TESTING 3

5.0 INSPECTIONS 3

6.0 DEFICIENCIES 4

7.0 DAILY REPORTS 4

7.1 Daily Reports 4

8.0 DEFINABLE FEATURES OF THE WORK 5

TABLES

Construction Documentation Soils Tests and Frequency 1Sample Quantities, Containers, Preservatives, and Packaging Requirements 2Materials Quality Control Program Soil/Bentonite Slurry Trench Cut-Off Wall 3Bio-Polymer Slurry Construction Documentation Tests and Frequency 4

APPENDICES

CQC Organization ICQC Manager and CQC Manager Designee Resumes IIDaily Job Report Form Ill

February 2001


1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Construction Quality Control Plan (CQCP) is prepared in conjunction with the Remedial Design forthe Skinner Landfill, located in Butler County, West Chester, Ohio. The plan addresses the Quality ControlProgram developed and to be utilized by Earth Tech, Inc., (Earth Tech) and their subcontractors, during theRemedial Action (RA) construction phase and will be implemented to assure the quality of workmanshipand the installation of integrity of the geosynthetic and soil cover, the groundwater interceptor system, thegas vent system, and the groundwater monitoring well/piezometer system.

2.0 DEFINITIONS

The following are definitions pertinent to this document and the other RA construction plans.

Quality Control: Quality Control refers to those actions taken to provide for materials and workmanshipthat meet the requirements of the design plans and specifications. The manufacturers, suppliers,contractors, and installers of the various components of the remedial action shall provide quality control.

Quality Assurance: Quality Assurance refers to means and actions employed to provide conformity withcontractual and regulatory requirements as outlined in the CQAP.

Construction Quality Control (CQC) Manager: The CQC Manager w i l l be responsible for Quality Controlduring the RA phase of the project. The CQC Manager is Rick Warwick of Earth Tech

Construction Quality Control (CQC) Manager Designee: The CQC Manager designee will be responsiblefor Quality Control in the absence of the CQC Manager during the RA phase of the project. The CQCManager designee is Tim Meade of Earth Tech

Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Engineer: The CQA Engineer will be responsible for QualityAssurance during the RA phase of the project. The CQA Manager is Ron Roelker of Earth Tech and aregistered P.E. in the State of Ohio.

Project Manager: The Project Manager is the official representative of the Owner. The Project Manager isBen Baker of the Skinner Landfill Work Group

Design Engineer: The Design Engineer is the individual and/or firm who prepares the design, includingproject plans and specifications for the lining system and groundwater interception system. The DesignEngineer is Rust (Earth Tech).

Field Supervisor: The Field Supervisor is responsible for directing day to day construction activities duringthe RA phase of the project and reports directly to the CQC Manager. The Field Supervisor is Tim Meadeof Earth Tech.

3.0 QUALITY CONTROL ORGANIZATION

3.1 Description

Appendix I contains an organizational chart of the QC Organization for the Skinner Landfill Project.

l.:\H'i WK'J.VJJ5:WP XuHtlemenls HiialViUiuKr ('(It' Plwi FINALJi* I February 2001


3.1.1 Construction Quality Control Manager

The Earth Tech CQC Manager, Rick Warwick, will be responsible tor overall management of CQC and havethe authority to act in all CQC matters to see that construction is being conducted in a manner consistent withthe plans and specifications. Appendix II contains the qualifications of Mr. Warwick to act in the capacityof CQC Manager. In the absence of Mr. Warwick, Mr. Tim Meade w i l l serve as the CQC Manager designee.Appendix II also contains the resume of Mr. Meade detailing his qualifications to act in this capacity. TheCQC Manager or his designate will be on-site at all times during construction and will be responsible for allquality control testing, reviewing, submitting, and coordinating shop drawing submittals, providing samples,and coordinating with CQC personnel.

The CQC Manager will provide daily construction reports that document all testing and describesconstruction activities of that day. The CQC Manager will send the daily reports to the Project Manager,Mr.Ben Baker of the Skinner Landfill Work Group (SLG). Additionally a copy will be sent to the CQAEngineer, Mr. Ron Roelker of Earth Tech and a copy of these reports will be available on-site for review.

With the assistance of the CQC staff, the CQC Manager will perform the following checks of each definablefeature of the work. Definable features of the work are itemized in Section 8.0.

• A review of applicable specifications.

• A review of the contract plans.

• A check to assure that all materials and/or equipment to be used have been tested as necessary and meetthe requirements of the project specifications.

• A check to assure that provisions have been made to provide required control inspection and testing.

• Examination of the work area to assure that all required prel iminary work has been completed and is incompliance with the contract.

• A physical examination of required materials, equipment, and sample work to assure that they are onhand, conform to approved shop drawings or submitted data, and are properly stored.

• A review of the appropriate activity hazard analysis to assure safety requirements are met.

• Review and understanding of procedures for constructing the work including repetitive deficiencies,documentation of construction tolerances and workmanship standards.

• A check to ensure that the portion of the plan for the work to be performed has been accepted by theCQA Engineer.

• A check of preliminary work to ensure that it is in compliance with contract requirements. Reviewminutes of the preparatory meeting.

• Verification of full contract compliance. Verify required control inspection and testing.

• Establish level of workmanship and verify that it meets m i n i m u m acceptable workmanship standards.

• Resolve differences between parties.

A meeting shall be conducted by the CQC Manager and attended by other CQC personnel (as applicable),and the Field Supervisor responsible for the definable feature before work on the definable feature is begun.These meetings are specifically designed to address how the work will be done in accordance with thespecifications and contract. The CQC Manager will discuss the pertinent topics identified after his reviewof the items listed above. The results of the above actions shall be documented by separate minutes preparedby the CQC Manager and attached to the daily CQC report.

l.:\W<>l<K'M})5,WfXupplfmtnhFiiiafSliiimtrl-QI.'l>la,FlfiAI..Jiii; 2 February 2001


At the completion of all work or any increment thereof established by the schedule, the CQC Manager shallconduct an inspection of the work and develop a deficiency list or "punch list" of items which do notconform to the approved plans and specifications, and shall include the estimated date by which thedeficiencies will be corrected. The CQC Manager or staff shall make a second inspection to ascertain thatall deficiencies have been corrected.

3.1.2 Construction Quality Control Technicians

In addition to the CQC Manager, Earth Tech will provide various numbers of CQC Technicians to performthe Quality Control Tasks required in the job specifications. The CQC staff shall be at the site of work atall times during progress of the work, with authority to take any action necessary to ensure compliance withthe contract. The staff will be of sufficient size to ensure adequate CQC coverage of all work phases, workshifts, and the work crews involved in the construction. These personnel will be fully qualified byexperience and technical training to perform their assigned CQC responsibilities.

3.2 Authorization

The CQC Manager will have sufficient authority to adequately perform the duties outlined herein includingauthority to reject material that does not meet project specifications or stop work which is not in compliancewith the contract. The CQC Manager shall issue letters of direction to all other various quality controlrepresentatives outlining duties, authorities, and responsibilities.

4.0 TESTING

The control, verification, and acceptable testing procedures for each specific test, including test name,specification requiring test, feature of work to be tested, person responsible for each test, and an estimateof the number of tests required is contained within the project specifications and Construction QualityAssurance Plan (CQAP). Tables 1 through 4 provides a list of testing requirements for each portion of work.Results from the tests wil l be submitted to the CQA Engineer w i t h i n 72-hours after receipt and wil l be

available on-site for review.

5.0 INSPECTIONS

The CQC Manager will be responsible for performing inspections of construction activities that requiremonitoring. The CQC Manager will work with the CQA Engineer and review the daily reports and/or logs,field notes, test data sheets and any other supporting data sheets prepared for the various work items.

Prior to beginning a certain phase of work, the CQC Manager and the CQA Engineer shall discuss thevarious testing procedures proposed by the CQA Engineer and outlined in the CQA Plan. The CQC Managerand the CQA Engineer shall agree on the proposed testing procedures to insure that the CQA Plan is properlyimplemented.

A Log Book will be kept by the CQC Manager or his designee, documenting the date, time, type ofinspection, purpose of inspection, and the results of the inspection. All entries will be signed by the CQCManger on a daily basis. The CQC Manager will provide the Project Manager with written documentation

3 February 2001


of all inspections and resolutions of deficiencies.

6.0 DEFICIENCIES

The CQC Manager shall record deficiencies observed during the required inspections and record these in theLog Book. The Log Book will document deficiencies and corrective action when a construction materialor activity is observed or tested and found to be substandard to the requirements of the CQA Plan.Documentation of deficiency identification and corrective action may include, but not be limited to, thefollowing information:

• A description of the deficiency, including reference to other data or observation leading tothe determination of the deficiency.

• Location of the deficiency, including how and when it was discovered and an estimate as tohow long it may have existed.

• An opinion as to the probable cause of the deficiency.

• A recommendation as to corrective action for resolving the deficiency. If corrective actionhas already been implemented, then observation and documentation to illustrate theresolution of said deficiency wi l l be included. If it has not been resolved by the end of theday upon which it was discovered, the report w i l l clearly state it as such, with all subsequentLog Book entries indicating the status of the deficiencies until resolved.

If the deficiency has not been resolved, the CQC Manager, CQA Engineer, and any subcontractor responsiblefor the work will discuss necessary corrective actions. A description of such deficiencies and correctiveactions implemented will be provided to the Project Manager.

The CQC Manager, CQA Engineer, and the Project Manager wil l determine if the deficiency is an indicationof a situation that may require input from the Design Engineer and/or changes to the plans and specificationsand/or the CQA Plan.

7.0

7.1

DAILY REPORTS

Daily Reports

The CQC Manager or his designee will prepare daily reports on prescribed forms (attached as Appendix III)out l in ing all work performed on the site for that day. An additional report will contain, at a minimum, fieldnotes, observations, deficiencies discovered, and corrective actions taken. Both of these reports will beavailable on-site for review. A summary of all supporting data sheets along with final testing results andField Supervisor's approval of the work shall be required upon completion of construction.

The Project Manager shall immediately be made aware of any nonconformance with the projectspecifications. In particular, the Project Manager shall be informed before the work in question is coveredby overlying system layers. The Project Manager shall then determine its cause and direct appropriatechanges or recommend the appropriate changes. When this type of evaluation is made, the results shall bedocumented, and any revision to procedures or project specifications shall be approved in writing by theOwner and Design Engineer.

('<J<'Plan FIX.4I t February 2001


8.0 DEFINABLE FEATURES OF THE WORK

The definable features of the work (tasks which are separate and dist inct from other tasks) for the SkinnerLandfill RA construction project are as follows:

• Waste Relocation• Final Cover

- SubgradeGas Venting Layer

- GCL- Geomembrane- Drainage Layer- Vegetative Soil Cover- Vegetation

• General Earthfill• Gas Vents/Gas Probes• Groundwater Interceptor System Trench• Groundwater Monitoring Wells/Piezometers• Groundwater Cut-off Wall• Groundwater Interception System Force Main

Ft\Ai.,iii- 5 February 2001

TABLES

TABLE 1

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION SOILS TESTS AND FREQUENCYSKINNER LANDFILL

Test Type TestMethod

TestFrequency

General earthfill (subbase only):o Field density and moisture contento Moisture-density relationship (Standard Proctor)o Grain-size distribution

(sieve and hydrometer)

oAtterberg Limits

Topsoil (post-construction):opH, nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassiumoUSDA soil classificationo Survey - grade and thickness

ASTM D2922ASTM D689

ASTM Dl 140.D422

ASTMD4318

2 tests/acre/lift1./material type

3/material type

3/material type

1 per 10 acresVisual

100 ft grid

TABLE 2

SAMPLE QUANTITIES, CONTAINERS, PRESERVATIVES, ANDPACKAGING REQUIREMENTS

SKINNER LANDFILLGEOTECHNICAL TESTING

Analysis

Moisture-DensityRelationship/MoistureContent

Atterberg Limits

Grain-size distribution

Permeability

Gradation determination

pH, Nitrogen,Phosphorous, andPotassium

Container

Sealed PlasticBag or Bucket

5 gal plasticbucket

5 gal plasticbucket

5 gal plasticbucket

5 gal plasticbucket

2 8-oz glassjars

Preservation

None

None

None

None

None

None

HoldingTime

None

None

None

None

None

None

Volumeof

Samples

10 to 15 Ibs

Fil l bucket

Fi l l bucket

Fill bucket

Fil l bucket

Fi l l jars

Shipping

Regular mai l

Regular mail

Regular mail

Regular mai l

Regular mai l

Regular mai l

NormalPackaging

Vermiculite

TABLE 3

MATERIALS QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAMSOIL/BENTONITE

SLURRY TRENCH CUT-OFF WALL

MATERIALS

SUBJECT

Water

Additives

Bentonite

STANDARD

-

--

APIStd 13A

TYPE OF TEST

- P H- Total Hardness

Manufacturer certificate ofcompliance

Manufacturer certificate ofcompliance

MINIMUMFREQUENCY

Per water source or aschanges occur

One per truckload

One per truckload

SPECIFIEDVALUES

As required to properly hydrate bentonite withapproved additives

As approved by Engineer

Premium grade sodium cation montmorillonite

Backfill soils

Prepared forplacement into the

trench

--

APIStd 13B

Selected soils approved by theEngineer

- Unit Weight- Viscosity

- Filtrate

One per source

2 set per shift or per batch(pond)

One per truckload

Consistent with Design Mix

Unit weight > 1 .03 gm/ccV > 15 centiposc or40 sec-Marsh @ 68°Loss < 30 cc in 30 min@ l O O p s i

SLURRY

In Trench APIStd 13B 1 - Unit Weight 2 per shift at point oftrenching

Unit weight = 1 .03- 1 .50 gm/cc

BACKFILL MIX

At Trench ASTMC 138ASTMC 143ASTM D422

EM- 11 10-2- 1906

- Uni t Weight- Slump- Gradation- Permeability

2 per shi f t 1 5 pcf > slurry densitySlump 2 to 6 inchesConsistent with Design MixK< 10'7 cm/sec

The results of all field testing done wi l l be recorded on field report tables and retained for the final documentation report.

TABLE 4

BIO-POLYMER SLURRYCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION TESTS AND FREQUENCY

SKINNER LANDFILL

Test Type Test Frequency

Bio-Polymer Slurry:o Densityo ViscosityopHo Filtrate Loss

4 tests/shift4 tests/shift4 tests/shift1 test/shift

APPENDIX I

CQC PROJECT ORGANIZATION

Appendix IQuality Control Organizational Chart

Skinner Landfill Project

SLWGProject Manager

Ben F. Baker

CQC ManagerRick Warwick

Field Supervisor/CQC Manager Designee

Tim Meade

Project Technicians Heavy EquipmentOperators

C Org Diagram ppt

APPENDIX II

CQC MANAGER ANDCQC MANAGER DESIGNEE RESUMES

RlCK A. WARWICK CQC Manager

REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS

Certified UST Installer, Ohio, #10-90-1175, 1990Certified UST Installer, Indiana

SPECIALIZED TRAINING

OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training, July 1987OSHA 8-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Refresher Training, September1999Confined Space Entry Training, May 1996Asbestos Supervisor Training, December 1995OSHA 8-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Supervisor Training. 1991Hazardous Waste Management Coursevvork, Bowling Green University, 1988-1990Hazardous Waste Management Coursework, Texas A&M, 1985Ohio Operating Engineer Apprenticeship Training, 1979-1984

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY

Mr. Warwick has over 17 years of experience in all phases of environmental remediation, site constructionand project management. He has supervised multidisciplinary crews and the operation of heavy equipmentfor landfill construction and capping, large earth moving projects, lagoon closure, underground storage tank(UST) removals, drum removal, soil excavation, soil and groundwater remediation, spill response,labpacking projects, and Phase I and II studies. Contaminants on these projects have included volatiles,semivolatiles, metals, creosote, PCBs, dioxins, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, and corrosives/caustics. Mr.Warwick also has extensive experience in the design and implementation of on-site treatment technologies.As a Project Manager for Earth Tech, he has been responsible for project management/supervision of largeearth moving projects, waste processing systems including thermal desorption, mechanical dewateringsystems, and in-situ soil vapor extraction systems. He is also responsible for waste brokering, costestimating, contract management QA/QC, cost projections, and interaction with regulatory agencies.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

• Construction Project Manager, Skinner Landfill Group, Skinner Landfill, West Chester,Ohio, December 1999 to present. As the Construction Project Manager, Mr. Warwick has beenresponsible for interfacing with the PRP group on pre-construction issues such as project scheduleand approach. Attendance at local community meetings and meetings with the EPA have also beenheld in preparation for the anticipated 2000 project kickoff. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Sprayfield Construction, MacDill AFB, Tampa, FL, July 1999 to November1999. Mr. Warwick managed construction a sprayfield for the discharge of treated wastewater fromthe MacDill AFB WWTP. Cleared and grubbed 20 acres; imported and placed over 30,000 cubicyards of soil to construct a 6-foot berm with 3:1 slopes; placement of top soil and seeding to becompleted. Oversaw the site supervisor, three equipment operators and two technicians duringcompletion of this project. [Earth Tech]

L \WORK\38335\WP SUPPLENfENTS REVOI'.WARWICK_CQC DOC

RICK A. WARWICK

• Construction Manager, Landfill Cap Construction, Omaha Corps of Engineers, KI SawyerAFB, Gwinn, Michigan, May 1999 to September 1999. Managed construction activities for this$2.7 mill ion project involving the capping of three separate landfi l ls totaling 24 acres the former AirForce Base. This complex project involved the use of up to 15 union equipment operators duringsimultaneous construction activities at three former landfill areas at the base. Specific activitiesincluded clearing and grubbing a total of 29 acres of highly vegetated areas, import and placement ofover 165,000 cubic yards of clean fill material, placement of 24,000 cubic yards of topsoil,installation of drainage ditches, fence installation, and placement of 25,000 square yards ofgeomembrane. Earth Tech completed all three sites for $560,000 less than the Engineers estimate.

• Project Manager, Buckeye Furnace Reclamation, Ohio Department of Natural Resources,Jackson, Ohio, July 1998 to August 1999. Mr. Warwick managed reclamation operations to restorethe environment at this former coal mine. Responsible for interfacing with ONDR representative anddirecting site operations, which includes management of up to an eight person crew. Site activitiesincluded: relocation and placement of over 125,000 cubic yards of clean fill material for erosioncontrol; placement of more than 200 linear feet of drainage piping; installation of 5.000 cubic yardsof drainage channels to promote proper site drainage; and placement of 14,000 square feet ofimpervious liner. Upon completion of liner and soil placement the 60-acre area was re vegetated.[Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Rose Township Superfund Site, Daimler Chrysler, Rose Twp., Michigan,April 1999 to May 1999. Managed construction activities for the construction of a 2.100 cubic yardstockpile measuring 100 feet x 100 feet x 7 feet high. The pile was constructed to treat VOC-contaminated soil at this Region V Superfund site. Multiple horizontal SVE trenches were installedin the pile and consisted of 4-inch draintile, partial PVC screen with a peastone pack. The SVEtrenches were connected to an existing SVE system on site. HDPE liner was placed beneath and overthe stockpile to promote lateral air flows. In addition, managed the excavation of approximately 100tons of PCB-contaminated soil for off-site disposal. [Earth Tech]

• Earthwork Project Manager, Landfill Cover/SVE System Installation, National PrestoIndustries, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, May 1998 to November 1998. Earthwork Project Manager,responsible for site work specifically related to site preparation/clearing and grubbing operations,relocation of 15,000 cubic yards of solvent-contaminated lagoon waste and placement of an 10-acremulti-layer synthetic site cap. [Earth Tech]

• Night Shift Project Manager, Emergency Response to Train Derailment, CSX Transportation,Huntington, West Virginia, June 1998. Mr. Warwick oversaw second-shift activities to removecontaminated soil that had been contaminated by approximately 11,000 gallons of formaldehyde dueto a derailment. Responsible for directing soil excavation, loading and transportation operations,ensuring proper labeling and manifesting and interfacing with the regulatory agencies regardingenvironmental impacts and expected project schedule. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Landfill Construction, County of Tazewell, Tazewell, Virginia, February1998 to June 1998. Mr. Warwick directed construction activities for an 8-acre Phase II SanitaryLandfill expansion. Directed two site supervisors, a project engineer, five equipment operators andthree technicians, during this massive earth-moving project. The project included the excavation of171,000-cubic yards of soil and rock, earthwork, installation of clay and geosynthetic liners, andconstruction of a leachate collection system. Approximately 146,000 square feet of 60-mil HDPEsmooth membrane was placed on the base of the landfill. Second, approximately 87,000 square feetof 60-mil HDPE texture membrane was be placed. Approximately one-half of the project was

L \\VORKU8335\WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOI\WARWtCK_CQC DOC APRIL 2000

RICK A. WARWICK

performed using two shifts to expedite completion of the project, at the request of the client. [EarthTech]

• Project Manager, Emergency Response to Tanker Spill, Environmental Maysville, Kentucky,December 1997. Managed emergency response efforts for the site clean-up resulting from a tankerroll-over in which 1,500 gallons of 15-W-40 motor oil was spilled on a dairy farm. Directed effortsto excavate over 300 tons of impacted soil and prevent the migration of oil to an adjacent pond.Oversaw a crew of five during execution of the project, during which Earth Tech responded to thewithin 90 minutes of receiving the request for services from the client. Interfaced with the FireMarshal, State EPA, Kentucky DEQ, local law enforcement and the insurance company. [EarthTech]

• Project Manager, Concrete Lined Drainage Ditch Installation, Reilly Chemical, Lima, Ohio,December 1997. Managed installation of a 350-foot long. 23-foot wide lined concrete drainage ditchto isolate limited areas of contaminated soil from impacting the surface water flowing through aportion of a county ditch. Removed 80 cubic yards of soil to obtain necessary elevation. Installed atemporary dam from which water was diverted around the construction area. Oversaw placement of5,700 square feet of 20-mil liner along the entire length of the ditch. Managed the placement of 4-inch thick concrete barrier on the ditch bottom. Restored water flow to the ditch following curing ofthe concrete. Managed a crew of 8 during performance of the work. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Site Remediation and Equipment Removal, CSX Transportation, Lima,Ohio, December 1997. Directed site remediation and equipment removal activities at this former railfacility. Activities included site grading (approximately 3,000 cubic yards), removal of 1,000 gallonsof oil from various vessels, and off-site disposal of the l iquid waste. Directed a three person crew forthe removal of various abandoned equipment and material items. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Exploratory Soil Removal and Landfill Cap Construction, General Electric,Coshocton, Ohio, May 1997 to July 1997. Mr. Warwick served as Project Manager for theconstruction of a five acre RCRA landfill at this plastic- and copper-clad fiberglass laminatemanufacturing. He was responsible for scheduling, cost projections, coordination of sub-contracts,and invoicing for this $1 mil l ion project. The project included excavation and relocation of 23,000cubic yards of metals contaminated soils, haul road construction, and excavation and characterizationof eighty-five drums containing both liquid and solid materials. [Earth Tech]

• Master Foreman, Ohio River Flood, Various Locations - Ohio River, USEPA Region IV, Marchto April 1997. Responsible for river barge operations for the recovery of drums, propane tanks,cylinders, oil tanks and freon cylinders from the shores, locks and dams on the Kentucky side of theOhio River. The Earth Tech barge team consisted of 1 tug boat, and 3 barges. On board was a crane,vacuum truck, 5,000-gallon tanker and a hopper barge to receive recovered drums and tanks.Supervised eight technicians and one equipment operator for the recovery of the various tanks andcylinders over a 300 mile length of the river. Coordinated with U.S. Coast Guard for access, permitsand scheduling. Recovery operations lasted about two months, bulking operations approximately twoweeks. Recovered items included: 2,170 drums, 470 tanks, 1015 cylinders and 665 miscellaneouscontainers. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Soil Excavation, Backfill and Loadout; Reilly Chemical, Indianapolis,Indiana, October 1996 to January 1998. Managed the excavation of over 13,000 tons of pyridineand PAH contaminated soil at four distinct areas of the site. Coordinated site activities at multipleareas of this active chemical manufacturing site, requiring daily coordination with the client, material

L \WORKU833i\WP SUPPLEMENTS REV01\VVARW]CK_CQC DOC APRIL 2000

RICK A. WARWICK

suppliers and Earth Tech crew. Project involved soil excavation from the four areas of the site andsubsequent stockpiling of the soil. Due to the proximity of the site to residential communities, dustcontrol and fugitive emissions were monitored and controlled, resulting in enhanced communityrelations. Managed the backfill of all excavated areas and placement of a concrete containment capover two of the areas. Stockpiled soil was loaded for transport to a client designated disposal facility.[Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Site Assessment and Development of Remedial Alternatives, Memcor-Truohm, Huntington, Indiana, December 1997 to present. Provided client guidance for the siteinvestigation at this electromaterial manufacturer. Chlorinated solvents had been detected soil andgroundwater samples collected at the site. Oversaw a geologist during site investigation activities todetermine the horizontal extent of contamination. Interfaced with client to determine the mosteffective and least costly remediation alternatives. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Site Preparation and Landfill Cap Construction, Reilly Chemical,Indianapolis, Indiana, September 1995 to May 1997. Managed a crew of 10 equipment operatorsin site preparation and construction of a 6-acre landfil l cap. After the designated areas of the landfillwere cleared, areas of free-flowing coal tar were excavated, stabilized, backfilled and compacted. Anestimated 17,000 cubic yards of stabilized material was backfilled and compacted before capping.Additionally, 10 acres of construction demolition debris and 1,000 linear feet of concrete foundationswere removed and/or crushed to specification. This material was stockpiled, sampled, and reloadedfor transportation to the landfill area. A total of 22,000 tons of soil and 6,000 tons of concrete wereprocessed for use as backfill for the landfill cap. The demolition debris, followed by 14,000 tons ofstone, was placed in uniform lifts, graded to proposed elevations, and compacted to specifications.Drainage ditches were installed to route the runoff to a retention basin. Finally. 11,000 tons of topsoilwere used to provide vegetative cover. Additional work items included construction of threeinfiltration galleries, construction of 2,000-linear foot road, and demolition of four 5,000-gallonstorage units. Responsible for all client interface, invoicing, cost tracking and quality' control.Instrumental in completing the landfil l construction portion of this project 25 percent ahead ofschedule and 30 percent under budget. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Petroleum-Contaminated Ballast Remediation, CSX, Savoy, Kentucky, Julyto August 1996. Approximately 160 linear feet of railroad track (i.e., the ballast below the tracksthemselves and an adjacent drainage swale) had apparently been contaminated with lube oil/greasefrom leaking locomotives. To protect the tracks/ties and to allow for collection by vacuum truck, anextendahoe was used to loosen contaminated material to the bottom of the railroad ties. Theremaining contaminated ballast was then excavated with a backhoe and stockpiled on 5-mil polypending disposal characterization. Prior to excavation in the ditch area, all l iquid material wasremoved using a diaphragm pump and containerized in 55-gallon drums for sampling and disposal.Supervised an operator and a laborer. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, UST Removals, James River Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, March toJuly 1996. Directed the excavation and removal of four 80,000-gallon USTs containing diesel fuel.A surfactant was applied to the walls of the excavation to enhance biodegradation of any remainingdiesel fuel. The excavation was then backfilled and regraded. This project also involved pavementrestoration. The tanks were cleaned and recycled. Supervised a crew of three equipment operatorsand two laborers using dozers, excavators, and loaders. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, UST Removal, Precision Industrial Automation, Cincinnati, Ohio, November1995. Directed one equipment operator and three laborers in the removal of a 10,000-galIon #2 fuel

L \WORK\J8335\W? SUPPLEMENTS REVOI\WARWICK_CQC DOC APRIL 2000

RICK A. WARWICK

oil UST at this site. The tank was located within 20 feet of a building and covered with 6 inches ofasphalt. No soil contamination was identified during the course of tank removal. The excavation wasbackfilled and the asphalt was restored. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, On-site Soil Treatment, Citizens Gas, Indianapolis, Indiana, October 1995 toJuly 1996. This project involved the remediation of approximately 60 cubic yards of TPH- andtetrachloroethene-contaminated soil associated with two tanks previously removed from the site.Supervising an operator, transferred the soil to three 20-cubic-yard roll-off boxes. Prior to theplacement of the soil, the roll-offs had been lined in poly and equipped with PVC piping. PVC wellswere placed along the middle axis of each box once the soils were in place. Following treatment viasoil vapor extraction, the soil was sent to an off-site bioremediation facility. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Shock Sensitive Removal, Systech, Toledo, Ohio, December 1994. Directedthe removal of approximately 2,000 cubic yards of shock-sensitive-contaminated soil from anabandoned burial pit. The material was removed using excavators, loaded into trucks, andtransported off site for disposal. The pit was backfilled with clean fill and compacted to existinggrade. Supervised an equipment operator and two laborers. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Belle Meadows Phase I Assessment, Coast Federal Bank, Trotvvood, Ohio,October 1994. Conducted a Phase I assessment on a 10-building apartment complex containing 144rental units. This assessment involved a site visit for the purpose of observing any potentialenvironmental concerns at the site or on adjacent properties and a review of the site's history and pastuses through site records, State regulatory agency files on the site and/or adjacent properties, andaerial photographs. No contamination or areas of concern were noted for the subject property,although a gasoline service station across the street was identified as a source of groundwatercontamination (downgradient). [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) System Design, General Motors, Dayton, Ohio,April to July 1994. Designed a pump station capable of treating the 17 areas of petroleum andchlorinated solvent contamination at this facility. A 400-scfm pump station was selected to supportthe different soil types and treatment cell sizes. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Bioremediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil, Roy F. Weston,Miamisburg, Ohio, April to August 1994. Managed this high-profile project involv ing theconstruction of a bioremediation facility at the U.S. Department of Energy Mound Facility.Responsible for estimating, scheduling, cost projection, cost control, QA/QC, coordination ofsubcontracts, and interaction with governmental contracting agencies. Supervised 10 to 15professionals, building trades, operators, and laborers. [ETC Environmental]

• Project Manager, Site Investigation/Remediation, Confidential Client, Dayton, Ohio,September 1993 to January 1994. This project involved the investigation and excavation of a thin,confined layer of contact cement spread over a half acre at this manufacturing facility. Designed andimplemented the investigation of two areas at the site. In one area, a backhoe was used in selectedplaces to scrape back layers of clean soil until discolored soil, if any, was visible. Soil samples werecollected and analyzed to verify the extent of VOC contamination. In a second area, a soil gas surveyusing a 10-foot grid was conducted to assess contaminant distribution. Directed a five-person crewcomposed of equipment operators and laborers in the removal of the impacted layer. The overburdenwas removed, segregated for sampling, and used as backfill after it was determined to be "clean." Atotal of 190 tons of contact cement was excavated, placed in roll-off boxes, and transported off sitefor thermal destruction. [ETG Environmental]

L >.WORK'J8535\WP SUPPLEMENTS REV01\WARW1CK.CQC DOC APRIL 2000

RICK A. WARWICK

Project Manager, Soil Remediation, Dailey Oil, New Castle, Indiana, June 1993 to April 1994.Designed and managed the $400,000 construction of an ex-situ stockpile, soil vapor extraction systemfor 3,000 cubic yards of soil containing 5,800 gallons of BTEX (gasoline) contaminated waste. Thecontaminant level in the soil was sufficiently reduced to allow for disposal as nonhazardous material.[ETG Environmental]

Project Manager, UST Removal and Soil Remediation, Confidential Client, Dayton, Ohio,November 1992 to August 1993. Designed and managed the removal of three USTs and theinstallation of an in situ soil vapor extraction system to treat soils containing 7 percent toluene.Approximately 5,000 cubic yards were treated to below detection limits. [ETG Environmental]

Project Supervisor, Thermal Desorption System Operation, Sun Oil Refinery, Toledo, Ohio,September 1991 to March 1992. Directed a six-person crew in the 24-hour operation of a thermaldesorption system treating refinery waste to meet land disposal regulations. The system involved on-line processing of wastewater treatment sludge using a medium temperature = 1,100° indirect heatuni t to achieve an 80 percent reduction of material requiring disposal. [ETG Environmental]

Project Supervisor, Drum Removal and Demolition, Pennsylvania Forest Service, CollegeStation, Pennsylvania, June to August 1991. Directed a five-person crew in the demolition of a5,000-square-foot building and disposal of hazardous tanks and soil. Also responsible forexploratory drum excavations. Approximately 50 drums were recovered. Contaminants at this siteincluded creosote and spirits associated with wood treatment. [ETG Environmental]

Project Supervisor, Sludge Removal, BP Oil, Toledo, Ohio, March to September 1990. Directedthe closure of an oily waste ditch approximately 3,300 feet long through an operating oil refinery.The $4.5 million project entailed excavation of oily sludges within the ditch followed by stabilizationwith pozzolime to allow for acceptance at a RCRA landfill . Supervised 25 to 35 personnel in Level Band C protection using excavators, loaders, dozers, graders, quarry trucks, and backhoes. A total of30,000 cubic yards of waste was excavated. [ETG Environmental]

Project Supervisor, Excavation and Sludge Dewatering, Chevron Refiner)', Baltimore,Maryland, May to October 1989. Directed this $300,000 excavation and dewatering project, whichinvolved 500 tons of API separator sludge. Supervised a crew of 10 operators and laborers usingexcavators and vacuum trucks. Dewatering was accomplished ut i l iz ing a plate and frame filter press.The processed material was disposed of in a RCRA hazardous waste landfill. [ETG Environmental]

Project Supervisor, Contaminated Soil Removal, Chrysler, Kokomo, Indiana, March 1987 toJanuary 1988. Supervised the excavation, disposal, and backfilling of a 25-acre, 451,000-cubic-yardarea of soil contaminated with transmission and cutting oils. Supervised 10 to 12 operators andlaborers removing and disposing of 3,000 cubic yards per day. This $2 mill ion project requiredextensive interaction with regulatory agencies and the client. [ETG Environmental]

Project Supervisor, Lagoon Closure, BP Oil, Lima, Ohio, April to September 1986. Directed the$3 mill ion closure of three lagoons, which involved the dredging of 3,000,000 gallons of refinerywaste and DAF sludge utilizing long-shaft, barge-mounted centrifugal pumps followed by dewateringof the sludge in a plate and frame filter press. Work was conducted around the clock with 10 to 12personnel per shift. The project was completed on time and within budget. [ETG Environmental]

L 'WORK 38J35\WP SUPPLEMENTS R£VOI\WARWICK_CQC DOC

RICK A. WARWICK

• Project Supervisor, Exploratory Waste Excavation, Ford Motor Company, Sandusky, Ohio,March to May 1986. Directed a five-person crew in the exploration for arsenic waste over a 30-acresite. Small areas of contamination were identified. "Surgical" excavation was conducted to removeapproximately 750 cubic yards of waste, which was then disposed of in a RCRA hazardous wastelandfill . [ETC Environmental]

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

Project Director, Earth Tech, Inc., August 1994-Present. Responsible for projectmanagement/supervision of landfill construction/capping projects, large soil excavation and wasteprocessing systems including thermal desorption, concrete crushing and mechanical dewatering systems..Also responsible for cost estimating, contract management QA/QC. cost projections, and interaction withclients and regulatory agencies.

Project Supervisor, ETC Environmental, Inc., May 1984-JuIy 1994. Managed crews of up to 40personnel for multimillion-dollar construction projects and developed a strong working relationship withclients that included Fortune 500 companies and numerous state and federal agencies. Responsible for allphases of work from proposal development/design to successful site closure.

Operating Engineer, Local 18, 1979-1984. Involved in stream reconstruction, building trade, and largeearth moving projects (million+ cubic yards).

L \WOWOJ83J5-.WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOI',WARWICK_CQC DOC

TIMOTHY R. MEADE Field Supervisor/CQC Manager Designee

EDUCATION

Computer and General Coursework, Lee College, Baytown, Texas, 1986-1991

SPECIALIZED TRAINING

OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training, September 1993OSHA 8-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Refresher Training. April 1999OSHA 8-Hour Hazardous Waste Supervisor Training, December 1993DOT General Awareness Training, May 1999First Aid and CPR, March 1996ATV Safety Training, May 1994Helicopter Rigging and Safety Training, May 1994

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY

Mr. Meade has over seven years of on-site experience in hazardous waste remediation and six additionalyears of experience supervising general construction projects. As a Project Manager, he is famil iar withall facets of construction and hazardous waste project management, with an emphasis on heavyequipment operations, soil stabilization, water treatment techniques and equipment, and plant operationsand maintenance. Mr. Meade is also responsible for bid and proposal preparation, work plan, health andsafety plan and quality control plan development and implementation. Upholding the highest standards insafety and quality, he has successfully managed a variety of environmental remediation, emergencyresponse, and construction projects ranging in value from $50,000 to $10 million. He has extensiveexperience in the management of subcontractors as well as subcontracting protocol. He is also proficientin the operation of heavy equipment, including excavators, backhoes, bull dozers, and front-end loaders.In addition to managing daily work activities, he is responsible for interfacing with clients and regulator}'officials. He has a wide range of knowledge in remediation services for both government facilities andprivate sector sites. Mr. Meade is an approved Response Manager in USEPA Regions II, III and V, and hasserved as a Project Manager and Foreman on USEPA sites in Regions IV and VI. His on-site experienceencompasses projects at a variety of locations, including institutions, factories, warehouses, chemicalfacilities, waste sites, and Department of Defense facilities.

Additionally Mr. Meade has six years of supervisory experience as a Superintendent for generalcontractors. In this capacity' he was responsible for supervising up to 25 Iron Workers, Operators,Pipefitters Concrete Finishers, Welders, Boilermakers, Millwrights, Electricians, Painters, PlantOperators Surveyors and Laborers on both union and non-union construction projects. He has alsodirectly supervised over 25 "critical lifts".

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

• Project Supervisor, Soil Excavation and Stabilization, Southwire, Carrolton, Georgia,November 1999 to January 2000. Directed soil testing, excavation, segregation, loading andpugmill stabilization at this wire rope manufacturer in Carrolton, Georgia. As part of sitemodernization and construction activities, over 40,000 tons of lead-contaminated soil were excavatedfor treatment and/or off-site disposal. Mr. Meade directed site-wide remedial construction activities

L \WORK1J8J35\WP SUPPLEMENTS REV01\MEADE_CQC DOC APRIL :000

TIMOTHY R. MEADE

including oversight of 6 equipment operators, four technicians, one T&D coordinator, one on-sitechemist and a pugmill subcontractor. Soils that "failed" TCLP criteria were treated in a pugmill viathe addition of TSP for stabilization. Lead-contaminated soil that "passed" TCLP was directly loadedfor off-site disposal. Mr. Meade was responsible for mainta ining an excavation production rate of1,000 to 2,000 tons per day, and a stabilization production rate of 750 tons per day. Remediationperformed within this active facility was completed with no interruption to plant operations despitethe presence of mul t ip le underground utilities, the majority of which were not identified on maps ordrawings. [Earth Tech]

• Project Supervisor, Landfill Cap Construction, KI Sawyer Air Force Base, Gwinn, Michigan,May 1999 to September 1999. Managed site activities for this $2.7 mill ion project involving thecapping of three separate landfil ls totaling 24 acres the former Air Force Base in the Upper Peninsulaof Michigan. This complex project involved the use of up to 15 union equipment operators duringsimultaneous construction activities at three former landf i l l areas at the base. Specific activitiesincluded clearing and grubbing a total of 29 acres of highly vegetated areas; import and placement ofover 100,000 cubic yards of refuse from an adjacent area; import and placement of 65,000 cubicyards of clean f i l l material; placement of 24,000 cubic yards of topsoil; installation of drainageditches; fence installation; and placement of 25,000 square yards of geomembrane. Also restored afive-acre wetlands area to original the condition. Earth Tech completed all three sites, capping a totalof 24-acres of former landfill area, for $560,000 less than the Engineer's estimate. Mr. Meade wasresponsible for coordinating with the Corp of Engineers and Air Force Representatives; daily costtracking and procurement of all site materials. [Earth Tech]

• Junior Response Manager, USEPA Region V, Tar Lake Superfund Site, Mancelona, Michigan,November 1998 to May 1999. Mr. Meade directed transportation and disposal efforts for the off-site disposal of wood-tar at this Region V Superfund Site. He was directly responsible for 60-foottruck scale set-up and operation, manifest preparation and documentation, on site sampling andanalysis, coordinating and scheduling shipments including securing the proper number of trucks,coordinating shipments and approvals with the disposal facil i t ies and directing on-site waste loadingoperations. Over 46,000 tons of material were disposed of during this removal action. As a result ofextensive coordination efforts, the volume of waste that was transported off site on a daily basis morethan tripled, with up to 60 trucks (1,400 tons) per day loaded, manifested and transported to fourseparate facilities by eight separate transporters. Due to the residential location of the project andcommunity concerns of the odor emitted during excavation activities, the project was undertakenduring the winter months in the very adverse weather conditions of northern Michigan. [Earth Tech]

• On-Site Project Manager, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Buckeye FurnaceReclamation, Jackson, Ohio, July 1998 to December 1998. Mr. Meade managed site activities forthe reclamation of this former coal mine. Directed site operations, which included oversight of fiveequipment operators, 12 dump truck drivers and two laborers. The project consisted of 8 separate sitelocations up to 4 miles apart ranging from 1 to 40 acres. Site activities included: clearing andgrubbing; construction of site access roads; installation of 5,500 liner feet of silt fence; excavation,transportation and placement of over 250,000 cubic yards of mine refuse, with over 75% beingplaced over "fine beds"; excavation, transportation, placement and compaction of over 140,000 cubicyards of borrow material to cap the refuse; placement of 200 linear feet of drainage piping; placementof 5,000 tons of rip rap; construction of 4,500 linear feet of drainage channels; application andincorporation of 1,500 tons of lime; construction of a wetlands; construction of two (300 x 100 feetand 100 x 50 feet) Successive Alkaline Producing Systems (SAPS); construction of a 300 linear foot

L \WORK'J83_15'.WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOIVMEADEJTQC DOC

TIMOTHY R. MEADE

long, 25 foot deep underdrain; and the application of 12,000 tons of Bypro paper sludge. Otherresponsibilities included procurement of all materials, equipment and subcontractors: cost tracking;invoicing; subcontract negotiations; site safety, and QA/QC. Mr. Meade worked very closely with alocal developer for access to land for clean borrow and with the DNR project officer during projectexecution. [Earth Tech]

• Foreman, Emergency Response, CSX Transportation, Huntington, West Virginia, June 1998.Mr. Meade served as Foreman for the night crew during remediation activities associated with thespill of approximately 30,000 gallons of formaldehyde. The spill occurred as a result of a trainderailment in which approximately 30 cars derailed in a residential area. Mr. Meade was responsiblefor operating excavation equipment to remove formaldehyde-contaminated soil. Over 200 roll-offboxes were used to containerize contaminated soil during this one week round-the-clock responseeffort. [Earth Tech]

• On-Site Project Manager, Tazewell County; Landfill Construction, Tazewell, Virginia,February 1998 to June 1998. Mr. Meade was the on-site project manager for this project tocomplete a 5-acre Phase II Sanitary Landfill expansion. On-site personal included 12 operators, 4laborers and 1 field engineer. The project included the excavation and transportation of 171,000-cubic yards of soil and rock and the excavation, transportation, placement and compaction of 16,000cubic yards of clay. Oversaw subcontractor placement of 220,000 square feet of geosynthetic liners.Managed the construction of a leachate collection system. Placed 15,000 tons of drainage stone and5,000 cubic yards of cushion soil over the liner. A record was set during the month of April for themost rain ever recorded for that month. Due to the extensive drainage control measures implementedby Mr. Meade, only 5 days of work were lost during that time. Site activities were performed 24-hours a day 7 days a week using two shifts during a portion of the work. Extensive quality controlmeasures were required by the state, including; 20 shelby tubes. 7 bat-well tests, 5 nuclearcompaction test per acre per l i f t and I sand cone per acre per l if t . Throughout the duration of theproject no area had to be re-worked for QC compliance. Mr. Meade was responsible for deployingall the necessary personnel and equipment to complete the work and interface with the landfillmanager. Mr. Meade's ability to utilize the personnel and equipment to their fullest extentdemonstrated to our client that we were running an efficient operation. In commendation lettersreceived from our client regarding this project, our crew was commended for "considerableknowledge and professionalism in complying with our needs and timetable, as well as making adiligent effort to keep costs to a minimum." [Earth Tech]

• Quality Control/Quality Assurance Manager, U.S Army Corps of Engineers SacramentoDistrict, Emergency Levee Repair, Sutler, Fresno and Madera County California, November1997. This $3.1 mil l ion project consisted of excavation, mass grading, backfilling and rip rapplacement for emergency levees repairs along the San Joanquin and Fresno rivers. Responsible forthe daily QA/QC requirements and supporting documentation required by the USAGE. Requirementsincluded visual inspection, on-site and laboratory soil testing, density testing of soil using nuclear andsand cone methods, visual inspection of lift placements and compaction techniques and visualinspection and laboratory testing of all aggregate for consistency and specification compliance.Because of the severe weather threats associated with El Nino, the project was considered anemergency action and was required to be completed within 45 days. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, City of Franklin, Franklin, Ohio, July 1997 to December 1997. Supervised thecivil work associated with the construction of 5 mil l ion gallon per day water treatment plant.Directed installation of approximately 6,000 linear feet of up to 36-inch underground piping for feed

L \WORK\38335\WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOI\MEADE_CQC DOC APRIL 2000

TIMOTHY R. MEADE

and discharge lines. Supervised the construction of two water retention ponds. Excavated soil wasused as on-site f i l l . Oversaw construction of 2,700 linear foot underground force main sewer line.Directed excavation and grading for clear well and foundations. Procured, placed and compacted100,000 cubic yards of soil for access road embankment. Placed, compacted and graded to + '/i"10,000 tons of rock for the road base. Raised or relocated 20 fire hydrants, manholes and valveboxes. Managed subcontractor placement of 1,100 tons of asphalt. Supervised the installation of1,600 feet of fence. Extensive coordination was required with the mechanical and electricalcontractors to ensure that the $4 million plant was operational in four months. [Earth Tech]

• Response Manager, Raeco Chemical, USEPA Region II, Rochester, New York, February toMarch 1997. Over 500 drums were abandoned in truck trailers at this former chemicalmanufacturing site. Coordinated drum unloading using forklifts to access drums. Level B PPE wasused during all site operations for the hazcatting and overpacking of the drums. All contents of thedrums were profiled and transported off site for disposal. Managed one foreman, one equipmentoperator, one chemist, one field cost accountant and four technicians during this phase of the projectin addition to serving as Site Safety Officer. [Earth Tech]

• Project Supervisor, Fullco Lumber, USEPA Region IV, Haleyville Alabama, January 1997. On-site supervisor responsible for overseeing the screening and relocation of 8,000 cubic yards of PAH-contaminated soil at a former wood treatment facility. Soil was solidified with saw dust, shredded,screened down to 2" minus, and stockpiled for future placement into an on-site bio-treatment cell.Debris was categorized and stockpiled for treatment or off-site disposal. Also sampled andperformed daily maintenance to the 3-acre bio-treatment cell which included watering, discing, andnutrient application and incorporation. [Earth Tech]

• Project Manager, Columbia Plating, USEPA III, Columbia, Pennsylvania, November toDecember 1996. Supervised three operators and four technicians during demolition and excavationactivities at this former plating facility. Contaminants included chromium, barium, and cadmium.An excavator was used to demolish the existing building, followed by off-site disposal ofapproximately 200 tons of non-hazardous construction debris. Over 4,000 tons of contaminated soilwas excavated and transported for off-site stabilization and disposal. Restored the site by backfillingthe excavated area with clean fill, and by placing geotextile and rip rap at an environmentallysensitive area beside an on-site pond. Additional site restoration activities included the erection of afence around the site, replacement of an asphalt road, placement of top soil, andrevegetation. [EarthTech]

• Project Supervisor, Hart Creosote Site, USEPA Region VI, Jasper, Texas, August to October1995. Responsible for all daily site operations for this $750.000 project, including: excavation of40,000 cubic yards of creosote-contaminated soil, on-site treatment of 1.1 mil l ion gallons ofcontaminated water using a sand and carbon filtration system, construction and closure of a 60,000-cubic-yard, clay-lined landfill, solidification of 20,000 cubic yards of contaminated sludge in fourponds, and reseeding and relandscaping to restore a 6.5-acre site. Also procured all equipment andsupplies, and served as site Health and Safety Officer. [Smith]

• Site Supervisor, Butte La Rose Site, United States Coast Guard, Butte La Rose, Louisiana,October to November 1995. Supervised a crew of 10 recovery technicians to contain a release ofapproximately 10,000 gallons of crude oil at this $200,000 spill cleanup conducted under a BasicOrdering Agreement (BOA) with the USCG. Oil was recovered from six different locations at an

L \\VORK'J8335\WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOI\MEADE_CQC DOC APRIL 2000

TIMOTHY R. MEADE

abandoned oil field in the Atchafalaya River basin. Sites were only accessible by boat, crews andequipment were transported up to 30 miles by boats daily. Free product was recovered withskimmers and pumps and contained in tanks. Sites consisted of pump stations, ponds and any otherareas where free-standing oil was present. [Smith]

• Project Supervisor, Safe Tire Project Site, USEPA Region VI, Midlothian, Texas, December1995. Managed a crew of five technicians and three equipment operators as one of three teamsubcontractors on this $100,000 emergency response action. Provided equipment and operators for"hot zone" activities, as well as responders and labor support for all support zone activities toextinguish approximately 20 acres of shredded tires that caught fire at a tire recycling facility. Theeffort was a 24-hour-a-day, 7-day-a-week operation that lasted 18 days and was conducted infreezing weather. [Smith]

• Project Supervisor, Jasper Creosote, USEPA Region VI, Jasper, Texas, April to June 1996.Managed a crew of six technicians and three equipment operators to conduct a $1.2 mil l ion cleanupof an abandoned creosote plant. Site activities included: taking more than 100 test samples from thesoil, l iquid in tanks, unknowns in warehouses, and neighboring ponds; disposal of 52,000 gallons ofwaste product left in tanks at an off-site incinerator facility; salvage of 1,500 tons of scrap metal; andset up and operation of a pugmill to encapsulate 67,000 tons of creosote-contaminated soil. Asbestoswas removed from tanks, pipes and pressure treating vessels. All metal, including piping and 12tanks, was decontaminated using pressure washers and sold for scrap. The area was cleared of allremaining treated and untreated wood, and restored with clay f i l l and topsoil. Then the entire sitewas reseeded and relandscaped. [Smith]

• Project Supervisor, Bioremediation Facility Construction, Crane Naval Weapons Station,Morrison Knudsen, Crane, Indiana, September to November 1996. Supervised the constructionof a bioremediation facility consisting of three metal bui ldings 120 feet x 300 feet long. Thebuildings were being constructed to house TNT- and explosives-contaminated soil forbiotreatment.Buildings were constructed with concrete slab walls and 6-foot walls inside the building for front-end-loader access during biotreatment activities. Directed the construction of two 100-foot x 100-foot ponds that were lined to contain contaminated water run-off. The 6-acre site was graded, rockedand asphalted to provide for run-off into ponds. Supervised construction of office support area,personnel decontamination areas, and truck decon areas. The truck decon area was constructed usingmasonry techniques, and required the installation of a canopy and high pressure sprayers. Providedextensive coordination with all subcontractors, including electricians, masons, plumbers, ironworkers, operators, laborers, concrete finishers and surveyors for construction activities. Up to 30subcontract personnel were on site routinely. Responsible for all scheduling andmaintaining/documenting costs. Conducted safety meetings to identify potential areas of concern.[Smith]

• Project Manager, PCB Cleanup, Trunkline Gas Company, Kountz, Texas, September 1996.Managed a crew of two technicians and two equipment operators to conduct comprehensive PCBcleanup for a gas company. Site activities included: excavation and off-site disposal of 3000 tons ofPCB-contaminated soil; on-site treatment of groundwater contaminated with VOCs, semi-volatileorganics, PAHs and heavy metals; and backfilling and restoring the site. Constructed 700 feet ofrock road on geotech fabric to access the site. Solidified soil withflyash in roll-offs, and coordinatedwith subcontractor to ensure safe and timely off-site disposal of contaminated soil. [Smith]

L >WORK'J8335\WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOI\MEADE_CQC DOC APRIL 2000

TIMOTHY R. MEADE

• Project Manager, Environmental Restoration, GATX, Galens Park, Texas, June to September1996. Managed a crew of three technicians and four equipment operators to close a 3-acre hazardouswaste pond. Site activities included: solidifying 2-6 feet of sludge, encapsulating debris,constructing new drainage structures, installing a clay liner, and improving the surrounding roads,ditches, and dike walls. Moved 3,000 cubic yards of soil to reshape dike walls and construct anaccess ramp into the pond. Three comprehensive strength cylinders were taken of each day's mix.Successfully met compressive strength requirements of 4,400 psf in 7 days. Despite l imited crewresources, project was completed 21 days ahead of schedule. [Smith]

• Project Manager, Emergency Responses throughout Texas, Various Clients. Supervised rapidresponders to address emergency incidents such as overturned tank trucks, shifted loads of hazardousmaterials, mystery drums, and petroleum spills on land and water. Projects were conducted forclients such as Texas Department of Transportation, TNRCC, USCG, and privately ownedbusinesses. The majority of these responses occurred outside of normal work hours and posedserious threats to human health and the environment unti l completed. [Smith]

• Operations Supervisor, Low Temperature Thermal Desorption Project, U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers, Romulus, New York, September 1994 to March 1995. Responsible for dailyoperations of this $6.2 mi l l ion project, including: excavation, thermal treatment, transportation, andbackfil l of 34,000 tons of contaminated soil; classification and decontamination of associated debris;and operation of a 50-gallon-per-minute water treatment plant for all groundwater anddecontamination water. Contaminants of concern at this site included VOCs, semi-volatile organics,and PAHs. [IT Corporation]

• General Foreman, Environmental Restoration Project, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nome,Alaska, April to September 1994. Responsible for complete oversight of all craft personnel anddaily field activities for this $17.9 mil l ion project at 10 sites in the Nome area. Activit ies consistedof: constructing and operating a 20,000-cubic-yard landf i l l and two decontamination facilities;treating contaminated soil /// situ using bioremediation techniques; and recovering, sampling,overpacking, classifying, decontaminating, transporting, and disposing of 30,000 drums. The drumscontained heating fuel, and were excavated from beaches, tundra, pond banks, and riverbeds. Somesites were only accessible by helicopter, all equipment and personal was flown in and activities wereperformed manually. All drums were transported to central location where they were deheaded,cleaned with a pressure washer, crushed, and disposed of in the landfill . Contents of the drums werebulked, transported to a barge in Nome, transferred onto the barge and recycled in the lower 48.Managed four crews at separate sites simultaneously. Due to contractual obligations, the entire laborforce had to be hired and trained locally. Interviewed, hired, trained and managed 4 foreman, 12operators and 40 environmental technicians. [IT Corporation]

• Operations and Maintenance Supervisor, Sikes Superfund Site, USEPA Region VI and theTexas Water Commission, Crosby, Texas, October 1993 to April 1994. Responsible for allactivities associated with thermal treatment unit feed preparation to treat and handle contaminatedsoils and associated debris. Managed site operations, including: receiving, handling, andmaintaining contaminated soils and stockpiles; using dump trucks and front-end loaders to transport,screen and stockpile debris; classifying contaminated soils for the purpose of blending and optimizingfor feed; shredding drums and over-sized debris using a high-torque, slow-speed shredder;decontaminating excavation equipment and materials to established clean-up criteria; and performingall necessary maintenance to support the equipment. [IT Corporation]

L \\VORK\J8335\WP SUPPLEMENTS RE VOI 'ME ADE_CQC DOC

TIMOTHY R. MEADE

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

Project Manager/Response Manager, Earth Tech, Wilder, Kentucky, 1996-Present. Responsible formanaging a variety of environmental restoration and construction projects including Superfund site work;demolition and decontamination projects, response to train derailments; drum characterization anddisposal; large earth moving projects and landfill construction work.

Project Manager, Smith Environmental Technologies, Deer Park, TX, 1995-1996. Responsible formanaging all types of EPA and private sector remediation and construction projects, including drumremoval, PCB cleanup, pugmill operations, landfill construction and closure, site development, hazardouswaste site clean-up and closer, and large maritime oil-spill responses. Directed multiple crew members,provided oversight on scheduling and project budgets, and interfaced with regulatory agencies.

Operations Supervisor and General Foreman, International Technology Corporation, Monroeville,PA, 1993-1995. Managed site operations at multiple hazardous waste sites. Duties included supervisingcrews in the operations and maintenance of mobile thermal treatment unites. Also responsible fordirecting crews in landfill construction, operation and closure, drum removal and bioremediation systeminstallation projects.

General Foreman, A.L. Helmcamp, Houston, TX, 1992-1993. Responsible for overseeing ironworkers, operators, pipefitters, concrete finishers, welders, boilermakers, millwrights, electricians,painters, plant operators, surveyors and laborers during general construction projects. Supervised crewsduring shut-down and turnaround events performed at manufacturing, chemical, and petro-chemicalrefinery facilities. The majority of the work involved upgrade, repair and installation of processequipment and unites. Most projects were 24 hours a day 7 days a week un t i l completed.

Site Superintendent, TEMCOR, Carson, CA, 1989-1992. Responsible for supervising up to 15 ironworkers, pipefitters, welders, and painters in the construction of Geodesic Domes. Projects ranged from$30,000 to 1 mil l ion dollars, and lasted from 1 week to 3 months. Completed over 50 projects in 38states for federal, state, and local government contractors and privately owned contractors. Also directly-supervised over 25 "critical lifts'" including the use of 4- to 165-ton cranes to set a 200-foot diameterdome on top a 50-foot high concrete tank. Traveled with a foreman and lead iron worker and hired craftpersonal through local union halls. Major projects included; University of Connecticut 320-foot diameterbasketball stadium roof; a 160-foot diameter hemisphere with 3 layers of V" sheeting and insulation foracoustical testing of jet engines for NASA in Cleveland, Ohio; over 32,000 square feet of trusses andremovable flat covers for a waste water treatment plant in San Antonio, Texas; and a 80-foot diameterglass hemisphere for a rain forest exhibit at the Cleveland Metropolitan Zoo in Cleveland, Ohio.

Foreman, Conservatek, Conroe, TX, 1987-1989. Field foreman for crews during fabrication andconstruction of Geodesic Domes. Supervised crews for the erection of framing and sheeting for domeconstruction.

L \WORK\38335\WP SUPPLEMENTS REVOnMEADEJTQC DOC

APPENDIX III

DAILY JOB REPORT FORM

E A R T H S ) T E C HVl/

200 Vint Street, Wilder. Kentucky 41076 • (606) 442-2300Job No.

Daily Job ReportDate_

Client.

Contact.

Title

Site Address.

City

Weather_

State. Zip.

PERSONNEL

Name : Title :. . . - • : - ; : . : : : - ' - • : ' : - : Time . . • • : • ' • • • ' ; '..!;'•;

Started Arrived Departed Completed

• • :Tbtaf

S.T. O.T.

VEHICLES

Item <»y. Hoofs Mileage Ips;::-.MATERIALS

Item

EQUIPMENT

Item Qty.

Oty. Unit

JOB DESCRIPTION

JOB DISCREPANCIES

ETNA Representative

Prepared by

Client Authorization

Organization

PROJECT

Continue Completed

- skinner landfill site west chester, ohio o · - skinner landfill site i butler county west...

Documents