small businesses and the employed in the inland …...in the inland empire, very small and small...
TRANSCRIPT
Small Businesses and the Self-Employed in the Inland Empire
August 2019
Economy White Paper Series
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
2
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
2
Introduction
To understand what contributes to a region’s economic dynamism and vitality, it is important to study the
structure of the economy and its key levers. This is the second of two white papers that go beyond headline job
numbers and assess the Inland Empire economy in terms of business establishments as well as employment. This
research improves our understanding of the regional economy’s structure by examining firm behavior “on the
ground.” In turn, it allows local leaders to fashion more effective economic and workforce development policies
in order to nurture long-run growth.
The first white paper examined business activity in the Inland Empire as represented by establishment and em-
ployment trends by industry. This white paper, the second in the series, examines business activity trends across
industries by firm size. It also studies the prevalence of self-employed persons across the region’s industries, and
evaluates the extent to which the “gig economy” has a growing presence in the region. This paper uses the most
recent data available, which currently runs through 2016 (please see Data Sources below).
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
3
The Inland Empire has experienced the fastest job growth among all of Southern California’s regional economies for several
years running, and has outpaced the overall state in job growth for seven consecutive years. This has led to a dramatic im-
provement in the local unemployment rate, now in record territory at near 4%, and lower than the unemployment rate in
California as a whole. While the Transportation and Warehousing/Logistics industry have been frequently touted for their
job growth in recent years, Health Care, Food and Hotel Services, Construction, and even Retail Trade have also made sig-
nificant contributions to the Inland Empire’s job growth.
Figure 1 - IE Outpaces CA in Job Gains 7 Years in a Row
Source: California EDD, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
6.0%
-2.0%
2.0%
-6.0%
4.0%
-4.0%
0.0%
-8.0%2006 20112008 2013 20162007 20122009 2014 20172010 2015 2018
IE
CA
Figure 2 - IE Employment Rate
Source: California EDD, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
16.0%
8.0%
12.0%
4.0%
14.0%
6.0%
10.0%
2.0%
0.0%2006 20112008 2013 20162007 20122009 2014 20172010 2015 2018
IE
CA
Executive Summary
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
4
But what is happening at a deeper level within the
economy? Are new businesses emerging in re-
sponse to the underlying growth trends? To what
extent is small business participating in recent busi-
ness trends within the Inland Empire economy? And
how prevalent are self-employed business owners
in the regional economy?
The health of the small business sector has long
been viewed as a key indicator of a region’s eco-
nomic dynamism and vitality. One way to measure
small business is to track the extent to which busi-
ness and job growth in the region have emanated
from small firms as opposed to medium and large
sized firms. This paper examines the Inland Empire
economy from two angles. First, it reports on trends
in the numbers of establishments by industry and
by size of establishment in an effort to evaluate
the contribution small businesses make to the In-
land Empire economy. Second, it looks at trends in
self-employed workers and assesses their contribu-
tion to the region’s job and business growth.
Key Highlights/Findings:There were 71,807 business establishments in the Inland Empire in 2016, an increase of 7,182 or 11.1% over 2011. 1
Compared to the state as a whole, the mix of estab-lishments by size in the Inland Empire in 2016 was characterized by a smaller concentration of Small firms and a somewhat larger share of Medium sized and Large establishments.
While Very Small establishments accounted for over half (52.9%) of the growth in new establishments statewide between 2011 and 2016, they accounted for just 45.1% of the gains in the Inland Empire. On the other hand, the region had the edge over the state in growth of Small businesses (31.0% versus 25.5% statewide) and Medium businesses (19.7% versus 17.2%).
51.8% of all establishments
32.4% of all establishments
13.3% of all establishments
2.5% of all establishments
Very Small (1 to 4 employees):
Small (5 to 19 employees):
Medium (20 to 99 employees):
Large (100 to more employees):
Despite accounting for 86.1% of establishment growth in the Inland Empire, Very Small and Small businesses together accounted for just 17.7% of the job growth that occurred in the region from 2011 through 2016. By contrast, Large firms account for just 4.2% of es-tablishment growth but nearly half (48.9%) of employ-ment gains.
Nearly 85% of the establishments in the Inland Empire are Very Small or Small:
1 The first report in this series describes establishment growth trends for the Inland Empire in more detail.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
5
Five industries accounted for 57% of the 54,971 Very Small and Small businesses in the Inland Empire in 2016: Retail Trade, Health Care, Construction, Pro-fessional, Scientific, and Technical Services, and Other Services.
Combining Very Small businesses and Small business-es, Construction added the largest number of estab-lishments (694), followed by Health Care (639). These two industries were followed somewhat distantly by Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (550), Real Estate Rental and Leasing (548), and Transporta-tion and Warehousing (541). Each of these industries is known anecdotally to have large numbers of small, independent business enterprises.
Analysis of self-employed workers in the region re-veals that there were 308,401 self-employed workers in the Inland Empire in 2016, 27% of the total num-ber of wage and salary workers. Real Estate and Oth-er Services were the only two industries with more self-employed workers than wage and salary workers in 2016.
The total number of self-employed in the Inland Em-pire increased by 9% from 2011 to 2016, somewhat slower than the 11.1% growth rate for business es-tablishments with wage and salary workers.
Transportation and Warehousing experienced the biggest increase in the number of self-employed workers from 2011 to 2016 – a 70% jump. This is partly because of increases in truckers and warehouse workers, but also because of increases in on-demand shared ride services such as Uber and Lyft.
Most other industries experienced smaller gains in the number of self-employed, with notable exceptions being Health Care, which has seen industry consoli-dation in recent years, Mining, which was adversely affected by decreases in energy and commodity pric-es earlier this decade, and Agriculture, which may be encroached upon by population growth in the region.
In general, industries that experienced the largest increase in small business establishment counts and self-employed tend to favor smaller firm size, whether because of low entry costs that make it easy to start up a business, or because the type of business itself is difficult to operate at large scale.
Understanding these nuances will be valuable to develop-
ing effective economic development policies and support
programs. Because economic development resources are
scarce, programs should be evaluated a priori to ensure
that they complement each other and don’t compete
with goals of other programs or squander resources. This
means that local leaders must be able to recognize which
businesses and industries are more likely to meet a par-
ticular policy goal and which are not. In turn, this requires
an understanding of which industries have characteristics
that are conducive to a given goal, the trends within a
given industry that may influence attainment of that goal,
and finally, external forces (for example, global competi-
tion) that play a role over which local government has no
control.
Data SourcesThe primary data source for this analysis is County Business Patterns (CBP), which is released annual-ly by the U.S. Census Bureau. The most recent re-lease, for the 2016 calendar year, came out in the second quarter of 2018. CBP provides subnational economic data by detailed industry. It reports on the number of establishments and employment during the week of March 12 each year, and also includes data on quarterly and annual payroll.
A second, less well-known Census Bureau product is the Nonemployer Statistics (NES) survey, also released in the second quarter of 2018 and con-taining information on establishments that have no employees. The NES is also an annual series, providing subnational economic data for business-es that have no paid employees and are subject to federal income tax. This series includes number of businesses and total receipts by industry.
This analysis examines business activity in the In-land Empire between the year 2011 and the latest available year, 2016. This corresponds to the peri-od following the ‘Great Recession’ when the region made significant progress in recovering from the downturn and then embarking on its current re-cord-setting expansion.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
6
Trends in Business Establishments By Size
Small businesses are generally touted as significant contributors to the vitality of any regional economy—and the
State of California is viewed as a hotbed of entrepreneurial activity. The following section examines business growth
trends in the Inland Empire by establishment size with particular focus on small business growth.
For the purpose of this white paper, ‘Small’ businesses are defined as having fewer than 20 employees. This is considerably
smaller than the threshold used by the U.S. Small Business Administration, which, as a general rule of thumb, considers
establishments with fewer than 500 employees to be ‘Small’ businesses. However, this study’s definition makes it possible
to focus on small sized firms where early signs of growth should be evident.
County Business Patterns data from the U.S. Census Bureau describes establishments by size, using a total of nine
categories. In this analysis, those categories are reduced to the following four:
• Very Small (1 to 4 employees):
• Small (5 to 19 employees):
• Medium (20 to 99 employees):
• Large (100 to more employees):
Overall Trends
Like the state and the nation, the Inland Empire has a very large number of smaller sized business establishments. Very
Small establishments account for more than half of all establishments in the region, while Small establishments account
for about 30%; this is also true in California overall. The Inland Empire does have a slightly larger share of Medium and
Large establishments compared to the state as a whole. The biggest difference between the region and state may be found
among Very Small establishments, which account for 51.8% of total establishments in the Inland Empire, 4.4% less than
in the state.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
7
Table 1 - Establishments by Size, Inland Empire and State
Table 2 - Structure & Sources of Growth by Size of Firm
Number of Establishments in IE
Share of EstablishmentsBy Size, 2016
IE Share of
Share of Growth by Size, 2011-16
Share of Growth by...
Size of Establishment
Size of Establishment
2016 IE
Estabs. Estabs.
IECA
Jobs Jobs
CA
All establishments
Very Small-1 to 4 employees
Small-5 to 19 employees
Medium-20 to 99 employees
Large-100 or more
All establishments
Very Small-1 to 4 employees
Small-5 to 19 employees
Medium-20 to 99 employees
Large-100 or more
71,807
37,172
23,267
9,582
1,786
100.0%
51.8%
32.4%
13.3%
2.5%
100.0%
51.8%
32.4%
13.3%
2.5%
100.0%
45.1%
31.0%
19.7%
4.2%
100.0%
45.1%
31.0%
19.7%
4.2%
100.0%
56.1%
29.8%
11.8%
2.3%
100.0%
6.7%
16.9%
30.5%
45.9%
100.0%
52.9%
25.5%
17.2%
4.4%
100.0%
4.6%
13.1%
33.3%
48.9%
Source: County Business Patterns, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Source: County Business Patterns, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
However, the Inland Empire and the state as a whole differ considerably in terms of establishment growth from 2011 to
2016. Very Small firms accounted for less than half (45.1%) of the establishment growth in the region compared to 52.9%
in California overall. Small and Medium firms accounted for a larger share of growth in the Inland Empire than in the state,
while Large firms accounted for a comparatively smaller share of growth (despite accounting for a larger share of estab-
lishments).
But to what extent are small businesses contributing to job growth in the Inland Empire? Also, which industries are en-
joying most of that growth? The answer is that while a majority of firms in the region are Very Small, they account for the
smallest share of jobs among all the firm size categories. Moreover, from 2011 to 2016 these firms made the smallest
contribution to total job gains. In fact, most of the job growth over the 5-year study period occurred among Medium and
Large establishments.
These observations shed light on the role played by Very Small and Small businesses in the Inland Empire’s recent eco-
nomic expansion. Small businesses are frequently perceived to be a key source of growth in a local economy. That may be
true in terms of establishment formation, but this segment of the Inland Empire’s overall business sector has made smaller
contributions to job gains than Medium or Large establishments.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
8
Five industries accounted for 57% of the 54,971 Very Small and Small businesses in the Inland Empire in 2016:
• Retail Trade: 7,959 establishments (14% of all Very Small and Small establishments)
• Health Care: 6,865 (12%)
• Construction: 5,991 (11%)
• Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services2: 5,301 (10%)
• Other Services3: 5,262 (10%)
Industries such as Retail Trade, Manufacturing, Health Care, and Management have roughly the same shares of Very Small
and Small businesses. Very Small businesses are particularly prominent within Agriculture, Real Estate Rental and Leasing,
and Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services where they account for 70% or more of all establishments in those
industries in the region. Very Small businesses are considerably less prevalent in Mining, Utilities, and Food and Hotel
industries where they account for less than one-third of all establishments. On the other hand, Mining, Food and Hotel,
and Retail Trade have the largest shares of Small businesses, where they account for 40% or more of all establishments in
those industries in the Inland Empire.
Table 3 - Number of Establishments by Size across IE Industries, 2016
Very Small1 to 4
Small5 to 19
Medium20 to 99
Large100+
Total Establishments Employment
Total Nonfarm
Agriculture
Mining
Utilities
Construction
Mfg
Wholesale Tr.
Retail Tr.
Trans. and Whsg.
Information
Fin. and Ins.
R.E. Rental
Pro. Sci. Tech.
Mgmt.
Admin Svcs.
Ed. Svcs.
Health Care
Arts. Ent. Rec.
Food and Hotel
Other
33,933
67
18
42
4,187
1,163
2,114
4,028
1,329
396
2,000
2,521
3,960
105
1,908
349
3,832
392
1,825
3,564
8,170
3
13
36
604
722
518
1,401
353
126
250
113
279
68
434
125
714
197
1,878
336
64,625
90
57
141
6,673
3,136
4,141
9,674
2,436
794
3,282
3,419
5,606
290
3,435
740
7,791
814
6,329
5,636
21,038
15
24
47
1,804
1,047
1,428
3,931
636
235
1,016
775
1,341
99
932
232
3,033
186
2,551
1,698
1,484
5
2
16
78
204
81
314
118
37
16
10
26
18
161
34
212
39
75
38
980,475
1,176
1,360
5,960
61,365
91,041
55,975
159,955
64,469
16,519
26,754
16,515
33,409
9,649
79,690
22,044
144,542
26,041
120,919
42,928
Source: County Business Patterns, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
2 This industry includes engineers, lawyers, IT consultants, management consultants, and other service professionals that often have relatively small offices with a handful of employees.3 This industry includes personal services such as hair and nail salons, auto mechanic firms and similar activities.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
9
Table 4 - Share of Establishments by Size across IE Industries, 2016
Very Small1 to 4
Small5 to 19
Medium20 to 99
Large100+
Total Establishments
Total Nonfarm
Agriculture
Mining
Utilities
Construction
Mfg
Wholesale Tr.
Retail Tr.
Trans. and Whsg.
Information
Fin. and Ins.
R.E. Rental
Pro. Sci. Tech.
Mgmt.
Admin Svcs.
Ed. Svcs.
Health Care
Arts. Ent. Rec.
Food and Hotel
Other
52.5%
74.4%
31.6%
29.8%
62.7%
37.1%
51.1%
41.6%
54.6%
49.9%
60.9%
73.7%
70.6%
36.2%
55.5%
47.2%
49.2%
48.2%
28.8%
63.2%
12.6%
3.3%
22.8%
25.5%
9.1%
23.0%
12.5%
14.5%
14.5%
15.9%
7.6%
3.3%
5.0%
23.4%
12.6%
16.9%
9.2%
24.2%
29.7%
6.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
32.6%
16.7%
42.1%
33.3%
27.0%
33.4%
34.5%
40.6%
26.1%
29.6%
31.0%
22.7%
23.9%
34.1%
27.1%
31.4%
38.9%
22.9%
40.3%
30.1%
2.3%
5.6%
3.5%
11.3%
1.2%
6.5%
2.0%
3.2%
4.8%
4.7%
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
6.2%
4.7%
4.6%
2.7%
4.8%
1.2%
0.7%
Source: County Business Patterns, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
From 2011 to 2016, across all Inland Empire industries and firm sizes, Health Care experienced the largest increase in
overall number of establishments (914), followed by Food and Hotel (876), and Construction (858). Only Agriculture lost
establishments during this period.
Breaking down overall changes in the number of establishments by industry, Table 5 shows that much of the growth in
Very Small business establishments in the Inland Empire occurred in service industries that may be characterized by a large
number of smaller sized businesses. Between 2011 and 2016, the largest increase in Very Small establishments occurred
in Professional, Scientific and Technical Services (457), a key sector that includes engineers, lawyers, IT consultants, man-
agement consultants, and other service professionals who often have relatively small offices with a handful of employees.
This was followed by Real Estate and Rental Services (443), another industry often characterized by a large number of
smaller sized businesses.
With the overall growth that has been occurring in the Inland Empire’s Transportation and Warehousing (411) and Con-
struction sectors (382), it’s no surprise to see a significant jump in Very Small businesses within these industries. At the
other end of the spectrum, there has been relatively little growth in Very Small businesses in industries that tend to have
large capital-intensive operations such as Manufacturing, and land- as well as capital-intensive activities such as Agricul-
ture.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
10
Table 5 - Change in Numbers of Establishments 2011-16
Total Nonfarm
Pro. Sci. Tech.
R.E. Rental
Trans. and Whsg.
Construction
Wholesale Tr.
Admin Svcs.
Other
Health Care
Information
Fin. and Ins.
Food and Hotel
Ed. Svcs.
Arts. Ent. Rec.
Mgmt.
Utilities
Mining
Agriculture
Mfg
Retail Tr.
155,509
4,676
2,282
23,696
25,609
10,569
-2,571
2,463
24,555
-53
150
27,980
1,061
2,301
1,927
-380
-528
-5
4,551
27,174
2,229
93
105
130
312
178
3
186
369
63
126
249
43
64
6
6
-5
2
62
236
302
10
0
40
52
22
14
-4
22
-10
6
32
-2
13
2
-1
-1
-1
30
78
7,182
619
571
661
858
579
373
520
914
190
183
876
77
137
31
24
0
-6
121
462
3,239
457
443
411
382
332
319
304
270
116
108
54
32
32
25
13
7
-11
-22
-23
1,412
59
23
80
112
47
37
34
253
21
-57
541
4
28
-2
6
-1
4
51
171
Source: County Business Patterns, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Change In Establishments by Size of Establishment
Industry Change in Empl11-16
Very Small1 to 6
Small5 to 19
Medium20 to 99
Total ChgEstablishments
Large 100 +
Somewhat surprisingly, the number of Very Small Retail Trade establishments declined from 2011 to 2016 (-23), although
the economic expansion over this period likely drove retailers to grow larger, something that is evident by the increase in
these establishments in other size categories. The expansion also triggered growth in Construction and Food and Hotel
establishments, with increases occurring across the range of firm sizes. Health Care also saw large increases across the
board as that industry expanded in response to demographic changes and greater demand for health care services.
Among Small businesses (5 to 19 employees), Health Care saw the largest increase in the number of establishments (369
Small establishments), far outpacing Construction (312) and Food and Hotel (249), which had the second- and third-larg-
est gains, respectively. Only Mining saw a decrease in the number of establishments over this period.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
11
The Inland Empire’s top eight (out of 18 total) industries account for more than 85% of all self-employed workers in the
region. Other Services comes in at number one with just over 55,000 self-employed workers. This is not surprising given
the array of personal services that comprise that industry, including hair and nail salons, auto mechanic firms, and similar
activities. Following Other Services are a number of industries that were identified in the previous section as having large
numbers of Very Small establishments, including Professional, Scientific and Technical Services, Transportation and Ware-
housing, Construction, and Health Care (a number of sub-sectors that have relatively modest capital requirements and
lend themselves to small-scale operations also have significant numbers of the self-employed). These stand in contrast
to industries such as Agriculture, Utilities, and Mining, where capital (and land) requirements tend to be more significant.
Self-Employed in the Inland Empire
The U.S. Census Bureau’s Nonemployer Statistics (NES) survey provides high level information about establish-
ments that have no employees, henceforth referred to in this paper as ‘self-employed’. Examples of work arrange-
ments for the self-employed include:
• an attorney or other professional who works on his/her own and has a steady stream of business
• a performer in the arts and entertainment industry
• a contingent worker in any number of industries in the so-called gig economy, which includes Uber and Lyft drivers
• an independent truck driver who owns and operates a rig to move containers from one point to another
• a handyman in the construction sector
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
12
Table 6 - Self Employed Workers by Industry
Other Services
Prof. Sci. and Technical Svcs
Administrative
Transportation and Warehousing
Retail Trade
Health Care
Construction
Real Estate, Rental, Leasing
Arts, Entertainment, and Rec.
Finance and Insurance
Educational Services
Wholesale Trade
Manufacturing
Hotel and Food Services
Information
Agriculture
Utilities
Mining
Total
55,040
35,429
30,425
28,934
28,229
28,073
27,891
27,854
12,181
7,834
6,676
6,274
4,951
4,221
3,125
889
259
116
308,401
45,391
38,085
77,119
88,165
187,129
169,097
86,974
18,797
28,342
26,904
23,105
66,544
95,592
148,899
16,466
1,171
5,580
832
1,135,984
17.8%
11.5%
9.9%
9.4%
9.2%
9.1%
9.0%
9.0%
3.9%
2.5%
2.2%
2.0%
1.6%
1.4%
1.0%
0.3%
0.1%
0.0%
100.0%
1.21
0.93
0.39
0.33
0.15
0.17
0.32
1.48
0.43
0.29
0.29
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.19
0.76
0.05
0.14
0.27
Source: Nonemployer Statistics, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Industry # of Self-Employed (NES)
Share of All Self Employment
# of Employees (CBP)
Ratio NES to CBP
It is worth noting that industries display considerable variation in terms of the presence of self-employed workers among
their ranks. This can be illustrated by comparing the number of self-employed workers in an industry to the number of
wage and salary workers, who are employees. In the Inland Empire, only Real Estate Services and Other Services have a
larger share of self-employed than employees. The Professional, Scientific and Technical Services industry has near parity
between the two, but the remaining industries are principally characterized by large numbers of employees. This includes
certain industries that are commonly thought of as having a high number of self-employed workers, notably Arts and En-
tertainment, Construction, and Transportation and Warehousing.
Trends over time in the number of self-employed workers vary greatly across the Inland Empire’s industries. Figures 3 and
4 illustrate changes in the number of self-employed workers in the region from 2011 through 2016, indexed to the year
2011. The first figure includes industries that exhibited above average growth over the period. While the total number of
self-employed workers increased by a modest 9%, Transportation and Warehousing saw a 70% increase in the self-em-
ployed. This is due in part to the explosive growth of the goods movement sector in the Inland Empire, but also because of
the relatively recent surge in on-demand rideshare workers for Uber and Lyft. Other industries in the region experienced
more modest growth in self-employed workers, albeit at a faster rate than the industry-wide average.
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
13
Figure 3 - Indexed Self-Employment in Fastest Growing Industries (2011=100)
Source: Nonemployer Statistics, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
Source: Nonemployer Statistics, Analysis by UCR Center for Economic Forecasting and Development
180
140
160
120
100
170
130
150
110
902011 2013 20162012 2014 2015
Trans & Whsg
Food & Hotel
Utilities
Wholesale Trade
Ed Svcs
Retail Trade
Arts, Ent., & Recr
Pro., Sci. & Tech
Total-All Sectors
Some industries have experienced little growth in the number of self-employed workers in recent years, or outright de-
clines. Mining experienced the most severe contraction as energy prices fell sharply in the middle of the 2011-2016 study
period. The decrease in self-employed workers in Health Care and Social Assistance appears to be driven by a broad trend
of consolidation in the aftermath of the Affordable Care Act a few years ago. In Information, recent volatility in the num-
ber of self-employed workers may be due to a transformation within this broad sector from one dominated by traditional
media to one that is increasingly digital and high tech in nature.
Figure 4 - Indexed Self-Employment in Slowest Growing Industries (2011=100)
110
70
90
100
60
80
2011 2013 20162012 2014 2015
Total-All Sectors
Finance and Insurance
Real Est. & Rental
Construction
Information
Other Services
Manufacturing
Admin. Svcs
Agriculture
Health Care
Mining
ECO
NO
MY
WH
ITE
PAPE
R S
ERIE
S
14
Understanding these nuances will be valuable to local leaders in developing effective economic development policies
and support programs. Because economic development resources are scarce, programs should be evaluated a priori
to ensure that they complement each other and don’t compete with goals of other programs or squander resources.
For example, broad policies that support the small business community somewhat loosely or imprecisely may sound
appealing and may preserve, if not increase, the number of home-grown establishments in the Inland Empire, but as
this analysis has demonstrated, only a handful of industries can be targeted if the goal is to promote small business and
foster local job opportunities.
It’s not enough to simply understand the number of small businesses in the region and the industries in which they op-
erate. Local leaders must also recognize which businesses and industries are more likely to meet a particular policy goal
and which are not. In turn, this requires an understanding of which industries have characteristics that are conducive to
a given goal, the trends within a given industry that may influence attainment of that goal, and finally, external forces
(for example, global competition) that play a role over which local government has no control.
Conclusion
This analysis clearly illustrates that businesses were being established in the Inland Empire at a rate close to that of
business establishment in California during the period of analysis from 2011 to 2016. While Small and Very Small
businesses accounted for the vast majority of growth in establishments in the region, their contributions to job
growth were small relative to Medium and Large businesses. That said, the industries that experienced the largest
increases in Small business establishments, as well as self-employed workers, tend to generally favor smaller sized
firms. This may be due to inherent characteristics in certain industries such as low entry costs that make it easy to
start up a business, minimal requirements for capital and land, and possibly organizational and efficiency hurdles
that make it difficult to operate at a large scale.
The UC Riverside School of Business Center for Economic Fore-
casting and Development opened its doors in October 2015 and
represents a major economic research initiative in one of California’s
most vital growth regions. The Center produces a wide variety of
research both independently and in collaboration with academic,
business, and government partners. Research products include
monthly employment analyses, quarterly regional economic fore-
casts, a quarterly business activity index, a white paper series, and a
major regional economic forecast conference, hosted annually.
About the Author
Robert Kleinhenz is Economist and Executive Director of Research at the UC Riverside School of Business Cen-
ter for Economic Forecasting and Development and one of California’s leading economists. Dr. Kleinhenz is a
much sought-after specialist for his deep knowledge of the California and U.S. economies and their industries.
Tapping nearly 30 years of experience in analyzing the national and state economies, as well as the economies
of California’s many diverse regions, he oversees economic research and public policy analysis at the Center.
He is also Executive Director of Research at Beacon Economics LLC.Robert Kleinhenz
About the Center forEconomic Forecastingand Development
www.UCREconomicForecast.org | [email protected]