smcswtse-jcg-smp-tm-pln-002279-d martin place stage 1 · 2018. 5. 9. · document no:...

Construction Traffic Management Plan Martin Place South Stage 1

Project: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works

Document No: SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002279

DOCUMENT APPROVAL REVISION DATE PREPARED

BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY REMARKS

A 3/2/2018 S Lewis For internal review

B 12 Feb 2018 S Lewis W Freelander J Glasgow For external review

C 12 Mar 18 S Lewis W Freelander J Glasgow For approval

D 23 Mar 18 S Lewis W Freelander J Glasgow Resubmitted for approval

Signature:

Martin Place South (Demolition) Stage 1 CTMP Approval - Sydney Metro

Tino / SueIn accordance with Schedule C1 Appendix A.9 Section 2.1 ( c ) and 2.2 ( c ) of the Principal’s General Specifications G10 – Traffic and Transport Management and Minister’s Condition of Approval E82 for the Sydney Metro City & South Westthe Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approve the Sydney Metro City & SouthWest Construction Traffic Management Plan – for Martin Place South (Demolition) Stage 1 works Rev D TSE WorksSMCSWTSEJCGSMPTMPLN002279D for demolition works subject to the following requirements:

• Providing a date for the station exit closures prior to their implementation• Obtaining Road Occupancy Licences (ROLs) from the Transport Management Centre (TMC) as required;• Complying with haulage routes as approved by SCO/RMS and described in Appendix 4 of the CTMP;• Addressing any safety issues identified in the Road Safety Audit review of this CTMP;

Addressing any issues raised by Council, State Transit Authority, Taxi Council, residents/businesses and/or Emergency Services in the CTMP approval process;Addressing the requirements arising as an outcome of the Local Pedestrian, Cycling and Traffic Calming Committee meeting;Turning paths for oversize / over mass deliveries being provided to SCO and RMS for review in advance of deliveries occurring; The Construction Traffic Management Plan being updated as required prior to construction commencing to ensure consistency with the final Construction Traffic Management Framework when it is approved;

• Promptly addressing any SCO and/or TMC and/or RMS issue that eventuates during the works

Regards,

Aaron GaleA/Associate Director Operations CBD & East Sydney Coordination Office Transport CoordinationTransport for NSW

GALE Aaron JFri 6/04/2018 3:32 PM

To:Tino Ferrero Sue Lewis ; Jeremy Glasgow Adrian Mientus

Cc:MELLA Carl A ; ISSA Steven C ; BERRY Adam RAMIREZ Giovanny


SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002279Construction Traffic Management Plan Martin Place South Stage 1 Page 2 of 26

Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 4

1.1. Project Overview ......................................................................................................... 4

1.2. Purpose of this Plan .................................................................................................... 4

1.3. CTMP indicative timings .............................................................................................. 5

2. Locality and existing conditions ............................................................................... 5

2.1. Martin Place ................................................................................................................ 6

2.2. Martin Place Train Station ........................................................................................... 6

3. Planning documents ................................................................................................... 7

3.1. EIS Proposal ............................................................................................................... 7

3.2. Approved project ......................................................................................................... 9

3.3. Discussions during tender ........................................................................................... 9

4. Site operations .......................................................................................................... 10

4.1. Works Required ......................................................................................................... 10

4.2. Operating Conditions ................................................................................................. 10

5. Other Considerations ............................................................................................... 16

5.1. Road Safety Audits .................................................................................................... 16

5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast ............................................................................................. 16

5.3. Police and Emergency Services ................................................................................ 17

5.4. Communications and the community ........................................................................ 17

5.5. Inspections and monitoring ....................................................................................... 18

5.6. Environmental Management ..................................................................................... 18

5.7. Site Contacts ............................................................................................................. 19

5.8. References ................................................................................................................ 19

Appendix 1 Proposed Operations ..................................................................................... 20

Appendix 2 Pedestrian modelling and analysis ............................................................... 21

Appendix 3 Data Redistribution ......................................................................................... 22

Appendix 4 Road Safety Audit ........................................................................................... 24

Appendix 5 Correspondence from Sydney Trains ........................................................... 25

Appendix 6 Review Comments .......................................................................................... 26



Figures Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project ................................................................................................ 4

Figure 2: Martin Place sites ...................................................................................................... 6

Figure 3 Martin Place Train Station Exit points ........................................................................ 7

Figure 4 EIS Martin Place Station construction pedestrian access arrangements ................... 8

Figure 5 EIS Martin Place Station construction site - alternative pedestrian and cyclist route . 9

Figure 6 Typical fencing/ barricading details .......................................................................... 11

Figure 7 TfNSW’s AM Distribution of pedestrians .................................................................. 12

Figure 8: Amended distribution based on 2018 data .............................................................. 13

Figure 9: Changes in distribution between TfNSW and TSE Contractor ................................ 15

Figure 10 Table from modelling analysis ................................................................................ 15

Figure 11: Data comparison TfNSW vs TSE counts .............................................................. 23

Tables Table 1 Proposed Communications ....................................................................................... 17

Table 2: Stakeholder Consultation ......................................................................................... 17

Table 3: Site contacts ............................................................................................................. 19



1. Introduction

1.1. Project Overview

The Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. The metro project currently consists of:

Stage one is the Sydney Metro Northwest, formerly the North West Rail Link,connecting the north western suburbs of Sydney, through to Chatswood.

Stage two is the City & South West project linking Chatswood through to Sydenham. Stage three includes the upgrade of the existing rail line between Sydenham and

Bankstown.

Figure 1 shows the proposed Sydney Metro project and stages.

Figure 1: Sydney Metro Project

1.2. Purpose of this Plan

The purpose of this Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP): MARTIN PLACE SOUTH STAGE 1 is to detail the requirement for the closure of the stairs located within Exit 6 between Castlereagh and Elizabeth streets and Exit 7 under the Tiffany’s building at 39 Martin Place to allow for the demolition of the Martin Place shopping circle and subsequent works required to provide connections between the existing Martin Place train station and the Sydney Metro rail line of the Sydney Metro City & South West project. This plan will set out the traffic management initiative that will be deployed to minimise disruption to and ensure the safety of



the wide range of stakeholders potentially affected by the works, including but not limited to: motorists, pedestrians; cyclists; public transport users, local residents and property owners; business owners; and workers/staff engaged on the Project.

1.3. CTMP indicative timings

The Martin Place South works consist of three overall phases of works:

1. Demolition phase2. Shaft excavation including adit construction3. Platform breakthrough to existing Martin Place station

The Martin Place South staging for the demolition works will consist of the following:

1. Closure of Exit 7 stairs contained with the Tiffany building ground level (Martin Placebar) area which provides access/ egress to Martin Place and train station and closureof the stairwell from Exit 6 between Castlereagh Street and Elizabeth Street. The MartinPlace shopping circle area will remain open with hoarding to be placed in front of theclosed shops. The existing street furniture on Martin Place will be removed prior to thestairway closures. To be implemented late March/ early April 2018 subject to CTMPapproval- THIS PLAN

2. Maintain the Stage 1 closure area and place hoarding on the surface of Martin Placein front of the Exit 6 stairs on the Castlereagh Street side. Hoarding to be installedwithin the shopping circle subway section restricting access to one side. Pedestrianaccess adjacent to Macquarie Building and the passageway adjacent to the enclosedhoarding next to the Tiffany Building demolition works will be retained. To beimplemented April 2018.

3. Maintain the Stage 1 closures and close the passageway adjacent to the enclosedhoarding (39 Martin Place) and retain the pedestrian path adjacent to Macquarie Bank.Implemented September 2018 through to end of TSE works.

4. Pedestrian subway connection maintained but moved to facilitate work area

Individual CTMP will be submitted for each of the stages detailed above.

2. Locality and existing conditions

Martin Place work sites consist of two distinct work sites:

Martin Place South – Tiffany’s building at 39 Martin Place Martin Place South – shopping circle area located between Elizabeth Street and

Castlereagh Street.

The two sites are shown in Figure 2 below in red.



Figure 2: Martin Place sites

The works required prior to and during the occupation of the Martin Place shopping circle area are included within the following CTMP:

SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002277 Tiffany's Building Demolition SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002306 Sydney CBD Utility Works

2.1. Martin Place

Martin Place is classed as a plaza which falls under the care and control of the City of Sydney council. It commences at Macquarie Street and ceases at George Street. Vehicle access to Martin Place is limited to vehicles authorised for access during approved hours.

The existing pedestrian thoroughfare areas are 8m on both sides of Martin Place stairs.

2.2. Martin Place Train Station

There are numerous train station exits and these are shown below in Figure 3 and are detailed below:

Exit 1 is located on the southern side of Martin Place between Phillip Street and MacquarieStreet and is an east facing stair exit connected to Exit 2;

Exit 2 is located on the southern side of Martin Place between Phillip Street and ElizabethStreet and is a west facing stair exit connected to Exit 1

Exit 3 is located on the northern side of Martin Place between Phillip Street and MacquarieStreet and is a west facing stair exit



Exit 4 is the lift (disabled access) on the northern side of Martin Place between Phillip Streetand Macquarie Street.

Exit 5 are the stairs located on Martin Place to the east of Elizabeth Street and alsocaptures the Colonial Centre exit to the north of the station and shopping area. For easeof separation this CTMP has adopted the naming convention of Exit 5 being the stairs toElizabeth Street and the escalators/ stairs/ lift to the Colonial Centre as the Colonial Centre

Exit 6 is the exit which connects Martin Place train station to the stairs between Elizabethand Castlereagh streets, the MLC Centre and the remaining exit to the west of CastlereaghStreet. The shopping circle stairs which connect to the surface area of Martin Place are theones to be closed. All other exits serviced by Exit 6 are to remain in operation.

Exit 7 is the stair exit adjacent to the Tiffany’s building which will be closed.

Figure 3 Martin Place Train Station Exit points

3. Planning documents

The Martin Place Station site has been the subject of a number of planning documents including:

The Environmental Impact Statement for the City and Southwest project Planning Approval and

This section of the CTMP highlights the original EIS requirements regarding pedestrian management and the components of the approved project.

3.1. EIS Proposal

The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project was released in May 2016. This document assessed the potential impact on traffic and transport during the construction stage of the Project. It described the existing traffic and transport environment and identified the potential nature and extent of impacts to traffic and transport services. Measure to address the potential impacts were described in Technical paper 1 – Traffic and transport.

The original proposal for passenger and commuter management as noted in the EIS was:

The existing underground pedestrian concourse between Castlereagh and Elizabethstreets and the associated connection to Martin Place would be closed during thesecut and cover works



The above would result in additional pedestrians using the pedestrian crossing facilitiesat Castlereagh and Elizabeth streets. There is sufficient pedestrian storage spacewithin Martin Place to accommodate these additional peak pedestrian movements.

The pedestrian access points which would be closed during this construction periodare shown in Figure 4 below.

Figure 4 EIS Martin Place Station construction pedestrian access arrangements

The subway alternative route for pedestrian use as defined in the EIS was shown as using the Tiffany building demolition site as noted in Figure 5 below.



Figure 5 EIS Martin Place Station construction site - alternative pedestrian and cyclist route

3.2. Approved project

The approved project for the Martin Place station area includes:

A northern entry via a pedestrian plaza opening to Castlereagh, Hunter and Elizabethstreets

A future northern entry via an underground pedestrian connection below Hunter Streetto O’Connell Street and/ or Bligh Street (subject to future development of the site)

A southern entry via a pedestrian plaza opening to Martin Place and Castlereagh Street New underground pedestrian link between the existing suburban Martin Place Station

platforms and the metro station platforms Closure of existing access and egress points, including the underground connections

to the west of Elizabeth Street from Martin Place to the underground concourseconnection to the existing Martin Place station.

3.3. Discussions during tender

It should be noted that since the release of the EIS a number of changes have occurred at the Martin Place site impacting on the original proposal for management of pedestrians including retention of the existing subway connection between Martin Place Rail Station and the MLC Centre located on the western side of Castlereagh Street.

Further changes were also agreed with TfNSW during the tender phase which included the staged demolition of Tiffany building basement to provide a connection between the new metro rail line and Martin Place, thus removing the opportunity to providing any pathway through the site as shown in Figure 5.



4. Site operations

Duration: 2 years Timing: March 2018 through to March 2020

4.1. Works Required

The existing Martin Place shopping circle area is required to be demolished to allow for the future connection between Martin Place train station and the Sydney Metro. This demolition will be undertaken behind hoarding which will be installed within the existing subway area but will not impact on pedestrian thoroughfares. The closure of stair exits located on Martin Place between Elizabeth and Castlereagh streets will also be required to allow the removal of stair infrastructure. The stairs will be blocked using fencing and will be securely locked. Exit 7 will be blocked where it branches from Exit 6 and the stairs leading up to the central area of Martin Place from Exit 6 will be blocked at the top with sufficient notification provided to commuters of the closure. The current bench located at the western end of the Martin Place Shopping Circle is to be removed prior to the closures.

4.2. Operating Conditions

Exit 7 stairs and exit 6 stairs centrally located between Elizabeth and Castlereagh streets will be closed to all pedestrian traffic, refer to Figure 3. This closure will see the installation of fencing to block the stairs leading to Martin Place. The existing street furniture located on this section of Martin Place will be removed to allow for greater pedestrian area. On the southern side of Martin Place, a fully enclosed hoarding will be installed as part of the Tiffany’s Building demolition, refer to Appendix 1.

It should be noted that the closure of exits 6 and 7 occur every weekend and is implemented by Sydney Trains from Friday night through to Monday morning. The closure described in this CTMP, however, will not close the subway exit (Exit 6) to MLC but only the stair exit onto Martin Place between Elizabeth and Castlereagh streets.

Figure 6 provides details on the fencing/ barricading arrangement. At the top of the exits (where the exit meets the surface) water filled barriers will be installed. At the base of the stairs temporary fencing will in place. At the exit directly from the Martin Place concourse into Exit 7, the existing roller doors will be closed and the exit will be supplemented with temporary fencing.



Figure 6 Typical fencing/ barricading details

4.2.1. Impact on Traffic Flow

There is no impact on existing vehicle traffic flow for these works.

4.2.2. Impact on Public Transport

The existing overflow bus stop on Elizabeth Street south of Martin Place will be impacted during the works on the Tiffany’s building demolition – these impacts are described in the CTMP for those works (SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002277). No other impacts are proposed to bus operations.

The closure of exit 6 stairs from Martin Place train station onto Martin Place will see those users displaced to other exits. For further discussions on this please refer to Section 4.2.3.1 below.

4.2.3. Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists

The current central area of Martin Place between Elizabeth and Castlereagh streets typically contains street furniture including flower beds, telephone kiosks, street vending barrows (JC Decaux) and storage units for City of Sydney works. These will be removed to allow for the Stage 1 works. Details on the predicted impacts of the closures of the two exits are discussed in Section 4.2.3.1 and Appendix 2.

4.2.3.1. Pedestrian modelling and analysis

Pedestrian counts were provided by TfNSW for 2015 and further counts were undertaken in 2017 and 2018. The latter counts were done using video cameras with the data subsequently extracted and provided to Arcadis for modelling inputs.



It should be noted that there are a number of key constraints which limit pedestrian flows through the subterranean area of Martin Place. These constraints include:

The escalators from the platforms to the concourse area are typically in the AM peak period in the configuration of 4 up and 2 down limiting the thoroughfare to 400 patrons per minute

The escalators to the east of Exit 6 (escalators at Martin Place Shopping Circle) limit the thoroughfare to 100 patrons per minute – refer to Photo 1 below

Photo 1 Shopping circle eastern escalators

The largest and most concentrated movement of pedestrians through Martin Place station occurs during the AM peak period. The PM peak period is not as concentrated and has a more balanced in/out flow compared to the AM. Therefore, the analysis has concentrated on the AM peak period.

The existing AM distribution of pedestrians was based on the AM peak passenger distribution from the 2015 surveys provided by TfNSW. This distribution can be seen in Figure 7 below.

Figure 7 TfNSW’s AM Distribution of pedestrians

Further analysis of the 2018 data shows that the TfNSW distribution used for the 2015 data is no longer accurate and the distribution changes are as detailed on Figure 8 below.



Figure 8: Amended distribution based on 2018 data

This change in distribution can be attributed to several factors including removal of tenants from the surrounding areas with the demolition works at Martin Place North (office blocks and retail premises located on the corner of Hunter, Elizabeth and Castlereagh streets), Wynyard Place, Hunter and George streets and the up and coming demolition works at the Tiffany Building and Martin Place Shopping Circle. These works are shown on Figure 9 below. It is further noted that the pedestrian amenity along George Street has also degraded as the footpath widths vary in width from 1.5m to 4m. The existing pedestrian crossing area across George Street at Martin Place has been reduced from a 25m width crossing to 10m and the continuation of Martin Place through Barrack Street has been substantially narrowed. Regiment Square to the north of Martin Place connecting George Street to Wynyard Street has also been restricted.



Figure 9: Works near the Sydney Metro site

However, it is likely that the largest factor which has influenced the change in distribution is the closure of George Street associated with the Sydney Light Rail works and the changes to the bus network associated with that closure. Previously George Street to the west of Martin Place was the location of busses associated with the Inner west, northern and southern services. Once these services were relocated to Elizabeth Street the pedestrian demand profile changed.

The construction sites associated with Sydney Light Rail along George Street would have also influenced pedestrian movements. This is seen with the subsequent large drop of pedestrians using the West of Castlereagh Street exit and a significant increase in pedestrians using the MLC exit.

A comparison of this change in distribution overall shows a reduction in numbers using all exits other than the MLC centre. This means that the modelling outputs based on the original TfNSW distribution, as shown in Appendix 2 are significantly worse than what will occur with the closures of exit 7 and the stairway closure from exit 6. This is clearly shown in Figure 10 below and can be further seen in Appendix 3 (Figure 12).



Figure 10: Changes in distribution between TfNSW and TSE Contractor

The internal analysis (refer to Appendix 2 and Figure 11 below) contains data from all counts and has taken the worst-case data as the base line for the modelling. The modelling results show that with the assumed TfNSW splits that the current infrastructure within the Martin Place station environs are able to cope with the displaced volumes. Given that these splits overestimate the % directed to each exit, the resulting model outcomes show that the current LoS is maintained or better.

It should be noted that there was a “double up” of counting at the MLC which was previously divided into MLC u/p and MLC Surf. This double up has now been removed.

Figure 11 Table from modelling analysis

Given the above and in reviewing the outputs from the data as presented in Appendix 2 it is noted that with the closure of Exit 7 that Exit 5 maintains the Level of Service prior to that closure. In the modelling data there is a drop in the Level of Service from A to C with the reduction in width of the Martin Place passageway (from 8.8m to 4.4m). It should be noted that the original intention was to partially close this passageway as part of the Stage 1 works but discussions on site with stakeholders, has resulted in the initial closures being limited to the stairs at the Shopping circle area and Exit 7, therefore the LoS at this area will remain at LoS A for the duration of this CTMP. For the exit west of Castlereagh Street (not the MLC centre) the LoS does not vary from before or during the construction (it maintains LoS A).

Of the 4% using Exit 7 (597 people), above 90% of these continue to the south of Martin Place. Given the small number of commercial properties between Martin Place and King Street, it is assumed that the majority of these people are accessing the areas south and west of King Street. This would mean that these people have an alternative to crossing Elizabeth Street at Martin Place by using the King Street crossing points. In the event that they do use the pedestrian crossing at Martin Place they will continue to the south and not use the plaza area and thus maintain the status quo.

92% of users at Exit 6 (715) are found to have crossed Castlereagh Street and continue their journeys west. Approximately 3% travel to the north of Martin Place with the remaining heading south. This means that all users of exit 6 will likely use Martin Place from the western most exit of Exit 6 (stair exit located between Castlereagh Street and Pitt Street).



4.2.4. Impacts on commercial and residential access

Access to the Macquarie Building (#48 Martin Place) will be retained during the works. Access to the MLC centre via a subway connection will also be retained. There are no impacts on evacuation plans for any of the buildings surrounding the site.

4.2.5. Cumulative impacts

Impacts from the Sydney Light Rail works on George Street are not expected. There are no other known work sites adjacent or within the immediate area which would impact on the current traffic, pedestrian and transport network.

4.2.6. Special Events

There are numerous special events held within the Sydney CBD. In reviewing the City of Sydney’s website, the majority of events are held within the Town Hall or other buildings. However, it is recognised that Class 1 and 2 events, as noted in the TMC’s publication (Special Events Guide 2006) do occur within the city centre. JHCPBG JV and their subcontractors will work with the various stakeholders in planning their works.

The Anzac Day service is held in Martin Place between George Street and Castlereagh Street. Vivid is also held in Martin Place and will be held from the 25th May through to the 16th June 2018. There are numerous other events in Martin Place/ Royal Botanical Gardens including The Domain which could impact on works and pedestrian management availability. Knowledge of these events will be via a number of channels and will be considered when planning the works.

4.2.7. Traffic Control Plan (TCP) / Road Occupancy License (ROL) Identified Works

There are no works requiring a Traffic Control Plan

4.2.8. City of Sydney Council required permit approvals

There are no works requiring City of Sydney permit approvals

4.2.9. Sydney Trains required approvals

Works that have been identified as requiring Sydney Trains approval include:

1. Closure of exits

2. Changes to wayfinding

5. Other Considerations

5.1. Road Safety Audits

Road safety audits will be undertaken during the development of the CTMP and upon implementation of the long-term work site. It should be noted that these exits are closed over weekends by Sydney Trains.

5.2. Weekly Traffic Forecast

A weekly traffic forecast is provided to local councils, RMS, Emergency Services, TfNSW, SCO and other stakeholders as requested. This forecast details the up and coming works and details of timings including hours of the day and dates of works that will impact traffic- road, public transport, pedestrians and cyclist.



5.3. Police and Emergency Services

The Police and relevant Emergency Services will be informed in a timely manner of relevant activities proposed within this CTMP. The initial communication to these stakeholders will be via the Traffic and Transport Liaison Group (TTLG). Regular updates will be provided to emergency services, including changes to road network configurations, changes to road conditions and worksite access locations, through emails and face to face discussions.

5.4. Communications and the community

The TSE will be responsible for the dissemination of information to the community including affected residents, relevant Councils, businesses and the public. Refer to Sydney Metro Community Consultation Strategy – Early Works.

Any enquiries, complaints and/ or compliments are to be directed to the TfNSW’s Sydney Metro Project Information line - 1800 171 386 or via email to: [email protected] or Sydney Metro City & Southwest, PO Box K659, Haymarket, NSW 1240 or Sydney Metro City & Southwest Website.

Table 1 provides the proposed communications to be implemented for this CTMP

Table 1 Proposed Communications

NOTIFICATION APPLICABLE

Community notice YES

Precinct update/ e-update YES

Email YES

Internet YES

On site briefings YES

Print advertising YES

Advanced warning signs YES

5.4.1. Travelling public

Where our works will impact on the travelling public we will undertake the following, where detailed in the relevant appendices:

Public transport interruptions will be communicated via on site signage Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes, including road closures, road changes

and lane closures well in advance using appropriate signage, including variable messagesigns (VMS)

Pedestrians and cyclists will be provided with advance warning signs.

5.4.2. Stakeholders consulted

Table 2 identifies the stakeholders consulted during the development of this CTMP:

Table 2: Stakeholder Consultation

STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE

TCG 21st Nov 2017 All members SCO/ TfNSW/ Councils/ RMS/ BDA

TTLG 23rd Nov 2017 All members SCO/ TfNSW/ Councils/ ES/ RMS/ BDA/ Other Contractors



STAKEHOLDER DATE CONSULTATION MAIN CONTACT PEOPLE

TCG 19th Dec 2017 All members SCO/ TfNSW/ Councils/ RMS/ BDA

RMS 12 Feb 2018 Submission of CTMP Carl Mella, Shane Schneider

City of Sydney Council 12 Feb 2018 Submission of CTMP Van Le, Tony Ly, Mark Hannan

SCO 12 Feb 2018 Submission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Aaron Gale/ Justine Bryant

TfNSW 12 Feb 2018 Submission of CTMP Berin Gordon

Centre for Road Safety 12 Feb 2018 Submission of CTMP Luke Wilby

RMS 12 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Carl Mella, Shane Schneider

City of Sydney Council 12 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Van Le, Tony Ly, Mark Hannan

SCO 12 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Justine Bryant

TfNSW 12 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon

RMS 23 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Carl Mella, Shane Schneider

City of Sydney Council 23 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Van Le, Tony Ly, Mark Hannan

SCO 23 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Giovanny Ramirez/ Justine Bryant

TfNSW 23 Mar 2018 Resubmission of CTMP Berin Gordon

5.5. Inspections and monitoring

The site will be monitored by the site supervisor. Any changes as noted in this CTMP, to signs/ lines that impact on the public will be monitored daily during site operating hours.

Traffic control used for pedestrian management, lane closures etc will need to provide records of the traffic control implemented. Any changes required to the traffic control set up will be authorised by a holder of an RMS “Prepare a Work Zone Traffic Management Plan” or equivalent.

5.6. Environmental Management

All works will be undertaken in accordance with the TSE Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002010) and associated sub plans including the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-002012). The TSE Works are also regulated by the NSW Environment Protection Authority and works to be undertaken outside of standard construction hours will need to comply with the requirements of the Environment Protection License.



5.7. Site Contacts

Table 3: Site contacts

NAME POSITION CONTACT #

Will Freelander Project Manager

Jeremy Glasgow Construction Manager

5.8. References

The following documents were used in the development of this CTMP:

Construction Traffic Management Framework – TfNSW, v Tender Principal’s General Specification G10 Traffic and Transport Management, v2.0 Roads and Maritime Service Traffic Control at Worksites Manual v 4.0 Relevant AustRoads Guides and RMS Supplements Sydney Metro Principal Contractor Health and Safety Standard Environmental Impact Statement for Sydney Metro Chatswood to Sydenham Chapter

8 Construction traffic and transport June 2016 SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002277 Tiffany's Building Demolition



Appendix 1 Proposed Operations

DRAWING NUMBER DESCRIPTION

JCG-SMP-TM-DRG-002279-0025 Martin Place pedestrian areas

REPORT Wayfinding

GAT

GAT

TSC

?

PM PM

TSC

PM PM

0 2 8 10m64

SCALE 1:200 (A1)SCALE 1:400 (A3)

SERVICEPROVIDERS

DRAWING COLOUR CODED - PRINT ALL COPIES IN COLOUR

CAMD DESCRIPTION DESIGNERSIGN./DATE

VERIFIEDSIGN./DATE

APPROVEDSIGN./DATE

SCALES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

DF 801*554

Plot

Dat

e &

Tim

eFi

le P

lotte

d

CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE:DRG No.STATUS:FILE No.

DRAWN

DESIGNED

DRG CHECK

DESIGN CHECK

APPROVED

OFSHEET:

EDMS No.

This drawing and the related information have been prepared by, or at the request of, Transport for NSW for a specificpurpose and may not be used for any purpose other than the purpose intended by Transport for NSW.Transport for NSW does not provide any warranties and accepts no liability arising out of the use of this drawing or anyof the related information for any purpose other than the intended purpose. This drawing is protected by copyrightand no part of this drawing may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Transport for NSW.

CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM: HEIGHT DATUM: SCALE: Plot

ted

by3/

19/2

018

11:2

3 AM

PTUL

LY1

CLIENT

SUBWAY HOARDING

SUBWAY WORK AREA

SUBWAY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY

SL/19.03.18GENERAL REVISION 19.03.18 SL/19.03.18A4

SL/12.03.18B CLASS HOARDING REMOVED FROM MARTIN PLACE 12.03.18 SL/12.03.18A3

SL/09.02.18GENERAL REVISION 09.02.18 SL/09.02.18A2

14.12.17ISSUED FOR INTERNAL REVIEW 14.12.17 SL/14.12.17A1

19.03.18SUE LEWIS

19.03.18SUE LEWIS

19.03.18SUE LEWIS

19.03.18SUE LEWIS

19.03.18PHIL TULLY

-

-11MARTIN PLACESTAGE 1TRAFFIC MANAGEMENTMARTIN PLACE STATION AND PRECINCTSYDNEY METRO CITY & SOUTHWEST

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELIZABETH STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

CASTLEREAGH STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

REFER TO SMCTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002277 TIFFANYS BUILDING DEMOLITION

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXIT CLOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXIT CLOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

MARTIN PLACE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENCLOSED HOARDING

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORAGE CONTAINERS

AutoCAD SHX Text

TELEPHONE KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

CASTLEREAGH STREET

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXIT CLOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXIT CLOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

MARTIN PLACE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENCLOSED HOARDING

AutoCAD SHX Text

STORAGE CONTAINERS

AutoCAD SHX Text

TELEPHONE KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

KIOSK

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOCHTIEF

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENGINEERING

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY

AutoCAD SHX Text

B-CLASS HOARDING

AutoCAD SHX Text

STAGE 1

AutoCAD SHX Text

REFER TOP INSET 'A' FOR SUBWAY DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSET A SCALE 1:500

AutoCAD SHX Text

A4

AutoCAD SHX Text

JCG-SMP-TM-DRG-002279-0025

Communication Plan & Wayfinding Strategy

1

Communication and Wayfinding Strategy Martin Place Station


2

Background Martin Place is described as a tranquil hub in the city for sitting and meeting people.

Over 10,000 people work in the offices adjacent to Martin Place. In addition, it is an

important commercial and retail hub. It’s estimated that 40,000+ people cross the

roads at Elizabeth and Castlereagh Streets each day.

Martin Place is also a central point for city events and ceremonies: the focal points

for these events being the Cenotaph (between George and Pitt Street), the

stage/fountain area (between Pitt Street and Castlereagh Street) and the new Lindt

siege memorial.Martin Place is also important in the staging of major events such as

the Vivid Sydney festival.

Martin Place is also a key transportation destination/stop for bus commuters (major

bus lines from all areas of Sydney) and train passengers (using the existing Martin

Place Station). There are important underground connections from the station to the

entertainment, commercial and retail precincts, particularly to the MLC Centre and

to 52 Martin Place.

John Holland CPB Ghella (JHCPBG) has been contracted to deliver the Tunnels

and Station Excavation (TSE) Works for Sydney Metro. This includes works to

demolish existing buildings, excavation and construction of the new underground

station at Martin Place. Station and tunnel fit out, metro operation and over-station

developments will be completed by other follow-on contractors.

This communication plan outlines the communication and engagement activities to

be undertaken to inform stakeholders and commuters of important changes to the

precinct and assist them to move around the space while demolition, excavation and

construction for the new Sydney Metro Martin Place Station is taking place (see

Table One). Once demolition is completed, there will be no further significant

changes to pedestrian paths. This plan will be reviewed after each stage of works

and revised if necessary. Follow on contractors will undertake the over station

development and fit out of the new Metro Station on completion of the TSE Works

and will develop and implement any required additional changes.

Location Martin Place extends from George Street to Macquarie Street and is crossed by Pitt

Street, Castlereagh Street, Elizabeth Street and Phillip Street. Each section has its

unique visual characteristics and amenities.

Martin Place is also an east-west pathway between George Street, Sydney Hospital,

Macquarie Street and the Domain.

The section that is the subject of this communication plan lies between Castlereagh

Street and Elizabeth Street, an area that contains the site for the future southern

entrance of the Sydney Metro Martin Place Station. This site is currently occupied

by 39 Martin Place and an underground shopping circle accessed from the existing

Martin Place Station from the surface between Castlereagh and Elizabeth Streets,

via Exit 5 and through 52 Martin Place retail area, via stairs from Martin Place

directly into the shopping circle, from the MLC centre and from an entry/exit at 39

Martin Place (Exit 7). In this document, the stairs from Martin Place to the shopping

circle will be referred to as the “Shopping Circle Stairs” which connect through to

Exit 6


3

Work activities Utility works, demolition, station excavation and construction

Works in Martin Place are part of a larger program for the Martin Place Station

excavation which includes two other CBD sites, Martin Place North

(Castlereagh/Hunter/Elizabeth Streets) and Bligh Street. (see map in Figure 1).

This communications plan focusses on the work at Martin Place South and

particularly on its impact on the Martin Place pedestrian thoroughfare.

There are several stages of works that will progressively require changes in

pedestrian movements through this section of Martin Place, both above and below

ground.

The building at 39 Martin Place and the underground shopping circle will be

demolished to create a construction site to allow for the excavation of the new

Martin Place Station south entrance. This site is marked as Martin Place South in

Figure 1 below.

Figure 1- Layout of the three Martin Place Station construction sites


4

Site establishment for the demolition of 39 Martin Place will start from Februay

2018. Before this however, extensive utilities investigation works will be undertaken,

and works will be required to relocate substations and install high voltage power.

This will be the start of changes to pedestrian movements which need to take place

to ensure the safety of the public while demolition and excavation works take place.

Structural demolition of 39 Martin Place will commence in Q2 2018. Prior to this, site

preparation (closure of the shopping circle, redirection of pedestrian pathways,

installation of hoardings, building strip out and utilities work) will be undertaken.

The main stages of works and timing are summarised in Table 1. (See drawings in

the Commuter and Passenger Management Plan which contains drawings showing

the areas that will be progressively closed to pedestrians):

Table 1- Timing and stages of works for Martin Place South

November/December

2017 and January/

February 2018

Clearing of street furniture (eg kiosks,

garden beds, smart poles and signage)

in Martin Place between Castlereagh

and Elizabeth streets

December 2017 and

January/February 2018

Utilities work in front of the Macquarie

Bank in Martin Place and along the

footpaths of Castlereagh and Elizabeth

Streets and some surrounding locations

February/March 2018

Closure of the underground access to

shopping circle stairs between

Castlereagh and Elizabeth Streets, and

Exit 7 from the existing Martin Place

Station underground pedestrian

thoroughfare. Diversions to be

implemented around the shopping circle

to maintain thoroughfare to MLC Centre

retail, Exit 5 (Elizabeth St & 52 Martin

Place retail and stairs) to Martin Place

between Pitt and Castlereagh streets.

Also closure of the surface access to

Exit 7 (Elizabeth Street) and the

shopping circle stairs (Martin Place).

From February 2018

Erecting hoarding around three sides of

39 Martin Place and above ground

around the shopping circle stair

entrance. Diverting above ground

pedestrian traffic to either side of Martin

Place (in front of Commonwealth Bank

and under B-class hoarding in front of

39 Martin Place.

Q2 – Q4 2018 Structural demolition of 39 Martin Place

and shopping circle

2019

Excavation of a shaft on the site of the

future Martin Place South station

entrance.


5

Communication

and engagement

approach

JHCPBG has developed a well-coordinated, targeted and timely communication

approach. The approach covers stakeholder identification, key messages,

consultation, engagement and communication tools and channels, including a draft

wayfinding strategy. Successful communication will depend on strong collaboration

with TfNSW, City of Sydney, Sydney Trains and the Sydney Coordination Office all

of whom communicate directly with key target groups.

Communication

aims

The communication aims are to:

• Inform businesses of JHCPBG works in advance of it occurring

• Keep commuters and pedestrians moving with minimal interruption

• Provide stakeholders with communication channels where they can findadditional information and timely updates

• Connect Sydney-siders and visitors with the project’s aims for improving publictransport

• Maintain tourist engagement with an iconic Sydney venue/landmark


6

Partners,

stakeholders and

interested

parties

The following communities, businesses and stakeholders have an interest in Martin

Place activities:

• TfNSW

• City of Sydney

• Sydney Coordination Office

• Roads and Transport Authority

• Roads and Martine Services

• Sydney Trains

• Sydney Buses

• Destination NSW

• Event organisers (including Vivid, Anzac Day etc)

• Retailers

• Customers of transport operators including regular commuters

• Customers of Martin Place businesses

• Tourists

• Special event attendees

• Restaurants and outdoor eating areas

• High rise tenants

• CTA Clubhouse (accommodation)

• Travelodge (with rooms overlooking Elizabeth Street)

• Channel 7

• Commonwealth Bank and Macquarie Bank

• MLC Centre, retailers, food court and open-air dining

• 52 Martin Place including retailers

• Other retailers within 500m (including Westfield)

• Building managers of buildings on Martin Place (see Appendix A for location of

key buildings)

• Residents and serviced apartments in Hosking Place and Macquarie Street

• Emergency services

• Taxis and Uber

• Freight and delivery drivers

• Cyclist and cycling organisations

• Vision Australia/Guide Dogs Australia

Target

Audiences

• Workers in buildings along and near Martin Place

• Customers of Sydney Trains who use Martin Place Station

• Customers of Sydney Buses who use bus stops near Martin Place on Elizabeth

and Castlereagh Street

• Tourists

• Other pedestrians in Martin Place

• Cyclists


7

Key messages • Sydney Metro is Australia’s biggest public transport project. It will transform

Sydney, delivering more trains and faster services for customers across the

network.

• John Holland CPB Ghella (JHCPBG) joint venture has been contracted to

design and construct the Tunnel and Station Excavation Works for the Sydney

Metro City & Southwest

• A new Metro Station is being built in Martin Place, to provide an interchange

with the existing rail network at the existing Martin Place Station.

• Martin Place will become a key transport hub in Sydney’s improved public

transport system

• Staged changes for pedestrians during construction are designed to minimise

disruption in this important precinct

• Government agencies, transport operators, the City of Sydney, tourism and

event organisers are working closely with JHCPBG to minimise disruption and

keep the public informed.

• Underground pedestrian access from Martin Place Station through to the MLC

Centre will be maintained (except for brief shutdown periods during the lifting of

concrete slabs requires a safety exclusion zone to be implemented)

• Underground access from MLC and Exit 5 and Exit 6 will be maintained (in

addition to Mon-Fri 6.30am-6.00pm access and egress underground through

the 52 Martin Place shops)


8

Communication

and engagement

activities

The following communication and engagement activities are being undertaken to

inform stakeholders about the temporary and intermittent changes associated with

the demolition, tunnelling and excavation works for the Sydney Metro Martin Place

Station site that will occur in the CBD and Martin Place.

1. Preparation phase (September 2017- February 2018)

• Business briefings, consultation and relationship building

• Building briefings

52 Martin Place - popup foyer info session + major tenants

Macquarie Bank – fortnightly meetings

Commonwealth Bank – monthly meetings

MLC Building – tenant briefing with building management

5 Martin Place – building management briefing

Channel 7 – ongoing consultation

CTA – one-on-one briefing

60 Castlereagh Street – building management and tenant briefing

Reserve Bank – individualised email updates

Retailers- email updates

• Pop-up information sessions

Information sessions designed for specific audiences: building tenants

(around Martin Place) and key Martin Place businesses (eg Channel 7,

CTA, 52 Martin Place (Colonial Building), 48 Martin Place

(Commonwealth Bank/MBL building), MLC, 5 Martin Place

• Newsletters – quarterly (Issue 1 – Nov 2017) issued 500m radius

• Updates – monthly

2. Utility investigations and intensive utility works (October 2017

to February 2018)

• Notifications – as required for out-of-hours works

• Meetings with directly affected building managers

• Look-ahead emails – weekly, to key high-rise buildings and Ch7

3. Warning phase – Closure minus 3-weeks (timed to align to

closure of exits and erection of hoardings)

• Wayfinding strategy and signage – See Appendix C

o Commuter information posters (Sydney Trains) explaining why

the changes are coming (to be developed)

o Signage at exits to be closed (underground and above ground in

Martin Place)

• Traffic stakeholder emails (Sydney Coordination Office)

• Email update- all existing stakeholders

• Briefing to Sydney Trains station staff (via Sydney Trains) and

Sydney Buses (via SCO)

• Newsletter with map February 2018 - 500m distribution


9

4. Closure of Exit 7 and Shopping Circle Stairs (March 2018)

• Wayfinding and closure signs

• Marshalls to assist commuters for first 2-3 DAYS

• Emails to mailing list

• SCO traffic update email

• Update maps and temporary signs that refer to exit numbers and

buses as required

5. During construction

• Newsletters (including maps) – issued 500m radius

• Updates – monthly

• Emails – monthly

• Notifications – as required

• Consultation and briefings - as required

• Update maps and temporary signs that refer to exit numbers and

buses as required


10

Table 2 Implementation Plan

Stage Communication Action Due Date Responsibility

Preparation phase Consult key business and building stakeholders Completed JHCPBG

Martin Place Newsletter (distributed to 500m radius) Completed JHCPBG

Notification for utility works Completed JHCPBG

Pop up information Sessions Completed JHCPBG

Monthly notification and update Dec/Jan Completed JHCPBG

Monthly notification and update Feb Completed JHCPBG

Agree wayfinding and signage strategy- colour, branding, location for Warning

stage and updates

Completed All

Agree remaining elements of wayfinding strategy for implementation Completed All

Briefing key stakeholders:

• City of Sydney Completed JHCPBG

• Consult key Sydney Trains personnel Completed Sydney Trains

• Government stakeholders Completed TfNSW

• Sydney Train executive Completed TfNSW/JHCPBG

• Emergency Services Completed Sydney Trains

• Others Ongoing

Warning Phase Signage at exits warning they will be closed (underground and above ground at

Shopping Circle Stairs and Exit 7) (Sign Type “A” in Appendix C)

• Artwork design approved Completed Sydney Metro

• Signage produced and installed covered Hoarding

installation date

minus 3-weeks

JHCPBG


11


• Signage revealed Hoarding

installation date

minus 3-weeks

JHCPBG

Sydney Trains station staff briefed / Sydney buses briefed Completed Sydney Trains / SCO

/JHCPBG

Stakeholder update email (key message- you will notice signage for changes that

will occur next year)

28 February JHCPBG

SCO traffic stakeholder email TBC SOC

Agree concept content of March newsletter with maps and commuter information

posters

22 February 2018 ALL

Send newsletter with map to print 28 February 2018 JHCPBG

Distribute newsletter mid-February- 500m distribution + email distribution to

stakeholder lists+ post on website (TfNSW and others -SoC, SCO, ST)

1 March 2018 JHCPBG/ All re

websites

Handout flyer to Martin Place pedestrians/commuters (pink tee shirts)

See artwork in appendix

29-1 March 2018 JHCPBG

Media release drafted 1 March 2018 JHCPBG/Sydney

Metro

Media release issued TBC Sydney Metro

TCG and TTLG updates February meetings

Ongoing

JHCPBG

Sydney Train App and Twitter updates TBC Sydney Trains

SCO email blast one liner TBC SCO

Fire hydrant TBC Sydney Trains


12


Closure Replace permanent signs as required.

Signage at exits stating they are closed (underground and above ground at

Shopping Circle Stairs and Exit 7) (Sign Type “B” in Appendix C)

Advanced warning signage with map (Sign Type “C”)

Directional signage (Sign Type “D”)

Replace permanent signage as required

Implementation

minus 3-weeks

JHCPBG

Sydney Trains

SCO

• Artwork design approved Completed TfNSW

• Signage produced and installed covered Implementation

date minus 2 days

JHCPBG

• Signage revealed 19 March JHCPBG

Station staff update TBC Sydney Trains

Stakeholder email updates/ traffic stakeholder email Implementation

date minus 2 days

JHCPBG/ Sydney

Trains/ SCO

Marshalls in Martin Place 19 March JHCPBG

Communication Plan

Appendix A: Martin Place Businesses

Communication Plan

Appendix B- Martin Place Wayfinding Strategy

Strategy Objectives:

• To prepare pedestrians and commuters for changes and assist them to readily find alternativepathways

• To minimise disruption and confusion

• Ensure commuters are aware that the underground thoroughfare is being maintained

Signage strategy Implement specific signage to provide:

• Notification of changes- upcoming closures (Sign type A)

• Advice at the closure point that the exit is closed and providing alternative wayfinding strategyentry/exit points (Example Sign B)

• Advance warning (near alternative exits) advising of closure points ahead so that pedestrianscan use alternative exit (Example Sign C)

• Directional signage to destination points/landmarks (eg specific streets or transport stops)(Example Sign D)

• Repurpose signage for Exit 6 to MLC centre

• Update above ground ‘local map’ hub signs x3

• Where exiting signage is removed, return to TfNSW wayfinding warehouse

Table 3: Sign Type and Location

Phase Date Sign Type Location

Notification 18 December 2017

A 1. Above ground at Shopping CircleStairs in Martin Place either side ofstairs

2. Bottom of shopping circle stairseither side

3. Above ground 39 Martin Place Exit 7(Tiffany building)

4. Exit 7 Stairs to Elizabeth St West

Closure 29 January 2018

B 1. Above ground at Shopping Circle,either side of stairs (Exit 6)

2. Bottom of shopping circle either sideof stairs (Exit 6)

3. Above ground 39 Martin Place Exit 7(Tiffany building)

4. At closure point at junction of mainpassageway with passageway toExit 7

Advanced Warning

29 January 2018

C 1. Near alternative exits

Directional Signage

From 29 January 2018

D At key points to direct pedestrians to destinations - these will move with underground hoarding changes

Communication Plan

Suggested signage types and locations


Pedestrian handout flyer for distribution in Martin Place

Front

Back

For additional directional signage seeTfNSW Customer Service Division Wayfinding TS-M01 attached


TfNSW Customer Service Division

Wayfinding TS-M01

Bus and underground wayfinding signage changes

Temporary signs - underground

Temporary signs Plan Exit 6 and 7

Bus signage

TfNSW Customer Services DivisionWayfinding Program

Temporary SignsExit 6 and 7 closure– Drawings

MPL

Martin PlaceOrder Number TS-M01 Version 1.0

18.12.2017

Prepared by Emily Hatton

Page B

Temporary SignsExit 6 and 7 closure– Drawings Register

MPLLast updated 18.12.2017

Drawing number

Drawing type

Drawing name Project 1. For Issue Date of most recent issue

DWG-100 Plan Key Plan Exit 6 and 7 closure 1.0 18.12.2017

DWG-101 Plan Concourse A Exit 6 and 7 closure 1.0 18.12.2017

DWG0-102 Plan Concourse B Exit 6 and 7 closure 1.0 18.12.2017

MPLTfNSW Customer Services DivisionWayfinding Program

Order Number TS-M01Temporary SignsExit 6 and 7 closureMartin Place

DWG-100Plan Key PlanVersion 1.0 18.12.2017

Single sided sign/ direction sign is facing

Sign types

Mode ID

Wall panels

Seat signs

Supergraphics

Cases

Signboards

Frame signs

Shelter signs

Pole signs

Blade signs

Double sided sign/ direction sign is facing

Sign type/number

Ground marking MPLTfNSW Customer Experience DivisionWayfinding Program

Wayfinding rollout package A2Job number 0065bSite documentation DWG-101


Signs

KEY

Sign types

Mode ID

Wall panels

Seat signs

Supergraphics

Cases

Signboards

Frame signs

Shelter signs

Pole signs

Blade signs

Double sided sign/ direction sign is facing

Sign type/number0000

Ground marking

DWG-106

DWG-202

DWG-107, DWG-302

DWG-108DWG-203DWG-303

DWG-101DWG-101 DWG-102



DWG-101Plan Unpaid Concourse WestVersion 1.0 18.12.2017

MPLMPLWayfinding Program

TPD Phase 2Job number 0065b

Martin Place Plan Site Overview_Concourse Version 4.0 11.09.14

To Martin Place Shopping Circle

To Martin Place near Castlereigh Street

Stairs to Martin Place Station

To Martin Place Station

To Elizabeth Streetnear Martin Place

To Elizabeth Streettowards King Street


New Signs

Sign type/numberNW-###

KEY

Temporary signs

Ground markings

Sign types

Ground marking /direction sign is facing

TS-101TS-102

TS-103



DWG-102Plan Unpaid Concourse EastVersion 1.0 18.12.2017

MPL MPLTfNSW Customer Experience DivisionWayfinding ProgramTPD Phase 2

Wayfinding rollout package A2Job number 0065bSite documentation

Martin PlaceDWG-102Plan Site Overview_PlatformsVersion 4.0 11.09.14

Site documentationMartin Place

ATM

To Martin Place

Shopping Circle

To Food Court

To Martin Placenear Phillip Street

To Paid Concourse


New Signs

Sign type/numberNW-###

KEY

Temporary signs

Ground markings

Sign types

Ground marking /direction sign is facing

EOP-201

EOP-302

EOP-303

EOP-301

For more information

Find your way

MPX-NH-HB-006_map

Hunter St

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Eliz

abet

h St

E

lizab

eth

St

Chi

fley S

quar

e

C

astle

reag

h St

C

astle

reag

h St

Phill

ip S

t

Phi

llip

St

King St

Federal Courtof Australia

St James’Church

Reserve Bankof Australia

MartinPlace

A

C

B

E

G

H

F

5

2 1

4

F

F Peak hoursonly

Peak hoursonly

Martin PlaceBus stands A-H

North

Train station

Macquarie St1Phillip St South2Phillip St North3Lift to station4Elizabeth St East5

Martin Place interchange

Lift

Station entry/exit

Bus interchange

Bus standsA


Find your way

Macquarie StStand A200 Chatswood

Stand B200 Bondi Junction

Elizabeth StStand C301 City Circular Quay

302 City Circular Quay


308 City Gresham St


339 City Gresham St

343 Chatswood














L94 City Circular Quay

M52 City Circular Quay

N100 Bondi Junction

X03 City Circular Quay

Elizabeth StStand E500 Ryde

507 Macquarie University

515 Eastwood


520 Parramatta

M52 Parramatta

Elizabeth StStand F301 Eastgardens

302 Eastgardens

303 Sans Souci

308 Marrickville Metro

333 Bondi Beach & North Bondi

339 Clovelly

343 Kingsford

373 Coogee

374 Coogee

377 Maroubra Beach

380 Bondi Beach & Watsons Bay

392 Little Bay

394 La Perouse

396 Maroubra Beach

397 South Maroubra

399 Little Bay

L94 La Perouse

N100 Railway Square

X03 Sans Souci

X39 Clovelly

X73 Coogee

X74 Coogee

X77 Maroubra Beach

X92 Little Bay

X94 La Perouse

X96 Maroubra Beach

Castlereagh StStand G412 Campsie

413 Campsie

431 Glebe Point

438 Abbotsford

439 Mortlake

470 Lilyfield

L38 Abbotsford

L39 Mortlake

Stand H422 Kogarah

423 Kingsgrove Depot

426 Dulwich Hill

428 Canterbury

L23 Kingsgrove Depot

L28 Canterbury


Find your way

MPX-NH-HB-007_map

Hunter St

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Eliz

abet

h St

E

lizab

eth

St

Chi

fley S

quar

e

C

astle

reag

h St

C

astle

reag

h St

Phill

ip S

t

Phi

llip

St

King St


St James’Church


MartinPlace

A

C

B

E

G

H

F

5

2 1

4

F

F Peak hoursonly

Peak hoursonly


North

Train station



Lift

Station entry/exit

Bus interchange

Bus standsA


Find your way






308 City Gresham St


339 City Gresham St

343 Chatswood
















N100 Bondi Junction




515 Eastwood


520 Parramatta

M52 Parramatta


302 Eastgardens

303 Sans Souci



339 Clovelly

343 Kingsford

373 Coogee

374 Coogee

377 Maroubra Beach


392 Little Bay

394 La Perouse

396 Maroubra Beach

397 South Maroubra

399 Little Bay

L94 La Perouse

N100 Railway Square

X03 Sans Souci

X39 Clovelly

X73 Coogee

X74 Coogee

X77 Maroubra Beach

X92 Little Bay

X94 La Perouse

X96 Maroubra Beach


413 Campsie

431 Glebe Point

438 Abbotsford

439 Mortlake

470 Lilyfield

L38 Abbotsford

L39 Mortlake

Stand H422 Kogarah


426 Dulwich Hill

428 Canterbury


L28 Canterbury


Find your way

MPX-NH-HB-008_map

Hunter St

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Eliz

abet

h St

E

lizab

eth

St

Chi

fley S

quar

e

C

astle

reag

h St

C

astle

reag

h St

Phill

ip S

t

Phi

llip

St

King St


St James’Church


MartinPlace

A

C

B

E

G

H

F

5

2 1

4

F

F Peak hoursonly

Peak hoursonly


North

Train station



Lift

Station entry/exit

Bus interchange

Bus standsA


Find your way






308 City Gresham St


339 City Gresham St

343 Chatswood
















N100 Bondi Junction




515 Eastwood


520 Parramatta

M52 Parramatta


302 Eastgardens

303 Sans Souci



339 Clovelly

343 Kingsford

373 Coogee

374 Coogee

377 Maroubra Beach


392 Little Bay

394 La Perouse

396 Maroubra Beach

397 South Maroubra

399 Little Bay

L94 La Perouse

N100 Railway Square

X03 Sans Souci

X39 Clovelly

X73 Coogee

X74 Coogee

X77 Maroubra Beach

X92 Little Bay

X94 La Perouse

X96 Maroubra Beach


413 Campsie

431 Glebe Point

438 Abbotsford

439 Mortlake

470 Lilyfield

L38 Abbotsford

L39 Mortlake

Stand H422 Kogarah


426 Dulwich Hill

428 Canterbury


L28 Canterbury


Find your way

MPX-NH-HB-006_map

Hunter St

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Eliz

abet

h St

E

lizab

eth

St

Chi

fley S

quar

e

C

astle

reag

h St

C

astle

reag

h St

Phill

ip S

t

Phi

llip

St

King St


St James’Church


MartinPlace

A

C

B

E

G

H

F

5

2 1

4

F

F Peak hoursonly

Peak hoursonly


North

Train station



Lift

Station entry/exit

Bus interchange

Bus standsA


Find your way






308 City Gresham St


339 City Gresham St

343 Chatswood
















N100 Bondi Junction




515 Eastwood


520 Parramatta

M52 Parramatta


302 Eastgardens

303 Sans Souci



339 Clovelly

343 Kingsford

373 Coogee

374 Coogee

377 Maroubra Beach


392 Little Bay

394 La Perouse

396 Maroubra Beach

397 South Maroubra

399 Little Bay

L94 La Perouse

N100 Railway Square

X03 Sans Souci

X39 Clovelly

X73 Coogee

X74 Coogee

X77 Maroubra Beach

X92 Little Bay

X94 La Perouse

X96 Maroubra Beach


413 Campsie

431 Glebe Point

438 Abbotsford

439 Mortlake

470 Lilyfield

L38 Abbotsford

L39 Mortlake

Stand H422 Kogarah


426 Dulwich Hill

428 Canterbury


L28 Canterbury


Find your way

MPX-NH-HB-007_map

Hunter St

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Eliz

abet

h St

E

lizab

eth

St

Chi

fley S

quar

e

C

astle

reag

h St

C

astle

reag

h St

Phill

ip S

t

Phi

llip

St

King St


St James’Church


MartinPlace

A

C

B

E

G

H

F

5

2 1

4

F

F Peak hoursonly

Peak hoursonly


North

Train station



Lift

Station entry/exit

Bus interchange

Bus standsA


Find your way






308 City Gresham St


339 City Gresham St

343 Chatswood
















N100 Bondi Junction




515 Eastwood


520 Parramatta

M52 Parramatta


302 Eastgardens

303 Sans Souci



339 Clovelly

343 Kingsford

373 Coogee

374 Coogee

377 Maroubra Beach


392 Little Bay

394 La Perouse

396 Maroubra Beach

397 South Maroubra

399 Little Bay

L94 La Perouse

N100 Railway Square

X03 Sans Souci

X39 Clovelly

X73 Coogee

X74 Coogee

X77 Maroubra Beach

X92 Little Bay

X94 La Perouse

X96 Maroubra Beach


413 Campsie

431 Glebe Point

438 Abbotsford

439 Mortlake

470 Lilyfield

L38 Abbotsford

L39 Mortlake

Stand H422 Kogarah


426 Dulwich Hill

428 Canterbury


L28 Canterbury


Find your way

MPX-NH-HB-008_map

Hunter St

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Mac

quar

ie S

t

Eliz

abet

h St

E

lizab

eth

St

Chi

fley S

quar

e

C

astle

reag

h St

C

astle

reag

h St

Phill

ip S

t

Phi

llip

St

King St


St James’Church


MartinPlace

A

C

B

E

G

H

F

5

2 1

4

F

F Peak hoursonly

Peak hoursonly


North

Train station



Lift

Station entry/exit

Bus interchange

Bus standsA


Find your way






308 City Gresham St


339 City Gresham St

343 Chatswood
















N100 Bondi Junction




515 Eastwood


520 Parramatta

M52 Parramatta


302 Eastgardens

303 Sans Souci



339 Clovelly

343 Kingsford

373 Coogee

374 Coogee

377 Maroubra Beach


392 Little Bay

394 La Perouse

396 Maroubra Beach

397 South Maroubra

399 Little Bay

L94 La Perouse

N100 Railway Square

X03 Sans Souci

X39 Clovelly

X73 Coogee

X74 Coogee

X77 Maroubra Beach

X92 Little Bay

X94 La Perouse

X96 Maroubra Beach


413 Campsie

431 Glebe Point

438 Abbotsford

439 Mortlake

470 Lilyfield

L38 Abbotsford

L39 Mortlake

Stand H422 Kogarah


426 Dulwich Hill

428 Canterbury


L28 Canterbury

Text0:Design Documentation

MPL - Temporary Signs

TS-M01

Temp signs order

Order scope summary

Scope details

MPLMartin Place

Supplier:

Order name: MPL - Temporary Signs

Order description: 1. Temporary signage required as Exit 6 and Exit 7 are closing due to construction for metro.

Issued to: Metro and Sydney Co-ordination Office

Project: Martin Place Exit 6 and 7 closure

Notes:

Order information

QuantityProduct Product name

2EYBC Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - 900 w

1EYBD Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - 1200 w

2EYBJ Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - 3000 w

2EYBZ Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - Custom width

Total products in this report 7

Sign reference Plan Sign location Sign notes Sign ID Substrate

TS-101 XS-004051DWG-101 Unpaid Concourse East

Fix corflute to sign WS-001878. Align edge of corflute to left edge of sign to cover existing message.

Product Product name W (mm) Message QtyArtwork file Artwork imageSite / Order H (mm)

Existing Sign

EYBZ 1000 ~ Blank ~ EYBZ_MPL_Blank 1Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - Custom width

MPL / TS-M01 300


18/12/2017 TS-M01 TfNSW Page 1 of 3

Design DocumentationMPL | Martin Place

TS-M01Temp signs order


Fix corflute to sign WS-001878. Align corflute to centre between TS-101 and TS-103 to cover existing message.


Existing Sign

EYBJ [Exit 6] MLC Centre [Exit 6]

EYBJ_Exit6_MLC_Centre_Exit6_AC

1Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - 3000 w

MPL / TS-M01



Fix corflute to sign WS-001878 . Align right edge of corflute to right edge of sign to cover existing message.


Existing Sign

EYBZ 1000 ~ Blank ~ EYBZ_MPL_Blank 1Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - Custom width

MPL / TS-M01 300


TS-201 XS-004054DWG-102 Unpaid Concourse West

Fix corflute to sign WS-001884. Align RHS of corflute to RH edge of sign to cover existing message.


Existing Sign

EYBD [B] Stands C-H ~ AR~

EYBD_B_Stands_C-H_AR


MPL / TS-M01



Fix corflute to sign WS-001953. Align corflute to to RH edge of existing sign. Corflute to cover existing message.


Existing Sign

EYBC ~ Blank ~ EYBC_blank 1Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - 900 w

MPL / TS-M01



Fix corflute to sign WS-001953. Align corflute to to centre of sign in between T-S301 and and TS-303


Existing Sign


Design DocumentationMPL | Martin Place

TS-M01Temp signs order

EYBJ U [Exit 6] MLC Centre [Exit 6] U ~ AC ~

EYBJ_U_Exit6_MLC_Centre_Exit6_U_AC


MPL / TS-M01



Fix corflute to sign WS-001953. Align corflute to to LH edge of existing sign. Corflute to cover existing message.


Existing Sign

EYBC ~ Blank ~ EYBC_blank 1Temporary sign - Frame - Panel grey - 300 h frame - 900 w

MPL / TS-M01

7Total products



Exiting the rail station via Exit 5,6 or 7 or 52 Martin Place during business hours

Martin Place between Castlereagh and Elizabeth, the entry to the shopping circle due to close (note street furniture which is being removed)

Exit 6, Exit 5 and entry to 52 Martin Place (Mon-Fri 6.30am-6.00pm)

Walkway to Exit 6 and 7 plus Exit 5 to Elizabeth Street east

Martin Place Station entry from Exits 1 & 2

Martin Place Eastern Suburbs Line Station entry between Pitt and Elizabeth Streets


Shopping circle steps exit to Castlereagh Street

Existing wayfinding and directional signage

To Exit 7 (signage to be removed)

Exit 7 Street entry (Elizabeth St West) to be closed

Exit 7 passageway to be closed (note signage)

Existing signage above shopping circle steps to be utilised for warning of changes?



Appendix 2 Pedestrian modelling and analysis

Pedestrian Modelling Summary Note – Internal AreaThis note presents the results of the pedestrian modelling analysis for the proposed closure of station entry/exits to enable the construction of the station box for the new Sydney Metro station at Martin Place. The analysis focuses on the busiest AM and PM peak periods during ‘normal operation’.

Peak Period of ImpactPassenger surveys show the AM peak period to be critical to the analysis, based on the high volume of exiting passengers during the AM peak, and surges in passenger flows exiting the station. This is typical of a station in a CBD location.

The analysis covers both the AM and PM peak hour periods.

Impacts on Passenger FlowsDuring the construction period, it will be necessary to close the Shopping Circle (Exit 6), and Exit 7, as shown below. Passengers will still be able to use the subterranean east-west through route which by-passes the Shopping Circle exit during this period to access the MLC Centre entry/exit points to the west. Based on data collected at Exit 7, 92% of those people head south from the exit and therefore those people are likely to use Exit 5. 8% are likely to use Colonial Centre. For Exit 6, 92% of those people continue west across Castlereagh Street so will likely use the exit west of Castlereagh Street, 3% likely will also use the exit west of Castlereagh Street also so that will make 95% in total. Theother 5% will likely use MLC centre.

For the PM peak analysis, the corresponding displaced entry flows have also been reallocated, on a pro-rata basis, across the four entry points circled.

Passenger Flows at Four Key LocationsA number of surveys have been undertaken during 2015 (1 survey), 2017 (2 surveys) and 2018 (2 surveys) of passenger entry/exit volumes at locations around the station, giving a robust data set from which to measure pedestrian movement patterns during both AM and PM peak periods. A summary for each of the key locations is provided below, where exits are closed, and where passengers are likely to be redistributed during the peak periods. As multiple data sets are available, the highest combined entry/exit flow has been selected for the analysis, as indicated in bold.

Space Planning Criteria and AssumptionsThe analysis has calculated the peak 1-minute flow for analysis, using the following assumptionsbased on survey observations and London Underground ‘Station Planning Standards and Guidelines’ (SPSG):

The peak 15-minute flow during the AM equates to the peak hour flow x 0.31 (factor calculated from survey data profiles); and

The peak 1-minute flow is calculated as the peak 15-minute flow divided by 15 (SPSG).

A summary analysis for each of the four locations is provided below. Fruin level of Service criteria are summarised as follows:

.

Results of Internal Area Analysis

Summary by AreaShopping Circle (Passageway)

During construction the Shopping Circle exit is closed, and the passageway in this area will be reduced to 4.4m in width;

All flows to the existing Shopping Circle exit, and all flows to the west and MLC exits could use this route;

The peak 1-minute two-way flow has been calculated as 145 passengers, equating to 38 passengers per metre per minute, Fruin Level of Service C. For normal operation a two-way passageway would be designed to accommodate 40 passengers per metre per minute, or 50 passengers per metre per minute during construction periods;

The above calculations include the uplift of displaced passengers, and show that flow rates would be within acceptable limits for a two-way passageway.

Exit 5 – Elizabeth Street East

This location is considered to have the second highest impact as a result of the closures,estimated at 42% of all displaced trips during the busiest AM peak, with exiting passengersrerouted to this exit during the construction period;

The entry/exit is via a 5.6m wide stair;

The peak 1-minute two-way flow has been calculated as 58 passengers, equating to 10passengers per metre per minute, Fruin Level of Service A. For normal operation two-waystairs would be designed for 28 passengers per metre per minute, or 35 passengers permetre per minute during construction periods;

Including the uplift of displaced passengers, the resulting flow is 13 passengers per metre perminute;

This is within acceptable limits for a two-way stair.

To Colonial Centre

It is not expected that a high percentage of displaced passengers will use this exit as analternative;

The main entry/exit is via two escalators. A stair and lift are also available;

The flow using the escalator has been estimated as 70% of the total flow observed travellingfrom the station internal concourse area (Exit 5 Elizabeth Street stair location) towards theColonial Centre;

The calculations based on peak-hour survey results calculate a peak 1-minute exit flow of 34passengers per minute across the peak 15-minute period. This has been validated usingminute-by-minute 2018 flow counts on the up escalator, estimating an average of 33passengers per minute using the escalator over the peak 15-minutes;

Including the uplift of displaced passengers, the resulting flow is 35 passengers per minute onthe up escalator;

Surveys at this escalator demonstrate the escalator has a peak 1-minute capacity of between40 and 50 passengers per minute, therefore, the analysis demonstrates that the exit escalatorwould have the capacity to accommodate the additional passengers.

West of Castlereagh Street)

This location is considered to have the highest impact with 53% of AM exiting passengersacross the peak hour;

Entry/exit is via a 7.0m wide stair;

The peak 1-minute two-way flow has been calculated as 44 passengers, equating to 6passengers per metre per minute, Fruin Level of Service A. For normal operation two-waystairs would be designed for 28 passengers per metre per minute, or 35 passengers permetre per during construction periods;

Including the uplift of displaced passengers, the resulting flow is 9 passengers per metre perminute;

This is within acceptable limits for a two-way stair.

MLC Centre (underpass and surface)

It is not expected that a high percentage of displaced passengers will use these exits as analternative;

The flow calculations estimate that flows would be less than 20 passengers per metre perminute, which would be acceptable in these locations. The impact of the closure is estimateat less than a 5% uplift.



Appendix 3 Data Redistribution



Figure 12: Data comparison TfNSW vs TSE counts



Appendix 4 Road Safety Audit

RSA-06931

Page 1 of 3 Martin Place Stage 1

Road Safety Audit Report SHORT FORMAT

Title / Project Martin Place Stage 1 RSA P/L Reference RSA-06931 Work Package Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works Report Date 13 March 2018 Audit Stage Desktop Lead (Senior) Auditor

Secondary Auditor / Reviewer Peter Harris Raj Muthusamy

Client John Holland CPB Ghella

TMP / Drawings SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002279 Revision C

Report Provider Road Safety Audits P/L Desktop TMP Scope: The scope of the audit is to assess the plans on their merits and in the context of the road environment, not compliance-checking to standards and guidelines.

RSA-06931


Martin Place Stage 1

T Audit Point Comment / Suggestion John Holland CPB Ghella

Contact: Response

x Status

y Headers*****

1. Issues relating to pedestrian movements andintersection overflow analysis and LOS appear to havebeen undertaken / considered.

Beyond these broad strategic checks with theirinherent assumptions, safety issues relating to thesetypes of closures typically cannot be easily picked upat desktop stage. They end up being issues relating to:

Behaviour of redistributed pedestrians in narrowedareas

Behaviour of redistributed pedestrians re: route-choice and road crossings

DDA issues Fencing / hoarding trip hazard issues

These issues can only be assessed by way of detailed implementation analysis.

This can be done under the guise of a ‘road safety audit’, but would typically be a specialised road safety audit that incorporates a significant observational period, and may include a DDA specialist as part of the audit team.

Noted Ongoing

2. Given the tourist nature of the area, the proposed way-finding signs might benefit from incorporating an iconicSydney feature.

For example, a symbolic ‘harbour bridge’ or ‘opera house’ on the map so as to provide a quick reference point (north-south-east-west is lost on most people).

These are signs developed by TfNSW and we have used their template

Closed

RSA-06931


Explanatory Notes

Short Format: This ‘short format’ report has been used by RSA P/L since 2008, initiated through requests by clients to assist their processes, for ease with stakeholders, and for timeliness. It is typically confined in use to construction traffic management and typically for discrete packages of plans / areas and often for large projects with repetitious small audit sections. The use of this format assumes that the reader/s know what a road safety audit is and how to respond to it.

Projects: Audit points are often raised in projects in relation to: 1. specific themes (e.g. the use of a safety barrier type), or 2. the treatment of particular locations. Once key issues have been initially raised, they will not necessarily be re-raised in future audits. This will depend on the issue, the RSA’s perception of the client’s assessment and understanding of the issue, and other factors. Therefore, discrete audits as part of a project should be read and actioned by a project representative who is familiar with the audit history.

Responding: Although the client receiving the report does not have to agree to the audit findings/suggestions, the issues and associated risks should be carefully considered. A written response should be made to all of the audit findings raised, then signed off by the responsible person from the project team. X

Response: The responder should fully or partially accept / reject the audit point and the comment / suggestion (i.e. not merely the suggestion) Y

Status: The status of the issue as it sits with the Project. i.e. ‘actioned’, ‘closed’, ‘pending information / further guidance’.

Language: o Note: RSA P/L does not typically use the Austroads risk rating method, mostly because it can only be applied to some points and therefore can skew the perceived risk of other

points, and also due to it being a highly subjective approach, giving the false impression of objectivity. o ‘Urgent’ / ‘High-Risk’: Needs immediate attention / changes as per RSA suggestion or similar. o ‘Recommend’ / ‘Serious’ / ‘Important’: Must be robustly reviewed. Most likely requires a change to avoid a high-risk road environment for one or more user groups. o ‘Should’ / ‘Suggest’ / ‘Significant’: Based on the view of the RSA team the suggestion should be done, but it concedes that there could be reasons why inaction or alternative

action is equally correct. Must be robustly reviewed by contractor and where relevant key traffic engineering project stakeholders. o ‘Review’ / ‘Consider’: RSA is raising an observation but has no strong opinion on the outcome and need for changes. Project should review because it’s not an immediate and

high risk and may not be immediately obvious to RSA the reasons for the practice / setup / behaviour. May need monitoring. o ‘Minor’: Typically a low road-safety consequence / compliance issues (to guidelines or plans) / administrative controls. Unlikely to increase risk of crash. o ‘Note’: Little or no road safety significance. Typically added to give a complete picture of the design, site, context, analysis, auditors understanding.

Intent of Issues Listing Order: Audit points might be clustered according to location, theme, or time. When this is not done and the audit comprises an uncategorised list of points, the key issues are often discussed first. However, there is no official ordering of points, and they should all be read on their merits and on the basis of the language guide above.

References: Construction: 1. Austroads Guide to Road Safety – Road Safety Audit – 2009, 2. AS 1742.3 – 2009, 3. Road Management Act 2004 – Code of Practice – Worksite Safety – Traffic Management (2010), and Design: 4. Austroads guidelines and VicRoads supplements and technical publications as relevant.

Safe System: Austroads guidelines encourage practitioners to adopt safe system principles within design and within road safety audits. Safe system (roads) calls for a design to not allow serious injury and fatalities to occur for the expected road users and the typical crash types expected for that design type. This design-objective is considered within this road safety audit as a ‘good practice’ objective. However, a road safety audit by definition does not have the aim of checking ‘Safe System conformance’.

Process and Quality: RSA P/L’s quality assurance process is based on its senior auditors having a rich experience base, but also utilises customised checklists designed for niche areas in traffic engineering/road design (e.g. safety barriers, pavement shaping, CBD traffic management), in conjunction with a four-layer audit process: 1. on-site inspection; 2. media and data capture and review; 3. specialist / second auditor input; and (where warranted) 4. secondary blinded reviews.

Audit Coverage: The audit has attempted to balance the safety needs of all road users. As per Austroads guidelines, the suggestions provided have attempted to be realistic/feasible and commensurate with the actual risk posed. Suggestions are made are from a safety perspective only, and are made in the absence of full project knowledge and design constraints. RSA P/L can provide a detailed risk assessment / issue evaluation report upon request. The audit raises potential safety risks noted / observed / anticipated by the audit team, and in particular the higher-risk issues. However, a road safety audit is fundamentally a subjective qualitative process undertaken by people, highly influenced by the experience, views and limitations of the individual team members. It is expected that the project team has competence to identify safety issues itself as the project progresses, and to ask the audit team further questions where necessary.



Appendix 5 Correspondence from Sydney Trains

FW: Martin Place - Updated SIMP

From: EURLINGS, Darren Sent: Monday, 19 March 2018 11:13 AMTo: Khanna, Roopali MARTIN PLACE, Station Cc: Smalley, JULIEANNE ; BARBER, JASON EFFATMANESHNIK, FRANK ; William Jobling ; William Freelander Mark.Black; CHENEY, PETER

Subject: Martin Place Updated SIMP

Good morning all,

Please see attached updated SIMP for Martin Place following the EPC held in January.

There is no requirement to amend the SIMP for the hoarding on the platform, as the map will remain fundamentally unchanged with services still located in the same position as is currently displayed on the platform map.

Kind regards

Darren EurlingsCustomer Service Interface ManagerCustomer ServiceSydney Trains

Sydney Trains is a NSW Government agency

William FreelanderMon 19/03/2018 11:21 AM

To:Sue Lewis

1 attachments (2 MB)Martin Place Station - Site Incident Management Plan.pdf;

FW: Updated Ped modelling

From: EFFATMANESHNIK, FRANK

Sent: Monday, 19 February 2018 4:12 PM

To: William Jobling William Freelander

Subject: Fwd: Updated Ped modelling

FYI

Please confirm when you are planning to resume the works. Thanks

Regards,

Frank EFFATMANESHNIK

Project Manager

Sydney Metro I City & Southwest

Future Network Delivery

Sydney Trains


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Wallace, Harry"

Date: 19 February 2018 at 3:21:25 pm AEDT

To: "EFFATMANESHNIK, FRANK"

Cc: "Van Deinsen, Bradley "BARBER, JASON" "EURLINGS, Darren"

Subject: Re: Updated Ped modelling

No objections

Harry Wallace

Readiness Operational Interface Manager


Sydney Trains


On 19 Feb 2018, at 12:14, EFFATMANESHNIK, FRANK wrote:

Hi Harry and Jason,

I have already got no objections from Brad/Darren, could you please confirm yours

too? Thanks

Regards,


Project Manager



Sydney Trains


On 13 Feb 2018, at 11:45 am, EFFATMANESHNIK, FRANK

wrote:

Hi Gents,

We have received the updated report. Could you please review and

advise No Objections? Thanks

Regards,


Project Manager



Sydney Trains


<image001.jpg>

From: Will Freeland er

Sent: Monday, 12 February 2018 1:08 PM

To: EFFATMANESHNIK, FRANK

Cc: ]obiing, William; Murray, Tom; Baker, Jess

Subject: Updated Ped modelling

Hi Frank,

Please find updated paper summarising the modelling results for the

Shopping circle underground area at Martin Place. As discussed in

last weeks meeting could you please distribute to the correct parties

within Sydney trains and if acceptable confirm back to me that

Sydney Trains has no objection to the closures proposed, based on

the modelling results?

Thanks,

Will Freelander

Project Manager - Martin Place

Sydney Metro TSE/JHCPB JV

<Internal Area Static Analysis Summary v3.docx>



Appendix 6 Review Comments

Martin Place Stage 1

Printed copies are uncontrolled Page 1 of 1

CTMP Review Comments Sheet Project Title Sydney Metro City & south west –Tunnels and station excavation contract

CTMP Title: Martin Place Stage 1 Document Number: SMCSWTSE JCG SMP TM PLN 002279 B-

Reviewer: City of Sydney Van Le Responder: S Lewis Date:2nd March 2018 Date:6th March 2-18

Item Section/ Page Comments Response

1 General The approval of the CTMP is subject to a site meeting with the appropriate members of the Sydney Metro City and Southwest Traffic Control Group to agree on the staging to detour pedestrians

Site meeting held with no other issues raised

2 General The City has requested that the hoarding used for the Tiffany’s Building demolition be enclosed to deter anti social behavior

Document amended

3 General Some street furniture will need to be removed prior to the installation of the hoarding

Document amended

4 General The installation of hoarding and scaffolding will require application for Hoardings, Scaffolding and other Temporary Structures and payment of associated fees

This application has already been approved

Document: Martin Place Stage 1 CTMP (closure of exit 6 and 7 and hoarding install)Version: B-00Date of review:

21/02/2018

Item No

Contract Contractor Doc RevRequirement Ref (COA or

REMM)Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description, Page, Para, Drg ref TfNSW comment Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018First sentence states partial closure of Martin Place. If this is the case why does the drawing in Appendix 1 show Martin Place open across its full width?

The plan identifies closures will occur in a number of phases and stages. This document is identified as describing the first stage only.

2 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018

The second sentence states the "plan will set out all traffic management initiatives.." Does this CTMP cover more than the pedestrian management required, as this CTMP does not mention anything outside pedestrian management?

Impacts on traffic due to pedestrian flows will be considered in further revisions of this CTMP. Traffic Management considers Pedestrian and Vehicular traffic management, hence this Construction traffic management plan has been submitted for these works


There are 3 numbered points on .pdf page 5 which are the "overall phases". Below that there are 3 more numbered points labelled as the staging. Are the first three points the main three stages and the next three points sub levels to the first 3?

Please make it clear how the staging phasing works. Please include dates.

Document amended


This section states "This CTMP details the staging associated with impacts to Martin Place" Point one below this sentence covers only Stage 1 and it is only for the closure of Exit 6 and 7, yet hoardings, and subway closures are mentioned. Please review and clarify what the staging is

As above

5 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Staging and phasing is mentioned a lot in this section. Are there drawings showing each stage? Please include likely time frames for each stage/phase

Document amended

6 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Could each section of the Martin Place have a coloured hatch to make it clear which is which?

The document clearly states the location of the various work sites as noted in Section 2

7 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Is there need to mention the Sydney CBD Utility CTMP? Those works are complete. This CTMP should focus only the works that are to occur.

Utilities works are not complete.

Sydney Metro City & Southwest Stakeholder Comment Tracker

Section 1.2

Section 2 - Fig 2

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC Closed

8 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 2.1 Please clarify what this sentence means "The existing through footway areas are 8m on both sides of Martin Pl stairs are 8m"

Area's of clear passage are approximately 8m in width, as one progresses past this distance from property lines through passage is obstructed by street furniture or the penetration in the slab where exit 6 stairs meet the surface

9 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 2.2 Is Figure 6 required?

Figure 6 shows the assumed split of pedestrian traffic and is fundamental to the discussion on the TfNSW distribution and our modelling analysis

10 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Figure 3 Add the street namesThe locations of the exits are detailed in Section 2.2 which provides the street names

11 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 3How the requirement for the Commuter and Passenger Management Plan will be managed should be detailed

Not necessary for this document. CPMP is a contract requirement, and does not form part of the CTMP

12 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 3.1 - Figure 4

The last dot point states "The pedestrian access points which would be closed during this construction period are shown in Figure 4 below" Figure 4 shows the MLC access and the nearby stairs as closed. This is not the case for these works. Please clarify and update the CTMP

This section, and this extract is describing the proposal in the EIS. Not the existing proposal. This is clarified in the sentence prior to the dot points. Section 3.4 clarifies the existing proposal differs from EIS. No change

13 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 3.3How is this section related to the closures of Exit 6 and 7? If it is not relevant consider removing it.

This section provides a context for what was included in the planning and tender documents so that reviewers are aware of the background

14 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 3.4The last line of the last paragraph refers to Figure 5, correct? If so then reference Figure 5 and/or put this information in the previous section.

Document amended - no change to location of information within document

15 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 4Section 1.2 outlines the stage that this CTMP covers. It covers only one stage. If that is the case then the duration should be of a set time period. Please update.

This is variable and completely dependent on approval requirements of further revision of CTMP. A duration is not possible to be estimated. No change


This section mention Class B Hoardings. There has been a request from City of Sydney Council for Class A hoardings. Is this correct? If so please update this section and all relevant drawings

Document amended

17 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Maps and/or drawings would help with explaining what is closed when.

Document amended to refer to existing diagram and drawings

Section 4.2

18 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 4.2.1

Will there be any deliveries that may impact traffic flow?

Please clarify that this is vehicle traffic flow and not pedestrian traffic flow

This section has been included in all CTMP submitted to date - no change to document required

19 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 4.2.2Suggest keeping impacts related to the works that this CTMP covers and do not mention other CTMPs

This section has been included in all CTMP submitted to date - no change to document required

20 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Figure 6The Exit 6 label appears to be in the wrong location, Exit 6 is the stairs isn't it?

Exit 6 is any of the exits west of Exit 7. Whilst confusing these diagrams have been adopted from the EIS.


An extra 500+ people would use Exit 5". Over what timeframe would and extra 500+ people use Exit 5?

'An extra 500+ people" is not an impact. Impact can mean, queues, delays and/or stoppages. The impact is what happens when 500+ people use Exit 5, for example:-Will those stopped on the street queues down the stairs?-Will the length of the ped phase need to be increased?-With the partial closure of Martin Pl will pedestrians be funnelled? Is this safe?

The above are just possible questions, that, (if applicable) when answered, address impacts of additional pedestrians at Exit 5. Such thinking applies to all situations where changes occurs, at all Exits, above and below the surface

What is the impact on ANZAC Day? This number is likely to be higher, same for VIVID

This CTMP addresses the closures of exit 6 and 7 specifically. The closure of these two exits and redistribution of pedestrians is not expected to impact on surface operations. Surface modelling will be provided in the next revision of this CTMP

Sydney Trains and Sydney Coordination Office and TMC are aware of the requirements for the closures and their special event planning will take this into consideration


"Of the 7% using exit 7". This amount is the out figure, there is also the 3% in. Does the displacement of this 3% have an affect? If so, what is the effect and how will it be managed

Total numbers are not shown, so while 3% is shown, 3% of what? 100 pedestrians an hour over 4 hours in the AM peak? 3% of 1000 pedestrians over 4 hours? Please provide some clarity

Total numbers are shown in Appendix 2 on page 2 of the analysis provided. The 3% is somewhere between the figure of 13-30 with the worst case scenario (greatest numbers exiting) being used for the modelling


This section states: "Knowledge of these events will be via a number of channels and will be considered when planning the works"

This CTMP is part of "planning the works" so these major special events should be considered and addressed in this CTMP. Please provide detail on pedestrian management during special events

Does the modelling reflect the flow during special events? If so please show this clearly within this CTMP

Not necessary for this document. Surface pedestrian modelling will be covered in the next phase of works


No traffic control plan? Hoarding installation has been mentioned, wont traffic control be required to install and deliver the hoarding?

Will traffic control be required for any deliveries of equipment into the subway area? Any general deliveries?

Access point exists to the Martin Place shopping Circle from 39 Martin Place below ground carpark. Demolition CTMP will provide sufficient access for these deliveries

25 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 4.2.8Does City of Sydney Council require a hoarding permit? Any stand plant permits required?

No hoarding in public space.

Section 4.2.3.1

26 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 5.2

Section 4.2.7 states ROLs are not required. The Weekly Traffic Forecast has been based on ROLs. Please advise how this information will be communicated in the Weekly Traffic Forecast

The Weekly traffic forecast is just not reliant on ROL

27 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 5.3Has a specific meeting, to discuss the changes, been arranged with Emergency Services?

These changes have been discussed and the Martin Place Station Emergency Plan has been updated to reflect these changes

28 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 5.4.1Dot point 2. It has been stated in this CTMP that motorists will not be affected. This point suggest they will be. Please provide detail to how motorists will or will not be affected.

Document amended

29 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 5.7Of the contacts listed which ones are the out of hours and Saturday contacts?

No clarification required. These are the site contacts.

30 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Section 5.8The Construction Traffic Management Framework is no longer in Tender version. The final approved version has been distributed.

no change to document at present


Please provide 3 cross sections showing the detail of the narrowed, existing, footpath (gutter to hoarding) on Elizabeth St, Castlereagh St and for the full width of Martin Pl. It should include any hoardings that may be in place and any existing street furniture (if still in place).

Please provide a full width cross section of the subway area

This level of detail is not necessary.The measurements of the subway are included in Appendix 2. The Martin Place widths are provided in Appendix 1

32 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018It is possible the Hoarding type has changed. If so, please update the drawing

Drawing amended

33 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018This CTMP has said the there is a partial closure of Martin Pl. This drawing shows Martin Pl open.

Described previously

34 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Staging is mentioned in Section 1.2. There is no staging shown here. Please clarify

Document amended to provide clarity on phase vs stage - the drawing included within this CTMP is the first stage of the demolition phase

35 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Provide specific detail drawing on how the stairs will be closed

Detail not necessaryAppendix 1

JCG-SMP-TM-DRG-002279-0025

36 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Add the driveway signage and pedestrian signage that will be in place at the Tiffany building driveway. Other TMPs should not be cross referenced

Not required - reefer to relevant CTMP

37 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Add a note to show MLC and western stairs near MLC are still open

Not necessary

38 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Label Macquarie Bank Not necessary

39 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Drawing states PRELIMINARY. When and how will final drawing be issued/included in the CTMP?

Remove preliminary

40 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 .pdf Page 31 - Table 3 Are these dates still correct?No. To be updated upon approval of the CTMP or approval to commence advertising is given - whatever is the first

41 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 .pdf Page 55 - second row first photo on leftThis photo has times underneath it. The times are an 11.5 hr window. What does the time frame mean, as isn't this photo just to show what the exit looks like?

The exit to the Colonial centre is closed outside of these hours

42 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018The graph on this page is hard to read. Please include a clearer version

This graph is replicated on page 69

43 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018Impact can mean, queues, delays and/or stoppages. What happens when the displaced percentages are added to the other exits?

The paper discusses Fruin level of service ratings. These are identified on page 59. Impacts (in terms of loading on other exits) are considered and given a Fruin LOS. This is how loading has been deemed acceptable or unacceptable

44 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 .pdf Page 60The increase at Exit 5 are documented in this CTMP, but the table on this page shows the Level of Service remaining at Level A. Please provide an explanation.

LoS is a rating which encompasses a loading range. The increase has not moved beyond the range captured by LoS A

45 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 .pdf Page 61Have special event pedestrian numbers/levels been taken into account in this analysis, there appears to be no mention?

Special event pedestrian numbers have not been modelled. Sydney Trains has operational plans for these

.pdf Page 58

46 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 .pdf Page 71There are no time frames shown on these graphs. Please provide an explanation

As noted in the report surveys were undertaken in the AM peak with the highest numbers used for the analysis

47 TSE JHCPBG JV B-00 IG BG 21-Feb-2018 Appendix 4

The correspondence shown in Appendix 4 seems to be in requesting permission to close Exit 7 before pedestrian modelling is complete. Which Sydney Trains agrees to.

The emails in this Appendix don’t show Sydney Trains agreement/acceptance of the works outlined by this CTMP

Is there evidence of Sydney Trains agreement/acceptance of this CTMP and the works, impacts and management strategies it outlines?

Document included

Document: CTMP - Martin Place Stage 1

Version: CDate of review: 16/03/2018

Item No Contract Contractor Doc Rev

Requirement Ref (COA or REMM) Stakeholder Reviewer Date Item Description,

Page, Para, Drg ref RMS comment Contractor Response Date Response Status(date) RMS response (date)

1 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 1.2

"This plan will set out the traffic management initiative…" No traffic management details appear in this plan apart from pedestrian management.

Traffic encompasses "the vehicles,pedestrians, ships, or planes moving alonga route" Webster dictionary

closed 16/3/2018


How do the 'three overall phases of works' relate to the project staging? Is there a definable difference between a 'phase' and a 'stage'?

Document amended closed 16/3/2018

"Individual CTMP will be submitted for each of the stages detailed above. However stage 1,2,3 all called Martin Place Stage 1. To avoid confusion of the stages please amend stages when preparing individual CTMP

They arent. The Demolition phase is Phase 1 with subsequent stages


"The Martin Place staging for the works will consist of the following stages:" The points under this section only describe implementing Stage 1 and then maintaining Stage 1. Are there any other stages for Martin Place? If so, they should be described here.


Refer to Item 2

Refer to response to Item 2

4 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 2.2"shown below in Figure 3Figure 6 and are detailed below:" Should be "shown in Figures 3 and 6 and are detailed below:"


5 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 Figure 4

Figure 4 shows 4 locations where pedestrian access will be closed during construction. This Stage 1 plan only nominated 2 accesses to be closed - Exit 7 and stairs immediately west of Exit 6.

How does this Stage 1 plan fit in with the closures proposed in the EIS? Is this change in the plan from the EIS or will the other accesses eventually be closed at a later stage of the Martin Place works?

As noted in the text - this is the EIS proposaland is included to show the change sincethe EIS

closed 16/3/2018

6 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 Figure 5 Is the 'Existing pedestrian and cycle route' shown for surface or subsurface or a combination via the staircase?

Refer to response to Item 5 closed 16/3/2018

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC ClosedCS Closed subject to additional action


For the 'Alternate pedestrian and cycle route during construction' will pedestrians be passing through the 'Proposed construction site area'?

It is unclear whether the 'Proposed construction site area' is above surface, below surface or both. It is also unclear whether the alternate route is above surface, below surface or both



How does this Stage 1 plan relate to Figure 5? Will this Alternate pedestrian and cycle route during construction' be implemented as part of the Stage 1 plan? Is there any signage proposed to facilitate the diversion of pedestrians to the alternate route?


9 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 4

"Duration: For the life of the projects" Please provide an indicative projected time frame (month/year)

What is meant by the "projects"? Is there more than one? Can the projects be listed/identified for clarification?

Document amended openProvide estimated finishing time (month/year)

Document amended with end date of TSE works

10 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 Figure 6Percentages of patrons using each section is okay, but this should be supported by actual numbers to give an indication of how many patrons are being impacted.

The actual numbers are provided on page 2of Appendix 2 and again in Appendix 3

closed 16/3/2018

11 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 4.2.3.1

"The resulting impact of these exit closures on the surface how that an extra 500+ people would use Exit 5 to gain access to the surface." 500 extra people using Exit 5 is the result of the closure of Exits 6 and 7. The impact of having 500 extra people using Exit 5 should be presented and discussed.

It is included in Appendix 2 and documentamended to include overall summary in thissection

open

"Martin Place passageway (from 8.8m to 4.4m)" Appendix 1 has a new drawing showing the width of the passage remain unchanged. Please confirm the modelling result/LOS will change due to the change.

Document amended

12 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 5.4.1 "Motoring public will be forewarned of any changes…" Are motoring public relevant to this CTMP?

No - but this is where deatiled on therelevant appendices

closed 16/3/2018

13 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 5.8"Construction Traffic Management Framework – TfNSW, v Tender" The 'Approved' version of this document should now be used, rather than the 'Tender' version.

At present the Tender CTMF is being usedas a reference

closed 16/3/2018

14 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 App 1'DRG-002279-0025' Please proveide dimensions showing distances and available widths for pedestrian paths. Drawing amended open

Please provide dimensions showing distances and widths for pedestrian paths.

Drawing amended

15 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 App 1

Wayfinding report, Table 3 - dates shown in this table do not correspond with dates shown in sample signs on following pages. What is the timing of the 'notification' signs in advance of the closure proposed for 19 March 2018.

The signs are "sample " signs as you havenoted and the dates will be updatedaccordingly when we have certainity ofapprovals

closed 16/3/2018

16 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 App 1Are there any wayfinding signs (apart from the closed sign) proposed for customers at Exit 6 or 7 after 19 March 2018?

Yes - these will be provided on theconcourse level and at the relevant exitpoints

closed 16/3/2018

17 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 App 1I note that signage is proposed to indicate the exits are closed, but what physical means will be used to close the exits at the top of the stairs and at the bottom of the stairs?

Fencing will be provided OpenPlease provide specific details on type of fencing, dimensions/heights etc

Document amended


Photos on pg 55. 2nd photo down on first column "Exit 6, Exit 5 and entry to 52 Martin Place (Mon-Fri 6.30am-6.00pm)" What significance does this time frame have to the photo?

This timeframe is when the entry to 52Martin Place is in operation - outside ofthese times the exit is closed

closed 16/3/2018


People using any given Martin Place exit across the peak hour would not be uniformly spread over the peak hour, but rather concentrated in ebbs and flows depending on train arrival times.

This assessment does not appear to consider pedestrian flows based on train arrival times, but rather simply total number of pedestrians in the peak spread evenly across the peak. This may not lead to an accurate reflection of Level of Service experienced by the pedestrian

That is correct - the assessment is based onworst case scenario (when a train arrives atthe station)

closed 16/3/2018


It appears that the number of people using Exit 5 will increase from 2691 to 3240. Given the 20% extra people using this exit when a train arrives, how is the Level of Service performance impacted based on concentrated pedestrian usage due to train arrivals?

The LOS for this is included within thedocument - also refer to response to Item19

closed 16/3/2018


Graphs on pg 71 - No time frames are shown for these. It is assumed that these are AM. What are these telling us? That more people are leaving Martin Place exits than arriving at Martin Place?

AM peak is the worst case scenario as thePM peak tends to be spread out

closed 16/3/2018


Graphs on pg 71 - Exit 5 graph - Do the 2018 numbers include the additional 500 people diverted from Exits 6 and 7?

If not, 500 extra people represents a 20% increase in number of people using this exit in the AM peak. Where is the assessment of the impact this increase has to the performace of this exit?

This slide is labelled "Available Survey Dataat 4 Key Locations" so no it doesn’t includethe displaced numbers as this is the basedata

closed 16/3/2018

23 TSE JHCPBG C RMS CM 16-Mar-2018 Appendix 1Based on site discusssion, question around what is the main trigger for Shopping Circle exit to be closed. Could project team provide a brief explaination. New comment

Document amended

Register No. Issued to: Date of IssueRegister No.1 XXXRegister No.2 XXXRegister No.3 XXX

Document: CTMP ‐ Martin Place Stage 1 Version: C

Date of review: 16/03/2018

Item No

Contract Contractor Doc RevItem Description, Page, Para, Drg

refStakeholder

Requirement Ref (COA or REMM)

TfNSW comment Contractor Response DateResponse

Status(date)

TfNSW response (date) Contractor Response

1 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCO

In the paragraph detailing the Martin Place staging for the works, Point 2 describes works that will take place from March 2018. Can you please clarify the exact timing of these works? Is the intent to also commence these works from 19 March? Will a separate CTMP be submitted for this?

This CTMP is the plan for these workswhich were scheduled for implementationon the 19th March

13-Mar-2018 ClosedCTMP has been updated to reflect a new date of 26 March. Please advise if this date is intended to change.

It will as we need to get CTMP approval - document amended to state this


Further to the above, the works described in point 3 (Page 5) will also require a separate CTMP.

CTMP are to be provided for each stage ofthe Phase 1 demolition phase - similarlywhere pedestrian impacts are requiredthese will be dealt with through the CTMPprocess

Closed


Please provide an overview of the various stages of works required at Martin Place, including indicative timings. SCO will require proposals for subsequent stages for review / comment prior to their implementation.

This information was provided in the initialsubmission but to make it clear I havenow given its own heading

Open

Please note a CTMP for subsequent stages will be required.

NEW COMMENTPlease confirm that the hoarding referred to in point 2 relates to hoarding on the shop fronts in the subway level, and not on the surface of Martin Place?

Yes as noted in Section 1.2 last sentence

It refers to hoarding in the subway but also on Martin Place in front of the shopping circle - this is not the subject of this CTMP and as per other CTMP we have tried to provide the context of all changes. It is clearly stated which stage this submitted CTMP relates to

4 TSE JHCPBG JV C 2.1 SCOSuggest removing 'are 8m' from the end of the second paragraph as this appears to be a double up

Document amended Closed


Please review the location listed for exits 1, 2, 3 and 4 as Figure 3 indicates these as being between Philip St and Macquarie St, not Philip St and Elizabeth St as the text suggests.


6 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOSuggest removing reference to Figure 6 as it appears the text is referring only to Figure 3. Document amended Closed

7 TSE JHCPBG JV C 3.4 SCO

This section is unclear. What does this mean for pedestrians? What is the impact on pedestrian path widths? It should be noted that should this information be deemed insufficient it will raise further comments and/or need for more pedestrian modelling.

The document is quite clear the changessince the EIS are:- the retention of the subway connectionand- the demolition to basement level on theTiffany's site removes the opportunity toproviding the pathway nominated in theEIS

Closed

Stakeholder Comment TrackerSydney Metro City & Southwest

1.2

2.2

RESPONSE STATUSO OpenC Closed

8 TSE JHCPBG JV C 4 SCO

Suggest updating the duration and timing of work to reflect Stage 1 works and also to align with the indicative timeline provided online at:

https://www.sydneymetro.info/citysouthwest/project‐overview

No change to document - the websiteclearly states that these timelines are"indicative"

Closed


Please include some detail regarding the methodology of the following ‐1. How the exits will be closed, and what is required in order to close them2. How the street furniture is to be removed, and what will be required in order to remove it

Fencing will be usedStreet furniture will be removed by City ofSydney contractor

OpenCan you provide some detail on the type of fencing? How will pedestrians be discouraged from jumping the fencing? And what is required in order to deliver and install the fencing? Please include a drawing as well.

Document amended

10 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOAre Council aware of the requirement to remove street furniture and provided their approval for this?

Yes - it is their street furniture Closed


It is anticipated that vehicles will be required to facilitate the works listed in this section. Please provide some detail regarding the expected vehicle types, number of movements, hourly breakdown of movements throughout the day, haulage routes etc. Furthermore vehicle access to the site and/or on‐street delivery needs to be detailed.

No vehicles are required as access to thearea will be from the basement car park of39 Martin Place (Tiffany building)

Closed


Further to the comment above, are any lane closures required to facilitate vehicle movements and deliveries? If so, TCPs will need to be provided as an appendix with the approval of ROLs mentioned in Section 4.2.7 and the impact on motorists is discussed in Section 4.2.1.

No Closed

13 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOIt is anticipated that temporary work sites will be required around street furniture in order to remove it. Please provide some detail on this.

This is being done by Council and theirsubcontractors Closed


For street furniture owned by JC Decaux, what requirements are needed by TSE in order to remove and/or relocate them? Or is this being managed by Council?

Refer to response to Item 13 Closed


Please advise the difference in pedestrians volumes between the data provided by TfNSW and the data collected? Which data has been used for the modelling provided in this CTMP?

I question the relevance of this - we have undertaken pedestrian counts to provide you with the most recent data

Open

So the data referred to is from the analysis undertaken by TSE contractor? Was there a difference between data collected and those provided from TfNSW in 2015?

The data differences are shown in Appendix 2 - the highest volumes are used for the modelling regardless of whether that was 2015, 2017 or 2018. It is trying to provide you with the worst case scenario. Figure 7 in the submitted CTMP shows the data collected at all locations in all years. (an excerpt from Appendix 2) The bold numbers are the worst case AM peak flows. Appendix 3 now provides the difference in data and distribution between TfNSW and TSE


There is a need to explain / summarise the findings of the pedestrian modelling in this section. Please update to include this in a clear and concise manner.

Document amended Open Please include detail on the LoS associated with the closure of Exit 6 at the exit between Castlereagh St and Pitt St

This is included in Appendix 2 - and is known as the exit west of Castlereagh Street - the document has been amended to reflect the outcome of the model within the document - LoS does not change for this exit

4.1

4.2.3

4.2.3.1


Please clearly define the impact on pedestrians and on the various remaining exit points, including any drops in the expected level of service. The outcomes from the modelling report need to be summarised in this section.

Document amended Open

This comment remains open pending detail for issue #16

Refer to response to Item 16


Will any deliveries be impacted for those retailers in the lower levels of the MLC and/or any remaining retailers on the lower levels of Martin Place?

No Closed

19 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCO Please include a drawing that clearly shows what remains in the subway connection to the MLC

This is provided on the drawing included inAppendix 1 and is labelled INSET A Closed


Has any consideration been given to how this stage of works will impact on major events, specifically the Anzac Day Dawn Service in Martin Place and VIVID? Please include some detail on the impact associated with each of these events. It is expected that Sydney Metro ‐ TSE will consult with event organisers. SCO together with the TMC will be able to facilitate these discussions.

The works have been planned for anumber of years and this detail has beenprovided in the EIS and relevant planningdocumentation. Similar to that done forSydney Light Rail, TSE are happy to meetwith event organisers however, theplanning of the event is typically donethrough TMC's special event unit who areassumed to understand the works andcurrent program. TSE is also happy tomeet with TMC representativesVivid is normally held betweenCastlereagh Street and Pitt Street which isoutside of the area of concern of thisCTMPDawn Service is held between GeorgeStreet and Pitt Street which is outside ofthe area of concern of this CTMP

Closed

SCO will work with TMC Major Events as per BAU. However, it should be noted that TSE will be required to provide information if required to assist with planning efforts and conflicts mitigation

Yes this is what was said in response to your previous comments - TSE are committed to working with SCO and TMC to ensure that we minimise, where reasonable and feasible, our impact on Sydney

21 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOLane closures have been referenced here but in 4.2.1 and 4.2.7 it is implied that these aren't required as part of the CTMP. Please advise.


22 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOA Road Safety Audit is required for these works. It is a requirement of the deed.

Noted - Road safety audit will be providedshortly Closed

23 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOPlease identify what is required for the exit closures by Sydney Trains.

installation of signage etc as identified inAppendix 1 Wayfinding Strategy Closed


Please ensure that emergency services are adequately briefed on the works and that these works are discussed at the Emergency Services Meeting established by SCO. This must involve an understanding and agreement of emergency evacuation plans

This was discussed at last week'sEmergency Services meeting held 2 March2018. Further details will be provided tothis regular forum and also via the WeeklyTraffic ForecastSydney Trains have been meeting andhave already agreed all changes requiredto their incident response plans - allrelevant services at last week's ESmeeting (Police, Fire and Ambulance andSydney Trains own incident responsepersonnel) have been involved in thechanges to these response plans includingevacuation procedures

Closed

25 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOPlease identify the impact on any emergency exits (if any) in this section

No impacts Closed

4.2.6

4.2.4

5.1

5.3


What consideration has been taken regarding evacuation plans for the train station, MLC and other nearby businesses? Please provide this information and inform what steps have been undertaken to update plans as appropriate.

Refer to response to Item 25note that evacuation back into a trainstation would not occur so there is noimpact on existing evacuation plans otherthan Sydney Trains

Closed Please note that some business may utilise parts of Martin Place in their evacuation plans as an emergency assembly point.Can you advise if Sydney Trains have updated their evacuation plans? And are TSE aware of the changes?

We note that some businesses may use Martin Place but this CTMP is focussed on the closures of Exit 7 and Exit 6 stairs from the Martin Place train station - no business will use this as a nominated evacuation route.Sydney Trains have updated their evacuation plans and TSE are aware fo the changes. It should be noted that we do not think it appropriate to put this doucment into this CTMP which will become a public document post approval

TSE JHCPBG JV C SCO

Please provide any correspondence with Sydney Trains, building managers and Emergency Services relating to emergency evacuation plans and statutory requirements for exit points

Document included Open Email trail included only shows no objections from Sydney Trains. What about other stakeholders, such as emergency services?

Refer to CTMP

27 TSE JHCPBG JV C 5.4 SCOShould Table 1 be updated to include further communications such as pedestrian wayfinding, train station notices etc.?

I would suggest that Advance Warningsigns would cover these items Closed


SCO Operational Communications have had some involvement in the development of the Communications and Wayfinding Strategy. Please ensure that their advice and recommendations are included and used during this stage of works.

The Wayfinding strategy has a separatesign off - assumed that TfNSW will captureSCO requirements

Closed


Please ensure that SCO Operational Communications are kept abreast of what activities have been undertaken and which remain as outstanding.

Refer to response to Item 28 Closed


Please clarify the responsibility of each party in relation to the implementation of this strategy, specifically who will install all of the wayfinding signs?

Implementation by TSE in conjunction withSydney trains wayfinding section Closed


Impacts on Passenger Flows & Figure 6 in Section 4.2.3.1:Drawing(s) should be provided showing the actual number of pedestrians using the various exit points. These would be beneficial to include in conjunction with the percentages already shown. Can peak hour volumes be divided into shorter time units?

Refer to response to Item 28 Open

Item 28 does not address this comment

As this comment was included in a comment on Appendix 1 Communications and Wayfinding Strategy it was noted that this has a separate approval pathway from the CTMP.

However,this information is now included in Appendix 3


Does this strategy comply with evacuation standards for train stations?

Refer to response to Item 28 Open

Item 28 does not address this comment

As this comment was included in a comment on Appendix 1 Communications and Wayfinding Strategy it was noted that this has a separate approval pathway from the CTMP. The Wayfinding is as per Sydney Trains requirements


The drawing makes reference to Stage 2, however this CTMP discusses Stage 1. Please update drawing to reflect Stage 1 works

Drawing amended Open Drawing still makes reference to Stage 2 (see column to the left of TfNSW logo). Please update so Stage 1 is only referenced.

Drawing amended

34 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOPlease advise the width of the remaining subway pedestrian walkway

As per existing for this CTMP Closed


The removal of street furniture has been referenced in the CTMP. What impacts will this have regarding the pedestrian pathway on Martin Place (surface level)? Should the street furniture be indicated on the drawing?

Drawing amended Open

No amendments appear to have been made, other than those made to Inset A. Please update.

Street furniture was indicated on the drawing but I have now softened the hatching and made the street furniture lines bolder so that it is more visible. As far as removal of the street furniture this is being removed by City of Sydney's contractor JC Decaux under City of Sydney approvals

Appendix 1 - JCG-SMP-PM-DRG-

002279-0025

Appendix 1 - Communications &

Wayfinding Strategy

36 TSE JHCPBG JV C SCOPlease provide cross sections for both surface and subway levels of Martin Place

the drawings now have dimensions socross sections will provide no further detail Open No dimensions appear on the drawing. Please

update

Dimensions of paths next to Shopping circle included

37 TSE JHCPBG JV C Appendix 2 SCO

Pedestrians using any given Martin Place exit would not be uniformly spread over the peak hour, with volumes instead being concentrated in accordance with train arrival and departure times.This modelling does not appear to consider pedestrian flows based on train arrival times, instead spreading pedestrian volumes across the peak and therefore does not provide an accurate reflection of the conditions and level of service pedestrians are likely to incur in a shorter space of time. Peak 15 minute counts are to be provided and compared against the SPSG predicted volumes.

The assessment is based on worst casescenario (when a train arrives at thestation) and is not spread uniformly overan hourActual numbers are provided in Appendix2, Page 2 and are replicated in Section4.2.3.1

Closed

38 TSE JHCPBG JV C Appendix 4 SCO

The correspondence shown seems to be more about closing Exit 7 rather than the overall acceptance of the works outlined in the CTMP. Please provide evidence of Sydney Trains acceptance and their requirements needed to be fulfilled in order to receive their approval.


39 TSE JHCPBG JV C General SCOPlease note that it is a condition of consent to maintain pedestrian pathways including connection to the MLC at all times.

Our proposal does retain the MLC subway -the EIS did not Closed

40 TSE JHCPBG JV B On-site Meeting (6 March 2018) SCO Open

NEW COMMENT

'At the on‐site meeting held on Tues 6 March the following was discussed but does not appear in the CTMP. Please update to include the following ‐

1. Removal of the table / bench located on the western side of Exit 6 (near the underside of the staircase) as requested by Council

2. It was asked at the meeting what works would be undertaken at the exit 6 staircase ‐ the impression was that minimal works were to take place which is unacceptable to TfNSW / SCO. Please include a scope of works to justify why this is required to be closed as part of Stage 1 works.

3. It was discussed that exits closed as per BAU process at Martin Place station. Can you include some detail on this in the CTMP and advise of where this information is include?

Document amended in Section 4.1



Suite 2.06, Level 2 29-31 Solent Circuit Baulkham Hills NSW 2153 Tel: 61 (02) 9659 5433 e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hbi.com.au

Leaders in Environmental Consulting

1

HBI Healthy Buildings International Pty Ltd A.C.N. 003 270 693 A.B.N. 39 003 270 693

Mr Stuart Hodgson 7 May 2018 Director Program Sustainability Environment & Planning Sydney Metro Transport for NSW PO Box K659 HAYMARKET NSW 1240 Ref: TSE CTMP MPS Demo Stage 1

Dear Stuart

RE: Endorsement of Construction Traffic Management Plan – Martin Place South Stage 1: Sydney Metro City & Southwest – TSE Works Reference is made to the following documents required by the Condition of Approval E82 of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project (SSI – 15_7400 January 9 2017) and submitted to the Environmental Representative (ER) for review and endorsement:

Construction Traffic Management Plan – Martin Place South Stage 1 - TSE Works Rev D; SMCSWTSE-JCG-SCN-TM-PLN-002279 (dated 23 March 2018).

Email from the Sydney Coordination office dated 6 April 2018 stating “In accordance with Schedule C1 Appendix A.9 Section 2.1 ( c ) and 2.2 ( c ) of the Principal’s General Specifications G10 – Traffic and Transport Management and Minister’s Condition of Approval E82 for the Sydney Metro City & South West the Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approve the Sydney Metro City & South West Construction Traffic Management Plan – for Martin Place South (Demolition) Stage 1 works Rev D TSE Works SMCSWTSE-JCG-SMP-TM-PLN-002279-D for demolition works”.

The Roads and Maritime Service of NSW and the Sydney Coordination Office approval above is conditional on the following requirements:

Providing a date for the station exit closures prior to their implementation

Obtaining Road Occupancy Licences (ROLs) from the Transport Management Centre (TMC) as required;

Complying with haulage routes as approved by SCO/RMS and described in Appendix 4 of the CTMP;

Addressing any safety issues identified in the Road Safety Audit review of this CTMP;

Addressing any issues raised by Council, State Transit Authority, Taxi Council, residents/businesses and/or

Emergency Services in the CTMP approval process;

mailto:[email protected]

Leaders in Environmental Consulting

2

HBI Healthy Buildings International Pty Ltd

Addressing the requirements arising as an outcome of the Local Pedestrian, Cycling and Traffic Calming Committee meeting;

Turning paths for oversize / over mass deliveries being provided to SCO and RMS for review in advance of deliveries occurring;

The Construction Traffic Management Plan being updated as required prior to construction commencing to ensure consistency with the final Construction Traffic Management Framework when it is approved;

Promptly addressing any SCO and/or TMC and/or RMS issue that eventuates during the works

As an approved ER for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project, I have reviewed the above documents. The review did not comprise a technical review, as the ERs are not traffic experts and have relied on the SCO RMS Approval for technical aspects of the Plan. It is noted the document provides review comments and responses in Appendix 6. It is considered that the plan is consistent with Condition E82 of the Project Approval subject to the above conditions being complied with and is endorsed in accordance with Condition A24(d) of the Infrastructure Approval. The effective date of the endorsement can be considered to be the date of the RMS/SCO approval - dated 6 April 2018. Yours sincerely

Michael Woolley Environmental Representative – Sydney Metro – City and South West

smcswtse-jcg-smp-tm-pln-002279-d martin place stage 1 · 2018. 5. 9. · document no:...

Documents