social safeguard monitoring report - asian development bank · this social safeguard monitoring...

Social Safeguard Monitoring Report Resettlement Plan Updating and Livelihood Restoration Program Preparation Report of External Monitoring Agency September 2013

INO: Loan 2500-2501- Integrated Citarum Water

Resources Management Program Project 1

Prepared by Project Coordination Management Unit, Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum,

Ministry of Public Works for the Directorate General of Water Resources Ministry of Public

Works Republic of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank.

NOTES

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This social safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Ministry of Public Works

Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum Indonesia

Program Management SupportIntegrated Citarum Water Resource Management Investment Program

REPORT ON RP UPDATING

AND LRP PREPARATION

External Monitoring Agency (EMA)

for Resettlement Plan Updating and Implementation

of West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation

December 2012

(Revised : September 2013)

Subcontract with In association with

External Monitoring Agency for Resettlement Plan Updating and Implementation

REPORT ON RP UPDATING AND LRP PREPARATION

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. i

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................ iv

LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................... v

ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................... vi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................. viii

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background………………………………………………………………... 1

1.2 External Monitoring Agency……………………………………………... 3

2 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................. 6

2.1 General Approach …………………………………………………………6

2.2 Community Development Approach……………………………………. 7

2.3 Monitoring Method ………………………………………………………...8

2.3.1 Literature Review ...................................................................... 8

2.3.2 Documentary Study................................................................... 8

2.3.3 Policy Analysis .......................................................................... 8

2.3.4 Participatory Observation.......................................................... 8

2.3.5 Desk Validation ......................................................................... 8

2.3.6 Field Survey .............................................................................. 9

3 RESETTLEMENT PLAN 2008............................................................ 11

3.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………...11

3.2 Background of RP 2008…………………………………………………..11

3.3 Policy and Legal Framework of RP 2008 ………………………………12

3.3.1 GOI Regulations Framework on Resettlement....................... 12

3.3.2 Adopted Resettlement Framework ......................................... 13

3.3.3 Project Objectives and Policies According to RP 2008 .......... 14

3.4 Scope of Resettlement Impact According to RP 2008 ………………..16

3.5 Project Entitlements and Implementation Arrangements According RP2008 ………………………………………………………………………16

3.6 Socioeconomic Conditions of AHs………………………………………18

3.7 Vulnerability, Gender and Ethnicity Issues in RP 2008 ……………….19

3.8 Consultation and Disclosure According to RP 2008 …………………..19



ii

4 RP UPDATING AND LRP PREPARATION ....................................... 21

4.1 Introduction: Scope of RP Updating …………………………………….21

4.2 Quality of AHs Data……………………………………………………….23

4.2.1 Conceptual and Analytical Framework ................................... 23

4.2.2 Result of Desk Validation........................................................ 24

4.2.3 Result of Field Research......................................................... 25

4.2.4 Final Detailed Engineering Design ......................................... 26

4.2.5 Capacity of Parties Handling RP Updating 38

4.3 Inclusion of AP’s …………………………………………………………..27

4.3.1 Introduction.............................................................................. 27

4.3.2 Entitlement .............................................................................. 27

4.4 The Quality and Effectiveness of the Complaint and GrievanceMechanism ………………………………………………………………….28

4.4.1 Comparison RP 2008 and Updated RP 2012......................... 29

4.5 The Inclusion of Gender Perspective……………………………………32

4.5.1 Gender Inclusion: Indonesian Context.................................... 33

4.5.2 Gender Inclusion: West Java Context .................................... 34

4.5.3 Gender Inclusion: Project Context .......................................... 35

4.5.4 Gender Sensitivity Assessment Checklist .............................. 38

5 LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION PROGRAM ....................................... 42

5.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………...42

5.2 Remarks on DED’s Socio-economic Survey …………………………42

5.3 Remarks on Survey on socialization of WTC Rehabilitation …………48

5.4 Livelihood Restoration Program and Relocation Facilitation Plan …51

6 RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................... 54

6.1 Recommendation on Policy Framework ………………………………..54

6.2 Recommendation on AHs Baseline Data ………………………………54

6.3 Recommendation on Complaints and grievance Mechanism ………..55

6.4 Recommendation on Inclusion of Gender …………...…………………55

6.5 Recommendation on Social-economic Conditions…………………….56

6.6 Recommendation on LRP ………………………………………………..56

6.7 Recommendation on Parties Handling Resettlement Plan…………...57

6.8 Concluding Remarks ……………………………………………………58

REFERENCES.............................................................................................. 59

Annex ……................................................................................................. 60



iii

LIST OF ANNEXES

Annex A List and Short Description of Related Project DocumentsReviewed By EMA

Annex B Paper on Policy AnalysisAnnex C Minutes of Meetings Attended By EMAAnnex D1 Paper on Analysis of AHs DatabaseAnnex D2 Suplement of Paper on Analysis of AHs DatabaseAnnex F Sampling Plan and Sampling FrameAnnex H Paper on Gender Sensitivity AnalysisAnnex I Paper on Analysis of Socialization WTC RehabilitationAnnex J Questionnaire of SurveyAnnex K Paper on Resettlement In Community Development

Perspective



iv

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.General steps of community development and indicator used forresettlement

Figure 2. Comprehensive methods utilized in monitoringFigure 3. Scheme for Resettlement Policy AnalysisFigure 4. Respondent by IncomeFigure 5. Respondent by ExpenditureFigure 6. Marital StatusFigure 7. Educational QualificationFigure 8. Respondent by OccupationFigure 9. Respondent by type of business they runFigure 10. Status of Land OwnershipFigure 11. Reason of Land UseFigure 12. Fields of InterestFigure 13. Loans of CapitalsFigure 14, Plan due to Rehabilitation of WTCFigure 15, Respondent’s Moving PlanFigure 16. What is the purpose of rehabilitation project?Figure 17. Sources of InformationFigure 18. Benefit of Rehabilitation ProjectFigure 19. Complaining Mechanism toward ProjectFigure 20. Perception toward complaing that be given to government.



v

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Comparison Grievance Redress Mechanism between RP 2008 andRP Updating

Table 2. Respondent who know of mechanism for channeling complaints andgrievances

Table 3. Source of information on channeling mechanism of complaints andgrievance

Table 4. Perception of respondents on complaints and grievance mechanismTable 5. Respondents of the ProjectTable 6. Marital StatusTable 7. OccupationsTable 8. Survey sample by gender and kabupaten/kotaTable 9. Length of businessTable 10. Respondent by debt to their familyTable 11. LRP SchemeTable 12. Facility in the new locationTable 13. Supports for restoring business



vi

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AHs Affected Households

APs Affected Person

ARUM Aliansi Rakyat untuk Citarum (People’s Alliance forCitarum)

BAPPEDA Provincial/District Development Planning Agency

BAPPENNAS National Development Planning Agency

BBWSC Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Citarum (Citarum River BasinOrganisation Unit)

CAP Correction Action Plan

CPMS Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies

COI Corridor of Impact

CRB Citarum River Basin

CSO Civil Society Organization

DED Detailed Engineering Design

DGSP Directorate General of Spacial Planning

DGWR Directorate General of Water Resources

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

DWRI Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation

DWRM Directorate of Water Resources Management

FAA Framework Financing Agreement

EA Executing Agency

EMA External Monitoring Agency

ETC East Tarum Canal

GOI Government of Indonesia

IA Implementing Agency

ICWRMIP Integrated Citarum Water Resources ManagementInvestment Program

IDR Indonesian Rupiah

IFC International Finance Corporation

IOL Inventory of Losses



vii

IRM Indonesia Resident Mission

LAC Land Acquisition Committee (Panitia Sembilan)

LRP Livelihood Restoration Program

MFF Multitranche Financing Facility

MOA Ministry of Agriculture

MOE Ministry of Environment

MOF Ministry of Finance

MOFr Ministry of Forestry

MOH Ministry of Health

MPW Ministry of Public Works

NGO Non Goverment Organization

NJOP Nilai Jual Objek Pajak (Tax Object Selling Price)

NSCWR National Steering Committee for Water Resources

PCMU Program Coordination and Management Unit

PFR Periodic Financing Request

PIB Project Information Booklet

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PIC Project Implementation Consultant

PJT 2 Perusahaan Umum Jasa Tirta 2 (WTC Operator)

PPTA Project Preparation Technical Assistance

RAR Review and Assessment Report

RCMU Roadmap Coordination and Management Unit

RCS Replacement Cost Study

RF Resettlement Framework

ROW Right of Way

RP Resettlement Plan

RWG Resettlement Working Group

SPF Special Project Facilitator

SES Social and Environmental Section

TOR Term of Reference

WTC West Tarum Canal



viii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Resettlement; as commonly understood, is a term used to describe themovement of individual or group from one location to another. In contrast withurbanization or transmigration (in Indonesia) wherein refers to a voluntarymovement of people, resettlement refers to a process of moving people to adifferent place because they are no longer allowed to stay in the area wherethey used to live because of government development project.

2. ICWRMIP-Project-1, incorporate resettlement program as sub-component 2.1 that requires both physical works and relocation of people whoare living and working along the canal on land belonging to the government andwithin the easement boundaries of the canal. Their assets minus their land,including the buildings, crops and trees should and will be paid by the WTCproject.

3. EMA (External Monitoring Agency) is an independent entity thatspecializes in applied social sciences. It will be directly accountable to theDirector of the Executing Agency. EMA will have access to all the officesinvolved in the implementation of the subproject RPs and all projectdocumentation. Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies (CPMS) atResearch Institute and Extension Program (LPPM) of Parahyangan CatholicUniversity has sub-contracted by EGIS International to carry out the task.

4. Community Development approach is used by EMA both atmonitoring RP updating and LRP preparation as well as at monitoring itscompliance. In order to carry on its tasks, EMA employs the followingtechniques: literature review, documentary study, policy analysis, participatoryobservation, desk validation, and field survey.

5. Clear Resettlement Policy Framework, is necessary for both designand implementing resettlement project such as ICWRMIP. However, GOI hasno consistent legal and policy framework for resettlement program that alignedwith international practices. Therefore both RP 2008 and updated RP 2012enforced and adopted RF agreed by both GOI and ADB. It aims to fill-in thegaps in what local laws and regulations cannot provide in order to ensure thatAHs are able to rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project condition.

6. Recently the GOI has declare Law Number 2/2012 and its enablingPresidential Decree number 71/2012. The spirit of the new law is actually hasfilled the gap by regulating provision of legal documents for assets to becompensated. This decree provides mechanism for those with no legal rights toreceive compensation. Such mechanism is specifically stated at article 26,articles 21 and 23. The land owner may still forward a written statement that aland is his/hers and supported by two witnesses from the surrounding areawhere the land is located. The witnesses must be those who do not havekinship relation with the owner up to level two, vertically and horizotally.However, the law and its derivative Presidential Decree cannot be applied toICWRMIP, for it has not taken into effect yet.

7. Having overviewed RP 2008, it is concluded that RP 2008 is acornerstone document for WTC Rehabilitation, not only in terms ofadministrative formality but primarily its substance that provides almost all about



ix

basic operational framework and guideline for the implementation of giveninvoluntary resettlement. The overall substance of RP 2008 consists of ninecritical parts i.e. project background, legal and policy framework, projectobjectives and basic principles, the scope of expected impacts, projectentitlement and its implementation arrangement, description on AHs economicconditions, the issue of vulnerability, gender and ethnicity, consultation anddisclosure. This document should be understood adequately, primarily byproject holders as well as affected community.

8. The last part of RP 2008 is a necessary guidance on RP updating andits implementation. It is also supposedly in accordance with the final detailedengineering design and changes in the corridor of impact in close consultationwith the APs and concerned stakeholders.

9. Having carefully over view RP updating as well as LRP preparation,EMA has analyzed five selected issues relevant to the scope of workmentioned in its TOR, these are quality of AHs data, inclusion of APs who mayhave been evicted, the accuracy of final survey and asset valuation, the qualityand effectiveness of complaints and grievances mechanism, the inclusion ofgender perspective.

10. Analysis on AHs data resulted in some recommendations to improveAHs data quality. Some possible corrections have been made to AHs databaseaccordingly, and in general can be summarized into correcting five areas,which are (1) completeness, which is the extent data is not missing and is ofsufficient breadth and depth for the task at hand; (2) conciseness ofrepresentation, which is the extent data is compactly represented; (3)consistency of representation, which is the extent data is presented in the sameformat; (4) freedom-of-error, which is the extent data is correct and reliable; and(5) timeliness, which is the extent data is sufficiently up-to-date for the task athand.

11. EMA has also analyzed the inclusion of AHs through tracer. It isunderstood that since 2009 evictions to the people living along the canal,including the project affected households, were carried out by Bekasi District.The eviction is for enforcement of the local government regulations (buildingpermit, cleanness and orderliness, spatial planning) and improve their chancesof winning environmental awards. Although the evictions were not related to theproject, they had occurred on land upon which an ADB loan had beenapproved. To ensure ADB fulfilled its obligations and more than satisfied theintent of its safeguard policies, ADB determined that it was obliged to attempt totrace the people who had been evicted by the Local Governments. As resultsthe tracer survey identified total number of evicted AHs up to the new agreedcut off dates were 223 households out of 466.

12. Conceptually complaint and grievance handling mechanism depict agood democratic governance practices. It basically includes complaints andgrievances reception mechanism and complaints and grievances handlingmechanism. EMA compared complaint and grievance mechanism stated both inRP 2008 and Updated RP 2012 in three stages. There are changes reflectingstrong intention to make quality and more effective mechanism in the latestdocument by significantly reducing number of days provided to handlecomplaints and grievances. These changes are probably resulted from thepreviously well-known case reflecting wherein complains and grievances werenot satisfactorily handled.



x

13. Survey conducted by EMA reveals with three interesting and yetimportant findings, these are, firstly, majority of respondents (73.21%) out of265 do not know about the mechanism for channeling complaints andgrievances related to the impact of WTC rehabilitation project. Secondly, 37respondents (74%) who are aware of information on channeling complaints andgrievances mechanism get information from local government officials. Only 13respondents (26%) get information from other sources includes 2 respondentsget information from surveyors and only 1 from NGOs. Finally, majority ofrespondents think that if there is a complain related to the project, then it waswell received and resolved in a good way. However, it is strongly indicated, thatthere is highly possible for misunderstanding between government and affectedcommunity with reference to asymmetric information acquired by both parties. Itis recommended by EMA, that government should build a good rapport andeffective communication with local community, elders and its leaders, includingKetua RT and RW at bridging community and government officials.

14. EMA also analyzed gender inclusion within three contexts, national,regional, and project context. In general, although at national and regionalcontext shows improvement across time, at project context need to be moresensitive. It reveals that although the resettlement is carried out on householdbasis, the corresponding effects affect persons differently either as an individualor a community. Gender is an important factor in determining differential impact.The dynamics inside the household will typically result in adversely affectedcondition for women and men. Some typical issues addressed in theresettlement gender sensitivity analysis are equality in access to compensationresulted from land ownership and property rights, equality in restoration oflivelihood and income, and women’s choice of livelihood alternative, intra-household gender disparity after resettlement.

15. EMA understand that socio-economic survey was aimed to obtaingeneral picture of socio-economic information of AHs. The information shouldbe considered as the input for designing the type of LRP that most suitable forAHs. Analysis was directed to reveal the logical relationship between patternsfound from socio-economic data of AHs and the LRP scheme.Recommencations were given accordingly to ensure the adequacy of LRP inmaintaining and improving the livelihood of affected households and people.Analysis on LRP preparation focuses on the extent to which the LRP attain theaforementioned objectives and the extent to which the LRP considers andaccomodates the relevant characteristics of AHs and APs found through thesocio-economic survey.

16. Also with reference to social-economic survey, most of respondentsare married, only 5 out of 235 respondents are single and 22 out of 87 of totalfemale respondent are widow. Women, therefore, are more vulnerable topoverty. Household led by women carry a “double day burden”, as a head ofhousehold, she has to handle domestic work and as well as the main earnersimultaneously. Women also suffer mobility constraint which possibly impactnegatively on their household income. It is also appears that most of respondentgraduated from elementary school. Government need to seriously consider ofhow to lift up education and job opportunities for AHs. This should beaccommodated in LRP scheme, not only in terms of shortsighted projectrestoration, but need to be integrated with the long term governmental publicservice accounts.



xi

17. Having reviewed socio-economic data, EMA recommends to improveLRP in two forms. Firstly, there should be initiatives or facilities to help AHs andespecially relocated AHs to establish their own businesses in their new sites.This initiative should also be able to restore and protect their income andlivelihood during their initial transient condition following the relocation.Secondly, the “facilitation” should not only focus on improving skill to restoreincome and livelihood, but, for improving its effectiveness, should be managedwithin a community development perspective. With this view, the programshould be conducted in 4 phases: (1) increasing the APs’ awareness of thesituation, (2) helping APs to recognize their strengths and potentials, (3)improving and nurturing the strength through trainings (which already beendesigned), and (4) protecting and institutionalizing the improved condition.

18. It is agreed, under ADB Resettlement Framework, the compensationthat given to both legal and illegal settlers considering opportunity cost.Compensation for structure, provision of transport, and provision of transitionsubsistence, should be given under no discriminative circumstances includingtheir social economic and legal status. It is strongly indicated from DED surveythat 70.02% of AHs will not move beyond the canal rehabilitation area,especially in Kabupaten Karawang and Kabupaten Bekasi. Therefore, efforts atraising awareness should be seriously and systematically conducted to reducemoral hazard for they granting luxurious rewards to their illegally occupy andexploit public goods and properties.

19. While conducting assessment EMA has opportunities to communicate,interact, and cooperate with different parties handling resettlement plan, bothformally and informally. As the late comer to the project, EMA especially isgrateful for notable support and assistance from PCMU. Thoroughcommunication and sincere cooperation with DED consultants and LPMEquator in the very first months of involvement, have given chances for EMA tolearn the project faster. Warm welcoming greetings from members of RWGs totheir meetings, and discussion with ADB professionals, make believe that theproject needs greater commitments from its stakeholders. Greater awarenesson project delay and un-proportional negative stigma on complaints andgrievance handling mechanism in the past should be transformed into apowerful energy accelerating successful collective actions.

20. Finally, it is expected by integrating community development approachto resettlement design and its implementation, the project would have not onlybuilding strong conviction on the needs of good project governance such asfirm legal instruments and its implementation tools, but also developingsensitivity and awareness of how resettlement can be regarded as not only amean to execute good project governance, but ultimately, the opportunity to:

• raise community awareness on the importance to regard public goodsand properties with virtue,

• empower community potentials to confidently make their own living,• develop capacity of both community as well as project holders to

conduct project in such a way that promote both community welfare ascommunity virtuous citizen, and

• protect community property rights as well as public goods andproperties.

1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

21. Resettlement; as commonly understood, is a term used to describe themovement of individual or group from one location to another. In contrast withurbanization or transmigration (in Indonesia) wherein refers to a voluntarymovement of people, resettlement refers to a process of moving people to adifferent place because they are no longer allowed to stay in the area wherethey used to live because of government development project.

22. Affected community; is number of people who live in particular

geographical area that consists of individual persons (affected person or known in

this report as APs) and groups (affected households known as AHs). They are

defined as those who stand to lose, as a consequence of the project, all or part of

their physical and non-physical assets, including homes, communities, productive

lands, resources such as forests, range lands, fishing areas, or important cultural

sites, commercial properties, tenancy, income-earning opportunities, social and

cultural networks and activities.1 Such definition is also commonly shared by both

development practices and donors.

23. Literature review reveals with two different types of resettlement,these are voluntary and involuntary. The former results in voluntary resettleswho are generally consist of people who are self-selected, young, and willing topursue new opportunities. While the later results in involuntary resettles who arepeople of all ages, outlooks, and capabilities, many of whom have no option butto give up their assets (usually productive assets).

24. Physical displacement that is the actual physical relocation of peopleresulting in a loss of shelter, productive assets or access to productive assets(such as land, water, and forests) most of the time is unavoidable. Economicdisplacement as results from an action that interrupts or eliminates people’saccess to productive assets, is also unavoidable although sometimes withoutphysically relocating the people themselves.

2

25. Consequently, systematic careful steps need to be formulated andimplemented such as :

1. using thematic maps that identify such features as populationsettlements, infrastructure, soil composition, natural vegetation areas,water resources, and land use patterns;

2. conducting a census that enumerates the affected people and registersthem according to location;

3. providing an inventory of lost and affected assets at the household,enterprise, and community level;

4. conducting socioeconomic surveys and studies of all affected people(including seasonal migrant, and host populations), as necessary;

5. doing analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensationparameters, to design appropriate income restoration and sustainable

1 Asian Development Bank, Handbook on Resettlement : A Guide to Good Practice, Manila, 1998,

page 32 International Finance Corporation, Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan,

Washington, 2002, page 5.

2

development initiatives, and to identify baseline monitoring indicators;and

6. opening consultation with affected populations regarding mitigation ofeffects and development opportunities.

3

26. The Government of Indonesia (GOI) currently hold Integrated CitarumWater Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP), an AsianDevelopment Bank funded project, which is to be carried out by the DirectorateGeneral of Water Resources (DGWR) as Executing Agency. One of its sub-project is The Rehabilitation of the West Tarum Canal (WTC) aims to improvethe flow and quality of water that provides 80% of Jakarta’s surface waterneeds, in addition to supplying the water through three district KabupatenKarawang, Kabupaten Bekasi and Kota Bekasi. The project requires torehabilitate industrial establishments and about 52,800 ha of farmland.

27. ICWRMIP-Project-1, as discussed above, incorporate resettlementprogram as sub-component 2.1 that requires both physical works and relocationof people who are living and working along the canal on land belonging to thegovernment and within the easement boundaries of the canal. Their assetsminus their land, including the buildings, crops and trees should and will be paidby the WTC project.

28. As it is indicated in updated Resettlement Plan 2012 within ICWRMIP-Project-1, there are 1320 AHs to be resettled. ADB has requirements related toresettlement with the purpose of verifying that the project contributes to povertyreduction. In the sense that the project has to provide opportunities to marginalpeople, especially households directly adversely affected by the project(affected households – AHs) to maintain their living standards.

29. Since at the moment there is lack of consistent regulation inIndonesia for resettlement, GOI has to adopt the Resettlement Framework forICWRMIP in order to fill the gap that is caused by the lack of law and localregulation related to verification of AHs is able to rehabilitate them. This is partof the Resettlement Framework (RF) requirements as a result of agreementwith ADB and relevant to the Resettlement Plan (RP) of each projectsubcomponents of ICWRMIP that involves resettlement.

30. In the context of ICWRMIP-Project-1, Asian Development Bank (ADB)

strongly urges that the aim of resettlement is to ensure that people who are

physically or economically displaced as a result of a project should end up no

worse off- and preferably, better off- than they were before the project was

undertaken. Bank policy also designates involuntary resettles as requiring

assistance.4

31. The bank tries to avoid or minimize resettlement risk of thecommunity and people who are disadvantages by the process of resettlementdue to the worse effect of it. However, if resettlement is unavoidable, the Bankhelps restore the quality of life and livelihoods of those affected. There may alsobe opportunities to improve the quality of life, particularly for vulnerable groups.

3 Ibid., page 13.

4Asian Development Bank, op.cit., p.6

3

32. The Bank also assures that compensation gets by the affected personor household should be fair with the assets that they loss during the project. Theprice of the compensation that they get is decided by the bank, the bank willappraisal the assets and the best price known in the market will be given to there-settlers so it will be fair enough for the re-settlers. Bank argues that cash forland acquisition has never been a satisfactory mode of compensation if it is notpaid at replacement values. In many cases, land-based resettlement programs

work better than non-land options.5

33. Such policy is also shared by other international development agencylike International Finance Corporation (IFC). At different context and cases, IFCurges supported project to compensate affected people for loss of physicalassets, revenue, and income resulting from economic displacement or physicalrelocation whether these losses are temporary or permanent. If domestic lawdoes not already specify such a framework, the project sponsor shouldestablish transparent methods for the valuation of all assets affected by the

project.6

34. Given such background spoken about above, it is convinced, that inorder to conduct successful resettlement program at least there are four keycritical issues need to be rigorously addressed i.e. firm Resettlement Policy,accurate Resettlement Plan, thorough social-economic survey, and relevantCorrection Action Plan that includes Livelihood Restoration Program especiallyfor those who belong to vulnerable groups. This report, therefore, mainly willreview resettlement in ICWRMIP-Project 1 along those respected key issues.All other issue will also be discussed in connection with them.

1.2 External Monitoring Agency

35. Project Monitoring Scheme is set to guarantee that the RP for anysubcomponent is designed based on the overall RF and is implemented basedon the approved plan, monitoring of resettlement will be conducted via anumber of complementary mechanisms. Firstly, Sub-Component 8.2 of whichBappenas acts as its implementing agency conducts Independent Monitoringand Evaluation to the whole program at national level. Secondly, within WestTarum Canal Rehabilitation Program, monitoring and evaluation is internallyconducted by SES PMU. Finally, external monitoring is conducted by anindependent agency that is known as the External Monitoring Agency (EMA).

36. It is understood that the EMA is an independent entity that specializesin applied social sciences. It will be directly accountable to the Director of theExecuting Agency. The EMA will have access to all the offices involved in theimplementation of the subproject RPs and all project documentation. Centre forPublic Policy and Management Studies (CPMS), Research Institute andExtension Program (LPPM) of Parahyangan Catholic University has sub-contracted by EGIS International to carry out the task.

37. Main objectives of External Monitoring Agency as mentioned in itsterm of reference are to:

1. Verify results of internal monitoring;

5Ibid, p.6

6International Finance Corporation, op.cit , p. 6

4

2. Monitor whether the RP updating and CAP preparation are beingconducted in accordance with ADB and GOI procedures;

3. Assess whether resettlement objectives as stated in the RF, finalupdated RP and CAP have been met, especially, whetherlivelihoods and living standards have been restored;

4. Assess whether the corrective actions planned in the final updatedRP were adequate in helping APs to at least restore their previousliving standards;

5. Assess whether the AHs whose dwellings, assets and livelihoodsare affected by the Projects are no worse off, in terms of householdeconomy and welfare after RP implementation and after projectimplementation, Special attention needs to be given to thevulnerable groups and severely AHs. If they were found to be worseoff, analysis on the main cause need to be done and specificremedial actions need to be proposed;

6. Assess resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact andsustainability, drawing lessons as a guide to future resettlementpolicy making and planning; and

7. Ascertain whether the resettlement entitlements were appropriate tomeeting the objectives, and whether the objectives were suited tothe APs conditions.

38. During RP Updating and LRP preparation the EMA will monitor thefollowing;

1. Quality of baseline data collection.It is envisaged that independent baseline data and as needed,other socio-economic information on a sample of AP householdswill need to be collected in order to assess the reliability and validityof the RP survey data; In the absence of baseline socio economicdata, and given the difficulties related to check on the information toobtained from AP’s, a quality check methodology may bedeveloped including verification by neighbours and local villageleader.

2. Inclusion of AP’s who may have been evicted.Whether the RP updating activities including the inventory oflosses, identification of the AHs who were evicted by the BekasiDistrict, consultation meetings to the APs including the evicted APs,relocation preparation in line with the RF/ADB requirements.

3. The accuracy of final survey and asset valuation.4. The quality and effectiveness of the complaint and grievance

mechanism for the APs and other stakeholders during the RPupdating and its resolution

5. The inclusion of a gender perspective.Whether the survey data has been disaggregated by gender andthat the RP is inclusive of gender and the needs of vulnerablegroups. As well as monitoring the consultant should also.

6. Provide recommendations for improving the RP updating and CAPpreparation.

39. During RP Implementation the EMA will monitor and evaluate thefollowing:

1. Review the updated baseline data and gather additional socio-economic information, as necessary, on sample AP households;

2. Whether survey and assets valuation are accurate

5

3. Whether land acquisition, compensation and livelihood restorationhas been implemented in a satisfactory way in line with the projectresettlement policy/ADB requirements.

4. Whether land (if any), buildings and crops were adequatelycompensated

5. Whether resolution of complaints and grievances raised by the APshas been achieved and was useful to any aggrieved APs;

6. Whether the institutional arrangements including the RWG haveadequately managed resettlement works

7. Whether the AHs are better or worse off as a result of the lossessustained and compensation as well as assistance received.

8. Specifically identify and evaluate if any severely affected orvulnerable households were found to have become worse off

9. Provide clear quantitative and qualitative justification for the aboveassessments

10. The quality and effectiveness of the livelihood restorationassistance and corrective actions provided for the evicted AHs.

11. Whether the RP implementation has been inclusive of genderconcerns and issues and ADB policy

12. Lessons learned to be applied to the next projects, and13. Provide recommendations for improving resettlement

implementation in the future.

40. This report covers only result on monitoring During RP Updating andLRP preparation only as aforementioned earlier in paragraph above. The reportwill consist of six parts. Firstly, introduction (this part) which include projectbackground and job description of External Monitoring Agency (EMA).Secondly, methodology that incorporate community development approachesemployed by EMA, into general approach that is indicated in EMA’s Terms ofReference (TOR). Thirdly, overview on Resettlement Plan (RP) 2008 as agreedby both GOI and ADB. Fourthly, overview on the updated RP Updating andLivelihood Restoration Program (LRP) Preparation. Fifthly, analysis on selectedissues which include quality of baseline data, inclusion of Affected Person(APs), accuracy of final survey and asset valuation, the quality andeffectiveness of complaints and grievances mechanism, and the inclusion ofgender. Sixthly, overview on Livelihood Restoration Program. Seventhly, thereport will be closed with recommendations.

6

2 METHODOLOGY

2.1 General Approach

41. According to TOR monitoring methodology will consist of thefollowing:

a. Field visits to assess RP updating and CAP preparation includinginventory of the lost assets, public consultation meetings,preparation of relocation, and effectiveness of ResettlementWorking Group, it is done using participatory observation bothduring RP updating and LRP preparation as well as duringcompliance monitoring.

b. Random review of payment vouchers and other forms ofcompensation to ensure full compliance with the requirements ofthe RF. This review will assess a representative sample of all theAPs.

c. Random site visits, where asset acquisition processes are takingplace, to ascertain that compensation has been duly paid prior tothe commencement of civil works. This activity will cover at least20% of the APs, and 20% of APs identified as vulnerable group. Forthis purpose, the EMA will check the following:(i) results of the detailed measurement survey or inventory of

affected assets;(ii) valuation of affected assets based on replacement cost; and(iii) compensation is paid prior to initiation of civil works.

d. Special market study to validate whether the unit costs used incompensating fixed assets are at current market prices orreplacement costs.

e. Periodic field visits to ascertain that affected people are adequatelyinformed of project objectives, impacts, compensation policy andentitlements through an effective public information campaign. Thisactivity will cover at least 20% of all the APs.

f. Periodic field visits to assess if grievance procedures areadequately explained to the affected people and implemented. Thisactivity will cover at least 30% of all the APs in the project.

g. For the evaluation study, the methodology will be based mainly oncomparison of the socio-economic status of severely APs followingdisplacement and their socio-economic prior to displacement. Forthis purpose, a follow-up socio-economic survey will be conductedby the EMA to find out the living standards of severely affected APsnine months to one year following completion of RPimplementation.

42. Data gathering will be carried out through a combination, asappropriate, of the following techniques:

(i) questionnaires, to be personally administered;(ii) purposive interviews of AP households;(iii) focus group discussions and village meetings; and(iv) meeting with project staff.

43. Soduring RPcompliancetwo monito

2.2 C

44. In developmcommunityprocess w

and genera 7

45. Coa small groof the scopterm endeinto the bbenefit to practice.

46. Thof life. Efferesponsibibetween sinterests wi

47. Costeps; raisand develothe four spboth RP uupdated Ranalyzed a

Figure 1resettleme

7Flo Frank

Community Development

Ⅻ SymetricInformation onthe projectscheme

Ⅻ Clearunderstanding oncommunity rightsand obligations

RAISEAWARENESS

43. Some method have been spoken about above haRP updating and LRP preparation, the other wi

ce monitoring, and some will be continuously caritoring periods.

Community Development Approach

44. In addition to the general approach, EMA is alsment approach which is "...the planned evolutiity well-being (economic, social, environmental a

whereby community members come together to t

erate solutions to common problems." 7

45. Community development scope can vary from sgroup, to large initiatives that involve the whole comope of the activity, effective community developme

deavour, well planned, inclusive and equitable, ho bigger picture, initiated and supported by comto the community, and grounded in experience.

46. The primary outcome of community developmenffective community development results in mutua

ibility among community members and recogni social, cultural, environmental and economic ma within a community; and its relationship to building

47. Community Development process should at leasise community awareness, community empowermelopment and protection of the outcomes. Figure 1 spoken steps and key indicators used in monito updating and LRP preparation as well as in th RP and LRP. Therefore, monitoring result will

along community development principles above.

1 General steps of community development andent

k and Anne Smith. 1999. The Community Development Hay Capacity. Labor Market Learning and Development Unt Canada (HRDC). p.6.

Ⅻ SymetricInformation onthe projectscheme

Ⅻ Clearunderstanding oncommunity rightsand obligations

RAISEAWARENESS

Ⅻ Firm Policy onresettlement andrelated issue

Ⅻ Fair and justregulation onCompensation

EMPOWEMENT

Ⅻ Community CapacityBuilding andDevelopment

Ⅻ Stakeholders'CapacityDevelopment

DEVELOPMENT

7

43. have been carried outwill be applied duringarried out during those

ch

44. lso using communityution of all aspects ofl and cultural). It is ao take collective action

7

45. small initiatives withinommunity. Regardless

ment should be a long-holistic and integratedmmunity members, ofce that leads to best

46. ent is improved qualityual benefit and sharednizes the connectionatters, the diversity of

ng capacity.

47. ast involves four basicment, capacity building

1 below, summarisesitoring activities duringthe implementation of

will be interpreted and.

and indicator used for

Handbook A Tool To Build Unit, Human Resources

DEVELOPMENT

Ⅻ Protection on landand state assets fordesignated publicfunctions

Ⅻ Protection forcommunitylivelihood

PROTECTION

8

2.3 Monitoring Method

48. Having discussed about both general approach and methodologiesassigned by TOR and applying community development approach as well asconsidering the progress of project activities in field; EMA decides to conductmonitoring activities of RP updating and LRP preparation using the followingtechniques: literature review, documentary study, policy analysis, participatoryobservation, desk validation, field survey.

2.3.1 Literature Review

49. Extensive literature review has been done since the beginning ofsubcontract period in March 2012 to date. The study mainly focused on theconceptual definitions, theoretical framework of resettlement, as well asresettlement practices elsewhere. Result of literature review on resettlementand other issues such as community development and policy review can befound in various annexed working papers.

2.3.2 Documentary Study

50. Documentary study has also been conducted by EMA since mid ofJanuary 2012 at the time of proposal preparation. Various related projectdocuments critically reviewed and internally discussed both as material forregular team meeting as well as supplemental graduate teaching materials. Listof project documents reviewed by EMA is listed in ANNEX A.

2.3.3 Policy Analysis

51. Policy analysis was done by EMA basically in order to clearlyunderstand resettlement framework as an integrated part of loan agreementwith reference to general policy framework both of ADB and GOI. Paper onpolicy analysis is attached in ANNEX B

2.3.4 Part ic ipatory Observat ion

52. EMA team members actively participate in various meeting of projectstakeholders and regularly make systematic contacts both with projectstakeholder as well as with randomly chosen AHs. Such activities wereconducted primarily in order to follow the progress of the project and tounderstand current issues as well as to provide informal inputs. Minutes ofofficial meetings in which EMA attends and provides inputs is attached inANNEX C.

2.3.5 Desk Validat ion

53. Desk validation on RP updating process and result was conducted byEMA. Various descriptive statistical exercises as well as correlations were run

to assess correction

2.3.6

54. FieWednesdawell trainepercent (20used to dewas attach

55. CoChecklist documentagender semethods uFigure 2 b

Figure 2. Co

56. It resettlemeresettlemebut also th

• raian

• em

• decoco

• propro

Field Survey

s the quality of baseline data. Report on the qualitn is attached as ANNEX D.

Field Survey

54. Field survey to verify content validity of updated RPday 31 October and Thursday 1 November 2012ned surveyors and 6 lectures get involved in th(20%) of respondents was chosen from 1320 AHs, determine the precise position of selected respondeched in ANNEX F.

55. Combination among all methods is also used wht Resettlement, for instance, is filled usingntary study, participatory observation as well asensitivity analysis is attached in ANNEX H, wh utilized in this monitoring stage can be illustrabelow.

. Comprehensive methods utilized in monitoring

56. It is expected by integrating community develoent design the project would have sensitivity anent can be regarded as not only to execute good

the opportunity to:raise community awareness on the importance to reand properties with virtue,empower community potentials to confidently makedevelop capacity of both community as well as projconduct project in such a way that promote both cocommunity virtuous citizenprotect community property rights as well as public properties.

LiteratureReview

DocumentaryStudy

PolicyAnalisis

ParticipatoryObservation

DeskValidation

Field Survey

9

lity of AHs data and its

54. RP was conducted on2 wherein 15 pairs of

the activities. TwentyHs, GPS instrument was

dents. Sampling frame

55. when possible. Gendering literature review,as survey. Paper onwhile comprehensive

trated in the following

56. elopment approach tond awareness of how

od project governance,

regard public goods

ke their own living,oject holders tocommunity welfare as

lic goods and

10

57. In addition community approach to resettlement is also expected tobuild strong conviction on the needs of good quality technical instrumentaltools and procedures such as firmed and enforceable legal instruments,accurate data and information, good project governance both in terms ofprocess and outcomes.

11

3 RESETTLEMENT PLAN 2008

3.1 Introduct ion

58. RP 2008 is a cornerstone document for WTC Rehabilitation, not onlyin terms of administrative formality but primarily its substance that providesalmost all about basic operational framework and guideline for theimplementation of given involuntary resettlement. This chapter providesoverview on RP 2008 as contextual background to the whole analysis.

59. As it is understood the overall substance of RP 2008 consists of ninecritical parts i.e. project background, legal and policy framework, projectobjectives and basic principles, the scope of expected impacts, projectentitlement and its implementation arrangement, description on AHs economicconditions, the issue of vulnerability, gender and ethnicity, consultation anddisclosure. The last part of RP 2008 is a necessary guidance on RP updatingand its implementation. The following paragraphs provide general overview onRP 2008. Its structure follows along the structural line of the original document.

3.2 Background of RP 2008

60. It is stated in its Project Background of RP 2008 that rehabilitation ofthe West Tarum Canal is a sub-Project of the proposed Integrated CitarumWater Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP) to be carriedout by the Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR) as its ExecutingAgency. The project is a 15 years plan and will be implemented in tranchesusing ADB’s Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF). It is planned that the projectcover the entire Citarum River Basin that covers a total of 10 regencies and 6municipalities in the province of West Java. The rehabilitation of West TarumCanal (WTC), among other components, has been proposed for inclusion inTranche 1 as a result of workshops series among various stakeholders inAugust and October 2006.

61. Project coverage area includes 54.2 km out of is 68.3 km long of WestTarum Canal will be rehabilitated. The rehabilitation of the remaining 14.3 kmbetween Bekasi River and the Ciliwung River will be handled by thePerusahaan Umum Jasa Tirta II (PJTII), the state enterprise in charge of theoperation and management of the WTC; this section is a fenced area in whichthere will be no affected people or resettlement effects. WTC has a 100 m right-of-way (ROW), measured at 50 m either side from the center of the canal. Themain objective of the rehabilitation of the WTC is to improve the flow and qualityof water that provides 80% of Jakarta’s surface water needs, in addition tosupplying the water requirements of industrial establishments and about 52,800ha of farmland. The WTC runs through three district Kabupaten Karawang,Kabupaten Bekasi and Kota Bekasi.

12

3.3 Policy and Legal Framew ork of RP 2008

3.3.1 GOI Regulat ions Framew ork on

Resett lement

62. Recently GOI have passed Law (UU) Number 2/2012 on procurementof land for development and for public interest and its derivative instrumentPresidential Decree number 71/2012 on procurement of land for developmentand public interests. These could be the most relevant to WTC involuntaryresettlement program, since these legal instruments have accommodated alllegal basis needed to conduct resettlement program aligned with internationalpractices.

63. The spirit of the latest Presidential Decree Number 71/2012 isbasically the same i.e. provision of legal documents for assets to becompensated. However, this decree provides mechanism for those with no legalrights to receive compensation. Such mechanism is specifically stated at article26 which says “ In case there is no proof of legal ownership of land as stated inarticles 21 and 23, the land owner may still forward a written statement that aland is his/hers and supported by two witnesses from the surrounding areawhere the land is located. The witnesses must be those who do not havekinship relation with the owner up to level two, vertically and horizontally.However, the respective law and its derivative Presidential Decree cannot beapplied to ICWRMIP for it has not taken into effect yet.

64. Given such aforementioned regulatory context, as it is acknowledge inRP 2008, the most relevant previous regulatory instrument to involuntaryresettlement is Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 as amended by PresidentialDecree No. 65/2006, regarding “On Land Acquisition for Development Purposesin the Public Interest”, and BPN Regulation No. 3/2007 on Land AcquisitionImplementation Guideline of Presidential Decrees No. 36/2005 and 65/2006.

65. Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 and Presidential Decree No.65/2006 provide various forms of compensation for private assets needed topursue Government development projects. Both Presidential Decree No.65/2006 and Presidential Decree No. 36/2005 develop provisions of the earlierPresidential Decree No. 55/1993 that essentially lays down the rules on howGovernment could exercise the State’s inherent power of eminent domain.Private properties could be acquired to pave the way for development projectsthat serve the public interest.

66. There are some related regulations at regional or provincial level,among others these can be identified:

• West Java Province Regulation No 9 Years 2008• West Java Province Regulation No 24 Years 2010• West Java Province Regulation No 2 Years 2009• West Java Province Regulation No 25 Years 2010• West Java Province Regulation No 9 Year 2010• West Java Province Regulation No 7 Years 2010• West Java Province Regulation No 22 Years 2010

13

67. These regulations do not directly relate to resettlement. They areabout development planning, cooperation among regions, conflict resolutionsamong regions, spatial plan and infrastructure. They serve contextualframeworks on resettlement at regions where the resettlement takes place.

68. Basic Principles summarized from the existing GOI policy frameworkare as follow:

• Procurement of land for development for the public interest is possiblethrough dis-charge (pelepasan) and cession (penyerahan) of landrights. This may take form of sale, purchase and swap.

• The discharge and cession of land rights should be conductedvoluntarily.

• Compensation may take form of cash, land replacement, resettlement,combination of all of them and other possible form as agreed by relatedparties.

• Compensation are given based on the principle of legal and formal suchas provision of legal documents for assets which are compensated.

69. Unfortunately, the respective laws and their enabling decrees, havebeen designed primarily for the purpose of acquiring in the most expeditiousway properties needed for the right-of-way (ROW) of government projects. Theywere not intended to address the social consequences of the exercise of powerby the State which referred, at this point, to involuntary resettlement.

70. Given such legal framework of GOI, therefore RP 2008 ofresettlement subproject has been enforced an adopted that aims to fill-in thegaps in what local laws and regulations cannot provide in order to ensure thatAHs are able to rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project condition.The following paragraphs analyze adopted resettlement framework withreference to that of ADB’s.

3.3.2 Adopted Resett lement Framew ork

71. Basic principles of ADB’s frameworks based on ADB’s Handbook ofResettlement can be summarized as follow:

• Involuntary resettlement should be avoided or minimized.• AP’s shall be provided with compensation and rehabilitation.• Lack of legal rights to assets will not bar the AP’s from compensation

and rehabilitation.• Replacement of affected assets shall be provided at their current

market values and without depreciation.• Resettlement plans shall be carried out with participation and

consultation with APs.• Schedule of budget for Resettlement Plan and implementation must be

incorporated into the overall project.• Payment of compensation must be completed prior to the award of

work contract.• Rehabilitation measure must also be in place but not necessarily

completed prior to the award of work contract.• Compensation and rehabilitation assistance for ethnic minorities and

socially disadvantaged such as women headed households, thedisabled and elderly will be carried out with respect for their specialneeds.

72. Thwhere ADBcountries, of policiesresettlemein Indonesto APs sucand poor d

73. Asbetween thoften ask governmenexecution dissatisfac

74. Asthem impleis againts tof policy imFigures.

Figure 3 S

3.3.3

75. PrIndonesia ICWRMIP been desigpractice, in

72. These basic principles apply to resettlement prograDB’s projects apply such as China, India, and B

s, as is the case of Indonesia, problems usually occes, in particular the compensation’s distribution.ent programs in developing countries (China, Ind

esia problems often occur on technicalities of paymuch as the amount of compensation, who should br data of APs.

73. As for compensation, problems usually occu the government and APs on the amount of thek for a larger amount of compensation than thoent. Prolong disagreement leads to postponemn of other related programs. On the APs action, some turn into conflict.

74. As for rehabilitation/restoration program of APs’plemented as it should be which leads to impoveriss the spirit of the policies. In brief, similarities, diffe implementation between ADB and GoI are visua

Scheme for Resettlement Policy Analysis

Project Object ives and Polic ies

RP 2008

75. Project objectives, as mentioned earlier paragrapia will use the Project Resettlement Policy (the PIP specifically because existing national laws and signed to address involuntary resettlement accor

, including ADB’s policy.

14

72. gram in any countriesBangladesh. In these

ccur at implementationn. As is the case ofndia, Bangladesh etc),yment of compensation be paid for how much,

73. cur on disagreementhe compensation. APsthose allocated by thement of payment and part, this leads to

74. s’ livelihood, not all ofrishment of APs whichferences and problemsualized in the following

s According to

75. aph the Government of Project Policy) for thed regulations have notording to international

15

76. One key policy objective of the RP is to replace and compensate lostassets based on the principle of replacement cost that should be in line withlocal government regulations, if available. Replacement cost is the amountcalculated before displacement that is needed to replace affected assets.

77. Additional socioeconomic support will be provided to AHs dependingon the type and severity of their losses consistent with the intention of helping tomitigate Project impacts and to restore livelihood and living standards. WhereGovernment assistance is not sufficient to replace lost land or other assets, theProject will provide additional special program under the livelihood restorationprogram support to raise the entitlement up to replacement cost.

78. The Project will provide “transitional subsistence assistance” tohouseholds displaced from their sources of productive income or from housingduring the transition period until they can re-establish productive income,businesses or houses at new locations. The subsistence assistance andtransportation allowance are in form program of LRP The Project will alsoprovide support to displaced AHs to transport their personal possessions andnew and used building materials, that is, “transportation allowance”.

79. The details of these additional socio-economic support allowances areprovided in the Entitlement Matrix.

80. Households that are physically displaced and or affected by loss of 10%or more of their productive assets, or who are vulnerable, will also be entitled toparticipate in a livelihood restoration program. The livelihood restorationprogram (LRP) may be made available to poor households and/or individualsliving in the villages along WTC and also those relocated under the KabupatenBekasi WTC roads program.

81. The Government of Indonesia will use the Project ResettlementPolicy (the Project Policy) for the ICWRMIP specifically because existingnational laws and regulations have not been designed to address involuntaryresettlement according to international practice, including ADB’s policy. TheProject Policy is aimed at filling-in any gaps in what local laws and regulationscannot provide in order to help ensure that Ahs are able to rehabilitatethemselves to at least their pre-project condition.

82. The principles of the Project Policy and the entitlements of the AHsare based on the type and degree of their losses. Where there are gapsbetween the Indonesian legal framework for resettlement and ADB’s Policy onInvoluntary Resettlement, practicable mutually agreeable approaches will bedesigned consistent with Government practices and ADB’s Policy.

83. The core principle of the Project Policy is anchored on the philosophythat Government development projects must serve the public good and that, inthe design and implementation of such projects, all efforts will be exerted tohelp ensure that Ahs are not worse off. Moreover, the ICWRMIP should providean opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it. Likewise, theICWRMIP should serve as an occasion for the local population to participate inits planning and implementation, thereby engendering a sense of ownershipover the Project, subprojects and other components.

16

3.4 Scope of Resett lement Impact According to

RP 2008

84. The first component of resettlement impact according to RP 2008 isthe Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts. The updatedInventory of Losses (IOL) undertaken by the TA Consultants1 in May 2008,calculated that a total of 892 entitled parties (EPs), which consist of 872affected households or AHs and 20 government agencies, will lose the use ofapproximately 46 has of land that will be cleared of structures and vegetation.

85. It was identified that none of the occupants of affected land have anylegal claim over the affected property within the established and acquired right-of-way (ROW) of WTC. The impacts on AHs are summarized as follows:

• marginal impacts due to permanent use of paddy land, 209 farmers• temporary loss of paddy/productive land in ex-river beds, 150 AHs• relocation of AHs who have other land to move to, 49 AHs (house, 8

AHs; house cum-shops, 1 AH; and shops, 40 AHs)• relocation of AHs who have no other land, 466 AHs (house, 109 AHs;

house cum-shops, 17 AHs, and shops, 338 AHs)• loss of income as canal boat operators, 9 AHs• impacts on poor and vulnerable AHs, 589 AHs• loss of 542 main structures, crops and trees

86. It was also determined that the land in ex-river beds may be re-usedafter about a year following the dumping of silt and earth on the site after thespoil has been assessed for any contamination and certified as safe for use.

3.5 Project Entit lements and Implementat ion

Arrangements According RP 2008

87. Project Entitlements; one of key policy objectives of the RP 2008 is toreplace and compensate lost assets based on the principle of replacement costthat should be in line with local government regulations, if available.Replacement cost is the amount calculated before displacement that is neededto replace affected assets.

88. Additional socioeconomic support will be provided to AHs dependingon the type and severity of their losses consistent with the intention of helping tomitigate Project impacts and to restore livelihood and living standards. WhereGovernment assistance is not sufficient to replace lost land or other assets, theProject will provide additional special program under the livelihood restorationprogram support to raise the entitlement up to replacement cost.

89. The Project will provide “transitional subsistence assistance” tohouseholds displaced from their sources of productive income or from housingduring the transition period until they can re-establish productive income,businesses or houses at new locations.

90. The subsistence assistance and transportation allowance are in formprogram of LRP. The Project will also provide support to displaced AHs to

17

transport their personal possessions and new and used building materials, thatis, “transportation allowance”.

91. The details of these additional socio-economic support allowances areprovided in the Entitlement Matrix. Households that are physically displacedand or affected by loss of 10% or more of their productive assets, or who arevulnerable, will also be entitled to participate in a livelihood restoration program.

92. The livelihood restoration program (LRP) may be made available topoor households and/or individuals living in the villages along WTC and alsothose relocated under the Kabupaten Bekasi WTC roads program.

93. Implementation Arrangements; the Directorate General of WaterResources is the Executing Agency and will have overall responsibility forensuring satisfactory planning and implementation of the Project.

94. The implementing agencies, Balai Besar Project Implementation Unit(PIU) and the District Resettlement Working Group (RWG) will be responsible inthe planning, updating and implementation of the RP.

95. The PIU will have qualified resettlement/social development staff whowill represent PIU in the RWG.

96. The Kabupaten/Kota, through the office of the Bupati (Regent) orWalikota (Mayor) will provide the main workforce by organizing the RWG,issuing decrees and approving disbursing funds.

97. It is also agreed that the entitlement implementation arrangementsbased on both the entitlement matrix and existing local government regulations,are described below:

a. APs within the Karawang district and Bekasi City will be entitled toreplacement cost as described in the entitlement matrix andcalculated based local regulations where available.

b. APs within the Bekasi District will be entitled to compensation usingthe “uang kerohiman” scheme as stipulated in the existing localgovernment regulation “Keputusan Bupati Bekasi Nomor300/Kep.71-POD. I/2007” or any updated local governmentregulation.

c. Any gaps in the Bekasi district regulation on providing compensationwill be fulfilling the form of a special program under the LRP.

d. All kind of allowance defined in the entitlement matrix will beprovided in the form the LRP (community empowerment program).

e. Monitoring and evaluation of the resettlement activities should referto the implementation approach defined in the above points (a), (b),(c) and (d).

98. The Project Implementation Consultants (PIC) will guide and assist thePIU and RWG in RP implementation. The PIC will also engage localorganization/NGO to design and implement relocation and livelihood relocationactivities and monitor livelihood restoration.

99. Monitoring. The PIU and RWG will be responsible for internalmonitoring of resettlement activities. Progress reports will be submitted to ADBon a quarterly basis.

18

100. An external monitoring and evaluation agency (EMA) will be engaged 1month following the start of RP updating. The EMA will be required to submit aninception report one month following its mobilization and quarterly reports onthe progress of RP updating and implementation and make necessaryrecommendations to address issues that will be identified.

101. The EMA will likewise conduct a Post-Resettlement ImplementationEvaluation Study.

102. RP Cost Estimates. The estimated cost of resettlement for therehabilitation of WTC USD 1.87 million, which includes payment for non-landassets, allowances, relocation and livelihood restoration programs, andcontingencies. It should be noted that these are estimates only and will beupdated during RP Updating.

103. Implementation Schedule. During the process of completion ofdetailed design, RP updating will commence. Subsequent resettlement activitieswill be coordinated with the schedule of civil works. Land acquisition andrelocation of affected households cannot commence until the updated RP hasbeen reviewed and approved by ADB.

104. The PIU will carry out its best efforts to minimize the resettlementtransition period. Acquisition of assets, payment of compensation, and theresettlement and the start of the livelihood rehabilitation activities of AHs, will becompleted prior to any construction activities taking place in a designatedconstructions works zone (CWZ).

3.6 Socioeconomic Condit ions of AHs

105. Socioeconomic condition of AHs is critical information for bothupdating RP and developing LRP. Its methodology, therefore, is critical toproduce accurate social economic data. The impact survey involved theconduct of inventory of losses (IOL) where all fixed assets (i.e., lands used forresidence, commerce, agriculture; dwelling units; stalls and shops;miscellaneous structures, such as toilets; trees with commercial value; etc.)located inside the corridor of impact (COI) are identified, tagged, measured,their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacementvalues calculated.

106. There were two sets of data gathering instruments. The first setdeveloped in 2006 and the second 2008. The basic instrument used inconducting of the impact survey was a questionnaire, translated into BahasaIndonesia. The survey team is composed of local government authorities andTA Consultants. Other than consultants (i.e., social safeguards specialists), ateam of fourteen local research assistants that included field coordinators,enumerators, computer data encoders, statistician, and replacement cost(market rates) researchers was organized to help prepare the RP. Except forthe statisticians and the replacement cost researchers, the rest of the localresearch assistants were based in the field.

107. Project Affected Persons. There are a total of 892 entitled parties(EPs) as per survey. Of these, 872 are households (AHs) and will lose part orthe entire area of the land they presently use or occupy while 20 aregovernment-owned properties.

19

108. Projected Affected Households. Total Number of AffectedHouseholds, Current Use of Affected State Land, Permanent and TemporaryImpacts on State Land, Impacts on Main Houses and Shops, Impacts onSecondary Structures, Impacts on Crops and Trees.

109. Affected Canal Boat Crossing Operators; There are 9 operators ofcanal crossing rigs, and their business will definitely stop with the rehabilitationof the WTC and the construction of foot bridges where these boat operators arelocated.

110. Impacts on Poor and Vulnerable Households; RP Updating of the total872 AHs, 589 AHs have been found to fall into one or more. They face theprospect of not having the same opportunity as the other AHs would in derivingbenefit from the Project. They in fact risk further marginalization unlessadditional support is extended to them. There are 91 women headedhouseholds, 58 households headed by the elderly, 440 households falling belowthe poverty line. 464 of the 589 vulnerable AH which falls under the threecategories are landless.

3.7 Vulnerability, Gender and Ethnicity Issues in

RP 2008

111. Vulnerability, gender and ethnicity issues are appearing as criticalissues to address in RP 2008. Therefore, participation, grievance redress anddisclosure are considerably important. Prior to the commencement of the IOL inSeptember and October 2006 and again in April and May 2007 and May 2008as part of follow-up activities on data gathering in connection with thepreparation of the RP, public meetings and consultations with local officials,residents, and AHs were held in villages traversed by the WTC.

112. Consultation-meetings with AHs and local officials will continue duringRP updating and implementation and will follow the Project’s participatoryapproach. A public information booklet (PIB) in the local language will bedistributed to the affected households and posted in commune offices (villageand sub-district) before the ADB’s Appraisal Mission. A copy of the RP in thelocal language will be placed in PIU and district offices.

113. A grievance mechanism has been designed to ensure that affectedhouseholds’ concerns and complaints are addressed and resolved in a timelyand satisfactory manner. The Project authority will continue to make affectedhouseholds fully aware of their rights through verbal and written means duringconsultation, survey, and at the time of compensation.

3.8 Consultat ion and Disclosure According to

RP 2008

114. Disclosure of RP and Social Monitoring Reports; according to RP2008 the key information in the draft RP will be disclosed to the affectedhouseholds before submission to ADB for review and approval. The draft of RPwill be uploaded on the ADB website before appraisal. Following approval of the

20

draft RP by the DGWR and ADB, the final RP will again be disclosed to theaffected households and uploaded on ADB website.

115. The updated RP (draft and approved) to be prepared during thedetailed design stage will likewise be disclosed to the affected households anduploaded on ADB website. Social monitoring reports will be made available tothe affected households and will be submitted to ADB for web posting.

116. Having discussed RP 2008 as the contextual framework of analysis, thenext chapter (Chapter 4) will provide the overview on RP Updating and LRPpreparation.

21

4 RP UPDATING AND LRP PREPARATION

4.1 Introduction: Scope of RP Updating

117. As the actual execution of resettlement need to be as accurately andmeticulously implemented as possible, RP 2008 needs to be updated due toits accuracy and current. This chapter deals with question, whether RP updatingmet the expectation.

118. In the closing part of RP 2008, it is mentioned that the scope of RPupdating should include the following items:

1. Implementation Arrangements2. Detailed Design and Detailed Measurement Survey3. Relocation of Households and Shop Owners4. Livelihood Restoration Program5. Community Rural Water Supply and Sanitation6. Special Measures for Affected Vulnerable Households and Madura

Migrants7. Gender Strategy8. Grievance Redress Mechanism9. Internal Monitoring10. External Monitoring11. RP Cost Estimates and Finalization of RP Budget During RP

Updating12. Consultation and Disclosure of Updated RP13. Implementation Schedule

119. EMA reviewed the final report of RP produced by DGWR thatsupposedly in accordance with the final detailed engineering design andchanges in the corridor of impact in close consultation with the APs andconcerned stakeholders. It is also expected that the final updated RP will reflectthe final identification of APs/AHs, actual impacts and correspondingentitlements, relocation facilitation, livelihood restoration program (LRP),institutional arrangement, monitoring system, and resettlement budget andschedule. During finalization of the updated RP, a detailed measurement survey(DMS) has been undertaken to determine the actual impacts on land and assetsas well as economic income and livelihood of each household.

120. It is clearly indicated in the final draft of RP, that serious efforts tominimize the resettlement impact should include the followings:

1. application of a working zone system so that the canal rehabilitationconstruction will not significantly disrupt to the traffic jam andeconomic or business activities along the canal;

2. ii) the construction activities will be maximized during the driedsession to avoid potential impacts of flooding.

3. iii) The rehabilitation of the inspection road will be limited to theexisting road ROW and therefore it will not trigger resettlement.

4. iv) The dredged sediment are to be properly dehydrated andaerated (to remove the smell) in temporary stockpile yards beforethey are transported to the spoil bank yards.

121. Following are the key principles in the Bank’s policy on involuntaryresettlement that has been agreed and should be followed:

22

1. Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible;

2. Where population displacement is unavoidable, it should beminimized by exploring all viable project options;

3. All compensation is based on the principle of replacement cost;

4. Each involuntary resettlement is conceived and executed as part ofa development project or program;

5. Affected people should be fully informed and consulted oncompensation and/or resettlement options;

6. Institutions of the affected people, and, where relevant, of theirhosts, are to be protected and supported. Affected people are to beassisted to integrate economically and socially into hostcommunities so that adverse impacts on the host communities areminimized and social harmony is promoted;

7. The absence of a formal legal title to land is not a bar to ADB policyentitlements;

8. Affected people are to be identified and recorded as early aspossible in order to establish their eligibility through a populationrecord or census that serves as an eligibility cut-off date, preferablyat the project identification stage, to prevent a subsequent influx ofencroachers of others who wish to take advance of such benefits;

9. Particular attention must be paid to the needs of the poorestaffected households and other vulnerable groups that may be athigh risk of impoverishment. This may include affected householdswithout legal title to land or other assets, households headed bywomen, the elderly or disabled, and ethnic minority peoples.Appropriate assistance must be provided to help them improve theirsocio-economic status;

10. The full costs of resettlement and compensation should be includedin the presentation of project costs and benefits; and

11. Relocation and rehabilitation may be considered for inclusion inADB loan financing for the project, if requested, to assure timelyavailability of the required resources and ensure compliance withinvoluntary resettlement procedures during implementation.

122. Having reviewed the final draft of updated RP, EMA will focus mainly on

monitoring five areas corresponding to its TOR and have been discussed in the

earlier parts of this report. These five mentioned areas are as the following:1. Quality of baseline data collection; it is envisaged that

independent baseline data and as needed, other socio-economicinformation on a sample of AHs will need to be collected in order toassess the reliability and validity of the RP survey data; In theabsence of baseline socio economic data, and given the difficultiesrelated to check on the information to obtained from AP’s, a qualitycheck methodology may be developed including verification byneighbors and local village leader.

2. Inclusion of AP’s who may have been evicted; it is necessary toassess whether the RP updating activities includes the inventory oflosses, identification of the AHs who were evicted by the BekasiDistrict, consultation meetings to the APs including the evicted APs,relocation preparation in line with the RF/ADB requirements.

3. The accuracy of final survey and asset valuation; it is critical to

23

assess whether final social economic survey is accurate and assetvaluation is comparable to market price.

4. The quality and effectiveness of the complaint and grievancemechanism; it is important to assess whether complaint andgrievance mechanism are effectively implemented both for the APsas well as for other stakeholders during the RP updating and itsresolution.

5. The inclusion of a gender perspective; it is questioned whetherthe survey data has been disaggregated by gender and that the RPis inclusive of gender and the needs of vulnerable groups.

Following paragraphs provide analysis on five selected issues relevant to thescope of work of EMA.

4.2 Quality of AHs Data

123. In order to analyze the quality of AHs data, EMA conduct two stagesof validations, desk validation and field survey. In the first stage of validationEMA conducted assessment AHs baseline data, descriptive statistics is used atanalyzing it. The results are presented in a paper on analysing AHs baselinedata (ANNEX I). In the second stage of validation, EMA was conducting fieldsurvey on 31 October and 1 November 2012 which involves 331 respondent(more than 25% of AHs) to be verified. Sampling frame is enclosed (ANNEX F)along with survey instrument (ANNEX J).

4.2.1 Conceptual and Analyt ical Framew ork

124. Theoretically, data quality should be analyzed based on a number ofdimensions, i.e.: accessibility, appropriateness of amount, believability,completeness, conciseness of representation, consistency of representation,ease of manipulation, freedom-of-error, interpretability, objectivity, relevancy,reputation, security, timeliness, understand-ability, and value-added (Pipino, et.

al., 2002).

125. According to the objectives of this study, the relevant dimensions ofdata quality that are employed in the analysis of AHs database are: (1)completeness, which is the extent data is not missing and is of sufficientbreadth and depth for the task at hand; (2) conciseness of representation, whichis the extent data is compactly represented; (3) consistency of representation,which is the extent data is presented in the same format; (4) freedom-of-error,which is the extent data is correct and reliable; and (5) timeliness, which is theextent data is sufficiently up-to-date for the task at hand.

126. Two stages of studies have been conducted by EMA, desk validationand field survey. The data used as the basis for analysis are: (1) the RP dated31 August 2012 which consists of 1320 affected households, and (2) affectedhousehold samples obtained from survey conducted on 31 October – 1November 2012 which consists of 331 affected households. The first data isused for analyzing RP based on the first three dimensions, while the seconddata is used for analyzing RP based on the last two dimensions.

24

4.2.2 Result of Desk Validat ion

127. In this study, completeness is viewed in term of missing value. Missing

values refer to data fields of a certain AHs that should have values but for some

reasons it does not. There are numbers of data fields that contain missing values in

a significant number in the RP data. It reveals here are many data fields contain

missing values, which number range from 1 to 769 (see ANNEX D). Missingvalues mean missing information. In the context of this resettlement project,some data fields are important in determining the status of the correspondingAHs regarding the LRP design. These data fields are Umur, Pekerjaan,Pendapatan, Fisik dan Sifat bangunan. This implies that the LRP might not fully

cover or resemble the real condition of AHs.

128. Another type of flaw, conciseness of representation, was found in“Pekerjaan” data field which has 93 categories (see ANNEX D). For analysispurpose (e.g. finding out the correlation pattern between variables), thiscategorization is too large and meaningless. Simplifying the categorization (e.g.up to 10-15 categories) will make the data management and analysis easierand more meaningful. A new classification was developed, adapted fromKlasifikasi Baku Jenis Pekerjaan Indonesia 2002 (2002 Indonesia OccupationStandard Classification) of the National Statistics Bureau. This newcategorization represents occupations data of AHs into 14 types: (a) AnggotaTNI/Polri, (b) Operator dan perakit mesin, (c) Pekerja kasar dan tenagakebersihan, (d) Pensiunan, (e) Teknisi dan asisten tenaga profesional, (f)Tenaga pengolahan dan kerajinan, (g) Tenaga profesional, (h) Tenaga tatausaha, (i) Tenaga jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar, (j) Tenaga usahapertanian dan peternakan, (k) Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar, (l)Usaha pengolahan dan kerajinan, (m) Usaha pertanian dan peternakan, and (n)Tidak bekerja.

129. The next feature of data quality, consistency of representation,consists of several types of inconsistencies, i.e.:

a. Categories that are not mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive(MECE).This type of flaw was found in, for example, “Orang beresiko” data field.In the RP data there are 6 categories for this data field: “Janda”, “Jompo”,“Sakit parah”, “Tua”, “Janda, jompo”, and “Tidak beresiko”. “Janda”,“Jompo”, and “Janda, jompo” are overlapped and hence not MECE (seeANNEX D).

b. Inconsistency due to mistakenly entered data.This type of inconsistency is caused by error when entering data into thespreadsheet table. For example, in data field “Hubungan AK2” there are 8categories: “Adik”, “Anak”, “isrti”, “istri”, “KK”, “mitra kerja”, “Orang Tua”,and “Saudara”. It is apparent that “isrti” and “istri” should refer to thesame meaning, but mistakenly entered and recognized as two differentcategories.

c. Different category names for the same data value.This type of flaw was found in “Agama” data field in which 4 categoriesrevealed, “Islam”, “Katolik”, “Kristen” and “Protestan”, in which the lasttwo categories should refer to the same meaning.

All of these flaws can be prevented from occuring if data entry is conductedusing a pull-down list instead of typing the value into the spreadsheet.

25

4.2.3 Result of Fie ld Research

130. Freedom-of-error in this study was analyzed using data obtained froma survey conducted on 31 October - 1 November 2012. The survey collected331 samples out of 1320 affected household population, with approximately4.66% error level and 95% confidence level. The survey aimed to verify AHsdata, especially AHs’ assets. Verification was conducted through interviewinstead of direct measurement. The results were summarized in terms of thepercentage of data that are valid, which correctly represent the real condition ofAHs. The values range from 79.9% to 100 %, with average value of 92.3%,quite high regardless of the usage of interview instead of direct measurement.The complete figure can be viewed in ANNEX D.

131. The timeliness of data represents the extent to which data is up-to-date. RP or AHs data was collected using 3 mechanisms, i.e. disclosure, tracer,and census conducted in 2011/2012, which cover a total period of more thanthree months. It is probable that the data has already been obsolete. Thetimeliness of RP data may be inferred from data obtained from surveyconducted on 31 October and 1 November 2012. In general, respondentsobtained from the survey were classified into 3 categories:

a. ADA, which means that the target respondent was still living on the siteand found during the survey.

b. PINDAH, which means that the target respondent was not living on thesite anymore and, based on at least one witness’ account, had alreadymoved to a new site.

c. TIDAK DITEMUKAN, which means that the target respondent and thecorresponding assets, for unknown reasons, were not found on the site.

The survey resulted in 79.8% of samples in ADA, 5.7% in PINDAH, and 14.5%in TIDAK DITEMUKAN category.

Based on survey, 79.8% of AHs are still at the same position on the site, 5.7%have already moved to new sites, and 14.5% were not found on the site forunknown reasons. It appears that the lengthy period of AHs data collection andbetween AHs data collection and survey makes only about 80% of AHs stillvalid according to on-site location. This figure might be getting worse with thelapse of time. Complete analysis results on the quality of baseline data isattached as ANNEX D.

26

132. To sum up, the quality of baseline data can be indicated in the tablebelow.

No. Dimensions Condition Correctable? Remedialactions

Risks

1

Completeness POOR No

Need to redothe survey toreplace themissing values

Will result innonconformingLRP

2 Consiceness ofrepresentation

POOR YesDone None

3 Consistency ofrepresentation

FAIR YesDone None

4Freedom or

errorGOOD Yes

Need to redothe DMS

Will result innonconformingLRP

5

Timeliness POOR No

Need toimplement theRP as soon aspossible

Will be difficultto implementLRP

4.2.4 Final Detailed Engineering Design

133. Analysis on AHs data resulted in some recommendations to improveAHs data quality. Some possible corrections have been made to AHs databaseaccordingly, and in general can be summarized as follows:

• A more concise representation of “Pekerjaan” data field that refers toKlasifikasi Baku Jenis Pekerjaan Indonesia 2002 (2002 IndonesiaOccupation Standard Classification) of the National Statistics Bureau.

• Corrections on inconsistent data field, i.e.: (i) correction on data that arenot mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, (ii) correction on datathat mistakenly entered, and (iii) correction on data fields with differentcategory names for the same data value.

134. For incompleteness problem, theoretically, some corrective actionsmay be applied, i.e. (1) complete case, (2) all-available approach, and (3)imputation by using replacement value. The first option is not applicable for thisresettlement project since it will neglect AHs with incomplete data. The secondoption is the easiest remedial action, but may cause nonconforming LRP. Thethird option may be applied in this situation, but determining the replacementvalue is not an easy task. Completeness problem cannot be corrected becausethere is no supporting data available for this remedial action. As discussedpreviously, this flaw may render to unappropriate LRP due to loss of AHs’information.

135. Since there are only 79.8% of AHs still living on the site, timelinessproblem do exists. This is the kind of problem that cannot be fixed but will surelydeteriorate with the lapse of time. The only remedial action for this problem isdo the implementation as soon as possible.

27

4.2.5 Capacity of Part ies Handling RP Updating

136. Regarding the capacity of parties handling RP updating, it can beinferred from the the methodology employed and the final RP updating result.InSection 4.3.2 it is shown that the methodology employed in RP updating isrobust and accountable.In term of result, based on the survey, from 331 AHs, 79.8% of AHs are still onsite at the same position, 5.7% of AHs have already moved to new sitesaccording to at least one witness’ account, and 14.5% of AHs were not foundfor unknown reason. This means that 85.5% (79.8% + 5.7%) of AHs truely exist,while for the rest 14.5% of AHs cannot be concluded.But, at least a factor other than the capacity of parties handling RP updatingmay be attributed to this discrepancy: the lengthy period between AHs dataacquisition and verification survey. The turnover among households living alongthe WTC is quite high, so it is quite possible that AHs already moved.

4.3 Inclusion of AP's

4.3.1 Introduction

137. Since 2009 a significant number of evictions to the people living alongthe canal, including the project affected households identified in the RP 2008,were carried out by Bekasi District. The eviction is at attempting for enforcementof the local government regulations (building permit, cleanness and orderliness,spatial planning) and improve their chances of winning environmental (Adipura)awards. The local governments have both confirmed that the actions were notrelated to the Project. There is no information on the precise number andidentification of evicted people.

138. Although the evictions were not related to the project, they hadoccurred on land upon which an ADB loan had been approved. To ensure ADBfulfilled its obligations and more than satisfied the intent of its safeguardpolicies, ADB determined that it was obliged to attempt to trace the people whohad been evicted by the Local Governments. The tracer is specificallyimplemented in Kabupaten Bekasi.

4.3.2 Entit lement

139. In order to deliver these project entitlements it was considerednecessary to carry out a tracer survey in order to locate the evicted households.The tracer methods and steps, which were developed by DED consultants,Arum and Local Government, include:

1. preparation of the survey instruments and data verification;2. capacity building on the tracer survey to the village office staff and field

facilitators working for the survey;3. announcement on the tracer through local radio, pamphlets posted on

strategic places, and broader socializations to 164 Neighborhood (RT-Rukun Tetangga) within the surrounding affected villages;

4. registration and data verification.

28

EMA recognized that tracer methodology covers the following aspects:Involving the most valid source of information regarding the

eviction― i.e.: the Government of Bekasi District― in identifying possible

location of the evicted AHs;

Using appropriate media and involving all the elements of the

community― the frontline of government official, snowball word-of-

mouth of complainants, local community leaders, community groups,

and informal dissemination meeting organized through desa and

kelurahan― in communicating the upcoming tracer;

Verification process using civil document and location checking; and

Accomodating appeal of the evicted AHs on the verification result.

EMA acknowledged that these characteristics already represents a robust andaccountable methodology. Hence, it can be concluded that the tracermethodology is appropriate.

140. The tracer was carried from 9 December 2011 to 31 January 2012 outby the Resettlement Consultant from the detailed design team in conjunctionwith the independent NGO team which was also responsible for preparation ofthe DMS. It was found out at the implementation level that the method wereimplemented as follows:

1. Placing some officers stand by at some determined points2. Spreading public notification via leaflets and transmitting it via radio3. Putting banner at strategic locations, but it was officially not allowed.

141. It was also found out that during the first stage of tracerimplementation was not running quite well. The team consist of two differentteam members, one group that consists of 6 people in charge of keeping thepost off duty properly, while the other group of six 6 was not, who have filledcomplaints to ADB later on. Those second group of 6 tracer were finallyreplaced with 8 people from the Equator. Till there was no residents werereported, so the tracer methodology was changed to a more anticipative way oftracing by extending number of brochures as printed to nearly 2000 pieces. Asresults the tracer survey identified that the total number of evicted AHs up to thenew agreed cut off dates were 223 households out of 466. Within AHs baselinedata the 223 households we listed without location coordinate. They wereevicted, but still considered eligible as Project beneficiaries.

4.4 The Quality and Effect iveness of the Complaint

and Grievance Mechanism

142. Conceptually complaint and grievance handling mechanism depict agood democratic governance practices. It basically includes complaints andgrievances reception mechanism and complaints and grievances handlingmechanism.

143. At this point EMA address this issue using three relevant data sourcesi.e. RP 2008, updated RP 2012 and EMA survey data. This part provides resultsof EMA’s assessment.

29

4.4.1 Comparison RP 2008 and Updated RP

2012

144. Table 1 below shows a comparison of complaint and grievancemechanism stated both in RP 2008 and Updated RP 2012 in three stages.There are changes reflecting strong intention to make quality and more effectivemechanism in the latest document by significantly reducing number of daysprovided to handle complaints and grievances. These changes are probablyresulted from the previously well-known case reflecting wherein complains andgrievances were not satisfactorily handled.

Table 1 Comparison Grievance Redress Mechanism between RP 2008 and RPUpdating

GRIEVANCE REDRESSMECHANISM RP 2008

GRIEVANCE REDRESSMECHANISM RP Updating

Grievances related to anyaspect of the rehabilitation ofWTC will be handled throughnegotiation aimed at achievingconsensus within 120 calendardays referring to existingIndonesian regulations17.Complaints will pass through 3stages before they could beelevated to a court of law as alast resort, thus:

Grievances related to anyaspect of the rehabilitation ofWTC will be handled throughnegotiation aimed at achievingconsensus within 120 calendardays referring to existingIndonesian regulationsComplaints will pass through 3stages before they could beelevated to a court of law as alast resort, as follows:

FirstStage

An aggrieved AH may bringhis/her complaint before anymember of the RWG or thearea coordinator of SES, eitherin writing or verbally. It isincumbent upon said memberof the RWG to notify the VillageChief about the complaint who,in turn, will inform the Camat.The Sub-district Chief togetherwith the Village Chief will have40 calendar days following thelodging of the complaint by theaggrieved AH to act on thecase. He/she may call, asneeded, any member of theLAC, to help him/her come upwith an acceptable resolution ofthe complaint. The Kecamatan(Sub-district government) isresponsible for documentingand keeping file of allcomplaints that it handles.

An AP may bring his/hercomplaint to the village Chief(kepala desa/lurah) or SubDistrict Chief (Camat), or theRWG or its facilitator, either inwriting or verbally. If thecomplaint is brought to theattention of the RWG, it willnotify the Kepala Desa/Lurahabout the complaint who willinform the Camat. The Camattogether with KepalaDesa/Lurah and RWG will have14 days to resolve thecomplaint following theirnotification

30



SecondStage

If after 40 calendar days theaggrieved AH does not hearfrom the Camat or theDesa/Lurah about thecomplaint, or if the AHis notsatisfied with the decisiontaken by the Camat, the AHmay bring the complaint, eitherin writing or verbally, to theBupati (Head of Regency orDistrict) or the Walikota (CityMayor). The Bupati or Walikotain turn will have 40 calendardays following the lodging ofthe complaint by the aggrievedAH to act on the case. He/shemay call, as needed, anymember of the LAC, to helphim/her comeup with an acceptableresolution of the complaint. TheKabupaten/Kota (Regency/CityGovernment) is responsible fordocumenting and keeping fileof all complaints that it handles.

If after 14 days the AP does notobtain the solution of thecomplaint, or if the AP is notsatisfied with the decisiontaken, the AP may bring thecomplaint, either in writing orverbally, to the Bupati (Head ofRegency or District) or theWalikota (City Mayor). TheBupati or Walikota will have 30days following notification ofthe complaint to resolve thecase. If needed, he/she maycall on the aggrieved AP, theRWG, and BBWSC to helphim/her come up with anacceptable resolution of thecomplaint.

ThirdStage

If after 40 calendar days theaggrieved AH does not hearfrom the Kabupaten/Kota, or ifthe AH is not satisfied with thedecision taken by the Bupati orWalikota, the AH may bring thecomplaint, either in writing orverbally, to the Office of theProvincial Governor. TheGovernor has 40 calendar dayswithin which to resolve thecomplaint to the satisfaction ofall concerned. The Office of theGovernor is responsible fordocumenting and keeping fileof all complaints that reachesthe same.

If after 30 days the aggrievedAP does not obtain the solutionfrom the Kabupaten/Kota, or ifis not satisfied with the decisiontaken by the Bupati orWalikota, the AP may bring thecomplaint, either in writing orverbally, to the Office of theProvincial Governor. TheGovernor has 30 days withinwhich to resolve the complaint

31



FinalStage, theCourt ofLawArbitrates

If after 40 days following thelodging of the complaint, theaggrieved AH does not hearfrom the Office of the ProvincialGovernor of if he/she is notsatisfied with the decisiontaken by the ProvincialGovernor, the complain may bebrought to a court of law foradjudication. The rules of courtwill be followed in theadjudication of the complaint

If after 30 days of registeringthe complaint, the AP does notobtain the acceptable solutionfrom the Kabupaten/Kotaand/or Propinsi, the complaintmay be brought to a court oflaw for adjudication

145. EMA’s survey reveals with three interesting and yet important findings,these are, firstly, majority of respondents (73.21%) out of 265 do not knowabout the mechanism for channeling complaints and grievances related to theimpact of WTC rehabilitation project. Only 18.87% of respondents are awareabout it. It means that information on complains and grievances mechanism isnot well disseminated. See Table 2 below.

146. Secondly, 37 respondents (74%) who are aware of information onchanneling complaints and grievances mechanism get information from localgovernment officials. Only 13 respondents (26%) get information from othersources includes 2 respondents get information from surveyors and only onefrom NGOs. It convincingly reveals that government officials are the maininformation givers. See Table 3 below.

147. Finally, majority of respondents think that if there is a complain relatedto the project, then it was well received and resolved in a good way. It isexpected, therefore, that majority of respondents confirm that they do not haveproject related complains and grievances. See Table 4 below.

148. Survey Question C9: Do you know about the mechanism forchanneling complaints related to the impact of West Tarum Canal Rehabilitationproject?

Table 2 Respondent who know of mechanism for channeling complaints andgrievances

RESPOND NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS %

Know 50 18.87%

Don't Know 194 73.21%

No Respond 21 7.92%

Total 265 100.00%

149. Survey Question C 10: How did you know about the mechanism forchanneling complaints related to the impact of West Tarum Canal Rehabilitationproject?

32

Table 3 Source of information on channeling mechanism of complaints andgrievance

RESPOND NUMBER OF RESPONDENT %

Local Government 37 74%

Others 13 26%

Total 50 100.00%

150. Survey Question C 11: Do you think your complaints related to WestTarum Canal Rehabilitation Project was received in a manner that ...

Table 4 Perception of respondents on complaints and grievance mechanism

RESPOND NUMBER OF RESPONDENT %

Very Good 2 0.60%

Good 33 9.97%

Indifferent 15 4.53%

Bad 13 3.93%

Very Bad 1 0.30%

Blank 267 80.66%

Total 331 100.00%

151. It is important to note that respondents who aware of information onchanneling complaints and grievance mechanism is relatively low (18.87%).It is also important, therefore, for the project to more actively disseminateinformation on the respective matter to the AHs in order to make the case ofgood project governance. It is also noted that local street level governmentofficials play a significant role as the main project information givers, thereforeaccurate and reliable information regarding all about the project is critical tothem. It is surprising though only 1 respondent out of 50, who gets discussedinformation from NGOs for it is contrary to the fact that commonly perceived onthe role of NGOs as enabler channel and liaison agent of public interest.Surveyors, on the other hand, professionally are not expected to give anyinformation or intervene data and information collection process. Rather, theyare expected to more or less objectively focus on collecting data. More well-trained surveyors are more preferable to be recommended for such sensitiveareas.

4.5 The inclusion of Gender Perspective

152. In general it reveals that although the resettlement is carried out onhousehold basis, the corresponding effects affect persons differently either asan individual or a community. Gender is an important factor in determiningdifferential impact. The dynamics inside the household will typically result inadversely affected condition for women and men. Some typical issuesaddressed in the resettlement gender sensitivity analysis are equality in accessto compensation resulted from land ownership and property rights, equality in

33

restoration of livelihood and income, and women’s choice of livelihoodalternative, intra-household gender disparity after resettlement.

153. The gender sensitivity of this overall resettlement project is analyzedusing framework and criteria established in “Gender Checklist for Resettlement”(Asian Development Bank, 2003). Based on this checklist, gender sensitivity inresettlement should be analyzed according to the project phases and element,i.e.: resettlement planning, entitlement and eligibility, developing resettlementand compensation option, resettlement and rehabilitation, site selection,transition, compensation, security of tenure, income restoration, grievanceredress mechanisms, and monitoring and evaluation. For each phase orelement, a number of key issues will be addressed based on both survey andnon-survey data.

4.5.1 Gender Inclusion: Indonesian

Context

154. According to several studies in Indonesia, over the past 3 years, thecountry has made important strides in achieving greater equality betweenwomen and men. In 2009, Indonesia was ranked 55 out of 102 in the Social

Institutions and Gender Index.10 Currently, Indonesia is ranked 32 out of 86 forthe same index. While the score for the Gender Inequality Index score was0.505, while Indonesia’s Global Gender Gap Index rating was 0.6594, placing itin 90th place (out of a total of 135 countries) for 2011.

155. There are five conceptual framework used to score the aforementioned

index above, these are :111. Discriminatory Family Code; related to variables: legal age of marriage,

early marriage, parental authority, and inheritance.2. Restricted Physical Integrity; related to variables: violence against

women (laws, attitudes and prevalence), female genital mutilation andreproductive integrity.

3. Son Bias; related to variables: missing women and fertility preferences.4. Restricted Resources and Entitlements; related to variables: access to

land, access to property other than land and access to credit.5. Restricted Civil Liberties; related to variables: access to public space

and political voice.

156. In contrast, the Human Development Index (HDI) score for Indonesia

was 0.617, placing it in 124th place (out of 187 countries) for 2011.12 Indonesiastill placed below the regional average although the HDI of East Asia and thePacific as a region increased from 0.428 in 1980 to 0.671 today. The HDI usedas an alternative to conventional measures of national development, such aslevel of health, education, income and the rate of economic growth.

10Source: http://genderindex.org/country/indonesia access 30 July 2012

11Source: http://genderindex.org/sites/default/files/2012SIGIsummaryresults.pdf access 30

July 201212 Source: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IDN.html access 30 July 2012

34

4.5.2 Gender Inclusion: West Java Context

157. Based on study conducted by the Bogor Agriculture Institute’s WomenStudy Center, discrimination against women is still occurring in West Java asthe biggest province in Indonesia. While the figure of women and men mayseem equal, which is there are 100 women for every 103 men among WestJava’s 43 million people, the West Java’s Gender Development Index, at 61.81,was still far behind the Human Development Index, which has reached 71.12.

13 The province still suffers an educational gap as well, with only an estimated46 percent of women attending senior high school, compared with 47.38percent for men. It is important to note that an issue of early marriage is one ofthe key issues identified in specific areas of West Java. This is considered as

affecting girls’ access to and participation in education.14

158. The Central Statistics Bureau recorded that in 2008, 60 percent of thewomen in West Java played a dual role as housewives and as breadwinnerswho, on average, supported four family members. In other words, in West Javawomen carry a huge burden. Currently, 78 percent of the employees behind theinformal sector, which accounts for more than IDR 7 trillion (US$805 million),are women, in addition to the many women working overseas as migrantworkers who also bring money home.

159. Related to the discussion of empowering women in the economy,society, politics and education, another study conducted by Peter Hancockpoints out that women work very hard to develop themselves from individuals,

households and communities level.15 Women in the grassroots level providehuge contribution to the development of their family and community with theirwages and through their attitude to work as a primary source to improve theirstatus. However, the situation depends upon many factors associated withpolitical and economic power and upon the elite in the local and national level.

160. In addition, the results of the baseline assessment on the populationand civil registration administrative public services conducted by the World

Bank show gender inequality in accessing the public services. 16 The baselineassessment above discusses some causes of this inequality include:(a) Some of the regent’s rules having not expressly shown partisanship to

the special needs and the social roles of women.(b) There was not any affirmative approach in transform the laws and

regulations into the regent’s rules and into main tasks and functions oflocal government and service providers.

13The Jakarta Post, Pushing for Women☂s Empowerment,

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/04/24/pushing-women%E2%80%99s-empowerment.html

acess 30 July 201214 Fact Sheet Girls’ Education In Indonesia

http://www.unicef.org/indonesia/girls_education_fact_sheet_final_ENG_1_.pdf access 30 July2012

15 Hancock, Peter, The Gender Empowerment Measure: Issues from West Java, Indonesia,http://devnet.anu.edu.au/online%20versions%20pdfs/51/VPThancock51.pdf access 30 July2012

16 Baseline Assessment on Women’s Accessibility to Public Services (West Java Province)http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/05/15/000356161_20120515003000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHIT0Services00West0Java0.pdf acess 30 July2012

35

(c) The limited knowledge of human resources involved in the publicservices regarding gender sensitivity,

(d) Standard Operating Procedure made by the service providers havingnot considered women as subject of the services.

(e) The majority of service providers have not capable of making indicatorsof work achievement targets with gender perspective especially relatedto the minimum service qualification and work achievement targets.

(f) Lack of allocation of the sufficient budget for activities required inimproving women accessibility to public services made by localgovernment and service providers.

(g) Majority of women as the responsible party in the household care dutiesnever been considered in preparing regulation and policy of the serviceproviders.

(h) In many cases related to establishing mechanism, plan, and documentsrequired to obtain the services the service providers frequently have notconsidered psychological and cost problems of women as householdhead, and geographical restriction as well as access limitation inaccessing information related to the services.

(i) In terms of analysing performance and impacts of a service, the serviceproviders have not considered women as the affected subject.

17

4.5.3 Gender Inclusion: Project Context

161. Related to monitoring and evaluation process of this project, this paperwould highlight some of collection of sex--disaggregated data in the baselinesurveys and development of monitoring indicators to assess the gender-differentiated impact. Based on data in three areas: Bekasi City, KarawangRegency and Bekasi Regency, the majority respondents are male, as expectedand indicated in many other similar project in other areas or even in othercountries (see Table 5).

Table 5 Respondents of the Project

17 Baseline Assessment on Women’s Accessibility to Public Services (West Java Province)http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/05/15/000356161_20120515003000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHIT0Services00West0Java0.pdf acess 30 July2012

70

40

70

42

11

2

Laki-laki

Perempuan

0 20 40 60 80

Kota Bekasi Kab. Karawang Kab. Bekasi

36

162. In contrast, there are more widows, both in Karawang Regency andBekasi Regency, than the widowers (see Table 6). In this situation, there aremore households headed by female than male, which need more recognitionfrom local and national government and intervention from the project. Forexample, there is a program to support for women’s empowerment programssuch as Perempuan Kepala Keluarga (Pekka), or the Women-HeadedHouseholds Empowerment Program, which was introduced in 2001 in WestJava, must come from the government. By conducting a provocative programsuch as Pekka, the local and province government would be able to push forsocial changes in West Java, despite the annual budget of only IDR 900 millionfrom the provincial administration.

Table 6 Marital Status

163. With regard of the type of the respondents’ occupations, the highestnumber of respondent work as sellers, especially in Bekasi Regency andKarawang Regency (see Table 7). It followed by farmers and housewives inKarawang Regency. For those three types of occupation, there are plentywomen involved in the sectors, both directly and indirectly. It is clear enoughthat a bulk of housewives need to be empowered in order to get a direct benefitfrom the project in collaboration with local and national government.

Table 7 Occupations

1

2

10

97

1

1

2

1

1

6

10010

3

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Belum▁

Cerai

Cerai Mati

Cerai Pisah

Duda

Janda

Menikah

Lajang


1011

7

13

11

175

231

119

322

16

1

341

2

1

1

9

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Bertani

Buruh Cuci Motor

Buruh Serabutan

Ibu Rumah Tangga

Pegawai (Swasta/Negeri)

Peternak

Usaha/Dagang


37

164. Related to the participation of women in this project through theirpresence in several Focus Group Discussion (FGD) meetings, there is anindication that women are involved actively even though the number is stilllower than male. For example, in Kabupaten Karawang there were 10 FGDswhich were conducted during AHs updating and LRP preparation and the rangeof percentage of female participants was 11.5% to 42.2%. In contrast, the rangeof percentage of male participants was 53.5% to 88.5%. In Kabupaten Bekasi,due to the limitation of data, there were only 2 lists of participants availableinstead of 16, which was 9% and 46% of female. Relatively similar to KotaBekasi, there were only 2 FGD meetings conducted and only 1 meetingattended by female participants which was only 12.5%.

165. Having looked those limited data above, the project has indicated agender inclusion perspective within their implementation of FGD meetings inseveral locations. However, it is important to note that the percentage has notbeen reflected the reality comprehensively and clearly. The data above has notprovided any information of reasons and explanations of limited number offemale attended and participated in different FGD meetings.

166. Gender Action Plan; As required by ADB, it is important to ensure that“gender mainstreaming” is tangible and explicitly visible in project design andimplementation. The project-specific gender action plan (GAP) is an inclusivecomponent that mirrors the project outputs as an integral part of project

design.18

167. Related to the idea above, it is important to highlight that there won’t beany limitation for women to access the resources, opportunities and servicesrelated to implication of this project. It is necessary for them to improve theirstandard of living for themselves and their families during and after this projectimplemented. All the stakeholders in the project have to ensure that women arenot become the victims of this project due to their multiple burdens in thehouseholds and their communities.

168. For these reasons, the stakeholders’ efforts to maintain the socialcontinuity of communities affected by a project—whether through the physicaldesign of new sites, measures to prevent the disintegration of the community, orthe provision of specialized social services at those sites—are important. Theinvolvement of women in many FGD meetings as part of the preparation of thisproject can be considered as a good example of GAP implementation. Inaddition, the involvement of women in different trainings as proposed has toguarantee by all the stakeholders involved.

169. Related to this project, EMA provides of the immediate and practicalinitiatives that can be considered to improve women’s adaptation to theresettlement site include:(a) ensuring and/or recognizing that land titles and compensation

entitlements are issued in the name of both spouses and/or wives only;(b) increasing incomes generating opportunities by setting up credit

groups, skills training, and access to markets based on their needs;

18 www.adb.org/themes/gender/project-action-plan acess 2 August 2012

38

(c) improving participation in decision making process especially related toprovide support for women’s interest groups).

170. All of the initiatives above may help women adapt to the resettlementsite. However, the social or legal status of women, in the project specifically andin Indonesia generally, is likely to remain circumscribed. Thus, their ability toimprove their own and their family’s livelihoods need a longer-term strategiceffort in order to change gender-based discrimination. In the future,stereotyping, social stigmatization (as a result of traditional or cultural bias) andeconomically marginalization are totally unacceptable in many different typesand levels.

171. In sum, it is important to note that all the recommendations are madebased on limited amount of data available due to personal and professionalreasons. Due to limited opportunity available, the expert has not able to conductfield visit in order to get a whole picture of the project. In addition, the circle ofinformation among stakeholders creates some limitations to get more and betterdata to provide comprehensive and reliable suggestion related to sustainabilityand continuity of this project.

4.5.4 Gender Sensit ivity Assessment

Checklist

172. In addition, using ADB’s Gender Checklist for Resettlement, EMA hasrun gender sensitivity analysis. As far as available and assessable data andinformation are concerned, the result reveals in the next following paragraphs,while detail information on the assessment result can be found in ANNEX H.

173. General Socio-Demographic Condition. The RP and socioeconomicdata regarding this resettlement project were collected at household level whiledemographic data are available at individual basis. However, somesocioeconomic data are available at individual basis, which can be segregatedby gender; those are age, education, occupation, and income. Other data are athousehold level.

174. In total, there are 1320 households living in the affected area, out ofwhich 101 households or about 7.7% were woman–headed. There are 2,368(53.1%) men and 2,095 (46,9%) women living in such area. The average age ofwomen living in the affected area is 29.3 years old with standard deviation of16.9 while for men is 32.3 years old with standard deviation of 19.5. Adultwomen composition based on education is as follow: (1) University graduate1.5%, (2) SMA graduate 12.0%, (3) SMP graduate 19.7%, (4) SD graduate36.4%, and (5) Below SD graduate 30.5%; while adult men composition basedon education is as follow: (1) University graduate 1.8%, (2) SMA graduate17.7%, (3) SMP graduate 20.1%, (4) SD graduate 33.1%, and (5) Below SDgraduate 27.3%.

175. There are 504 out of 2,095 (24,1%) working women, from which themajority (243 or 48.2%) run their own businesses in the category of “Usaha jasadan penjualan di toko dan pasar”. Average monthly income of working-man inthe affected area is Rp1,829,472 while for woman is Rp1,503,704.

39

176. Women’s Land and Property Status. In the Resettlement Plan, landand property data are acquired at household level. Hence, individual gender-based ownership might only be analyzed as referred to household head. Basedon this, there are 101 women (who head household) have control overproperties in the affected area. Only 1 household out of 1320 has legal title toaffected land, while all other lands are owned by the government. Householdsliving in the area have “informal” control over structures on the land. Asestimated through the survey, average value of structure (main building) ownedby woman-headed household is Rp14,580,269 while for man-headedhousehold is Rp13,659,074.

177. Women’s Livelihood and Contribution to Family Income. Mainwomen’s livelihood sources are (1) Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar48.2%, (2) Operator dan perakit mesin 15.9%, and (3) Usaha pertanian danpeternakan 14.7%. With such livelihood, average monthly income of working-woman in the affected area is Rp1,503,704, comparing to Rp1,829,472 for men.The average women’s contribution to family income in woman-headedhouseholds is 74.8%, while in man-headed households is 11.4%. The averagewomen’s contribution to family income for all AHs is 16.3%.

178. Entitlement and Eligibility. As mentioned before, only 1 household outof 1320 have a legal title to land in the affected area. Since almost all of themdo not have legal title to the land, they do not also have legal title to anystructure on the land. Women have “informal” control over the structure on theaffected land in which they dwell through their position as household head.Condition that should be appropriately considered regarding this issue is theexistence of 7.7% woman-headed households and 24,1% working women, fromwhich the majority or 48.2% run their own businesses in the category of “Usahajasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar”. Compensation options developed for theresettlement does not provide particular compensation and resettlementarrangement for women. Households considered eligible are those dwelled inthe affected area in the periods of registration.

179. Transition Issues. Transportation arrangements are provided andinformed to all affected AHs, instead of specifically to affected women. Dataabout physical condition of each household member is available, and can beinferred as needs for special assistance regarding transportation. There are 264out of 1320 (20.0%) AHs might be categorized as need special assistance withtransportation, consists of 145 (11.0%) elderly-headed households, 99 (7.5%)woman-headed households, and 20 (1.5%) disabled-headed households.

180. Women’s Income Restoration. As mentioned earlier, of 24,1%working women, majority (approx. 48.2%) run their own businesses in thecategory of “Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar”. This kind of businessdepends on local (neighboring) market, which is mainly driven by social relationand acquaintanceship. If they are evicted from their current property’s location,their income sources might be significantly affected. The risks regarding thisissue are: (1) there will be a total loss of women’s livelihood source becausethey cannot start their business in the new site, or (2) there will be a decrease inwomen’s livelihood source because they have to start their business in the newsites. In this resettlement project, the new site is not provided by the project-owner; instead, AHs should look for a new site themselves.

40

181. Another issue regarding income restoration is the need for skillupgrading for affected people to help them restoring their losing income. This isalready included in the Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP).

182. Some conclusions and remarks regarding the inclusion of genderissues in the Updated RP can be drawn as follow:a. With the current available data, gender sensitivity of the RP can be

inferred, specifically in terms of resettlement planning, defining entitlement

and eligibility, development of resettlement and compensation option,

safeguarding women’s interest in resettlement, transition issues, and

income restoration.

b. According to the checklist, gender sensitivity of the RP can be indicated as

follow:

i. In term of resettlement planning, the inclusion of women in the

socioeconomic survey has been accomodated, household division of

labor and women’s livelihood sources and contribution to family

income have been identified. It can be concluded that the gender

sensitivity is GOOD.

ii. In term of defining entitlement and eligibility, information regarding

women’s legal title on land and property, women’s ownership,

access, and control over resources and property, and women’s

customary or informal rights to land, property, and other resources

cen be inferred from the available RP data. The effect of

resettlement on women’s sources of livelihood is also identified. In

this sense, gender sensitivity is FAIR.

iii. Regarding the development of resettlement and compensation

options, there is no law that entitle women to compensation

assistance, and there is no particular compensation and

resettlement for women. It can be concluded that in this regard the

gender sensitivity is POOR.

iv. In term of safeguarding women’s interest in resettlement, separate

identification of women’s socioeconomic condition, needs, and

priorities had not been properly conducted. The only available

gender-based socioeconomic data is income while data on the

needs is collected on household basis, and no data currently

available regarding women’s priorities. In this sense, the gender

sensitivity is POOR.

v. In term of transition issues, transportation and relocation facilitation

are provided, and women and other vulnerable groups who may

need special assistance with transportation have been identified.

But, there is no information regarding consultation with women on

transportation and transit issues. In this sense, gender sensitivity is

FAIR.

vi. Regarding income restoration, information on women’s sources and

level of income, women’s contribution to household income, and the

predicted effect of resettlement on women’s income have been

identified. In this sense, gender sensitivity is GOOD

41

183. Other issues regarding gender inclusion in resettlement that should benoticed and monitored in the next phase of this resettlement project are:a. How to safeguard women’s interest in the process of land acquisition and

displacement, and ensure that grants should be in the name of both

spouses.

b. How to safeguard women and children’s interest in the process of

resettlement and rehabilitation.

c. How to accomodate women’s interest in compensation payment

d. How to monitor and evaluate the issues of women’s livelihood restoration,

safety, and habitability.

e. How to include women in resettlement participatory monitoring.

42

5 LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION PROGRAM

5.1 Introduct ion

184. EMA understand that socio-economic survey was aimed to obtain general

picture of socio-economic information of AHs. The information should be

considered as the input for designing the type of LRP that most suitable for AHs.

Analysis will be directed to reveal the logical relationship between patterns found

from socio-economic data of AHs and the LRP scheme. Recommendations will be

given accordingly to ensure the adequacy of LRP in maintaining and improving the

livelihood of affected households and people.

184. Analysis on LRP preparation focuses on the extent to which the LRP attain

the aforementioned objectives and the extent to which the LRP considers and

accommodates the relevant characteristics of AHs and APs found through the

socio-economic survey. Socio-economic data will be analyzed to find relevant

patterns and recommendations will be given accordingly to improve the LRP to

ensure the attainment of the objectives.

5.2 Remarks on DED's Socio-economic Survey

185. Generally, resettlement is perceived as rationale respond at alleviatingthe environmental pressure and improve people’s production and livingcondition with regard to the extremely devastating environment, land conflictand other severe living conditions. In the context of West Tarum Canal (WTC),though, there are still irrigation area along Citarum River where reservedagricultural resources and other productive economic activities of those who livethere. This resettlement project scheme basically proposed entitlement of landwith the intention of helping to mitigate project impact and to restore livelihoodand living standard. The key policy objective, as indicated in RP, is to replaceand compensate lost asset based on the principle of replacement cost thatshould be in line with local government regulation.

186. As it is understood, DED Consultants have conduct Socio-EconomicSurvey of AHs along the corridor of WTC. EMA has no sufficient ground toassess its methodology, but feel confident on consultant’s reputation and merit.Hence the survey can also be regarded as a standard social economic surveywith no such complicated technique that require specific professional oracademic skill beyond the ordinary. Therefore, EMA would focus more on itsfindings that might relevant to understanding AHs social-economic conditions.

187. As it is noted, survey data was collected and analyzed from 235respondents chosen from 1320 AHs population (latest numbers) about 17.8% orapproaching 20% with reference to smaller number of population at the timesurvey was conducted. As appears in Tabel 8 below, sample consists of 148men and 87 women, they are proportionately distributed in three WTC district.

43

Table 8 .Survey sample by gender and kabupaten/kota

KOTA/KABUPATEN

GENDER

Kabupaten

Bekasi

Kabupaten

Karawang

Kota

Bekasi Grand Total

Men 67 69 12 148

Women 42 43 2 87

Grand Total 109 112 14 235

188. In terms of income, AHs can be categorized into middle class to lowerclass income. Figure 4 below shows that almost 41% of respondent haveincome below the minimum wage of West Java i.e. Rp 1,236,991 per month(2012). In Karawang District, it has 51% of respondent with income below onepoint five million rupiah per month and 13 % of people with income above fivemillions rupiah per month. Slightly different, with Bekasi District, it has 23% ofrespondent has an income above five millions rupiah per month, and only 6% ofsample with income below one million rupiah. Interestingly, they are notspending much of their revenue. Most of them (58%) of sample has spent theirrevenue around two millions to two millions five hundred rupiah per month. Sobasically, their income is sufficient in supporting and meeting their dailynecessity. See Figure 5.

Figure 4 Respondent by Income Figure 5 Respondent by Expenditure

189. In terms of marital status, most of the respondents are married. Only 5

out of 235 respondents are single. However, 22 out of 87 of total female

respondent are widow (see Figure 6). Apparently, at this point women are more

vulnerable to poverty. Most irritatingly, household led by women carry a ☜double

day burden☝, as a head of household, she have to handle domestic work and as the

main earner simultaneously (Moghadam, 1997). Consequently, these women

suffer mobility constraint which possibly impact negatively on their household

income. Figure 7 tells that most of respondent just graduated from elementary

school. In Karawang, 65% of respondent only completed elementary school and

only 1 person out of 112 respondents who graduated from college. More education

means more choices and career opportunities. In general, within such situation of

low-educated community, woman has less opportunity to become educated or to

earn a living. Government need to seriously consider how to open up education

and job opportunities for AHs. This should be accommodated in not only

shortsighted project LRP scheme, but ultimately integrated to the long term

governmental public service accounts especially for the next generation of AHs.

44

Figure 6 Marital Status Figure 7 Educational Qualification

190. In terms of occupation, see Figure 8 below, the majority of respondent is

self-employed. They are 14% percent dependent on agriculture and 14% percent

are labor, such as construction worker, mill-hand and handyman. It is also noted

that 36 out of 87 female respondents are housewife. Only 7 respondents are

employee. It seems that their lack of education affect their working availability in

formal sector. This condition calls not only immediate restoration of their

livelihood due to their resettlement, but also for a betterment of their capacity to

face future strand.

Figure 8 Respondents by Occupation

191. In terms of types of business, see Figure 9 below, the respondents who

have stalled in front of their house or at the nearest market, mostly they sell daily

product, such as food toiletries, herbs, vegetable, cooking utensil, and net tools.

There are 4 respondents who open a business workshop or recycling. According to

Table 9 and Table 10 below, they are long standing entrepreneurs in their class

who in average have run their business more than one year. They are also

financially independent for 68,5% of respondent has no debt on family, and 78,2 %

of respondent has no business debt. This condition calls project respect to their

potentials that need to be systematically strengthened and developed.

45

Figure 9 Respondent by type of business they run

Table 9 Length of business Table 10 Respondent by debt to their family

192. In terms of land ownership, according to Figure 10 below, only oneperson who owns the land and has the right to use land. The majority ofrespondent are illegal settlers along WTC. Respondent mostly can be classifiedas cultivators i.e. approximately 79% of respondent. It is noted, that 3 out of 235respondent are tenant. On the other hand, mostly respondent own asset, suchas home or stall. Figure 11 below depict that most of respondent frequentlystated that the land use for business-reason, for example iron smelting,especially in Bekasi District. Meanwhile in Karawang District, 34 out of 112respondent claimed that the land use only for residential.

Period Respondent

1-3 years 69

3-6 years 43

6-10 years 26

10-20 years 24

<20 years 8

Family DebtTotal %

<Rp 1,000,000 16 6,9

Rp 1,000,000 – Rp 2,000,000 12 5,2

Rp 2,000,000 – Rp 4,000,000 5 2,1

Rp 4,000,000 – Rp 8,000,000 12 5,2

>Rp 8,000,000 19 8,1

No debt at all 161 68,5

Total 235 100

46

Figure 10 Status of Land Ownership

Figure 11 Reason of Land Use

193. It is noted from Figure 12 below, that most of the respondent want to

have business or become self-employed. They claimed that opening business is

catch their interest and will bring financial independence. In accordance with the

fact that most respondent have no debt neither to the bank nor family, other

information reveals, that most of respondents who own business or asset are

financed by himself. Only 11 people, who are indebted to the bank, around 8% of

the respondent still borrows some amount of money from brokers or middlemen,

due to faster and easier loan process. At this point, LRP can also address the issue

by providing business loan within micro and small business scheme.

Figure 12. Fields of Interest

Figure 13. Loans of Capitals

47

194. At last but not least, it is obvious from Figure 14 and Figure 15, belowthat most of the people don’t have plan to move from their current inhabited,both their stalls and houses. According to their response, they prefer to install their

little shop or stall along the canal. This is certain things should be one of the

cornerstones in seeing how the actual needs of respondents along the canal.

Regardless of the terms of the legal aspects of the ownership of the land or not,

should be realized that a country often unable to granting access to the community

in building a formal housing system.

Figure 14 Plan due to Rehabilitation of WTC

Figure 15 Respondent’s Moving Plan

48

195. Finally, under ADB Resettlement Framework, the compensation thatgiven to both legal and illegal settlers considering opportunity cost. Every eachimpact or loss that occurs should be assessed regarding the lost benefit. It isshown in project entitlement. Therefore, compensation for structure, provision oftransport, and provision of transition subsistence, should be given regardlesssocial economic statuses. However, it is also strongly indicated that 70.02% ofAHs will not move beyond the canal area, especially in Kabupaten Karawang(82 respondents) and Kabupaten Bekasi (71 out of 235 respondents) out of 235respondents.

5.3 Remarks on Survey on socializat ion of WTC

Rehabilitat ion

196. Believing in information theory proposed by Stiglitz (2002) onasymmetric information provided by consultant, EMA assess survey results toextent to which empirical evidence reveals. Theoretically, it is understood that ingeneral society and affected community in particular is never perfectly informed.The government would have superior information while the society would haveat an inferior position. Under project circumstances, for instance, both partieswould have incentives to behave strategically. The party with superiorinformation would have an incentive to take advantage of its informationposition to meet its goals. On the other side, the party with inferior informationwould recognize this incentives and information accordingly. At this context,should be recognized that both government and affected communities havedifferent objectives, and the challenge is to improve the efficiency of project andallocate the distribution of gains that greater efficiency implies. It is claims thatsuch asymmetrical information would arouse moral hazard, the situation inwhich a party takes advantage of special knowledge while engaging in sociallyinefficient behavior (Lipsey et al, 2008). The following paragraphs providedescription on information have by AHs regarding WTC project.

197. It is revealed that 54% of respondents do not know about the purposeof Rehabilitation WTC. Most of the respondents, 199 out of 331, do notacknowledge the purpose of rehabilitation. Although, 41% of respondentclaimed that they do know about it. They mention about improving the flow andquality water in the river, widening river and road. It means that the informationnot fully acquired by the project affected community (Figure 16).

49

Figure 16 What is the purpose of rehabilitation project?

Figure 17 Sources of Information

198. In general, the majority of respondent express that they don☂t get

informed and no one notify them about rehabilitation project and the benefit of its

project, as shown in the chart above. DG Water Resources (Ministry of Public

Works) and local government separately participate in providing the information,

though no significant result. Only 93 out of 311 who claimed that they get informed

by government agency. As a result, they need to empower the role local

government, especially Head of RT and RW. As the head of community association,

who works closely with society, they able to provide information promptly and

clearly for WTC people (see Figure 17). The following Figure 18 represents theWTC people knowledge toward Rehabilitation Project Benefit. Half ofrespondent stated that they don’t know if that project will advantage ordisadvantage them. The people who acknowledge the project stated someadvantages such as providing clean water, managing water flow of Citarum,improving living condition, and preventing flood.

Figure 18 Benefit of Rehabilitation Project

50

199. Figure 19 below depicts that mostly of the respondent not conscious ofcomplaining mechanism. They do not comprehend in filing complaint, who willbe in charge to respond them, and how long it would take to get response. Only8% admit that they get inform by officer directly. They don’t know how to legallycomplaint about impact that appears due to Rehabilitation Project. Since only afew people get informed by DG Water Resources (Ministry of Public Works) andlocal government.

Figure 19 Complaining Mechanism toward Project

200. This following figure, Figure 20, illustrates the WTC people perceptiontoward complaining procedure regarding implementation of WTC RehabilitationProject. Apparently, 267 out of 331 of respondent don’t have any idea aboutgovernment response toward any complaining filed. Nevertheless, there are10% of total respondent who believe that complaining toward government willbe accepted. Also, 7% of total respondent affirm that arising issues will besolved carefully and effectively by government

Figure 20 Perception toward complaing that be given to government.

51

.

201. In conclusion, it is highly possible for misunderstanding between bothparties, government and affected community. They are both has differentinterest and information. It is recommended, firstly, that government shouldbuild a good and effective communication with local community and elders orcommunity leaders. Give community leader a role to informing his or hercommunity about Rehabilitation Project. This community leader has highconnectivity with the community and highly respected. Secondly, empoweringhead of community association such as Head of RT and RW is important inbridging community and government officials. As a representative of thegovernment, they need to get informed about the project, therefore they able togive clear information for society in WTC. This information could be givenregularly in weekly or monthly meeting, whether in letter or directly. Suchrecommendation is very much consistent with EMA findings through its survey.

5.4 Livelihood Restorat ion Program and Relocation

Facilitat ion Plan

202. LRP scheme was designed based on the classification of AHs asimpacted by the resettlement project which categorizes AHs into 3 groups:

a. Category I (Low Impact); consists of AHs with corresponding impact onsecondary structure, trees, and plants.

b. Category II (Medium Impact); consists of AHs with correspondingimpact on main structure with a proportion of less than 50%, hence arenot subject to relocation.

c. Category III (Severe Impact); consist of AHs that fulfill at least one ofthe following three conditions, AHs to be relocated (with impacted mainstructure of 50% or more), losing more than 10% of their business, andlosing more than 10% if their agricultural yields.

203. Referring to the above classification, 8 types of LRP have beenproposed and assigned to each category. LRP will be granted commensuratewith AHs’ perceived impact. Below is the LRP scheme as indicated by the LRPdocument.

Table 11 LRP Scheme

204. Fridentified:

393 outto move368 ouwill be or (87.0toko dakerajinapeterna312 outheir ow

Of 24.1% wthe categopenjualan mainly drivtheir curreaffected.

205. Frthe new lo

Kemudah

Air bersih

Akses jala

Pendidika

Tempat ib

Keamana

204. From AHs data, some interesting patterns related:ut of 556 (70.7%) AHs to be relocated do not haveve to.ut of 556 (66.2%) AHs to be relocated run their

e affected if they are relocated to new sites. These7.0%) have business in the category of “Usaha jadan pasar”, 15 or (4.0%) in the category of “Usainan”, and 33 or (9.0%) in the category of “Usnakan”.ut of 368 (84.8%) AHs to be relocated which inco

own businesses do not have any alternative sites to

working women, majority (approx. 48.2%) run thegory of “Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasn di toko dan pasar” depends on local (neighbourriven by social relation and acquintanceship. If th

rrent property’s location, their income sources m.

205. From socio-economic survey data, facilities that co location are depicted in the table below.

FacilitiesCount

(multi-respon

ahan usaha 137

ih 38

jalan/ keudahan transportasi 20

ikan anak 12

t ibadah 3

nan tinggal 2

Total 212

52

204. ted to LRP have been

ve any alternative sites

ir own business whichse AHs consist of 320

jasa dan penjualan diUsaha pengolahan dan“Usaha pertanian dan

come source is runing to move to.

heir own businesses inasar”. “Usaha jasa danuring) market which is they are evicted from might be significantly

205. onsidered important in

t

onse)%

64,6%

17,9%

9,4%

5,7%

1,4%

0,9%

100,0%

53

Another important fact from socio-economic survey data indicates that supportsconsidered important in the new location are depicted in the table below.

Supports for restoring businessCount

(multi-response)%

Pelatihan teknis/ keterampilan usaha 99 66,4%

Sarana input usaha 25 16,8%

Akses modal financial 19 12,8%

Pelatihan manajemen dan organisasi 5 3,4%

Transportasi 1 0,7%

Total 149 100,0%

From the LRP document, it is apparent that “facilitation” focuses mainly onimproving skill to restore income and livelihood.

206. Having scrutinized the LRP document and examining the AHs andsocioeconomic survey data, the following issues have been identified andshould be properly managed in the next phase of this resettlement project:

a. The arrangements to facilitate AHs in finding new place for living or

business and negotiate payment for new place have not been specified.

Since the large part of to-be-relocated AHs do not have alternative sites

for living and business, the availability of this arrangement is very

important and urgent.

b. It is apparent that LRP focuses mainly on improving skill to restore

income and livelihood through training. From the view point of community

development, initiatives for restoring the livelihood of AHs should be

managed following the phases of RAISE AWARENESS,

EMPOWERMENT, DEVELOPMENT, and PROTECTION. Training is in

the DEVELOPMENT phase. RAISE AWARENESS and

EMPOWERMENT can be delivered through proper facilitation. There

should be initiatives to implement the PROTECTION step.

c. There should be any considerations in utilizing informal groups in the

community of AHs as a basis for grant disbursement, not only based on

location.

d. For 312 to-be-relocated AHs which running their own businesses, the

eminent risks following the displacement is the loss of income since they

still do not have alternative sites to move to. There should be initiatives to

help them to reestablish and restore their business in the new locations.

This is in line with the result from socioeconomic survey which indicates

that the most important facility is “Kemudahan usaha”.

54

6 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Recommendation on Policy Framew ork

207. On part of GOI's regulation, clear governmental policy on resettlement and

its enforcement is needed. Although it is too late for this project, there has been a

new law and presidential decree to accommodate such need. Policy formulation to

accommodate rehabilitation of APs livelihood post-resettlement, has also been set.

The new policy aims not only to be in line with ADB☂s framework on resettlement,

but for policy improvement and to ensure that resettlement will not lead to the

impoverishment of the poorest of the poor, including those who have no legal

rights to the assets and the vulnerable groups. The fact that none of the 515 (out of

the 872 households) who are to be relocated, have no legal documents to prove

their ownership of the land along the West Tarum canal where they live, reflects

unclear governmental policy and its enforcement regarding the matter.

208. Related to policy implementation on resettlement, there is a need toimprove the administrative and bureaucratic system of resettlement, especiallythat relates to compensation’s distribution. The main principle of theresettlement is to ensure that post resettlement, APs’ livelihood is not gettingworse and to allow them to take advantages of the project. APs who areentittled for compensation are those who are registered in the ResettlementPlan based on the survey in 2008, identified in the updated survey in thefollowing years and those who are relocated by local government within theperiod of 2009-2011. As RP updating has been also renewed with consultationwith the affected persons (APs), it should be ensured its accomplishment duringthe implementation stage.

6.2 Recommendation on AHs Baseline Data

209. Analysis on AHs data resulted in some recommendations to improveAHs data quality. Some possible corrections have been made to AHs databaseaccordingly, and in general can be summarized as follows:

• A more concise representation of “Pekerjaan” data field that refers toKlasifikasi Baku Jenis Pekerjaan Indonesia 2002 (2002 IndonesiaOccupation Standard Classification) of the National Statistics Bureau.

• Corrections on inconsistent data field, i.e.: (i) correction on data that arenot mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, (ii) correction on datathat mistakenly entered, and (iii) correction on data fields with differentcategory names for the same data value.

210. For incompleteness problem, theoretically, some corrective actions maybe applied, i.e. (1) complete case, (2) all-available approach, and (3) imputationby using replacement value. The first option is not applicable for thisresettlement project since it will neglect AHs with incomplete data. The secondoption is the easiest remedial action, but may cause nonconforming LRP. Thethird option may be applied in this situation, but determining the replacementvalue is not an easy task. Completeness problem cannot be corrected becausethere is no supporting data available for this remedial action. As discussedpreviously, this flaw may render to unappropriate LRP due to loss of AHs’information.

55

211. Since there are only 79.8% of AHs still living on the site, timelinessproblem do exists. This is the kind of problem that cannot be fixed but will surelydeteriorate with the lapse of time. The only remedial action for this problem isdoing the implementation as soon as possible.

6.3 Recommendation on Complaints and

grievance Mechanism

212. It is important to note that respondent who aware of information onchanneling complaints and grievance mechanism is relatively low (18.87%). It isimportant, therefore, for the project to more actively disseminate information onthe respective matter to the AHs in order to make the case of good projectgovernance. It is also noted that local street level government officials play asignificant role as the main project information givers, therefore accurate andreliable information regarding all about the project is critical to them. It issurprising though only 1 respondent out of 50, who gets discussed informationfrom NGOs for there is common higher expectation. Surveyors, on the otherhand, professionally are not expected to give any information. Well trainedsurveyors are more preferable to be recommended for such sensitive subjectareas.

213. It is concluded, there is highly possible for misunderstanding betweengovernment and affected community with reference to asymmetric informationacquired by both parties. It is recommended, firstly, that government shouldbuild a good rapport and effective communication with local community, eldersand its leaders. They should be given a role to informing their community aboutRehabilitation Project. These community leaders have high connectivity with thecommunity and they are highly respected. Secondly, it is necessary toempowering head of community association such as Ketua RT and RW, inbridging community and government officials. As a representative of thegovernment, they need to get informed accurately all about the projectinformation, therefore they able to give a clear information for society in WTC.Those information should be given in regular basis could be given in weekly ormonthly meeting, whether in letter or directly. Such recommendation is verymuch consistent with EMA findings through its survey and will become essentialingredients for community empowering process.

6.4 Recommendation on Inclusion of Gender

214. The gender sensitivity of the RP is, on average, FAIR. Some issuesthat still need special attentions are (1) the development of resettlement andcompensation options for women, and (2) safeguarding women’s interest inresettlement, separate identification of women’s socioeconomic condition,needs, and priorities. Some remedial actions that are still possible regardingthese two issues are involving women in compensation disbursement andproviding options for women needs and priorities.

Regarding gender sensitivity of the next phases of the project, it is stronglyrecommended to:

56

a. Safeguard women’s interest in the process of land acquisition and

displacement, and ensure that grants should be in the name of both

spouses.

b. Safeguard women and children’s interest in the process of resettlement and

rehabilitation.

The facilitation in the LRP implementation phase should focus on assisting

AHs in finding new sites and ensure that women and children’s interests

(e.g. sanitation and education) are properly taken care of during and after

the transition period following the displacement.

c. Accomodate women’s interest in compensation payment

It is advised that women should be asked about their opinion regarding

compensation payment, also regarding joint names of account.

d. Monitor and evaluate the issues of women’s livelihood restoration, safety,

and habitability.

Regarding this issue, EMA recommends to promote participation of women inimplementation of M&E by including more women in the project team, includespecific inputs from women, ensure that community-based mechanisms haveproportionate representation of women, and include women in resettlementparticipatory monitoring.

6.5 Recommendation on Social-economic

Condit ions

215. In terms of marital status, most of the respondents are married. Only 5out of 235 respondents are single. However, 22 out of 87 of total femalerespondent are widow At this point women are more vulnerable to poverty.Household led by women carry a “double day burden”, as a head of household,she have to handle domestic work and as the main earner simultaneously(Moghadam, 1997). Consequently, these women suffer mobility constraintwhich possibly impact negatively on their household income. It is also appearsthat most of respondent just graduated from elementary school. In Karawang,65% of respondent only completed elementary school and only 1 person out of112 respondents who graduated from college. More education means morechoices and career opportunities. In general, within such situation of low-educated community, woman has less opportunity to become educated or toearn a living. Government need to seriously consider how to lift up educationand job opportunities for AHs. This should be accommodated in LRP scheme,not only shortsighted project restoration, but need to be integrated with the longterm governmental public service accounts.

6.6 Recommendation on LRP

216. Based on the above facts and the community development approachemployed in this study, some recommendations for improving LRP are given:

a. There should be initiatives or facilities to help AHs and especiallyrelocated AHs to establish their own businesses in their new sites. Thisinitiative should also be able to restore and protect their income andlivelihood during their initial transient condition following the relocation.

b. The “facilitation” should not only focus on improving skill to restoreincome and livelihood, but, for improving its effectiveness, should be

57

managed within a community development perspective. With this view,the program should be conducted in 4 phases: (1) increasing the APs’awareness of the situation, (2) helping APs to recognize their strengthsand potentials, (3) improving and nurturing the strength throughtrainings (which already been designed), and (4) protecting andinstitutionalizing the improved condition.

217. It is agreed, under ADB Resettlement Framework, the compensationthat given to both legal and illegal settlers considering opportunity cost. Everyimpact or loss that occurs should be assessed regarding the lost benefit. It isshown in project entitlement. Therefore, compensation for structure, provision oftransport, and provision of transition subsistence, should be given under nodiscriminative circumstances including their social economic and illegal status. Itis strongly indicated that 70.02% of AHs will not move beyond the canalrehabilitation area, especially in Kabupaten Karawang (82 respondents) andKabupaten Bekasi (71 out of 235 respondents) out of 235 respondents.Therefore, efforts at raising awareness should be seriously and systematicallyconducted to reduce moral hazard for they granting luxurious rewards to theirillegally occupy and exploit public goods and properties.

6.7 Recommendation RP Implementat ion

218. Based on the results of desk study, field research and thecorresponding analysis, some recommendations regarding RP implementationare given below:

The implementation should be conducted as soon as possible to ensurethe accuracy of data and prevent the growing uncertainties among theAHs.To comply to gender sensitivity and accountability issue, compensationshould be given in the name of both spouses of AHs, directly.In the relocation process, women and children’ interest should besafeguarded. Since most of the to-be-relocated AHs still do not havealternative sites, assistance in finding new sites should be provided toensure that women and children’ interests are taken care of, i.e.:access to water and sanitary facility, access to school, and access toresource that contributes to livelihood.

Other related recommendations have been provided in other recommendationsections

6.8 Recommendation on Part ies Handling

Resett lement Plan

219. Figure 22 below shows interconnected parties handling resettlementplan. EMA has no solid basis for assessing whether all parties play their rolesas they are supposed to be. As far as resources are concerned, thisassessment put as less important for EMA for it is also the late comer to theproject. However, during conducting assessment EMA has invaluableopportunities to communicate, interact, and cooperate with different partiesinvolved both formally as well as informally. EMA especially gratefully thanks fornotable support and assistance from PCMU. Thorough communication andsincere cooperation with DED consultants and LPM Equator in the very firstmonths of involvement, have given chances for EMA to learn the project faster.

AHs

NGOs

Warm welchats withcommitmeun-proportmechanismsuccessful

Figure 22

6.9 C

220. It resettlemeresettlemebut also th

• raian

• em

• decoco

• propro

221. In build strontools and accurate dprocess an

RESETTLEMENT

DIRECTORATEGENERAL OF

WATERRESOURCES

BBWSC

MAYOR/BUPATI

BAPPEDA

RWGs

CONSULTANTS

FACILITATORS

UNIVERSITY

AHs

NGOs

ADB

elcoming greetings from members of RWGs to with ADB professionals, make believe that the pr

ents from its stakeholders. Greater awareness ortional negative stigma on complains and

ism in the past should be transformed into powerfuful collective actions.

2 Parties Handling Resettlement Plan

Concluding Remarks

220. It is expected by integrating community develoent design, the project would have sensitivity anent can be regarded as not only to execute good

the opportunity to:raise community awareness on the importance to reand properties with virtue,empower community potentials to confidently makedevelop capacity of both community as well as projconduct project in such a way that promote both cocommunity virtuous citizen,protect community property rights as well as public properties.

221. In addition community approach to resettlement ong conviction on the needs of good quality ted procedures such as firmed and enforceable data and information, good project governanc

and outcomes.

58

to their meetings, andproject needs greater on project delay and grievance handlingful energy accelerating

220. elopment approach toand awareness of howod project governance,

regard public goods

ke their own living,oject holders tocommunity welfare as

lic goods and

221. nt is also expected to technical instrumentalble legal instruments,nce both in terms of

59

REFERENCES

1. Asian Development Bank, Handbook on Resettlement: A Guide toGood Practice, Manila, 1998.

2. Asian Development Bank, Gender checklist: Resettlement, 2003.

3. Badan Pusat Statistik, KBJI 2002: Klasifikasi Baku Jenis Pekerjaan

Indonesia, 2002.

4. Baseline Assessment on Women’s Accessibility to Public Services

(West Java Province), available http://www-

wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/

05/15/000356161_20120515003000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHI

T0Services00West0Java0.pdf, acessed 30 July 2012.

5. Baseline Assessment on Women’s Accessibility to Public Services

(West Java Province), available: http://www-

wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/

05/15/000356161_20120515003000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHI

T0Services00West0Java0.pdf, acessed 30 July 2012.

6. Frank, F. and Smith, A., The Community Development Handbook A

Tool To Build Community Capacity. Labor Market Learning and

Development Unit, Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC),

1999.

7. Hancock, P., The Gender Empowerment Measure: Issues from West

Java, Indonesia, available:

http://devnet.anu.edu.au/online%20versions%20pdfs/51/VPThancock51

.pdf, accessed 30 July 2012.

8. International Finance Corporation, Handbook for Preparing a

Resettlement Action Plan, Washington, 2002.

9. Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W., and Wang, R. W., Data Quality Assessment,

Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45 No. 4ve, April 2002.

60

Annex A List and Short Descript ion of

Related Project Documents

Review ed By EMA

Annex B Paper on Policy Analysis

Annex C Minutes of Meet ings Attended By

EMA

Annex D1 Paper on Analysis of AHs

Database

Annex D2 Suplement of Paper on Analysis of

AHs Database

Annex F Sampling Plan and Sampling

Frame

Annex H Paper on Gender Sensit ivity

Analysis

Annex I Paper on Analysis of Socialization

WTC Rehabilitat ion

Annex J Quest ionnaire of Survey

Annex K Paper on Resett lement In


Perspect ive

Annex A List and Short Descript ion of

Related Project Documents

Review ed By EMA

PARAHYANGAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (CPMS)

Sub-Contract for External Monitoring Agency


for West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation

LIST AND SHORT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DOCUMENTS

NOVEMBER 2012

Integrated Citarum Water Management Resources Invesment Project

Subcomponent 8.1: Program Management Support

List and Description of Project Documents

Name of Project Documents Published by Categorizes Description

A Comparative Survey of DAM-induced Resettlement in 50 Cases Thayer Scudder with the Statistical Assistance of John Gay

Thayer Scudder References It presents a statistical analysis of resettlement outcomes associated with 50 dams in areas of the world where most future dams will be built

A Manual on Monitoring and Evaluation for Alternative Development Projects

UNODC Regional Centre, Chiang Mai

University, and Maejo University

References

This manual intends to provide some basic information and practical guidelines on project monitoring and evaluation in order to enhance better understanding on project monitoring and evaluation

Gender Checklist : Resettlement ADB February 2003 References

This checklist is designed to assist staff and consultants in implementing the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (November 1995) and Policy on Gender and Development (June 1998). It will guide users in identifying and addressing gender issues in resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring, and in designing gender-inclusive resettlement plans.

Guide to Gender Sensitive Indicatiors

Canadian International Development

Agency, August 1997

References

This Guide explains why gender-sensitive indicators are useful tools for measuring the results of CIDA's development initiatives. It concentrates in particular on projects with an end-user focus, and shows how gender-sensitive indicators can and should be used in both gender integrated and WID-specific projects, and in combination with other evaluation techniques.

Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan

International Finance Corporation (IFC)

References

This publication, Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disasters: Experiences from Latin America, presents case studies illustrating how various countries have incorporated this measure in innovative ways



Handbook on Resettlement : A Guide to Good Practice

Asian Development Bank

References

.

Introduction to Gender Analysis Concepts and Steps

Hunt, J, 2004. ‘Introduction to gender analysis

concepts and steps’, Development

Bulletin, no. 64, pp. 100-106.

References

This dissertation argues that solving the internal displacement problem is crucial for building peace, and any solution to the problem of internal displacement must include institutionalized property rights for internally displaced persons (IDPs).

Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards : Project Case Studies in the Philippines

Asian Development Bank January 2008

References

The case studies presented in this report were conducted in preparation of the special evaluation study (SES)1 of the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) 1995 Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (IR)2.

Preventive Resettlement of Populations at Risk of Disaster : Experiences from Latin America

GFDRR References

The following report and recommendation on (i) a proposed multitranche financing facility (MFF), and (ii) a proposed administration of grant to be provided by the Global Environment Facility (GEF)1, both to the Republic of Indonesia for the Integrated Citarum Water Resource Management Investment Program (the Investment Program), and (iii) a proposed administration of a portion of technical assistance (TA) for Institutional Strengthening for Integrated Water Resources Management in the 6 Cis River Basin Territory to be provided by the Government of the Netherlands and the Multi-Donor Trust Fund under the Water Financing Partnership Facility.



Program Administration Memorandum (PAM)- Republic of Indonesia : ICWRMIP

ADB 2 September 2009

References

This Program Administration Memorandum (PAM) was prepared to assist the Government in the implementation of the Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (the Program), for which ADB’s Board of Directors approved a Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) Number 0027 ($ 500,000,000) including the loan 2500 - INO OCR ($20,000,000) and 2501 - INO ADF ($30,000,000) and the technical assistance 7189 – INO ($8,000,000) respectively

Property Rights in Return and Resettlement of Internally Displaced Persons : A Quantitative and Comparative Case Study

Deniz Sert 2008 References

This Resettlement Framework has been prepared to guide in the preparation and implementation of resettlement plans for potential subprojects with land acquisition and resettlement impacts.

Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors : Proposed Multifranche Financing Facility and Administration of Grant and Technical Assitance Grant Republic of Indonesia : ICWRMIP

ADB November 2008 References

The framework and guidelines in thispaper will ensure that people affected by land acquisition who permanently or temporarily lose their livelihoods will be eligible for appropriate compensation under the Project.

Resettlement Framework : ICWRMIP

Directorate General Water Resources, Ministry of Public

Works 8 August 2008

References

This Resettlement Framework has been prepared to guide in the preparation and implementation of resettlement plans for potential subprojects with land acquisition and resettlement impacts.



Resettlement Framework : Second Urban Primary Health Care Project in People's Republic of Bangladesh

Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives of

Bangladesh October 2004

References

The Resettlement Plan is formulated in accordance with the Land Law of the People’s Republic of China (2004), Notice on Strengthening Reform to Strict Land Management Promulgated by State Council (No.: GF [2004]28), relevant Anhui Provincial policies, Involuntary Resettlement requirements of the Asian Development Bank Safeguard Policy Statement (2009).

Resettlement Plan : Anhui Chao Lake Environmental Rehabilitation Project

The Wuwei Government June

2012 References

The RP outlines the objectives, policy principles and procedures for land acquisition, compensation and other assistance measures to be provided for persons who will experience resettlement effects when the DWSSDP is implemented

Resettlement Plan : Dhaka Water Supply Sector Development Program

Dhaka Water and Sanitation Authority

June 2007 References

This resettlement policy is to avoid or minimize impacts on people’s sources of livelihood. Since majority of the main structures that the Project will adversely affect are used for business, the Project resettlement policy putsmuch emphasis on ensuring that the affected people (APs) are able to continue with their livelihood during and after construction with minimal, or no, disruption in their business operation.

Resettlement Plan : Great Mekong Subregion Northwestern Provincial Road Improvement Project

Government of Cambodia May 2009

References

This Resettlement Plan is based on the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (2004), Decision of the State Council on Deepening Reform and Strictly Enforcing Land Administration (Ref. No. GF[2004] 28), related policies of Guiyang City and Guizhou Province, and ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement.



Resettlement Plan : Guiyang Integrated Water Resources Management Sector Project

Black & Veatch Ltd September 2006

References

This paper describe the Resettlement Plan for The Duc Hoa Main Canal project. It is about 17.68 km in length, passing through Trang Bang district of Tay Ninh Province, Cu Chi district of HCMC and Duc Hoa district of Long An province, and will deliver water to the Duc Hoa Irrigation area benefiting a command area of approximately 13,821 ha. Up to 13,500 households are expected to benefit from the improved irrigation facilities.

Resettlement Plan : Phuoc Hoa Water Resouces Project

Project Management Board for Investment and Construction of

Agriculture and Rural Development of Tay Ninh Province, April

2012

References

The purpose of this updated LARF is to define procedures, consistent with SPS and LAA for planning and implementing all land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) tasks for the projects under the MFF program.

Resettlement Plan : Punjab Irrigated Agriculture Investment Project (PIAIP)

Punjab Irrigation Department,

Government of Pakistan February

2012

References

This Resettlement Plan has been prepared in tune with the ADB Handbook on Resettlement and the agreed Resettlement Framework (RF). The primary objective of this Resettlement Plan is to mitigate the adverse impacts of the intervention and to assist the Affected Persons in resettlement and restoration of their livelihood.

Resettlement Plan : Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program - Widening and Strengthening of Various Roads at Sikar Town Subproject

Local Self Government

Department of India September 2012

References

The resettlement plan (RP) is prepared according to the People‘s Republic of China‘s Land Administration Law (2004) and the related national, provincial, and municipal policies and regulations, as well as in compliance with ADB‘s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009).



Resettlement Plan : Shaanxi Weinan Luyang Integrated Saline Land Management Project

The Weinan City Government October

2012 References

This report examines how well young offender institutions (YOIs) holding young men (aged 15 to 18 years) work with youth offending services and other relevant agencies to ensure that the accommodation and education, training and employment (ETE) resettlement needs of sentenced young men are met in custody and on release, including the use of release on temporary licence (ROTL).

Resettlement Provision for Children and Young People

HM Inspectorate of Prisons June 2011

References

to 18 years) work with youth offending services and other relevant agencies to ensure that the

Special Evaluation Study on the Policy Impact of Involuntary Resettlement

Asian Development Bank September

2000 References

accommodation and education, training and employment (ETE) resettlement needs of

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) : ICWRMP

Nippon Koei Co, Ltd and Associates

Tranche 6 December 2006

References sentenced young men are met in custody and on release, including the use of release on

UNHCR : Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2012

UNHCR, 2011, Geneva

References temporary licence (ROTL).

Grant Aggrement "Citarum Watershed Management and Biodiversity Conservation" between Republic of Indonesia and Asian Development Bank - Grant Number 0216-INO

GOI and ADB Public Information This is a Grant Agreement between GOI and ADB for Citarum Watershed Management and Biodiversity Conservation Project

Loan Aggrement ICRWMIP between Republic of Indonesia and Asian Development Bank - Loan Number 2500-INO

GOI and ADB Public Information This is a Loan Aggrement between GOI and ADB for ICWMIP



Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Terpadu di Wilayah Sungai Citarum

BBWSC and PCMU Public Information This is a brochure that explaining the information about Citarum Roadmap

Public Information Booklet : IWCRMIP Directorate General of Water Resources

Public Information This is a brochure that explaining the information about Citarum Roadmap

Ringkasan Utama Untuk Program Investasi Sumber Daya Air Terpadu Wilayah Sungai Citarum

RCMU and PCMU March 2010


Roadmap untuk Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Terpadu Wilayah Sungai Citarum

RCMU and PCMU March 2010


Siaran Pers Aliansi Rakyat untuk Citarum

ARUM Public Information

Keputusan Bupati Karawang Nomor 592.2/Kep.257-Huk/2009 tentang Klasifikasi Harga Standar Bangunan di wilayah Kabupaten Karawang

GOI Regulations

This study evaluates the relevance, adequacy, and effectiveness of the IRP and its implementation. The objectives are to enhance ADB’s future portfolio development and management, and to provide feedback to enhance IRP implementation in future projects.

Keputusan Bupati Bekasi Nomor 521/Kep.208-Diperta/2010 tentang Harga Dasar Ganti Rugi Tanaman bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum di Wilayah Kabupaten Bekasi

GOI Regulations



Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum

GOI Regulations

This report summarizes the resettlement activities of UNHCR of ces worldwide in 2010. The information for this report is drawn from the UNHCR Resettlement Statistical Reports (RSR), which are submitted by UNHCR country of ces on a quarterly basis

Keputusan Bupati Bekasi Nomor 640/Kep.31.A-DPPB/2008 tentang Standar Harga Bangunan dan Spesifikasi Bangunan untuk Harga Tertinggi Proyek Pembangunan Pemerintah dan Ganti Rugi terhadap Bangunan Umum Atau Bangunan Milik Pemerintah yang Terkena Proyek Pembangunan di WIlayah Kabupaten Bekasi tahun 2008

GOI Regulations

Keputusan Bupati Karawang Nomor 910/Kep.554-Huk/2007 tentang Standar Satuan Harga Barang dan Jasa dalam Pelaksanaan APBD tahun Anggaran 2008

GOI Regulations

Peraturan Direktur Jendral Perbendaharaan Nomor 42 Tahun 2009 tentang Petujuk Pelaksanaan Penyaluran dan Pencairan Dana Pinjaman ADB no. 2501-INO (SF) ICWRMIP-P1

GOI Regulations

SK Walikota Bekasi Nomor 520/Kep. 333-Dispera/VII/2010 tentang Penetapan Harga Dasar Tanaman untuk Pembayaran Ganti Rugi Tanaman di kota Bekasi

GOI Regulations

Surat Bupati Bekasi perihal Pemberitahuan Tenggat Waktu Penghitungan Orang Terkena Dampak Rehabilitasi Saluran Tarum Barat

Bupati Bekasi Mei 2008

Regulations



Surat Bupati Karawang perihal Penentuan Tenggal Waktu Pendataan Orang Terkena Dampak Rehabilitasi Saluran Induk Tarum Barat

Bupati Karawang 30 Mei 2008

Regulations

Surat Sekretaris Daerah kota Bekasi perihal Pemberitahuan Tenggat Waktu (Cut off date) Penghitungan Orang Terkena Dampak Rehabilitasi STB

Sekretaris Bekasi 30 Mei 2008

Regulations

Additional Survey and Consultation to the Affected People in Preparation of Resettlement Plan for The West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation

ICWRMP 2007 Consultant's Report

The objective of this survey and consultation to the Aps are as follow : 1. To asses APs who are included poor category and who are included non poor category 2. To update the lost of impact of WTC rehabilitation 3. To Asess alternative of appropriate solution for all impact (compensations). 4. To estimate the total compensation budget.

Daftar RTD per Desa dan Total Nilai Aset

DED Consultant 17 April 2012

Consultant's Report

This manual intends to provide some basic information and practical guidelines on project monitoring and evaluation in order to enhance better understanding on project monitoring and evaluation

Daftar Tracer per Desa dan Total Nilai Aset


Consultant's Report

This additional survey was made to collect more detail information related to matrix entitlement. The result of survey will be used by GOI and ADB to take decision in update the Draft RP of WTC Rehabilitation.

Data Sensus 2008

DED Consultant

Consultant's Report

The Database of Sensus 2008

Database SC2.1 WTC 2012 DMS 7 DED Consultant 12

August 2012 Consultant's Report The database of Detailed AH's



Database Sosek DED Consultant 9

Augst 2012 Consultant's Report

The Database of Socio Economic Warum Tarum Canal Final

Database Sosek WTC Final DED Consultant 12

Juni 2012 Consultant's Report

The Database of Socio Economic Warum Tarum Canal Final

Draft Database Angkatan Pelatihan RTD WTC ver 01

DED Consultant 9

April 2012

Consultant's Report

Draft Final RP DED Consultant 21

September 2012 Consultant's Report

RP Updating from DED Consultant, Updating information related to resettlement plan that will be implemented by GOI

Draft Keputusan Gubernur Jawa Barat tentang Skema Pemberdayaan Masyarakat bagi Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak Khusus Rehabilitasi Saluran Tarum Barat yang dilaksanakan oleh BBWSC, Kementrian PU, di Kabupaten Karawang, Kabupaten Bekasi dan Kota Bekasi.

DED Consultant Consultant's Report

Draft Penghitungan Biaya Penggantian Aset dan LRP ver 01


Consultant's Report Final Draft of RP Updating created by DED Consultant, published on September 2012

Environmental Assessment Report : ICWRMIP - Initial Environmental Examination of Tranche 1

Nippon Koei Co, Ltd

and Associates Tranche 1 IEE 7 December 2006

Consultant's Report Regulation SK Gubernur Jawa Barat for Implementing Resettlement Plan West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation



Executive Summary : Updating Resettlement Program for WTC Rehabilitation ver 01

DED Consultant 29 March 2012

Consultant's Report Executive Summary Report published by DED Consultant that shown progress report on Resettlement Program versi 01

Executive Summary : Updating Resettlement Program for WTC Rehabilitation ver 02


Consultant's Report Executive Summary Report published by DED Consultant that shown progress report on Resettlement Program versi 02

Final LRP Design and Estimated Budget

DED Consultant 2 May 2012

Consultant's Report Final LRP Report by DED Consultant

Inception Report : Development of a Water Quality Management System for the West Tarum Canal of Citarum River Basin in West Java Province

KIWE, Korea Water Resources

Corporation March 2007

Consultant's Report

Kuesioner Sensus WTC DED Consultant Consultant's Report This Questionnaire is used by DED Consultant when they do the Sensus WTC

Kuesioner Sosek WTC DED Consultant Consultant's Report

This checklist is designed to assist staff and consultants in implementing the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (November 1995) and Policy on Gender and Development (June 1998). It will guide users in identifying and addressing gender issues in resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring, and in designing gender-inclusive resettlement plans.



Laporan Design Program Pemberdayaan WTC rev 2


Consultant's Report Progress Report about design program WTC

Peta Situasi Penanganan Rehabilitasi WTC

DED Consultant Consultant's Report

This Guide explains why gender-sensitive indicators are useful tools for measuring the results of CIDA's development initiatives. It concentrates in particular on projects with an end-user focus, and shows how gender-sensitive indicators can and should be used in both gender integrated and WID-specific projects, and in combination with other evaluation techniques.

Petunjuk Teknis Penanganan Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak Rehabilitasi Saluran Tarum Barat

DED Consultant Consultant's Report Intent of this Handbook was to document the essential steps for best practice in designing and implementing resettlement action plans

Report of Replacement Cost Study DED Consultant 15

April 2012 Consultant's Report

The Handbook describes the resettlement process and operational requirements within the Bank’s project cycle.

Resettlement Plan - Draft for Consultation - ICWRMIP

Directorate General of Water Resources

11 August 2008 Consultant's Report

This Resettlement Plan is Resettlement Plan 2008 that formulated between GOI and ADB for implementing Resettlement WTC Program

Summary List of AHS 2012 DED Consultant 2

May 2012 Consultant's Report

This article outlines the essential steps that need to be addressed to undertake gender analysis for each of the different levels referred to above, and draws on concepts from a number of different frameworks.

Tabel Segresi Sosek WTC DED Consultant 9

Augst 2012 Consultant's Report

The case studies presented in this report were conducted in preparation of the special evaluation study (SES)1 of the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) 1995 Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (IR)2.

Tracer Methodology Draft DED Consultant Consultant's Report Explaining about the methodology of tracer survey that implemented by DED Consultant

Annex B Paper on Policy Analysis




for Resettlement Plan Updating and Implementation for West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation

WORKING PAPER

POLICY ANALYSIS

Resett lement polic ies:

A review of ADB’s framew orks and GoI ’s

regulat ions

NAME OF CONSULTANT:

INDRASWARI

with kind assistance of FITRIANA HAPSARI PUTRI

NOVEMBER 2012



Resettlement policies:

A review of ADB’s frameworks and GoI’s regulations

Abstract

This paper reviews policies on resettlement within the context of the rehabilitation

program of Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program

(ICWRMIP), held under the responsibility of Directorate General of Water Resources,

Ministry of Public Works.

Policies which are reviewed belong to the main parties who are responsible for the

program i.e. the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB’s) frameworks on resettlement and the

Government of Indonesia’s (GoI’s) regulations on resettlement.

Both the ADB’s framework and GoI’s regulations stipulate that involuntary resettlement

shall be avoided. Should there is no other options, affected persons (APs) should be

provided with compensation.

The differences between ADB’s frameworks and GoI’s regulations on resettlement lie on

three areas. First, it is about APs’ legal rights of their assets which are the main

requirement for compensation according to GoI’s regulations. Based on ADB’s

frameworks such rights are not required. However the latest Presidential Decree number

71/2012, article 26, opens possibility for those with no legal rights (to receive

compensation) by providing certain mechanism to overcome the problem of lack of legal

rights. Second, GoI’s regulations have no specific measurements to accommodate the

special needs of women headed households, the disabled and the elderly, while ADB’s

frameworks have. Third, GoI’s regulations have no specific measurement for rehabilitation

of APs livehood post resettlement.This measurement is inseparable according to ADB’s

frameworks.

This paper recommends that for policy formulation, there is a need to accommodate

those with no legal rights for compensation (which is solved by Presidential Decree

number 71/2012), as well as to accommodate the special needs of vulnerable groups

such as women headed households, the disabled and the elderly. As for policy

implementation, improvement of the administrative system and burreaucracy is needed

especially that relates to compensation’s distribution.

1. Introduction

This paper examines policies which are related to the resettlement of people who live

along the West Tarum canal. The resettlement is part of the rehabilitation program of

Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ICWRMIP), held

under the responsibility of Directorate General of Water Resources, Ministry of Public

Works.

This program consists of several stages within 15 years period and covers the whole area

of Citarum river. Administratively it covers Karawang regency, Bekasi regency and Bekasi

city. The length of the West Tarum canal is 54.2 km, started from Karawang regency to

Bekasi city.

The rehabilitation of West Tarum canal aims to improve the provision of clean water

supply for people living in the surrounding area as well as to improve agricultural products

and water supply for Jakarta.

In Karawang regency, Bekasi regency and Bekasi city, a Resettlement Working Groups

(RWGs) has been established and consists of various parties involved in the program.

The rehabilitation of West Tarum canal including land acquisition of areas on the left and

right sides of the river of six meters each. Based on the survey in 2008 there will be 20

government assets and 872 households which are affected by the project. As many as

515 out of the 872 households are to be relocated, none of them have legal documents to

prove their ownership of the land where they live.

The resettlement plan of 2008 needs to be renewed due to the development of the project

and with consultation with the affected persons (APs). The main principle of the

resettlement is to ensure that post resettlement, APs’ livelihood is not getting worse and

to allow them to take advantages of the project. APs who are entittled for compensation

are those who are registered in the Resettlement Plan based on the survey in 2008,

identified in the updated survey in the following years and those who are relocated by

local government within the period of 2009-2011.

2. ADB’s framework

Based on ADB’s Handbook of resettlement, basic principles of ADB’s frameworks are as

follow:

• Involuntary resettlement should be avoided/minimized

• AP’s shall be provided with compensation and rehabilitation

• Lack of legal rights to assets will not bar the AP’s from compensation and

rehabilitation

• Replacement of affected assets shall be provided at their current market values and

without depreciation

• Resettlement plans shall be carried out with participation and consultation with APs

• Schedule of budget for Resettlement Plan and implementation must be incorporated

into the overall project.

• Payment of compensation must be completed prior to the award of work contract.

• Rehabilitation measure must also be in place but not necessarily completed prior to

the award of work contract,

• Compensation and rehabilitation assistance for ethnic minorities and socially

disadvantaged such as women headed households, the disabled and elderly will be

carried out with respect for their special needs

These basic principles apply to resettlement program in any countries where ADB’s projects

apply such as China, India, and Bangladesh. In these countries, as is the case of Indonesia,

problems usually occur at implementation of policies, in particular the compensation’s

distribution.

3. GoI’s policies

National policies which directly relate to resettlement/rehabilitation of West Tarum canal are

law (UU) number 2/2012 on procurement of land for development and for public interest. A

latest instrument most relevant to resettlement which is a derivative of the law is Presidential

Decree number 71/2012 on procurement of land for development and public interests. Other

instruments are Presidential decree number 65/2006 which is the revised version of

Presidential decree number 36/2005.

Other national policies that indirectly relate to resettlement/rehabilitation of West Tarum canal

are government regulation number 26/2008 on spatial plan and agrarian law number 5/1960.

Basic Principles of these policies are:

• Procurement of land for development for the public interest is possible through

discharge (pelepasan) and cession (penyerahan) of land rights. This may take form

of sale, purchase and swap.

• The discharge and cession of land rights should be conducted voluntarily.

• Compensation may take form of cash, land replacement, resettlement, combination

of all of them and other possible form as agreed by related parties.

• Compensation are given based on the principle of legal and formal such as provision

of legal documents for assets which are compensated.

• The spirit of the latest Presidential Decree number 71/2012 is basically the same i.e.

provision of legal documents for assets to be compensated. However this decree

provides mechanism for those with no legal rights to receive compensation. Such

mechanism is specifically stated at article 26 which says “ In case there is no proof of

legal ownership of land as stated in articles 21 and 23, the land owner may still

forward a written statement that a land is his/hers and supported by two witnesses

from the surrounding area where the land is located. The witnesses must be those

who do not have kinship relation with the owner up to level two, vertically and

horizontally.

4. Compensation

As is the case of resettlement programs in developing countries (China, India,

Bangladesh etc), in Indonesia problems often occur on technicalities of payment of

compensation to APs such as the amount of compensation, who should be paid for how

much, and poor data of APs.

For compensation, problems usually occur on disagreement between the government

and APs on the amount of the compensation. APs often ask for a larger amount of

compensation than those allocated by the government. Prolong disagreement leads to

postponement of payment and execution of other related programs. On the APs part, this

leads to dissatisfaction, some turn into conflict.

As for rehabilitation/restoration program of APs’ livelihood, not all of them implemented as

it should be which leads to impoverishment of APs which is againts the spirit of the

policies. In brief, similarities, differences and problems of policy implementation between

ADB and GoI are visualized in the following diagrams.

5. Practical recommendation on Policy of GoI

On part of GoI’s regulation, there should be revision on policy formulation to accommodate

rehabilitation of APs livelihood post resettlement. The revision aims not only to be in line with

ADB’s framework on resettlement, but for policy improvement and to ensure that resettlement

will not lead to the impoverishment of the poorest of the poor, including those who have no

legal rights to the assets and the vulnerable groups. The fact also shows that none of the 515

(out of the 872 households) who are to be relocated has legal documents to prove their

ownership of the land along the West Tarum canal where they live.

For policy implementation, there is a need to improve the administrative and bureaucratic

system of resettlement, especially that relates to compensation’s distribution.

In bureaucratic system, emerging issue that needs to be addressed effectively is overlapping

authorities of each GoI’s stakeholder. There are some strategic issues of cooperation among

involved agency as follows:

1. Management area

The various numbers of institutions that involved in this particular project inflict conflict

of authorities and interest. Each of the involved institution works on different

framework and has its own authorities.

2. Lack of understanding

Each of project implementer has different knowledge toward this project, certainly it

affects the way they work. They don’t share common value, vision and mission.

3. Conflict of interest

Some of conflict of interest that emerged such as utilization of river water, economic

and environmental control, law enforcement, preserving watershed, preserving

agricultural and function of each organization (which are involved in the project).

4. Commitment

Lack of sense of belonging of each stakeholder who are involved in the project.

These issues need further research as they relate directly on the succeed of this project.

Based on these particular problems, there are some policies at national and regional levels

which can be the basis of recommendation, as follow:

- Government Regulation No 38 Years 2007

- Government Regulation No 19 Years 2010

- West java Province Regulation No 9 Years 2008




- West java Province Regulation No 9 Year 2010



These regulations do not directly relate to resettlement. They are about cooperation

among regions, development planning, conflict resolutions among regions, spatial plan

and infrastructure.

The main points of these regulations are about who are in charge in coordinating all

government agencies which are involved in its project. Based on this regulation,

provincial governor as the representative of the government, should direct those

agencies and local governments in the regions (involved in project) and should supervise

project execution.

As for the recommendation, it is essential to strengthen the role of the governor in the

project implementation. Governor should facilitate monthly meeting with all related

agencies that are involved so that they are able to share the same value (vision and

mission) and carry those value to their works, as well as in addressing compensation

issues.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, regarding compensation, it shoudl be negotiable. The main point to be

addressed is how to make local governments understand about resettlement framework

which reflect national government and ADB’s interest. Unfortunately, there is a gap between

national, provincial and local government’s understanding toward this project. This is due to

RF discussion which occurs at national level and lack of distribution of information to related

agencies. Based on an agreement between ADB and GoI, the latter needs to comply ADB’s

provision.

Lastly, the institutions that should take the lead to facilitate both government’s people’s

interest are provincial government. Governor should become the facilitator to ensure that this

project will succeed.

With regard to compensation issues, the best compensation is compensation that reflected

community’s requisite. Based on Socio Economic 1, the compensation that represents WTC

people expectation is business capital or active assets. Most of the people have desire to

open small businesses and building community development through training. This type of

compensation should be carried out strictly by provincial government.

Province

Governor

Supervising

Controlling

Bekasi City

Karawang District

Bekasi District

Provincial and

Distric Health

Services Provincial District

Environemntal

Services

Provincial District

Foresty Services

Provincial District

Mines and Energy

Services

Provincial District

Water Resources

Services

Provincial and

Distric Planning and Development

Agency

BBWSC

GoI’s

stakeholder

Strategic Issues: - Management Area

- Lack of Understanding

- Conflict of interest

- Lack of Commitment

Should be addresed by

Province Governor as

the Government

representative

Annex C Minutes of Meet ings Attended

By EMA






MINUTES OF MEETING ATTENDED BY EMA



NOTULEN PERTEMUAN MINUTES OF MEETING

Judul Pertemuan

Pembahasan dan Negosiasi Proposal Teknis EMA Meeting Tittle

Discussing and Negotiating Technical Proposal

Date Monday, 20 February 2012 Attendants PCMU Team, Egis Team, EMA Team

Venue / Tempat Meeting Room BBWSC Bandung Note taker Sherlywati

Agenda :

Pembahasan dan negosiasi proposal teknis EMA

berdasarkan TOR

Discussing and negotiating technical proposal of

EMA based on TOR

Ringkasan Rapat :

Bapak Pius menyampaikan secara ringkas isi

dari proposal teknis yang telah disusun oleh

tim UNPAR kepada tim EGIS; mulai dari work

plan schedule, personel composition, dan

financial proposal. Bapak Geofrey menanggapi beberapa hal

terkait paparan proposal teknis yang

disampaikan Bapak Pius :

1. Total dana yang tersedia dari ADB melalui

EGIS tidak mungkin ditambah, sebaiknya

kegiatan yang ada dipadatkan menjadi 15

bulan karena kegiatan monitoring RP sudah

terlambat 6 bulan dan akan berakhir pada

bulan Maret. Oleh karena itu kegiatan

monitoring tahap 1 perlu difokuskan dan

dipadatkan selama 1 bulan ini sampai

dengan akhir Maret.

2. Kegiatan monitoring implementasi tahap 2

dapat dipadatkan sampai dengan Maret

2013. Apabila hasil kerja dianggap memadai

dan berkualitas, maka akan ada

kemungkinan perpanjangan penyelesaian

pekerjaan.

3. Perlu ada jaminan untuk setiap personel

yang terlibat mengenai implementasi saat

bekerja sebanyak 75% dari total kontrak

dan waktu kontrak maksimum adalah 15

bulan.

4. Perhatikan pos-pos biaya untuk out of

expenses. Pos �reproduction document of

reports� tidak perlu karena laporan yang

disubmit cukup dalam bentuk softcopy saja.

Untuk pos biaya rent vehicle, laptop, dan

printer perlu dikaji ulang apakah benar-

benar diperlukan. Dan pos consumption

dikurangi menjadi 2 kali dalam sebulan

selama 15 bulan.

5. Seluruh administrasi proyek akan diaudit

oleh BPKP dan ADB.

Meeting Summary :

Mr Pius present consciesly the content of

technical proposal that already compiled by

UNPAR team to EGIS team; start from work

plan schedule, personnel composition, and

financial proposal.

Mr. Geofrey respond to some things related to

the technical proposal exposure submitted by

Mr Pius:

1. Total funds available from ADB through Egis

impossible to be added, the activity should

be compressed into 15 months because the

RP monitoring activities already late for 6

months and will end in March. Therefore

the first stages of monitoring activities need

to be focused and solidified for 1 month

until the end of March.

2. Activity monitoring of the implementation

of phase 2 can be compressed up to March

2013. If the work is considered adequate

and qualified, then there will be the

possibility of extension of work done.

3. There needs to be guarantees for each

personnel involved in the implementation

of the job as much as 75% of the total

contract and the maximum contract is 15

months.

4. Consider the cost items out of expenses.

"Reproduction of reports document"

station is not necessary because the report

submitted sufficiently in softcopy only. For

a cost rent vehicles, laptops, and printers

cost station need to be revisited if

absolutely necessary. And post

consumption reduced to 2 times a month

for 15 months.

5. The entire administration of the project will

be audited by BPKP and ADB.


Bapak Maksum menyampaikan bahwa proyek

ini sudah terlambat sehingga diharapkan

dapat sesegera mungkin menyelesaikan

proposal teknis agar dapat segera

menandatangani kontrak dan langsung

memobilisasi kegiatan. Tindak Lanjut Rapat :

1. Tim UNPAR akan segera merevisi proposal

teknis terutama proposal keuangan, sesuai

masukkan dari Bapak Geofrey, dengan

mereduksi waktu menjadi 15 bulan.

2. Revisi proposal akan dimasukkan ke EGIS

paling lambat Rabu, 22 February 2012.

Mr. Maksum conveyed that the project was

already late so hopefully as soon as possible to

resolve the technical proposal to immediately

sign a contract and directly mobilization the

activities.

Meeting Follow Up:

1. Tim UNPAR will soon revise their technical

proposals, especially the financial

proposals, appropriate insert from Mr

Geofrey, by reducing the time to 15

months.

2. Revised proposals will be incorporated into

EGIS by Wednesday, 22 February 2012 the

latest.


Judul Pertemuan

Pembahasan Isu-isu WTC Resettlement Meeting Tittle

Meeting of WTC Issues Resettlement

Date Tuesday, 3 April 2012

Attendants PCMU Team, DED Consultant Team,

ADB Team, KRC Consultant, LPM

Equator, EMA Team

Agenda : Pembahasan Isu-isu WTC Resettlement

Note Taker : Pius Suratman Kartasasmita

Berikut poin-poin ini mencatat selama pertemuan

Isu WTC di kantor BBWSC:

1. WTC konstruksi proses pengadaan

ひ PWﾐｪ;S;;ﾐ Proses Of konstruksi WTC akan

diambil 4 April 2012 ditempat. IFB akan

diterbitkan pada tanggal 4 April di Jakarta

Post dan di ADB dan situs PU.

2. Laporan Quarter

ひ Laporan Triwulanan Desember 2011 telah

diselesaikan dan diserahkan kepada

Sekretaris PCMU oleh konsultan tetapi

dokumen belum diterima oleh ADB.

Konsultan akan memeriksa kembali

administrasi dan mengirim ulang mereka

secara resmi ke BBWSC Dani c / o Mr

Hamdan (PPK), Konsultan kini

mempersiapkan 2012 Maret QR.

3. mekanisme Bansos

ひ H;ﾉｷﾐｷ SｷヮWヴﾉ┌kan untuk berkonsultasi

dengan KPPN dan Kanwil BPKP. Kanwil

menegaskan bahwa mekanisme Bansos

dapat melanjutkan Pelaksanaan

Pemukiman Kembali WTC bekerja selama

disertai dengan Surat Keputusan Menteri

atau Dirjen serta Petunjuk Teknis untuk

Bansos dan dokumen pendukung

administrasi. Draft keduanya akan

dipersiapkan kembali oleh Tim Pemukiman

(LPM Equator) hingga 11 April 2012 dan

siap untuk diserahkan kepada Ditjen SDA.

Dokumen ini harus bersifat final pada akhir

April 2012, hal ini dapat didasarkan pada

pedoman MOA dan template usulan akan

disertakan. Pak Hendra akan menjadi

orang kontak dari BBWSC untuk

pengaturan Bansos.

The following points noted during a meeting of

WTC Issues at BBWSC office:

1. WTC construction procurement process

• Procurement process Of WTC construction

will be taken place 4 April 2012. The IFB

will be published on 4 April in Jakarta Post

and on ADB and MPW websites.

2. Quarterly report

• Even that Quarterly report of December

2011 was finalized and handed to PCMU

Secretary by the consultant but the

documents were not accepted by ADB yet.

The consultant will recheck the

administration and resend them officially

to BBWSC c/o Mr Dani Hamdan (the PPK);

The consultant is now preparing the March

2012 QR.

3. Bansos mechanism

• It is required for consultation with KPPN

and Kanwil BPKP. The Kanwil was

confirmed that the Bansos mechanism can

be proceed in WTC Resettlement

Implementation works as long as

accompanied by Surat Keputusan Menteri

or Dirjen as well as Petunjuk Teknis for

Bansos and its supporting administrative

documents. The draft both of them will be

prepared by the Resettlement Team (LPM

Equator) by 11 April 2012 and ready to

submit to DGWR. These document must

be final by end of April 2012; This could be

based on MOA�s guidelines and proposal

templates would be attached to it. Mr.

Hendra will be a contact person from

BBWSC for the Bansos arrangement.

4. Resettlement Implementation Budget


4. Pelaksanaan Anggaran Resettlement

ひ BBWSC デWﾉ;ｴﾏWﾐｪ;ﾉﾗﾆ;ゲｷﾆ;ﾐ RヮヲがΑ ﾏｷﾉｷ;ヴ pada tahun 2012 dan DIPA Rp 4 miliar

tambahan diperlukan untuk pelaksanaan

pemukiman kembali pada tahun 2012

(pembayaran / penggantian aset yang

hilang dan bantuan relokasi). Kekurangan

pada anggaran tersebut akan dialokasikan

dari dana tender yang tersisa. Tambahan

anggaran akan diusulkan untuk revisi

anggaran 2012 nasional dan persetujuan

dari RWG (Resettlement Working Group)

akan diminta untuk proposal.

5. RP Updating

ひ Kﾗﾐデヴ;ﾆ Eケ┌;デﾗヴ LPM ゲWﾉWゲai tanggal 31

Maret 2012. Sesuai data yang telah dicek

kembali di lapangan, laporan program

untuk mengurangi dampak pemukiman

kembali (Inventarisasi Hasil Kerugian, Mata

Pencaharian Restorasi Program dan

anggaran estimasi untuk program) yang

tertunda untuk disampaikan kepada

BBWSC serta ADB. Kemudian, disepakati

bahwa tidak ada lagi penundaan, laporan

draft akhir harus disampaikan dan

disajikan pada tanggal 11 April 2012 pada

BBWSC;

ひ AS; S┌; デWヴゲｷゲ; っﾉWHｷｴﾆWｪｷ;デ;ﾐ HWヴﾆ;ｷデ;ﾐ

dengan finalisasi RP updating yaitu: (1)

Pengungkapan AHS dan aset kerugian

mereka untuk mendapatkan konfirmasi

akhir dan (2) Konsultasi dengan RWGs

untuk finalisasi program untuk mengurangi

kegiatan pemukiman kembali. Sejak dua

tugas sudah dalam TOR, usulan anggaran

tambahan tidak dapat diterima dan LPM

Equator diminta untuk menyampaikan

kegiatan dengan anggaran asli;

ひPertemuan konsultasi dengan semua RWGs

akan dilakukan pada tanggal 18 April 2012

dan pengungkapan rahasia harus

dilakukan sebelum pertemuan RWG.

6. pelaksanaan LSM

ひ TOR ┌ﾐデ┌ﾆ LSM ┌ﾐデ┌ﾆヮWﾉ;ﾆゲ;ﾐ; RP デWﾉ;ｴ disiapkan dengan perkiraan anggaran

• BBWSC has allocated IDR 2,7 billion in the

2012 DIPA and additional IDR 4 billion is

required for resettlement implementation

in 2012 (payment/replacement of lost

assets and relocation assistance).

Drawback to these funds will be allocated

from the remaining tender funds. The

additional budget will be proposed to the

2012 national budget revision and

approval from RWG (Resettlement

Working Group) will be required to the

proposal.

5. RP Updating

• The contract of LPM Equator was finished

by 31 March 2012. Due to data rechecking

in the field, the reports of program to

mitigate resettlement impact (Inventory of

Losses Result, Livelihood Restoration

Program and estimation budget for the

program) are delayed to be submitted to

BBWSC as well as ADB. Then, it was agreed

that there is no more any delay, the draft

final reports must be delivered and

presented by 11 April 2012 to BBWSC;

• There are two remaining/more activities

deals with finalization of RP updating that

are: (1) Disclosure of AHs and their loss

assets to get their final confirmation and

(2) Consultation with RWGs for finalization

of the program to mitigate resettlement

activities. Since the two tasks are already

in the TOR, the proposal for additional

budget is not acceptable and LPM Equator

is requested to do the said activities with

the original budget;

• The consultation meeting with all RWGs

will be conducted on 18 April 2012 and the

disclosure should be conducted prior to

the RWG meetings.

6. NGO Implementation

• The TOR for NGO for implementing RP has

been prepared with the estimated budget

amounting to IDR 1.6 billions. The

mobilization of NGO will be under KRC


sebesar Rp 1,6 miliar. Mobilisasi LSM akan

berada di bawah kontrak KRC dan

anggaran untuk LSM telah dimasukkan

dalam addendum kontrak tambahan

dengan KRC, KRC akan menyerahkan

addendum draft kontrak pada 10 April

2012. Sebagai perkiraan anggaran untuk

LSM lebih dari USD 100.000, diperlukan

untuk menggunakan CQS (Seleksi

Konsultan Kualifikasi) yang akan

menghabiskan lebih dari 2 - 3 bulan.

Dalam rangka meminimalkan

keterlambatan pelaksanaan RP, BBWSC

menyarankan agar LSM tersebut akan

diperoleh melalui pemilihan sumber

tunggal dan oleh karena itu kontrak untuk

LSM akan dibagi menjadi dua paket (akan

ada dua LSM melaksanakan RP). Hal Ini

perlu dikonfirmasi oleh ADB.

7. Sumber daya untuk masa transisi

ひ MWﾆ;ﾐｷゲﾏW B;ﾐゲﾗゲﾏWﾏH┌デ┌ｴﾆ;ﾐ ┌ゲ┌ﾉ;ﾐ dari masyarakat dilengkapi dengan

dokumen pendukung. Hal ini tidak

tercakup dalam karya memperbarui RP

dan perlu ditangani dengan melibatkan

LSM;

ひ SWH;ｪ;ｷﾏﾗHｷﾉｷゲ;ゲｷヮWﾉ;ﾆゲ;ﾐ;;ﾐ LSM akan

memakan waktu, sedangkan penggantian

aset yang hilang dan relokasi harus

diselesaikan pada 2012, disepakati untuk

memobilisasi beberapa fasilitator di bawah

Kontrak DED untuk mendukung Ibu Dwi

untuk menyelesaikan usulan masyarakat.

KRC akan pra dibiayai tersebut fasilitator.

8. EMA

• Laporan Inception sedang berlangsung.

Draft akan tersedia pada tanggal 18 April

2012 dan akan dipresentasikan secara

resmi pada tanggal 2 Mei 2012 dengan

tempat di Universitas Katolik

Parahiyangan, Semua stakeholder yang

terlibat dalam Rencana Pemukiman

Kembali akan diundang;

• Kontrak EMA akan ditandatangani 12

Maret 2012 untuk periode 14 bulan.

contract and the budget for NGO has been

included in the additional contract

addendum by KRC; KRC will submit the

draft contract addendum by 10 April 2012.

As the estimated budget for NGO is more

than USD 100,000, it is required to use

CQS (Consultant Qualification Selection)

that will spend more than 2 � 3 months. In

order to minimize the delay of RP

implementation, BBWSC suggested that

the NGO will be procured through the

single source selection and therefore the

contract for NGO will be divided into two

packages (there will be two NGOs

implementing the RP).This needs to be

confirmed by ADB.

7. Resources for transition period

• The Bansos mechanism requires

community proposals completed with

supporting documents. This is not covered

during the RP updating works and needs to

be handled by implementing NGO;

• As the mobilization of implementing NGO

will take time, while the replacement of

lost assets and relocation should be

completed by 2012, it is agreed to mobilize

some facilitators under the DED Contract

to support Ibu Dwi to finalize the

community proposals. KRC will pre

financed those facilitators.

8. EMA

• Inception report is being in progress. The

draft will be available on 18 April 2012 and

going to be presented officially by 2 May

2012 with the venue in Parahiyangan

Catholic University; All stakeholders of

Resettlement Plan updating will be invited;

• EMA contract was signed by 12 March

2012 for the period of 14 months. Refer to

the TOR, the three tasks of EMA: (1)

monitoring of updating, (2) monitoring of

the implementation and (3) monitoring

the impacts. Due to limit in available

budget, the item of monitoring of

resettlement impacts was not included in


Mengacu pada TOR, tiga tugas dari EMA:

(1) pemantauan update, (2) pemantauan

pelaksanaan dan (3) pemantauan dampak.

Karena untuk membatasi anggaran yang

tersedia, item pemantauan dampak

pemukiman kembali tidak termasuk dalam

kontrak EMA, oleh karena itu, perlu

anggaran tambahan lebih untuk

menyelesaikan tugas terakhir;

• PCMU telah dibahas oleh Mr Pius

(Pemimpin tim dari Tim EMA) pada

fleksibilitas masa kerja di bawah kontrak

dan Telah disetujui bahwa 14 bulan dari

kontrak adalah basis intermiten. Namun,

Tim EMA diusulkan untuk memiliki masa

kerja yang jelas.

9.Koordinasi dengan MOH / DED WTC dan PJTII

akan diselenggarakan oleh PCMU pada April 2012

Petugas:

1. BBWSC:

ひ B;ヮ;ﾆ H;ゲ;ﾐ┌SｷﾐふKWヮ;ﾉ;ぶきひ Mヴ HWﾐSヴ;きひ Mヴ Gｴﾗﾐｷきひ Mヴ WｷSﾃ;ﾃ;ﾐデﾗきひ Mヴ N┌ヴTﾃ;ｴﾃﾗﾐﾗきひ B;ヮ;ﾆ D;ni Hamdan;

ひ Mヴ Eﾐｪﾆ┌ゲきひ B;ヮ;ﾆ Tヴｷ N┌ｪヴﾗｴﾗW;ゲﾆｷデﾗき

2. PCMU konsultan:

ひ Mヴ GWﾗaa Wきひ Mヴ M;ﾆゲ┌ﾏきひ Mヴ P┌ｪ┌ｴき

3. ADB:

ひ Mヴ EヴｷIきひ Mヴゲ N;ﾐｷﾐｪ Mきひ Mヴゲ HWﾉWﾐ;き

4. KRC konsultan:

ひ Mヴ Cｴ┌ﾐｪきひ Mヴゲ D┘ｷき

5. LPM Khatulistiwa:

ひ Mヴ AﾉW┝きひ Mヴゲ Iヴﾏ;きひ Mヴゲ Dﾗra

EMA contract; It, therefore, needs more

additional budget to complete the last

task;

• PCMU has discussed with Mr Pius (The

team leader of EMA Team) on the

flexibility of working period under the

contract and It is agreed that the 14

months of the contract is intermittent

base. However, the EMA Team proposed

to have a clear of working period.

9. Coordination with MOH/DED WTC and PJTII

This will be organized by PCMU by April 2012

The attendants:

1. BBWSC :

• Mr Hasanudin (The Head);

• Mr Hendra;

• Mr Ghoni;

• Mr Widjajanto;

• Mr NurTjahjono;

• Mr Dani Hamdan;

• Mr Engkus;

• Mr Tri NugrohoWaskito;

2. PCMU consultant:

• Mr Geoff W;

• Mr Maksum;

• Mr Puguh;

3. ADB:

• Mr Eric;

• Mrs Naning M;

• Mrs Helena;

4. KRC consultant:

• Mr Chung;

• Mrs Dwi;

5. LPM Equator:

• Mr Alex;

• Mrs Irma;

• Mrs Dora;


Judul Pertemuan

Program Penanganan Dampak Resettlement

Saluran Tarum Barat

Meeting Tittle

Handling of Impact from STB Rehabilitation

Date Friday, 20 April 2012

Venue BBWSC

Attendants PCMU Team, DED Consultant Team,

LPM Equator Team, EMA Team

Agenda : pembahasan program penanganan

dampak resettlement saluran tarum kanal barat

Pembahasan :

1. Hasil diskusi dengan ke tiga RWG terkait

program penanganan dan kelengkapan

administrasinya :

a. Untuk pengesahan Petujunk Teknis yang

mengatur pelaksanaan program), ketiga

RWG menghendaki dari pusat (SDA atau

Kementrian PU) karena dana

penanganan berasal dari APBN. Daerah

merasa tidak punya kewenangan

mengatur dana dari pusat/APBN

b. Kesediaan tentang pembuatan

dukungan surat keputusan dari daerah

(Kab/kota) mengenai skema program

penanganan dampak resettlement

terhadap warga terkena dampak

pembangunan Saluran Tarum Barat:

- Kabupaten Karawang dan

Kabupaten Bekasi: bersedia

mengeluarkan SK Bupati untuk

pengesahan skema program

penanganan dan daftar Rumah

Tangga Terkena Dampak (RTD)

- Kota Bekasi : pengesahan skema

penanganan program

penanganan dan daftar RTD oleh

BBWSC/Kem PU, sementara

Pemda (RWG) hanya

mengetahui

c. Harga satuan yang digunakan untuk

Discussion :

1. Discussions with three of RWG related with

program handling and related administrative

completeness:

a. For Technical Guidelines governing the

legalization program implementation),

the three RWG wants from the center

(SDA or the Ministry of Public Works)

because the handling of funds from

APBN. The area felt he had no

authority to regulate the funds from

central or APBN budget

b. The willingness of decision-making

support letter from local (district /

city) regarding the handling of the

impact of resettlement scheme for

residents affected by the construction

of the West Tarum Channels:

- Kabupaten Karawang and

Kabupaten Bekasi : willing to issue

a decree for handling

authentication scheme and a list

of Affected Households (RTD)

- Kota Bekasi : authentication

scheme handling management

program and a list of RTD by

BBWSC / Kem PU, while the Local

Government (RWG) just knowing.

c. Unit price used for the calculation of

the program refers to the standard

price of treatment that already exists

(Decree on the unit price of each local

government for the replacement of

assets and Shopping Standard General,


perhitungan program penanganan

mengacu pada standar harga yang sudah

ada (SK tentang harga satuan di masing-

masing Pemerintah Daerah setempat

untuk penggantian aset dan Standard

Belanja Umum, dari Menkeu untuk

program pelatihan)

2. Beberapa catatan terkait dengan hasil diskusi

ketiga RWG tersebut da tindaklanjutnya

adalah :

a. Jika menggunakan harga satuan dari

Pemda setempat, ada kemungkinan nilai

estimasi biaya program penanganan

menjadi lebih tinggi dibandingkan jika

menggunakan estimasi harga hasil studi

Equator. BBWSC tidak masalah dengan

jumlah rupiah nya sejauh ada dasar

hukumnya. Maksimal harga penggantian

adalah sesuai denga standard harga

Pemda setempat.

b. Untuk membahas lebih lanjut tentang

bentuk dan isi dari dukungan surat

keputusan dari daerah (Kab/kota)

mengenai skema program penanganan

dampak resettlement terhadap warga

terkena dampak pembangunan Saluran

Tarum Barat, akan diadakan pertemuan

antara pihak BBWSC dengan masing-

masing RWG terlebih dahulu sebelum

menuju rapat pleno

DED Resettlement Specialist (Dwi) akan

merevisi draft Surat Keputusan

Bupati/Walikota tentang program

penanganan yang sudah dibuat mengacu

pada SK Bupati Bekasi No.

300/Kep.71.POB.P/2007 tentang

Besarnya Bantuan Biaya Pindah diatas

Tanah Bantaran Kalimalang (uang

kerohiman). Draft ini akan menjadi

from Minister of finance for training

programs)

2. A few notes related to the three RWG

discussions and the follow-up are :

a. If using the unit price of the local

government, it is likely the value of the

estimated cost of the treatment is

higher than if you use an estimate of

the results of the study Equator.

BBWSC no problems with the amount

of rupiah as far as there is a legal basis.

Maximum reimbursement rates are

conformed to the standard price of

the local government.

b. To discuss more about the form and

content of the decision letter of

support area (district / city) regarding

the handling of the impact of

resettlement scheme for residents

affected by the construction of the

West Tarum Canal, there will be a

meeting between the BBWSC with

each RWG before heading to plenary

meeting.

DED Resettlement Specialist (Dwi) will

revise the draft Decree Regent /

Mayor of treatment programs that

have been created with the Bekasi

decree No. 300/Kep.71.POB.P/2007

about the amount of land on Moving

Costs Help banh Kalimalang

(kerohiman money). This draft will be

discussed at a meeting with each of

the RWG

c. After meeting with the third RWG,

BBWSC will discuss the impact of this

treatment program to the center /

Directorate of SDA.

3. According the direction of Mr. Hasanudin at

the previous meeting, a draft of a letter to the

Director General of Water Resources BBWSC

that inform on the activities of resettlement in

the West Tarum Canal rehabilitation and


bahan diskusi saat pertemuan dengan

masing-masing RWG.

c. Setelah dilakukan pertemuan dengan

ketiga RWG tersebut, BBWSC akan

mendiskuskan program penanganan

dampak ini ke pusat/Direktorat SDA.

3. Sesuai arahan Pak Hasanudin pada rapat

sebelumnya, draft surat dari BBWSC ke Dirjen

SDA yang menginformasikan tentang kegiatan

resettlement pada rehabilitasi Saluran Tarum

Barat dan usulan program penangananannya

telah dibuat oleh DED Resettlement Specialist

lengkap dengan kronologinya sebagai

lampiran.

4. Draft Petunjuk Teknis yang sudah

disusun harus direvisi/disederhanakan isinya,

memuat hal-hal pokok terkait mekanisme

pencairan dana, kelompok sasaran dan

pertanggungjawabannya dilampiri format-

format yang diperlukan untuk mekanisme

bansos ini.

5. Jadwal dan Rencana Tindak Lanjut :

handling of program proposals that have been

made by the Resettlement Specialist DED

complete with chronology as an attachment.

4. Draft Technical Guidelines that have been

drafted to be revised / simplified content,

contains subject matter related to the

mechanism of disbursement of funds, the

target group and the responsibility attached

with the required formats for this Bansos

mechanism.

5.

Kegiatan Jadwal Penanggung Jawab

Pertemuan formal antara BBWSC dengan masing-

masing RWG membahas kejelasan mengenai

dukungan surat keputusan yang sesuai dari masng-

masing Pemda tentang skema program penanganan

Minggu pertama Mei

2012 Bp. Widjayanto

Diskusi dengan pusat /Direktorat SDA tentang

program penanganan dan mekanismenya

Minggu kedua Mei 2012 Bp. Widjayanto

Rapat Pleno dengan ketiga RWG untuk

penyepakatan program penanganan dan

mekanismenya

Minggu ketiga Mei 2012

Finalisasi updating RP Juni 2012 Dwi

Persetujuan updating RP dari ADB Juli

Pelaksanaan konstruksi Oktober-November 2012


Judul Pertemuan

Rapat Resettlement Working Group (Rwg)

Kabupaten Karawang

Meeting Tittle

Resettlement Working Group (Rwg) Kabupaten

Karawang Meeting

Date Kamis, 3 Mei 2012

Tanggal

Attendants

Peserta

Venue / Tempat Ruang Rapat Bappeda Kabupaten

Karawang

Note taker Dwi Soufnita

Agenda :

Evaluasi Hasil Pendataan dan Konsep

Pemberdayaan OTD

Agenda:

Data Collection and Evaluation Concepts OTD

Empowerment

Pembahasan :

Rapat Evaluasi Hasil Pendataan dan Konsep

Pemberdayaan OTD yang dilaksanakan oleh RWG

Kabupaten Karawang dibuka dan dipimpin oleh

Sekretaris Bappeda Kabupaten Karawang (Bapak

Samsuri, S.Ip. Pemimpin Rapat menjelaskan hal-hal

sebagai berikut:

• Rapat hari ini merupakan tahap finalisasi

karena saat ini membuat kesepakatan-

kesepakatan yang perlu dibuat oleh Pemerintah

Daerah Kabupaten Karawang terkait hasil

pemberdayaan dan konsep pemberdayaan OTD

yang dilaksanakan oleh Konsultan.

• Di ruangan sebelah juga dilaksanakan rapat

terkait program ICWRMIP tentang sanitasi dan

air bersih. Kemaren pembahasan dengan

IWASH, cakupan air bersih di Kabupaten

Karawang untuk tahun 2015 mencapai 76%

dengan perhitungan sebagai berikut; 1) 36%

dari PDAM; 2) 40% dari non PDAM. Untuk

sanitasi berupa jamban keluarga diharapkan

mencapai 64% memiliki akses jamban keluarga.

Untuk program ICWRMIP berapa persen akan

menyumbang sanitasi dan air bersih? Hal yang

perlu dipikirkan juga terkait air bersih adalah

enghindari terjadinya pencurian air dari pipa.

Oleh karena itu nanti dari Bidang Cipta Karya

Dinas PU perlu ada kegiatan pemberdayaan

masyarakat untuk pengelolaan air bersih.

• Rapat hari ini akan menyepakati:

1. Penentuan Calon Penerima dan Calon Lokasi

(CPCL) yang diminta oleh BBWSC berupa SK

Bupati. Ini bisa difasilitasi oleh Pemkab

Discussion:

Data Collection and Evaluation Meeting

Empowerment OTD concept implemented by RWG

Khanewal district was opened and chaired by the

Secretary Bappeda Khanewal district (Mr Samsuri,

S.IP. Leaders Meeting clarify this following :

• Meetings today are finalization stage as

currently making arrangements need to be

made by the District Government of

Karawang relevant results OTD

empowerment and empowerment

concept implemented by the Consultant

• In the next room also held meetings

ICWRMIP related programs on sanitation

and clean water. Yesterday discussions

with IWASH, clean water coverage in

Karawang district for the year 2015

reached 76% was calculated as follows: 1)

36% of the PDAM; 2) 40% of the non

PDAM. To be a family latrine sanitation is

expected to reach 64% have access to

household toilets. For what percentage of

the program will contribute ICWRMIP

sanitation and clean water? It is also

relevant to consider the water clean is to

prevent the theft of water from the pipe.

Hence future of the field of Human

Settlements Public Works Department

needs to conduct community

empowerment activities for water

management.

• Meeting today will agree:


Karawang asalkan setelah data RTD kita

tetapkan, tidak ada lagi penambahan RTD

baru. Ini tugas Camat untuk memastikan

tidak ada lagi ada tambahan RTD ilegal. Jika

nama-nama RTD sudah diterbitkan dalam

bentuk SK Bupati maka jumlah RTD tersebut

harus dikunci, tidak ada tambahan lagi

karena kalau diberi spare pasti bertambah

banyak seperti orang pakai Surat

Keterangan Tidak Mampu (SKTM) pasti ke

rumah sakit. Oleh karena itu nama RTD di

luar SK Bupati dianggap ilegal.

2. Permintaan standar harga ganti rugi untuk

penggantian aset RTD, ini bisa dibuatkan

karena Pemkab Karawang punya standar

harga dari Dalbang, lalu ada standar harga di

Bidang Cipta Karya Dinas PU. Permintaan ini

bisa dilaksanakan dengan catatan harus

berdasarkan musyawarah, misalnya orang

pertanian menghitung harga pohon dari

berapa lingkar pohon sementara spesialis

aset ada hitungan ekonomisnya. Bagi kami

yang penting nilai layak hidup mereka harus

lebih baik dari hari ini, jangan tambah

miskin. Nilai apraisal jangan terbuka,

takutnya antar pemilik terjadi protes dan

konflik. Kami biasanya melaksanakan

penilaian tertutup, tapi kalau antara

Kementerian PU dan Konsultan ingin

terbuka harus ada Berita Acara untuk

menjelaskan bahwa harga penggantian

tersebut sudah disepakati oleh setiap RTD,

hal ini perlu dilakukan untuk menghindari

kecemburuan antara RTD.

3. Ada saran bentuknya Bansos. Perlu

dipikirkan dengan cermat apakah

mekanisme Bansos sudah tepat dan

menjamin orang-orang yang sudah diberi

ganti rugi tidak kembali lagi ke lokasi

tersebut karena perlu diantisipasi setelah

program Bansos selesai dan RTD diberi

uang, tidak menambah masalah lagi bagi

Pemkab Karawang.

Ibu Helena (Project Implementation Officer ADB

IRM):

• Nanti akan ada EMA untuk memantau bahwa

1. Determination of Potential Recipient

and Candidate (CPCL) BBWSC be

requested by decree. This could be

facilitated by the District Government

Karawang RTD as long as the data we

created, no further addition of new RTD .

This task District Head to ensure no more

no additional RTD illegal. If the RTD names

are published in the form of the number of

RTD decree should be locked, no further

because if given the spare surely multiply

like people wear Certificate of Ability

(SKTM) bound to the hospital. Hence the

name RTD outside SK Bupati decrees is

illegal.

2. Inquiry compensation for the standard

price of an asset replacement RTD, this

could be made because the district

government Karawang has a standard

price of Dalbang, then there is a standard

price in the Field of Human Settlements

Department of Public Works. This request

must be done with records based on

consensus, such as the agricultural

calculate how much the price of the tree

while the tree ring specialist asset there

are matter of economics. For us the

important value of a decent life should be

better than today, not poorer. Appraisal

value should not open, fears among

owners of protest and conflict. We usually

carry out assessments covered, but if the

Ministry of Public Works and Consultants

want to open there should Minutes to

explain that the price has been agreed

upon by the replacement of each RTD, this

needs to be done to avoid jealousy

between RTD.

3. There are suggestions Bansos forms. We

need to think carefully whether Bansos

mechanism is correct and ensure the

people who have been given

compensation did not return to that

location because it is anticipated once the

program is completed and RTD Bansos

given the money, do not add more

problems to the District Government


RTD tidak akan kembali lagi ke Koridor Dampak.

Kalau bisa, Kita bisa diskusi dengan Pemda

untuk mengintegrasikan program-rogram di

Pemda untuk keberlanjutan ke depannya

supaya hidup RTD tidak lebih buruk dan tidak

akan membebani Pemda.

Pemimpin Rapat/ Sekretaris Bappeda Kabupaten

Karawang (Bapak Samsuri, S.Ip):

• Bapak Deny perlu menginventarisasi masalah

atau dampak dari implementasi dari

mekanisme Bansos yang ada dalam updating

RP. Kita jangan hanya kosentrasi kepada

pemindahan orang tetapi luput untuk

mengantisipasi dampak-dampak yang tidak

terinvetarisir.

Acara selanjutnya pihak Konsultan akan

mempresentasikan draft Updating RP dan program

penanganan dampak. Sesi ini dimoderatori oleh

Bapak Didin Rachmadhi.

Presentasi Bapak Rimun Wibowo (Chairman LPM

Equator):

• Isu-isu penting sudah dibahas oleh Seretaris

Bappeda. Di Kabupaten Karawang jumlah RTD

ada yang berkurang karena disposel area, ada

45 RTD yang tidak terkena dampak karena

kemiringan. Kami sudah membuat penilaian

harga penggantian tetapi tidak dicantumkan,

tetapi data tersebut ada.

• Pada prinsipnya RTD ada 3 kelompok dampak

yaitu; 1) Ringan; 2) Sedang; 3) Berat. Secara

global ada yang direlokasi dan ada yang tidak

direlokasi. Untuk RTD yang direlokasi yang

termasuk dalam kategori dampak berat. Jumlah

RTD yang perlu direlokasi di Kabupaten

Karawang: 105 RTD (dampak berat). Total

semua RTD yang terkena dampak proyek di

Kabupaten Karawang adalah 549 RTD dengan

rincian; 1) Jumlah dampak ringan: 354 RTD; 2)

Jumlah dampak sedang: 90 RTD; 3) Jumlah

dampak berat: 105 RTD (direlokasi).

• Hal-hal yang perlu didiskusikan antara lain

terkait nilai penggantian aset RTD karena

nilainya kecil-kecil. Kemaren ada diskusi dengan

BBWSC untuk nilai kecil ini bagaimana? Apa

Karawang.

Mrs. Helena (ADB Project Implementation Officer

IRM):

ひ There will be EMA to monitor that RTD

would not return to the Corridor Impact. If

possible, we can integrate the discussion

with the local government to local

government programs to sustain life in the

future so that RTD is not worse and will

not burden the government.

Leader Meeting / Secretary Bappeda Khanewal

district (Mr Samsuri, S.Ip):

ひ Mヴく DWﾐ┞ ﾐWWS デﾗｷﾐ┗Wﾐデﾗヴ┞ デｴW ヮヴﾗHﾉWﾏゲﾗヴ the impact of the implementation of

mechanisms that exist in updating Bansos

RP. We do not just concentration to the

displacement of people but spared to

anticipate the effects that are not

inventories.

The next event the Consultant will present the

draft RP Updating and impact management

program. The session was moderated by Mr. Didin

Rachmadhi.

Presentation Mr. Rimun Wibowo (LPM Chairman

Equator):

ひ Important issues were discussed by Seretaris

Bappeda. In Karawang district RTD amount was

reduced because disposel area, there were 45

RTD are not affected because of the slope.

We've made the price assessment

reimbursement but are not listed, but the data

is exist.

ひ RTD In principle there are 3 groups of impact,

namely: 1) Light weight, 2) Moderate, 3)

Weight. Globally there are relocated and there

are not relocated. For RTD relocated included in

the category of heavy impact. The number of

RTD needs to be relocated in Karawang district:

105 RTD (severe impact). Total all RTD project

affected in Karawang district is 549 RTD with

details: 1) The number of light effects: 354 RTD,

2) number of impacts were: 90 RTD; 3) Total

impact weight: 105 RTD (relocated).


nilainya apa adanya atau dinaikkan? Kami

merefer standar harga Pemda juga

mengkonversi dengan replecement cost. Itu

yang kita rumuskan untuk mengganti aset.

• Kemudian kami mengusulkan Jadup 7 hari

untuk RTD yang terkena dampak ringan, tetapi

teman-teman BBWSC minta dihilangkan karena

untuk kategori ringan tidak ada goncangan

karena tidak pindah. Persoalan nilai tidak

masalah bagi BBWSC tetapi yang menjadi

masalah apakah angka-angka itu wajar

sehingga PPK tidak terkena temuan, makanya

kami mohon masukan dari Pemkab Karawang.

• Untuk kategori RTD kelompok rentan (miskin,

cacat, janda, jompo) dalam policy ADB perlu

diadakan program pemulihan mata pencarian/

Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP).Persoalan

Administrasi yang perlu

dipertanggungjawabkan maka program

pemulihan mata pencarian melalui pelatihan

sehingga bisa di SPJ-kan.

• Bagi RTD yang masuk di dalam kelompok

dampak berat ada Jadup selama 3 bulan

karenabutuh bantuan hidup selama pindah.

Bagi yang punya usaha tidak ingin pindah di

lokasi yang tidak strategis.

Ibu Dwi Apriyanti (Resettlement Specialist DED

Consultant):

• Apakah bisa negoisasi dengan Pemda untuk

tanah dari Bidang Jasa Marga dapat disewa

oleh masyarakat?



• Memang bisa disewa tetapi kalau sempadan

jalan tidak boleh karena jika dilegalkan malah

menjadi masalah terkait regulasi. Sempadan

jalan sudah jelas peruntukannya. Sejak dini

harus hati-hati dan jangan ada janji-janji. Kalau

judulnya Bansos, jangan pakai nilai real tetapi

ada nilai sosialnya. Lebih baik pakai ukuran

cluster atau tipe. Sebenarnya model Bansos

berat karena ada resiko sosial, ada kerentanan

sosial. Mengukur kerentanan sosial berat

karena selesai dipindahkan jaminan hidupnya

• Things that need to be discussed include

the replacement value of assets related to

RTD because of small value. Yesterday

there was a discussion with a small value

BBWSC for this how? What value is or

raised? We refer also convert standard

government rates the cost replecement.

That's what we formulated to replace

assets.

• Then we propose Jadup 7 days for RTD

light affected , but my friends ask BBWSC

omitted due to the lightweight category

there was no shock because it does not

move. The issue is not a problem for

BBWSC value but the issue of whether

those numbers are reasonable so that the

CO is not affected by the findings, so we

ask for input from the District Government

Karachi

• For RTD categories of vulnerable groups

(the poor, the disabled, widows, elderly) in

the policy there should be ADB livelihood

recovery programs / Livelihood

Restoration Program (LRP). Administration

Issues that need to be accounted for the

livelihood restoration program through

training so they can be the SPJ.

• For RTD that goes in within the group of

severe repercussions there are Jadup for 3

months due to need help to live during the

move. For those who own a business does

not want to move in a location that is not

strategic.

Mrs. Dwi Apriyanti (DED Resettlement Specialist

Consultant):

ひ IゲｷデヮﾗゲゲｷHﾉW デﾗﾐWｪﾗデｷ;デW ┘ｷデｴデｴW Government for the land of Jasa Marga

Field can be rented by the public?



tidak lebih buruk.

Bapak Rimun Wibowo (Chairman LPM Equator):

• Mekanisme Bansos karena wadah/ganti rugi

bagi penduduk ilegal. Ada tidak mekanisme lain

selain Bansos?



• Mekanisme Bansos ada resiko kerentanan

sosial, itu yang dinilai. Jalur Bansos sudut

penilaiannya tidak matematis tetapi ada

ukuran-ukuran sosial.

• Untuk Jadup memang bagusnya untuk RTD

yang mendapat dampak berat. Di Masyarakat

kita tinggal komunikasi karena mereka

menanam pohon, tinggal dan berusaha di tanah

orang lain sehingga yang penting sosialisasinya

berjalan dengaan baik. Akan lebih baik lagi

bekerjasama dengan Disnakertrans terkait

alternatif solusi untuk progrm transmigrasi bagi

RTD yang terkena dampak berat (perlu

direlokasi).


• Nanti untuk yang terkena dampak berat ada

bantuan untuk pemasangan air dan listrik.



• Konsep Bansos ini berupa uang yang biasanya

merupakan Bantuan Langsung Masyarakat

(BLM). Ini perlu hati-hati karena takutnya waktu

pencairan dana tidak bisa di Kementerian PU

tetapi di Ditjen Perbendaharaan Kementerian

Keuangan. Mekanisme Bansos ini perlu

ditanyakan kepada PU apakah bisa dicairkan

oleh PU atau tidak karena uang

kerohiman/kadeudeuh tersebut termasuk juga

bantuan pemasangan listrik dan air bagi RTD

yang direlokasi.


• Maksud kita semua pencairan dana tersebut

dalam bentuk proposal sehingga ketemu

nilainya sekian lalu dana ditransfer ke rekening

kelompok senilai dengan jumlah di proposal


ひ Iデ I;ﾐ HW ヴWﾐデWS H┌デｷa デｴW HﾗヴSWヴゲｴﾗ┌ﾉS not be legalized because if even an issue

related regulations. Road border was clear

designation. Since early must be careful

and do no promises. If the title is Bansos,

do not use real values but no social value.

It is better to use a cluster size or type.

Actually the model Bansos is heavy

because of the risk of social, social

vulnerability exists. Measuring social

vulnerability is heavy because the finished

weight of displaced life insurance is no

worse.

Mr. Rimun Wibowo (LPM Chairman Equator):

ひ Mechanisms Bansos as container /

compensation for illegal residents. There is no

mechanism other than Bansos?

ひデｴWヴW ｷゲ ; ヴｷゲﾆﾗa ゲﾗIｷ;ﾉ ┗┌ﾉﾐWヴ;Hｷﾉｷデ┞ in

mechanisms Bansos, it is assessed. Bansos path

angle judgment has not mathematically but no

social measures.

• To Jadup is good for RTD gets

severely affected. In society we live

communication as they plant trees,

and trying to live in the land of

others so important socialization

goes well. It would be better

cooperation with relevant

Disnakertrans alternative solution

to the transmigration program for

RTD affected weight (need to be

relocated).


ひ L;デWヴﾗﾐｴW;┗ｷﾉ┞ ;aaWIデWS デｴWヴW ｷゲｴWlp for

the installation of water and electricity.

Leader Meeting / Karawang district Bappeda

secretary (Mr Samsuri, S.Ip):

ひ This Concept of Bansos usually in the

form of money who is help of the Direct

Community Assistance (BLM). It needs to

be careful because it fear that it can not be

disburse in the Ministry of Works but in

DG Treasury Ministry of Finance. This

Bansos mechanisms need to be asked to


yang nilainya tunai.



• BLM biasanya proses pencairan dananya di

Ditjen Perbendaharaan Kemenkeu karena

mekanisme transfer uang melalui Kemenkeu.

Coba tanyakan apakah kepada Kementerian PU,

apakah Kementerian PU bisa mencairkan dana

BLM ke rekening kelompok?


• Kami pernah menangani program yang

langsung dari Pimpro ke kelompok masyarakat

di Deptan dan di Depkes tetapi nilai sama.

Kemaren pembahasan di BBWSC, ada masalah

karena nilai uangnya berbeda-beda.

BBWSC:

• Anggarannya memang sudah ada slot di tahun

2012 tetapi kami perlu kejelasan dana tersebut

mau dikemanakan dan tidak menjadi

permasalahan pada waktu pemeriksaan BPK.

Pusat mensetujui program Bansos tapi harus

ada dasar hukumnya dari daerah berupa SK

Bupati/Walikota sehingga nanti dokumen

tersebut akan kami bawa ke Pusat.



• Kalau kode rekening di Kementerian PUuntuk

alokasi dana Rehabilitasi Kanal Barat Sungai

Citarum sudah ada, lalu ada kerentanan sosial

sehingga ada mekanisme Bansos yang

penyaluran dananya melalui

kelompok.Mekanisme pencairannya melalui

uang yang transfer yang bentuk SPJ.

Pertanyaan tadi apakah PU bisa mentrasfer

dana langsung ke kelompok? Payung hukum

juknis di Pemerintah Pusat, bukan di

Pemerintah Daerah.

BBWSC:

• Juknis bisa dikeluarkan oleh Pemerintah Pusat

tetapi ada dasar berupa SK Bupati/Walikota

untuk RTD yang terkena dampak.

be disbursed by the PU PU whether or not

because of the money kerohiman /

kadeudeuh involves the installation of

electricity and water assistance for

relocated RTD.


ひ The purpose of the disbursement of the

funds we are all in the form of a proposal

that met its value so then the funds

transferred to the account of the worth of

the amount of cash value in the proposal.



ひ BLM typically fund disbursement process

in the Directorate General of Treasury

Ministry of Finance as the money transfer

mechanism through the Ministry of

Finance. Try asking whether the Ministry

of Public Works, Ministry of Public Works

is able to disburse BLM funds to the

account of group ?


We�ve been deal directly from Pimpro

programs to community groups in the

Ministry of Agriculture and Department of

Health but the same value. Yesterday

BBWSC discussion, there is a problem

because the value of money is different.

BBWSC:

ひ The budget is already in the slot in 2012

but we need to clarity where the fund willl

go and does not a problem at the time of

inspection from BPK. Center allow Bansos

program but should had a legal basis in the

form of regional SK Regent / Mayor, so

that later we will take the document to the

Center.



ひ If the account code in the Ministry of

Works for Canal Rehabilitation allocation

Citarum are exist, and social vulnerability

so there there is a mechanism Bansos

received the funds through group.



• Dasar hukum ini saling menguatkan karena

nanti ada SK dari Dirjen Sumber Daya Air

Kementerian PU terkait Mekanisme Bansos.



• Untuk permohonan usulan proposal kita hanya

bisa membuat surat Bupati yang ditujukan

kepada Kementerian PU yang dilampiri draft SK

Bupati Kabuaten karawang tentang RTD dan

besaran biaya penggantian. Yang perlu

dipastikan apakah Kementerian PU bisa

mencairkan dana Bansos tersebut? Kita harus

mendapat kepastian dari Pemerintah Pusat

dapat melaksanakan program ini dengan kata

lain Pemkab butuh jaminan dari Pemerintah

Pusat bahwa pendanaan untuk program Bansos

dapat dicairkan di Kementerian PU.

BBWSC:

• Dari surat Bupati yang ada lampiran tersebut

nanti akan digodog lagi karena programnya

sudah ada.

Bapak Wawan (Pegawai Pemkab Karawang):

• Saya pernah mengikuti pertemuan ICWMIP ini.

Program ini programnya PU dan tanahnya juga

tanah PU. Mengenai program penggantian

aset/resettlement, bentuk penggantian,

appraisal mejadi kewenangan penuh di PU,

Pekab hanya memfasilitasi saja karena tidak

memiliki kewenangan. Jangan sampai kita

membuat juknis berupa keputusan Bupati yang

nantinya jadi bumerang bagi kita karena bukan

kewenangan kita.



• Saat ini bukan mempermasalahkan Pusat atau

Daerah/ vertikal dan horizontal. Ada RWG yang

memberi masukan. Untuk SK Bupati tentang

CPCL dan besaran biaya penggantian bisa

dilakukan oleh Kabupaten Karawang karena

masih ada kewenangannya di Bupati. Untuk

Mechanism of redemption through the

money transfer form SPJ. The question

was whether the PU can transfer funds

directly to the group? Legal guidelines in

the Central Government, not the Regional

Government.

BBWSC:

ひ TWIｴﾐｷI;ﾉ G┌ｷS;ﾐIW Iﾗ┌ﾉS HW issued by the

Central Government but there is a basic

form of SK Regent / Mayor for RTD

affected.


ひ TｴW ﾉWｪ;ﾉ H;ゲｷゲｷゲﾏ┌デ┌;ﾉﾉ┞ ヴWｷﾐaﾗヴIｷﾐｪ because there will be a decree of the

Director General of Water Resources

Ministry of Public Works Bansos related

mechanisms.



ひ To petition a proposal we could simply

make a letter addressed to the Regent

Ministry of Public Works which is attached

draft decree karawang District of RTD and

the amount of the cost of replacement. All

you need to ascertain whether the

Ministry of Public Works was can dilute

the funds Bansos? We have received

confirmation from the Central

Government to implement the program in

other words Pemkab need a guarantee

from the central government that the

funding for the program Bansos can be

availed at the Ministry of Public Works.

BBWSC:

ひ From a letter Bupati there attachment will

be boiled again because the program

already exists.

Mr. Wawan (Civil District Government Karawang):

ひ I ﾗﾐce took this ICWMIP meeting. This

program PU�s program and the soil are

PU�s also. Regarding the asset replacement

program / resettlement, reimbursement

forms, appraisal becoming full authority in

PU, Pekab only facilitate it because it has


pencairan dana kewenangannya tidak ada di

Pemkab. PU sudah punya gambaran untuk

pencairan BLM tidak melalui Kementerian

Keuangan tetapi melalui Kementerian PU tetapi

kami butuh kepastian benar-benar bisa

dicairkan supaya kami tidak dikejar-kejar oleh

masyarakat.


• Pemkab Karawang tidak masalah untuk

membuat surat permohonan dengan lampiran

asalkan sudah ada kepastian dari Pusat bahwa

mekanisme pencairan Bansos dapat

dilaksanakan?



• Kita bersama-sama bekerja dan kami akan

konsultasi juga dengan pemeriksa, bisa atau

tidak proses pencairan dana engan mekanisme

Bansos bisa dilaksanakan oleh PU. Lalu nilai

penggantian aset nantinya tertutup atau

terbuka?


• Tugas kami sudah selesai, nanti ada Tim Antara

(Bridging Team). Tim Antara agak berbahaya

untuk memastikan bahwa dana itu bisa

dicairkan oleh PU atau tidak.


IRM):

• Apakah dasar penilaian harga satuan

penggantian aset yang digunakan apa? Apakah

dari konsultan?


• Hasil dari inventory of losses dari LPM Equator

dengan RWG dan nilainya terbuka untuk

masyarakat.



• Jika terbuka harus ada Berita Acara dari setiap

RTD untuk kesepakatan harga yang akan

dibayarkan. Hal yang kita kuatirkan apakah bisa

dibayarkan oleh PU atau tidak? Lalu jumlah 549

no authority. Do not let us make a decision

in the form of guidelines, which will be a

boomerang Regents for us because it is

not our authority.

Leader Meeting / Secretary Bappeda Karawang


ひ Tｴｷゲｷゲﾐﾗデ ; Sｷゲヮ┌デWS CWﾐデヴW ﾗヴ RWｪｷﾗﾐ;ﾉっ vertical and horizontal. There RWG who

gave input. For the SK Bupati about CPCL

and magnitude of the replacement cost

can be done by the Karawang district

because there is authority in Bupati. For

disbursement of funds authority does not

exist in local government. PU've got a

picture for disbursement BLM but not

through the Ministry of Finance through

the Ministry of Works but we need

certainty could actually disbursed so we

were not being chased by the community.


ひ For District Government Karawang its not

a problem to make a written request with

attachments has as long as no assurance

from the Centre that Bansos disbursement

mechanism can be implemented?



ひ We work together and we will also consult

with the examiner, may or may not

process the disbursement of funds Bansos

mechanism can be implemented by the

PU. Then later on the replacement value of

assets closed or open?


ひ Our job is completed, there will be a Team

Reuters (Bridging Team). Between

somewhat dangerous team to ensure that

the funds be disbursed by public works or

not.


IRM):

ひ Wｴ;デｷゲデｴW H;ゲｷI ┌ﾐｷデヮヴｷIW ﾗa デｴW replacement asset valuation used what?


RTD di Kabupaten Karawang sudah fix?

• Bridging Team bisa bekerja setelah ada

kepastian pencairan dana Bansos tersebut bisa

dilaksanakan oleh PU. Bansos itu njlimet

mekanismenya karena dalam proposal untuk

bisa bertahan hidup setelah dipindahkan. Oleh

karena itu kita membutuhkan kepastian dari PU

tentang pencairan dana Bansos tidak melalui

Kementerian Keuangan tapi langsung dari PU

ke rekening kelompok.

BBWSC:

• Kementerian PU mau membuat juknis tetapi

meminta daerah membuat surat dari Bupati.



• Untuk Bupati membuat surat langsung, kita

keberatan. Paling kita membuat skenario untuk

menyampaikan aporan proggres dan

menyampaikan skenario Bansos itu disetujui

tidak oleh PU? Kalau skenario itu disetujui,

nanti kami akan melampirkan draft SK di surat

tersebut untuk mempertanyakan kepada

Kementerian PU tentang proses pencairan

dana Bansos bisa dilaksanakan oleh PU atau

tidak.

Bapak Maksum (PCMU BBWSC):

• Waktu untuk membuat surat berapa lama?

Satu minggu untuk membuat surat

mempertanyakan kepada Kementerian PU bisa

tidak mekanisme Bansos?

Asep Cece Juhandi (Camat Ciampel):

• Mohon hasil laporan konsultan ditembuskan ke

kecamatan untuk memonitor RTD supaya tidak

bertambah lagi. Untuk pemindahan, mau di

mana? Lokasinya di mana? Karena harga tanah

sudah mahal di atas Rp 200.000,- /m2. Jadi

tolong diperhitungkan.



• Bupati bisa membuat CPCL kalau ada

agreement dari semua pihak tidak akan ada

Did the consultant?


ひ TｴW ヴWゲ┌ﾉデゲ aヴﾗﾏｷﾐ┗Wﾐデﾗヴ┞ ﾗa ﾉﾗゲゲWゲ aヴﾗﾏ LPM Equator with RWG and its value is

open to the public.



ひ If there should open the Minutes of each

RTD to the deal price to be paid. Things we

worry about is whether it can be paid by

public works or not? Then the number 549

RTD in Karawang district has been fixed?

ひ Bridging Team work after disbursement of

funds Bansos there is certainty can be

implemented by the PU. Bansos was

complicated mechanism for the proposal

to survive after being transferred.

Therefore, we need certainty about

disbursement of funds from Public Works

Bansos not through the Ministry of

Finance but directly from PU to the group

account.

BBWSC:

ひ Mｷﾐｷゲデヴ┞ ﾗa P┌HﾉｷI Wﾗヴﾆゲ ┘ﾗ┌ﾉS IヴW;デW guidelines, but asked to make note from

Bupati area.



ひ Tﾗﾏ;ﾆW デｴW B┌ヮ;デｷ SｷヴWIデﾏ;ｷﾉが ┘W objected. At least we create a scenario to

present progress reports and submit

Bansos scenario is approved or not by the

PU? If that scenario is approved, we'll

attach a draft decree on the letter to ask

the Ministry of Public Works Bansos

disbursement of funds process can be

carried out by public works or not.

Mr. Maksum (PCMU BBWSC):

ひ How long Time to write a letter? One week

to write a letter to the Ministry of Public

Works question could not Bansos

mechanism?


penambahan CPCL (Ilegal dari CPCL yang sudah

masuk dari SK Bupati). Lalu untuk menjawab

pertanyaan Camat Ciampel, relokasi ke mana?

Jhon Riko (Divisi I PJT II):

• Bagi masyarakat yang mendapat izin dari PJT II

bagaimana? Karena ada cost yang mereka

keluarkan ketika dulu mengurus izin. Program

resettlement yang kami tau, 6-8 meter dari

kanan dan kiri tanggul. Jika tanah relokasi di

tanah PJT II juga apakah tidak menjadi beban

Pemda? Supaya tidak menjadi bangunan liar?

Ada kesepakatan dari Pemda.



• Berapa banyak yang diberi izin oleh PJT II dan

prosesnya seperti apa? Karena waktu mereka

mendapat izin ada uang yang keluar.


• Punya Surat Perjanjian Pemanfaatan Lahan

(SPPL) tidak?

Deni S.Harlan (Satpol PP Kabupaten Karawang):

• Masalah pengawasan untuk izin yang sudah

dikeluarkan karena tidak ada koordinassi antara

Pemkab dengan PJT II. Izin penggunaan lahan

itu untuk apa?

Jhon Riko (Divisi I PJT II):

• Izin itu untuk retribusi.



• Setuju dengan Bansos, perlakuan berbeda

untuk mereka yang memiliki SPPL, misalnya

yang punya izin SPPL ditambah dananya atau

tidak? Ada acuan alokasi dana kenapa berbeda.


• Penyamaan persepsi Bansos hanya bentuk

penggantiannya karena ada replacement cost.

Policy proyek gabungan antara ADB dengan

GOI tanpa melihat mereka itu legal atau ilegal.

Replacement cost diganti dengan pertimbangan

Cece Asep Juhandi (Camat Ciampel):

ひ Please kindly forwarded consultant

reportsd to the district to monitor RTD not

to grow again. For removal, going where?

Location where? Since the price of land is

high above Rp 200,000, - / m2. So please be

calculated.



ひ B┌ヮ;デｷ Iﾗ┌ﾉS ﾏ;ﾆW CPCL ｷa ;ﾐ┞ ;ｪヴWWﾏWﾐデ from all parties there will be no additional

CPCL (Illegal CPCL had entered from SK

Bupati). So to answer the question Ciampel

Camat, relocating to where?

Jhon Rico (Division I PJT II):

ひ FﾗヴヮWﾗヮﾉW ┘ｴﾗｪﾗデヮWヴﾏｷゲゲｷﾗﾐ aヴﾗﾏ PJT II how? Because there are costs they incur

when first taking care of permissions.

Resettlement programs that we know, 6-8

feet from the right and the left

embankment. If the land on the ground

relocation PJT II also did not become a

burden local government? In order not to

become illegal buildings? There was

agreement from local government.



ひ Hﾗ┘ ﾏ;ﾐ┞ ┘WヴW ｪｷ┗WﾐヮWヴﾏｷゲゲｷﾗﾐ H┞ PJT II and the process like? Because when they

get there money out permission.


ひ H;┗W ; L;ﾐS UゲW AｪヴWWﾏWﾐデゲふSPPLぶｷゲ not?

Deni S.Harlan (municipal police Karawang district):

ひ IﾗﾐデヴﾗﾉヮヴﾗHﾉWﾏゲ aﾗヴヮWヴﾏｷデゲデｴ;デｴ;┗W been issued because there is no local

government koordinassi between the PJT II.

Land use permit for what?

Jhon Rico (Division I PJT II):

ひ PWヴﾏｷゲゲｷﾗﾐデﾗﾉWvy.


bagaimana mereka nanti setelah direlokasi bisa

hidup. Nilai aset ada yang pesimis, moderat dan

progresif, nanti kita lihat dengan RWG untuk

menentukan nilai mana yang akan diambil (nilai

fix). Nanti akan ada bridging team untuk

mensosialisasikan ke desa-desa. Untuk surat

yang disampaikan oleh Bupati kepada

Kementerian PU untuk menanyakan

mekanisme Bansostersebut, bisa tidak dengan

lampiran hasil dari kita?



• Surat mempertanyakan Bansos bisa dibayarkan

oleh PU dan waktunya akan dilaksanakan

kapan? Lalu bagaimana dengan konsep

resettlement untuk relokasi kemana RTD

tersebut akan pindah? Menjawab pertanyaan

Bapak Camat?


Consultant):

• Untuk resettlement kami hanya memfasilitasi

untuk pindah karena BBWSC tidak mungkin bisa

membeli tanah dari program ini. Bagaimana jika

ke tanah PJT II? Untuk relokasi banyak orang

sulit untuk dilaksanakan. Beberapa orang ada

yang punya lokasi pindah dan ada yang tidak,

yang kita fasilitasi untuk mereka pindah, ada

tidak lahan yang bisa mereka sewa (minta

bantuan kepada Camat untuk mendapatkan

lahan yang bisa mereka sewa).


• Skema proses pencairan dana; 1) Ada tim

verifikator di Pemkab (RWG) untuk

memverifikasi proposal yang diusulkan oleh

kelompok; 2) Ada tim verifikator di PPK untuk

memverifikasi nilai yang sudah diusulkan oleh

kelompok. Hasil verifikasi tersebut berupa

rekomendasi bahwa uang yang diusulkan bisa

disetujui oleh PPK di KPA.


Consultant):

• Berapa lama proses dari proposal ke pencairan

dana?



ひ AｪヴWW ┘ｷデｴ B;ﾐゲﾗゲが SｷaaWヴWﾐデデヴW;デﾏWﾐデ aﾗヴ those who have SPPL, for example, which

have a license to SPPL plus funds or not?

There is a reference to Why did different

allocations.


ひ M;デIｴデｴW ヮWヴIWヮデｷﾗﾐ B;ﾐゲﾗゲﾗﾐﾉ┞ aﾗヴﾏﾗa reimbursement because replacement cost.

Policy between the ADB joint project with

GOI without seeing them it was legal or

illegal. Replacement cost is replaced with a

consideration of how they will live after

relocation. Asset value was pessimistic,

moderate and progressive, we shall see the

RWG to determine which values are

retrieved (fixed value). Bridging team will be

there to socialize into villages. For the letter

submitted by the Bupati to the Ministry of

Public Works to inquire Bansos mechanism,

whether it be the result from our

attachment?



ひ TｴW ﾉWデデWヴケ┌WゲデｷﾗﾐWS B;ﾐゲﾗゲ HW ヮ;ｷd by the

PU when it will be implemented? And what

about the concept of resettlement for

relocation where RTD is going to move?

Answering questions Mr. Camat?


Consultant):

ひ WW ﾃ┌ゲデ a;Iｷﾉｷデ;デW resettlement to move

because BBWSC not be able to buy the land

from the program. What if the ground PJT

II? To relocate a lot of people are hard to

implement. Some people have had to move

the location and there are not, that we

facilitate for them to move, there was

nothing they could land rent (ask for

assistance to Sub for land they can lease).


ひ SIｴWﾏW SｷゲH┌ヴゲWﾏWﾐデヮヴﾗIWゲゲぎ 1) There is a




• Proposalnya sesuai tidak? Lalu diverifikasi apa

saja permintaannya, biasanya lama kalau

permintaannya banyak. Proposal bisa dikolektif

sehingga proses verifikasi bisa dilakukan

bersamaan. Yang mengajukan proposal berapa

kelompok?


• Kelompok setiap desa rata-rata 3 kelompok.

Forum-forum untuk mekanisme Bansos sudah

ada. Rekening kelompok tapi distribusi untuk

masing-masing RTD didampingi oleh

pendamping (fasilitator).



• Tim verifikasi proses pencairan dana dari PPK

itu yang akan menilai layak atau tidak usulan

dari proposal tersebut untuk memastikan

alokasinya dibayarkan.

• Masalah rusunawa di Kabupaten Karawang

karena terkait dengan tradisi/budaya

masyarakat yang ingin hidup berbaur sehingga

tidak gampang untuk tinggal berubah karena

tidak ada keluarga di sana. Ada rusunawa tapi

tidak laku padahal biaya sewanya murah, hanya

Rp 100.000,- setiap bulan.

• Waktu pencairan dana ke kelompok yang

selanjutnya akan didistribusikan ke RTD, jangan

diberikan mau Lebaran karena di sini budaya

masyarakatnya konsumtif, pasti programnya

tidak berhasi. Jadi kalau mau mencairkan dana

setelah Lebaran.

• Kesimpulan rapat hari ini antara lain:

1. Pemkab Karawang akan membuat surat

Bupati dengan lampiran dari konsultan yang

ditujukan kepada Kementerian PU untuk

memprtanyakan mekanisme Bansos dapat

dicairkan oleh Kementerian PU atau oleh

Kementerian Keuangan.

2. Koordinasi dengan Disnakertrans untuk

penambahan nilai aset.

3. PJT II tidak boleh lagi memberikan izin

team of verifiers in the regency (RWG) to

verify the proposal proposed by the group,

2) There is a team of verifiers at PPK to

verify the value that has been proposed by

the group. Results of the verification in the

form of a proposed recommendation that

the money could be approved by PPK within

KPA.


Consultant):

ひ Hﾗ┘ ﾉﾗﾐｪｷゲデｴW ヮヴﾗIWゲゲ aヴﾗﾏヮヴﾗヮﾗゲ;ﾉデﾗ disbursement of funds?



ひヮヴﾗヮﾗゲ;ﾉ SﾗWゲﾐﾗデ aｷデい TｴWﾐ ┗Wヴｷa┞ ;ﾐ┞ request, usually much longer if his request

plenty. The proposal can be collectively so

that verification can be done

simultaneously. How many groups filed the

proposal ?


ひ W;Iｴ ┗ｷﾉﾉ;ｪW ｪヴﾗ┌ヮ ;┗Wヴ;ｪW ﾗa ンｪヴﾗ┌ヮゲく Forums for Bansos existing mechanisms.

Group account but the distribution for each

RTD accompanied by a companion

(facilitator).



ひ TｴW ┗erification team disbursement process

from the CO that will assess the worth or

not the proposal of the proposal to ensure

the allocations are paid.

ひ PヴﾗHﾉWﾏゲヴ┌ゲ┌ﾐ;┘; ｷﾐ K;ヴ;┘;ﾐｪ SｷゲデヴｷIデ because it is associated with the tradition /

culture of the people who want to live

together so it is not easy to stay changed

because no family there. There rusunawa

but did not sell when the rent is cheap, only

Rp 100,000, - per month.

ひ TｷﾏW SｷゲH┌ヴゲWﾏWﾐデﾗa a┌ﾐSゲデﾗデｴW ｪヴﾗ┌ヮ that will then be distributed to the RTD, do

not be like Eid because consumerist culture

of the people here, for sure the program


kepada masyarakat di daerah sepanjang

kanal (di lokasi program) supaya tidak

terjadi penambahan RTD.

4. Bidging team apakah akan membahas CPCL?

5. Sebelum dipertanggungjawabkan oleh

Bupati perlu ada Berita Acara dari setiap

RTD untk menyepakati nilai penggantian

aset yang akan diberikan.


IRM):

• Musrenbang akan mulai, apakah ada program-

program dari Pemda yang ditujukan untuk

masyarakat di sekitar Kanal Barat Sungai

Citarum? Supaya tidak ada keresahan di

masyarakat.



• Belum ada di dalam Musrenbang masuk ke

wilayah itu karena keterbatasan dana dan

kosentrasi pada penataan kawasan kumuh

perkotaan, kalau yang existing kemungkinan

ada.

does not work. So if you want to withdraw

funds after Lebaran.

ひ CﾗﾐIﾉ┌ゲｷﾗﾐﾏWWデｷﾐｪゲデﾗS;┞ ｷﾐIﾉ┌SWぎ

1. District Government Karawang will make a

Bupati with the attachment of the

consultants addressed to the Ministry of

Public Works to question Bansos

mechanism can be availed by the Ministry

of Public Works or the Ministry of Finance.

2. Coordination with Disnakertrans to

increase asset value.

3. PJT II no longer allowed to give permission

to people in the area along the canal (at the

location of the program) so that no

additional RTD.

4. Bidging team will discuss whether CPCL?

5. Before there needs to be accounted for by

the Regents Minutes of each RTD to agree

on the replacement value of assets to be

provided.


IRM):

ひ M┌ゲヴWﾐH;ﾐｪ ┘ｷﾉﾉ HWｪｷﾐが ;ヴW デｴWヴW ;ﾐ┞ ﾗa デｴW government programs aimed at

communities around the West Canal

Citarum? So that there is no unrest in

society.



ひ TｴWヴW ｷゲﾐﾗｷﾐゲｷSW M┌ゲヴWﾐH;ﾐｪｷﾐデﾗデｴW region due to lack of funding and the

concentration on the arrangement of the

inner city, there is the possibility that the

existing.


Judul Pertemuan

Rapat Resettlement Working Group (Rwg)

Kabupaten Bekasi

Meeting Tittle

RWG Kab. Bekasi Meeting

Date Selasa, 8 Mei 2012 Attendants

Venue / Tempat Ruang Rapat Bappeda Lantai II

Kabupaten Bekasi


Agenda :

Pembahasan Skema Bantuan Sosial dan Legal

Aspek

Pembahasan :

Rapat Pembahasan Skema Bantuan Sosial dan

Legal Aspek yang dilaksanakan oleh RWG

Kabupaten Bekasi dibuka dan dipimpin oleh Bapak

Kancang Kastura (Kabid Fispra Bappeda

Kabupaten Bekasi). Pemimpin Rapat menjelaskan

bahwa rapat hari ini merupakan tindak lanjut dari

batas waktu survey dan sudah dilaksanakan

berapa kali diskusi. Pada kesempatan ini Tim Pokja

dipersilahkan menyampaikan skema Bansos yang

diusulkan untuk pelaksanaan rencana pemukiman

kembali.

Bapak Wijayanto (Kabid RJA BBWSC):

• Terkait masalah rehabilitasi Kanal Barat Sungai

Citarum, permasalahannya terkait mekanisme

pembayaran yang bisa diterima oleh semua

pihak. Untuk penjelasan skema Bansos ini

mungkin bisa dijelaskan oleh Ibu Dwi.


Consultant):

• Rapat ini merupakan tindak lanjut dari rapat-

rapat sebelumnya dan dari hasil diskusi-diskusi

tersebut, mekanisme yang bisa membayar RTD

melalui mekanisme Bansos.

• Untuk skema program penanganan dampak

resettlement di bagi menjadi 3 kelompok yaitu

ringan, sedang dan berat. Paket program

penanganan dampak ini mengakomodir

kebijakan program (ADB policy). Paket program

kategori I untuk dampak ringan berupa: 1)

pengantian aset seperti pagar,pohon, tanaman;

2) Pelatihan peningkatan taraf hidup untuk

kelompok rentan; 3) Pendampingan pelatihan.

Discussion :

Legal Aspects and Social Assistance Scheme

Discussion Meeting implemented by the RWG

Bekasi opened and chaired by Mr. Kancang

Kastura (Head Fispra Bappeda Bekasi Regency).

Meeting leader explained that this meeting is a

follow up of the time limit survey and the was

implemented the number of times the discussion

the proposed. On this occasion, the Working

Group Team invited to deliver the Bansos scheme

for the implementation of the resettlement plan.

Mr. Wijayanto (RJA Head BBWSC):

• Related to the rehabilitation problem of

West Canal Citarum, the issues related to

the payment mechanism that is

acceptable to all parties. For the

description of Bansos scheme may be

explained by Ms. Dwi.


Consultant):

• This meeting is a follow up of the previous

meetings and the results of these

discussions, a mechanism that could pay

RTD through Bansos mechanism.

• For handling the impact of resettlement

scheme is divided into 3 groups: mild,

moderate and severe. Package handling

program is to accommodate the effects of

program policies (ADB policy). Category I

program package for mild effects include:

1) the replacement of assets such as

fences, trees, plants, 2) Training to

improve the standard of living for

vulnerable groups; 3) Mentoring training


• Total RTD di Kabupaten Bekasi: 504 RTD yang

masih tinggal di sepanjang kanal sungai

Citarum. Total tracer: 224 RTD, yang sudah

keluar dari koridor dampak.

Bapak Deny ( Satpol PP Kabupaten Bekasi):

• Itu data kapan karena di lapangan ada

penambahan.


Consultant):

• Rincian RTD di Kabupaten Bekasi sebagai

berikut; 1) RTD yang terkena dampak ringan:

184 RTD; 2) RTD yang terkena dampak sedang:

84 RTD; 3) RTD yang terkena dampak berat:

236 RTD; 4) Jumlah RTD tracer: 224 RTD.

Doug Martin (ADB IRM):

• Untuk kategori medium mereka tidak harus

pindah, dampaknya hanya sementara. Mungkin

untuk kelompok medium dari kajian kontruksi

itu dampaknya sekitar 2 bulan. Definisi dampak

sedang kurang jelas karena 15% dari rumah

yang terkena dampak.

Bapak Kancang Kastura (Pemimpin Rapat/ Kabid

Fispra Bappeda KabupatenBekasi):

• Menurut saya kategori dampak ringan,sedang

dan berat sudah cukup jelas dari paparan

tersebut.


• Saya kira dampak sedang dari kontruksi

dampaknya hanya sebentar. Saya pikir rapat

hari ini mulai membahas pilihan-pilihan bagi

AHs dari usulan ini.

Noor Tjahjono (BBWSC):

• Mungkin kita kembali ke skema usulan ini

tetapi kita lebih fokus kepada payung hukum

untuk mekanisme pencairan dana Bansos. Ada

kemungkinan, bisa tidak membuat SK Bupati

untuk mengimplementasikan mekanisme

Bansos? Lalu dari hasil ini akan kami sampaikan

ke Pusat (Jakarta).

• Total RTD in Bekasi: 504 RTD who still live

along the river channel Citarum. Total

tracer: 224 RTD, which was out of the

corridor of impact.

Mr. Deny (municipal police Bekasi Regency):

• When was the data because there is an

addition in the field


Consultant):

• Details of RTD in Bekasi as follows: 1) RTD

light affected: 184 RTD, 2) being affected

RTD: RTD 84; 3) RTD heavily affected: 236

RTD, 4) Number of RTD tracer: 224 RTD .


• For the category of medium they do not

have to move, the effect is only

temporary. Maybe for the medium of

construction study the impact is about 2

months. Definition of impact was less clear

because 15% of the homes affected.

Mr. Kancang Kastura (Leader Meeting / Head

Fispra Bappeda Kabupaten Bekasi):

• I think the impact categories mild,

moderate and severe is quite clear from

the exposure.


• I think the impact of the construction

impact was short-lived. I think today's

meeting began discussing options for AHS

from this proposal.

Noor Tjahjono (BBWSC):

• Maybe we go back to the scheme of this

proposal but we are more focused on the

legal umbrella for Bansos disbursement

mechanism. It is possible, could not make

the decree to implement the mechanism

Bansos? Then from these results We will

provide to the Centre (Jakarta).



Consultant):

• Pemerintah Pusat membutuhkan SK

pengesahan RTD, lalu Pemerintah Daerah

mengeluarkan surat kepada Ditjen Sumber

Daya Air tentang uang kerohiman pada RTD

yang terkena dampak rehabilitasi Kanal Barat

Sungai Citarum.



• Kita sudh mengeluarka SK tentang tengat

waktu tetapi sekarang OTD sudah bertambah

lagi. Kalau bisa secepatnya dilaksanakan

relokasi supaya tidak bertambah lagi OTD dan

tidak menjadi masalah di Dinas Sosial. Tolong

beri penjelasan tentang payung hukum untuk

kegiatan ini.

Dinas Sosil Kabupaten Bekasi :

• Terkait Bansos, ada ketentuan/payung

hukumnya, setelah itu baru bisa dilakukan

penyaluran Bansos yang biasanya berupa

barang, pelatihan, atau hal-hal lain di lokasi

RTD. Jika berbentuk uang tunai agak riskan.

Lalu bagaimana cara pengaturnnya? Akan

tetapi kalau mekanisme itu disetujui tidak

masalah walaupun berupa uang.

Satpol PP Kabupaten Bekasi:

• Soal SK Bupati cut off date, sudah dilakukan

tetapi di dalam perkembangannya jumlah RTD

bertambah terus di lapangan. Tanpa diberi

uang karena kami sudah menertibkan OTD yang

berada disepanjang bantaran kali tetapi kondisi

di lapangan tetap bertambah bangunan baru.

Jika diberi uang jumlah OTD akan bertambah

terus. Makanya perlu secepatnya dilaksanakan

relokasi.

• Kami menertibkan bangunan liar karena

bangunan tersebut tidak ada IMB sehingga

harus ada teguran dari Distarkim. Tupoksi

Satpol PP untuk menertibkan bangunan liar dan

tidak ada uang kerohiman. Sebelum

dilaksanakan penertiban, jangan ada uang

kerohiman supaya untuk penertiban selanjutny

Mrs. Dwi Apriyanti (Resettlement Specialist DED

Consultant):

• The Central Government requires SK

ratification RTD and Local Government

issued a letter to the DG of Water

Resources on kerohiman money for the

rehabilitation of affected West Canal

Citarum RTD.

Mr. Kancang Kastura (Leader Meeting / Head


• We have issued a decree about the

deadline but now OTD has increased

again. If it can be implemented as soon as

possible so as not to grow anymore

relocation OTD and not a problem in Social

Service. Please give an explanation of the

legal framework for these activities.

Dinas Sosil Kabupaten Bekasi :

• Related to Bansos, no provision / legal

umbrella, after which it could be done are

usually a Bansos distribution of goods,

training, or other things in the RTD

location. If in the form of cash it is rather

risky. Then how the settings? However, if

the mechanism is approved in the form of

money is not a problem though.

Satpol PP Kabupaten Bekasi:

• Problem decree cut off date, has been

conducted but the development the

number of RTD continues to increase in

the field. Without any money because we

already regulate OTD that runs along the

river bank but conditions in the field still

growing of new buildings. If given the

money will continue to grow the number

of OTD. Hence the need to be

implemented as soon as possible

relocation.

• We curb illegal buildings because building

has no building permit so there should be

a rebuke from Distarkim. Main Tasks and

Functions of municipal police is to curb


tidak ada uang kerohiman.

• Kita sudah punya daftar OTD tinggal dibuatkan

SK Bupati, untuk selanjutnya Bidang Fispra

Bappeda mngeluarkan Peraturan Bupati. APB

lebih mudah mengeluarkan peraturan.


• Lebih susah karena untuk penduduk ilegal.

Sabni YK (Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Bekasi):

• Mekanisme penyalurannya bagaimana?

Ibu Roro (Bappeda Kabupaten Bekasi):

• Tolong disampaikan mekasnisme Bansos. Tadi

kami beranggapan dari Dinas Sosial yang akan

menyalurkan, ternyata tidak seperti itu

makanya Pemda perlu tau bagaimana

mekanisme pencairan dananya?

Ibu Dwi (RS DED Konsultan):

• Menjelaskan anggaran RTD dan mekanisme

penyaluran Bansos. RTD akan dibuat menjadi

kelompok yang ada Ketua, Sekretaris,

Bendahara dan Anggota. Sudah ada contoh

proposal kelompok dan mekanisme pencairan

dananya yang nanti akan ditransfer ke rekening

kelompok.



• Dari PPK berbentuk uang ke kelompok lalu dari

Ketua kelompok diberikan kepada Anggota

bukan berbentuk arang? Kita sepakat tidak

memberi uang karena takut terkendala di tahap

selanjutnya. Nanti berupa SK Bupati untuk

menetapkan RTD dan apa yang akan mereka

dapatkan. Kami siap membuat SK Bupati

dengan data dari Ibu Dwi.

Bapak Rahmat (Satpol PP Kabupaten Bekasi):

• Perlu ada verifikasi dari Tim untuk

memverifikasi usulan, nilai dan proposal

berdasarkan rekap OTD yang terdaftar.

Tom Pamela (Project Manager ICWRMIP ADB

illegal buildings and no kerohiman money.

Before the demolition done, don�t give

money in order to further curb there is no

kerohiman money.

• We already have a list of OTD so the

decree can be made, to the next field

Fispra Bappeda issued the decree. APB

issued regulations easier


• More difficult because to the illegal

population.

Sabni YK (Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Bekasi):

• how the distribution mechanism?


• Please communicated Bansos mechanism.

Earlier we think the Social Services that

will deliver, it's not like so that

government needs to know how the fund

disbursement mechanism?


• Describe the RTD budget and Bansos

delivery mechanisms. RTD will be an

existing group Chairman, Secretary,

Treasurer and Member. Already there are

examples of the proposal and fund

disbursement mechanism that will be

transferred to the account group.



• From PPK form of money to the group and

from the Chairman of the group is not

given to Members in the form of charcoal?

We agreed not to give money for fear of

being constrained in the next stage. It'll be

a decree to establish the RTD and what

they will get. We are ready to make the

decree with data from Ms. Dwi.


• There should be verification of the Team


IRM):

• Ini sebenarnya tidak hanya pembebasan lahan

tetapi kalobarasi antara PU dan ADB untuk

program Rehabilitasi Kanal Barat Sungai

Citarum atau program ICWRMIP. Dalam

kerjasama dengan PU,masing-masing ada

kebijakan (ADB,GOI,LG) karena itu diharapkan

ada kerjasama. Meang sudah ada loan

agreement antara ADB dengan GOI.

• Terimakasih banyak untuk persiapan

penyusunan SK Bupati untuk AHs. Supaya tidak

ada penolakan AHs dilapangan diharapkan

nanti SK tersebut disosialisasikan kepada AHs

sehingga di lapangan lebih tenang.

• Ini memang proyek yang tidak biasa karena

banyak AHs yang tidak memiliki IMB tetapi di

dalam kebijakan ADB bagi AHs yang tidak

memiliki IMB juga bisa diperhatikan. Apalagi

ada kebijakan PU tentang pembebasan lahan,

orang yang tidak punya IMB juga perlu

diperhatikan, jadi antara kebijakan DB dengan

GOI tidak bertentangan.

• Perhatian dari Pemda untuk isu yang tidak

punya IMB untuk diganti rugi sesuai dengan

aset yang dampak. Untuk sementara

Kabupaten Bekasi belum setuju dengan

pendekatan tunai dibanding Kabupaten

Karawang dan Kota Bekasi yang ebih mudah

dan sederhana dalam pelaksanaannya.

Pendekatan uang hanya terbatas dalam project

ini saja. Ini perlu didalami lagi karena pakai

kompensasi tanah lebih sedrhana dan lebih

mudah dan kita terbuka untuk mendiskusikan

hal ini.



• Bantuannya diharapkan berupa uang? Tetapi

Kabupaten Bekasi saat ini tidak mau berupa

uang tetapi berupa barang bagi OTD.

Eric Quincieu (Project Management Specialist ADB

IRM):

• Pada siapa sepakat tidak mau berupa uang?

Lalu kalau Kabupaten Karawang dan Kota

Bekasi berupa uang tidak masalah?

to verify the proposal, and a proposal

based on the value listed recap OTD.


IRM):

• It is not only the land acquisition but the

collaboration between the PU and the

ADB for the Western Canal Rehabilitation

program or program Citarum ICWRMIP. In

cooperation with PU, each existing policy

(ADB, GOI, LG) since it is expected that

cooperation. Indeed, existing loan

agreement between ADB with the GOI.

• Thanks a lot for the preparation of the

decree for the AHS. So that there is no

denial from AHS on the field expected

later that the decree disseminated on the

ground so that AHS quieter.

• This is an unusual project because many

AHS do not have the IMB but in ADB policy

for AHS with no IMB also be considered.

Moreover, there are works on land

acquisition policy, people who do not have

a building permit will also need to be

considered, so the DB policies do not

conflict with the GOI.

• The attention of the Government to issue

no building permits to be compensated in

accordance with the asset impact. For a

while Bekasi not agree with this approach

compared to Karawang and Bekasi which

more easy and simple in its execution.

Approach to money is limited in this

project only. This needs to be explored

further as compensation for land use

simpler and easier, and we are open to

discuss this.



• The assistance is expected to be money?

But Bekasi currently would not be money

but in the form of goods for the OTD.




• Masyarakat yang mendiami tanah ilegal tidak

hanya di Kali Malang saja. Kalau OTD diberi

uang nanti akan menjadi masalah karena kita

tidak mempunyai dana untuk penduduk ilegal

lainnya.


• Sejak awal Pemda sudah punya komitmen

untuk menertibkan penduduk yang tinggal di

sepanjang Kali Malang. Jika tujuannya untuk

normalisasi Kanal Tarum Barat, makanya kita

mengusulkan program bukan berupa uang

tunai.


IRM):

• Ini usulannya supaya lebih memudahkan.



• Nanti akan ada kelompok, jadi PPK akan

memberi bantuan program berupa barang.


IRM):

• Kalau memberi bantuan berupa barang

bagiman untuk pindah? Supaya tidak kembali

lagi ke lokasi yang sama dan tidak liar lagi?

Berarti perlu pendampingan?

Dinas Pertanian abupaten Bekasi:

• Bantuan program untuk meningkatkan

partisipasi masyarakat kuncinya

pemberdayaan.


• Usulan dari Konsultan hanya satu kali pelatihan

dan tidak berkelanjutan. Kita perlu kreatif

karena kita perlu melaksanakan proyek ini lebih

cepat. Atau ada opsi lain untuk pelatihan yang

berkelanjutan?


• Konsep pelatihan sudah didiskusikan dengan


IRM):

• To whom agreed not want to be money?

Then if Karawang district and the City of

Bekasi in the form of money is not a

problem?



• People who dwell in the land is not only

illegal in Kali Malang only. If OTD given

money will be a problem because we do

not have the funds for illegal residents.


• Since the beginning the local government

already has a commitment to curb the

population living along the Kali Malang. If

the goal for the normalization of the West

Tarum Canal, so we proposed a program

instead of cash.


IRM):

• This proposal to make it more easier.



• There will be a group, so PPK will provide

assistance programs in the form of goods.


IRM):

• how about giving aid in the form of goods

to be moved? In order not to return to the

same location and not wild anymore?

Means need assistance?

Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Bekasi:

• Support programs to increase the

participation of community the key is

empowerment.


• Proposal of the Consultant only one time

and not ongoing training. We need to be


BBWSC karena pelatihan hanya tambahan saja

untuk pemulihan mata pencarian dan

keerdulian BBWSC terhadap RTD tetapi sifatnya

bukan pemberdayaan.



• Pelatihan sebagai program tambahan.

Bapak Alim (Konsultan):

• Program pelatihan sebagai tambaha supaya

AHs yang diberi pelatihan tersebut bisa

memulihkan mata pencarian OTD. Usulan kita

termasuk alat dan bantuan modal tetapi karena

terbatas pendanaan karena ini APBN murni

sehingga usulannya hanya pelatihan. OTD yang

ikut pelatihan benar-benar yang membutuhkan

jadi kalau untuk pelatihan berkelanjutan

tergantung pendanaan di BBWSC. Memang

kalau ada penggusuran perlu ada program

pemberdayaan masyarakat supaya OTD tidak

kembali lagi. Mungkin kita sekarang usulkan

Pemkab Bekasi membuat SK Bupati tentang

OTD dan penggantian aset berupa barang

tetapi PPK di BBWSC tidak bisa berupa barang

karena mata anggarannya bukan berupa

pengadaan barang. Kesulitan uang yang

ditransfer ke kelompok untuk berupa barang

akan sulit tetapi pada prinsipnya bisa.



• PPK akan menginventarisir kebutuhan

kelompok, membuat tim kecil untuk membuat

kebutuhan kelompok tersebut.


• Bagaimana untuk penduduk yang tergusur?

Yang tidak punya tempat? Lalu bagaimana jika

diberi barang dengan kondisi seperti itu?

Bapak Agung (BPN):

• Kita sulit kalau ringan,sedang dan berat, kenapa

tidak persentasi dampak saja? Kalau bicara

resettement mencari lokasi pindah OTD karena

kalau tidak ada tetap saja mereka akan kembali

lagi. Apakah data sudah valid?


creative because we need to implement

the project more quickly. Or are there

other options for ongoing training?


• The concept has been discussed with

BBWSC training because training is only an

additional course for the recovery of

livelihoods and the BBWSC concern RTD

but its not empowerment.



• Training as an additional program.


• Training programs in addition to the given

training so that AHS can restore

livelihoods OTD. Our proposal including

tools and capital but due to limited

funding for this budget proposal is only

pure that training. OTD who participated

in the training is really a need for ongoing

training so that funding depends on

BBWSC. Indeed, if there is no eviction

should OTD community empowerment

programs that did not return. Perhaps we

are now proposing to make Bekasi regency

decree on OTD and replacement of assets

in the form of goods but BBWSC PPK can

not the form of goods because the eye is

not a procurement budget. The difficulty

of the money transferred to the group for

the goods will be difficult but in principle

could.



• PPK will inventory the needs of the group,

making a small team to make the needs of

the group.


• How for displaced populations? That has

no place? So what if they given goods with

such conditions?



• Kategiri sudah didiskusikan dan tidak ada

pengadaan tanah.


IRM):

• Masalah keterbatasan dana untuk bantuan

modal dan alat bagi AHs yang mau berusaha?


• Proyek ini normalisasi Kanal Tarum Barat yang

akan dipagar supaya tidak ada RTD yang

kembali. Dana sudah ada tetapi besarannya

ditunggu dari Ibu Dwi. Pada prinsipnya dana

bisa diusulkan asalkan ada payung hukumnya.

Untuk relokasi RTD di Kabupaten Bekasi tidak

bisa berupa uang tunai lalu bentuknya seperti

apa? Mungkin skemanya seperti apa? Rumah-

rumah sederhana, bantuan alat? jadi

mekanismenya tetap terpakai.



• Jadi solusinya ada proteksi pagar supaya OTD

tidak kembali, lalu konsultan bikin program

karena dana ada.


• Minta konsultan mendapat informasi yang

detail dari RTD karena untuk resettlement ada

kategori berat yag harus pindah. RTD yang

pindah ini tidak semua kehilangan tempat

tinggal tetapi kehilangan tempat usahanya. RTD

yang kehilangan rumah hanya 81 RTD, mungkin

bisa untuk sewa kios yang dibayarkan oleh

kelompok. Kalau untuk rumah tinggal bisa

tidak? Apa ada rumah lain? Jadi kalau butuh

rumah bisa dibayarkan oleh kelompok atau

ambil rumah sederhana. Artinya kalau tidak

memberikan uang tunai tetap akan dicarikan

solusinya.


IRM):

• Jawaban Ibu Roro sangat detail. Ada tidak

anggaran dari Pemkab Bekasi untuk kegiatan

disekitar lokasi Kanal Barat Sungai Citarum?


IRM):

• Kalau ada program yang sudah berjalan bisa

direplikasi untuk program dari BBWSC.

Bapak Agung (BPN):

• It is difficult if mild, moderate and severe,

why not just percentage impact? When it

comes to looking for a location to move

OTD resettement as if nothing still they

will come back again. Whether the data is

valid?



• Categories are discussed and there is no

land acquisition.


IRM):

• The problem of limited funds for capital

assistance and tools for AHS who want to

try?


• This project normalization West Tarum

Canal to be fenced so that no RTD

returned. Existing funds but the amount

expected from Mrs Dwi. In principle, the

funds can be proposed as long as there are

legal umbrella. For relocation RTD in

Bekasi can not cash then looks like?

Scheme might like? The simple houses,

help tool? so the mechanism remains

unused.



• So the solution is no protection fences so

OTD does not return, then a consultant

make the program because the funds

exist.


• Ask the consultant received detailed

information from RTD because for

resettlement exist weight categories that

must be moved. RTD that this move is not

all lost their homes but lost his place of

business. RTD only 81 left homeless RTD,

might be able to stall rental paid by the



• Apakah program itu syarat untuk RWG? Kalau

dari APBD bisa diusulkan. Di sepanjang Kanal

Tarum Barat, kami sudah pernah memberikan

bantuan ikan Patin (program seperti itu). Solusi

Bapak Rahmat, sudah baik untuk menyarankan

supaya bantuan tidak uang tunai karena kita

menginginkan berjalan sesuai dengan keinginan

kita.Lalu ada masalah yang di daerah tidak kena

program, menyisakan masalah di PJT II dan bagi

Pemda.


IRM):

• PJT II tidak hadir padahal mereka memberikan

izin ke AHs.



• PJT II memberikan izin kepada OTD untuk

penggunaan lahan pertanian tetapi dipakai

untuk bangunan. Kita akan bentuk tim kecil

untuk membuat payung hukum. Konsultan

membuat daftar OTD yang terkena dampak dan

nilai kompensasi yang akan diberikan kepada

mereka.


IRM):

• Ditambahkan juga akan direlokasi ke arah

mana, sepertinya BBWSC tidak masalah untuk

memfasilitasi AHs pindah.



• Tim kecil akan membuat draft SK dan

lampirannya. Draft SK sesuai format umumnya

SK Bupati tetapi nanti akan diberi lampiran.


IRM):

• erimakasih atas waktunya. Banyak ide-ide yang

baik, yang penting fair pelaksanaannya di

lapangan dan kita perlu mencari ide-ide kretaif

untuk melaksanakan kegiatan ini. Banyak de-

ide ii perlu didokumentasikan dan notice perlu

didokumentasi supaya ADB bisa megetahuinya.

Memang perlu rencana detail yang akan dibuat

group. If for home stay could not? Are

there any other houses? So if you need a

home can be paid by the group or take

home simple. This means that if you do

not give cash will still find a solution.


IRM):

• Mrs. Roro answer very detailed. There is

no budget from the local government for

activities around the site Bekasi West

Canal Citarum?


IRM):

• If exist programs that are running can be

replicated for program from BBWSC.


• Does it qualify for RWG? If from the

budget can be proposed. Along the West

Tarum Canal, we've been providing

assistance Patin fish (such a program).

Solution Mr. Rahmat, was good to suggest

that cash does not help because we want

to walk in accordance with our wishes.

Then there are the problems in the area

not affected by the program, leaving the

problem in the PJT II and for local

governments.


IRM):

• PJT II was not present when they give

permission to the AHS.



• PJT II gave permission for OTD for

agricultural land use but used for building.

We will form a small team to make legal.

Consultants make a list of the affected

OTD and amount of compensation that

will be given to them.


IRM):

• Added also will be relocated to the

direction in which, it seems BBWSC AHS

does not matter for facilitate the move.




oleh tim kecil dan nanti akan direview oleh ADB

untuk memastikan apakah compliance dengan

policy ADB. Kebetulan banyak perhatian dari

pihak ketiga dn banyk pihak ke tiga yang akan

interview Pemkab Bekasi.



• anti dokumen yang dibutuhkan

akandisampaikan. Tanggal 14 Mei nanti akan

ada pelantikan Kepala Daerah baru jadi nanti

kami akan sampaikan setelah acara tersebut.

• emimpin Rapat mengucapkan terimakasih dan

menutup pertemuan tersebut.

• Small teams will make the draft decree

and its attachments. Draft decree decree

generally appropriate format but will be

given an attachment.


IRM):

• Thank you for your time. Lots of good

ideas, which is important fair

implementation in the field and we need

to find creative ideas for implementing

these activities. Many ideas ii notice needs

to be documented and should be

documented so that ADB can

megetahuinya. It needs a detailed plan

that will be created by a small team and

will be reviewed by ADB for determine

whether compliance with ADB policy.

Incidentally a lot of attention from third

parties, and many third party who will

interview Bekasi regency.



• Later documents required to be delivered.

May 14 there will be the inauguration of

the new regional heads so we'll tell after

the event.

Leader thanked Meetings and closed the meeting.


Judul Pertemuan

Rapat Pembahasan Resettlement Meeting Tittle

Discussing of Resettlement

Date Rabu, 23 Mei 2012

Tanggal

Attendants BBWSC Team, EMA Team, DED

Consultant, PCMU Team

Venue / Tempat Ruang Rapat Kepala

BBWSC,Bandung


Agenda :

Pembahasan kemajuan Ressetlement

Pembahasan :

1. Usulan skema program yang semula disepakati

akan diberikan dengan mengadopsi

mekanisme bansos diganti dengan berbagai

pertimbangan sebagai berikut :

Tidak ada akun bansos dalam Kementrian PU

Perlu waktu lama untuk menerbitkan SK dari

Menteri atau Dirjen SDA untuk pengesahan

mekanisme dan JUKNIS nya.

Pencairan dana mulai dari penyampaian

proposal sampai ke rekening masyarakat

membutuhkan waktu cukup lama

2. kema program penanganan resettlement yang

diusulkan yang adalah : Pemberdayaan

Masyarakat-unsur dimana didalamnya

mengandung unsur-unsur :

emberian modal kerja dalam bentuk uang

tunai yang besarannya masing-masing dihitung

sesuai denga nilai aset yang hilang (dasar

perhitungan nilai aset yang hilang SK Pemda

tentang standard harga bangunan dan

tanaman)

elatihan kepada Rumah Tangga Terkena

Dampak sebagai pengganti transitional

allowance,transportation allowance,

tunjangan kelompok rentan/vulnerable dan

kelompok yang terkena dampak serius

3. ekanisme pencairan dana APBN untuk

penanganan program : diberikan langsung

kepada masing-masing RTD. Daftar RTD,jenis

dan besaran aset yang hilang serta nilai nya

disyahkan oleh Bupati/Walikota

4.

Discussion :

1. Proposed scheme which was originally agreed

to be given by adopting Bansos mechanism is

replaced by the following considerations:

• There is no Bansos account in the Ministry of

Public Works

• It takes a long time to publish a decree of the

Minister or the Director General of Water

Resources for mechanism and its guidelines

approval.

• The disbursement of funds from proposal

submission to the local accounts take a long

time.

2. Handling resettlement scheme proposed is:

Empowerment elements where it contains the

following elements:

• Provision of working capital in the form of

cash, which amount is calculated according to

their respective premises lost assets value (the

basis for calculating the value of lost assets

government decree on the standard price of

the building and plant)

• Training for Affected Households in place

transitional allowance, transportation

allowance, allowances for vulnerable groups

and seriously affected groups.

3. Budget disbursement mechanism for handling

program: given directly to each RTD. List of

RTD, the type and amount of lost assets and

its value endorsed by the Regent / Mayor.

4. Based on the discussion of the third premises

RWG: Bekasi District Government and

Karawang District will provide support in the

form of:

• Decree for a list of RTD, the type and amount

of assets affected and the replacement value


erdasarkan hasil diskusi denga ketiga RWG :

Pemerintah Kabupaten Bekasi dan Kabupaten

Karawang akan memberikan dukungan berupa

:

- urat Keputusan Bupati untuk daftar RTD,jenis

dan besaran aset terkena dampak dan nilai

penggantian yang akan diterima oleh masing-

masing RTD

- urat Bupati tentang skema program yang akan

diterima masing-masing RTD. Saat diskusi

dilakukan skema program yang akan

diterapkan menggunakan/mengadopsi

mekanisme bansos

5. arena skema dan mekanisme program

penanganan berubah,maka perlu pertemuan

kembali dengan ketiga RWG. Pertemuan akan

dilakukan antara Kepala Balai dengan

pengambil keputusan dimasing-masing

Pemerintah Daerah

6. iskusi tentang beberapa issue penting pada RP

2008 :

a. ab IV. Project Entitlement Matrix dan

Implementation Arrangement :

Pemahaman Team Resettlement (Ibu Dwi dan

Pak Rimun) : pemberian kompensasi/program

penanganan dampak mengacu pada

peraturan pemerintah daerah yang ada dan

jika peraturan pemerintah daerah tidak

tersedia maka pemberian kompensasi

mengacu pada entitlement matrix seperti yang

tercantum dalam Resettlement

Plan/Resettlement Framework

Pemahaman Narasumber (Ibu Ratih) :

pemberian kompensasi/penanganan mengacu

pada peraturan pemerintah yang ada dan jika

peraturan pemerintah daerah tidak ada proyek

tidak harus membayar kompensasi/member

program penanganan kepada RTD

b. emahaman tentang �Peraturan Pemerintah

Daerah � yang dimaksud dalam RP 2008 atau

to be received by each RTD

• Letter of Regents of the scheme that will be

accepted each RTD. When the discussion is

that the scheme will be implemented using /

adopting Bansos mechanisms

5. Since the scheme and mechanism of

management program change, it is necessary

to go back to third RWG meeting. The meeting

will be conducted between the Head of the

respective decision-making Local Government

6. Discussions on some issues important to the

RP 2008:

a. Chapter IV. Project Entitlement Matrix

and Implementation Arrangement:

• Resettlement Team Understanding

(Mrs. and Mr. Dwi Rimun):

compensation / treatment program

refers to the impact of government

regulations that exist and if

government regulation is not available

then the compensation refers to the

entitlement matrix as shown in the

Resettlement Plan / Resettlement

Framework

• informant Understanding (Mrs. Ruth):

compensation / treatment refers to

government regulations and if there

are no government regulations do not

have to pay compensation project /

program management members to

RTD

b. An understanding of the "Government

Regulation" as defined in RP 2008 or

RF:

• Resettlement Team: local government

regulations relating to standard rates

to calculate the value of lost assets

• Informant (Mrs. Ruth): local

government regulations relating to

compensation for illegal occupants

c. An understanding of the

compensation scheme in 2008:

• Resettlement Team: providing cash

lost assets, Livelihood Restoration

Program (special program) for the

difference in the calculation of money


RF :

eam Resettlement : peraturan pemerintah

daerah terkait dengan standard harga untuk

menghitung nilai aset yang hilang

Narasumber (Ibu Ratih) : peraturan

pemerintah daerah terkait dengan pemberian

kompensasi untuk penghuni illegal

c. emahaman tentang skema kompensasi tahun

2008 :

Team Resettlement : pemberian uang tunai

aset yang hilang, Livelihood Resetoration

Program (special program ) untuk selisih

perhitungan uang kerohiman dan prinsip

replacement cost untuk Kabupaten Bekasi, dan

Livelihood Restoration Program (general

program) untuk mengganti transitional

allowance, transportation allowance,

tunjanga kelompok rentan dan kelompok yang

terkena dampak serius.

arasumber (Ibu Ratih) : semua kompensasi

diberikan dalam bentuk Livelihood Restoration

Program

7. iskusi tentang perlu tidaknya dukungan

Peraturan Pemerintah Daerah untuk

mekanisme pengeluaran dana APBN :

arasumber (Pak Yudha) : perlu berupa

pengesahan daftar RTD, jenis aset yang hilang

dan nilainya oleh Bupati/Walikota atau

Gubernur

arasumber (Ibu Ratih) perlu Peraturan Daerah

tentang pemberian penanganan pada RTD

ED RS (Ibu Dwi) perlu berupa pengesahan

daftar RTD, jenis aset yang hilang dan nilainya

oleh Bupati/Walikota

Tindak lanjut : BBWSC (PPK PAB) akan

berkonsultasi denga bagian

Hukum,Departemen PU untuk mendapat

kepastian bentuk peraturan pemerintah

and the principle of replacement cost

kerohiman for Bekasi and Livelihood

Restoration Program (general

program) for replace the transitional

allowance, transportation allowance,

allowances for vulnerable groups and

seriously affected groups.

• Informant (Mrs. Ruth): all of the

compensation awarded in the form of

Livelihood Restoration Program

7. Discussion on whether to support the Local

Government Regulation for the state budget

expenditures mechanisms:

• Informant (Pak Yudha): RTD needs approval

list, the type and value of assets lost by the

Regent / Mayor or Governor

• Informant (Mrs. Ruth) Regulation on the

provision of needs treatment on RTD

• DED RS (Mrs. Dwi) needs validation list RTD,

type and value of assets lost by the Regent /

Mayor

• Follow-up: BBWSC (PPK PAB) will consult with

the Law, the Department of Public Works to

ascertain the form of regulations appropriate

areas (late May had received assurance)

8. Pak Yudha Sharing experience in handling

resettlement along the river .... (illegal

occupants)

• Based on the Governor SK land occupied

replaced 25% from the real values

• Another asset is replaced cash directly to each

RTD, RTD lists and massive compensation

values endorsed by Governor

9. Discussions on the scope of updating RP data

collection:

• Input from the source (Mrs. Ruth) that based

on the discussion (no meeting minutes) in the

year 2008 on the addition of RTD after a cut of

date will be handled using the General

Program (not clear form the basis of programs

and administration)

• For that survey data are required to be divided

into RTD in 2008, a new RTD based on

corridors DED, and the new RTD corridor by

2008 to base treatment decisions impact.

Discourse is if the cut-off date used cut-off


daerah yang sesuai (akhir Mei sudah

mendapat kepastian)

8. haring pengalaman Pak Yudha dalam

penanganan resettlement di bantaran

sungai�.(penghuni illegal)

Berdasarkan SK Gubernur tanah yang

ditempati diganti 25% dari nilai real

set lain diganti langsung tunai langsung ke

masing-masing RTD, daftar RTD dan besaran

nilai kompensasinya disyahkan oleh Gubernur

9. iskusi tentang lingkup pendataan updating RP:

Input dari narasumber (Ibu Ratih) bahwa

berdasarkan diskusi (tidak ada notulen/dasar

tertulis) pada tahun 2008 tentang

penambahan jumlah RTD setelah batas cut of

date akan ditangani menggunakan General

Program (tidak jelas bentuk program dan dasar

pemberianya)

Untuk itu data hasil survey diminta untuk

dipilah menjadi RTD tahun 2008, RTD baru

berdasarkan koridor DED, dan RTD baru

bedasarkan koridor 2008 untuk dijadikan dasar

pengambilan keputusan penanganan dampak.

Wacananya adalah jika cut off date yang

dipakai cut off date 2008 : RTD 2008 dan RTD

baru berdasarkan koridor 2008 akan

menerima program pemberdayaan penuh

(penggantian aset/modal kerja dan pelatihan)

sementara untuk RTD baru di koridor 2008

akan menerima penanganan yang berbeda

(general program?)

DED RS menyampaikan beberapa

pertimbangan untuk pengambilan keputusan

penanganan yang berbeda terhadap RTD ini

sbb :

a. etiga RWG menghendaki pendataan dan

penanganan dampak dilakukan terhadap

seluruh RTD yang terdata pada saat survey

updating RP dilakukan, hal ini untuk

date 2008: RTD 2008 and the new RTD

corridor by 2008 will receive the full

empowerment program (replacement assets /

working capital and training) while in the

corridor for a new RTD 2008 will receive

different treatment (general program ?)

• DED RS convey some considerations for

handling different decision on this RTD

follows:

a. Third RWG requires data collection

and handling of the impact of the

whole RTD conducted on the data

collected during RP updating survey

done, This is for avoid the impact of

the social field

b. RTD has been recorded, invited

socialization and confirmed loss of

assets

c. New RTD outside in the hallway 2008

will be more seriously affected than

the dang new RTD outside in the

hallway DED (assets affected more

significantly)

d. In the Project Information Booklet

distributed RTD listed that are

recorded at the time of updating

survey entitled to receive

reimbursement

So if you later decide different

handling for the new RTD outside in

the hallway, 2008, it must be done

again with RWG coordination and re-

socialization into the RTD

Because it does not adopts impact the

handling mechanism Bansos

mechanism, the bridging team limited

in scope only for RTD and finalization

of data loss


menghindari dampak social dilapangan

b. TD sudah didata,diundang sosialisasi dan

dikonfirmasi kehilangan asetnya

c. TD baru dikoridor 2008 akan terkena dampak

lebih serius dang dibandingkan RTD baru

dikoridor DED (aset yang terkena lebih

signifikan)

d. ada Booklet Informasi Proyek yang disebarkan

tercantum bahwa RTD yang terdata pada saat

survey updating berhak untuk menerima

penggantian

Sehingga kalau kemudia diputuskan

penanganan berbeda untuk RTD baru

dikoridor 2008, maka harus dilakukan re

koordinasi ulag dengan RWG dan re-sosialisasi

ke RTD

Karena mekanisme penanganan dampak tidak

jadi mengadop mekanisme bansos, maka

lingkup kerja bridging team dibatasai hanya

untuk finalisasi data RTD dan kehilangan


Judul Pertemuan

Rapat Pembahasan Quarterly Report Juni 2012 Meeting Tittle

ADB Comment for Quarterly Report

Date Kamis, 30 Agustus 2012

Tanggal

Attendants PCMU team, DED Consultant, EMA

Team

Peserta

Venue / Tempat Ruang Rapat PCMU BBWSC Note taker Sherlywati

Agenda :

Pembahasan komentar ADB terhadap Inception

Report dan Quarterly Report

Agenda:

Discussion comments ADB's Inception Report and

Quarterly Report

Pembahasan :

Rapat Pembahasan Quarterly Report yang

dilaksanakan oleh PCMU di BBWSC dibuka dan

dipimpin oleh Konsultan Independent (Bapak

Maksum Hidayat). Pemimpin Rapat menjelaskan

hal-hal sebagai berikut:

1. Inception Report EMA sudah dikirim ke

ADB dan sudah diberi komentar oleh ADB

per tanggal 16 Agustus 2012. Inception

Report masih ada yang perlu direvisi

terutama menjawab komentar-komentar

ADB.

2. First Quarterly Report masih ada yang

belum memenuhi kebutuhan ADB.

Sebagai Team Leader EMA, Pak Pius

menyampaikan beberapa hal terkait komentar

ADB terhadap Inception Report, diantaranya :

1. Tanggapan terhadap Point 1, scope of

work EMA tidak termasuk safeguard

compliance, tidak tercantum di TOR

2. Tanggapan terhadap point 2, mengenai

payment schedule, berkaitan dengan

realisasi konkret dari EGIS, di Inception

Meeting sudah disebutkan akan berjalan

secara LumpSum, tetapi sampai saat ini,

setiap invoice EMA hanya dibayarkan

berdasarkan persentase milestone dari

total Remuneration Cost, bukan dari Total

Contract.

3. Tanggapan point 3 & 4 : durasi kontrak

yang awalnya 14 bulan, diminta mundur

menjadi 18 bulan dengan sisa reportnya

adalah 3 Quarterly Report dan 1 Final

Discussion:

Discussion Meeting Quarterly Report conducted by

the PCMU in BBWSC opened and chaired by

Independent Consultant (Maksum Mr. Hidayat).

Leaders Meeting to explain the following:

1. Inception Report EMA has been sent to the

ADB and has given comments by ADB as at

August 16, 2012. Inception Report has to be

revised, especially to answer the comments

ADB.

2. First Quarterly Report there are those who do

not meet the needs of ADB.

As a Team Leader EMA, Mr. Pius convey

somerelevant comments ADB's Inception

Report, including:

1. Response to Point 1, the scope of work not

included safeguards compliance EMA, not

listed in the TOR

2. Response to point 2, the payment schedule, in

relation to the concrete realization of Egis,

already mentioned in the Inception Meeting

will run in per diems, but until now, every

invoice EMA is only paid based on a

percentage of the total Remuneration Cost

milestone, not of Total Contract.

3. Response Point 3 & 4: duration of the initial

14-month contract, asked to resign to 18

months with the rest of the report is 3 and 1

Quarterly Report and the Final Report will be

made Monthly Report containing the List of

Activity

4. Response Point 5: Pak Maksum provide

desired order made in a matrix, which


Report serta akan dibuatkan Monthly

Report yang isinya adalah List of Activity

4. Tanggapan point 5 : Pak Maksum

memberikan masukkan agar dibuatkan

didalam sebuah matrix yang isinya

menjelaskan comply or not comply; how

and why. Jelaskan apa yang dilihat, yang

diperoleh, dan kasih opini.

5. Tanggapan point 6, mengenai survey,

sedang dirancang proses dan rencana

survey

Masukkan Pak Maksum, dalam Inception

Report tatap padaTOR, apa yang bisa atau

tidak bisa dilakukan; workplan dan apa

yang harus dilakukan.

6. Tanggapan point 7, study impact tetap

masuk dalam Inception Report tapi ketika

di Quarterly Report dijelaskan bahwa

study impact tidak akan dilakukan dengan

beberapa alasan.

7. Tanggapan point 8, mengenai penugasan

di unpar, tergantung surat tugas unpar,

jadi kapanpun bisa berubah-ubah.

Mengenai amandemen kontrak, perlu

dibuatkan kejelasan mengenai lumpsum

basis berdasarkan total kontrak. Buat

amandemen kontrak dari segi waktu dan

cara pembayaran. Buat perubahan dari

pasal sebelumnya yang ada dikontrak dan

akan menjadi seperti apa.

Pembahasan paper dari konsultan EMA.

1. Paper Pak Gandhi mengenai Social

Statistic.

2. Paper Bu Indras mengenai �Resettlement

policies: A review of ADB�s frameworks

and GoI�s regulations�

3. Paper Bu Nophie mengenai �Gender

Perspective�

describes the comply or not comply; how and

why. Explain what is seen, learned, and give

opinions.

5. Responses point 6, the survey was designed

and planned the survey

suggestion from Pak Maksum, the Inception

Report still on the TOR, what can or can not

do; work plan and what to do.

6. Responses point 7, study impact remains in

the Inception Report but when in the

Quarterly Report explained that the impact

study will not be done for several reasons.

7. Responses point 8, the assignment in UNPAR,

depending UNPAR assignment letter, so can

change anytime.

Regarding amendments to the contract, it

should be made clear on the per diem basis

based on the total contract. Create a contract

amendment in terms of time and method of

payment. Make the changes from the

previous chapter that there will be

contracted and what would be.

Discussion paper from EMA consultant.

1. Mr. Gandhi Paper on Social Statistics.

2. Bu Indras Paper on "Resettlement policies: A

review of ADB's frameworks and GoI's

regulations"

3. Bu Nophie Paper on "Gender Perspective"


Judul Pertemuan

Pembahasan Komentar ADB pada First

Quarterly Report

Meeting Tittle

Feedback on the First Quarterly Report

Date Friday, 19 October 2012

Tanggal

Attendants Pak Maksum, Pak Puguh, Pak Pius,

Bu Dwi

Venue / Tempat PCMU Office Note taker Pius Suratman Kartasasmita

Agenda : Pembahasan Komentar ADB pada First

Quarterly Report

Whether the content of Quarterly Report

submitted by EMA has respond ADB's concerns ?

Pembahasan:

ひﾆﾗﾏWﾐデ;ヴ ADB ヮ;S; L;ヮﾗヴ;ﾐ Tヴｷ┘┌ﾉ;ﾐ PWヴデ;ﾏ; diperpanjang di e-mail kepada PCMU tanggal 28

Agustus 2012 sebagai berikut:

1.Laporan ini mencerminkan kemajuan karya

EMA, tapi bukan hasil kegiatan pemantauan

sendiri.

2. Setelah check-in awal hanya menemukan

tonggak pembayaran yang mengatakan akan

ada perbaruan RP dan persiapan LRP untuk

30% dan laporan triwulan pertama untuk

10%. Jadi kita perlu memastikan akan ada

laporan mengenai RP memperbarui dan

persiapan LRP.

3. Table2: laporan menunjukkan kemajuan

laporan tentang reliabilitas dan validitas

survei sosial ekonomi oleh Khatulistiwa ini

mungkin theo ne kita perlu;

4. Tabel 2: keprihatinan tentang kurangnya

anggaran untuk melakukan kunjungan

lapangan dan wawancara secara acak

dengan AHS. Kita perlu memeriksa dengan

PCMU pada anggaran lapangan, meskipun

benjolan sumcontract-thisshould tidak akan

terjadi.

ひ SWｴ┌H┌ﾐｪ;ﾐ SWﾐｪ;ﾐﾐﾗﾏﾗヴﾆﾗﾏWﾐデ;ヴヱ S;ﾐヲ untuk hasil kegiatan pemantauan, silakan

mempertimbangkan beberapa aspek pada

pemantauan sebagai berikut:

1. Untuk menganalisis data dasar kualitas

survey pengukuran rinci dan survei sosial

ekonomi, harap sertakan analisis apakah

Discussing :

• ADB's comments on the First Quarterly

Reports were extended in its e-mail to PCMU

dated August 28, 2012 as follows:

1. The report is reflecting the progress of

the work of EMA, but not the result of

monitoring activity itself.

2. Upon check in the inception only

found the payment milestone which

said there would be RP updating and

LRP preparation for 30% and first

quarterly report for 10%. So we need

to ensure there will be a report on RP

updating and LRP preparation.

3. Table2 : the progress report indicated

report on the reliability and validity of

social economy survey by Equator this

might be theo ne we need;

4. Table 2: concern about lack of budget

for doing field visit and random

interview with the AHs. We need to

check with PCMU on the fieldwork

budget, although it is a lump

sumcontract -thisshould not be

happened.

• In relation with comment number 1 and 2 for

the result of monitoring activity, please

consider several aspects on monitoring as

below:

1. To analyze quality baseline data of

detailed measurement survey and

social economicsurvey, please include

analysis whether method of DMS and


metode DMS dan survei sosial ekonomi

byEquator digunakan adalah handal, apakah

data tanah yang hilang dan non-tanah aset

telah accurateby memeriksa di lapangan.

Laporan ini menunjukkan laporan rinci data

dasar dan LRP adalah inAnnex A, namun

saya tidak menemukan dalam laporan.

Silakan kirim kata Lampiran. Silakan juga

melaporkan hasil pemantauan pada

identifikasi direlokasi AHS dan desain

2. Laporan ini menunjukkan bahwa kategori

dampak: dampak cahaya, dampak

menengah, dan dampak berat sejalan

dengan kebijakan ADB pada kerangka

pemukiman kembali. Jelaskan sebagai

kebijakan ADB tentang pemukiman kembali

hanya mengakui sangat terpengaruh dan

tidak sangat terpengaruh. Thereare ada

kategori ringan, sedang, dan dampak yang

berat.

3. Silakan analisis apakah metodologi pelacak

dan peningkatan kapasitas untuk pelacak

telah diterapkan dengan benar dan analisis

hasil pelacak. Apakah jumlah dan identifikasi

ahs digusur telah maksimal dan akurat.

Silakan laporkan apakah ada keluhan yang

diajukan oleh AHS digusur pada kegiatan

pelacak. Jika ada, mohon juga melaporkan

apakah pengaduan telah ditangani dan

diselesaikan.

4. Silakan menganalisis apakah penggantian

biaya studi telah dilakukan dengan benar.

Dan penggantian biaya untuk aset yang

hilang disiapkan oleh Equator telah sesuai

dengan prinsip biaya penggantian.

5. Silakan laporkan hasil pemantauan pihak

penanganan RP update: RWGs, tim Equator,

tim BBWSC DEDConsultant, dll

6. Pemantauan dari perspektif gendre tidak

hanya memantau pada keterlibatan

perempuan dalam pertemuan

theconsultation, tetapi juga apakah gender

telah tercermin dalam survei sosial ekonomi

(sampling metode dan data gender terpisah)

keterlibatan perempuan dalam theRWGS.

Silakan mengklarifikasi.

7. Silakan laporkan hasil pemantauan yang

socio economic survey used byEquator

are reliable, whether the data of lost

land and non-land assets have been

accurateby checking in the field. The

report indicates detailed report on

data base and LRP are inAnnex A, yet I

don't find in the report. Please send

the said Annex. Please also

reportmonitoring result on

identification of relocated AHs and

design of

2. The report indicates that thecategory

of impact: light impact, medium

impact, and heavy impact is in line

with ADB policy on resettlement

framework. Please clarify as the ADB

policyon involuntary resettlement just

recognizes severely affected and non

severely affected.Thereare no

category of light, medium, and heavy

impacts.

3. Please analysis whether the tracer

methodology and capacity building for

tracer has beenproperly implemented

and analysis on the tracer result.

Whether the number andidentification

of evicted AHs has been maximal and

accurate. Please report whether

therewere complaints raised by the

evicted AHs on the tracer activities. If

any, please also reportwhether the

complaints have been properly

handled and resolved.

4. Please analyze whether replacement

cost study has been properly carried

out. Andreplacement cost for lost

assets prepared by Equator has been

in compliance with replacement cost

principle.

5. Please report monitoring result on

parties handling RP updating: RWGs,

Equator team, DEDConsultant team

BBWSC, etc

6. Monitoring gender perspectiveis not

only monitoring on women

involvement in theconsultation

meetings, but also whether gender has


berkaitan dengan pengungkapan publik

(pembagian selebaran ke AP, dll) selama

update RP. Sebagai program akses air telah

dilaksanakan, mohon memantau apakah AP

dan non-tanah pemegang gelar tinggal di

sepanjang kanal memiliki akses pada

program.

8. Kesimpulan tentang isu-isu substantif yang

tidak jelas. Ini harus mencerminkan

kesimpulan dari hasil pemantauan kegiatan

RP memperbarui termasuk DMS dan

metode survei sosial ekonomi dan hasil,

pelacak untuk diusir AHS pertemuan

konsultasi, (dengan perspektif gender dan

partisipasi dari semua ahs), identifikasi

daerah relokasi (fasilitasi relokasi) sumber

daya.

9. Pada June2 012, kesepakatan tentang

mekanisme pembayaran kompensasi telah

bergeser dari Bansos untuk pembayaran

langsung. Uang kompensasi untuk aset yang

hilang dan tunjangan tunai untuk bantuan

relokasi juga telah dibahas. Hal ini belum

mencerminkan laporan inthe. Harap

memberikan analisis pada mereka.

10. Berdasarkan temuan, berikan jelas

rekomendasi yang akan digunakan oleh

BBWSC, Konsultan DED, dan RWGs

peningkatan forthe.

ひ Penting bagi EMA untuk menanggapi komentar

di atas. Disepakati bahwa Laporan Triwulanan

Pertama EMA tidak sepenuhnya memasukkan

komentar. Untuk mengatasi masalah ini EMA

akan menambah penjelasan singkat dan

menampung mereka dalam Laporan Triwulan

kedua dan RP memperbarui dan LRP Laporan

persiapan yang sedang berlangsung sekarang.

Pertemuan Triwulanan :

ひ EMA SWﾐｪ;ﾐゲデ;ﾆWｴﾗﾉSWヴ SｷヴWﾐI;ﾐ;ﾆ;ﾐ untuk berada di Kamis, November 7, 2012.

ひ PCMU ;ﾆ;ﾐﾏWﾏH;ﾐtu EMA untuk

mengubah subkontrak dengan Egis.

ひ BWHWヴ;ヮ; ヮWデ┌ﾐﾃ┌ﾆ ┌ﾐデ┌ﾆﾏWﾐ;ﾐｪｪ;ヮｷ

been reflected in the socio economic

survey (sampling method and gender

segregated data) involvement of

women in theRWGS. Please clarify.

7. Please report monitoring result related

to public disclosure( distribution

leaflet to the APs,etc) during the RP

updating. As the water access program

has been implemented, pleasemonitor

whether the APs and other non-land

title holders living along the canal have

hadaccess on the program.

8. Conclusion on substantive issues are

not clear. This should reflect the

conclusion ofmonitoring result on RP

updating activities including DMS and

socio economic surveymethod and

results; tracer to evicted AHs,

consultation meetings (with gender

perspectiveand participation of all

AHs), identification relocation area

(relocation facilitation) resources.

9. In June2 012, the agreement on the

mechanismof compensation payment

has been shiftedfrom the Bansos to

direct payment. The cash

compensation for lost assets and

cashallowance for relocations

assistance have also been discussed.

This has not been reflectedinthe

report. Please provide analysis on

them.

10. Based on those findings, please

provide clearly recommendations to

be used by BBWSC,DED Consultant,

and RWGs forthe improvement.

• It is important for EMA to respond above

comments. It is agreed that the First Quarterly

Report of EMA does not entirely incorporate

the comments. To address the issue EMA will

add short explanation and accommodate them

in the second Quarterly Report and RP

updating and LRP preparation Report which is

now in progress.

• EMA's Quarterly Meeting with stakeholders


komentar ADB

1. Isu: EMA harus memberikan tiga

pernyataan yang jelas dan konklusif, yang,

pertama, masalah ditentukan berdasarkan

data yang valid dan informasi tertentu.

Kedua, analisis dengan mengacu pada

kerangka hukum yang ada, teori praktik

terbaik. Ketiga, rekomendasi eksplisit yang

akan digunakan oleh Konsultan BBWSC dan

DED.

Menanggapi itu EMA: EMA akan meninjau

laporan itu sekali lagi, menulis ringkasan

terpisah dalam menanggapi komentar ADB,

dan mengakomodasi analisis penuh baik

dalam QR kedua serta dalam memperbarui

RP dan laporan persiapan LRP.

2. Isu: Dalam rangka untuk membandingkan

ADB RF dan Peraturan Pemerintah tentang

Pemukiman Kembali, diketahui ada masalah

hukum yang saling bertentangan yaitu: Hal

ini disebutkan dalam UU No.2/2012 baik dan

PP No.71/2012, di satu sisi, yang masyarakat

/ individu yang mengelola lahan dan aset

memiliki hak untuk biaya penggantian

asalkan itu legal. Di sisi lain, ADB RF

mewajibkan pemerintah untuk membayar

biaya penggantian untuk semua ahs

tercantum dalam RP 2008 tanpa legalitas

mereka. Apa dasar hukum untuk

menerapkan ADB RF daripada peraturan

Pemerintah Indonesia.

EMA Menanggapi: Loan Agreement (Pasal 5)

yang ditandatangani oleh kedua ADB dan

Pemerintah Indonesia diminta Pemerintah

Indonesia untuk melakukannya. Perjanjian

Pinjaman ini juga telah diikuti dengan

Permintaan Keuangan Berkala (PFR) yang

juga memerlukan pelaksanaan RF ADB.

3. Isu: Di satu sisi, kebijakan ADB tentang

pemukiman kembali hanya mengakui sangat

terkena dampak dan non sangat

terpengaruh. Di sisi lain, Konsultan DED

serta LPM Equator mengusulkan tiga

kategori AHS yang berdampak ringan,

was planned to be on Thursday, November 7,

2012.

• PCMU will help EMA to amend subcontract

with EGIS.

• Some hints to respond ADB's comments

1. Issue: EMA should provide three clear

and conclusive statement, which are,

firstly, determined issue based on

valid particular data and information.

Secondly, analysis with reference to

the existing legal framework, theory of

best practices. Thirdly, explicit

recommendations that will be used by

BBWSC and DED Consultants.

EMA's Respond:EMA will review the

report once again, write separate

summary at responding ADB's

comments, and accommodate full

analysis both in the second QR as well

as in the RP updating and LRP

preparation reports.

2. Issue:In order to compare ADB's RF

and GOI's Regulations on

Resettlement, it is noted there is a

conflicting legal issue which is: It is

mentioned in both UU No.2/2012 and

PP No.71/2012, on one side, that

society/individuals who manage the

land and assets have right to

replacement cost as long as it is legal.

On the other side, ADB's RF obliges the

government to pay replacement cost

to all AHs listed in RP 2008 regardless

their legalities. What is the legal basis

to apply ADB's RF rather than GOI

regulations.

EMA Responded: Loan Agreement

(Article 5) that signed by both ADB and

GOI required Indonesian Government

to do so. This Loan Agreement has also

been followed with Periodic Finance

Request(PFR) that also requires the

implementation of ADB's RF.


dampak menengah, dan benturan keras.

EMA Menanggapi: tidak ada pelanggaran RF

ADB, perbaikan dilakukan untuk tujuan

teknis hanya pada penentuan tingkat

pembayaran yang dibutuhkan oleh data.

Oleh karena itu, usulan tersebut masih

sejalan dengan kebijakan ADB pada

kerangka pemukiman kembali.

4. Isu: Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa AHS tracer

menghasilkan angka yang lebih rendah

dibandingkan dengan RP 2008. Hal ini

menunjukkan bahwa distribusi leaflet,

pengumuman radio dan alat komunikasi lain

masyarakat tidak efektif untuk mencapai

target AHS.

EMA Menanggapi: juga mungkin bahwa

jumlah AHS telah secara sukarela

memutuskan untuk meninggalkan dan

pindah ke batas-batas spasial dilacak karena

kurangnya data base hukum.

5. Isu: Dalam June2 012, kesepakatan tentang

mekanisme pembayaran kompensasi telah

bergeser dari Bansos untuk pembayaran

langsung. Uang kompensasi untuk aset yang

hilang dan tunjangan tunai untuk bantuan

relokasi juga telah dibahas. Apa konsekuensi

logis dan praktis dari pergeseran?

EMA Menanggapi: tidak ada konsekuensi

perbedaan, mekanisme kedua mencakup

baik kompensasi (biaya penggantian) tanah /

aset yang hilang dan biaya relokasi, serta

program pelatihan untuk dampak AHS.

Pembayaran langsung secara hukum yang

benar dalam hal mekanisme penyaluran

bansos daripada hukum.

6. Isu Tambahan: apakah berdampak pada AHS

sepanjang kanal memiliki akses ke fasilitas air

bersih yang disediakan oleh proyek.

EMA Menanggapi: Masalah tersebut telah

jelas alamatnya dalam paket 2.3 dari proyek.

Namun, ada dua masalah yang dihadapi

ditunjukkan pada tingkat empiris. Pertama,

lokasi sarana air bersih yang terletak agak

3. Issue: On one side, ADB policyon

involuntary resettlement just

recognizes severely affected and non

severely affected. On the other side,

DED Consultants as well as LPM

Equator proposethree categories of

AHs which are light impact, medium

impact, and heavy impact.

EMA Responded:there is no violation

to ADB's RF, the refinement is done for

technical purpose only at determining

level of payment required by data.

Therefore, the proposal is still in line

with ADB policy on resettlement

framework.

4. Issue: It is indicated that AHs tracer

resulted in lower numbers compare to

RP 2008. It was indicated that

distribution of leaflet, radio

announcement and other means of

public communication were not

effectively to reach the targeted AHs.

EMA Responded:it is also possible that

numbers of AHs have voluntarily

decided to leave and move to the

untraceable spatial boundaries due to

lack of legal data base.

5. Issue:In June2 012, the agreement on

the mechanismof compensation

payment has been shiftedfrom the

Bansosto direct payment. The cash

compensation for lost assets and

cashallowance for relocations

assistance have also been discussed.

What is the logical and practical

consequences of the shifting?

EMA Responded: there is no

difference consequences, the two

mechanism covers both compensation

(replacement cost) for land/asset lost

and relocation cost, as well as training

program for the impacted AHs. Direct

payment is legally correct in term of

disbursement mechanism than legal


jauh dari kanal. Kedua, tetap perumahan

masyarakat di mana fasilitas berlokasi sosial

mengecualikan ahs dari fasilitas karena rasa

memiliki dan tanggung jawab masalah.

bansos.

6. Additional Issue:whether impacted

AHs along the canal have access to

clean water facilities provided by the

project.

EMA Responded: such issue has been clearly

address in package 2.3 of the project. However,

there are two indicated problems faced at

empirical level. Firstly, location of clean water

facilities were located rather remote from the

canal. Secondly, permanent of residential

community where facilities are located socially

exclude the AHs from the facilities due to sense of

belonging and responsibility issues.


Judul Pertemuan

Pemantauan perkembangan proyek

resettlement

Meeting Tittle

Monitoring on Project Progress

Date Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Tanggal

Attendants Bu Dwi, Pak Pius, Sherlywati

Peserta

Venue / Tempat : Kantor Pemberdayaan Air

Bekasi

Note taker : Sherlywati

Agenda : Konsultasi kemajuan proyek

resettlement

Agenda: Consultation resettlement project

progress

1. Hal-hal istimewa dan yang menonjol dari

RWG yang mendukung pergerakan proyek

Resettlement :

a. Setelah peran diambil alih oleh sekretaris

Bappeda Karawang Pak Syamsuri,

kemajuannya sangat cepat, sikapnya pro

rakyat, selalu mendukung di lapangan,

pandangan mengenai ide bansos pun

berasal dari pa Syamsuri, banyak

membantu DED dalam membuat solusi

serta menemukan celah dalam

menangani dampak resettlement.

b. Kabupaten Bekasi supportnya terasa

terutama ketika melacak kembali warga

yang sudah digusur, tetapi atas nama

proyek ini, pemkab bekasi mau mencari

kembali warga yang sudah mereka gusur.

Ketika ADB minta untuk dilacak, pemkab

mendukung (mengalah) walaupun

mereka sendiri yang telah menggusur

warga dalam rangka pembersihan

Adipura 2009-2011.

c. Pada awalnya pemkab bekasi tidak setuju

memberikan penggantian dalam bentuk

cash, tetapi pada akhirnya mereka setuju

juga penggantian dalam bentuk direct

payment dan cash. Disamping itu, peran

DED consultant pun sangat terlihat,

dengan keuletan DED, akhirnya pemkab

bekasi mau menyetujui pola cash direct

payment. Serta peran dan usaha Pak

Hasanudin yang mempercepat proses

1. And the special things that stand out from the

RWG to support the movement Resettlement

Project:

a. Once the role was taken over by the Bappeda

secretary Karawang mr.Syamsuri, progressing

very quickly, his pro-people, always supported

on the ground, the view of the idea was derived

from mr.Syamsuri helped DED in making

solutions and find gaps in addressing the impact

of resettlement.

b. Bekasi support is felt especially when tracing

back the people that have been displaced, but

the name of the project, the district government

would seek again bekasi residents who had

evicted. When ADB requested to be tracked, the

district government support (yield) even though

they themselves had been displaced residents in

order to purge Adipura 2009-2011.

c. At first pemkab disagree bekasi provide

reimbursement in the form of cash, but in the

end they agreed also the replacement in the

form of direct payment and cash. In addition,

the DED consultant role was highly visible, with

tenacity DED, Bekasi district government

eventually wants to agree to direct cash

payment patterns. And the role and effort Pak

Hasanudin that speeds the approval process

substitution pattern is used, the Head of

Planning Mr Jamari Tarin, and the district head

d. During the process, the head of Satpol pp


persetujuan pola penggantian yang

dipakai, Kepala Bappeda Pak Jamari

Tarigan, dan Bupati setempat

d. Selama proses, kepala Satpol pp Karawang

sudah 3kali ganti orang, namun tidak ada

resistensi yang signifikan, hanya

mengenai tupoksi di awal saja.

e. Dari kota Bekasi, lebih pasif karena warga

yang terkena dampak hanya sedikit, ikut

keputusan yang ada saja, sempat sulit

menerima/menyetujui untuk membuat

SK, masih tergantung siapa yang memberi

instruksi. Perlu pendekatan dari balai. Ide

terakhir SK yang akan menandatangani

adalah gubernur

2. 3 jenis pendataan affected household untuk

RP yaitu Survey, Disclosure, dan Tracer.

a. Survey ada 2 :

• Inventory of losses = database asset

RTD

• Survey sosec = requirement ADB 10%

dari total Ahs dan 20% dari severely

household. Pada akhirnya terhitung 18%

walaupun pada pelaksanaan Pak Rimun

mengambil 20% periode September

2011 - Maret 2012

Hasil survey : profil kehilangan asset,

kedua survey ini dilakukan parallel

b. Tracer

• Hanya berlaku untuk kab bekasi, warga

yang sudah diusir, dilacak kembali padahal

sudah cut off date 2008.

• Metode yang dilakukan didiskusikan

bersama antara DED, Arum, Pemkab kab

bekasi

Karawang already 3 times change people, but

no significant resistance, only about tupoksi at

the beginning.

e. From the city of Bekasi, more

passive because the people

affected only slightly, join existing

decision alone, was hard to accept

/ agree to a decree, it still depends

on who is giving instruction. It

should be the approach of the

hall. SK last idea is a governor who

will sign.

2. 3 types of data collection for the RP is affected

household Survey, Disclosure, and Tracer.

a. Survey there is 2:

ひ Iﾐ┗Wﾐデﾗヴ┞ ﾗa ﾉﾗゲゲWゲ Э RTD ;ゲゲWデ S;デ;H;ゲW

ひ S┌ヴ┗W┞ ゲﾗゲWI Э ADB ヴWケ┌ｷヴWﾏWﾐデﾗa ヱヰХ of the total ahs and 20% of the Severely

household. In the end though accounting

for 18% of the implementation of the Pak

Rimun take 20% the period September

2011 - March 2012

Survey results: loss of asset profiles, the

second survey was conducted parallel

b. Tracer

ひ Oﾐﾉ┞ ;ヮヮﾉｷWゲデﾗﾆ;H HWﾆ;ゲｷがヴWゲｷSWﾐデゲ ┘ｴﾗ had been expelled, but was tracked back

cut off date of 2008.

ひ The method used was discussed with the

DED, Arum, kab Bekasi.

ひ SﾗｷﾐデWヴﾏゲﾗa ;┌デｴﾗヴｷデ┞ ;ﾐS ﾉﾗﾗゲｷﾐｪ a;IWが Bekasi district government only approved

of the way the crude tracer only.

ひ TｴW ﾏWデｴﾗS ;ﾐS ヴWゲ┌ﾉデゲ ;ヴW ｷﾏヮﾉWﾏWﾐデWS as follows:

√ Some officers stand by at some point


• Jadi dari segi kewibawaan dan loosing

face, pemkab bekasi hanya menyetujui

cara tracer yang seadanya saja.

• Metode dan hasil yang dilaksanakan sbb :

Ada petugas yang stand by di

beberapa titik

Pemberitahuan melalui brosur dan

radio

Rencananya akan pasang baner tapi

tidak diijinkan

Pada pelaksanaan, 6 orang yang

bertugas menjaga posko tidak

bertugas dengan baik, 6 orang ini

adalah orang LKL (LSM Advokasi) dan

LKL ini adalah LSM yang pernah

complain ke ADB, ada indikasi karena

di fire dari team tracer, maka mereka

mengajukan complain ke ADB dengan

berita yang lain.

6 orang tracer ini diganti dengan 8

orang dari Equator, tapi tetap tidak

ada warga yang melapor, jadi

metodologi tracer diubah dengan cara

jemput bola, brosur diperluas, hamper

tercetak 2000 .

Data OTD 2008 kab bekasi ada 466,

dan yang berhasil dilacak kembali

hanya 223 RTD

Dalam database 223 RTD ini terlihat

dengan status OTD tracer tanpa

ordinat

Metode tracer terlampir

c. Disclosure

• Lebih tepat disebut validasi data RTD dn

kehilangan asset

√ Notification via leaflets and radio

√ The plan will be put banner but was not

allowed

√ In the implementation, 6 people in charge

of keeping the post off duty properly, 6 is

the LKL (LSM Advocacy) and LKL are NGOs

who have complaints to ADB, because

there is no indication of the team tracer

fire, then they filed a complaint to the

ADB with other news.

6 people tracer was replaced with 8

people from the Equator, but still no

residents were reported, so the tracer

methodology changed the way pick up

the ball, extended brochures, printed

nearly 2000.

2008 OTD data kab there bekasi 466, and

only 223 managed to trace back RTD

In the 223 RTD database is seen with

tracer OTD status without ordinate

Methods tracer attached

c. Disclosure

ひ MﾗヴW ;ヮヮヴﾗヮヴｷ;デWﾉ┞ I;ﾉﾉWS RTD S;デ; validation and asset loss

ひ Dﾗ M;┞-June 2012 by way of the names

attached to RTD and the lost assets at

the village office and public facilities

ひ Lｷゲデ TSB ヮﾗゲデWS aﾗヴヱヰ S;┞ゲ aﾗヴﾏWﾏHWヴゲ only chance residents who are not

satisfied with the results of the data

collection or who are not in the data to

deliver the complaint to the facilitator in

the field

.3. Complain mechanism is running properly

but because the interests of each it

sounded is not correct procedure. Arum


• Dilakukan Mei � Juni 2012 dengan cara

menempel nama-nama RTD dan asset

yang hilang di kantor desa dan fasilitas

public

• List tsb ditempel selama 10 hari untuk

member kesempatan warga yang tidak

puas dengan hasil pendataan atau yang

merasa belum di data untuk

menyampaikan komplainnya kepada

fasilitator di lapangan

3. Complain mechanism sudah dijalankan

secara benar tetapi karena ada kepentinga

masing-masing maka kesannya tidak benar

prosedurnya. Arum sebagai LSM, sempat

diajak untuk berdiskusi mengenai metodologi

tracer, tetapi Arum memposisikan dirinya

sebagai monitoring, Arum complain ketika

diajak diskusi, jadi sebenarnya Arum tidak

terlibat dalam pelaksanaan, mereka bergaya

sebagai pemantau.

4. Di data Ahs ada nama yang sama terulang

beberapa kali, bisa ada beberapa

kemungkinan ;

• Pak rimun yang seharusnya verifikasi

• Ada juga yang di data dengan a.n ketua RT

nya karena orangnya tidak ada

5. Mekanisme pemberian kompensasi dan LRP

a. Akan diberikan direct payment dengan

mekanisme ganti rugi, tetapi ada

pergeseran dari ganti rugi menjadi

pemberdayaan. Hal ini terjadi karena

payung hukumnya tdak jelas, jadi supaya

lebih praktis dilakukan direct payment.

b. Intinya yang diterima oleh OTD tidak ada

perubahan ketika mekanisme apapun

yang akhirnya diambil. Tapi pada akhirnya

allowances tidak akan diterima dalam

bentuk cash tapi dalam bentuk NATURA

as an LSM, was invited to discuss the

tracer methodology, but positioned

himself as monitoring Arum, Arum

complain when invited to the discussion,

so actually Arum was not involved in the

implementation, they are stylish as

observers.

4. In the data there ahs the same name

repeated several times, there could be

several possibilities;

ひ P;ﾆヴｷﾏ┌ﾐデｴ;デゲｴﾗ┌ﾉS ┗Wヴｷa┞

ひ TｴWヴW ｷゲ ;ﾉゲﾗ ;ﾐﾗﾐ RTろゲ S;デ; ┘ｷデｴｷデ because people do not exist

5. Compensation mechanism and LRP:

a. Will be provided with a direct payment

compensation mechanism, but there is a

shift from compensation to

empowerment. This happens because

the legal umbrella never an obvious, so

to make it more practicable direct

payment.

b. The point earned by OTD no change

when any mechanism which ultimately

taken. But in the end allowances will not

be accepted in the form of cash but in

the form of NATURA (transport etc) that

the recipient is a group, each person

directly.

c.Results persuasion ADB to pa Hasanudin

considering the time efficiency will be

run by direct payment by way of

empowerment and working capital. But

there are fears Hasanudin staff when

making payment directly to the

individual, whether paid all surely?

d. Actually, because the existing nominal

Governor SK in detail, then technically

it can directly transfer via Bank BRI.

e.Regarding LRP: Is the concept of 2008,

which contains a transport allowance,


(transport dll) yang penerimanya adalah

kelompok, tidak orang per orangan

langsung.

c. Hasil bujukan ADB ke pa Hasanudin

dengan mempertimbangkan efisiensi

waktu akan dijalankan dengan direct

payment dengan cara pemberdayaan dan

modal kerja. Tapi staf Hasanudin masih

ada ketakutan ketika melakukan

pembayaran langsung ke orang per

orang, apakah pasti terbayarkan semua ?

d. Sebenarnya karena di SK Gubernur sudah

ada nominal secara detail, maka

teknisnya bisa langsung transfer saja via

Bank BRI.

e. Mengenai LRP : Merupakan konsep 2008,

yang berisikan tunjangan transport, loss

of income, penanganan vulnerable ini

dikemas dalam bentuk LRP (training dan

modal kerja). Apakah RTD yang menerima

trainingnya tepat apa tidak ?

6. Tentang kompensasi dan Gender

1. Mengenai joint names dan bisakah

dikuasakan kepada nama lain ?

Dalam RP Updating, pelaksanaan akan

berdasarkan keputusan kepala BPN no

3 2007 mengenai Mekanisme

Pembayaran Ganti Rugi, 1orang hanya

boleh menjadi kuasa atas nama 1 orang

2. CAP adalah semua tindakan mitigasi dan

program penanganan dampak yang akan

dikaitkan secara keseluruhan.

3. Mengenai Gender, pria dan wanita harus

dipastikan mendapat hak yang sama,

dalam survey sosec, diskusi2 wanita

telah dilibatkan. Jadi sejauh ini

perempuan tidak diacuhkan bahkan di

karawang, partisipasi wanita tinggi,

camatnya pun wanita. Dalam FGD

keterlibatan wanita karawang cukup

loss of income, handling of vulnerable is

packaged in the form of LRP (training

and working capital). Is RTD who

received training was exactly what did

not?

6. About compensation and Gender

1. Regarding joint names and can

authorized to another name?

In RP Updating, implementation of the

decision will be based on the head of

BPN No. 3 2007 the Compensation

Payment Mechanism, one person may

only be authorized on behalf of one

person

2. CAP is all mitigation and impact

management program that will be

associated as a whole.

3. Regarding gender, men and women

must be ensured receive the same

rights, the survey sosec, discussion 2

women have been involved. So far

women have been ignored even in

karawang, high female participation, the

local district were women. In FGD

karawang quite active involvement of

women.

4. The involvement of gender socialization

and implementation at the time, but

they were expected to present their

culture handed these things to the head

of the household.

5. for gender analysis, EMA tried to focus

to issues based on the data, with the

first reference to the regulatory context

and relevant theory and best practices

available.


aktif.

4. Bentuk keterlibatan gender pada saat

sosialisasi dan implementasi, diharapkan

mereka hadir tetapi budaya mereka

lebih menyerahkan hal-hal ini kepada

kepala rumah tangga.

5. untuk analisa gender, EMA mencoba

focus ke issue based on data, dengan

referensi pertama pada regulasi, konteks

dan teori yang relevan dan best

practices yang ada.


Judul Pertemuan

Lapor Diri Pelaksanaan Survey

Meeting Tittle

Permission to Conduct the Survey

Date Wednesday, 31 October 2012 Attendants Pak Pius, Sherlywati

Venue / Tempat Kantor Bupati Karawang Note taker Sherlywati

Agenda : Lapor diri dan memantau perkembangan

proyek resettlement

Agenda: Report ourselves and monitor the

progress of the project resettlement

• Bekasi dan karawang sudah membuat

surat edaran bupati masing-masing

kepada kecamatan dan kelurahan yang

menegaskan tidak akan ada lagi

penambahan pendataan asset, tapi saat ini

kondisinya sudah banyak warga baru yang

membuat pemukiman baru. Di lapangan

bertanya pelaksanaannya kapan sejak

akhir 2008.

• Dana ganti rugi dari APBN ke BBWSC dan

baru dialirkan ke daerah, seharusnya ada

pemberitahuan mengenai jadwalnya

supaya daerah tahu dan bisa menangani

kondisi yang ada.

• kenapa tidak menggunakan SK Menteri

keuangan tetapi satuan harganya lebih

detail di daerah,

• Peran daerah terlihat di RWG tergantung

kepemimpinan tetapi semua keputusan,

konflik ada di RWG

• Peran BBWS dalam bertindak lambat,

terutama karena struktur. Kita

menggunakan dana APBD murni tetapi

mengapa menggunakan frameworknya

ADB. Jadi sebenarnya BBWS bingung krn

APBN murni tetapi kebijakan ADB.

• Sebenarnya hanya perlu kesepakatan dari

3 RWG karena pelaksanaannya di RWG.

Yang bisa mempercepat proyek ini,

perpendek birokrasi, di tingkat daerah

komunikasi sudah baik, koordinasi by

phone juga sudah jalan, yang menjadi

hambatan adalah pihak BBWS.

• Kinerja DED consultant sangat baik,

banyak turun ke lapangan, kerjasama

dengan daerah baik.

• LSM karawang tidak ada, dan tidak

dilibatkan serta tidak ingin terlibat, bagi

ひ BWﾆ;ゲｷ ;ﾐS ﾆ;ヴ;┘;ﾐｪｴ;┗W ﾏ;SW IｷヴI┌ﾉ;ヴゲ to their respective district and sub-district

that confirms there will be no additional

asset data collection, but this time his

condition has many new residents are

making a new settlement. In field practice

when asked since the end of 2008.

ひ F┌ﾐSゲ aﾗヴ IﾗﾏヮWﾐゲ;デｷﾗﾐ aヴﾗﾏデｴW ゲデ;デW budget to the new BBWSC and streamed

into the area, there should be a notice

about the schedule in order to know the

area and can handle the conditions.

ひ Wｴ┞ ﾐﾗデ ┌ゲW SKろゲ aｷﾐ;ﾐIW ﾏｷﾐｷゲデWヴ H┌デデｴW unit price is more detail in the area,

ひ TｴW ヴﾗﾉW ﾗa デｴW ┗ｷゲｷHﾉW ;ヴW; ｷﾐデｴW RWG depending leadership but all decisions, a

conflict exists in the RWG

ひ BBWS role in acting slow, mainly because

of the structure. We use pure local funds

but why use ADB framework. So actually

confused because BBWS pure state

budget but ADB policy.

ひ AIデ┌;ﾉﾉ┞ ﾗﾐﾉ┞ ﾐWWS agreement from 3

RWG for implementation in the RWG. That

could speed up the project, shorten the

bureaucracy, at the regional level has

been good communication, coordination

by phone is also running, the obstacle is

the BBWS

ひ DED Iﾗﾐゲ┌ﾉデ;ﾐデヮWヴaﾗヴﾏ;ﾐIW ｷs very good,

a lot comes down to the field, working

with the area well.

ひ LSM ﾆ;ヴ;┘;ﾐｪ SｷSﾐげデ, and are not

involved and do not want to get involved,

for them the project was not economically

viable and therefore they do not want to

be involved in this project.

ひデｴW ﾏ┞ゲデｷI;ﾉ ;デﾏﾗゲヮｴWヴW デｴ;デ ┘ｷﾉﾉ HW moved so far they resigned because they


mereka proyek ini tidak ekonomis maka

dari itu mereka tidak ingin terlibat dalam

proyek ini.

• Suasana kebatinan masyarakat yang akan

dipindahkan sejauh ini mereka pasrah

karena mereka sadar kalau itu tanah

Negara, hanya bangunan yang hilang saja.

realize that it is the ground state, only the

buildings that lost it.


Judul Pertemuan

Kemajuan dan Isu Badan Pengawas Eksternal

untuk Rencana memperbaharui Pemukiman

Kembali dan Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi WTC

Meeting Tittle

Progress and Issues of the External Monitoring

Agency for Resettlement Plan Updating and

Implementation for WTC Rehabilitation

Date Monday, 5 November 2012

Tanggal

Attendants IRM ADB, PCMU, EMA�s Team

Peserta

Venue / Tempat IRM ADB Jakarta Note taker : Rian Praktikto

Agenda :

1. Kualitas laporan (IR, 1, dan 2 QR)

ひ Iゲｷﾉ;ヮﾗヴ;ﾐｷデ┌ Sｷ;ﾐｪｪ;ヮデｷS;ﾆﾏWﾏ;S;ｷがｴ;ヴ┌ゲ meliputi periode detail kegiatan, Moms antara

EMA dan BBWS tentang kemajuan, temuan,

analisis, dan rekomendasi.

ひ Kﾗﾐデヴ;ﾆ ┞;ﾐｪ HWヴｴ┌H┌ﾐｪ;ﾐ SWﾐｪ;ﾐｴ;ﾉ-hal

yang harus dikecualikan dari laporan.

ひ SWﾏ┌; ｷﾐaﾗヴﾏ;ゲｷ ┞;ﾐｪ SｷH┌デ┌ｴﾆ;ﾐゲ┌S;ｴ tersedia, itu hanya sekitar kemasan laporan

sesuai dengan kebutuhan ADB dan format.

ひ Aﾆ;ﾐ ;S; ﾆﾗﾏentar pada IR dari ADB.

Follow-up:

ひ SWﾏ┌; ﾆWﾆｴ;┘;デｷヴ;ﾐ ;ﾆ;ﾐ ;IIﾗﾏﾗI;デWS S;ﾉ;ﾏ laporan mendatang (akan diserahkan dalam

waktu 2 minggu)

2. Arus informasi (termasuk laporan)

ひ ADB ﾏWﾐｪharapkan praktik pelaporan lebih

cepat dan lebih tepat waktu melalui

penyampaian simultan untuk PCMU dan ADB.

ひ PCMU HWヴヮWﾐS;ヮ;デ H;ｴ┘; praktek yang tepat

yaitu semua laporan harus pergi ke RWG dulu,

lalu ke pemangku kepentingan lainnya

ひEMA ｴ;ヴ┌ゲﾏWﾐ┞;ﾃｷﾆ;ﾐデWﾏ┌;ﾐﾆWヮ;S; ゲWﾉ┌ヴ┌ｴ stakeholder terkait terlebih dahulu sebelum

memberikan dalam pertemuan formal.

ひ H;ヴ┌ゲ ;S; ﾆﾗﾗヴSｷﾐ;ゲｷﾆ;ﾐヮWヴｷﾗSｷﾆ ;ﾐデ;ヴ; EMA dan BBWS.

Follow-up:

ひ PWﾉ;ヮﾗヴ;ﾐ Pヴ;ﾆデWﾆ ;ﾆ;ﾐ SｷH;ｴ;ゲﾆWﾏ┌Sｷ;ﾐﾗﾉWｴ PCMU dan EMA

ひ Aﾆ;ﾐ SｷデｷﾐS;ﾆﾉ;ﾐﾃ┌デｷゲWゲ┌;ｷ SWﾐｪ;ﾐ EMA

3. Keluhan ganti rugi mekanisme

1. Quality of reports (IR, 1st

, and 2nd

QR)

Content of the report was considered

inadequate, should includes detail period of

activities, MoMs between EMA and BBWS

regarding progress, findings, analysis, and

recommendations.

Contract-related things should be excluded from

the reports.

All information needed was already available, it�s

only about packaging the report according to

ADB�s requirement and format.

There will be comments on IR from ADB.

Follow-up :

• All concerns will be accomocated in the

upcoming report (will be submitted

within 2 weeks)

2. Flow of information (including reports)

ADB expected faster and more timely reporting

practice through simultaneous submission to

PCMU and ADB.

PCMU argued that according to proper practice

all reports should go to RWG first, then to other

stakeholders

EMA should present the findings to all related

stakeholders first before deliver them in the

formal meeting.

There should be periodic coordinations between

EMA and BBWS.

Follow-up :

• Reporting practice will be discussed

later by PCMU and EMA

• Will be followed-up accordingly by

EMA


ひ EMA ｴ;ヴ┌ゲﾏWﾐｪﾆﾗﾐaｷヴmasikan data untuk

penyebar informasi, hasilnya harus

dimasukkan dalam laporan.

Follow-up:


4.Penyelarasan peraturan mengenai

penyelesaian dan RF (sumber utama

keterlambatan proyek)

ひ RF ;S;ﾉ;ｴｴ;ゲｷﾉﾆWゲWヮ;ﾆ;デ;ﾐ ;ﾐデara ADB dan

Pemerintah Indonesia, karena itu milik

Pemerintah Indonesia.

ひMasalah utama: bagaimana mengatasi

kesenjangan antara RF dan peraturan

Pemerintah Indonesia, terutama mengenai

kompensasi kepada AHS.

ひ M;ゲ;ﾉ;ｴぎふヱぶヮWﾉ;ﾆゲ;ﾐ;;ﾐヮヴﾗ┞Wﾆｴ;ヴ┌ゲゲWゲ┌;ｷ dengan kebijakan pemberi pinjaman, (2) tidak

ada rekening tersebut dalam APBN yang

mengakomodasi kebutuhan ini, regulasi Pemda

yang diperlukan untuk mengatasi situasi

thisproblematic.

ひ H;ヴ┌ゲ ;S; Sｷゲﾆ┌ゲｷﾉWHｷｴゲWヴｷﾐｪ ;ﾐデ;ヴ; EMA S;ﾐ Kepala Balai atau Bagian Hukum di PU

mengenai masalah ini.

Follow-up:


5. survei

ひAkan ada survei tentang pelaksanaan

pemukiman kembali rencana.

ひ Dｷヮ┌デ┌ゲﾆ;ﾐ H;ｴ┘; ┌ﾆ┌ran sampel dari 20% dari

populasi dianggap cukup dan dapat digunakan

dalam survei berikutnya.

6. Laporan selanjutnya

ひ Iゲｷﾉ;ヮﾗヴ;ﾐ HWヴｷﾆ┌デﾐ┞;ぎ RP ﾆﾗﾏヮヴWｴWﾐゲｷa memperbarui dan persiapan LRP. RP Updating

juga harus mencakup analisis gender

sensitivitas, pengungkapan, analisis kebijakan,

dan penanganan keluhan.

ひ Sデヴ┌ﾆデ┌ヴﾉ;ヮﾗヴ;ﾐ HWヴｷﾆ┌デﾐ┞;ぎデWﾏ┌;ﾐが ;ﾐ;ﾉｷゲｷゲが recommencations.

ひ H;ヴ┌ゲ SｷゲWヴ;ｴﾆ;ﾐﾆWヮ;S; PCMU ヮ;S; 19/11/2012 paling lambat.

Follow-up:

ひ Aﾆ;ﾐ SｷヮWﾐ┌ｴｷﾗﾉWｴ EMA S;ﾉ;ﾏﾉ;ヮﾗヴ;ﾐ

3. Grievances redress mechanism

EMA should confirm the data to the

information�s disseminator; the result should

be included in the report.

Follow-up :

• Will be followed-up accordingly by EMA

4. Alignment of the regulations regarding

settlement and the RF (main source of project

delay)

RF is a result of agreement between ADB and

GoI, therefore it belongs to GoI.

Main issue: how to address the gap between

RF and regulations of GoI, especially

regarding compensation to AHs.

Problems: (1) project execution should

comply to lender�s policy, (2) there is no such

account in APBN that accomodate this need;

Pemda�s regulation is needed to resolve

thisproblematic situation.

There should be more frequent discussions

between EMA and Kepala Balai or Bagian

Legal at PU regarding this issue.

Follow-up :

• Will be followed-up accordingly by EMA

5. Surveys

There will be a survey on resettlement plan

implementation.

It was decided that sample size of 20% of the

population is considered sufficient and can

be used in the next surveys.

Follow-up :

• Will be coordinated according to the

resettlement implementation.

• Sampling requirement in ToR will be

revised accordingly.

6. Next report

Content of the next report: comprehensive

RP updating and LRP preparation. RP

Updating should also include gender


berikutnya. sensitivity analysis, disclosure, policy

analysis, and grievances handling.

Structure of the next report: findings,

analysis, recommencations.

Should be submitted to PCMU on

19/11/2012 at the latest.

Follow-up :

• Will be accomodated by EMA in the next

report.

Annex D1 Paper on Analysis of AHs

Database

PARAHYANGAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (CPMS)

Sub-Contract for External Monitoring Agency for Resettlement Plan Updating and Implementation


WORKING PAPER

ON

QUALITY OF BASELINE DATA

NAME OF CONSULTANT:

FRANSISKUS RIAN PRATIKTO

NOVEMBER 2012

Integrated Citarum Water Management Resources Invesment Project Subcomponent 8.1: Program Management Support

Quality of Affected Households(AHs) Data or Resettlement Plan (RP)

Theoretically, data quality should be analyzed based on a number of dimensions, i.e.: accessibility,

appropriateness of amount, believability, completeness, conciseness of representation, consistency

of representation, ease of manipulation, freedom-of-error, interpretability, objectivity, relevancy,

reputation, security, timeliness, understandability, and value-added (Pipino, et. al., 2002).

According to the objectives of this study, the relevant dimensions of data quality that are employed

in the analysis of AHs database are:

1. Completeness: the extent data is not missing and is of sufficient breadth and depth for the task at

hand.

2. Conciseness of representation: the extent data is compactly represented.

3. Consistency of representation: the extent data is presented in the same format.

4. Freedom-of-error: the extent data is correct and reliable

5. Timeliness: the extent data is sufficiently up-to-date for the task at hand

1. Completeness

There is a significant number of data field of a certain AH that should have values but for some

reasons it does not. This is summarized in the table below.

No. Data field Number of missing values

1 Umur kepala keluarga 1

2 Nomor identitas 57

3 Alamat kepala keluarga � Kota/Kabupaten 2

4 Alamat kepala keluarga � Kecamatan 4

5 Alamat kepala keluarga � Desa/Kelurahan 5

6 Alamat kepala keluarga � RT 33

7 Alamat kepala keluarga � RW 32

8 Penguasaan atas tanah dan bangunan � Status bangunan 65

9 Lokasi aset terkena dampak � Posisi 3

10 Anggota keluarga pertama � Umur 1

11 Anggota keluarga pertama � Agama 225

12 Anggota keluarga pertama � Status kawin 143

13 Anggota keluarga pertama � Pekerjaan 131

14 Anggota keluarga pertama � Pendapatan 146

15 Anggota keluarga pertama � Suku 224

16 Anggota keluarga pertama � Fisik normal 130

17 Bangunan utama kuesioner 1 � Sifat bangunan 21

2. Conciseness of representation

This type of flaw was found in �Pekerjaan� data field which has too many categories.

Data field Category

Anggota keluarga pertama � Pekerjaan 1 Aksesoris motor

Bertani

Bertani dan ternak

Beternak

Buruh

Buruh Bangunan

Buruh Bongkar Muat

Buruh cuci motor

Buruh cuci pakaian

Buruh Limbah

Buruh Pabrik

Buruh proyek

Buruh Serabutan

Buruh Tani

dagang sembako

Ibu Rumah Tangga

Ketua RT

Ketua RW

Lainnya

Limbah

LINMAS

Matrial

Nganggur

Ojek

Pedagang

Pedagang Buah

Pedagang Burung

Pedagang Gado-Gado

Pedagang Genjer

Pedagang Gerabah

Pedagang Kacang Rebus

Pedagang Koran dan Majalah

Pedagang Sayur

Pedagang Sembako

Pedagang Tanaman Hias

Pegawai

Pegawai Desa

Pegawai koperasi

Pegawai Swasta

Pemulung Barang Bekas

Pengelola Cafe

Pengepul limbah

Pengepul Rongsokan/Barang Bekas

Penghulu

Pengrajin Batu Nisan

Pengumpul barang bekas

Pensiunan

Perangkat Desa

Perangkat Desa/KUA

Petugas kebersihan kawasan

Petugas PJT 2

PNS

Polisi

rumah kontrakan

Satpam

sawah padi

serabutan

Sopir/Buruh (Tidak Tetap)

Supir

tambal ban

Tempat Parkir

Ternak ayam, bebek

TNI

Tidak Bekerja

tukang kayu

Tukang Ojek

Usaha

usaha (cucian motor)

Usaha (Tidak Tetap)

Usaha / Juru Photo

Usaha cafe

Usaha cafe dangdut

Usaha counter HP

Usaha jaket motor

Usaha kayu

Usaha kayu bekas

Usaha Limbah

Usaha steam motor

Usaha Tambal ban

Usaha warung

Usaha Warung Kopi

Usaha Warung Kopi Dan Cafe

Usaha Warung kopi dan Steam Motor

Usaha warung nasi

Usaha Warung remang-remang

Usaha warung rokok

Usaha warung rokok+kopi

Usaha Warung Sayuran

UsahaWarung sembako

Usaha/Stim Motor/Toko

Usaha/warung

Wiraswasta

For analysis purpose (e.g. finding out the correlation pattern between variables), this

categorization is too large and meaningless. Simplifying the categorization (e.g. into up to 10

categories) will make the data management and analysis easier and more meaningful.

A new classification based on Klasifikasi Baku Jenis Pekerjaan Indonesia 2002 (2002 Indonesia

Occupation Standard Classification) from the National Statistics Bureau was proposed which

categorizes occupations in this AHs data into 13 types:

a. Anggota TNI/Polri

b. Operator dan perakit mesin

c. Pekerja kasar dan tenaga kebersihan

d. Pensiunan

e. Teknisi dan asisten tenaga profesional

f. Tenaga pengolahan dan kerajinan

g. Tenaga profesional

h. Tenaga tata usaha

i. Tenaga jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar

j. Tenaga usaha pertanian dan peternakan

k. Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar

l. Usaha pengolahan dan kerajinan

m. Usaha pertanian dan peternakan

3. Consistency of representation

This feature consists of several types of inconsistencies, i.e.:

a. Categories that are not mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (MECE)

Below are 2 examples of data field that suffer from this type of inconsistency.

No. Data field Category

1 Orang beresiko Janda

Jompo

Sakit parah

Tua

Janda, jompo

Tidak beresiko

2 Anggota keluarga ketiga � Pendidikan 3 PAUD

TK

Tidak lulus SD

Masih SD

Lulus SD

Masih SMP

Lulus SMP

Masih SMA

Lulus SMA

Masih kuliah

Lulus kuliah

Tidak sekolah

b. Inconsistency due to mistakenly entered data

Below are 2 examples of data field that suffer from this type of inconsistency.

No. Data field Category

1 Anggota keluarga kedua � Hubungan 2 Adik

Anak

isrti

istri

KK

mitra kerja

Orang Tua

Saudara

2 Anggota keluarga kedua � JK 2 2

L

P

c. Different category names for the same data value

Below is an example of data field that suffer from this type of inconsistency.

Data field Category

Anggota keluarga pertama � Agama 1 Islam

Katolik

Kristen

Protestan

4. Freedom-of-error

In this study, this dimension of data quality is analyzed using data obtained from a survey

conducted on 31 October - 1 November 2012. The survey collected 331 samples out of 1320

affected households population, with approximately 4.66% error leveland 95% confidence level.

The survey aimed to verify AHs data, especially AHs� assets. Verification was conducted through

interview instead of direct measurement. Table below summarizes the results (non-response

data is not counted):

No. Asset characteristics to be verified % valid data count

1 Land ownership 98.2%

2 Affected main structure 1 86.9%

3 Type of main structure 1 87.0%

4 Characteristic of main structure 1 91.0%

5 Total size of main structure 1 81.3%

6 Affected size of main structure 1 79.9%

7 Affected main structure 2 95.3%

8 Type of main structure 2 96.5%

9 Characteristic of main structure 2 96.5%

10 Total size of main structure 2 99.0%

11 Affected size of main structure 2 100.0%

12 Fence availability 87.0%

13 Fence material 75.0%

14 Fence length 76.9%

15 Terrace availability 100.0%

16 Terrace material 100.0%

17 Terrace size 100.0%

18 Well availability 100.0%

19 Well material 94.4%

20 Number of well 100.0%

21 Bathroom availability 85.7%

22 Bathroom material 100.0%

23 Bathroom size 85.7%

24 Cage availability 100.0%

25 Cage material 100.0%

26 Cage size 81.8%

Average 92.3%

Average value of % valid data count is 92.3%, quite high regardless of the usage of interview

instead of direct measurement.

5. Timeliness

RP or AHs data was collected using 3 mechanisms, i.e. disclosure, tracer, and census conducted in

2011/2012, which cover a total period of ... years. It is probable that the data has already been

obsolete. The timeliness of RP data may be inferred from data obtained from survey conducted

on 31 October and 1 November 2012. In general, respondents obtained from the survey were

classified into 3 categories:

a. ADA, which means that the target respondent was still living on the site and found during the

survey.

b. PINDAH, which means that the target respondent was not living on the site anymore and,

based on at least one witness�s account,had already moved to a new site.

c. TIDAK DITEMUKAN, which means that the target respondent, for unknown reasons, was not

found on the site.

The following table represents the survey�s finding.

Category Count %

ADA 264 79.8%

PINDAH 19 5.7%

TIDAK DITEMUKAN 48 14.5%

331 100.0%

Based on survey, 79.8% of AHs are still at the same position on the site, 5.7% have already moved

to new sites, and 14.5% were not found on the site for unknown reasons. It appears that the

lengthy period during AHs data collection, and between AHs data collection and survey makes

only 80% of AHs still valid according to on-site location. This figure might be getting worse with

the lapse of time.

Statistics Summary and Analysis of Affected Households (AHs) Data

As a result of RP Updating, affected household data were analyzed an corrected according to the

aforementioned types of flaw. Below are the results of the correction.

A. Descriptive statistics

This section presents the descriptive statistics of AHs�s variables, for both before and after data

correction.

1. AH risk status

Before correction

Status risiko

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid

Tidak Beresiko 1060 80,3 80,3 80,3

Jompo 165 12,5 12,5 92,8

Janda 44 3,3 3,3 96,1

Tua 28 2,1 2,1 98,3

Sakit Parah 21 1,6 1,6 99,8

Janda 1 ,1 ,1 99,9

Jompo 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status risiko responden


Valid

Tidak Beresiko 1060 80,3 80,3 80,3

Jompo 166 12,6 12,6 92,9

Janda 45 3,4 3,4 96,3

Tua 28 2,1 2,1 98,4

Sakit Parah 21 1,6 1,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

2. Respondent�s domicile

Before correction

Domisili responden


Valid

Menetap 1058 80,2 80,2 80,2

Mobile 253 19,2 19,2 99,3

menetap 8 ,6 ,6 99,9

mobile 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Domisili responden

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Valid

Menetap 1066 80,8 80,8 80,8

Mobile 254 19,2 19,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

3. Buildings

Before correction

Bangunan


Valid

Ada 741 56,1 56,1 56,1

Tidak Ada 421 31,9 31,9 88,0

Sudah Digusur 141 10,7 10,7 98,7

ada 17 1,3 1,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Bangunan


Valid

Ada 758 57,4 57,4 57,4

Tidak Ada 421 31,9 31,9 89,3

Sudah Digusur 141 10,7 10,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

4. Trees

Pohon


Valid

Tidak Ada 796 60,3 60,3 60,3

Ada 524 39,7 39,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

5. Plants

Before correction

Tanaman


Valid

Tidak Ada 970 73,5 73,5 73,5

Ada 323 24,5 24,5 98,0

ada 26 2,0 2,0 99,9

tidak ada 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Tanaman


Valid

Tidak Ada 971 73,6 73,6 73,6

Ada 349 26,4 26,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

6. Owned business

Before correction

Usaha


Valid

Tidak Ada 727 55,1 55,1 55,1

Ada 577 43,7 43,7 98,8

ada 13 1,0 1,0 99,8

tidak ada 3 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Usaha


Valid

Tidak Ada 730 55,3 55,3 55,3

Ada 590 44,7 44,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

7. Owned land

Before correction

Lahan hak milik


Valid

Tidak Ada 1315 99,6 99,6 99,6

tidak ada 4 ,3 ,3 99,9

Ada 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Lahan hak milik


Valid

Tidak Ada 1319 99,9 99,9 99,9

Ada 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

8. Respondent�s status in family

Before correction

Status responden


Valid

KK 975 73,9 73,9 73,9

Istri 279 21,1 21,1 95,0

Anak 41 3,1 3,1 98,1

Saudara 9 ,7 ,7 98,8

ISTRI 6 ,5 ,5 99,2

istri 3 ,2 ,2 99,5

kk 3 ,2 ,2 99,7

Tetangga 2 ,2 ,2 99,8

anak 1 ,1 ,1 99,9

Orang Tua 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status responden


Valid

Anak 42 3,2 3,2 3,2

Istri 288 21,8 21,8 25,0

KK 978 74,1 74,1 99,1

Orang Tua 1 ,1 ,1 99,2

Saudara 9 ,7 ,7 99,8

Tetangga 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

9. Respondent�s gender

Before correction

JK responden


Valid

L 961 72,8 72,8 72,8

P 352 26,7 26,7 99,5

l 5 ,4 ,4 99,8

p 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK responden


Valid

L 966 73,2 73,2 73,2

P 354 26,8 26,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

10. Gender of HH head

Before correction

JK KK


Valid

L 1213 91,9 91,9 91,9

P 99 7,5 7,5 99,4

l 6 ,5 ,5 99,8

p 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK KK


Valid

L 1219 92,3 92,3 92,3

P 101 7,7 7,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

11. Age of HH head

Age distribution of HH head

12. ID possession

Punya ID


Valid

1 1263 95,7 95,7 95,7

0 57 4,3 4,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

13. HH head�s location of domicile

Before correction

Lokasi tinggal KK


Valid

Luar lokasi Proyek 885 67,0 67,0 67,0

Lokasi Proyek 428 32,4 32,4 99,5

Luar Lokasi Proyek 6 ,5 ,5 99,9

Luar lokasi proyek 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Lokasi tinggal KK


Valid

Luar Lokasi Proyek 892 67,6 67,6 67,6

Lokasi Proyek 428 32,4 32,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

14. Land use

Penggunaan lahan


Valid

Lahan PJT II untuk tinggal dan atau usaha

937 71,0 71,0 71,0

Lahan PJT II untuk produksi pertanian

378 28,6 28,6 99,6

Lahan PJT II untuk tinggal dan atau usaha dan produksi pertanian

5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

15. Permit

Ijin


Valid

Tidak 1297 98,3 98,3 98,3

Ya 23 1,7 1,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

16. Building status

Before correction

Status Bangunan


Valid

Milik Sendiri 893 67,7 67,7 67,7

Tidak ada bangunan 265 20,1 20,1 87,7

65 4,9 4,9 92,7

Milik sendiri 37 2,8 2,8 95,5

Menyewa 21 1,6 1,6 97,0

Tidak Ada bangunan 15 1,1 1,1 98,2

milik sendiri 14 1,1 1,1 99,2

tidak ada bangunan 3 ,2 ,2 99,5

Milik Saudara 2 ,2 ,2 99,6

Tidak ada Bangunan 2 ,2 ,2 99,8

Tidak Ada Bangunan 2 ,2 ,2 99,9

milik kelompok 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status Bangunan


Valid

Milik Sendiri 944 71,5 71,5 71,5

Tidak Ada Bangunan 287 21,7 21,7 93,3

65 4,9 4,9 98,2

Menyewa 21 1,6 1,6 99,8

Milik Saudara 2 ,2 ,2 99,9

Milik Kelompok 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

17. Location of asset

Before correction

Posisi aset


Valid

Di atas tanggul kiri 553 41,9 41,9 41,9

Di atas tanggul kanan 368 27,9 27,9 69,8

Sisi luar serongan tanggul kiri

126 9,5 9,5 79,3

Sisi luar serongan tanggul kanan

118 8,9 8,9 88,3

Kali mati Cibeet 70 5,3 5,3 93,6

Sisi dalam serongan tanggul kiri

23 1,7 1,7 95,3

Sisi Luar serongan tanggul kiri

15 1,1 1,1 96,4

Kali mati Citarum 13 1,0 1,0 97,4

Kali mati Cikarang 12 ,9 ,9 98,3

Sisi dalam serongan tanggul kanan

10 ,8 ,8 99,1

Kali mati Bekasi 7 ,5 ,5 99,6

3 ,2 ,2 99,8

Sisi luar serongan tanggul kanan dan sisi luar serongan tanggul kiri

2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Posisi aset


Valid

Di atas tanggul kiri 553 41,9 41,9 41,9

Di atas tanggul kanan 368 27,9 27,9 69,8

Sisi luar serongan tanggul kiri

141 10,7 10,7 80,5

Sisi luar serongan tanggul kanan

118 8,9 8,9 89,4

Kali mati Cibeet 70 5,3 5,3 94,7

Sisi dalam serongan tanggul kiri

23 1,7 1,7 96,4

Kali mati Citarum 13 1,0 1,0 97,4

Kali mati Cikarang 12 ,9 ,9 98,3

Sisi dalam serongan tanggul kanan

10 ,8 ,8 99,1

Kali mati Bekasi 7 ,5 ,5 99,6

3 ,2 ,2 99,8

Sisi luar serongan tanggul kanan dan sisi luar serongan tanggul kiri

2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

18. Disposal area

Before correction

Disposal Area


Valid

Non 956 72,4 72,4 72,4

Disposal Area 363 27,5 27,5 99,9

Disposal area 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Disposal Area


Valid

Non 956 72,4 72,4 72,4

Disposal Area 364 27,6 27,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

19. HH member-1: Relation to HH head

Before correction

Hubungan AK1


Valid

KK 1315 99,6 99,6 99,6

Kk 4 ,3 ,3 99,9

Saudara 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK1


Valid

KK 1319 99,9 99,9 99,9

Saudara 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

20. HH member-1: Gender

Before correction

JK AK1


Valid

L 1215 92,0 92,0 92,0

P 97 7,3 7,3 99,4

l 6 ,5 ,5 99,8

p 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK AK1


Valid

L 1221 92,5 92,5 92,5

P 99 7,5 7,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

21. HH member-1: Age

Age distribution of HH member-1

22. HH member-1: Religion

Before correction

Agama AK1


Valid

Islam 1068 80,9 80,9 80,9

225 17,0 17,0 98,0

Kristen 24 1,8 1,8 99,8

Protestan 2 ,2 ,2 99,9

Katolik 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK1


Valid

Islam 1068 80,9 80,9 80,9

225 17,0 17,0 98,0

Kristen 26 2,0 2,0 99,9

Katolik 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

23. HH member-1: Marital status

Before correction

Status Kawin AK1


Valid

Kawin 1045 79,2 79,2 79,2

143 10,8 10,8 90,0

Janda 60 4,5 4,5 94,5

Belum Kawin 28 2,1 2,1 96,7

Duda 28 2,1 2,1 98,8

Kawin 16 1,2 1,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status Kawin AK1


Valid

Kawin 1061 80,4 80,4 80,4

143 10,8 10,8 91,2

Janda 60 4,5 4,5 95,8

Belum Kawin 28 2,1 2,1 97,9

Duda 28 2,1 2,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

24. HH member-1: Education

Pendidikan AK1


Percent

Valid

Lulus SD 445 33,7 33,7 33,7

Tidak Sekolah 237 18,0 18,0 51,7

Tidak Lulus SD 204 15,5 15,5 67,1

Lulus SMP 194 14,7 14,7 81,8

Lulus SMA 175 13,3 13,3 95,1

- 39 3,0 3,0 98,0

Lulus Kuliah 26 2,0 2,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

25. HH member-1: Occupation

Before correction

Pekerjaan AK1


Percent

Valid

131 9,9 9,9 9,9

Aksesoris motor 1 ,1 ,1 10,0

Bertani 145 11,0 11,0 21,0

Bertani dan ternak 100 7,6 7,6 28,6

Beternak 4 ,3 ,3 28,9

Buruh 1 ,1 ,1 28,9

Buruh Bangunan 15 1,1 1,1 30,1

Buruh Bongkar Muat 1 ,1 ,1 30,2

Buruh cuci motor 1 ,1 ,1 30,2

Buruh cuci pakaian 1 ,1 ,1 30,3

Buruh Limbah 1 ,1 ,1 30,4

Buruh Pabrik 10 ,8 ,8 31,1

Buruh proyek 1 ,1 ,1 31,2

Buruh Serabutan 16 1,2 1,2 32,4

Buruh tani 7 ,5 ,5 33,0

Buruh Tani 8 ,6 ,6 33,6

dagang sembako 1 ,1 ,1 33,6

Ibu Rumah tangga 1 ,1 ,1 33,7

Ibu Rumah Tangga 3 ,2 ,2 33,9

karyawan 1 ,1 ,1 34,0

Karyawan 67 5,1 5,1 39,1

Ketua RT 1 ,1 ,1 39,2

Ketua RW 1 ,1 ,1 39,2

Lainnya 23 1,7 1,7 41,0

limbah 1 ,1 ,1 41,1

Limbah 1 ,1 ,1 41,1

Linmas 1 ,1 ,1 41,2

LINMAS 1 ,1 ,1 41,3

Matrial 1 ,1 ,1 41,4

Nganggur 6 ,5 ,5 41,8

Ojek 1 ,1 ,1 41,9

Pedagang 14 1,1 1,1 43,0

Pedagang Buah 4 ,3 ,3 43,3

Pedagang Burung 1 ,1 ,1 43,3

Pedagang Gado-Gado 1 ,1 ,1 43,4

Pedagang Genjer 1 ,1 ,1 43,5

Pedagang Gerabah 1 ,1 ,1 43,6

Pedagang Kacang Rebus 1 ,1 ,1 43,6

Pedagang Koran dan

Majalah 1 ,1 ,1 43,7

Pedagang Sayur 2 ,2 ,2 43,9

Pedagang Sembako 1 ,1 ,1 43,9

Pedagang Tanaman Hias 5 ,4 ,4 44,3

Pegawai 1 ,1 ,1 44,4

Pegawai Desa 1 ,1 ,1 44,5

Pegawai koperasi 1 ,1 ,1 44,5

Pegawai Swasta 5 ,4 ,4 44,9

Pemulung Barang Bekas 1 ,1 ,1 45,0

Pengelola Café 2 ,2 ,2 45,2

Pengepul limbah 3 ,2 ,2 45,4

Pengepul

Rongsokan/Barang Bekas 1 ,1 ,1 45,5

Penghulu 1 ,1 ,1 45,5

Pengrajin Batu Nisan 1 ,1 ,1 45,6

Pengumpul barang bekas 1 ,1 ,1 45,7

Pensiunan 9 ,7 ,7 46,4

Perangkat Desa 1 ,1 ,1 46,4

Perangkat Desa/KUA 1 ,1 ,1 46,5

Petugas kebersihan

kawasan 1 ,1 ,1 46,6

Petugas PJT 2 1 ,1 ,1 46,7

PNS 5 ,4 ,4 47,0

Polisi 1 ,1 ,1 47,1

rumah kontrakan 1 ,1 ,1 47,2

Satpam 5 ,4 ,4 47,6

sawah padi 1 ,1 ,1 47,7

serabutan 1 ,1 ,1 47,7

Sopir/Buruh (Tidak Tetap) 184 13,9 13,9 61,7

Supir 7 ,5 ,5 62,2

tambal ban 1 ,1 ,1 62,3

Tempat Parkir 1 ,1 ,1 62,3

Ternak ayam, bebek 1 ,1 ,1 62,4

Tidak Bekerja 18 1,4 1,4 63,8

TNI 1 ,1 ,1 63,9

tukang kayu 1 ,1 ,1 63,9

Tukang Ojek 4 ,3 ,3 64,2

Usaha 423 32,0 32,0 96,3

Usaha (cucian motor) 1 ,1 ,1 96,4

usaha (Tidak Tetap) 1 ,1 ,1 96,4

Usaha / Juru Photo 1 ,1 ,1 96,5

Usaha café 1 ,1 ,1 96,6

Usaha café dangdut 1 ,1 ,1 96,7

Usaha counter HP 1 ,1 ,1 96,7

Usaha jaket motor 1 ,1 ,1 96,8

Usaha kayu 1 ,1 ,1 96,9

Usaha kayu bekas 1 ,1 ,1 97,0

usaha limbah 1 ,1 ,1 97,0

Usaha limbah 1 ,1 ,1 97,1

Usaha Limbah 3 ,2 ,2 97,3

Usaha steam motor 1 ,1 ,1 97,4

Usaha tambal ban 1 ,1 ,1 97,5

Usaha Tambal ban 2 ,2 ,2 97,7

Usaha warung 3 ,2 ,2 97,9

Usaha Warung Kopi 5 ,4 ,4 98,3

Usaha Warung Kopi Dan

Café 1 ,1 ,1 98,3

Usaha Warung kopi dan

Steam Motor 1 ,1 ,1 98,4

Usaha warung nasi 1 ,1 ,1 98,5

Usaha Warung remang-

remang 3 ,2 ,2 98,7

Usaha warung rokok 2 ,2 ,2 98,9

Usaha warung rokok+kopi 1 ,1 ,1 98,9

Usaha Warung Sayuran 1 ,1 ,1 99,0

Usaha Warung sembako 2 ,2 ,2 99,2

Usaha/Stim Motor/Toko 1 ,1 ,1 99,2

Usaha/warung 2 ,2 ,2 99,4

Usaha/Warung 5 ,4 ,4 99,8

wiraswasta 1 ,1 ,1 99,8

Wiraswasta 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Pekerjaan AK1


Percent

Valid

184 13,9 13,9 13,9

Anggota TNI/Polri 2 ,2 ,2 14,1

Operator dan perakit mesin 196 14,8 14,8 28,9

Pekerja kasar & tenaga

kebersihan 39 3,0 3,0 31,9

Pensiunan 9 ,7 ,7 32,6

Tenaga pengolahan dan

kerajinan 1 ,1 ,1 32,7

Tenaga tata usaha 85 6,4 6,4 39,1

Tenaga usaha jasa dan

penjualan di toko dan pasar 8 ,6 ,6 39,7

Tenaga usaha pertanian

dan peternakan 15 1,1 1,1 40,8

Usaha jasa dan penjualan di

toko dan pasar 504 38,2 38,2 79,0

Usaha pengolahan dan

kerajinan 26 2,0 2,0 81,0

Usaha pertanian dan

peternakan 251 19,0 19,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

26. HH member-1: Ethnic of origin

Before correction

Suku AK1


Valid

1584 59,1 59,1 59,1

Sunda 793 29,6 29,6 88,7

Jawa 123 4,6 4,6 93,3

Madura 71 2,6 2,6 95,9

Betawi 46 1,7 1,7 97,6

lainnya 31 1,2 1,2 98,8

sunda 11 ,4 ,4 99,2

Batak 9 ,3 ,3 99,6

Lainnya 6 ,2 ,2 99,8

Palembang 2 ,1 ,1 99,9

betawi 1 ,0 ,0 99,9

Bugis 1 ,0 ,0 99,9

jawa 1 ,0 ,0 100,0

Sulawesi 1 ,0 ,0 100,0

Total 2680 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK1


Valid

224 17,0 17,0 17,0

Batak 9 ,7 ,7 17,7

Betawi 47 3,6 3,6 21,2

Bugis 1 ,1 ,1 21,3

Jawa 124 9,4 9,4 30,7

Lainnya 37 2,8 2,8 33,5

Madura 71 5,4 5,4 38,9


Sulawesi 1 ,1 ,1 39,1

Sunda 804 60,9 60,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

27. HH member-1: Physical condition

Before correction

Fisik AK1


Valid

130 9,8 9,8 9,8

Cacat Fisik 8 ,6 ,6 10,5

normal 10 ,8 ,8 11,2

Normal 972 73,6 73,6 84,8

Sakit Parah 12 ,9 ,9 85,8

Tua 188 14,2 14,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Fisik AK1


Valid

130 9,8 9,8 9,8


Normal 982 74,4 74,4 84,8


Tua 188 14,2 14,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Hubungan AK2


Valid

221 16,7 16,7 16,7

Adik 1 ,1 ,1 16,8

anak 3 ,2 ,2 17,0

Anak 79 6,0 6,0 23,0

isrti 3 ,2 ,2 23,3

istri 37 2,8 2,8 26,1

Istri 962 72,9 72,9 98,9

KK 1 ,1 ,1 99,0

mitra kerja 1 ,1 ,1 99,1

Orang Tua 4 ,3 ,3 99,4

Saudara 8 ,6 ,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK2


Valid

221 16,7 16,7 16,7

Adik 1 ,1 ,1 16,8

Anak 82 6,2 6,2 23,0

Istri 1002 75,9 75,9 98,9

KK 1 ,1 ,1 99,0

Mitra Kerja 1 ,1 ,1 99,1

Orang Tua 4 ,3 ,3 99,4

Saudara 8 ,6 ,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

JK AK2


Valid

219 16,6 16,6 16,6

2 2 ,2 ,2 16,7

L 67 5,1 5,1 21,8

P 1032 78,2 78,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK AK2


Valid

219 16,6 16,6 16,6

L 67 5,1 5,1 21,7

P 1034 78,3 78,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Before correction

Agama AK2


Valid

295 22,3 22,3 22,3

islam 15 1,1 1,1 23,5

Islam 983 74,5 74,5 98,0

ISLAM 5 ,4 ,4 98,3

Kristen 21 1,6 1,6 99,9

Protestan 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK2


Valid

295 22,3 22,3 22,3

Islam 1003 76,0 76,0 98,3

Kristen 22 1,7 1,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Status kawin AK2


Valid

220 16,7 16,7 16,7

Belum Kawin 69 5,2 5,2 21,9

Duda 3 ,2 ,2 22,1

Janda 10 ,8 ,8 22,9

kawin 13 1,0 1,0 23,9

Kawin 1005 76,1 76,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status kawin AK2


Valid

220 16,7 16,7 16,7

Belum Kawin 69 5,2 5,2 21,9

Duda 3 ,2 ,2 22,1

Janda 10 ,8 ,8 22,9

Kawin 1018 77,1 77,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Pendidikan AK2


Valid

220 16,7 16,7 16,7

Lulus Kuliah 17 1,3 1,3 18,0

Lulus SD 426 32,3 32,3 50,2

Lulus SMA 89 6,7 6,7 57,0

Lulus SMP 174 13,2 13,2 70,2

masih SD 1 ,1 ,1 70,2

Masih SD 6 ,5 ,5 70,7

Masih SMA 10 ,8 ,8 71,4

Masih SMP 8 ,6 ,6 72,0

Tidak lulus SD 1 ,1 ,1 72,1

Tidak Lulus SD 156 11,8 11,8 83,9

Tidak Sekolah 212 16,1 16,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Pendidikan AK2


Valid

220 16,7 16,7 16,7

Lulus Kuliah 17 1,3 1,3 18,0

Lulus SD 426 32,3 32,3 50,2

Lulus SMA 89 6,7 6,7 57,0

Lulus SMP 174 13,2 13,2 70,2

Masih SD 7 ,5 ,5 70,7

Masih SMA 10 ,8 ,8 71,4

Masih SMP 8 ,6 ,6 72,0

Tidak Lulus SD 157 11,9 11,9 83,9

Tidak Sekolah 212 16,1 16,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Suku AK2


Valid

224 17,0 17,0 17,0

Batak 8 ,6 ,6 17,6

betawi 1 ,1 ,1 17,7

Betawi 38 2,9 2,9 20,5

Bugis 1 ,1 ,1 20,6

jawa 1 ,1 ,1 20,7

Jawa 108 8,2 8,2 28,9

lainnya 22 1,7 1,7 30,5

Lainnya 17 1,3 1,3 31,8

Madura 68 5,2 5,2 37,0


Sulawesi 1 ,1 ,1 37,3

sunda 11 ,8 ,8 38,1

Sunda 817 61,9 61,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK2


Valid

224 17,0 17,0 17,0

Batak 8 ,6 ,6 17,6

Betawi 39 3,0 3,0 20,5

Bugis 1 ,1 ,1 20,6

Jawa 109 8,3 8,3 28,9

Lainnya 39 3,0 3,0 31,8

Madura 68 5,2 5,2 37,0


Sulawesi 1 ,1 ,1 37,3

Sunda 828 62,7 62,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Fisik AK2


Valid

176 13,3 13,3 13,3


normal 10 ,8 ,8 14,3

Normal 1082 82,0 82,0 96,3


Tua 41 3,1 3,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Fisik AK2


Valid

176 13,3 13,3 13,3


Normal 1092 82,7 82,7 96,3


Tua 41 3,1 3,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Hubungan AK3


Valid

417 31,6 31,6 31,6

anak 15 1,1 1,1 32,7

Anak 855 64,8 64,8 97,5

Cucu 6 ,5 ,5 98,0

Istri 7 ,5 ,5 98,5

orang tua 1 ,1 ,1 98,6

Orang Tua 8 ,6 ,6 99,2

Saudara 11 ,8 ,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK3


Valid

417 31,6 31,6 31,6

Anak 870 65,9 65,9 97,5

Cucu 6 ,5 ,5 98,0

Istri 7 ,5 ,5 98,5

Orang Tua 9 ,7 ,7 99,2

Saudara 11 ,8 ,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

JK AK3


Valid

411 31,1 31,1 31,1

l 2 ,2 ,2 31,3

L 487 36,9 36,9 68,2

p 4 ,3 ,3 68,5

P 416 31,5 31,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK AK3


Valid

411 31,1 31,1 31,1

L 489 37,0 37,0 68,2

P 420 31,8 31,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Before correction

Agama AK3


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Hindu 1 ,1 ,1 17,1

islam 12 ,9 ,9 18,0

Islam 1049 79,5 79,5 97,5

ISLAM 4 ,3 ,3 97,8

Katolik 4 ,3 ,3 98,1

Protestan 25 1,9 1,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK3


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Hindu 1 ,1 ,1 17,1

Islam 1065 80,7 80,7 97,8

Katolik 4 ,3 ,3 98,1

Kristen 25 1,9 1,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Status kawin AK3


Percent

Valid

427 32,3 32,3 32,3

belum kawin 7 ,5 ,5 32,9

Belum kawin 58 4,4 4,4 37,3

Belum Kawin 607 46,0 46,0 83,3

Duda 10 ,8 ,8 84,0

janda 1 ,1 ,1 84,1

Janda 18 1,4 1,4 85,5

kawin 3 ,2 ,2 85,7

Kawin 189 14,3 14,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status kawin AK3


Valid

427 32,3 32,3 32,3

Belum Kawin 672 50,9 50,9 83,3

Duda 10 ,8 ,8 84,0

Janda 19 1,4 1,4 85,5

Kawin 192 14,5 14,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Pendidikan AK3


Valid

465 35,2 35,2 35,2

Lulus Kuliah 6 ,5 ,5 35,7

Lulus SD 115 8,7 8,7 44,4

Lulus SMA 135 10,2 10,2 54,6

Lulus SMP 140 10,6 10,6 65,2

Masih kuliah 2 ,2 ,2 65,4

Masih Kuliah 23 1,7 1,7 67,1

masih sd 1 ,1 ,1 67,2

Masih Sd 1 ,1 ,1 67,3

Masih SD 133 10,1 10,1 77,3

Masih SMA 67 5,1 5,1 82,4

Masih SMP 86 6,5 6,5 88,9

PAUD 1 ,1 ,1 89,0

SMA 1 ,1 ,1 89,1

Tidak Lulus SD 42 3,2 3,2 92,3

Tidak Sekolah 98 7,4 7,4 99,7

TK 4 ,3 ,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Suku AK3


Valid

562 42,6 42,6 42,6

Batak 6 ,5 ,5 43,0

Betawi 28 2,1 2,1 45,2

Bima 1 ,1 ,1 45,2

jawa 1 ,1 ,1 45,3

Jawa 57 4,3 4,3 49,6

lainnya 18 1,4 1,4 51,0

Madura 47 3,6 3,6 54,5

Medan 1 ,1 ,1 54,6

Padang 1 ,1 ,1 54,7


sunda 12 ,9 ,9 55,7

Sunda 585 44,3 44,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK3


Valid

562 42,6 42,6 42,6

Batak 6 ,5 ,5 43,0

Betawi 28 2,1 2,1 45,2

Bima 1 ,1 ,1 45,2

Jawa 58 4,4 4,4 49,6

Lainnya 18 1,4 1,4 51,0

Madura 47 3,6 3,6 54,5

Medan 1 ,1 ,1 54,6

Padang 1 ,1 ,1 54,7


Sunda 597 45,2 45,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Fisik AK3


Valid

516 39,1 39,1 39,1

Cacat 7 ,5 ,5 39,6

Normal 788 59,7 59,7 99,3

Sakit parah 1 ,1 ,1 99,4

Tua 8 ,6 ,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Hubungan AK4


Valid

698 52,9 52,9 52,9

anak 10 ,8 ,8 53,6

Anak 562 42,6 42,6 96,2

Cucu 3 ,2 ,2 96,4

Istri 2 ,2 ,2 96,6

KK 1 ,1 ,1 96,7

Menantu 8 ,6 ,6 97,3

Orang tua 1 ,1 ,1 97,3

Orang Tua 11 ,8 ,8 98,2

Saudara 24 1,8 1,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK4


Valid

698 52,9 52,9 52,9

Anak 572 43,3 43,3 96,2

Cucu 3 ,2 ,2 96,4

Istri 2 ,2 ,2 96,6

KK 1 ,1 ,1 96,7

Menantu 8 ,6 ,6 97,3

Orang Tua 12 ,9 ,9 98,2

Saudara 24 1,8 1,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

JK AK4


Valid

694 52,6 52,6 52,6

l 1 ,1 ,1 52,7

L 298 22,6 22,6 75,2

p 5 ,4 ,4 75,6

P 322 24,4 24,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK AK4


Valid

694 52,6 52,6 52,6

L 299 22,7 22,7 75,2

P 327 24,8 24,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Before correction

Agama AK4


Valid

729 55,2 55,2 55,2

islam 17 1,3 1,3 56,5

Islam 533 40,4 40,4 96,9

ISLAM 23 1,7 1,7 98,6

Kristen 16 1,2 1,2 99,8

Protestan 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK4


Valid

729 55,2 55,2 55,2

Islam 573 43,4 43,4 98,6

Kristen 18 1,4 1,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Status kawin AK4


Valid

707 53,6 53,6 53,6


Belum Kawin 470 35,6 35,6 89,2

Duda 1 ,1 ,1 89,3

Janda 22 1,7 1,7 91,0

Kawin 119 9,0 9,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status kawin AK4


Valid

707 53,6 53,6 53,6

Belum Kawin 471 35,7 35,7 89,2

Duda 1 ,1 ,1 89,3

Janda 22 1,7 1,7 91,0

Kawin 119 9,0 9,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Pendidikan AK4


Valid

752 57,0 57,0 57,0


Lulus SD 75 5,7 5,7 63,0

lulus sma 1 ,1 ,1 63,0

lulus SMA 1 ,1 ,1 63,1

Lulus SMA 50 3,8 3,8 66,9

Lulus SMP 76 5,8 5,8 72,7

Masih Kuliah 8 ,6 ,6 73,3

masih sd 1 ,1 ,1 73,3

Masih SD 159 12,0 12,0 85,4

masih sma 2 ,2 ,2 85,5

Masih SMA 32 2,4 2,4 88,0

Masih SMP 56 4,2 4,2 92,2

SMP 1 ,1 ,1 92,3



TK 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Pendidikan AK4


Valid

752 57,0 57,0 57,0


Lulus SD 75 5,7 5,7 63,0

Lulus SMA 52 3,9 3,9 66,9

Lulus SMP 76 5,8 5,8 72,7


Masih SD 160 12,1 12,1 85,4

Masih SMA 34 2,6 2,6 88,0

Masih SMP 57 4,3 4,3 92,3



TK 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Suku AK4


Valid

807 61,1 61,1 61,1

Batak 2 ,2 ,2 61,3

Betawi 20 1,5 1,5 62,8

Bima 1 ,1 ,1 62,9

jawa 1 ,1 ,1 63,0

Jawa 42 3,2 3,2 66,1

lainnya 12 ,9 ,9 67,0

Lainnya 1 ,1 ,1 67,1

Madura 28 2,1 2,1 69,2

Medan 1 ,1 ,1 69,3

Padang 2 ,2 ,2 69,5


sunda 15 1,1 1,1 70,7

Sunda 387 29,3 29,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK4


Valid

807 61,1 61,1 61,1

Batak 2 ,2 ,2 61,3

Betawi 20 1,5 1,5 62,8

Bima 1 ,1 ,1 62,9

Jawa 43 3,3 3,3 66,1

Lainnya 13 1,0 1,0 67,1

Madura 28 2,1 2,1 69,2

Medan 1 ,1 ,1 69,3

Padang 2 ,2 ,2 69,5


Sunda 402 30,5 30,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Fisik AK4


Valid

777 58,9 58,9 58,9

Cacat 6 ,5 ,5 59,3

normal 10 ,8 ,8 60,1

Normal 522 39,5 39,5 99,6

Tua 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Fisik AK4


Valid

777 58,9 58,9 58,9

Cacat 6 ,5 ,5 59,3

Normal 532 40,3 40,3 99,6

Tua 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Hubungan AK5


Valid

1008 76,4 76,4 76,4

anak 4 ,3 ,3 76,7

Anak 253 19,2 19,2 95,8

Cucu 7 ,5 ,5 96,4

Istri 2 ,2 ,2 96,5

Menantu 3 ,2 ,2 96,7

Orang tua 2 ,2 ,2 96,9

Orang Tua 9 ,7 ,7 97,6

Saudara 32 2,4 2,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK5


Valid

1008 76,4 76,4 76,4

Anak 257 19,5 19,5 95,8

Cucu 7 ,5 ,5 96,4

Istri 2 ,2 ,2 96,5

Menantu 3 ,2 ,2 96,7

Orang Tua 11 ,8 ,8 97,6

Saudara 32 2,4 2,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

JK AK5


Valid

1002 75,9 75,9 75,9

L 178 13,5 13,5 89,4

p 1 ,1 ,1 89,5

P 139 10,5 10,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

JK AK5


Valid

1002 75,9 75,9 75,9

L 178 13,5 13,5 89,4

P 140 10,6 10,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Before correction

Agama AK5


Valid

1027 77,8 77,8 77,8

islam 3 ,2 ,2 78,0

Islam 273 20,7 20,7 98,7

ISLAM 8 ,6 ,6 99,3

Kristen 8 ,6 ,6 99,9

Protestan 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK5


Valid

1027 77,8 77,8 77,8

Islam 284 21,5 21,5 99,3

Kristen 9 ,7 ,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Status kawin AK5


Valid

1009 76,4 76,4 76,4

Kawin 1 ,1 ,1 76,5


Belum kawin 15 1,1 1,1 77,8

Belum Kawin 229 17,3 17,3 95,2

Janda 10 ,8 ,8 95,9

kawin 1 ,1 ,1 96,0

Kawin 53 4,0 4,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status kawin AK5


Valid

1009 76,4 76,4 76,4

Belum Kawin 246 18,6 18,6 95,1

Janda 10 ,8 ,8 95,8

Kawin 55 4,2 4,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Pendidikan AK5


Valid

1037 78,6 78,6 78,6

Lulus SD 25 1,9 1,9 80,5

lulus sma 1 ,1 ,1 80,5

Lulus SMA 17 1,3 1,3 81,8

Lulus SMP 40 3,0 3,0 84,8


Masih SD 71 5,4 5,4 90,3

Masih SMA 25 1,9 1,9 92,2

masih smp 1 ,1 ,1 92,3

masih SMP 1 ,1 ,1 92,3

Masih SMP 16 1,2 1,2 93,6

Paud 1 ,1 ,1 93,6

SD 1 ,1 ,1 93,7

Tidak lulus SD 1 ,1 ,1 93,8

Tidak Lulus SD 12 ,9 ,9 94,7


TK 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Suku AK5


Valid

1068 80,9 80,9 80,9

Batak 2 ,2 ,2 81,1

Betawi 8 ,6 ,6 81,7

Jawa 18 1,4 1,4 83,0

lainnya 6 ,5 ,5 83,5

Lainnya 1 ,1 ,1 83,6

Madura 17 1,3 1,3 84,8

sunda 3 ,2 ,2 85,1

Sunda 197 14,9 14,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK5


Valid

1068 80,9 80,9 80,9

Batak 2 ,2 ,2 81,1

Betawi 8 ,6 ,6 81,7

Jawa 18 1,4 1,4 83,0

Lainnya 7 ,5 ,5 83,6

Madura 17 1,3 1,3 84,8

Sunda 200 15,2 15,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Fisik AK5


Valid

1051 79,6 79,6 79,6

Cacat 2 ,2 ,2 79,8

Normal 259 19,6 19,6 99,4


Tua 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Hubungan AK6


Valid

1196 90,6 90,6 90,6

anak 1 ,1 ,1 90,7

Anak 93 7,0 7,0 97,7

cucu 2 ,2 ,2 97,9

Cucu 4 ,3 ,3 98,2

Orang tua 1 ,1 ,1 98,3

Orang Tua 4 ,3 ,3 98,6

Saudara 19 1,4 1,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK6


Valid

1196 90,6 90,6 90,6

Anak 94 7,1 7,1 97,7

Cucu 6 ,5 ,5 98,2

Orang Tua 5 ,4 ,4 98,6

Saudara 19 1,4 1,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


JK AK6


Valid

1191 90,2 90,2 90,2

L 81 6,1 6,1 96,4

P 48 3,6 3,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Before correction

Agama AK6


Valid

1203 91,1 91,1 91,1

Hindu 1 ,1 ,1 91,2

islam 2 ,2 ,2 91,4

Islam 108 8,2 8,2 99,5

ISLAM 1 ,1 ,1 99,6

Katolik 2 ,2 ,2 99,8

Kristen 3 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK6


Valid

1203 91,1 91,1 91,1

Hindu 1 ,1 ,1 91,2

Islam 111 8,4 8,4 99,6

Katolik 2 ,2 ,2 99,8

Kristen 3 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Status kawin AK6


Valid

1194 90,5 90,5 90,5

Belum Kawin 103 7,8 7,8 98,3

Janda 3 ,2 ,2 98,5

Kawin 20 1,5 1,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Pendidikan AK6


Valid

1210 91,7 91,7 91,7


Lulus SD 16 1,2 1,2 93,0

Lulus SMA 8 ,6 ,6 93,6

Lulus SMP 12 ,9 ,9 94,5

Masih SD 22 1,7 1,7 96,1

Masih SMA 3 ,2 ,2 96,4

masih smp 1 ,1 ,1 96,4

Masih SMP 6 ,5 ,5 96,9



TK 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Pendidikan AK6


Valid

1210 91,7 91,7 91,7


Lulus SD 16 1,2 1,2 93,0

Lulus SMA 8 ,6 ,6 93,6

Lulus SMP 12 ,9 ,9 94,5

Masih SD 22 1,7 1,7 96,1

Masih SMA 3 ,2 ,2 96,4

Masih SMP 7 ,5 ,5 96,9



TK 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

66. HH member-6: Ethnic or origin

Before correction

Suku AK6


Valid

1221 92,5 92,5 92,5

Betawi 3 ,2 ,2 92,7

Jawa 5 ,4 ,4 93,1

lainnya 3 ,2 ,2 93,3

Lainnya 1 ,1 ,1 93,4

Madura 6 ,5 ,5 93,9

sunda 2 ,2 ,2 94,0

Sunda 79 6,0 6,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK6


Valid

1221 92,5 92,5 92,5

Betawi 3 ,2 ,2 92,7

Jawa 5 ,4 ,4 93,1

Lainnya 4 ,3 ,3 93,4

Madura 6 ,5 ,5 93,9

Sunda 81 6,1 6,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Fisik AK6


Valid

1213 91,9 91,9 91,9

normal 3 ,2 ,2 92,1

Normal 101 7,7 7,7 99,8


Tua 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Fisik AK6


Valid

1213 91,9 91,9 91,9

Normal 104 7,9 7,9 99,8


Tua 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Hubungan AK7


Valid

1284 97,3 97,3 97,3

anak 1 ,1 ,1 97,3

Anak 26 2,0 2,0 99,3

cucu 1 ,1 ,1 99,4

Cucu 1 ,1 ,1 99,5

Saudara 7 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hubungan AK7


Valid

1284 97,3 97,3 97,3

Anak 27 2,0 2,0 99,3

Cucu 2 ,2 ,2 99,5

Saudara 7 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


JK AK7


Valid

1278 96,8 96,8 96,8

L 23 1,7 1,7 98,6

P 19 1,4 1,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Before correction

Agama AK7


Valid

1284 97,3 97,3 97,3

islam 2 ,2 ,2 97,4

Islam 34 2,6 2,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Agama AK7


Valid

1284 97,3 97,3 97,3

Islam 36 2,7 2,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Status kawin AK7


Valid

1281 97,0 97,0 97,0

Belum kawin 17 1,3 1,3 98,3

Belum Kawin 14 1,1 1,1 99,4

Janda 1 ,1 ,1 99,5

Kawin 7 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Status kawin AK7


Valid

1281 97,0 97,0 97,0

Belum Kawin 31 2,3 2,3 99,4

Janda 1 ,1 ,1 99,5

Kawin 7 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Pendidikan AK7


Valid

1281 97,0 97,0 97,0

Lulus SD 7 ,5 ,5 97,6

Lulus SMA 2 ,2 ,2 97,7

Lulus SMP 2 ,2 ,2 97,9

masih sd 1 ,1 ,1 98,0

Masih SD 4 ,3 ,3 98,3

Masih SMP 3 ,2 ,2 98,5



Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Pendidikan AK7


Valid

1281 97,0 97,0 97,0

Lulus SD 7 ,5 ,5 97,6

Lulus SMA 2 ,2 ,2 97,7

Lulus SMP 2 ,2 ,2 97,9

Masih SD 5 ,4 ,4 98,3

Masih SMP 3 ,2 ,2 98,5



Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Suku AK7


Valid

1287 97,5 97,5 97,5

Jawa 3 ,2 ,2 97,7

Madura 2 ,2 ,2 97,9

sunda 1 ,1 ,1 98,0

Sunda 27 2,0 2,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Suku AK7


Valid

1287 97,5 97,5 97,5

Jawa 3 ,2 ,2 97,7

Madura 2 ,2 ,2 97,9

Sunda 28 2,1 2,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Before correction

Fisik AK7


Valid

1284 97,3 97,3 97,3

normal 2 ,2 ,2 97,4

Normal 34 2,6 2,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Fisik AK7


Valid

1284 97,3 97,3 97,3

Normal 36 2,7 2,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Hubungan AK8


Valid

1307 99,0 99,0 99,0

Anak 8 ,6 ,6 99,6

Cucu 1 ,1 ,1 99,7

Orang Tua 1 ,1 ,1 99,8

Saudara 3 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


JK AK8


Valid

1305 98,9 98,9 98,9

L 9 ,7 ,7 99,5

P 6 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0




Agama AK8


Valid

1306 98,9 98,9 98,9

Islam 14 1,1 1,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Status kawin AK8


Valid

1307 99,0 99,0 99,0

Belum Kawin 8 ,6 ,6 99,6

Kawin 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Pendidikan AK8


Valid

1308 99,1 99,1 99,1

Lulus SD 4 ,3 ,3 99,4

Lulus SMA 2 ,2 ,2 99,5

Lulus SMP 2 ,2 ,2 99,7

Tidak Sekolah 4 ,3 ,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Suku AK8


Valid

1307 99,0 99,0 99,0

Jawa 2 ,2 ,2 99,2

Madura 2 ,2 ,2 99,3

Sunda 9 ,7 ,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0


Fisik AK8


Valid

1307 99,0 99,0 99,0

Normal 13 1,0 1,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

84. Family income

85. Income per capita

86. Poverty based on Regional Minimum Wage

Before correction

Miskin Based On UMR


Valid

- 26 2,0 2,0 2,0

Tidak 180 13,6 13,6 15,6

Ya 1114 84,4 84,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

Aftercorrection

Miskin Based On UMR


Valid

Tidak 180 13,6 13,6 13,6

Ya 1140 86,4 86,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

87. Poverty based on Statistics National Bureau

Before correction

Miskin Based On BPS


Valid

- 26 2,0 2,0 2,0

Tidak 1011 76,6 76,6 78,6

Ya 283 21,4 21,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

Aftercorrection

Miskin Based On BPS


Valid

Tidak 1011 76,6 76,6 76,6

Ya 309 23,4 23,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

88. Land ownership

Tanah milik pribadi


Valid

Tidak 1319 99,9 99,9 99,9

Ya 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

89. Fraction of affected main building 1

Besaran BU1


Valid

639 48,4 48,4 48,4

Sebagian 121 9,2 9,2 57,6

Seluruhnya 560 42,4 42,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

90. Type of affected main building 1

Before correction

Jenis/Tipe BU1


Valid

639 48,4 48,4 48,4

darurat 1 ,1 ,1 48,5

Darurat 266 20,2 20,2 68,6

permanen 2 ,2 ,2 68,8

Permanen 34 2,6 2,6 71,4

sementara 3 ,2 ,2 71,6

Sementara 267 20,2 20,2 91,8

semi permanen 1 ,1 ,1 91,9

Semi permanen 7 ,5 ,5 92,4

Semi Permanen 100 7,6 7,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

Aftercorrection

Jenis/Tipe BU1


Valid

639 48,4 48,4 48,4

Darurat 267 20,2 20,2 68,6

Permanen 36 2,7 2,7 71,4

Sementara 270 20,5 20,5 91,8

Semi Permanen 108 8,2 8,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

91. Characteristic of affected main building 1

Sifat BU1


Valid

618 46,8 46,8 46,8

Mobile 21 1,6 1,6 48,4

Tidak mobile 681 51,6 51,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

92. Usage of affected main building 1

Fungsi BU1


Valid

639 48,4 48,4 48,4

Fasum, Bangunan Pemerintah

2 ,2 ,2 48,6

Rumah Tinggal 183 13,9 13,9 62,4

Rumah Tinggal dan Tempat Usaha

118 8,9 8,9 71,4

Tempat Usaha/Toko/Kontrakan

378 28,6 28,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

93. Fraction of affected main building 2

Besaran BU2


Valid

1315 99,6 99,6 99,6

Sebagian 1 ,1 ,1 99,7

Seluruhnya 4 ,3 ,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

94. Type of affected main building 2

Jenis/Tipe BU2


Valid

1315 99,6 99,6 99,6

Darurat 3 ,2 ,2 99,8

Sementara 1 ,1 ,1 99,9

Semi Permanen 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

95. Characteristic of affected main building 2

Sifat BU2


Valid

1315 99,6 99,6 99,6

Tidak mobile 5 ,4 ,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

96. Usage of affected main building 2

Fungsi BU2


Valid

1315 99,6 99,6 99,6

Rumah Tinggal 1 ,1 ,1 99,7

Tempat Usaha/Toko/Kontrakan

4 ,3 ,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

97. Fence

Before correction

Pagar


Valid

1093 82,8 82,8 82,8

pagar 14 1,1 1,1 83,9

Pagar 213 16,1 16,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Pagar


Valid

1093 82,8 82,8 82,8

Pagar 227 17,2 17,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

98. Terrace

Pagar


Valid

1093 82,8 82,8 82,8

Pagar 227 17,2 17,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

99. Well

Before correction

Sumur


Valid

1285 97,3 97,3 97,3

sumur 4 ,3 ,3 97,7

Sumur 31 2,3 2,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Sumur


Valid

1285 97,3 97,3 97,3

Sumur 35 2,7 2,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

100. Toilet

KM/WC


Valid

1296 98,2 98,2 98,2

KM/WC 24 1,8 1,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

101. Cage

Before correction

Kandang


Valid

1264 95,8 95,8 95,8

kandang 4 ,3 ,3 96,1

Kandang 52 3,9 3,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Kandang


Valid

1264 95,8 95,8 95,8

Kandang 56 4,2 4,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

102. Source of drinking water

Before correction

Air Minum


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Air bersih pabrik 1 ,1 ,1 17,1

air hujan 1 ,1 ,1 17,2

Mata air permukaan 1 ,1 ,1 17,3

PAM 11 ,8 ,8 18,1

penjual air 8 ,6 ,6 18,7

Penjual air 3 ,2 ,2 18,9

Penjual Air 595 45,1 45,1 64,0

Penjual air, mata air permukaan

2 ,2 ,2 64,2

Penjual Air, Saluran Irigasi 2 ,2 ,2 64,3

saluran irigasi 1 ,1 ,1 64,4

Saluran irigasi 2 ,2 ,2 64,5

Saluran Irigasi 18 1,4 1,4 65,9

Sumur 448 33,9 33,9 99,8

Sumur, Penjual Air 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Air Minum


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Air Bersih Pabrik 1 ,1 ,1 17,1

Air Hujan 1 ,1 ,1 17,2

Mata Air Permukaan 1 ,1 ,1 17,3

PAM 11 ,8 ,8 18,1

Penjual Air 606 45,9 45,9 64,0

Penjual Air, Mata Air Permukaan

2 ,2 ,2 64,2

Penjual Air, Saluran Irigasi 2 ,2 ,2 64,3


Sumur 448 33,9 33,9 99,8

Sumur, Penjual Air 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

103. Water source

Air Bersih MCK


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Air Bersih Pabrik 1 ,1 ,1 17,1

Empang 1 ,1 ,1 17,2

Mata Air Permukaan 2 ,2 ,2 17,3

PAM 51 3,9 3,9 21,2

Penjual Air 10 ,8 ,8 22,0


Sumur 637 48,3 48,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

104. Defecation

Before correction

Hajat Besar


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Jamban/ WC Orang Lain 2 ,2 ,2 17,2

Jamban/WC Keluarga 624 47,3 47,3 64,5

Jamban/WC Umum 112 8,5 8,5 73,0

Lahan Terbuka 115 8,7 8,7 81,7

Saluran air bukan saluran irigasi

11 ,8 ,8 82,5

saluran irigasi 1 ,1 ,1 82,6

Saluran irigasi 21 1,6 1,6 84,2


Saluran Irigasi dan Lahan Terbuka

27 2,0 2,0 99,5

WC Keluarga 6 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Hajat Besar


Valid

225 17,0 17,0 17,0

Jamban/ WC Orang Lain 2 ,2 ,2 17,2

Jamban/WC Keluarga 624 47,3 47,3 64,5

Jamban/WC Umum 112 8,5 8,5 73,0

Lahan Terbuka 115 8,7 8,7 81,7

Saluran Air Bukan Saluran Irigasi

11 ,8 ,8 82,5


Saluran Irigasi dan Lahan Terbuka

27 2,0 2,0 99,5

WC Keluarga 6 ,5 ,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

105. Business sector of AHs

Before correction

Sektor usaha


Valid

652 49,4 49,4 49,4

Industri 2 ,2 ,2 49,5

jasa 1 ,1 ,1 49,6

Jasa 68 5,2 5,2 54,8

Perdagangan 454 34,4 34,4 89,2

Perdagangan, jasa 3 ,2 ,2 89,4

pertanian 9 ,7 ,7 90,1

Pertanian 127 9,6 9,6 99,7

Pertanian, Jasa 1 ,1 ,1 99,8

Perternakan 2 ,2 ,2 99,9

Sea food/pecel lele 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Sektor usaha


Valid

652 49,4 49,4 49,4

Industri 2 ,2 ,2 49,5

Jasa 70 5,3 5,3 54,8

Perdagangan 454 34,4 34,4 89,2

Perdagangan, Jasa 3 ,2 ,2 89,5

Pertanian 136 10,3 10,3 99,8

Pertanian, Jasa 1 ,1 ,1 99,8

Perternakan 2 ,2 ,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

106. Characteristic of comodity

Before correction

Sifat Komoditas


Valid

644 48,8 48,8 48,8

Mudah dipindahkan 1 ,1 ,1 48,9

Mudah Dipindahkan 59 4,5 4,5 53,3

Sulit Dipindahkan 616 46,7 46,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Sifat Komoditas


Valid

644 48,8 48,8 48,8

Mudah Dipindahkan 60 4,5 4,5 53,3

Sulit Dipindahkan 616 46,7 46,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

107. Characteristic of customer

Before correction

Sifat Pelanggan


Valid

646 48,9 48,9 48,9

Khusus 135 10,2 10,2 59,2

umum 1 ,1 ,1 59,2

Umum 538 40,8 40,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Sifat Pelanggan


Valid

646 48,9 48,9 48,9

Khusus 135 10,2 10,2 59,2

Umum 539 40,8 40,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

108. Characteristic of business location

Before correction

Sifat Lokasi Usaha


Valid

646 48,9 48,9 48,9

Boleh terpencil 1 ,1 ,1 49,0

Boleh Terpencil 205 15,5 15,5 64,5

harus ramai 1 ,1 ,1 64,6

Harus ramai 1 ,1 ,1 64,7

Harus Ramai 465 35,2 35,2 99,9

Khusus 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Sifat Lokasi Usaha


Valid

646 48,9 48,9 48,9

Boleh Terpencil 206 15,6 15,6 64,5

Harus Ramai 467 35,4 35,4 99,9

Khusus 1 ,1 ,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

109. Characteristic of market

Before correction

Sifat Pasar


Valid

647 49,0 49,0 49,0

menerus 2 ,2 ,2 49,2

Menerus 474 35,9 35,9 85,1

musiman 10 ,8 ,8 85,8

Musiman 187 14,2 14,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Sifat Pasar


Valid

647 49,0 49,0 49,0

Menerus 476 36,1 36,1 85,1

Musiman 197 14,9 14,9 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

110. Business change plan

Rencana Ganti


Valid

646 48,9 48,9 48,9

Tidak 585 44,3 44,3 93,3

Ya 89 6,7 6,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

111. Availability of alternative land

Before correction

Ada lahan alt.


Valid

ada 11 ,8 ,8 ,8

Ada 161 12,2 12,2 13,0

ADA 3 ,2 ,2 13,3

tidak ada 8 ,6 ,6 13,9

Tidak ada 22 1,7 1,7 15,5

Tidak Ada 1115 84,5 84,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Ada tempat tinggal alt.


Percent

Valid

224 17,0 17,0 17,0

Ada 505 38,3 38,3 55,2

Tidak Ada 591 44,8 44,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

112. Availability of alternative place to stay

Ada tempat tinggal alt.


Valid

224 17,0 17,0 17,0

Ada 505 38,3 38,3 55,2

Tidak Ada 591 44,8 44,8 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

113. Availability of alternative place for business and stay

Before correction

Ada tempat tinggal & usaha alt.


Valid

228 17,3 17,3 17,3

Ada 66 5,0 5,0 22,3

tidak ada 11 ,8 ,8 23,1

Tidak ada 2 ,2 ,2 23,3

Tidak Ada 1013 76,7 76,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Ada tempat tinggal & usaha alt.


Valid

228 17,3 17,3 17,3

Ada 66 5,0 5,0 22,3

Tidak Ada 1026 77,7 77,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

114. Availability of alternative place for business

Before correction

Ada tempat usaha alt.


Valid

230 17,4 17,4 17,4

ada 1 ,1 ,1 17,5

Ada 40 3,0 3,0 20,5

tidak ada 18 1,4 1,4 21,9

Tidak ada 23 1,7 1,7 23,6

Tidak Ada 1008 76,4 76,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

After correction

Ada tempat usaha alt.


Valid

230 17,4 17,4 17,4

Ada 41 3,1 3,1 20,5

Tidak Ada 1049 79,5 79,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

115. Subject to relocation

Relokasi


Percent

Valid

Tidak 670 50,8 50,8 50,8

Ya 650 49,2 49,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

116. AHs category according to affected asset

Kategori RTD


Valid

Berat 371 28,1 28,1 28,1

Ringan 763 57,8 57,8 85,9

Sedang 186 14,1 14,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

117. Poverty based on ADB poverty line

Categorization HH based on ADB poverty line


Valid

0 703 53,3 53,7 53,7

1 607 46,0 46,3 100,0

Total 1310 99,2 100,0 Missing System 10 ,8 Total 1320 100,0

118. AHs headed by elderly

Eldery HH head (65 or more)


Valid

0 1175 89,0 89,0 89,0

1 145 11,0 11,0 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

119. AHs headed by disabled

Disabled HH head


Valid

0 1300 98,5 98,5 98,5

1 20 1,5 1,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

120. AHs headed by female

HH headed by female


Valid

0 1221 92,5 92,5 92,5

1 99 7,5 7,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

121. AHs without land and/or house outside the project location

HH without land or house owned outside COI


Valid

0 600 45,5 45,5 45,5

1 720 54,5 54,5 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

122. Vulnerability of AHs

HH categorized vulnerable (fullfilling 1 of the 5 criteria)


Valid

0 401 30,4 30,4 30,4

1 919 69,6 69,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

123. AHs to be relocated

HH to be relocated


Valid

0 764 57,9 57,9 57,9

1 556 42,1 42,1 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

124. AHs losing more than 10% of their business

HH losing more than 10% of their business superficy


Valid

0 856 64,8 64,8 64,8

1 464 35,2 35,2 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

125. AHs losing more than 10% of their agriculture

HH losing more than 10% of their agricultural superficy


Valid

0 942 71,4 71,4 71,4

1 378 28,6 28,6 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

126. Severity of AHs

HH categorized severely affected (fullfilling 1 of the 3 criteria)


Valid

0 366 27,7 27,7 27,7

1 954 72,3 72,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

127. AHs categorized as vulnerable and severely affected

HH categorized vulnerable and severely affected


Valid

0 655 49,6 49,6 49,6

1 665 50,4 50,4 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

B. Association analysis

In this section, association or correlation between relevant AHs�s characteristics were tested to

reveal significant and useful patterns regarding the project monitoring.

1. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and vulnerability

Kategori RTD * Vulnerable Crosstabulation Count

Vulnerable Total

Tidak Ya

Kategori RTD

Berat 273 98 371

Ringan 539 224 763

Sedang 129 57 186 Total 941 379 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,033 ,484

N of Valid Cases 1320

There is no significant association between AHs category according to affected asset and

vulnerability.

2. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and severity

Kategori RTD * Severely Crosstabulation Count

Severely Total

Tidak Ya

Kategori RTD

Berat 0 371 371

Ringan 763 0 763

Sedang 186 0 186 Total 949 371 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.



There is a significant association between AHs category according to affected asset and

severity.

3. Association between vulnerability and severity

Vulnerable * Severely Crosstabulation Count

Severely Total

Tidak Ya

Vulnerable Tidak 668 273 941

Ya 281 98 379 Total 949 371 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.



There is no significant association between vulnerability of AHs and their severity.

4. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and poverty based on BPS

poverty line

Crosstab Count

Categorization HH based on BPS poverty line

Total

0 1

Kategori RTD

Berat 314 57 371

Ringan 469 294 763

Sedang 145 41 186 Total 928 392 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.




poverty based on BPS poverty linebut with a relatively low magnitude.

5. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and poverty based on

Regional Minimum Wage

Crosstab Count

Categorization HH based on UMR per HH

Total

0 1

Kategori RTD

Berat 248 119 367

Ringan 312 445 757

Sedang 108 78 186 Total 668 642 1310

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.




poverty based on BPS poverty linebut with a relatively low magnitude.

6. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and poverty based on

Regional Minimum Wage

Crosstab Count


Total

0 1

Kategori RTD

Berat 261 106 367

Ringan 335 422 757

Sedang 107 79 186 Total 703 607 1310

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.




poverty based on Regional Minimum Wagebut with a relatively low magnitude.

7. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and AHs headed by elderly

Crosstab Count

Eldery HH head (65 or more) Total

0 1

Kategori RTD

Berat 344 27 371

Ringan 657 106 763

Sedang 174 12 186 Total 1175 145 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.




poverty based on Regional Minimum Wagebut with a relatively low magnitude.

8. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and AHs headed by elderly

Crosstab Count

Disabled HH head Total

0 1

Kategori RTD

Berat 364 7 371

Ringan 751 12 763

Sedang 185 1 186 Total 1300 20 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.




AHs headed by elderly.

9. Association between AHs category according to affected asset and AHs headed by female

Crosstab Count

HH headed by female Total

0 1

Kategori RTD

Berat 343 28 371

Ringan 706 57 763

Sedang 172 14 186 Total 1221 99 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.




AHs headed by female.

10. Association between AHs severity and poverty based on BPS poverty line

Crosstab Count

Categorization HH based on BPS poverty line

Total

0 1

Severely Tidak 614 335 949

Ya 314 57 371 Total 928 392 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.



There is a significant association between AHs severity and poverty based on BPS poverty

line but with a relatively low magnitude.

11. Association between severity and poverty based on Regional Minimum Wage

Crosstab Count

Categorization HH based on UMR per HH

Total

0 1


Ya 248 119 367 Total 668 642 1310

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.



There is a significant association between severity and poverty based on Regional

Minimum Wage but with a relatively low magnitude.

12. Association between severity and poverty based on ADB poverty line

Crosstab Count


Total

0 1


Ya 261 106 367 Total 703 607 1310

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.



There is a significant association between severity and poverty based on ADB poverty line

but with a relatively low magnitude.

13. Association between severity and AHs headed by elderly

Crosstab Count

Eldery HH head (65 or more) Total

0 1


Ya 344 27 371 Total 1175 145 1320

Symmetric Measures

c

Value Approx. Sig.



There is a significant association between severity and AHs headed by elderly but with a

relatively very low magnitude.

14. Association between severity and AHs headed by disabled

Crosstab Count

Disabled HH head Total

0 1


Ya 364 7 371 Total 1300 20 1320

Symmetric Measuresc

Value Approx. Sig.



There is no significant association between severity and AHs headed by disabled.

C. Further analysis

In this section, some new data fields were derived from the initial data to gain a deeper

understanding of the pattern of RP that is considered relevant to the project monitoring

activities.

1. Vulnerability level

Since vulnerability is the or-combination of 5 condition, it can be categorized to 5 level

according to the number of conditions fulfilled. Below is the summary statistics of the

vulnerability level.

Vulnerability level


Valid

,00 401 30,4 30,4 30,4

1,00 542 41,1 41,1 71,4

2,00 301 22,8 22,8 94,2

3,00 72 5,5 5,5 99,7

4,00 4 ,3 ,3 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

2. Severity level

Severity is the or-combination of 3 condition.Hence, it can be categorized to 3 level

according to the number of conditions fulfilled. Here is the summary statistics of this new

data field.

Severity level


Valid

0 366 27,7 27,7 27,7

1 519 39,3 39,3 67,0

2 426 32,3 32,3 99,3

3 9 ,7 ,7 100,0

Total 1320 100,0 100,0

Annex D2 Suplement of Paper on

Analysis of AHs Database

な

Quality of AHs database regarding the Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP) of the Resettlement

Project of West Tarum Canal By

Gandhi Pawitan Prepare for Evalution Monitoring Agency

LPPM � UNPAR 2012

Contents 1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 1

2 LITERATURE IN RESETTLEMENT ........................................................................................ 3

3 DESIGNING THE LRP ......................................................................................................... 3

UPDATING AHS DATA ................................................... ................................................... ............... 6 SOCIOどECONOMIC SURVEY ................................................... ................................................... ......... 6 CATEGORIZING THE AHS ................................................... ................................................... ........... 6

4 QUALITY OF THE AHS DATABASE ...................................................................................... 7

5 VALIDITY OF THE DATABASE ........................................................................................... 12

RELOCATION CATEGORIES VS AHS CATEGORIES ................................................... .............................. 12 CUTどOFF DATE VS AHS CATEGORIES ................................................... ............................................. 13 ECONOMICS STATUS VS INCOME CATEGORIES AND AHS CATEGORIES ................................................... .. 15 ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OF THE AHS ................................................... .............................................. 16

6 RECOMMENDATION ....................................................................................................... 20

7 REFFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 20

1 Background Final LRP Design report was prepared by Equator Consultant Agency in 2012. The report stated some background of the project (Equator, 2012). Some keys background are listed in the following paragraph.

The project regards the Citarum river, which is being a largest in West Java Province. The river flows along the 350 km, started from Mount Wayang (Bandung District) and end at the Tanjung area (Karawang District).

The Citarum river has an important role for social and economic life for West Java and Jakarta, as source of drinking water, agriculture irrigation, fisheries, electic power generator, and also major supplier of water for industrial.

に

The last twenty years, the environmental conditions and water quality along the Citarum getting worse. Within this length of time, the population, settlements and industrial activities along the watershed grow and develop rapidly.

The West Tarum Canal is part of the Catarum river, which is covering area of Karawang District, Bekasi District, and Bekasi City, which overall length is 54,2 km. The project focus on a rehabilitation of West Tarun Canal (WTC). The main goal of WTC rehabilitation project is to improve clearn water supply and sanitation to families along the canal, increase agriculture productitivity, and improve water supply to Jakarta.

The rehabilitation project implementation will affect residents along the canal who live in the left and right embankment. They are households (affected households � AH) which have no legality to stay in the affected area, but in contrary, the ADB policy urge the Government of Indoneisia (GOI) to provide a compensation and restoration of their socialどeconomics conditions. As part of the rehabilition project, it has been design the Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP), which contains :

a. Design the alternative policy to handle AHs as the impact of WTC Rehabilitation

b. Design the empowerment strategy as the guidline to restore the livelihood of AHs.

c. Design the detail implementation management of LRP to as an effort to restore affected household�s social and economy condition. Development activities are conducted in form of training and follow up assistances. Training is held according to community�s need to improve their knowledge and skills in a business sector. They should be able to use them for improving their livelihood and economy.

d. Design the facilitation of LRP

The LRP was designed in several stages, such as updating AHs data, socioどeconomic survey, focus group discussion (FGD), consultation to SKPD/RWG regarding the proposed program, and categorizing AHs.

The LRP is designed to be implemented into AHs. Whatever the LRP, but it can be successfully implemeted depend on the validity of the AHs. One factor that affect the validity of the AHs is cutどoff date.

This paper aims to evaluate a process in updating AHs, socioどeconomic survey, and categorizing AHs. The evaluation result may give insight regarding an important of the validity of the AHs databse.

ぬ

2 Literature in resettlement There are two types of resettlement, which is voluntary and involuntary resettlement (Asthana, 1996). There are two factors affecting these types of resttlement, which is the anthropologist consider it as pull and push factors. The involuntary resettlement is mainly caused by push factors, such as natural disaster, conflict, war, or public development project. Asthana (1996) discussed this issues and shows data of resettlement which was caused with dam project in some countries from 1950ど1990.

Resettlement caused by public project has been discussed thoroughly, such as Asif (2000) explored some perspective of affected persons. One crucial aspect most concerned were assured of a means of livelihood. Others such as Shami (1993) discussed some social implication of the resettlement which focus on the Arab Middle East cases. A few literatures were in Indonesian cases, such as in Tirtosudarmo (1997) which only discussed on internal migration.

It is interesting to cite the Cernea (2007), which he said that

Adequate rehabilitation and the proper resettlement of those displaced as part of developmentどinduced displacement have always been a difficult issue to resolve. The method usually favoured by governments has been to offer compensation, but this is never sufficient, for such sums accrue to the ultimate project costs and the invariable tendency is to minimise these.

Furthermore, the author also underlining statement that developmentどcaused involuntary resettlement need to look at a betterどcapacity to succeed, such as better in institutional and financial capacity. The stressing was at institutional capacity to succeed the development. On the other hand, the author also proposed a strategy as part of compensation. The strategy was a benefitどsharing mechanism, where a local community were given a chance to access a facility being developed.

3 Designing the LRP Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP) is a crucial stage in rehabilitation of the West Tarun Canal. The rehabilitation project is under the umbrella of the Integrated Citarum Water Resource Management Investment Program (ICWRMP). It is assisted with funding from the Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) of the Asian Development Band (ADB).

The ADB has a set of strict rules which has to be obeys by GOI on involuntary resettlement that are aimed at helping ensure that a project contributes to the reduction of poverty. Project funded by the ADB should provide an opportunity for the marginal, such as AH, to at least maintain their living standards.

ね

Part of the implementation of the ICWRMP, the GOI has adopted the Resettlement Framework (RF) for the ICWRMP as a remedial policy measure, in order to help ensure that AHs are able to rehabilitate themselves to at least their preどproject conditions.

The LRP targets on the AHs. The validity of the AHs database is critical. How was the AHs database setted up ? Setting up the AHs database

Figure 1. Steps of the LRP design

Final report by EQUATOR (2012) has defined some characteristics of the AHs, which are briefly listed as follow,

ど All the AHs that residing, working, doing business and/or cultivating land within the corridor of impact (3ど6 m from the edge of top embarkment (left side) and 6ど8 m from the edge of top embankment (right side) as mentioned in the in the final DED of WTC.

ど AHs that have assets (building, trees and seasonal crop) located within the affected corridors in Citarum/Curug exどriver, Cibeet exどriver, Cikarang exどriver and Bekasi exどriver or other governement lad that has been planned and design on DED 2011 as disposal area).

ど All the AHs that residing, working and/or cultivating land within the disposal area as proposed in the final DED of WTC.

ど AHs evicted by local governments after the cut off date and have been traced during tracing period (December � January 2012).

The AHs definitions is a crucial step, and should be informed to all stake holder, such as affected individu, local government officer, and other interested party.

の

The definition has to be discussed and negotiated among the stake holder. It should be stated and agreed together.

The AHs are classified into three category based on the level of impact. The AHs categories are severely AHs, non severely AHs with medium impact, and non severly AHs with low impact (detail in Table 1).

Table 1. Classification scheme on level of impact and type of delivered compensation (Equator, 2012).

No Type of Scheme of LRP Received

Category I (Low Impact)

Category II (Medium Impact)

Category III (Sever Impact)

1 Compensation of Assets Yes Yes Yes 2 Transportation (Relocation)

allowance No No Yes

3 Transition allowance (Jaminan Hidup)

No Rice for 7 days Rice for 3 months

4 Training to increase livelihood Yes Yes Yes 5 Access to water and electricity No No Yes 6 Relocation facilitation No No Yes 7 School allowance for children No No Yes 8 Facilitation Yes Yes Yes

The classification was derived using procedure which is defined in Figure 2. There are several step involved, but a crucial step was tracing the AHs registered in cutoff date 2008 that are affected by District of Bekasi.

は

Figuer 2. Updating and designing of LRP

UpdatingAHsdataThis step is fulfilled by conducting Inventory of Losses (IOL) survey. The IOL survey is conducted to detail the affected assets of AHs, to update the ownership of assets then estimate the replacement cost for each AHs.

Tracing the AHs registered in cutoff date 2008 that are affected by District of Bekasi. Tracing is aimed to find the AHs that was evicted by District of Bekasi Government and assure that the AHs being registered in updating data 2011ど2012. The tracing AHs will be addressed the same as AHs of IOL survey.

Socio┽economicsurveySocioどeconomic survey is aimed to obtain general picture of socioどeconomic information of AHs. The information will be considered as the input for designing the type of LRP that most suitable for AHs.

CategorizingtheAHsAHs categorize based on the level of impact to their assets. The AHs categorize in 2 (two) type as follows:

ば

a. Severely AHs, is the AHs whose more than 10% of their main livelihood/income affected by project. This AHs with Sever impact that should be relocated.

b. Non Severely AHs, is the AHs that should not be relocated. This AHs received low and medium impact but still feasible to stay.

4 Quality of the AHs database One the quality issue of the database is consistency in defining the scale of characteristics being observed/measured. Some characteristics are presented in the following Figures 3. An example for the status of the AHs were varied accross the different cutどoff date (or situation being observed). It seems some human errors were occured when inputing the data. The same errors were also occured in others characteristics.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3. Inconsistency in defining the categories

OTD

Bar

u di R

OW

200

8

OTD B

ARU D

ED

OTD B

ARU D

ED

OTD

Bar

u DED

OTD

bar

u DED

Otd

Bar

u de

d

Otd b

aru

ded

OTD

200

8

40

30

20

10

0

statusotd

Pe

rce

nt

Chart of statusotd

Percent within all data.

Tidak BeresikoSakit ParahJompojompoJandajanda

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

statusr

Pe

rce

nt

Chart of statusr


ぱ

(a)

(b) Figure 4. Unclear about value of the characteristics/categories

Figure 4 shows a common error within the database. In this situation the value is relevant with the characteristics, e.g. income for 87,5 million rupiah. But the value is apparently irrelevant compare with others. A similar situation in Figure 4 b.

Other issues may affect the quality of the database are in handling a complexity of the database, such number of cases and characteristics. For large database which contains a large number of cases and characteristics, should be handled using an appropriate database software.

Other more complex example is In the following categories of jobs/activities of the persons wihtin the AHs.

87,575,062,550,037,525,012,50,0

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

income (in million rupiah)

Pe

rce

nt

Histogram of income

SedangRinganRelokasiBerat

50

40

30

20

10

0

kategori

Pe

rce

nt

Chart of kategori


ひ

Tally for Discrete Variables: pekerjaan pekerjaan Count Percent

bertani 2 0,18

Bertani 93 8,33

Bertani 1 0,09

Bertani 2 0,18

Bertani 1 0,09

Bertani/ Peternak 1 0,09

Bertani/Ternak 88 7,88

Buruh 3 0,27

Buruh / Serabutan 2 0,18

Buruh bangunan 2 0,18

Buruh Bangunan 12 1,07

Buruh Bongkar Muat 1 0,09

buruh cuci 1 0,09

buruh cuci motor 1 0,09

Buruh Limbah 1 0,09

buruh pabrik 1 0,09

Buruh Pabrik 2 0,18

Buruh proyek 1 0,09

Buruh PT 1 0,09

Buruh PU 1 0,09

Buruh serabutam 1 0,09

Buruh serabutan 1 0,09

Buruh Serabutan 11 0,98

Buruh tani 5 0,45

Buruh Tani 19 1,70

Buruh Tani Serabutan 1 0,09

Buruh/Kuli Pasir 1 0,09

Buruh/Pabrik 2 0,18

Dagang 5 0,45

dagang sembako 1 0,09

Dagang Warung Kopi 1 0,09

Dagang/Buah Keliling 1 0,09

Honorer PJT 1 0,09

Ibu Rumah tangga 1 0,09

Ibu Rumah Tangga 4 0,36

Jual buah 2 0,18

Jual burung 1 0,09

Jualan 1 0,09

jualan warung sembako 1 0,09

Karyawan Pabrik 2 0,18

Karyawan PAM 1 0,09

karyawan PT UPA 1 0,09

Ketua RT 1 0,09

Ketua RW 2 0,18

Lainnya 24 2,15

Limbah 1 0,09

Linmas 1 0,09

など

LINMAS 1 0,09

Matrial bahan bangunan 1 0,09

Menganggur 5 0,45

Nganggur 17 1,52

Ngangur 1 0,09

Ojeg 1 0,09

Ojek 2 0,18

pedagang 1 0,09

Pedagang 6 0,54

Pedagang Gado-Gado 1 0,09

Pedagang Sayur 2 0,18

Pegawai 1 0,09

Pegawai (Swasta/Negeri) 60 5,37

Pegawai Leasing 1 0,09

pegawai negri 1 0,09

Pegawai PT Toyota 1 0,09

Pegawai swasta 1 0,09

Pegawai Swasta 2 0,18

pegawai swasta/negeri 1 0,09

Pekerja 1 0,09

Pemulung Barang Bekas 1 0,09

Pengelola Café 2 0,18

Pengepul limbah 1 0,09

Pengepul Rongsokan/Barang Bekas 1 0,09

Penghulu 1 0,09

Pengrajin Batu Nisan 1 0,09

Pensiunan 6 0,54

Pensiunan IRJEN pengairan 1 0,09

Pensiunan Perairan 1 0,09

Pensiunan PJT 2 2 0,18

Pensiunan staff desa 1 0,09

Perangkat Desa 1 0,09

Perangkat Desa/KUA 1 0,09

Petani 30 2,69

Peternak 3 0,27

Petugas kebersihan kawasan 1 0,09

PNS 2 0,18

PNS Guru 2 0,18

PNS/guru 1 0,09

Salon 1 0,09

Satpam 1 0,09

Satpam PT DELTA 1 0,09

Security 2 0,18

Sekuriti 1 0,09

Sopir 1 0,09

Sopir/Buruh 180 16,11

supir 1 0,09

Supir Kontraktor 1 0,09

Supir Pabrik 1 0,09

なな

Supir Truck 1 0,09

Tambal ban 2 0,18

tani 5 0,45

Tani 10 0,90

Tani 2 0,18

Ternak kambing 1 0,09

Tidak Bekerja 1 0,09

Tidak kerja 1 0,09

TNI 1 0,09

Tukang ojeg 1 0,09

Usaha 381 34,11

Usaha / Dagang kacang rebus 1 0,09

Usaha / Dagang Sayur keliling 1 0,09

Usaha / Jual Beli Gabah 1 0,09

Usaha / Juru Photo 1 0,09

Usaha café 1 0,09

Usaha café dangdut 1 0,09

Usaha kayu 1 0,09

Usaha Lapak 1 0,09

usaha limbah 1 0,09

Usaha Limbah 1 0,09

Usaha steam motor 1 0,09

Usaha tani 6 0,54

Usaha Tani 4 0,36

Usaha warung 2 0,18

Usaha warung rokok 1 0,09

Usaha/Jual Genjer 1 0,09

Usaha/Stim Motor/Toko 1 0,09

Usaha/warung 2 0,18

Usaha/Warung 2 0,18

Warung kopi 3 0,27

Warung Kopi 1 0,09

Warung Kopi Dan Café 1 0,09

Warung kopi dan Steam Motor 1 0,09

Warung remang-remang 3 0,27

Warung Sayuran 1 0,09

Warung sembako 2 0,18

Wiraswasta 1 0,09

Wiraswasta pengepul limbah 2 0,18

N= 1117

*= 2

In this case, simplification of the category may be applied, hence information about job/activities of individuals are disclose clearly.

なに

5 Validity of the database Validity of the database may affect the quality of policy being developed. A good quality of policy may be implemented ideally without any conflict amongs the affected community. But in realization the conflict could be minimized by looking at some key AHs characteristics carefully, i.e cutどoff date agreement, socioどeconomic characteristics. These characteristics were cross tabulated into the category of the AHs. The category of AHs were Berat (severe), Ringan (low), and Sedang (Moderate). In the following presentation, the category of AHs is setted as a collumns and other categories are setted as rows.

RelocationcategoriesVSAHscategoriesTabulated statistics: relocate; kategori_n Rows: relocate Columns: kategori_n

Ringan Sedang Berat All

Non Relokasi 579 191 0 770

75,19 24,81 0,00 100,00

Relokasi 0 1 348 349

0,00 0,29 99,71 100,00

All 579 192 348 1119

51,74 17,16 31,10 100,00

The presentation may indicate there will be a minimum conflict, since the severe AHs categories were mostly relocated, only one moderates is being relocate. This tabulation indicates a situation that the data is valid since there are not severe AHs status were in �Non Relokasi�. Tabulation for each regions are also indicate the same situation, which may be observed within the table below.

Tabulated statistics: relocate; kategori_n; kab_kota Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Bekasi Rows: relocate Columns: kategori_n



67,83 32,17 0,00 100,00

100,0 100,0 0,0 53,4


0,00 0,00 100,00 100,00

0,0 0,0 100,0 46,6

All 175 83 225 483

36,23 17,18 46,58 100,00

100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Karawang Rows: relocate Columns: kategori_n



80,96 19,04 0,00 100,00

100,0 100,0 0,0 81,8


0,00 0,00 100,00 100,00

0,0 0,0 100,0 18,2

All 387 91 106 584

66,27 15,58 18,15 100,00

なぬ

100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

Results for kab_kota = Kota Bekasi Rows: relocate Columns: kategori_n



50,00 50,00 0,00 100,00

100,00 94,44 0,00 65,38

Relokasi 0 1 17 18

0,00 5,56 94,44 100,00

0,00 5,56 100,00 34,62

All 17 18 17 52

32,69 34,62 32,69 100,00

100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00

But other socioどeconomic characteristics reveal an interesting insight about the AHs conditions, which may lead a worst situation. Such as a cross tabulation between cutどoff date versus AHs categories as follow :

Cut┽offdateVSAHscategoriesTabulated statistics: statusotd; kategori_n Rows: statusotd Columns: kategori_n


OTD 2008 163 51 98 312

52,24 16,35 31,41 100,00

OTD Baru DED 211 68 99 378

55,82 17,99 26,19 100,00

OTD Baru Di ROW 2008 205 73 151 429

47,79 17,02 35,20 100,00

All 579 192 348 1119

51,74 17,16 31,10 100,00

Number of the AHs in the categories were not the same from one cutどoff date to another. The AHs were a dynamics community, which may change periodically. It is indicate by the following table. The table shows that a new cutどoff date tend to increase level of AHs. For each regions are also the same and is shown below Tabulated statistics: statusotd; kategori_n; kab_kota Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Bekasi Rows: statusotd Columns: kategori_n Ringan Sedang Berat All

OTD 2008 59 30 68 157

37,58 19,11 43,31 100,00

33,71 36,14 30,22 32,51

OTD Baru DED 23 11 46 80

28,75 13,75 57,50 100,00

13,14 13,25 20,44 16,56

OTD Baru Di ROW 2008 93 42 111 246

37,80 17,07 45,12 100,00

53,14 50,60 49,33 50,93

All 175 83 225 483

36,23 17,18 46,58 100,00

100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00

なね

Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Karawang Rows: statusotd Columns: kategori_n Ringan Sedang Berat All

OTD 2008 102 19 26 147

69,39 12,93 17,69 100,00

26,36 20,88 24,53 25,17

OTD Baru DED 188 57 53 298

63,09 19,13 17,79 100,00

48,58 62,64 50,00 51,03

OTD Baru Di ROW 2008 97 15 27 139

69,78 10,79 19,42 100,00

25,06 16,48 25,47 23,80

All 387 91 106 584

66,27 15,58 18,15 100,00

100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00

Results for kab_kota = Kota Bekasi Rows: statusotd Columns: kategori_n Ringan Sedang Berat All

OTD 2008 2 2 4 8

25,00 25,00 50,00 100,00

11,76 11,11 23,53 15,38


OTD Baru Di ROW 2008 15 16 13 44

34,09 36,36 29,55 100,00

88,24 88,89 76,47 84,62

All 17 18 17 52

32,69 34,62 32,69 100,00

100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00

At differenct cutどoff date, it is shown a different number of AHs within an income categories. Income characteristic of the AHs are shown in the following table, and it is found about 85% of the AHs are in the low income category. Tabulated statistics: statusotd; income_n Rows: statusotd Columns: income_n

Low Modert High All

OTD 2008 265 43 4 312

84,94 13,78 1,28 100,00


91,01 7,14 1,85 100,00

OTD Baru Di ROW 2008 344 66 19 429

80,19 15,38 4,43 100,00

All 953 136 30 1119

85,17 12,15 2,68 100,00

This table indicates that the low income category has a largest proportion compare with other categories, hence it become crucial to handle appropriately. But who is the low income AHs?

なの

EconomicsstatusVSIncomecategoriesandAHscategoriesTabulated statistics: econ_status; income_n Rows: econ_status Columns: income_n

Low Modert High All

Miskin 226 0 0 226

23,7 0,0 0,0 20,2

Tidak Miskin 727 136 30 893

76,3 100,0 100,0 79,8

All 953 136 30 1119

100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

It is interesting that the low income AHs were mostly classified as �TIDAK MISKIN� (76,3%). It shows a matter of how the data was collected and a complexity of the poverty definitions.

But in the following table, it is indicated 85,63% of the �BERAT� categories was from the �TIDAK MISKIN�.

Tabulated statistics: econ_status; kategori_n Rows: econ_status Columns: kategori_n


Miskin 142 34 50 226

24,53 17,71 14,37 20,20

Tidak Miskin 437 158 298 893

75,47 82,29 85,63 79,80

All 579 192 348 1119

100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00

Tabulated statistics: econ_status; income_n; kab_kota Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Bekasi Rows: econ_status Columns: income_n

Low Modert High All

Miskin 61 0 0 61

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

16,1 0,0 0,0 12,6


75,59 20,38 4,03 100,00

83,9 100,0 100,0 87,4

All 380 86 17 483

78,67 17,81 3,52 100,00

100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Karawang Rows: econ_status Columns: income_n

Low Modert High All

Miskin 157 0 0 157

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

29,4 0,0 0,0 26,9


88,29 9,37 2,34 100,00

なは

70,6 100,0 100,0 73,1

All 534 40 10 584

91,44 6,85 1,71 100,00

100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

Results for kab_kota = Kota Bekasi Rows: econ_status Columns: income_n

Low Modert High All

Miskin 8 0 0 8

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

20,5 0,0 0,0 15,4


70,45 22,73 6,82 100,00

79,5 100,0 100,0 84,6

All 39 10 3 52

75,00 19,23 5,77 100,00

100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0

EconomicactivitiesoftheAHsEconomic activities of the AHs is a crucial characteristcs in designing the LRP. The data indicates 9 (nine) groups of AHs according their economics activities, which are three prominent groups, �PEGAWAI/BURUH�, �PETANI�, and �WIRAUSAHA�. Tally for Discrete Variables: pekerjaan_1 pekerjaan_1 Count Percent

Bekerja (non permanen) 7 0,63

Lainnya 24 2,15

Pegawai/buruh 334 29,90

Pengangguran 23 2,06

Pensiunan 11 0,98

Perangkat Desa 8 0,72

Petani 239 21,40

PNS 6 0,54

Tidak bekerja 7 0,63

Wirausaha 458 41,00

N= 1117

*= 2

Tabulated statistics: pekerjaan_1; income_n

なば

Rows: pekerjaan_1 Columns: income_n

Low Modert High All Bekerja (non permanen) 7 0 0 7

0,736 0,000 0,000 0,627

Lainnya 24 0 0 24

2,524 0,000 0,000 2,149

Pegawai/buruh 313 21 0 334

32,913 15,441 0,000 29,902

Pengangguran 23 0 0 23

2,419 0,000 0,000 2,059

Pensiunan 10 1 0 11

1,052 0,735 0,000 0,985

Perangkat Desa 8 0 0 8

0,841 0,000 0,000 0,716

Petani 226 13 0 239

23,764 9,559 0,000 21,397

PNS 4 2 0 6

0,421 1,471 0,000 0,537

Tidak bekerja 7 0 0 7

0,736 0,000 0,000 0,627

Wirausaha 329 99 30 458

34,595 72,794 100,000 41,003

Missing 2 0 0 *

* * * *

All 951 136 30 1117

100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

Tabulated statistics: pekerjaan_1; kategori_n Rows: pekerjaan_1 Columns: kategori_n

Ringan Sedang Berat All Bekerja (non permanen) 3 2 2 7

42,86 28,57 28,57 100,00

0,519 1,042 0,576 0,627

Lainnya 22 0 2 24

91,67 0,00 8,33 100,00

3,806 0,000 0,576 2,149


61,68 18,86 19,46 100,00

35,640 32,813 18,732 29,902


56,52 17,39 26,09 100,00

2,249 2,083 1,729 2,059

Pensiunan 11 0 0 11

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,903 0,000 0,000 0,985


100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,384 0,000 0,000 0,716

Petani 206 14 19 239

86,19 5,86 7,95 100,00

35,640 7,292 5,476 21,397

PNS 6 0 0 6

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,038 0,000 0,000 0,537


71,43 0,00 28,57 100,00

0,865 0,000 0,576 0,627

なぱ

Wirausaha 98 109 251 458

21,40 23,80 54,80 100,00

16,955 56,771 72,334 41,003

Missing 1 0 1 *

All 578 192 347 1117

51,75 17,19 31,07 100,00

100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

This result lead that the LRP would be designed to give attention into these groups. Tabulated statistics: pekerjaan_1; kategori_n; kab_kota Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Bekasi Rows: pekerjaan_1 Columns: kategori_n


Bekerja (non permanen) 0 1 0 1

0,00 100,00 0,00 100,00

0,000 1,205 0,000 0,207


53,95 15,79 30,26 100,00

23,429 14,458 10,222 15,735


80,00 0,00 20,00 100,00

2,286 0,000 0,444 1,035

Pensiunan 3 0 0 3

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,714 0,000 0,000 0,621


100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,143 0,000 0,000 0,414

Petani 82 5 8 95

86,32 5,26 8,42 100,00

46,857 6,024 3,556 19,669

PNS 2 0 0 2

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,143 0,000 0,000 0,414


0,00 0,00 100,00 100,00

0,000 0,000 0,444 0,207

Wirausaha 41 65 192 298

13,76 21,81 64,43 100,00

23,429 78,313 85,333 61,698

All 175 83 225 483

36,23 17,18 46,58 100,00

100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

なひ

Results for kab_kota = Kabupaten Karawang Rows: pekerjaan_1 Columns: kategori_n


Bekerja (non permanen) 3 1 2 6

50,00 16,67 33,33 100,00

0,777 1,099 1,905 1,031

Lainnya 22 0 2 24

91,67 0,00 8,33 100,00

5,699 0,000 1,905 4,124


64,31 20,00 15,69 100,00

42,487 56,044 38,095 43,814


47,06 23,53 29,41 100,00

2,073 4,396 4,762 2,921

Pensiunan 6 0 0 6

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,554 0,000 0,000 1,031


100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,554 0,000 0,000 1,031

Petani 120 9 11 140

85,71 6,43 7,86 100,00

31,088 9,890 10,476 24,055

PNS 4 0 0 4

100,00 0,00 0,00 100,00

1,036 0,000 0,000 0,687


83,33 0,00 16,67 100,00

1,295 0,000 0,952 1,031

Wirausaha 48 26 44 118

40,68 22,03 37,29 100,00

12,435 28,571 41,905 20,275

Missing 1 0 1 *

All 386 91 105 582

66,32 15,64 18,04 100,00

100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

にど

Results for kab_kota = Kota Bekasi Rows: pekerjaan_1 Columns: kategori_n



33,3 0,0 66,7 100,0

5,88 0,00 11,76 5,77


100,0 0,0 0,0 100,0

5,88 0,00 0,00 1,92

Pensiunan 2 0 0 2

100,0 0,0 0,0 100,0

11,76 0,00 0,00 3,85

Petani 4 0 0 4

100,0 0,0 0,0 100,0

23,53 0,00 0,00 7,69

Wirausaha 9 18 15 42

21,4 42,9 35,7 100,0

52,94 100,00 88,24 80,77

All 17 18 17 52

32,7 34,6 32,7 100,0

100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00

6 Recommendation The LRP final report defined 6 (six) types of livelihood restoreation program, which are Technical Training of Agriculture, Entrepreneurship Training, Training for Improving Small Shop Business, Training of Vocational Skill, Training of Ornamental Plants, Cultivation and its Opportunity, Joint Training. These program fit to the AHs characteristics, but it should take an attention into some socioどeconomic characteristics, such as income categories, economics status, ages, etc.

The different cutどoff date implies a different categorization of the AHs. Socioどeconomics structure within the community is another factor which may lead a different categorization of the AHs. Technically this situation is minimized by well designed survey procedures, data handling, and a good data analysing procedure.

7 Refferences Asif, Mohammed. (2000). Why Displaced Persons Reject Project Resettlement

Colonies. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(24), 2005ど2008. Asthana, Roli. (1996). Involuntary Resettlement: Survey of International

Experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(24), 1468ど1475. Cernea, Michael M. (2007). Financing for Development: BenefitどSharing

Mechanisms in Population Resettlement. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(12), 1033ど1046.

Equator. (2012). Updating of Resettlement Plan and Design of Livelihood Restoreation Program for the West Tarum Canal Rehabilitation sub Project under the Integrated Citarum Water Resources Management Investment Program (ADB LOAN : 2501どINO). Equator.

にな

Shami, Seteney. (1993). The Social Implications of Population Displacement and Resettlement: An Overview with a Focus on the Arab Middle East. International Migration Review, 27(1), 4ど33.

Tirtosudarmo, Riwanto. (1997). Economic Development, Migration, and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia: A Preliminary Observation. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 12(2), 293ど328.

Annex F Sampling Plan and Sampling

Frame






SAMPLING PLAN

And

SAMPLING FRAME OF Ahs

AUGUST 2012



Monitoring methodology (According to ToR):

a. Random review of payment vouchers and other form of compensation to ensure full

compliance with the requirements of the RF. This review will assess a representative

sample of all the AHs.

b.

Sampling technique : cluster sampling based on area (area sampling)

Area Population (HH)

based on 31/08/2012 data Sample size (HH)

(95% conf. & 5% error)

Bekasi City 64 39 Bekasi District 718 85 Karawang District 538 82

Data to be collected:

- Actual amount of payment vouchers and other form of compensation received by

the AHs.

c. Random site visits, where asset acquisition processes are taking place, to ascertain that

compensation has been duly paid to the commencement of civil works. This activity will

cover at least 20% of the AHs, and 20% of AHs identified as vulnerable group. For this

purpose, the EMA will check the following: (i) results of the detailed measurement survey

or inventory of affected assets; (ii) valuation of affected assets based on replacement

cost; and (iii) compensation is paid prior to initiation of civil works.

Sampling technique : combination of cluster sampling based on area & vulnerability

and quota sampling


based on 31/08/2012 data

Vulnerable (HH) based on

31/08/2012 data

Sample size (HH) 20% quota

Vulnerable Non-vulner.

Bekasi City 64 62 13 0 Bekasi District 718 494 99 45 Karawang District 538 363 73 35


- Verification of affected assets

- The value of affected assets based on replacement cost

- Actual time of payment

d. Special market study to validate whether the unit costs used in compensating fixed assets

are at current market prices or replacement costs.

Sampling technique : combination of area sampling (based on Kecamatan) and

quota sampling

City/District Sub-district Number of village

Sample Size (Village)

Bekasi City Bekasi Selatan 1 1

Bekasi Timur 1 1

Bekasi District Cibitung 1 1

Cikarang Barat 2 2

Cikarang Pusat 3 3

Cikarang Selatan 4 4

Cikarang Utara 1 1

Tambun Selatan 5 5

Karawang District Ciampel 6 6

Klari 1 1

Teluk Jambe Barat 6 6

Teluk Jambe Timur 5 5


- Property/land price (in Rp/m2)

e. Periodic field visits to ascertain that affected people are adequately informed of project

objectives, impact, compensation policy entitlements through an effective public

information campaign. This will cover at least 30% of all the AHs in the project.

Sampling technique : combination of area sampling and quota sampling



30% quota Bekasi City 64 19 Bekasi District 718 149 Karawang District 538 109


- Awareness and knowledge of affected AHs about the project objectives, impact,

and compensation policy entitlements

f. Periodic field visits to assess if grievance procedures are adequately explained to the

affected people and implemented. This will cover at least 30% of all the AHs in the

project.

Sampling technique : combination of area sampling and quota sampling



30% quota Bekasi City 64 19 Bekasi District 718 149 Karawang District 538 109


- Awareness and knowledge of AHs about the grievance procedure

- Grievance mechanism experienced by the AHs

Sampling Frame of AHs Verification Survey

No. Nama KK Coordinates


Easting Northing Easting Northing

1 A Kaja 742237 9299093 548 Kendi K 726034 9306510

2 A.Saepudin 730644 9305335 549 KGS Arif 723298 9307538

3 AA.Silegar 743366 9298372 550 Khaerudin 743140 9298569

4 Aas 737755 9302073 552 Kholid A 721239 9308280

6 Abd.Rosid 733356 9304849 553 Kholilullah 740168 9300129

7 Abdul Azis 733161 9304906 554 Khusni Ali Murtado 721234 9308279

10 Abdul Hamid 733500 9304838 555 Kiman 741000 9299593

11 Abdul Hamid 741526 9299408 556 Kocan Syahruli 732978 9304939

12 Abdul Kosur 738698 9301177 557 Kokom 743735 9298065

13 Abdul muin 733699 9304823 558 Komar 739650 9300532

15 Abdul Mukti 736164 9303611 561 Kotik 734058 9304680

18 Abdul Wahid 726018 9306513 562 Kotong Kosasih 741354 9299544

22 Abu Binti Tibong 742662 9298917 564 Krisman 742516 9299048

30 Achmat Munawar 737445 9302533 565 Kristanto 733736 9304865

31 Aci 739355 9300800 570 L.panjaitan 729748 9305483

33 Acim bin Manda 740968 9299592 573 Lasan 733644 9304820

36 Ade 726137 9306468 574 Lasim 734139 9303942

41 Adi Firmansyah 723401 9307506 575 Lukianah Binti Cardi 737763 9302046

42 Adi S 728973 9305602 578 M Sodik 736439 9303616

49 Adul 742189 9299192 582 M. Subekti 725988 9306524

53 Agus Deri 721457 9308204 588 M.Masim SP 741090 9299558

55 Agus Sopian 741503 9299408 589 M.Owing 741371 9299471

56 Agus Suprianto 738734 9301216 591 M.Syai 729044 9305601

57 Agus Sutisna 721558 9308163 592 M.Yusup 721833 9308066

58 Ahmad 741299 9299558 593 Maanih 734817 9303596

63 Ahyar 733766 9304812 594 Ma'at 732854 9304941

64 Ainur Rafiq 733667 9304836 597 Madrais 733336 9304876

66 Aja 743323 9298403 608 Maman L 739605 9300631

72 Ajum 733690 9304878 609 Maman S 730630 9305339

75 Alam 739411 9300775 610 Maman Surahman 729103 9305580

90 amir dedi R 730578 9305352 611 Mandon H 732990 9304933

91 Amir Hamzah 721929 9308034 615 Mardais 741379 9299534

94 Amung 743583 9298190 619 Mariduk 723164 9307587

96 Anah 737776 9302030 620 Marimin 721790 9308076

98 Anda 743539 9298235 621 Marja 742567 9299020

99 Anda 739099 9300907 626 Marta'i 733623 9304832

100 Anda 741820 9299283 628 Ma'ruf Tajudin 725709 9306587

104 Anda Suhanda 743758 9298046 630 Marzuki 736254 9303626

105 Anden 741373 9299539 633 Mashuri 733130 9304905

107 Andi Azis 741225 9299592 636 Mat Salim 733368 9304848

109 Andi Saputra 738008 9301811 638 Matlumin 733432 9304865




111 andri 733613 9304832 639 Matraji 733394 9304840

114 Aneng Bin Jiang 735038 9303611 641 Matruki 733353 9304864

120 Antonius Nainggolan 737307 9302780 644 Miftah 731011 9305277

121 Apay 743730 9298059 647 Mirta 742730 9298886

128 Arizal 723164 9307587 657 Muflikhun 721566 9308158

138 Arti 740612 9299684 662 Mujahidin 726164 9306461

141 Asan 743110 9298604 663 Mujana 741194 9299591

143 Asep 741193 9299591 664 Mujib 733713 9304795

144 Asep 738689 9301188 666 Mulyadi 721100 9308378

145 Asep 743062 9298648 668 Munir 733355 9304878

146 Asep Ibami 739898 9300382 669 Musih 725004 9306855

147 Asep Mamun 739546 9300667 671 Mustalim 733702 9304811

151 Asep.s 729886 9305456 673 Mustofa 738228 9301550

153 ASIM 733788 9304854 677 Naat 734273 9304099

155 Asim Bin Bonan 738381 9301410 694 Nana Sukarna 721493 9308188

156 Asim Bin kawilan 740705 9299656 695 Nanang 730447 9305369

160 Asmali 733327 9304861 696 Nanang S 737346 9302724

161 Asmin 733592 9304824 700 Nardi 735018 9303629

164 Asum 734214 9303728 701 Narim 734936 9303624

168 Atang Yuda 739511 9300700 702 Narimin 741025 9299640

171 Ati Kurniati 730861 9305304 703 Nasib Jumantoro 738681 9301187

173 Atih 730992 9305280 707 Natih 734201 9304078

184 Awing 735314 9303627 708 Natik 733416 9304841

187 Ayat Sudrajat 740180 9300099 711 Nekin 739211 9300828

188 Ayim Permana 743363 9298379 713 Nemin Sahudin 730971 9305285

190 ayo sunarya 733836 9304809 714 Nendi 734657 9303627

191 Ayum 739111 9300903 721 Nilan 740659 9299690

193 Bahar Mario 741858 9299332 722 Nimun 730657 9305335

194 Baharuddin 734181 9304024 724 Noa 741430 9299448

199 Bambang S 723806 9307299 725 Noan 740562 9299708

200 Basri 740270 9299937 732 Nuran 734668 9303611

201 Basri 736288 9303604 735 Nurhojin 732100 9305074

202 Basuki Y G 730480 9305365 737 Nurman 730743 9305327

203 Benin 734237 9303712 742 Oding 737768 9302042

204 Bening 734210 9303824 744 Olim bin bia 740626 9299700

205 Sarnah 734223 9303773 754 Onin N 737267 9302951

206 bikner manik 729757 9305482 755 Osib 739394 9300707

207 Binderman 737822 9302063 764 Parda 742300 9299060

209 Boan bin Ersin 734168 9304166 766 Paulinus sinaga 739345 9300810

210 Bohani 733743 9304862 767 Pefron 737304 9302758

212 Bonar Sibarani 726299 9306407 771 Pujiyanto 737585 9302377

213 Bondan 734525 9303621 774 Radinah 723646 9307366




215 Bosin 741113 9299611 776 Rahmat 740010 9300359

219 Busadin 733583 9304842 778 Rahnat G 721100 9308378

223 Cakam Firdaus 741056 9299576 789 Renin 734854 9303628

227 Cardi Bin Kojar 737784 9302017 791 Rianto 730672 9305326

238 Dace 734280 9304096 794 Ridoi 733301 9304886

246 Dalim 738221 9301552 795 Ridwan 721566 9308158

252 Darmaji 730901 9305296 796 Rika Rangga 721929 9308034

254 Darmanto 740705 9299656 797 Rindon 734402 9303638

255 Darno 725978 9306531 806 Romli 733097 9304902

257 Darsan 739682 9300520 812 Ropii 730452 9305315

260 Darwanto 730932 9305290 817 Rukman 725721 9306584

275 Denny 726080 9306491 818 Rusli 730654 9305335

278 Didi Rusfandi 740138 9300176 822 Rustam 733548 9304846

300 Eep Ependi 743305 9298411 833 Sahala L Tobing 737228 9302899

303 eha bt edi 743556 9298208 839 Saim Brata 737606 9302297

317 Enan 740485 9299744 841 Saimar 741382 9299531

333 Endih B Embin 736339 9303627 843 Saji 737751 9302066

344 Engkos 730474 9305373 844 Sakim wijaya 743325 9298402

345 Engkos Somantri 741313 9299558 851 Samad binti micang 742881 9298810

351 Enti 739603 9300635 852 Saman 723869 9307328

355 Enung Binti Anung 742940 9298766 855 Samin 734151 9304215

358 Erizal 734991 9303623 857 Samin bin Tigung 733861 9304801

359 Erni Maryani 737796 9302015 859 Samsuri 741345 9299546

360 Ersim 734199 9304071 863 Sanadi 721493 9308188

364 Faishal 733160 9304903 877 Sariti 730459 9305352

365 Faishal 733160 9304903 878 Sariyah 734166 9304529

369 Fauzi 733286 9304887 883 Sarnita bin saden 741116 9299559

372 Gunawan 739449 9300670 897 Sihol Manurung 726441 9306357

373 Gunawan 726580 9306260 898 Simah binti amung 743599 9298183

374 Gunawan 725148 9306837 901 Slamat 733703 9304820

380 H. Nasim 733394 9304861 903 Sodikin 730667 9305327

382 H.Acim 738734 9301217 905 Soleh Santoso 734170 9304496

386 H.Hasan 733701 9304831 908 Somad 733323 9304873

390 H.Rosul 736382 9303616 910 Sopyan 732107 9305109

399 Harun 737264 9302955 912 Suamin 723320 9307480

405 Hasan 731055 9305269 914 Suanda 730897 9305298

406 Hasan Basri 723424 9307494 916 Subed Dillah 721929 9308034

409 Hasniah 733631 9304815 924 Suharti 734122 9303928

417 Hj Hotijah 725194 9306782 925 Suharto Bin Kusen 741116 9299616

419 Holil 741213 9299588 928 Sukandi 738350 9301434

420 Hosimah 736097 9303625 931 Sukarna 741356 9299482

421 Hotland risan 737385 9302805 932 Sukarta 738092 9301737




422 Husni AM 721239 9308280 938 Sumiho 726534 9306275

425 Ican Sanusi 740232 9300004 939 Sumriyah 733277 9304858

426 icung bin kinan 733978 9304761 946 Suparjo 741548 9299401

428 Idi 740274 9299919 948 Suparta 741497 9299413

429 Idim Damayana 740886 9299613 954 Supriyatno 729483 9305525

432 Ihin 721412 9308213 955 Surahman 737237 9302994

434 Ija Bin Tubi 737373 9302810 961 Susis W A 730911 9305295

436 Ijo 725971 9306499 965 Sutarjo 741224 9299573

438 ikin 729168 9305570 972 Suwarni 725144 9306801

442 Imat 741325 9299554 974 Syarif hidayat 730186 9305410

443 Imin 743186 9298529 988 Tasim 739688 9300507

444 Imin Bin Ota 734160 9304165 994 Tawi 741302 9299560

447 Imran Sinaga 723378 9307462 996 Taya 743546 9298229

449 Indra M 729869 9305476 998 Tinah 742481 9299068

452 Irawan Maryono 721379 9308238 1001 Tohadi 725152 9306835

453 Irfan 729288 9305550 1002 Tohari 740058 9300319

454 irfan 721566 9308138 1003 Torang S 739898 9300434

456 Isani 729886 9305455 1007 Tudel Ferri 729563 9305515

460 Itang bin Jamain 741841 9299348 1019 Ujang 726196 9306445

462 Iwan S 729497 9305518 1027 Umar 740660 9299641

463 Jaan Bin Siman 740633 9299697 1029 Unan 740422 9299756

464 Jaelani 739532 9300680 1030 Unan Bin Samin 741351 9299538

469 jamah 743537 9298196 1033 Usi 725021 9306854

470 Jamaluddin 721833 9308066 1040 Wacing 743024 9298690

472 Jaman 732737 9304964 1043 Wahyudi 740150 9300166

474 Jamil 737591 9302313 1048 Wardi 734148 9303742

480 Jaya 725960 9306535 1057 Wasim 726346 9306396

483 Jelali 733713 9304820 1060 Wasriah 730829 9305267

485 Johanes purba 730731 9305329 1061 Wasroni 733179 9304900

487 Jony 733604 9304844 1064 Wawan S 721379 9308238

492 Julius manala 734172 9304507 1065 Waya 743469 9298272

499 Juricum 737799 9302022 1069 Yaan bin Ota 734175 9304451

500 Jusman 736950 9303241 1073 Yana Suryana 737760 9302055

507 Kamad Dirja 737252 9302981 1075 Yanto 723164 9307587

512 Kanan 734144 9303892 1078 Yudi Rojali 730853 9305307

518 Kardi Bin Lajur 742234 9299171 1079 Yus Hendri 743067 9298639

523 Karmah 742212 9299111 1084 Zaenal arifin 723328 9307530

536 Kartini 723646 9307366 1312 Asen 734168 9304506

538 Karya Saputra 735027 9303614 1313 Maulana Djaya 737394 9302657

539 Kasirun SH 723298 9307538 1315 Arlimen Simbolon 737422 9302611

541 Kasmali 730897 9305300

Annex H Paper on Gender Sensit ivity

Analysis

PARAHYANGAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (CPMS)

Sub-Contract for External Monitoring Agency for Resettlement Plan Updating and Implementation


WORKING PAPER ON

GENDER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

NAME OF CONSULTANTS:

ELISABETH DEWI

FRANSISKUS RIAN PRATIKTO

NOVEMBER 2012

Integrated Citarum Water Management Resources Invesment Project Subcomponent 8.1: Program Management Support

2 | 2 0

I. Context of Gender Equality in Indonesia

According to several studies in Indonesia, over the past 3 years, the country has made

important strides in achieving greater equality between women and men. In 2009,

Indonesia was ranked 55 out of 102 in the Social Institutions and Gender Index.1

Currently, Indonesia is ranked 32 out of 86 for the same index. While the score for the

Gender Inequality Index score was 0.505, while Indonesia’s Global Gender Gap Index

rating was 0.6594, placing it in 90th place (out of a total of 135 countries) for 2011.

There are five conceptual framework used to score the index above:2

1. Discriminatory Family Code; related to variables: legal age of marriage, early

marriage, parental authority, and inheritance.

2. Restricted Physical Integrity; related to variables: violence against women (laws,

attitudes and prevalence), female genital mutilation and reproductive integrity.

3. Son Bias; related to variables: missing women and fertility preferences.

4. Restricted Resources and Entitlements; related to variables: access to land,

access to property other than land and access to credit.

5. Restricted Civil Liberties; related to variables: access to public space and political

voice.

In contrast, the Human Development Index (HDI) score for Indonesia was 0.617,

placing it in 124th place (out of 187 countries) for 2011.3 Indonesia still placed below

the regional average although the HDI of East Asia and the Pacific as a region

increased from 0.428 in 1980 to 0.671 today. The HDI used as an alternative to

conventional measures of national development, such as level of health, education,

income and the rate of economic growth.

II. Context of Gender Equality in West Java

Based on study conducted by the Bogor Agriculture Institute’s Women Study Center,

discrimination against women is still occurring in West Java as the biggest province in

Indonesia. While the figure of women and men may seem equal, which is there are

100 women for every 103 men among West Java’s 43 million people, the West Java’s

Gender Development Index, at 61.81, was still far behind the Human Development

1 Source: http://genderindex.org/country/indonesia access 30 July 2012

2 Source: http://genderindex.org/sites/default/files/2012SIGIsummaryresults.pdf access 30 July 2012

3 Source: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IDN.html access 30 July 2012

http://genderindex.org/country/indonesia

http://genderindex.org/sites/default/files/2012SIGIsummaryresults.pdf

http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IDN.html

3 | 2 0

Index, which has reached 71.12. 4 The province still suffers an educational gap as

well, with only an estimated 46 percent of women attending senior high school,

compared with 47.38 percent for men. It is important to note that an issue of early

marriage is one of the key issues identified in specific areas of West Java. This is

considered as affecting girls’ access to and participation in education.5

The Central Statistics Bureau recorded that in 2008, 60 percent of the women in West

Java played a dual role as housewives and as breadwinners who, on average,

supported four family members. In other words, in West Java women carry a huge

burden. Currently, 78 percent of the employees behind the informal sector, which

accounts for more than IDR 7 trillion (US$805 million), are women, in addition to the

many women working overseas as migrant workers who also bring money home.

Related to the discussion of empowering women in the economy, society, politics and

education, another study conducted by Peter Hancock points out that women work

very hard to develop themselves from individuals, households and communities level.6

Women in the grassroots level provide huge contribution to the development of their

family and community with their wages and through their attitude to work as a primary

source to improve their status. However, the situation depends upon many factors

associated with political and economic power and upon the elite in the local and

national level.

In addition, the results of the baseline assessment on the population and civil

registration administrative public services conducted by the World Bank show gender

inequality in accessing the public services. 7 The baseline assessment above

discusses some causes of this inequality include:

(a) Some of the regent’s rules having not expressly shown partisanship to the

special needs and the social roles of women.

(b) There was not any affirmative approach in transform the laws and regulations

into the regent’s rules and into main tasks and functions of local government and

service providers. 4 The Jakarta Post, Pushing for Women�s Empowerment,


acess 30 July 2012 5 Fact Sheet Girls' Education In Indonesia

http://www.unicef.org/indonesia/girls_education_fact_sheet_final_ENG_1_.pdf access 30 July 2012 6 Hancock, Peter, The Gender Empowerment Measure: Issues from West Java, Indonesia,

http://devnet.anu.edu.au/online%20versions%20pdfs/51/VPThancock51.pdf access 30 July 2012 7 Baseline Assessment on Women's Accessibility to Public Services (West Java Province) http://www-

wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/05/15/000356161_20120515003

000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHIT0Services00West0Java0.pdf acess 30 July 2012


http://www.unicef.org/indonesia/girls_education_fact_sheet_final_ENG_1_.pdf

http://devnet.anu.edu.au/online%20versions%20pdfs/51/VPThancock51.pdf

http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/05/15/000356161_20120515003000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHIT0Services00West0Java0.pdf



4 | 2 0

(c) The limited knowledge of human resources involved in the public services

regarding gender sensitivity,

(d) Standard Operating Procedure made by the service providers having not

considered women as subject of the services.

(e) The majority of service providers have not capable of making indicators of work

achievement targets with gender perspective especially related to the minimum

service qualification and work achievement targets.

(f) Lack of allocation of the sufficient budget for activities required in improving

women accessibility to public services made by local government and service

providers.

(g) Majority of women as the responsible party in the household care duties never

been considered in preparing regulation and policy of the service providers.

(h) In many cases related to establishing mechanism, plan, and documents required

to obtain the services the service providers frequently have not considered

psychological and cost problems of women as household head, and

geographical restriction as well as access limitation in accessing information

related to the services.

(i) In terms of analyzing performance and impacts of a service, the service

providers have not considered women as the affected subject. 8

III. Summary of Gender Assessment of the Project

Related to monitoring and evaluation process of this project, this paper would highlight

some of collection of sex--disaggregated data in the baseline surveys and

development of monitoring indicators to assess the gender-differentiated impact.

Based on data in three areas: Bekasi, Karawang Regency and Bekasi Regency, the

majority respondents are male, as expected and indicated in many other similar project

in other areas or even in other countries (see Table 1).

8 Baseline Assessment on Women's Accessibility to Public Services (West Java Province) http://www-

wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/05/15/000356161_20120515003

000/Rendered/PDF/684360ESW0WHIT0Services00West0Java0.pdf acess 30 July 2012




5 | 2 0

Table 1: Respondents of the Project

In contrast, there are more widows, both in Karawang Regency and Bekasi Regency,

than the widowers (see Table 2). In this situation, there are more households headed

by female than male, which need more recognition from local and national government

and intervention from the project. For example, there is a program to support for

women’s empowerment programs such as Perempuan Kepala Keluarga (Pekka), or

the Women-Headed Households Empowerment Program, which was introduced in

2001 in West Java, must come from the government. By conducting a provocative

program such as Pekka, the local and province government would be able to push for

social changes in West Java, despite the annual budget of only IDR 900 million from

the provincial administration.

Table 2: Marital Status

With regard of the type of the respondents’ occupations, the highest number of

respondent work as sellers, especially in Bekasi Regency and Karawang Regency

70

40

70

42

11

2

Laki-laki

Perempuan

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80


1

2

10

97

1

1

2

1

1

6

10010

3

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Belum Menikah

Cerai

Cerai Mati

Cerai Pisah

Duda

Janda

Menikah

Lajang


6 | 2 0

(see Table 3). It followed by farmers and housewives in Karawang Regency. For those

three types of occupation, there are plenty women involved in the sectors, both directly

and indirectly. It is clear enough that a bulk of housewives need to be empowered in

order to get a direct benefit from the project in collaboration with local and national

government.

Table 3: Occupations

Related to the participation of women in this project through their presence in several

Focus Group Discussion (FGD) meetings, there is an indication that women are

involved actively even though the number is still lower than male. For example, in

Kabupaten Karawang there were 10 FGDs which were conducted during AHs updating

and LRP preparation and the range of percentage of female participants was 11.5% to

42.2%. In contrast, the range of percentage of male participants was 53.5% to 88.5%.

In Kabupaten Bekasi, due to the limitation of data, there were only 2 lists of

participants available instead of 16, which was 9% and 46% of female. Relatively

similar to Kota Bekasi, there were only 2 FGD meetings conducted and only 1 meeting

attended by female participants which was only 12.5%.

Having looked those limited data above, the project has indicated a gender inclusion

perspective within their implementation of FGD meetings in several locations.

However, it is important to note that the percentage has not been reflected the reality

comprehensively and clearly. The data above has not provided any information of

reasons and explanations of limited number of female attended and participated in

different FGD meetings.

1011

7

13

11

175

231

119

322

16

1

341

2

1

1

9

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Bertani

Buruh Cuci Motor

Buruh Serabutan

Ibu Rumah Tangga

Pegawai (Swasta/Negeri)

Peternak

Usaha/Dagang


7 | 2 0

IV. Gender Action Plan

As required by ADB, it is important to ensure that “gender mainstreaming” is tangible

and explicitly visible in project design and implementation. The project-specific gender

action plan (GAP) is an inclusive component that mirrors the project outputs as an

integral part of project design.9

Related to the idea above, it is important to highlight that there won’t be any limitation

for women to access the resources, opportunities and services related to implication of

this project. It is necessary for them to improve their standard of living for themselves

and their families during and after this project implemented. All the stakeholders in the

project have to ensure that women are not become the victims of this project due to

their multiple burdens in the households and their communities.

For these reasons, the stakeholders’ efforts to maintain the social continuity of

communities affected by a project—whether through the physical design of new sites,

measures to prevent the disintegration of the community, or the provision of

specialized social services at those sites—are important. The involvement of women in

many FGD meetings as part of the preparation of this project can be considered as a

good example of GAP implementation. In addition, the involvement of women in

different trainings as proposed has to guarantee by all the stakeholders involved.

Related to this project, I would like to provide of the immediate and practical initiatives

that can be considered to improve women’s adaptation to the resettlement site include:

(a) ensuring and/or recognizing that land titles and compensation entitlements are

issued in the name of both spouses and/or wives only;

(b) increasing incomes generating opportunities by setting up credit groups, skills

training, and access to markets based on their needs;

(c) improving participation in decision making process especially related to provide

support for women’s interest groups).

All of the initiatives above may help women adapt to the resettlement site. However,

the social or legal status of women, in the project specifically and in Indonesia

generally, is likely to remain circumscribed. Thus, their ability to improve their own and

their family’s livelihoods need a longer-term strategic effort in order to change gender-

based discrimination. In the future, stereotyping, social stigmatization (as a result of

9 www.adb.org/themes/gender/project-action-plan acess 2 August 2012

http://www.adb.org/themes/gender/project-action-plan

8 | 2 0

traditional or cultural bias) and economically marginalization are totally unacceptable in

many different types and levels.

In sum, it is important to note that all the recommendations are made based on limited

amount of data available due to personal and professional reasons. Due to limited

opportunity available, the expert has not able to conduct field visit in order to get a

whole picture of the project. In addition, the circle of information among of stakeholders

create some limitations to get more and better data to provide comprehensive and

reliable suggestion related to sustainability and continuity of this project.

9 | 2 0

V. Gender Sensitivity Analysis

The gender sensivitity of this resettlement project is analyzed using framework and criteria established in “Gender Checklist Resettlement”

(Asian Development Bank, 2003).

No. Element or Phase

Relevant Points of Concern Condition or Remarks

1 Resettlement planning

Have women been included in the socioeconomic survey?

The socioeconomic data was collected at household level while demographic data are available at individual basis.

Socioeconomic data available at individual basis＿which can be segregated by gender＿are age, education, occupation, and income, while other data are at household level.

There are 2,368 (53.1%) men and 2,095 (46,9%) women living in the affected area.

There are 101 woman-headed households out of 1320 AHs, or about 7.7%. The average age of women living in the affected area is 29.3 years old with

standard deviation of 16.9 while for men is 32.3 years old with standard deviation of 19.5.

Adult women composition based on education is as follow: (1) University graduate 1.5%, (2) SMA graduate 12.0%, (3) SMP graduate 19.7%, (4) SD graduate 36.4%, and (5) Below SD graduate 30.5%.

Adult men composition based on education is as follow: (1) University graduate 1.8%, (2) SMA graduate 17.7%, (3) SMP graduate 20.1%, (4) SD graduate 33.1%, and (5) Below SD graduate 27.3%.

There are 504 out of 2,095 (24,1%) working women, from which the majority (243 or 48.2%) run their own businesses in the category of “Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar”. If they are evicted from their current property’s location, their income might be significantly affected.

Average monthly income of working-man in the affected area is Rp1,829,472 while for woman is Rp1,503,704.

10 | 2 0



Has information been collected on women’s land and property status?

Land and property data are acquired at household level. Hence, inidividual gender-based ownership might only be analyzed as referred to household head. There are 101 woman-headed households out of 1320 AHs, or about 7.7%.

All lands in the affected area are owned by the government. Average value of structure (main building) owned by woman-headed household is

Rp14,580,269 while for man-headed household is Rp13,659,074.

Does the survey include questions on household division of labor, women’s livelihood sources, and women’s contribution to family income?

Main women’s livelihood sources are (1) Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar 48.2%, (2) Operator dan perakit mesin 15.9%, and (3) Usaha pertanian dan peternakan 14.7%.

Average monthly income of working-woman in the affected area is Rp1,503,704, while for man is Rp1,829,472.

The average women’s contribution to family income in woman-headed households is 74.8%, while in man-headed households is 11.4%. The average women’s contribution to family income for all AHs is 16.3%.

2 Defining entitlement and eligibility

Do women have legal title to land and property?

Only 1 household out of 1320 have a legal title to land in the affected area. Since almost all of them do not have legal title to the land, they do not also have legal title to any structure on the land.

What ownership, access, and control do women have over resources and property?

Women have “informal” control over the structure on the affected land in which they dwell through their position as household head. There are 101 woman-headed households out of 1320 AHs, or about 7.7%.

Will women’s sources of livelihood be affected?

There are 504 out of 2,095 (24,1%) working women, from which the majority (243 or 48.2%) run their own businesses in the category of “Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar”. If they are evicted from their current property’s location, their income might be significantly affected.

Do women have customary or informal rights to land, property, and other resources?

Nobody has customary or informal right to land, property and other resources in the affected area.

3 Developing Resettlement

What is the relevant law for compensation?

11 | 2 0



and Compensation Options

How does it define “persons eligible for compensation”?

Household dwelled in the affected area in the period of registration.

Does the law entitle women to compensation assistance?

No

What are the compensation and resettlement options selected by women?

There is no particular compensation and resettlement options for women.

4 Safeguarding Women’s Interest in Resettlement

Separately identify the socioeconomic conditions, needs, and priorities of women; surveys and entitlements criteria should recognize female-headed households. Impact on women should be monitored and evaluated separately.

The only available gender-based socioeconomic data is income. Data on the needs is collected on household basis. There is no data currently available regarding women’s priorities.

Female-headed households were recognized in the survey. Recommendation: monitoring and evaluation of resettlement impact on women.

Ensure that the process of land acquisition and resettlement does not disadvantage women.

This phase has not been carried out yet.

Land/house titles and grants should be in the name of both spouses.


12 | 2 0



Female staff should be hired by the resettlement agency to work with and assist women in all aspects of resettlement activities, including planning and implementation of income restoration programs. Involve women’s groups in resettlement planning, management and operations, job creation, and income generation.

5 Resettlement and rehabilitation – site selection

Have affected women representing all socioeconomic groups been shown the alternative sites?

Affected households will look for and select new site by themselves.

How far is the site from their existing homes?

Have women approved the site?

Are schools and health centers easily accessible?

Is the site close to the women’s current places of employment or income generation?

6 Resettlement and rehabilitation – housing

Were women consulted on the structure and design of the housing? What are the specific needs?


13 | 2 0



What kind of assistance is required by women?

Do women prefer to undertake the construction on their own with money or materials from government or do they want the government to provide the housing?

Are women willing to contribute toward housing finance?

What measures are being taken to address women’s concerns regarding housing?

What are the women’s suggestions regarding settlement design?

Do women prefer cluster housing, e.g., people of one community housed together?

7 Resettlement and rehabilitation – habitality and safety

Have issues of habitability and safety been addressed?


Are women more vulnerable to violence from outside forces in the new settlement?

Are women concerned about safety?

Does the new settlement restrict women’s mobility?

14 | 2 0



8 Resettlement and rehabilitation – civic infrastructure

What infrastructure needs have women identified?


What services might be required by women and children in relation to civic infrastructure?

How will the site and services be maintained?

9 Resettlement and rehabilitation – sanitation

Is there a requirement for separate bathing places/toilet

facilities/washing slabs for women?


What is the best design and location for these facilities?

Where are the community toilets located? How many families are there per toilet?

It is important that the community takes responsibility for maintaining its toilets. What will be the role of the women?

Should lighting of public spaces and areas around toilet facilities be included to ensure safety of women?

15 | 2 0



What are the mechanisms for waste disposal and sewage disposal and what is the role of the community?

Will there be bathing areas within the houses or common bathing spaces? How many families will use each common facility? What are the mechanisms for maintaining these?

10 Resettlement and rehabilitation – education

How many school children are there?

This phase has not been carried out yet. How far do children currently travel to attend school?

Are there existing facilities in the relocation site, such as elementary or a high school?

Is it physically accessible to the new settlers?


Can existing facilities accommodate the children of the new settlers?

If not, what are the requirements to meet their schooling needs?

11 Resettlement and rehabilitation –

What are the common diseases of women in the area?


16 | 2 0



health Are they related to existing living conditions?

What is the current state of medical facilities?

Do they need upgrading for persons who do not need relocation?

What facilities are available at the new site?

Will they be sufficient for new settlers?

Is there any potential for introduction of new diseases in the relocation site?

Are health facilities accessible to women and children?

12 Transition issues

Have women been consulted on transportation and transit issues?

Is transportation provided? Are women aware of the transportation arrangements?

Yes, transportation is provided. Yes, the transportation arrangements are informed to all affected AHs, instead of specific to affected women.

Have women and other vulnerable groups, who may need special assistance with transportation, been identified?

Data about physical condition of each household member is available, and can be inferred as needs for special assistance regarding transportation. There are 264 out of 1320 AHs might be categorized as need special assistance with transportation, consists of 145 elderly-headed households, 99 woman-headed households, and 20 disabled-headed households.

17 | 2 0



Is ample time provided for dismantling and resettlement, especially for female-headed households and the elderly?


What arrangements have been made for ensuring access to basic facilities and access to schools for children in the transit phase?


13 Compensation What is the opinion of women with regard to the payment of

compensation—cash, bank account, or check?

There is no data currently available regarding this issue.

Has the payment of compensation in joint names been considered?

Do the women have bank or postal accounts in their name to receive compensation?

There is no data currently available regarding this issue.

Are there provisions to ensure that women have an account?

Have men been consulted on payment of compensation in joint names?

Is there any possibility of separate cash compensation payment for women?

18 | 2 0



What is the likely risk to women of paying compensation and other cash assistance in joint names or wholly to women? Can the risks be minimized?

14 Security of tenure

What provisions are made for women who do not have ownership rights over land/property taken over by the project?

There is no particular provisions made for women who do not have ownership rights over land/property taken over by the project.

15 Income restoration

Do women contribute to household income?

The average women’s contribution to family income in woman-headed households is 74.8%, while in man-headed households is 11.4%. The average women’s contribution to family income for all AHs is 16.3%.

What are women’s income levels prior to displacement?

Average monthly income of working-woman is Rp1,503,704.

What are the activities from which women earn incomes?

There are 504 out of 2,095 (24,1%) working women, from which the majority (243 or 48.2%) run their own businesses in the category of “Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar”.

Will these income sources be affected?

If they are evicted from their current property’s location, their income sources might be significantly affected.

How many women will lose their livelihood sources?

Approximately 243 women who run their own businesses in the category of “Usaha jasa dan penjualan di toko dan pasar”.

What are the ways in which livelihood will be affected? Will there be total loss of livelihood source or a decrease in income only?

The risks regarding this issue are: (1) there will be a total loss of women’s livelihood source because they cannot start their business in the new site, or (2) there will be a decrease in women’s livelihood source because they have to start their business in the new site.

19 | 2 0



Does the new site provide the same or alternative opportunities for earning incomes?

The relocation has not been carried out. The new site is not provided by the project; instead, AHs should look for a new

site themselves.

What are the existing levels of women’s skills/training?

Adult women composition based on education is as follow: (1) University graduate 1.5%, (2) SMA graduate 12.0%, (3) SMP graduate 19.7%, (4) SD graduate 36.4%, and (5) Below SD graduate 30.5%.

Is there a need to upgrade women’s skills and are the facilities available?

The needs for skill upgrading are identified on household basis instead of individual and already included in the Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP)

16 Grievance redress mechanisms

Is the grievance redress mechanism structured to address gender issues?

Is the grievance redress committee gender sensitive?

Does it take into account special problems faced by women?

Are there any women members on the grievance redress committee or related group that has been or will be constituted?

17 Monitoring and evaluation

Do the M&E indicators include issues of women’s livelihood restoration, safety, habitability, and other issues addressed in this checklist?

This issue will be considered in the monitoring and evaluation phase.

20 | 2 0



Is the budget sufficient to address gender issues?

Yes

Is the M&E baseline gender inclusive?


Have appropriate mechanisms been developed for participatory monitoring and are women included?


Are gender issues included in the terms of reference of supervisory consultants?

Yes

Annex I Paper on Analysis of

Socializat ion WTC

Rehabilitat ion






ANALYSIS OF SOCIALIZATION WTC REHABILITATION

PROJECT FROM DATA SURVEY

NAME OF WRITER :

Fitri

Sherlyw ati

NOVEMBER 2012



41%54%

5%

Apakah Anda tahu tujuan proyek

Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ?

Ya Tidak Blank

10%

21%

6%3%

60%

Apa yang Anda ketahui tentang tujuan

proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat

?

Pemberdayaan

Sungai

Pelebaran Sungai

Pembuatan Jalan

Lainnya

Blank

ANALYSIS OF SOCIALIZATION WTC REHABILITATION PROJECT FROM DATA SURVEY

Society is never perfectly informed (Stiglitz, 2002). The government would have superior

information and the society would have inferior information. Under these circumstances, both

parties would have incentives to behave strategically. The party with superior information

would have an incentive to take advantage of its information position to meet its goals. The

party with inferior information would recognize this incentives and information accordingly.

Both government and society have different objectives, and the challenge is to improve the

efficiency of project and allocate the distribution of gains that greater efficiency implies. This

asymmetrical information would arouse moral hazard, the situation in which a party takes

advantage of special knowledge while engaging in socially inefficient behavior (Lipsey et al,

2008).

Reflecting from that theory, consultant needs to obtain information and opinion of WTC

people regarding ICWRMIP. It is essential todiscovercommunity perception and knowledge

toward rehabilitation of WTC and its impact.

Chart 1 what is the purpose of rehabilitation project?

Bothcharts represent that 54% of respondents said they don’t know about the purpose of

Rehabilitation WTC. Most of all the respondent, 199 out of 331 respondents don’t

acknowledge the purpose of rehabilitation. Although, 41% of respondent claimed that they

doknow about rehabilitation. For instance for improving the flow and quality water in the

river, widening river and road. It means that the information not fully given to the WTC

people.

3% 6%6%

5%

80%

Dari mana Anda tahu mengenai

manfaat proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal

Citarum Barat ini?

Pemda setempat

Dinas PU dan

Pengairan

Surveyor

Lainnya

34%

59%

7%

Apakah Anda tahu manfaat

proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal

Citarum Barat ?

Ya Tidak Blank

Chart 3 Sources of Information

In general, the majority of respondent express that they don’t get informed and no one notify

them about rehabilitation project and the benefit of its project, as shown in the chart above.

DG Water Resources (Ministry of Public Works) and local government separately participate

in providing the information, though no significant result. Only 93 out of 311 who claimed that

they get informed by government agency. As a result, they need to empower the role local

government, especially Head of RT and RW. As the head of community association, who

works closely with society,they able to provide information promptly and clearly for WTC

people.

Chart 4 Benefit of Rehabilitation Project

This chart represents the WTC people knowledge

toward Rehabilitation Project Benefit. Half of

respondent stated that they don’t know if that

project will advantage or disadvantage them. The

people who acknowledgethe project stated some

advantages such as providing clean water,

managing water flow of Citarum, improving living

condition, and preventing flood.

12%16%6%6%

60%


tujuan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal

Citarum Barat ?Sosialisasi

Pemda

Setempat

Dinas

Pekerjaan

Umum dan

PengairanSurveyor

Terdahulu

7% 5%3%1%

2%271,

82%

Menurut Anda, keluhan Anda terkait

dengan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal

Citarum Barat akan diselesaikan

dengan ....

Baik Biasa saja Buruk Sangat baik Sangat buruk Blank

10%4% 4%

1%

0%

81%

Menurut Anda, Keluhan Anda terkait

dengan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal

Citarum Barat ini diterima dengan cara

yang ....

Baik Biasa saja Buruk Sangat baik Sangat buruk Blank

5% 3% 1%

41%50%


mekanisme untuk menyalurkan keluhan

terkait dengan dampak proyek

Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

Pemda setempat

Dinas PU dan

Pengairan

Lainnya

Blank

18%

73%

9%

Apakah Anda tahu tentang

mekanisme untuk menyalurkan

keluhan terkait dengan dampak

proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal

Citarum Barat ?

Ya Tidak

Grievance Redress Mechanism Information of Affected Household

Chart 5 Complaining Mechanism toward Project

This chart depicts that mostly of the respondent not conscious of complaining mechanism.

They don’t comprehend in filing complaint, who will be in charge to respond them, andhow

long it would take to get response. Only 8% admit that they get inform by officer directly.

They don’t know how to legally complaint about impact that appears due to Rehabilitation

Project.Since only a few people get informed by DG Water Resources (Ministry of Public

Works) and local government.

This following chart illustrates the WTC people perception toward complaining procedure

regarding implementation of WTC Rehabilitation Project.

Chart 7 Perception toward complaing that be given to government

Apparently, 267 out of 331 of respondent don’t have any idea about government response

toward any complaining filed. Nevertheless, there are 10% of total respondent who believe

that complaining toward government will be accepted. Also, 7% of total respondent affirm

that arising issues will be solved carefully and effectively by government.

In conclusion, is highly possible for missunderstanding between both parties, government

and WTC people. Both has different interest and information. Our suggestion, First,

government should build a good and effective communication with local community and

elders or community leaders. Give community leader a role to informing the society about

Rehabilitation Project. This man has high connetivity with the community and highly

respected. Second, empowering head of community association such as Head of RT and

RW, in bridging community and government. As a representative of the government, they

need to get informed by Project Manager clearly, therefore they able to give a clear

information for society in WTC. Those information should be given in weekly or mothly

meeting, whether in letter or dircetly.

Society

Lack of information

- Purpose

- Benefit

- Filling

Complaint

Perception toward

government is blank,

no argument

Government not

actively giving an

infromation

Build Effective Communication

Society Government

Head of RT & RW

Community Leader

(Elder)

Annex J Quest ionnaire of Survey

Halaman 1 dari 3

Kuesioner

RESPONDEN PEWAWANCARA

AH No. : Nama : ………………………………..

Nama KK : Mulai Tanggal : ………………………………..

Nama Resp. : ………………………………….. Jam : ……………………….............

No. Telepon : …………………………............ Selesai Tanggal : ……………………….............

Koordinat Jam : ……………………….............

Easting :

Northing : Dicek oleh : ………………………………..

PENGANTAR

Nama saya ................., dari Centre for Public Policy and Management Studies (CPMS) Universitas Parahyangan (UNPAR), Bandung. Kami ditunjuk oleh Pemerintah dan Bank Pembangunan Asia untuk menjadi pemantau independen dalam proyek pemukiman kembali penduduk yang terkena dampak rehabilitasi Kanal Barat Citarum. Tugas kami adalah mengawasi pelaksanaan proyek untuk memastikan pelaksanaan proyek ini sesuai dengan aturan dan rencana yang ada.

Kami memohon kesediaan Anda untuk menjadi responden dalam survey ini. Informasi yang Anda berikan dijamin kerahasiaannya dan hanya akan digunakan untuk kepentingan pengawasan proyek ini. Terima kasih atas kesediaan Anda meluangkan waktu untuk mengisi kuseioner ini.

BAGIAN A (Screening)

A1. Apakah Anda kepala keluarga atau anggota keluarga dari rumah tangga ini?

Ya 1

Tidak 2 Stop

A2. Usia Anda?

Kurang dari 17 tahun 1 Stop

Di atas 17 tahun, ................. tahun 2

BAGIAN B (Aset dan Kompensasi)

B1. Aset milik rumah tangga yang terkena dampak proyek:

a. Lahan milik pribadi :

Luas lahan terkena dampak : ..................... m2

b. Bangunan utama 1 (rumah dan warung)

Besaran terkena dampak : ....................................

Jenis/tipe bangunan : ............................................

Sifat bangunan* : ..................................................

Luas total : ........................................ m2

Luas terdampak : ............................. m2

* Ket. sifat bangunan: - Mobile : mudah & tidak akan rusak jika dipindahkan,

misalnya gerobak, roda. - Tidak mobile : aset akan rusak jika dipindahkan

c. Bangunan utama 2 (rumah dan warung)

Besaran terkena dampak : ....................................

Jenis/tipe bangunan : ............................................

Sifat bangunan* : ..................................................

Luas total : ........................................ m2

Luas terdampak : ............................. m2

d. Bangunan sekunder-pagar: .................................

Bahan pagar: .......................................................

Panjang pagar: .................................. m

e. Bangunan sekunder-teras: ....................................

Bahan teras: ..........................................................

Luas teras: ......................................... m

f. Bangunan sekunder-sumur: ..................................

Bahan sumur: .......................................................

Jumlah sumur: ......................................................

g. Bangunan sekunder-KM/WC: ...............................

Bahan KM/WC: .....................................................

Luas KM/WC: ........................................................

h. Bangunan sekunder-kandang: ..............................

Bahan kandang: ....................................................

Luas kandang: ......................................................

i. Bangunan sekunder lainnya: ................................

Bahan BS lain: ......................................................

Luas BS lain: .........................................................

Halaman 2 dari 3

j. Pohon

No. Nama pohon Ukuran dan banyaknya pohon

Diameter besar Diameter sedang Diameter kecil

1 cm cm cm

2 cm cm cm

3 cm cm cm

4 cm cm cm

5 cm cm cm

6 cm cm cm

7 cm cm cm

8 cm cm cm

k. Tanaman semusim

No. Tanaman Umur (bulan) Luas tanam (m2)

1

2

3

4

5

BAGIAN C (Sosialisasi)

C1. Apakah Anda tahu tujuan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

Ya 1

Tidak 2 Ke C4

C2. Apa yang Anda ketahui tentang tujuan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………

C3. Dari mana Anda tahu mengenai tujuan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………

C4. Apakah Anda tahu manfaat proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

Ya 1

Tidak 2 Ke C7

C5. Apa yang Anda ketahui tentang manfaat proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………

Halaman 3 dari 3

…………………………………………………………

C6. Dari mana Anda tahu mengenai manfaat proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………

C7. Jika Anda memiliki keluhan mengenai proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini, apakah Anda tahu ke mana dan bagaimana Anda harus menyampaikan keluhan?

Ya 1

Tidak 2 Ke C9

C8. Dari mana Anda tahu mengenai cara untuk menyampaikan keluhan terkait dengan dampak proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

…………………………………………………………

C9. Apakah Anda pernah menyampaikan keluhan mengenai proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

Ya 1

Tidak 2 Stop

C10. Kepada siapa Anda menyampaikan keluhan Anda terkait dengan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini?

…………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………

C11. Menurut Anda, keluhan Anda terkait dengan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini diterima dengan cara yang ...............................

Sangat buruk 1

Buruk 2

Biasa saja 3

Baik 4

Sangat baik 5

C12. Menurut Anda, keluhan Anda terkait dengan proyek Rehabilitasi Kanal Citarum Barat ini diselesaikan dengan ...........

Sangat buruk 1

Buruk 2

Biasa saja 3

Baik 4

Sangat baik 5

TERIMA KASIH ATAS PARTISIPASI ANDA

Annex K Paper on Resett lement In


Perspect ive






WORKING PAPER

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROACH

ON RESETTLEMENT

NAME OF CONSULTANT:

Pius Suratman Kartasasmita

w ith k ind assistance of

Hilda Ambar Martina

NOVEMBER 2012



ABSTRACT This paper aims to, first of all, review the definitions of resettlement, types of resettlement, and resettlement strategy which are commonly used in development practices. In addition, this paper is also intended to acknowledge resettlement from community development point of view. It reveals that there are many definitions of resettlement which are commonly used by development practices as well as donors. In general resettlement is commonly defined as a term used to describe the movement of individuals or groups from one location to another. From development practices it shows different types of and strategy or concept of resettlement, and yet it usually with reference to involuntary resettlement. Secondly, this paper describes resettlement from community development point of view, which can be defined as a process of relocating numbers of people that involves community participation in raising community awareness, strengthening and empowering community potentials, building and developing their capacity, as well as protecting the outcomes. Finally, this paper provides various resettlement cases across countries to illustrate different context of resettlement practices as comparison.

1. PRINCIPLES: DEFINITION OF RESETTLEMENT

There is almost no dispute among development practices and donors regarding basic notion of resettlement and other related concepts. Asian Development Bank (ADB) defines "...resettlement is a term used to describe the movement of individual or group from one location to another location. Nowadays, resettlement happens because the effect of government project. This project affected not only the asset around the project, but also the people live there before." Whereas affected persons (APs) are defined as those who stand to lose, as a consequence of the project, all or part of their physical and non-physical assets, including homes, communities, productive lands, resources such as forests, range lands, fishing areas, or important cultural sites, commercial properties, tenancy, income-earning opportunities, social and cultural networks and activities.1

Affected Persons (APs) or Affected Households (AHs) are the persons or families who get affected by the project rules by government. They have to leave all of their physical and non-physical assets and move to other places which already or will be prepared for them or reestablish elsewhere. The aim of resettlement is to ensure that people who are physically or economically displaced as a result of a project end up no worse off- and preferably, better off- than they were before the project was undertaken.

International Finance Corporation (IFC), as comparison, differentiates between physical displacement and economic displacement. The former, physical displacement is the actual physical relocation of people resulting in a loss of shelter, productive assets or access to productive assets (such as land, water, and forests). While the later, economic displacement, results from an action that interrupts or eliminates people’s access to productive assets without physically relocating the people themselves.2

Affected populations (both person and household), as well as impacts should be carefully identified. IFC, for instance, suggest a series of steps to be carried out at identifying the respective matters as the following:

1. thematic maps that identify such features as population settlements, infrastructure, soil composition, natural vegetation areas, water resources, and land use patterns;

2. a census that enumerates the affected people and registers them according to location;

3. an inventory of lost and affected assets at the household, enterprise, and community level;

4. socioeconomic surveys and studies of all affected people (including seasonal migrant, and host populations), as necessary;

5. analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters, to design appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives, and to identify baseline monitoring indicators; and

6. consultation with affected populations regarding mitigation of effects and development opportunities. 3

1 Asian Development Bank, Handbook on Resettlement : A Guide to Good Practice, Manila, 1998, page 3.

2 International Finance Corporation, Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan, page 5

3 Ibid, page 13

It is also commonly understood that resettlement can be clearly differentiated into voluntary and involuntary resettles’ for they are different significantly in their characteristics. Voluntary resettles are generally self-selected, young, and willing to pursue new opportunities. While involuntary resettles are people of all ages, outlooks, and capabilities, many of whom have no option but to give up their assets (usually productive assets). Asian Development Bank policy designates involuntary resettles as requiring assistance.4 In principle the Bank, and also other parties in common, try to avoid or minimize resettlement to ensure that some people are not disadvantages by the process of resettlement due to the worse effect of the resettlement. At this point, people might have different understanding of resettlement because many of the assets that are being resettled is their main income. In the case that resettlement is unavoidable, the Bank helps to restore the quality of life and livelihoods of those affected. At most, there may also be opportunities to improve the quality of life, particularly for vulnerable groups.

Compensation gets by the affected person, in principle, should be fair with the assets that they loss during the project. The price of the compensation that they get is decided by the bank, the bank will appraisal the assets and the best price known in the market will be given to the re-settlers so it will be fair enough for the re-settlers. In terms of fair compensation, cash for land acquisition has never been a satisfactory mode of compensation if it is not paid at replacement values. In many cases, it is empirically proven that land-based resettlement programs work better than non-land options.5 In terms of compensation, IFC expects projects to compensate affected people for loss of physical assets, revenue, and income resulting from economic displacement or physical relocation whether these losses are temporary or permanent. If domestic law does not already specify such a framework, the project sponsor should establish transparent methods for the valuation of all assets affected by the project.6

2. PRINCIPLES: TYPES OF RESETTLEMENT

Both development practice and donors are also in common about different types of resettlement that follows different types of communities. IFC at least categorizes resettlement into four categories, these are rural resettlement, urban resettlement, linear resettlement and site specific resettlement. Rural resettlement, refers to displacement of people in rural areas typically result from a project’s acquisition of farm land, pasture, or grazing land or the obstruction of access to natural resources on which affected populations rely for livelihoods (for example forest product, wildlife, and fisheries). Urban Resettlement is resettlement in urban setting typically results in both physical and economic displacement affecting housing, employment and enterprises. Linear Resettlement describe project having linear pattern of land acquisition (highways, railways, canals, and power transmission line). While site specific Resettlement is associated with discrete, non-linear project such as factories, ports, highway interchange, hotels, commercial plantation, etc. Where land acquisition encompasses a fixed area. 7

At determining the type and size of resettlement plan, it seems there is solid

agreement with ADB that defines "significant" resettlement is those which involve:

4 Ibid, page 6

5 Ibid, page 6

6 International Finance Corporation, op.cit., page 6

7 Ibid., page 28

• 200 people or more will experience resettlement effects • 100 people or more who experiencing resettlement effects are vulnerable

as defined in the policy, or • More than 50 people who experiencing resettlement effects are particularly

vulnerable.

ADB determines, accordingly, that different strategy should be applied to different size of affected members of community. If the effect of resettlement is significant a full resettlement plan (RP) is a must, otherwise the Bank requires to apply a short version of RP. According to ADB requirement, a full RP consists of:

(a) Objectives, policies and strategies (b) Organizational responsibilities (c) Community participation and integration with host populations (d) Socioeconomic survey (e) The legal framework including mechanism for resolution of conflicts and

appeals procedures (f) Identification of alternative sites and selection (g) Valuation of and compensation for lost assets (h) Land ownership, tenure, acquisition, and transfer (i) Access to training, employment, and credit (j) Shelter, infrastructure, and social services (k) Environmental protection and management (l) Implementation, schedule, budget, and M&E

While the short RP consist only :

(a) Summarize the numbers affected and extent of losses (b) The policies and legal framework applicable (c) Arrangements made for asset valuation, compensation, relocation,

rehabilitation, and environmental protection (d) Responsibilities in delivering and monitoring entitlements (e) Costs (f) Time frame for land acquisition and resettlement measures (g) Consultation and grievance mechanism for people affected. 8

There are many aspects should be taken into account in order to develop effective Resettlement Plan. There are commonly accepted key planning concepts to be taken into account within resettlement practices, which are policy framework, definition of entitlement and eligibility, gender planning, social preparation, budget and timeline. The policy framework for the resettlement plan is needed, weather the policy is already exist or should the new policy which is related with the resettlement is needed to be build. The persons who will receive the compensation and rehabilitation need to be measures in some precise way. The affected women need to be analyzed weather it needs to be taken into consideration. The needs of the affected person specifically the vulnerable groups should be met. The sufficient financial resources for the resettlement should be prepared. Definite time line for resettlement should fit into the schedule of the overall project timeline.

8 Asian Development Bank, Op.Cit., page 12

3. PRINCIPLES: RESETTLEMENT STRATEGY

In terms of resettlement planning strategy, African Development Bank practices some applicable approaches that might commonly applied by other development agencies and donors. These are:

a. Development Approach; Resettlement planning would involve offering the displaced persons and host communities several development options consisting of activities to reconstruct the production foundation of the resettled and making them self-sustaining producers and wage earners. The resettlement plan ensures that the displaced persons are provided with assistance during relocation. The aims of relocation is to improve their former living standards, income earning capacity, and production levels. The displaced persons and host communities should be offered support after relocation, for a transition period that covers a reasonable period of time necessary for them to improve their livelihood and standard of living.

b. Participation; The affected population and host communities should be involved in the design of the resettlement plan. Community participation helps to ensure that compensation measures, relocation site, development programs and service provision reflect the needs, priorities, and development aspirations of the affected people and their hosts. All stakeholders, particularly the affected population, host communities and their representatives, should be fully informed, consulted and effectively involved at all stages of the project cycle. Participation can also facilitate greater transparency and fair play in compensation procedures, and encourage greater community involvement in operation and maintenance of service infrastructure and in development programs.

c. Eligibility and Entitlements; The resettlement plan should have a clear definition of the project affected persons (PAPs) by socio-economic and gender category; household or family; the cut-off dates for eligibility for compensation; the assets to be compensated at replacement cost, and the development projects proposed. The benefits offered by the resettlement program should be clearly established. This may cover, for urban resettlement activities, financial compensation; housing and service provision; transport, temporary accommodation and other short-term provisions required for relocation such as, credit facilities, training or job opportunity. In rural areas however, this may cover land-for-land, participation in training, and access to material equipments, inputs and credit. In cases, where land is not the preferred option for some of the displaced persons, non land-based options should be considered. These options should be built around creating employment opportunity or self-employment.

d. Compensation Procedure; The plan should describe the legal basis and the procedures for expropriation and compensation at full replacement cost for land and property. The plan should identify any gaps or inconsistencies between the borrower’s legal framework and the Bank’s resettlement policy, and the mechanisms to bridge such gaps. The criteria for assessing the value of land, housing and other property should be standardized and transparent. The dispute settlement procedures should be sufficiently agile to resolve arguments over valuation quickly. As a

result, appropriate and accessible grievance mechanisms, through informally constituted local committees with representatives from key stakeholder groups should be established to resolve any dispute arriving during the compensation procedures.

e. Relocation Criteria; The criteria for site selection should be explicit and should be discussed in detail with the affected families (i.e. both the relocatees and their hosts). It may be important for rural resettlement programs, to ensure that a whole community or village is resettled together. Agricultural or pastureland provided through land for-land resettlement should be equal or better in quality, including access to safe drinking water and irrigation water for agricultural lands. Other infrastructure and public services such as access roads, community centers, education and health services should be provided as necessary to improve living standards of the displaced population and host communities.

f. Legal and Institutional Framework; The resettlement plan should be consistent with the national legislation of the borrower as well as the requirements set in this policy. The plan should include detailed timetable, covering all components of the resettlement program such as, transport, storage and any temporary dwelling arrangements for the move. The resettlement plan should also include a detailed budget breakdown by components, agency and calendar year. The arrangement for reporting, monitoring and evaluation, consistent with the overall project planning and scheduling, should be included in the plan. 9

At dealing with resettlement procedures for international refugees, UNHCR provides the Baseline SOPs outline responsibilities and minimum standards for required actions in each of the following areas:

1. Resettlement management and risk mitigation • integrity of the resettlement process • dealing with resettlement needs and expectations • administration • handling enquiries

2. Resettlement processing

• case identification • receiving referrals and preliminary assessment of resettlement needs • resettlement interviews and assessment of resettlement needs • group resettlement • specific requirements for vulnerable refugees • finalizing the Resettlement Registration Form (RRF) • submission decision • selection missions by resettlement countries • follow-up after submission • withdrawal/suspension of submissions • resettlement country decision

9 African Development Bank, Involuntary Resettlement Policy, 2003, page 16

• departure arrangements and monitoring10

Refugees offered resettlement are provided an opportunity to rebuild their lives in safety. There are limited places available, however, and resettlement operations must be well-planned, and implemented with efficiency, integrity and transparency to make the most effective use of this invaluable durable solution.

4. PRACTICES: RESETTLEMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

a. Resettlement And Community Development Plan in Vietnam

In terms of physical assets, the Project Roads require land acquisition of 4.08 hectares (ha) accounting for some 1.78 ha of paddy land and 1.11 ha of homestead land, affecting 231 households; 81 houses and small shops, and 42 rice bins, all of which would need to be relocated. There are also 18 trees to be cleared from the construction corridors. In terms of people, the project affects total some 261 households. The Project has minimized resettlement effects by adopting a bypass of Borikhan town on the Bolikhamxay road. This has reduced the number of households affected (along this section) from 92 to 25, and for this road from 219 to 124 households in total. The Project is still expected to make every effort to reduce resettlement impacts wherever possible. The detailed design of the phase one and three roads has been done already and will be reviewed by the Construction Supervision Consultants and necessary design changes made after which DOR, Resettlement Consultants and Provincial and District Resettlement Committees will conduct the detailed measurement survey of actually affected households.

As part of the Project’s preparation, a social analysis was carried out along each of the phase one and three roads. The phase one roads are Pakxan - B. Thasi (Bolikhamxay) and Xaisetha – Sanxai (Attapu). The phase three road is Sayaburi – Hongsa (Sayaburi). A census and inventory of lost assets was carried out for all households potentially affected by loss of homestead land and dwellings within a 15-meter (m) wide construction corridor. Based on the information collected for this ROW, three Resettlement Plans have been prepared for the Project in compliance with the ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (1995) and the Handbook on Resettlement: A Guide to Good Practice. The PPTA determined that the mainly ethnic minority communities along the Attapu and Sayaburi roads will be vulnerable as a result of the road improvements because of their low literacy and numeracy levels. This triggered the need for Ethnic Minority Development Plans as required by ADB’s Policy on Indigenous People.

However, because the ethnic minority families are integrated with the non-minority population, the term Community Development Plan has been used to replace Ethnic Minority Development Plans, and they have been combined with the Resettlement Plans. A Resettlement and Community Development Framework has also been prepared to guide in the resettlement and ethnic minority planning and implementation for the other two subproject roads: Hongsa-Thaxoang (Sayaburi) and Pakton-Ban Vang (Vientiane Province). The detailed design of the latter roads will be done under the Project and resettlement and community development plans prepared in accordance with the Framework and submitted to ADB for approval.

10

UNHCR Resettlement Handbook, 2011, page 126

b. Empowerment as a tool for a healthy resettlement: a case of new African settlers in South Australia

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe the application of empowerment and the role that it plays in fostering community participation, community integration and in enabling a healthy re-settlement of culturally and linguistically diverse migrants who have recently arrived in Australia from Sub Saharan Africa.

Design/methodology/approach – The approach used in the paper is a discussion expressing the views of authors supported by the relevant literature drawn from a wide range of sources on migration, settlement, health, social, environment, cultural and public health issues. The African community and its peak organization, the African Communities Council of South Australia is presented and various empowerment strategies used by the council are discussed as a healthy model for empowering new settlers in the new environment.

Findings – The first part of the paper describes the migration of African migrants in South Australia and sets the scenario describing the current state of these migrants including opportunities and challenges they face in the new environment. The second part describes theories and contexts of community empowerment, relationship between community empowerment and a healthy settlement; and the relevance and implications of community empowerment. The third part draws the above context and the empowerment strategy is specifically related to the African Community in South Australia. The empowerment strategy in this case represents a wide range of interventions aimed to equip new African migrants to a successful and a healthy resettlement and integration in South Australia. By addressing a wide range of settlement challenges and issues, the strategy employs concepts of empowerment that have been used in public health in general, health promotion, health education, communications, community engagement and community development.

Originality/value – The paper highlights challenges and opportunities for new migrants in the new environment and argues that community empowerment is an important enabling tool for a healthy settlement, particularly for people with refugee backgrounds. The paper also acknowledges that the community development approach has assisted the target group and has improved their ability to overcome challenges associated with settlement through capacity building, social capital and community connectivity.

c. Innovative approaches for Involuntary resettlement (Lunawa environmental Improvement & Community Development Project)

In Sri Lanka today, as in many other developing countries, there is a growing

urgency to come up with creative and sustainable solutions to tackle the twin

pressures of infrastructure needs and the interests of communities who are affected

by such projects, often losing their homes, land and livelihood in the process.

The project team has proved that the community development component---

uplifting the living conditions of the people living in the Lunawa Lake catchment area

through participatory resettlement and upgrading of underserved sites -- is as much

of a priority as improving the storm water drainage of the area and Lunawa Lake’s

eco system. The two pronged approach has fostered a win-win situation, benefiting

the project affected persons as well as local governments and the project authorities,

as beneficiaries with a stake in the project, protest less and are willing to take

ownership of the canals and other structures after the construction work is over.

Communities which struggled every year with the ravages of flooding and

damaged property in many underserved areas now feel more secure. The threat of

inundation has receded and with security of tenure, they are busy making long-term

plans. Families who lived in shanties previously and who had to move to make way

for the project now own their own homes in the resettlement sites; those who were

not even part of the formal economy now have bank accounts which they acquired

when the entitlement amount was deposited; women in the resettlement sites feel

more empowered as joint owners of property to which they now have a legal claim.

The project has also led to the creation of many community based organizations

(CBOs) and strengthened existing CBOs who received ‘community contracts’ to build

drains, service roads, community centers etc within the resettlement sites and other

parts of the project area. Apart from providing a sense of ‘ownership’ to the

communities, these activities have contributed significantly towards livelihood

restoration among the project-affected people. In many cases, individuals and

families have been able to improve upon their previous situation tapping into these

opportunities.

The successes on the ground have led to other institutions and projects

tapping the Lunawa toolkit of good practices, and adapting specific ones, for their

own benefit. The most important lesson from this path-breaking project is that

investing time and resources in the preparatory phase pays, and it is helpful to have

NGO partners who can act as strong links between the urban poor and the project

team as well as with local authorities, and help build a cordial working relationship.

This can be leveraged later for other development objectives.

d. Bujagali Interconnection Project Resettlement And Community

Development Action Plan

The Bujagali project is a proposed hydropower facility on the Victoria Nile in

the Republic of Uganda. It is located approximately 8km downstream (i.e. north) of

the Town of Jinja. Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL) has entered into an agreement with

the Government of Uganda to Build, Operate, and Transfer this facility. In order to

evacuate power from the proposed hydropower facility effectively, new transmission

lines and improvements to some of Uganda’s existing transmission and distribution

system are required. These new lines and system improvements are the subject of a

Social and Environmental Assessment (SEA), this Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

being part of this SEA.

Both the SEA and this RAP have been prepared to comply with the

requirements of the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA), the

Ugandan national agency in charge of environmental protection. The World Bank

Group (WBG) institutions and the African Development Bank are potential lenders

for the project. This document has therefore been prepared in accordance with WBG

RAP requirements, as they stand in Performance Standard 5 “Land Acquisition and

Involuntary Resettlement” and OP 4.12 “Involuntary Resettlement”.

The Bujagali Interconnection System is overall a linear project with fairly

benign impacts on land use and livelihoods, as the extent of affected land is

generally limited, and affected people will in most instances recover land after it has

been impacted by the Project for agricultural use. UETCL and BEL have, however,

proactively decided to dedicate some funds to general development objectives, with

communities taking the lead in determining which priority project they would be

willing to implement.

Beyond the obvious benefits to communities in terms of social infrastructure,

the CDAP is also viewed as a means to enhance community self-reliance in

prioritizing projects, and to build project implementation capacity within the

community.

e. Resettlement Planning Document Bangladesh: Dhaka Water Supply Sector Development Program

This case describe the objectives, policy principles and procedures for land acquisition, compensation and other events that will be provided for persons who will experience resettlement effects when the Dhaka Water Supply Sector Development Program is executed. This is a water supply project that will address the residents of Dhaka all of the issues that happen in their residents by refurbishing the existing network to repair leaks, increase capacity and pressure, remove illegal connections, and provide a new system of metering to streamline leak detection and aid cost recovery. The project will involve most parts of the city, where pipes of the existing water supply network (which are mainly buried beneath roads) will be repaired or replaced, and house connections will be repaired and provided with new meters. A number of smaller individual locations will also be affected, as existing Overhead Reservoirs (OR) will be repaired and new ORs will be constructed, and new chlorination equipment will be installed at existing Deep Tube Wells (DTW).

f. PRC: Guiyang Integrated Water Resources Management Sector Project

Jinlong Reservoir Water Supply Subproject is one of the core subprojects of Guiyang Integrated Water Resources Management Project financed by ADB. The total storage capacity of Jinlong Reservoir is 4.18 million m³. The major impacts caused by Jinlong Reservoir Water Supply Subproject are permanent land acquisition and temporary land occupation, covering six villages. The Subproject will requisition a total 373.93mu of collective land (non-crop land) on permanent basis, including 249.81mu of shrub land and 124.12mu of unused land. It will also occupy 275.3mu of collective land on temporary basis, including 50.8mu of paddy field, 43.8mu of shrub land and 48mu of unused land. This Resettlement Plan is based on the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China (2004), Decision of the State Council on Deepening

Reform and Strictly Enforcing Land Administration (Ref. No. GF[2004] 28), related policies of Guiyang City and Guizhou Province, and ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement. All the lands to be requisitioned by the project belong to non-crop land. Therefore, the income restoration measures for the APs will include cash compensation, provision of technical training and priority in getting jobs in project.

g. India: Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program – Widening and Strengthening of Various Roads at Sikar Town Subproject

Government of Rajasthan (GoR) has launched the Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program (RUSDIP) for development of infrastructure in 15 towns of the state with the financial assistance of Government of India (GoI) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The overall objectives of the Program are to meet basic human needs, improve quality of life and stimulate sustainable economic development. The Infrastructure sectors that are being developed in Sikar under this Program are:

(i) Water Supply Rehabilitation and Expansion (ii) Waste Water Management (Sewerage) (iii) Solid Waste Management (iv) Drainage; and (v) Development/ Up-gradation of Roads

This Resettlement Plan has been prepared in tune with the ADB Handbook on Resettlement and the agreed Resettlement Framework (RF). The Methodology prescribed by ADB was scrupulously adhered to, to find out any adverse or Involuntary Resettlement impact in the project area. This Resettlement Plan is based on Transect Walks on all the 31 Roads to undergo development, widening, up-gradation, 100% Census and Socio-Economic Survey of Project Affected Persons (APs), and consultations with the Affected Persons. The primary objective of this Resettlement Plan is to mitigate the adverse impacts of the intervention and to assist the Affected Persons in resettlement and restoration of their livelihood. Affected Persons can bring their grievances to the notice of the implementing NGO and the Social Development Expert (SDE) of the DSC.

h. PAKISTAN: Punjab Irrigated Agriculture Investment Project (PIAIP)

The Program is financed through the MFF, which includes several tranches, each covering one or more sub-project. The Tranche (s) Project will focus on a broad irrigation system interrelated objectives inclusive of: (i) on-farm level water resources management improvement; (ii) capacity and institutional strengthening for irrigated agriculture/ water resources management; (iii) irrigation/ water resources infrastructure rehabilitation and modernization; and (iv) enhancement of the enabling environment for improved agricultural productivity. This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) of the MFF for the Punjab Irrigated Agriculture Investment Program has been updated by Punjab Irrigation Department (PID), the Program’s Executing Agency (EA) in accordance with the requirements of ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS 2009), Pakistan’s Land Acquisition Act of 1894 (LAA), and applicable rules and regulations of

government of Punjab. The purpose of this updated LARF is to define procedures, consistent with SPS and LAA for planning and implementing all land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) tasks for the projects under the MFF program. The updated LARF also conforms to the ADB policy regulating the MFF procedures and conditions, as well as applicable laws and regulations of Pakistan.

i. PRC: Anhui Chao Lake Environmental Rehabilitation Project This project can improve the water quality of Chaohu and make the residents living and working around Chaohu benefit from well-being, health and economy, which is very significant for improving the water quality of Chaohu basin. The land acquisition and resettlement will cover three village groups (Ren Village group, Peng Village group and Zhanglao Village group) of Zhangmiao Village in Fudu Town. The Resettlement Plan is formulated in accordance with the Land Law of the People’s Republic of China (2004), Notice on Strengthening Reform to Strict Land Management Promulgated by State Council (No.: GF [2004]28), relevant Anhui Provincial policies, Involuntary Resettlement requirements of the Asian Development Bank Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). The resettlement and income-recovering measures will include cash compensation, endowment insurance for landless farmers, technical training and preferential employment of project, etc. Permanent land acquisition is mainly caused by the construction of the wastewater treatment plant, which will exert a slight impact on daily agricultural production based on statistic analysis. In the Zhangmiao Community, through consultation with the APs, all compensation fees for land acquisition will be paid to APs. The land acquisition and resettlement cost will be included in the overall budget of the project. Based on the price of October, 2011, the total resettlement costs are RMB 5,325,300, including basic cost of land acquisition, relevant taxes and contingencies, accounting for 4.14% of the total project costs.

j. Resettlement provision for children and young people This report examines how well young offender institutions (YOIs) holding young men (aged 15 to 18 years) work with youth offending services and other relevant agencies to ensure that the accommodation and education, training and employment (ETE) resettlement needs of sentenced young men are met in custody and on release, including the use of release on temporary licence (ROTL). The findings in this report come from two main sources: fieldwork at six male YOIs and responses from 770 sentenced young men surveyed across all nine male YOIs. Fieldwork included interviews with the head of resettlement and the head of learning and skills at each establishment; interviews with 61 sentenced young men approaching release; and interviews with the establishment case supervisor and/or analysis of the case files for each of the 61 young men in our case sample. Case supervisors were also asked to complete a questionnaire on what accommodation and ETE the young people in our sample had on their day of release, and a month after release.

k. VIE: Phuoc Hoa Water Resources Project The Duc Hoa Main Canal is about 17.68 km in length, passing through Trang Bang district of Tay Ninh Province, Cu Chi district of HCMC and Duc Hoa district of

Long An province, and will deliver water to the Duc Hoa Irrigation area benefiting a command area of approximately 13,821 ha. Overall, there are 337 households (with about 1,447 people) and 6 organizations to be affected by the project. From the affected households, there are 139 HHs severely affected. There are 54 HHs having their house affected, in which 37 HHs will be entirely losing houses, 10 HHs will be partly losing houses and 7 HHs will be losing shops). It is estimated that 120 HHs losing more than 20% of their productive land. Compensation will be paid for some 5,975.02 m2 of housing and structures. About 65,557.75 m2 of crops and about 45,774 trees will be affected by the project. No ethnic minorities in the communes are affected. As permitted under Decree 197/2004/ND-CP, MARD has assigned the Tay Ninh Provincial Peoples’ Committee (PPC) to be the project owner responsible for the implementation of resettlement activities for Duc Hoa main canal – Tay Ninh section. PPMB Tay Ninh is an implementation agency which is responsible for the preparation and implementation of the RP. However the main overall project implementation agency is ICMB9 under MARD. Implementation of the updated RP will be regularly supervised and monitored by PPMU’s internal monitoring with the support of OSDP consultants and implementation consultants. A qualified external monitoring consultant was selected by ICMB9 for conducting independent monitoring on the compliance of the compensation and resettlement implementation with the regulations of updated RP Compensation and assistance for APs are funded by the counterpart fund of Vietnam’s Government (MARD) and ODA loans. After obtaining approval of compensation plan by the PPCs, the Center for Land Fund Development of Trang Bang District will withdraw cash from the Provincial Treasury to pay for APs.

5. CLOSING REMARKS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROACH TO RESETTLEMENT

Community development as it is defined by Frank and Smith is "...the planned evolution of all aspects of community well-being (economic, social, environmental and cultural). It is a process whereby community members come together to take collective action and generate solutions to common problems." 11 From community development point of view, resettlement can be defined as a process of relocating numbers of people who live in a certain geographical boundary (community), that involves participation in raising their awareness, strengthening and empowering their potentials, building and developing their capacity, as well as protecting the outcomes that benefit both for the affected people as well as for larger community members. Community development scope can vary from small initiatives within a small group, to large initiatives that involve the whole community. Regardless of the scope of the activity, effective community development should be a long-term endeavor, well planned, inclusive and equitable, holistic and integrated into the bigger picture, initiated and supported by community members, of benefit to the community, and grounded in experience that leads to best practice.

11

Flo Frank and Anne Smith. 1999. The Community Development Handbook A Tool To Build Community Capacity. Labor Market Learning

and Development Unit, Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC). p.6.

The primary outcome of community development is improved quality of life.

Effective community development results in mutual benefit and shared responsibility

among community members and recognizes the connection between social, cultural,

environmental and economic matters, the diversity of interests within a community;

and its relationship to building capacity.

Having extensively discussed both resettlement principles and practices as

well as community development approach, it is the intention of this closing remarks

at proposing a model that should at least involves four basic steps; raise community

awareness, community empowerment, capacity building and development and

protection of the outcomes. Feature 1 below, summarizes the four spoken steps and

key indicators used in monitoring activities during both RP updating and LRP

preparation as well as in the implementation of updated RP and LRP. Therefore,

monitoring result will be interpreted and analyzed along community development

principles above.

Feature 1. General steps of community development and indicator used for

resettlement

ひ SHARING information ON: project scheme

ひ Clear understanding about community rights and obligations

RAISE AWARENESS

ひ POLICY FRAMEWORK on:

ひ Inclusion of AHs

ひ Fair and just Compensation

EMPOWEMENT

ひ Community Capacity Building and Development

ひ Stakeholders' Capacity Development

DEVELOPMENT

ひ Protection on land and state assets for designated public functions

ひ Protection for community livelihood

PROTECTION

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Asian Development Bank. 2007. Dhaka Water and Sanitation Authority. Bangladesh: Dhaka Water Supply Sector Development Program. Black & Veatch (Asia) Ltd., 2006, PRC: Guiyang Integrated Water Resources Management Sector Project, ADB, Guiyang, China. Local Self Government Department, 2012, India: Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program – Widening and Strengthening of Various Roads at Sikar Town Subproject, ADB, India. Punjab Irrigation Department (PID), 2012, PAKISTAN: Punjab Irrigated Agriculture Investment Project (PIAIP), ADB, Pakistan. The Wuwei Government ADB Loan Project Working Panel, 2012, PRC: Anhui Chao Lake Environmental Rehabilitation Project, ADB, China. HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 2011, Resettlement provision for children and young people, London, England. Project Management Board for Investment and Construction of Agriculture and Rural Development of Tay Ninh Province, 2012, VIE: Phuoc Hoa Water Resources Project, ADB, Vietnam. Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Ministry of Communication, Transport, Post and Construction, 2003, Roads For Rural Development Project: Resettlement And Community Development Plan, Xaisetha–Sanxai. Lillian Mwanri, Kiros Hiruy, Joseph Masika, (2012) "Empowerment as a tool for a healthy resettlement: a case of new African settlers in South Australia", International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, Vol. 8 Iss: 2, pp. 86-97 Patralekha Chatterjee, 2009, Srilanka: InnovatIve approaches for Involuntary resettlement, UN-HABITAT, Srilanka. Frederic Giovannetti, 2006, Bujagali Interconnection Project Resettlement and Community Development Action Plan, Burnside, Canada. African Development Bank, 2003, Involuntary Resettlement Policy, Côte d'Ivoire, Abidjan. Asian Development Bank, 1998, Handbook on Resettlement: A Guide to Good Practice, Philippines, Manila. International Finance Corporation, 2002, Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan, U.S.A, Washington. UNHCR, 2011, UNHCR Resettlement Handbook, Switzerland, Geneva.