social software&sustainable knowledge
DESCRIPTION
Views on social software and knowledge developmentTRANSCRIPT
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Social software, sustainable knowledge
development and responsibility
Frederik Truyen, K.U.Leuven
Online Publishing
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
What will we discuss? Social Software Changing expectations on knowledge
• 4 short example cases • From information to knowledge• Knowledge as a social construction • The Network of knowledge
Impact on e-learning strategies• From LCMS to Learning Networks• Two example projects
Ethical dimension of knowledge as a foundation of (e-)learning strategy
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Social software and web 2.0
Integrates aspects of group interaction (different forms of online interactivity and different modes of communication)
Easy to use. Accessible, simple technology Emergent: enables group self-organisation,
rather then imposing an organisation to a group.
Bottom-up, adaptive and subversive
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Two parallell movements Socialisation of the web
• The web connects people. It allows peer-to-peer knowledge development
• Information selection through the social network, e.g. social bookmarking
• >> Rich Use
Automation
• The computer network acts on the content, it plays a role in content selection
• Information selection through metadata (tags): Resource Description Framework
• >> Rich Content
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Examples Online collaboration
• Wikipedia• Wiki’s• Blogs
Social bookmarking• Delicious• Mind-mapping• Folksonomies• Tagging / Tagclouds
Social networking• Linked-In• Facebook• Hives
Social sharing• YouTube• Flickr• MySpace• RSS-feeds
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Changing expectations on knowledge
Maerlant Centre
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Case 1: Linux-installation IT professional performs an installation of Linux
• People agree he/she “knows” how to do it, he/she is “in the know”
• Yet, he/she has no knowledge of all details: there simply are to many details to be known
• Needs no real insight in key explanatory mechanisms: weak justification
• Has to fall back on online documentation• Needs chat with other professionals• “Just-in-Time delivery” of key items• Has certainty on his/her network: strong metabeliefs• Has good knowledge on own knowledge reach and limits
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Case 2: epo-test Lab performs epo-test
• No individual certainty of researcher/lab assistant: an individual can no longer oversee the complex lab setup
• Fallback on procedures• Certification of instruments• Certification of Lab procedures• Peer-review of used methodology• We can safely say the lab assistant “knows” the result;
however, the assistant fails the traditional benchmark for knowledge, since he has no individual certainty
• The lab environment enforces the knowledge claim, it provides enabling conditions
• Lab result can be contested on prodecures
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Case 3: Family doctor Little girl with grandpa visits family doctor
• Doctor has ca. 30 minutes for each patient• Grandpa maybe is a highly educated aeronautics engineer,
who has studied his grandchild’s case on PubMed• Patient side has more brainpower/time resources available
than doctor and has ample access to information• The social context is to the disadvantage of the family
doctor, whose authority is challenged• A modern approach will try to use and exploit the patient
side in the knowledge strategy towards addressing the disease, while stressing the family doctor’s information validation skills and responsibility therein
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Case 4: CEO presents annual balance
The CEO is legally bound to communicate a truthful annual balance
• Complexity of accounting goes far beyond his own cognitive powers
• Depends on very complex software processing tens of thousands of transactions
• CEO needs to follow trust-enhancing procedures Hiring qualified accountancy personnel Selecting certified software Ordering timely, independent external audits
• The CEO cannot hide from his responsibility to know what is considered to be within reasonable reach
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
What happened? In the four cases, today’s availability of information
and its inherent complexity defy our traditional conceptions about what one should and can know
The individual often can’t cope any longer on his own to make a justifiable knowledge judgment
New requirements are set out for what is socially accepted as knowledge
This poses some challenges for education (e-)Learning should support these requirements and
address these challenges
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
From information to knowledge
Internet is often seen as a tool for easy distribution of information
• It has been compared with the introduction of print and its impact
• It solves the distribution problem• Hailed as a major democratization of
information• Availabilty is no longer the problem,
retrieval and assessment are
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
However …
Information is not the same as knowledge (Dretske 1999, Floridi 2007)
More so, the concept of knowledge itself comes under strain due to the information age (Schiltz – Truyen - Coppens 2007)
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Diagram largely based on the work of Luciano Floridi (Floridi 2006)
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Information vs. knowledge
InformationIs a commodityCan be copiedIs impersonalIs a message
KnowledgeCannot exist in itselfCan be acquiredBecomes personalIs a state
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge reach
The knowledge reach is related to our activities, and the required granularity to support our actions
We do not all need the same depth of knowledge on a specific topic (Kripke 1980)
Social organization helps to make available the knowledge we need when we need it (Goldman 1999)
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge as social construction
An ever increasing percentage of our knowledge is about our own creations, like artifacts and concepts
• (e.g. organisational psychology studies abstract concepts like “job satisfaction” etc.)
These concepts gain their meaning from the social context (Lave & Wenger 1991)
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge is related to human action
“If a lion could speak, we could not understand him.”
• (Wittgenstein, PI, p.223)
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge in the network
Sharing of responsibility for knowledge Deference to experts (Kripke 1980) Reasonable grounds to accept something
from a known expert (Burge 1979) Participative knowledge model
• Stakeholders• Testimony (Burge 1993)
Development of procedures
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge in the network Externalisation of knowledge (Clarck & Chalmers 1998)
• On a macro level External memory (knowledge is stored) (Bush 1945) Translation into organisations, structures Consolidation into artifacts Integration into software External validation
• On a micro level We weave our personal knowledge trail on our portable, mobile, iPod,
PDA, … Socialization of knowledge (Goldman 1999)
• What we know is what others accept that we know, we are entrusted with knowledge
Acculturation of our environment: we are gradually operating in a more and more knowledgeable, intelligible domain
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge development circle
Knowledge is passed on from experts to stakeholder communities, where it is merged with practice to yield more concrete, specific knowledge
This way, a knowledge development circle emerges where at one time one acts as an expert, at another one uses other experts’ insights as a professional
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Just-in-Time delivery
The true revolution in the knowledge economy can be compared with the evolution in logistics and transport
We are heading to Just-in-time delivery of knowledge
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge on Demand
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Different structure of knowledge
Contemporary knowledge integrates the time dimension
No static descriptions, but a continuous tuning of knowledge-paths
Knowledge is becoming project-centered Knowledge is industrially produced in research and
more artisanal in the stakeholder communities “Guarantees” for knowledge claims are required Certification and self-certification help to build trust in
new knowledge domains
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Multifacetted en fine-meshed
Each “community of practice” develops a proper language registry to grasp its activity domain
These intricate overlapping realms of meaning give a rich variety to what is to be known
What would the richness of the world of ideas be without the depth of human activity?
Each will decide the depth and width of the particular understanding he needs to develop in a layered knowing society
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Simulation rather than representation
Computers with massive computing power enable real-time simulations
Advanced parameterization makes classical “understanding” less achievable, yet it is possible to make simulations with sufficient predictive strength
Science amounts to reliable predications rather than “understanding”
Acquired knowledge is dependent on the simulation environment
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Simulation
There is a specific knowledge transfer in a simulation
On-line games e.g. do not only aim at factual reconstruction but also and foremost experience reconstruction
• Coping with emotions• Build emotional and social knowledge• Learn how to make agreements and
committments
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge actors
People Groups Organisations Artifacts
• Machines• Software• Bots
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Impact on (e)Learning
Weaving the web of knowledge
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Universitaire meerwaardeketen
LCMSLCMS
Wiki’s, blogs, forums, groups, shared spaces, conferencing ...
Wiki’s, blogs, forums, groups, shared spaces, conferencing ...
E-Learning
Information oriented
Knowledge oriented
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Learning changes
Knowledge becomes a personal journey in a social environment (think about E-Portfolio)
Learning is reaching the network of stakeholders
Learning is getting accepted in the circle of “those in the know”
It requires taking responsibility for knowing
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Track while Scan
In a wide sweep, we keep track on a whole range of adjacent knowledge fields, without going into details
• We trust others to do so … Depending on the need, we will engage
specific details in depth• We learn others to trust we are doing so …
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Knowledge workers Knowledge workers and researchers
• Introduce themselves in a « community of practice » (Wenger …)
• Mix private and professional knowledge development
• Gain authority • Have good situational awareness of the
knowledge network• Feel responsible for a particular knowledge
domain• Weave their personal web of knowledge, often on
their laptop and other mobile devices
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
To Know is to Learn
Learning is a continuous, unalienable state The learner needs to build on specific meta-
cognitive skills that will help him to clearly understand where the boundaries lay of his own responsibilities and what can be given safely in a “hand-off” to others. This can be lateral, higher or lower in the knowledge chain.
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Ethical dimension of knowledge
Learning then becomes getting involved in a reference-community in a reliable way
Taking and granting responsibility is becoming crucial
There is an imperative to mutual quality assessment and control
One will always have to assess, at the boundaries of one’s own core competence domain, how “loosely” one is allowed to know things to be able to perform in a professional way
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
From LCMS to Learning Network
The static LCMS need to earn its place in the virtual social workspace of the student
The student has to be encouraged to build his own learning network
Part of the evaluation of the student should focus on his « Virtual Sitz im Leben »
Students will learn to assess each others knowledge and learn to claim their own
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Two projects to illustrate this
Leuven University Association starts a project « personal information management skills » for each student as a prerequisite for networked knowledge competencies
From virtual to real:New Humanities Study Landscape project tries to extend the virtual workspace of the students with real rooms for structured collaborative work
• A group work « cell » room can be booked by students• It hooks into their virtual environment• Project needs sophisticated didactical models to really
enforce group learning
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Conclusion Knowledge-oriented e-learning is something
quite different from just using online tools to complete a cognitive task
It also is quite more than a layer of social skills over a cognitive learning path
On the contrary, it are essentially cognitive competencies, understood from within the social context which is the learning network
The ethics of knowledge is the foundation of any sustainable (e-)learning strategy
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Contact
Prof. Dr. Frederik Truyen• Maerlant Centre, Institute for Cultural
Studies at Faculty of Arts Leuven University
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Short bibliography Burge, Tyler (1979) `Individualism and the Mental', Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4:
73—121. Burge, Tyler (1993) `Content Preservation', Philosophical Review 102: 457—88. Bush, Vannevar (1945) `As We May Think', The Atlantic Monthly 15(176): 101—8.
[http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush] Castells, Manuel (1996) The Rise of the Network Society (The Information Age:
Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1). Oxford: Blackwell. Clark, Andy and Chalmers, David J. (1998) `The Extended Mind', Analysis 58: 10—23.
(Reprinted in P. Grim (ed.) The Philosopher's Annual, Vol. XXI, 1998.) [ http://consc.net/papers/extended.html]
Eisenstein, Elisabeth L. (1979) The Printing Press as an Agent of Social Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-modern Europe, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, Alvin (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goldman, Alvin (2002) Pathways to Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Social software, sustainable knowledge development and responsibility
Maerlant Centre
Short bibliography Kittler, Friedrich (1993) `Geschichte der Kommunikationsmedien', in A. Assman and J.
Huber (eds) Raum und Verfahren, pp. 169—88. Basel/Frankfurt am Main: Stroemfeld /Roter Stern.
Kripe, Saul (1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kripke, Saul (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press. Morville, Peter (2005) Ambient Findability. Cambridge, MA: O'Reilly Publishing. [cf.
http://www.findability.org] O'Reilly, Tim (2005) `What Is Web 2.0? — Design Patterns and Business Models for the
Next Generation of Software.' [http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html]
Schiltz, Michael, Verschraegen, Gert and Magnolo, Stefano (2006) `Open Access to Knowledge in World Society?', Soziale Systeme 11(2): 346—69.
Schiltz, Michael, Frederik Truyen, and Hans Coppens. 2007. Cutting the Trees of Knowledge: Social Software, Information Architecture, and Their Epistemic Consequences. Thesis Eleven. Journal of Critical Theory and Historical Sociology. issue 89.
Weinberger, David (2006) `Taxonomies and Tags from Trees to Piles of Leaves.' [http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/misc/taxonomies_and_tags.html ]
Weinberger, David (2007) ‘Everything is Miscellaneous’