#socialtagging: defining its role in the academic library
DESCRIPTION
Paper presented at the University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education Student Research Symposium, Buffalo, NY, with Annalise Ammer, April 14, 2011.TRANSCRIPT
#socialtagging: Defining its role in the academic library
Department of Library and Information Studies
Today’s information seeker and user
Expects the ability to participate and interact in an online environment
Is now both a consumer and contributor of information
Information literacy is closely attached to themselves and their work
Has an increasingly diverse demographic
Needs new ways to access information2
What is social tagging?
User generated annotations and subject search terms
Also known as: collaborative tagging, social classification, social indexing, folksonomy, social annotation
3
Tagging WebsitesSocial tagging websites cover a wide range
of topics and cater to both social networking and academia:
– www.Delicious.com– www.Librarything.com– www.Diigo.com– www.CiteULike.com– www.Connotea.com– www.Goodreads.com– www.Flickr.com (images)
4
Benefits of tagging
Created using “plain” language
Removes barrier between user and document
Flexible and easy to edit
Encourages a sense of community
Engages the user in the knowledge retrieval
Can be: Personalized for user’s own reference Structured for broad access
5
The dark side of tagging
No authority control
Spam tagging—“spagging”
Lose track of assigned tags—“information closets”
Incorrectly or inappropriately tagged documents
Staying power of tagging?
Digital divide6
What about subject headings?
Pros: Cons:Highly structured
Eliminates sense ambiguity
Standardized, high quality
Longevity
React slowly to new concepts and changes
Difficult for non-experts to use for formulating queries
7
Tagging in the academic library
Provides a new way to interact with the catalog
Social tagging complements subject headings. More access points that may be more user friendly
Tags are used to start the search, subject headings are used to retrieve the related records
Suggestions for tags from the vocabulary
Participation is key
Should be easy for people to contribute
“Make tagging fun and useful, not just a chore” (Steele 2009 p.76)8
PennTagsHosted and developed by University of
Pennsylvania
Penn community members can tag web sites, articles in the library’s database, video and OPAC catalog records
“Add to PennTags” link available at the bottom of any resource page in the library
Caters to traditional users and those seeking a new way of interacting with the catalog
9
10
Tagroll
Tag cloud
ConclusionThe “aboutness” of an object is determined by
many people allowing more access points
Social tagging is not meant to replace subject headings but serves as a complement to enhance access to collections
Can provide insight for understanding the information needs and interests of library users Supports participatory librarianship
11
ReferencesGoh, Dion, Foo, Schubert. Social information retrieval systems: Emerging technologies
and applications for searching the Web effectively /Hershey: Information Science Reference, c2008
Jank, David. "Toward a Unifying Ontology for Human-Information Interaction / Vers une unification ontologique dans le domaine de l'interaction humaine avec l'information." Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 34.4 (2010): 403-432. Project MUSE. Web. 22 Jan. 2011. <http://muse.jhu.edu/>.
Kakali, C., & Papatheodorou, C. (2010). Exploitation of Folksonomies in Subject Analysis. Library & Information Science Research , 192-202.
Lu, C., Park, J., & Hu, X. (2010). User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: a comparison of librarything tags and library of congress subject headings. Journal of Information Science, 36(6), doi: 10.1177/0165551510386173
Matthews, B., Jones, C., Puzon, B., Moon, J., Tudhope, D., Golub, K., et al. (2010). An Evaluation of Enhancing Social Tagging with a Knowledge Organization System. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Penntags. (2005, October 11). Retrieved from http://tags.library.upenn.edu/
Steele, T. (2009). The new cooperative catalog. Library Hi Tech, 27(1), doi: 10.1108/07378830910942928
Ying, D., Jacob, E. K., Zhixiong, Z., Foo, S., Erjia, Y., George, N. L., & Lijiang, G. (2009). Perspectives on social tagging. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(12), 2388. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.12
Questions
13
#socialtagging: Defining its role in the academic library