soil bentonite mix design
TRANSCRIPT
Soil Bentonite Mix Design
Plant Scholz Soil Bentonite Slurry Wall
Gulf Power Company
Sneads, Florida
Prepared By:
Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure
3541 Teasley Lane, Suite 200
Denton, Texas 76210
July 27, 2017
Mix Design i Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
Table of Contents
Section 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
Project Overview ............................................................................................................. 1
Sample Collection ........................................................................................................... 1
Section 2.0 Materials .................................................................................................................. 2
Water .............................................................................................................................. 2
Bentonite ......................................................................................................................... 2
Supplemental Import (If Needed) ................................................................................... 2
Section 3.0 Soil Sample Testing ............................................................................................... 3
Composite Samples........................................................................................................ 3
Section 4.0 Mix Design .............................................................................................................. 4
Mixes .............................................................................................................................. 4
Mix Preparation ............................................................................................................... 4
Permeability Testing ....................................................................................................... 4
Section 5.0 Discussions and Recommendations ................................................................... 6
Recommendation ............................................................................................................ 6
Bentonite Certificate ....................................................................................................... 7
Mix Design Report .......................................................................................................... 8
List of Attachments
Attachment A – Bentonite Certificate
Attachment B – Mix Design Report
Mix Design 1 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
Section 1.0 Introduction
Project Overview
Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure (GL E&I) scope of work includes preparation of a soil bentonite cutoff wall mix design and construction of approximately 35,000 square feet of soil-bentonite cutoff wall. The soil bentonite slurry wall is part of the IWWTP Work at Gulf Power Company Plant Scholz in Sneads, Florida. Great Lakes Environmental and Infrastructure (GL E&I) has completed the laboratory cutoff wall mix design in accordance with Specification Section 31 35 26.23 of the subject projects specifications to produce a soil-bentonite backfill that meets a maximum permeability of 1 x 10-7 cm/sec.
Sample Collection
Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure (GL E&I) performed borings along the proposed cutoff wall alignment to secure soil samples. GL E&I along with its subcontractor Ardaman and Associates secured three composite samples using a 4-inch diameter truck mounted continuous flight auger. Great Lakes E&I and Ardaman personnel collected the samples by removing material from auger cuttings. Additional GL E&I obtained a sample of supplemental material from SAIIA and attained a sample of onsite water to be used in slurry wall construction.
All of the materials were shipped to Tolunay-Wong in Geismar, Louisiana to conduct the laboratory testing and soil-bentonite mixing. Tolunay-Wong personnel have performed numerous mix designs in the past and is certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers for the associated testing.
Mix Design 2 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholtz – Slurry Wall
Section 2.0 Materials
Water
Great Lakes Environmental and Infrastructure (GL E&I) used water provided by SAIIA construction from onsite source for bentonite slurry mixing and permeability testing. Test results of the site water are attached in Mix Design report.
Bentonite
Great Lakes Environmental and Infrastructure (GL E&I) used Western Gel API 13A bentonite supplied by Western Clay in Utah. This bentonite meets the American Petroleum Institute (API) “Specification No. 13A for Oil Well Drilling Fluid Materials”. A manufacturer’s data sheet is attached in Attachment A.
Supplemental Import (If Needed)
Great Lakes Environmental and Infrastructure (GL E&I) tested supplemental material supplied by SAIIA construction. The gradation of the material can be found in table below.
Mix Design 3 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
Section 3.0 Soil Sample Testing
Composite Samples
Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure (GL E&I) obtained soil samples from subsurface borings drilled adjacent to proposed cutoff wall alignment to obtain representative samples of the underlying soils. The soil samples were prepared, tested and based on the below results GL E&I performed the mix design with a composite samples of A and C. GL E&I ran the mix design with a composite of samples A and C since they demonstrated the lowest percentage passing the 200 sieve. GL E&I approach was to evaluate the worst case in performing the mix design. The following table summarizes the test results:
Bulk Sample
Description
(as described on bucket)
% Moisture % Passing % Retained Class
A Boring North
– 20-ft 15 22.7 77.3
Dark Brown Clayey Sand
(SC)
B Boring Middle
- 20-ft 19 28.1 71.9
Reddish Brown
Clayey Sand (SC)
C Boring South - 20-ft/30-ft
19 25.8 74.2 Brown
Clayey Sand (SC)
D Supplemental (If Needed)
13 28.1 71.9 Light Brown Clayey Sand
(SC)
Mix Design 4 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
Section 4.0 Mix Design
Mixes
Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure used a composite of borings of A and C and prepared three (3) mixes from the collected soil samples. The following table summarizes the test results:
Mix Preparation
Tolunay-Wong completed the mix preparation at their laboratory in Geismar, Louisiana. Prior to soil-bentonite mix preparation, Tolunay-Wong hydrated the bentonite slurry. The bentonite slurry had a viscosity of 47 MFV seconds and a density of 64.58 pcf. A copy of mix design report and slurry properties are attached in Attachment B. The bentonite slurry was mixed in a “Hobart” mixer. Source water was poured into the mixer and the mixing blade was turned on, then bentonite was added. The bentonite slurry was mixed for a period of three minutes. Tolunay-Wong hydrated the bentonite slurry for 4 hours prior to adding it to the soil or to the soil and dry bentonite mixtures.
Permeability Testing Testing was performed on samples AC-1, AC-2 and AC-3 and performed in accordance with ASTM D5084. Based on our measurements, each of the soil-bentonite test samples achieved the specified permeability requirements of 1x10-7 cm/sec or less. Test sample confining pressures and hydraulic gradients for the project were not specified in the project specifications.
Bulk Sample Description % Moisture LL PL PI
AC-1 AC Mix w/
5% Bentonite 47.6 47 15 32
AC-2 AC Mix w/
5% Bentonite + 0.5% Dry 46.8 48 15 33
AC-3
AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite + 1.0% Dry 48.6 49 15 34
Mix Design 5 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
Permeability test results can be found in the mix design report. The following table summarizes the test results:
MIX NO. Sample Matrix Slurry Mix Permeability (cm/sec)
AC-1 AC Mix w/ Bentonite 5% Bentonite 1.5 x 10-8
AC-2 AC Mix w/ Bentonite +
0.5% Dry 5% Bentonite with
0.5% Dry Bentonite 2.0 x 10-8
AC-3 AC Mix w/ Bentonite +
1.0% Dry 5% Bentonite with
1.0% Dry Bentonite 1.8 x 10-8
Mix Design 6 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
Section 5.0 Discussions and Recommendations
Recommendation
Based on the results all mixes demonstrated a permeability less than the requirement of 1 x 10-7 cm/sec exceeding the project requirements. Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure recommends the use of mix AC-1, which is the use of site spoils and bentonite slurry to meet the requirements set forth in specifications.
Mix Design 7 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
ATTACHMENT A
Bentonite Certificate
Description PRIME-GEL is an API certified 200 mesh premium-grade sodium bentonite which
complies with the current edition of API Specification 13A, section 9 requirements. PRIME-GEL functions as a viscosifier and filtrate reducer in freshwater drilling systems.
Application
• Hydraulic Barriers
Seepage Cut-Off Walls Reservoirs Landfills Hazardous Material Containment
• Drilling Fluids Oil Well Drilling Mineral Exploration Drilling Water Well Drilling Seismic Drilling Caisson Drilling Horizontal Drilling
Typical Properties
Product Specification Typical PRIME-GEL API 13A, Sec. 9
Specifications Color
Density pH
Barrel Yield Viscometer 600 rpm
YP/PV Ratio Filtrate Volume
Residue > 75 Micrometers Moisture
tan to beige 66 PCF Compact
8.5 to 9.0 90 minimum
42 1.5
13.7 cm3 3.0 wt.%
7-12 wt.%
- - - -
30 minimum 3 maximum
15.0 cm3 maximum 4.0 wt.% maximum
-
Advantages
• American Petroleum Institute (API) Certified • NSF/ANSI Standard 60 Certified • Cools and lubricates drill bit • Mixes quickly and easily in freshwater or freshwater drilling fluids • Reduces fluid loss into the formation • Removes cuttings • Stabilizes borehole • Excellent hard water performance
PRIME-GEL Premium Sodium Bentonite / Viscosifier / Filtrate Reducer
Recommended Treatment
Approximate Amounts of PRIME-GEL Added to Fresh Water
Condition lb/100 gal lb/bbl kg/m3
Normal Drilling Conditions To stabilize caving formations To stop circulation loss
30-50 60-80 70-95
13-22 25-35 30-40
35-60 70-100 85-110
Packaging
PRIME-GEL is available in 50 and 100 lb. multi-wall paper bags, super sacks, and bulk shipments.
Availability
To order PRIME-GEL please contact us at:
Certified to NSF/ANSI 60
Western Clay Company PO BOX 127
Aurora, Utah 84620 Phone: 435-529-3281
Toll Free: 800-982-7960 Fax: 435-529-3714
Mix Design 8 Great Lakes E&I Gulf Power Company, Plant Scholz – Slurry Wall
ATTACHMENT B
Mix Design Report
Houston, TX • Dallas/Fort Worth, TX • Beaumont, TX • LaPorte, TX • New Orleans, LA • Baton Rouge, LA
6037 Commerce Point Drive • Geismar, Louisiana 70734 • Phone (225) 644-4966 • Fax (225) 644-4987
July 27, 2017
Great Lakes Environmental & Infrastructure
3541 Teasley Lane, Suite 200
Denton, Texas 76210
Attn: Mr. Rodney Louviere
Ref: Laboratory Testing Procedure and Results - Soil-Bentonite Slurry Mix Design
Plant Scholz Project - Slurry Trench Cutoff Wall
Sneads, Florida
TWE Project No.: 17.33.058 / Report No. 20200
Dear Mr. Louviere,
As requested, Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. (TWE) performed laboratory testing for Great Lakes
Environmental and Infrastructure (GLEI) in support of a soil and bentonite mix design for a slurry
trench cutoff wall at the Plant Scholz Coal Combustion Residuals Surface Impoundment Project in
Sneads, Florida. This report summarizes our laboratory testing program and results for the referenced
project.
Bulk Soil Samples
On July 12, 2017, we received four (4) bulk soil samples from GLEI. Three of the bulk samples were
labeled according to the boring location and boring depth (i.e., Boring North, 20-ft). The fourth bulk
sample was labeled “Supplemental Material” which contained soil from an offsite borrow source. For
laboratory testing purposes, the four bulk samples were relabeled A, B, C, and D.
No. 200 sieve analyses were performed on the bulk samples. The results indicated that 71.9% to 77.3%
of the soil was retained on the sieve and each sample was classified as a Clayey Sand (SC). Moisture
contents for four samples ranged from 13% to 19%. A summary of the bulk sample laboratory test
results are provided in Table 1.
Table 1 – Bulk Soil Samples
Bulk
Sample Description
Sample
Moisture
% Passing
(No. 200)
% Retained
(No. 200) Soil Classification
A Boring North – 20-ft 15% 22.7 77.3 Dark Brown Clayey Sand(SC)
B Boring Middle - 20-ft 19% 28.1 71.9 Reddish Brown Clayey Sand(SC)
C Boring South - 20-ft/30-ft 19% 25.8 74.2 Brown Clayey Sand(SC)
D Supplemental Material 13% 28.1 71.9 Light Brown Clayey Sand(SC)
Report No. 20200 July 27, 2017
Houston, TX • Dallas/Fort Worth, TX • Beaumont, TX • LaPorte, TX • New Orleans, LA • Baton Rouge, LA Page 2 of 3
Soil-Bentonite Mix Design
The soil-bentonite mix design materials and proportions were provided to us by GLEI. Bulk Samples
A and C were combined and used as the design soil mixture. Atterberg Limits testing indicated a
Liquid Limit of 37, a Plastic Limit of 14, and a Plasticity Index of 23 for the AC soil mixture.
The slurry was mixed with a bentonite powder meeting API 13A specification and a representative
water sample that was shipped to us with the bulk samples. The bentonite powder and water were
mixed using a proportion of 5% bentonite powder by weight of water. Testing of the slurry was
performed using a Marsh funnel, a mud balance, and a pH meter. The Marsh funnel viscosity of the
slurry was 47 seconds and the unit weight of the slurry was 64.58-1b/ft3. The pH of the slurry was 8.6.
Chemical analysis of the water sample indicated a pH of 7.55, a hardness of 139 mg/L CaCO3, and a
total dissolved solids content of 182 mg/L.
Three test samples were prepared using 1500 grams of the AC soil mixture and the 5% bentonite
slurry. Each of the test samples was mixed with 400 mL of bentonite slurry to achieve an approximate
4” slump consistency. Two of the test samples were mixed with additional bentonite powder in
amounts based on the dry weight of the AC soil mixture. Specifically, sample AC-2 was mixed with
0.5% bentonite powder by dry soil weight and sample AC-3 was mixed with 1.0% bentonite powder
by dry soil weight. Atterberg limits testing was performed on each of the samples and the results are
summarized in Table 2.
Table 2 – Soil-Bentonite Test Samples
Test
Sample Description
Sample
Moisture LL PL PI
AC AC Mix - Soil Only 18.9% 37 14 23
AC-1 AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite Slurry 47.6% 47 15 32
AC-2 AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite Slurry + 0.5% Dry 46.8% 48 15 33
AC-3 AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite Slurry + 1.0% Dry 48.6% 49 15 34
Permeability Testing
Permeability testing was performed on test samples AC-1, AC-2 and AC-3. The testing was performed
in general accordance with ASTM D5084-16a Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic
Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter. The Constant
Volume-Falling Head (by Mercury), Rising Tailwater Elevation Method was used (ASTM Method F).
Cylindrical acrylic molds were used to form the test specimens due to the relatively high slump
consistency of the test samples. Flexible membranes were placed inside of the acrylic molds and
together with the porous stones formed the initial test sample dimensions. Perforations in the acrylic
molds allowed the applied chamber pressure to reach the test samples. The samples were backpressure
saturated followed by a consolidation stage at approximately 10.4 psi (10.4 psi is the estimated
overburden at mid-height of a 30-ft slurry wall and 100 lb/ft3 soil-bentonite mixture estimated unit
weight).
Appendix A
No. 200 Sieve and Atterberg Limits Test Results
Appendix B
Permeability Test Results
17.33.058 Date: 7/20/17 CELL 1
Tech: RC
Sample ID:
Description:
Length(in) 2.57 Length(in) 2.05 DIA(in) LENGTH(in)
Diameter(in) 2.90 Diameter(in) 2.54 2.899 2.583
Length(cm) 6.54 Length(cm) 5.21 2.898 2.575
Diameter(cm) 7.36 Diameter(cm) 6.44 2.898 2.586
2.901 2.535
Specific Gravity 2.70 Assumed 2.898 2.587
Wet Weight(gm) 394.20 Wet Weight(gm) 333.47 Avg. 2.899 2.573
Area(cm2) 42.58 Area(cm
2) 32.57
Volume(cc) 278.29 Volume(cc) 169.84 DIA(in) LENGTH(in)
2.668 2.005
Wet Wt.+Tare(gm) 86.6 Wet Wt.+Tare(gm) 103.04 2.736 2.006
Dry Wt.+Tare(gm) 68.80 Dry Wt.+Tare(gm) 89.02 2.467 2.096
Tare Weight(gm) 31.41 Tare Weight(gm) 31.38 2.303 2.100
Moisture(%) 47.61 Moisture(%) 24.32 2.503 2.057
Avg. 2.535 2.053
Wet Weight(pcf) 88.4 Wet Weight(pcf) 122.6
Dry Weight(pcf) 59.9 Dry Weight(pcf) 98.6 Test Constants
Vol.Voids(cc) 179.2 Vol.Voids(cc) 70.7 M1= 0.03018
Void Ratio 1.807 Void Ratio 0.713 M2= 1.0409532
Saturation(%) 71.1 Saturation(%) 92.1 S= 0.1600774
Cell(psi) 55 a-in (cm2) 0.7671 G= 12.542
Backpressure(psi) 45 a-out (cm2) 0.0314 C= 0.000385
Actual Actual Elapsed a - in a - out Trial Hydraulic
Date Time Time Temperature Outflow Inflow Gradient Constant Conductivity
(mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm:ss) (seconds) (Fahren.) (Cels) (mm) (mm) T (20C,cm/sec)
11:54:00 AM 0 68.72 20.4 159 11.18 38.4
11:57:00 AM 180 68.72 20.4 158 11.22 38.1 0.07042 1.5E-08
11:57:00 AM 0 68.72 20.4 158 11.22 38.1
12:00:00 PM 180 68.72 20.4 157 11.27 37.8 0.07092 1.5E-08
12:00:00 PM 0 68.72 20.4 157 11.27 37.8
12:03:00 PM 180 68.72 20.4 156 11.31 37.6 0.07143 1.5E-08
12:03:00 PM 0 68.72 20.4 156 11.31 37.6
12:06:00 PM 180 68.72 20.4 155 11.35 37.3 0.07194 1.5E-08
1.5E-08
EEH Date: 7/22/17 Date: 7/22/17
Sample No. 1
AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite Slurry
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the CLIENT. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, with out our prior written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the material(s) tested and/or inspected and are not necessarily indicative of the quality of apparently identical material(s).
Great Lakes
Project Number:
Project Name:
Client Name:
Address:
Coefficient of permeability, k20º (cm/sec)
Before Test After Test
Specimin Data Specimin Data
ASTM D 5084; Falling Head/Rising Tail Method
Constant Volume Apparatus
AFTER
BEFORE
Calculated By: Reviewed By: PH
Moisture Data
Weight/Volume Data
Moisture Data
Weight/Volume Data
7/24/2017
Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc.
17.33.058 Date: 7/20/17 CELL 1
Tech: RC
Sample ID:
Description:
Length(in) 2.92 Length(in) 2.51 DIA(in) LENGTH(in)
Diameter(in) 2.92 Diameter(in) 2.45 2.915 2.935
Length(cm) 7.42 Length(cm) 6.39 2.914 2.929
Diameter(cm) 7.41 Diameter(cm) 6.21 2.925 2.850
2.918 2.946
Specific Gravity 2.70 Assumed 2.918 2.947
Wet Weight(gm) 467.40 Wet Weight(gm) 391.00 Avg. 2.918 2.921
Area(cm2) 43.14 Area(cm
2) 30.34
Volume(cc) 320.15 Volume(cc) 193.70 DIA(in) LENGTH(in)
2.528 2.465
Wet Wt.+Tare(gm) 101 Wet Wt.+Tare(gm) 132.12 2.382 2.487
Dry Wt.+Tare(gm) 78.90 Dry Wt.+Tare(gm) 113.63 2.370 2.512
Tare Weight(gm) 31.63 Tare Weight(gm) 30.64 2.394 2.556
Moisture(%) 46.75 Moisture(%) 22.28 2.560 2.549
Avg. 2.447 2.514
Wet Weight(pcf) 91.1 Wet Weight(pcf) 126.0
Dry Weight(pcf) 62.1 Dry Weight(pcf) 103.1 Test Constants
Vol.Voids(cc) 201.9 Vol.Voids(cc) 75.5 M1= 0.03018
Void Ratio 1.708 Void Ratio 0.639 M2= 1.0409532
Saturation(%) 73.9 Saturation(%) 94.1 S= 0.2104797
Cell(psi) 55.8 a-in (cm2) 0.7671 G= 12.542
Backpressure(psi) 45 a-out (cm2) 0.0314 C= 0.000506
Actual Actual Elapsed a - in a - out Trial Hydraulic
Date Time Time Temperature Outflow Inflow Gradient Constant Conductivity
(mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm:ss) (seconds) (Fahren.) (Cels) (mm) (mm) T (20C,cm/sec)
5:57:00 AM 0 67.64 19.8 159 11.18 31.4
6:00:00 AM 180 67.64 19.8 158 11.22 31.1 0.07042 2.0E-08
6:00:00 AM 0 67.64 19.8 158 11.22 31.1
6:03:00 AM 180 67.64 19.8 157 11.27 30.9 0.07092 2.0E-08
6:03:00 AM 0 67.64 19.8 157 11.27 30.9
6:06:00 AM 180 67.64 19.8 156 11.31 30.7 0.07143 2.0E-08
6:06:00 AM 0 67.64 19.8 156 11.31 30.7
6:09:00 AM 180 67.64 19.8 155 11.35 30.5 0.07194 2.1E-08
2.0E-08
EEH Date: 7/25/17 Date: 7/25/17
Sample No. 2
AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite Slurry + 0.5% Dry
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the CLIENT. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, with out our prior written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the material(s) tested and/or inspected and are not necessarily indicative of the quality of apparently identical material(s).
Great Lakes
Project Number:
Project Name:
Client Name:
Address:
Coefficient of permeability, k20º (cm/sec)
Before Test After Test
Specimin Data Specimin Data
ASTM D 5084; Falling Head/Rising Tail Method
Constant Volume Apparatus
AFTER
BEFORE
Calculated By: Reviewed By: PH
Moisture Data
Weight/Volume Data
Moisture Data
Weight/Volume Data
7/25/2017
Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc.
17.33.058 Date: 7/20/17 CELL 1
Tech: RC
Sample ID:
Description:
Length(in) 2.93 Length(in) 2.40 DIA(in) LENGTH(in)
Diameter(in) 2.95 Diameter(in) 2.40 2.964 2.925
Length(cm) 7.44 Length(cm) 6.09 2.963 2.932
Diameter(cm) 7.49 Diameter(cm) 6.10 2.914 2.930
2.942 2.928
Specific Gravity 2.70 Assumed 2.965 2.926
Wet Weight(gm) 437.23 Wet Weight(gm) 370.10 Avg. 2.950 2.928
Area(cm2) 44.08 Area(cm
2) 29.21
Volume(cc) 327.88 Volume(cc) 177.86 DIA(in) LENGTH(in)
2.376 2.378
Wet Wt.+Tare(gm) 97.6 Wet Wt.+Tare(gm) 135.16 2.299 2.382
Dry Wt.+Tare(gm) 76.00 Dry Wt.+Tare(gm) 114.87 2.369 2.366
Tare Weight(gm) 31.54 Tare Weight(gm) 30.46 2.463 2.434
Moisture(%) 48.58 Moisture(%) 24.04 2.498 2.426
Avg. 2.401 2.397
Wet Weight(pcf) 83.2 Wet Weight(pcf) 129.9
Dry Weight(pcf) 56.0 Dry Weight(pcf) 104.7 Test Constants
Vol.Voids(cc) 218.7 Vol.Voids(cc) 67.6 M1= 0.03018
Void Ratio 2.002 Void Ratio 0.613 M2= 1.0409532
Saturation(%) 65.5 Saturation(%) 105.9 S= 0.2084473
Cell(psi) 55.7 a-in (cm2) 0.7671 G= 12.542
Backpressure(psi) 45 a-out (cm2) 0.0314 C= 0.000502
Actual Actual Elapsed a - in a - out Trial Hydraulic
Date Time Time Temperature Outflow Inflow Gradient Constant Conductivity
(mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm:ss) (seconds) (Fahren.) (Cels) (mm) (mm) T (20C,cm/sec)
5:31:00 AM 0 69.44 20.8 175 10.53 36.6
5:34:00 AM 180 69.44 20.8 174 10.57 36.3 0.06329 1.7E-08
5:34:00 AM 0 69.44 20.8 174 10.57 36.3
5:37:00 AM 180 69.44 20.8 173 10.61 36.1 0.06369 1.8E-08
5:37:00 AM 0 69.44 20.8 173 10.61 36.1
5:40:00 AM 180 69.44 20.8 172 10.65 35.9 0.06410 1.8E-08
5:40:00 AM 0 69.44 20.8 172 10.65 35.9
5:43:00 AM 180 69.44 20.8 171 10.69 35.7 0.06452 1.8E-08
1.8E-08
EEH Date: 7/25/17 Date: 7/25/17
Sample No. 3
AC Mix w/ 5% Bentonite Slurry + 1.0% Dry
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the CLIENT. This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, with out our prior written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the material(s) tested and/or inspected and are not necessarily indicative of the quality of apparently identical material(s).
Great Lakes
Project Number:
Project Name:
Client Name:
Address:
Coefficient of permeability, k20º (cm/sec)
Before Test After Test
Specimin Data Specimin Data
ASTM D 5084; Falling Head/Rising Tail Method
Constant Volume Apparatus
AFTER
BEFORE
Calculated By: Reviewed By: PH
Moisture Data
Weight/Volume Data
Moisture Data
Weight/Volume Data
7/24/2017
Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc.
Appendix C
Analytical Water Test Results
Cover
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERFORMED BY
GCAL, LLC 7979 Innovation Park Dr. Baton Rouge, LA 70820
Report Date 07/18/2017
GCAL Report 217071236
9999999999
Project Project Shoalz 17.33.58
Deliver To Additional Recipients Brady Turk NONE Tolunay-Wong Engineers 6037 Commerce Pointe Drive Geismar, LA 70734 225-202-5488
NELAP CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 01955
DOD ELAP CERTIFICATE NUMBER: L14-243
Page 1 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
Laboratory Endorsement Sample analysis was performed in accordance with approved methodologies provided by the Environmental Protection Agency or other recognized agencies. The samples and their corresponding extracts will be maintained for a period of 30 days unless otherwise arranged. Following this retention period the samples will be disposed in accordance with GCAL's Standard Operating Procedures.
Common Abbreviations that may be Utilized in this Report
ND Indicates the result was Not Detected at the specified reporting limit NO Indicates the sample did not ignite when preliminary test performed for EPA Method 1030 DO Indicates the result was Diluted Out MI Indicates the result was subject to Matrix Interference TNTC Indicates the result was Too Numerous To Count SUBC Indicates the analysis was Sub-Contracted FLD Indicates the analysis was performed in the Field DL Detection Limit DL Diluted analysis – when appended to Client Sample ID LOD Limit of Detection LOQ Limit of Quantitation RE Re-analysis CF HPLC or GC Confirmation 00:01 Reported as a time equivalent to 12:00 AM
Reporting Flags that may be Utilized in this Report
J or I Indicates the result is between the MDL and LOQ J DOD flag on analyte in the parent sample for MS/MSD outside acceptance criteria U Indicates the compound was analyzed for but not detected B or V Indicates the analyte was detected in the associated Method Blank Q Indicates a non-compliant QC Result (See Q Flag Application Report) * Indicates a non-compliant or not applicable QC recovery or RPD – see narrative E The result is estimated because it exceeded the instrument calibration range E Metals - % diference for the serial dilution is > 10% P RPD between primary and confirmation result is greater than 40
Sample receipt at GCAL is documented through the attached chain of custody. In accordance with NELAC, this report shall be reproduced only in full and with the written permission of GCAL. The results contained within this report relate only to the samples reported. The documented results are presented within this report. This report pertains only to the samples listed in the Report Sample Summary and should be retained as a permanent record thereof. The results contained within this report are intended for the use of the client. Any unauthorized use of the information contained in this report is prohibited. I certify that this data package is in compliance with The NELAC Institute (TNI) Standard 2009 and terms and conditions of the contract and Statement of Work both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions in the case narrative. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the computer readable data submitted has been authorized by the Quality Assurance Manager or his/her designee, as verified by the following signature. Estimated uncertainty of measurement is available upon request. This report is in compliance with the DOD QSM as specified in the contract if applicable.
Authorized Signature GCAL Report 217071236
Page 2 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
Certifications
Certification Certification Number
DOD ELAP L14-243
Alabama 01955
Arkansas 12-060-0
Colorado 01955
Delaware 01955
Florida E87854
Georgia 01955
Hawaii 01955
Idaho 01955
Illinois 200048
Indiana 01955
Kansas E-10354
Kentucky 95
Louisiana 01955
Maryland 01955
Massachusetts 01955
Michigan 01955
Mississippi 01955
Missouri 01955
Montana N/A
Nebraska 01955
New Mexico 01955
North Carolina 618
North Dakota R-195
Oklahoma 9403
South Carolina 73006001
South Dakota 01955
Tennessee 01955
Texas T104704178
Vermont 01955
Virginia 460215
USDA Soil Permit P330-10-00117
Page 3 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
Case Narrative
Client: Tolunay-Wong Engineers Report: 217071236
Gulf Coast Analytical Laboratories received and analyzed the sample(s) listed on the Report Sample Summary page of this report. Receipt of the sample(s) is documented by the attached chain of custody. This applies only to the sample(s) listed in this report. No sample integrity or quality control exceptions were identified unless noted below.
METALS
In the SM 2340 B analysis, sample 21707123601 (WS-1) had to be diluted in order to bracket the concentration of target analyte(s) within the calibration range of the instrument.
GENERAL CHEMISTRY
pH is a field parameter and should be performed within 15 minutes after sample collection.
MISCELLANEOUS
Sample 21707123601 (WS-1), container ID 21707123601-2 had to be preserved at the laboratory with HNO3. This container was used to analyze SM 2340 B.
Page 4 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
Sample Summary
GCAL ID Client ID Matrix Collect Date/Time Receive Date/Time
21707123601 WS-1 Water 07/12/2017 13:00 07/12/2017 14:00
Page 5 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
Detect Summary
Summary of Compounds Detected WS-1
WS-1 Collect Date 07/12/2017 13:00 GCAL ID 21707123601
Receive Date 07/12/2017 14:00 Matrix Water
SM 2340 B
SM 2340 B
CAS# Parameter Result LOQ Reg Limit Units
000-01-5 Hardness 139 16.6
mg/L CaCO3
SM 2540 C-2011
SM 2540 C-2011
CAS# Parameter Result LOQ Reg Limit Units
WET-035 Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) 182 10.0
mg/L
SM 4500-H+ B/EPA 9040C
SM 4500-H+ B/EPA 9040C
CAS# Parameter Result LOQ Reg Limit Units
pH pH 7.55 1.00
pH unit
Page 6 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
Sample Results
Sample Results WS-1
WS-1 Collect Date 07/12/2017 13:00 GCAL ID 21707123601
Receive Date 07/12/2017 14:00 Matrix Water
SM 2340 B
SM 2340 B
Prep Date Prep Batch Prep Method Dilution Analysis Date By Analytical Batch
07/13/2017 14:00 614055 EPA 3010A 10 07/14/2017 11:15 AWG 614171
CAS# Parameter Result LOQ Reg Limit Units
000-01-5 Hardness 139 16.6
mg/L CaCO3
SM 2540 C-2011
SM 2540 C-2011
Prep Date Prep Batch Prep Method Dilution Analysis Date By Analytical Batch
NA NA NA 1 07/17/2017 12:02 AJE 614313
CAS# Parameter Result LOQ Reg Limit Units
WET-035 Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) 182 10.0
mg/L
SM 4500-H+ B/EPA 9040C
SM 4500-H+ B/EPA 9040C
Prep Date Prep Batch Prep Method Dilution Analysis Date By Analytical Batch
NA NA NA 1 07/12/2017 16:32 DLS 614031
CAS# Parameter Result LOQ Reg Limit Units
pH pH 7.55 1.00
pH unit
Page 7 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
QC Summary
Inorganics QC Summary Inorganics
Analytical Batch 614171 Prep Batch 614055 Prep Method EPA 3010A
Client ID GCAL ID
Sample Type Prep Date
Analysis Date Matrix
MB614055 1701815 MB 07/13/2017 14:00 07/14/2017 11:08 Water
LCS614055 1701816 LCS 07/13/2017 14:00 07/14/2017 11:12 Water
SM 2340 B Units
Result mg/L CaCO3
LOQ Spike
Added Result %R
Control Limits%R
Hardness 000-01-5 ND 1.66 83.0 92.2 111 83 - 118
Page 8 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Report#: 217071236
Project ID: Project Shoalz 17.33.58 Report Date: 07/18/2017
General Chemistry QC Summary General Chemistry
Analytical Batch 614031
Client ID GCAL ID
Sample Type Prep Date
Analysis Date Matrix
SOURCE 21707121101 SAMPLE NA 07/12/2017 15:31 Water
1701415DUP 1701634 DUP NA 07/12/2017 15:31 Water
SM 4500-H+ B/EPA 9040C Units
Result pH unit
LOQ Result RPD
RPD Limit
pH pH 8.44 1.00 8.43 0 6
Analytical Batch 614313
Client ID GCAL ID
Sample Type Prep Date
Analysis Date Matrix
MB614313 1703053 MB NA 07/17/2017 12:02 Water
LCS614313 1703054 LCS NA 07/17/2017 12:02 Water
SM 2540 C-2011 Units
Result mg/L LOQ
Spike Added
Result %R Control
Limits%R
Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) WET-035 ND 10.0 1000 1030 103 80 - 120
Analytical Batch 614313
Client ID GCAL ID
Sample Type Prep Date
Analysis Date Matrix
BC2-CT1 21707133601 SAMPLE NA 07/17/2017 12:02 Water
1702095DUP 1703055 DUP NA 07/17/2017 12:02 Water
SM 2540 C-2011 Units
Result mg/L LOQ
Result RPD RPD Limit
Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) WET-035 1930 10.0 1950 1 5.4
Page 9 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Page 10 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
SAMPLE RECEIVING CHECKLIST *217071236*SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP 217071236
Client PM SAB3 Transport Method4952 - Tolunay-Wong Engineers CUST
Profile Number Received By273756 Reese, Sean M.
Line Item(s) Receive Date(s)1 - Water Sample 07/12/17
CHECKLIST YES NO
Samples received with proper thermal and chemical preservation?
Radioactivity is <1600 cpm? If no, record cpm value in notes section.
When used, were custody seals intact?
COC relinquished and complete (including sampleIDs, collect dates/times, and sampler)?
All containers received in good condition and within hold time?
All sample labels and containers received match the chain of custody?
Preservation checked at receipt if necessary? Except: VOC, Coliform, TOC, O&G, DOC
Preservative added to any containers?
VOC water containers received with headspace < 6mm?
Samples collected in containers provided by GCAL?
COOLERS
Airbill Thermometer ID: E29 Temp oC
2.1
DISCREPANCIESNone
LAB PRESERVATIONS
SM 2340 B \ HNO3
NOTES
Revision 1.6 Page 1 of 1
Page 11 of 11GCAL Report#: 217071236
Appendix D
USACE Laboratory Validation