solar energy and zoë power life in the atacama 2005 science & technology workshop january 6-7,...
TRANSCRIPT
Solar Energy andZoë power
Life in the Atacama 2005Science & Technology WorkshopJanuary 6-7, 2005
James TezaCarnegie Mellon University
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
2 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Zoë Power in 2004
Advanced Triple Junction solar array• Cell efficiency 23.3%, system efficiency 21.7%• Area 2.4 m2
Batteries Lead acid (used to Oct 14) • 1000 Wh
Li polymer (Oct 14 through 18)• total 3k Wh
Power management and distribution (PMAD) systemMonitored of power system parameters• bus voltages and currents• solar input currents• load currents (locomotion and hotel)
Load switching hardware in place but not operationalAcquired insolation data at weather station
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
3 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
SOLARARRAY 1
Zoë power system - overview
MPPT 1
BATTERY 1AND
CONTROLLER
LOCOMOTION(FRONT)
SOLARARRAY 2 MPPT 2
BATTERY 2AND
CONTROLLER
LOCOMOTION(REAR)
HOTELDC/DC
COMPUTING
SCIENCEINSTRUMENTATION
SENSORS
COMM
PMADCONTROL &
LOGGING
PMADSWITCHING
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
4 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Do we have enough energy available?
Weather station logged solar radiation data each minute
Sensor• Thermopile, spectral range: 305 to 2800 nm
Data logged to disk within station
Station located within about 10 km of science site B, 20 km of site C
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
5 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Solar flux – Atacama - September
3 4 5 6 7Sol
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
6 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Solar flux – Atacama - October
Sol 10 Sol 11
Sol 14Sol 13
Sol 12
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
7 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Solar energy in Atacama
Available solar energy per day for flat collector using logged data
Average: 2.52 x 107 J per day (period 9/8/04 through 10/9/04)
Sol 3 4 5 6 7
Sol 10 11 12 13 14
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
8 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Available electrical energy on Zoë
Calculations based on logged dataATJ panel area 2.4 m2, Cell efficiency – 23.3%, MPPT efficiency – 97%
Array network efficiency (diode) – 96%
Average: 1.35 x 107 J per day (period 9/8/04 through 10/9/04)
Sol 3 4 5 6 7
Sol 10 11 12 13 14
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
9 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Zoë electrical load energy – logged data
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
10 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Solar input energy from array – logged data
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
11 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Energy balance – logged data
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
12 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Energy required per day
Average Power (W)
Time per day
(h)
Energy per
day (Wh)
Energy per
Day (MJ)
Locomotion 260 6 1560 5.62
Hotel 215 10 2150 7.74
Spectrometer 14 2 28 1.01
FI 114 2 228 0.82
Hibernation
(estimate)
14 14 196 0.70
Total 15.0
Issue: Available electrical power on Zoë marginalfor expected locomotion and science loads
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
13 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
Issues with logged data
Weather station data contained gapsSpectral mismatch of solar sensors and solar cellsSpectral response of ATJ cells about 450 to 1600 nmThermopile data from the weather station may over estimate available insolation
PMAD data log contained gaps Start of day charging was typically not loggedPMAD time stamps incorrectInitial PMAD logs (before site C) corrupt
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
14 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
2004 results
Positive
ATJ solar arrays performed as expected
Lithum polymer batteries appeared to perform well
- typically ended day at 60 to 77 % of full charge
Negative
Power available marginal for expected loads (computing and FI)
PC104 stacks not as robust as hoped • PMAD, weather station and state estimator all experienced faults
Electrical system several faults• Softstart relay failure at start of mission• PMAD problems during Site B – faulty connection
PMAD logging not automatic – missing data
PMAD switching not implemented – hardware exists (mostly) but not software
PMAD power backup – implementation faulty and unreliable
Li polymer cell balance is critical for extended operation
Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop
15 NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon
2005 Issues
Power switching required to fulfill objectives
Complete PMAD hardware implementation
PMAD Software design
Robust system - extensive testing
Consider lower power options – if any
Mission scheduling to maximize insolation and minimize load
Li battery testing and spares
Better battery model for planning extended operation